Stand-Alone Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Additional Substrate Modification as Index Ablation Procedures in Patients With Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Long-term effects of catheter ablation with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion vs. pulmonary vein isolation alone on persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and long-term effects of catheter ablation with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for bidirectional mitral isthmus block in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty patients from five centers with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent radiofrequency ablation from October 2018 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 120 patients who underwent traditional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI Only group) and 120 patients who underwent PVI and Marshall vein ablation (Marshall Plus group). The operation time, X-ray exposure, incidence of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Among the 240 patients (mean age: 57.2 ± 7.2 years, males: 195/240, 81.25 %), vein of Marshall ethanol infusion was successfully performed in 113 of 120 patients. At 12 and 36 months, the proportion of patients free from AF/ AT after a single procedure was 76.3 % (90/118) in the PVI plus vein of Marshall ethanol infusion group and 67.5 % (79/117) in the PVI only group (P < 0.01). Perimitral block was successfully achieved in 90.8 % (109/120) patients in the Marshall Plus group. Freedom from AF/AT at the 3-year follow-up (68.6 % vs. 59.8 %, P < 0.01) and incidence of adverse events were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PVI combined with Marshall venous infusion ablation can safely and effectively increase the long-term success rate of AF ablation. Duration of AF, left atrial volume(>42 mm,)and bidirectional mitral isthmus block were associated with recurrence of AF/AT.

Enhancing ablation outcomes: vein of Marshall ethanol infusion in persistent atrial fibrillation with severe left atrial enlargement

Background

Left atrial (LA) enlargement is a widely recognized factor that increases the risk of ablation failure in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective, observational study aimed to assess the influence of vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) on persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) ablation among patients with severe LA enlargement.

Methods

In this research, 178 patients underwent the VOM-EI followed by the radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedure, which was based on circumferential pulmonary vein antrum (CPVA) ablation and linear ablation of the roof of the LA and the mitral isthmus (MI). In comparison, 83 patients only underwent the RF ablation procedure.

Results

In the VOM + RF ablation group, the duration of left CPVA ablation was shorter compared to the RF ablation group (20.3 ± 8.7 minutes vs. 27.1 ± 8.1 minutes, P < 0.0001). The rate of MI block was higher (94.9% vs. 85.5%, P = 0.01) in the VOM + RF ablation group, with a shorter MI ablation time (23.2 ± 10.8 minutes vs. 30.5 ± 11.8 minutes, P < 0.0001), and a lower need for coronary sinus vein ablation compared to the RF ablation group (64.0% vs. 78.3%, P = 0.02). Throughout the one-year observation period, the VOM + RF ablation group exhibited a notably superior survival rate without recurrence compared to the RF ablation group (78.7% vs. 65.1%, P = 0.02). As compared to the RF ablation group, the VOM + RF ablation group had a lower rate of recurrence with atrial tachycardia (8.4% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

The VOM-EI facilitated the left CPVA and the MI ablation and improved the ablation outcomes in patients with severe LA enlargement for treating PsAF.

Extensive ablation for elderly patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: insights from the EARNEST-PVI prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), extensive ablation for substrate modification, such as linear ablation or complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains controversial. Previous studies investigating extensive ablation have demonstrated its varying efficacy, suggesting the possible heterogeneity of its efficacy. Aging is a major risk factor for AF and is associated with atrial remodeling. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the extensive ablation strategy compared with PVI alone strategy between young and elderly patients.

METHODS

This study is a post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating the efficacy and safety of PVI-only (PVI-alone arm) compared with extensive ablation (PVI-plus arm) in patients with persistent AF (EARNEST-PVI trial). We divided the overall population into 2 groups based on age and assessed treatment effects.

RESULTS

In the young group (age <65 years, N = 206), there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the PVI-alone group and PVI-plus group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.57-1.73, p = 0.987], whereas the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the PVI-plus group compared to the PVI-alone group in the elderly group (age ≥65 years, N = 291) (HR: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.29-0.76, p = 0.0021) (p for interaction = 0.0446). There were no fatal procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

In patients with persistent AF, the extensive ablation strategy was more effective than the PVI-alone strategy in elderly patients, while the effectiveness of both approaches was comparable in young patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03514693. URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022454 Unique ID issued by UMIN: UMIN000019449.

Aggressive ablation vs. regular ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre real-world cohort study

AIMS

Current guidelines for the optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) remain unclear. While our previous RCT confirmed the favourable prognosis of aggressive ablation, real-world evidence is still lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 4833 PerAF patients undergoing catheter ablation at 10 centres, two groups were defined: regular ablation (PVI-only or PVI plus anatomical ablation) and aggressive ablation (anatomical plus electrogram-guided ablation), with 1560 patients each after propensity score (PS) matching. The primary endpoint was 12-month AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence-free survival off anti-arrhythmic drugs after a single procedure. Additional PS matching was performed within the regular group between PVI-only and anatomical ablation (n = 455 each). Furthermore, anatomical ablation from the regular group was independently matched with aggressive ablation (n = 1362 each). At 12 months, the aggressive group showed superior AF/AT-free survival (66.2% vs. 59.3%, P < 0.001; HR 0.745), similar AT recurrence (12.0% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.539), and significantly higher procedural AF termination (67.0% vs. 21.0%, P < 0.001) than regular group. Moreover, patients with AF termination had improved AF/AT-free survival (72.3% vs. 55.2%, P < 0.001). Safety endpoints did not differ significantly between the two groups. Both the ablation outcomes and AF termination rate showed increasing trends with the extent of ablation aggressiveness but declined with extremely aggressive ablation. After additional PS matching, within the regular group, no statistical differences were observed though AF/AT-free survival in the anatomical group was slightly higher than the PVI-only group (60.7% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.122); while aggressive ablation showed improved AF/AT-free survival compared to anatomical ablation alone from regular group (67.5% vs. 59.9%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Aggressive ablation achieved more favourable outcomes than regular ablation, and moderately aggressive ablation may be associated with better clinical outcomes. AF termination is a reliable ablation endpoint.

The Influence of Risk Factor Modification on Atrial Fibrillation Outcomes and Their Impact on the Success of Catheter Ablation

The global prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing with a significant increase in AF burden. The pathophysiology of AF is complex and exhibits a strong relationship with modifiable lifestyle AF risk factors, such as physical inactivity, smoking, obesity, and alcohol consumption, as well as co-morbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease. Current evidence suggests that cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle risk factor modification can potentially lower the overall AF burden. Additionally, AF ablation can be an effective treatment for a rhythm control strategy, but reducing AF recurrences post-catheter ablation is paramount. Thus, addressing these modifiable lifestyle risk factors and co-morbidities is critical, as the recent 2024 European Society of Cardiology AF guidance update highlights. A comprehensive approach to treating these risk factors is essential, especially given the rising prevalence of AF. This article provides a state-of-the-art update on the evidence of addressing AF-related risk factors and co-morbidities, particularly in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Instant termination as a novel indicator for prognosis of persistent atrial fibrillation during cryoballoon ablation: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Instant atrial fibrillation termination (AFT) during radiofrequency ablation has been suggested as a predictor of prognosis in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its role in cryoballoon ablation remains unclear. This study investigated the association between AFT and recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with persistent AF undergoing cryoballoon ablation.

Methods

Patients with non-valvular, drug-resistant, persistent AF who underwent cryoballoon ablation between January 2021 and June 2023 were included and categorized based on the presence or absence of AFT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to eliminate covariate imbalances. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

A total of 189 patients [65.0 (59.0-71.0) years] were included. Among them, 41 experienced instant AFT, while 148 remained in AF rhythm. The baseline conditions were similar, except that patients with AFT presented significantly lower left atrial diameter (LAD). During a follow-up of 16.0 [9.1-26.9] months, the recurrence rates of arrhythmias were significantly lower in the AFT group (log-rank P = 0.044). Both AFT [HR: 0.298, 95% CI: (0.091-0.976), P = 0.035] and baseline LAD [HR: 1.079, 95% CI: (1.012-1.151), P = 0.021] were independent predictors of recurrence. We further assessed the prognostic value of AFT in PSM groups which showed that the recurrence rates were also significantly lower in the AFT group (log-rank P = 0.049).

Conclusion

Instant AFT during cryoballoon ablation is associated with a reduced risk of arrhythmic recurrence in patients with persistent AF.

Which ablation strategy is the most effective for treating persistent atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

There is no consensus on the most efficient ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the effectiveness of different ablation strategies for PerAF. The primary efficacy outcome was the recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a single ablation procedure during the follow-up period. The primary safety outcome of interest was any reported complication related to the procedure. The secondary outcome was the procedure time. Fifty-two studies with 9048 patients were included in this NMA. The studies were conducted between 2004 and 2024, and 22 different ablation strategies were identified. Pulmonary vein isolation + posterior wall box isolation + extra-pulmonary vein isolation was the most effective ablation therapy for PerAF. Most additional substrate modification ablation strategies do not show significant additional benefits. There were no significant differences in the incidence of procedure-related complications between the different ablation strategies. Pulmonary vein isolation combined with additional ablation sites increases the duration of the procedure.

Representation of Women in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Sex inequality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to cardiovascular disease has been observed. This study examined the proportion of women enrolled in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation RCTs and the potential risks of underrepresentation of women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for AF ablation RCTs published from 2015 to 2022. Participant characteristics were compared among trials with higher and lower proportions of women. Of 147 AF ablation RCTs (30,055 participants), only 10 trials had enrolled women ≥50% of the total participants. Additionally, 42 trials (28.57%) excluded pregnant/breastfeeding women; 6 (4.1%) excluded reproductive-age women without reliable birth control. The proportion of women in AF RCTs ranged from 9% to 71% (median 31.5%), whereas the median proportion of men was 67.7%. The rate of women included in the trials was stable from 2015 to 2022 (P=0.49). Study characteristics, including funding source, showed no correlation with the rate of inclusion of women. RCTs with a higher proportion of female participants enrolled older patients with AF, had a higher prevalence of hypertension but less persistent AF, and smaller left atrium size (P<0.05 for all). Biological sex was evaluated as a risk factor or in a subgroup analysis in 28 RCTs; 10.7% of these trials observed the implication of sex on their results.

CONCLUSION

Women were underrepresented in contemporary AF ablation RCTs. Additionally, women enrolled in AF RCTs were likely to have more comorbidities but less advanced AF, limiting the applicability of the results to women with AF.

Clinical Outcome of Cryoballoon Ablation for Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: From the Korean Cryballoon Ablation Registry

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is considered an effective primary strategy for early persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data regarding CBA for long-standing persistent AF (PeAF) are limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of CBA for long-standing PeAF compared to PeAF.

METHODS

The study included 1484 patients with non-paroxysmal AF from Korean CBA registry data with follow-up of > 12 months after de novo CBA. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) of ≥ 30-s after a 3-month blanking period.

RESULTS

A total of 367 PeAF (25%) and 1117 long-standing PeAF (75.3%) patients (mean age 61.9 ± 9.6 years, 80% men) underwent de novo CBA. Compared to patients with PeAF, patients with long-standing PeAF had more heart failure, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, chronic kidney disease, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, and larger left atrium (LA). During a mean follow-up period of 15.1 ± 10.9 months, ATs recurrence occurred in 41.4% of PeAF and 40.1% of long-standing PeAF. Multivariate analysis showed that female gender (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.31, p = 0.01), larger LA ≥ 45 mm (HR: 1.53, p < .001) and LA volume index ≥ 51 mL/m2 (HR: 1.77, p < 0.001), and longer AF duration ≥ 5 years (HR: 1. 33, p = .003) were associated with ATs recurrence. After propensity score matching, larger LA was an independent factor for ATs recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

During a long-term follow-up period after index CBA in patients with non-paroxysmal AF, ATs recurrence rate was similar between PeAF and long-standing PeAF. CBA might be an effective strategy as an initial rhythm control therapy regardless of AF type.

Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion for recurrent atrial fibrillation in patients with durably isolated pulmonary veins

BACKGROUND

Vein of Marshall (VoM) ethanol ablation has a proven benefit in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing index procedure; however, its role in repeat ablation is unknown. We sought to evaluate the benefit of empiric VoM ethanol ablation in addition to posterior wall isolation (PWI) during the repeat procedure in patients with durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation from prior ablation.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (age 67.1 + / - 7.4, 74% males) who received empiric VoM ethanol infusion in addition to PWI were matched for age, gender, ejection fraction, and left atrial size with forty-six patients receiving empiric PWI alone. All patients in the study group underwent additional ablation on mitral isthmus to complete the lateral mitral isthmus line. Additional ablation was based on program and trigger stimulation. Primary outcome was freedom from AF after a blanking period of 3 months by qualification of symptoms, EKG, wearable, or implantable monitor or device.

RESULTS

The study group had a higher average BMI (35.07 + / - 8.98 vs. 30.85 + / - 5.65, p = 0.033) and rate of persistent AF (83.0% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.029) versus the control. The 1-year AF-free survival for the study and control groups was 20 (86.96%) and 28 (60.1%) patients (p = 0.027). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed a significant reduction in AF recurrence in the study group (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.073-0.843, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing repeat catheter ablation for recurrent AF with durably isolated PVs, the addition of VoM ethanol infusion increased the likelihood of remaining free from AF at 12 months.

High-Power Short-Duration Posterior Wall Isolation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using the New TactiFlex™ Ablation Catheter

BACKGROUND

The TactiFlex™ ablation catheter, Sensor Enabled™ (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA), is an open-irrigation radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with flexible tip technology. This catheter delivers high-power short-duration (HPSD) RF ablations and has been adopted for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. HPSD is well-established not only in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) but also when targeting extra-pulmonary vein (PV) targets. This study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of PVI plus posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF) using HPSD and the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent the ablation of Pe-AF in our centre between February 2023 and February 2024 were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PVI plus PWI using TactiFlex™ and the HPSD strategy. The RF parameters were 50 W on all the PV segments and the roof, and within the posterior wall (PW). Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and the high-density multipolar Advisor HD Grid, Sensor Enabled™ mapping catheter. We compared the procedural data using HPSD with TactiFlex™ (n = 52) vs. a historical cohort of patients who underwent PVI plus PWI using HPSD settings and the TactiCath ablation catheter (n = 84).

RESULTS

Fifty-two consecutive patients were included in the study. PVI and PWI were achieved in all patients in the TactiFlex™ group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 97.9% of PVs (n = 195/199). PWI was obtained in all cases by delivering extensive RF lesions within the PW. There were no significant differences compared to the TactiCath group: first-pass PVI was achieved in 96.3% of PVs (n = 319/331). Adenosine administration revealed PV reconnection in 5.7% of patients, and two reconnections of the PW were documented. Procedure and RF time were significantly shorter in the TactiFlex™ group compared to the TactiCath group, 73.1 ± 12.6 vs. 98.5 ± 16.3 min, and 11.3 ± 1.5 vs. 23.5 ± 3.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001. The fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No intraprocedural and periprocedural complications related to the ablation catheter were observed. Patients had an implantable loop recorder before discharge. At the 6-month follow-up, 76.8% of patients remained free from atrial arrhythmia, with no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD PVI plus PWI using the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter is effective and safe. Compared to a control group, the use of TactiFlex™ to perform HPSD PVI plus PWI is associated with a similar effectiveness but with a significantly shorter procedural and RF time.

Atrial Fibrillation Termination as a Predictor for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Background: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to validate the predictive role of atrial fibrillation (AF) termination in long-term arrhythmia recurrence. Method: Our search encompassed databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library up to August 1, 2021. Three independent reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. The data included ablation strategy, recurrence mode, AF termination mode, numbers of patients, and recurrence cases in the termination and nontermination groups. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia at long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months). Results: Our analysis included 22 publications, with 11 prospective studies being eligible for further meta-analysis. Among these, 14 studies reported significantly lower rates of arrhythmia recurrence in the AF termination group compared to the nontermination group. Among seven studies involving 1114 patients that examined single procedure outcomes, the pooled estimated effect was RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68-1.90) with an I 2 value of 57%. Subgroup analysis focusing on termination mode as sinus rhythm yielded a pooled estimated effect of RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.92) with an I 2 value of 47%. Additionally, analysis of seven studies involving 1433 patients for repeat procedures demonstrated a significant preference for the AF termination group (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, I 2 = 84%). Subgroup analysis indicated reduced heterogeneity when the termination mode was sinus rhythm (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90, I 2 = 57%). Conclusion: Our study establishes that AF termination serves as an effective predictor for the success of persistent AF ablation procedures. This finding holds potential implications for clinical practice and contributes to our understanding of long-term arrhythmia recurrence in the context of AF termination.

Initial real-world data on catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using the novel lattice-tip focal pulsed-field ablation catheter

AIMS

Technological advancements have contributed to the enhanced precision and lesion flexibility in pulsed-field ablation (PFA) by integrating a three-dimensional mapping system combined with a point-by-point ablation strategy. Data regarding the feasibility of this technology remain limited to some clinical trials. This study aims to elucidate initial real-world data on catheter ablation utilizing a lattice-tip focal PFA/radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation for persistent AF via the lattice-tip PFA/RFA catheter were enrolled. We evaluated acute procedural data including periprocedural data as well as the clinical follow-up within a 90-day blanking period. In total, 28 patients with persistent AF underwent AF ablation either under general anaesthesia (n = 6) or deep sedation (n = 22). In all patients, pulmonary vein isolation was successfully achieved. Additional linear ablations were conducted in 21 patients (78%) with a combination of successful anterior line (n = 13, 46%) and roof line (n = 19, 68%). The median procedural and fluoroscopic times were 97 (interquartile range, IQR: 80-114) min and 8.5 (IQR: 7.2-9.5) min, respectively. A total of 27 patients (96%) were interviewed during the follow-up within the blanking period, and early recurrent AF was documented in four patients (15%) including one case of recurrent AF during the hospital stay. Neither major nor minor procedural complication occurred.

CONCLUSION

In terms of real-world data, our data confirmed AF ablation feasibility utilizing the lattice-tip focal PFA/RFA catheter in patients with persistent AF.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Very-high-power Short-duration Ablation versus Conventional Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of very-high-power short-duration (VHPSD) ablation (70-90 W/4-7 s) with conventional ablation (30-40 W/>20 s, 50 W/7-11 s) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with AF. A total of 13 studies were included in this analysis (1,527 patients). AF recurrence occurred in 14% (95% CI [11-18%]) of the VHPSD group. VHPSD was associated with lower AF recurrence (OR 0.65; 95% CI [0.48-0.89]; p=0.006) compared with the conventional ablation group. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI had a similar rate of AF recurrence (16% versus 10%) compared with PVI alone. Procedure and ablation durations were significantly shorter in the VHPSD group with a mean differences of -14.4 minutes (p=0.017) and -14.1 minutes (p<0.001), respectively. Complications occurred in 6% (95% CI [3-9%]) of the VHPSD group, and the rate was similar between the two groups (OR 1.03; 95% CI [0.60-1.80]; p=0.498). VHPSD ablation resulted in less AF recurrence and a shorter procedure time. Additional ablation beyond PVI alone in VHPSD may not provide additional benefits.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Catheter ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is established as a mainstay in rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current practice and future perspectives in AF ablation. The main clinical benefit of AF ablation is the reduction of arrhythmia-related symptoms and improvement of quality of life. Catheter ablation of AF is recommended, in general, as a second-line therapy for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF, who have failed or are intolerant to pharmacological therapy. In selected patients with heart failure and reduced left-ventricular fraction, catheter ablation was proven to reduce all-cause mortality. Also, optimal management of comorbidities can reduce AF recurrence after AF ablation; therefore, multimodal risk assessment and therapy are mandatory. To date, the primary ablation tool in widespread use is still single-tip catheter radiofrequency (RF) based ablation. Additionally, balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has gained prominence, especially due to its user-friendly nature and established safety and efficacy profile. So far, the cryoballoon (CB) is the most studied single-shot device. CB-based PVI is characterized by high efficiency, convincing success rates, and a beneficial safety profile. Recently, CB-PVI as a first-line therapy for AF was shown to be superior to pharmacological treatment in terms of efficacy and was shown to reduce progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In this context, CB-based PVI gains more and more importance as a first-line treatment choice. Non-thermal energy sources, namely pulsed-field ablation (PFA), have garnered attention due to their cardioselectivity. Although initially applied via a basket-like ablation tool, recent developments allow for point-by-point ablation, particularly with the advent of a novel lattice tip catheter.

Efficacy and safety of the vein of Marshall ethanol infusion with radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in elderly patients

Background

Increasing age is a significant risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA). We accomplished this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) with CA in elderly patients with persistent AF (PsAF).

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 360 consecutive adult patients with PsAF, of which 141 were in the Elder group (age ≥65 years) and 219 were in the Younger group (age <65 years), who underwent the VOM-EI and radiofrequency CA (RFCA) between May 2020 and April 2022. The efficacy endpoint was no recurrence of AF within one year after CA.

Results

The VOM-EI was successfully performed in 90.8% of patients from the Elder and 88.6% from the Younger group. All patients achieved PVI; 97.9% of patients from the Elder and 98.6% from the Younger group reached LA roof block, and 93.6% of patients from the Elder and 95.9% from the Younger group achieved MI block. There was no significant difference in 1-year survival without recurrence of AF between the two groups (83.0% and 84.5%, respectively). The incidence of complications within 30 days after the procedure from the two groups was low and did not differ significantly.

Conclusion

The VOM-EI combined with RFCA proved to be an effective and safe strategy for treating PsAF in elderly and younger patients.

Pulmonary vein isolation by visually guided laser balloon ablation: single-center 5-year follow-up results

BACKGROUND

Visually guided laser balloon (VGLB) ablation is a balloon-based treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) that uses a titratable laser energy source to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), allowing for real-time visualization of target tissue and ablation lesions through an endoscopic camera. Few long-term data on this technique are currently available. This report presents acute efficacy, procedural data, complication rates, and long-term AF-free survival up to 5 years post-ablation.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, observational report, 152 patients (72.4% male, mean age 60.6 ± 9.7 years, 62.5% paroxysmal AF, 598 pulmonary veins in total) treated with the first-generation VGLB system between 2014 and 2016 were included for analysis. AF ablation consisted of PVI only.

RESULTS

Acute PVI was achieved in 98.2% of veins, with first-pass isolation in 92.5%. Procedure duration of 129 min [IQR 113-150], fluoroscopy time of 15 min [IQR 11-20], and dose area product of 5016 mGy·cm2 [IQR 3603-8711] were recorded. During a median follow-up of 51 months [IQR 45-57], 74.3% of patients remained free of AF (78.8% for paroxysmal and 65.3% for persistent AF, p = 0.108). Freedom of AF at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years follow-up was 88.2%, 82.2%, 78.9%, and 74.8%, respectively. PV reconnections were identified in only 46.9% of redo procedures. The median number of PV reconnections during redo procedures was 0 [IQR 0-2]. Anti-arrhythmic drug use was significantly reduced after ablation (p < 0.001). The most commonly reported complications were minor vascular complications (4.6%) and transient phrenic nerve paralysis (3.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

First-generation VGLB ablation demonstrated high acute isolation rates, reasonable procedure times and low complication rates. Long-term freedom from AF was 78.8% for paroxysmal AF and 65.3% for persistent AF, performing PVI only.

[Long-term success after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation]

Ablation is an established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with convincing success rates and a reasonable safety profile. Ablation strategies going beyond pulmonary vein isolation in patients with chronic forms of AF are less well established and reproducible. Especially in patients with progressed AF forms multiple ablation procedures might be mandatory to achieve reasonable clinical success. An early ablation strategy might stop or prolong the progress from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In addition, ablation is more effective than drug-based treatment and comparably safe. Long-term success rates after a single and after multiple ablation procedures in paroxysmal AF are reported with 60-70% and up to 80%, while success rates in persistent or long-standing persistent AF are less favorable (single procedure 40-50%, multiple procedures 70%). However, currently non-recurrence of AF is the most established but potentially not the best endpoint. The burden of AF after ablation as assessed by novel monitoring modalities might gain further clinical importance.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of Ibutilide-guided cardioversion and direct current synchronized cardioversion after radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Backgroup

Ibutilide has already been used for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Ibutilide-guided cardioversion on clinical outcomes after individualized ablation of PsAF.

Methods

From October 2020 to September 2021, consecutive patients with PsAF accepted for RFCA were prospectively enrolled. After individualized ablation including pulmonary vein isolation plus left atrial roof line ablation and personalized linear ablation based on left atrial low-voltage zones, patients were divided into the spontaneous conversion (SCV) group, direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) group and Ibutilide group according to different cardioversion types during ablation. The rates of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATT) among the three groups were evaluated after follow-up.

Results

In this study, 110 patients were enrolled, including 12 patients with SCV, 50 patients receiving DCC and 48 patients receiving Ibutilide cardioversion after individualized ablation. Among the three groups, the SCV group had shorter AF duration {12 months [interquartile range (IQR) 12-16], P = 0.042} and smaller left atrial diameter (LAD) [35 mm (IQR: 33-42), P = 0.023]. A 12-month freedom from ATT rate was 83.3% in SCV group, 69.4% in DCC group, and 79.2% in Ibutilide group, respectively (Log-rank, P = 0.745). During the follow-up [17 months (IQR: 15-19)], the rate of freedom from ATT of SCV group (83.3%), and Ibutilide group (72.9%) were both higher than that of DCC group (53.1%, P = 0.042). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance in Ibutilide group than in DCC group (Log-rank, P = 0.041). After adjusting for risk factors of AF recurrence, the hazard ratio for AF recurrence of the DCC group with reference to the Ibutilide group was 4.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) (1.87-8.98), P < 0.001]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that freedom from ATT rate in effective Ibutilide subgroup was significantly higher than noneffective Ibutilide subgroup (Log-rank, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

For the treatment of the patients with PsAF, Ibutilide-guided cardioversion after individualized RFCA may be benefit for maintenance of SR compared to conventional DCC, especially for the patients who are effective for administration of Ibutilide.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A review of techniques

Ablation of atrial fibrillation is a key area of current research. A multitude of techniques have been tested, some of which are poorly evidenced and not recommended in routine clinical practice whilst others are more promising. Additionally, a plethora of issues exist when researching ablation techniques, from control arm ablation strategy to the relevance of outcome measures. In this review article, we discuss these issues in the context of the current evidence base.

Long-Term Impact of Additional Ablation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Results From EARNEST-PVI Trial

Background An optimal strategy for left atrial ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been determined. Methods and Results We conducted an extended follow-up of the multicenter randomized controlled EARNEST-PVI (Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial, which compared 12-month rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF between patients randomized to a PVI-alone strategy (n=248) or PVI-plus strategy (n=248; PVI followed by left atrial additional ablation, including linear ablation or ablation targeting areas with complex fractionated electrograms). The present study extended the follow-up period to 3 years after enrollment. Outcomes were compared not only between randomly allocated groups but also between on-treatment groups categorized by actually created ablation lesions. Recurrence rate of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was lower in the randomly allocated to PVI-plus group than the PVI-alone group (29.0% versus 37.5%, P=0.036). On-treatment analysis revealed that patients with PVI+linear ablation (n=205) demonstrated a lower AF/AT recurrence rate than those with PVI only (26.3% versus 37.8%, P=0.007). In contrast, patients with PVI+complex fractionated electrograms ablation (n=37) had an AF/AT recurrence rate comparable to that of patients with PVI only (40.5% versus 37.8%, P=0.76). At second ablation in 126 patients with AF/AT recurrence, ATs excluding common atrial flutter were more frequent in patients with PVI+linear ablation than in those with PVI only (32.6% versus 5.7%, P<0.0001). Conclusions Left atrial ablation in addition to PVI was efficacious during 3-year follow-up. Linear ablation was superior to other ablation strategies but may increase iatrogenic ATs. Registration URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm; Unique identifier: UMIN000019449.

Effects of Inflammatory Cell Death Caused by Catheter Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a serious healthcare burden on society due to its high morbidity and the resulting serious complications such as thrombosis and heart failure. The principle of catheter ablation is to achieve electrical isolation by linear destruction of cardiac tissue, which makes AF a curable disease. Currently, catheter ablation does not have a high long-term success rate. The current academic consensus is that inflammation and fibrosis are central mechanisms in the progression of AF. However, artificially caused inflammatory cell death by catheter ablation may have a significant impact on structural and electrical remodeling, which may affect the long-term prognosis. This review first focused on the inflammatory response induced by apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis and their interaction with arrhythmia. Then, we compared the differences in cell death induced by radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation and pulsed-field ablation. Finally, we discussed the structural and electrical remodeling caused by inflammation and the association between inflammation and the recurrence of AF after catheter ablation. Collectively, pulsed-field ablation will be a revolutionary innovation with faster, safer, better tissue selectivity and less inflammatory response induced by apoptosis-dominated cell death.

Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Anchored Reentry Substrate Created by Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Computational Models

Background Postablation arrhythmia recurrence occurs in ~40% of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Fibrotic remodeling exacerbates arrhythmic activity in persistent atrial fibrillation and can play a key role in reentrant arrhythmia, but emergent interaction between nonconductive ablation-induced scar and native fibrosis (ie, residual fibrosis) is poorly understood. Methods and Results We conducted computational simulations in pre- and postablation left atrial models reconstructed from late gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans to test the hypothesis that ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation creates new substrate conducive to recurrent arrhythmia mediated by anchored reentry. We trained a random forest machine learning classifier to accurately pinpoint specific nonconductive tissue regions (ie, areas of ablation-delivered scar or vein/valve boundaries) with the capacity to serve as substrate for anchored reentry-driven recurrent arrhythmia (area under the curve: 0.91±0.03). Our analysis suggests there is a distinctive nonconductive tissue pattern prone to serving as arrhythmogenic substrate in postablation models, defined by a specific size and proximity to residual fibrosis. Conclusions Overall, this suggests persistent atrial fibrillation ablation transforms substrate that favors functional reentry (ie, rotors meandering in excitable tissue) into an arrhythmogenic milieu more conducive to anchored reentry. Our work also indicates that explainable machine learning and computational simulations can be combined to effectively probe mechanisms of recurrent arrhythmia.

High-Power Short-Duration Lesion Index-Guided Posterior Wall Isolation beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been adopted to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Although the role of HPSD is well-established in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), fewer data have assessed the impact of HPSD when addressing extra-pulmonary veins (PVs) targets. Therefore, this study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of HPSD lesion index (LSI)-guided posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to PVI as an initial strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ablation of Pe-AF in our center between August 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients' ablation strategy was PVI plus PWI using HPSD LSI-guided isolation. RF parameters included 50 W targeting LSI values of ≥5 on the anterior part of the PVs and anterior roofline and ≥4 for the posterior PVs aspect, bottom line, and within the posterior wall (PW). We compared the LSI values with and without acute conduction gaps after the initial first-pass PWI. Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and a high-density multipolar Grid-shaped mapping catheter. We compared the procedural characteristics using HPSD (n = 35) vs. a control group (n = 46). Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in the study. PWI on top of PVI was achieved in all cases in the HPSD group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 93.3% of PVs (n = 126/135). First-pass roofline block was obtained in most patients (n = 31, 88.5%), while first-pass block of the bottom line was only achieved in 51.4% (n = 18). There were no significant differences compared to the control group; first-pass PVI was achieved in 94.9% of PVs (n = 169/178), first-pass roofline block in 89.1%, and bottom-line in 45.6% of patients. To achieve complete PWI with HPSD, scattered RF applications within the PW were necessary. No electrical reconnection of the PW was found after adenosine administration and the waiting period. The procedure and RF times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the control group, with values of 116.2 ± 10.9 vs. 144.5 ± 11.3 min, and 19.8 ± 3.6 vs. 26.3 ± 6.4 min, respectively, p < 0.001. Fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No procedural complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, 71.4% of patients remained free from AF, with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: HPSD LSI-guided PWI on top of PVI seems effective and safe. Compared to a control group, HPSD is associated with similar rates of first-pass PWI and PVI but with a shorter procedural and RF time.

Association with the nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation duration and outcome of ExTRa Mapping-guided rotor ablation

Background

Additional ablation strategies after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF) lasting ≥2 years have not been fully effective. This is presumably because of insufficient identification of non-PAF maintenance mechanisms. In this study, we employed a novel online and real-time phase mapping system, ExTRa Mapping, to identify and modulate rotors as one of the non-PAF maintenance mechanisms in patients with non-PAF sustained after PVI. We investigated the relationship between outcomes of ExTRa Mapping-guided rotor ablation (ExTRa-ABL) and non-PAF duration prior to this procedure.

Methods

This study consisted of 73 non-PAF patients (63 ± 8 years, non-PAF duration 31 ± 37 months) who underwent the first ExTRa-ABL in patients with non-PAF sustained after completion of PVI.

Results

Freedom from non-PAF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence at 12 months after ExTRa-ABL was achieved in 50 (69%) of patients. The non-PAF duration prior to ExTRa-ABL was significantly longer in patients with non-PAF/AT recurrence after ExTRa-ABL compared with those without (56 ± 50 vs. 19 ± 22 months, p = .001). In patients with non-PAF duration of ≤60 months prior to ExTRa-ABL, compared with >60 months, non-PAF/AT-free rate was significantly higher (68.9% vs. 23.1%, p < .001), during the follow-up of 36 ± 18 months.

Conclusions

A non-PAF duration of ≤60 months prior to ExTRa-ABL was associated with a better outcome. The effect of ExTRa-ABL was considered to be limited in patients with >60 months of non-PAF duration.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon; first and early two centre experience in Europe

INTRODUCTION

The Heliostar™ ablation system is a novel RF balloon ablation technology with an integrated three-dimensional mapping system. Here, we describe our early experience and procedural outcomes using this technology for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

METHODS

We sought to comprehensively assess the first 60 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using the novel HELISOTAR™ RF balloon technology including procedural outcomes. A comparison of the workflow between two different anaesthetic modalities (conscious sedation [CS] vs. general anaesthesia [GA]) was made. Procedural data were collected prospectively from two high-volume centers (Barts Heart Centre, UK and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich). A standardized approach for catheter ablation was employed.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients had the procedure under CS and the remaining under GA. Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 84 ± 33 min and 1.1 min. The median duration of RF energy application was 7 (5-9.8) mins per patient. All veins were successfully isolated, and the median isolation time was 10 (7-15) seconds. Our cohort's rate of procedural complications was low, with no mortality within 30 days postprocedure.

CONCLUSION

Our early experience shows that catheter ablation using the Heliostar™ technology can be performed efficiently and safely; however, long-term data is yet to be established. Low fluoroscopy requirements, short learning curves and use of this technology with CS is possible, including the use of an oesophageal temperature probe.

Quantification of Mechanical Characteristics of Conventional Steerable Ablation Catheters for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Heart Phantom

PURPOSE

Accurate and reliable catheter navigation is important in formation of adequate lesions during radiofrequency cardiac catheter ablation. To inform future device design efforts and to characterize the limitations of conventional devices, the focus of this study is to assess and quantify the mechanical performance of manual ablation catheters for pulmonary vein isolation procedures within a phantom heart model.

METHODS

We measured three important metrics: accuracy of catheter tip navigation to target anatomical landmarks at the pulmonary veins (PVs), orientation of the catheter relative to the tissue at the targets, and the delivered force values and their stability and variations at those targets. A stereovision system was used for navigational guidance and to measure the catheter's tip position and orientation relative to the targets. To measure force, piezoelectric sensors were used which were integrated at the targets, whereby operators were instructed to stabilize the catheter to achieve a chosen reference force value.

RESULTS

An overall positioning accuracy of 1.57 ± 1.71 mm was achieved for all targets. No statistical significance was observed in position accuracy between the right and left PVs (p = 0.5138). The orientation of the catheter relative to tissue surface was 41° ± 21° with no statistical significance between targets. The overall force stability was 41 ± 6 g with higher difficulty in force stabilization in the right compared to the left PV (40 ± 8 vs. 43 ± 2 g, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, future improvements to manual catheter navigation for ablation should focus on improving device performance in orientation control and improved force stability.

A novel stepwise approach incorporating ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Introduction

Apart from pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), several step-by-step procedures that aim to modify left atrial substrate have been proposed for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), yet the optimal strategy remains elusive. There are cumulative data suggesting an incremental benefit of adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to PVI in patients with persistent AF. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel stepwise ablation approach, incorporating a VOM alcoholization step, for persistent AF.

Methods

In this single-center study, we prospectively enrolled 66 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent AF and failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug (ADD). The ablation procedure consisted of (i) PVI, (ii) left atrial segmentation with VOM ethanol infusion and the deployment of linear radiofrequency lesions across the roof and the mitral isthmus and (iii) electrogram-based ablation of dispersion zones. The first two steps were performed in all patients, whereas the third step was carried out only in those still in AF at the end of the second step. Atrial tachycardias during the procedure were mapped and ablated. At the end of the procedure, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was additionally performed in all patients. The primary endpoint was 12-month freedom from AF and atrial tachycardia after a single procedure and an initial three-month blanking period.

Results

Total procedure time was 153 ± 38.5 min. Fluoroscopy time was 16 ± 6.5 min and the radiofrequency ablation time was 26.14 ± 0.26 min. The primary endpoint occurred in 54 patients (82%). At 12 months, 65% of patients were off any AAD. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% was the only predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.04-12.19; p = 0.04). One patient developed a pericardial tamponade and another a minor groin hematoma.

Conclusion

A novel stepwise approach, including a step of ethanol infusion in the VOM, is feasible, safe and provides a high rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months in patients with persistent AF.

Extensive Posterior Wall Isolation on Top of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Guided by Ablation Index in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Background: Durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but it has been demonstrated that it may not be enough to treat persistent AF (Pe-AF). Therefore, posterior wall isolation (PWI) is among the strategies adopted on top of PVI to treat Pe-AF patients. However, PWI using contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions remains challenging, and few studies have evaluated the impact of the Ablation Index (AI) on the efficacy of PWI. Moreover, previous papers did not evaluate arrhythmia recurrences using continuous monitoring. Methods: This is a prospective, observational, single-center study on patients affected by Pe-AF undergoing treated PVI plus AI-guided PWI. Procedures were performed using the CARTO mapping system, SmartTouch SF ablation catheter, and PentaRay multipolar mapping catheter. The AI settings were 500–550 for the anterior PV aspect and roofline, while the settings were 450–500 for the posterior PV aspect, bottom line, and/or PW lesions. All patients received an implantable loop recorder (ILR). All patients underwent clinical evaluation in the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at each visit, and device data from the ILR were reviewed to assess for arrhythmia recurrence. Results: Between January 2021 and December 2021, forty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI plus PWI guided by AI at our center and were prospectively enrolled in the study. PVI was achieved in all patients, first-pass roofline block was obtained in 82.9% of the patients, and first-pass block of the bottom line was achieved in 36.5% of the patients. In 39% of the patients, PWI was not performed with a “box-only” lesion set, but with scattered lesions across the PW to achieve PWI. AI on the anterior aspect of the left PVs was 528 ± 22, while on the posterior aspect of the left PVs, it was 474 ± 18; on the anterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 532 ± 27, while on the posterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 477 ± 16; on the PW, AI was 468 ± 19. No acute complications occurred at the end of the procedure. After the blanking period, 70.7% of the patients reported no arrhythmia recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions: In patients with Pe-AF undergoing catheter ablation, PWI guided by AI seems to be an effective and feasible strategy in addition to standard PVI.

Pulmonary vein isolation with adjunctive left atrial ganglionic plexus ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive ganglionic plexus (GP) ablation may increase the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Prior meta-analyses examining PVI with adjunctive GP ablation have included non-randomized trials and have included trials evaluating thorascopic epicardial ablation. The objective of this study is to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing endocardial catheter-based PVI to PVI with adjunctive GP ablation.

METHODS

Summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² values. Sub-group analysis was performed comparing arrhythmia recurrence between patients with paroxysmal versus persistent AF at trial baseline. Meta-regressions were performed with mean left atrial diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction at trial baseline as the moderator variables.

RESULTS

Five RCTs were identified including 814 patients: 406 PVI + GP ablation and 408 PVI alone. The mean age of participants was 56.5 years and 74.7% were male. Four of these trials evaluated catheter-based endocardial ablation for a total of 574 patients: 289 PVI + GP ablation and 285 PVI alone. The odds of arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing adjunctive GP ablation with PVI compared with PVI alone were a reduced: odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.82, I² = 40.2%. In the subgroup analysis, the odds of arrhythmia recurrence with adjunctive GP ablation were reduced in those with paroxysmal AF (OR 0.396, 95% CI 0.23-0.69, I² = 0%). A non-significant trend to reduced arrhythmia recurrence was also observed in those with persistent AF (OR 0.726, 95% CI 0.475-1.112, I² = 0%). When performing the meta-regression, increased left atrial diameter was associated with decreased treatment effect of adjunctive GP ablation (R² index = 1.0, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of GP ablation to PVI was associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence. Adjunctive GP ablation was more effective in paroxysmal AF and in patients with smaller atria. Larger RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of GP + PVI ablation.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone or in combination with substrate modulation after electrical cardioversion failure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: The PACIFIC trial: Study design

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective at treating 50% of unselected patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Alternatively, PVI combined with a new ablation strategy entitled the Marshall-PLAN ensures a 78% 1-year sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rate in the same population. However, a substantial subset of patients could undergo the Marshall-PLAN unnecessarily. It is therefore essential to identify those patients who can be treated with PVI alone versus those who may truly benefit from the Marshall-PLAN before ablation is performed. In this context, we hypothesized that electrical cardioversion (EC) could help to select the most appropriate strategy for each patient.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized study, patients with AF recurrence within 4 weeks after EC will be randomized 1:1 to PVI alone or the Marshall-PLAN. Conversely, patients in whom SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC will be treated with PVI only and included in a prospective registry. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year SR maintenance rate after a single ablation procedure.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The Marshall-PLAN might be necessary in patients with an advanced degree of persistent AF (i.e., where SR is not maintained for ≥4 uninterrupted weeks after EC). Conversely, in patients with mild or moderate persistent AF (i.e., where SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC), PVI alone might be a sufficient ablation strategy. The PACIFIC trial is the first study designed to assess whether rhythm monitoring after EC could help to identify patients who should undergo adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI.

Treatment Planning for Atrial Fibrillation Using Patient-Specific Models Showing the Importance of Fibrillatory-Areas

Computational models have made it possible to study the effect of fibrosis and scar on atrial fibrillation (AF) and plan future personalized treatments. Here, we study the effect of area available for fibrillatory waves to sustain AF. Then we use it to plan for AF ablation to improve procedural outcomes. CARPentry was used to create patient-specific models to determine the association between the size of residual contiguous areas available for AF wavefronts to propagate and sustain AF [fibrillatory area (FA)] after ablation with procedural outcomes. The FA was quantified in a novel manner accounting for gaps in ablation lines. We selected 30 persistent AF patients with known ablation outcomes. We divided the atrial surface into five areas based on ablation scar pattern and anatomical landmarks and calculated the FAs. We validated the models based on clinical outcomes and suggested future ablation lines that minimize the FAs and terminate rotor activities in simulations. We also simulated the effects of three common antiarrhythmic drugs. In the patient-specific models, the predicted arrhythmias matched the clinical outcomes in 25 of 30 patients (accuracy 83.33%). The average largest FA (FAmax) in the recurrence group was 8517 ± 1444 vs. 6772 ± 1531 mm2 in the no recurrence group (p < 0.004). The final FAs after adding the suggested ablation lines in the AF recurrence group reduced the average FAmax from 8517 ± 1444 to 6168 ± 1358 mm2 (p < 0.001) and stopped the sustained rotor activity. Simulations also correctly anticipated the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs in 5 out of 6 patients who used drug therapy post unsuccessful ablation (accuracy 83.33%). Sizes of FAs available for AF wavefronts to propagate are important determinants for ablation outcomes. FA size in combination with computational simulations can be used to direct ablation in persistent AF to minimize the critical mass required to sustain recurrent AF.

Best Practice Guide for Cryoballoon Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: The Compilation Experience of More than 1000 Procedures

Nowadays, the cryoballoon (CB) constitutes an established alternative to radio frequency (RF) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which offers the possibility to isolate the PVs with a single application. Since the introduction of the second-generation CB, we prospectively collected our data to optimize the procedure on >1000 consecutive patients who underwent CB PVI performed in our center. It is expected that subsequent guidelines will suggest first-line PVI through CB in patients with paroxysmal AF with a class I indication. Indeed, in the long-term follow-up (36 months) of the EARLY-AF trial, CB had a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation episodes compared to the anti-arrhythmic drugs group. We now review the current best practices in an effort to drive consistent outcomes and minimize complications. PV isolation through CB is the most studied single-shot technique for atrial fibrillation ablation, having shown the potential to alter the natural history of the arrhythmia. Several procedural tips and tricks can improve procedural flow and effectiveness. In the present article we provided not only technical details but measurable biophysical parameters that can reliably guide the operator into achieving the best outcome for his patients.

Efficacy and Safety Ablation Index-Guided High-Energy Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: PVI Plus Linear Ablation of Mitral Isthmus and Posterior Box Isolation

BACKGROUND

For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), whether linear ablation should be performed remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety for ablation index (AI)-guided high-energy linear ablation of mitral isthmus (MI) and left atrial (LA) posterior box isolation is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and clinical success rate of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) combined with linear ablation of LA roof and posterior inferior (posterior wall isolation) and MI compare with the PVI-alone method in patients of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

362 consecutive persistent AF patients were enrolled from two electrophysiology centers. A total of 200 cases were in PVI-plus group and 162 cases were in PVI-alone group. The PVI-alone group received wide circumferential isolation of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins. PVI combined with linear ablation of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI)and MI were performed in the PVI-plus group. The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia. After 24 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was achieved in 73.5% of the patients in the PVI-plus group and 62.5% in the PVI-alone group (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91, log rank p = 0.012). The procedure-related complication rates were 2.5% in PVI-plus group and 1.9% in PVI-alone group (p = 0.808).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the ablation strategy of ablation (PVI plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation) was feasible and safe for persistent AF patients. Compared with the PVI-alone method, it improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF.

Risk and benefit of extrapulmonary vein ablation in atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the recent development, benefit, and safety of extrapulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation.

RECENT FINDING

Studies have shown that extrapulmonary vein ablation can help maintain normal sinus rhythm for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. As prior strategies targeting anatomical lines and triggers are well utilized, novel techniques for substrate mapping have been rapidly developing. These strategies are well tolerated and could be chosen based on patients' conditions and physicians' experience.

SUMMARY

Extrapulmonary vein ablation could be safely and effectively performed for patients with atrial fibrillation. It provides further consolidation of normal sinus rhythm.

Characterization of arrhythmia substrate to ablate persistent atrial fibrillation (COAST-AF): Randomized controlled trial design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Atrial low voltage area (LVA) catheter ablation has emerged as a promising strategy for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear if catheter ablation of atrial LVA increases treatment success rates in patients with persistent AF.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this trial is to assess the potential benefit of adjunctive catheter ablation of atrial LVA in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent AF, when compared to PVI alone. The secondary aims are to evaluate safety outcomes, the quality of life and the healthcare resource utilization.

METHODS/DESIGN

A multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, 2-arm, single-blinded randomized controlled trial is under way (NCT03347227). Patients who are candidates for catheter ablation for persistent AF will be randomly assigned (1:1) to either PVI alone or PVI + atrial LVA ablation. The primary outcome is 18-month documented event rate of atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter) post catheter ablation. Secondary outcomes include procedure-related complications, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months, AF burden, need for emergency department visits/hospitalization, need for repeat ablation for atrial arrhythmia, quality of life at 12 and 18 months, ablation time, and procedure duration.

DISCUSSION

Characterization of Arrhythmia Mechanism to Ablate Atrial Fibrillation (COAST-AF) is a multicenter randomized trial evaluating ablation strategies for catheter ablation. We hypothesize that catheter ablation of atrial LVA in addition to PVI will result in higher procedural success rates when compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent AF.

Temperature-controlled ablation of the mitral isthmus line using the novel DiamondTemp ablation system

Background

The novel DiamondTemp™ (DT)-catheter (Medtronic®) was designed for high-power, short-duration ablation in a temperature-controlled mode.

Aim

To evaluate the performance of the DT-catheter for ablation of the mitral isthmus line (MIL) using two different energy dosing strategies.

Materials and methods

Twenty patients with recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial tachycardia (AT) following pulmonary vein (PV) isolation were included. All patients underwent reisolation of PVs in case of electrical reconnection and ablation of a MIL using the DT-catheter. Application durations of 10 (group A, n = 10) or 20 s (group B, n = 10) were applied. If bidirectional block was not reached with endocardial ablation, additional ablation from within the coronary sinus (CS) was conducted.

Results

In 19/20 (95%) patients, DT ablation of the MIL resulted in bidirectional block. Mean procedure and fluoroscopy time, and dose area product did not differ significantly between the two groups. In group B, fewer radiofrequency applications were needed to achieve bidirectional block of the MIL when compared to group A (26 ± 12 vs. 42 ± 17, p = 0.04). Ablation from within the CS was performed in 8/10 patients (80%) of group A and in 5/10 (50%) patients of group B (p = 0.34). No major complication occurred.

Conclusion

Mitral isthmus line ablation with use of the DT-catheter is highly effective and safe. Longer radiofrequency-applications appear to be favorable without compromising safety.

Efficacy of left atrial low-voltage area-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-voltage area (LVA)-guided substrate modification catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Systematic searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were performed from inception to July 2022 for all available studies. The effect estimates were combined with the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to explore the sources of statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 1942 subjects (mean age: 61 ± 10 years, 69% male) were identified. All studies included patients with paroxysmal AF, non-paroxysmal AF, or both. At a mean follow-up of 18.9 months, patients who underwent LVA-guided substrate modification ablation had significantly higher freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence than patients who underwent control ablation [67.7% vs. 48.9%, risk ratios (RR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.76, P < 0.001], with 36% relative risk and 18.7% absolute risk reductions in all-atrial tachycardia recurrence. Subgroup analysis based on AF types demonstrated that the decreased risk of all-atrial tachycardia recurrence was present predominantly in non-paroxysmal AF compared with paroxysmal AF (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.69 vs. RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.13).

CONCLUSION

Low-voltage area-guided substrate modification ablation combined with PVI appears to have a significant beneficial effect of improving freedom from all-atrial tachycardia recurrence, especially in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Artificial intelligence software standardizes electrogram-based ablation outcome for persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Multiple groups have reported on the usefulness of ablating in atrial regions exhibiting abnormal electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF). Still, previous studies have suggested that ablation outcomes are highly operator- and center-dependent. This study sought to evaluate a novel machine learning software algorithm named VX1 (Volta Medical), trained to adjudicate multipolar electrogram dispersion.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, multicentric, nonrandomized study conducted to assess the feasibility of generating VX1 dispersion maps. In 85 patients, 8 centers, and 17 operators, we compared the acute and long-term outcomes after ablation in regions exhibiting dispersion between primary and satellite centers. We also compared outcomes to a control group in which dispersion-guided ablation was performed visually by trained operators.

RESULTS

The study population included 29% of long-standing persistent AF. AF termination occurred in 92% and 83% of the patients in primary and satellite centers, respectively, p = 0.31. The average rate of freedom from documented AF, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), was 86% after a single procedure, and 89% after an average of 1.3 procedures per patient (p = 0.4). The rate of freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia, with or without AADs, was 54% and 73% after a single or an average of 1.3 procedures per patient, respectively (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences between outcomes of the primary versus satellite centers were observed for one (p = 0.8) or multiple procedures (p = 0.4), or between outcomes of the entire study population versus the control group (p > 0.2). Interestingly, intraprocedural AF termination and type of recurrent arrhythmia (i.e., AF vs. AT) appear to be predictors of the subsequent clinical course.

CONCLUSION

VX1, an expertise-based artificial intelligence software solution, allowed for robust center-to-center standardization of acute and long-term ablation outcomes after electrogram-based ablation.

Cryoballoon ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation for de novo pulmonary vein isolation: a single-center follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) remains controversial. The characteristics of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) to treat PersAF and the blanking period recurrence are underreported.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients with PersAF undergoing second-generation CBA for de novo PVI. The post-procedural efficacy and survival analysis were compared between patients with different PersAF durations. The multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to detect the risk factors for recurrence. Early and long-term recurrence were analyzed relative to each other.

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were enrolled, with a median PersAF duration of 4.0 months (interquartile range: 2.0-12.0 months); 257 patients (78.1%) were male. Kaplan-Meier analysis of freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence at 12, 24, and 30 months showed 71.0%, 58.5%, and 54.9%, respectively. Early PersAF had a relatively favorable survival rate and a narrow P-wave duration of restoring sinus rhythm compared with that of PersAF lasting more than three months (P < 0.05). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PersAF duration and left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 42 mm were the risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence after CBA [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.01-1.4, P = 0.042; HR = 3.6, 95% CI: 2.4-5.4, P < 0.001, respectively]. The blanking period recurrence predicted the long-term recurrence (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

CBA of PersAF had safety and efficacy to reach de novo PVI. The PersAF duration and left atrial size were risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence after CBA. Blanking period recurrence was associated with long-term recurrence.

Validating left atrial fractionation and low-voltage substrate during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm-A high-density mapping study in persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Low-voltage-substrate (LVS)-guided ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described either in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. Prolonged fractionated potentials (PFPs) may represent arrhythmogenic slow conduction substrate and potentially co-localize with LVS. We assess the spatial correlation of PFP identified in AF (PFP-AF) to those mapped in SR (PFP-SR). We further report the relationship between LVS and PFPs when mapped in AF or SR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with ablation naïve persistent AF underwent left atrial (LA) high-density mapping in AF and SR prior to catheter ablation. Areas presenting PFP-AF and PFP-SR were annotated during mapping on the LA geometry. Low-voltage areas (LVA) were quantified using a bipolar threshold of 0.5 mV during both AF and SR mapping. Concordance of fractionated potentials (CFP) (defined as the presence of PFPs in both rhythms within a radius of 6 mm) was quantified. Spatial distribution and correlation of PFP and CFP with LVA were assessed. The predictors for CFP were determined.

RESULTS

PFPs displayed low voltages both during AF (median 0.30 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.50 mV) and SR (median 0.35 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.56 mV). The duration of PFP-SR was measured at 61 ms (Q1-Q3: 51-76 ms). During SR, most PFP-SRs (89.4 and 97.2%) were located within LVA (<0.5 mV and <1.0 mV, respectively). Areas presenting PFP occurred more frequently in AF than in SR (median: 9.5 vs. 8.0, p = 0.005). Both PFP-AF and PFP-SR were predominantly located at anterior LA (>40%), followed by posterior LA (>20%) and septal LA (>15%). The extent of LVA < 0.5 mV was more extensive in AF (median: 25.2% of LA surface, Q1-Q3:16.6-50.5%) than in SR (median: 12.3%, Q1-Q3: 4.7-29.4%, p = 0.001). CFP in both rhythms occurred in 80% of PFP-SR and 59% of PFP-AF (p = 0.008). Notably, CFP was positively correlated to the extent of LVA in SR (p = 0.004), but not with LVA in AF (p = 0.226). Additionally, the extent of LVA < 0.5 mV in SR was the only significant predictor for CFP, with an optimal threshold of 16% predicting high (>80%) fractionation concordance in AF and SR.

CONCLUSION

Substrate mapping in SR vs. AF reveals smaller areas of low voltage and fewer sites with PFP. PFP-SR are located within low-voltage areas in SR. There is a high degree of spatial agreement (80%) between PFP-AF and PFP-SR in patients with moderate LVA in SR (>16% of LA surface). These findings should be considered when substrate-based ablation strategies are applied in patients with the left atrial low-voltage substrate with recurrent persistent AF.

Catheter ablation and thoracoscopic ablation in long persistent atrial fibrillation with large left atrium

Background

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the clinical outcomes of PVAI are unsatisfactory in patients with persistent AF and a large left atrium (LA).

Objectives

We investigated the clinical outcomes following radiofrequency ablation (RFCA), cryoballoon ablation (CBA), and thoracoscopic maze in patients with persistent AF and a large LA.

Methods

We included patients with consecutive persistent AF who had a large LA (LA diameter >50 mm) and underwent RFCA, CBA, or thoracoscopic maze surgery. In the RFCA group, additional linear ablation was performed at the physician’s discretion. The endpoint was 12 months without recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia, including AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia, following a 90-day blanking period.

Results

We recruited 89 persistent AF patients with a large LA who underwent RFCA (n = 32), CBA (n = 38), or the thoracoscopic maze procedure (n = 19). During the 12-month follow-up, 48 (53.9%) cases of AF recurrence were observed. There was no prognostic difference between groups (50.0% in RFCA vs. 52.6% in CBA vs. 63.2% in thoracoscopic maze, all P > 0.05). Early recurrence during the blanking period was a significant predictor of late recurrence for RFCA and CBA, but not for the thoracoscopic maze.

Conclusion

In persistent AF patients with a large LA, we did not find a prognostic difference RFCA, CBA, or a thoracoscopic maze procedure in recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Early recurrence predicted late recurrence in catheter ablation, but not in thoracoscopic maze.

Pulsed-field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation: acute safety, efficacy and short-term follow-up in a multi-center real world scenario

PURPOSE

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a new energy source to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by targeted electroporation of cardiomyocytes. Experimental and controlled clinical trial data suggest good efficacy of PFA-based PVI. We aimed to assess efficacy, safety and follow-up of PFA-based PVI in an early adopter routine care setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent PVI using the Farawave® PFA ablation catheter in conjunction with three-dimensional mapping at two German high-volume ablation centers. PVI was achieved by applying 8 PFA applications in each PV.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients undergoing a first PVI (67 ± 12 years, 66% male, 62% persistent AF) were treated. PVI was achieved in all patients by deploying 4563 applications in 546 PVs (8.4 ± 1.0/PV). Disappearance of PV signals after the first application was demonstrated in 544/546 PVs (99.6%). More than eight PFA applications were performed in 29/546 PVs (6%) following adapted catheter positioning or due to reconnection as assessed during remapping. Mean procedure time was 78 ± 22 min including pre- and post PVI high-density voltage mapping. PFA catheter LA dwell-time was 23 ± 9 min. Total fluoroscopy time and dose area product were 16 ± 7 min and 505 [275;747] cGy*cm². One pericardial tamponade (0.7%), one transient ST-elevation (0.7%) and three groin complications (2.2%) occurred. 1-year follow-up showed freedom of arrhythmia in 90% in patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 47) and 60% in patients with persistent AF (n = 82, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

PFA-based PVI is acutely highly effective and associated with a beneficial safety and low recurrence rate.

Percutaneous Treatment Approaches in Atrial Fibrillation: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice, represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with an increasing prevalence. Pharmacologic treatment remains the cornerstone of its management through rhythm and rate control, as well as the prevention of thromboembolism with the use of oral anticoagulants. Recent progress in percutaneous interventional approaches have provided additional options in the therapeutic arsenal, however. The use of the different catheter ablation techniques can now lead to long arrhythmia-free intervals and significantly lower AF burden, thus reducing the rate of its complications. Particularly encouraging evidence is now available for patients with persistent AF or concomitant heart failure, situations in which catheter ablation could even be a first-line option. In the field of stroke prevention, targeting the left atrial appendage with percutaneous device implantation may reduce the risk of thromboembolism to lower rates than that predicted with conventional ischemic risk scores. Left atrial appendage occlusion through the approved Watchman or Amplatzer devices is a well-established, efficacious, and safe method, especially in high-ischemic and bleeding risk patients with contraindications for oral anticoagulation.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different catheter ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIMS

Whereas pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the universally agreed target in catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), an ideal ablation set in persistent AF remains questioned. Aim of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing different ablation strategies in persistent AF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Network meta-analysis was performed in a frequentist framework with the different ablation strategies constituting the competitive arms of interest. Primary efficacy endpoint was recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, and/or organized atrial tachycardia). Secondary endpoints included major peri-procedural complications, procedure, and fluoroscopy duration. PubMED/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through June 2020. 2548 records were screened and 57 full-text articles assessed. Eventually 24 RCTs were included, encompassing 3245 patients (median follow-up 15 months, IQR 12-18). Compared to PVI alone, PVI plus linear lesions in the left atrium and elimination of extra-PV sources was the only strategy associated with a reduced risk of arrhythmia recurrence (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.27-0.88). Most treatment arms were associated with longer procedural time compared with PVI; however, major peri-procedural complications and fluoroscopy time did not differ.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive strategy including PVI, linear lesions in the left atrium, and elimination of extra-PV sources (constrained by a heterogeneous definition across studies) was associated with reduced risk of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to PVI alone. All investigated treatment arms yielded similar safety profiles. Further research should rely on enhanced substrate-based approach definitions to solve one of the most evident knowledge gaps in interventional electrophysiology.

Higher serum sST2 is associated with increased left atrial low-voltage areas and atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a comprehensive analysis of prospectively measuring the concentration of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) to predict left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 84 patients, including 54 paroxysmal AF cases and 30 persistent AF cases who underwent RFA, were recruited. Electroanatomical voltage mapping determined the extent of LVAs. The serum level of sST2 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All patients were followed for 12 months after the RFA procedure to verify AF recurrence.

RESULTS

The concentration of sST2 measured in the sample was 17.90-198.77 pg/mL, and the range of LA LVAs was 0-85.6%. The sST2 level positively correlated with LVAs (r = 0.40; P = 0.005). When comparing the top and bottom quartile, sST2 is significantly associated with LA LVAs (OR = 1.833, 95% CI: 1.582-2.011, P = 0.004). When compared with the 1st quartile group, the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for AF recurrence after RFA were 1.57 (95% CI: 1.182-1.795) for the 4th quartile group, 1.44 (95% CI: 1.085-1.598) for the 3rd quartile group, and 1.27 (95% CI: 0.954-1.318) for the 2nd quartile group. The AF-free survival rates of patients with 1st quartile and 4th quartile sST2 levels after ablation were 95% and 59.6%, respectively (Log Rank test, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Elevated sST2 levels of AF patients were associated with higher LA LVAs and a significantly increased risk of recurrence. The circulating sST2 concentration might be a pre-diagnostic marker of AF recurrence after RFA.

Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Catheter placement and stability are well-known challenges in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. As a result, steerable sheaths (SS) were developed to improve catheter stabilization and maintain proper catheter-tissue contact. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to see if employing a SS influences procedure outcome.

Method

We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SS compared to nonsteerable sheaths (NSS) in AF ablation. The primary outcome was the rate of atrial arrhythmia (AA) freedom by the time of the last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the procedure-related complications and procedural characteristics. Risk ratio (RR) or the mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

A total of 10 studies, including 967 AF patients (mean age: 59.2 ± 11.1 years, 516 patients managed with SS vs. 454 with NSS), were included. SS group showed a higher rate of freedom of AA compared to NSS (RR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.29; p < .001). Both techniques had similar rate for procedural-related complication (RR: 1.09, 95% CI 0.50-2.39; p = .83). The SS strategy had a shorter procedure time (MD -10.6 [min], 95% CI -20.97, -0.20; p = .05) but comparable fluoroscopic and radiofrequency application times to the NSS group.

Conclusions

The SS for AF catheter ablation not only reduced the total procedure time but also significantly increased the rate of successful ablation while maintaining a similar safety profile when compared to the traditional NSS.

Comparing the efficacy of catheter ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation has been recommended as the first-line treatment option for selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, a widely accepted ablation strategy for persistent AF (perAF) has not yet been established. The benefits of ablation strategies are not conclusive for perAF. There is an urgent need to systematically analyze the results of previous studies and rank these treatment strategies to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ablation for perAF were included. The primary outcome was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) after a single ablation procedure. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis model was fitted.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included in the analysis. A total of 3394 patients and 22 ablation strategies were found in the involved studies. The ablation strategy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) + electrical box isolation of the left atrial posterior wall (PBOX) + non-PV trigger ablation (NPV) showed the best treatment effect in terms of the primary outcome. The individualized ablation strategies of mapping and ablation combined with PVI, such as PVI + rotors, PVI + dispersion areas, and PVI + low voltage zone (LVZ) also showed a better ablation effect in perAF.

CONCLUSIONS

PVI ablation is a widely used strategy in perAF and is recognized as a cornerstone procedure for perAF. The PVI + PBOX + NPV strategy showed the highest rank in our analysis. Mapping and ablation strategies that could provide individualized substrate modification also showed a better rank in our analysis and are believed to be a promising direction for the treatment of perAF.