Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions

Chronic Kidney Disease and Risk of Mortality and Major Adverse Limb Events After Femoral Artery Endovascular Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease: The Boston Femoral Artery Endovascular Revascularization Outcomes (Boston FAROUT) Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse outcomes in peripheral artery disease (PAD). The impact of the severity of CKD on mortality and major adverse limb events (MALE) after endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is unknown.

AIMS

To assess the relationship of increasing severity of CKD on the risk of mortality and MALE in patients after endovascular revascularization of the SFA.

METHODS

We followed a cohort of 202 patients (253 limbs) with SFA endovascular revascularization for claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia in two academic centers between 2003 and 2011. Patients were categorized into four Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) categories of increasingly worse CKD based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, noncardiovascular death, and MALE. The relationship between CKD severity and outcomes was assessed by hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) from cause-specific multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Fine-Gray competing risks analyses.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 9.3 years, there was a graded and increasing risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality with worse eGFR (all tests of trend p < 0.001). The lowest eGFR category (< 45 mL/min/1.73 m²) was associated with the highest risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 5.0, 95% CI = 2.4, 10), cardiovascular mortality (HR = 5.8, 95% CI = 1.8, 18), and noncardiovascular mortality (HR = 4.5, 95% CI = 1.9, 11). There was no significant association between CKD severity and MALE or minor revascularization events.

CONCLUSION

The risk of mortality risk after SFA endovascular revascularization incrementally increases with decreasing renal function. However, impaired renal function is not related to the risk of adverse limb events and supports femoral revascularization in these patients.

Plaque morphological changes after drug-coated balloon angioplasty according to underlying plaque components

A 52-year-old man with a short chronic total occlusion in the left superficial femoral artery underwent drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Evaluation using integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound revealed that the plaque volume of fibrosis was compressed just after treatment (from 494.67 mm3 to 398.36 mm3) and was further decreased at 1 month after treatment (to 362.07 mm3). The plaque volume of the lipid pool was not changed at follow-up compared with that just after DCB dilation. These integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound findings suggest that the effect of DCB angioplasty may differ depending on the type of underlying plaque components.

Development of a clinical and ultrasonic parameter-based nomogram model to predict restenosis after superficial femoral artery stenting

OBJECTIVES

Prediction of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is clinically important for patients with peripheral artery disease in their superficial femoral arteries (SFA) who have been treated with stenting. The aim of this study was to construct and validate a predictive model for ISR after SFA stenting based on a series of clinical and ultrasonic parameters.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 381 patients who were treated with self-expanding bare nitinol stents in their SFA at our hospital between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2022. These patients were randomly allocated to a training cohort (266 patients) or a validation cohort (115). Clinical and ultrasonic parameters related to ISR (>50%) in the SFA at 12 months were derived by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to create a nomogram model predictive of risk of ISR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to assess the recognition ability of the model. A calibration curve was used to evaluate the model's calibration ability, and decision curve analysis was used to validate the nomogram's clinical utility.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analyses showed that sex, echogenicity of the target plaque, preoperative arterial runoff score, preoperative popliteal artery flow rate, lesion length, and residual diameter were risk factors for ISR; these parameters were used to construct the nomogram model. Internal and external validation showed that the areas under the ROC curves were 0.82 (95%CI: 0.77-0.87) and 0.70 (95%CI: 0.60-0.79), respectively, suggesting good recognition ability of the model. Additionally, calibration curves for the predictive model indicated good calibration, and decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical utility of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel nomogram that predicts ISR after SFA stenting demonstrated excellent discriminatory power, calibration capacity, and clinical usefulness.

Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions

PURPOSE

Previous studies have indicated mixed short-term outcomes between drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. However, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to present the long-term outcomes of DCB angioplasty for infrapopliteal lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AcoArt II-BTK Trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial that enrolled 120 patients with CLI. The patients were randomized 1:1 to DCB angioplasty or PTA. Assessments over 5 years included freedom from all-cause death, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and occurrence of major amputation. Additional endpoints included the rate of composite major adverse events.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, patients treated with DCB angioplasty demonstrated a higher rate of freedom from all-cause death than patients treated with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate 74.6% vs 57.2%; log-rank p=0.04). The major amputation rate was 5.2% for DCB angioplasty compared with 1.8% for PTA (log-rank p=0.347). Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 70.5% and 53.7%, respectively (log-rank p=0.058). The rate of composite major adverse events was 34.5% for DCB angioplasty and 56.1% for PTA (log-rank p=0.013), and this statistically significant difference persisted throughout the 5-year follow-up period. Conclusion:Infrapopliteal artery revascularization in patients with CLI using Litos/Tulip DCB angioplasty showed superior 5-year overall survival compared with PTA. The DCB angioplasty group had a consistently lower rate of major adverse events within 5 years of follow-up.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The use of DCB in infrapopliteal arterial lesions has been controversial regarding both early and mid-term outcomes, with limited data on long-term results. However, this article demonstrates that the Litos/Tulip DCB exhibits favorable long-term outcomes in infrapopliteal artery lesions. These positive findings provide robust evidence supporting the use of DCB in treating infrapopliteal artery disease.

Quantifying patients' preferences on tradeoffs between mortality risk and reduced need for target vessel revascularization for claudication

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a warning that symptomatic relief from claudication using paclitaxel-coated devices might be associated with an increase in mortality over 5 years. We designed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to quantify tradeoffs that patients would accept between a decreased risk of clinically driven target-vessel revascularization (CDTVR) and increased mortality risk.

METHODS

Patients with claudication symptoms were recruited from seven medical centers to complete a web-based survey including eight DCE questions that presented pairs of hypothetical device profiles defined by varying risks of CDTVR and overall mortality at 2 and 5 years. Random-parameters logit models were used to estimate relative preference weights, from which the maximum-acceptable increase in 5-year mortality risk was derived.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients completed the survey. On average, patients would accept a device offering reductions in CDTVR risks from 30% to 10% at 2 years and from 40% to 30% at 5 years if the 5-year mortality risk was less than 12.6% (95% CI: 11.8-13.4%), representing a cut-point of 4.6 percentage points above a baseline risk of 8%. However, approximately 40% chose the device alternative with the lower 5-year mortality risk in seven (20.6%) or eight (18.0%) of the eight DCE questions regardless of the benefit offered.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in the study would accept some incremental increase in 5-year mortality risk to reduce the 2-year and 5-year risks of CDTVR by 20 and 10 percentage points, respectively. However, significant patient-level variability in risk tolerance underscores the need for systematic approaches to support benefit-risk decision making.

Management and Pharmacological Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a complex, heterogeneous condition that has become a leading health concern globally. Peripheral arterial disease often co-exists with other vascular disease states, including cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. Optimal therapy for managing symptoms and progression of disease employs non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and contemporary revascularisation techniques to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life. However, large well-designed randomised control trials (RCT) and corresponding evidence-based guidelines for management of PAD are lacking, with current practice standards often extrapolated from evidence in coronary artery disease. Purpose: This review article aims to discuss currently accepted best pharmacological practice for PAD. Method: Relevant articles were searched between May 2023 and January 2024 through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and international guidelines, focusing on pharmacological management for PAD. Results: This narrative review discusses holistic pharmacological treatments for PAD.

Results of SurVeil Versus IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in Femoropopliteal Arteries: 24 Month Outcomes of the Randomised TRANSCEND Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the TRANSCEND study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the next generation SurVeil PCB with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB in patients with femoropopliteal arterial disease. SurVeil is a lower dose PCB (2.0 μg/mm2vs. 3.5 μg/mm2 for IN.PACT Admiral) with a uniform microcrystalline coating intending to enhance durability and maximise drug delivery.

METHODS

TRANSCEND is a prospective, single blind, randomised controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical study. Patients with femoropopliteal artery disease in Rutherford stages 2 - 4 were randomised 1:1 to the SurVeil or the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. A sample size of 446 patients was calculated to prove non-inferiority of the SurVeil compared with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB for primary safety and efficacy endpoints at twelve months. Primary safety was defined as a composite of freedom from device and procedure related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven (CD) target vessel revascularisation at twelve months. Primary efficacy was defined as primary patency at twelve months as a composite of freedom from binary re-stenosis and freedom from CD target lesion revascularisation. Secondary outcomes were reported up to twenty four months.

RESULTS

A total of 446 subjects were randomised, 222 to the SurVeil and 224 to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. Primary safety was 91.8% for the SurVeil vs. 89.8% for the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (pnon-inferiority < .001), and primary efficacy was 82.2% vs. 85.9% (pnon-inferiority = .003). Primary patency through twenty four months was 65.4% with the SurVeil and 66.9% with the IN.PACT Admiral PCB (pnon-inferiority = .005).

CONCLUSION

The next generation low dose SurVeil PCB demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy up to twenty four months and was non-inferior to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB. (ClinicalTrials registration ID: NCT03241459).

Long-Term Adverse Limb Events After Femoral Artery Endovascular Revascularization: The Boston FAROUT Study

Background

: Patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics may impact the long-term risks of adverse limb outcomes differently after successful endovascular revascularization for lower extremity peripheral artery disease. The study objective was to assess the relationships of patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics to the subsequent risk of major and minor adverse limb events over the decade after successful endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) or lifestyle-limiting claudication.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent endovascular revascularization between 2003-2011 were followed for a median of 9.3 (IQR, 6.8-11.1) years. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI from Cox proportional hazards models assessed the risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) (major amputation, bypass, or thrombolysis) or minor revascularization, MALE alone, and minor revascularization alone.

Results

There were 232 index limb revascularizations in 185 patients. Longer lesion length was associated with a higher risk of MALE or minor revascularization (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.22-3.60) and minor revascularization alone (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.39-4.61). Current smoking was linked with minor revascularization (HR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.54-9.56). CLTI was associated with MALE or minor revascularization (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.09-3.29), and MALE alone (HR, 7.43; 95% CI, 3.11-17.79). Black race/ethnicity (HR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.51-14.9) and low-density lipoprotein >100 mg/dL (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.20-6.35) were linked to MALE alone.

Conclusions

Factors related to MALE differed from those related to minor revascularization. Lesion length and smoking were linked to minor revascularization, whereas CLTI, Black race/ethnicity, and elevated low-density lipoprotein were linked to MALE.

Mortality, Safety, and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Containing Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials since 2018

PURPOSE

To provide an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and effectiveness outcomes with paclitaxel-containing devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating paclitaxel-containing balloons or stents in the treatment of femoropopliteal disease was performed. Pooled risk ratio (RR) was calculated using the inverse-variance, random-effects model in the assessment of primary patency, all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and thrombosis.

RESULTS

In total, 19 RCTs were included comprising 4,284 participants. All-cause mortality rates did not differ significantly between the 2 arms at 12 months (RR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.72; P = .80), 24 months (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.56-1.50; P = .73), 36 months (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.65-2.25; P = .55), or 48-60 months (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.39; P = .81) after intervention. Primary patency was significantly higher at 12 months in the paclitaxel-containing arm: 80.92% (1,438/1,777) versus 57.48% (607/1,056) in the control arm (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.30-1.59; P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation, or thrombosis with paclitaxel drug-eluting therapy to the femoropopliteal region. Additionally, improved and durable patency rates with a statistically significantly lower risk of clinically driven TLR with paclitaxel drug-eluting therapy have been demonstrated.

Drug-eluting devices for lower limb peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease is the third leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity after coronary artery disease and stroke. Lower limb peripheral arterial disease commonly involves infrainguinal arteries, may impair walking ability (intermittent claudication) and may confer a significant risk of limb loss (chronic limb-threatening ischaemia), depending on the severity of ischaemia. Endovascular treatment has become the mainstay revascularisation option in both the femoropopliteal and the below-the-knee arterial segments. After crossing and preparing the lesion, treatment results in these arterial segments can be enhanced by using drug-coated devices (drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons) that mitigate the occurrence of restenosis. As for other medical devices, the use of drug-eluting devices is based on their demonstrated safety and efficacy profiles when applied in the distinct segments of the lower limb vasculature. In this state-of-the-art narrative review we provide an overview of the safety and efficacy of drug-coated devices when used in the femoropopliteal and below-the-knee arterial segments.

Stellarex Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease: Five-Year Results from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to report the 5-year outcomes from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal randomized controlled trial of the lower dose (2 µg/mm2) Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Philips, formerly Spectranetics Corp, Colorado Springs, Colorado) compared with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Long-term safety and effectiveness data for DCBs remains limited. The ILLUMENATE Pivotal was a prospective, randomized, multi-center, single-blinded study. Patients (Rutherford Clinical Category 2 to 4) were randomized 2:1 to Stellarex DCB or PTA. Follow-up was through 60 months. In total, 300 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.8 ± 10.2 years. At 60 months, freedom from a primary safety event was 69.2% in the Stellarex DCB arm and 68.2% in the PTA arm (log-rank, p = 0.623). The cumulative rate of major adverse events was 41.0% compared with 44.6% (p = 0.597), respectively. Freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was 70.3% in the Stellarex DCB arm compared with 68.2% in the PTA arm (p = 0.505). Time to first CD-TLR was 768.3 ± 478.9 days compared with 613.5 ± 453.4 days, respectively (p = 0.161). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from all-cause mortality were 80.1% in the Stellarex DCB arm and 80.2% in the PTA arm (log-rank, p = 0.980). In conclusion, the 5-year results of the ILLUMENATE Pivotal randomized controlled trial add to the consistent safety data from the broader ILLUMENATE clinical program. These are the first data to report the 5-year safety and efficacy of a lower dose (2 µg/mm2) DCB for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Clinicaltrials.gov Registration:NCT01858428.

One-year Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: BEASTARS Study Results

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have shown comparable outcomes between drug-eluting stents (DESs) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treating femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions; however, DCB outcomes include approximately 10% to 50% bailout stents. Therefore, comparing DESs and DCBs is not simple. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of DESs and DCBs in patients with symptomatic FPA disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the registries of 7 institutions, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1356 patients who underwent endovascular therapy for FPA with DESs (n=333; Eluvia, 74.0%; Zilver PTX stent, 26.0%) or DCBs without bailout stents (n=1023; IN.PACT, 67.6%; Lutonix, 32.4%). The primary outcome was the 1-year primary patency comparison between DESs and DCBs, using propensity score matching. The severity of the dissection pattern after predilatation (none or grades A-C) was included as an explanatory variable for matching. Patients with grade D dissections were excluded from the main analysis and assessed independently.

RESULTS

After matching, the 1-year primary patency between DESs and DCBs was similar (88.8% vs 85.2%, p=0.31). By contrast, perioperative complications were frequent with DES, compared with DCB (5.1% vs 2.2%, p=0.005), and the intravascular ultrasound-evaluated minimum luminal area was significantly larger with DES than with DCB (19 mm2 vs 14 mm2, p<0.001). In the supplemental analysis of lesions with grade D dissection, the 1-year primary patency was significantly higher with DES than with DCB (86.1% vs 55.1%, p=0.014).

CONCLUSION

In FPA lesions without severe dissection (ie, no dissection or grade A-C dissection), DESs and DCBs showed comparable 1-year primary patency in matched populations. However, DCBs did not perform well with severe dissection (ie, grade D or more).

CLINICAL IMPACT

The results of this study clearly define the appropriate boundaries for the "leaving nothing behind" strategy. Clinicians can now more clearly differentiate between the use of DES and DCB, based on the results of lesion preparation. Further prospective investigations with well-designed trials and larger populations are necessary to confirm these findings.

Device regulation and surveillance in vascular care: Challenges and opportunities

Cardiovascular devices are essential for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including cerebrovascular, coronary, valvular, congenital, peripheral vascular and arrhythmic diseases. The regulation and surveillance of vascular devices in real-world practice, however, presents challenges during each individual product's life cycle. Four examples illustrate recent challenges and questions regarding safety, appropriate use and efficacy arising from FDA approved devices used in real-world practice. We outline potential pathways wherein providers, regulators and payors could potentially provide high-quality cardiovascular care, identify safety signals, ensure equitable device access, and study potential issues with devices in real-world practice.

Predicting residual pressure gradients after balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions

In endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) lesions, studies examining the relationship between lesion morphology and hemodynamic status are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate FPA lesion characteristics, including imaging findings and their cutoff values that can predict hemodynamic significance after balloon angioplasty. This single-center retrospective study enrolled 50 de novo FPA lesions from 43 patients treated under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) usage between June 2022 and March 2023. As a physiological parameter, the pressure gradient was measured, and the cutoff value of the residual pressure gradient (RPG) was defined as a systolic pressure > 10 mmHg through the lesions after balloon angioplasty. The pressure gradients were measured using a 0.014-inch wire-guided, rapid exchange-type microcatheter, Navvus II (Acist, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA). Predictive risk factors for RPG were analyzed using the random forest (RF) method. The relationship between the variables, RPG, and the cutoff points of each predictor was assessed using the partial dependence plot (PDP) method. RPG was observed in 20% of the lesions after balloon angioplasty. The RF model revealed that the percent diameter stenosis (%DS) and minimum lumen area (MLA) on IVUS assessment were strong predictive factors for RPG after balloon angioplasty. The PDP model revealed that a higher %DS (cutoff 30%) and smaller MLA (cutoff 10 mm2) could predict RPG after balloon angioplasty. Conventional lesion parameters such as %DS and MLA can predict hemodynamic significance during EVT for FPA lesions.

Comparative effectiveness of endovascular treatment modalities for de novo femoropopliteal lesions at long-term follow-up: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the best endovascular treatment for de novo femoropopliteal lesions at long-term follow-up through network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Medical databases were searched on September 17, 2023. 17 trials and 7 treatments were selected. Outcomes were primary patency, target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation and all-cause mortality at 3 and/or 5 years.

RESULTS

Regarding 3-year primary patency, drug-eluting stents (DES) was the best and better than balloon angioplasty (BA; odds ratio [OR], 4.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.68-9.18), bare metal stents (BMS; OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.45-5.46), cryoplasty (OR, 6.75; 95% CI, 2.76-16.50), covered stents (CS; OR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.19-8.87) and drug-coated balloons (DCB; OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.14-3.63). Regarding 5-year primary patency, DES was the best and better than BMS (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.10-4.99). Regarding 3-year TLR, DES was the best and better than BA (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.44). Regarding 5-year TLR, DES was the best and better than BA (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09-0.42) and balloon angioplasty with brachytherapy (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74). Regarding 3- and 5-year major amputation, DCB was the best. Regarding 3-year mortality, DES was the best and better than CS (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

DES was the best treatment regarding 3-year primary patency, TLR and mortality, and DCB was the best regarding major amputation. DES was the best treatment regarding 5-year TLR, and DCB was the best regarding primary patency and major amputation. DES and DCB should be given priority in treating femoropopliteal lesions.

Randomized Trial Comparing a Stent-Avoiding With a Stent-Preferred Strategy in Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

Limited comparative data exist on different interventional strategies for endovascular revascularization of complex femoropopliteal interventions.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors aimed to compare a stent-avoiding (SA) vs a stent-preferred (SP) strategy, promoting optimal lesion preparation and the use of drug-eluting technologies in both arms.

METHODS

Within a prospective, multicenter, pilot study, 120 patients with symptomatic complex femoropopliteal lesions (Rutherford classification 2-4, mean lesion length 187.7 ± 78.3 mm, 79.2% total occlusions) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to endovascular treatment with either paclitaxel-coated balloons or polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting stents. Lesion preparation including the use of devices for plaque modification and/or removal was at the operators' discretion in both treatment arms.

RESULTS

In the SA group, lesion preparation was more frequently performed (71.7% SA [43/60] vs 51.7% [31/60] SP; P = 0.038) with a high provisional stenting rate (48.3% [29/60]). At the 12-month follow-up, primary patency was 78.2% (43/55) in the SA group and 78.6% (44/56) in the SP group (P = 1.0; relative risk: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.818-1.210). Freedom from major adverse events was determined in 93.1% (54/58) in the SA group and in 94.9% (56/59) in the SP group (P = 0.717; relative risk: 0.981; 95% CI: 0.895-1.075), with all adverse events attributable to clinically driven target lesion revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Both endovascular strategies promoting lesion preparation before the use of drug-eluting devices suggest promising efficacy and safety results in complex femoropopliteal procedures with a high proportion of total occlusions through 12 months. Ongoing follow-up will show whether different results emerge over time. (Best Endovascular Strategy for Complex Lesions of the Superficial Femoral Artery [BEST-SFA]; NCT03776799).

A registry-based study of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of the femoral-popliteal artery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report the results of a prospective, single-arm, registry-based study assessing the safety and performance of a paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) in a United States population.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, single-arm, post-market registry of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB for the treatment of ISR lesions in the SFA or popliteal artery at 43 sites within the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Registry from December 2016 to January 2020. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, target vessel revascularization, major limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. Results are presented as survival probabilities based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 300) were 58% male, with a mean age of 68 ± 10 years. Diabetes was present in 56%, 80% presented with claudication, and 20% with rest pain. Lesions included ISR of the SFA in 68%, SFA-popliteal in 26%, and popliteal arteries in 7%. The mean lesion length was 17.8 ± 11.8 cm. Lesions were categorized as occlusions in 43% (mean occluded length, 16 ± 10 cm). TASC type was A (17%), B (29%), C (38%), and D (15%). Technical success was 99%. Re-stenting was performed in 5% and thrombolysis in 0.6% of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from target lesion revascularization were 90%, 72%, and 62% at 12, 24, and 36 months. Freedom from target vessel revascularization was 88%, 68%, and 59% and freedom from major target limb amputation was 99.6%, 98.9%, and 98.9%, respectively, at 12, 24, and 36 months. Survival was 95%, 89%, and 85% at 12, 24, and 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This post-market registry-based study shows promising results in treating femoral-popliteal ISR with paclitaxel DCB in comparison to the results of plain balloon angioplasty reported in the literature. These results demonstrate the ability of the SVS VQI to conduct post-market evaluation of peripheral devices in partnership with industry and federal regulators.

Repeat drug-coated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions: 12-month results from a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of restenosis after drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment remain unclear. We compared the clinical outcomes between DCB angioplasty for restenosis and de novo femoropopliteal artery lesions. This single-center retrospective study included 571 patients (737 limbs) who underwent either repeat (54 patients, 64 limbs) or de novo DCB (517 patients, 673 limbs) without bailout stenting. After propensity score matching, 49 matched pairs were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the 1-year primary patency, with secondary endpoints including the freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse limb events (MALE), and early restenosis. Predictors of restenosis were identified using multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The repeat-DCB group displayed significantly lower rates of 1-year primary patency and freedom from TLR compared to those of the de novo-DCB group (50.1% vs. 77.4%, p = 0.029 and 54.9% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.0.44, respectively). No significant differences were observed in early restenosis or MALE (10.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.455 and 48.3% vs. 73.4%, p = 0.055, respectively). Restenosis after DCB angioplasty was associated with repeat DCB (hazard ratio [HR], 5.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-18.4; p = 0.012) and small vessel size of < 4.5 mm (HR, 6.25; 95% CI, 1.17-33.4; p = 0.032). Furthermore, restenosis after repeat DCB angioplasty was associated with the Peripheral Artery Calcification Scoring System (PACSS) grade 4 (HR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.08-16.3; p = 0.038), small vessel size of < 4.5 mm (HR, 9.44; 95% CI, 1.21-73.7; p = 0.032), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) use (HR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.44; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-year primary patency rate following repeat DCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions was notably lower than that of DCB treatment for de novo lesions. Repeat DCB strategy was associated with an increased risk of patency loss. Regarding repeat restenosis after DCB treatments, PACSS grade 4 calcification and small vessel diameter of < 4.5 mm were associated with an increased risk of restenosis, whereas IVUS use correlated with a decreased risk of restenosis.

Long-Term Follow-up and Mortality Rate of Patients of the Randomized Freeway Stent Study

PURPOSE

This follow-up study was designed as a reopen of the completed Freeway Stent Study and collected mortality and clinical outcome data for at least 5 years after enrollment to evaluate long-term patient safety and treatment efficacy. The primary study enrolled 204 patients with stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Patients were randomized to primary nitinol stenting followed by standard PTA or primary nitinol stenting followed by FREEWAY™ paclitaxel-eluting balloon PTA.

METHODS

Previous patients were recontacted by phone or during a routine hospital visit, and medical records were reviewed. Vital and clinical status information was collected.

RESULTS

No increased late mortality was observed at 5 years, with an all-cause mortality rate of 12.0% in the FREEWAY drug-eluting balloon group versus 15.0% in the non-paclitaxel PTA group. No accumulation of any cause of death was observed in either group, nor was there any correlation with the dose of paclitaxel used. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 5 years was significantly higher in the FREEWAY drug eluting balloon group (85.3%) compared to standard PTA group (72.7%) Log-rank p = 0.032.

CONCLUSION

The safety results presented support the recent conclusions that the use of paclitaxel technology does not lead to an increase in mortality. At the same time, the efficacy results clearly demonstrate that the potential benefits of drug-eluting balloon treatment are maintained over a 5-year period.

Five-Year Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons Alone or With Provisional Bare Metal Stenting for Real-World Femoropopliteal Lesions: IN.PACT Global Study Subgroup Analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of complex infra-inguinal disease with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is associated with a significant number of patients undergoing provisional stenting to treat a suboptimal result. To determine the potential long-term impact of DCB treatment with provisional bare metal stenting in complex lesions in real-world patients, a post hoc analysis was performed on data from the IN.PACT Global Study (The IN.PACT Global Clinical Study for the Treatment of Comprehensive Superficial Femoral and/or Popliteal Artery Lesions Using the IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Eluting Balloon). Five-year outcomes were compared between participants who were stented after DCB treatment versus those treated with DCB alone.

METHODS

The IN.PACT Global Study enrolled 1535 participants with intermittent claudication and/or ischemic rest pain caused by femoropopliteal lesions; 1397 patients were included in this subgroup analysis (353 stented and 1044 nonstented). Effectiveness was assessed as freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 60 months. The primary safety composite end point was defined as freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically driven target vessel revascularization through 60 months.

RESULTS

Lesions in the stented group were longer (15.37 versus 10.98 cm; P<0.001) and had more total occlusions (54.7% versus 28.6%; P<0.001) compared with the nonstented group. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was similar between groups (66.8% stented versus 70.0% nonstented group, log-rank P=0.22). The safety composite end point was achieved in 64.5% stented versus 68.2% nonstented participants (log-rank P=0.19) as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. No significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of major adverse events (49.1% stented versus 45.0% nonstented; log-rank P=0.17), including all-cause death (19.6% stented versus 19.3% nonstented, log-rank P=0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, revascularization of complex femoropopliteal artery lesions with DCB angioplasty alone or DCB followed by provisional bare metal stenting in certain lesions achieved comparable long-term safety and clinical effectiveness.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01609296.

Impact of a Less Than 50% Residual Stenosis Following Vessel Preparation in Femoropopliteal Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

PURPOSE

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been established as first-line therapy in femoropopliteal (FP) intervention, and successful vessel preparation (VP) is considered a key element. However, the clinical impact of successful VP remains unknown. This retrospective study examined the clinical impact of successful VP in DCB FP intervention.

METHODS

In total, 268 patients (308 limbs) who underwent successful FP intervention using DCB without atherectomy devices for symptomatic lower extremity artery disease between March 2018 and December 2019 were included in this study (high-dose DCB: 69.8%; low-dose DCB: 30.2%). Successful VP was defined as <50% residual stenosis and

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 2.1 (interquartile range=1.1-2.7) years. Successful VP was achieved in 163 patients (60.8%). Primary patency and freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were significantly higher in the successful VP group than in the nonsuccessful VP group (54.2% vs 33.0%, p<0.001; 69.9% vs 57.7%, p=0.047). In the successful VP group, high-dose DCB and low-dose DCB were comparable in primary patency and freedom from CD-TLR (53.2% vs 53.6%, p=0.48; 68.7% vs 70.9%, p=0.69). In nonsuccessful VP group, high-dose DCB demonstrated numerically higher primary patency but not statistically significant than low-dose DCB (44.5% vs 16.0%, p=0.06), whereas no significant difference in freedom from CD-TLR was observed (56.0% vs 58.9%, p=0.29). On multivariate analysis, successful VP and preballoon size to reference vessel diameter ratio were significantly associated with primary patency.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving successful VP before DCB was independently associated with primary patency in DCB FP intervention.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study revealed that the successful vessel preparation (VP) before DCB and preballoonsize to reference vessel diameter ratio were independently associated with primary patency in DCB femoropopliteal intervention. When successful VP was achieved only before DCB treatment, the clinical outcomes were comparable between high-dose DCB and low-dose DCB at midterm follow-up.To maximized DCB efficacy, successful VP is very important in daily clinical practice.

Collapse

Key Words

• drug-coated balloon
• peripheral artery disease
• vessel preparation

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Yusuke Tomoi Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Yoshimitsu Soga Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Kazuaki Imada Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Nobuaki Sakai Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Tomonori Katsuki Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
Kenji Ando Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan

Collapse

Effect of High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon Repetition After Drug-Coated Balloon Failure

PURPOSE

Although the optimal treatment for femoropopliteal (FP) drug-coated balloon (DCB) restenosis lesions remains debatable, the effectiveness of DCB repetition for DCB restenosis has been reported. However, the optimal DCB repetition strategy is not yet established. Thus, this study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of high-dose DCB repetition with those of low-dose DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center, observational study used a clinical database of 677 consecutive patients undergoing FP endovascular intervention for symptomatic peripheral artery disease between December 2018 and December 2021. Of these patients, 89 cases treated with DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions were analyzed. The primary endpoint was recurrent restenosis (re-restenosis) and the secondary endpoints were recurrent target-lesion revascularization (TLR), re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events (MALE) obtained using propensity score matching. Interaction analysis was also performed to explore the effects of the baseline characteristics on the association between high- and low-dose DCB with restenosis risk.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, high-dose DCB demonstrated a significantly higher freedom from re-restenosis compared with low-dose DCB repetition at 1 year (90.4% vs 40.9%, p=0.034). In addition, freedom from re-TLR and MALE at 1 year was significantly higher in the high-dose DCB group (95.0% vs 53.3%, p=0.025; 95.0% vs 54.7%, p=0.025, respectively). Conversely, freedom rates from re-occlusion were not significantly different between the 2 groups (100.0% vs 84.0%, p=0.99). No baseline characteristics or perioperative outcomes had any significant interaction effect on the association of high-dose DCB versus low-dose DCB with restenosis risk.

CONCLUSION

For FP DCB restenosis lesions, high-dose DCB repetition offered more favorable outcomes than low-dose DCB repetition.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study revealed that for femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon (DCB) restenosis lesions, high-dose DCB repetition obtained more favorable outcomes than low-dose DCB repetition. In addition, there was no significant interaction effect on the association of high- versus low-dose DCB with re-restenosis risk for the baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. This finding might be also a reason for choosing high-dose DCB repetition for FP DCB restenosis lesions in daily clinical practice.

Mortality in randomised controlled trials using paclitaxel-coated devices for femoropopliteal interventional procedures: an updated patient-level meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous randomised clinical trials and real-world studies have supported the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices for the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. However, a 2018 summary-level meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-coated devices compared with uncoated control devices. This study presents an updated analysis of deaths using the most complete and current data available from pivotal trials of paclitaxel-coated versus control devices.

METHODS

Ten trials comparing paclitaxel-coated versus control devices were included in a patient-level pooled analysis. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of paclitaxel exposure on risk of death in both intention-to-treat (ITT; primary analysis) and three as-treated analysis sets accounting for treatment group crossover at the index procedure and over time. The effect of paclitaxel dose and baseline covariates were also evaluated.

FINDINGS

A total of 2666 participants were included with a median follow-up of 4·9 years. No significant increase in deaths was observed for patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices. This was true in the ITT analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 0·93-1·40), the as-treated analysis (HR 1·13, 95% CI 0·92-1·39), and in two crossover analyses: 1·07 (0·87-1·31) when late crossovers were censored and 1·04 (0·84-1·28) when crossovers were analysed from the date of paclitaxel exposure. There was no significant effect of paclitaxel dose on mortality risk.

INTERPRETATION

This meta-analysis found no association between paclitaxel-coated device exposure and risk of death, providing reassurance to patients, physicians, and regulators on the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices.

FUNDING

Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Philips, Surmodics, and TriReme Medical.

Low-Dose vs High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon for Symptomatic Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The PROSPECT MONSTER Study Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have shown comparable outcomes between second-generation low-dose drug-coated balloons (LD-DCBs) and first-generation high-dose drug-coated balloons (HD-DCBs); but the trial patients had low clinical complexity, and there were no comparisons in medically complex populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between an LD-DCB (Ranger; 2.0 μg/mm2) and an HD-DCB (IN.PACT; 3.5 μg/mm2) in patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease.

METHODS

PROSPECT MONSTER (Prospective Comparison of Second-Generation Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon With High-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon) was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized trial that prospectively collected data from 581 patients who underwent endovascular therapy with the LD-DCB (n = 370) or the HD-DCB (n = 211) for symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease (Rutherford classes 2-5). The primary outcome was the 1-year primary patency of the LD-DCB in comparison with that of the HD-DCB, as evaluated using propensity score matching. The incidence of impaired flow after drug-coated balloon application was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching extracted 163 pairs (358 and 163 patients in the LD-DCB and HD-DCB groups, respectively), with no significant intergroup difference in baseline characteristics. The 1-year primary patency rates in the matched population were similar between the LD-DCB and HD-DCB groups (87.0% [95% CI: 82.5%-91.7%] vs 81.3% [95% CI: 74.8%-88.5%]; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.55-1.59; P = 0.79), as was the incidence of impaired flow (13.6% vs 9.8%; OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.78-2.73; P = 0.24). No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effects on the association of the LD-DCB vs the HD-DCB and 1-year restenosis risk.

CONCLUSIONS

LD-DCBs demonstrate efficacy and safety comparable with HD-DCBs in patients with complex clinical backgrounds, suggesting that drug-coated balloon treatment using a lower dose may be possible.

Two-year clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and angiographic predictors of restenosis among patients with de novo femoropopliteal lesions

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the 2-year clinical outcomes of patients with de novo femoropopliteal (FP) lesions who underwent drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and the angiographic predictors of restenosis.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, and observational study evaluated 129 de novo FP lesions treated with DCB angioplasty without bailout stenting. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for loss of primary patency were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The participants were aged 48-93 (mean: 73.6 ± 9.8) years, and 31% were women. Approximately 33% of the patients were receiving regular dialysis, and 35% of the affected limbs had critical ischemia. The mean lesion length was 132 ± 96 mm, and the mean reference vessel diameter (RVD) was 4.7 ± 0.8 mm. Forty-three (33%) limbs had chronic total occlusion of the target artery segment. Fifty-seven (44%) and 72 (56%) lesions were treated with DCB angioplasty using IN.PACT Admiral and Lutonix, respectively. The primary patency and amputation-free survival at 2 years were 59.3% and 89.5%, respectively. RVD was found to be an independent predictor of loss of primary patency. Based on the receiver operating characteristic analysis, an RVD of 4.2 mm was the best predictor of loss of primary patency at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term clinical outcome of DCB angioplasty for de novo FP lesions was acceptable. Moreover, an RVD of <4.2 mm was an independent predictor of restenosis after DCB angioplasty.

Risk of Mortality Related to Recurrent Limb Events After Endovascular Revascularization of the Superficial Femoral Artery for Peripheral Artery Disease: The Boston Femoral Artery Endovascular Revascularization Outcomes (Boston FAROUT) Study

Endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) may lead to recurrent ischemic syndromes, revascularization, or amputation. The impact of these events on mortality is unknown. We followed all patients having SFA endovascular revascularization for claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia in 2 cardiovascular (CV) divisions in Boston, Massachusetts. Any recurrent limb event after the initial SFA revascularization included recurrent claudication (67%), limb ulceration or gangrene (13%), repeat endovascular revascularization (61%), surgical revascularization (15%), or major (9%) or minor amputation (8%). We linked data to the National Death Index to ascertain cause of death grouped into CV mortality, or non-CV mortality. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) from Cox proportional hazards and sub-HRs from Fine-Gray competing risks analyses were clustered by patient. Overall, there were 202 patients with 253 index limb endovascular procedures. A recurrent limb event occurred in 123 limbs (49%) and 93 patients (46%). Patients with and without recurrent limb events had similar numbers of deaths over follow-up (76 [62%] vs 71 [55%], respectively). In multivariable models, recurrent limb event was not related to all-cause death (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.33), CV death (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.30), or non-CV death (HR 0.65, CI 0.39 to 1.07). Competing risk analyses suggested male gender and chronic limb-threatening ischemia were more strongly related to CV death, and chronic kidney more strongly related to disease to non-CV death. In conclusion, recurrent limb events, which contribute to patient morbidity, do not increase the risk of all-cause or cause-specific mortality, and should not discourage repeat revascularization to relieve symptoms or ischemia.

Prognostic Factors for Restenosis of Superficial Femoral Artery after Endovascular Treatment

High incidence of superficial femoral artery (SFA) restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) poses a persistent challenge in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treatment. We studied how the patients' and lesions' characteristics, thrombin generation, overall haemostatic potential (OHP), and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the NR4A2 and PECAM1 genes affected the likelihood of restenosis. In total, 206 consecutive PAD patients with limiting intermittent claudication due to SFA stenosis who were treated with balloon angioplasty with bailout stenting when necessary were included. Patients' clinical status and patency of the treated arterial segment on ultrasound examination were assessed 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. Restenosis occurred in 45% of patients, with less than 20% of all patients experiencing symptoms. In the multivariate analysis, predictors of restenosis proved to be poor infrapopliteal runoff, higher lesion complexity, absence of treated arterial hypertension, delayed lag phase in thrombin generation, and higher contribution of plasma extracellular vesicles to thrombin concentration. Poor infrapopliteal runoff increased the risk of restenosis in the first 6 months, but not later. The negative effect of poor infrapopliteal runoff on SFA patency opens questions about the potential benefits of simultaneous revascularisation of below-knee arteries along with SFA revascularisation.

[Angioplasty with Sirolimus-coated Balloon: the New Standard in the Treatment of PAD?]

Endovascular revascularisation with paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of peripheral artery disease has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option in the femoropopliteal segment. The antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel prevents restenosis. In contrast, in the infra-popliteal segment, the evidence is currently conflicting. However, there is evidence of an increased risk of amputation and mortality from the second year after angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons. This may be due to a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of paclitaxel. Sirolimus-coated balloons might therefore be an alternative because sirolimus is cytostatic rather than cytotoxic and thus has a wide therapeutic window.Three single-arm pilot studies (50, 25, and 50 patients, respectively) show that angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons leads to comparable results to those reported from paclitaxel-coated balloons (late lumen loss at 6 months: 0.29 mm; primary patency at 12 months: femoropopliteal 79%-82%, infra-popliteal 59%; freedom from target lesion revascularization at 12 months: femoropopliteal 83%-94%, infra-popliteal 86%). Randomised controlled trials comparing standard balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-coated balloons for the treatment of intermittent claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischaemia are active and are expected to provide efficacy and safety results from mid 2024.This review presents the results of pilot studies on angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloons for the treatment of peripheral artery disease and reviews currently ongoing randomised controlled trials.

Combined therapy with rotational atherectomy and drug coated balloon for superficial femoral artery in-stent restenosis: safety, efficacy, and two-year results of a single center experience

BACKGROUND

The primary patency rate of superficial femoral artery (SFA) after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has improved with the use of self-expanding stents. However, occurrence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) still represents a frequent problem. Despite different studies have assessed the role of atherectomy and drug coated balloons (DCBs), no long-term data exist about combined use. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of combined treatment with Jetstream (Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA) atherectomy and DCB for SFA intrastent restenosis (ISR) at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

30 patients treated with PTA from November 2018 to September 2019 at Montevergine Clinic (Mercogliano, Avellino, Italy) were included in this analysis. All patients underwent PTA of SFA-ISR with Jetstream Atherectomy System followed by paclitaxel eluting balloon treatment. Patients were evaluated at 30 days, and every 3 months up to 24.

RESULTS

Technical and procedural success was achieved in every patient. No in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred. No acute and sub-acute(in-hospital) procedure related complications occurred. During follow-up, 1 patient died due to stroke. Primary patency rate at 12 months was 93.4%. Primary patency rate at 24 months was 83.4%. Secondary patency rate at 24 months was 96.7%. One minor amputation, planned before treatment, was performed in the first 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that combined therapy with Rotational Atherectomy and DCBs for SFA-ISR represents a safe and effective procedure with a high rate of primary patency at 2-year follow-up.

Five-Year Outcomes after Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions in Diabetic and Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Cohorts: IN.PACT Global Study Post Hoc Analysis

PURPOSE

To summarize the 5-year outcomes of drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) compared to non-DM and intermittent claudication (IC).

METHODS

The IN.PACT Global study was a real-world prospective, multicenter, international, single-arm study that enrolled 1535 participants. Post hoc analyses were conducted for participants with DM (n = 560) versus non-DM (n = 842) and CLTI (n = 156) versus IC (n = 1246). Assessments included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 60 months, a composite safety outcome (freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and freedom from CD-target vessel revascularization within 60 months), and major adverse events (MAEs).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier estimates of 60-month freedom from CD-TLR were 67.7% and 70.5% (p = 0.25) in the DM and non-DM cohorts; and 60.7% and 70.5% (p = 0.006) in the CLTI and IC cohorts. The Kaplan-Meier 60-month composite safety outcomes were 65.1% DM versus 68.9% non-DM (p = 0.12); 53.2% CLTI versus 69.1% IC (p < 0.001). Between DM and non-DM, MAE rates were not significantly different through 60 months except for all-cause mortality which was higher in DM (23.8% versus 16.6%; p < 0.001). Participants with CLTI had a higher cumulative incidence of major target limb amputation (6.8% versus 1.1%; p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (37.4% versus 17.4%; p < 0.001) through 60 months compared to IC.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world study, 5-year reintervention rates following DCB angioplasty were similar between DM and non-DM, but mortality rates were expectedly higher in patients with DM. Reintervention, mortality, and amputation rates were all higher in CLTI patients compared to IC, which is consistent with the known frailty of this patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty for Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) versus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) for treatment of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis.

METHODS

A Markov model was created to compare DCB versus POBA for AVF stenosis over a 2-year time horizon from a United States payer's perspective. Probabilities related to complications, restenosis, retreatment, and all-cause mortality were obtained from published literature. Costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates and data from published cost analyses, inflation-adjusted to 2021. Health outcomes were measured with quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY.

RESULTS

Base case calculation showed better quality-of-life outcomes but increased cost with POBA compared to DCB, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $27,413/QALY, making POBA the more cost-effective strategy in the base case model. Sensitivity analyses showed that DCB becomes cost-effective if the 24-month mortality rate after DCB is no more than 3.4% higher than that after POBA. In secondary analyses where mortality rates were equalized, DCB was more cost-effective than POBA until its additional cost reached more than $4213 per intervention.

CONCLUSION

When modeled from a payer's perspective over 2 years, the cost utility of DCB versus POBA varies with mortality outcomes. POBA is cost-effective if 2-year all-cause mortality after DCB is greater than 3.4% higher than after POBA. If 2-year mortality after DCB is less than 3.4% higher than after POBA, DCB is cost-effective until its additional cost per procedure exceeds $4213 more than POBA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

HISTORICALLY CONTROLLED STUDY.: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Impact of Postoperative Lumen Gain on the Reduction of Restenosis Risk after Endovascular Treatment using Drug-coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions Assessed by Intravascular Ultrasound

AIM

This study aimed to reveal whether a larger postprocedural minimum lumen area (MLA) would reduce restenosis risk after endovascular therapy (EVT) using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in femoropopliteal (FP) lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective, nonrandomized, single-arm, and multicenter registry analyzed patients with FP lesions undergoing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided EVT with DCB between 2017 and 2021. The primary outcome was restenosis 1 year after EVT. The association between IVUS-based MLA and restenosis risk was investigated using a generalized propensity score (GPS) method to address imbalance of baseline covariates. The dose-response function of IVUS-measured MLA for restenosis risk was developed using the GPS-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

This study enrolled consecutive 489 patients with 595 lesions undergoing DCB treatment. The median MLA (interquartile range) was 13.20 (9.90-16.91) mm2. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that freedom from restenosis was 84.4% at 1 year. The GPS-adjusted dose-response function showed that MLA was inversely associated with restenosis risk. The upper limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) of the slope was lower than 0 between 10.6 and 17.0 mm2 of MLAs. The 1-year cumulative incidence of restenosis was estimated to be 9.8% (95% CI, 5.8%-13.7%) for the 3rd quartile of MLA (16.91 mm2) versus 18.5% (12.3%-24.1%) for the 1st quartile (9.90 mm2), with a hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.39-0.67; p＜0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present GPS analysis suggested that larger IVUS-measured MLA might be associated with lower risk of 1-year restenosis after DCB treatment for FP lesions.

Patient and limb outcomes 10 years after endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery for peripheral artery disease: The Boston Femoral Artery Endovascular Revascularization Outcomes (Boston FAROUT) study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe patient and limb outcomes in the decade after endovascular revascularization for chronic lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD).

METHODS

We assessed outcomes in patients having endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral artery in two centers between 2003 and 2011 and followed for a median 9.3 (25-75%: 6.8, 11.1) years. Outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat limb revascularizations, and amputations. We used competing risks analysis with clustering by patient to determine the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for patients, and procedural characteristics for cause of death, cardiovascular events, and major adverse limb events (MALE).

RESULTS

There were 253 index limb revascularizations in 202 patients followed for a median 9.3 years. Patients had intensive medical treatment with 90% on statins and 80% on beta-blockers. During follow up there were 57 (28%) cardiovascular deaths and 62 (31%) noncardiovascular deaths. Of the 253 limbs, 227 (90%) were free of MALE over follow up and 93 (37%) had MALE or minor repeat revascularization. In multivariable models, cardiovascular death significantly associated with critical limb ischemia (HR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.84, 5.61) and noncardiovascular death with chronic kidney disease (HR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.68, 4.30), and smoking (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.01, 7.52). MALE or minor repeat revascularization associated with critical limb ischemia (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.84, 2.43), smoking (HR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.26, 4.90), and lesion length > 200 mm (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.98, 2.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with intensive medical therapy, the risk of noncardiovascular death was high and similar to cardiovascular death. Endovascular intervention can have acceptable long-term results. Future studies should evaluate strategies to reduce both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deaths.

Long-Term Patient Outcomes After Femoropopliteal Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients With Intermittent Claudication

BACKGROUND

In patients with intermittent claudication (IC), short-term amputation rates from clinical trial data following lower extremity femoropopliteal (FP) peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) are <1% with unknown longer-term rates.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify revascularization and amputation rates following PVI in the FP segment and to assess 4-year amputation and revascularization rates after FP PVI for IC.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, 19,324 patients undergoing FP PVI for IC were included from the PINC AI Healthcare Database and evaluated by treatment level (superficial femoral artery [SFA], popliteal artery [POP], or both). The primary outcome was index limb amputation (ILA) assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimate. The secondary outcomes were index limb major amputation and repeat revascularization. HRs were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

The 4-year index limb amputation rate following FP PVI was 4.3% (95% CI: 4.0-4.7), with a major amputation rate of 3.2% (95% CI: 2.9-3.5). After POP PVI, ILA was significantly higher than SFA alone (7.5% vs 3.4%) or both segment PVI (5.5%). In multivariate analysis, POP PVI was associated with higher ILA rates at 4 years compared with isolated SFA PVI (HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.52-2.91) and index limb major amputation (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.32-2.95). Repeat FP revascularization rates were 15.2%; they were highest in patients undergoing both SFA and POP PVI (18.7%; P < 0.0001) compared with SFA (13.9%) and POP (17.1%) only.

CONCLUSIONS

IC patients undergoing FP PVI had 4-year rates of index limb repeat revascularization of 16.7% and ILA rates of 4.3%. Further risk factors for amputation requires further investigation.

Propensity score-matched analysis of six-month outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloons combined with UltraScore balloons versus conventional scoring balloons for femoropopliteal lesions

PURPOSE

Combination angioplasty with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) and conventional scoring balloons for femoropopliteal lesions has demonstrated satisfactory results, even for complex lesions. The UltraScore balloon (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA), which has a maximum length of 300 mm, has two longitudinal 0.010-inch stainless steel wires and is a new treatment option for complex femoropopliteal lesions. However, no studies have evaluated the effect of the UltraScore balloon on femoropopliteal lesions. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of angioplasty over a six-month period using UltraScore balloons versus conventional scoring balloons for the treatment of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions with PCBs.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center observational study enrolled 272 patients who underwent PCB angioplasty combined with an UltraScore balloon (n = 58) or conventional scoring balloon (n = 214) without bailout stenting. Propensity score matching was used to minimize intergroup differences in baseline characteristics, and six-month outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary endpoint was a technical success (i.e., residual angiographic stenosis of <30% with non-severe dissection). The secondary endpoints were the incidences of periprocedural complications, restenosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR).

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 50 matched pairs of patients were selected for analysis. The UltraScore group had a significantly longer vessel length (192.8 ± 94.9 versus 36.6 ± 7.9 mm, P < 0.001), a lower frequency of non-compliant balloon (26.0% versus 56.0%, P = 0.002), and a smaller PCB diameter (5.32 ± 0.65 versus 5.66 ± 0.52 mm, P = 0.002) compared with the scoring group. The primary endpoint of technical success was significantly higher in the UltraScore group than in the scoring group (76.0% versus 56.0%, P = 0.035). There were no significant differences in periprocedural complications (4.0% versus 2.0%, P = 0.562), six-month restenosis (4.0% versus 8.0%, P = 0.339), and TLR (2.0% versus 4.0%, P = 0.500) between both groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that UltraScore use was independently associated with an increase in technical success (odds ratio: 2.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.05-6.36, P = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

The use of an UltraScore balloon during PCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions significantly improved technical success compared with conventional scoring balloons. UltraScore use was an independent predictor of technical success, indicating its potential advantages in peripheral intervention procedures.

Multicenter, retrospective registry of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal arteries treated with endovascular revascularization

Isolated atherosclerotic popliteal lesions (IAPLs) have been considered challenging. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of endovascular therapy (EVT) using the newer devices for IAPLs. This retrospective multicenter registry analyzed patients with lower extremity artery disease having IAPLs who underwent EVT using the newer devices between 2018 and 2021. The primary outcome was primary patency 1 year after EVT. A total of 392 consecutive patients undergoing EVT for IAPLs were enrolled. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the primary patency and the freedom from target lesion revascularization were 80.9% and 87.8% 1 year after EVT, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the clinical features that were independently associated with restenosis risk were drug-coated balloon (DCB) use for younger age (< 75 years old; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.08 [95% confidence interval 1.08-8.74]; P = 0.035), non-ambulatory status (2.74 [95% confidence interval 1.56-4.81]; P < 0.001), cilostazol use (0.51 [95% confidence interval 0.29-0.88]; P = 0.015), severe calcification (1.86 [95% confidence interval 1.18-2.94]; P = 0.007), and small external elastic membrane (EEM) area measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (< 30 mm²) (2.07 [95% confidence interval 1.19-3.60]; P = 0.010). From the univariate analysis, among patients treated with DCB, younger patients (n = 141) were associated with more comorbidities including smoking (P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), end-stage renal disease (P < 0.001), history of revascularization (P = 0.046) and small EEM area (P = 0.036), compared to older patients (n = 140). Moreover, smaller post-procedural minimum lumen area measured by IVUS after DCB dilatation was observed in younger patients (12 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 4 mm², P = 0.033). This retrospective study demonstrated that the current EVT provided an acceptable 1-year primary patency rate in patients with IAPLs. The primary patency was lower following DCB in younger patients, likely due to the higher rates of comorbidities in this patient population.

5-Year Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons for Peripheral Artery In-Stent Restenosis, Long Lesions, and CTOs

BACKGROUND

Long-term data on drug-coated balloon (DCB) outcomes in complex femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to report 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes of a paclitaxel DCB for the treatment of de novo in-stent restenosis (ISR), long lesions (LL), or chronic total occlusions (CTOs) in the prespecified imaging cohorts of the IN.PACT Global Study.

METHODS

The IN.PACT Global study was a prospective, international single-arm study. Assessments through 5 years included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), a safety composite (freedom from device- and procedure-related death to 30 days, and freedom from major target limb amputation and freedom from clinically driven target vessel revascularization within 60 months), and major adverse events.

RESULTS

The prespecified imaging cohorts enrolled 132 de novo ISR, 158 LL, and 127 CTO participants. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from CD-TLR through 5 years were 58.0% (ISR), 67.3% (LL), and 69.8% (CTO). The cumulative incidences of the composite safety endpoint were 56.0% (ISR), 65.7% (LL), and 69.8% (CTO). The 5-year freedom from all-cause mortality with vital status update were 81.4% (ISR), 75.2% (LL), and 78.2% (CTO). Within the ISR cohort, 15.9% of participants experienced 2 or more TLRs, compared with 9.5% and 5.5% in the LL and CTO groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate long-term safety and effectiveness of this DCB in all 3 cohorts, with low reintervention rates in the LL and CTO cohorts and no safety issues. These results support the inclusion of this DCB into the treatment algorithm for complex femoropopliteal disease.

The Ability to Look Beyond: The Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease

This paper offers a practical overview of the contemporary management of patients with peripheral arterial disease presenting intermittent claudication (IC), including clinical and instrumental diagnosis, risk factors modification, medical management, and evidence-based revascularization indications and techniques. Decision making represents a crucial element in the management of the patient with IC; for this, we think a review of this type could be very useful, especially for non-vascular specialists.

Validation of the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria could apply to peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT).

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the application of the ARC-HBR criteria to PAD patients undergoing EVT with contemporary drug-coated devices (DCD) for femoropopliteal artery lesions.

METHODS

Between May 2012 and December 2019, 542 consecutive patients undergoing EVT with DCD for femoropopliteal artery lesions were retrospectively analysed. The primary study endpoint was major bleeding events, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5.

RESULTS

Of 542 patients, 435 (80.3%) were stratified into the HBR group. The cumulative 5-year incidence of major bleeding events was significantly higher in the HBR group than in the non-HBR group (31.9% vs 2.3%; p<0.001). The 5-year major bleeding event rate gradually increased with the number of ARC-HBR criteria (≥2 major criteria: 48.6%, 1 major: 33.1%, ≥2 minor: 12.9%, and non-HBR: 2.3%; p<0.001). Major bleeding events were associated with a 5.4-fold increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.42, 95% confidence interval: 2.91-10.1; p<0.001). Severe chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and severe anaemia were predictors of major bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

80.3% of PAD patients undergoing EVT for femoropopliteal artery lesions with contemporary drug-coated devices met the ARC-HBR criteria. Given that major bleeding events remarkably increased the risk of mortality after EVT, the ARC-HBR criteria might be helpful for the risk stratification of PAD patients who undergo EVT with contemporary DCD.

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Eluting Stent: The Debate of Leave Nothing Behind

Endovascular techniques for peripheral artery disease have changed significantly in the past 10 years with advances in technology and data. Treatment of superficial femoral disease is complex secondary to the length, degree of calcification, high rate of chronic total occlusion, and areas of flexion within this vessel. Use of drug-coated devices has increased the interventionalist's toolbox with the objective to improve freedom from target lesion revascularization and primary patency. There remains debate as to which devices may reach these goals while also limiting overall morbidity and mortality. This article aims to highlight recent advances in the literature regarding the use of drug-coated devices.

Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1-2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44-4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93-3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89-3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC.

Two-year clinical outcomes and predictors of restenosis following the use of polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents or drug-coated balloons in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease

We aimed to assess the clinical performance and risk factors for patency loss within 2 years following the use of polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stents (PC-PESs) and drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in patients with lower extremity artery disease. Multi-center registry data from 151 patients (65 and 86 treated with PC-PES and DCB, respectively) were retrospectively investigated. Two-year primary patency (PP) and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Predictors of restenosis within 2 years of the procedures were analyzed using the random survival forest method. The consistent predictors of restenosis within 1 and 2 years were assessed and validated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Two-year PP was 77.2 and 57.2% (log rank p = 0.047) and freedom from CD-TLR was 84.4 and 84.8% in the PC-PES and DCB groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.89). In the DCB group, most of the patients (n = 77, 89.5%) were treated with high-dose DCB. Consistent predictors of restenosis were lower vessel diameter and severity of Clinical Frailty Scale in the PC-PES group, and severity of peripheral artery calcification scoring system grade, severity of post dissection pattern, and smaller vessel diameter in the DCB group. The validation analysis revealed that patients with consistent predictors had significantly worse PP values than that of those without in the PC-PES (87.9% vs. 55.3%, log rank p = 0.003) and DCB groups (75.9% vs. 35.2%, log rank p = 0.001). The 2-year PP of DCBs was lower than that of PC-PESs. A smaller vessel diameter could predict restenosis in both devices. Vessel calcification and dissection should be considered when using DCB to ensure longer term patency.

Safety and Efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter in Atherosclerotic Femoropopliteal Lesions: The Multicenter BIOLUX P-IV China Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this trial was to assess the safety and effectiveness of a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in Chinese patients with de novo or nonstented restenotic femoropopliteal atherosclerotic lesions.

METHODS

BIOLUX P-IV China is a prospective, independently adjudicated, multicenter, single-arm trial conducted in China. Patients with Rutherford class 2-4 were eligible, excluded were patients in which predilation resulted in severe (≥ grade D) flow-limiting dissection or residual stenosis > 70%. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 6, and 12 months. The primary safety end point was 30-day major adverse event rate and the primary effectiveness end point was primary patency at 12 months.

RESULTS

We enrolled 158 patients with 158 lesions. Mean age was 67.6 ± 9.6 years, diabetes was present in 53.8% (n = 85), and previous peripheral intervention/surgeries in 17.1% (n = 27). Lesions were 4.1 ± 0.9 mm in diameter and 74 ± 50 mm long with a mean diameter stenosis of 91 ± 13%; 58.2% (n = 92) were occluded (core laboratory analysis). Device success was achieved in all patients. The rate of major adverse events was 0.6% (95% confidence interval: 0.0; 3.5) at 30 days, consisting of 1 target lesion revascularization. At 12 months, binary restenosis was present in 18.7% (n = 26) and target lesion revascularization was performed in 1.4% (n = 2, all clinically driven), resulting in a primary patency of 80.0% (95% confidence interval: 72.4, 85.8); no major target limb amputation occurred. Clinical improvement at 12 months, defined as improvement of at least 1 Rutherford class, was 95.3% (n = 130). The median walking distance per 6-minute walk test was 279 m at baseline and improved by 50 m at 30 days and by 60 m at 12 months; the visual analogue scale changed from 76.6 ± 15.6 at baseline to 80.0 ± 15.0 at 30 days and 78.6 ± 14.6 at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed the clinical effectiveness and safety of a paclitaxel-coated peripheral balloon dilatation catheter for the treatment of de novo and nonstented restenotic lesion of the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery in Chinese patients (NCT02912715).

Comparison of Drug-Coated Balloons vs Bare-Metal Stents in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease has shifted toward drug-coated balloons (DCB). However, limited data are available regarding the safety and efficacy of DCB vs bare-metal stents (BMS).

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare DCB vs BMS outcomes in a propensity-adjusted, pooled analysis of 4 prospective, multicenter trials.

METHODS

Patient-level data were pooled from 4 prospective, multicenter studies: the IN.PACT SFA I/II and IN.PACT SFA Japan randomized controlled DCB trials and the Complete SE and DURABILITY II single-arm BMS studies. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Clinical endpoints were 12-month primary patency, freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and cumulative 36-month major adverse events (MAE).

RESULTS

The primary analysis included 771 patients (288 DCB, 483 BMS). IPTW-adjusted demographic, baseline lesion, and procedural characteristics were matched between groups. The adjusted mean lesion length was 8.1 ± 4.7 cm DCB and 7.9 ± 4.5 cm BMS. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency (90.4% DCB, 80.9% BMS, P = 0.007), freedom from 36-month clinically driven target lesion revascularization (85.6% DCB, 73.7% BMS, P = 0.001), and cumulative incidence of 36-month MAE (25.3% DCB, 38.8% BMS, P < 0.001) favored DCB. There were no statistically significant differences observed in all-cause mortality, target limb major amputation, or thrombosis through 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In a patient-level, IPTW-adjusted pooled analysis of prospective, multicenter pivotal studies, DCB demonstrated significantly higher patency, lower revascularization and MAE rates, and no statistically significant differences in mortality, amputation, or thrombosis vs BMS. This analysis supports DCB use vs BMS in moderately complex femoropopliteal lesions amenable to both treatments.

Understudied factors in drug-coated balloon design and evaluation: A biophysical perspective

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) percutaneous interventional therapy allows for durable reopening of the narrowed lumen via physical tissue expansion and local anti-restenosis drug delivery, providing an alternative to traditional uncoated balloons or a permanent indwelling implant such as a conventional metallic drug-eluting stent. While DCB-based treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been incorporated into clinical guidelines, DCB use has been recently curtailed due to reports that showed evidence of increased mortality risk in patients treated with paclitaxel (PTX)-coated balloons. Given the United States Food and Drug Administration's 2019 consequent warning regarding PTX-eluting DCBs and the subsequent marked reduction in clinical DCB use, there is now a critical need to better understand the compositional and mechanical factors underlying DCB efficacy and safety. Most work to date on DCB refinement has focused on designing both the enabling balloon catheter and alternate coatings composed of various drugs and excipients, followed by device evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. We contend that improvement in DCB performance will require a better understanding of the biophysical factors operative during and following balloon deployment, and moreover that the elaboration and demonstrated control of these factors are needed to address current concerns with DCB use. This article provides a perspective on the biophysical interactions that govern DCB performance and offers new design strategies for the development of next-generation DCB devices.