Research Goes Red: Early Experience With a Participant-Centric Registry

Design and rationale of the social determinants of the risk of hypertension in women of reproductive age (SAFE HEART) study: An American Heart Association research goes red initiative

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular health literacy (CVHL) and social determinants of health (SDoH) play interconnected and critical roles in shaping cardiovascular health (CVH) outcomes. However, awareness of CVH risk has declined markedly, from 65% of women being aware that cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for women in 2009 to just 44% being aware in 2019. The American Heart Association Research Goes Red (RGR) initiative seeks to develop an open-source, longitudinal, dynamic registry that will help women to be aware of and participate in research studies, and to learn about CVD prevention. We proposed to leverage this platform, particularly among Black and Hispanic women of reproductive age, to address CVHL gaps and advance health equity.

METHODS

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the cross-sectional association of CVHL, SDoH using a polysocial score, and CVH in women of reproductive age at increased risk of developing hypertension (HTN). To achieve this we will use a cross-sectional study design, that engages women already enrolled in the RGR registry (registry-enrolled). To enhance the racial and ethnic/social economic diversity of the cohort, we will additionally enroll 300 women from the Baltimore and Washington D.C. community into the Social Determinants of the Risk of Hypertension in Women of Reproductive Age (SAFE HEART) Study. Community-enrolled and registry-enrolled women will undergo baseline social phenotyping including detailed SDoH questionnaire, CVH metrics assessment, and CVHL assessment. The secondary objective is to assess whether a 4-month active health education intervention will result in a change in CVHL in the 300 community-enrolled women.

DISCUSSION

The SAFE HEART study examines the association between CVHL, SDoH, and CVH, with a focus on racial and ethnic minority groups and socioeconomically disadvantaged women of reproductive age, and the ability to improve these parameters by an educational intervention. These findings will inform the future development of community-engaged strategies that address CVHL and SDoH among women of reproductive age.

Disparities in awareness and treatment among women with hypertension: Insights from the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry

Hypertension is an important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and affects nearly one-third of women in the U.S. Prior research has demonstrated declining rates of blood pressure (BP) control nationally among women, and there are significant racial and ethnic disparities in both hypertension prevalence and outcomes among U.S. women. However, national-level data on attitudes and awareness of women with hypertension are limited. To address this gap, data were analyzed from participants with self-reported hypertension enrolled in the American Heart Association's Research Goes Red Registry. Of 6170 women who responded as of February 2023, 1835 (30 %) reported a history of hypertension. The top health concerns reported among women with hypertension were weight, healthcare access and costs, and hypertension. Health concerns varied significantly by age, race, and ethnicity; younger women and Black and Hispanic women were more likely to report hypertension as their top concern. Among women with self-reported hypertension, 77 % reported knowing their BP, and 90 % reported being on an anti-hypertensive. Black and Hispanic women were less likely to know their BP compared to White women. Younger women were less likely to be treated for hypertension, and there were also disparities in treatment by employment status and among uninsured women. In this national registry of women in the U.S., gaps and disparities exist in awareness and treatment of hypertension, highlighting targets for quality improvement in hypertension care for women.

Association of Prior Stroke With Health Care Perceptions of Adequate Emergency Care in Women

BACKGROUND

Women with a history of stroke represent a vulnerable patient population due to their extant disability, morbidity, and risk of recurrence. The association between prior stroke with patient experience and perception of emergency medical care is unknown.

METHODS

We utilized data from the Health Care Experiences and Perception cross-sectional, online survey from the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry. Ordinal logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between a self-reported history of stroke in the prior 10 years and the perception of not receiving adequate care in an emergency department because of gender or race. Models were adjusted for age at the time of enrollment, race/ethnicity, myocardial infarction within 10 years, and current smoking status.

RESULTS

A total of 3498 women participants met inclusion criteria: 89 participants with a history of stroke in the past 10 years (mean age, 49.4 years; 10.1% Black participants and 5.6% Hispanic participants) and 3409 participants without such history (mean age, 45.8 years; 7.8% Black participants and 7.0% Hispanic participants). In multivariate logistic regression models, stroke history was significantly associated with greater odds of answering "to a great extent" that "I will not receive adequate care in an emergency room based on my gender" (odds ratio, 3.23 [95% CI, 1.69-6.17]) and "…race/ethnicity" (odds ratio, 3.88 [95% CI, 1.45-10.39]). Similar results were seen for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Women patients with a stroke history felt less likely to receive adequate emergency care based on gender and race/ethnicity. Whether these negative health perceptions are associated with delays in presentation for stroke or other time-sensitive conditions should be the focus of future studies, given that these populations are known to less frequently receive advanced therapies for stroke, in part due to delays in presentation.

Reproductive Experiences and Cardiovascular Disease Care in Pregnancy-Capable and Postmenopausal Individuals: Insights From the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry

To evaluate preconception health and adverse pregnancy outcome (APO) awareness in a large population-based registry. We examined data from the Fertility and Pregnancy Survey of the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry to questions regarding prenatal health care experiences, postpartum health, and awareness of the association of APOs with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Among postmenopausal individuals, 37% were unaware that APOs were associated with long-term CVD risk, significantly varying by race-ethnicity. Fifty-nine percent of participants were not educated regarding this association by their providers, and 37% reported providers not assessing pregnancy history during current visits, significantly varying by race-ethnicity, income, and access to care. Only 37.1% of respondents were aware that CVD was the leading cause of maternal mortality. There is an urgent, ongoing need for more education on APOs and CVD risk, to improve the health-care experiences and postpartum health outcomes of pregnant individuals.

Reproductive Experiences and Cardiovascular Disease Care in Pregnancy Capable and Post-Menopausal Individuals: Insights from the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry

Background

Information on reproductive experiences and awareness of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among pregnancy-capable and post-menopausal individuals has not been well described. We sought to evaluate preconception health and APO awareness in a large population-based registry.

Methods

Data from the Fertility and Pregnancy Survey of the American Heart Association Research Goes Red Registry (AHA-RGR) were used. Responses to questions pertaining to prenatal health care experiences, postpartum health, and awareness of the association of APOs with CVD risk were used. We summarized responses using proportions for the overall sample and by stratifications, and we tested differences using the Chi-squared test.

Results

Of 4,651individuals in the AHA-RGR registry, 3,176 were of reproductive age, and 1,475 were postmenopausal. Among postmenopausal individuals, 37% were unaware that APOs were associated with long-term CVD risk. This varied by different racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White: 38%, non-Hispanic Black: 29%, Asian: 18%, Hispanic: 41%, Other: 46%; P = 0.03). Fifty-nine percent of the participants were not educated regarding the association of APOs with long-term CVD risk by their providers. Thirty percent of the participants reported that their providers did not assess pregnancy history during current visits; this varied by race-ethnicity ( P = 0.02), income ( P = 0.01), and access to care ( P = 0.02). Only 37.1% of the respondents were aware that CVD was the leading cause of maternal mortality.

Conclusions

Considerable knowledge gaps exist in the association of APOs with CVD risk, with disparities by race/ethnicity, and most patients are not educated on this association by their health care professionals. There is an urgent and ongoing need for more education on APOs and CVD risk, to improve the health-care experiences and postpartum health outcomes of pregnant individuals.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Research: A Path Toward Precision Health for Everyone

Healthcare disparities are a persistent societal problem. One of the contributing factors to this status quo is the lack of diversity and representativeness of research efforts, which result in nongeneralizable evidence that, in turn, provides suboptimal means to enable the best possible outcomes at the individual level. There are several strategies that research teams can adopt to improve the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) of their efforts; these strategies span the totality of the research path, from initial design to the shepherding of clinical data through a potential regulatory process. These strategies include more intentionality and DEI-based goal-setting, more diverse research and leadership teams, better community engagement to set study goals and approaches, better tailored outreach interventions, decentralization of study procedures and incorporation of innovative technology for more flexible data collection, and self-surveillance to identify and prevent biases. Within their remit of overlooking research efforts, regulatory authorities, as stakeholders, also have the potential for a positive effect on the DEI of emerging clinical evidence. All these are implementable tools and mechanisms that can make study participation more approachable to diverse communities, and ultimately generate evidence that is more generalizable and a conduit for better outcomes. The research community has an imperative to make DEI principles key foundational aspects in study conduct in order to pursue better personalized medicine for diverse patient populations.

Call to Action for Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Epidemiology, Awareness, Access, and Delivery of Equitable Health Care: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association

Addressing the pervasive gaps in knowledge and care delivery to reduce sex-based disparities and achieve equity is fundamental to the American Heart Association's commitment to advancing cardiovascular health for all by 2024. This presidential advisory serves as a call to action for the American Heart Association and other stakeholders around the globe to identify and remove barriers to health care access and quality for women. A concise and current summary of existing data across the areas of risk and prevention, access and delivery of equitable care, and awareness and education provides a framework to consider knowledge gaps and research needs critical toward achieving significant progress for the health and well-being of all women.