Apolipoprotein B Versus Non–High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Pros and Cons of Long-Chain Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Cardiovascular Health

The long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), are found in seafood, supplements, and concentrated pharmaceutical preparations. Prospective cohort studies demonstrate an association between higher intakes of EPA+DHA or higher levels of EPA and DHA in the body and lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction, and of cardiovascular mortality in the general population. The cardioprotective effect of EPA and DHA is due to the beneficial modulation of a number of risk factors for CVD. Some large trials support the use of EPA+DHA (or EPA alone) in high-risk patients, although the evidence is inconsistent. This review presents key studies of EPA and DHA in the primary and secondary prevention of CVD, briefly describes potential mechanisms of action, and discusses recently published RCTs and meta-analyses. Potential adverse aspects of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids in relation to CVD are discussed.

Waist-to-height ratio as a clinical predictor for cardiovascular risks and insulin resistance in children and adolescents with exogenous obesity

Background

Obesity is one of the most challenging clinical syndromes associated with deleterious health problems. Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), a newer index for abdominal fat assessment, can be a superior tool in the evaluation of cardiometabolic risk. This study aimed to determine the relation between WHtR and lipid cardiovascular risk ratios and insulin resistance (IR) in children and adolescents with exogenous obesity.

Results

This analytical cross-sectional study included 80 children and adolescents with exogenous obesity, compared to 80 age- and sex-matched healthy non-overweight non-obese controls. Fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)), fasting insulin, and fasting blood glucose were done and lipoprotein risk ratios were calculated; TC/HDL, LDL/HDL, non-HDL/HDL, and TG/HDL). In addition, homeostatic model assessment for IR (HOMA IR), triglyceride glucose index (TyG), TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC were calculated. The study group included 55 (34.4%) males and 105 (65.6%) females with a mean age of 13.6 ± 2.22 years. Obese group had significantly higher TC, TG, LDL, non-HDL, LDL/HDL, TC/HDL, non-HDL/HDL, and TG/HDL, with significantly lower HDL. In addition, they had significantly higher FBG, HOMA IR, TyG, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC indices compared to the control group. There were statistically significant correlations between WHtR and lipid profile, lipid risk ratios and indices of IR. WHtR was found to be an independent predictor of IR by linear regression analysis.

Conclusion

WHtR can be an excellent, easy, and reliable clinical predictor for cardiovascular risk and IR in children and adolescents with exogenous obesity.

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: anti-inflammatory and anti-hypertriglyceridemia mechanisms in cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the world's most recognized and notorious cause of death. It is known that increased triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and remnants of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (RLP) are the major risk factor for CVD. Furthermore, hypertriglyceridemia commonly leads to a reduction in HDL and an increase in atherogenic small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL or LDL-III) levels. Thus, the evidence shows that Ω-3 fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have a beneficial effect on CVD through reprogramming of TRL metabolism, reducing inflammatory mediators (cytokines and leukotrienes), and modulation of cell adhesion molecules. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide the molecular mechanism related to the beneficial effect of Ω-3 PUFA on the lowering of plasma TAG levels and other atherogenic lipoproteins. Taking this into account, this study also provides the TRL lowering and anti-inflammatory mechanism of Ω-3 PUFA metabolites such as RvE1 and RvD2 as a cardioprotective function.

Association of apolipoprotein levels with peripheral arterial disease: a meta-analysis of literature studies

AIMS

Lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a leading cause of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Discordant data are available on the association between apolipoprotein and PAD. We performed a meta-analyses on the association between apolipoprotein (apo)B, apoA-I, and apoB/apoA-I ratio with PAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies providing data about apoB, apoA-I, apoB/apoA-I ratio in PAD subjects and non-PAD controls were included. Differences between PAD and non-PAD subjects were expressed as mean difference (MD) with pertinent 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Twenty-two studies were included. Peripheral artery disease subjects showed higher apoB (MD: 12.5 mg/dL, 95%CI: 2.14, 22.87) and lower apoA-I levels (MD: -7.11 mg/dL, 95%CI: -11.94, -2.28) than non-PAD controls. Accordingly, ApoB/ApoA-I ratio resulted higher in PAD subjects than non-PAD controls (MD: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.21). Non-HDL-C showed a direct association with the difference in apoB (z-value: 4.72, P < 0.001) and an inverse association with the difference of apoA-I (z-value: -2.43, P = 0.015) between PAD subjects and non-PAD controls. An increasing BMI was associated with an increasing difference in apoA-I values between PAD subjects and non-PAD controls (z-value: 1.98, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests that PAD subjects exhibit increased apoB and reduced apoA-I levels, accompanied by an increased apoB/apoA-I ratio as compared with non-PAD controls.

Measuring LDL-cholesterol: what is the best way to do it?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cholesterol on low-density lipoproteins (LDL-C) is one of the main drivers of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and hence its measurement is critical in the management of patients at risk. Although LDL-C has routinely been either calculated by the Friedewald equation or measured with direct assays, these methods have limitations, particularly for patients with dyslipidaemias, low LDL-C, and hypertriglyceridemia. The focus of this review will be recent advances in the measurement of LDL for ASCVD risk management.

RECENT FINDINGS

We first describe the recent recommendations on how LDL-C is used in ASCVD risk assessment and management. We then review the current approaches to the measurement of LDL-C and recent developments on new more accurate equations for calculating LDL-C. Finally, we present new and emerging LDL assays that may be superior to LDL-C for risk assessment, such as LDL particle number and small dense LDL-C, and several LDL-based lipid tests in early development.

SUMMARY

LDL-C is valuable in ASCVD risk management but recent improvements in its measurement and the development of other LDL-related tests may further improve its value.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF DYSLIPIDEMIA AND PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE

OBJECTIVE

The development of these guidelines is mandated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

METHODS

Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols.

RESULTS

The Executive Summary of this document contains 87 recommendations of which 45 are Grade A (51.7%), 18 are Grade B (20.7%), 15 are Grade C (17.2%), and 9 (10.3%) are Grade D. These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world medical care. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for Executive Summary Recommendations. This update contains 695 citations of which 203 (29.2 %) are EL 1 (strong), 137 (19.7%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 119 (17.1%) are EL 3 (weak), and 236 (34.0%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence).

CONCLUSION

This CPG is a practical tool that endocrinologists, other health care professionals, health-related organizations, and regulatory bodies can use to reduce the risks and consequences of dyslipidemia. It provides guidance on screening, risk assessment, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various lipid disorders. The recommendations emphasize the importance of treating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in some individuals to lower goals than previously endorsed and support the measurement of coronary artery calcium scores and inflammatory markers to help stratify risk. Special consideration is given to individuals with diabetes, familial hypercholesterolemia, women, and youth with dyslipidemia. Both clinical and cost-effectiveness data are provided to support treatment decisions.

ABBREVIATIONS

4S = Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study A1C = glycated hemoglobin AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists AAP = American Academy of Pediatrics ACC = American College of Cardiology ACE = American College of Endocrinology ACS = acute coronary syndrome ADMIT = Arterial Disease Multiple Intervention Trial ADVENT = Assessment of Diabetes Control and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Niaspan Trial AFCAPS/TexCAPS = Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study AHA = American Heart Association AHRQ = Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AIM-HIGH = Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome With Low HDL/High Triglycerides trial ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ATP = Adult Treatment Panel apo = apolipoprotein BEL = best evidence level BIP = Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention trial BMI = body mass index CABG = coronary artery bypass graft CAC = coronary artery calcification CARDS = Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CDP = Coronary Drug Project trial CI = confidence interval CIMT = carotid intimal media thickness CKD = chronic kidney disease CPG(s) = clinical practice guideline(s) CRP = C-reactive protein CTT = Cholesterol Treatment Trialists CV = cerebrovascular CVA = cerebrovascular accident EL = evidence level FH = familial hypercholesterolemia FIELD = Secondary Endpoints from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes trial FOURIER = Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research with PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk trial HATS = HDL-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HeFH = heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia HHS = Helsinki Heart Study HIV = human immunodeficiency virus HoFH = homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia HPS = Heart Protection Study HPS2-THRIVE = Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events trial HR = hazard ratio HRT = hormone replacement therapy hsCRP = high-sensitivity CRP IMPROVE-IT = Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial IRAS = Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study JUPITER = Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Lp-PLA2 = lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 MACE = major cardiovascular events MESA = Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis MetS = metabolic syndrome MI = myocardial infarction MRFIT = Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial NCEP = National Cholesterol Education Program NHLBI = National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 Post CABG = Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft trial PROSPER = Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk trial QALY = quality-adjusted life-year ROC = receiver-operator characteristic SOC = standard of care SHARP = Study of Heart and Renal Protection T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus TG = triglycerides TNT = Treating to New Targets trial VA-HIT = Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial VLDL-C = very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol WHI = Women's Health Initiative.

Serum apolipoprotein B is inversely associated with eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to examine the relationship of serum apolipoprotein B level with left ventricular (LV) structural and functional characteristics, in particular, LV remodeling parameters in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

METHODS

A total of 182 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving PD were identified. Conventional echocardiography was performed for each patient, and echocardiographic characteristics were analyzed according to apo B quartile groups. Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine the associations between serum apo B and LV remodeling indices.

RESULTS

A high serum apo B level was significantly related to the reduction in left atrium dimension (r = - 0.20, P = 0.011), LV dimensions (end-diastolic: r = - 0.27, P = 0.001; end-systolic: r = - 0.24, P = 0.003), peak velocities of early filling divided by peak velocities of atrial filling (r = - 0.38, P < 0.001), and LV volumetric dimension (end-diastolic: r = - 0.27, P < 0.001; end-systolic: r = - 0.28, P < 0.001). After adjustment for clinical confounding factors, the effect of serum apo B on LV eccentric remodeling modestly weakened but remained statistically significant (P = 0.038), while other associations were not significant. In multivariate linear regression analysis, conventional lipid profiles were not significantly associated with LV eccentric remodeling, whereas serum apo B was an independent determinant of LV dilatation (β: - 42.10, 95% CI - 74.82 to - 9.38, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum apo B was significantly and inversely associated with LV dilatation, independently of conventional lipids and other CV risk factors in our ESRD patients undergoing PD. It suggested that low serum apo B level could be a powerful risk marker for eccentric left ventricular geometry remodeling and could be potentially used to risk-stratify PD patients.

The association between the apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio and coronary calcification may differ depending on kidney function in a healthy population

Background

The apolipoprotein B/A-1 ratio has been reported to be one of the strongest risk predictors of cardiovascular events. However, its prognostic value for cardiovascular disease is still uncertain, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to investigate whether the association between the apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio and coronary artery calcification differed according to kidney function in a healthy population.

Methods

Of the data from 7,780 participants from the medical records database in Gangnam Severance Hospital from 2005 through 2016, a cross-sectional analysis included participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m² determined based on the Chronic Kidney Disease -Epidemiology Collaboration equation (n  =  1,800). Mild renal insufficiency was defined as an eGFR of 60–90 mL/min/1.73 m². Coronary artery calcification measured with computed tomography was defined as an above-zero score. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between coronary calcification and the apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio according to eGFR by adjusting for the influence of confounders.

Results

The mean apolipoprotein B/A-I level was significantly higher in the participants with coronary artery calcification than in the participants without coronary artery calcification. The apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio was significantly different according to coronary artery calcification in the participants with normal kidney function, but in the participants with mild renal insufficiency, it was not different. After adjusting for age, male sex, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, current smoking status, and fasting plasma glucose, the apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio was significantly associated with an increased risk of coronary artery calcification in participants with normal kidney function (odds ratio = 2.411, p = 0.011), while in the participants with mild renal insufficiency, the apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio was not associated with coronary artery calcification.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the predictive value of apolipoprotein B/A-I ratio for coronary artery calcification may differ according to kidney function.

Prediction of future development of cardiovascular disease with an equation to estimate apolipoprotein B: A community-based cohort study

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) has additional benefits over conventional lipid measurements in predicting future cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to validate the clinical relevance of our equation to estimate apoB in a large-scale, prospective, community-based cohort study (Ansung-Ansan cohort study).A total of 9001 Korean subjects were assessed. We excluded subjects with history of CVD (n = 228), taking lipid-lowering medications (n = 51), and those whose outcome data were not available (n = 33). Finally, a total of 8713 subjects (4126 men and 4587 women) with a mean age of 52.2 years were enrolled and followed up biannually for a mean 8.1 years.At baseline, 24.9% of subjects were current smokers, 12.5% had diabetes, and 22.2% had hypertension. Incident case of CVD occurred in 600 of the study subjects (493 ischemic heart disease and 424 stroke). Independent variables included in the models were age, sex, waist circumference, current smoking, and presence of diabetes and hypertension. Both non-HDL cholesterol (HR per 1-SD [95% CI]; 1.13 [1.05-1.23], P = 0.002) and estimated apoB (HR per 1-SD [95% CI]; 1.14 [1.05-1.24], P = 0.001) were independently associated with the development of CVD; however, the LDL cholesterol level was not predictive of future CVD (HR per 1-SD [95% CI]; 1.07 [0.99-1.16], P = 0.08).Both non-HDL cholesterol and estimated apoB level were independently associated with the development of CVD. Because LDL cholesterol has limited value to predict incident CVD, we recommend calculating non-HDL cholesterol or apoB with our equation to predict risk of incident CVD in the general Korean population.

Associations between intensive diabetes therapy and NMR-determined lipoprotein subclass profiles in type 1 diabetes

Our objective is to define differences in circulating lipoprotein subclasses between intensive versus conventional management of type 1 diabetes during the randomization phase of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). NMR-determined lipoprotein subclass profiles (NMR-LSPs), which estimate molar subclass concentrations and mean particle diameters, were determined in 1,294 DCCT subjects after a median of 5 years (interquartile range: 4-6 years) of randomization to intensive or conventional diabetes management. In cross-sectional analyses, we compared standard lipids and NMR-LSPs between treatment groups. Standard total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels were similar between randomization groups, while triglyceride levels were lower in the intensively treated group. NMR-LSPs showed that intensive therapy was associated with larger LDL diameter (20.7 vs. 20.6 nm, P = 0.01) and lower levels of small LDL (median: 465 vs. 552 nmol/l, P = 0.007), total IDL/LDL (mean: 1,000 vs. 1,053 nmol/l, P = 0.01), and small HDL (mean: 17.3 vs. 18.6 μmol/l, P < 0.0001), the latter accounting for reduced total HDL (mean: 33.8 vs. 34.8 μmol/l, P = 0.01). In conclusion, intensive diabetes therapy was associated with potentially favorable changes in LDL and HDL subclasses in sera. Further research will determine whether these changes contribute to the beneficial effects of intensive diabetes management on vascular complications.

Identifying an Optimal Cutpoint for the Diagnosis of Hypertriglyceridemia in the Nonfasting State

BACKGROUND

Nonfasting triglycerides are similar or superior to fasting triglycerides at predicting cardiovascular events. However, diagnostic cutpoints are based on fasting triglycerides. We examined the optimal cutpoint for increased nonfasting triglycerides.

METHODS

We obtained baseline nonfasting (<8 h since last meal) samples from 6391 participants in the Women's Health Study who were followed prospectively for ≤17 years. The optimal diagnostic threshold for nonfasting triglycerides, determined by logistic regression models by use of c-statistics and the Youden index (sum of sensitivity and specificity minus 1), was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident cardiovascular events. Performance was compared to thresholds recommended by the American Heart Association (AHA) and European guidelines.

RESULTS

The optimal threshold was 175 mg/dL (1.98 mmol/L), with a c-statistic of 0.656, statistically better than the AHA cutpoint of 200 mg/dL (c-statistic 0.628). For nonfasting triglycerides above and below 175 mg/dL, after adjusting for age, hypertension, smoking, hormone use, and menopausal status, the HR for cardiovascular events was 1.88 (95% CI 1.52-2.33, P < 0.001), and for triglycerides measured at 0-4 and 4-8 h since the last meal, 2.05 (1.54- 2.74) and 1.68 (1.21-2.32), respectively. We validated performance of this optimal cutpoint by use of 10-fold cross-validation and bootstrapping of multivariable models that included standard risk factors plus total and HDL cholesterol, diabetes, body mass index, and C-reactive protein.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of middle-aged and older apparently healthy women, we identified a diagnostic threshold for nonfasting hypertriglyceridemia of 175 mg/dL (1.98 mmol/L), with the potential to more accurately identify cases than the currently recommended AHA cutpoint.

Apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Predictive value for CHD severity and prognostic utility in CHD patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To explore the clinical value of the combination of apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 (apoB/A1) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in evaluating the severity of coronary heart disease (CHD) and in predicting in-hospital CHD events and the long-term prognosis of CHD patients.

METHODS

According to the results of coronary angiography, 826 patients were enrolled and classified into a CHD group (532 cases, including single-branch stenosis group, n = 165; double-branch stenosis group, n = 175;and multi-branch stenosis group, n = 192) and a normal group (294 cases). The serum apoB/apoA1 ratio and non-HDL-C were calculated at baseline. The Gensini score and logistic regression were applied to analyze the association between the apoB/apoA1 ratio, non-HDL-C, and the severity of CHD. Major in-hospital adverse incidents were recorded and follow-up telephone interviews were conducted 3 years after discharge.

RESULTS

Both the apoB/apoA1 ratio and non-HDL-C rose with the number of stenotic coronary branches. Only apoB and apoB/apoA1 remained significantly associated with the risk of multi-branches lesions and the Gensini score after adjustment. Patients with combined high levels of apoB/apoA1 and non-HDL-C (N = 50, 43.10 %) suffered from the highest risk of multi-branches lesions. Similarly, patients with combined high levels of apoB/apoA1 and non-HDL-C not only suffered from the highest risk of in-hospital new-onset heart failure and cardiac death (16.38 % vs. 10.35 %), but also had the highest risk of adverse events, angina, myocardial infarction, new-onset heart failure, stroke, and cardiac death after an average 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The combination of apoB/apoA1 and non-HDL-C is predictive of the severity of CHD, and it could provide more prognostic information than its individual components or other routine lipid profiles.

Clinical Strategies for Managing Dyslipidemias

Dyslipidemia is defined as elevated fasting blood levels of total cholesterol (TC), and its primary lipoprotein carrier—low-density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TG), or reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL), alone, or in combination (mixed dyslipidemia). Dyslipidemia is well known to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. All patients with dyslipidemia should initiate therapeutic lifestyle changes to target lifestyle-related factors such as physical inactivity, dietary habits, and obesity. The combination of a proper dietary plan and regular aerobic exercise has been reported to lower TC, LDL-C, and TG by 7% to 18%, while increasing HDL-C by 2% to 18%. Numerous pharmacological therapies are available and aggressive therapy using a HMG-CoA reductase (3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase) inhibitor (statins) should be initiated if lifestyle therapy is not enough to achieve optimal lipid levels with a primary target of lowering LDL-C levels. Aggressive treatment of dyslipidemia with maximal dosage of statin drugs have been reported to reduce LDL-C by 30% to 60%. If mixed dyslipidemia is present, a combination therapy with statin, niacin, cholestyramine, or fibrates should be initiated to reduce the risk of CVD events. These strategies have been shown to reduce CVD risk and optimize LDL-C levels in primary and secondary prevention of CVD.

Chronic kidney disease, lipids and apolipoproteins, and coronary heart disease: the ARIC study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with elevated apolipoprotein B to A-1 ratio (ApoB/A1). It is not known whether these markers are more strongly associated with the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in CKD compared to traditionally measured lipids and lipoprotein cholesterol ratios.

METHODS

We studied the association of lipids and apolipoproteins including non-HDL-cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol ratio (NonHDLc/HDLc) and ApoB/A1 with incident CHD in 10,137 individuals free of CHD at baseline (visit four) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. An estimated glomerular filtration rate of 15 to <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) based on a cystatin C measurement was used to define CKD (Stage 3-4). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine the association of lipids and apolipoprotein measurements with the risk of CHD in those with and without CKD after adjustment for demographic and known clinical cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS

CKD was present in 1217 (12%) individuals free of CHD at baseline. The median follow-up time was 11.1 years. A CHD event developed in 498 out of 8920 individuals without CKD (incidence rate: 5.2 events per 1000 person-years) and in 138 out of 1217 individuals with CKD (incidence rate: 12.0 events per 1000 person-years; P < 0.001). Those with CKD had a lower concentration of ApoA1: median (in g/L) and interquartile range (IQR) = 1.40 (1.38-1.42) vs. 1.48 (1.47-1.49) P < 0.001; and a higher ApoB/A1 = 0.75 (0.73-0.77) vs. 0.71 (0.70-0.72) P < 0.001; than those without CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Among individuals with CKD, ApoB/A1 and NonHDLc/HDLc were both associated with the risk of CHD: hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per one standard deviation increase = 1.22 (1.02-1.46) for ApoB/A1 and 1.30 (1.07-1.57) for NonHDLc/HDLc with no significant differences detected (P for interaction >0.1) when comparing these estimates to those of participants without CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CKD is associated with a lower ApoA1 concentration and with a higher ApoB/A1, we found no evidence that these apolipoproteins are more strongly associated with CHD incidence in CKD compared to NonHDLc/HDLc.

Comparison of therapeutic lipid target achievements among high-risk patients in Oman

We compared therapeutic lipid target achievements among patients with diabetes or coronary heart disease (CHD) in Oman. A retrospective chart review of 94 patients was conducted at an outpatient clinic in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. The variables included low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apo B). The overall mean age of the cohort was 59 ± 12 years, 54% were male, 66% were diabetic, 48% hypertensive, 45% had CHD, 94% were on simvastatin, 4% were on fenofibrate, and 2% were on both simvastatin and fenofibrate. Lipid goal attainments of calculated LDL-C (<2.6 mmol/L), apo B (<0.9 g/L), and non-HDL-C (<3.36 mmol/L) were reached in 52%, 39%, and 53% of the patients, respectively. A significant proportion of high-risk patients treated with lipid-lowering agents reach LDL-C but not the apo B treatment targets, suggesting that the use of apo B target values should also be considered.

Discriminant ratio and biometrical equivalence of measured vs. calculated apolipoprotein B100 in patients with T2DM

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB100) determination is superior to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to establish cardiovascular (CV) risk, and does not require prior fasting. ApoB100 is rarely measured alongside standard lipids, which precludes comprehensive assessment of dyslipidemia.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate two simple algorithms for apoB100 as regards their performance, equivalence and discrimination with reference apoB100 laboratory measurement.

METHODS

Two apoB100-predicting equations were compared in 87 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients using the Discriminant ratio (DR). Equation 1: apoB100 = 0.65*non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol + 6.3; and Equation 2: apoB100 = -33.12 + 0.675*LDL-C + 11.95*ln[triglycerides]. The underlying between-subject standard deviation (SDU) was defined as SDU = √ (SD2B - SD2W/2); the within-subject variance (Vw) was calculated for m (2) repeat tests as (Vw) = Σ(xj -xi)2/(m-1)), the within-subject SD (SDw) being its square root; the DR being the ratio SDU/SDW.

RESULTS

All SDu, SDw and DR's values were nearly similar, and the observed differences in discriminatory power between all three determinations, i.e. measured and calculated apoB100 levels, did not reach statistical significance. Measured Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficients between all apoB100 determinations were very high, respectively at 0.94 (measured vs. equation 1); 0.92 (measured vs. equation 2); and 0.97 (equation 1 vs. equation 2), each measurement reaching unity after adjustment for attenuation.

CONCLUSION

Both apoB100 algorithms showed biometrical equivalence, and were as effective in estimating apoB100 from routine lipids. Their use should contribute to better characterize residual cardiometabolic risk linked to the number of atherogenic particles, when direct apoB100 determination is not available.

Hypertriglyceridemia and residual dyslipidemia in statin-treated, patients with diabetes at the highest risk for cardiovascular disease and achieving very-low low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels

BACKGROUND

As the result of the high prevalence of comorbidities and conventional risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), most patients belong to the highest cardiovascular disease risk category, and have a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of <70 mg/dL. Because substantial residual risk persists at LDL-C <70 mg/dL, a more comprehensive control of non-LDL-C and particles was recommended in the joint 2008 American Diabetes Association/American College of Cardiology Consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain, in statin-treated T2DM patients belonging to this greatest-risk group, with on-statin LDL-C <70 mg/dL, (1) the proportion of patients meeting all three critical levels (LDL-C <70 mg/dL, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C] <100 mg/dL, apoB <80 mg/dL) and (2) the variables associated with target attainment versus nonattainment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 675 unselected patients with T2DM, 367 were both at very high cardiometabolic risk and taking statins; 118 of these patient had LDL-C levels <70 mg/dL. Patients meeting all three criteria (LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB; n = 79; all three at goal group) were compared with those only reaching LDL-C (n = 49; only LDL-C at goal group).

RESULTS

LDL-C was 54 (12) for the all three at goal group versus 57 (10) mg/dL for the only LDL-C at goal group (NS). The two groups were similar regarding age, gender, diabetes duration, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, renal function and micro-/macroangiopathy prevalence. A statin plus fibrate was given to 16% of patients in the all three at goal group and 32% in the only LDL-C at goal group. The two groups did not differ in baseline (prestatin) LDL-C, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C, except for pre-/post-lipid-lowering drug(s) triglycerides (TG): 177 (95)/118 (56) for all three at goal versus 279 (134)/ 241 (103) mg/dL for only LDL-C at goal (P = .0230 and P = .0001). The only LDL-C at goal group had lower HDL-C (vs. all three at goal): 41 (12) vs. 47 (14) mg/dL (P = .0237), with atherogenic dyslipidemia [hypo-HDL-C + hyper-TG] prevalence of 35% in the all three at goal versus 56% in the only LDL-C at goal group (P < .0001). log(TG)/HDL-C was 0.049 (0.021) for all three at goal versus 0.063 (0.021) for only LDL-C at goal (P < .0001). The LDL-C/apoB ratio was 0.92 (0.24) for all three at goal vs. 0.67 (0.18) for only LDL-C at goal (P < .0001), suggestive of smaller/denser LDL.

CONCLUSION

The presence of atherogenic dyslipidemia was associated with a failure to meet all three critical modifiable targets for hypercholesterolemia, such a nonachievement being found in a large proportion (one-third) of very-high risk T2DM patients with very-low on-statin LDL-C. Attainment of all three targets will require (1) titration/permutation of statins, (2) lifestyle (re)inforcement; and/or (3) statin-fibrate bitherapy.

Assessment of chitosan-affected metabolic response by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor bioluminescent imaging-guided transcriptomic analysis

Chitosan has been widely used in food industry as a weight-loss aid and a cholesterol-lowering agent. Previous studies have shown that chitosan affects metabolic responses and contributes to anti-diabetic, hypocholesteremic, and blood glucose-lowering effects; however, the in vivo targeting sites and mechanisms of chitosan remain to be clarified. In this study, we constructed transgenic mice, which carried the luciferase genes driven by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), a key regulator of fatty acid and glucose metabolism. Bioluminescent imaging of PPAR transgenic mice was applied to report the organs that chitosan acted on, and gene expression profiles of chitosan-targeted organs were further analyzed to elucidate the mechanisms of chitosan. Bioluminescent imaging showed that constitutive PPAR activities were detected in brain and gastrointestinal tract. Administration of chitosan significantly activated the PPAR activities in brain and stomach. Microarray analysis of brain and stomach showed that several pathways involved in lipid and glucose metabolism were regulated by chitosan. Moreover, the expression levels of metabolism-associated genes like apolipoprotein B (apoB) and ghrelin genes were down-regulated by chitosan. In conclusion, these findings suggested the feasibility of PPAR bioluminescent imaging-guided transcriptomic analysis on the evaluation of chitosan-affected metabolic responses in vivo. Moreover, we newly identified that downregulated expression of apoB and ghrelin genes were novel mechanisms for chitosan-affected metabolic responses in vivo.

Clinical Impact of Non-High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein B on Clinical Outcomes in Metabolic Syndrome Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background and Objectives

Subjects and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Reducing vascular events risk in patients with dyslipidaemia: an update for clinicians

Reducing the risk of vascular events in patients with dyslipidaemia requires cardiovascular disease risk stratification and lifestyle/pharmacological intervention on modifiable risk factors. Reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins is highly effective in reducing cardiovascular disease in patients with and without diabetes, but leaves unaddressed a sizeable residual vascular risk (RvR), which is rarely quantified in routine clinical practice. Such RvR may relate to lack of strict target attainment for all atherogenic variables [LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and/or apolipoprotein B(100)]. Another substantial lipid-related and modifiable RvR component is related to atherogenic dyslipidaemia, especially as global rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome are increasing. Atherogenic dyslipidaemia is associated with insulin-stimulated very-low-density lipoprotein overproduction and reduced reverse cholesterol transport. The hallmark of atherogenic dyslipidaemia is the coexistence of low HDL-C and elevated triglycerides. Therapeutic lifestyle changes and combination lipid-lowering therapy with drugs targeting atherogenic dyslipidaemia (such as fibrates or innovative drugs targeting atherogenic dyslipidaemia and/or apolipoprotein B(100) metabolism) on top of background statins, have a potential to reduce RvR in high-risk groups, as shown in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, in which combination therapy with simvastatin plus fenofibrate decreased macrovascular risk in patients with diabetes and atherogenic dyslipidaemia, and retinopathy risk irrespective of baseline lipids.

ApoB/apoA-I ratio is better than LDL-C in detecting cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cardiovascular (CV) events occur even when LDL-C are <100mg/dL. To improve the detection of CV risk we investigated the apoB/apoA-I ratio versus LDL-C in subjects considered normal glucose tolerant (NGT) by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 616 NGT (273 men and 343 women), and we measured insulin resistance, lipid profile, apoB/apoA-I and the factors compounding the metabolic syndrome (MetS). An unfavourable apoB/apoA-I (≥0.9 for males and ≥0.8 for females) was present in 13.9% of 108 patients with LDL-C <100mg/dL: compared to subjects with lower apoB/apoA-I (<0.9 for males and <0.8 for females), they had more elements of MetS and their lipid profile strongly correlated with high CV risk. Out of 314 patients with lower apoB/apoA-I, 40.12% had LDL-C ≥130mg/dL: these retained a more favourable lipid profile than corresponding subjects with elevated apoB/apoA-I ratio. Finally, we found a significant correlation between LDL-C and apoB/apoA-I ratio (r=0.48, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In NGT with LDL-C <100mg/dL, a higher apoB/apoA-I exhibited an atherogenic lipid profile, indicating that LDL-C alone is insufficient to define CV risk. Independent from LDL-level, when apoB/apoA-I is lower, the lipid profile is, in fact, less atherogenic. This study demonstrates that apoB/apoA-I is at least complementary to LDL-C in identifying the "effective" CV risk profile of asymptomatic NGT subjects.

Non-HDL-cholesterol as valid surrogate to apolipoprotein B100 measurement in diabetes: Discriminant Ratio and unbiased equivalence

Background

Apolipoprotein B₁₀₀ (apoB) is a superior indicator of CV risk than total or LDL-C. Non-HDL-C represents a simple surrogate for apoB in hypertriglyceridemic and/or T2DM patients. ApoB and non-HDL-C show high correlation, although the degree of mutual concordance remains debated in CV risk evaluation.

Objectives

We used the Discriminant Ratio (DR) methodology to compare the performance of non-HDL-C with that of apoB to rank diabetic patients according to dyslipidemia and to establish the underlying relationship between these variables taking measurement noise and intra-/intersubject variation into account, and to derive an unbiased equivalence equation.

Methods

Fasting total C, HDL-C, apoB and triglycerides were measured in 45 diabetic patients. The DR of the underlying between-subject standard deviation (SD) to the within-subject SD was calculated from duplicates. Correlation coefficients between pairs were adjusted to include an estimate of the underlying correlation.

Results

Mean values [day 1 (1SD)] were 143 (36) mg/dl (non-HDL-C) and 98 (24) mg/dl (apoB). The DR's of both parameters were similar (1.76 and 1.83) (p = 0.83). Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient between tests was very high (0.94), reaching unity (1.00) after attenuation adjustment. The unbiased equation of equivalence relating apoB to non-HDL-C had a slope of 0.65 and an intercept of 6.3 mg/dl.

Conclusions

The discrimination power of non-HDL-C is similar to that of apoB to rank diabetic patients according to atherogenic cholesterol and lipoprotein burden. Since true correlation between variables reached unity, non-HDL-C may provide not only a metabolic surrogate but also a candidate biometrical equivalent to apoB, as non-HDL-C calculation is readily available.

Predictors of the intima-media thickness of carotid artery in asymptomatic newly detected severe hypercholesterolemic patients

BACKGROUND

Data about predictors of intima-media thickness (IMT) of common carotid artery (CCA) in asymptomatic subjects with newly detected severe hypercholesterolemia is scarce.

AIM

This research is aimed at studying the predictors of the IMT of CCA among basic atherogenic risk biomarkers - lipid [total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, Apolipoprotein-B, Apolipoprotein-Ai, Apolipoprotein-B/A(1) index] and non-lipid, [asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), total homocysteine, cell adhesion molecules] in asymptomatic subjects with newly detected severe hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty asymptomatic patients with severe, newly hypercholesterolemia and 200 controls were evaluated. Hypercholesterolemia was defined as TC > 7.5 mm and LDL cholesterol > 4.9 mm. The ADMA and cell adhesion molecules were determined by ELISA and total homocysteine by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

There was significant difference between the two groups in respect to all lipid biomarkers (P<0.001). Hypercholesterolemic patients had significantly higher level of ADMA, sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, IMT (P<0.001), whereas no significant difference was found between two groups with respect to total homocysteine, P-selectin and E-selectin (P>0.05). A strong positive correlation between IMT mean and age (r(xy) = 0.714; P<0.001), Apolipoprotein-B (r(xy) = 0.706; r(xy) < 0.001), Apolipoprotein-B/A(1) (r(xy) = 0.324; P<0.001), ADMA (r(xy) = 0.603; P<0.001) was found. The subsequent linear and multiple regression analysis selected age and Apolipoprotein-B as most significant factors in relation to IMT mean. Apolipoprotein-B is a better factor for assessment of risk, as LDL cholesterol underestimates the risk in asymptomatic subjects with newly detected severe hypercholesterolemia, until more rapid and feasible methods for measurement of small and dense LDL are available.

Premature onset of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected individuals: the drugs and the virus

Life expectancy in HIV-infected individuals has been greatly enhanced through immunologic restoration and virologic suppression resulting from antiretroviral therapy. Current clinical HIV care in Western countries focuses on treatment of drug toxicities and prevention of comorbidities. These non-AIDS HIV-related comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, occur even in individuals with virologic suppression and manifest at an earlier age than when normally presenting in the general population. While traditional risk factors are present in many HIV-infected individuals who develop cardiovascular disease, the additional roles of HIV-related chronic inflammation and immune activation as well as chronic HIV viremia may be significant. This review provides current evidence for the contributions of the virus, in terms of both chronic viremia and its contribution via chronic low-level inflammation, immune activation, premature immune senescence and dyslipidemia, to the pathogenesis of HIV-related cardiovascular disease, and balances this against the propensity of specific antiretroviral therapies to cause cardiovascular disease, in particular through altered cholesterol metabolism.

Dyslipidemia and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: Role of Lifestyle Approaches for Its Management

Multiple risk factors have a causative relationship to the etiology of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, it is clear that dyslipidemia plays a central role. The chain of evidence is strongest for elevated levels of total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). An inverse association has also been demonstrated between levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and its principal apolipoprotein, A-1, and risk of CHD. Elevated levels of fasting triglyceride (TG) also are a predictor of CHD, but the independent contribution of TG is difficult to prove because of its usual association with reduced levels of HDL-C; elevated levels of small, dense, highly-atherogenic LDL particles; and the metabolic syndrome. Elevated fasting levels of non—HDL-C (TC — LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B also are strongly predictive of the risk of CHD. Therapeutic lifestyle changes are important adjuncts to pharmacologic management of dyslipidemia. The purpose of this article is to review these contributions with an emphasis on dietary habits (particularly lipid intake), weight management, and aerobic exercise.

Carotid intima-media thickness and apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I ratio in middle-aged patients with Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To explore the association between carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and the apolipoprotein B (apoB)/apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) ratio compared with conventional lipids in middle-aged patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We analysed data from 247 patients with Type 2 diabetes, aged 55-66 years, in the Cardiovascular Risk factors in Patients with Diabetes-a Prospective study in Primary care (CARDIPP-1) study. Primary care nurses measured blood pressure and anthropometric characteristics. Blood samples were taken for laboratory analyses. The carotid IMT was determined by ultrasonography at the University Hospital in Linköping and at the County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.

RESULTS

The ApoB/apoA-I ratio (r = 0.207, P = 0.001), apoB (r = 0.166, P = 0.009) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) (r = 0.129, P = 0.046) correlated with IMT. Conventional lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and systolic blood pressure were not significantly correlated to IMT. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted with IMT as the dependent variable and the apoB/apoA-I ratio, HbA(1c), hsCRP, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), total cholesterol, non-HDL-c and treatment with statins as independent variables. Following adjustment for age and gender, only the apoB/apoA-I ratio remained significantly associated with IMT (odds ratio 4.3, 95% confidence intervals 1.7-10.8, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there was a significant association between the apoB/apoA-I ratio and IMT in middle-aged patients with Type 2 diabetes. The association was independent of conventional lipids, hsCRP, glycaemic control and use of statins.

Ezetimibe: cholesterol lowering and beyond

Ezetimibe is a cholesterol absorption inhibitor that blocks the intestinal absorption of both biliary and dietary cholesterol. It appears to exert its effect by blocking intestinal sterol transporters, specifically Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 proteins, thereby inhibiting the intestinal absorption of cholesterol, phytosterols and certain oxysterols. Ezetimibe monotherapy and in combination with statin therapy is primarily indicated for lowering LDL-cholesterol levels. In addition, it may favorably affect other parameters that could potentially further reduce atherosclerotic coronary heart disease risk, such as raising HDL-cholesterol and lowering levels of triglycerides, non-HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and remnant-like particle cholesterol. Further effects of ezetimibe include a reduction in circulating phytosterols and oxysterols and, when used in combination with statins, a reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. The clinical significance of the LDL-cholesterol lowering and other effects of ezetimibe is being evaluated in clinical outcome studies.

Apolipoprotein B and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk of coronary heart disease in Chinese

The aim of our study was to compare apolipoprotein B (apoB), non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (nonHDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and other lipid markers as predictors of coronary heart disease (CHD) in Chinese. Overall, 122 individuals developed CHD during a median 13.6 years of follow-up in 3,568 adult participants from a community-based cohort. The multivariate relative risk of CHD in the highest quintile compared with the lowest quintile was 2.74 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45-5.19] for apoB, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.00-3.92) for nonHDL-C, and 1.86 (95% CI, 1.00-3.49) for LDL-C (all tests for trend, P < 0.05). ApoB also had the highest receiver operator characteristic curve area (0.63; 95% CI, 0.58-0.68) in predicting CHD. When apoB and nonHDL-C were mutually adjusted, only apoB was predictive; the relative risk was 2.80 (95% CI, 1.31-5.96; P = 0.001) compared with 1.09 (95% CI, 0.49-2.40; P = 0.75) for nonHDL-C. Compared with the lowest risk, participants with the highest apoB and total cholesterol/HDL-C had a 3-fold increased risk of developing CHD (relative risk = 3.21; 95% CI, 1.45-7.14). These data provide strong evidence that apoB concentration was a better predictor of CHD than other lipid markers in Chinese.

Comparison of apolipoprotein B and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for identifying coronary artery disease risk based on receiver operating curve analysis

Whether or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is equivalent to apolipoprotein B (apo B) for screening remains controversial. One reason for continued controversy is that most studies express results as relative risk/hazard or odds ratios based on P values that reflect diagnostic values poorly. Apo B and lipoprotein lipids were compared in 437 men. The results were evaluated by multivariate techniques and by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. When analyzed by ROC curves, the difference between Apo B and lipoprotein lipids proved to be less than would be anticipated from the odds ratios. Although, after adjustment, the difference was about 14% by odds ratios, ROC analysis showed only a small difference of about 1%. These data show that clinical studies should analyze the data using an absolute measure of risk such as ROC curves rather than just relative indexes. Such a small absolute difference may also explain discrepancies between studies.

Effect of rosuvastatin 5-20mg on triglycerides and other lipid parameters in Japanese patients with hypertriglyceridemia

To evaluate the potential dose effect of rosuvastatin on triglyceride (TG) levels in Japanese hypertriglyceridemic patients, we randomized 154 patients with TG levels of >or=200 and <800 mg/dL to 8 weeks of treatment with rosuvastatin 5, 10 or 20mg once daily; bezafibrate 200mg twice daily; or placebo. Compared with placebo, TG was reduced by 30.1% with rosuvastatin 5mg, 30.1% with 10mg and 32.3% with 20mg (all p<or=0.0001), with no evidence of a dose effect. Changes in TG were evident after 2 weeks of treatment and maintained thereafter. In a benchmark comparison, rosuvastatin across its dose range reduced TG by 29.1-31.1% from baseline versus 45.4% for bezafibrate. Compared with bezafibrate, rosuvastatin was superior with respect to changes in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C, -36.8 to -44.3% for rosuvastatin versus -2.0% for bezafibrate), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-31.9 to -41.0% versus +29.3%), total cholesterol (-27.1 to -33.3% versus +2.1%), although smaller improvements in HDL-C (12.4-16.7% versus 19.6%) were observed. Rosuvastatin also produced superior dose-related decreases in median high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (22.9-38.5%). Treatment was well tolerated in both rosuvastatin and bezafibrate patients, with clinically important increases in alanine aminotransferase being rare, no adverse effect on renal function being observed and no cases of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis being reported. The current study does not suggest a dose-related effect of rosuvastatin in lowering TG in hypertriglyceridemic Japanese patients, although dose-related improvements in other elements of the atherogenic lipid profile were observed.

Lifestyle Intervention and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factor Changes over 18 Months in Postmenopausal Women: The Women On the Move through Activity And Nutrition (WOMAN Study) Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

In this paper, we present the results of changes in risk factors by use of hormone therapy (HT) at 18 months in the Women On the Move through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) randomized trial.

METHODS

The trial was designed to test the hypothesis that aggressive dietary changes and increased physical activity to reduce weight, waist circumference (WC), glucose, insulin, and lipoproteins would reduce progression of subclinical atherosclerosis, carotid intimal media thickness and plaque, coronary artery calcification, and pulse wave velocity (PWV). The study focused on postmenopausal women (n = 508), mean age of 57, who were randomized to the Lifestyle Change (LC) or Health Education (HE) group.

RESULTS

At 18 months of follow-up, there was significant, 17 lb, weight loss and 10 cm WC decrease in the LC group. There were significant differences in changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), insulin, glucose, large LDL, and LDL particles between the LC and HE groups. Risk factor changes were greater for women in the LC who lost a significant amount of weight (>or=18.8 lb). Participants at 18 months were subdivided into women who had stayed on HT, 125 (28%); stopped HT after randomization, 145 (33%); and not on HT at baseline but stopped an average of 7 months prior to randomization, 173 (39%). Weight loss in the LC was similar for all three groups, but LDL lipoprotein response was better for women who stopped HT after randomization or were not on HT at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial has been successful in increasing exercise and diet changes and reduction in weight and WC and variables related to metabolic syndrome.

Inflammatory and Long-term Risk Markers

Evidence indicates that the process of atherosclerosis has an inflammatory component. Markers of inflammation have been explored as a means for assessing (predicting) risk for the disease. Studies that evaluated the usefulness of fibrinogen, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, myeloperoxidase, and soluble CD40 ligand for risk prediction are reviewed. Criteria for identifying a clinically useful test are discussed, along with the use of relative risk as a means for making clinically useful comparisons. It is concluded that clinically useful markers for routine screening and risk stratification have not been established, that prospective studies will be necessary to confirm the usefulness of current markers, and that on the basis of current knowledge, it will be a challenge to show that any of those inflammatory markers discussed herein will meet the needed criteria. Continued research into basic mechanisms by which inflammation acts in atherosclerosis may be necessary to identify useful markers for prediction.

The apoB/apoA-I ratio: a strong, new risk factor for cardiovascular disease and a target for lipid-lowering therapy--a review of the evidence

During the last several years interest has focused on the importance of the lipid-transporting apolipoproteins--apoB transports all potentially atherogenic very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and LDL particles, and apoA-I transports and acts as the major antiatherogenic protein in the HDL particles. The evidence for the apoB/apoA-I ratio being a strong, new risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease and a target for lipid-lowering therapy is reviewed. Results from clinical prospective studies and lipid-lowering trials in healthy subjects and in patients with different clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis are reported. Risk of nonfatal and fatal myocardial infarction and stroke, and manifestations of atherosclerosis documented by angiographic, ultrasound and other techniques has been related to conventional lipids and apolipoproteins (apo). The cholesterol balance determined as the apoB/apoA-I ratio has repeatedly been shown to be a better marker than lipids, lipoproteins and lipid ratios. The results indicate that the apoB/apoA-I ratio is a simple, accurate and new risk factor for CV disease--the lower the apoB/apoA-I ratio, the lower is the risk. Guidelines should be developed in order to recognize the important clinical risk information embedded in the apoB/apoA-I ratio.