Management of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Requiring Cardiac and Noncardiac Surgery

Incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate periprocedural and perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is little evidence on the impact of current recommendations on the use of antiplatelet therapy during the perioperative and periprocedural period in our setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate use of antiplatelet therapy in a population of patients undergoing surgery or a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure in "real life" in Spain.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter observational study of patients treated with antiplatelet agents requiring intervention was conducted. The incidence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events at 30 days was analyzed according to peri-intervention management of antiplatelet therapy.

RESULTS

We included 643 patients (31.9% women, 39.0% over 75 years of age), most of them (87.7%) receiving aspirin as antiplatelet therapy at a dose of 100mg/day. Indications for antiplatelet therapy were ischemic heart disease (44.9%), cerebrovascular disease (21.7%), and peripheral vascular disease (23.0%). Ischemic risk was low in 74.3%, while 51.6% had a low bleeding risk of the intervention. Periprocedural management was considered appropriate in 61.7% of cases. 30-day incidence of the combined primary endpoint of thrombotic events and major bleeding (12.1% versus 5.0%; p=0.002) and 30-day mortality (5.2% versus 1.5%; p=0.008) were significantly higher in patients with inappropriate periprocedural management of antiplatelet agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite current recommendations for the use of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative/periprocedural period, their implementation in the "real world" remains low. Inappropriate use is associated with an increased incidence of adverse events, both thrombotic and hemorrhagic.

Prospective observational registry of perioperative and periprocedural management of antithrombotic therapy in "real world": the REQXAA study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There is scarce real-world evidence on the management of perioperative antithrombotic treatment according to current recommendations. The aim of this study was to analyze the management of antithrombotic treatment in patients undergoing surgery or another invasive intervention and to assess the consequences of this management on the occurrence thrombotic or bleeding events.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, multicenter and multispecialty study analyzed patients receiving antithrombotic therapy who underwent surgery or another invasive intervention. The primary endpoint was defined as the incidence of adverse (thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic) events after 30 days of follow-up with respect to management of perioperative antithrombotic drugs.

RESULTS

We included 1266 patients (male: 63.5%; mean age 72.6 years). Nearly half of the patients (48.6%) were under chronic anticoagulation therapy (mainly for atrial fibrillation; CHA2DS2-VASC: 3.7), while 53.3% of the patients were under chronic antiplatelet therapy (mainly for coronary artery disease). Low ischemic and hemorrhagic risk was found in 66.7% and 51.9%, respectively. Antithrombotic therapy management was in line with current recommendations in only 57.3% of the patients. Inappropriate management of antithrombotic therapy was an independent risk factor for both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of recommendations on the perioperative/periprocedural management of antithrombotic therapy in real-world patients is poor. Inappropriate management of antithrombotic treatment is associated with an increase in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic events.

Urgent Revascularization of the Left Proximal Circumflex Following Cessation of Cangrelor Within Six Hours of Procedure

Patients undergoing procedures are often transitioned off anticoagulants using anti-platelet agents with short half-lives as a "bridge." We present the case of a patient with a history of in-stent thromboses who experienced a thrombotic event following a literature-guided bridging protocol. This case is one of the first to show that stopping cangrelor within six hours led to a need for urgent revascularization and suggests that the timing for discontinuing bridging agents should be customized based on the patient's history of increased blood clotting.

Clinical and Pre-Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bentracimab

Antiplatelet agents are among the most frequently used medications in cardiovascular medicine. Although in patients with atherosclerotic disease manifestations, in particular those treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, antiplatelet agents are beneficial for the prevention of ischemic events, they inevitably increase the risk of bleeding. Furthermore, 5-15% of patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention may need a surgical procedure within 2 years, creating challenges to safe and effective antiplatelet drug management. Importantly, major spontaneous or procedural-related bleedings are associated with increased hospital admission, length, costs, and poor prognosis. Although the effects of other antithrombotic therapies, such as direct oral anticoagulants, can be reversed by approved specific agents, there are no approved reversal agents for any antiplatelet drugs. The fact that many antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin and thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and prasugrel), bind irreversibly to their targets represents a challenge for the development of a drug-specific reversal agent. In contrast, ticagrelor is a non-thienopyridine with a plasma half-life of 7-9 h that reversely binds the P2Y₁₂ receptor producing potent signaling blockage. In 2015, bentracimab (also known as PB2452 or MEDI2452), a neutralizing monoclonal antibody fragment that binds free plasma ticagrelor and its major active metabolite, was identified. This systematic overview provides a comprehensive summary of the drug development program of bentracimab, focusing on its pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles.

Perioperative Management of Oral Antithrombotics in Dentistry and Oral Surgery: Part 2

Part 1 of "Perioperative Management of Oral Antithrombotics in Dentistry and Oral Surgery" covered the physiological process of hemostasis and the pharmacology of both traditional and novel oral antiplatelets and anticoagulants. Part 2 of this review discusses various factors that are considered when developing a perioperative management plan for patients on oral antithrombotic therapy in consultation with dental professionals and managing physicians. Additionally included are how thrombotic and thromboembolic risks are assessed as well as how patient- and procedure-specific bleeding risks are evaluated. Special attention is given to the bleeding risks associated with procedures encountered when providing sedation and general anesthesia within the office-based dental environment.

Thrombotic Events Develop in 1 Out of 5 Patients Receiving ECMO Support: An 11-Year Referral Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for critically ill patients is growing rapidly given recent developments in technology. However, adverse events are frequently reported that have potentially devastating impacts on patient outcomes. The information on predictors and risk factors for thrombotic events, especially that focusing on the comparison of veno-arterial and veno-venous ECMO configurations, are still inconsistent and sparse; therefore, we aimed to close this gap.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients on extracorporeal life support admitted to the intensive care units of a tertiary university center in Europe.

RESULTS

From 645 patients, 417 who received extracorporeal life support due to cardiogenic shock (290, 70%), respiratory failure (116, 28%) or hypothermia (11, 3%) were included. In total, 22% (92) of the patients experienced thrombotic events with a similar incidence in both ECMO configurations. Anticoagulation consisted of unfractionated heparin (296, 71%) and argatroban (70, 17%). Univariate Cox analyses identified hemoconcentration and increased maximal clot firmness (thromboelastometry) as risk factors for thrombosis. Moreover, the patients experiencing thrombosis had longer ECMO duration and intensive care stays.

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO is a specialized life-support modality with a high risk of complications. A longer ECMO duration is associated with thrombosis occurrence in patients receiving ECMO support. Following hemorrhage, thromboembolic complications are common adverse events. However, in contrast to major bleeding, no impact on mortality was observed. The question arises if a protocol with less anticoagulation may have a role to play in the future.

Predictors of antiplatelet cessation in a real-world patient population undergoing non-cardiac surgery after PCI

BACKGROUND

The optimal perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy (APT) therapy in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery (NCS) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. We sought to identify predictors of APT cessation in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing NCS within 1 year of PCI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing PCI at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Perioperative interruption of APT was defined as cessation of either aspirin or P2Y₁₂ inhibitor between 1 and 14 days prior to NCS. Predictors of APT discontinuation were identified by multivariable Cox regression with stepwise selection of candidate variables.

RESULTS

A total of 1092 surgeries corresponding to 747 patients were identified. Overall, there were 487 (44.6%) preoperative antiplatelet interruptions: discontinuation of either P2Y₁₂ inhibitors only (47.4%), aspirin only (7.9%), or both agents (44.7%). Both patient-specific risk factors (prior stroke, lower BMI, anemia, MI) and procedure specific risk factors (chronic total occlusions, multivessel disease, drug-eluting stent use) affected decisions regarding APT cessation. Likelihood of APT cessation increased in higher-risk surgeries and in patients on more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (ticagrelor/prasugrel vs clopidogrel) whereas those undergoing NCS <90 days post PCI were less likely to have cessation of APT.

CONCLUSION

In this contemporary cohort of post-PCI patients undergoing NCS, patient-, angiographic- and surgery-specific factors all affected decision-making regarding APT cessation. Our findings reflective of real-world practice, highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach to individualize decision making in these patients.

The Role of Excessive Anticoagulation and Missing Hyperinflammation in ECMO-Associated Bleeding

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used in carefully selected patients with cardiac or respiratory failure. However, complications are common and can be associated with worse outcomes, while data on risk factors and outcomes are inconsistent and sparse. Therefore, we sought to investigate potential risk factors and predictors of haemorrhage and adverse events during ECMO and its influence on mortality. We retrospectively reviewed all patients on ECMO support admitted to intensive care units of a tertiary university centre in Austria. In a period of ten years, ECMO support was used in 613 patients, with 321 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of this study. Haemorrhage, occurring in more than one third of the included patients (123, 38%), represented the most common and serious ECMO complication, being associated with an increased one year mortality (51% vs. 35%, p = 0.005). The main risk factors for haemorrhage were severity of the disease (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, p = 0.047), a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (HR = 1.01, p = 0.007), and lower values of C-reactive protein (HR = 0.96, p = 0.005) and procalcitonin (HR = 0.99, p = 0.029). In summary, haemorrhage remained the main ECMO complication with increased mortality. Moreover, we reported a possible association of lower inflammation and bleeding during ECMO support for the first time. This generated a new hypothesis that warrants further research. Finally, we recommend stricter monitoring of anticoagulation especially in patients without hyperinflammation.

Safety and Efficacy of Periprocedural Bridging With Cangrelor Versus Eptifibatide

ABSTRACT

Patients with percutaneous coronary interventions undergoing procedures often require interruptions in their dual antiplatelet therapy. Periprocedural bridging is considered for patients at high thrombotic risk using intravenous cangrelor, a reversible P2Y12 inhibitor with a short half-life, or eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, with a slightly longer half-life but less costly alternative. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of cangrelor compared with eptifibatide when used in a periprocedural setting. The primary outcome of this retrospective cohort study was the incidence of bleeding events defined by the global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries criteria, and the secondary outcomes include the transfusion requirements, inpatient major cardiac adverse events, and cost savings per patient. A total of 75 patients were included who were bridged to procedures (cangrelor, n = 50; eptifibatide, n = 25). There were no significant differences in overall bleeding events defined by global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries criteria: mild bleeding [8% (n= 4) vs. 8% (n= 2); P = 0.68], moderate bleeding [28% (n = 14) vs. 48% (n = 12); P = 0.07), and severe bleeding [8% (n = 4) vs. 8% (n = 2); P = 0.25] between cangrelor and eptifibatide. The composite inpatient major cardiac adverse events were also similar between cangrelor and eptifibatide [10% (n = 10) vs. 8% (n = 8); P = 0.78]. The average cost savings per each cangrelor patient on the equivalent duration of eptifibatide was calculated out to be $5824 per patient. Cangrelor and eptifibatide were similar in terms of safety and efficacy when used as a bridge in patients with recent coronary stents, but considerable cost savings could be made if cangrelor was substituted for by eptifibatide in select patients. Further studies are needed to determine its applicability specifically in patients at high thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk.

Regulation of Key Antiplatelet Pathways by Bioactive Compounds with Minimal Bleeding Risk

Cardiovascular disease is strongly influenced by platelet activation. Platelet activation and thrombus formation at atherosclerotic plaque rupture sites is a dynamic process regulated by different signaling networks. Therefore, there are now focused efforts to search for novel bioactive compounds which target receptors and pathways in the platelet activation process while preserving normal hemostatic function. The antiplatelet activity of numerous fruits and vegetables and their multiple mechanisms of action have recently been highlighted. In this review, we review the antiplatelet actions of bioactive compounds via key pathways (protein disulfide isomerase, mitogen-activated protein kinases, mitochondrial function, cyclic adenosine monophosphate, Akt, and shear stress-induced platelet aggregation) with no effects on bleeding time. Therefore, targeting these pathways might lead to the development of effective antiplatelet strategies that do not increase the risk of bleeding.

"Tailored" antiplatelet bridging therapy with cangrelor: moving toward personalized medicine

In the setting of patients with indication to receive dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing surgery or invasive procedures, the risk of perioperative cardiac ischemic events, particularly stent thrombosis, is high, because surgery has a prothrombotic effect and antiplatelet therapy is withdrawn in order to avoid bleeding complications. Cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, has been tested in a randomized trial as a "bridge" to cardiac surgery from discontinuation of oral P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists. Thus, a consensus document extended its off-label use in this setting and before non-cardiac surgery. Currently, despite the implementation of a standardized bridging protocol with cangrelor, a residual risk of adverse outcome mainly due to bleeding events, still persist during the perioperative phase.Accordingly, a personalized management driven by platelet reactivity serial measurements and careful assessment of ischemic and bleeding risks has potential to optimize outcomes and costs as compared to a standardized bridging protocol, based on average pharmacodynamic data of oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors.While specific indications for bridging have been extensively addressed in the aforementioned consensus statement, the aim of the present document is the proposal of a "tailored" clinical decision-making algorithm inspired to the principle of personalized medicine dealing with complex clinical scenarios.

Bridging Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Patients undergoing early surgery after coronary stent implantation are at increased risk for mortality from ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. The optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients who cannot discontinue dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before surgery is unclear. Current guidelines, based on surgical and clinical characteristics, provide risk stratification for bridging therapy with intravenous antiplatelet agents, but management is guided primarily by expert opinion. This review summarizes perioperative risk factors to consider before discontinuing DAPT and reviews the data for intravenous bridging therapies. Published reports have included bridging options such as small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (eptifibatide or tirofiban) and cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y₁₂ inhibitor. However, optimal management of these complex patients remains unclear in the absence of randomized controlled data, without which an argument can be made both for and against the use of perioperative intravenous bridging therapy after discontinuing oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. Multidisciplinary risk assessment remains a critical component of perioperative care.

Coronary Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently coexist, with up to two thirds of patients with AS having significant CAD. Given the challenges when both disease states are present, these patients require a tailored approach diagnostically and therapeutically. In this review the authors address the impact of AS and aortic valve replacement (AVR) on coronary hemodynamic status and discuss the assessment of CAD and the role of revascularization in patients with concomitant AS and CAD. Remodeling in AS increases the susceptibility of myocardial ischemia, which can be compounded by concomitant CAD. AVR can improve coronary hemodynamic status and reduce ischemia. Assessment of the significance of coexisting CAD can be done using noninvasive and invasive metrics. Revascularization in patients undergoing AVR can benefit certain patients in whom CAD is either prognostically or symptomatically important. Identifying this cohort of patients is challenging and as yet incomplete. Patients with dual pathology present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge; both AS and CAD affect coronary hemodynamic status, they provoke similar symptoms, and their respective treatments can have an impact on both diseases. Decisions regarding coronary revascularization should be based on understanding this complex relationship, using appropriate coronary assessment and consensus within a multidisciplinary team.

Efficacy of Cangrelor as Bridging Therapy Post PCI

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains the cornerstone management for the prevention of acute stent thrombosis after percutaneous intervention (PCI). Situations mandating early interruption of DAPT carry a high risk of ischemic complications. Perioperative bridge therapy using Cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y2 inhibitor, may offer a potential solution. Unfortunately, evidence for its use in non-cardiac procedures is limited.

Methods

Our protocol demonstrates successful off-label use of IV Cangrelor bridge therapy in a non-cardiac surgery patient. We describe a case of a 77-year old male; triple therapy with Aspirin, Apixaban, and Ticagrelor for recent drug-eluting stent placement required immediate surgical resection of stage I colonic adenocarcinoma.

Results

Cangrelor bridge therapy was utilized both preoperatively and postoperatively without ischemic or bleeding complications. The patient tolerated exploratory laparoscopic colectomy with minimal bleeding and good post-op recovery.

Conclusion

Minimizing the interruption of DAPT therapy in high-risk patients is achievable. However, careful planning with a team-based approach involving surgeons, cardiologists and pharmacists, along with close clinical follow-up and vigilant management of anti-platelet therapy is recommended.

The effect of ticagrelor on microarterial thrombosis in an experimental model

Thromboses that form in the pedicle after free flap and/or replantation may result in the loss of the flap and/or limb. Ticagrelor is an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist antithrombotic that can inhibit ADP-dependent platelet activation and aggregation. It is clinically used in acute coronary syndrome and unstable angina. However, its effect on microarterial anastomoses has not been investigated in the literature. An experimental thrombosis model was developed in both femoral arteries of a total of 40 rats. Twenty rats were randomly selected as the drug-free control group, and 20 rats were randomly selected as the ticagrelor group. The rats in the ticagrelor group were administered a 20 mg/kg loading dose orally by gavage 24 h before the experiment, and a maintenance dose of 2x10 mg/kg ticagrelor for 14 days after surgery. After the experiment, the femoral artery was evaluated for macroscopic and microscopic thrombosis, inflammation, edema, and endothelialization. Macroscopically and microscopically, thrombosis was observed at rates of 73.3% and 33.3% in the control group and the ticagrelor group, respectively. Inflammation in the vessel wall was found as 56.7% in the control group and 16.7% in the ticagrelor group. Edema in the vessel wall was found in 63.3% of the control group and 20% of the ticagrelor group. A statistical difference was found between the two groups in terms of thrombosis, inflammation, and edema. Both groups had similar characteristics in terms of endothelialization. Ticagrelor has a reducing effect on thrombosis in the microarterial tuck model.

Antiplatelet Therapy with Cangrelor in Patients Undergoing Surgery after Coronary Stent Implantation: A Real-World Bridging Protocol Experience

Objective  The aim of the study is to describe the real-world use of the P2Y ₁₂ inhibitor cangrelor as a bridging strategy in patients at high thrombotic risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and referred to surgery requiring perioperative withdrawal of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Materials and Methods  We collected data from nine Italian centers on patients with previous PCI who were still on DAPT and undergoing nondeferrable surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation. A perioperative standardized bridging protocol with cangrelor was used.

Results  Between December 2017 and April 2019, 24 patients (mean age 72 years; male 79%) were enrolled. All patients were at high thrombotic risk after PCI and required nondeferrable intermediate to high bleeding risk surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation (4.6 ± 1.7 days). Cangrelor infusion was started at a bridging dose (0.75 µg/kg/min) 3 days before planned surgery and was discontinued 6.6 ± 1.5 hours prior to surgical incision. In 55% of patients, cangrelor was resumed at 9 ± 6 hours following surgery for a mean of 39 ± 38 hours. One cardiac death was reported after 3 hours of cangrelor discontinuation prior to surgery. No ischemic outcomes occurred after surgery and up to 30-days follow-up. The mean hemoglobin drop was <2 g/dL; nine patients received blood transfusions consistent with the type of surgery, but no life-threatening or fatal bleeding occurred.

Conclusion  Perioperative bridging therapy with cangrelor is a feasible approach for stented patients at high thrombotic risk and referred to surgery requiring DAPT discontinuation. Larger studies are warranted to support the safety of this strategy.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention–related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management

Perioperative cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality associated with non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vulnerable patients and implementation of adequate preventive measures, excessive evaluation might lead to undue resource utilization and surgical delay. Owing to conflicting data, there remains some uncertainty regarding the most beneficial perioperative strategy for patients with CAD. Antithrombotic agents are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic events but substantially increase the risk of bleeding. Given that 5-25% of patients undergoing coronary stent implantation require non-cardiac surgery within 2 years, surgery is the most common reason for premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, which necessitates concomitant evaluation of the individual thrombotic and bleeding risks related to both clinical and procedural factors, poses a recurring dilemma in clinical practice. Current guidelines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patients is yet to be determined. This Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedural management of patients with CAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, including those treated with stents.

PERK Inhibition Mitigates Restenosis and Thrombosis: A Potential Low-Thrombogenic Antirestenotic Paradigm

•

Drug-eluting stents impede neointimal smooth muscle cell hyperplasia but exacerbate endothelial cell dysfunction and thrombogenicity. It has been a challenge to identify a common target to inhibit both. Findings in this study suggest PERK as such a target.

•

A PERK inhibitor administered either via an endovascular (in biomimetic nanocarriers) or perivascular (in hydrogel) route effectively mitigated neointimal hyperplasia in rats.

•

Oral gavage of the PERK inhibitor partially preserved the normal blood flow in a mouse model of induced thrombosis.

•

Dampening PERK activity inhibited STAT3 while activating SRF in smooth muscle cells, and also reduced prothrombogenic tissue factor and growth impairment of endothelial cells.

Developing endothelial-protective, nonthrombogenic antirestenotic treatments has been a challenge. A major hurdle to this has been the identification of a common molecular target in both smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, inhibition of which blocks dysfunction of both cell types. The authors’ findings suggest that the PERK kinase could be such a target. Importantly, PERK inhibition mitigated both restenosis and thrombosis in preclinical models, implicating a low-thrombogenic antirestenotic paradigm.

Surgical thromboprophylaxis in daily urologic surgery: Beyond bridge therapy

INTRODUCTION

With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice.

OBJECTIVES

To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based.

RESULTS

Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the current guidelines, there might be an overuse of heparins in the daily clinical practice. The development of -direct oral- anticoagulants have shown to reduce the time to reintroduction of medication for chronic conditions as well as a more effective bleeding management.

Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Anticoagulation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Perioperative management of chronically anti-coagulated patients undergoing bariatric surgery requires a balance of managing hemorrhagic and thromboembolic risks. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of hemorrhagic complications and their management in chronically anticoagulated (CAT) patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of CAT patients undergoing bariatric surgery at an academic center from 2008 to 2015 was studied.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients on CAT underwent surgery [Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 79), sleeve gastrectomy (n = 63), and adjustable gastric banding (n = 11)] during the study period: 85 patients (55%) were females; median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR] 49-64), and median BMI was 49 kg/m² (IQR 43-56). The most common indications for CAT were venous thromboembolism (n = 87) and atrial fibrillation (n = 83). Median duration of procedure and estimated intraoperative blood loss was 150 min (IQR 118-177) and 50 ml (IQR 25-75), respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complications were reported in 33 patients (21.6%) including postoperative bleeding (n = 19), anastomotic leak (n = 3), and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). Nineteen patients (12%) with early postoperative bleeding were further categorized to intra-abdominal (n = 10), intraluminal (n = 6), and at the port site or abdominal wall (n = 3). All-cause readmissions within 30 days of surgery occurred in 19 patients (12%). There was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, patients who require chronic anticoagulation medication are higher than average risk for postoperative complications and all-cause readmission rates. Careful surgical technique and close attention to postoperative anticoagulation protocols are essential to decrease perioperative risk in this high-risk cohort.

Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention–related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

A Multidisciplinary Approach on the Perioperative Antithrombotic Management of Patients With Coronary Stents Undergoing Surgery: Surgery After Stenting 2

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy in patients treated with coronary stents undergoing surgery remains poorly defined. Importantly, surgery represents a common reason for premature treatment discontinuation, which is associated with an increased risk in mortality and major adverse cardiac events. However, maintaining antithrombotic therapy to minimize the incidence of perioperative ischemic complications may increase the risk of bleeding complications. Although guidelines provide some recommendations with respect to the perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy, these have been largely developed according to the thrombotic risk of the patient and a definition of the hemorrhagic risk specific to each surgical procedure, key to defining the trade-off between ischemia and bleeding, is not provided. These observations underscore the need for a multidisciplinary collaboration among cardiologists, anesthesiologists, hematologists and surgeons to reach this goal. The present document is an update on practical recommendations for standardizing management of antithrombotic therapy management in patients treated with coronary stents (Surgery After Stenting 2) in various types of surgery according to the predicted individual risk of thrombotic complications against the anticipated risk of surgical bleeding complications. Cardiologists defined the thrombotic risk using a "combined ischemic risk" approach, while surgeons classified surgeries according to their inherent hemorrhagic risk. Finally, a multidisciplinary agreement on the most appropriate antithrombotic treatment regimen in the perioperative phase was reached for each surgical procedure.

Bridging with Tirofiban During Temporary Withdrawal of Oral Antiplatelets for Two Major Surgical Procedures in High Ischaemic Risk Patients

Background:

Recent coronary stent implantation requires Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) for at least 6 months. Serious issues are raised when non-cardiac surgery is required during this period, because of the balance between ischemic and haemorrhagic complications.

Case Reports:

We report 2 high ischemic risk cases requiring intermediate bleeding risk non-cardiac surgery, during the first month of DAPT initiation. Perioperative management with discontinuation of the P2Y12 inhibitor and bridging with tirofiban, while aspirin was uninterrupted, was uneventful.

Conclusion:

Bridging with intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors may be a safe and effective alternative to P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation in non-deferrable non-cardiac surgery.

An Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Comprehensive MTM Integrated with Point-of-Care Phenotypic and Genetic Testing for U.S. Elderly Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Poor health outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients is an area of concern among policymakers and administrators. In an effort to determine the best strategy to improve outcomes among elderly patients who underwent PCI, several studies have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy compared with universal use of any one of the antiplatelet drugs indicated for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent PCI. The results have either been in favor of genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy or universal use of ticagrelor. However, no study has yet evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-provided face-to-face medication therapy management (MTM) combined with point-of-care genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy (POCP) when compared with universal use of ticagrelor or clopidogrel for the elderly after PCI.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a pharmacist integration of MTM with POCP (MTM-POCP) when compared with universal use of ticagrelor or clopidogrel combined with MTM (MTM-ticagrelor or MTM-clopidogrel).

METHODS

We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the U.S. health care system. A hybrid model, consisting of a 1-year decision tree and a 20-year Markov model, was used to simulate a cohort of elderly patients (aged at least 65 years) with ACS who underwent PCI. Treatment strategies available to patients were POCP, POCP-MTM, MTM-clopidogrel, or MTM-ticagrelor. Data used to populate the model were obtained from the PLATO trial and other published studies. Outcome measures were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost per QALY gained. A deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for the joint uncertainty around the key parameters of the model. Finally, a benchmark willingness to pay of $50,000-200,000 was considered.

RESULTS

The use of PCOP (with dual antiplatelet therapy) resulted in 5.29 QALYs, at a cost of $50,207. MTM-clopidogrel resulted in 5.34 QALYs, at a cost of $50,011. The use of POCP-MTM resulted in 5.36 QALYs, at a cost of $50,270. Finally, MTM-ticagrelor resulted in 5.42 QALYs, at a cost of $53,346. MTM-ticagrelor was found to be cost-effective compared with MTM-clopidogrel or MTM-POCP, irrespective of the willingness to pay. The deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of MTM-ticagrelor was cost-effective when compared with MTM-POCP or MTM-clopidogrel. The transitional probabilities, however, were mostly based on published studies. Analysis based on a prospective randomized clinical study, comparing all the treatment strategies included in this study, is warranted to confirm our findings.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Study concept and design were contributed by Okere and Diaby. Ezendu took the lead in data collection, along with Okere. Data interpretation was performed by all the authors. The manuscript was written by Okere, Diaby, and Berthe and revised by Okere and Diaby.

A Case Report of Cangrelor Bridge Therapy for a Diagnostic Bronchoscopy With Biopsy

Although premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic complications, patients may present with an urgent need for surgery that would require interruption of DAPT. Antiplatelet bridge therapy using cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y₁₂ inhibitor, has been studied as a potential option to ensure continuation of DAPT perioperatively. However, limited evidence exists supporting the off-label use of cangrelor bridge therapy to noncardiac procedures. We describe the case of a 67-year-old class 3 obese female on DAPT (aspirin and ticagrelor) for recent drug-eluting stent placement who required a bronchoscopy with biopsy for suspected lung cancer. Cangrelor bridge therapy was utilized both preoperatively and postoperatively without ischemic or bleeding complications, and the patient was subsequently able to begin radiation therapy after a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer.

Perioperative and Periprocedural Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: Consensus Document of SEC, SEDAR, SEACV, SECTCV, AEC, SECPRE, SEPD, SEGO, SEHH, SETH, SEMERGEN, SEMFYC, SEMG, SEMICYUC, SEMI, SEMES, SEPAR, SENEC, SEO, SEPA, SERVEI, SECOT and AEU

During the last few years, the number of patients receiving anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy has increased worldwide. Since this is a chronic treatment, patients receiving it can be expected to need some kind of surgery or intervention during their lifetime that may require treatment discontinuation. The decision to withdraw antithrombotic therapy depends on the patient's thrombotic risk versus hemorrhagic risk. Assessment of both factors will show the precise management of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in these scenarios. The aim of this consensus document, coordinated by the Cardiovascular Thrombosis Working Group of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and endorsed by most of the Spanish scientific societies of clinical specialities that may play a role in the patient-health care process during the perioperative or periprocedural period, is to recommend some simple and practical guidelines with a view to homogenizing daily clinical practice.

In vitro inhibition of platelets aggregation with generic form of clopidogrel versus branded in patients with stable angina pectoris

Introduction: Clopidogrel is a potent platelet activation and aggregation inhibitor that prevents thrombosis in coronary artery diseases (CADs). In comparison to locally produced generic one (Osvix®), original brand of clopidogrel (Plavix®) is expensive. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and uniformity of Osvix® versus Plavix® in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by means of platelet aggregation indexes.

Methods: This randomized, double blind clinical study was conducted at Shahid Madani heart hospital, Tabriz, Iran, and 129 patients with previous PCI were enrolled in two independent treatment groups. All patients participated in this study were on dual antiplatelet therapy at least for 30 days. ASA 80 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d and a stat dose of 300 mg of clopidogrel before PCI were administered for all patients. To evaluate the anti-platelet activity, blood samples were taken from the patients and platelet aggregation test was performed.

Results: The total study population represents a group of 129 patients (99 men and 30 women) with mean age of 57.7 ± 9.7 years with stable angina pectoris. The baseline characteristics and laboratory findings of two groups (except mean platelet volume [MPV]) were not different statistically. The mean platelets aggregation at 30th day was 13.7±7.0 in Plavix® group and 14.8±5.8 in Osvix® group (P value = 0.35).

Conclusion: This study showed that Osvix® as a generic form of clopidogrel was not significantly different from the original brand (Plavix) in terms of in vitro platelet inhibition.

Impact of bridging with perioperative low-molecular-weight heparin on cardiac and bleeding outcomes of stented patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

When patients with coronary stents undergo non-cardiac surgery, bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is not infrequent in clinical practice. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach is poorly understood. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with coronary stent(s) on any antiplatelet therapy undergoing non-cardiac surgery between March 2003 and February 2012. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 30-day incidence of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome leading to hospitalisation, or stroke. The primary safety endpoint was the 30-day composite of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleedings ≥ 2. Among 515 patients qualifying for the analysis, LMWH bridging was used in 251 (49 %). At 30 days, MACCE occurred more frequently in patients who received LMWH (7.2 % vs 1.1 %, p=0.001), driven by a higher rate of myocardial infarction (4.8 % vs 0 %, p< 0.001). This finding was consistent across several instances of statistical adjustment and after the propensity matching of 179 pairs. Patients bridged with LMWH also experienced a significantly higher risk of BARC bleedings ≥ 2 (21.9 % vs 11.7 %, p=0.002) compared to those who were not, which remained significant across different methods of statistical adjustment and propensity matching. In conclusion, LMWH bridging in patients with coronary stents undergoing surgery is a common and possibly harmful practice, resulting in worse ischaemic outcomes at 30 days, and a significant risk of bleeding.

Clopidogrel Therapy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Step Towards Individualization

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to test platelet function pre- and peri-operatively in clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.

METHODS

This was a pilot study involving 20 male patients treated with clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and scheduled for elective transurethral resection of the prostate. Platelet function testing with light transmittance aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma of four samples (T0, T1, T2, and T3 drawn on the same day, 3 and 7 days of clopidogrel cessation and 24-h post-operatively, respectively) was performed and evaluated in each patient. P-selectin membrane expression was evaluated using monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

The platelet response to adenosine diphosphate 5 µΜ and 20 µΜ at T0 were 42 ± 15 and 60 ± 14%, respectively. After discontinuation of clopidogrel, corresponding maximum aggregation values at T1 were 60 ± 16 and 74 ± 14%, and increased to 69 ± 16 and 79 ± 18% at T2. No significant difference in platelet aggregation values were noted between T1 and T2, while similar aggregation values were recorded at T3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate, platelet activation is similar 3 and 7 days from clopidogrel cessation. These results may be of relevance in subjects at increased thrombotic risk prior to a surgical procedure carrying a high-bleeding risk.

Clinical outcomes after craniotomy for unruptured intracranial aneurysm in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) patients receiving antiplatelet agents occasionally undergo craniotomy. We aimed to clarify clinical outcomes after craniotomy for unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) in patients with CAD. We also aimed to identify the possible predictive factors for morbidity and surgical complications in patients on antiplatelet treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 401 consecutive patients who had undergone craniotomy for UIA at our institution between January 2006 and December 2016. Forty-three patients (10.7%) received antiplatelet agents during the perioperative period. The underlying reasons for antiplatelet treatment were CAD in 12 patients and other diseases in 31 patients.

RESULTS

Severe morbidity and intracranial hemorrhage occurred more commonly and symptomatic brain infarction occurred less frequently in patients with CAD compared to patients with other underlying diseases (16.7% versus 3.2%, 16.7% versus 9.7%, and 8.3% versus 16.1%, respectively), though differences between the two groups were not significant. Univariate analysis revealed that a low preoperative baseline platelet count was significantly correlated with the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage (cutoff value, 16.5×10⁴/µL; odds ratio (OR), 46.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.88-561.95; p=0.0005), and a high baseline platelet count tended to correlate with severe morbidity (cutoff value, 29.8×10⁴/µL; OR, 11.33; 95% CI, 0.88-145.52; p=0.0550).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that surgical complications and clinical outcomes after craniotomy may depend on the underlying reason for antiplatelet treatment. Moreover, a preoperative platelet count can be useful in predicting the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage and severe morbidity after craniotomy in patients receiving antiplatelet agents.

Management of oral antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation therapy before bronchoscopy

Although, bronchoscopy is a relatively safe procedure, small amount of bleeding in the airway can have serious consequences. Careful consideration of the risks of diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopic intervention can help minimize potential complications. With increasing number of patients using antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies, strategies for minimizing thromboembolic and operative bleeding events need to be included in the risk and benefit analyses. Growing evidence suggests that aspirin is safe and does not increase bleeding during bronchoscopy. In addition, despite small studies reporting that it may be safe to perform bronchoscopic procedures that have low risk for bleeding such as endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration on clopidogrel, it is still recommended to hold it for 7 days prior to performing elective bronchoscopy. It is recommended to hold vitamin K antagonist, as well as new oral anticoagulation agents prior to bronchoscopy. The timing for pre-procedural discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy and the decision to bridge depend on the agent used, the renal function and the thromboembolic risk. In this review article, we will discuss available data regarding management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy as it applies to bronchoscopic procedures.

Is breast cancer surgery safely performed in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy?

Aim

The aim of the study was to assess the safety of surgery for breast cancer in patients with antithrombotic therapy (ATT), including antiplatelet therapy (APT) and anticoagulation therapy (ACT) for thromboembolic risks.

Methods

One hundred ninety-three consecutive patients receiving breast surgery for breast cancer at our institution between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, ATT was regularly used in 50 patients (25.9%). Our perioperative management included maintenance of preoperative aspirin monotherapy for APT and bridging heparin for ACT in patients at high thromboembolic risks and early postoperative reinstitution in all ATT cases. The outcome variables of patients with ATT (ATT group) were compared to those of patients without ATT (non-ATT group), and the significant risk factors for postoperative complications were determined by multivariate analysis.

Results

This series included 127 mastectomy and 66 breast-conserving surgery. ATT group showed significantly high frequency of history of cerebral infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In the ATT group, 32 patients (16.6%) were categorized as high risk for thromboembolism, but there was neither thromboembolic event nor perioperative death in the whole cohort. Surgical blood loss and rates of intraoperative transfusion were identical between the groups. Whereas overall postoperative bleeding complication was more frequently observed in the ATT group compared to the non-ATT group (12.0% vs. 3.5%, p=0.360) in univariate analyses, multivariate analysis showed that neither ATT nor preoperative aspirin continuation affected postoperative bleeding complications.

Conclusion

Even in patients undergoing ATT, surgery for breast cancer is safely performed without any increase in blood loss or postoperative bleeding, and no thromboembolism was experienced in the series. Our perioperative management of ATT patients is valid during breast surgery, although this patient population is still challenging and should be rigorously managed.

Effects of autologous platelet transfusion on platelet inhibition in ticagrelor-treated and clopidogrel-treated subjects

Essentials Limited data on hemostatic benefits of platelet transfusion (PT) exist. 44 healthy subjects had a single dose of ticagrelor or clopidogrel ± autologous PT post-dosing. PT did not reverse ticagrelor's antiplatelet effects and had minimal impact post clopidogrel. Post-ticagrelor, PT is unlikely to be beneficial, and the benefits post-clopidogrel are unknown.

SUMMARY

Background Antiplatelet agents increase bleeding risk. Few data on hemostatic benefits of platelet transfusion exist. Objective To assess the effect of autologous platelet transfusion on ticagrelor-mediated and clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition in a single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study (NCT01744288). Methods Forty-four healthy subjects received ticagrelor (180 mg) or clopidogrel (600 mg; two functional CYP2C19 alleles [*1 or *17] required) with or without platelet transfusion (14-day washout). Subjects received one autologous platelet apheresis unit (approximately six pooled donor platelet units) 24 h (n = 15) or 48 h (n = 13) after ticagrelor or 48 h after clopidogrel (n = 16). Platelet apheresis was conducted 72 h before transfusion. Aspirin (81 mg per day) was taken from after apheresis until 24 h before transfusion. P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) and inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) induced by ADP were measured. Results Mean age and body mass index were 30 years (standard deviation [SD] 6 years) and 26.9 kg m-2 (SD 4.0 kg m-2 ), respectively; 98% of subjects were men, and 39 of 44 completed treatment. Platelet transfusion 24 h after ticagrelor had minimal effects on IPA or PRU values within 48 h after transfusion. Platelet transfusion 48 h after ticagrelor also had minimal effects on IPA or PRU values at most post-transfusion times. Platelet transfusion 48 h after clopidogrel, versus no transfusion, had a small reversing effect on IPA (24 h, 36 h, and 48 h) and PRU values (12 h, 24 h, and 36 h) after transfusion. Conclusions Autologous platelet transfusion is unlikely to be of clinical benefit in reversing the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor. The clinical relevance of the small effects seen with clopidogrel is unknown.

Pretreatment with Antiplatelet Agents in the Setting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: When and Which Drugs?

Administering antiplatelet agents before coronary angiography to patients referred to elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) requires a careful evaluation of advantages and disadvantages associated with platelet inhibition to avoid overtreatment on one side and undertreatment on the other. The delicate balance between ischemic protection and bleeding demands the ability to undertake risk stratification and individualized decisions, which is particularly challenging in the setting of ad hoc PCI and urgent procedures. This review analyzes the current evidence on pretreatment with oral and intravenous P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in patients undergoing coronary angiography with intent to undergo PCI.

Perioperative management of patient with intracoronary stent presenting for noncardiac surgery

As the number of percutaneous coronary interventions increase annually, patients with intracoronary stents (ICS) who present for noncardiac surgery (NCS) are also on the rise. ICS is associated with stent thrombosis (STH) and requires mandatory antiplatelet therapy to prevent major adverse cardiac events. The risks of bleeding and ischemia remain significant and the management of these patients, especially in the initial year of ICS is challenging. The American College of Cardiologists guidelines on the management of patients with ICS recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) for minimal 14 days after balloon angioplasty, 30 days for bare metal stents, and 365 days for drug-eluting stents. Postponement of elective surgery is advocated during this period, but guidelines concerning emergency NCS are ambiguous. The risk of STH and surgical bleeding needs to be assessed carefully and many factors which are implicated in STH, apart from the type of stent and the duration of DAT, need to be considered when decision to discontinue DAT is made. DAT management should be a multidisciplinary exercise and bridging therapy with shorter acting intravenous antiplatelet drugs should be contemplated whenever possible. Well conducted clinical trials are needed to establish guidelines as regards to the appropriate tests for platelet function monitoring in patients undergoing NCS while on DAT.

Bridging Experience With Eptifibatide After Stent Implantation

BACKGROUND

Patients who have undergone intracoronary stent implantation often require surgery within the first year after the procedure. Planned or emergent surgical intervention requires interruption of antiplatelet therapy and is associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis. Eptifibatide, an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPIIb/IIIa), can be considered for antiplatelet bridging of high-risk patients in the periprocedural period.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this report is to describe the management of antiplatelet therapy and outcomes of patients who were bridged with eptifibatide perioperatively within 1 year of intracoronary stent implantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients identified through the hospital's computer system consecutively from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014. We included 18 patients who were bridged from an oral P2Y12-receptor antagonist with eptifibatide before surgery. Outcome measures were the incidence of thromboembolic events or stent thrombosis within 30 days of surgery and death within 90 days of hospital discharge. Safety measures were the incidence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major, minor, or minimal bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 18 patients assessed, no patients experienced thromboembolic events or stent thrombosis. There was one major bleeding event and one minimal bleeding event postoperatively. Antiplatelet therapy management was highly variable in the perioperative period with 72.2% receiving the recommended GPIIb/IIIa loading dose, 50% of patients not continuing aspirin throughout the surgery, 27.8% of patients stopping antiplatelet therapy less than 5 days before surgery, and 50% not receiving a loading dose of an oral P2Y12-receptor antagonist postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Within a limited sample size, bridging with an intravenous GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor appeared feasible. Further study is needed on the optimal strategy to manage patients with recent stenting who need surgical procedures.

Platelet function testing as a biomarker for efficacy of antiplatelet drugs

Despite the overwhelming evidence in support of the efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, it is also obvious that not all patients benefit from these drugs to the same extent. This interindividual variability in platelet responses may underlie clinical differences in drug efficacy, with potential for optimization of antiplatelet therapy to prevent ischemic events without excessively increasing bleeding risk. This review presents the current evidence regarding platelet function testing for monitoring of antiplatelet therapy, with emphasis on the prognostic value of platelet function testing to predict ischemic and bleeding events. The potential of platelet function testing to provide personalized antiplatelet therapy is also discussed, with an outlook toward the future of platelet function testing in high-risk individuals.