Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Eluting Stents: Is There a Mortality Risk in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease?

Long-Term Follow-up and Mortality Rate of Patients of the Randomized Freeway Stent Study

PURPOSE

This follow-up study was designed as a reopen of the completed Freeway Stent Study and collected mortality and clinical outcome data for at least 5 years after enrollment to evaluate long-term patient safety and treatment efficacy. The primary study enrolled 204 patients with stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Patients were randomized to primary nitinol stenting followed by standard PTA or primary nitinol stenting followed by FREEWAY™ paclitaxel-eluting balloon PTA.

METHODS

Previous patients were recontacted by phone or during a routine hospital visit, and medical records were reviewed. Vital and clinical status information was collected.

RESULTS

No increased late mortality was observed at 5 years, with an all-cause mortality rate of 12.0% in the FREEWAY drug-eluting balloon group versus 15.0% in the non-paclitaxel PTA group. No accumulation of any cause of death was observed in either group, nor was there any correlation with the dose of paclitaxel used. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 5 years was significantly higher in the FREEWAY drug eluting balloon group (85.3%) compared to standard PTA group (72.7%) Log-rank p = 0.032.

CONCLUSION

The safety results presented support the recent conclusions that the use of paclitaxel technology does not lead to an increase in mortality. At the same time, the efficacy results clearly demonstrate that the potential benefits of drug-eluting balloon treatment are maintained over a 5-year period.

Paclitaxel Protects against Isoproterenol-Induced Damage in Rat Myocardium: Its Heme-Oxygenase Mediated Role in Cardiovascular Research

(1) Background: In cardiovascular applications, paclitaxel inhibits smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration and significantly reduces the occurrence of restenosis and target lesion revascularization. However, the cellular effects of paclitaxel in the myocardium are not well understood; (2) Methods: Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control (CTRL), isoproterenol (ISO) treated (1 mg/kg) and two groups treated with paclitaxel (PAC), which was administrated (10 mg/kg/day) for 5 days by gavage/per os alone or in combination (ISO + PAC) 3 weeks after ISO treatment. Ventricular tissue was harvested 24 h later for measurements of heme oxygenase (HO-1), reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), superoxide dismutase (SOD), NF-κB, TNF-α and myeloperoxidase (MPO); (3) Results: HO-1 protein concentration, HO-1 activity, SOD protein concentration and total glutathione significantly decreased in response to ISO treatment. When PAC was administered in conjunction with ISO, HO-1, SOD concentration and total glutathione were not different from control levels. MPO activity, NF-κB concentration and TNF-α protein concentration were significantly increased in the ISO-only group, while the levels of these molecules were restored when PAC was co-administered; (4) Conclusions: Oral administration of PAC can maintain the expression of important antioxidants, anti-inflammatory molecules, HO-1, SOD and GSH, and suppress the production of TNF-α, MPO and NF-κB, which are involved in myocardial damage. The principal component of this cellular defense seems to be the expression of HO-1.

Reassuring Intraoperative Parameters Do Not Obviate the Need for Infrainguinal Bypass Completion Angiograms

OBJECTIVE

To determine if routine completion angiography for lower extremity bypasses using vein conduit results in lower rates of postoperative bypass occlusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

With the increasing availability of on-table angiography and significant advancements in endovascular techniques, some operators routinely perform completion angiograms. The effect of this surgical paradigm has yet to be rigorously compared to the more widespread selective use of completion imaging in the modern era.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included infrainguinal arterial bypass procedures utilizing vein conduit completed at a single hospital system from 2001 to 2018 and compared postoperative outcomes between bypasses that underwent routine completion angiography versus selective completion angiography. Notably, any bypasses that underwent completion angiography due to intraoperative concerns were excluded from this analysis.

RESULTS

666 bypasses that were performed in 589 patients met inclusion criteria. 126 (16.9%) bypasses were classified into the routine completion angiogram group compared to 540 (81.0%) into the selective completion angiogram group. Patients who underwent routine completion angiograms had a rate of intraoperative reintervention of 22.2%. The routine angiogram group had lower rates of reintervention (3.9% vs 10.0%, P = 0.03) and graft occlusion (2.3% vs 9.2%, P = 0.01) at 1-month postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity bypasses using vein conduit that undergo routine completion angiography are associated with lower rates of graft occlusion at 30-days postoperatively. Completion angiography should thus be routinely performed in infrainguinal bypasses that utilize venous conduit.

Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent Safety in Patients With Femoropopliteal and Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

Background Patients with severe-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) were excluded from femoropopliteal disease trials evaluating drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) versus plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) and bare metal stents (BMSs). We examined the interaction between CKD status and device type for the association with 24-month all-cause mortality and major amputation risk. Methods and Results We studied patients undergoing femoropopliteal interventions (September 2016-December 2018) from Medicare-linked VQI (Vascular Quality Initiative) registry data. We compared outcomes for: (1) early-stage CKD (stages 1-3) receiving DCB/DES, (2) early-stage CKD receiving POBA/BMS, (3) severe-stage (4 and 5) CKD receiving DCB/DES, and (4) severe-stage CKD receiving POBA/BMS. We studied 8799 patients (early-stage CKD: 94%; severe-stage: 6%). DCB/DES use was 57% versus 51% in patients with early-stage versus severe-stage CKD. Twenty-four-month mortality risk for patients with early-stage CKD receiving DCB/DES (reference) was 21% versus 28% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47 [95% CI, 1.31-1.65]) for those receiving POBA/BMS; patients with severe-stage CKD: those receiving DCB/DES had a 49% (HR, 2.61 [95% CI, 2.06-3.31]) mortality risk versus 52% (HR, 3.64 [95% CI, 2.91-4.55]) for those receiving POBA/BMS (interaction P<0.001). Adjusted analyses attenuated these results. For severe-stage CKD, DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS mortality risk was not significant at 24 months (post hoc comparison P=0.06) but was higher for the POBA/BMS group at 18 months (post hoc P<0.05). Patients with early-stage CKD receiving DCB/DES had the lowest 24-month amputation risk (6%), followed by 11% for early-stage CKD-POBA/BMS, 15% for severe-stage CKD-DCB/DES, and 16% for severe-stage CKD-POBA/BMS (interaction P<0.001). DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS amputation rates in patients with severe-stage CKD did not differ (post hoc P=0.820). Conclusions DCB/DES versus POBA/BMS use in patients with severe-stage CKD was associated with lower mortality and no difference in amputation outcomes.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of below-the-knee arterial disease

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in the treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) arterial disease.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted from inception to July 24, 2021. Retrospective, prospective, and randomized studies that had used SESs to treat BTK arterial disease and had reported the primary patency, technical success, target lesion revascularization, and/or mortality were included. Meta-analyses of the proportions were conducted to derive pooled summary statistics of the outcomes. Where Kaplan-Meier curves were provided for primary patency, a meta-analysis of the individual patient data was conducted via a graphic reconstruction tool to estimate primary patency at various follow-up points. For studies comparing SESs and bare metal stents (BMSs), a two-stage meta-analysis was performed to compare the 6-month primary patency of SESs vs BMSs.

RESULTS

Ten studies across 13 publications, including 995 patients, were retrieved for analysis. In the meta-analysis of proportions, across six studies (n = 339 patients), the pooled 6-month primary patency was 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.6%-92.1%). Across seven studies (n = 283 patients), the pooled 6-month mortality was 5.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-11.2%). An individual patient data analysis of three studies (n = 282 patients) yielded a primary patency rate of 95.2% (95% CI, 92.7%-97.8%), 82.8% (95% CI, 78.3%-87.6%), 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%), and 79.8% (95% CI, 75.0%-85.0%) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The 12-month target lesion revascularization rate across four studies (n = 324 patients) was 9.6% (95% CI, 6.4%-13.4%). In the two-stage meta-analysis of 6-month primary patency across three studies (n = 168 patients), the use of SESs was significantly favored over BMSs (risk ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12-1.46; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall evidence suggests that the use of SESs appears to be safe and offers favorable outcomes for BTK arterial disease compared with BMSs.

Outcome after revascularization with paclitaxel-coated devices in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX)-coated peripheral arterial devices for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) atherosclerotic disease is derived from studies that mainly evaluated patients with claudication. Outcomes of PTX treatment for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is incompletely defined. This study compares outcome in patients with CLTI treated with and without PTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients who underwent FPA intervention for an indication of CLTI in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention database from 2016 to 2020. Patients who had concomitant iliac or tibial interventions were included. One limb per patient was studied. Propensity score matching based on demographics, comorbidities, indication, and pharmacological therapy was performed to generate balanced cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression compared limb salvage, overall survival, primary patency, and major adverse limb events (MALE) between patients treated with and without PTX.

RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, indications, and procedural details were similar between 14,065 PTX and 14,065 non-PTX propensity-matched patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 18-month follow-up demonstrated that the PTX group compared with the non-PTX group had a significantly higher rates of limb salvage (89.2% vs 86.5%; P < .001), primary patency (80.3% vs 76.9%; P < .001), and freedom from MALE (72.6% vs 67.9%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis also showed that PTX treatment was associated with a lower risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82; P < .001), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87; P < .001), and MALE (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.82; P < .001). Overall, 21% of patients had a prior ipsilateral peripheral vascular intervention. Removing these patients from the analysis yielded similar results at 18 months. Overall survival at 54 months was not statistically different between the PTX and non-PTX groups in the overall cohort (73.5 vs 71.3%; P = .07), but significant in the de-novo treated patients (73.9% vs 70.7%; P = .02).Multivariate analyses showed a lower mortality risk in the PTX patients (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

FPA intervention with a PTX-coated device is associated with improved limb salvage, primary patency, and freedom from MALE at the 18-month follow-up compared with uncoated devices. This benefit was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality out to 4.5 years. Further study is necessary to determine the optimal role for PTX in the treatment of the FPA for patients with CLTI and to understand its long-term outcome.

Vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, an update

Arterial occlusive disease is the leading cause of death in Western countries. Core contemporary therapies for this disease include angioplasties, stents, endarterectomies and bypass surgery. However, these treatments suffer from high failure rates due to re-occlusive vascular wall adaptations and restenosis. Restenosis following vascular surgery is largely due to intimal hyperplasia. Intimal hyperplasia develops in response to vessel injury, leading to inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cells dedifferentiation, migration, proliferation and secretion of extra-cellular matrix into the vessel's innermost layer or intima. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on the origin and mechanisms underlying the dysregulated proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in intimal hyperplasia, and we present the new avenues of research targeting VSMC phenotype and proliferation.

Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clinical benefit of paclitaxel-coated devices for patients with peripheral arterial disease has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis published in 2018 identified late mortality risk over a long follow-up period due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries, which caused enormous controversy and debates globally. This study aims to further evaluate the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices by incorporating the most recently published data.

Methods

We searched for candidate studies in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid) online databases, government web archives and international cardiovascular conferences. Safety endpoints of interest included all-cause mortality rates at one, two and five years and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the summary measure. The primary analysis was performed using random-effects models to account for potential clinical heterogeneity.

Findings

Thirty-nine RCTs including 9164 patients were identified. At one year, the random-effects model yielded a pooled RR of 1.06 (95% CI [0.87, 1.29]) indicating no difference in short-term all-cause deaths between the paclitaxel and control groups (crude mortality, 4.3%, 214/5025 versus 4.5%, 177/3965). Two-year mortality was reported in 26 RCTs with 382 deaths out of 3788 patients (10.1%) in the paclitaxel arm and 299 out of 2955 patients (10.1%) in the control arm and no association was found between increased risk of death and usage of paclitaxel-coated devices (RR 1.08, 95% CI [0.93, 1.25]). Eight RCTs recorded all-cause deaths up to five years and a pooled RR of 1.18 (95% CI [0.92, 1.51]) demonstrated no late mortality risk due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices (crude mortality, paclitaxel 18.2%, 247/1360 versus control 15.2%, 122/805).

Conclusions

We found no significant difference in either short- or long-term all-cause mortalities between patients receiving paclitaxel-coated and uncoated devices. Further research on the longer-term safety of paclitaxel usage (e.g., 8- or 10-year) is warranted.

Registration

PROSPERO, CRD42021246291.

Use of paclitaxcel-coated balloons in clinical setting is not associated with increased mortality compared to plain balloon angioplasty in femoropopliteal lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate mortality and causes of death associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) compared to plain balloon (PB) angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions in real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent percutaneous femoropopliteal artery angioplasty without stenting between years 2014 and 2020. Patients were stratified into PCB and PB groups according to the index procedure. Those who had undergone any prior or subsequent intervention using drug-eluting technology were excluded from the PB group. Long-term survival was estimated up to 5 years using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for all-cause mortality were assessed in a multivariable analysis. Causes of death were retrieved from a national registry.

RESULTS

The study included 139 patients treated with PB and 190 with PCB. Patients treated with PCB had higher prevalence of chronic pulmonary disease (27% vs 17%; P=0.02) and were less often on anticoagulant therapy (34% vs 48%; P=0.01) compared to patients in the PB group. Those treated with PB were more likely to have chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; 82% vs 72%; P=0.04). Ipsilateral perioperative amputation rate was significantly higher in the PB group (7% vs 1%; P=0.01). There were no major differences in other 30-day outcomes between the groups and no differences in the rates of reinterventions and ipsilateral amputations during a mean follow-up time of 2.7±1.9 years. Survival at 1-year in the PCB group was 83±3% compared to 73±4% in the PB group (P=0.0001). The 5-year survival estimates were 56±5% and 37±5%, respectively. PCB use was independently associated with decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.97). Independent risk factors for increased mortality were age (HR 1.04 per year; 95% CI 1.02-1.06), cardiac insufficiency (HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.12-2.27), chronic renal insufficiency (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.47-2.85), anticoagulation therapy (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.34) and CLTI (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.51-5.39). In the PCB group, 63% of deaths were due to cardiovascular causes compared to 42% in the PB group (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PCB is safe and there is no concern of increased mortality after the procedure based on the 5-year survival estimates.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of drug eluting stent versus drug coated balloon angioplasty for lower extremity peripheral artery diseases

OBJECTIVES

Recent evidence raised the concern that paclitaxel-containing therapy was associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with peripheral artery diseases (PAD). However, it is unclear whether drug-eluting stent (DES) versus drug-coated balloon (DCB) have different effect on mortality of PAD patients. Our study aimed to systematically review current literature comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated with DES versus DCB for PAD.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for eligible studies from January 2000 to December 31^st, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) or cohort studies that reported outcomes of DES versus DCB were included in our study. The primary outcome was 12-month all-cause mortality. Random-effect model was used to pool the odds ratios (OR) and related 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Our review included seven studies, involving two RCTs and five cohort studies. A total of 4237 patients with DES and 9234 patients with DCB were analyzed. All included cohort studies were high-quality with Newcastle-Ottawa scores from 7 to 8. No significant difference in 12-month all-cause mortality was found between DES and DCB without significant heterogeneity (OR 1.02, 95%CI 0.91-1.14, I²=0%). As for primary patency, no significant difference between treatments was observed (OR 1.27, 95%CI 0.75-2.15, I²=55%). Similar results were observed for freedom from target lesion revascularization (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.64-1.40, I²=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that no significant difference in 12-month all-cause mortality was found between DES and DCB. Primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization of lower extremity PAD were also comparable between the two groups.

Clinical Use of Hydrogen Sulfide to Protect Against Intimal Hyperplasia

Arterial occlusive disease is the narrowing of the arteries via atherosclerotic plaque buildup. The major risk factors for arterial occlusive disease are age, high levels of cholesterol and triglycerides, diabetes, high blood pressure, and smoking. Arterial occlusive disease is the leading cause of death in Western countries. Patients who suffer from arterial occlusive disease develop peripheral arterial disease (PAD) when the narrowing affects limbs, stroke when the narrowing affects carotid arteries, and heart disease when the narrowing affects coronary arteries. When lifestyle interventions (exercise, diet…) fail, the only solution remains surgical endovascular and open revascularization. Unfortunately, these surgeries still suffer from high failure rates due to re-occlusive vascular wall adaptations, which is largely due to intimal hyperplasia (IH). IH develops in response to vessel injury, leading to inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cells dedifferentiation, migration, proliferation and secretion of extra-cellular matrix into the vessel’s innermost layer or intima. Re-occlusive IH lesions result in costly and complex recurrent end-organ ischemia, and often lead to loss of limb, brain function, or life. Despite decades of IH research, limited therapies are currently available. Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is an endogenous gasotransmitter derived from cysteine metabolism. Although environmental exposure to exogenous high H₂S is toxic, endogenous H₂S has important vasorelaxant, cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. Its vasculo-protective properties have attracted a remarkable amount of attention, especially its ability to inhibit IH. This review summarizes IH pathophysiology and treatment, and provides an overview of the potential clinical role of H₂S to prevent IH and restenosis.

Reporting Peripheral Artery Disease in Claudicants: Lessons Learned From the TASC-Ability Study

BACKGROUND

The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document (TASC II) aims to comprehensively describe the case scenarios of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal lesions to suggest an endovascular or a surgical approach. Over time, it has become a guide for describing the gravity of arterial lesions.

PURPOSE

To assess the revised TASC II system for classifying arterial lesions in a large database of patients presenting with claudication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of the arteriograms of patients with intermittent claudication. Aortoiliac and femoropopliteal lesions were classified according to the TASC II. When no consensus was reached, the lesion was rated as unTASCable.

RESULTS

In total, 1454 patients were included (male: 62.1%, 66.8±9.3 years). There were 39% aortoiliac lesions (n=960/2462) and 61% femoropopliteal lesions (n=1502/2462); 33.6% of the patients (n=489/1454) were associated with aortoiliac and femoropopliteal lesions. In addition, 20% of the lesions (n=493/2462) were unTASCable, and 26.7% of the patients (n=388/1454) had at least 1 unTASCable lesion. There were 4 categories of unTASCable lesions: (1) association with a common femoral artery lesion in 53.1% (n=262/493); (2) iliac artery lesions in 23.1% (n=114/493); (3) femoropopliteal lesions whose lengths did not fit into any category in 16.6% (n=82/493); and (4) association with an aortic lesion in 7.1% (n=35/493). The interobserver agreement was 0.97 for anatomically describing the infrarenal arterial tree and 0.85 for TASCing, with the lesions lowering to 0.69 for aortoiliac lesions.

CONCLUSION

Using the revised TASC II case scenario, 26.7% of the patients had at least 1 unTASCable lesion. Reporting peripheral artery disease using a comprehensive anatomical description of the infrarenal arterial tree showed better interobserver reproducibility.

Ten-Year Clinical Follow-Up Following Bare-Nitinol Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

Aim: More than 5-year clinical outcomes after femoropopliteal (FP) stenting with bare-nitinol stent (BNS) have not yet been unclear. We investigate the long-term patency and mortality following FP stenting with BNS.

Methods: This study was a multicenter retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database. From April 2004 to December 2011, 1824 consecutive patients (2211 limbs) who underwent FP stenting with BNS for de novo lesions were selected and analyzed. Primary endpoint was primary patency which was defined as treated vessel without restenosis and reintervention and its associated factors.

Results: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and dialysis was 60.5% and 23.8%, respectively. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) accounted for 30.8%. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) was found in 52.7%, and lesion length was more than 20 cm in 22.6%. During the median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range, 1.4 to 7.4 years), 1049 cases lost patency, whereas 355 cases were dead without experiencing loss of patency. The primary patency (95% CI) was estimated to be 74.8%, 47.3% and 29.1% at 1-, 5- and 10-year. On multivariate analysis, female sex, age ≥ 80 years, diabetes, dialysis, CLTI, CTO, arterial calcification, long lesion (＞20 cm), and small vessel (≤ 4 mm) were the independent predictors of primary patency after FP stenting. In addition, the prognostic impact of age ≥ 80 years, CLTI, and arterial calcification was significantly attenuated afterwards (P＜0.05).

Conclusions: Ten-year patency after BNS implantation for FP disease has been continuously reducing up to 10 years and the prognostic impact of risk factors was changed over time.

Peripheral arterial disease: Effects of ethanolic extracts of seed kernels of mango (Mangifera indica .L) on acute hind limb ischemia-reperfusion injury in diabetic rats

Background and aim

Hind limb ischemia is one of the peripheral arterial diseases affecting majority of the people with atherosclerosis, diabetes and chronic cigarette smokers. Hind limb ischemic-reperfusion injury is also one of the exacerbating events in these peoples, resulting in hind limb dysfunction. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of ethanolic extracts of mangifera indica (EEMI) on reversing hind limb dysfunction in diabetic rats with acute hind limb ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Experimental procedure

Unilateral femoral artery ligated diabetic rats were orally fed with EEMI (0.2 and 0.4 g/kg) for 14 days. At the end of the study, plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and relevant biochemical parameters were measured. The isolated gastrocnemius muscles were used for gene expression and histopathological studies.

Results

There was a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide, malondialdehyde; and the expression levels of mRNA of induced nitric oxide synthase and intercellular adhesion molecule -1; and increase in anti-inflammatory cytokine, in isolated gastrocnemius muscles of animals treated with 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg of EEMI in comparison to disease control. In addition, histopathological study of gastrocnemius muscle and hind limb function test indicated the recovery of tissue damage from ischemic reperfusion at 0.2 and 0.4 g/kg of EEMI in comparison to disease control.

Conclusion

We conclude that 14-day EEMI treatment of rats with acute hind limb ischemia/reperfusion in diabetic rats recovered from ischemic/reperfusion injury by modulating (decreasing) oxidative stress and inflammation.

Safety and Effectiveness of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Revascularization: Insights From VOYAGER PAD

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel drug-coated devices (DCDs) were developed to improve lower extremity revascularization (LER) patency in peripheral artery disease (PAD) but have been associated with long-term mortality.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed DCD safety and effectiveness in LER for PAD.

METHODS

VOYAGER PAD (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD) randomized patients with PAD who underwent LER to rivaroxaban or placebo. The primary VOYAGER PAD study efficacy and safety outcomes were composite cardiovascular and limb events and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. For prespecified DCD analyses, primary safety and effectiveness outcomes were mortality and unplanned index limb revascularization (UILR). Major adverse limb events (MALE) were a secondary outcome. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to account for each subject's propensity for DCD treatment. Effects of rivaroxaban were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 4,316 patients who underwent LER, 3,478 (80.6%) were treated for claudication, and 1,342 (31.1%) received DCDs. Median follow-up was 31 months, vital status was ascertained in 99.6% of patients, and there were 394 deaths. After weighting, DCDs were not associated with mortality (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.83-1.09) or MALE (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.90-1.30) but were associated with reduced UILR (3-year Kaplan-Meier: 21.5% vs 24.6%; HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76-0.92). Irrespective of DCD use, consistent benefit of rivaroxaban for composite cardiovascular and limb events (P_interaction = 0.88) and safety of rivaroxaban with respect to bleeding (P_interaction = 0.57) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In >4,000 patients with PAD who underwent LER, DCDs were not associated with mortality or MALE but were associated with persistent reduction in UILR. These findings provide insight into the safety and effectiveness of DCDs in PAD. (Vascular Outcomes Study of ASA [acetylsalicylic acid] Along with Rivaroxaban in Endovascular or Surgical Limb Revascularization for PAD [VOYAGER PAD]; NCT02504216).

Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery: study protocol for the randomized controlled SIRONA trial

Background

Endovascular revascularization has established as the first-line therapy of femoropopliteal artery disease. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty proved to be superior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) regarding prevention of restenosis and need for recurrent revascularization. Over the past years, paclitaxel was the only active drug to inhibit neointimal proliferation which could be processed to an appropriate balloon coating. The purpose of this study is to assess whether efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is noninferior to paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty.

Methods

This randomized controlled, single-blinded, multicentre, investigator-initiated noninferiority trial aims to enrol a total of 478 participants with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease of Rutherford category 2 to 4 due to de novo stenosis or restenosis. After pre-dilation, participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty. Post-dilation with the drug-coated balloon (DCB) used or standard balloon is mandatory in case ≥ 50%, and optional in case of ≥ 30% residual diameter stenosis. Bailout stenting with bare-metal nitinol stents should be conducted in case of flow-limiting dissection. Primary noninferiority endpoints are primary patency and the composite of all-cause mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are clinical and hemodynamic improvement, change in health-related quality of life, and safety throughout 60 months.

Discussion

Although concerns about long-term safety of paclitaxel-coated devices were not confirmed by recent patient-level data analyses, conflicting evidence contributed to a loss of confidence among patients and physicians. Therefore, sirolimus, known for a broader therapeutic range than paclitaxel, may serve as a welcome alternative. This will be justified if noninferiority of sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty against the current standard of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty can be demonstrated.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT04475783. Registered on 17 July 2020

EUDAMED No. CIV-20-11-035172, DRKS00022452

Twelve-Month Results From the First-in-China Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Study of the FREEWAY Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Treatment

Background: Several paclitaxel-coated balloons have been proved to provide better efficacy results than uncoated balloons in femoropopliteal lesions. But the efficacy and safety of FREEWAY balloons have not been investigated in Chinese patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety performance of FREEWAY paclitaxel-coated balloons vs. uncoated balloons in Chinese femoropopliteal artery lesions.

Methods: In this prospective multi-center randomized controlled FREEWAY-CHINA study, 311 patients with symptomatic lower limb ischemia (Rutherford category 2–5) and femoropopliteal lesions of 14 Chinese centers were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to endovascular treatment with either FREEWAY paclitaxel-coated balloons or uncoated balloons (control). The primary endpoint was the 6-month clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the device and technical success rate, the ankle-brachial indexes (ABIs), Rutherford category change, the 6-month primary and secondary patency rates, severe adverse effects, and the 12-month CD-TLR rate.

Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of their demographic and lesion characteristics. Patients' mean age was 70 years, and 70% were men. The mean lesion length was 71 mm. The 6-month CD-TLR rate was 2.6% in the FREEWAY group and 11.7% in the control group (P = 0.001). The 12-month CD-TLR rate was 2.7% in the FREEWAY group and 13.2% in the control group (P = 0.0005). Other endpoints, including patency rates, major adverse events, and ABI or Rutherford change, did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion: The FREEWAY balloon resulted in an effective decrease in CD-TLR rates and had similar safety results compared to the uncoated balloon in Chinese femoropopliteal artery patients at the 12-month follow-up appointment.

Long-term safety of drug-coated devices for peripheral revascularisation

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses of randomised trials of paclitaxel-coated peripheral devices found an association with worse long-term survival.

AIMS

We aimed to assess long-term mortality in patients treated with drug-coated versus non-drug-coated devices who are insured by Medicare Advantage (MA), an alternative to traditional Medicare that represents >30% of the Medicare eligible population. We analysed data from an MA administrative claims data source that includes both inpatient and outpatient femoropopliteal artery revascularisation procedures.

METHODS

Patients treated with or without drug-coated devices for femoropopliteal artery revascularisation from 4/2015-12/2017 were studied using Optum's De-identified Clinformatics Datamart Database. Mortality was assessed up to December 2019 using Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for differences between groups.

RESULTS

Of 16,796 patients revascularised, 4,427 (26.4%) were treated with drug-coated devices: 3,600 (81.3%) balloons and 827 (18.7%) stents. The median follow-up was 2.66 years (IQR 2.02-3.52). Treatment with drug-coated devices was associated with similar long-term mortality to non-drug-coated devices (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.96-1.10; p=0.39). Results were comparable for patients treated with balloons alone (adjusted HR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.08; p=0.96) or stents (adjusted HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.88-1.18; p=0.78). These findings did not differ based on treatment setting, disease severity, age, sex or comorbidity burden (interaction p>0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, there was no evidence of increased long-term mortality following treatment with drug-coated devices.

Four-Year Patient-Level Pooled Mortality Analysis of the ILLUMENATE US Pivotal and EU Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis of two concordant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the long-term, four-year safety profile of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

An independent, third-party, meta-analysis of homogenous, patient-level data from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs was performed to assess mortality (time to death) in patients treated for symptomatic femoropopliteal disease. Kaplan Meier (KM) methodology was used to estimate hazard rates of all-cause mortality and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess predictors of mortality. All serious adverse events, including deaths, were adjudicated by an independent, blinded clinical events committee (CEC).

RESULTS

In total, 589 (419 DCB; 170 PTA) patients were included in the pooled analysis of the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs. The median follow-up was 1735 days (IQR 1434-1829), equivalent to 4.75 years. Vital status compliance was >95% in each RCT. The total number of deaths through four years was 81/589 (13.8%); 58/419 (13.8%) in the DCB arm and 23/170 (13.5%) in the PTA arm. The one-year KM estimate of all-cause mortality was 1.9% ± 0.7% (estimate ± SE) in those treated with DCB versus 1.2 ± 0.9% in those treated with PTA. At two, three, and four years, the respective KM estimates were 6.6 ± 1.2% versus 4.9 ± 1.7%, 9.3 ± 1.4% versus 9.9 ± 2.4%, and 14.0% ± 1.7% versus 14.4% ± 2.8% (P = 0.864). There were no significant differences in CEC-adjudicated deaths between the two cohorts. In multivariate analysis, predictors of four-year mortality were age (HR, 1.048; 95% CI, 1.026 - 1.071; P < 0.0001), renal insufficiency (HR, 2.440; 95% CI, 1.566 - 3.800; P < 0.0001), and lesion length (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.000 - 1.008; P = 0.041). Neither paclitaxel exposure (DCB versus PTA; HR, 1.086; 95% CI, 0.709 - 1.664; P = 0.705) nor dose (mg; HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 0.971 - 1.119; P = 0.248) were predictors of all-cause mortality at four years.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic meta-analysis of two concordant ILLUMENATE RCTs shows no difference in all-cause mortality through four-years between Stellarex DCB and PTA, confirming the acceptable, long-term safety profile of the Stellarex DCB.

Paclitaxel and mortality in patients with claudication and de novo femoropopliteal lesions: a historical cohort study

Objective

To compare the mortality rates of patients with claudication and de novo femoropopliteal lesions treated with and without paclitaxel coated devices (PCD).

Background

A recent meta-analysis, mostly including patients with claudication and de novo femoropopliteal lesions but also with recurrent stenoses and critical limb ischemia, has shown a significant excess mortality in patients treated with PCD.

Methods

Comparison of two historical cohorts of patients presenting with claudication and de novo femoropopliteal lesions treated with and without PCD between 2008 and 2018.

Results

After review of 5219 arteriograms in patients presenting with peripheral artery disease, 700 consecutive patients were included consisting in 72.6% of male (n = 508). Mean age was 68.1 ± 8.5 years. 45.7% of the patients (n = 320) had a treatment including a PCD. Mean femoropopliteal lesion length was 123 ± 91 mm including 44.6% of occlusions. Patients of the control group were censored at crossover to paclitaxel when applicable. Mortality rates at 1, 2 and 5 years were 4.6%, 7.5%, 19.4% and 1.6%, 6.2%, 16.6% in the non-PCD and PCD groups respectively. The relative risks of death when using PCD were 0.35 (p = 0.03), 0.83 (p = NS) and 0.86 (p = NS) at 1, 2 and 5 years respectively.

Conclusion

There was no excess mortality in patients with claudication and de novo femoropopliteal lesions treated with paclitaxel coated devices at 1, 2 and 5 years of follow-up in this cohort. The current study suggests that additional prospective randomized studies properly powered to study mortality are necessary.

Paclitaxel-coated peripheral arterial devices are associated with improved overall survival and limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Paclitaxel (PTX)-coated peripheral arterial devices have been shown to decrease femoropopliteal artery restenosis and the need for reintervention compared with non-PTX-coated devices. The data regarding PTX efficacy and safety come from randomized controlled trials that almost exclusively enrolled patients with claudication. The outcomes of PTX treatment in patients who present with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are unknown. This study compares long-term outcomes in patients with CLTI treated with and without PTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 983 patients with CLTI treated with femoropopliteal artery angioplasty, atherectomy, stent, or combination between 2011 and 2019. Procedures were performed with additional proximal or distal tibial interventions as needed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox-regression analysis compared overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS), freedom from major amputation (ff-MA), and freedom from target vessel revascularization (ff-TVR) between patients treated with and without PTX.

RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, and Rutherford class were similar between 574 PTX (58.5%) and 409 non-PTX (41.6%) patients except that non-PTX patients were more likely to be male (56.2% vs 49.7%), dialysis dependent (19.6% vs 14.3%), and have higher average creatinine (2.3 vs 1.8 mg/dL). Through 4-year follow-up, the PTX group demonstrated a significant increase in OS (56.2% vs 43.9%, P = .013), AFS (52.6% vs 36.1%, P < .0001), ff-MA (87.4% vs 78.7%, P = .0007), and ff-TVR (77.6% vs 70.6%, P = .012). Multivariable Cox-regression analysis demonstrated that PTX treatment was associated with improved OS, AFS, ff-MA, and ff-TVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CLTI, treatment with a PTX-coated device is associated with improved OS, AFS, ff-MA, and ff-TVR through 4-year follow-up. PTX-coated devices may be especially beneficial in patients who present with CLTI.

Paclitaxel-coated devices in the treatment of femoropopliteal stenosis among patients ≥65 years old: An ACC PVI Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

The connection between paclitaxel-coated devices (PCD) use during peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) and mortality is debated. We aimed to analyze patterns of PCD use and the safety and effectiveness of PCD use in the superficial femoral and/or popliteal arteries.

METHODS

Patients undergoing PVI of femoropopliteal lesions with and without PCD between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017 were compared using the American College of Cardiology's National Cardiovascular Data Registry PVI Registry. Outcomes were derived from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid claims data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6-, 12-, and 24-months following PVI. Inverse probability weighting and frailty models were used to assess the differences between groups. The analysis was IRB-approved.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort consisting of 6,302 femoropopliteal PVIs, PCD-PVI patients were more likely to be treated for claudication (63.5% vs 51.3%, P< .001), less likely to have a chronic total occlusion (24.6% vs 34.7%, P < .001), and more likely to be treated in certain geographic and practice settings. In the analytic cohort consisting of 1,666 femoropopliteal PVIs with linked claims outcomes (888 PCD-PVI, 53.3%), unadjusted rates of all outcomes were lower in PCD-PVI patients. After adjustment, there were no significant differences in mortality following PCD-PVI versus non-PCD PVI at 1 year (adjusted RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.01, P= .055) or 2 years (aRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.24, P= .844).

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences between the patients in whom and settings in which PCD-PVI was versus was not used. PCD-PVI was not associated with an increased risk of 2-year mortality in real-world use.

Mortality with Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in Peripheral Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

The results of a recent meta-analysis aroused concern about an increased risk of death associated with the use of paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons and stents in lower-limb endovascular interventions for symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

We conducted an unplanned interim analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, open-label, registry-based clinical trial. At the time of the analysis, 2289 patients had been randomly assigned to treatment with drug-coated devices (the drug-coated-device group, 1149 patients) or treatment with uncoated devices (the uncoated-device group, 1140 patients). Randomization was stratified according to disease severity on the basis of whether patients had chronic limb-threatening ischemia (1480 patients) or intermittent claudication (809 patients). The single end point for this interim analysis was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up. Paclitaxel was used as the coating agent for all the drug-coated devices. During a mean follow-up of 2.49 years, 574 patients died, including 293 patients (25.5%) in the drug-coated-device group and 281 patients (24.6%) in the uncoated-device group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.22). At 1 year, all-cause mortality was 10.2% (117 patients) in the drug-coated-device group and 9.9% (113 patients) in the uncoated-device group. During the entire follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death between the treatment groups among patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (33.4% [249 patients] in the drug-coated-device group and 33.1% [243 patients] in the uncoated-device group) or among those with intermittent claudication (10.9% [44 patients] and 9.4% [38 patients], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized trial in which patients with peripheral artery disease received treatment with paclitaxel-coated or uncoated endovascular devices, the results of an unplanned interim analysis of all-cause mortality did not show a difference between the groups in the incidence of death during 1 to 4 years of follow-up. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02051088.).

Three-Year Sustained Clinical Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in a Real-World Femoropopliteal Cohort

Purpose: To report the 36-month outcomes from the prospective, multicenter, single-arm IN.PACT Global Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01609296) evaluating the performance of the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon (DCB) in real-world patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease. Materials and Methods: The IN.PACT Global Study was conducted at 64 international sites and enrolled 1535 patients with complex lesions, which included bilateral disease, multiple lesions, de novo in-stent restenosis, long lesions, and chronic total occlusions. The predefined full clinical cohort included 1406 patients (mean age 68.6 years; 67.8% men) with claudication or rest pain treated with the study DCB. Mean lesion length was 12.09±9.54 cm; 18.0% had in-stent restenosis, 35.5% were totally occluded, and 68.7% were calcified. Freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was evaluated through 36 months. The safety composite endpoint was freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days and freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization within 36 months. All safety and revascularization events were reviewed by an independent clinical events committee. Results: The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from CD-TLR through 36 months was 76.9%. The composite safety endpoint was achieved in 75.6% of patients. The 36-month all-cause mortality rate was 11.6%, and the major target limb amputation rate was 1.0%. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from CD-TLR through 36 months was significantly lower in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) compared with claudicants (67.6% vs 78.0%; p=0.003). Lesions affecting both the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal artery had lower Kaplan-Meier freedom from CD-TLR through 36 months (69.2%) than either isolated SFA (79.7%) or popliteal artery lesions (76.5%; log- rank p<0.001). Predictors of CD-TLR through 36 months included increased lesion length, reference vessel diameter ≤4.5 mm, in-stent restenosis, bilateral disease, CLTI, and hyperlipidemia. Conclusion: DCB angioplasty with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB for femoropopliteal disease in a diverse and complex real-world population is associated with sustained clinical efficacy and low rates of reinterventions at 3 years after the initial procedure.

Long-term safety of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon-only angioplasty for de novo coronary artery disease: the SPARTAN DCB study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate long-term survival of paclitaxel DCB for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Safety concerns have been raised over the use of paclitaxel devices for peripheral artery disease recently, following a meta-analysis suggesting increased late mortality. With regard to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for coronary artery intervention however, there is limited data to date regarding possible late mortality relating to paclitaxel.

METHODS

We compared all-cause mortality of patients treated with paclitaxel DCB to those with non-paclitaxel second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) for stable, de novo coronary artery disease from 1st January 2011 till 31st December 2018. To have homogenous groups allowing data on safety to be interpreted accurately, we excluded patients with previous PCI and patients treated with a combination of both DCB and DES in subsequent PCIs. Data were analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression statistical models.

RESULTS

We present 1517 patients; 429 treated with paclitaxel DCB and 1088 treated with DES. On univariate analysis, age, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, prior myocardial infarction, heart failure, smoking, atrial fibrillation, decreasing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [and renal failure (eGFR < 45)] were associated with worse survival. DCB intervention showed a non-significant trend towards better prognosis compared to DES (p = 0.08). On multivariable analysis age, decreasing eGFR and smoking associated with worse prognosis.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence of late mortality associated with DCB angioplasty compared with non-paclitaxel second-generation DES in up to 5 years follow-up. DCB is a safe option for the treatment of de novo coronary artery disease.

Paclitaxel-Coated Peripheral Arterial Devices are Associated with Reduced Mortality in Younger Patients

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel-coated devices have been shown to decrease restenosis when used in the femoropopliteal artery. Recent reports have suggested a possible risk of increased late mortality in patients treated with paclitaxel. It has been suggested that younger patients and those with limited comorbidities may be at higher risk. Our objective was to analyze long-term mortality based on patient age comparing treatment with paclitaxel to uncoated devices.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 1,170 consecutive patients who underwent femoropopliteal percutaneous intervention by angioplasty, atherectomy, stent placement, or combination between 2011 and 2018. Patients were grouped by age at the time of procedure: <60 years old (n = 244, 20.9%), 60-80 years old (n = 635, 54.3%), and >80 years old (n = 291, 24.9%). Within each group, patients were further divided by use of paclitaxel. The primary outcome measure was survival assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences between the groups were analyzed with analysis of variance. Multivariable analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of the 1,170 patients who underwent femoropopliteal percutaneous intervention, 654 (55.9%) received a paclitaxel-coated device during treatment and 516 (44.1%) did not. Mean age of the overall patient cohort was 70.4 ± 12.6 years and 663 (56.7%) were male. When comparing the groups by age we found an increase in age but a decrease in the proportion of patients who smoke. The use of paclitaxel-coated devices was similar across the groups (<60 years old, 56.2%; 60-80 years old, 57.0%; >80 years old, 52.6%; P = 0.45). Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the patients treated with and without paclitaxel within each age group except more males in the <60-year-old group treated without paclitaxel and more patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia in the >80-year-old group treated with paclitaxel. In patients <60 and 60-80 years old paclitaxel use was associated with increased survival at 4 years: <60 (80.7% vs. 64.4%; P = 0.04); 60-80 (63.2% vs. 55.1%; P = 0.04). Survival was similar in the >80-year-old group (46.6% vs. 32.8%; P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the use of paclitaxel-coated arterial devices is not associated with increased mortality. On the contrary, our data show that younger patients treated with paclitaxel show improved survival compared with those treated without paclitaxel. Paclitaxel-coated devices may be used with continued caution especially in patients at high risk for restenosis.

Assessment of Mortality and Factors Affecting Outcome of Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Femoropopliteal PAD

The use of drug-coated devices in intravascular therapy is aimed at preventing neointimal hyperplasia caused by excessive proliferation of vascular smooth muscle and thereby restenosis. Although its use seemed initially promising, a recent publication has shown an increased risk of mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices, and there is an urgent need to reaffirm assessments of drug-eluting stents (DES). Objective: The aim of the study was to compare mortality and effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated stents and bare-metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with long-term follow-up. Materials and methods: In a single center randomized study, 256 patients with PAD were treated intravascularly with stent implantation. Patients were randomized into two groups: the first (n = 126) were treated with DES, and the second (n = 130) were treated with BMS. The study included evaluation after the procedure, after about 6 months and 36 months. Co-morbidities, with risks for atherosclerosis, were analyzed in all patients. Patients were evaluated for clinical outcome, restenosis frequency, and safety (complications and total mortality). Results: Clinical benefit at the end of the investigation was statistically significantly better in the DES group compared with the BMS group: 85.7% versus 66.2% (p = 0.0003), respectively. Restenosis occurred significantly less frequently in patients with DES: 16.0% versus BMS: 35.0%, p = 0.012. There was no significant effect of comorbidities on the frequency of restenoses. There were no differences in all-cause mortality over the three years with paclitaxel and no-paclitaxel stents cohorts (8.7% versus 7.1%; long-rank p = 0.575). No association was found with mortality and treatment with DES or BMS. Conclusions: The use of paclitaxel-coated stents gave good clinical benefit and caused a significantly lower frequency of restenosis compared to bare-metal stents. The use of paclitaxel-coated stents did not increase mortality.

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes With Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo Coronary Lesions: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Background

The role of drug‐coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions is not well established.

Methods and Results

Electronic databases and major conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared DCBs with stents or angioplasty for de novo coronary lesions. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization. Summary estimates were conducted using random‐effects analysis complemented by several subgroup and sensitivity analyses. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with 2483 patients were included. At a mean follow up of 12 months, DCBs were associated with no difference in the incidence of target lesion revascularization as compared with alternative strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.35–1.76). There was no difference in treatment effect based on the indication (ie, small‐vessel disease, myocardial infarction, bifurcation, or high bleeding risk) (P_interaction=0.22). DCBs were associated with lower target lesion revascularization compared with bare metal stents and similar target lesion revascularization compared with drug‐eluting stents (P_interaction=0.03). There was no difference between DCBs and control in terms of major adverse cardiac events, vessel thrombosis, or cardiovascular mortality. However, DCBs were associated with a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25–0.90) and all‐cause mortality (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22–0.94).

Conclusions

In patients with de novo coronary lesions, use of DCBs was associated with comparable clinical outcomes irrespective of the indication or comparator device. DCBs had a similar rate of target lesion revascularization compared with drug‐eluting stents. A randomized trial powered for clinical outcomes and evaluating the role of DCBs for all‐comers is warranted.

Balloon catheters and stents with paclitaxel: are they really dangerous? A review and update

The aim of this review is to summarize and update current research concerning the safety of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) with paclitaxel (PTX) in peripheral arteries. The data from the large randomized controlled trials showed evidence of the superiority of DCBs over plain balloon angioplasty concerning efficacy. Also, the safety parameters between the two groups did not differ. However, two meta-analyses identifying an increased late mortality risk after using PTX technologies were published only a short time ago. In contradiction, a lot of following studies (meta-analyses, real-world analysis, retrospective review) published in 2019 and 2020, did not confirm any significant difference in all-cause death between PTX and no-PTX cohorts. The safety of PTX technologies still represents the most serious and controversial issue in peripheral interventions. Until it is definitively solved further research must continue. In daily practice, recommendations for the use of PTX products include the treatment of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (not of de novo lesions), the maintenance of patency of bypasses, and angioplasty for limb salvage. In heavily calcified lesions, a prior debulking with atherectomy is suitable. Generally, the risks and benefits of the application of PTX devices should be considered in every single patient.

Nutritional status and outcomes of superficial femoral artery stenting due to intermittent claudication

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis is still not clear. The aim of this study was to determine the nutritional status of patients with lower limb ischemia and the risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR) after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting.

METHODS

Numerous parameters of nutritional status assessment were compared between 70 patients undergoing SFA endovascular intervention with a self-expandable plane stent due to life-limiting intermittent claudication and 40 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). All subjects were followed up for at least 1 year in relation to outcomes such as clinically driven TLR occurrence.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing SFA stenting had a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity than those who underwent CAS (51.43% vs. 72.50%; P=0.031). An increase in Ankle-Brachial Index of >0.15 after SFA stenting (early end-point) was positively associated with greater handgrip strength (HGS), fat-free mass, skeletal muscle mass and waist-to-hip ratio. Freedom from TLR (late end-point) was significantly related to a higher waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), HGS and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) Score. The 1-year risk of TLR for patients with a WHtR of ≥61.39 amounted to odds ratio; 95% confidence interval: 0.21; 0.05-0.25; P=0.021.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters of nutritional status assessment were associated with early and late outcomes of SFA stenting in patients with intermittent claudication. Abdominal fat distribution and higher HGS and GNRI scores lowered the 1-year risk of TLR. Further study is needed to determine the pathomechanism of the obesity paradox, sarcopenia and undernutrition in relation to outcomes of endovascular interventions.

Paclitaxel-coated peripheral artery devices are not associated with increased mortality

OBJECTIVE

Long-term safety concerns have been raised that the use of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents is linked to excess mortality. Our objective was to compare outcomes in patients treated with paclitaxel vs uncoated devices and to analyze long-term mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-institution review of 1170 consecutive patients who underwent femoropopliteal percutaneous revascularization by angioplasty, atherectomy, stent placement, or combination between 2011 and 2018. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. Groups were divided into patients who received paclitaxel (n = 652) and those who did not (n = 518). Categorical variables were assessed using χ² analysis and continuous variables with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A multivariable analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression models. Mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Demographics, risk factors, and Rutherford class were similar between the groups, except that the paclitaxel group was more likely to have diabetes (60.9% vs 55.0%; P = .04), was less likely to be on dialysis (10.7% vs 14.9%; P = .04), and had lower average creatinine concentration (1.6 ± 1.8 mg/dL vs 2.0 ± 2.3 mg/dL; P = .003). There were no differences in all-cause mortality through 2 years between paclitaxel and no-paclitaxel cohorts (25.5% vs 30.3%; log-rank, P = .098). At 3 years and 3.5 years, mortality was significantly lower in the paclitaxel group: year 3, 32.1% vs 39.4% (log-rank, P = .041); year 3.5, 35.2% vs 43.9% (log-rank, P = .027). Survival rates were not significantly different in examining subgroups by diabetes, chronic kidney disease, presence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia, or paclitaxel-coated balloon manufacturer. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that age, dialysis, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure were independent risk factors for mortality, whereas paclitaxel use was associated with lower mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents does not increase mortality compared with uncoated devices out to 3.5 years. Paclitaxel-coated devices can be used with continued caution, especially in patients at increased risk of restenosis. Further long-term studies are needed to determine the risk of late mortality.

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?

Percutaneous coronary interventions with stent-based restorations of vessel patency have become the gold standard in the treatment of acute coronary states. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) have been designed to combine the efficiency of drug-eluting stents (DES) at the time of implantation and the advantages of a lack of foreign body afterwards. Complete resolution of the scaffold was intended to enable the restoration of vasomotor function and reduce the risk of device thrombosis. While early reports demonstrated superiority of BVS over DES, larger-scale application and longer observation exposed major concerns about their use, including lower radial strength and higher risk of thrombosis resulting in higher rate of major adverse cardiac events. Further focus on procedural details and research on the second generation of BVS with novel properties did not allow to unequivocally challenge position of DES. Nevertheless, BVS still have a chance to present superiority in distinctive indications. This review presents an outlook on the available first and second generation BVS and a summary of results of clinical trials on their use. It discusses explanations for unfavorable outcomes, proposed enhancement techniques and a potential niche for the use of BVS.