Atrial therapies reduce atrial arrhythmia burden in defibrillator patients

Impact of the Pattern of Atrial Fibrillation on Stroke Risk and Mortality

Thromboembolism is the most serious complication of AF, and oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy. Current guidelines place all AF types together in terms of anticoagulation with the major determinants being associated comorbidities translated into risk marker. Among patients in large clinical trials, those with non-paroxysmal AF appear to be at higher risk of stroke than those with paroxysmal AF. Higher complexity of the AF pattern is also associated with higher risk of mortality. Moreover, continuous monitoring of AF through cardiac implantable devices provided us with the concept of ‘AF burden’. Usually, the larger the AF burden, the higher the risk of stroke; however, the relationship is not well characterised with respect to the threshold value above which the risk increases. The picture is more complex than it appears: AF and underlying disorders must act synergically respecting the magnitude of its own characteristics, which are the amount of time a patient stays in AF and the severity of associated comorbidities.

The Role of Pharmacogenetics in Atrial Fibrillation Therapeutics: Is Personalized Therapy in Sight?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide requiring therapy. Despite recent advances in catheter-based and surgical therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic AF. However, response in individual patients is highly variable with over half the patients treated with rhythm control therapy experiencing recurrence of AF within a year. Contemporary AADs used to suppress AF are incompletely and unpredictably effective and associated with significant risks of proarrhythmia and noncardiac toxicities. Furthermore, this "one-size" fits all strategy for selecting antiarrhythmics is based largely on minimizing risk of adverse effects rather than on the likelihood of suppressing AF. The limited success of rhythm control therapy is in part due to heterogeneity of the underlying substrate, interindividual differences in disease mechanisms, and our inability to predict response to AADs in individual patients. Genetic studies of AF over the past decade have revealed that susceptibility to and response to therapy for AF is modulated by the underlying genetic substrate. However, the bedside application of these new discoveries to the management of AF patients has thus far been disappointing. This may in part be related to our limited understanding about genetic predictors of drug response in general, the challenges associated with determining efficacy of response to AADs, and lack of randomized genotype-directed clinical trials. Nonetheless, recent studies have shown that common AF susceptibility risk alleles at the chromosome 4q25 locus modulated response to AADs, electrical cardioversion, and ablation therapy. This monograph discusses how genetic approaches to AF have not only provided important insights into underlying mechanisms but also identified AF subtypes that can be better targeted with more mechanism-based "personalized" therapy.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study to assess the effects of dronedarone 400 mg twice daily for 12 weeks on atrial fibrillation burden in subjects with permanent pacemakers

Purpose

Dronedarone is a benzofuran derivative with a pharmacological profile similar to amiodarone but has a more rapid onset of action and a much shorter half-life (13–19 h). Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of dronedarone in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients using dual-chamber pacemakers capable of quantifying atrial fibrillation burden.

Methods

Pacemakers were adjusted to optimize AF detection. Patients with AF burden >1 % were randomized to dronedarone 400 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. Pacemakers were interrogated after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in AF burden from baseline over the 12-week treatment period. Patients with permanent AF, severe/recently decompensated heart failure, and current use of antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded. AF burden was assessed by a core laboratory blinded to treatment assignment.

Results

From 285 patients screened, 112 were randomized (mean age 76 years, 60 % male, 84 % hypertensive, 65 % with sick sinus syndrome, 26 % with diabetes mellitus type II, 15 % with heart failure). Baseline mean (SEM) AF burden was 8.77 % (0.16) for placebo and 10.14 % (0.17) for dronedarone. Over the 12-week study period, AF burden compared to baseline decreased by 54.4 % (0.22) (P = 0.0009) with dronedarone and trended higher by 12.8 % (0.16) (P = 0.450) with placebo. The absolute change in burden was decreased by 5.5 % in the dronedarone group and increased by 1.1 % in the placebo group. Heart rate during AF was reduced to approximately 4 beats/min with dronedarone (P = 0.285). Adverse events were higher with dronedarone compared to placebo (65 vs 56 %).

Conclusions

Dronedarone reduced pacemaker-assessed the relative AF burden compared to baseline and placebo by over 50 % during the 12-week observation period.

Genetic mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: impact on response to treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most-common sustained arrhythmia observed in clinical practice, but response to therapy is highly variable between patients. Current drug therapies to suppress AF are incompletely and unpredictably effective and carry substantial risk of proarrhythmia and noncardiac toxicities. The limited success of therapy for AF is partially the result of heterogeneity of the underlying substrate, interindividual differences in disease mechanisms, and our inability to predict response to therapies in individual patients. In this Review, we discuss the evidence that variability in response to drug therapy is also conditioned by the underlying genetic substrate for AF. Increased susceptibility to AF is mediated through diverse genetic mechanisms, including modulation of the atrial action-potential duration, conduction slowing, and impaired cell-to-cell communication, as well as novel mechanisms, such as regulation of signalling proteins important in the pathogenesis of AF. However, the translation of genetic data to the care of the patients with AF has been limited because of poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms associated with common AF-susceptibility loci, a dearth of prospective, adequately powered studies, and the challenges associated with determining efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs. What is apparent, however, is the need for appropriately designed, genotype-directed clinical trials.

Modeling atrial arrhythmias: impact on clinical diagnosis and therapies

Atrial arrhythmias are the most frequent sustained rhythm disorders in humans and often lead to severe complications such as heart failure and stroke. Despite the important insights provided by animal models into the mechanisms of atrial arrhythmias, direct translation of experimental findings to new therapies in patients has not been straightforward. With the advances in computer technology, large-scale electroanatomical computer models of the atria that integrate information from the molecular to organ scale have reached a level of sophistication that they can be used to interpret the outcome of experimental and clinical studies and aid in the rational design of therapies. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art of computer models of the electrical dynamics of the atria and discusses the evolving role of simulation in assisting the clinical diagnosis and treatment of atrial arrhythmias.

Nocturnal peak in atrial tachyarrhythmia occurrence as a function of arrhythmia burden

INTRODUCTION

We examined circadian periodicity of atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT/AF) in a large group of patients with implantable devices, which allow continuous collection of the event data over prolonged periods of time.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 16,130 AT/AF events were recorded in 236 patients (age: 63 ± 12 years, 27% female, 90% had a history of cardiovascular disease, 33% ischemic, LVEF: 49 ± 18%) over a period of 12 months. To exclude interactions with therapy, the patterns of arrhythmia occurrence were examined for all events and for those episodes that were preceded by at least 1, 6, and 24 hours of sinus rhythm. To prevent biasing toward patients with more frequent episodes, the patterns of AT/AF onset were analyzed both in absolute and patient-normalized (i.e., divided by the total number of events in each patient) units per hour per patient and then summarized for the entire group. In patients with <4 AT/AF events, the onset times were randomly distributed over 24-hour period. However, as the number of AT/AF events increased, a nocturnal pattern of occurrence (determined by the occurrence of a trough around noon) gradually emerged and became highly statistically significant (P < 10(-4) ). The magnitude of nocturnal peak of AT/AF events was well explained by a single-exponential function (R(2) = 0.97, P < 10(-2) ).

CONCLUSION

Patients with more frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias are more likely to develop AT/AF at night. Knowledge of patient-specific circadian patterns of arrhythmia occurrence can be useful for personalized management of individuals with significant arrhythmia burden.

Atrial burst pacing with biphasic and monophasic waveforms for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Biphasic pacing is a novel mode of pacing that was suggested to increase cardiac conduction velocity as compared with cathodal monophasic pacing. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rapid atrial pacing to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to normal sinus rhythm.

METHODS

Multiple biphasic (anodal/cathodal), reverse biphasic (cathodal/anodal), and monophasic (cathodal) atrial pacing therapies were performed among 12 patients undergoing left atrial catheter ablation for AF. The efficacy end point was successful conversion of AF to sinus rhythm, and safety end point no induction of ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were paced at three cycle lengths (100, 200, and 333 msec) for 60 seconds at three locations (right and left atrial appendages and coronary sinus).

RESULTS

Among the 66 biphasic (anodal/cathodal) pacing procedures one procedure in a patient with chronic AF, which involved pacing at the left atrial appendage with a cycle length of 200 msec, led to conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. None of the 66 monophasic pacing procedures or the 66 reverse biphasic (cathodal/anodal) pacing procedures was associated with AF termination. None of the biphasic pacing procedures was associated with induction of ventricular arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid atrial pacing using a variety of waveforms at the cycle length and output used in the current study was found to be safe. There was a single success in converting a chronic AF to sinus rhythm.

Is there a role for bi-atrial pacing resynchronisation therapy in the management of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation in patients unsuitable for left atrial ablation?

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study evaluated whether long term outcome of atrial resynchronisation therapy using bi-atrial pacing (BiaP) to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) was effective in patients deemed unfit for left atrial (LA) ablation procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The patient population comprised 2 groups: those deemed suitable for left LA ablation (n=14) and those who were not (n = 17). Both groups underwent BiaP and outcomes were evaluated by comparing symptoms, AF duration, admissions and antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) for an equal period of time pre and post implantation. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 8-66 months) for the unsuitable group and 31 months (range 7-84 months) for the suitable group. Efficacy in reduction of both AF and symptoms was similar (P = 0.44) in both groups (unsuitable group: 13/17; suitable group: 8/14). There was significant improvement in median AF episodes/week pre and post BiaP in both groups (unsuitable group AF reduction: 5 days/week, P = 0.001; suitable group AF reduction: 4.9 days/week, P = 0.03); the improvement was similar in both groups (P = 0.33). There was a significant reduction in the median number of admissions for AF in both groups (unsuitable group: P = 0.003; suitable group: P = 0.01) and this reduction was also similar (P = 0.70). The median number of AAD was also reduced to a similar degree (P = 0.83) in both groups (suitable group: P = 0.004; unsuitable group: P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial resynchronisation therapy is effective in the long term management of drug-resistant AF in patients unsuitable for LA ablation, leading to significant reductions in symptoms, AF duration, admissions and AAD.

[Sandwiched between the single- and triple-chamber ICD: do we still need the dual-chamber ICD?]

Since it has been shown that adverse events are more frequent with dual-compared to single-chamber ICDs in patients with heart failure, and since the importance of prevention of unnecessary right ventricular pacing and the success of biventricular pacing have been demonstrated in numerous studies, the need for dual-chamber ICD systems has to be reassessed. The development of these systems was accompanied by expectations of improved hemodynamics in patients with bradycardia, a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation, inappropriate therapies, and bradycardia-associated ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Single-chamber ICDs should be used restrictively and with great caution in patients with (sinus-) bradycardia and heart failure, since a relevant proportion of these patients is at risk of hemodynamic deterioration. Even if the proportion of patients with proven pacemaker syndrome is so small that it does not reach the level of statistical significance in large studies, a small percentage of patients with hemodynamic deterioration due to VVI pacing is still clinically (and economically) intolerable. Since the development of bradycardia or symptomatic chronotropic incompetence (e.g., due to amiodarone) is difficult to predict, it seems reasonable to use the indication for dualchamber systems liberally. However, the systematic prevention of unnecessary right ventricular pacing is crucial if dual-chamber ICDs are used. If advanced tachycardia discrimination algorithms and careful, individual programming are used, dual-chamber ICDs are superior in the prevention of inappropriate therapies. Additionally, dualchannel electrograms allow a more reliable interpretation of stored tachycardia episodes. In summary, dual-chamber systems represent a valuable improvement of ICD therapy but require thorough programming to convey their advantage.

The role of pacemakers in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation

Pacemakers have an important role in the major strategies for the management of atrial fibrillation, rate control and rhythm control. Of all the current non-pharmacologic therapies for atrial fibrillation, the use of pacemakers impacts the largest number of patients. Pacemakers are used to facilitate medical management of atrial fibrillation with rate control agents and anti-arrhythmic drugs. Atrioventricular junction ablation in conjunction with pacemaker implantation can be an effective therapy for controlling a rapid ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. The minimization of right ventricular apical pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is an important objective. Cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are likely to be beneficial in select patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac rhythm disorder, and confers a substantial mortality and morbidity from stroke, thromboembolism, heart failure, and impaired quality of life. With the increasingly elderly population in the developed world, as well as improvements in the management of myocardial infarction and heart failure, the prevalence of atrial fibrillation is increasing, resulting in a major public-health problem. This Review aims to provide an overview on the modern management of atrial fibrillation, with particular emphasis on pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. Irrespective of a rate-control or rhythm-control strategy, stroke prevention with appropriate thromboprophylaxis still remains central to the management of this common arrhythmia. Electrophysiological approaches could hold some promise for a curative approach in atrial fibrillation.

Management of atrial arrhythmias 3: paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

This is the third in a series of four practical articles highlighting the important management steps for non-cardiologists and non-cardiac electrophysiologists dealing with patients with atrial fibrillation and common atrial flutter. This article will deal with care pathways and management principles for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

How, why, and when may atrial defibrillation find a specific role in implantable devices? A clinical viewpoint

This viewpoint article discusses the potential for incorporation of atrial defibrillation capabilities in modern multi-chamber devices. In the late 1990s, the possibility of using shock-only therapy to treat selected patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) was explored in the context of the stand-alone atrial defibrillator. The failure of this strategy can be attributed to the technical limitations of the stand-alone device, low tolerance of atrial shocks, difficulties in patient selection, a lack of predictive knowledge about the evolution of AF, and, last but not least, commercial considerations. An open question is how atrial defibrillation capability may now assume a specific new role in devices implanted for sudden death prevention or cardiac resynchronization. For patients who already have indications for implantable devices, device-based atrial defibrillation appears attractive as a "backup" option for managing AF when preventive pharmacological/electrical measures fail. This and several other personalized hybrid therapeutic approaches await exploration, though assessment of their efficacy is methodologically challenging. Achievement of acceptance by patients is an essential premise for any updated atrial defibrillation strategy. Strategies that are being investigated to improve patient tolerance include waveform shaping, pharmacologic modulation of pain, and patient-activated defibrillation (patients might also perceive the problem of discomfort somewhat differently in the context of a backup therapy). The economic impact of implementing atrial defibrillation features in available devices is progressively decreasing, and financial feasibility need not be a major issue. Future studies should examine clinically relevant outcomes and not be limited (as occurred with stand-alone defibrillators) to technical or other soft endpoints.

The role of pacing in rhythm control and management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is increasing in prevalence with an ageing population. As the arrhythmia is often asymptomatic the true prevalence is likely even higher. Largely because of stroke this arrhythmia places a huge financial burden on the health economy. Despite this, large studies assessing rate versus rhythm control have been equivocal. Because of the ineffectiveness of pharmacological therapy much research effort has been undertaken in device and ablative approaches to rhythm management. Although catheter ablation has gained favour because of the high success rates the technique requires considerable expertise and still has a significant complication profile maintaining interest in pacing therapies for atrial fibrillation. Dual chamber versus single-chamber ventricular pacing has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. Research is currently underway to see if minimising the deleterious effects of right ventricular apical pacing could further increase the benefits of atrioventricular synchronous pacing. Several studies show some (albeit variable) reduction in AF burden with anti-AF algorithms in the setting of bradycardia. Antitachycardia pacing, on the other hand, has not been shown to treat AF in a randomised trial despite the successful termination of co-existent atrial tachycardias. There is increasing evidence that alternative atrial pacing sites may treat AF by improving atrial function. Furthermore, these strategies coupled with other therapies in a 'hybrid approach' have also showed promising results.

Role of High Frequency Atrial Pacing for the Termination of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Atypical Atrial Flutter

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of high-frequency (HF) pacing from the right atrial appendage (RAA) or coronary sinus ostium (CS-Os) for the termination of acute atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter (AAFL) during an electrophysiological (EP) study.

METHODS

128 episodes of acute fast atrial arrhythmias (FAAs; 93 AF and 35 AAFL) were analyzed in 110 patients. Patients were initially observed for 60s leading to spontaneous termination of 28 FAAs. The remaining 100 FAAs (70 AF) episodes were randomized to the following strategies: (A) pacing at RAA using up to 10 consecutive 20-Hz trains followed by the same stimulation protocol at CS-Os if RAA pacing failed, (B) pacing at CS-Os using the same stimulation protocol followed by HF pacing at RAA, or (C) observation up to 6 minutes ("no pacing").

RESULTS

The 20-Hz pacing at both RAA and CS-Os was associated with higher conversion of AAFL, as compared to strategy C (60% and 77% vs 11%; P < 0.05). Only HF pacing at CS-Os was superior to observation strategy for the conversion of AF (21% vs 4%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 20-Hz pacing protocol is superior to observation strategy for interruption of either acute AF or acute AAFL episodes; however, its efficacy is higher in AAFLs. These results can be helpful for the termination of acute atrial tachyarrhythmias during EPstudy and should be further evaluated in patients with implantable devices capable of antitachycardia pacing.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in clinical practice: need for electrical, mechanical, clinical and logistic synchronization

Considering the relatively short history of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the amount of available evidence of efficacy is impressive, and effectiveness studies are now required. Transfer of our experimentally gained knowledge into the real world raises issues that call for synchronization among the many specialists involved in chronic heart failure (CHF) management and CRT decision making. From an economic perspective, the demonstrated ability of CRT to reduce hospitalizations could help ease the burden on health systems derived from the growing incidence of CHF. Recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline revisions should encourage a synchronized approach to rational deployment of CRT in selected patients. Nevertheless, current QRS criteria for CRT candidacy do not directly address the key issue of identification of patients with a pacing-correctable mechanical dyssynchrony (and in clinical trials, 25-30% of implanted patients did not respond to CRT). Echocardiography could become an important adjunct (or even an alternative) to QRS duration for patient selection; routine implementation would require use of straightforward, reproducible measurements, possibly obtainable on standard equipment. Echocardiography could also help optimize site location, although this would not eliminate lead placement problems. A series of issues remain open for investigation, including the potential of CRT in patients with atrial fibrillation, impact of devices with defibrillation ability, effects of electrical/pharmacological tailoring, need for confirmation that efficacy of CRT extends into the long term and possible use of CRT in mild CHF. Interdisciplinary synchronization in the various phases of CRT (screening, proposing, implementing, optimizing and monitoring) should eventually help develop a coordinated system for patient referral.

Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Rhythm control using implantable devices

Presently, most devices with atrial diagnostic and therapeutic features are implanted in patients for electrical treatment of bradyarrhythmias and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The painless electrical strategies for prevention and termination of ATa have not demonstrated significant clinical effectiveness in the general population with ATa. The effectiveness of ATP in reducing burden may be significantly higher in a subgroup of patients with a high incidence of stable ATa, but this needs to be evaluated prospectively. Smart sensing and detection schemes will also help provide accurate information and determine when ATa can be terminated with ATP. Although electrical defibrillation is effective, the discomfort associated with atrial shocks has limited the widespread use of this technology. Recent technological advances have increased the capabilities of implantable devices to store large amounts of diagnostic information. In the near future, implantable devices without transvenous leads may be implanted to monitor a variety of physiologic signals. This could help improve clinical outcomes and determine which therapies (pharmacologic, ablative, or electrical) would be most effective as well as monitor their safety and efficacy. Frequent monitoring from home and the availability of this data to the physician/nurse on the Internet can potentially improve the management of patients' ATa at a much lower cost.

Temporal variability of atrial fibrillation in pacemaker recipients for bradycardia: implications for crossover designed trials, study sample size, and identification of responder patients by means of arrhythmia burden

BACKGROUND

Most clinical trials that have tested pacing therapies to prevent and treat atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) have chosen endpoints such as AT frequency or burden (defined as percentage of time a patient is in AT), but failed to show unequivocal evidence of a clinical impact.

AIM

The aim of our multicenter prospective observational study was to measure the variability of AT burden and estimate its impact on study outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty patients indicated for permanent pacing and suffering from AT (age 71 +/- 9 years; 47.2% male) received a dual-chamber pacemaker. AT burden was measured in two consecutive, 2-month observation periods; the Monte Carlo method was then applied to simulate findings of a crossover design study. We simulated several models of therapy impact, each model being characterized by the percentage of responder patients and the percentage reduction in AT burden. To show a significant impact of AT therapies in a sample of 250 patients in whom 100, 75, or 50% would be theoretical responders to therapies, AT burden reduction should be at least 27, 32, or 57%, respectively. Temporal fluctuations in AT burden were so high that about 60% of patients would falsely appear as responders or nonresponders in a crossover study, regardless of AT burden reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients paced for bradycardia and suffering from AT, high intrapatient variability in AT burden was measured. Various models of therapy impact showed that, in crossover trials of AT therapies, time-related fluctuations in AT burden negatively impact on sample sizes and impair the ability to identify patients as responders or nonresponders.

Physiologic Pacing for Atrial Fibrillation Prevention in Sinus Node Disease: Long-Term Results

BACKGROUND

Physiologic pacing has been demonstrated to be effective in preventing atrial fibrillation recurrences in patients with sinus bradycardia. Aim of the study was to evaluate long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation in a large population of patients affected by sinus node disease receiving physiologic pacing. Furthermore, predictors of arrhythmia recurrence and effect of pacing mode were investigated.

POPULATION

Four hundred twenty-five patients (220 Male, 77 +/- 9 years) were retrospectively analyzed: implanted system was AAI in 20.5% and DDD in 79.5%. Thirty-four percent had atrial fibrillation before implant.

RESULTS

Follow-up lasted on average 51 +/- 36 months (median 42, range 1 month-18 years). Sixty-six percent were on antiarrhythmic drug therapy. After 5 years, 89% survived, 74.5% had at least one episode of atrial fibrillation, 39.9% were submitted to electrical cardioversion, 67.2% were hospitalized because of cardiac causes, 33.3% developed permanent atrial fibrillation. Primary conduction system disease and valvular heart disease were independent predictors for atrial fibrillation recurrence. Preimplant atrial fibrillation predicted arrhythmia recurrence during the follow-up, but it did not predict development of permanent atrial fibrillation. AAI pacing, when compared with DDD, was associated to a lower rate of atrial fibrillation recurrences (AAI 28.7%, DDD 53.3%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In spite of expected benefits of physiologic pacing, the development of atrial fibrillation and permanent atrial fibrillation were quite common. The additional benefits of multifunction pacemakers designed to prevent and treat atrial fibrillation should be evaluated in controlled studies.

Clinical Experience with Tiered Atrial Therapies and Atrial Arrhythmia Prevention Algorithms in a Dual Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillator

INTRODUCTION

The acceptance of atrial arrhythmia features in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) will depend on their ability to appropriately discriminate atrial tachyarrhythmias/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF). This study tested the effectiveness of an atrial/ventricular ICD with advanced atrial detection and new algorithms designed to prevent atrial arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were implanted with a dual chamber ICD (Model 1900, Guidant Corporation, MN, USA) at 25 US centers. Ten patients received a coronary sinus (CS) lead allowing a defibrillation vector for AT/AF cardioversion. Follow-up was 12.2 months. The addition of new atrial features designed for detection, discrimination, and prevention of AT/AF had no adverse effect upon detection of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) (mean detection time with new features ON was 2.22 seconds vs 2.19 seconds with features OFF). A total of 100% of the induced and spontaneous ventricular and atrial arrhythmias receiving shock therapy were reviewed as appropriate detection. Atrial shock conversion efficacy for spontaneous and induced AT/AF episodes was 83% and 96%, respectively (144 spontaneous, 162 induced episodes). A 3-month randomized crossover trial of atrial preventative pacing features did not result in adverse effects, but there was no clinical efficacy for prevention of AT/AF.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced atrial detection and discrimination features combined with tiered atrial therapies did not adversely impact the ability of the ICD (Model 1900) to appropriately detect and treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Long term management of atrial arrhythmias in young patients with sick sinus syndrome undergoing early operation to correct congenital heart disease

AIMS

The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with operated congenital heart disease (CHD), post-operative sinus node dysfunction and atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) who had a new generation of DDDRP pacemakers (Model AT501, Medtronic Inc., MN, USA) able to deliver preventive atrial pacing and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifteen CHD patients (mean age 17+/-9 years, eight after Mustard operation, five after extracardiac Fontan operation and two after atrial septum repair) received a dual-chamber pacemaker with transvenous (eight patients) or epicardial leads (seven patients). In the year before implantation, all patients had symptomatic AT (palpitations), eight patients required hospitalization and five required electrical cardioversion. Pacing prevention algorithms were enabled in all patients, and ATP therapies in six patients. During a mean follow-up of 30 months (range 24-44), three patients (two Fontan, one Mustard) died of CHF, whereas AT required hospitalization in three patients (two Fontan, one atrial septum repair). Only seven patients had symptomatic AT. One hundred and twenty-five AT episodes were treated by ATP in three patients, with an overall termination efficacy of 43.2%. In one patient, atrial lead noise induced inappropriate AT detection that resulted in ATP delivery. Several AT episodes were not treated owing to their very short duration, atrial undersensing, or 1:1 atrioventricular conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with antitachycardia pacemakers in CHD patients with post-operative sick sinus syndrome after biventricular correction or palliation shows that these devices are safe and that atrial pacing may play a role in AT prevention and treatment.

Randomized comparison between Ramp and Burst+ atrial antitachycardia pacing therapies in patients suffering from sinus node disease and atrial fibrillation and implanted with a DDDRP device

AIMS

Atrial tachycardia and flutter frequently occur in association with atrial fibrillation and may be treated by overdrive pacing in patients who receive pacemakers with antitachycardia pacing (ATP) capabilities. The PITAGORA trial was a multi-centre, randomized, cross-over study aimed at comparing two different ATP modes for atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) termination in patients suffering from sinus node disease (SND).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-six patients (72 M, age 71+/-9 years) received a Medtronic AT500 pacemaker. All patients were on class IC or III antiarrhythmic drugs. After a 5-month observation period, 170 patients were randomized to either Ramp or Burst+ ATP therapy; 4 months later they crossed over. One hundred and fifty-seven patients completed the 13 months of follow-up; 114 (72.6%) suffered 6088 AT episodes. In 75 patients, 1904 AT episodes were treated and 934 (49.1%) successfully terminated. The median value of individual patients' ATP efficacy was 60%. Burst+ terminated 387 out of 873 AT episodes (44%) in 58 patients. Ramp terminated 547 out of 1031 AT episodes (53%, P<0.001) in 56 patients. Ramp efficacy was significantly (P<0.01) and directly correlated with AT cycle length (ATCL), whereas Burst+ efficacy was not. Ramp showed higher (P<0.001) termination efficacy than Burst+ for ATCL >240 ms. Quality of life, as measured by the EuroQoL questionnaire, and number of symptoms significantly improved in the overall population. This improvement was significantly higher in patients with ATP efficacy >60%.

CONCLUSION

In patients suffering from SND and AT, Ramp therapy shows higher termination efficacy than Burst+ therapy in AT episodes with ATCL >240 ms. Further studies are required to show the impact of ATP on clinical outcomes.

Is time to first recurrence of atrial fibrillation correlated with atrial fibrillation burden?

The time to the first recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the AF burden have commonly been used as end points for AF therapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a large pacemaker registry to assess the relation between the time to the first recurrence and the AF burden. Although a statistical association exists, the small correlation coefficients limit the clinical value of the time to first recurrence as an indicator of AF burden.

Impact of atrial fibrillation duration on postcardioversion recurrence

BACKGROUND

"Begetting," a mechanistic tenet of atrial fibrillation (AF), stipulates that the rate of recurrence of AF after cardioversion is proportional to the preceding arrhythmia duration. However, recent reports suggest that, for brief durations, the incidence of early recurrence of AF (ERAF) is inversely proportional to duration. These reports were based on potentially biased data.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a prospective study to examine the impact of AF duration on postcardioversion recurrence.

METHODS

Forty-four patients underwent placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) capable of delivering patient-elicited AF cardioversion shocks. Subsequently, in the ambulatory setting, the timing of shocks in relationship to perceived AF onset was randomly assigned within individuals to early (as soon as possible) or delayed (1 day later).

RESULTS

During a follow-up averaging 199 days per patient, a total of 61 AF episodes among 17 patients occurred for which a patient-elicited cardioversion shock was delivered. Twenty-three shocks were delivered using early protocol (mean 6.8 hours after AF onset), and 38 shocks were delivered using delayed protocol (mean 34.7 hours after AF onset). The incidence of ERAF was significantly lower using the delayed protocol.

CONCLUSION

A strategy of approximately 24-hour delay in cardioversion shock timing decreased the incidence of ERAF, relative to a shock delivered within a few hours of AF onset. This observation has important mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

Utility of adjunctive single oral bolus propafenone therapy in patients with atrial defibrillators

AIMS

Previous studies have demonstrated that ambulatory atrial defibrillation shocks delivered by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are safe and effective, but poorly tolerated. Separate studies have demonstrated the utility of single oral bolus propafenone for conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF); however, most patients were hospitalized, had no structural heart disease, were taking no other antiarrhythmic drugs, and were not exposed to concomitant shock. We hypothesized that a single oral bolus dose of propafenone given early after onset would be a safe and effective adjunct to ICD-based AF therapy and improve overall therapy tolerance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A randomized three-way crossover study design was used to compare three strategies, deployed in the ambulatory setting early after AF episode onset in 35 ICD patients with advanced, drug refractory episodic/persistent syndromes, many of whom had structural heart disease and were taking other antiarrhythmic drugs: (i) single oral bolus propafenone (600 mg), followed by ICD shock if necessary; (ii) single oral bolus placebo, followed by ICD shock if necessary; and (iii) no oral bolus therapy and ICD shock if necessary (no bolus). Antiarrhythmic efficacy, defined by the restoration of sinus rhythm within 24 h, was similar during propafenone (81%) and no-bolus strategies (84%); both were significantly higher than during placebo strategy (62%). Propafenone was well tolerated and not associated with proarrhythmia. Shock use was significantly lower during propafenone strategy (19%) than during no-bolus strategy (55%); this was correlated with improved patient tolerance.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive use of single oral bolus propafenone is safe and effective in patients with an ICD and improves patient tolerance of device-based AF therapy.

Differences in outcomes between patients treated with single- versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a substudy of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the influence of single- versus dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) on the occurrence of heart failure and mortality as well as appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT-II).

BACKGROUND

In MADIT-II, ICD therapy in patients with a prior myocardial infarction and ejection fraction < or =0.30 was associated with a 31% reduction in risk of mortality when compared to conventionally treated patients. An unexpected finding was an increased occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure in the ICD group.

METHODS

Data from 717 patients randomized to ICD therapy with single- or dual-chamber pacing devices in MADIT-II were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints selected for analysis included death from any cause, new or worsening heart failure requiring hospitalization, death or heart failure, appropriate therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), and inappropriate ICD therapy for atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia.

RESULTS

A total of 404 single-chamber ICDs (S-ICDs) and 313 dual-chamber ICDs (D-ICDs) were implanted. Patients receiving D-ICDs were at a higher risk at baseline than those receiving S-ICDs, with older age, higher NYHA class, more frequent prior CABG, wider QRS complex, more LBBB, higher BUN level, a history of more atrial arrhythmias requiring treatment, and a longer time interval from their index myocardial infarction to enrollment. While there was a trend toward an increase in adverse outcomes in the D-ICD group, no statistically significant differences in heart failure or mortality were observed between S-ICD versus D-ICD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with D-ICDs had a nonsignificant trend toward higher mortality and heart failure rates than patients with S-ICDs.

Is Dual Defibrillator Better than Conventional DDD Pacing in Brady-Tachy Syndrome? Results of the ICARUS Trial (Internal Cardioversion Antitachypacing and Prevention: Resource Utilization Study)

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the impact of dual defibrillator versus conventional DDD pacing on quality of life and hospitalizations in patients with sinus node disease and recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, parallel, controlled trial.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients (41 M, mean age 71 +/- 8 years) with sinus node disease and at least three symptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation during the last year were enrolled. Thirty-one consecutive patients received a dual defibrillator (group A) and 32 standard DDD pacing (group B). In group A, 12 patients received an external remote-control device in order to shock themselves in case of atrial fibrillation, while 19 were scheduled for early in-hospital manual shock. Seventy-five percent had been hospitalized during the last year and 57% had required electrical cardioversion. Atrial fibrillation was persistent in 63.5% and paroxysmal in 37.5%. The follow-up lasted 1 year.

RESULTS

Atrial fibrillation recurred in 83.3% in group A and 79.3% in group B (p = ns). Electrical cardioversion was applied in 54.8% in group A and in 21.9% in group B (p < 0.05). On the whole, 89.5% of electrical cardioversions were delivered in the defibrillator group (p < 0.0001). In the whole population 27.0% patients had cardiac-related hospitalization (31.2% in the pacemaker group and 22.6% in the defibrillator group, p = n.s.). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, cardiac-related hospitalization rate was significantly lower in the group A (0% vs. 30%, p < 0.05). Considering Symptom Check List, symptoms significantly improved in the whole population, but symptom number and frequency improved significantly only in the group A. Similarly, SF-36 questionnaire scores showed a little higher quality of life improvement in the group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual defibrillator showed consistent trends toward a higher effectiveness when compared with standard DDD pacing. Dual defibrillator was associated to reduced in-patient cardioversions and to better quality of life. All-cause hospitalizations were reduced only in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Predictors of atrial antitachycardia pacing efficacy in patients affected by brady-tachy form of sick sinus syndrome and implanted with a DDDRP device

Predictors of ATP efficacy in brady/tachy patients.

BACKGROUND

Recent options to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) include implantable devices delivering antitachycardia pacing therapies (ATP). No prospective study selected patients with higher chances of episode termination by ATP or indicated the most effective ATP use. Our aim was to study ATP efficacy in patients with brady-tachy form of sinus node disease (SND), identifying clinical factors, ATA characteristics, and device features predicting ATP efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred and sixteen patients (105 M, aged 71.1+/-8.8 years) received a DDDRP pacemaker and were prospectively followed. Median follow-up was 18 months: 37,125 ATA episodes occurred in 217 patients; ATP treated 5,536 of them. Overall, ATP efficacy was 50.0%. A multivariate analysis identified longer arrhythmia cycle lengths (OR=1.25; CI=1.07-1.47) and shorter delays to ATP delivery (OR=0.15; CI=0.10-0.22) as independent predictors of ATP efficacy for episodes preceded by >or=5 minutes of sinus rhythm. Additionally, ATP efficacy for all treated episodes was predicted by lower New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (OR=0.64; CI=0.42-0.98), episode classification as nonimmediate recurrence of ATA (non-IRAT) (OR=0.07; CI=0.02-0.33), absence of overlap in the device detection windows (OR=0.54; CI=0.32-0.91), and flecainide treatment (OR=2.22; CI=1.04-4.71).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients paced for SND, multivariate analysis shows that ATP efficacy is associated to longer arrhythmia cycle lengths, shorter ATP delivery delays, NYHA class I, episode classification as non-IRAT, absence of overlap in the atrial arrhythmia device detection windows, and flecainide treatment.

Recurrence of Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients

BACKGROUND

Because the natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) is not known in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) but without device-based atrial therapies, we aimed to describe the characteristics and recurrence of AT in such patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter trial, 269 patients with standard indications for ICD placement and 2 episodes of AT in the preceding year received a dual-chamber ICD capable of logging AT. Patients were randomly assigned to 3-month periods of atrial therapies "on" or "off." This analysis considered only the 118 patients with atrial therapies programmed off at ICD placement.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (49%) had at least 1 AT episode longer than 1 minute, and 21 (18%) had at least 1 prolonged episode (>24 hours). The median episode frequency for each patient (episodes per month) was 1.8 episodes longer than 1 minute, 0.8 longer than 1 hour, and 0 longer than 24 hours. The median AT burden was 12.2 hours per month.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with standard ICD indications and history of AT have infrequent episodes, frequent short episodes, or prolonged episodes of AT-atrial fibrillation. However, the clinical characteristics examined did not distinguish among the groups. Improved diagnostic tools may help identify patients at risk for development of AT, thereby allowing specific therapies to be targeted to each group of patients.

Long-term reduction of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences in patients paced for bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) are considered progressive diseases. Several rhythm control therapies for treatment of AT have been proposed.

OBJECTIVES

The Italian AT500 Registry was designed to prospectively study long-term AT evolution in patients paced for the brady-tachy form of sinus node disease (BT-SND).

METHODS

Three hundred forty-six BT-SND patients received an antitachycardia dual-chamber pacemaker and were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months (median 19 months). Prevention and antitachycardia pacing (ATP) features were enabled in all patients.

RESULTS

During the observation period, 224 (65%) patients were treated by antiarrhythmic drugs and 45 (13%) patients were cardioverted. Five patients suffered a stroke, 4 transient ischemic attack, 22 permanent AT, and 98 AT recurrences longer than 7 days. AT mean cycle length changed from 246 to 270 ms, and the percentage of patients with AT-related hospitalizations significantly decreased with an annual 28% relative reduction. AT burden and the percentage of patients with AT recurrences longer than 2 days remained constant with time in the overall population but decreased significantly in the subgroup of patients who did not develop permanent AT. High ATP efficacy was associated with an increasingly higher prevention of AT recurrences longer than 2 days.

CONCLUSION

In a long-term observation of BT-SND patients, AT-related hospitalizations decreased significantly and mean AT cycle length increased significantly. The data suggest that rhythm control therapies induce inversion of AT progression.

Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with a Dual Defibrillator: Characteristics of Spontaneous and Induced Episodes and Effect of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Induction

BACKGROUND

The pattern of FF intervals during atrial fibrillation (AF) has been analyzed in induced and spontaneous AF episodes, after the induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and after atrial shock, in order to suggest practical considerations for AF management in patients implanted with antitachycardia devices.

METHODS

In 13 patients implanted with a dual-chamber defibrillator, FF intervals were analyzed during two separate induced AF episodes, before and after VF induction over AF, as well as during spontaneous AF episodes and after unsuccessful atrial shocks. The following parameters were considered: mean atrial cycle length (CL), atrial CL stability, and standard deviation of the atrial cycle.

RESULTS

The AF pattern had comparable characteristics considering two separate inductions of AF, as well as spontaneous AF episodes. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia induction resulted in a shortening of atrial CL (P < 0.02) and in a less organized AF pattern (P < 0.005). Changes in the FF interval after ineffective shock therapy showed a shortening of AF cycles after shocks with energies far below the defibrillation threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

(a) The AF pattern is reproducible in separate inductions of sustained AF and in spontaneous episodes, (b) dynamic changes involving a shortening of the AF cycle and an evolution to a less homogeneous pattern occur after VF induction, revealing a complex interplay between AF and VF, and (c) FF interval analysis after ineffective shock delivery may allow the relationship between delivered shock energy and effective defibrillation energy to be estimated, thereby providing practical suggestions for step-up protocols in atrial cardioversion.

Device-based therapies for atrial fibrillation

Ablation of the atrioventricular conduction system and pacemaker implantation is the preferred procedure for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in whom a rate control strategy has been selected but in whom rate-controlling medications are intolerable or ineffective. Selection of standard right ventricular (RV) pacing versus biventricular pacing is individualized, based on the degree and etiology of left ventricular dysfunction. Atrial-based pacing is clearly preferable to ventricular-based pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome, because it leads to a reduction in the development of AF. Emerging evidence indicates that excess RV pacing is deleterious, increasing AF, heart failure, and possibly mortality. Therefore, physiologic pacing with minimization of RV pacing is desirable. Atrial pacing algorithms that increase the frequency of atrial pacing have shown modest efficacy in the prevention of AF. Use of atrial pacing algorithms is reasonable for patients with a history of AF and standard bradycardia indications for permanent pacing in whom maintenance of sinus rhythm is desirable. Studies assessing novel and multiple site atrial pacing therapies have mixed results, without compelling evidence of clinically important benefit. The exceptions are biatrial and right atrial overdrive pacing immediately after cardiac surgery. Several studies have shown effective suppression of postoperative AF with their use. Device therapy (eg, atrial antitachycardia pacing and defibrillation) for the termination of AF is effective in reducing arrhythmia burden. However, improvement in clinically relevant end points is not established and indications are not clearly defined. If a patient lacks an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, we do not offer atrial defibrillation as a treatment option. Atrial arrhythmias may be better prevented by programming to avoid ventricular pacing than by specific atrial interventions.

High atrial antitachycardia pacing therapy efficacy is associated with a reduction in atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in a subset of patients with sinus node dysfunction and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachycardia (AT) and atrial flutter that occur in association with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) can be successfully terminated by antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy. We hypothesized that atrial ATP therapy reduces AT/AF burden in a subset of patients with symptomatic bradycardia and frequent paroxysmal AT/AF.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effect of atrial ATP therapy on AT/AF burden in a pacemaker population with paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

We compared AT/AF burden in 261 patients who received a Medtronic AT500 pacemaker for treatment of AT/AF in the setting of symptomatic bradycardia based on device-classified atrial ATP efficacy < 60% and > or = 60%. Patients with > or = 10 device-detected episodes of AT/AF before and after atrial ATP therapy initiation were identified from four clinical studies performed in 72 centers worldwide.

RESULTS

The high efficacy group comprised 75 patients with atrial ATP efficacy > or = 60%. The low efficacy group comprised 186 patients with atrial ATP efficacy < 60%. AT/AF episode frequency was similar in both groups prior to ATP activation and decreased in the low efficacy group following ATP activation. Following atrial ATP initiation, total AT/AF burden increased slightly in the low ATP efficacy group (median 2.77 [25th-75th percentiles 0.84-5.86] hours/day vs 2.92 [0.59-8.12] hours/day, P = .01). In contrast, total AT/AF burden decreased significantly in the high efficacy group (median 2.46 [0.29-8.88] hours/day vs 0.68 [0.13-2.97] hours/day, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Up to 30% of patients with frequent episodes of paroxysmal AF and symptomatic bradycardia experience a reduction in AT/AF burden from atrial ATP therapy over time.

Comparison of Induced and Spontaneous Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with a History of Spontaneous Atrial Tachyarrhythmias

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study investigated whether induced episodes could be used to predict the morphology of future spontaneous atrial episodes.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients (64 +/- 12 years; 77% male; CAD in 60%; left ventricular ejection fraction 45 +/- 16%) with a history of atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) were implanted with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and followed for 6 months. A total of 224 episodes of induced and spontaneous AT/AF were classified into type I, II, and III according to the method of Israel et al. and then compared based on average cycle length (CL) and atrial amplitude. Episodes were also grouped as "pace-terminable" or "nonpace-terminable" based on the CL definition of Gillis et al.

RESULTS

The analysis of 121 induced episodes (from 80 patients) and 103 spontaneous episodes (from 43 patients) showed that within each arrhythmia type, there were no significant differences in CL or mean amplitude between induced and spontaneous episodes. Additional analysis of patients that had both induced and spontaneous episodes (n = 41) showed 78% had at least one spontaneous episode that matched the induced episode. Fifty-seven percent of spontaneous episodes were considered to be pace-terminable based on CL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that there is no significant difference between induced and spontaneous episodes of AT/AF of the same type. The majority of patients had at least one spontaneous episode of the same type as the induced episode, showing that induced atrial arrhythmias may be useful in predicting the morphology of future spontaneous episodes and in identifying patients potentially benefiting from atrial antitachycardia pacing.

Serial evaluation of atrial tachyarrhythmia burden and frequency after implantation of a dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator

Serial evaluation of AT burden and frequency after implantation of D-ICD.

BACKGROUND

We sought to characterize atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) burden and frequency after implantation of a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (D-ICD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 149 subjects underwent implantation of a D-ICD (Jewel AF model 7250, Medtronic, Inc.) for the primary indication of drug-resistant AT, and were followed for at least 12 months during which device programming was constant. The device employed atrial overdrive pacing as well as shocks to terminate episodes of AT. Arrhythmia burden and frequency were evaluated during the 0- to 6-month follow-up and and 6- to 12-month follow-up intervals. A majority of subjects (62%) received a type I/III antiarrhythmic drug during follow-up. The median arrhythmia burden decreased from 8.2 hours/month during 0-6 months to 3.3 hours/month during 6-12 months (P=0.004); this result was driven primarily by the subgroup with persistent AT prior to device implantation. There was no significant change in the median AT frequency (2.2 vs 1.0 episodes/month). There was a significant decrease in the median shock frequency (0.32 vs 0.00 shocks/month, P=0.003) and an increase in shock efficacy (85.5% vs 94.9%, P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Device-based treatment of AT, in association with antiarrhythmic drugs, yields a significant time-dependent decrease in AT burden but not frequency.

New antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is a frequent reason for antiarrhythmic therapy. Existing antiarrhythmic drugs have important side effects and presently the therapy to maintain sinus rhythm is not superior to a strategy of controlling excessive heart rate. This review summarises current strategies to improve antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation. The most important strategies are: i) to develop drugs without proarrhythmic effects--development of drugs devoid of QT prolonging potential is the main strategy; ii) multiple channel-blocking drugs--inspired by the efficacy of amiodarone, several drugs are being developed that have similar electrophysiological properties as amiodarone, but without the extracardiac side effects; iii) drugs that act exclusively in the atria--the atria contain specific potassium channels, and several drugs that act only on these channels are in development; and iv) antiarrhythmic therapy without effects on ion channels--inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and steroid therapy has been shown to have some effect in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Many drugs are in development and the therapeutic scenario for treatment of atrial fibrillation may change quickly.

Biatrial and Three-Dimensional Mapping of Spontaneous Atrial Arrhythmias in Patients with Refractory Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

While atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation in the pulmonary veins has been well-studied, simultaneous biatrial and three-dimensional noncontact mapping (NCM) has not been performed. We hypothesized that these two techniques would provide novel information on triggers, initiation, and evolution of spontaneous AF and permit study of different AF populations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The origin of atrial premature beats (APBs), onset of spontaneous AF and its evolution were analyzed in 50 patients with AF in the presence or absence of structural heart disease (SHD) and in different AF presentations (group A: Persistent, group B: Paroxysmal). In 45 patients, spontaneous APBs in the right atrium (RA; n = 60) and left atrium (LA; n = 25) with similar regional distributions regardless of heart disease status were demonstrated. In total, 22 patients (44%) had > or =2 disparate regional origins. Biatrial regional foci were seen with equal frequency in patients with SHD (31%), without SHD (40%), in group A (32%), and in group B (36%). Biatrial mapping and NCM showed organized monomorphic atrial tachyarrhythmias arising in the RA (17), septum (17), or LA (21) and were classified as atrial flutter (RA = 34, LA = 8), macro-reentrant atrial tachycardia (RA = 1, LA = 3) or focal atrial tachycardia (RA = 2, LA = 7). Their regional distribution was more extensive in patients with SHD and persistent AF compared with patients without SHD or paroxysmal AF. Simultaneous biatrial tachycardias were observed only in group A patients and those with SHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous biatrial and NCM permits successful AF mapping in different AF populations and demonstrates a biatrial spectrum of spontaneous triggers and tachycardias. Organized monomorphic tachycardias with multiple unilateral or biatrial locations are commonly observed in human AF. Patients with heart disease or persistent AF have a more extensive distribution as well as simultaneous coexistence of multiple tachycardias during AF.

Temporal variability of atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in bradycardia–tachycardia syndrome patients

AIMS

Several studies have tested non-pharmacological therapies for atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) by measuring the cumulative time (burden) the patient spends in arrhythmia. Contradictory results questioned either therapy efficacy or statistical power of the trials. We studied AT burden variability in patients paced for sinus node disease (SND) in order to interpret currently published data appropriately and to evaluate reliable sample sizes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and five patients with AT and SND received a dual chamber pacemaker with antitachyarrhythmia-pacing capability, and were followed for 13 months. Seventy-eight patients (74%) suffered AT recurrences. Device-gathered diagnostic measures were used to simulate results of randomized studies both with crossover and parallel design. The sample size required for statistically significant results was calculated as a function of the expected therapy-induced burden reduction. AT burden intra-patient variability was high: 43% of patients showed intrinsic fluctuations hiding any therapy-induced burden reduction lower than 30%. Demonstrating therapeutic breakthrough through a 6 month study would require 290 patients with crossover design and 5800 patients with parallel design. Doubling the study period requires 400 and 3000 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with AT and paced for SND showed high intra-patient burden variability, which could possibly hide an AT burden reduction induced by a therapy. Previous studies involving non-pharmacological therapies utilizing AT burden endpoints could lack the power to reach statistical significance.