Creatinine Bump Following Antihypertensive Therapy

Initial eGFR Changes with SGLT2 Inhibitor in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Associations With the Risk of Abnormal Serum Potassium Level

BACKGROUND

Both high and low levels of serum potassium measurements are linked with a higher risk of adverse clinical events among patients with type 2 diabetes. The study was aimed at evaluating the implications of the various degrees of initial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change on subsequent serum potassium homeostasis following sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiation among patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used medical data from a multicenter health care provider in Taiwan and recruited 5529 patients with type 2 diabetes with baseline/follow-up eGFR data available after 4 to 12 weeks of SGLT2i treatment from June 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. SGLT2i treatment was associated with an initial mean (SEM) eGFR decline of -3.5 (0.2) mL/min per 1.73 m2 in overall study participants. A total of 36.7% (n=2028) of patients experienced no eGFR decline, and 57.9% (n=3201) and 5.4% (n=300) of patients experienced an eGFR decline of 0% to 30% and >30%, respectively. Patients with an initial eGFR decline of >30% were associated with higher variability in consequent serum potassium measurement when compared with those without an initial eGFR decline. Participants with a pronounced eGFR decline of >30% were associated with a higher risk of hyperkalemia ≥5.5 (adjusted hazard ratio,4.59 [95% CI, 2.28-9.26]) or use of potassium binder (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.65 [95% CI, 1.78-3.95]) as well as hypokalemia events <3.0 mmol/L (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.21 [95% CI, 1.90-5.42]) or use of potassium supplement (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.37-2.56]) following SGLT2i treatment after multivariate adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be aware that the eGFR trough occurs shortly, and consequent serum potassium changes following SGLT2i initiation.

Association of acute increases in serum creatinine with subsequent outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor

AIMS

The frequency of an acute increase in serum creatinine (sCr) of >30%, following treatment of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and its clinical implications in patients with type 2 diabetes remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used medical data from a multicenter health care provider in Taiwan and recruited 11,657 and 8,117 diabetic patients with baseline/follow-up sCr data available within 12 weeks of SGLT2i and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) treatment from June 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. Participants receiving SGLT2i or DPP4i were categorized by initial sCr change into three groups:>30% sCr increase, 0-30% increase, or no-sCr increase. Participants receiving SGLT2i was associated with a higher proportion of sCr increase of 0-30% (52.7% vs. 42.6%) but a lower proportion of sCr increase of >30% (5.9% vs. 9.6%) when compared with DPP4i. In contrast to DPP4i, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate over time became stable after 24 weeks in three categories of sCr increase following SGLT2i initiation. Compared with no sCr increase, an initial sCr increase of >30% was associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]:2.91, [95% confidence interval [CI]:1.37-6.17]), heart failure hospitalization (HHF) (aHR:1.91,[95%CI:1.08-3.40]), and composite renal outcome (aHR:1.53,[95%CI:1.05-2.25]) in SGLT2i group; an initial sCr increase of >30% associated with a higher risk of HHF and composite renal outcome in DPP4i group after multivariate adjustment. Overall, participants receiving SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of HHF (aHR:0.64,[95%CI:0.48-0.85]) and composite renal outcomes (aHR:0.40,[95%CI:0.34-0.48]) compared with DPP4i after multivariate adjustment, and the treatment benefit was persistent across three categories of sCr increase (P interaction>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A modest increase in serum creatinine (<30%) was common following SGLT2i initiation, and was not associated with worse clinical outcomes, therefore should not stop therapy prematurely, but a larger increase in creatinine following drug therapy was not typical and should raise concern and review of the patient.

Chlorthalidone for Hypertension in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Little evidence has been available to support the use of thiazide diuretics to treat hypertension in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease and poorly controlled hypertension, as confirmed by 24-hour ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring, in a 1:1 ratio to receive chlorthalidone at an initial dose of 12.5 mg per day, with increases every 4 weeks if needed to a maximum dose of 50 mg per day, or placebo; randomization was stratified according to previous use of loop diuretics. The primary outcome was the change in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the change from baseline to 12 weeks in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, plasma renin and aldosterone levels, and total body volume. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients underwent randomization, of whom 121 (76%) had diabetes mellitus and 96 (60%) were receiving loop diuretics. At baseline, the mean (±SD) estimated glomerular filtration rate was 23.2±4.2 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and the mean number of antihypertensive medications prescribed was 3.4±1.4. At randomization, the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure was 142.6±8.1 mm Hg in the chlorthalidone group and 140.1±8.1 mm Hg in the placebo group and the mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure was 74.6±10.1 mm Hg and 72.8±9.3 mm Hg, respectively. The adjusted change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 weeks was -11.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.9 to -8.1) in the chlorthalidone group and -0.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.5 to 2.5) in the placebo group. The between-group difference was -10.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -14.6 to -6.4) (P<0.001). The percent change in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to 12 weeks was lower in the chlorthalidone group than in the placebo group by 50 percentage points (95% CI, 37 to 60). Hypokalemia, reversible increases in serum creatinine level, hyperglycemia, dizziness, and hyperuricemia occurred more frequently in the chlorthalidone group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and poorly controlled hypertension, chlorthalidone therapy improved blood-pressure control at 12 weeks as compared with placebo. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Indiana Institute of Medical Research; CLICK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02841280.).

How to Manage Hypertension in People With Diabetes

Hypertension is a common condition that is often seen in patients with diabetes. Both diseases increase the risk of morbidity and mortality from CV events and kidney disease progression. Factors that influence blood pressure (BP) control in diabetes include the persons' genetic background for hypertension and kidney disease, level of obesity and insulin resistance, the magnitude of preexisting kidney disease, and lifestyle factors, such as level of sodium and potassium intake, sleep quality and exercise effort all of which can affect levels of sympathetic nerve activity and contribute to increased BP variability. Lifestyle intervention is a key component to the effective management of diabetes and hypertension and can markedly reduce event rates of both heart and kidney outcomes. The approach to pharmacologic treatment of BP in diabetes is crucial since certain classes of agents for both BP and diabetes confer significant benefits to reduce cardiorenal outcomes.

Creatinine increase following initiation of antihypertensives is associated with cardiovascular risk: a nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Abrupt decline in renal function following initiation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitor is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but studies of other antihypertensive drugs are sparse. We investigated the risk of cardiovascular event associated with increased plasma creatinine after initiating first-line antihypertensive treatment.

METHODS

In a nationwide cohort study, we identified adult Danish primary care patients initiating either renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, calcium channel blocker or thiazide, between 2008 and mid-2018. Patients with prior end-stage renal disease, renal transplantation, or cardiovascular disease were excluded. Percentual plasma creatinine increase was calculated between the nearest creatinine measurement up to 1 year before redeeming the prescription (baseline), and the nearest measurement 90 days or less after (index). Multiple logistic regression and restricted cubic splines were applied to estimate the 6-month absolute risk of cardiovascular event (ischemic heart disease, heart failure or stroke) associated with this creatinine increase.

RESULTS

We included 20 789 patients. Within the first 6 months of follow-up, 283 (1.4%) cardiovascular events and 93 (0.4%) all-cause deaths were registered. With a creatinine increase of 0 and 30%, 6-month absolute risk [CI] of cardiovascular event was 1.4% [1.1-1.9] and 3.5% [2.4-5.2], respectively (in men aged 50-79 years with estimated glomerular filtration rate at least 60 ml/min per 1.73 m and no diabetes). Higher age and reduced renal function, but not the type of antihypertensive treatment, were associated with higher cardiovascular risk.

CONCLUSION

In primary care, patients initiating first-line antihypertensive treatment, an increase in plasma creatinine above 30% was associated with increased absolute 6-month risk of cardiovascular event.

Management of Presumed Acute Kidney Injury during Hypertensive Therapy: Stay Calm and Carry on?

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated that intensive blood pressure control is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Acute kidney injury (AKI), however, was more common in the intensive treatment group prompting concern in the nephrology community.

SUMMARY

Clinical trials on hypertension control have traditionally defined AKI by changes in serum creatinine. However, serum creatinine has several inherent limitations as a marker of kidney injury, with various factors influencing its production, secretion, and elimination. Urinary biomarkers of kidney injury and repair have the potential to provide insight on the presence and phenotype of kidney injury. In both the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes study, urinary biomarkers have suggested that the increased risk of AKI associated with intensive treatment was due to hemodynamic changes rather than structural kidney injury. As such, clinicians who encounter rises in serum creatinine during intensification of hypertension therapy should "stay calm and carry on." Alternative explanations for serum creatinine elevation should be considered and addressed if appropriate. When the rise in serum creatinine is limited, particularly if albuminuria is stable or improving, intensive blood pressure control should be continued for its potential long-term benefits. Key Messages: Increases in serum creatinine during intensification of blood pressure control may not necessarily reflect kidney injury. Clinicians should evaluate for other contributing factors before stopping therapy. Urinary biomarkers may address limitations of serum creatinine as a marker of kidney injury.

Heart Failure and Changes in Kidney Function: Focus on Understanding, Not Reacting

The kidney is a regulatory organ and accommodates changes in cardiac function. There is cross-talk between the kidney and the heart. In heart failure, the kidney acts as a bystander but also contributes to several maladaptive processes. The pathophysiology of worsening kidney function and its association with prognosis are discussed, as are other aspects of how worsening kidney function contributes to increased cardiovascular risk. Data suggest that morbidity and mortality reduction in people with heart failure and kidney disease requires use of a renin angiotensin system blocker, beta blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, as well as an SGLT 2 inhibitor.