Dabigatran is Less Effective Than Warfarin at Attenuating Mechanical Heart Valve-Induced Thrombin Generation

Is There an Alternative Oral Anticoagulation to Vitamin-K-Antagonists for Patients with Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement? - A Literature Review

Current guidelines exclusively recommend vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) as anticoagulation for patients after mechanical aortic valve replacement due to the increased postoperative risk of valve thrombosis and thrombo-embolism. Strict and regular assessments are mandatory during VKA therapy to ensure a potent anticoagulatory effect within the desired range. From the patients' perspective, VKA are associated with relevant interactions and side effects reducing the quality of life and contributing to a high number of patients not achieving the optimal therapeutic target. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have replaced VKA therapy in the past for several indications, e.g., atrial fibrillation. However, it is still unclear if DOACs could replace VKA therapy in patients after mechanical aortic valve replacement. While the PROACT-Xa study did not show a sufficient anticoagulatory effect of apixaban plus aspirin compared to VKA therapy in patients after mechanical aortic valve replacement, the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the oral factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban showed promising results in comparable patient cohorts in smaller studies and case reports. Factor Xa inhibitors were able to prevent thrombosis and thrombo-embolic events in patients after mechanical aortic valve replacement. Therefore, factor Xa inhibitors or factor XI inhibitors could provide a potent alternative to VKA for patients after a mechanical aortic valve replacement.

Characterizing thrombus adhesion strength on common cardiovascular device materials

Thrombus formation in blood-contacting medical devices is a major concern in the medical device industry, limiting the clinical efficacy of these devices. Further, a locally formed clot within the device has the potential to detach from the surface, posing a risk of embolization. Clot embolization from blood-contacting cardiovascular devices can result in serious complications like acute ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction. Therefore, clot embolization associated with device-induced thrombosis can be life-threatening and requires an enhanced fundamental understanding of embolization characteristics to come up with advanced intervention strategies. Therefore, this work aims to investigate the adhesive characteristics of blood clots on common biocompatible materials used in various cardiovascular devices. This study focuses on characterizing the adhesion strength of blood clots on materials such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyurethane (PU), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), nitinol, and titanium, frequently used in medical devices. In addition, the effect of incubation time on clot adhesion is explored. Results from this work demonstrated strongest clot adhesion to titanium with 3 h of incubation resulting in 1.06 ± 0.20 kPa detachment stresses. The clot adhesion strength on titanium was 51.5% higher than PEEK, 35.9% higher than PTFE, 63.1% higher than PU, and 35.4% higher than nitinol. Further, adhesion strength increases with incubation time for all materials. The percentage increase in detachment stress over incubation time (ranging from 30 min to 3 h) for polymers ranged from at least 108.75% (PEEK), 140.74% (PU), to 151.61% (PTFE). Whereas, for metallic surfaces, the percentage rise ranged from 70.21% (nitinol) to 89.28% (titanium). Confocal fluorescence imaging of clot remnants on the material surfaces revealed a well-bounded platelet-fibrin network at the residual region, representing a comparatively higher adhesive region than the non-residual zone of the surface.

Mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis: A literature review of treatment strategies

Mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis (MPVT) is a common complication of valvular implantations. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different treatments for MPVT. A systematic search of electronic databases identified studies evaluating surgical, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic therapies. Although several studies of different types have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of these treatment strategies the lack of randomized controlled trials has resulted in the inability to make a definitive conclusion about the pros and cons of these treatments. Recent treatments, such as slow and ultraslow infusion of thrombolytics, showed comparable efficacy and lower complication rates than traditional methods. Inadequate anticoagulant use is a major risk factor for MPVT, highlighting the importance of prevention. Treatment selection should be individualized based on patient factors and available expertise. Overall, slow and ultraslow infusion of thrombolytics may be a promising treatment option for MPVT.

Design and Rationale for the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Apixaban in Left Ventricular Assist Devices (DOAC LVAD) Study

Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is used to improve quality of life, alleviate symptoms and extend survival rates in patients with advanced heart failure. Patients with LVADs require chronic anticoagulation to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications, and they commonly experience bleeding events. Apixaban is a direct oral anticoagulant that has become first-line therapy for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism; however, its safety in patients with LVADs has not been well characterized. The evaluation of the hemocompatibility in the DOAC LVAD (Direct Oral Anti-Coagulant apixaban in Left Ventricular Assist Devices) trial is a phase 2, open-label trial of patients with LVADs who were randomized to either apixaban or warfarin therapy. Patients randomized to apixaban will be started on a dosage of 5 mg twice daily, whereas those randomized to warfarin will be managed at an International Normalized Ratio goal of 2.0-2.5. All patients will be treated with aspirin at 81 mg daily. We plan to randomize and follow as many as 40 patients for 24 weeks to evaluate the primary outcomes of freedom from death or hemocompatibility-related adverse events (stroke, device thrombosis, bleeding, aortic root thrombus, and arterial non-CNS thromboembolism). The DOAC LVAD trial will establish the feasibility of apixaban anticoagulant therapy in patients with LVADs. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04865978.

Factor XI inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A new therapeutic approach on the horizon?

Anticoagulant drugs that are currently used to prevent and/or treat thrombosis have some limitations that hinder their ability to meet specific clinical requirements. While these drugs effectively reduce the rates of thrombotic events, they simultaneously increase the risk of bleeding. Moreover, their risk-to-benefit balance is problematic in some patients, such as those with severe chronic kidney disease or those at high bleeding risk. A novel anticoagulation method, FXI inhibition has emerged as a promising alternative. It demonstrates a strong rationale for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the potential fulfillment of unmet clinical needs in the cardiovascular field. A number of FXI inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical investigation. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of early results of research on FXI inhibitors in the cardiovascular setting, offering valuable insights into their potential role in shaping the future of anticoagulation.

DOACs in the Anticoagulation of Mechanical Valves: A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

Valvular heart disease is a common disease often necessitating valve replacement. Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) are often used in younger patients because of their longer durability. Their main disadvantage is the need for lifelong anticoagulation. Warfarin is considered a standard treatment, but it is far from perfect. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a new and more patient-friendly alternative to warfarin when anticoagulation is required, but have not yet been approved for the indication of mechanical valves.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Cochrane Library (from inception to May 2023) was performed using a search string that was well defined and not modified during the study. An extensive overview of the search terms used in each database can be found in the Appendix. Only prospective clinical trials were included in this review. A total of 10 publications were included in this review.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This systematic review summarizes the different types of DOACs and their possible use in the anticoagulation of mechanical valves. We aim to propose future directions in anticoagulation research for mechanical valves.

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC use in MHVs has been halted due to the failure of both dabigatran and apixaban in two major clinical trials. However, rivaroxaban was successful in two small clinical trials. Ample research is still needed to explore new valve designs as well as new anticoagulation targets.

Unresolved issues in the use of direct acting oral anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

Currently approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) target thrombin or coagulation factor Xa. Administered in fixed doses without routine laboratory monitoring, DOACs have simplified the approach to oral anticoagulation, when previously the choice was limited to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

AREA COVERED

We discuss a) unresolved issues related to optimal use of DOACs and b) new developments including the potential for FXIa inhibitors to be effective and safer anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

By simplifying oral anticoagulation, DOACs have facilitated the uptake of anticoagulation. The DOACs are approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and their indications are expanding to include the prevention of atherothrombosis. DOACs have now replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for most indications, but not all. DOACs are inferior to VKAs for patients with mechanical heart valves, left ventricular assist device, rheumatic atrial fibrillation, and those with antiphospholipid syndrome, and their safety and efficacy are uncertain in some populations (e.g. advanced renal and liver disease). Impediments to use include concerns for bleeding and cost. The newly developed FXIa and FXIIa inhibitors have the potential to be safer than current anticoagulants, but phase 3 trials are needed to confirm their clinical efficacy and safety.

Clinical Studies with Anticoagulants that Have Changed Clinical Practice

Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Taking a historical perspective, starting in the 1960s, and progressing through to 2022, we discuss key clinical trials of anticoagulants that have changed clinical practice, and examine obstacles encountered in bringing these anticoagulants to the clinic. The design of some of the early studies that shaped clinical practice was poor by current standards, but their results were influential because nothing better was available. Both heparin and vitamin K antagonists had been in clinical use for several decades before well-designed trials in the 1980s optimized their dosing and enhanced their safety and efficacy. Low-molecular-weight heparin then replaced unfractionated heparin because it had a more predictable dose-response and a longer half-life, thereby allowing it to be used conveniently in out-of-hospital settings. More recently, direct oral anticoagulants became the oral anticoagulants of choice for most indications because they were shown to be at least as safe and effective as vitamin K antagonists when used in fixed doses without the need for laboratory monitoring. The design of the trials that led to the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants was excellent, but further studies are required to optimize their dosing in selected patients who were underrepresented in these trials.

How Did We Get Here? Antithrombotic Therapy after Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review

IMPORTANCE

 Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease, and more than 90% of patients who undergo aortic valve replacement receive a bioprosthetic valve. Yet optimal antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement remains uncertain, and guidelines provide contradictory recommendations.

OBSERVATIONS

 Randomized studies of antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement are small and underpowered. Observational data present opposing, and likely confounded, results. Historically, changes to guidelines have not been informed by high-quality new data. Current guidelines from different professional bodies provide contradictory recommendations despite citing the same evidence.

CONCLUSION

 Insufficient antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement has serious implications: ischemic stroke, systemic arterial thromboembolism, and clinical and subclinical valve thromboses. Unnecessarily intense antithrombotic therapy, however, increases risk of bleeding and associated morbidity and mortality. Professional bodies have used the current low-quality evidence and generated incongruent recommendations. Researchers should prioritize generating high-quality, randomized evidence evaluating the risks and benefits of antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Factor XI/XIa Inhibition: The Arsenal in Development for a New Therapeutic Target in Cardio- and Cerebrovascular Disease

Despite major advancements in the development of safer and more effective anticoagulant agents, bleeding complications remain a significant concern in the treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Improvements in our understanding of the coagulation pathways highlights the notion that the contact pathway-specifically factor XI (FXI)-has a greater role in the etiopathogenesis of thrombosis than in physiological hemostasis. As a result, a number of drugs targeting FXI are currently in different stages of testing and development. This article aims to review the different strategies directed towards FXI-inhibition with a brief summation of the agents in clinical development, and to comment on the therapeutic areas that could be explored for potential indications. Therapeutics targeting FXI/FXIa inhibition have the potential to usher in a new era of anticoagulation therapy.

Risk of device-related thrombosis following short-term oral anticoagulation with low-dose dabigatran versus warfarin after Watchman left atrial appendage occlusion

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides an alternative for poor candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC). To prevent device-related thrombosis (DRT), OAC should be continued for the first 45 days to allow complete endothelialization post-LAAO implantation. Whereas, evidence is limited on the feasibility and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used after LAAO.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational single-center study of AF patients undergoing LAAO with a Watchman device and receiving either low-dose dabigatran (110mg twice daily) or warfarin in the peri- and post-procedural period for 45 days. Transesophageal echocardiography was scheduled to perform at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after the procedure to assess the stability of the device and to detect DRT. Incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events were also evaluated during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were a total of 84 patients who successfully underwent Watchman implantation, with 38 patients (45.2%) receiving low-dose dabigatran and 46 patients (54.8%) using warfarin post-LAAO. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 10 patients, with 3 patients in the dabigatran group and 7 patients in the warfarin group (7.9% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.30). During the 12-month follow-up, 1 patient experienced major bleeding and 16 patients suffered minor bleeding in the warfarin group, while 5 patients treated with dabigatran had minor bleeding (34.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.02). Besides, 6 DRT (15.8%) were detected in dabigatran groups, and the incidence was higher than in the warfarin group (15.8% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.03). No DRT-related ischemic events were found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that short-term low-dose dabigatran (110 mg twice daily) could significantly decrease the risk of bleeding compared with warfarin at the expense of increased risk of DRT post-LAAO. Therefore, low-dose dabigatran should be used with caution for post-implant anticoagulation of LAAO. Further studies are urgently needed on the feasibility and safety of DOACs post-LAAO.

DOACs in Mechanical and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: A Narrative Review of Emerging Data and Future Directions

In the recent years, there has been significant transformation in the management of valvular heart disease (VHD), as a result of new minimally invasive technologies, such as the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Conventionally, mechanical heart valves require anticoagulation with warfarin to prevent thrombogenic events. Lately, there has been an uptrend in the usage of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in both mechanical and bioprosthetic heart valves. In clinical practice, there has shown to be notable heterogeneity in the antithrombotic regimen for patients. Recommendations from clinical guidelines and emerging data on DOAC use in these settings will be critically reviewed here. Future large, randomized-controlled trials are warranted to delineate the role of DOACs in patients receiving a bioprosthetic valve/TAVI or mechanical heart valve, with and without a baseline indication for anticoagulation or antiplatelets. Until clinical trial data from well-designed studies are available, providers must remain vigilant about DOAC use in patients with VHD, especially in patients with a bioprosthetic or mechanical heart valve.

Uninterrupted DOACs Approach for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Do DOACs Levels Matter?

Most patients present for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (CAAF) with residual or full effect of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). In daily practice, it has been observed that the activated clotting time (ACT) was actually poorly sensitive to the effect of DOACs and that patients on DOACs required more unfractionated heparin (UFH) to achieve the ACT target of 300 s during the procedure, leading some authors to worry about potential overdosing. Conversely, we hypothesize that these higher doses of UFH are necessary to achieve adequate hemostasis during CAAF regardless of the residual effect of DOACs. During CAAF, thrombosis is promoted mainly by the presence of thrombogenic sheaths and catheters in the bloodstream. Preclinical data suggest that only high doses of DOACs are able to mitigate catheter-induced thrombin generation, whereas low dose UFH already do so. In addition, the effect of UFH seems to be lower in patients on DOACs, compared to patients on VKAs, explaining part of the differences observed in heparin requirements. Clinical studies could not identify increased bleeding risk in patients on DOACs compared to those on VKAs despite similar efficacy during CAAF procedures. Moreover, targeting a lower ACT was associated with an increased periprocedural thrombotic risk for both DOAC and VKA patients. Therefore, the low sensitivity of the ACT to the residual effect of DOACs should not be a major concern in its use in the interventional cardiology laboratory.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with valvular heart disease

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban have transformed the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), but are only approved by regulatory authorities for stroke prophylaxis in patients with so-called "non-valvular AF." This terminology has spawned confusion about which patients with valvular heart disease benefit from NOACs and which should be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) instead. Patients with valvular heart disease other than mechanical prosthetic valves or severe mitral stenosis (including those with bioprosthetic valves) were included in pivotal trials demonstrating the benefit of NOACs over VKAs, and consensus guidelines recommend NOACs over VKAs in these patients. Subsequent devoted randomized controlled trials in patients with AF and bioprosthetic valves, including transcatheter valves, have confirmed the safety of NOACs in this population. In patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis, observational studies indicate that NOACs may be safe and effective, but randomized controlled trials are ongoing. By contrast, a randomized controlled trial showed that dabigatran is harmful in patients with mechanical prosthetic mitral valves; however, these data may not extrapolate to patients with mechanical valve prostheses in other locations or to other NOACs, and randomized controlled trials are ongoing. In this review, we discuss these data in greater depth, and make recommendations for the use of NOACs in patients with valvular heart disease.

Factor Xa Inhibitors for Patients after Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement?

Patients with a mechanical heart valve need a lifelong anticoagulation due to the increased risk of valve thrombosis and thrombo-embolism. Currently, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the only approved class of oral anticoagulants, but relevant interactions and side effects lead to a large number of patients not achieving the optimal therapeutic target international normalized ration (INR). Therefore, steady measurements of the INR are imperative to ensure potent anticoagulation within a distinctive range. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with newer agents could serve as a possible alternative to VKAs in this patient cohort. DOACs are approved for several indications, e.g., atrial fibrillation (AF). They only have a minor interaction potential, which is why monitoring is not needed. Thereby, DOACs improve the livability of patients in need of chronical anticoagulation compared with VKAs. In contrast to dual platelet inhibition using aspirin in combination with an ADP receptor antagonist and the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, the oral factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban show promising results according to current evidence. In small-scale studies, factor Xa inhibitors were able to prevent thrombosis and thrombo-embolic events in patients with mechanical heart valves. Finally, DOACs seem to represent a feasible treatment option in patients with mechanical heart valves, but further studies are needed to evaluate clinical safety. In addition to the ongoing PROACT Xa trial with apixaban in patients after aortic On-X valve implantation, studies in an all-comer collective with rivaroxaban could be promising.

Use of oral anticoagulants in patients with valvular atrial fibrillation: findings from the NCDR PINNACLE Registry

Recent data suggest direct oral anticoagulants are as safe and efficacious as warfarin among select patients with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, real-world treatment patterns of AF stroke prophylaxis in the setting of valvular AF are currently unknown. Accordingly, using the prospective, ambulatory National Cardiovascular Data Registry Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry, we sought to characterize overall use, temporal trends in use, and the extent of practice-level variation in the use of any direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin among patients with valvular AF from January 1, 2013, to March 31, 2019.

Ex Vivo Assessment of Different Oral Anticoagulant Regimens on Pump Thrombosis in a HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device

BACKGROUND

In light of decreased intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants and concerns about their safety in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices, we conducted an ex vivo study of thrombus formation using multiple anticoagulation agents.

METHODS

A continuous flow left ventricular assist device (HeartWare ventricular assist device) hemocompatibility loop was run using human blood under 7 conditions: control (no anticoagulation or antiplatelet); in vitro addition of aspirin; in vitro addition of apixaban at low dose (equivalent 2.5 mg twice daily); addition of apixaban at high dose (equivalent 5 mg twice daily); patients on warfarin; patients on apixaban (5 mg twice daily); and patients on dabigatran (150 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was time to formation of intrapump thrombosis. Secondary outcomes were reduction in clotting times over 1 hour, hemolysis, reduced platelet aggregation, and von Willebrand activity.

RESULTS

Twenty-one runs were completed. Times to thrombosis in median (interquartile range) were control, 131 (127-134.5); in vitro aspirin, 124 (114.5-137); and patients on dabigatran, 131 (130.5-135.5) minutes, respectively. Times in patients on warfarin were, 137 (136.5-143.5); in vitro low-dose apixaban, 141 (138.5-142); and patients on apixaban, 140 (138-142.5) minutes, respectively. No thrombus formed in the in vitro high-dose apixaban group. There were no significant differences between the individual groups. When all apixaban groups were compared with nonapixaban groups, the time to thrombosis formation was significantly longer, 143 (137-150) versus 133.5 (128.5-140) minutes, P=0.02. There were similar changes in lactate dehydrogenase levels and other secondary end points.

CONCLUSIONS

In an in vitro study of anticoagulation using human blood in a mock loop with a HeartWare HVAD, we demonstrated similar thrombosis times for apixaban and warfarin. Time to clotting was longer in the combined apixaban groups compared with combined other groups, but thrombosis times between individual groups were not significantly different.

Antithrombotics and new interventions for venous thromboembolism: Exploring possibilities beyond factor IIa and factor Xa inhibition

Direct oral anti-activated factor X and antithrombin agents have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists as the standard of care in treatment of venous thromboembolism. However, gaps in efficacy and safety persist, notably in end-stage renal disease, implantable heart valves or assist devices, extracorporeal support of the circulation, and antiphospholipid syndrome. Inhibition of coagulation factor XI (FXI) emerges as a promising new therapeutic target. Antisense oligonucleotides offer potential advantages as a prophylactic or therapeutic modality, with one dose-finding trial in orthopedic surgery already published. In addition, monoclonal antibodies blocking activation and/or activity of activated factor XI are investigated, as are small-molecule inhibitors with rapid offset of action. Further potential targets include upstream components of the contact pathway such as factor XII, polyphosphates, or kallikrein. Finally, catheter-directed, pharmacomechanical antithrombotic strategies have been developed for high- and intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism, and large randomized trials aiming to validate their efficacy, safety, and prognostic impact are about to start.

Anticoagulation in sub-Saharan Africa: Are direct oral anticoagulants the answer? A review of lessons learnt from warfarin

Warfarin has existed for >7 decades and has been the anticoagulant of choice for many thromboembolic disorders. The recent introduction of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has, however, caused a shift in preference by healthcare professionals all over the world. DOACs have been found to be at least as effective as warfarin in prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and in treatment of venous thromboembolism. In sub-Saharan Africa, however, the widespread use of DOACs has been hampered mainly by their higher acquisition costs. As the drugs come off patent, their use in sub-Saharan Africa is likely to increase. However, very few trials have been conducted in African settings, and safety concerns will need to be addressed with further study before widespread adoption into clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis' Role in Design of Phase ⅠClinical Trials of Anticoagulant Agents: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

There remains an unmet need for better anticoagulants. The phase I clinical trial is of great significance in the development of anticoagulants, and the design is special. This system review aims to provide insights for the design of future phase I clinical trials of anticoagulants.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the database PubMed and ClinicalTrail.gov website, to collate the phase I clinical trial of anticoagulants in healthy people. The study protocol, inclusion-exclusion criteria, safety, and pharmacodynamic indexes were reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

New anticoagulants under development focused on inhibiting one or more than one serine proteases within the coagulation cascade. Agents targeting intrinsic factors are in the pipeline of the drug development. The enrollment eligibility criteria have more restrictions on laboratory tests, medical history, or medication history related to bleeding and coagulation; more precautions were taken to assess and minimize the risk of hemorrhagic events. Pharmacodynamics markers were evaluated as a surrogate marker of anticoagulation potency to guide further dose selection in drug's development. In future, the positive control study can be applied in phase I studies of new anticoagulants with appropriate pharmacodynamics markers, which can provide more favorable information on making 'go/no' decision in drug development.

Closure Device-Related Thrombosis After Anticoagulation With Dabigatran in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Case Reports and Literature Review

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective and safe operation strategy for stroke prevention in patients who are diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) but cannot tolerate long term anticoagulation medication. We presented four rare cases of thrombosis formation on the occluder device. After the LAAC operation was successfully performed on patients, they followed a course of anticoagulation with dabigatran (110 mg b.i.d.), and device-related thrombosis (DRT) occurred as indicated by a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) during the follow-up period. Regressions were achieved after replacing dabigatran with rivaroxaban or warfarin for more than 1 month. No thrombosis or bleeding-related complications occurred in subsequent follow-ups.

Novel antithrombotic strategies for treatment of venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is the third most common cause of vascular death after heart attack and stroke. Anticoagulation therapy is the cornerstone of VTE treatment. Despite such therapy, up to 50% of patients with DVT develop postthrombotic syndrome, and up to 4% of patients with PE develop chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Therefore, better therapies are needed. Although direct oral anticoagulants are more convenient and safer than warfarin for VTE treatment, bleeding remains the major side effect, particularly in cancer patients. Factor XII and factor XI have emerged as targets for new anticoagulants that may be safer. To reduce the complications of VTE, attenuation of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activity is under investigation in PE patients to enhance endogenous fibrinolysis, whereas blockade of leukocyte interaction with the vessel wall is being studied to reduce the inflammation that contributes to postthrombotic syndrome in DVT patients. Focusing on these novel antithrombotic strategies, this article explains why safer anticoagulants are needed, provides the rationale for factor XII and XI as targets for such agents, reviews the data on the factor XII- and factor XI-directed anticoagulants under development, describes novel therapies to enhance fibrinolysis and decrease inflammation in PE and DVT patients, respectively, and offers insights into the opportunities for these novel VTE therapies.

Aptamer-modified FXa generation assays to investigate hypercoagulability in plasma from patients with ischemic heart disease

BACKGROUND

High plasma levels of activated Factor VII-Antithrombin complex (FVIIa-AT) have been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if FVIIa-AT levels are associated with activated factor X generation (FXaG) in modified assays.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Forty CAD patients were characterized for FVIIa-AT levels by ELISA and for FXaG in plasma. Novel fluorogenic FXaG assays, based on aptamers inhibiting thrombin and/or tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), were set up.

RESULTS

FXaG correlated with FVIIa-AT levels (R_AUC = 0.393, P = 0.012). The combination of thrombin inhibition and FXaG potentiation by using anti-thrombin and anti-TFPI aptamers, respectively, favors the study of time parameters. The progressive decrease in lag time from the lowest to the highest FVIIa-AT quartile was magnified by combining TFPI and thrombin inhibitory aptamers, thus supporting increased FXaG activity in the coagulation initiation phase. By exploring FXaG rates across FVIIa-AT quartiles, the largest relative differences were detectable at the early times (the highest versus the lowest quartile; 5.0-fold, P = 0.005 at 45 s; 3.5-fold, P = 0.001 at 55 s), and progressively decreased over time (2.3-fold, P = 0.002 at 75 s; 1.8-fold, P = 0.008 at 95 s; 1.6-fold, P = 0.022 at 115 s). Association between high FVIIa-AT levels and increased FXaG was independent of F7 -323 A1/A2 polymorphism influencing FVIIa-AT levels.

CONCLUSIONS

High FVIIa-AT plasma levels were associated with increased FXaG. Hypercoagulability features were specifically detectable in the coagulation initiation phase, which may have implications for cardiovascular risk prediction by either FVIIa-AT complex measurement or modified FXaG assays.

New warfarin anticoagulation management model after heart valve surgery: rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial to compare an internet-based warfarin anticoagulation management model with the traditional warfarin management model

INTRODUCTION

Warfarin is an effective anticoagulant and the only oral anticoagulant available for patients with mechanical heart valves. The prothrombin time and the associated international normalised ratio (INR) are routinely tested to monitor the response to anticoagulation therapy in patients. Patients who undergo mechanical heart valve replacement need lifelong anticoagulation therapy, and their INR is regularly measured to adjust the anticoagulation strength and the dose of anticoagulation drugs. Appropriate warfarin anticoagulation management can reduce patient complications, such as bleeding and thrombosis, and improve the long-term survival rate. We propose modern internet technology as a platform to build a warfarin anticoagulation follow-up system after valve replacement surgery. This system will provide doctors and patients with more standardised and safer follow-up methods as well as a method to further reduce the risk of warfarin anticoagulation-related complications and improve its therapeutic effects.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial will be conducted. A total of 700 patients who require long-term warfarin anticoagulation monitoring after heart valve replacement will be enrolled and randomly divided at a 1:1 ratio into a traditional outpatient anticoagulation management group and a group undergoing a new method of management based on the internet technology with follow-up for 1 year. Differences in the percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR), drug dose adjustments, bleeding/thrombosis and other related complications will be observed. The primary endpoint is the difference in the TTR between the two groups. The purpose of this study is to explore a safer and more effective mode of doctor-patient interaction and communication in the internet era. As of 13 July 2019, 534 patients had been enrolled.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1800016204.

How Did We Get Here?: A Historical Review and Critical Analysis of Anticoagulation Therapy Following Mechanical Valve Replacement

Managing severe valvular heart disease with mechanical valve replacement necessitates lifelong anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist. Optimal anticoagulation intensity for patients with mechanical valves remains uncertain; current recommendations are inconsistent across guideline bodies and largely based on expert opinion. In this review, we outline the history of anticoagulation therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves and critically evaluate current antithrombotic guidelines for these patients. We conclude that randomized trials evaluating optimal anticoagulation intensity in patients with mechanical valves are needed, and that future guidelines must better justify antithrombotic treatment recommendations.

Antithrombotic Agents

Recent advances in our understanding of the contribution of thrombin generation to arterial thrombosis and the role of platelets in venous thrombosis have prompted new treatment paradigms. Nonetheless, bleeding remains the major side effect of such treatments spurring the quest for new antithrombotic regimens with better benefit-risk profiles and for safer anticoagulants for existing and new indications. The aims of this article are to review the results of recent trials aimed at enhancing the benefit-risk profile of antithrombotic therapy and explain how these findings are changing our approach to the management of arterial and venous thrombosis. Focusing on these 2 aspects of thrombosis management, this article discusses 4 advances: (1) the observation that in some indications, lowering the dose of some direct oral anticoagulants reduces the risk of bleeding without compromising efficacy, (2) the recognition that aspirin is not only effective for secondary prevention of atherothrombosis but also for prevention of venous thromboembolism, (3) the finding that dual pathway inhibition with the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban to attenuate thrombin generation plus aspirin to reduce thromboxane A2-mediated platelet activation is superior to aspirin or rivaroxaban alone for prevention of atherothrombosis in patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, and (4) the development of inhibitors of factor XI or XII as potentially safer anticoagulants.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complicating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: Review of the literature and alternative anticoagulants

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening prothrombotic, immune-mediated complication of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin therapy. HIT is characterized by moderate thrombocytopenia 5-10 days after initial heparin exposure, detection of platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a form of mechanical circulatory support used in critically ill patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. Systemic anticoagulation is used to alleviate the thrombotic complications that may occur when blood is exposed to artificial surfaces within the ECMO circuit. Therefore, when HIT complicates patients on ECMO support, it is associated with a high thrombotic morbidity and mortality. The risk for HIT correlates with the accumulative dosage of heparin exposure. In ECMO patients receiving continuous infusion of heparin for circuit patency, the risk for HIT is not neglected and must be thought of in the differential diagnosis of the appropriate clinical and laboratory circumstances. The following article reviews the current knowledge in HIT complicating ECMO patients and the alternative anticoagulation options in the presence of HIT.

Clinical Relevance of Histopathologic Analysis of HeartMate II Thrombi

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) thrombosis is a devastating complication that occurs in about 10% of patients despite anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment. How the thrombus initiates and propagates is unknown. We pathologically and immunohistochemically examined 28 thrombi removed from 17 HeartMate II LVADs. Two groups of thrombi were found: those formed in the inlet/outlet and those on the rotor. The four thrombi found at the inlet (three inlet conduit and one inlet tube) and outlet (three at outlet elbow and one outlet graft) appeared similar and were composed of a loose meshwork of fibrin(ogen), von Willebrand factor, leukocytes, and aggregated platelets. The majority of the thrombi (20/28), however, were located on the rotor: nine at the inlet bearing, five on the rotor vanes, and six at the outlet bearing. Laminated thrombi formed around the inlet bearing in rings, an area of blood recirculation. The inner rings of the thrombus had fibrin and von Willebrand factor. Aggregated platelets were found in the outer thrombi rings, but limited evidence of platelets within the laminated thrombi was noted. The presence of distinct rings suggests development of the clot over time. The increased platelets in the outer rings of the inlet bearing thrombi would support further investigation into their role in thrombus growth. Initiating events require further investigation, but the fibrin-rich structure of HeartMate II thrombi suggests that alternative anticoagulation strategies are needed to prevent thrombosis in our LVAD patients.

Assessing the impact of product inhibition in a chromogenic assay

Chromogenic substrates (CS) are synthetic substrates used to monitor the activity of a target enzyme. It has been reported that some CSs display competitive product inhibition with their target enzyme. Thus, in assays where enzyme activity is continuously monitored over long periods of time, the product inhibition may significantly interfere with the reactions being monitored. Despite this knowledge, it is rare for CSs to be directly incorporated into mathematical models that simulate these assays. This devalues the predictive power of the models. In this study, we examined the interactions between a single enzyme, coagulation factor Xa, and its chromogenic substrate. We developed, and experimentally validated, a mathematical model of a chromogenic assay for factor Xa that explicitly included product inhibition from the CS. We employed Bayesian inference, in the form of Markov-Chain Monte Carlo, to estimate the strength of the product inhibition and other sources of uncertainty such as pipetting error and kinetic rate constants. Our model, together with carefully calibrated biochemistry experiments, allowed for full characterization of the strength and impact of product inhibition in the assay. The effect of CS product inhibition in more complex reaction mixtures was further explored using mathematical models.

The blood compatibility challenge. Part 1: Blood-contacting medical devices: The scope of the problem

Blood-contacting medical devices are an integral part of modern medicine. Such devices may be used for only a few hours or may be implanted for life. Despite advances in biomaterial science, clotting on medical devices remains a common problem. Systemic administration of antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants is often needed to reduce the risk of clotting. Although effective, such therapy increases the risk of bleeding, which can be fatal. This chapter (a) describes some of the commonly used blood-contacting devices and their potential complications, (b) provides an overview of the mechanisms that drive device-associated clotting, and (c) reviews the strategies employed to attenuate clotting on blood-contacting medical devices. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This paper is part 1 of a series of 4 reviews discussing the problem of biomaterial associated thrombogenicity. The objective was to highlight features of broad agreement and provide commentary on those aspects of the problem that were subject to dispute. We hope that future investigators will update these reviews as new scholarship resolves the uncertainties of today.

Antithrombotic Therapy and Device-Related Thrombosis Following Endovascular Left Atrial Appendage Closure

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to review the evidence on the use of antithrombotic therapy and risk of device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure.

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly performed for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, especially those who cannot tolerate or are ineligible for oral anticoagulation.

METHODS

After device implantation for LAAC, different antithrombotic regimens with varying duration of therapy are currently used. Such selection depends on patients' risk for bleeding and physicians' choice.

RESULTS

Device-related thrombosis remains an Achilles' heel of LAAC, and the etiology remains incompletely understood. Dual-antiplatelet therapy, and direct oral anticoagulation may have similar safety and device-related thrombosis occurrence in real-world LAAC registries compared with warfarin and aspirin. Device imaging surveillance should be routinely performed to assess for device-related thrombosis, which if diagnosed should be treated aggressively, as it is associated with higher thromboembolic risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the uncertainties and therapeutic dilemma, the authors provide an in-depth discussion of the options and rationale for antithrombotic therapy post-LAAC.

The Prospective Randomized On-X Valve Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT): Lower is better, but is it good enough?

Due to their durability, mechanical prostheses are frequently used for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in young adults. However, these valves are thrombogenic and require lifelong anticoagulation. Over the last few decades, efforts have been made towards the lowering of INR targets in an effort to reduce bleeding events without influencing the thromboembolic risk. The Prospective Randomized On-X Valve Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT) was designed to compare standard versus low anticoagulation targets in high-risk patients undergoing mechanical AVR with the ON-X prosthesis.

New versus Old Oral Anticoagulants: How Can We Set the Scale Needle? Considerations on a Case Report

Ischemic stroke is a complex multifactorial disorder. Anticoagulation is a growing research area, with the main goal of preventing systemic embolization and stroke. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman with antiphospholipid syndrome who was unsuccessfully treated with Dabigatran, a new oral anticoagulant, as she developed a major stroke involving the right carotid artery, due to deep venous thrombosis with pulmonary embolism. We therefore suggest a closer monitoring of the safety and efficacy of dabigatran. Moreover, in the presence of multifactorial causes of pro-coagulation, we believe that warfarin should remain the mainstay of oral anticoagulation.

Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

Publisher's Note: There is a Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.

INR Control of Patients with Mechanical Heart Valve on Long-Term Warfarin Therapy

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is an anticoagulant indicated for patients who had undergone mechanical heart valve(s) replacement (MHVR). In these patients, time in therapeutic range (TTR) is important in predicting the bleeding and thrombotic risks.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the anticoagulation control of warfarin using TTR in patients with MHVR in a tertiary health care referral Center.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively by reviewing clinical notes of outpatients who attended international normalized ratio (INR) clinics in November 2015. Patients who had MHVR and who took warfarin were included. The data collected were demographics, relevant laboratory investigations, and patients' prior medical history. TTR was calculated using Rosendaal and traditional methods.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients with MHVR were recruited. The mean age was 51.72 ± 13.97 years and 46.6% were male. A total of 54.4% had mitral valve replacement (MVR), whereas 26.2% had aortic valve replacement (AVR). The mean TTR calculated using the Rosendaal method was 57.1%. There was no significant difference among patients with AVR, MVR, and both valves (AMVR) in terms of TTR (AVR vs. MVR vs. AMVR, 62.94 ± 23.08, 54.12 ± 21.62, 57.63 ± 17.47; p = 0.213). The average dose of warfarin for all groups was approximately 3 mg/day. Moreover, MVR, AVR, and AMVR patients who had TTR (Rosendaal method) ≤60% were 58.9%, 37.0%, and 45.0%, respectively. Only 4.8% had minor bleeding, whereas none had stroke in the period of TTR determination.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a majority of patients having <60% TTR, there were low incidences of bleeding and stroke events in this center. There were no factors found to be associated with INR control in this study.

Large Left Ventricular Thrombus as a Cause of Recurrent Cardioembolic Stroke While on Dabigatran

•

LV thrombus can result in systemic embolization and ischemic stroke.

•

Oral VKA therapy for ≥3 months is the recommended treatment of choice.

•

The role of DOAC therapy in LV thrombus is limited to case reports.

•

Surgical thrombectomy should be considered in patients with large mobile LV thrombi.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic valves

INTRODUCTION

The non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which include dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for stoke prevention in most patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The NOACs are contraindicated in atrial fibrillation patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves. There is evidence that bioprosthetic heart valves are less thrombogenic than mechanical heart valves, but it is unknown whether the risk of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic valves differs from that in patients without such valves. Areas covered: The authors present a review of the efficacy and safety evidence surrounding the use of NOACs for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients with bioprosthetic heart valves. Expert commentary: While the data is limited, there is no significant difference in thromboembolic, and bleeding outcomes in patients with AF and bioprosthetic heart valves treated with NOAC therapy. Future studies are required before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the safety and efficacy of NOAC therapy in AF patients bioprosthetic heart valves.

Anticoagulant prophylaxis and therapy in children: current challenges and emerging issues

This review is aimed at describing the unique challenges of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment in children, and highlighting areas for research for improving clinical outcomes of children with thromboembolic disease. The evidence presented demonstrates the challenges of advancing the evidence base informing optimal management of thromboembolic disease in children. Recent observational studies have identified risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children, but there are few interventional studies assessing the benefit-risk balance of using thromboprophylaxis in risk-stratified clinical subgroups. A risk level-based framework is proposed for administering mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. More research is required to refine the assignment of risk levels. The anticoagulants currently used predominantly in children are unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists. There is a paucity of robust evidence on the age-specific pharmacology of these agents, and their efficacy and safety for prevention and treatment of thrombosis in children. The available literature is heterogeneous, reflecting age-specific differences, and the various clinical settings for anticoagulation in children. Monitoring assays and target ranges are not well established. Nevertheless, weight-based dosing appears to achieve acceptable outcomes in most indications. Given the limitations of the classical anticoagulants for children, there is great interest in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), whose properties appear to be particularly suitable for children. All DOACs currently approved for adults have Pediatric Investigation Plans ongoing or planned. These are generating age-specific formulations and systematic dosing information. The ongoing pediatric studies still have to establish whether DOACs have a positive benefit-risk balance in the various pediatric indications and age groups.