Prognosis and Predictors of Mortality in Patients Suffering Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Clinical impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: a prospective multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may radiologically identify or confirm underlying pathophysiologies in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), however, there are scant prospective data evaluating the impact on routine clinical care.

METHODS

In a multicentre international cohort study of MINOCA, clinical diagnosis, diagnostic certainty and intended clinical management were prospectively determined before and again after CMR. The primary outcome was a composite of change in clinical diagnosis and/or management. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, change in diagnostic certainty and number-needed-to-test for deprescription of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Predictors of the primary outcome were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In 320 patients, CMR was associated with change in diagnosis and/or management in 63% (95% CI 57% to 68%, p<0.001) and significantly increased diagnostic certainty (8/10 post-CMR (5-9) vs 6/10 pre-CMR (4-7), p<0.0001). Relevant predictors of the primary outcome on multivariable analysis were early CMR (≤14 days), absence of atheroma on coronary angiography and significant pre-CMR diagnostic uncertainty (≤5/10); CMR changed diagnosis and/or management in 80% of individuals with all three predictors versus 40% in those with none. In individuals where treating physicians initially chose to prescribe DAPT despite no obstructive culprit lesion, number-needed-to-test by CMR for DAPT deprescription was 3.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR in MINOCA is associated with significant changes in clinical diagnosis, diagnostic certainty and management. The impact on deprescription of unnecessary DAPT could have important implications for patient safety and costs and warrants further evaluation. Early CMR should be considered to augment diagnosis and management in MINOCA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN75233845.

A Comprehensive Review on Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): One size does not fit all

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as clinical evidence of myocardial infarction (MI) without significant obstruction (<50% stenosis) in coronary angiography, making it a clinically distinct and heterogeneous disorder. Unlike MI associated with obstructive coronary artery disease (MICAD), MINOCA is more common in younger women and often involves microvascular dysfunction or vasospastic conditions. Despite recent advancements in understanding MINOCA, its prognosis and predictors remain uncertain, necessitating further research into its pathogenesis. The diverse underlying causes of MINOCA mean that traditional treatment of the "one-size-fits-all" approach used for MICAD may not be appropriate, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment strategies based on accurate diagnosis. There is an urgent need to raise awareness among healthcare providers, implement standardized diagnostic protocols, and conduct targeted research to improve patient outcomes. Multi-centered studies and clinical trials are essential to establish evidence-based therapies and optimize management strategies for MINOCA, ensuring better long-term outcomes.

Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndromes in Women: Tailored Management and Cardiac Rehabilitation

Secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes is the key strategy to reduce the residual cardiovascular disease risk. A tailored assessment is necessary to suggest the best management and treatment for patients. Sex and gender differences should be strongly considered during cardiovascular evaluation and risk estimation. Indeed, women have a worse outcome than men and are less likely to receive appropriate treatment and evidence-based management. Proper lifestyle management, guideline-directed medical therapy, risk factor management, and cardiac rehabilitation should be recommended early after an acute event in women to reduce the high risk of recurrent events and mortality and improve quality of life. Women-focused cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention represent a necessary step in the management and treatment of patients to ensure the best evidence-based care after acute coronary syndromes. This review offers a critical, updated, and comprehensive overview of the appropriate strategies for secondary prevention in women after acute coronary syndromes and long-term treatment, with a focus on cardiac rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, gaps in evidence on this topic and practical recommendations will be provided.

Impact of Mental Health Disorders in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined by myocardial infarction criteria with < 50% stenosis and no clear cause. While mental health disorders are linked to cardiovascular risk, their impact on MINOCA outcomes is not well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2017 to 2021, identifying hospitalized MINOCA patients with and without mental health disorders using ICD-10-CM codes. Propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting (IPW) were employed to adjust for confounders and balance baseline characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for in-hospital outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 4300 propensity-matched pairs (8600 patients), MINOCA patients with mental health disorders had higher in-hospital mortality (2.26% vs 1.21%, p < 0.001) and increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest (1.51% vs 0.65%, p < 0.001). They were also more likely to develop pulmonary embolism (1.54% vs 0.65%, p < 0.001) and acute kidney injury (25.45% vs 20.24%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Mental health disorders are independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes among MINOCA patients. These findings highlight the urgent need for integrated cardiovascular and psychiatric care, emphasizing early screening, multidisciplinary management, and targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.

The PROMISE of Precision Medicine in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a working diagnosis encompassing several pathophysiological mechanisms with specific treatments and different prognoses. Despite the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, MINOCA has proven to be associated with a significant risk of mortality, angina burden, and socioeconomic costs. However, due to the heterogeneous nature of this clinical condition and the absence of randomized clinical trials, evidence supporting a standardized diagnostic algorithm and the clinical management of these patients is lacking. The PROMISE trial is the first randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of a precision medicine approach strategy in improving the outcomes and quality of life of patients with MINOCA, offering new insights into personalized treatment strategies. This review article discusses the promise of a precision medicine approach in patients with MINOCA, highlighting the potential innovations and challenges of a personalized medicine strategy in MINOCA.

Gender disparities in delayed angina diagnosis: insights from 2001-2020 NHANES data

BACKGROUND

Women with coronary artery disease (CAD) are more likely than men to experience a delay in diagnosis, which is attributed to differences in clinical presentation. The objective of this study is to examine any persistent disparities in timely CAD diagnosis in the United States (U.S.) among women who present with clinically similar symptoms and demographic characteristics to their male counterparts.

METHODS

From the 2001 - 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, participants were categorized as having missed angina if they experienced angina and did not self-report a prior diagnosis of angina pectoris or CAD. We assessed the association between gender and missed angina using weighted multivariate logistic regression models representative of the U.S.

POPULATION

Mortality follow-up data were available for participants up to December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

Of 874 participants with missed angina, 551 (63%) were women and 323 (37.0%) were men. Baseline characteristics showed that women and men with missed angina were more likely than their diagnosed counterparts to be younger, of ethnic minorities, uninsured, and smokers. Women with missed angina were more likely to be in a relationship than diagnosed women, while the opposite pattern was observed in men. The odds ratio of missed angina in women compared to men was 2.61 (95% CI: 1.73, 3.94) after adjusting for age, race, education, body mass index, smoking, alcohol use, income, insurance, and comorbidities. Among participants who had a cardiac cause of death, the odds of missed angina in women compared to men was 3.02 (95% CI: 1.18, 7.75) in the adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

Women with similar CAD symptoms to their male counterparts still have higher odds of going undiagnosed. This relationship extends to individuals who ultimately die of cardiac causes. Potential solutions to this disparity include addressing overgeneralized perceptions of differences in the prevalence and presentation of CAD between genders and exploring targeted screening programs for women with risk factors. Further research accounting for healthcare access and proximity to care is needed to support our findings. Timely recognition of CAD in women is essential to decreasing preventable mortality.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries evaluated by optical coherence tomography

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary artery (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous disease with different pathophysiological mechanisms and prognosis. In recent years, it has been found that the incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events in MINOCA is similar to that of myocardial infarction with coronary artery disease (MI-CAD), and it is difficult to clarify the pathogenesis of both through coronary angiography (CAG). Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical features, plaque characteristics and prognosis of patients with MINOCA and MI-CAD through optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 553 culprit lesions from AMI patients who underwent CAG and OCT were retrospectively analysed. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups: the MINOCA group and the MI-CAD group. The clinical characteristics, plaque characteristics and prognosis of the two groups were compared. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stroke, and rehospitalisation for angina or heart failure. (1) Patients with MINOCA exhibited a lower incidence of ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a less frequent history of combined drug-eluting stent (DES) compared to those with MI-CAD. Additionally, they demonstrated lower levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), peak troponin T (peak TnT) and peak creatine kinase (peak CK). The MINOCA group had more lesions in the left anterior descending (LAD) and fewer in the left circumflex (LCX). Additionally, they demonstrated a lower prevalence of multibranch vasculopathy and a diminished post-discharge use of aspirin, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs), and a higher proportion of conservative treatment compared to DES. The frequency of plaque rupture, calcified plaque, cholesterol crystals, macrophages infiltration, microvessels, thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), and thrombus were found to be lower in the MINOCA group than in the MI-CAD group, with these differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05); (2) No significant difference was observed in the incidence of MACE at 30-days and 1 year between patients in the MINOCA and MI-CAD groups (P > 0.05). Compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA patients had fewer high-risk plaques on OCT and were more likely to be treated conservatively, with lower rates of stenting and less post-discharge pharmacological treatment. Both groups had similar rates of MACE at 30-day and 1 year, highlighting the importance of individualising treatment for MINOCA patients. Patients with MINOCA who develop MACE are more likely to exhibit high-risk OCT plaque features, with macrophage infiltration identified as an independent risk factor. OCT plaque features such as plaque rupture, plaque erosion, cholesterol crystals, macrophages, microvessels, TCFA may have played different roles in the progression of the two groups of patients.

Prognostic significance of individual COVADIS criteria in patients undergoing acetylcholine provocation testing

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS) criteria during acetylcholine (ACh) provocation testing is uncertain.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of COVADIS criteria in patients with myocardial ischaemia (INOCA) or myocardial infarction (MINOCA) and non-obstructive coronary arteries undergoing ACh provocation testing.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive INOCA and MINOCA patients undergoing ACh provocation testing. The occurrence of each COVADIS criterion was recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 519 patients (346 [66.7%] INOCA and 173 [33.3%] MINOCA), 274 (52.8%) exhibited a positive ACh test. Over a median 22-month follow-up, the highest incidence of MACCE occurred in patients with 3 positive criteria (15.4%), followed by those with 2 (10.3%) and 1 (9.2%), while the lowest incidence occurred in patients with 0 (3.1%; p=0.004). Patients with ≥1 positive criteria had significantly higher MACCE rates than those with 0 (12.5% vs 3.1%; p=0.003). MACCE-free survival differed significantly among the four groups, with the best survival for 0 criteria and the worst for 3 (p=0.004). Epicardial coronary diameter reduction ≥90% and MINOCA were independent MACCE predictors. Among patients with a negative test, an epicardial coronary diameter reduction ≥90% was the only independent predictor of MACCE, and the presence of ≥1 criteria in this group was associated with a significantly higher MACCE rate compared to patients without any criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings challenge the binary stratification (positive vs negative) of COVADIS criteria, suggesting an added value of a comprehensive analysis of their components to provide prognostic stratification and personalised treatment.

Pathological findings at invasive assessment in MINOCA: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pathological mechanisms of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are heterogeneous, with an unknown impact on prognosis, and often remain unrecognised in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic impact of pathological findings by invasive coronary angiography (ICA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and coronary function testing in MINOCA.

METHODS

Studies published until August 2023 were searched on PubMed and SCOPUS and included if reporting the prevalence of patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries (NObs-CA; 1-49% coronary stenosis) versus normal coronary arteries (NCA; 0% coronary stenosis) by ICA, pathological findings by OCT, and/or coronary vasomotor tests in MINOCA. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. The pooled prevalence of pathological findings was estimated with random-effects models. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs of all-cause death, MI and the composite of both in patients with NObs-CA versus NCA were calculated at short-term (<1 month), 1-year and long-term follow-up (> 1 year).

RESULTS

Forty-five studies including 17 539 patients were analysed. The pooled prevalence of NObs-CA at ICA was 53% (95% CI 0.47 to 0.60). OCT showed acute pathological findings in 62% (95% CI 0.44 to 0.78) of patients and coronary vasomotor tests were positive in 49% (95% CI 0.31 to 0.67). NObs-CA compared with NCA was associated with an increased 1-year risk of all-cause death or MI (RR=1.49 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.90)) and MI alone (RR=1.80 (95% CI 1.26 to 2.59)), whereas the risk of all-cause death was comparable. Similar results were seen at long-term, but not at short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Stratification of MINOCA into NObs-CA versus NCA has prognostic value. OCT and vasospasm testing, often informative about the pathological mechanism of MINOCA, should be part of an invasive diagnostic algorithm.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023468183.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries in Japan: Insights From the Miyagi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Study

BACKGROUND

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are not fully understood, particularly in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 8881 patients with acute MI from the Miyagi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Study (2012-2020), with a median age of 69 years. Among them, 239 patients (2.7%) were diagnosed with MINOCA. Compared with those with MI with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD), patients with MINOCA were more often women, had a higher incidence of non-ST-segment-elevation MI and a lower prevalence of dyslipidemia. Compared with patients with MI-CAD, patients with MINOCA in all age groups (<59, 60-69, 70-79, >80 years of age) had a higher incidence of non-ST-segment-elevation MI. Additionally, those ≤59 years of age were more often women and had a lower prevalence of diabetes and dyslipidemia. In-hospital mortality increased with age in patients with MI-CAD (3.9% for <59 years of age, 5.6% for 60-69 years of age, 8.3% for 70-79 years of age, and 15.2% for >80 years of age; P<0.01), but not in patients with MINOCA (4.5%, 7.4%, 6.0%, and 9.6%, respectively; P=0.36). Compared with patients with MI-CAD, patients with MINOCA had lower in-hospital mortality for Killip class IV (40.7% versus 20.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.31 [95% CI, 0.10-0.94]; P=0.04) and renal dysfunction (20.0% versus 7.1%; adjusted OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09-0.96]; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MINOCA exhibit distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes compared with those with MI-CAD, particularly in terms of age, sex, prevalence of comorbidities, and in-hospital mortality. These findings underscore the importance of tailored clinical approaches for patients with MINOCA.

Understanding Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): a comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis compared to MI with the Obstructive Coronary Artery (MIOCA)

BACKGROUND

MINOCA (Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries) represents a unique subset of acute coronary syndrome, distinct from MIOCA (Myocardial Infarction with Obstructive Coronary Arteries) and a control group. This study systematically compares their prevalence, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes to improve understanding and treatment approaches.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines across multiple databases up to 2024. STATA 17 was used for statistical analyses, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to assess study quality.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twelve studies, including 5,908,768 patients, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of MINOCA among patients undergoing coronary angiography was 8.92% (95% CI: 8.90-8.94). MINOCA patients were generally younger, predominantly female, and more likely to present with atypical chest pain and dyspnea compared to MIOCA patients. Laboratory findings showed higher levels of CRP, BNP, and fibrinogen in MINOCA patients, suggesting inflammation and microvascular dysfunction as key mechanisms. In contrast, MIOCA patients had higher rates of diabetes and dyslipidemia, highlighting differences in pathophysiological processes. Medication use differed between the groups, with MINOCA patients more likely to be prescribed anticoagulants and β-blockers. Prognostically, MINOCA patients experienced significantly lower rates of adverse short- and long-term outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and cardiovascular death, compared to MIOCA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that patients with MINOCA have a better prognosis compared to those with MIOCA and are at a lower risk of serious cardiac events. Based on the findings of this study, we emphasize that microcirculation and vascular spasm are the main mechanisms involved in MINOCA. Considering these findings, it is suggested that a better management strategy for MINOCA patients can be established by precisely defining diagnostic criteria and focusing on anti-inflammatory treatments and risk factor control.

Non-atherosclerotic coronary causes of myocardial infarction in women

Ischemic heart disease is the most common cardiovascular cause of death in women worldwide. Obstructive coronary atherosclerosis is the primary cause of myocardial infarction (MI), however, non-atherosclerotic mechanisms of MI, such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection, vasospasm, microvascular dysfunction, embolization, inflammation, coronary anomalies, infectious and infiltrative causes are increasingly being recognized. Emerging data suggest that women are two to five times more likely to have an MI in the absence of coronary atherosclerosis compared to men, but they continue to remain underdiagnosed and undertreated, partly due to underdiagnosis and limited understanding of these mechanisms. Recent advancements in invasive and noninvasive imaging techniques and physiological testing allow for distinguishing these mechanisms from each other, providing a definitive diagnosis and tailored treatment. This review summarizes the existing literature on the non-atherosclerotic coronary causes of MI with a focus on evidence pertaining to women, offering a basis for future studies.

Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries - Insights From the Real-World JAMIR Database

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) using real-world databases in the coronary intervention era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 22,236 patients (mean [±SD] age 68±13 years, 23.4% female) enrolled in the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (JAMIR) between 2011 and 2016. Based on urgent coronary angiography findings, 286 (1.3%) patients were diagnosed as MINOCA, and the remaining 21,950 (98.7%) as MI with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). MINOCA patients were characterized by younger age, fewer coronary risk factors, lower rate of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, lower Killip classification, and lower peak creatinine phosphokinase levels than MI-CAD patients. In-hospital all-cause mortality did not differ between the MINOCA and MI-CAD groups (5.2% vs. 5.7%, respectively; P=0.82). Comparing cause-specific mortality, non-cardiac mortality was higher in the MINOCA than MI-CAD group (4.2% vs. 1.6%; P<0.01). Importantly, non-cardiac death was more prevalent among elderly (≥65 years) than younger (<65 years) patients in the MI-CAD group, whereas this trend was not observed in the MINOCA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of the real-world JAMIR database revealed a relatively high prevalence of non-cardiac death among MINOCA patients, underscoring the need for comprehensive management to improve disease prognosis, particularly in younger patients.

Sex differences in patients with working diagnosis of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) constitutes 3-15% of all acute myocardial infarctions. Women are more frequently diagnosed with MINOCA, although the influence of sex on long-term outcomes is still unclear. In this study we aimed to compare sex-based differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected MINOCA. We have retrospectively analyzed 6063 patients diagnosed with MINOCA (3220 females and 2843 male patients) from combined 3 large polish registries (PL-ACS, SILCARD and AMI-PL). Male patients were significantly younger (63 (55-74) vs. 71 (61-79) years, p < 0.05) and less frequently diabetic (20.1% vs. 24.1%, p < 0.05). Mortality was significantly higher in male population (11.8% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.05 at 1 year and 17.6% vs. 15.0%, p < 0.05 at 3 years). Male sex was an independent predictor of both mortality (HR = 1.29; CI 1.11-1.51; p < 0.05) and myocardial infarction (HR = 1.39; CI 1.1-1.75, p < 0.05) at 3 years follow-up. All-cause readmission rates were similar in male and female patients both at 1 year (46.0% vs. 44.4, p = 0.2) and 3 years follow-up (56.4% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.93). However, cardiovascular readmissions were more prevalent in male patients at both timepoints (33.9% vs. 29.10%, p < 0.05 at 1 year, and 41.0% vs. 37.6%, p < 0.05 at 3 years). This large-scale registry-based analysis demonstrated higher 3 years rates of adverse events, including death and MI among male patients with suspected MINOCA.

The association between fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and adverse prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

The fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) has been identified as a new inflammatory marker for predicting the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, its prognostic relevance in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) remains uncertain.

METHODS

This study included a total of 1031 hospitalized patients diagnosed with MINOCA, enrolled consecutively. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Based on the median FAR value, patients were divided into high FAR (FARH) and low FAR (FAR-L) groups. Baseline clinical characteristics and the incidence of adverse events during the follow-up period were compared between the two groups. Various statistical methods were applied, including restricted cubic spline modeling, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 42.3 months, during which 157 patients (15.2 %) experienced MACE. The FAR-H group had a significantly higher incidence of MACE compared to the FAR-L group (21.2 % vs. 9.3 %, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher FAR was an independent predictor of long-term MACE in MINOCA patients (hazard ratio = 2.76, 95 % confidence interval: 1.95-3.89, p < 0.001), after adjusting for relevant clinical variables.

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated FAR is linked to a poor long-term prognosis in patients with MINOCA.

Hypertensive Crisis and Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries in a Leprosy Patient With Erythema Nodosum Leprosum: The Role of Corticosteroids

A hypertensive crisis is a severe condition characterized by a sudden, critical rise in blood pressure, which can lead to organ damage. Myocardial infarction occurring in the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis is referred to as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Patients with leprosy may develop erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), a serious inflammatory condition that can impair cardiovascular health and is frequently treated with corticosteroids. In this case, we describe a 52-year-old male patient, known to have hypertension, who complained of breathlessness, facial edema, and chest pain. Additional testing indicated hypertension, elevated cardiac biomarkers, and an ECG that showed characteristics of a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). When coronary angiography was performed, non-obstructive epicardial coronary arteries were discovered.

Age Variation in Patients with Troponin Level Elevation Without Obstructive Culprit Lesion or Suspected Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries-Long-Term Data Covering over Decade

Background/Objectives: Troponin level elevation without an obstructive culprit lesion is caused by heterogenous entities. The effect of aging on this condition has been poorly investigated. Methods: After screening 24,775 patients between 2010 and 2021, this study included a total of 373 patients with elevated troponin levels without an obstructive culprit lesion or suspected myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCAs) categorized into four age groups containing 78 patients (<51 years), 72 patients (51-60 years), 81 patients (61-70 years), and 142 patients (>70 years). This study analyzed the baseline characteristics, the in-hospital complications, in-hospital mortality, and the long-term outcomes. Results: The older patients exhibited a higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular in-hospital events than those of the other age groups (15.4% in the <51-year-old group vs. 36.1% in the 51-60-year-old group vs. 33.3% in the 61-70-year-old group vs. 47.2% in the >70-year-old group; p < 0.001). However, the rate of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) was higher in the 51-60-year-old patients than those of the other age groups (5.6% in the 51-60-year-old group vs. 1.3% in the 61-70-year-old group vs. 0.7% in the >70-year-old group; p = 0.027). At the 11-year follow-up, cardiovascular mortality was higher among the older patients compared to that of the younger patients (3.9% in the 61-70-year-old group vs. 4.2% in the >70-year-old group, p = 0.042), while non-cardiovascular mortality was comparable between the age groups. Conclusions: The older patients with troponin level elevation without an obstructive culprit lesion experienced a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization compared to that of the younger groups. Additionally, higher cardiovascular mortality rates were revealed in the older patients at a long-term follow-up.

Developing a Women's Heart Center With a Specialization in Coronary Microvascular and Vasomotor Dysfunction: If You Build It, They Will Come

BACKGROUND

Women's Heart Centers (WHC) are comprehensive, multidisciplinary care centers designed to close the existing gap in women's cardiovascular care. The WHC at The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Institute (TCH-WHC) in Cincinnati, Ohio was established in October of 2020, and is a specialized coronary microvascular and vasomotor dysfunction (CMVD) program.

METHODS

The TCH-WHC focuses its efforts across five pillars: patient care, research, education, community outreach and advocacy, and grants and philanthropy. These areas, centered around providing specalized CMVD care and treatment have allowed for substantial growth.

RESULTS

From October 2020-December 2023, TCH-WHC saw a total of 3219 patients, 42% of which were apart of the CMVD program. Since establishment, patient volume has consistently increased year over year.

CONCLUSION

The CMVD program at TCH-WHC is one of the fastest growing in the U. S. and is nationally recognized for specialized clinical care, diagnostics, and research. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the TCH-WHC structure that allows for the establishment and growth of a CMVD program and to outline core activities supporting the TCH-WHC approach.

Myocardial Infarction with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries Complicated by a Ventricular Septal Rupture: The Challenge of Achieving Hemodynamic Stability Using Impella Devices

The prognosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is reported to be as worse as myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary arteries. However, its mechanical complications are still poorly understood. A 71-year-old woman developed MINOCA after ascending aortic replacement surgery. During treatment, the patient experienced cardiogenic shock due to a ventricular septal rupture (VSR). The introduction of Impella devices reduced the left-to-right shunt and improved the patient's hemodynamics. Finally, a scheduled surgical repair was performed under stable conditions. In this report, we focused on the pathophysiology of MINOCA-related VSR and discussed the effectiveness of Impella devices as a bridge to surgical repair and circulatory backup during the perioperative period.

Pre-Hospital Delay and Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Real-world evidence on the relationship between delayed hospitalization and outcomes in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is lacking. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with MINOCA and the 2-year mortality outcomes in this patient population according to the symptom-to-door time (SDT).

METHODS

Overall, 861 patients with MINOCA from 2 Korean nationwide observational registries (2011-2020) were included and categorized as early or late presenters. Late presentation was defined as SDT ≥12 hours in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and SDT ≥24 hours in patients with non-STEMI. The primary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) and age-sex adjusted analysis were used to determine whether late presentation independently affected mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the independent factors correlated with late presentation.

RESULTS

In unadjusted data, late presenters had a notably higher risk of 2-year all-cause mortality than early presenters (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-4.08). This trend persisted in age-sex adjusted analysis (adjusted HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.36-3.84) and PSM-adjusted analysis (adjusted HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.05-4.53). The positive independent factors for late presentation included female sex, no emergency medical service use and high creatinine level, whereas the negative independent factor was a dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Late presentation is associated with higher mortality in patients with MINOCA. Multidisciplinary efforts are needed to reduce pre-hospital delay, thereby improving the clinical outcomes in these patients.

MINOCA: A Pathophysiological Approach of Diagnosis and Treatment-A Narrative Review

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a clinical entity characterized by the absence of significant coronary artery obstruction in epicardial arteries (<50%) on coronary angiography in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This article aims to provide a narrative review of the pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic challenges, and prognosis associated with MINOCA based on pathophysiology regarding the atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic causes. Etiological factors, including thromboembolism, coronary artery spasm, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary microvascular disease, and supply-demand mismatch, are addressed. Imaging modalities such as echocardiography, advances in coronary angiography like intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) are also analyzed. MINOCA patients have a better short-term prognosis compared to those with obstructive coronary artery disease but face significant long-term risks, underscoring the need for precise diagnosis and management strategies. Elevated inflammatory markers and specific genetic predispositions are also associated with adverse outcomes in MINOCA. This review focused on MINOCA from a pathophysiological perspective on the diverse underlying mechanisms, the challenges in achieving accurate diagnosis, the importance of a tailored therapeutic approach and the necessity for further investigation of clinical outcomes.

Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter, Prospective Registry Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic implication of mildly reduced ejection fraction (mrEF) after acute myocardial infarction has not been clearly demonstrated. We investigated the long-term risk of cardiovascular death and its predictors in patients with mrEF following acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 18 668 patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction were included in 2 prospective, multicenter registries. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) strata at index admission were evaluated. A score system consisting of clinical variables were developed to predict long-term cardiovascular death in the mrEF group. There were 2548 patients with reduced EF (EF ≤40%), 4266 patients with mrEF (EF 41%-49%), and 11 854 patients with preserved EF (EF ≥50%). During a median follow-up period of 37.9 months, the cardiovascular death rate was 22.3% in the reduced EF group, 10.3% in the mrEF group, and 7.3% in the preserved EF group (P<0.001). In the mrEF group, age>65 years, hypertension, stroke, severe renal insufficiency, and Killip class ≥3 were independent predictors for cardiovascular death. Presence of >2 predictors best discriminated the high-risk patients for cardiovascular death with an area under the curve of 0.746. Incidence of cardiovascular death in the high-risk mrEF group was comparable with the rEF group, while it was lower in the low-risk mrEF group than in the pEF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with mrEF after acute myocardial infarction had a modest risk of cardiovascular death. Clinical predictors could help discriminate a high-risk subpopulation with cardiovascular death risks comparable with those in the reduced EF group.

Sex Differences and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is more common in women, it is unknown whether sex is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with MINOCA. We aimed to investigate the relationship between sex differences and outcomes of patients with MINOCA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from their inception until August 2023 for relevant studies. End points were pooled using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects model as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. Nine studies, involving 30 281 patients with MINOCA (comprising 18 079 women and 12 202 men), were included in the study. Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and stroke compared with men. The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years, with an interquartile range of 2.2 to 4.2 years. Pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87-1.22]), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.89-1.58]), heart failure (OR, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.57-3.03]), stroke (OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.56-2.26]), and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.29-3.76]) between the 2 groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, women had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.16-1.53]) whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.64-1.28]) between the 2 patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the differences in demographics and comorbidity profiles, there was no significant difference in the long-term outcomes for patients with MINOCA between sexes. However, it is noteworthy that women experienced a higher risk of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events compared with men.

MI and Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries

MI and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is recognized as an important contributor to adverse cardiovascular outcomes in both men and women but is particularly prevalent in young women. Multiple coronary mechanisms such as coronary plaque disruption, coronary artery spasm, coronary microvascular dysfunction, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and coronary thromboembolism can trigger MINOCA. Beyond routine left heart catheterization, invasive intracoronary imaging and cardiac MRI can help to clarify the cause of MINOCA. Conditions such as myocarditis, takotsubo syndrome, and cardiomyopathy are on the differential as alternate explanations in those suspected of MINOCA. Identification of the underlying cause in a case of MINOCA has therapeutic implications. While long-term management of MINOCA is not standardized, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and statins appear to be of benefit. In this review, we discuss the prevalence and pathophysiology of MINOCA, diagnostic considerations, and current treatment approaches to manage this high-risk group of patients.

Sex differences in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: a state-of-the-art review

Cardiovascular conditions in the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes are characterized by sex differences with regard to pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, invasive and pharmacologic treatment, and outcomes. This review delves into these differences, including specific subsets like myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries or Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection, and alternative diagnoses like Takotsubo cardiomyopathy or myocarditis. Moreover, practical considerations are enclosed, on how a sex-specific approach should be integrated in clinical practice: in fact, personal history should focus on female-specific risk factors, and hormonal status and hormonal therapy should be assessed. Moreover, physical and psychological stressors should be investigated, particularly in the event of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

[Myocardial Infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries: Imaging plays a central role]

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary lesion (MINOCA) represents a non-negligible percentage of the proportion of myocardial infarctions (≈6%). Moreover, the long-term prognosis is poor, with an annual mortality rate of 2%. This high mortality rate may be explained by the fact that MINOCA represents a heterogeneous group, and the diagnosis of pathology is poorly understood. It is essential to be aware of this clinical presentation, and to follow the different diagnostic strategies, in order to identify the etiological mechanism, and thus set up a suitable treatment. Many tools are available to support diagnosis, notably in the fields of imaging, the principal contributors being coronary angiography, coronary physiology and pharmacological testing, as well as endo-coronary imaging and cardiac MRI. This review will provide an update on the definition, epidemiology, diagnostic strategies and treatment options for patients with MINOCA.

Management of cardiac emergencies in women: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), the Heart Failure Association (HFA), and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Cardiac emergencies in women, such as acute coronary syndromes, acute heart failure, and cardiac arrest, are associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes and mortality. Although women historically have been significantly underrepresented in clinical studies of these diseases, the guideline-recommended treatment for these emergencies is generally the same for both sexes. Still, women are less likely to receive evidence-based treatment compared to men. Furthermore, specific diseases affecting predominantly or exclusively women, such as spontaneous coronary dissection, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries, takotsubo cardiomyopathy, and peripartum cardiomyopathy, require specialized attention in terms of both diagnosis and management. In this clinical consensus statement, we summarize current knowledge on therapeutic management of these emergencies in women. Key statements and specific quality indicators are suggested to achieve equal and specific care for both sexes. Finally, we discuss several gaps in evidence and encourage further studies designed and powered with adequate attention for sex-specific analysis.

Prognostic factors of MINOCA and their possible mechanisms

OBJECTIVE

Despite not showing substantial stenosis of coronary arteries, Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) presents with myocardial ischemia injury, thus having a grave prognosis and a high risk of long-term complications. This necessitates increased clinical attention and exploration of its root causes to prevent a similar crisis.

METHODS

Research on MINOCA is limited, especially in terms of its clinical attributes, long-term outlook, risk stratification, and prognosis-linked cardiometabolic risk factors. This review aims to fill these gaps, providing an extensive overview of clinical trials and studies on MINOCA to separate the issue from the presence of non-obstructive coronary arteries in cardiac patients.

RESULTS

It has been found that MINOCA patients still face a high risk of long-term adverse events. Due to social and physiological factors, the hospital mortality rate is higher among women, and they are also more susceptible to MINOCA. Cardiac metabolic risk factors, including disorder of glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as changes in serum CysC levels, have significant impacts on the occurrence and prognosis of MINOCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is still needed to fully understand the complex biological mechanisms underlying the prognostic factors of MINOCA. A profound understanding of these factors could reveal potential targets for improving prognosis, thereby indicating new strategies for managing this cardiovascular condition.

Long term all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction with non-obstructed vs obstructed coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of adjusted data

BACKGROUND

The difference in the long-term outcomes of myocardial infarction in patients with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) and patients with myocardial infarction with obstructed coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) is not clear. The current study aimed to pool adjusted data to compare long-term outcomes of MINOCA vs MI-CAD.

METHODS

Electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases was done for publications up to 18th June 2023. Only studies reporting multivariable-adjusted data with > 1 year of follow-up were included.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Our meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between MINOCA and MI-CAD patients (HR: 0.90 95% CI 0.68, 1.19 I2 = 94% p = 0.48). Analysis of the limited data showed a reduced combined risk of all-cause mortality and MI (HR: 0.54 95% CI 0.39, 0.76 I2 = 72% p = 0.003) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (HR: 0.66 95% CI 0.51, 0.84 I2 = 51% p = 0.0009) in patients with MINOCA vs MI-CAD, and no difference in the risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.81 95% CI 0.54, 1.22 I2 = 0% p = 0.31) and readmission between the two groups (HR: 0.85 95% CI 0.61, 1.19 I2 = 90% p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

A pooled analysis of adjusted outcomes from the available studies indicated that MINOCA and MI-CAD patients have similar long-term all-cause mortality risk. Our conclusions on the risk of cardiovascular mortality, MACE and readmission rates need to be taken with caution due to a lack of adequate studies. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence on this important subject.

Comparison between myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronaries (MINOCA) and myocardial infarct patients with coronary artery disease (MI-CAD): A single-center retrospective cohort study

Background

The coronary angiography results in a group of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are normal or near-normal; which is diagnosed as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). This study aimed to compare the mortality rate and risk factors between MINOCA and myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery (MI-CAD).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. A total of 679 patients admitted to Afshar Hospital in Yazd with a diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) from 2018-2019 who underwent primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) were enrolled in the study. Demographic, and clinical variables, ECG finding and one-year mortality, were extracted using MI registry data from the Yazd Cardiac Research Center.

Results

The estimated frequency of MINOCA was 4.6%. Patients with MINOCA (47.14±6.2) were younger than patients with MI-CAD (57.61±9.1) (P <0.0001). MINOCA patients (47.4±9.47) had a considerably greater left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than MI-CAD patients (43.5±6.8) (P =0.018). The majority site of MI in MINOCA patients was located in the non-anterior wall (p <0.0001). A comparison of MINOCA and MI-CAD patients' one-year mortality revealed no significant difference (P =0.07).

Conclusion

The prevalence of patients with MINOCA in Yazd was similar to other communities. Although these patients probably do not have a better prognosis, despite being younger and having better LV systolic function and lower CAD risk factors.

Pathophysiology and diagnostic pathway of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous and diverse disease entity, which accounts for about 6 % of all acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases. In patients with chest pain and acute myocardial injury detected by a highly sensitive troponin assay, the absence of epicardial coronary stenosis of 50 % or greater on angiography leads to the working diagnosis of MINOCA. The updated JCS/CVIT/JCC 2023 Guideline described MINOCA as a new disease concept and recommended a multimodality approach to uncovering the underlying causes of MINOCA. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is useful in not only making a definite diagnosis of MINOCA, but also excluding non-ischemic causes that mimic AMI such as takotsubo cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. Meanwhile, intracoronary imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), enables us to evaluate precisely intracoronary morphological alterations including plaque disruption and spontaneous coronary artery dissection which are not revealed by angiographic findings alone. Recent studies have shown that an initial workup with the combination of CMR and OCT could provide a definite diagnosis in a significant percentage of patients suspected of MINOCA. Consecutively, patients with inconclusive results of a series of CMR and OCT implementation are eligible for assessing the potential for coronary functional abnormalities or blood coagulopathy as another factor involved in the development of MINOCA. Although uncovering the pathogenesis of MINOCA might be essential for establishing an individualized treatment approach, significant knowledge gaps in terms of secondary prevention strategies for MINOCA focusing on the improvement of long-term prognosis remain to be overcome. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of MINOCA and highlight contemporary diagnostic approaches for patients with suspected MINOCA.

Effect of renin angiotensin system inhibitors on long-term major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk

The advantage of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients with preserved LV systolic function is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the effects of ACEI/ARB in high atherosclerotic risk patients without overt heart failure (HF) on long-term major cardiovascular outcomes (MACEs). The Cohort Of patients with high Risk for cardiovascular Events (CORE-Thailand) registry is a prospective, multicenter, observational, longitudinal study of Thai patients with high atherosclerotic risk. The patients with ejection fraction < 50% were excluded. Among 8513 recruited patients, there were 4246 patients included into final analysis after propensity score matching. At 5-years follow-up, Cox regression analysis showed that ACEI/ARB was significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality or non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and HF hospitalization (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.96, P = 0.011). The benefit was driven by the reduced all-cause mortality and HF. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that ACEI/ARB decreased risk of long-term MACEs in patients with diabetes (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, P = 0.011) and patients not taking statin (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.82, P = 0.002). We demonstrated that the use of ACEI/ARB was associated with reduced risk of long-term MACEs in a large cohort of high atherosclerotic risk patients. Reduction of all-cause mortality and HF were likely the main contributors to the benefit of ACEI/ARB.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of coronary microvascular diseases (2023 Edition)

Since the four working groups of the Chinese Society of Cardiology issued first expert consensus on coronary microvascular diseases (CMVD) in 2017, international consensus documents on CMVD have increased rapidly. Although some of these documents made preliminary recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of CMVD, they did not provide classification of recommendations and levels of evidence. In order to summarize recent progress in the field of CMVD, standardize the methods and procedures of diagnosis and treatment, and identify the scientific questions for future research, the four working groups of the Chinese Society of Cardiology updated the 2017 version of the Chinese expert consensus on CMVD and adopted a series of measures to ensure the quality of this document. The current consensus has raised a new classification of CMVD, summarized new epidemiological findings for different types of CMVD, analyzed key pathological and molecular mechanisms, evaluated classical and novel diagnostic technologies, recommended diagnostic pathways and criteria, and therapeutic strategies and medications, for patients with CMVD. In view of the current progress and knowledge gaps of CMVD, future directions were proposed. It is hoped that this expert consensus will further expedite the research progress of CMVD in both basic and clinical scenarios.

Coronary artery tortuosity and mid-term all-cause mortality of patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries

Background: Coronary artery tortuosity (CAT) is a frequently encountered angiographic feature of patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). However, there is limited data regarding the possible correlation between CAT and all-cause mortality in these patients. Aim: To assess the survival prognostic implications of CAT in INOCA patients and the predictors of all-cause mid-term mortality of these patients. Methods: All consecutive INOCA patients, with preserved ejection fraction evaluated for clinical ischemia by coronary angiography in our department between January 2014 and December 2020 were considered for inclusion. Patients with epicardial coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50%, severe pulmonary hypertension, or decompensated extra cardiac disease were excluded. Eleid classification was used for CAT severity characterization. We assessed all-cause mortality in January 2023. Results: Our sample included 328 INOCA patients. 15.54% died during the mean follow-up of 3.75 ± 1.32 years. 79.88% had CAT. CAT patients were older (65.10±9.09 versus 61.24±10.02 years, p=0.002), and more often female (67.18% versus 31.82%, p<0.001). CAT was inversely correlated with all-cause mid-term mortality (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.16 - 0.77, p=0.01). CAT severity had no impact on survival. In CAT patients the initial multivariable analysis identified NT-proBNP levels (HR 3.96, p=0.01), diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 4.76, p=0.003), and atrial fibrillation (HR 2.68, p=0.06) as independent predictors of all-cause mortality. In the final analysis, NT-proBNP and DM were the main independent predictors of survival. Conclusions : In our INOCA cohort, CAT patients were older and more likely female. CAT was inversely correlated with mid-term all-cause mortality. NT-proBNP and DM were the main independent predictors of mortality of CAT patients.

Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries and Mimickers

Importance

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with nonobstructive coronaries (MINOCA) are largely unknown.

Objective

To assess differences in 5-year mortality in patients presenting with STEMI due to MINOCA and MINOCA mimickers as compared with obstructive disease.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective analysis of a prospective registry-based cohort study of consecutive STEMI activations at 3 regional Midwest STEMI programs. STEMI without a culprit artery and elevated troponin levels were categorized as MINOCA (absence of coronary artery stenosis >50% and confirmed or suspected coronary artery plaque disruption, epicardial coronary spasm, or coronary embolism/thrombosis) or MINOCA mimickers (takotsubo cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, or nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Data were analyzed from March 2003 to December 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Adjusted Cox regression analysis was used to assess 5-year mortality risk in STEMI presenting with MINOCA and MINOCA mimickers in comparison with obstructive disease.

Results

Among 8560 consecutive patients with STEMI, mean (SD) age was 62 (14) years, 30% were female (2609 participants), and 94% were non-Hispanic White (4358 participants). The cohort included 8151 patients with STEMI due to obstructive disease (95.2%), 120 patients with MINOCA (1.4%), and 289 patients with MINOCA mimickers (3.8%). Patients were followed up for a median (IQR) of 7.1 (3.6-10.7) years. Patients with MINOCA and MINOCA mimickers were less likely to be discharged with cardiac medications compared with obstructive disease. At 5-year follow-up, mortality in STEMI presenting with obstructive disease (1228 participants [16%]) was similar to MINOCA (20 participants [18%]; χ21 = 1.1; log-rank P = .29) and MINOCA mimickers (52 participants [18%]; χ21 = 2.3; log-rank P = .13). In adjusted Cox regression analysis compared with obstructive disease, the 5-year mortality hazard risk was 1.93 times higher in MINOCA (95% CI, 1.06-3.53) and similar in MINOCA mimickers (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.79-1.49).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large multicenter cohort study of consecutive clinical patients with STEMI, presenting with MINOCA was associated with a higher risk of mortality than obstructive disease; the risk of mortality was similar in patients with MINOCA mimickers and obstructive disease. Further investigation is necessary to understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in this high-risk STEMI population.

MINOCA: A Working Diagnosis

Cases of patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) without angiographic obstructive CAD are not trivial and have significant prevalence. "The Fourth Universal Definition of MI" (4UDMI) published in 2018 introduced MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). The new section was of great importance as it validated the diagnosis by defining its criteria and recognizing its presence in the community and the need for further investigation. Given the nature of the diagnosis of MINOCA, coronary angiography provides limited information about prognosis and risk stratification for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Thus, additional imaging to understand the underlying etiology of MINOCA in conjunction with a better understanding of prognostic factors is necessary to expand on the current guidelines and aid in screening for possible complications, risk of MACE, and all-cause mortality. Discerning the etiology of the presentation is crucial, and physiologic studies, as well as additional imaging, are an important part of this evaluation. These modalities include intravascular studies such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), fractional flow reserve (FFR), and imaging in the form of cardiac CT (CCT) and cardiac MRI (CMR). This step is essential to target treatment regimens more efficiently. The purpose of promoting multiple imaging modalities beyond traditional angiography is to address the working MINOCA diagnosis, with the finality of identifying the specific ischemic pathophysiology. MINOCA has multiple causative mechanisms, making it a heterogeneous collection of etiologies, resulting in acute MI: atherosclerotic, and non-atherosclerotic. This literature revision demonstrates that MINOCA prevalence and mortality are not trivial, and the diagnosis affects quality of life. MINOCA presents a definitive risk of MACE without proper stratification and targeted medical therapy. Several prognostic factors of morbidity and mortality in MI-CAD patients have been identified to correlate with MINOCA patients, especially inflammatory markers. MINOCA is not an exclusion diagnosis but a working diagnosis for which further imaging studies should be performed.

Characteristics of patients with recurrent acute myocardial infarction after MINOCA

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) is an increasingly recognized condition with challenging management. Some MINOCA patients ultimately experience recurrent acute MI (re-AMI) during follow-up; however, clinical and angiographic factors predisposing to re-AMI are still poorly defined.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study we enrolled consecutive patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria of MINOCA according to the IV universal definition of myocardial infarction; characteristics of patients experiencing re-AMI during the follow-up were compared to a group of MINOCA patients without re-AMI.

RESULTS

54 patients (mean age 66 ± 13) experienced a subsequent re-AMI after MINOCA and follow-up was available in 44 (81%). Compared to MINOCA patients without re-AMI (n = 695), on first invasive coronary angiography (ICA) MINOCA patients with re-AMI showed less frequent angiographically normal coronaries (37 versus 53%, p = 0.032) and had a higher prevalence of atherosclerosis involving 3 vessels or left main stem (17% versus 8%, p = 0.049). Twenty-four patients (44%) with re-AMI underwent a new ICA: 25% had normal coronary arteries, 12.5% had mild luminal irregularities (<30%), 20.8% had moderate coronary atherosclerosis (30-49%), and 41.7% showed obstructive coronary atherosclerosis (≥50% stenosis). Among patients undergoing new ICA, atherosclerosis progression was observed in 11 (45.8%), 37.5% received revascularization, only 4.5% had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL_C) under 55 mg/dL and 33% experienced a new cardiovascular disease (CVD) event (death, AMI, heart failure, stroke) at subsequent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, only a minority of MINOCA patients with re-AMI underwent a repeated ICA, nearly one out of two showed atherosclerosis progression, often requiring revascularization. Recommended LDL-C levels were achieved only in a minority of the cases, indicating a possible underestimation of CVD risk in this population.

Endothelial cell dysfunction in cardiac disease: driver or consequence?

The vascular endothelium is a multifunctional cellular system which directly influences blood components and cells within the vessel wall in a given tissue. Importantly, this cellular interface undergoes critical phenotypic changes in response to various biochemical and hemodynamic stimuli, driving several developmental and pathophysiological processes. Multiple studies have indicated a central role of the endothelium in the initiation, progression, and clinical outcomes of cardiac disease. In this review we synthesize the current understanding of endothelial function and dysfunction as mediators of the cardiomyocyte phenotype in the setting of distinct cardiac pathologies; outline existing in vivo and in vitro models where key features of endothelial cell dysfunction can be recapitulated; and discuss future directions for development of endothelium-targeted therapeutics for cardiac diseases with limited existing treatment options.

Diagnostic Puzzles and Cause-Targeted Treatment Strategies in Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: An Updated Review

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a distinct subtype of myocardial infarction (MI), occurring in about 8-10% of spontaneous MI cases referred for coronary angiography. Unlike MI with obstructive coronary artery disease, MINOCA's pathogenesis is more intricate and heterogeneous, involving mechanisms such as coronary thromboembolism, coronary vasospasm, microvascular dysfunction, dissection, or plaque rupture. Diagnosing MINOCA presents challenges and includes invasive and non-invasive strategies aiming to differentiate it from alternative diagnoses and confirm the criteria of elevated cardiac biomarkers, non-obstructive coronary arteries, and the absence of alternate explanations for the acute presentation. Tailored management strategies for MINOCA hinge on identifying the underlying cause of the infarction, necessitating systematic diagnostic approaches. Furthermore, determining the optimal post-MINOCA medication regimen remains uncertain. This review aims to comprehensively address the current state of knowledge, encompassing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, in the context of MINOCA while also highlighting the evolving landscape and future directions for advancing our understanding and management of this intricate myocardial infarction subtype.

MINOCA: Myocardial infarction no obstructive coronary artery disease

Myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) is defined as myocardial infarction with mild or no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on angiogram. MINOCA has a number of heterogeneous causes, including coronary disruption, coronary vasospasm, coronary embolism, spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Even though MINOCA might have a better prognosis than MI with obstructive CAD, it is not benign. A stepwise diagnostic approach is crucial to identifying the underlying cause of MINOCA or conditions mimicking it. A cause-specific treatment approach is the key to managing MINOCA.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Myocardia Infarction (MI) With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries and MI With Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and patients with myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary arteries (MIOCA). This meta-analysis was conducted according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The literature search was conducted in online databases including PubMed and Web of Science from 2010 onwards. Primary outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction. A total of 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that the risk of MACE was higher in MIOCA patients (risk ratio (RR): 1.47, 95%CI: 1.43-1.52, p-value: 0.001) compared to MINOCA patients. Additionally, the risk of all-cause mortality was also significantly higher in MIOCA patients compared to MINOCA (RR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.14-1.56, p-value: 0.001). Our findings also indicate that patients with MIOCA are at a significantly higher risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and cardiovascular-related mortality compared to patients with MINOCA. Overall, the insights gained from this meta-analysis have significant clinical implications, guiding decision-making in the management of patients with MINOCA.

MINOCA and INOCA: Role in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infarction (MINOCA) and ischaemia (INOCA) with non-obstructive coronary disease are recent non-conventional presentations of coronary syndromes that are increasingly recognised in the clinical arena, particularly with the availability of new cardiovascular imaging techniques. Both are related to heart failure (HF). MINOCA is not associated with benign outcomes, and HF is among the most prevalent events. Regarding INOCA, microvascular dysfunction has also been found to associate with HF, particularly with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

RECENT FINDINGS

Regardless of the several aetiologies underlying HF in MINOCA, it is likely related to LV dysfunction, where secondary prevention is not yet clearly established. Regarding INOCA, coronary microvascular ischaemia has been associated to endothelial dysfunction leading ultimately to diastolic dysfunction and HFpEF. MINOCA and INOCA are clearly related to HF. In both, there is a lack of studies on the identification of the risk factors for HF, diagnostic workup and, importantly, the appropriate primary and secondary prevention strategies.

Do Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries Have Similar Prognosis Compared to Ones with MI-CAD?

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and it is primarily caused by acute plaque disruption and coronary occlusion. Recent studies suggest that myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) also occurs but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully understood until recently. The evidence also suggests that the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with MINOCA are similar to AMI patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD), including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. The present narrative review considers the risk factors, pathological changes, and outcomes associated with MINOCA and compares them with MI-CAD.

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries: from pathophysiology to therapeutic strategies

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is a heterogeneous group of clinical entities characterized by clinical evidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with normal or near-normal coronary arteries on coronary angiography (stenosis < 50%) and without an over the alternative diagnosis for the acute presentation. Its prevalence ranges from 6% to 11% among all patients with AMI, with a predominance of young, nonwhite females with fewer traditional risks than those with an obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD). MINOCA can be due to either epicardial causes such as rupture or fissuring of unstable nonobstructive atherosclerotic plaque, coronary artery spasm, spontaneous coronary dissection and cardioembolism in-situ or microvascular causes. Besides, also type-2 AMI due to supply-demand mismatch and Takotsubo syndrome must be considered as a possible MINOCA cause. Because of the complex etiology and a limited amount of evidence, there is still some confusion around the management and treatment of these patients. Therefore, the key focus of this condition is to identify the underlying individual mechanisms to achieve patient-specific treatments. Clinical history, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and coronary angiography represent the first-level diagnostic investigations, but coronary imaging with intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography, coronary physiology testing, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging offer additional information to understand the underlying cause of MINOCA. Although the prognosis is slightly better compared with MI-CAD patients, MINOCA is not always benign and depends on the etiopathology. This review analyzes all possible pathophysiological mechanisms that could lead to MINOCA and provides the most specific and appropriate therapeutic approach in each scenario.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: Etiology, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is responsible for 10% of myocardial infarctions. Previously, patients were thought to have good prognosis, but evidence-based management and treatment strategies were scarce. Today, researchers and physicians recognize MINOCA as a condition with non-trivial mortality and morbidity. Therapeutic strategies are highly dependent on the underlying disease mechanism in each patient. However, to reach a diagnosis of MINOCA, a multimodal approach is required and, even with an optimal work-up, the cause remains unknown in 8-25% of patients. Research has been growing and position papers from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology have been published, and MINOCA has been included in the more recent ESC guidelines on myocardial infarction. Nonetheless, some clinicians still assume that the absence of coronary obstruction excludes the possibility of acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, in the present paper, we aim to compile and present the available data on the etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of MINOCA.

Characteristics and Long-term Mortality in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (STE-MINOCA): A High Risk Cohort

Background

The prognosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronaries (STE-MINOCA) is largely unknown.

Methods

The objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and 5-year mortality of patients with STE-MINOCA compared to STEMI with coronary artery obstruction (STEMI-Obstruction) using a multicenter cohort of consecutive STEMI patients at 3 regional Midwest STEMI programs from 2003 to 2020. STE-MINOCA was defined based on (1) coronary stenosis < 60% by visual estimation, (2) ischemia with elevated troponin, and (3) no alternative diagnosis. STE-MINOCA was further classified based on American Heart Association (AHA) definition as AHA STE-MINOCA and AHA STE-MINOCA Mimicker.

Results

8,566 STEMI patients, including 420 (4.9%) STE-MINOCA (26.9% AHA STE-MINOCA and 73.1% AHA STE-MINOCA Mimicker) were followed for a median of 7.1 years. Compared to STEMI-Obstruction, STE-MINOCA were younger, more often female, had fewer cardiovascular risk factors, and were less likely to be discharged on cardiac medications. At five years, mortality was higher in STE-MINOCA compared with STEMI-Obstruction (18% vs. 15%, p=0.033). In propensity score-matched analysis, STE-MINOCA had a 1.4-fold (95% CI: 1.04-1.89, p=0.028) higher risk of 5-year all-cause mortality compared with STEMI-Obstruction. Furthermore, 5-year mortality risk was significantly higher in AHA STE-MINOCA Mimicker (19% vs. 15%, p=0.043) but similar in AHA STE-MINOCA (17% vs. 15%, p=0.42) compared with STEMI-Obstruction.

Conclusions

In this large multicenter STEMI cohort, nearly 5% of patients presented with STE-MINOCA. At five years, mortality approached 20% among patients with STE-MINOCA. Despite the lower risk profile, STE-MINOCA patients were at 40% higher risk of 5-year all-cause mortality compared with STEMI-Obstruction. Additionally, 5-year all-cause mortality risk was higher in AHA STE-MINOCA Mimicker but similar in AHA STE-MINOCA compared to STEMI-Obstruction.

Nonobstructive coronary atherosclerosis is associated with adverse prognosis among patients diagnosed with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognostic impact of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), as opposed to normal coronary arteries, on long-term outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is unclear. We aimed to address the association between nonobstructive-CAD and major adverse events (MAE) following MINOCA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive MINOCA patients admitted to a large referral medical center between 2005 and 2018. Patients were classified according to coronary angiography as having either normal-coronaries or nonobstructive-CAD. The primary outcome was MAE, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality and recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

RESULTS

Of the 1544 MINOCA patients, 651 (42%) had normal coronaries, and 893 (58%) had CAD. The mean age was 61.2 ± 12.6 years, and 710 (46%) were females. Nonobstructive-CAD patients were older and less likely to be females, with higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and chronic renal-failure (p < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 7 years, MAE occurred in 203 (23%) patients and 67 (10%) patients in the nonobstructive-CAD and normal-coronaries groups, respectively (p < 0.01). In multivariable models, nonobstructive -CAD was significantly associated with long-term MAE [adjusted-hazard-ratio (aHR):1.67, 95% confidence-interval (95%CI):1.25-2.23; p < 0.001]. Other factors associated with a higher MAE-risk were older-age (aHR:1.05,95%CI:1.03-1.06; p < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection-fraction<40% (aHR:3.04,95%CI:2.03-4.57; p < 0.001), while female-sex (aHR:0.72, 95%CI: 0.56-0.94; p=0.014) and sinus rhythm at presentation (aHR:0.66, 95%CI: 0.44-0.98; p=0.041) were associated with lower MAE-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In MINOCA, nonobstructive-CAD is independently associated with a higher MAE-risk than normal-coronaries. This finding may promote risk-stratification of patients with nonobstructive-CAD-MINOCA who require tighter medical follow-up and treatment optimization.