Highest Obesity Category Associated With Largest Decrease in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

Aim: To perform an overall assessment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) adults with central obesity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: We enrolled HFpEF patients with central obesity (n =73, mean age 52.4 ± 6.3 years) and without obesity (n =70, mean age 51.9 ± 7.1 years) and compared with an age-matched healthy subjects who had not suffered from HF (n = 69, mean age 52.3 ± 7.5 years). Physical examination, routine laboratory tests such as fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance (HOMA) index, serum lipids, haemoglobin, creatinine, ALT, AST, uric acide, hs CRP, TSH, N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and standard transthoracic echocardiogram (2D and Doppler) examinations were performed and assessed.

RESULTS

Results: The average values of diastolic blood pressure (DBP), glucose and lipid profiles, uric acide, hs CRP were found to be significantly higher among obese patients with HFpEF than non-obese. Despite more severe symptoms and signs of HF, obese patients with HFpEF had lower NT-proBNP values than non-obese patients with HFpEF (129±36.8 pg/ml, 134±32.5 pg/ml vs 131±30.4 pg/ml, 139±33.8 pg/ml respectively; p < 0.05). However, it was found that patients with high central (visceral) adiposity have more pronounced obesity-related LV diastolic dysfunction, lower E/e' ratio, lower mitral annular lateral e' velocity, an increased LV diastolic dimension and LV mass index. Compared with non-obese HFpEF and control subjects, obese patients displayed greater right ventricular dilatation (base, 35±3.13 mm, 36±4.7 mm vs 33±2.8 mm, 34±3.2 mm and 29±5.3 mm, 30±3.9 mm; length, 74±5 mm, 76±8 mm vs 67±4 mm, 69±6 mm and 60±3 mm, 61±5 mm respectively; p < 0.05), more right ventricular dysfunction (TAPSE 16±2 mm, 15±3 mm vs 17±2 mm, 17±1 mm and 19±2 mm, 20±3 mm respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Obese patients with HFpEF have higher diastolic BP, atherogenic dyslipidemia, insulin resistance index values and greater systemic inflammatory biomarkers, despite lower NT-proBNP values, which increase the risk of cardiovascular events in future. Echocardiography examination revealed not only significant LV diastolic dysfunction, but also displayed greater RV dilatation and dysfunction.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and low NT-proBNP levels

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and low N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Seven hundred ninety consecutive patients hospitalized with HFpEF from 2006 to 2017 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between low NT-proBNP group (<300 ng/L) and elevated NT-proBNP group (≥300 ng/L). 108 HFpEF patients (13.7%) presented with low NT-proBNP levels. Age, body mass index, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association functional class, and albumin were independent predictors of low NT-proBNP levels in HFpEF patients. During the median follow-up duration of 1103 days, 11 patients (10.2%) in low NT-proBNP group suffered from primary endpoint event. Elevated NT-proBNP group had a higher risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation than low NT-proBNP group (adjusted HR [95%CI]: 2.36 [1.24,4.49], P = .009). Stratified analyses showed that the association between NT-proBNP (elevated NT-proBNP group vs low NT-proBNP group) and risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation was stronger in non-atrial fibrillation patients than in atrial fibrillation patients (P value for interaction = .025). Furthermore, the associations between NT-proBNP and risk of all-cause death or heart transplantation were stronger in younger and male patients than in older and female patients. However, both subgroups only reached borderline significant (P values for interaction = .062 and .084, respectively). Our findings suggest that low NT-proBNP levels were common in patients hospitalized with HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF and low NT-proBNP levels had a better prognosis than those with elevated NT-proBNP levels, particularly in younger, male, and non-atrial fibrillation patients.

Effect of body mass index on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a biomarker used for the diagnosis of heart failure. There is a relationship between NT-proBNP levels and body mass index (BMI). The study aimed to explore the impact of BMI on NT-proBNP concentrations and to examine whether other factors independent of or combined with BMI affect NT-proBNP values in patients with heart failure.

RESULTS

A total of 293 participants were recruited. The mean age was 68.9 ± 13.2 years, males accounted for 46.4% of the total cohort, the mean BMI was 23.1 ± 4.0 kg/m2, and the median NT-proBNP level was 3776 (1672-8806) pg/ml. There was an inverse relationship between BMI and log NT-proBNP (r = - 0.29; p < 0.001, Spearman correlation). Each standard deviation increase in BMI (4 kg/m2) was associated with a 7% decrease in NT-proBNP values in the total cohort. The independent inverse determinants of NT-proBNP other than BMI were male gender and eGFR, while the variables directly correlated to NT-proBNP were LVEF ≤ 40% and NYHA class III-IV heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an inverse association between BMI and NT-proBNP levels. However, the correlation is weak, and there are other variables that have a significant impact on the NT-proBNP values as well. The NT-proBNP levels are still valuable in the diagnosis of heart failure regardless of BMI status.

Obesity, Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure, and Left Ventricular Remodeling

Owing to the overwhelming obesity epidemic, preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly ensues in patients with severe obesity and the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is now commonplace in clinical practice. Severe obesity and preserved ejection fraction heart failure share congruent cardiovascular, immune, and renal derangements that make it difficult to ascertain whether the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure is the convergence of two highly prevalent conditions or severe obesity enables the development and progression of the syndrome of preserved ejection fraction heart failure. Nevertheless, the obese phenotype of preserved ejection fraction heart failure provides a unique opportunity to assess whether sustained and sizeable loss of excess body weight via metabolic bariatric surgery reverses the concentric left ventricular remodeling that patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure commonly display.

Decreased left atrial function in obesity patients without known cardiovascular disease

Obesity is a risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that assessment of left atrial (LA) strain may be useful to reveal precursors of HFpEF in obesity patients. Echocardiograms of obesity patients without known cardiovascular disease who underwent bariatric surgery, and echocardiograms of age- and gender matched controls were analyzed. The echocardiogram was repeated 1 year after bariatric surgery. LA reservoir strain (LASr), LA conduit strain (LAScd), and LA contractile strain (LASct) were measured. 77 Obesity patients were compared with 46 non-obese controls. Obesity patients showed a significantly decreased LA function compared with non-obese individuals (LASr 32.2% ± 8.8% vs. 39.6% ± 10.8%, p < 0.001; LAScd 20.1% ± 7.5% vs. 24.9% ± 8.3%, p = 0.001; LASct 12.1% ± 3.6% vs. 14.5% ± 5.5%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in prevalence of diastolic dysfunction between the obesity group and controls (9.1% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.139). One year after bariatric surgery, LASr improved (32.1% ± 8.9% vs. 34.2% ± 8.7%, p = 0.048). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, BMI was associated with LASr, LAScd, and LASct (β =  - 0.34, CI - 0.54 to - 0.13; β =  - 0.22, CI - 0.38 to - 0.06; β =  - 0.10, CI - 0.20 to - 0.004). Obesity patients without known cardiovascular disease have impairment in all phases of LA function. LA dysfunction in obesity may be an early sign of cardiac disease and may be a predictor for developing HFpEF. LASr improved 1 year after bariatric surgery, indicating potential reversibility of LA function in obesity.

Epidemiology of Asymptomatic Pre-heart Failure: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To quantify the prevalence of asymptomatic pre-heart failure (pre-HF), progression to more severe stages, and associated mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review was conducted between 01 January 2010 and 12 March 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020176141). Data of interest included prevalence, disease progression, and mortality rates. In total, 1030 sources were identified, of which, 12 reported on pre-HF (using the ACC/AHA definition for stage B HF) and were eligible. Prevalence estimates of pre-HF ranged from 11 to 42.7% (10 sources) with higher estimates found in the elderly, in patients with hypertension, and in men. Three studies reported on disease progression with follow-up ranging from 13 months to 7 years. The incidence of symptomatic HF (HF/advanced HF) ranged from 0.63 to 9.8%, and all-cause mortality from 1.6 to 5.4%. Further research is required to investigate whether early detection and intervention can slow or stop the progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic HF.

Natriuretic Peptide-Based Inclusion Criteria in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinical Trials: Insights from PARAGON-HF

AIM

Natriuretic peptides (NPs) are now routinely incorporated as key inclusion criteria in clinical trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as objective measures of risk. An early amendment in PARAGON-HF required all participants to have elevated NP concentrations, but some were enrolled pre-amendment, providing a unique opportunity to understand the influence of enrollment pathway in HFpEF clinical trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 4,796 participants in PARAGON-HF, 193 (4.0%) did not meet the final NP-based enrollment criteria (NT-proBNP >300 pg/ml for patients in sinus rhythm or >900 pg/ml for patients in atrial fibrillation/flutter). These patients had lower rates of the primary endpoint of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death as compared with patients meeting final enrollment criteria (8.6 [6.7-11.2] events per 100py vs. 14.0 [13.4-14.7] events per 100py P=0.01). The rate ratio for the treatment effect comparing sacubitril/valsartan with valsartan was 0.85 [95% CI 0.74-0.99]; P=0.035 in those who met final criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

NPs are an important tool in HFpEF clinical trials to objectively affirm diagnoses and enrich clinical event rates.

Under-Enrollment of Obese Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients in Major HFpEF Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains an unmet need with lack of consensus definition of HFpEF for inclusion into clinical trials. We evaluated for whether hemodynamically characterized patients from a HFpEF referral center met inclusion criteria for 4 major HFpEF trials.

METHODS

Patients were assessed for theoretical inclusion into four major clinical trials (I-PRESERVE, RELAX, TOPCAT, and PARAGON-HF). Clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic characteristics, and cardiovascular outcomes were compared between patients who met inclusion criteria versus those who did not for each trial.

RESULTS

Of 131 HFpEF patients, 23% of patients met enrollment criteria for I-PRESERVE, 38% for RELAX, 18% for TOPCAT, and 13% for PARAGON-HF. The top criteria that excluded patients included low natriuretic peptide level, obesity, uncontrolled hypertension, young age, and low hemoglobin. There was no difference in probability of HF hospitalization or death in patients included or excluded into each clinical trial.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort with hemodynamic evidence of HFpEF, a low proportion of patients met inclusion criteria for major HFpEF clinical trials, with no difference in outcomes in patients who did or did not meet inclusion criteria. Given the lack of proven therapies in HFpEF, consideration should be given to modifying criteria to represent contemporary HFpEF patients in future clinical trials.

Adiponectin and cardiometabolic trait and mortality: where do we go?

Adiponectin is an adipocyte-derived cytokine known for its cardioprotective effects in preclinical studies. Early epidemiologic studies replicated these findings and drew great interest. Subsequent large-scale prospective cohorts, however, showed that adiponectin levels seemed not to relate to incident coronary artery disease (CAD). Even more surprisingly, a paradoxical increase of all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality with increased adiponectin levels was reported. The adiponectin-mortality paradox has been explained by some groups asserting that adiponectin secretion is promoted by elevated natriuretic peptides (NP). Other groups have proposed that adiponectin is elevated due to adiponectin resistance in subjects with metabolic syndrome or heart failure (HF). However, there is no unifying theory that can clearly explain this paradox. In patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), stretched cardiomyocytes secrete NPs, which further promote release of adiponectin from adipose tissue, leading to adiponectin resistance. On the other hand, adiponectin biology may differ in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which constitutes 50% of all of HF. Most HFpEF patients are obese, which exerts inflammation and myocardial stiffness, that is likely to prevent myocardial stretch and subsequent NP release. This segment of the patient population may display a different adiponectin biology from its HFrEF counterpart. Dissecting the adiponectin-mortality relation in terms of different HF subtypes may help to comprehensively understand this paradox. Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses claimed that adiponectin levels are not causally related to CAD or metabolic syndrome. Results from MR studies, however, should be interpreted with great caution because the underlying history of CAD or CHF were not taken into account in these analyses, an issue that may substantially confound the results. Here, we discuss many aspects of adiponectin; cardiometabolic traits, therapeutic interventions, and the ongoing debate about the adiponectin paradox, which were recently described in basic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies.

Highest Obesity Category Associated With Largest Decrease in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) constitutes half of hospitalized heart failure cases and is commonly associated with obesity. The role of natriuretic peptide levels in hospitalized obese patients with HFpEF, however, is not well defined. We sought to evaluate change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels by obesity category and related clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF hospitalized for acute heart failure. Methods and Results A total of 89 patients with HFpEF hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure were stratified into 3 obesity categories: nonobese (body mass index [BMI] <30.0 kg/m², 19%), obese (BMI 30.0-39.9 kg/m², 29%), and severely obese (BMI ≥40.0 kg/m², 52%), and compared for percent change in NT-proBNP during hospitalization and clinical outcomes. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with normal NT-proBNP (≤125 pg/mL) and elevated NT-proBNP. Admission NT-proBNP was inversely related to BMI category (nonobese, 2607 pg/mL [interquartile range, IQR: 2112-5703]; obese, 1725 pg/mL [IQR: 889-3900]; and severely obese, 770.5 pg/mL [IQR: 128-1268]; P<0.01). Severely obese patients had the largest percent change in NT-proBNP with diuresis (-64.8% [95% CI, -85.4 to -38.9] versus obese -40.4% [95% CI, -74.3 to -12.0] versus nonobese -46.9% [95% CI, -57.8 to -37.4]; P=0.03). Nonobese and obese patients had significantly worse 1-year survival compared with severely obese patients (63% versus 76% versus 95%, respectively; P<0.01). Patients with normal NT-proBNP (13%) were younger, with higher BMI, less atrial fibrillation, and less structural heart disease than those with elevated NT-proBNP. Conclusions In hospitalized patients with HFpEF, NT-proBNP was inversely related to BMI with the largest decrease in NT-proBNP seen in the highest obesity category. These findings have implications for the role of NT-proBNP in the diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in obese patients with HFpEF.

Implications of obesity across the heart failure continuum

The obesity paradox, which suggests a survival advantage for the obese in heart failure (HF) has sparked debate in the medical community. Studies demonstrate a survival advantage in obese patients with HF, including those with advanced HF requiring continuous inotropic support for palliation or disease modifying therapy with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplantation (HT). Importantly, the obesity paradox is affected by the level of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). It is now recommended that HF patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m² achieve at least 5-10% weight loss, in order to improve symptoms and cardiac function, though more robust data are urgently needed. CRF may be the single best predictor of overall health and small improvements in fitness levels may lead to improved outcomes in HF. In addition to implications of obesity in chronic HF, we also discuss management of obese patients with advanced HF and their implications for therapies such as LVAD implantation and HT.