The long-term effects of nedocromil sodium and beclomethasone dipropionate on bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in nonatopic asthmatic subjects

Effect of Individual Patient Characteristics and Treatment Choices on Reliever Medication Use in Moderate-Severe Asthma: A Poisson Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

Even though increased use of reliever medication, including short-acting beta agonists (SABA), provides an indirect measure of symptom worsening, there have been limited efforts to assess how different patterns of reliever use correlate with symptom control and future risk of exacerbations. Here, we evaluate the effect of individual baseline characteristics on reliever use in patients with moderate-severe asthma on regular maintenance therapy with fluticasone propionate (FP) or combination therapy with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR).

METHODS

A drug-disease model describing the number of 24-h puffs and overnight occasions was developed with data from five clinical studies (N = 6212). The model was implemented using a nonlinear mixed effects approach and a Poisson function, considering clinical and demographic baseline characteristics. Goodness of fit and model predictive performance were assessed. Heatmaps were created to summarise the effect of concurrent baseline factors on reliever utilisation.

RESULTS

The final model accurately described individual patterns of reliever use, which is significantly increased with time since diagnosis, smoking, higher Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score and higher body mass index (BMI) at baseline. Whilst the number of puffs decreases slowly after an initial drop relative to the start of treatment, exacerbating patients utilise significantly more reliever than those who do not exacerbate. The mean effect of FP/SAL (median dose: 250/50 μg BID) on reliever use was slightly higher than that of BUD/FOR (median dose: 160/4.5 μg BID), i.e. a 75.3% vs 69.3% reduction in reliever use, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of individual-level patient data in conjunction with a parametric approach enabled the characterisation of interindividual differences in the patterns of reliever use in patients with moderate-severe asthma. Taken together, individual demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as exacerbation history, can be considered an indicator of the degree of asthma control. High SABA reliever use suggests suboptimal clinical management of patients on maintenance therapy.

Challenging the paradigm

I read with interest the review by Bush and Pavord [1] regarding the suggestion that we should abandon “umbrella” diagnoses and rather we should address “treatable traits” when looking after patients with airways disease. Unfortunately, aspects of their proposal are only likely to add to, rather than reduce, the current confusion regarding management of these conditions. More importantly, it seems to include some potentially very dangerous recommendations.

While advocating for addressing “treatable traits” is admirable in that it reminds clinicians to consider the patient and not the disease, the use of this idea to promote dangerous changes in practice should be challenged.https://bit.ly/30VkP8Q

Precision Medicine and Childhood Asthma: A Guide for the Unwary

Many thousands of articles relating to asthma appear in medical and scientific journals each year, yet there is still no consensus as to how the condition should be defined. Some argue that the condition does not exist as an entity and that the term should be discarded. The key feature that distinguishes it from other respiratory diseases is that airway smooth muscles, which normally vary little in length, have lost their stable configuration and shorten excessively in response to a wide range of stimuli. The lungs' and airways' limited repertoire of responses results in patients with very different pathologies experiencing very similar symptoms and signs. In the absence of objective verification of airway smooth muscle (ASM) lability, over and underdiagnosis are all too common. Allergic inflammation can exacerbate symptoms but given that worldwide most asthmatics are not atopic, these are two discrete conditions. Comorbidities are common and are often responsible for symptoms attributed to asthma. Common amongst these are a chronic bacterial dysbiosis and dysfunctional breathing. For progress to be made in areas of therapy, diagnosis, monitoring and prevention, it is essential that a diagnosis of asthma is confirmed by objective tests and that all co-morbidities are accurately detailed.

Asthma: A Loss of Post-natal Homeostatic Control of Airways Smooth Muscle With Regression Toward a Pre-natal State

The defining feature of asthma is loss of normal post-natal homeostatic control of airways smooth muscle (ASM). This is the key feature that distinguishes asthma from all other forms of respiratory disease. Failure to focus on impaired ASM homeostasis largely explains our failure to find a cure and contributes to the widespread excessive morbidity associated with the condition despite the presence of effective therapies. The mechanisms responsible for destabilizing the normal tight control of ASM and hence airways caliber in post-natal life are unknown but it is clear that atopic inflammation is neither necessary nor sufficient. Loss of homeostasis results in excessive ASM contraction which, in those with poor control, is manifest by variations in airflow resistance over short periods of time. During viral exacerbations, the ability to respond to bronchodilators is partially or almost completely lost, resulting in ASM being "locked down" in a contracted state. Corticosteroids appear to restore normal or near normal homeostasis in those with poor control and restore bronchodilator responsiveness during exacerbations. The mechanism of action of corticosteroids is unknown and the assumption that their action is solely due to "anti-inflammatory" effects needs to be challenged. ASM, in evolutionary terms, dates to the earliest land dwelling creatures that required muscle to empty primitive lungs. ASM appears very early in embryonic development and active peristalsis is essential for the formation of the lungs. However, in post-natal life its only role appears to be to maintain airways in a configuration that minimizes resistance to airflow and dead space. In health, significant constriction is actively prevented, presumably through classic negative feedback loops. Disruption of this robust homeostatic control can develop at any age and results in asthma. In order to develop a cure, we need to move from our current focus on immunology and inflammatory pathways to work that will lead to an understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to ASM stability in health and how this is disrupted to cause asthma. This requires a radical change in the focus of most of "asthma research."

Therapeutic novelties of inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators in asthma

Orally inhaled agents are a key therapeutic class for treatment of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most effective anti-inflammatory treatment for asthma thus representing the first-line therapy and bronchodilators complement the effects of ICSs. A significant body of evidence indicates that addition of a β2-agonist to ICS therapy is more effective than increasing the dose of ICS monotherapy. In this paper, pharmacological features of available ICSs and bronchodilators will be reviewed with a focus on fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate combination which represents the one of the most powerful ICS acting together with the most rapid active LABA.

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway inflammation are key pathophysiological features of asthma. Bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) are objective tests for AHR that are clinically useful to aid in the diagnosis of asthma in both adults and children. BPTs can be either “direct” or “indirect,” referring to the mechanism by which a stimulus mediates bronchoconstriction. Direct BPTs refer to the administration of pharmacological agonist (e.g., methacholine or histamine) that act on specific receptors on the airway smooth muscle. Airway inflammation and/or airway remodeling may be key determinants of the response to direct stimuli. Indirect BPTs are those in which the stimulus causes the release of mediators of bronchoconstriction from inflammatory cells (e.g., exercise, allergen, mannitol). Airway sensitivity to indirect stimuli is dependent upon the presence of inflammation (e.g., mast cells, eosinophils), which responds to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Thus, there is a stronger relationship between indices of steroid-sensitive inflammation (e.g., sputum eosinophils, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide) and airway sensitivity to indirect compared to direct stimuli. Regular treatment with ICS does not result in the complete inhibition of responsiveness to direct stimuli. AHR to indirect stimuli identifies individuals that are highly likely to have a clinical improvement with ICS therapy in association with an inhibition of airway sensitivity following weeks to months of treatment with ICS. To comprehend the clinical utility of direct or indirect stimuli in either diagnosis of asthma or monitoring of therapeutic intervention requires an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of AHR and mechanisms of action of both stimuli.

Corticosteroid-sparing effect of chromoglycate sodium and nedocromil

The most appropiate management for bronchial asthma is the control of airway inflammation. Corticosteroids are the most effective anti-inflammatory drugs available, but they have a number of side effects; most of these are dose-dependent. In children, asthma control should be accomplished with low steroid doses possibly given by inhalation. In a double-bind placebo-controlled crossover study a group of children with mild to moderate asthma received NED 16 mg/day or BDP 400 μg/day. Values for FEV₁, PEF, symptoms use ofbronchodilators overlapped, whereas bronchial hyper-responsiveness assessed by histamine bronchoprovocation challenge was better with BDP than NED. In another case, one boy with high bronchial hyper-reactivity assessed by provocation test with hypertonic solution, experienced a significant improvement only after 2 weeks of therapy with Deflazacort (2 mg/Kg/day) followed by 4 months on combined treatment with NED (16 mg/day) and BDP (300 μ/day). Authors conclude that NED could have a steroidsparing effect over long-term use.

Cromoglycate and nedocromil: influence on airway reactivity

Although basic mechanisms of bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) are still incompletely understood, inflammation of airways is likely to play a fundamental role in modulating BHR in patients with asthma. The involvement of several inflammatory cells (eosinophils, mast cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, macrophages and platelets) and of bioactive mediators secreted by these cells in the pathogenesis of asthma is well documented. Sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium are two pharmacological agents which have anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory properties. Their clinical effectiveness in mild to moderate asthma, and the capacity to reduce BHR under different natural and experimental conditions, make them valuable drugs for maintenance therapy in patients with asthma.

Effects of fluticasone propionate on arachidonic acid metabolites in BAL-fluid and methacholine dose-response curves in non-smoking atopic asthmatics

Hyperresponsiveness of the airways to nonspecific stimuli is a characteristic feature of asthma. Airway responsiveness is usually characterized in terms of the position and shape of the dose–response curve to methacholine (MDR). In the study we have investigated the influence of fluticasone propionate (FP), a topically active glucocorticoid, on arachidonic acid (AA) metabolites in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid (i.e. TxB₂, PGE₂, PGD₂, 6kPGF_1α and LTC₄) on the one hand and MDR curves on the other hand. The effect of FP was studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design in 33 stable nonsmoking asthmatics; 16 patients received FP (500 μg b.i.d.) whereas 17 patients were treated with placebo. We found that the forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV₁ % predicted) increased, the log₂PC₂₀ methacholine increased and the plateau value (% fall in FEV₁) decreased after a 12 week treatment period. No changes in AA-metabolites could be determined after treatment except for PGD₂ which decreased nearly significantly (p = 0.058) within the FP treated group, whereas the change of PGD₂ differed significantly (p = 0.05) in the FP treated group from placebo. The levels of the other AA metabolites (i.e. TxB₂, PGE₂, 6kPGF_1α and LTC₄) remained unchanged after treatment and were not significantly different from the placebo group. Our results support the hypothesis that although FP strongly influences the position, the shape and also the maximum response plateau of the MDR curve, this effect is not mainly achieved by influence on the level of AA metabolites. Other pro-inflammatory factors may be of more importance for the shape of the MDR curve. It is suggested that these pro-inflammatory factors are downregulated by FP.

The dynamic face of respiratory research: understanding the effect of airway disease on a lung in constant motion

The lungs are in a constant state of motion. The dynamic nature of tidal breathing, whereby cycles of pressure changes across the lungs cause the chest wall, lung tissue and airways to repeatedly expand and contract, ventilates the lung tissue and allows respiration to occur. However, these regular cycles of tidal inspirations and expirations are punctuated by breaths of differing volumes, most particularly periodic deep inspirations. In normal, healthy subjects, these deep inspirations have a dual effect in reducing airway responsiveness. Firstly, deep inspirations taken under baseline conditions protect the airways against subsequent bronchoconstriction, termed DI bronchoprotection. Secondly, deep inspirations are able to dramatically reverse bronchoconstriction. The ability for deep inspirations to reverse bronchoconstriction appears to be due to both the ability to dilate the airways with a full inspiration to total lung capacity (TLC) and the rate at which the airways re-narrow once tidal breathing is resumed. Deep inspiration reversal is reduced in subjects with asthma and is due both to a reduced ability to dilate the airways as well as an increase in the rate of re-narrowing. On the other hand, DI bronchoprotection is completely absent in asthma. Although the mechanisms behind these abnormalities remain unclear, the inability for deep inspirations to both protect against and fully reverse bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma appears critical in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness. As such, determining the pathophysiology responsible for the malfunction of deep inspirations in asthma remains critical to understanding the disease and is likely to pave the way for novel therapeutic targets.

The importance of airway remodelling in the natural course of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is associated with airflow limitation and increased decline in lung function. The underlying mechanism for this was probably that persisting inflammation leads to remodelling of the airways.

OBJECTIVES

To review the importance of different factors which are related to airflow limitation and lung function decline in asthma.

METHODS

Case report and literature review.

RESULTS

Asthma severity, smoking, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and eosinophil inflammation were the variables that were most convincingly related to decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) in asthma. Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids probably decreased the rate of FEV(1) decline, although this was more uncertain because of the lack of randomised double blind studies that show such an effect. Progress in the field of the genetics of asthma may, in the near future, elucidate the role of gene-environment interaction in lung function decline in asthma.

CONCLUSION

Regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroids may partly have a beneficial effect on airway remodelling in asthma. Improved understanding of the processes leading to airway remodelling is, however, important in order to prevent a large number of asthmatics from developing irreversible airflow obstruction.

Improvement in bronchodilation following deep inspiration after a course of high-dose oral prednisone in asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilation following deep inspiration is usually impaired in patients with asthma. This might be due to changes in airway mechanics in the presence of inflammation or structural changes within the airways. Although inhaled corticosteroid treatment has been shown to improve airway responses to deep inspiration in patients with asthma, airway inflammation can persist despite inhaled corticosteroid treatment, and thus could still influence the airway mechanics during deep breaths. We hypothesized that oral steroid treatment further optimizes deep inspiration-induced bronchodilation in clinically stable asthmatic patients who are receiving therapy with inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Twenty-four atopic patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma (FEV1, > 70% predicted; provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 [PC20], < 8 mg/mL), who were treated with 250 to 2,000 mug of beclomethasone-dipropionate or equivalent, participated in a parallel-design, double-blind study. Before and after treatment with 0.5 mg/kg/d prednisone or placebo for 14 days, a methacholine challenge was performed. Deep inspiration-induced bronchodilation was measured by the ratio of flow at 40% of FVC on the flow-volume curve after maximal inspiration/flow at 40% of FVC on the flow-volume curve after partial (60% of FVC) inspiration (M/P ratio).

RESULTS

The M/P ratio significantly increased from a mean of 1.31 (range, 1.0 to 1.7) to 1.49 (range, 1.1 to 2.3) in the prednisone group. Interestingly, the improvement in the M/P ratio did not correlate with an accompanying significant increase in PC20 for methacholine (mean change, 1.02; SD doubling dose, 0.97) and a decrease in exhaled nitric oxide (mean change, 14 parts per billion [ppb]; SD, 33.4 ppb).

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic antiinflammatory treatment in addition to maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids increases bronchodilation by deep inspiration in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. This suggests that residual inflammation impairs airway mechanics in asthma patients.

Nedocromil sodium for chronic asthma in children

BACKGROUND

Currently inhaled corticosteroids are the main stay in the maintenance treatment of chronic asthma in children. Although inhaled corticosteroids play a crucial role in the management of childhood asthma, the long-term side effects of inhaled corticosteroids used in the management of chronic asthma in children are not clearly known.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to compare the safety and efficacy of inhaled nedocromil sodium with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma in children.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane airway group trials register, Cochrane controlled trials register, Current contents, review articles, reference lists of articles. We also contacted the drug manufacturer and primary authors for additional citations. We also searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings. The last search was carried out in October 2004

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo controlled trials comparing nedocromil sodium to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma in children (0 to 18 years).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials (twelve parallel group studies; three crossover trials recruiting 1422 children (837 males and 585 females)) were included. The studies were generally of good methodological quality. Two large long term studies used nedocromil for six months and four to six years and showed conflicting results in symptom free days. Short term studies (duration between 4 weeks to 12 weeks) showed that nedocromil sodium produced some improvement in a number of efficacy measures compared to placebo including FEV(1), FVC, FEV(1) % predicted, PC20 FEV(1), evening PEF and symptom scores. The parent's assessment of efficacy was in favour of nedocromil (odds ratio (OR) 0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.8). Nedocromil sodium has a good safety profile. The only significant side effect observed was unpleasant taste. There was little evidence for a clinically dose response effect and only a few studies recruited participants with severe asthma.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A limited number of small studies have shown that nedocromil is of benefit in improving lung function and some measures of symptoms, but the evidence with regard to the primary outcome of the review was conflicting. Two long-term trials did not show consistent effects on lung function outcomes, whereas several small short-term trials have shown benefit in these outcomes. Differing severities at baseline may explain this difference with milder participants experiencing less benefit, although the discrepancy between study findings may also reflect publication bias. Nedocromil sodium is associated with a very good safety profile with no significant short term or long- term adverse side effects. Although nedocromil may have advantages over inhaled corticosteroids in terms of side effects, there is a need for head to head trials of nedocromil and inhaled corticosteroids to establish whether asthma control is similar, especially in mild asthma. It is not yet clear where nedocromil should sit in relation to other therapies in the treatment of asthma in children.

Substituted coumarins as potent 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors

Leukotriene biosynthesis inhibitors have potential as therapeutic agents for asthma and inflammatory diseases. A novel series of substituted coumarin derivatives has been synthesized and the structure-activity relationship was evaluated with respect to their ability to inhibit the formation of leukotrienes via the human 5-lipoxygenase enzyme.

Risk factors associated with occurrence of clinical deterioration after cessation of beclomethasone in asthmatic children and adolescents

Despite recent advances in the treatment of asthma using inhaled corticosteroids, the outcome for children after its discontinuation is not well known. This study aims to analyze the rate of clinical deterioration and related risk factors after beclomethasone withdrawal in asthmatic children and adolescents. One hundred two subjects with moderate or severe persistent asthma, who had started treatment with beclomethasone at the age of 2-11 years, were followed for 1 year after drug cessation. Depending on the occurrence of clinical deterioration, they were allocated to two groups, and then comparisons were made with respect to clinical criteria and skin prick test results. Statistical analysis was undertaken by using descriptive statistics and Cox's regression model. Treatment with beclomethasone had to be restarted in 28 patients (27.5%) because of relapse. There was a significant association with the risk of clinical deterioration with mother's history of asthma [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.01-4.76, p = 0.04] and father's history of asthma and/or allergic rhinitis (HR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.06-5.26, p = 0.03). A period shorter than 6 months without symptoms before prophylaxis cessation (HR = 2.26, 95% CI = 0.98-5.26, p = 0.05) and atopy (RH = 2.75, 95% CI = 0.94-7.69, p = 0.06) were also associated with risk of relapse but with marginal statistical significance. Results suggest that clinical benefits were maintained for at least 1 year in the majority of the children after the cessation of prophylaxis. Special attention must be given to those with atopy and a parental history of asthma and rhinitis because of the risk of clinical deterioration.

An update of the leukotriene modulators for the treatment of asthma

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease involving many cells and mediators. Chronic inflammation constitutes an important predisposing condition for airway remodelling with secondary irreversible airflow obstruction. Current approaches for asthma treatment involve many classes of drugs, adequate patient education for their correct use, environmental exposure control and daily monitoring of pulmonary function. Unfortunately, the use of multiple therapies complicates treatment regimens, thus leading to a reduced compliance to therapy. Available evidence from randomised clinical trials and real-word experience derived from managing patients with asthma justifies a broader role for leukotriene receptor antagonist drugs in asthma management than that recommended in the National Asthma Education and Prevention Programme and National Health Lung and Blood Institute Treatment Guidelines. While a low dose of inhaled corticosteroids remains the reference drug as a controller in mild-to-moderate persistent asthma, oral therapy with an leukotriene-receptor antagonist drug represents a good option providing the clinical efficacy requested in common clinical practice. For this reason the recent Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines allocate this drug to the second and third steps of asthma treatment.

Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has been, together with inhaled budesonide, the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma for many years. A range of new prophylactic therapies for asthma is becoming available and BDP has been reformulated using a hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) propellant which is free from chlorofluorocarbon (CFC).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: (1) Compare the efficacy of BDP with placebo with both CFC and HFA propellants in the treatment of chronic asthma. (2) Explore the possibility that a dose response relationship exists for BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma. (3) To provide the best estimate of the efficacy of BDP as a benchmark for evaluation of newer asthma therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches were current as of January 2003.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group design trials for a minimum period of four weeks, in children and adults comparing CFC-BDP or HFA-BDP with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. We analysed data with RevMan Analyses 1.0.2.

MAIN RESULTS

60 studies recruiting 6542 participants met the inclusion criteria. CFC-BDP (57 studies): In non-oral steroid treated patients, at doses of 400 mcg/day or less CFC-BDP produced significant improvements from baseline in a number of efficacy measures compared with placebo, including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 360 ml (95% CI 260 to 460); FEV1 (% predicted) WMD 12.41% (95% CI 8.18 to 16.64) and morning peak expiratory flow rate (am PEF) WMD 35.95 L/min (95% CI 27.85 to 44.04). BDP also led to reductions in rescue beta-2 agonist use compared with placebo of -2.32 puffs/d (95% CI -2.55 to -2.09) and reduced the relative risk (RR) of trial withdrawal due to an asthma exacerbation 0.25 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.51). Subgroup analyses based on treatment duration provide support to the proposal that a treatment period of greater than four weeks is required to realise a fuller treatment effect. In oral steroid treated patients BDP led to significantly greater reductions in oral prednisolone use WMD -4.91 mg/d (95% CI -5.88 to -3.94 mg/d) and greater likelihood of withdrawing oral steroid treatment RR 8.02 (95% CI 3.23 to 19.92). HFA-BDP (3 studies): In non-oral steroid-treated patients, HFA-BDP was significantly more effective than placebo in improving FEV1, morning and evening PEF, FEF25 to 75%, reduced asthma symptoms and beta2-agonists daily consumption. Significant effects for such outcomes were apparent after six weeks of treatment. In oral steroid treated patients, HFA-BDP improved significantly FEV1 and am PEF. The summary estimates for these outcomes suggested a high level of heterogeneity, and divergent aims of the studies may contribute to the variation we observed. Limited data on adverse events were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has quantified the efficacy of CFC-BDP and HFA-BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma and strongly supports its use. Current asthma guidelines recommend titration of dose to individual patient response, but the published data provide little support for dose titration above 400 mcg/d in patients with mild to moderate asthma. There are insufficient data to draw any conclusions concerning dose-response in people with severe asthma.

The Effects of Long-Term Administration of Sodium Nedocromil on Bronchial Hypereactivity

The effect of long-term treatment with sodium nedocromil on airway hypereactivity was investigated in two groups of 20 patients each. Group I patients presented with allergic asthma while Group II patients presented with intrinsic asthma. For each subject of the two groups, the base FEV1 was measured and nebulized methacholine was administrated in consecutively higher concentrations until a decrease in FEV1 of >20 % was observed. Following measurement, all patients included in the study were treated with 12 mg of sodium nedocromil per day for 12 months. At the end of the treatment, bronchial hyperreactivity was evaluated for a second time by administering the same dosage of methacholine that originally produced a decline in FEV1 of >20 %. In Group I patients (allergic asthma) mean FEV1 was 3126 ml, before challenge, while after methacholine challenge FEV1 was 2400ml. Following 1-year of sodium nedocromil administration the FEV1 was 2601ml (P<0.05). Before treatment, the mean fall in FEV1, following methacholine challenge, was 23.67% while following a 1-year-long sodium nedocromil administration this value reduced to 15.70% (P<0.05). Correspondingly, PC20 was 5.59 while after sodium nedocromil administration it increased to 11.66 (P<0.05). In Group II patients (intrinsic asthma) mean FEV1 was 2750 ml, before challenge, while after methacholine challenge FEV1 was 2066ml. Following 1-year of sodium nedocromil administration the FEV1 was 2223ml (P<0.05). Before treatment, the mean fall in FEV1, following methacholine challenge, was 27.65 % while following a 1-year-long sodium nedocromil administration this value reduced to 21.92 % (P<0.05). Correspondingly, PC20 was 5.91 while after sodium nedocromil administration it increased to 6.19 (P<0.05). The results suggest a positive effect of long-term sodium nedocromil administration in bronchial hyperreactivity for both groups of patients.

The role of leukotrienes in asthma

Leukotrienes (LT), both the cysteinyl LTs, LTC(4), LTD(4) and LTE(4), as well as LTB(4) have been implicated in the clinical course, physiologic changes, and pathogenesis of asthma. The cysteinyl LTs are potent bronchoconstrictors, which have additional effects on blood vessels, mucociliary clearance and eosinophilic inflammation. In addition, the cysteinyl LTs are formed from cells commonly associated with asthma, including eosinophils and mast cells. LTB(4), whose role is less well defined in asthma, is a potent chemoattractant (and cell activator) for both neutrophils and eosinophils. In the last 5 years, drugs have been developed which block the actions or formation of these mediators. Clinical and physiologic studies have demonstrated that they are modest short-acting bronchodilators, with sustained improvement in FEV(1) occurring in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials for up to 6 months. These drugs have demonstrated efficacy in preventing bronchoconstriction caused by LTs, allergen, exercise and other agents. Additionally, there are multiple published studies which have demonstrated improvement in asthma symptoms, beta agonist use and, importantly, exacerbations of asthma in both adults and children. Comparison studies with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) suggest that ICS are superior to leukotriene modifying drugs in moderate persistent asthma. However, several published studies now suggest that leukotriene modifying drugs are effective when added to ongoing therapy with ICS, either to improve current symptoms or to decrease the dose of ICS required to maintain control. While an anti-inflammatory effect is suggested, longer-term, earlier intervention, studies are needed to determine whether these compounds will have any effect on the natural history of the disease.

Management of asthma in adults: current therapy and future directions

Asthma is increasing in prevalence worldwide and results in significant use of healthcare resources. Although most patients with asthma can be adequately treated with inhaled corticosteroids, an important number of patients require additional therapy and an increasing number of options are available. A further minority of patients develop severe persistent asthma which remains difficult to manage despite current pharmacological therapies. This review discusses the various treatment options currently available for each stage of asthma severity, highlights some of the limitations of current management, and outlines directions which may improve the management of asthma in the future.

6. Asthma

The increasing incidence and prevalence of asthma in many parts of the world continue to make it a global health concern. The heterogeneous nature of the clinical manifestations and therapeutic responses of asthma in both adult and pediatric patients indicate that it may be more of a syndrome rather than a specific disease entity. Numerous triggering factors including viral infections, allergen and irritant exposure, and exercise, among others, complicate both the acute and chronic treatment of asthma. Therapeutic intervention has focused on the appreciation that airway obstruction in asthma is composed of both bronchial smooth muscle spasm and variable degrees of airway inflammation characterized by edema, mucus secretion, and the influx of a variety of inflammatory cells. The presence of only partial reversibility of airflow obstruction in some patients indicates that structural remodeling of the airways may also occur over time. Choosing appropriate medications depends on the disease severity (intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent, severe persistent), extent of reversibility, both acutely and chronically, patterns of disease activity (exacerbations related to viruses, allergens, exercise, etc), and the age of onset (infancy, childhood, adulthood).

Effects of varying doses of fluticasone propionate on the physiology and bronchial wall immunopathology in mild-to-moderate asthma

OBJECTIVES

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are typically associated with a flat dose-response curve when traditional efficacy values are examined (eg, FEV(1)). The aim of the present study was to investigate if a dose-response relationship exists for lung function and inflammatory cell numbers in bronchial biopsy specimens.

METHODS

Bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained from 36 patients randomized to receive 100 micro g, 500 microg, or 2,000 microg/d of fluticasone propionate (FP). Lung physiology and bronchial biopsies were performed at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Improvement in lung function and suppression of airway inflammation were optimal at a dose of 500 microg/d of FP. Significant changes from baseline following treatment were documented in FEV(1) (p = 0.02), forced expiratory flow (p = 0.002), FEV(1)/FVC (p = 0.007), provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)) [p = 0.02], T-cell numbers (p = 0.0005), activated eosinophils (p = 0.01), and numbers of macrophages (p = 0.01) in the group treated with 500 microg/d of FP. Comparison between groups administered different doses of FP failed to demonstrate a dose-response relationship for change from baseline in PC(20) (p = 0.43), any of the lung function parameters, T-cell numbers (p = 0.64), activated T cells (p = 0.46), eosinophils (p = 0.53), activated eosinophils (p = 0.48), or macrophage numbers (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

The apparent lack of a dose-response for ICS treatment in patients with asthma further validates the preferential use of add-on therapy over increasing the dose of ICS.

The role of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) are mediators released in asthma and are both direct bronchoconstrictors and proinflammatory substances that mediated several steps in the pathophysiology of chronic asthma, including inflammatory cells recruitment, vascular leakage, and possibly airway remodelling. Available evidence from clinical trials and real world experience derived from managing patients with asthma justifies a broader role for antiLTRAs in asthma management than that recommended in the National Asthma Education and Prevention Programm (NAEPP) and National Health Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) treatment guidelines. Leukotriene-receptor antagonist drugs (LTRAs) seem to be effective alternatives to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) either as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy that reduces the need for higher doses of ICS in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. LTRAs may be used as adjunctive therapy for al levels of disease severity because they are effective in combination with ICS during long-term maintenance therapy. The agents seem especially effective in preventing aspirin-induced asthma, exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and they may provide an additional advantage of reducing nasal congestion in patients with both asthma and rhinitis.

Effectiveness of montelukast versus budesonide on quality of life and bronchial reactivity in subjects with mild-persistent asthma

Insufficient data exist to evaluate the comparative effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) on airway inflammation and quality of life (QoL). The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of montelukast compared to budesonide at different doses on QoL and bronchial reactivity in mild-asthmatic adult patients. 45 subjects with bronchial asthma were randomly assigned to a different treatment and divided in 3 treatment groups: A: 400 mg of budesonide twice a day; B: 10 mg of montelukast daily; C: 10 mg of montelukast daily plus 400 mg of budesonide twice a day. At the beginning of the study and at the end of the treatment period (16 weeks) all patients underwent complete clinical evaluation, pulmonary function testing and methacholine challenge test (MCHt). In group A the increase from baseline was 153.4&amp;#x0025;, in group C was 133.2&amp;#x0025;, and in group B 247.7&amp;#x0025;, the latter increase being statistically significant compared to that in the other 2 groups (p&amp;#x003C; 0.005 Wilcoxon test). In all domains the improvement in quality of life in the group treated with montelukast (group B) was significantly greater than that in the group treated with both medications (group C): in particular, the improvement was consistent in the symptoms (p&amp;#x003C; 0.01) and emotions (p&amp;#x003C; 0.01) domains, and weaker in the physical activity (p&amp;#x003C; 0.05). A similar difference was observed between group B and A, but only in the symptoms (p&amp;#x003C;0.01), emotions (p&amp;#x003C;0.01), and environmental stimuli domains (p&amp;#x003C;0.05). The personal perception of their own disease is important for a correct therapeutic management of asthma. In order to optimize the treatment, a complete adherence of the patient to the treatment itself is required, to be achieved through simplification of therapeutic schedule and easy administration of medications. Montelukast may be considered a valid alternative in the treatment of mild-persistent asthma, both for the clinical and functional benefits and for the great advantage of the once-daily dosage, which consistently improves the compliance with the chronic treatment of the disease.

Irreversible airway obstruction in childhood asthma? A clinician's viewpoint

Even though childhood asthma is assumed to comprise reversible airway obstruction, some children develop irreversible airway obstruction (not reversed by a bronchodilator or corticosteroids); this may be due to inflammation that has caused remodeling. Lately, it has been claimed that in the absence of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, most patients will develop progressive irreversible obstruction. Several studies culminating with the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study, which was the first randomized placebo-controlled prospective long-term study designed to test for irreversible obstruction, did not show the development of such progressive irreversible obstruction. Nevertheless, deterioration in pulmonary function does occur in some patients, probably due to inadequate anti-inflammatory treatment, and possibly also due to maintenance adrenergic treatment. Most previous studies concentrated on forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), a test assessing mostly large airway obstruction. More studies are needed to investigate the presence of small airway obstruction.

Balancing Safety and Efficacy in Pediatric Asthma Management

In the treatment of childhood asthma, balancing safety and efficacy is key to achieving optimal therapeutic benefit. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), because of their efficacy, remain a cornerstone in managing persistent pediatric asthma, but also are associated with significant adverse effects, including growth suppression. Consequently, careful attention must be given to balancing their safety and efficacy, which should include an understanding of airway patency and systemic absorption (dose, disease severity, propellant and lipophilicity of inhalant), bioavailability (inhalation technique, propellant, delivery devices, and hepatic first-pass metabolism), techniques for using minimum effective doses (dosing time, add-on therapy), and reduction of other exacerbating conditions (allergens, influenza, upper-respiratory diseases). The growth-suppressive effects of ICS may be most evident in children with: 1) mild asthma because the relatively high airway patency may facilitate increased levels of deposition and steroid absorption in more distal airways, and 2) evening dosing that may reduce nocturnal growth hormone activity. A step-down approach targeting a minimum effective dose and once-daily morning dosing is suggested for achieving the most acceptable safety/efficacy balance with ICS. The achievement of regular, safe, and correct ICS use requires significant knowledge and time for both caregiver and patient. Chromones, methylxanthines, long-acting β-agonists, and leukotriene receptor antagonists are currently available alternatives to ICS for the control of persistent childhood asthma. Chromones are safe but, like methylxanthines, are difficult to use and frequently result in compromised effectiveness. Long-acting β-agonists are not recommended as monotherapy for persistent asthma. Several factors that support leukotriene receptor antagonists as a therapeutic option for mild-to-moderate persistent pediatric asthma include established efficacy, good safety profiles, and simple, oral dosing. Physicians must evaluate and compare the balance of safety and efficacy for each agent to determine the appropriate asthma therapy for individual patients.

History and future perspectives of treating asthma as a systemic and small airways disease

Asthma is an inflammatory disorder in which the small airways of the lung play an important role. There is also evidence for the systemic nature of asthma. No current method adequately measures small airways function alone. Therefore, a combination of functional and clinical parameters should be used to ensure that patients with asthma are adequately treated with due consideration of the small airways. Previously therapeutic strategies have focused on bronchodilation and attenuation of airway inflammation. While early oral therapies had the advantage of reaching the small airways and treating the systemic aspect of asthma, they were associated with serious side-effects. Inhaled therapies were therefore developed to limit these effects. However, inhaled therapies have the disadvantage of limited penetration into the peripheral airways and an inability to treat the systemic component of asthma. They are also associated with local and systemic side-effects. The future for asthma treatment is likely to be a systemically administered medication with few side-effects targeting disease-specific mediators. The leukotriene receptor antagonists and anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies are examples of such therapies and the emergence of other new strategies is awaited.

The pathobiologic implications for treatment. Old and new strategies in the treatment of chronic asthma

An increased understanding of the pathobiology of asthma has led to improved treatment for chronic asthma. This article discusses the old and new strategies of asthma therapy based on a pathobiologic approach. Therapeutic agents discussed include beta-adrenergic agonists, methylxanthines, corticosteroids, cromolyn, nedocromil, leukotriene modifiers, and new investigational agents.

Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial)

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. Leukotrienes play a key role in asthma pathophysiology, and since pro-inflammatory leukotrienes are poorly suppressed by corticosteroids it seems rational to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) when a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not provide sufficient disease control. Long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatment represents an alternative to LTRAs and both treatment modalities have been shown to provide additional disease control when added to corticosteroid treatment. To compare the relative clinical benefits of adding either a LTRA or a LABA to asthma patients inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 48-week study will be initiated at approximately 120 centres throughout Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific region in early 2000. The study will compare the oral LTRA montelukast with the inhaled LABA salmeterol, each administered on a background of inhaled fluticasone, on asthma attacks, quality of life, lung function, eosinophil levels, healthcare utilization, and safety, in approximately 1200 adult asthmatic patients. The requirements for study enrollment include a history of asthma, FEV1 or PEFR values between 50% and 90% of the predicted value together with > or = 12% improvement in FEV1 after beta-agonist administration, a minimum pre-determined level of asthma symptoms and daily beta-agonist medication. The study will include a 4-week run-in period, during which patients previously taking inhaled corticosteroids are switched to open-label fluticasone (200 microg daily), followed by a 48-week double-blind, treatment period in which patients continuing to experience abnormal pulmonary function and daytime symptoms are randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily) and salmeterol placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (100 microg daily) and montelukast placebo. All patients will continue with inhaled fluticasone (200 microg daily). During the study, asthma attacks, overnight asthma symptoms, and morning peak expiratory flow rate will be assessed using patient diary cards; quality of life will also be assessed using an asthma-specific quality-of life questionnaire. The results of this study are expected to provide physicians with important clinical evidence to help them make a rational and logical treatment choice for asthmatic patients experiencing breakthrough symptoms on inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled beclomethasone versus placebo for chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) has been, together with inhaled budesonide, the mainstay of anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma for many years. A range of new prophylactic therapies for asthma is becoming available and BDP is now frequently used as the reference treatment against which these newer agents are being compared.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: a) Compare the efficacy of BDP with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. b) Explore the possibility that a dose response relationship exists for BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma. c) To provide the best estimate of the efficacy of BDP as a benchmark for evaluation of newer asthma therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register (1999) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and Glaxo Wellcome for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing BDP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer extracted data; authors were contacted to clarify missing information. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using Review Manager (Revman) 4.0.3 with Metaview 3.1.

MAIN RESULTS

52 studies were selected for inclusion (3459 subjects). The studies were generally of high methodological quality. In non-oral steroid treated patients, BDP produced significant improvements in a number of efficacy measures compared to placebo including FEV1 weighted mean difference (WMD) 340ml (95% CI 190-500ml); FEV1 (% predicted) WMD 6% (95% CI 0.4 to 11.5%) and morning PEFR WMD 50 L/min (95% CI 8 to 92 L/min). BDP also led to reductions in rescue beta2 agonist use compared to placebo WMD 1.75 puffs/d (95% CI 1.4 to 2.4 puffs/d) and reduced the likelihood of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation relative risk (RR) 0.26 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.43). In oral steroid treated patients BDP led to significantly greater reductions in oral prednisolone use WMD 5 mg/d (95% CI 4 to 6 mg/d) and a higher likelihood of discontinuing oral prednisolone RR 0.54 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.67). There was little evidence for a clincially worthwhile dose response effect, but few studies recruited patients with more severe asthma.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review has quantified the efficacy of BDP in the treatment of chronic asthma and strongly supports its use. Current asthma guidelines recommend titration of dose to individual patient response, but the published data provide little support for dose titration above 400 mcg/d in patients with mild to moderate asthma. There are insufficient data to draw any conclusions concerning dose-response in patients with severe disease.

Immunosuppressive and cytotoxic effects of furosemide on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that children with mild asthma have a modest improvement in their pulmonary function tests after aerosolized furosemide. The mechanism of action is not known. The observation that furosemide possesses a similar profile of protection as sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium suggests that furosemide may inhibit mediator production and release.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the in vitro effects of furosemide on cytokine release from normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) induced by E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated by density gradient centrifugation, stimulated with LPS and incubated at 37 degrees C with varying concentrations of furosemide, hydrocortisone, sodium cromoglycate, and nedocromil sodium for 24 hours. Supernatants were extracted and study for levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8). Intracellular IL-6 and TNF-alpha concentrations were also measured by cell cytometry. Cell viability was examined using XTT cell proliferation test and-measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction in levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 at a furosemide concentration of 0.5 x 10(-2) M and a reduction in IL-8 levels at 10(-2) M. This inhibition was comparable to that found with equivalent molar concentrations of hydrocortisone. These findings were also confirmed with measurements of intracellular IL-6 and TNF-alpha by cell cytometry. High concentration of furosemide at 10(-2) M caused significant cellular cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that furosemide may exhibit an anti-inflammatory effect. Specifically, the addition of furosemide resulted in decreased production of cytokines. This effect may be due to an immunosuppressive activity on monocytes as well as a direct cytotoxic effect at high furosemide concentrations.

How do we monitor asthma control?

The present consensus on asthma management includes avoidance of triggers, education, regular follow-up, and an action plan that relies on symptoms and lung function measurements for the monitoring of disease severity. Inclusion of objective measurements for monitoring seems to be important because patients and physicians may not always recognize asthma symptoms or their severity. However, the additional value of monitoring peak flow and symptoms in guiding asthma therapy has not been well established. Furthermore, it can be questioned whether a treatment strategy which is solely based on optimizing symptoms and lung function leads to optimal control of asthma in each individual patient, since airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airways inflammation may persist. The chronicity of such abnormalities may lead to airways remodelling, thereby worsening the long-term outcome of asthma. It has been shown that AHR provides prognostic information on asthma control, because it can serve as a valuable noninvasive surrogate marker of airways inflammation when added to the guides of asthma therapy. A limited increase in dose of inhaled steroids, instead of applying an increased dose indiscriminately, can be successfully tailored to the needs of the individual patient based on the degree of AHR. Such a strategy leads to both a better clinical outcome and a better histologic outcome. The present worldwide effort is to find alternative markers of airways inflammation in asthma that can be easily implemented in routine practice. In the near future, longitudinal studies will determine which parameter is potentially most useful in guiding asthma management.

Lung function and sputum characteristics of patients with severe asthma during an induced exacerbation by double-blind steroid withdrawal

Some patients with severe asthma are difficult to control and suffer from frequent exacerbations, whereas others remain stable with anti-inflammatory therapy. To investigate mechanisms of exacerbations, we compared 13 patients 20 to 51 yr of age (11 female, two male) with difficult-to-control asthma (two or more exacerbations during the previous year) and 15 patients 20 to 47 yr of age (13 female, two male) with severe but stable asthma (no exacerbations) after matching for sex, age, atopy, lung function, airway responsiveness, and medication. Exacerbations were induced by double-blind, controlled tapering of inhaled corticosteroids (fluticasone propionate) at weekly intervals. FEV1, airway responsiveness for methacholine (PC20MCh) and hypertonic saline (HYP slope), eosinophils and soluble markers (ECP, albumin, IL-6, IL-8) in induced sputum were assessed at baseline and during exacerbation (peak flow < 60% of personal best), or after 5 wk if no exacerbation occurred. Steroid tapering caused a decrease (mean +/- SEM) in FEV1 (12.1 +/- 3.1% pred; p = 0.045), PC20MCh (2.1 +/- 0.4 doubling dose; p = 0.004) and HYP slope (1.7 +/- 0.3 doubling dose; p = 0.001), and an increase in sputum eosinophils (10 +/- 3%; p = 0.008) and soluble markers for the two groups combined, without significant differences between the groups. Patients with difficult-to-control asthma had more exacerbations than did the stable asthmatics during both steroid tapering (7 versus 2; p = 0.022) and corticosteroid treatment (6 versus 0; p = 0.003). Exacerbations during steroid treatment in the patients with difficult-to-control asthma were associated with a decrease in FEV1 and PC20MCh, but not in HYP slope or increase in sputum eosinophils. We conclude that tapering of inhaled corticosteroids induces a rapid, reversible flare-up of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Patients with difficult-to-control asthma may develop exacerbations despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, which appear to have an eosinophil-independent mechanism. This implies that assessment of the nature of exacerbations may contribute to improved treatment for these patients.

Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial responsiveness in patients with "corticosteroid naive" mild asthma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are the most efficacious anti-inflammatory drugs in asthma. International guidelines also advocate the early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in corticosteroid naive patients. A study was undertaken to assess the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with corticosteroid naive asthma by conventional meta-analysis.

METHODS

A Medline search of papers published between January 1966 and June 1998 was performed and 11 papers were selected in which the patients had no history of treatment with inhaled or oral corticosteroids. Bronchial responsiveness to bronchoconstricting agents was considered as the main outcome parameter. Doubling doses (DD) of histamine or methacholine were calculated.

RESULTS

The total effect size of inhaled corticosteroids (average daily dose 1000 microg) versus placebo in the 11 studies was +1.16 DD (95% confidence interval (CI) +0.76 to +1.57). When only the eight short term studies (2-8 weeks) were analysed the effect size of the bronchoconstricting agent was +0.91 DD (95% CI +0.65 to +1.16). No relationship was found between the dose of inhaled corticosteroid used and the effect on bronchial responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis in patients with corticosteroid naive asthma indicates that, on average, high doses of inhaled corticosteroids decrease bronchial hyperresponsiveness in 2-8 weeks. It remains unclear whether there is a dose-response relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Inflammation in asthma: the cornerstone of the disease and target of therapy

Asthma is a chronic disease associated with variable levels of airflow obstruction. Considerable evidence has been obtained to show that airway inflammation is a major factor in the pathogenesis of asthma in associated bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and in the level of disease severity. The inflammatory pattern in asthma is multicellular in nature, with mast cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, T lymphocytes, and epithelial cells participating in the response. Furthermore, it is known that mediators, cytokines, and chemokines from these cells contribute to the orchestration of the inflammatory process. Because airway inflammation appears to be a critical etiologic feature of asthma, it has become the target of therapy. In this review the features of airway inflammation will be examined, and the effect of therapeutic agents on markers of airway injury will be discussed. Establishing, understanding, and finally controlling the features of airway inflammation have given insight to disease pathogenesis and the effectiveness of various treatments. The integral role of inhaled corticosteroids in modifying the complex inflammatory component of asthma will be explored, with special focus on the high degree of efficacy associated with this treatment--vis-á-vis other therapeutic agents--in preventing or blocking specific proinflammatory markers.

Alternative agents for anti-inflammatory treatment of asthma

Recent guidelines for the management of asthma have emphasized the role of inflammation in persistent asthma. Medications with anti-inflammatory properties are recommended as the primary long-term-control medications. Of the available choices of long-term-control medications, inhaled corticosteroids are the preferred medication. A literature review of the available studies supports this recommendation of inhaled corticosteroids as the preferred agents for long-term control. Other long-term-control medications--specifically nedocromil, theophylline, and leukotriene modifiers, but not cromolyn--can supplement the beneficial effect of inhaled corticosteroids on pulmonary function and symptom control. Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists can also provide an additive clinical benefit to inhaled corticosteroids on symptom control and pulmonary function, but they do not provide additional anti-inflammatory effect. Extended long-term studies of each of the long-term-control medications with anti-inflammatory actions are needed to assess their specific effect on airway remodeling and on the natural history of asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids and the prevention of readmission to hospital for asthma

Despite the proven efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in reducing airway inflammation and their increasing use for the treatment of asthma since the mid 1980s, hospitalization for asthma has been increasing in frequency in several countries. Only few studies, reporting contradictory results, have investigated the role of inhaled corticosteroids in the prevention of hospitalizations for asthma. Using a cohort of 2,059 hospitalized asthmatic patients between 5 and 54 yr of age, we estimated the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in preventing a readmission to hospital for asthma as a function of the duration of therapy. The cohort was selected from the databases of Saskatchewan Health from 1977 to 1993. The rate ratio (RR) of a readmission for asthma varied with duration of regular therapy with inhaled corticosteroids. During the first 15 d of regular therapy, users of inhaled corticosteroids were as likely as nonusers of these medications to be readmitted for asthma with a RR of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.8). Subjects treated regularly with inhaled corticosteroids for at least 16 d and as long as 6 mo were 40% less likely to be readmitted for asthma (RR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9), while after 6 mo of regular treatment the protective effect disappeared (RR = 1.3; 95% CI: 0.7-2.4). We conclude that regular therapy with inhaled corticosteroids can substantially reduce the risk of a readmission for asthma after only 15 d of use. Confounding by severity appears as the most likely explanation for the disappearance of the beneficial effect after 6 mo of regular therapy.

Short-term effects of budesonide, nedocromil sodium and salmeterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND

The effects of budesonide, nedocromil sodium and salmeterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness were determined over a period of 3 weeks.

METHODS

Forty-three asymptomatic children (22 male, 21 female, aged 7-17 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma were evaluated. The study was placebo-controlled and double-blind. At the beginning the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured and a methacholine challenge was performed to determine PC20 (provocative concentration of inhaled methacholine required to reduce FEV1 by 20%). The patients in group I (n = 12), group II (n = 10), group III (n = 11), and group IV (n = 10) inhaled 200 micrograms of budesonide, 2 mg of nedocromil sodium, 25 micrograms of salmeterol and a placebo, respectively, twice a day over the period of 3 weeks. Then the methacholine PC20 values of all patients were measured again and the results were compared statistically with their previous values.

RESULTS

The statistical data revealed that the methacholine doses in PC20 before and after treatment were different in group I (P < 0.01). However, these differences were not statistically significant in the other groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The short term usage of budesonide decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness, but nedocromil sodium and salmeterol in the given dises do not affect bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Dose-related response to inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with methacholine-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Dose-response relationships with inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma have been difficult to establish. A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of low doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Methacholine challenge testing was conducted in addition to measurement of traditional efficacy variables. After a single-blind screening period, 138 patients > or = 12 years of age were randomly assigned to receive placebo, FP 50 microg, or FP 100 microg, twice daily for 8 weeks. The results of methacholine challenge testing averaged over all visits favored FP 200 microg/day over placebo and FP 100 microg/day (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences between placebo and FP 100 microg/day. Mean changes from baseline to endpoint favored each dose of FP over placebo based on forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), patient-measured peak expiratory flow (PEF), total symptom scores, and rescue bronchodilator use (p < 0.05); there were no differences in these parameters between the two doses of FP. The addition of methacholine challenge testing allowed definition of a dose-response relationship that was not apparent with traditional efficacy variables.

New approaches to anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma

Currently, corticosteroids are the therapy of choice for the inflammatory component of asthma. This class of drug provides powerful anti-inflammatory effects in most patients; however, these effects are not specific and in some cases may result in serious side effects. Also, many patients have difficulty adhering to therapy with inhaled forms of these drugs, which are administered by metered-dose inhalers up to several times per day. There are several other therapies that provide potential anti-inflammatory effects, but they are of low efficacy, with little definitive anti-inflammatory effect. While efforts are currently under way to improve corticosteroid therapy, other directions include the development of targeted anti-inflammatory agents. For example, the leukotrienes, a family of inflammatory mediators that have been shown to enhance bronchoconstriction and airway mucus secretion, have been the focus of numerous investigations. Specific leukotriene receptor antagonists and synthesis inhibitors have been developed and are currently showing promise in clinical trials; one leukotriene receptor antagonist (zafirlukast) and one 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (zileuton) were recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of asthma.

Comparison of inhaled corticosteroids

OBJECTIVE

To review the comparative studies evaluating both efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in the management of asthma. Specifically, comparative clinical trials are evaluated that allow clinicians to determine relative potencies of the various inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

A critical review was performed of the published clinical trials, either as articles or abstracts, comparing the clinical efficacy or systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids. No a priori criteria were applied, as this was not a meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

In vitro measures of antiinflammatory activity of corticosteroids consistently demonstrate potency differences among the various corticosteroids. Traditionally, these in vitro measures have been used to develop new corticosteroids with greater topical activity. While no accepted direct measure of antiasthmatic antiinflammatory activity exists, clinical trials using surrogate measures (e.g., forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, symptom control) indicate that in vitro measures provide a relatively accurate assessment of antiasthmatic potency. The relative antiinflammatory potency of the inhaled corticosteroids is in the following rank order. flunisolide = triamcinolone acetonide < beclomethasone dipropionate = budesonide < fluticasone. Studies of systemic activity appear to confirm this relative order of potency. Currently, no evidence exists for greater efficacy for any of the inhaled corticosteroids when administered in their relative equipotent dosages. The preponderance of current data suggests that when administered in equipotent antiinflammatory doses as a metered-dose inhaler plus spacer or as their respective dry-powder inhaler, the existing inhaled corticosteroids have similar risks of producing systemic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery systems can significantly affect both topical and systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroids. More direct comparative studies between agents are required to firmly establish comparative topical to systemic activity ratios. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the agents are not equipotent on a microgram basis.

Effect of nedocromil sodium on bronchial hyperreactivity in children with nonatopic asthma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although cromones inhibit immediate bronchial responses to both allergen and nonspecific challenge, their effectiveness in treating nonatopic childhood asthma is unknown. We therefore investigated a possible effect of nedocromil sodium on bronchial hyperreactivity and asthmatic symptoms in a group of children receiving this drug for nonatopic asthma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of two parallel groups was carried out in our pediatric respiratory disease clinic. Twenty children with mild, nonatopic asthma hyperreactive to fog-induced challenge were treated with inhaled nedocromil sodium 16 mg each day for 6 weeks (group N) or with a placebo (group P). Five girls and five boys (7 to 13 years of age) were randomly assigned to group N, and three girls and seven boys (aged 6 to 16 years) to group P. Symptoms and bronchodilator use were reported on diary cards. Ultrasonic nebulized distilled water PD10 was measured administering increasing doses of nebulized distilled water (2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 L).

RESULTS

Symptom scores were significantly affected by the active treatment. Baseline lung function was normal and remained unaltered after treatment with nedocromil sodium. Nonspecific reactivity was significantly reduced over time only in the active treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Nedocromil sodium can reduce the severity of asthmatic symptoms and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity at fog-induced challenge in children with stable, nonatopic asthma.

Bronchoscopic evaluation of severe asthma. Persistent inflammation associated with high dose glucocorticoids

The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of severe asthma chronically treated with high doses of glucocorticoids is poorly understood. Despite this, treatment has been aimed at advancing anti-inflammatory and immunomodulator therapy. This study was designed to evaluate both the presence and type of airway inflammation in patients with severe asthma. A prospective bronchoscopic study evaluated 14 severe, high-dose oral glucocorticoid dependent asthmatics. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was analyzed for cytology and inflammatory mediators. Endobronchial and transbronchial biopsies were performed in selected patients for morphometric evaluation of macrophage/monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils and lymphocytes. These results were compared with lavage and endo- and transbronchial biopsy studies in normal controls and patients with moderate asthma. The concentration of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was highest in the moderate asthmatics not on glucocorticoids, with very little difference between normal controls and severe asthmatics (significant difference among the groups, p = 0.007). In contrast, the severe asthmatics demonstrated a twofold higher concentration of neutrophils in lavage than either the mild-moderate asthmatics, or the normal controls (p = 0.032 among the groups, p < 0.05 between the severe asthmatics and both controls). Similar results were obtained in the endobronchial and transbronchial biopsy specimens, which consistently showed significantly higher numbers of neutrophils in the severe asthmatics than in the control groups. The eicosanoid mediators, thromboxane and leukotriene B4, were also highest in the severe asthma group (differences among the groups, p = 0.019 and p = 0.023, respectively). These findings suggest that inflammation remains in severe symptomatic asthmatics despite treatment with high dose glucocorticoids which may be due to the severity of disease, glucocorticoid treatment, or other as yet undefined factors.

Differential inhibitory effect of regular inhaled corticosteroid on airway responsiveness to adenosine 5' monophosphate, methacholine, and bradykinin in symptomatic children with recurrent wheeze

Indirect tests of bronchial responsiveness to agents such as adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) or bradykinin might be more specific markers of a therapeutic responses to anti-inflammatory treatment than a test of direct responsiveness to agents such as methacholine. In children selected from the community on the basis of mildly symptomatic wheeze, we compared in a randomized, double-blind study design the effect of 400 micrograms/day of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or placebo on three separate ways of provoking bronchial responsiveness, using methacholine, bradykinin, and AMP as the provoking agents. Following pretreatment bronchial challenges, 29 children received paired monthly methacholine and AMP challenges for 3 months, while for the same period another 33 children received paired monthly methacholine and bradykinin challenges. Compared with placebo-treated subjects, FEV1 increased significantly in the children receiving BDP. This improvement was observed in those randomized to either the AMP challenge or the bradykinin challenge. In children challenged with AMP, the PD20 AMP increased significantly after 1 month and 2 months of BDP therapy when compared with placebo, while under similar conditions the PD20 methacholine was not significantly affected. In children challenged with bradykinin, BDP therapy did not significantly alter either the PD20 bradykinin or PD20 methacholine. We conclude that a bronchial challenge with AMP appears to be a more sensitive predictor of response to anti-inflammatory treatment than either methacholine or bradykinin.

Anti-inflammatory drugs do not alleviate bronchial hyperreactivity in Sjögren's syndrome

Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is found in Sjögren's syndrome, as in a number of other conditions such as asthma. BHR associated with asthma can be effectively treated with corticosteroids or sodium cromoglycate. We treated 19 Sjögren's syndrome patients with BHR with inhaled budesonide and inhaled cromoglycate for 6 weeks each. None of the treatment had any significant effect on symptoms of hyperreactivity or lung function. There was no effect on BHR measured as methacholine reactivity. Primary Sjögren's syndrome is a disease with inflammation not only in the salivary and lacrimal glands but also in the pulmonary alveoli and the bronchi. The main inflammatory cell is the lymphocyte, whereas, in the bronchi in asthma, the eosinophil granulocyte is the characteristic inflammatory cell. The cause of the discrepancy with regard to treatability of BHR in asthma and in Sjögren's syndrome is not known. Possibly not all BHR is caused by inflammation. There is not a perfect correlation between inflammation and hyperreactivity even in asthma. Even in the bronchial inflammation and the asthma symptoms are easy to treat with anti-inflammatory medicines, a considerable component of BHR usually still remains, as measured with methacholine or histamine.