Randomized study of adding inhaled iloprost to existing bosentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary Hypertension in Adult Congenital Heart Disease-Related Heart Failure

Already a challenging condition to define, adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) -associated heart failure (HF) often incorporates specific anatomies, including intracardiac and extracardiac shunts, which require rigorous diagnostic characterization and heighten the importance of clinicians proactively considering overall hemodynamic impacts of using specific therapies. The presence of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance dramatically increases the complexity of managing patients with ACHD-HF. Total circulatory management in patients with ACHD-HF requires input from multidisciplinary care teams and thoughtful and careful utilization of medical, interventional, and surgical approaches.

Efficacy and safety of iloprost in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of iloprost in treating pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is controversial. Adverse reactions such as hypotension may occur during treatment.

OBJECTIVES

Aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iloprost for PAH.

METHODS

Studies were obtained from an electronic search of the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 18, 2023. A meta-analysis of each study was performed using RevMan 5.4 with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). A randomized or fixed-effects model was applied according to a heterogeneity test.

RESULTS

Twelve trials involving 718 participants were selected, including 433 in five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 285 in seven prospective clinical trials. All the patients received iloprost inhalation. The short- and prolonged treatment groups significantly improved the 6-minute walking distance (6 MWD). The mortality and clinical deterioration incidences in the iloprost group were not significantly different from those in the control group. The mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) was reduced after 3 months of iloprost RCTs and 12 months of prospective treatment. Iloprost decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by approximately 231.29 units, significantly increased cardiac output (CO), and improved the quality of life (QoL). The main adverse reactions to iloprost treatment were cough (17 %), headache (16.4 %), and flushing (12.4 %).

CONCLUSION

Iloprost, either used alone or as adjuvant therapy, can enhance exercise capacity, lower hemodynamic parameters, and improve long-term outcomes. However, the risk of mortality and clinical deterioration remains unknown.

Future Perspectives of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review of Novel Pipeline Treatments and Indications

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is characterized by elevated blood pressure and pathological changes in the pulmonary arterioles, leading to the development of right-heart failure and potentially fatal outcomes if left untreated. This review aims to provide an overview of novel drugs or formulations and new drug indications for pulmonary arterial hypertension that are currently in phases II-III of randomized controlled trials, and describe the rationale for the use of these targeted therapies, as well as their efficacy, safety profile, and impact on quality of life and survival. The literature research was conducted using data from ClinicalTrials.gov for the period between 1 January 2016 up to 31 December 2022. The population of interest includes individuals aged ≥ 18 years who have been diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The review selection criteria included trials with recruiting, enrolling by invitation, active, terminated or completed status in 2022 and 2023. A total of 24 studies were selected for evaluation based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This review summarizes the updated information from randomized clinical trials involving novel therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, larger clinical trials are required to validate their clinical safety and effects. In the future, clinicians should choose therapies based on the patient's individual situation and requirements when developing treatment strategies.

Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilators for the Treatment of Right Ventricular Failure in Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Is One Better than the Others?

Right ventricular failure (RFV) is a potential complication following cardio-thoracic surgery, with an incidence ranging from 0.1% to 30%. The increase in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is one of the main triggers of perioperative RVF. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (IPVs) can reduce PVR and improve right ventricular function with minimal systemic effects. This narrative review aims to assess the efficacy of inhaled nitric oxide and inhaled prostacyclins for the treatment of perioperative RVF. The literature, although statistically limited, supports the clinical similarity between them. However, it failed to demonstrate a clear benefit from the pre-emptive use of inhaled nitric oxide in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation or early administration during heart-lung transplants. Additional concerns are related to cost safety and IPV use in pathologies associated with pulmonary venous congestion. The largest ongoing randomized controlled trial on adults (INSPIRE-FLO) is addressing whether inhaled Epoprostenol and inhaled nitric oxide are similar in preventing RVF after heart transplants and left ventricular assist device placement, and whether they are similar in preventing primary graft dysfunction after lung transplants. The preliminary analysis supports their equivalence. Several key points may be achieved by the present narrative review. When RVF occurs in the setting of elevated PVR, IPV should be the preferred initial treatment and they should be preventively used in patients at high risk of postoperative RVF. If severe refractory postoperative RVF occurs, IPVs should be combined with complementary pharmacology (inotropes and inodilators). If unsuccessful, right ventricular mechanical support should be established.

Multifunctional nanoparticle-mediated combining therapy for human diseases

Combining existing drug therapy is essential in developing new therapeutic agents in disease prevention and treatment. In preclinical investigations, combined effect of certain known drugs has been well established in treating extensive human diseases. Attributed to synergistic effects by targeting various disease pathways and advantages, such as reduced administration dose, decreased toxicity, and alleviated drug resistance, combinatorial treatment is now being pursued by delivering therapeutic agents to combat major clinical illnesses, such as cancer, atherosclerosis, pulmonary hypertension, myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Combinatorial therapy involves combining or co-delivering two or more drugs for treating a specific disease. Nanoparticle (NP)-mediated drug delivery systems, i.e., liposomal NPs, polymeric NPs and nanocrystals, are of great interest in combinatorial therapy for a wide range of disorders due to targeted drug delivery, extended drug release, and higher drug stability to avoid rapid clearance at infected areas. This review summarizes various targets of diseases, preclinical or clinically approved drug combinations and the development of multifunctional NPs for combining therapy and emphasizes combinatorial therapeutic strategies based on drug delivery for treating severe clinical diseases. Ultimately, we discuss the challenging of developing NP-codelivery and translation and provide potential approaches to address the limitations. This review offers a comprehensive overview for recent cutting-edge and challenging in developing NP-mediated combination therapy for human diseases.

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare pulmonary vascular disease characterized by progressive pulmonary arterial remodeling, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular dysfunction, and reduced survival. Effective therapies have been developed that target three pathobiologic pathways in PAH: nitric oxide, endothelin-1, and prostacyclin. Approved therapies for PAH include phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogs, and prostacyclin receptor agonists. Management of PAH in the modern era incorporates multidimensional risk assessment to guide the use of these medications. For patients with PAH and without significant comorbidities, current guidelines recommend two oral medications (phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor and endothelin receptor antagonist) for low- and intermediate-risk patients, with triple therapy including a parenteral prostacyclin to be considered in those at high or intermediate-high risk. Combination therapy may be poorly tolerated and less effective in patients with PAH and cardiopulmonary comorbidities. Thus, a single-agent approach with individualized decisions to add-on other PAH therapies is recommended in older patients and those with significant comorbid conditions. Management of PAH is best performed in multidisciplinary teams located in experienced centers. Other core pillars of PAH management include supportive and adjunctive treatments including oxygen, diuretics, rehabilitation, and anticoagulation in certain patients. Patients with PAH who progress despite optimal treatment or who are refractory to best medical care should be referred for lung transplantation, if eligible. Despite considerable progress, PAH is often fatal and new therapies that reverse the disease and improve outcomes are desperately needed.

Impact of Parenteral Prostanoids in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The Relevance of Timing

Parenteral prostanoids are being recommended in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment, but the prognostic relevance of delayed treatment initiation is still debated. This study assessed the impact of the timing of prostacyclin treatment initiation on reducing PVR and achieving a low-risk profile in PAH patients. The study enrolled 151 patients who started on parenteral prostanoids with different treatment strategies. All patients underwent right heart catheterization, clinical evaluation, and risk assessments at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. Patients with an upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoid plus one oral drug had -5.3 ± 6.2 WU (-50 ± 19%) reduction in PVR, patients with an upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoid plus double oral drug had -12.8 ± 5.9 WU (-68 ± 17%) reduction in PVR, while patients with an add-on strategy including parenteral prostanoid after oral drugs had -3.9 ± 3.5 WU (-23 ± 19%) reduction in PVR. An upfront strategy including parenteral prostanoids was independently associated with an increased likelihood of achieving the greater reduction of PVR compared with an add-on strategy. Additionally, the greater the severity of PH at the time of diagnosis, in terms of PVR and RV reverse remodeling, the higher the probability of treatment failure. An upfront strategy including a parenteral prostanoid is associated with the highest likelihood of achieving a low-risk profile and a greater reduction of PVR compared with parenteral prostanoid as an add-on to oral treatment.

Treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: recent progress and a look to the future

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe but treatable form of pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension caused by pulmonary vascular remodelling. As a result of basic science discoveries, randomised controlled trials, studies of real-world data, and the development of clinical practice guidelines, considerable progress has been made in the treatment options and outcomes for patients with PAH, underscoring the importance of seamless translation of information from bench to bedside and, ultimately, to patients. However, PAH still carries a high mortality rate, which emphasises the urgent need for transformative innovations in the field. In this Series paper, written by a group of clinicians, researchers, and a patient with PAH, we review therapeutic approaches and treatment options for PAH. We summarise current knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of PAH, with an emphasis on emerging treatable pathways and optimisation of current management strategies. In considering future directions for the field, our ambition is to identify therapies with the potential to stall or reverse pulmonary vascular remodelling. We highlight novel therapeutic approaches, the important role of patients as partners in research, and innovative approaches to PAH clinical trials.

Scleroderma pulmonary arterial hypertension: the same as idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a common complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc), which confers significant morbidity and mortality. The current therapies and treatment strategies for SSc-associated PAH (SSc-PAH) are informed by those used to treat patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH). There are, however, important differences between these two diseases that impact diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both SSc-PAH and IPAH are incompletely understood with ongoing research into the underlying cellular biology that characterize and differentiate the two diseases. Additional research seeks to improve identification among SSc patients in order to diagnose patients earlier in the course of their disease. Novel therapies specifically for SSc-PAH such as rituximab and dimethyl fumarate are under investigation.

SUMMARY

Although patients with SSc-PAH and IPAH present with similar symptoms, there are significant differences between these two forms of PAH that warrant further investigation and characterization of optimal detection strategies, treatment algorithms, and outcomes assessment.

Pulmonary hypertension inhaled therapies: An updated review

Treatments of pulmonary hypertension (PH) continue to evolve with approval of new therapies. The currently FDA approved inhaled PH therapies include inhaled iloprost for group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), inhaled treprostinil solution and treprostinil dry powder inhaler for both group 1 PAH and group 3 PH associated with interstitial lung disease (PH-ILD). Inhaled treprostinil was recently approved for group 3 PH-ILD based on the results of INCREASE trial and the newer formulation of treprostinil dry powder that comes with a new inhaler was recently approved for both group 1 PAH and group 3 PH-ILD based on BREEZE study. The pipeline for inhaled PH therapies includes several promising molecules that can enrich the current PH therapeutic era and mitigate several systemic side effects by directly delivering the drug to the target organ. In this review article we summarize the evidence for the currently approved inhaled PAH/PH therapies, discuss the available inhalation devices, present a roadmap for successful treatment strategy, and present several inhaled PAH/PH therapies in the pipeline.

Evolution and optimization of clinical trial endpoints and design in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Selection of endpoints for clinical trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging because of the small numbers of patients and the changing expectations of patients, clinicians, and regulators in this evolving therapy area. The most commonly used primary endpoint in PAH trials has been 6-min walk distance (6MWD), leading to the approval of several targeted therapies. However, single surrogate endpoints such as 6MWD or hemodynamic parameters may not correlate with clinical outcomes. Composite endpoints of clinical worsening have been developed to reflect patients' overall condition more accurately, although there is no standard definition of worsening. Recently there has been a shift to composite endpoints assessing clinical improvement, and risk scores developed from registry data are increasingly being used. Biomarkers are another area of interest, although brain natriuretic peptide and its N-terminal prohormone are the only markers used for risk assessment or as endpoints in PAH. A range of other genetic, metabolic, and immunologic markers is currently under investigation, along with conventional and novel imaging modalities. Patient-reported outcomes are an increasingly important part of evaluating new therapies, and several PAH-specific tools are now available. In the future, alternative statistical techniques and trial designs, such as patient enrichment strategies, will play a role in evaluating PAH-targeted therapies. In addition, modern sequencing techniques, imaging analyses, and high-dimensional statistical modeling/machine learning may reveal novel markers that can play a role in the diagnosis and monitoring of PAH.

Medical Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current Approaches and Investigational Drugs

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a malignant pulmonary vascular syndrome characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, which eventually leads to right heart failure and even death. Although the exact mechanism of PAH is not fully understood, pulmonary vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling, immune and inflammatory responses, and thrombosis are thought to be involved in the development and progression of PAH. In the era of non-targeted agents, PAH had a very dismal prognosis with a median survival time of only 2.8 years. With the deep understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism of PAH as well as advances in drug research, PAH-specific therapeutic drugs have developed rapidly in the past 30 years, but they primarily focus on the three classical signaling pathways, namely the endothelin pathway, nitric oxide pathway, and prostacyclin pathway. These drugs dramatically improved pulmonary hemodynamics, cardiac function, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and prognosis in PAH patients, but could only reduce pulmonary arterial pressure and right ventricular afterload to a limited extent. Current targeted agents delay the progression of PAH but cannot fundamentally reverse pulmonary vascular remodeling. Through unremitting efforts, new therapeutic drugs such as sotatercept have emerged, injecting new vitality into this field. This review comprehensively summarizes the general treatments for PAH, including inotropes and vasopressors, diuretics, anticoagulants, general vasodilators, and anemia management. Additionally, this review elaborates the pharmacological properties and recent research progress of twelve specific drugs targeting three classical signaling pathways, as well as dual-, sequential triple-, and initial triple-therapy strategies based on the aforementioned targeted agents. More crucially, the search for novel therapeutic targets for PAH has never stopped, with great progress in recent years, and this review outlines the potential PAH therapeutic agents currently in the exploratory stage to provide new directions for the treatment of PAH and improve the long-term prognosis of PAH patients.

No Placebo Effect beyond Regression to the Mean on the Six Minute Walk Test in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Trials

In drug studies, patients are often included when the disease activity is high. This will make any treatment appear to lessen disease activity, although the improvement is biased by selection. This effect is known as regression towards the mean (RTM). We aimed at investigating drug trials in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) using the 6-minute walking distance test (6MWD) as a primary outcome for the phenomenon of RTM. An existing registry of 43 open label studies and 23 randomized controlled trials conducted between 1990 and 2009 was used as the data source. Data analysis was carried out for 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 24 open label studies out of this registry. Data were analyzed for verum and placebo arms of the RCTs separately, as well as for the open label arms. In the verum arms, the overall effect given as 33.2 m (95% CI: 25.7; 40.6]); 6MWD was slightly lower than the effect in the observational studies, with 44.6 m (95% CI: [25.4; 63.8]). After studying and interpreting the data, we found that regression towards the mean plays only a minor role in PAH studies. In particular, placebo effects in the RCTs were negligibly small, with a mean 6MWD of -2.5 m (95% CI: [-9.8; 4.7]) in the placebo arm. Therefore, our analysis indicates that results of non-randomized observational studies can be regarded as valid tools for gaining valid clinical effects in patients with PAH.

The evolving landscape of pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials

Although it is a rare disease, the number of available therapeutic options for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension has increased since the late 1990s, with multiple drugs developed that are shown to be effective in phase 3 randomised controlled trials. Despite considerable advancements in pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment, prognosis remains poor. Existing therapies target pulmonary endothelial dysfunction with vasodilation and anti-proliferative effects. Novel therapies that target proliferative vascular remodelling and affect important outcomes are urgently needed. There is need for additional innovations in clinical trial design so that all emerging candidate therapies can be rigorously studied. Pulmonary arterial hypertension trial design has shifted from short-term submaximal exercise capacity as a primary endpoint, to larger clinical event-driven trial outcomes. Event-driven pulmonary arterial hypertension trials could face feasibility and efficiency issues in the future because increasing sample sizes and longer follow-up durations are needed, which would be problematic in such a rare disease. Enrichment strategies, innovative and alternative trial designs, and novel trial endpoints are potential solutions that could improve the efficiency of future pulmonary arterial hypertension trials while maintaining robustness and clinically meaningful evidence.

Medications for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the most effective treatments of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Our objective was to compare effects of medications for PAH.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to December 2021. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis on all included trials. We rated the certainty of the evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

We included 53 randomised controlled trials with 10 670 patients. Combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) plus phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) reduced clinical worsening (120.7 fewer events per 1000, 95% CI 136.8-93.4 fewer; high certainty) and was superior to either ERA or PDE5i alone, both of which reduced clinical worsening, as did riociguat monotherapy (all high certainty). PDE5i (24.9 fewer deaths per 1000, 95% CI 35.2 fewer to 2.1 more); intravenous/subcutaneous prostanoids (18.3 fewer deaths per 1000, 95% CI 28.6 fewer deaths to 0) and riociguat (29.1 fewer deaths per 1000, 95% CI 38.6 fewer to 8.7 more) probably reduce mortality as compared to placebo (all moderate certainty). Combination therapy with ERA+PDE5i (49.9 m, 95% CI 25.9-73.8 m) and riociguat (49.5 m, 95% CI 17.3-81.7 m) probably increase 6-min walk distance as compared to placebo (moderate certainty).

CONCLUSION

Current PAH treatments improve clinically important outcomes, although the degree and certainty of benefit vary between treatments.

Assessment of Clinical Worsening End Points as a Surrogate for Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Clinical worsening (CW) is a composite end point commonly used in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) trials. We aimed to assess the trial-level surrogacy of CW for mortality in PAH trials, and whether the various CW components were similar in terms of frequency of occurrence, treatment-related relative risk (RR) reduction, and importance to patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 1990 to December 2020) for trials evaluating the effects of PAH therapies on CW. The coefficient of determination between the RR for CW and mortality was assessed by regression analysis. The frequency of occurrence, RR reduction, and importance to patients of the CW components were assessed.

RESULTS

We included 35 independent cohorts (9450 patients). PAH therapies significantly reduced CW events (RR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.55-0.73]), including PAH-related hospitalizations (RR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79]), treatment escalation (RR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.84]) and symptomatic progression (RR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.48-0.69]), and modestly reduced all-cause mortality when incorporating deaths occurring after a primary CW-defining event (RR, 0.860 [95% CI, 0.742-0.997]). However, the effects of PAH-specific therapies on CW only modestly correlated with their effects on mortality (R²_trial, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.10-0.59]; P<0.0001), and the gradient in the treatment effect across component end points was large in the majority of trials. The weighted proportions of CW-defining events were hospitalization (33.5%) and symptomatic progression (32.3%), whereas death (6.7%), treatment escalation (5.6%), and transplantation/atrioseptostomy (0.2%) were infrequent. CW events were driven by the occurrence of events of major (49%) and mild-to-moderate (37%) importance to patients, with 14% of the events valued as critical.

CONCLUSIONS

PAH therapies significantly reduced CW events, but study-level CW is not a surrogate for mortality in PAH trials. Moreover, components of CW largely vary in frequency, response to therapy, and importance to patients and are thus not interchangeable.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO; Unique identifier: CRD42020178949.

Efficacy and safety of sequential combination therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) combination therapy pooled sequential and initial combination together, which might threaten their authenticity and clinical significance for the difference between two strategies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sequential combination therapy (SCT) with background therapy (BT) in PAH patients. Raw data were extracted to calculate risk ratio (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) for predefined efficacy and safety outcomes. Mantel-Haenszel fixed or random effects model was used based on heterogeneity.

RESULTS

17 RCTs involving 4343 patients (97.2% of patients with WHO-FC II-III) were included. SCT decreased clinical worsening (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.76), nonfatal clinical worsening (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.71), functional class (decrease of 28% in the portion of patients with WHO-FC worsening and increase of 33% in the portion of patients with WHO-FC improvement), and increased 6-min walk distance (WMD 17.68 m, 95% CI 10.16 to 25.20), but didn't reduce mortality, lung transplantation, admission to hospital, and treatment escalation compared with BT. Although any adverse event and serious adverse event were similar between SCT and BT, SCT increased all-cause treatment discontinuation (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.71) and drug-related treatment discontinuation (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.84) with higher incidence of headache, flushing, nausea, diarrhoea and jaw pain.

CONCLUSIONS

For WHO-FC II-III PAH patients who have established BT, our study reinforced the recommendation of SCT to improve clinical worsening, functional status, and exercise capacity, although with higher incidence of side-effects and withdrawal.

Indian Guidelines on Nebulization Therapy

Inhalational therapy, today, happens to be the mainstay of treatment in obstructive airway diseases (OADs), such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is also in the present, used in a variety of other pulmonary and even non-pulmonary disorders. Hand-held inhalation devices may often be difficult to use, particularly for children, elderly, debilitated or distressed patients. Nebulization therapy emerges as a good option in these cases besides being useful in the home care, emergency room and critical care settings. With so many advancements taking place in nebulizer technology; availability of a plethora of drug formulations for its use, and the widening scope of this therapy; medical practitioners, respiratory therapists, and other health care personnel face the challenge of choosing appropriate inhalation devices and drug formulations, besides their rational application and use in different clinical situations. Adequate maintenance of nebulizer equipment including their disinfection and storage are the other relevant issues requiring guidance. Injudicious and improper use of nebulizers and their poor maintenance can sometimes lead to serious health hazards, nosocomial infections, transmission of infection, and other adverse outcomes. Thus, it is imperative to have a proper national guideline on nebulization practices to bridge the knowledge gaps amongst various health care personnel involved in this practice. It will also serve as an educational and scientific resource for healthcare professionals, as well as promote future research by identifying neglected and ignored areas in this field. Such comprehensive guidelines on this subject have not been available in the country and the only available proper international guidelines were released in 1997 which have not been updated for a noticeably long period of over two decades, though many changes and advancements have taken place in this technology in the recent past. Much of nebulization practices in the present may not be evidence-based and even some of these, the way they are currently used, may be ineffective or even harmful. Recognizing the knowledge deficit and paucity of guidelines on the usage of nebulizers in various settings such as inpatient, out-patient, emergency room, critical care, and domiciliary use in India in a wide variety of indications to standardize nebulization practices and to address many other related issues; National College of Chest Physicians (India), commissioned a National task force consisting of eminent experts in the field of Pulmonary Medicine from different backgrounds and different parts of the country to review the available evidence from the medical literature on the scientific principles and clinical practices of nebulization therapy and to formulate evidence-based guidelines on it. The guideline is based on all possible literature that could be explored with the best available evidence and incorporating expert opinions. To support the guideline with high-quality evidence, a systematic search of the electronic databases was performed to identify the relevant studies, position papers, consensus reports, and recommendations published. Rating of the level of the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation was done using the GRADE system. Six topics were identified, each given to one group of experts comprising of advisors, chairpersons, convenor and members, and such six groups (A-F) were formed and the consensus recommendations of each group was included as a section in the guidelines (Sections I to VI). The topics included were: A. Introduction, basic principles and technical aspects of nebulization, types of equipment, their choice, use, and maintenance B. Nebulization therapy in obstructive airway diseases C. Nebulization therapy in the intensive care unit D. Use of various drugs (other than bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids) by nebulized route and miscellaneous uses of nebulization therapy E. Domiciliary/Home/Maintenance nebulization therapy; public & health care workers education, and F. Nebulization therapy in COVID-19 pandemic and in patients of other contagious viral respiratory infections (included later considering the crisis created due to COVID-19 pandemic). Various issues in different sections have been discussed in the form of questions, followed by point-wise evidence statements based on the existing knowledge, and recommendations have been formulated.

Targeted Therapies in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Due to Congenital Heart Disease

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating cardiovascular disease leading to right heart failure and death if untreated. Medical therapies for PAH have evolved substantially over the last decades and are associated with improvements in functional class, quality of life, and survival. PAH-targeted therapies now consist of multiple inhaled, oral, subcutaneous, and intravenous therapies targeting the phosphodiesterase, guanylate cyclase, endothelin and prostacyclin pathways. Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at high risk of developing PAH and growing evidence exists that PAH-targeted therapy can be beneficial in PAH-CHD. However, the PAH-CHD patient population is challenging to treat due to the heterogeneity and complexity of their cardiac lesions and associated comorbidities. Furthermore, most high-quality randomized placebo-controlled trials investigating the effects of PAH-targeted therapies only included a minority of PAH-CHD patients. Few randomized, controlled trials have investigated the effects of PAH-targeted therapy in pre-specified PAH-CHD populations. Consequently, the results of these clinical trials cannot be extrapolated broadly to the PAH-CHD population. This review summarizes the data from high-quality clinical PAH treatment trials with a specific focus on the PAH-CHD population.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a subtype of pulmonary hypertension (PH), characterized by pulmonary arterial remodeling. The prevalence of PAH is approximately 10.6 cases per 1 million adults in the US. Untreated, PAH progresses to right heart failure and death.

OBSERVATIONS

Pulmonary hypertension is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mm Hg and is classified into 5 clinical groups based on etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is 1 of the 5 groups of PH and is hemodynamically defined by right heart catheterization demonstrating a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mm Hg, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 15 mm Hg or lower, and a pulmonary vascular resistance of 3 Wood units or greater. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is further divided into subgroups based on underlying etiology, consisting of idiopathic PAH, heritable PAH, drug- and toxin-associated PAH, pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, PAH in long-term responders to calcium channel blockers, and persistent PH of the newborn, as well as PAH associated with other medical conditions including connective tissue disease, HIV, and congenital heart disease. Early presenting symptoms are nonspecific and typically consist of dyspnea on exertion and fatigue. Currently approved therapy for PAH consists of drugs that enhance the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate biological pathway (sildenafil, tadalafil, or riociguat), prostacyclin pathway agonists (epoprostenol or treprostinil), and endothelin pathway antagonists (bosentan and ambrisentan). With these PAH-specific therapies, 5-year survival has improved from 34% in 1991 to more than 60% in 2015. Current treatment consists of combination drug therapy that targets more than 1 biological pathway, such as the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate and endothelin pathways (eg, ambrisentan and tadalafil), and has shown demonstrable improvement in morbidity and mortality compared with the previous conventional single-pathway targeted monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pulmonary arterial hypertension affects an estimated 10.6 per 1 million adults in the US and, without treatment, typically progresses to right heart failure and death. First-line therapy with drug combinations that target multiple biological pathways are associated with improved survival.

Inhaled Iloprost Induces Long‐term Beneficial Hemodynamic Changes in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Combination Therapy

Inhaled iloprost is an established treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, the long‐term hemodynamic changes that inhaled iloprost induces are unclear. Here, we retrospectively enrolled 18 patients with PAH who received inhaled iloprost as add‐on to oral combination therapy from December 2016 to January 2021 at our institute in Japan. We then examined the changes in hemodynamic parameters induced by iloprost in these patients during right heart catheterization (RHC). To examine the long‐term effects of iloprost, we repeated the RHC examination at follow‐up (median time to follow‐up, 8.5 months). During both catheterization procedures, iloprost was administered by using an I‐neb AAD system (Philips NV). In a comparison of pre‐inhalation values at the first and follow‐up RHCs, inhaled iloprost significantly improved mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP; 39.9 ± 7.8 to 32.5 ± 7.2 mmHg, p = 0.016) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; 588.5 ± 191.7 to 464.4 ± 188.5 dyn s cm⁻⁵, p = 0.047). During the follow‐up RHC, in a comparison of the pre‐inhalation and best recorded values out to 30 min after the end of iloprost inhalation, iloprost significantly decreased mPAP (32.5 ± 7.2 to 30.0 ± 6.6 mmHg, p = 0.007) and PVR (457.8 ± 181.4 to 386.2 ± 142.8 dyn s cm⁻⁵, p = 0.025) and significantly increased cardiac output (4.19 ± 0.91 to 4.64 ± 1.01 L/min, p = 0.035). Iloprost may have not only acute vasodilation effects but also long‐term hemodynamic benefits in PAH patients receiving combination therapy.

Additional Use of Prostacyclin Analogs in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Combination therapy has become an attractive option in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether additional use of prostacyclin analogs could exert any additional benefits over background targeted therapies in PAH patients.

Methods: Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 1 October 2021. Randomized controlled trials were included if patients had been treated with prostacyclin analog-containing combination therapy and compared with the use of other PAH-specific background therapies. The bias risk and statistical analysis of the enrolled studies were performed with RevMan 5.1. Sensitivity analysis and funnel plot were used to evaluate the stability and publication bias, respectively. PROSPERO registered number CRD42021284196.

Results: Ten trials involving 1828 patients were included. Prostacyclin analog treatment was associated with greater improvement in clinical worsening (risk ratio [RR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–0.86), 6-min walk distance (mean difference [MD], 37.17 m; 95% CI, 3.01–71.33 m), NYHA/WHO functional class (RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.05), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MD, −9.23 mmHg; 95% CI, −17.44 to −1.03 mmHg), and cardiac index (MD, 0.41 L/min/m²; 95% CI, 0.26–0.55 L/min/m²) than the control group. No significant differences in pulmonary vascular resistance (MD, −137.22 dyn·s/cm⁵; 95% CI, −272.61 to −1.84 dyn·s/cm⁵) and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57–1.61) were found between the prostacyclin analog group and control group. Of note, more adverse events (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02–1.13) occurred in the prostacyclin analog group but no significant increase in serious adverse events (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.75–2.11).

Conclusion: Additional prostacyclin analog treatment exerted benefits on clinical worsening, exercise capacity, functional class, mean pulmonary artery pressure, and cardiac index in PAH patients, but it was associated with overall risk of adverse events.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021284196, identifier CRD42021284196.

Treating Inflammation Associated with Pulmonary Hypertension: An Overview of the Literature

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) comprises five groups of serious clinical entities characterized by pulmonary artery vasoconstriction and vascular remodeling leading to right heart failure and death. In addition to vascular remodeling, recruitment and exaggerated accumulation of several perivascular inflammatory cells is also observed, including macrophages, monocytes, T and B-lymphocytes, dendritic cells and mast cells distributed in pulmonary perivascular spaces and around remodeling pulmonary vessels. Current pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies aim to improve functional capacity, pulmonary hemodynamic conditions, and delay disease progression. Nevertheless, PAH remains incurable, with a poor prognosis and is often refractory to drug therapy, highlighting the need for further research. In the last three decades, the best pathophysiological understanding of PAH has allowed for progression from a disease of little-known pathogenesis, without specific and effective therapy to expanding the arsenal of drugs on a cellular, genetic and molecular basis. This article provides an overview on current knowledge and progress in recent advances in pharmacological therapy in PAH.

Endothelial upregulation of mechanosensitive channel Piezo1 in pulmonary hypertension

Piezo is a mechanosensitive cation channel responsible for stretch-mediated Ca2+ and Na+ influx in multiple types of cells. Little is known about the functional role of Piezo1 in the lung vasculature and its potential pathogenic role in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (PAECs) are constantly under mechanic stretch and shear stress that are sufficient to activate Piezo channels. Here, we report that Piezo1 is significantly upregulated in PAECs from patients with idiopathic PAH and animals with experimental pulmonary hypertension (PH) compared with normal controls. Membrane stretch by decreasing extracellular osmotic pressure or by cyclic stretch (18% CS) increases Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation (p) of AKT and ERK, and subsequently upregulates expression of Notch ligands, Jagged1/2 (Jag-1 and Jag-2), and Delta like-4 (DLL4) in PAECs. siRNA-mediated downregulation of Piezo1 significantly inhibited the stretch-mediated pAKT increase and Jag-1 upregulation, whereas downregulation of AKT by siRNA markedly attenuated the stretch-mediated Jag-1 upregulation in human PAECs. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein expression level of Piezo1 in the isolated pulmonary artery, which mainly contains pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs), from animals with severe PH was also significantly higher than that from control animals. Intraperitoneal injection of a Piezo1 channel blocker, GsMTx4, ameliorated experimental PH in mice. Taken together, our study suggests that membrane stretch-mediated Ca2+ influx through Piezo1 is an important trigger for pAKT-mediated upregulation of Jag-1 in PAECs. Upregulation of the mechanosensitive channel Piezo1 and the resultant increase in the Notch ligands (Jag-1/2 and DLL4) in PAECs may play a critical pathogenic role in the development of pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH and PH.

Cardiovascular complications in patients with interstitial lung disease and their correlation with 6-minute walk test and spirometry: A single-center study

Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension and other cardiac complications occur frequently due to chronic hypoxia induced by interstitial lung diseases (ILD) or due to connective tissue disorder itself. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography is ideal for identifying abnormalities at a given time. In this study, we tried to detect cardiovascular complications in patients with ILD using 2D echocardiography and correlate them with a 6-minute walk test (6 MWT) and spirometry.

Materials and Methods

This study was carried out for 18 months including 100 consecutive cases of ILD. The diagnosis was made using the latest criteria as per the disease and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) thorax. All patients were evaluated with 2D echocardiography, 6 MWT, and spirometry along with routine investigations. Their results were analyzed using STATA 15.1 software.

Result

Cardiovascular involvement was detected in 68% of cases. Pulmonary hypertension predominated with a prevalence of 50%. In spirometry, mean Forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV₁)and Forced vital capacity (FVC) were found to be 54.96 (L) and 53.49 (L), respectively, with a predominant restrictive pattern (89%). There was a significant correlation between baseline saturation of oxygen (SpO₂) and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) with a P value of <0.05. Baseline SpO₂ and distance covered in 6 MWT had a significant correlation (P = 0.014).

Conclusion

A baseline or nighttime hypoxia is responsible for developing PAH. Pulmonary arterial hypertension should be suspected in patients unable to perform 6 MWT or having low baseline SpO₂. A routine follow-up with a 6 MWT and baseline SpO₂ should be performed in each visit to identify early deterioration of the disease.

The prognostic significance of the alterations of pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic assessment in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is essential for risk stratification and pharmacological management. However, the prognostic value of the hemodynamic changes after treatment is less well established.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the prognostic impacts of the changes in hemodynamic indices, including mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), right atrial pressure (RAP), and cardiac output index (CI). We conducted this systematic review with meta-regression analysis on existing clinical trials.

METHODS

We searched and identified all relevant randomized controlled trials from multiple databases. An analogous R² index was used to quantify the proportion of variance explained by each predictor in the association with PAH patients' prognosis. A total of 21 trials and 3306 individuals were enrolled.

RESULTS

The changes in mPAP, PVR, RAP, and CI were all significantly associated with the change in 6MWD (∆6MWD). The change in mPAP was with the highest explanatory power for ∆6MWD (R² analog = 0.740). Additionally, the changes in mPAP, PVR, and CI were independently predictive of adverse clinical events. The change in mPAP had the highest explanatory power for the clinical events (R² analog = 0.911). Furthermore, the change in PVR was with the highest explanatory power for total mortality of PAH patients (R² analog = 0.612).

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic changes after treatment, including mPAP, PVR, CI, and RAP, were significantly associated with adverse clinical events or mortality in treated PAH patients. It is recommended that further studies be conducted to evaluate the changes in hemodynamic indices to guide drug titration.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019125157.

Digital Tracking of Physical Activity, Heart Rate, and Inhalation Behavior in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated With Inhaled Iloprost: Observational Study (VENTASTEP)

Background

Pulmonary arterial hypertension restricts the ability of patients to perform routine physical activities. As part of pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment, inhaled iloprost can be administered via a nebulizer that tracks inhalation behavior. Pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment is guided by intermittent clinical measurements, such as 6-minute walk distance, assessed during regular physician visits. Continuous digital monitoring of physical activity may facilitate more complete assessment of the impact of pulmonary arterial hypertension on daily life. Physical activity tracking with a wearable has not yet been assessed with simultaneous tracking of pulmonary arterial hypertension medication intake.

Objective

We aimed to digitally track the physical parameters of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who were starting treatment with iloprost using a Breelib nebulizer. The primary objective was to investigate correlations between changes in digital physical activity measures and changes in traditional clinical measures and health-related quality of life over 3 months. Secondary objectives were to evaluate inhalation behavior, adverse events, and changes in heart rate and sleep quality.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study of adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension in World Health Organization functional class III who were adding inhaled iloprost to existing pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy. Daily distance walked, step count, number of standing-up events, heart rate, and 6-minute walk distance were digitally captured using smartwatch (Apple Watch Series 2) and smartphone (iPhone 6S) apps during a 3-month observation period (which began when iloprost treatment began). Before and at the end of the observation period (within 2 weeks), we also evaluated 6-minute walk distance, Borg dyspnea, functional class, B-type natriuretic peptide (or N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index).

Results

Of 31 patients, 18 were included in the full analysis (observation period: median 91.5 days, IQR 88.0 to 92.0). Changes from baseline in traditional and digital 6-minute walk distance were moderately correlated (r=0.57). Physical activity (daily distance walked: median 0.4 km, IQR –0.2 to 1.9; daily step count: median 591, IQR −509 to 2413) and clinical measures (traditional 6-minute walk distance: median 26 m, IQR 0 to 40) changed concordantly from baseline to the end of the observation period. Health-related quality of life showed little change. Total sleep score and resting heart rate slightly decreased. Distance walked and step count showed short-term increases after each iloprost inhalation. No new safety signals were identified (safety analysis set: n=30).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that despite challenges, parallel monitoring of physical activity, heart rate, and iloprost inhalation is feasible in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and may complement traditional measures in guiding treatment; however, the sample size of this study limits generalizability.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03293407; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03293407

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

RR2-10.2196/12144

Clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, and survival outcome of long-term inhaled iloprost treatment in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension: Data from prospective multicenter observational OPTION study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of long-term inhaled iloprost treatment in the daily practice for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

METHODS

A total of 115 patients with PAH on inhaled iloprost treatment were included. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were recorded at baseline and at 3rd to 24th month visits. Safety and tolerability of iloprost treatment were also evaluated during follow-up, as were the survival, clinical worsening, and the related risk factors.

RESULTS

The treatment was associated with an increase in the percentage NYHA functional class II (from 0.0% at enrolment to 36.2% at 24th month visit) patients but no significant difference was noted in 6MWD values. Clinical worsening was observed in 63.5% patients, while survival rate was 69.6%. NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors (p=0.042). Cox regression analysis revealed the association of female sex [odds ratio (OR)=0.318; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.128-0.792; p=0.014] and scleroderma-related PAH (OR=0.347; 95% CI, 0.140-0.860; p=0.022) with significantly lower risk (3.14 fold and 2.88 fold, respectively) of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate favorable efficacy, safety, and tolerability of long-term iloprost treatment in the management of PAH, whereas improved NYHA functional class was not accompanied with a significant change in 6MWD values. Patient age was a risk factor for clinical worsening, while female sex, scleroderma subtype, and lower NT-proBNP levels were associated with significantly lower mortality risk.

Efficacy and safety of novel-targeted drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe and fatal clinical syndrome characterized by high blood pressure and vascular remodeling in the pulmonary arterioles, which is also a rapidly progressing disease of the lung vasculature with a poor prognosis. Although PAH medication made great advances in recent years, the efficacy and safety of the medication are unsatisfactory. Therefore, we aimed to update and expand previous studies to explore the efficacy and safety of PAH-targeted medications. Methods: Relevant articles were searched and selected from published or publicly available data in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE (from inception until October 1^st, 2020). To assess the efficacy and safety of PAH therapies, five efficacy outcomes [6-minute walking distance (6MWD), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP), WHO functional class (WHO FC) improvement, clinical worsening, death] and two safety outcomes [adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs)] were selected. And 6MWD was regarded as the primary efficacy outcome.

Results: 50 trials included with 10 996participants were selected. In terms of efficacy, all targeted drugs were more effective than placebo. For 6MWD, Bosentan + Sildenafil, Sildenafil, Bosentan + Iloprost were better than others. Bosentan + Iloprost and Bosentan + Sildenafil were better for mPAP. Bosentan + Iloprost and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil were more effective in improving WHO FC. Bosentan + Tadalafil and Bosentan + Iloprost had the Ambrisentan probability to reduce the incidence of clinical worsening. It is demonstrated that Ambrisentan had clear benefits in reducing all-cause mortality. In terms of safety, no therapies had been shown to reduce the incidence of SAEs significantly, and Ambrisentan + Tadalafil significantly increased the incidence of AEs.

Conclusions: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) + Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERA) seems to be better therapy for PAH. Prostacyclin analogs (ProsA) + ERA appear promising, though additional data is warranted.

Registration PROSPERO CRD42020218818.

Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is the term used to describe a group of disorders characterized by abnormally high pressures in the pulmonary arteries. Initial evaluation is focused on identifying the cause, which helps guide appropriate treatment. Pulmonary hypertension is often a feature of advanced common diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and left heart disease, and treatment is focused primarily on the underlying disease. More rarely, pulmonary hypertension results from chronic organized thromboemboli or a primary vasculopathy. The former requires evaluation for surgical intervention, and the latter is treated with advanced medical therapies.

Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators: a narrative review

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe disease that affects people of all ages. It can occur as an idiopathic disorder at birth or as part of a variety of cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders. Inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (IPV) can reduce pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and improve RV function with minimal systemic effects. IPV includes inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), inhaled aerosolized prostacyclin, or analogs, including epoprostenol, iloprost, treprostinil, and other vasodilators. In addition to pulmonary vasodilating effects, IPV can also be used to improve oxygenation, reduce inflammation, and protect cell. Off-label use of IPV is common in daily clinical practice. However, evidence supporting the inhalational administration of these medications is limited, inconclusive, and controversial regarding their safety and efficacy. We conducted a search for relevant papers published up to May 2020 in four databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Web of Science. This review demonstrates that the clinical using and updated evidence of IPV. iNO is widely used in neonates, pediatrics, and adults with different cardiopulmonary diseases. The limitations of iNO include high cost, flat dose-response, risk of significant rebound PH after withdrawal, and the requirement of complex technology for monitoring. The literature suggests that inhaled aerosolized epoprostenol, iloprost, treprostinil and others such as milrinone and levosimendan may be similar to iNO. More research of IPV is needed to determine acceptable inclusion criteria, long-term outcomes, and management strategies including time, dose, and duration.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease that leads to right heart failure and premature death. Endothelin receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and the reference sections of retrieved articles. The searches are current as of 4 November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials and quasi-randomised trials involving participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two of five review authors selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality according to established criteria. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance, 6MWD), World Health Organization (WHO) or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Borg dyspnoea scores and dyspnoea-fatigue ratings, and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 randomised controlled trials involving a total of 3322 participants. Most trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). Sixteen trials were placebo-controlled, and of these nine investigated a non-selective ERA and seven a selective ERA.   We evaluated two comparisons in the review: ERA versus placebo and ERA versus phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor. The abstract focuses on the placebo-controlled trials only and presents the pooled results of selective and non-selective ERAs. After treatment, participants receiving ERAs could probably walk on average 25.06 m (95% confidence interval (CI) 17.13 to 32.99 m; 2739 participants; 14 studies; I² = 34%, moderate-certainty evidence) further than those receiving placebo in a 6MWD. Endothelin receptor antagonists probably improved more participants' WHO functional class (odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.70; participants = 3060; studies = 15; I² = 5%, moderate-certainty evidence) and probably lowered the odds of functional class deterioration (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; participants = 2347; studies = 13; I² = 40%, moderate-certainty evidence) compared with placebo. There may be a reduction in mortality with ERAs (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58, 1.07; 2889 participants; 12 studies; I² = 0%, low-certainty evidence), and pooled data suggest that ERAs probably improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and may reduce Borg dyspnoea score in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, but may be increased by ERA treatment from 37 to 67 (95% CI 34 to 130) per 1000 over 25 weeks of treatment (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.90; moderate-certainty evidence). Although ERAs were well tolerated in this population, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported, which led the licence holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide.  As planned, we performed subgroup analyses comparing selective and non-selective ERAs, and with the exception of mean pulmonary artery pressure, did not detect any clear subgroup differences for any outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For people with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO functional class II and III, endothelin receptor antagonists probably increase exercise capacity, improve WHO functional class, prevent WHO functional class deterioration, result in favourable changes in cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables compared with placebo. However, they are less effective in reducing dyspnoea and mortality. The efficacy data were strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in people treated with ERAs. The question of the effects of ERAs on pulmonary arterial hypertension has now likely been answered.. The combined use of ERAs and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may provide more benefit in pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, this needs to be confirmed in future studies.

Molecular and Genetic Profiling for Precision Medicines in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and chronic lung disease characterized by progressive occlusion of the small pulmonary arteries, which is associated with structural and functional alteration of the smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells within the pulmonary vasculature. Excessive vascular remodeling is, in part, responsible for high pulmonary vascular resistance and the mean pulmonary arterial pressure, increasing the transpulmonary gradient and the right ventricular “pressure overload”, which may result in right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and failure. Current technological advances in multi-omics approaches, high-throughput sequencing, and computational methods have provided valuable tools in molecular profiling and led to the identification of numerous genetic variants in PAH patients. In this review, we summarized the pathogenesis, classification, and current treatments of the PAH disease. Additionally, we outlined the latest next-generation sequencing technologies and the consequences of common genetic variants underlying PAH susceptibility and disease progression. Finally, we discuss the importance of molecular genetic testing for precision medicine in PAH and the future of genomic medicines, including gene-editing technologies and gene therapies, as emerging alternative approaches to overcome genetic disorders in PAH.

Inhaled iloprost as third add-on therapy in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Triple combination therapy is suggested in current pulmonary arterial hypertension guidelines in case of unsatisfactory treatment with oral double combination therapy. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning some of the drug combinations currently employed. We demonstrate the clinical and hemodynamical benefits of inhaled iloprost as third add-on therapy in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Selexipag for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare pulmonary vasculopathy. This review focuses on selexipag, a prostacyclin receptor agonist validated for the treatment of PAH.

AREAS COVERED

We review the structure, mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of selexipag. Clinical efficacy and tolerability are discussed using the main clinical trial published for selexipag (GRIPHON) and its post-hoc analysis.

EXPERT OPINION

Selexipag should be added as a triple oral combination therapy in case of insufficient response to oral combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor. However, selexipag should not replace parenteral prostacyclin in high-risk patients.

Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Purpose of Review

This review focuses on the therapeutic management and individualized approach to Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), utilizing Food and Drug Administration-approved PAH-specific therapies and various interventional and surgical options for PAH.

Recent Findings

The paradigm for the optimal management of PAH has shifted in recent years. Upfront combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor is now widely accepted as standard of care. In addition, there is increasing emphasis on starting prostanoids early in order to delay time to clinical worsening. However, less is known regarding which prostanoid agent to initiate and the optimum time to do so. In order to facilitate shared decision-making, there is an increasing need for decision tools based on guidelines and collective clinical experiences to navigate between pharmacologic and interventional treatments, as well as explore innovative, therapeutic pathways for PAH.

Summary

The management of PAH has become increasingly complex. With a growing number of PAH-specific therapies, intimate knowledge of the therapeutics and the potential barriers to adherence are integral to providing optimal care for this high-risk patient population. While current PAH-specific therapies largely mediate their effects through pulmonary vasodilation, ongoing research efforts are focused on ways to disrupt the mechanisms leading to pulmonary vascular remodeling. By targeting aberrations identified in the metabolism and proliferative state of pulmonary vascular cells, novel PAH treatment pathways may be just on the horizon.

Current clinical utilization of risk assessment tools in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a descriptive survey of facilitation strategies, patterns, and barriers to use in the United States

Practice guidelines suggest that treatment decisions in pulmonary arterial hypertension be informed by periodic assessment of patients' clinical risk. Several tools, well validated for risk discrimination, such as the Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management calculator, were developed to assess pulmonary arterial hypertension patients' risk of death based on multiple parameters, including functional class, hemodynamics, biomarkers, comorbidities, and exercise capacity. Using an online survey, we investigated the use of risk assessment tools by pulmonary hypertension healthcare providers in the United States. Of 121 survey respondents who make treatment decisions, 59% reported using risk assessment tools. The use of these tools was lower for non-physicians (48% vs. 65% physicians) and for practitioners at centers with 1 to 100 pulmonary arterial hypertension patients compared with centers with >100 patients (47% vs. 64%). Risk was most frequently assessed by decision makers at the time of diagnosis (cited by 54%) and at the time of worsening symptoms (cited by 42%), suggesting that use of pulmonary arterial hypertension risk assessment tools remains low. In our survey, non-physicians compared with physicians cited two major barriers to increased tool use: lack of education and training (20% vs. 4%) and lack of clarity on the best tool to use (30% vs. 18%). Information technology tools, such as electronic medical record integration and web or phone-based risk calculating applications, were cited most frequently as ways to increase the use of risk assessment tools.

Current and emerging therapeutic approaches to pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and fatal lung disease of multifactorial etiology. Most of the available drugs and FDA-approved therapies for treating pulmonary hypertension attempt to overcome the imbalance between vasoactive and vasodilator mediators, and restore the endothelial cell function. Traditional medications for treating PAH include the prostacyclin analogs and receptor agonists, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors, endothelin-receptor antagonists, and cGMP activators. While the current FDA-approved drugs showed improvements in quality of life and hemodynamic parameters, they have shown only very limited beneficial effects on survival and disease progression. None of them offers a cure against PAH, and the median survival rate remains less than three years from diagnosis. Extensive research efforts have led to the emergence of innovative therapeutic approaches in the area of PAH. In this review, we provide an overview of the current FDA-approved therapies in PAH and discuss the associated clinical trials and reported-side effects. As recent studies have led to the emergence of innovative therapeutic approaches in the area of PAH, we also focus on the latest promising therapies in preclinical studies such as stem cell-based therapies, gene transfer, and epigenetic therapies.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension specific therapy: The old and the new

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a vascular disorder associated with high morbidity and mortality rate and is characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling and increased pulmonary vascular resistance, ultimately resulting in right ventricular failure and death. Over the past few decades, significant advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension have occured. This has led to the development of disease specific treatment including prostanoids, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. These therapies significantly improve exercise capacity, quality of life, pulmonary hemodynamics, but none of the current treatments are actually curative and long-term prognosis remains poor. Thus, there is a clear need to develop new therapies. Several potential pharmacologic agents for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension are under clinical development and some promising results with these treatments have been reported. These agents include tyrosine protein kinase inhibitors, rho-kinase inhibitors, synthetically produced vasoactive intestinal peptide, antagonists of the 5-HT2 receptors, and others. This article will review several of these promising new therapies and will discuss the current evidence regarding their potential benefit in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension: Rationale for using multiple vs. single drug therapy

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is defined by a heterogenous pathobiology that corresponds to variable clinical presentation, treatment response, and prognosis across affected patients. The approach to pharmacotherapeutics in PAH has evolved since the introduction of the first prostacyclin replacement drug, which was trialed in patients with end-stage disease as a strategy by which to delay or prevent mortality. Subsequently, the aim of care in PAH has shifted toward minimizing symptoms, improving functional capacity, delaying disease progression, and prolonging life. Thus, treatments are now implemented earlier and according to the evidence base, which spans more than twenty years and includes patients at various stages of disease. Overall, the evidence supports multidrug therapy rather than monotherapy in the majority of PAH patients. Among incident patients, up-front combination therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil or other comparable agents within these drug classes is recommended based on strong clinical trial data. In the near future, up-front triple therapy may be emerge as bona fide treatment approach in selected patients. Future goals that are already under consideration in PAH include stronger integration of pathobiological characteristics when considering the use of specific drugs, or the development of novel therapies, toward precision medicine-based clinical pharmacology.

Drug Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Children

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease in infants and children that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The disease is characterized by progressive pulmonary vascular functional and structural changes resulting in increased pulmonary vascular resistance and eventual right heart failure and death. In many pediatric patients, PAH is idiopathic or associated with congenital heart disease and rarely is associated with other conditions such as connective tissue or thromboembolic disease. PAH associated with developmental lung diseases such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia or congenital diaphragmatic hernia is increasingly more recognized in infants and children. Although treatment of the underlying disease and reversal of advanced structural changes have not yet been achieved with current therapy, quality of life and survival have improved significantly. Targeted pulmonary vasodilator therapies, including endothelin receptor antagonists, prostacyclin analogs, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors have resulted in hemodynamic and functional improvement in children. The management of pediatric PAH remains challenging as treatment decisions depend largely on results from evidence-based adult studies and the clinical experience of pediatric experts. This article reviews the current drug therapies and their use in the management of PAH in children.

Medicinal Plants and Phytochemicals for the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension

Background

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive disease that is associated with pulmonary arteries remodeling, right ventricle hypertrophy, right ventricular failure and finally death. The present study aims to review the medicinal plants and phytochemicals used for PH treatment in the period of 1994 – 2019.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus were searched based on pulmonary hypertension, plant and phytochemical keywords from August 23, 2019. All articles that matched the study based on title and abstract were collected, non-English, repetitive and review studies were excluded.

Results

Finally 41 studies remained from a total of 1290. The results show that many chemical treatments considered to this disease are ineffective in the long period because they have a controlling role, not a therapeutic one. On the other hand, plants and phytochemicals could be more effective due to their action on many mechanisms that cause the progression of PH.

Conclusion

Studies have shown that herbs and phytochemicals used to treat PH do their effects from six mechanisms. These mechanisms include antiproliferative, antioxidant, antivascular remodeling, anti-inflammatory, vasodilatory and apoptosis inducing actions. According to the present study, many of these medicinal plants and phytochemicals can have effects that are more therapeutic than chemical drugs if used appropriately.

The future of treatment in systemic sclerosis: can we design better trials?

Strides have been made in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis, with successful trials of combination therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension and of new drugs that slow the decline of lung function in interstitial lung disease. However, many trials in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis have been negative, including trials of tocilizumab, abatacept, and riociguat, despite improvements in skin scores and other endpoints that approached statistical significance. Trials of macitentan for digital ulcers in these patients have also been disappointing. Trials that do not meet their primary endpoint do not necessarily signify ineffective therapies, as there are many other possible reasons for negative trial results, including features of trial design, insufficient trial duration, or insufficient power to detect differences between groups. In this Series paper, I discuss some of these reasons and what the research community can learn from negative trials to inform future trial design going forward.

Retrospective Database Analysis of Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Release of the 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines put increased emphasis on using combination therapy, either as upfront or sequential therapy among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, with these recommendations and the therapy advances made in the last several years, little is known on the real-world treatment patterns among patients with PAH, particularly before and after publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD) enrollees with at least one claim for a PAH-related medication from January 01, 2012 to March 31, 2017, at least one medical claim with a pulmonary hypertension diagnosis, and continuous health plan enrollment at least 6 months prior to and at least 12 months following the date of the first pharmacy claim for PAH-related therapy (index date). Patients were divided into cohorts based on prescription of monotherapy or combination therapy and index date category (2012-2013, January 2014-July 2015, and August 2015-March 2017).

RESULTS

Out of 1878 patients, 90.8% initiated with monotherapy and 9.2% initiated with combination therapy. The percentage of patients with index combination therapy increased from 5.7% in 2012-2013 to 13.0% in August 2015-March 2017. Patients with index combination therapy had better persistence (11.6 months versus 10.3 months) and adherence (0.95 versus 0.85). Overall, the discontinuation rate was 40% and was higher in monotherapy versus combination therapy patients (42.8% versus 12.2%). Approximately 30.2% of patients had a second regimen, of which 50% were combination regimens. The time to combination therapy initiation decreased from 10.5 months in 2012-2013 to 3.4 months in August 2015-March 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients initiated monotherapy treatment for PAH, most often a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i). Patients with upfront combination therapy increased following publication of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines, indicating that physicians responded to the guideline's option of prescribing upfront combination therapy.