Exogenous growth hormone inhibits growth hormone-releasing factor-induced growth hormone secretion in normal men

Growth hormone doping in sports: a critical review of use and detection strategies

GH is believed to be widely employed in sports as a performance-enhancing substance. Its use in athletic competition is banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency, and athletes are required to submit to testing for GH exposure. Detection of GH doping is challenging for several reasons including identity/similarity of exogenous to endogenous GH, short half-life, complex and fluctuating secretory dynamics of GH, and a very low urinary excretion rate. The detection test currently in use (GH isoform test) exploits the difference between recombinant GH (pure 22K-GH) and the heterogeneous nature of endogenous GH (several isoforms). Its main limitation is the short window of opportunity for detection (~12-24 h after the last GH dose). A second test to be implemented soon (the biomarker test) is based on stimulation of IGF-I and collagen III synthesis by GH. It has a longer window of opportunity (1-2 wk) but is less specific and presents a variety of technical challenges. GH doping in a larger sense also includes doping with GH secretagogues and IGF-I and its analogs. The scientific evidence for the ergogenicity of GH is weak, a fact that is not widely appreciated in athletic circles or by the general public. Also insufficiently appreciated is the risk of serious health consequences associated with high-dose, prolonged GH use. This review discusses the GH biology relevant to GH doping; the virtues and limitations of detection tests in blood, urine, and saliva; secretagogue efficacy; IGF-I doping; and information about the effectiveness of GH as a performance-enhancing agent.

The role of hypothalamic hormones in the control of growth hormone secretion and of growth

GHRH and somatostatin have major integrative roles in the control of GH secretion. Alterations in the secretion of each hypothalamic hormone have profound effects on GH secretion. On the basis of current information, it appears that disturbances in GHRH secretion provide a most convincing argument for the pathophysiological role of this hypothalamic hormone in clinically recognized disorders of GH secretion. Thus, the potential use of GHRH and its agonists and antagonists in the treatment of patients with both deficient and excessive GH secretion is based on a solid framework of physiological and pathophysiological studies.

Somatostatin and somatostatin receptor physiology

Since the discovery of somatostatin (SST) over three decades ago, its ubiquitous distribution and manifold functions are still being documented. SST is synthesized in the hypothalamus and transported to the anterior pituitary gland where it tonicaly inhibits GH and TSH secretion as well as being responsible for GH pulsatile release. Several internal feedback loops, sleep, exercise, and chemical agents control and influence SST release. SST also impacts the function of a wide variety of cells and organ systems throughout the body. Knowledge of the structures of the SSTs has resulted in recognition of the essential four core conserved residues responsible for their actions. The SSTs act through six separate SST cell surface receptors (SSTRs), members of the family of G protein-coupled receptors. Receptor ligand binding (SST/SSTR) results in cellular activities specific for each receptor, or receptor combinations, and their tissue/cell localization. Understanding the structure/function relationship of the SSTs and their receptors, including the internalization of SST/SSTR complexes, has facilitated the development of a variety of novel pharmacologic agents for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and unfolding new applications.

A single growth hormone (GH) determination is sufficient for the diagnosis of GH-deficiency in adult patients using the growth hormone releasing hormone plus growth hormone releasing peptide-6 test

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults is based on the provocative testing of GH secretion. When testing a patient with suspected GH deficiency, clinicians assess the whole secretory curve and select the GH peak as an index of secretory capability. This procedure is time consuming and the determination of GH in several samples is necessary. The combined administration of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) plus growth hormone releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) is an effective test of GH secretion, and it has been unambiguously demonstrated that the elicited GH peak is capable of segregating normal GH secretion subjects from GH deficient patients on an individual basis. The GHRH + GHRP-6 test biochemically classifies patients into three groups; those with a stimulated GH peak >/= 20 micro g/l are considered normal and those with peaks at </= 10 micro g/l as GH deficient. The group comprising individuals between these parameters is considered uncertain, and the results are further interpreted according to clinical information, or by other tests.

OBJECTIVE

As the GHRH + GHRP-6 test induces GH peaks consistently in the first 30 minutes, the working hypothesis assessed in this study was whether a single determination of GH 30 minutes after stimulus could provide the same clinical classification as the whole secretory curve.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and forty-nine adult subjects (146 patients with organic pituitary disease and 203 healthy subjects) were studied. All were administered GHRH 1 micro g/kg i.v. plus GHRP-6 1 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 minutes, and blood samples were obtained at regular intervals. GH was determined in all samples.

RESULTS

GHRH + GHRP-6-evoked GH peaks in controls and patients were not correlated with GH basal values, making this determination useless for test validation. In contrast, an excellent correlation was observed between GH values at 30 minutes and the GH peaks (r = 0.994, P < 0.0001). When comparing the 30-minute GH values against the peaks, the biochemical classification changed from normal toward uncertain in only five out of 203 control subjects, which is without clinical relevance according to Bayes theorem. Similarly, when the 30-minute value was used instead of the peak in GH deficient patients, only two out of 146 patients moved from the uncertain area toward the GH deficient one. Thus, better diagnostic classification was provided for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The GHRH + GHRP-6 test is a convenient, safe and reliable, provocative test of GH reserve in adults, which can be reduced to a single fixed GH determination 30 minutes after stimulus.

Unequal autonegative feedback by GH models the sexual dimorphism in GH secretory dynamics

Growth hormone (GH) secretion, controlled principally by a GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH release-inhibiting hormone [somatostatin (SRIF)] displays vivid sexual dimorphism in many species. We hypothesized that relatively small differences within a dynamic core GH network driven by regulatory interactions among GH, GHRH, and SRIF explain the gender contrast. To investigate this notion, we implemented a minimal biomathematical model based on two coupled oscillators: time-delayed reciprocal interactions between GH and GHRH, which endow high-frequency (40-60 min) GH oscillations, and time-lagged bidirectional GH-SRIF interactions, which mediate low-frequency (occurring every 3.3 h) GH volleys. We show that this basic formulation, sufficient to explain GH dynamics in the male rat [Farhy LS, Straume M, Johnson ML, Kovatchev BP, and Veldhuis JD. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 281: R38-R51, 2001], emulates the female pattern of GH release, if autofeedback of GH on SRIF is relaxed. Relief of GH-stimulated SRIF release damps the slower volleylike oscillator, allowing emergence of the underlying high-frequency oscillations that are sustained by the GH-GHRH interactions. Concurrently, increasing variability of basal somatostatin outflow introduces quantifiable, sex-specific disorderliness of the release process typical of female GH dynamics. Accordingly, modulation of GH autofeedback on SRIF within the interactive GH-GHRH-SRIF ensemble and heightened basal SRIF variability are sufficient to transform the well-ordered, 3.3-h-interval, multiphasic, volleylike male GH pattern into a femalelike profile with irregular pulses of higher frequency.

E2 supplementation selectively relieves GH's autonegative feedback on GH-releasing peptide-2-stimulated GH secretion

Female gender confers resistance to GH autonegative feedback in the adult rat, thereby suggesting gonadal or estrogenic modulation of autoregulation of the somatotropic axis. Here we test the clinical hypothesis that short-term E2 replacement in ovariprival women reduces GH's repression of spontaneous, GHRH-, and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-stimulated GH secretion. To this end, we appraised GH autoinhibition in nine healthy postmenopausal volunteers during a prospective, randomly ordered supplementation with placebo vs. E [1 mg micronized 17 beta-E2 orally twice daily for 6-23 d]. The GH autofeedback paradigm consisted of a 6-min pulsed i.v. infusion of recombinant human GH (10 microg/kg square-wave injection) or saline (control) followed by i.v. bolus GHRH (1 microg/kg), GHRP-2 (1 microg/kg), or saline 2 h later. Blood was sampled every 10 min and serum GH concentrations were measured by chemiluminescence. Poststimulus GH release was quantitated by multiparameter deconvolution analysis using published biexponential kinetics and by the incremental peak serum GH concentration response (maximal poststimulus value minus prepeak nadir). Outcomes were analyzed on the logarithmic scale by mixed-effects ANOVA at a multiple-comparison type I error rate of 0.05. E2 supplementation increased the (mean +/- SEM) serum E2 concentration from 43 +/- 1.8 (control) to 121 +/- 4 pg/ml (E2) (158 +/- 6.6 to 440 +/- 15 pmol/liter; P < 0.001), lowered the 0800 h (preinfusion) serum IGF-I concentration from 127 +/- 7.7 to 73 +/- 3.6 microg/liter (P < 0.01), and amplified spontaneous pulsatile GH production from 7.5 +/- 1.1 to 13 +/- 2.3 microg/liter per 6 h (P = 0.020). In the absence of exogenously imposed GH autofeedback, E2 replacement enhanced the stimulatory effect of GHRP-2 on incremental peak GH release by 1.58-fold [95% confidence interval, 1.2- to 2.1-fold] (P = 0.0034) but did not alter the action of GHRH (0.83-fold [0.62- to 1.1-fold]). In the E2-deficient state, bolus GH infusion significantly inhibited subsequent spontaneous, GHRH-, and GHRP-induced incremental peak GH responses by, respectively, 33% (1-55%; P = 0.044 vs. saline), 79% (68-86%; P < 0.0001), and 54% (32-69%; P = 0.0002). E2 repletion failed to influence GH autofeedback on either spontaneous or GHRH-stimulated incremental peak GH output. In contrast, E2 replenishment augmented the GHRP-2-stimulated incremental peak GH response in the face of GH autoinhibition by 1.7-fold (1.2- to 2.5-fold; P = 0.009). Mechanistically, the latter effect of E2 mirrored its enhancement of GH-repressed/GHRP-2-stimulated GH secretory pulse mass, which rose by 1.5-fold (0.95- to 2.5-fold over placebo; P = 0.078). In summary, the present clinical investigation documents the ability of short-term oral E2 supplementation in postmenopausal women to selectively rescue GHRP-2 (but not spontaneous or GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion from autonegative feedback. The secretagogue specificity of E's relief of GH autoinhibition suggests that this sex steroid may enhance activity of the hypothalamopituitary GHRP-receptor/effector pathway.

A construct of interactive feedback control of the GH axis in the male

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is controlled by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), the GH release-inhibiting hormone somatostatin (SRIF), and autofeedback connections. The ensemble network produces sexually dimorphic patterns of GH secretion. In an effort to formalize this system, we implemented a deterministically based autonomous feedback-driven construct of five principal dose-responsive regulatory interactions: GHRH drive of GH pituitary release, competitive inhibition of GH release by SRIF, GH autofeedback via SRIF with a time delay, delayed GH autonegative feedback on GHRH, and SRIF inhibition of GHRH secretion. This formulation engenders a malelike pattern of successive GH volleys due jointly to positive time-delayed feedback of GH on SRIF and negative feedback of SRIF on GH and GHRH. The multipeak volley is explicated as arising from a reciprocal interaction between GH and GHRH during periods of low SRIF secretion. The applicability of this formalism to neuroendocrine control is explored by initial parameter sensitivity analysis and is illustrated for selected feedback-dependent experimental paradigms. The present construct is not overparameterized and does not require an ad hoc pulse generator to achieve pulsatile GH output. Further evolution of interactive constructs could aid in exploring more complex feedback postulates that confer the vivid sexual dimorphism of female GH profiles.

Neurophysiological regulation and target-tissue impact of the pulsatile mode of growth hormone secretion in the human

Neuroendocrine axes function as an ensemble of regulatory loci which communicate and maintain homeostasis via time-delayed blood-borne signals. The growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) feedback axis sustains a vividly pulsatile mode of interglandular signalling. Pulsatility is driven jointly by hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), and modulated by somatostatinergic restraint. Paradoxically, intermittent somatostatin inputs also facilitate somatotrope-cell responses to recurrent secretagogue stimuli, thereby amplifying pulsatile GH secretion. A concurrent low basal (8-12% of normal total) rate of GH release is controlled positively by GHRH and GHRP and negatively by somatostatin. Sex-steroid hormones (such as oestradiol and aromatizable androgen) and normal female and male puberty augment GH secretory-burst mass 1.8- to 3.5-fold, whereas ageing, relative obesity, physical inactivity, hypogonadism, and hypopituitarism mute the amplitude/mass of pulsatile GH output. An abrupt rise in circulating GH concentration stimulates rapid internalization of the GH receptor in peripheral target tissues, and evokes second-messenger nuclear signalling via the STAT 5b pathway. Discrete GH peaks stimulate linear (skeletal) growth and drive muscle IGF-I gene expression more effectually than basal (time-invariant) GH exposure. A brief pulse of GH can saturate the plasma GH-binding protein system and achieve prolonged plasma GH concentrations by convolution with peripheral distribution and clearance mechanisms. A single burst of GH secretion also feeds back after a short latency on central nervous system (CNS) regulatory centres via specific brain GH receptors to activate somatostatinergic and reciprocally subdue GHRH outflow. This autoregulatory loop probably contributes to the time-dependent physiologically pulsatile dynamics of the GH axis. More slowly varying systemic IGF-I concentrations may also damp GH secretory pulse amplitude by delayed negative-feedback actions. According to this simplified construct, GH pulsatility emerges due to time-ordered multivalent interfaces among GHRH/GHRP feedforward and somatostatin, GH and IGF-I feedback signals. Resultant GH pulses trigger tissue-specific gene expression, thereby promoting skeletal and muscular growth, metabolic and body compositional adaptations, and CNS reactions that jointly maintain health and homeostasis.

Interactive regulation of postmenopausal growth hormone insulin-like growth factor axis by estrogen and growth hormone-releasing peptide-2

Estrogen is the proximate sex steroid sustaining GH secretion throughout the human life span in both sexes. However, very little is known about the specific neuroendocrine mechanisms by which estrogen activates and maintains GH secretion in the young or aging human. The identification of somatostatin in 1973 as a key negative peptidyl regulator of the GH axis and the discovery of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in 1982 as a dominant feedforward agonist of GH secretion provided an initial basic science foundation for exploring sex-steroid control of the GH-IGF-1 axis. Although GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) were first recognized in 1977-1981, subsequent cloning of hypothalamopituitary receptors transducing potent secretagogue actions of GHRPs in 1996 and of an endogenous ligand for this effector pathway in 1999 now extend the framework for examining the mechanisms of estrogen-driven GH secretion in aging. Herein, we review several novel and multifaceted interactions in postmenopausal women between estrogen and GHRP-2. We combine these observations into a simplified construct of GH-axis neuroregulation comprising the somatostatin, GHRH, and GHRP effector pathways, as well as GH and IGF-1 autofeedback. We suggest the thesis that estrogen controls the interfaces among these pivotal regulatory peptides in hyposomatotropic postmenopausal individuals.

Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is regulated through a complex neuroendocrine control system, especially by the functional interplay of two hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS), exerting stimulatory and inhibitory influences, respectively, on the somatotrope. The two hypothalamic neurohormones are subject to modulation by a host of neurotransmitters, especially the noradrenergic and cholinergic ones and other hypothalamic neuropeptides, and are the final mediators of metabolic, endocrine, neural, and immune influences for the secretion of GH. Since the identification of the GHRH peptide, recombinant DNA procedures have been used to characterize the corresponding cDNA and to clone GHRH receptor isoforms in rodent and human pituitaries. Parallel to research into the effects of SS and its analogs on endocrine and exocrine secretions, investigations into their mechanism of action have led to the discovery of five separate SS receptor genes encoding a family of G protein-coupled SS receptors, which are widely expressed in the pituitary, brain, and the periphery, and to the synthesis of analogs with subtype specificity. Better understanding of the function of GHRH, SS, and their receptors and, hence, of neural regulation of GH secretion in health and disease has been achieved with the discovery of a new class of fairly specific, orally active, small peptides and their congeners, the GH-releasing peptides, acting on specific, ubiquitous seven-transmembrane domain receptors, whose natural ligands are not yet known.

Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human

During the last decade, the GH axis has become the compelling focus of remarkably active and broad-ranging basic and clinical research. Molecular and genetic models, the discovery of human GHRH and its receptor, the cloning of the GHRP receptor, and the clinical availability of recombinant GH and IGF-I have allowed surprisingly rapid advances in our knowledge of the neuroregulation of the GH-IGF-I axis in many pathophysiological contexts. The complexity of the GHRH/somatostatin-GH-IGF-I axis thus commends itself to more formalized modeling (154, 155), since the multivalent feedback-control activities are difficult to assimilate fully on an intuitive scale. Understanding the dynamic neuroendocrine mechanisms that direct the pulsatile secretion of this fundamental growth-promoting and metabolic hormone remains a critical goal, the realization of which is challenged by the exponentially accumulating matrix of experimental and clinical data in this arena. To the above end, we review here the pathophysiology of the GHRH somatostatin-GH-IGF-I feedback axis consisting of corresponding key neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and metabolic effectors, and their cloned receptors and signaling pathways. We propose that this system is best viewed as a multivalent feedback network that is exquisitely sensitive to an array of neuroregulators and environmental stressors and genetic restraints. Feedback and feedforward mechanisms acting within the intact somatotropic axis mediate homeostatic control throughout the human lifetime and are disrupted in disease. Novel effectors of the GH axis, such as GHRPs, also offer promise as investigative probes and possible therapeutic agents. Further understanding of the mechanisms of GH neuroregulation will likely allow development of progressively more specific molecular and clinical tools for the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions in which GH secretion is regulated abnormally. Thus, we predict that unexpected and enriching insights in the domain of the neuroendocrine pathophysiology of the GH axis are likely be achieved in the succeeding decades of basic and clinical research.

Natural course of growth hormone hypersecretion in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

High growth hormone levels in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes were recognised 25 years ago. For many years this has been explained as an epiphenomenon of poor metabolic control. The natural course of the disease is characterised by gradual loss of residual beta-cell function and parallel elevations of plasma growth hormone and can be divided into three consecutive phases. It appears that the hormonal changes observed are determined by the IGF-1 generating capacity of the liver which, in turn, is dependent on the synergistic stimulating action of growth hormone and portal insulin. The first (initial) phase of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is characterised by the absence of insulin, high growth hormone levels and low plasma IGF-1. The pituitary growth hormone response to exercise and other stimuli is pathological. The second phase of disease ('C-peptide positive phase') is characterised by the return of some residual beta-cell insulin secretion, increased levels of growth hormone compared to non-diabetic subjects, physiological IGF-1 levels and near normal pituitary growth hormone responses to different agents. The third phase of the disease is characterised by complete loss of endogenous insulin secretion, very high plasma growth hormone levels, low normal plasma IGF-1 but impaired hepatic IGF-1 generating capacity. The control mechanisms of pituitary growth hormone secretion (long loop negative feedback and auto-feedback), are disturbed.

Exogenous growth hormone administration does not inhibit the growth hormone response to hexarelin in normal men

Administration of exogenous human growth hormone (GH) blunts the GH response to physiological as well as pharmacological stimuli, including GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Hexarelin (Hex) is a new synthetic GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) similar to GHRP-6 with potent GH-releasing activity in animals and men. To determine whether the short-term administration of GH inhibits the Hex-induced GH release, we measured the GH response to Hex (2 micrograms/kg iv) in five normal adult males (age 26-32 yr) three h after an iv bolus of rhGH (2 IU) or saline. Mean incremental change of serum GH from value at time 0 was 47.5 +/- 5.5 and 41.5 +/- 4.1 micrograms/l after saline + Hex and GH + Hex, respectively. Mean incremental area under the curve over baseline was 3216 +/- 586 and 3735 +/- 506 micrograms.min.1 after saline + Hex and GH + Hex, respectively. One of the proposed mechanism of action of GHRPs is to serve as functional somatostatin (SRIH) antagonists, and it is known that GH feeds backs on the hypothalamus to stimulate SRIH release. Therefore, we speculate that antagonisms of SRIH function by Hex prevented the inhibitory effect of exogenous GH, thus lending further support to the hypotheses that SRIH is involved in the feedback regulation of GH secretion, and that GHRPs action involves inhibition of SRIH function.

Growth hormone increases somatostatin release and messenger ribonucleic acid levels in the rat hypothalamus

Growth hormone (GH) suppresses its own secretion by stimulating somatostatin (SRIF) release. Thus, the possible regulation of GH-releasing factor (GRF) and SRIF release and SRIF messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) by GH was studied in the hypothalamus of male rats in vitro. The median eminences (ME's) were incubated in buffer containing 10(-7)-10(-11) M GH for 30 min. SRIF and GRF released into the medium were quantitated by RIA. The release of SRIF from ME fragments was significantly increased (P < 0.001) by 10(-9) M GH; however, 10(-9) M GH also inhibited (P < 0.01) GRF release from the ME. To determine the effect of GH on SRIF mRNA levels, periventricular nucleus (PeN) explants were cultured during 6 h in medium with 10(-7)-10(-11) M GH. Levels of SRIF mRNA (determined by an S1 nuclease protection assay) were significantly elevated in the presence of 10(-10)-10(-7) M GH. Likewise, 10(-9) M GH significantly stimulated SRIF release from PeN explants at 30 min and at 6 h. Surprisingly, 10(-9) M GH also significantly increased GRF release from the PeN explants at these times as well. This GRF was not responsible for the increased SRIF release or SRIF mRNA induced by GH since GRF antibody did not modify the GH-induced increases in SRIF release and mRNA levels. These results demonstrate a negative short-loop feedback of GH mediated at the ME by suppression of GRF and stimulation of SRIF release, whereas in the PeN GH increased both SRIF release and SRIF mRNA levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Growth response to growth hormone-releasing hormone(1-29)-NH2 compared with growth hormone

To assess the growth-promoting effect of different doses of growth hormone-releasing hormone(1-29)-NH2 (GHRH(1-29)-NH2) in GH deficiency (GHD) of hypothalamic origin, 43 prepubertal children aged between 4.3 and 18.9 years (mean 10.4 +/- 2.9 years) were randomly assigned to three treatment regimens: low-dose GHRH(1-29)-NH2 (LD group; n = 15), high-dose GHRH(1-29)-NH2 (HD group; n = 12) and GH (GH group; n = 16). The LD group received GHRH(1-29)-NH2 at 30 micrograms/kg/day s.c. in three daily doses, the HD group received 60 micrograms/kg/day s.c. in three daily doses and the GH group received GH, 0.1 IU/kg/day s.c. once daily. All children were treated for a period of 6 months. Evaluation included anthropometry, bone age, intravenous and subcutaneous GHRH(1-29)-NH2 tests and determination of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. An increase in height velocity of 2 cm/year or more was observed in all except two children. Height velocity during treatment was lowest in the LD group, but comparable in the HD and GH groups. An increase in height SDS for bone age occurred only in the GH-treated group. GH responses to intravenous GHRH(1-29)-NH2 showed a priming effect of the LD GHRH(1-29)-NH2 treatment, while a decrease in response occurred in the GH-treated group. Following a subcutaneous test dose of one-third of the daily dose of GHRH(1-29)-NH2, GH levels remained unchanged in both the LD and HD groups. There was accumulation of GHRH immunoreactivity over time in the HD group, but there was no correlation between measured GHRH and GH levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cholinergic control of growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing hormone in insulin dependent diabetics: evidence for attenuated hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone and decreased GH autofeedback

OBJECTIVE

We have investigated the effects of cholinergic modulation with pirenzepine and pyridostigmine and of GH pretreatment on the subsequent GH response to a maximal stimulatory dose of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We have also investigated the relationship between the differences in metabolic control and other parameters of disease state with the differences in GH responses in IDDM.

PATIENTS

Thirteen male subjects with IDDM and no clinical evidence of complications were selected based on HbA1 levels to provide a wide range of metabolic control. Seven normal subjects were also studied.

DESIGN

Twelve of the subjects with IDDM and six normal subjects received pirenzepine 200 mg and pyridostigmine 120 mg pretreatment 60 minutes and GH pretreatment 3 hours before an i.v. injection of GHRH (1-44) (80 micrograms) in random order. All subjects underwent a control study with GHRH alone.

MEASUREMENTS

Serum GH and plasma glucose were measured at regular intervals throughout the study. Fasting plasma glucose and HbA1 were measured before each study to provide measures of metabolic control.

RESULTS

Subjects with IDDM demonstrated exaggerated GH responses to GHRH compared to normals. Pirenzepine significantly reduced GH responses in both normal and diabetic subjects. However, the GH response to GHRH after pirenzepine was higher in subjects with IDDM (mean GH:IDDM vs normals; 8.1 +/- 1.3 vs 2.9 +/- 0.7 mU/l, P < 0.05). Pyridostigmine 120 mg significantly augmented the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. In diabetic subjects, pyridostigmine failed to increase GH response to GHRH compared to GHRH alone (mean GH: pyridostigmine vs control: 75.7 +/- 12.6 vs 38.9 +/- 5.4 mU/l, P = NS). GH responses to GHRH after pyridostigmine pretreatment in both normal and diabetic subjects did not differ and the GH response to GHRH after pyridostigmine in normal subjects did not differ from the GH response to GHRH alone in diabetic subjects. In normal subjects, GH pretreatment significantly reduced subsequent GH responsiveness to GHRH (delta peak GH 26.4 +/- 5.2 vs 7.7 +/- 5.4 mU/l, P < 0.04). In contrast, GH pretreatment did not cause any significant reduction in GH responsiveness to GHRH in diabetics (delta peak GH 53.6 +/- 9.7 vs 33.4 +/- 11 mU/l, P = NS). No significant correlation was demonstrated between measures of diabetic control and the responses to GHRH alone or after cholinergic modulation and GH pretreatment.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that ambient hypothalamic cholinergic tone in diabetes is high, and of similar degree to the enhanced cholinergic tone in normal subjects pretreated with pyridostigmine. We suggest that in diabetic subjects, the reduced responsiveness to autofeedback may be secondary to the enhanced cholinergic tone demonstrated in these patients. The mechanisms linking the uncontrolled diabetic state to this abnormal neuroregulation of GH remains unknown at present.

Dependency of growth hormone (GH) stimulation following releasing hormones on the spontaneous 24-hour GH secretion in healthy male and female subjects

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether in healthy subjects the GH response following stimulation with releasing hormones is dependent on the spontaneous GH secretion within 24 hr prior to the stimulation test. In 18 male and 9 female healthy subjects (21-59 years) GH was measured every 15 min over 26 hr. Twenty-four hours after the beginning of blood sampling, a GH stimulation test was performed by using a combined releasing hormone test. Sleep was recorded in three consecutive nights. A positive correlation was found between the AUCs of the 24-hr GH secretion and the AUCs of GH stimulation, which could not be explained by an age effect only. This study demonstrates that subjects with comparatively high amounts of GH secreted within 24 hr also show good GH secretory responses when immediately after the 24-hr sampling period a stimulation test is undertaken. Therefore, a low GH response to stimulation cannot be explained by feedback effects of high GH amounts secreted during the 24 hr before the test or by empty pituitary GH storages.

Supplemental growth hormone alters body composition, muscle protein metabolism and serum lipids in fit adults: characterization of dose-dependent and response-recovery effects

Using double-blind, placebo-controlled procedures, the effects of low and high therapeutic dosages of methionyl-human growth hormone (met-hGH) on body composition, muscle protein metabolism and serum lipids were studied in 7 fit adults without growth hormone (GH) deficiency. Dose-dependent changes in body composition were observed that in part appeared to be influenced by a response-recovery effect, as measured by responses factored according to the duration of washout between exposure to the low and high dosages of met-hGH (6 weeks vs. 12 weeks vs. 18 weeks). Increases in fat-free weight were accompanied by an increase in skeletal muscle protein metabolism. Basal levels of cholesterol were inversely related to peak levels of GH in response to exercise stimulation and IGF-I, while GH supplementation lowered levels of total cholesterol and high- and low-density lipoproteins. A dose-dependent effect occurred for total cholesterol, and the percent change in cholesterol was related to the percent change in insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Endogenous levels of GH were attenuated in response to stimulation and IGF-I levels were increased after treatment with GH, but no dose-dependent changes were observed. We conclude that met-hGH alters body composition and muscle protein metabolism, and decreases stored and circulating lipids in fit adults with a pre-existing supranormal body composition. The physiological profile of the person was not as important as the treatment conditions in determining the somatic and physiological response outcomes.

The pituitary gland is capable of responding to two successive doses of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH)

We have studied the serum growth hormone (GH) response to two consecutive doses of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) (50, 100, 200 micrograms) given 1, 2 or 3 h apart in seven adult males. The serum GH profile was analysed by deconvulution incorporating a variable half-life for GH. All three doses of GHRH stimulated maximal GH secretion: 50 micrograms, 146.0 mU/min (SEM 24.0); 100 micrograms, 128.1 mU/min (SEM 14.3); 200 micrograms, 134.1 mU/min (SEM 20.5) (one-way ANOVA, P = NS). The magnitude of the second secretory burst after the second dose of GHRH was less than that induced by the first injection of GHRH, particularly when doses of 200 micrograms were used. Factors influencing the response to the second dose were the GH secretory status at the point that the stimulus was applied and the time interval between administration of the first and second doses. These studies demonstrate that the pituitary gland is capable of responding to two consecutive doses of GHRH although the second response is always less than the first. The data demonstrate the importance of using methods of assessing GH secretion and not relying simply on measured serum GH concentration values.

The growth hormone clamp technique: inhibition of growth hormone release by growth hormone occurs independently of free fatty acids

It has been suggested that growth hormone (GH) can inhibit its own release: in fact it has repeatedly been shown that an acute methionyl-GH (met-GH) infusion blocks the GH response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). However, met-GH infusions are accompanied by a significant increase of free fatty acids (FFA), which can block GH release. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the inhibition of GH response to GHRH also occurs when lipolysis is pharmacologically blocked. Therefore, six normal subjects received GHRH, 50 micrograms intravenously (IV), after a 4-hour saline infusion and a 4-hour met-GH infusion (80 ng/kg/min, yielding a constant GH level of 33.6 +/- 4.63 micrograms/L), and GH release was evaluated during the following 2 hours. To prevent lipolysis, all subjects received on both occasions acipimox, an antilipolytic agent, 500 mg during the 6 hours before IV GHRH. GHRH induced a clear GH release during saline infusion (46.6 +/- 2.70 micrograms/L) and a scanty GH release during met-GH infusion (9.3 +/- 1.52 micrograms/L; P less than .01). Plasma levels of FFA, somatostatin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and glucagon and serum insulin levels were unaffected, while blood glucose levels slightly decreased during saline infusion, but not during GH infusion. These data confirm that met-GH inhibits GHRH-induced GH release, and demonstrate that this inhibition is not mediated by FFA levels.

A short course of recombinant human growth hormone treatment stimulates osteoblasts and activates bone remodeling in normal human volunteers

The effects of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) on biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral content (BMC) were investigated in 20 normal male volunteers (aged 22-31 years) randomized to treatment for 7 days with either rhGH (0.1 IU/kg subcutaneously twice a day) or placebo. Serum somatomedin C rose during treatment (p less than 0.001) but was not significantly different from baseline at day 14. The fasting urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine (p less than 0.001) and calcium/creatinine ratios (p less than 0.01) increased during treatment and remained elevated for 4 and 2 weeks, respectively. Serum bone gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-containing protein (BGP) increased during treatment (p less than 0.001) and remained elevated for 6 months (p less than 0.02). Serum bone alkaline phosphatase (B-AP), after an initial fall in the treatment period (p less than 0.001), increased slightly in the following months (p less than 0.01). In the rhGH group BMC was significantly higher than the prestudy value at day 14 (p less than 0.05) but was unaltered at the end of study. The simultaneous increase in markers of bone resorption and formation during rhGH treatment followed by a decline in resorption parameters within a few weeks and the prolonged effect on BGP and B-AP demonstrate that rhGH treatment stimulates osteoblasts and activates bone remodeling.

Psychoneuroendocrine research in depression. II. Hormonal responses to releasing hormones as a probe for hypothalamic-pituitary-endorgan dysfunction

The rapid growth of fundamental research in neuroendocrinology includes advances in our understanding of the role of neurotransmitters in the control of hypophysiotropic neurons, the concept of neurosecretion, the portal circulation chemotransmitter hypothesis of anterior pituitary regulation, and the chemical structures of the hypophysiotropic hormones. These advances correspond to the emergence of psychoneurobiology, with the appreciation of the roles of neuropeptides, such as hypothalamic releasing and inhibiting hormones, their relevance to brain function and possible involvement in psychiatric disease, and their introduction into psychoneuroendocrinological studies. The subject of the present review is to summarize and integrate current knowledge of the neuroendocrinology of hypothalamic releasing and inhibiting hormones, to apply it to the understanding of the pathogenesis of depression, and to evaluate their relevance as psychoneuroendocrine research tools.

Acute inhibition of somatotroph response to human growth hormone-releasing hormone 1-44 occurs following three hours but not one hour of growth hormone infusion

Our previous studies have demonstrated that a short-term (three hour) infusion of methionyl human growth hormone (met-hGH, 2 micrograms/kg/h) is associated with a rise in serum concentrations of free fatty acids and glycerol, and a blunting of somatotroph response to human growth hormone releasing hormone 1-44 (GRH) in normal volunteers. To gain more information on the time course of this blunting, and to determine whether it could be temporally dissociated from the GH-induced rise in serum concentrations of lipolytic products, the response to GRH (0.3 micrograms/kg) was measured in five normal adult volunteers from hours 1.0 to 3.5 of a 3.5-hour infusion of saline or met-hGH 2 micrograms/kg/h. Somatotroph response to the same dose of GRH from hours 3.0 to 5.5 of a longer (5.5-hour) infusion of saline or met-hGH (2 micrograms/kg/h) in five other volunteers was used for comparison. There was a significant blunting of somatotroph response following three hours, but not one hour of met-hGH infusion. The longer infusion was associated with a significant rise in serum concentrations of free fatty acids, and the shorter met-hGH infusion was too brief to provoke such a rise. Neither met-hGH infusion was associated with a significant rise in serum concentrations of glycerol, insulin, glucose, or insulin-like growth factors (IGF). This study provides further evidence that there is an association between circulating FFA and somatotroph function and suggests that FFA may act as messengers, which provide information to central systems regarding the energy balance of the organism.

Hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) participates in the negative feedback regulation of growth hormone secretion

Effects of growth hormone (GH) excess on immunoreactive hypothalamic GH-releasing factor (GRF) and somatostatin (SRIF) were studied in rats. Hypothalamic GRF content significantly reduced after 7-day daily treatment with 160 micrograms of rat GH or after inoculation of GH-secreting rat pituitary tumors, MtT-F4 for 9 or 13 days and GH3 for 3 months. Basal and 59 mM K+-evoked release of GRF from incubated hypothalami diminished, more than the content, by 43-51% in MtT-F4 tumor- or by 67-83% in GH3 tumor-bearing rats. In contrast, there was a small but significant increase in content or release of SRIF in rats harboring the GH3 or MtT-F4 tumor, respectively. These results indicate the existence of a negative feedback loop via hypothalamic GRF as well as SRIF in control of GH secretion.

Growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing hormone in depression: correlation with GH release following clonidine

Twenty subjects (10 patients with major depressive disorder and 10 controls matched for age, gender, and ovarian status) received 1 microgram/kg synthetic human growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-44 amide as an i.v. bolus dose. Compared to controls, depressed patients showed a significant attenuation of net growth hormone (GH) responses to GHRH associated with normal basal GH concentrations. The blunted GH responses occurred in the face of significantly higher somatomedin C (Sm-C) concentrations. Comparison of GH responses after GHRH with GH output following the alpha 2-agonist clonidine (CLON) revealed a significant positive correlation. The concordance between GH responses after specific challenges at different levels of the GHRH-GH-somatomedin axis indicates the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-somatotropic system in depression and supports the view that altered GH secretory patterns in depression may primarily be due to a suprapituitary disturbance.

Short-term met-hGH infusion inhibits somatotroph response to growth hormone releasing hormone (1-44)

To determine whether the short-term administration of growth hormone inhibits pituitary responsiveness to h-GHRH we measured the somatotroph response to h-GHRH-44 (0.3 micrograms/kg) stimulation in ten normal subjects from the third to the fifth hour of an infusion of met-hGH (2 micrograms/kg/h) or saline. Insulin, insulin-like growth factors (IGF), somatomedins, free fatty acids (FFA), glycerol, and glucose levels also were assessed during the first 3 hours of infusion. Steady-state GH levels of 5 to 20 ng/mL were achieved during met-hGH infusion. No significant changes in IGF, insulin, or glucose levels measured at the beginning and again after three hours of infusion occurred within or between conditions. Infusion of met-hGH was associated with a significantly greater increase in FFA levels (69 +/- 50 mumol/L following saline v 433 +/- 57 mumol/L following three hours of met-hGH infusion (P less than .001)). The somatotroph response to h-GHRH-44 was significantly blunted during met-hGH infusion (incremental area under the GH/time curve decreasing from 1,196 +/- 183 (ng/mL) X min to 380 +/- 139 (ng/mL) X min (P less than .005)). These data demonstrate that this blunting can occur following short-term exogenous GH administration and at serum GH levels comparable to those achieved during naturally occurring bursts of GH secretion. They also suggest that acute mediation of GH release must occur, at least in part, at the pituitary somatotroph level and that IGFs and/or insulin may not be the primary inhibitors. This phenomenon may be directly or indirectly due to GH-dependent metabolic factors such as FFA or glycerol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Response to a growth hormone-releasing hormone analog in heifers treated with recombinant growth hormone

Sixteen pregnant Holstein heifers (430kg) were used to determine the effect of long-term administration of a bovine growth hormone (bGH) made by recombinant DNA technology on the ability of a bolus injection of a growth hormone-releasing hormone analog (Ac-His-1, D-Ala-2, Nle-27, GHRH(1-29 NH2) to increase serum GH. Eight heifers received a daily intramuscular injection of bGH (50 mg/day) for 5 months while the other half received a daily injection of physiological saline (control) over the same period. On the last day of bGH treatment and 1, 5, 10 and 25 days after the cessation of bGH treatment, five heifers from each group were challenged with GHRH analog and the response to this releasing hormone analog was measured. Basal GH concentrations were elevated on the last day of treatment in bGH-treated heifers and declined to concentrations similar to control heifers by 1 day after cessation of treatment. Response to GHRH analog was impaired by bGH during the last day of treatment and one day later. Responsiveness returned to a level similar to controls by 5 days after the end of bGH treatment. Response to GHRH analog was lessened during the period of bGH treatment but there were no long term effects on the animals' ability to respond to the releasing hormone.

GH feedback occurs through modulation of hypothalamic somatostatin under cholinergic control: studies with pyridostigmine and GHRH

We have studied the effect of increased cholinergic tone on the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and on GH feedback, using pyridostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. In six healthy male adult volunteers 120 mg oral pyridostigmine increased basal GH secretion compared to placebo and augmented the GH response to 100 micrograms i.v. GHRH (1-29) NH2; the effect was more than the additive effect of pyridostigmine and GHRH when each was given alone. Pretreatment with 2 IU methionyl-hGH given i.v. abolished the serum GH response to GHRH given 3 h later, demonstrating a negative feedback loop of GH on the response to GHRH; this inhibited response to GHRH was restored in subjects given pyridostigmine as well as methionyl-hGH. The data demonstrate that enhanced cholinergic tone releases GH, augments the serum GH response to GHRH and unblocks the negative feedback effect of methionyl-hGH pretreatment on the GH response to GHRH. These results suggest that GH negative feedback effects on its own secretion occur predominantly through increased hypothalamic somatostatin secretion; this somatostatin secretion is under inhibitory cholinergic control.

Effect of growth hormone on short normal children

The growth of 26 short normal prepubertal children (mean age 8.4, height velocity standard deviation score for chronological age between +0.4 and -0.8) was studied for two years. Sixteen children were treated with somatrem (methionyl growth hormone) during the second year, and the remaining 10 children served as controls. During one year of treatment the height velocity standard deviation score for chronological age increased from the pretreatment mean of -0.44 (SD 0.33) to +2.20 (1.03). These values represented a change in height velocity from a pretreatment mean of 5.3 cm/year (range 4.6-6.9) to 7.4 cm/year (range 5.7-9.9). In the control group the height velocity standard deviation score was unchanged. Bone age advanced by 0.75 (0.33) years in the treated group compared with 0.70 (0.18) years in the control group. There was a significant increase in the height standard deviation score for bone age (0.63 (0.55] in the treated group. Multiple regression analysis of predictive factors contributing to the change in height velocity standard deviation score over the first year of treatment showed that the dose of growth hormone and pretreatment height velocity standard deviation score were important, together yielding a regression correlation coefficient of 0.80. The only metabolic side effect of treatment was an increase in fasting insulin concentration, which may be an important mediator of the anabolic effects of growth hormone. Treatment had no effect on thyroid function, blood pressure, or glucose tolerance. At the end of the treatment year seven of the 16 treated children had developed antibodies to growth hormone, but they were present in low titre with low binding capacity and in no child was growth attenuated. Biosynthetic growth hormone improved the height velocity of children growing along or parallel to the third height centile, but the effects on height prognosis need to be assessed over a longer period.

Growth hormone pretreatment in man blocks the response to growth hormone-releasing hormone; evidence for a direct effect of growth hormone

The effect of pretreatment with biosynthetic methionyl human GH (hGH) on the GH response to GHRH has been studied in normal subjects. Eight volunteers were given either 4 IU hGH or placebo s.c. 12-hourly for 72 h before a GHRH test, or a single s.c. dose of 4 IU hGH 12 h before a GHRH test. Somatomedin-C (Sm-C) levels at the time of the GHRH tests were significantly elevated after treatment with hGH compared to placebo, and the GH response to GHRH was significantly attenuated. A further six subjects were given 2 IU hGH or placebo i.v., and i.v. GHRH 3 h later; there was no rise in Sm-C for the 5 h of the study after either treatment; nevertheless, the response to GHRH was completely abolished by pretreatment with hGH. These results demonstrate that GH can regulate its own secretion independently of changes in Sm-C levels, through a mechanism other than the inhibition of GHRH release. The attenuated response to GHRH in the presence of elevated Sm-C levels may be related to Sm-C, or be a more direct effect of the recently elevated GH levels.