Changes in use of valproate and other mood stabilizers for patients with schizophrenia from 1994 to 1998

Benzodiazepines and Mood Stabilizers in Schizophrenia Patients Treated with Oral versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics-An Observational Study

Schizophrenia is a chronic, invalidating, and polymorphic disease, characterized by relapses and remission periods. The main treatment option in schizophrenia are antipsychotics, administered as an oral or as a long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation. Although international guidelines rarely recommend it, mood stabilizers (MS) and/or benzodiazepines (BZD) are frequently prescribed as adjunctive therapy in schizophrenia patients for various reasons. This is an observational, cross-sectional study including stabilized schizophrenia patients. A total of 315 patients were enrolled. Of these, 77 patients (24.44%) were stabilized on LAIs and 238 (75.56%) patients on oral antipsychotics (OAP). Eighty-four patients (26.66%) had concomitant treatment with MS and 119 patients (37.77%) had concomitant benzodiazepine treatment. No statistical significance was observed in MS or BZD use between LAIs and OAPs. In total, 136 patients (43.17%) were stabilized on antipsychotic monotherapy. Our study shows that the long-term use of benzodiazepines and mood stabilizers remains elevated among stabilized schizophrenia patients, regardless of the antipsychotic formulation (oral or LAI). Patients receiving second-generation LAI antipsychotics (SGA-LAI) seem to be more likely to be stabilized on monotherapy compared to those receiving oral antipsychotics. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary in order to clarify the benefits of the current drug polypharmacy trends.

Effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on serum valproic level acid in Chinese Han patients with schizophrenia

Valproic acid is an anticonvulsant, which is also widely used for treating psychiatric disorders. Some clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of valproic acid augmentation therapy in schizophrenia. Interindividual variability in valproic acid dose and serum concentration may reflect functional consequences of genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum concentrations of valproic acid and single nucleotide polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 gene in patients with schizophrenia. All patients had been receiving fixed dose of valproic acid for at least 2 weeks. The daily doses were 0.5–1.5 g. No other drugs except olanzapine were coadministered. Serum concentrations of valproic acid were measured using the ultra-high performance liquid chromatography method with mass-spectrometric detection. The CYP2C19 (CYP2C19*2 G681A rs4244285 and CYP2C19*3 G636A rs4986893) genotypes were identified by real-time PCR analyses. The mean concentration/dose ratios of valproic acid were significantly higher in patients with CYP2C19 *1/*2 genotype (P < 0.01) or CYP2C19 *2/*3 genotype (P < 0.01) than in those with CYP2C12 *1/*1 genotype. The mean concentration/dose ratios of valproic acid were significantly higher in patients with 1 (P < 0.01) or 2 (P < 0.01) mutated alleles for CYP2C19 than in those without mutated alleles. And the post hoc analysis revealed that the result has acceptable statistical (power (1 – β) = 0.8486 at type I  level of 0.05) to support the observed significant associations for CYP2C19 SNPs and serum C/D ratios of valproic acid. The findings of this study suggest that the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19 significantly affect the steady-state serum concentrations of valproic acid in Chinese Han population. The determination of the CYP2C19 genotypes may be useful for dosing adjustment in schizophrenia patients on valproic acid therapy.

Mood Stabilizers in Psychiatric Disorders and Mechanisms Learnt from In Vitro Model Systems

Bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia are psychiatric disorders that manifest unusual mental, behavioral, and emotional patterns leading to suffering and disability. These disorders span heterogeneous conditions with variable heredity and elusive pathophysiology. Mood stabilizers such as lithium and valproic acid (VPA) have been shown to be effective in BD and, to some extent in schizophrenia. This review highlights the efficacy of lithium and VPA treatment in several randomized, controlled human trials conducted in patients suffering from BD and schizophrenia. Furthermore, we also address the importance of using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as a disease model for mirroring the disease's phenotypes. In BD, iPSC-derived neurons enabled finding an endophenotype of hyperexcitability with increased hyperpolarizations. Some of the disease phenotypes were significantly alleviated by lithium treatment. VPA studies have also reported rescuing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and reducing activity. Another significant contribution of iPSC models can be attributed to studying the molecular etiologies of schizophrenia such as abnormal differentiation of patient-derived neural stem cells, decreased neuronal connectivity and neurite number, impaired synaptic function, and altered gene expression patterns. Overall, despite significant advances using these novel models, much more work remains to fully understand the mechanisms by which these disorders affect the patients' brains.

Effect of gabapentin on sleep-deprivation-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition

RATIONALE

There are controversial reports on the effects of gabapentin in respect to psychotic symptoms. Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response is an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. In laboratory rodents, deficits in sensorimotor gating are used to model behavioral endophenotypes of schizophrenia. Sleep deprivation disrupts prepulse inhibition and can be used as a psychosis model to evaluate effects of gabapentin.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate behavioral effects of gabapentin in both naïve and sleep-deprived rats.

METHODS

Sleep deprivation was induced in male Wistar rats by using the modified multiple platform technique in a water tank for 72 h. The effect of water tank itself was studied in a sham group. The effects of oral acute and subchronic (4.5 days) gabapentin doses (25, 100, or 200 mg/kg/day) on sensorimotor gating and locomotor activity was evaluated by prepulse inhibition test and locomotor activity test, respectively. Plasma gabapentin levels of some groups and body weights of all groups were also assessed.

RESULTS

Sleep deprivation disrupted prepulse inhibition, increased locomotor activity, reduced gabapentin plasma levels, and body weights. Some gabapentin doses disrupted sensorimotor gating irrespective of sleep condition. Some gabapentin doses increased locomotor activity in non-sleep-deprived rats and decreased locomotor activity in sleep-deprived rats. On the contrary, gabapentin did not normalize sleep deprivation-induced disruption in sensorimotor gating.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep deprivation via modified multiple platform technique could be used as an animal model for psychosis. Gabapentin may have dose- and duration-dependent effects on sensorimotor gating and locomotor activity.

Psychotropic drug-prescribing correlates of disorganized speech in Asians with schizophrenia: The REAP-AP study

BACKGROUND

Although disorganized speech is seen as one of the nuclear features of schizophrenia, there have been few reports of disorganized speech-associated psychotropic drug-prescribing patterns in large samples of schizophrenia patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the prevalence of disorganized speech and its correlates in terms of psychotropic drug prescribing, using the data from the Research on Asian Psychotropic Patterns for Antipsychotics (REAP-AP) study.

METHOD

A total of 3744 patients with the ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia were enrolled from 71 survey centers in 15 Asian countries/areas. An essential criterion of disorganized speech was that it was "severe enough to impair substantially effective communication" as defined in the DSM-5. A binary logistic model was fitted to identify the psychotropic drug-prescribing correlates of disorganized speech.

RESULTS

After adjusting for the potential effects of confounding variables, the binary logistic regression model showed that the presence of disorganized speech was directly associated with adjunctive use of mood stabilizers (P < 0.001) and cumulative diazepam equivalent dose (P < 0.0001), and inversely associated with adjunctive use of anti-Parkinson drugs (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The association between disorganized speech and adjunctive use of mood stabilizers could perhaps be understood in the context of a relationship with impulsiveness/aggressiveness, or in terms of deconstructing the Kraepelinian dualism.

Valproate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, and valproate is one of these.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether:1. valproate alone is an effective treatment for schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses; and2. valproate augmentation of antipsychotic medication is an effective treatment for the same illnesses.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (July 2002; February 2007; July 2012; March 04, 2016). We also contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of relevant studies in order to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials comparing valproate to antipsychotics or to placebo (or no intervention), whether as the sole agent or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts, ordered papers, and re-inspected and quality-assessed these. At least two review authors independently extracted data. We analysed dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CI). We analysed continuous data using mean differences (MD) and their 95% CI. We assessed risk of bias for included studies and used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to create a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

The 2012 update search identified 19 further relevant studies, most of which were from China. Thus the review currently includes 26 studies with a total of 2184 participants. All trials examined the effectiveness of valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotics. With the exception of two studies, the studies were small, the participants and personnel were not blinded (neither was outcome assessment), and most were short-term and incompletely reported.For this update we prespecified seven main outcomes of interest: clinical response (clinically significant response, aggression/agitation), leaving the study early (acceptability of treatment, overall tolerability), adverse events (sedation, weight gain) and quality of life.Adding valproate to antipsychotic treatment resulted in more clinically significant response than adding placebo to antipsychotic drugs (14 RCTs, n = 1049, RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.47, I2 = 12%, low-quality evidence). However, this effect was removed after excluding open RCTs in a sensitivity analysis. In terms of acceptability of treatment (measured by the number of participants leaving the study early due to any reason) valproate was just as acceptable as placebo (11 RCTs, n = 951, RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.24, I2 = 55%). Also overall tolerability (measured by the number of participants leaving the study early for adverse events) between valproate and placebo was similar (6 RCTs, n = 974, RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.97, I2 = 0).Participants in the valproate group were found to be less aggressive than the control group based on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (3 RCTs, n = 186, MD -2.55, 95% CI -3.92 to -1.19, I2 = 82%, very low-quality evidence). Participants receiving valproate more frequently experienced sedation (8 RCTs, n = 770, RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.79, I2 = 0, low-quality evidence) but were no more likely to gain weight than those receiving placebo (4 RCTs, n = 427, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.82, I2 = 0, low-quality evidence). No study reported on the important outcome of quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence, based on a number of trials, that the augmentation of antipsychotics with valproate may be effective for overall clinical response, and also for specific symptoms, especially in terms of excitement and aggression. However, this evidence was entirely based on open RCTs. Moreover, valproate was associated with a number of adverse events among which sedation and dizziness appeared significantly more frequently than in the control groups. Further randomised studies which are blinded are necessary before any clear recommendation can be made. Ideally these would focus on people with schizophrenia and aggression, on those with treatment-resistant forms of the illness and on those with schizoaffective disorders.

Trends in the access to and the use of antipsychotic medications and psychotropic co-treatments in Asian patients with schizophrenia

To date, antipsychotics remain the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia and related disorders although other psychotropic medications and non-pharmaceutical interventions have been used adjunctively in some patients and settings. Regular surveys on access to and prescription patterns of psychotropic medications in clinical practice are an important and efficient way of examining the use and time trends of treatments in a given population and region. Unlike developed Western countries, Asian countries have not fully undergone deinstitutionalisation of the severely and chronically mentally ill, and community-based mental health services are still under-developed. As a result, a large number of psychiatric patients still receive treatments in psychiatric hospitals. Moreover, there have been very limited studies examining access to and prescription patterns of psychotropic medications for schizophrenia patients in Asian countries. In this paper, we focus on the only international project on the use of psychotropic medications in schizophrenia patients in selected East and Southeast Asian countries/territories summarising its major findings. Most of the first- and second-generation antipsychotics (FGAs and SGAs) are available in Asian countries, but the access to psychotropic medications is largely affected by socio-cultural and historical contexts, health insurance schemes, health care policy, medication cost and consumers' preference across different countries/territories. Overall, the proportional use of FGAs, high dose antipsychotic treatment and antipsychotic polypharmacy have decreased, while the use of SGAs and antidepressants have increased and the utilisation of benzodiazepines and mood stabilisers has remained relatively stable over time. However, within these general trends, there is great inter-country variation regarding the psychotropic prescribing patterns and trends in Asian schizophrenia patients that also seems to differ from data in many Western countries.

Gender differences in mood stabilizer medications prescribed to Veterans with serious mental illness

BACKGROUND

Mood stabilizer medications (MSMs) can induce significant weight gain and other metabolic side effects. Research suggests that women are more susceptible to psychotropic medication-induced metabolic side effects than men. We examined gender differences in the likelihood of receiving an MSM with a lower liability for weight gain using data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system.

METHODS

We identified 3823 VA patients with a schizophrenia or bipolar disorder diagnosis who initiated treatment with a MSM between 10/2006 and 9/2011. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to examine gender differences in the likelihood of incident prescription of MSMs with low versus medium/high metabolic risk, adjusting for fiscal year of prescribing and demographic, mental health, and physical health characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 47% of women were prescribed a low metabolic risk MSM compared to 26% of men (p<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, women were 2.19 times as likely as men to be prescribed a low metabolic risk MSM (95% CI: 1.84-2.60, p<0.0001). Several demographic and clinical covariates were also independently related to prescribing of MSMs by level of metabolic risk.

LIMITATIONS

This study used retrospective administrative data collected from a VA healthcare system database, which does not allow us to understand the context in which MSM treatment decisions were made.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribing choices for MSMs by VA mental health prescribers and female Veterans may reflect a growing awareness of the potential adverse health consequences of these treatments in women.

Efficacy and safety of valproic acid versus haloperidol in patients with acute agitation: results of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of valproate versus haloperidol in decreasing the agitation level in affected patients in the emergency department. We assigned 80 acutely agitated patients to receive either intravenous sodium valproate (20 mg/kg) or intramuscular haloperidol (5 mg/1 ml). Agitation was measured at baseline and 30 min after the first injection using the Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-Excited Component subscale, and the Agitated Behavior Scale. For 80 patients treated with sodium valproate, the mean ± SD dosage was 1541.5 ± 286 mg (range 940-2400). The mean postintervention ACES scores from baseline to 30 min after drug injection were 4.73 (SD = 1.93) for the valproate group and 5.45 (SD = 2.09) for the haloperidol group (P = 0.028). No significant differences were observed in terms of the mean changes 30 min after the intervention for two additional agitation scales. A larger proportion of patients in the haloperidol group experienced intense sedation (36.2%, P < 0.001) and extrapyramidal symptoms (8.7%, P = 0.007) compared with the valproate group (2.5% for intense sedation, no patient for extrapyramidal symptoms). The findings suggest that in the clinical practice setting of emergency psychiatry, intravenous valproate is as effective as haloperidol in reducing agitation, with a better safety profile.

The psychopharmacology of violence: making sensible decisions

Violent behavior associated with mental disorders is a common reason for admission to a psychiatric inpatient unit. Once hospitalized, patients may continue to be intermittently agitated and have persistent aggressive behaviors, preventing their discharge back into the community. Managing agitation quickly with effective pharmacological agents can avoid further escalation to aggression and violence. In the acute setting, this usually involves the parenteral use of antipsychotics, with or without benzodiazepines. Within the past decade, short-acting intramuscular formulations of second-generation antipsychotics have become available and provide a means to induce calm with a substantially lower risk of acute dystonia or akathisia compared with haloperidol. New alternative formulations that avoid injections include inhalation and sublingual administration. Longer-term management of persistent aggressive behavior by reducing the frequency and intensity of future episodes of agitation is more complex. In contrast to agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar mania, no agents have yet been approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of persistent aggressive behavior. The strongest evidence supports the use of clozapine as an antihostility agent, followed by olanzapine. Adjunctive strategies with anticonvulsants and beta-adrenergic agents may also be worthwhile to consider.

Factors influencing weight gain in an Asian population of psychiatric inpatients: a retrospective study in Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with weight gain by psychiatric inpatients in short-term treatment.

METHODS

A total of 378 medical records were reviewed, and sociodemographic, clinical, and baseline biochemical data from 221 psychiatric inpatients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Evaluation of baseline characteristics indicated that the following were significant predictors of weight gain: Axis I diagnosis, treatment with second-generation antipsychotics and mood stabilizers, length of stay, admission body weight, low-density lipoprotein value, triglyceride level, and triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein ratio. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the independent predictors of weight gain were length of stay and taking both a second-generation antipsychotic and a mood stabilizer. The triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein ratio was an influencing factor inversely associated with weight gain (P = 0.063).

DISCUSSION

Length of hospitalization and polypharmacy strongly predicted weight gain among psychiatric inpatients receiving short-term treatment.

Off-label use of sodium valproate for schizophrenia

Background

Off-label use of a drug not according to its regulatory labeling has become common in medicine, especially in the field of psychiatry. Mood stabilizers are intended to be used to attenuate mood fluctuations in bipolar disorder, but their use has spread to patients with schizophrenia, as it provides greater control of impulsivity and aggressiveness. Sodium valproate is one of the most frequently used mood stabilizers in psychiatry. This study determined the prevalence of off-label use of sodium valproate for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in Abarbanel Psychiatric Hospital and the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with its use.

Methods

Retrospective study of patients hospitalized in 2011–2012 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in one of three general psychiatric wards.

Results

Valproate use was significantly lower in the geriatric group (11.6% vs. 20.1%, chi square  = 4.7, p = .03), in patients with schizophrenia (14.1% vs. schizoaffective disorder (35.2%), chi square  = 29, p<.001) and in patients receiving both atypical and typical antipsychotics (23.3% vs. 16.4%, p = .04). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, diagnosis and the combination of atypical and typical antipsychotics predicted the use of sodium valproate. The number of other medications prescribed did not predict sodium valproate use.

Conclusions

Off-label use of sodium valproate in psychiatric patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder is extensive, especially in younger patients and those with schizoaffective disorder. More research is needed to determine whether it is being prescribed appropriately.

Spectrum of effectiveness of valproate in neuropsychiatry

Valproate is principally effective in manic aspects of bipolar disorder. Tolerability has been somewhat more favorable for valproate than comparators, with the frequent adverse effects being gastrointestinal disturbances and weight gain. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins are reduced by valproate. Valproate is effective and well tolerated when combined with lithium or antipsychotic drugs. Valproate is efficacious in mixed and euphoric mania. In studies of maintenance versus placebo and active comparators, patients initially treated with divalproex for mania had more robust long-term benefits than in the full sample analyses. In maintenance treatment, patients whose valproate serum levels were between 75 and 99 microg/ml had longer time to discontinuation for any reason or a new mood episode than did patients receiving placebo. The profile of utility in bipolar disorders is principally for core features of manic symptomatology (e.g., impulsivity, hyperactivity and irritability), with little evidence of benefit for anxiety or psychosis. Valproate appears useful in other disorders that have behavioral dimensions inclusive of the domains that valproate benefits in bipolar disorders, such as schizophrenia.

Pharmacokinetics of Aripiprazole and Concomitant Lithium and Valproate

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of the antipsychotic aripiprazole when coadministered with lithium or valproate. Two open-label, sequential treatment design studies were conducted in chronically institutionalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requiring treatment with lithium (n = 12) or valproate (divalproex sodium) (n = 10). Patients received aripiprazole 30 mg/day on days 1 to 14 and aripiprazole with concomitant therapy on days 15 to 36. Lithium was titrated from 900 mg until serum concentrations reached 1.0 to 1.4 mEq/L for at least 5 days. Valproate was titrated to 50 to 125 mg/L. Coadministration with lithium increased mean Cmax and AUC values of aripiprazole by about 19% and 15%, respectively, whereas the apparent oral clearance decreased by 15%. There was no effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of aripiprazole. Coadministration with valproate decreased the AUC and Cmax of aripiprazole by 24% and 26%, respectively, with minimal effects on the active metabolite. Therapeutic doses of lithium and divalproex had no clinically significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Trends in treatment of newly treated schizophrenia-spectrum disorder patients in Taiwan from 1999 to 2006

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine trends in the first-year pharmacological treatment of newly treated schizophrenia patients in Taiwan between 1999 and 2006.

METHOD

We collected data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of all newly treated patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (ICD-9 295.x). We analyzed all prescription records after diagnosis of schizophrenia and described the patterns of antipsychotics use, other concomitant psychotropic agents use, and mental health system utilization. We tested for trend using multivariate logistic regression and Spearman's partial correlation rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 2895 newly treated patients with schizophrenia were enrolled. The percentage of prescriptions of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) was found to have increased significantly, from 27.5% in 1999 to 76.9% in 2006. The ratio of good antipsychotics adherence (medication possession ratio >0.8) also increased, from 23.2% in 1998 to 38.9% in 2006. Corresponding to this, the percentage of usage of first-generation antipsychotic drugs, anticholinergic agents, and long-term combination therapy declined. However, the prescription of antidepressants and mood stabilizers and the hospitalization rate increased. No change was noted in the number of psychiatric visits.

CONCLUSION

In the first-year treatment of newly treated schizophrenic patients between 1999 and 2006, we found pharmacological treatment had changed in terms of types of antipsychotics, adherence, and the use of other concomitant psychotropic agents, with the introduction of SGAs. The benefits and costs of the changes with a trend toward an increasing prescription of SGAs warrant further investigation.

Pharmacological management of acute and persistent aggression in forensic psychiatry settings

Aggressive behaviour is common in forensic psychiatric settings. The aetiology of aggressive behaviour is multifactorial and can be driven by psychosis, impulsivity, psychopathy, intoxication, cognitive impairment, or a combination of all of these. Recognition of the different factors behind the aggression can inform medication selection and the relative need for specific environmental and behavioural interventions in a forensic psychiatric setting. Acute agitation needs to be managed quickly and effectively before further escalation of the behavioural dyscontrol occurs. Benzodiazepines and/or antipsychotic medications are often used and can be given intramuscularly to achieve a rapid onset of action. Available are intramuscular preparations of second-generation antipsychotics that have similar efficacy to lorazepam and haloperidol in reducing agitation, but are well tolerated and not associated with the extrapyramidal adverse effects, including akathisia, that can plague the older first-generation antipsychotics. The longer-term management of persistent aggressive behaviour can be quite complex. A major obstacle is that the causality of aggressive events can differ from patient to patient, and also from event to event in the same patient. For patients with schizophrenia and persistent aggressive behaviour, clozapine is recommended both for its superior antipsychotic effect and its specific anti-hostility effect. Mood stabilizers such as valproate may be helpful in instances of poor impulsivity and personality disorders. Other agents that have been successfully used include β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers) and antidepressants.

Adjunctive mood stabilizer treatment for hospitalized schizophrenia patients: Asia psychotropic prescription study (2001-2008)

Recent studies indicate relatively high international rates of adjunctive psychotropic medication, including mood stabilizers, for patients with schizophrenia. Since such treatments are little studied in Asia, we examined the frequency of mood-stabilizer use and its clinical correlates among hospitalized Asian patients diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2001-2008. We evaluated usage rates of mood stabilizers with antipsychotic drugs, and associated factors, for in-patients diagnosed with DSM-IV schizophrenia in 2001, 2004 and 2008 in nine Asian regions: China, Hong Kong, India, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and Singapore. Overall, mood stabilizers were given to 20.4% (n=1377/6761) of hospitalized schizophrenia patients, with increased usage over time. Mood-stabilizer use was significantly and independently associated in multivariate logistic modeling with: aggressive behaviour, disorganized speech, year sampled (2008 vs. earlier), multiple hospitalizations, less negative symptoms, younger age, with regional variation (Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore>Taiwan or China). Co-prescription of adjunctive mood stabilizers with antipsychotics for hospitalized Asian schizophrenia patients increased over the past decade, and was associated with specific clinical characteristics. This practice parallels findings in other countries and illustrates ongoing tension between evidence-based practice vs. individualized, empirical treatment of psychotic disorders.

The effect of adjunctive armodafinil on cognitive performance and psychopathology in antipsychotic-treated patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of adjunctive armodafinil for cognitive performance, and negative and affective symptoms, were examined in 60 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

METHOD

This was a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed dose trial of armodafinil (150 mg/d) augmentation in patients with clinically stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Cognition, psychopathology, alertness/wakefulness and adverse effects were assessed with standardized rating instruments. The primary endpoint was performance on measures of attention/vigilance.

RESULTS

Patients were randomly allocated to adjunctive armodafinil or placebo. There was a significant Drug×Time interaction effect for attention/vigilance, due to modest non-significant worsening in the armodafinil group and improvement in the armodafinil group [CPT-Pairs d', F(1,40)=6.2, p=0.017]. However, it became non-significant after correction for multiple comparisons. There were no differences between armodafinil and placebo in other cognitive domains or psychopathology measures. However, armodafinil was associated with significant improvement in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) anhedonia-asociality [F(1,41)=4.1, p=0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in neurocognitive measures between adjunctive armodafinil and placebo in this 6-week study. Armodafinil improved anhedonia-asociality, but not other negative symptom domains.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from the participants and interested parties, and cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. The practice recommendations presented are based on the available evidence to date, and seek to clarify which interventions are of proven benefit. It is hoped that the recommendations will help to inform clinical decision making for practitioners, and perhaps also serve as a source of information for patients and carers. They are accompanied by a more detailed qualitative review of the available evidence. The strength of supporting evidence for each recommendation is rated.

Carbamazepine but not valproate induces CYP2A6 activity in smokers with mental illness

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drugs (AED) are being increasingly used in the management of serious mental illness, but their effects on nicotine metabolism have not been studied.

METHODS

This study investigated the effects of three AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and valproic acid) on nicotine and nicotine metabolite levels in 149 smokers with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder who participated in an afternoon blood draw for nicotine, cotinine, and 3'-hydroxycotinine (3HC). The ratio of 3HC to cotinine was calculated as a marker of CYP2A6 metabolic activity. Among the participants, 8 smokers were taking carbamazepine, 6 were taking oxcarbazepine, and 40 were taking valproic acid.

RESULTS

The 3HC/cotinine ratio was significantly higher in individuals taking carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine (combined, n = 14) versus those not taking either (mean 0.993 versus 0.503; P < 0.001). The cotinine/cigarette per day ratio was significantly lower in individuals taking carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine. The 3HC/cotinine ratios were also significantly higher in the subgroup of individuals taking carbamazepine (n = 8) versus those not taking it. There were no significant differences in nicotine or cotinine levels or 3HC/cotinine ratios in individuals taking valproic acid versus those not taking it. We conducted backward stepwise linear regression models to identify predictors of the log transformed 3HC/cotinine ratios. Taking carbamazepine and number of cigarettes smoked per day were significant determinants of log 3HC/cotinine.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbamazepine likely induces hepatic metabolism via CYP2A6 and is associated with increased 3HC/cotinine ratios.

IMPACT

Increased nicotine metabolism in individuals using AED has implications for increased smoking behavior and exposure to more tobacco toxins, which warrants further study.

Treatment of schizophrenia with depot preparations of fluphenazine, haloperidol, and risperidone among inpatients at state-operated psychiatric facilities

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to characterize the inpatient utilization of depot antipsychotics.

METHOD

The characteristics of adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, hospitalized for at least 28 days, and who were prescribed depot antipsychotics were examined from 2004 to 2006 using a database from a large state-operated psychiatric hospital system. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving depot fluphenazine or haloperidol were compared to those prescribed depot risperidone.

RESULTS

We identified 2210 unique patients who initiated treatment with a depot antipsychotic (after receiving oral antipsychotics). Of these, 1484 (67.1%) received depot fluphenazine or haloperidol, and 726 (32.9%) received risperidone as their initial depot antipsychotic. Patients who received depot risperidone did not differ from those receiving depot fluphenazine or haloperidol with regard to demographics, diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, number of comorbid psychiatric or medical diagnoses, or diagnosis of substance abuse. Patients started on depot risperidone during the observation period had a longer length of stay prior to initiation of depot than those started on depot fluphenazine or haloperidol (583 days vs. 237 days, t=5.489, p<.001). Patients who started on depot risperidone were less likely to be discharged on that medication than were patients who started on depot fluphenazine or haloperidol (odds ratio from Cox regression model=0.846 [95% CI 0.745-0.960]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initiated on depot risperidone had a longer length of stay prior to their first injection and were less likely to be discharged on that medication compared to patients initiated on depot fluphenazine or haloperidol, possibly indicating that patients initiating depot risperidone had a more severe or treatment-resistant course of illness and/or that there were reimbursement barriers for the outpatient utilization of depot risperidone, or that efficacy differences exist between the depot antipsychotics at the doses used in this population.

Schizophrenia with impulsive and aggressive behaviors

Impulsive and aggressive behaviors are important clinical challenges in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. They occur both in the acute phase as well as in the chronic phase of the disorder and call for differentiated treatment interventions. It is important to always first consider behavioral and nonpharmacological interventions. High levels of structure and organization together with a nonconfrontational approach may be very successful interventions. In terms of acute pharmacological interventions, clinicians now have a broad spectrum of intramuscular antipsychotic compounds available with rapid onset of action and relatively little sedation. There is a need for new compounds with a more acceptable tolerability profile for the long-term treatment of these important syndromes.

"Stat" medication administration predicts hospital discharge

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the use of "stat" medications for inpatients in a large state psychiatric hospital system, and examines the relationship between receipt of a "stat" for agitation and subsequent hospital discharge.

METHODS

Use of "stat" medications in 2005 was retrospectively determined using a database that contains diagnosis and prescription information from 17 state-run adult civil facilities. A logistic regression model explored the relationship between receipt of a "stat" order for intramuscular preparations of either antipsychotics or lorazepam within the first 30 days of hospitalization and likelihood of hospital discharge by 6 months.

RESULTS

Among 7,202 patients who received antipsychotic medication in 2005, 3,240 (45%) also received a "stat" psychotropic medication during that year. Among 40,651 stat orders, 19,142 (47%) were for intramuscular antipsychotics or lorazepam presumably given for the treatment of agitation. Among 1,673 patients admitted in the first 6 months of 2005, 415 (25%) received at least one such "agitation stat." The percent discharged at six months among "agitation stat" receivers was 39%, compared to 69% among those who did not receive an "agitation stat" (chi-square = 115, df = 1, P < .001). Regression analysis showed that receiving an "agitation stat" in the first 30 days of hospitalization was associated with a 37% lower likelihood of being discharged by 6 months after admission (odds ratio .63, 95% CI: .46-.86).

CONCLUSIONS

"Stat" medications are commonly used. The use of "agitation stat" medications can be used as a proxy for clinical stability and may prove to be a useful outcome measure for future pharmacoepidemiologic studies of comparative medication effectiveness.

Antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia: likelihood to be helped or harmed, understanding proximal and distal benefits and risks

Benefit-risk decisions are the central part of the philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Although number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) can quantify differences between two antipsychotics in terms of benefits and risks for the treatment of schizophrenia, these benefits and risks can take on greatly differing degrees of importance or relevance depending on the subjective point of view of the patient and clinician, baseline risks, severity of the underlying illness, as well as the time horizon when these effects emerge. The metric of likelihood to be helped or harmed, the ratio NNH to NNT, can be helpful in quantifying the benefit:risk ratio, provided that the outcomes are carefully matched in terms of both importance to the clinician and the patient and whether they are proximal or distal. The examples provided are extensions to the initially published NNT and NNH analyses conducted by the first author.

Valproate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used; valproate is one of these.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of valproate for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (last update February 2007). This register is compiled by methodical searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, Dissertation abstracts, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO, RUSSMED, Sociofile, supplemented with hand searching of relevant journals and numerous conference proceedings. We also contacted a pharmaceutical company and authors of relevant studies in order to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials comparing valproate to antipsychotics or to placebo (or no intervention), whether as the sole agent or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts, ordered papers and re-inspected and quality assessed these. Data were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. We analysed dichotomous data using relative risks (RR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CI). We analysed continuous data using weighted mean differences. Where possible we calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistics.

MAIN RESULTS

The update search identified two further relevant studies, thus the review currently includes seven studies with a total of 519 participants. All trials examined the effectiveness of valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotics. With one exception the studies were small, short-term and incompletely reported. Adding valproate was as acceptable as adding placebo to antipsychotic drugs (6 RCT, n=270, RR leaving the study early 1.7 CI 0.9 to 3.2). No significant effect of valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication on the participants' global state or the general mental state at the endpoint was evident. However, one study showed a quicker onset of action in the combination group (Casey 2003). A single small study found the participants in the valproate group to be less aggressive than the control group (n=30, WMD -3.8, CI -5.1 to -2.5). Participants receiving valproate more frequently experienced sedation than those in the placebo group. In a single small study valproate significantly reduced tardive dyskinesia (n=30, WMD -3.3, CI -4.9 to -1.7). The effects of valproate on important subgroups such as those with schizophrenia and aggressive behaviour or those with schizoaffective disorder are unknown.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on currently available randomised trial-derived evidence, there are no data to support or to refute valproate as a sole agent for schizophrenia. There is some evidence for positive effects on aggression and tardive dyskinesia, but given that these results were based on only a single small study they cannot be considered robust. Given the paucity of the available database further large, simple well-designed and reported trials are necessary. Ideally these would focus on people with schizophrenia and aggression, on those with treatment resistant forms of the disorder and on those with schizoaffective disorders.

Adjunct extended-release valproate semisodium in late life schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Adjunctive anticonvulsant medications may benefit some individuals with schizophrenia, however data on adjunct anticonvulsants in older adults with schizophrenia is limited. This prospective, 12-week open label study evaluated adjunct extended-release valproate semisodium (divalproex) in 20 older adults with schizophrenia.

METHODS

The study was conducted at an academic psychiatry clinic in the mid-western United States. Participants were self-referred from posted advertisements or referred by clinic practitioners. Extended-release valproate semisodium was added onto antipsychotic treatment. Individuals with active substance use disorders or active significant medical comorbidity were excluded. Primary outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Tolerability was evaluated via patient self-reported side effects, change from baseline in body weight and change on abnormal movement scales.

RESULTS

Patients (mean age 61 years, range 49.8-79.2 years) had significant reductions in psychosis scores as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) p<0.01, as well as in global functioning as measured by the Global Assessment Scale (GAS) p<0.01 and depression as measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) p<0.05. Mean dose of extended-release valproate semisodium was 587.50 mg/day SD+/-247.02. Extended-release valproate semisodium was well tolerated in this older adult population. The primary adverse effect was sedation, which appeared to be relatively dose and titration-speed dependent. Weight change was not significant.

CONCLUSION

While extended-release valproate semisodium appears efficacious and well tolerated in older adults with schizophrenia, data from larger, controlled trials is needed.

Changes in density of calcium-binding-protein-immunoreactive GABAergic neurons in prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

There is evidence that GABAergic neurotransmission is altered in mental disorders such as schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorder (BPD). The calcium-binding proteins (CBPs) calbindin (CB), calretinin (CR), and parvalbumin (PV) are used as markers of specific subpopulations of cortical GABAergic interneurons. We examined the postmortem prefrontal cortical region (Brodmann's area 9) of patients with SCZ and BPD, and of age-matched control subjects, excluding suicide cases. The laminar density of neurons immunoreactive (IR) for three CBPs, namely CB, CR, and PV, was quantified. The densities of CB-IR neurons in layer 2 and PV-IR neurons in layer 4 in the SCZ subjects decreased compared with those in the control subjects. When CBP-IR neurons were classified according to their size, a reduction in the density of medium CB-IR neurons in layer 2 in SCZ subjects and an increase in the density of large CR-IR neurons in layer 2 in BPD subjects were observed. These results suggest that alterations in specific GABAergic neurons are present in mental disorders, and that such alterations may reflect the vulnerability toward the disorders.

Risperidone alone versus risperidone plus valproate in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and hostility

The objective of the study was to compare the antiaggressive efficacy of risperidone monotherapy versus risperidone plus valproate in patients with schizophrenia. This was an 8-week open-label randomized parallel group clinical trial in hospitalized adults diagnosed with schizophrenia and with hostile behavior. Patients were randomly assigned to receive risperidone alone (n=16) or risperidone plus valproate (n=17). To minimize bias, raters were blinded to the assigned treatment arm. Outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE), and the Overt Aggression Scale (OAS). Although significantly fewer patients randomized to monotherapy completed the study (chi(2)=8.62, d.f.=1, P=0.003), no significant differences between monotherapy or combination treatment were observed in change of the BDHI, BIS, NOSIE, PANSS total scores, OAS measures of aggressive behavior or the hostility item of the PANSS. In conclusion, although patients receiving combination treatment were more likely to complete the study, we were unable to detect a meaningful advantage for combination therapy as measured by rating scales.

Pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole and concomitant carbamazepine

The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole when coadministered with carbamazepine using an open-label sequential treatment design in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Nine male patients were enrolled and received aripiprazole monotherapy (30 mg once daily) for 14 days, after which aripiprazole steady-state pharmacokinetics were assessed. Subjects were then administered carbamazepine together with aripiprazole for 4 to 6 weeks. The dose of carbamazepine was titrated to produce a trough serum concentration within the range of 8 to 12 mg/L. Aripiprazole pharmacokinetics were then assessed in the presence of carbamazepine. Six patients completed the study as designed. Coadministration with carbamazepine decreased the values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of aripiprazole by 66% and 71%, respectively (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Similarly, coadministration with carbamazepine decreased the values of mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour dosing interval of the major active metabolite of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, by 68% and 69%, respectively (P < 0.001). Both aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole are substrates for the cytochrome P-450 3A4 enzyme which is known to be induced by carbamazepine dosed to steady state. Thus, therapeutic doses of carbamazepine had significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. When carbamazepine is added to aripiprazole therapy, aripiprazole dose should be doubled (to 20-30 mg/d). Additional dose increases should be based on clinical evaluation. When carbamazepine is withdrawn from combination therapy, aripiprazole dose should then be reduced.

Do NMDA receptor antagonist models of schizophrenia predict the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic drugs?

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, such as ketamine and phencyclidine, induce perceptual abnormalities, psychosis-like symptoms, and mood changes in healthy humans and patients with schizophrenia. The similarity between NMDA receptor antagonist-induced psychosis and schizophrenia has led to the widespread use of the drugs to provide models to aid the development of novel treatments for the disorder. This review investigates the predictive validity of NMDA receptor antagonist models based on a range of novel treatments that have now reached clinical trials. Furthermore, it considers the extent to which the different hypotheses that have been proposed to account for the psychotomimetic effects of NMDA receptor antagonist have been validated by the results of these trials. Finally, the review discusses some of the caveats associated with use of the models and some suggestions as to how a greater use of translational markers might ensure progress in understanding the relationship between the models and schizophrenia.

Schizoaffective disorders are psychotic mood disorders; there are no schizoaffective disorders

Schizoaffective disorder (SA D/O), introduced in 1933 by Dr. Jacob Kasanin, represented a first, modest change in our concept about the diagnoses of psychotic patients away from the beliefs of E. Bleuler, i.e., that hallucinations and delusions define schizophrenia, and toward the recognition of a significant role for mood disorders. SA D/O established a connection between schizophrenia and mood disorders, traditionally considered mutually exclusive, a connection that has strengthened progressively toward the diagnostic unity of all three disorders. A basic tenet of medicine holds that if discrepant symptoms can be explained by one disease instead of two or more, it is likely there is only one disease. The scientific justification for SA D/O and schizophrenia as disorders distinct from a psychotic mood disorder has been questioned. The "schizo" prefix in SA D/O rests upon the presumption that the diagnostic symptoms for schizophrenia are disease specific. They are not, since patients with severe mood disorders can evince any or all of the "schizophrenic" symptoms. "Schizophrenic" symptoms mean "psychotic" and not any specific disease. These data and a very low interrater reliability for SA D/O suggest that the concepts of SA D/O and schizophrenia as valid diagnoses are flawed. Clinically SA D/O remains popular because it encompasses both schizophrenia and psychotic mood disorder when there is a diagnostic question. We present a review of the literature in table form based on an assignment of each article assigned to one of five categories that describe the possible relationships between SA D/O, schizophrenia and psychotic mood disorders. We conclude that the data overall are compatible with the hypothesis that a single disease, a mood disorder, with a broad spectrum of severity, rather than three different disorders, accounts for the functional psychoses.

Adjunct divalproex or lithium to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

This retrospective study examined adjunct divalproex (N = 15) or lithium (N = 9) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients added to clozapine and compared to clozapine monotherapy (N = 25). Six month total BPRS scores were similarly improved in all treatment groups, however significantly greater improvements occurred in the first month for those on divalproex (-9) or lithium (-8) vs. clozapine alone (-4.5) (F = 3.32, df = 10.43, p = 0.0003). Rates of sedation, tachycardia, orthostasis, GI disturbances, confusion and dizziness were similar among groups. Mean weight gain was 8.7 pounds for clozapine monotherapy, 3.0 pounds in the adjunct divalproex group and 13.3 pounds in the adjunct lithium group (P = NS). A trend was noted for greater increases in blood glucose levels for those treated with adjunct lithium (F = 2.62, df = 2.28, p = 0.09). The addition of divalproex was significantly more effective in reducing global symptoms (driven by hostility and anxiety) in the first month of adjunct treatment as compared to clozapine monotherapy and to previous clozapine treatment.

Medication options for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: implications for global mental health financing

Treatment resistance in schizophrenia creates a persistent public health problem and leads to repeated hospitalization. In search for a treatment for such patients, psychiatrists have co-prescribed multiple psychotropic medications simultaneously. Such practice is based mostly on clinical experience, rather than research derived evidence. Such combinations may not be fully "effective" if the cost, adverse effect profile and the potential for noncompliance by patients secondary to regimen complexity are considered. Is it really wise to try these various combinations of costly medicines in the mental health system, which is already struggling with its limited resources and funding worldwide? However, if mental health policy makers restrict reimbursement for such "unproven" combinations, patients might not receive the benefits of some of these combinations, which are showing some promise for the treatment of resistant schizophrenia.

Trends in the pharmacological treatment of patients with schizophrenia over a 12 year observation period

In this study we evaluated whether our efforts to promote evidence-based guidelines for the psychopharmacological treatment of patients with schizophrenia have led to measurable changes of treatment practice in our hospital by investigating three primary hypotheses: 1) Polypharmacy has become less common in recent years, 2) Conventional neuroleptics have been replaced by second generation antipsychotics; and 3) Dosing regimes have changed towards lower doses. We have therefore collected data from the clinical records of all in-patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnoses of schizophrenia hospitalized at the Department of Psychiatry of the Medical University Innsbruck in the years 1989, 1995, 1998 and 2001. Data from 1989 to 1998 showed a significant decrease in the use of two or more antipsychotics given simultaneously. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was a significant increase in polypharmacy between 1998 and 2001. The predominant use of second generation antipsychotics became standard in schizophrenia treatment. In this context the decrease of concomitant anticholinergic medication is notable. Doses of conventional antipsychotics like haloperidol as well as doses of risperidone decreased whereas doses of other second generation antipsychotics increased. All in all, the pharmacological management of schizophrenia patients is increasingly in tune with current treatment guidelines.

The potential role of lamotrigine in schizophrenia

RATIONALE

Atypical antipsychotic drugs are the drugs of choice for the treatment of schizophrenia. However, despite advances, no treatments have been established for patients who fail to improve with the most effective of these, clozapine. The inhibition of dopamine transmission through blockade of dopamine D2 receptors is considered to be essential for antipsychotic efficacy, but it is postulated that modulation of glutamate transmission may be equally important. In support of this, symptoms similar to schizophrenia can be induced in healthy volunteers using N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist drugs that are also known to enhance glutamate transmission. Furthermore, lamotrigine, which can modulate glutamate release, may add to or synergise with atypical antipsychotic drugs, some of which may themselves modulate glutamate transmission.

OBJECTIVES

We examine the evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine. We consider how this fits with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of the disorder. We discuss mechanisms by which lamotrigine might influence neuronal activity and glutamate transmission, and possible ways in which the drug might interact with antipsychotic medications.

RESULTS

Data from four clinical studies support the efficacy of adjunctive lamotrigine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In addition, and consistent with a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis of schizophrenia, lamotrigine can prevent the psychotic symptoms or behavioural disruption induced by NMDA receptor antagonists in healthy volunteers or rodents.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of lamotrigine is most likely explained within the framework of a glutamate neuron dysregulation hypothesis, and may arise primarily through the drugs ability to influence glutamate transmission and neural activity in the cortex. The drug is likely to act through inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels, though other molecular interactions cannot be ruled out. Lamotrigine may add to or synergise with some atypical antipsychotic drugs acting on glutamate transmission; alternatively, they may act independently on glutamate and dopamine systems to bring about a combined therapeutic effect. We propose new strategies for the treatment of schizophrenia using a combination of anti-dopaminergic and anti-glutamatergic drugs.

Toward convergence in the medication treatment of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

Reaching a correct differential diagnosis among patients with psychotic symptoms was especially important during the era of first-generation antipsychotics, when treatments for the different disorders varied in terms of adverse events and likelihood of response. The historical "overdiagnosis" of schizophrenia and "underdiagnosis" of bipolar disorder in the United States was blamed for an increased exposure to neuroleptics among patients who might have benefited from lithium. With the recognition that second-generation antipsychotics are useful in the treatment of both schizophrenia and bipolar mania, and that combining them with classic mood stabilizers such as valproate may results in increased efficacy, the field is witnessing a convergence of pharmacological approaches to the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Substantially more data is available regarding combination treatments for bipolar disorder than for schizophrenia, and appropriate diagnosis remains important in predicting prognosis, but until the precise pathophysiology of psychotic disorders can be elucidated, and specific targeted treatments crafted, we will continue to see similar blended treatments for these two disease states.

Schizophrenia, epigenetics and ligand-activated nuclear receptors: a framework for chromatin therapeutics

Covalent modifications of DNA and its surrounding chromatin constitute an essential and powerful regulatory mechanism for gene transcription. Epigenetics is the study of this regulatory system. There is now strong albeit indirect evidence that epigenetic mechanisms contribute to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Furthermore, the discovery that valproic acid, a widely used psychotropic, has powerful epigenetic effects in clinically relevant concentrations suggests new therapeutic possibilities, i.e., drugs that act on chromatin structure. Fortunately, many proteins engaged in these processes, particularly chromatin remodeling, are accessible to pharmacological agents that have a high likelihood of crossing the blood brain barrier. This review will first summarize the essentials of the epigenetic regulatory system, then address the molecular evidence for altered epigenetic mechanisms in schizophrenia, and finally focus on the retinoic acid family of ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors as a likely system for new drug development in the management of schizophrenia-related symptoms.

Valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotics for schizophrenia: a systematic review of randomized trials

Randomized controlled trials comparing valproate (as a sole, or as an adjunctive compound) to placebo for patients with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like disorders were summarized in a metaanalysis. It was possible to include only five trials (n = 379) examining valproate as add-on to antipsychotics in this review. Some of the single studies showed inconsistent beneficial effects on some aspects of response, but no overall superiority of valproate augmentation at study endpoints was shown.

Extended-Release Divalproex Sodium for Mood Stabilization

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of extended-release divalproex sodium.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, 4-week study

SETTING

Long-term care facility of the Missouri Department of Mental Health.

PATIENTS

Ten hospitalized patients (mean age 39.4 yrs) with mood or thought disorders who were experiencing adverse effects from delayed-release divalproex sodium.

INTERVENTION

All participants were switched from delayed-release to extended-release divalproex sodium.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Efficacy was monitored with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and safety and tolerability were monitored with the Systematic Assessment for Treatment Emergent Events (SAFTEE). Frequently reported adverse effects before conversion were sedation, stomach upset, and tremor. At study conclusion, no differences were seen in total BPRS scores or individual BPRS items, although a trend pointed to decreased somatic complaints (p=0.057). The mean serum concentration of valproic acid among participants did not change significantly in the transition from the delayed-release formulation to an equivalent dose-adjusted extended-release formulation (90.5 mg/L vs 95.5 mg/L, p=0.493). At study conclusion, significant decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p=0.010) and potassium (p=0.043) levels were identified. Three categories of adverse effects decreased significantly after patients switched to the extended-release form of divalproex sodium: sedation (p=0.022), stomach or abdominal discomfort (p=0.045), and tremor (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary investigation suggests that patients receiving delayed-release divalproex sodium for mood lability can be converted successfully to extended-release divalproex sodium. Moreover, these findings imply that this transition is associated with a reduction in some of the adverse effects associated with divalproex sodium.

Results of a naturalistic study of treatment options: Switching atypical antipsychotic drugs or augmenting with valproate

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with atypical antipsychotic agents has not been well studied. Duration of persistence with a prescribed treatment regimen can be used to estimate overall treatment success.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether valproate augmentation improved treatment efficacy (ie, persistence with the prescribed regimen) and efficacy (ie, reduction of antipsychotic dose) with atypical antipsychotic drugs for older and younger patients, using a retrospective database analysis.

METHODS

Prescription refill data for atypical antipsychotics during calendar-year 2001 from a national pharmacy chain was used for longitudinal analyses. The database was used to identify patients aged 15 to 64 years and > or =65 years taking risperidone, quetiapine, or olanzapine (but not valproate). Patients who switched to another atypical antipsychotic (group A) or added valproate (group B) were followed after the index prescription to determine the duration of persistence with the treatment regimen and dose changes.

RESULTS

We identified 10,262 patients who were prescribed an atypical antipsychotic, of whom 1022 patients switched to an alternative atypical and 1651 added valproate to the index atypical. The addition of valproate provided significantly longer duration of treatment regimen (mean, 155-159 days) than switching from any atypical antipsychotic drug (mean, 127-130 days) for patients aged 15 to 64 years or > or =65 years (all P<0.001). Atypical antipsychotic doses did not change significantly from baseline to final prescription in groups A or B. The final mean (SD) dose of valproate added to risperidone (389.1 [130.7] mg/d) was significantly lower than valproate added to quetiapine (424.6 [117.1] mg/d; P=0.002) or olanzapine (411.6 [122.8] mg/d; P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In this naturalistic study, the addition of valproate to an atypical antipsychotic increased the duration of treatment compared with switching among atypical antipsychotics. Valproate augmentation may be a good treatment strategy for patients whose atypical antipsychotic monotherapy is inadequate.

Clinical correlates of antipsychotic polytherapy in patients with schizophrenia in Singapore

The purpose of the present study wa to determine the prevalence of antipsychotic polytherapy (use of more than one antipsychotic drug at one time) and its clinical correlates among 300 hospitalized psychotic Asian patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. It was hypothesized that such treatment would be associated with more severe illness than in comparable monotherapy patients, and with higher chlorpromazine-equivalent (CPZ) total daily doses. Clinical and demographic details were obtained from the medical records and direct clinical examinations. Polytherapy was encountered in 215 of the 300 patients (71.7%), with an average number of 1.8 antipsychotics (range 1-4) prescribed at a mean CPZ daily dose of 612 +/- 528 mg (median: 464 mg, range: 25-2500 mg). The 215 patients prescribed more than one antipsychotic agents were younger, ill longer, more likely to be taking at least one high-potency agent, in receipt of higher average daily CPZ doses, and more likely to be prescribed anticholinergic agents but with similar admission illness severity rating (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) scores compared to the 85 patients given only one antipsychotic drug at one time. The high rate of antipsychotic polytherapy that appeared to be unrelated to current illness severity suggests that this practice may not consistently be based on rational therapeutic principles.

A study of the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of switching from the standard delayed release preparation of divalproex sodium to the extended release formulation in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of switching from a multiple dose preparation of divalproex sodium delayed release (DR) to once-daily dosing with divalproex sodium extended release (ER) in patients with schizophrenia already receiving the standard DR formulation.

METHOD

Thirty subjects with schizophrenia were switched from divalproex DR to a 4-week open-label treatment trial of the ER formulation. Baseline plasma levels of valproate were obtained 12 hours postdose. Patients were converted from divalproex DR to ER on a 1.0:1.0 mg basis (rounded up to the nearest 500-mg increment) if baseline valproate plasma levels were > or =85 microg/mL; otherwise, the conversion rate was 1.0:1.2 mg rounded up. Measured at baseline and end point were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale. End point plasma levels were obtained at both 12 and 24 hours postdose.

RESULTS

Patients who switched from divalproex DR to ER had a small (and probably clinically insignificant) improvement noted on the total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale at end point (mean change +/- SD = -2.3 +/- 5.4; t = -2.2538; df = 28; P = 0.0322) and on the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (mean change+/- SD = -2.2+/- 4.1; t = -2.7361; df = 26; P = 0.0111). Baseline and end point trough plasma levels were 80.1 +/- 20.4 and 73.1 +/- 24.2 microg/mL, respectively. Patients who converted on a 1.0:1.0 mg basis had lower end point valproate trough plasma levels than at baseline but did not experience deterioration on their psychopathology. For all patients, end point valproate peak and trough plasma levels were statistically significantly different (t = -3.8706; df = 27; P = 0.0006), but these differences were small in magnitude (mean +/- SD = 14.6 +/-19.6 microg/mL). Seven patients experienced spontaneously reported adverse events, but none required early termination from the protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to a once-daily formulation of ER divalproex can be accomplished without a deterioration in psychopathology. The ER formulation of divalproex sodium appears well tolerated. A parallel group design will be necessary to confirm these findings.

Psychotic bipolar disorders: dimensionally similar to or categorically different from schizophrenia?

For over a century, clinicians have struggled with how to conceptualize the primary psychoses, which include psychotic mood disorders and schizophrenia. Indeed, the nature of the relationship between mood disorders and schizophrenia is an area of ongoing controversy. Psychotic bipolar disorders have characteristics such as phenomenology, biology, therapeutic response, and brain imaging findings, suggesting both commonalities with and dissociations from schizophrenia. Taken together, these characteristics are in some instances most consistent with a dimensional view, with psychotic bipolar disorders being intermediate between non-psychotic bipolar disorders and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. However, in other instances, a categorical approach appears useful. Although more research is clearly necessary to address the dimensional versus categorical controversy, it is feasible that at least in the interim, a mixed dimensional/categorical approach could provide additional insights into pathophysiology and management options, which would not be available utilizing only one of these models.

Valproate for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Many people with schizophrenia do not achieve a satisfactory treatment response with ordinary antipsychotic drug treatment. In these cases, various add-on medications are used, among them valproate.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of valproate for the treatment of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewers searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (July 2002). This register is compiled of methodical searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, Dissertation abstracts, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO, RUSSMED, Sociofile, supplemented with hand searching of relevant journals and numerous conference proceedings. We also contacted a pharmaceutical company and authors of relevant studies in order to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing valproate to antipsychotics or to placebo (or no intervention), whether as the sole agent or as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. Data were extracted independently by at least two reviewers. Dichotomous data were analysed using relative risks (RR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous data were analysed using weighted mean differences. Where possible the number needed to treat (NNT) or number needed to harm statistics were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies with a total of 379 participants were included. All trials examined the effectiveness of valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotics. With one exception the studies were small, short-term and incompletely reported. Adding valproate was as acceptable as adding placebo to antipsychotic drugs (n=130, RR leaving the study early 1.6 CI 0.8 to 3.1). No significant effect of using valproate as an adjunct to antipsychotic medication on the participants' global state or general mental state at the endpoint studies was evident. However, one study showed a quicker onset of action in the combination group. Participants receiving valproate more frequently experienced sedation than those in the placebo group. The effects of valproate on important subgroups such as those with schizophrenia and aggressive behaviour or those with schizoaffective disorder are unknown.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Based on randomised trial-derived evidence which is currently available, there are no data to support or to refute the use of valproate as a sole agent for schizophrenia. There is some evidence for a more rapid improvement with valproate augmentation, but this effect vanished over time. Given this limited evidence, further large, simple well-designed and reported trials are necessary. These might focus on people with schizophrenia and violent episodes, on those with treatment resistant forms of the disorder and on people with schizoaffective disorders.

GABA and schizophrenia: a review of basic science and clinical studies

BACKGROUND

A converging body of evidence implicates the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmitter system in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.

METHODS

The authors review neuroscience literature and clinical studies investigating the role of the GABA system in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. First, a background on the GABA system is provided, including GABA pharmacology and neuroanatomy of GABAergic neurons. Results from basic science schizophrenia animal models and human studies are reviewed. The role of GABA in cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia is then presented, followed by a discussion of GABAergic compounds used in monotherapy or adjunctively in clinical schizophrenia studies.

RESULTS

In basic studies, reductions in GABAergic neuronal density and abnormalities in receptors and reuptake sites have been identified in several cortical and subcortical GABA systems. A model has been developed suggesting GABA's role (including GABA-dopamine interactions) in schizophrenia. In several clinical studies, the use of adjunctive GABA agonists was associated with greater improvement in core schizophrenia symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Alterations in the GABA neurotransmitter system are found in clinical and basic neuroscience schizophrenia studies as well as animal models and may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. The interaction of GABA with other well-characterized neurotransmitter abnormalities remains to be understood. Future studies should elucidate the potential therapeutic role for GABA ligands in schizophrenia treatment.