Multifunctional nanoparticle-mediated combining therapy for human diseases

Combining existing drug therapy is essential in developing new therapeutic agents in disease prevention and treatment. In preclinical investigations, combined effect of certain known drugs has been well established in treating extensive human diseases. Attributed to synergistic effects by targeting various disease pathways and advantages, such as reduced administration dose, decreased toxicity, and alleviated drug resistance, combinatorial treatment is now being pursued by delivering therapeutic agents to combat major clinical illnesses, such as cancer, atherosclerosis, pulmonary hypertension, myocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic disorders and neurodegenerative diseases. Combinatorial therapy involves combining or co-delivering two or more drugs for treating a specific disease. Nanoparticle (NP)-mediated drug delivery systems, i.e., liposomal NPs, polymeric NPs and nanocrystals, are of great interest in combinatorial therapy for a wide range of disorders due to targeted drug delivery, extended drug release, and higher drug stability to avoid rapid clearance at infected areas. This review summarizes various targets of diseases, preclinical or clinically approved drug combinations and the development of multifunctional NPs for combining therapy and emphasizes combinatorial therapeutic strategies based on drug delivery for treating severe clinical diseases. Ultimately, we discuss the challenging of developing NP-codelivery and translation and provide potential approaches to address the limitations. This review offers a comprehensive overview for recent cutting-edge and challenging in developing NP-mediated combination therapy for human diseases.

Medical Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current Approaches and Investigational Drugs

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a malignant pulmonary vascular syndrome characterized by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, which eventually leads to right heart failure and even death. Although the exact mechanism of PAH is not fully understood, pulmonary vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling, immune and inflammatory responses, and thrombosis are thought to be involved in the development and progression of PAH. In the era of non-targeted agents, PAH had a very dismal prognosis with a median survival time of only 2.8 years. With the deep understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism of PAH as well as advances in drug research, PAH-specific therapeutic drugs have developed rapidly in the past 30 years, but they primarily focus on the three classical signaling pathways, namely the endothelin pathway, nitric oxide pathway, and prostacyclin pathway. These drugs dramatically improved pulmonary hemodynamics, cardiac function, exercise tolerance, quality of life, and prognosis in PAH patients, but could only reduce pulmonary arterial pressure and right ventricular afterload to a limited extent. Current targeted agents delay the progression of PAH but cannot fundamentally reverse pulmonary vascular remodeling. Through unremitting efforts, new therapeutic drugs such as sotatercept have emerged, injecting new vitality into this field. This review comprehensively summarizes the general treatments for PAH, including inotropes and vasopressors, diuretics, anticoagulants, general vasodilators, and anemia management. Additionally, this review elaborates the pharmacological properties and recent research progress of twelve specific drugs targeting three classical signaling pathways, as well as dual-, sequential triple-, and initial triple-therapy strategies based on the aforementioned targeted agents. More crucially, the search for novel therapeutic targets for PAH has never stopped, with great progress in recent years, and this review outlines the potential PAH therapeutic agents currently in the exploratory stage to provide new directions for the treatment of PAH and improve the long-term prognosis of PAH patients.

Pulmonary pressure recovery in idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension: Determinants and clinical impact

BACKGROUND

Over the past two decades randomized controlled trials of combination treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) have demonstrated improvements of clinical status but only modest reductions in mean pulmonary pressure (mPAP). Recent experiences with upfront combination treatments including parenteral prostacyclins have shown more substantial mPAP reductions, and have provided grounds for reconsiderations of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the possibility of achieving mPAP <25 mmHg with current treatments, its determinants and the prognostic impact of mPAP reduction.

METHODS

267 consecutive idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced PAH patients treated with targeted therapies from three expert centers were followed with periodic clinical and hemodynamic assessments for survival detection.

RESULTS

Fifty-four (20.2%) patients achieved a mPAP <25 mmHg over 58 months (IQR 27-90) of treatment. Determinants of mPAP <25 mmHg were mPAP at diagnosis (HR 0.96, 95C.I. 0.93-0.98, p = 0.002) and an upfront combination strategy (double oral combination: HR 2.3, 95C.I. 1.10-4.76, p = 0.02; one oral plus parenteral prostanoid: HR 3.6, 95C.I. 1.39-9.37, p = 0.008; triple combination employing parenteral prostanoids: HR 12.9, 95C.I. 4.9-33.2, p = 0.0001). Seventy-three patients (27.3%) died. Survival rates were 90%, 79%, 70%, 55%, and 42% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Mean PAP during follow-up, days from diagnosis to prostanoid initiation and prostanoid maximum dose emerged as independent predictors of survival (Uno-C-index: 0.85). A mPAP ≤35 mmHg during follow-up was identified as the best cutoff value for prediction of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction to a mean PAP ≤ 35 mmHg appears to be a meaningful treatment target in idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Combination of Sildenafil and Ba2+ at a Low Concentration Show a Significant Synergistic Inhibition of Inward Rectifier Potassium Current Resulting in Action Potential Prolongation

Sildenafil (Viagra) is a vasodilator mainly used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Atrial or ventricular fibrillation may rarely occur as a side effect during sildenafil therapy. Although changes in inward rectifier potassium currents including I_K1 are known to contribute to the pathogenesis of fibrillation, the effect of sildenafil on I_K1 has not been studied. In experiments, Ba²⁺ is used as a specific inhibitor of I_K1 at high concentrations (usually 100 µM). Being an environmental contaminant, it is also present in the human body; Ba²⁺ plasmatic concentrations up to 1.5 µM are usually reported in the general population. This study was primarily aimed to investigate changes of I_K1 induced by sildenafil in a wide range of concentrations (0.1–100 µM). Additionally, the effect of combination of sildenafil and Ba²⁺ at selected clinically-relevant concentrations was tested, at 0.1 µM both on I_K1 and on the action potential duration (APD). Experiments were performed by the whole-cell patch-clamp technique on enzymatically isolated rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, mostly at 23°C with the exception of APD measurements which were performed at 37°C as well. Sildenafil caused a significant, reversible, and concentration-dependent inhibition of I_K1 that did not differ at −50 and −110 mV. Simultaneous application of sildenafil and Ba²⁺ at 0.1 µM revealed a massive inhibition of both inward and outward components of I_K1 (this synergy was missing at other tested combinations). The combined effect at 0.1 µM (45.7 ± 5.7 and 43.0 ± 6.9% inhibition at −50 and −110 mV, respectively) was significantly higher than a simple sum of almost negligible effects of the individual substances and it led to a significant prolongation of APD at both 23 and 37°C. To our knowledge, similar potentiation of the drug-channel interaction has not been described. The observed massive inhibition of I_K1 induced by a combined action of the vasodilator sildenafil and environmental contaminant Ba²⁺ at a low concentration and resulting in a significant APD prolongation may contribute to the genesis of arrhythmias observed in some patients treated with sildenafil.

An open‐label, dose‐escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single doses of GSK2586881 in participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that angiotensin‐converting enzyme type 2 activity may be impaired in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH); therefore, administration of exogenous angiotensin‐converting enzyme type 2 (ACE2) may be beneficial. This Phase IIa, multi‐center, open‐label, exploratory, single‐dose, dose‐escalation study (NCT03177603) assessed the potential vasodilatory effects of single doses of GSK2586881 (a recombinant human ACE2) on acute cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in hemodynamically stable adults with documented PAH who were receiving background PAH therapy. Successive cohorts of participants were administered a single intravenous dose of GSK2586881 of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mg/kg. Dose escalation occurred after four or more participants per cohort were dosed and a review of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and hemodynamic data up to 24 h postdose was undertaken. The primary endpoint was a change in cardiopulmonary hemodynamics (pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac index, and mean pulmonary artery pressure) from baseline. Secondary/exploratory objectives included safety and tolerability, effect on renin‐angiotensin system peptides, and pharmacokinetics. GSK2586881 demonstrated no consistent or sustained effect on acute cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in participants with PAH receiving background PAH therapy (N = 23). All doses of GSK2586881 were well tolerated. GSK2586881 was quantifiable in plasma for up to 4 h poststart of infusion in all participants and caused a consistent and sustained reduction in angiotensin II and a corresponding increase in angiotensin (1–7) and angiotensin (1–5). While there does not appear to be a consistent acute vasodilatory response to single doses of GSK2586881 in participants with PAH, the potential benefits in terms of chronic vascular remodeling remain to be determined.

Bosentan for Treatment of Pediatric Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: State-of-the-Art

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is a complex disease associated with progressive deterioration. Targeted therapy for IPAH has improved in the last several decades. However, there remain many challenges to current treatment of children with IPAH, including poor prognosis and a median survival of 0.8 years. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) appears to be a key mediator in the pathogenesis of IPAH, with elevated concentrations in the plasma. Bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, has been confirmed in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to effectively treat IPAH when administered in recent studies. This review focuses on related studies and advance of bosentan in the treatment of IPAH in children.

Chronic Right Heart Failure: Expanding Prevalence and Challenges in Outpatient Management

Right heart failure is caused by right heart dysfunction resulting in suboptimal stroke volume to supply the pulmonary circulation. Therapeutic developments mean that patients with acute right heart failure survive to hospital discharge and live with chronic right heart failure. Chronic right heart failure management aims to reduce afterload, optimize preload, and support contractility, with the best evidence available in vascular targeted therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, the management of chronic right heart failure relies on adapting therapies for left ventricular heart failure to the right. We review right heart failure management in the ambulatory setting and its challenges.

Evaluation of the effects of RP5063, a novel, multimodal, serotonin receptor modulator, as single-agent therapy and co-administrated with sildenafil, bosentan, and treprostinil in a monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension rat model

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a condition that is defined by pulmonary vasculature constriction and remodeling, involves dysfunctional signaling of the serotonin (5-HT) receptors, 5-HT_2A/2B/7. In a rat model of monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH, the effectiveness of RP5063 (RP), a dopamine and 5-HT receptor modulator, was evaluated as monotherapy and as an adjunct to standard PAH treatments. After a single 60 mg/kg dose of MCT, rats received vehicle (MCT+Veh; gavage twice-daily [b.i.d.]), RP (10 mg/kg; gavage b.i.d.), bosentan (B; 100 mg/kg; gavage BID), sildenafil (S; 50 mg/kg; gavage, BID), treprostinil (T; 100 ng/kg/min over 24 h intravenous), RP+B, RP+S, and RP+T for 28 days. Single-agent RP limited the functional and structural effects of PAH seen in the MCT+Veh group, with significant improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics, right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy, SO₂, and pulmonary blood vessel structural changes. These effects appeared comparable with those associated with B, S, and T. Adjunctive RP treatment resulted in significantly lower mean pulmonary arterial pressures, RV systolic pressure. It also improved SO₂ measurements, as compared with MCT+Veh (P < 0.05), and diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (P < 0.05), as compared with single-agent B and S therapy (Bonferroni method adjusting for multiplicity). RP+S appeared to show the most consistent and extensive effects on pulmonary hemodynamics, respiratory parameters, and histopathologic changes. These results corroborate earlier preclinical findings supporting the efficacy of single-agent RP in PAH. RP, as mono and adjunctive therapy compared with induced-control, mitigated the functional and structural effects of MCT-induced PAH.

Sildenafil dosed concomitantly with bosentan for adult pulmonary arterial hypertension in a randomized controlled trial

Background

Few controlled clinical trials exist to support oral combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Methods

Patients with PAH (idiopathic [IPAH] or associated with connective tissue disease [APAH-CTD]) taking bosentan (62.5 or 125 mg twice daily at a stable dose for ≥3 months) were randomized (1:1) to sildenafil (20 mg, 3 times daily; n = 50) or placebo (n = 53). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) at week 12, assessed using analysis of covariance. Patients could continue in a 52-week extension study. An analysis of covariance main-effects model was used, which included categorical terms for treatment, baseline 6MWD (<325 m; ≥325 m), and baseline aetiology; sensitivity analyses were subsequently performed.

Results

In sildenafil versus placebo arms, week-12 6MWD increases were similar (least squares mean difference [sildenafil–placebo], −2.4 m [90% CI: –21.8 to 17.1 m]; P = 0.6); mean ± SD changes from baseline were 26.4 ± 45.7 versus 11.8 ± 57.4 m, respectively, in IPAH (65% of population) and −18.3 ± 82.0 versus 17.5 ± 59.1 m in APAH-CTD (35% of population). One-year survival was 96%; patients maintained modest 6MWD improvements. Changes in WHO functional class and Borg dyspnoea score and incidence of clinical worsening did not differ. Headache, diarrhoea, and flushing were more common with sildenafil.

Conclusions

Sildenafil, in addition to stable (≥3 months) bosentan therapy, had no benefit over placebo for 12-week change from baseline in 6MWD. The influence of PAH aetiology warrants future study.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00323297 (registration date: May 5, 2006).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-017-0674-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Riociguat: Mode of Action and Clinical Development in Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are progressive and debilitating diseases characterized by gradual obstruction of the pulmonary vasculature, leading to elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). If untreated, they can result in death due to right-sided heart failure. Riociguat is a novel soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator that is approved for the treatment of PAH and CTEPH. We describe in detail the role of the nitric oxide-sGC-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of PAH and CTEPH and the mode of action of riociguat. We also review the preclinical data associated with the development of riociguat, along with the efficacy and safety data of riociguat from initial clinical trials and pivotal phase III randomized clinical trials in PAH and CTEPH.

Combination Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy (CT) for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has been recommended for many years, despite weak evidence of efficacy over monotherapy (MT). A previous meta-analysis comparing CT vs MT with pulmonary vasodilators failed to demonstrate a clear reduction in clinical worsening events.

METHODS

We searched for relevant articles in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database, and clinicaltrials.gov; we also manually searched review articles and conference abstracts from 1980-December 2015. Target articles were double-blinded studies of 2 or more pulmonary vasodilators given in combination vs monotherapy for treatment of patients with PAH. The principal outcome of interest was "combined clinical worsening" (CCW) events (including but not limited to death or hospitalization). Data on physiological outcomes were also explored. Meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.

RESULTS

We extracted data from 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (N = 4162). CT was associated with a significant 38% reduction of risk of CCW (15 RCTs: n = 3906; risk ratio [RR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.77). This reduction in risk was driven by a reduction in nonfatal end points (12 RCTs: n = 2611; RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.78) and not by a reduction of mortality (12 RCTs: n = 2717; RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53-1.17). CT was also associated with improvement in 6-minute walking distance (10 RCTs: n = 1553; weighted mean difference [WMD], +23.0 m; 95% CI, 15.9-30.1), improved functional class (9 RCTs: n = 1737; RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.05-1.51), and beneficial effects on pulmonary hemodynamics such as cardiac index (WMD, +0.35 L/min/m; 95% CI, 0.14-0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

In this highly comprehensive meta-analysis, CT reduces the risk of CCW events in patients with PAH and brings physiological improvement.

[Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension, associated with connective tissue diseases, treated by sildenafil: results of the prospective study]

AIM

To investigate the effect of sildenafil on the survival of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD), who have been followed up at the Rheumatology Expert Center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 16 patients (all women) with PAH associated with CTD, who had been admitted to the V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology in 2013-2015, were examined. PAH corresponded to Functional Class II in the majority of the patients. After the diagnosis was verified by catheterization of the right heart and pulmonary artery, all the patients received original sildenafil (a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, a potent vasodilator, the efficiency of which was proven in patients with PAH) at a dose of 20 mg thrice daily. Survival rates and time to clinical deterioration were estimated during a prospective follow-up).

RESULTS

Three-year survival rates were 94% in the study group and 25% in the group of historical control (p < 0.05). The time to clinical deterioration was associated with the duration of the follow-up and hemodynamic parameters (right atrial pressure and changes in vascular resistance within 4 months after therapy initiation).

CONCLUSION

The administration of sildenafil substantially improves survival in patients with PAH associated with CTD as compared with the historical control. The identification of poor prognostic factors in this cohort of patients and early diagnosis will favor the personification of therapy for the fatal manifestation of CTD.

Phase I safety study of ranolazine in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) causes right ventricular ischemia, dysfunction, and failure. PAH patients may benefit from antianginal agents based on a shared pathophysiology with left ventricular ischemia. A single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (1∶1) to assess the acute vasoreactivity and safety of ranolazine in PAH was conducted. Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were drawn during hemodynamic measurements at 0, 60, 90, 120, 240, and 360 minutes from a Swan-Ganz catheter. All patients received 500-mg doses, uptitrated to 1,000 mg at week 4, monthly evaluations, and a complete objective assessment after 12 weeks, followed by an open-label extension. Thirteen patients were randomized and 12 enrolled (6 ranolazine, 6 placebo). All patients completed the acute phase; 10 completed the 12-week study. There were no acute changes in invasive hemodynamics. At 12 weeks ranolazine was well tolerated. Only 1 of the 5 patients on ranolazine had a serum concentration considered to be in the therapeutic range. Two serious adverse events required early withdrawal (both in the ranolazine group); gastrointestinal complaints were the most common adverse event. Efficacy measures did not demonstrate any differences between treatment groups. During the open-label trial, 2 additional patients reached a therapeutic concentration. Ranolazine in PAH appears safe, without acute hemodynamic effects after a 500-mg dose. Ranolazine administrated to PAH patients receiving background PAH therapies did not consistently reach therapeutic levels. Future studies should first perform PK analysis in PAH patients receiving PAH therapies and explore the safety and tolerability of the higher doses perhaps necessary to achieve therapeutic levels in PAH patients. (

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01757808.).

Investigation of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, a novel endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy subjects

AIM

To study the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between macitentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, and sildenafil in healthy male subjects.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, three way crossover study, 12 healthy male subjects received the following oral treatments: A) a loading dose of 30 mg macitentan on day 1 followed by 10 mg once daily for 3 days, B) sildenafil 20 mg three times a day for 3 days and a single 20 mg dose on day 4 and C) both treatments A and B concomitantly. Plasma concentration-time profiles of macitentan and its active metabolite ACT-132577 (treatments A and C) and sildenafil and its N-desmethyl metabolite (treatments B and C) were determined on day 4 and analyzed non-compartmentally.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of macitentan were not affected by sildenafil. In the presence of sildenafil Cmax and AUCτ of the metabolite ACT-132577 decreased with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval (CI)) of 0.82 (0.76, 0.89) and 0.85 (90% CI 0.80, 0.91), respectively. In the presence of macitentan, plasma concentrations of sildenafil were higher than during treatment with sildenafil alone, resulting in increased Cmax and AUCτ values. The respective geometric mean ratios were 1.26 (90% CI 1.07, 1.48) and 1.15 (90% CI 0.94, 1.41). The pharmacokinetics of N-desmethylsildenafil were not affected by macitentan. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

A minor, not clinically relevant, pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between macitentan and sildenafil. Based on these results, no dose adjustment of either compound appears necessary during concomitant treatment with macitentan and sildenafil.

Combining bosentan and sildenafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients failing monotherapy: real-world insights

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a severe disease with a complex pathogenesis, for which combination therapy is an attractive option.

This study aimed to assess the impact of sequential combination therapy on both short-term responses and long-term outcomes in a real-world setting.

Patients with idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension, or pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease or connective tissue disease and who were not meeting treatment goals on either first-line bosentan or sildenafil monotherapy, were given additional sildenafil or bosentan and assessed after 3–4 months. Double combination therapy significantly improved clinical and haemodynamic parameters, independent of aetiology or the order of drug administration. Significant improvements in functional class were observed in patients with idiopathic/heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival estimates were 91%, 69% and 59%, respectively. Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease had significantly poorer survival rates compared to other aetiologies (p<0.003).

The favourable short-term haemodynamic results and good survival rates, observed in patients receiving both bosentan and sildenafil, supports the use of sequential combination therapy in patients failing on monotherapy in a real-world setting.

Sildenafil and bosentan plasma concentrations in a human immunodeficiency virus- infected patient with pulmonary arterial hypertension treated with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor

Sildenafil and bosentan are increasingly used for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in HIV-infected patients. However, concerns exist about pharmacokinetic interactions among sildenafil, bosentan and antiretroviral drugs, including protease inhibitors (PI). We describe here the case of an HIV-infected patient with PAH, who was co-administered bosentan 125 mg twice daily and sildenafil 40 mg three times per day, together with a ritonavir-boosted PI-based antiretroviral therapy; plasma levels of bosentan, sildenafil, N-desmethylsildenafil, and PI were measured. The patient had a sildenafil C_through and C_max of 276.94 ng/mL and 1733.19 ng/mL, respectively. The C_through and the C_max of bosentan were 1546.53 ng/mL and 3365.99 ng/mL, respectively. The patient was able to tolerate as high sildenafil blood concentrations as 10 times those usually requested and did not report any significant adverse reaction to sildenafil during the follow-up period. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered during sildenafil therapy in patients concomitantly treated with ritonavir-boosted PI.

Predicting the Need for Upfront Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy is commonly used for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. We aimed to identify factors that may predict the need for future combination therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with PAH in an aim to describe baseline clinical, echocardiogram, and hemodynamic characteristics of patients who eventually required combination therapy during the course of their disease and compared them to the ones who were maintained on monotherapy.

RESULTS

The monotherapy group was followed for an average of 31.8 ± 18.8 months and the combination therapy group was followed for an average of 28.7 ± 13.6 months. Among the 71 patients analyzed, a significantly higher number of patients who eventually required combination therapy belonged to World Health Organization functional class 3 (45% vs 37%) and 4 (23% vs 0) at baseline, compared with those on monotherapy (P < .05). Combination group also had a higher Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management (REVEAL) PAH risk score at presentation. End of 6-minute walk test (6MWT), oxygen saturation (Spo 2) was also lower in the combination therapy group, 86% ± 8% versus 91% ± 7% (P < .05). Patients who eventually required combination therapy were more frequently noticed to have right ventricular enlargement, right atrial enlargement, and had a higher resting estimated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). Right heart catheterization-derived hemodynamics data at baseline showed that the combination therapy group had a higher mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, lower cardiac output, and higher pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). On univariate analysis, only PVR ≥300 dyne·s/cm(5), mean PA pressure of ≥40 mm Hg, estimated RVSP ≥ 60 mm Hg, PAH risk score ≥ 10, and end of 6MWT saturation of ≤ 90% were of significance.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PAH who require combination therapy in the course of their disease have worse hemodynamics, PAH risk score, functional class, and end of 6MWT oxygen saturation at the time of presentation compared to patients maintained on monotherapy.

The role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the management of pulmonary vascular diseases

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE) can be used as therapeutic agents for various diseases such as dementia, depression, schizophrenia and erectile dysfunction in men, as well as congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory diseases, diabetes and various other conditions. In this review we will concentrate on one type of PDE, mainly PDE5 and its role in pulmonary vascular diseases.

Genetics and genomics of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Major discoveries have been obtained within the last decade in the field of hereditary predisposition to pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Among them, the identification of bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) as the major predisposing gene and activin A receptor type II-like kinase-1 (ACVRL1, also known as ALK1) as the major gene when PAH is associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. The mutation detection rate for the known genes is approximately 75% in familial PAH, but the mutation shortfall remains unexplained even after careful molecular investigation of these genes. To identify additional genetic variants predisposing to PAH, investigators harnessed the power of next-generation sequencing to successfully identify additional genes that will be described in this report. Furthermore, common genetic predisposing factors for PAH can be identified by genome-wide association studies and are detailed in this paper. The careful study of families and routine genetic diagnosis facilitated natural history studies based on large registries of PAH patients to be set up in different countries. These longitudinal or cross-sectional studies permitted the clinical characterization of PAH in mutation carriers to be accurately described. The availability of molecular genetic diagnosis has opened up a new field for patient care, including genetic counseling for a severe disease, taking into account that the major predisposing gene has a highly variable penetrance between families. Molecular information can be drawn from the genomic study of affected tissues in PAH, in particular, pulmonary vascular tissues and cells, to gain insight into the mechanisms leading to the development of the disease. High-throughput genomic techniques, on the basis of next-generation sequencing, now allow the accurate quantification and analysis of ribonucleic acid, species, including micro-ribonucleic acids, and allow for a genome-wide investigation of epigenetic or regulatory mechanisms, which include deoxyribonucleic acid methylation, histone methylation, and acetylation, or transcription factor binding.

Efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in comparison to other endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Macitentan is a novel dual endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) showing sustained receptor occupancy. In vitro and in vivo animal studies have demonstrated its potency in antagonizing endothelin-induced disorders. A large morbidity/mortality study in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) taking macitentan has been completed recently.

AREAS COVERED

This drug evaluation reviews the efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in the treatment of PAH.

EXPERT OPINION

The large Phase III study (SERAPHIN) tested macitentan in more than 700 PAH patients and has provided unique long-term outcome data for this ERA, not available for other members of this class. The effect on a composite clinically relevant morbidity/mortality end point was highly significant at a 10 mg/day dose. The safety profile of macitentan appears to be superior with respect to hepatic safety and edema/fluid retention than bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively, and is similar when considering decrease in hemoglobin concentration. The drug has a low propensity for drug-drug interactions and has one circulating pharmacologically active metabolite. The pharmacokinetics of macitentan in patients with renal or hepatic impairment does not require dose adjustments. Based on its characteristics, macitentan is an important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in the long-term treatment of PAH. Its potential use in other disorders is under investigation.

Combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Despite major advances in understanding the mechanisms of disease and development of specific drug therapy, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a progressive, fatal disease. At present there are 3 classes of drug therapy for PAH: prostaglandins, endothelin receptor antagonists, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. To maximize therapeutic benefit, and according to national and international guidelines, many patients are treated with combinations of these medications. This review presents a detailed account of the published data on the use of combination therapy in PAH. There are few randomized, placebo-controlled trial data to strongly support efficacy of most combination therapy, particularly oral combination therapy.

Combination therapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Many potential therapeutic options are now available for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Interest has emerged in using therapies in various combinations. Retrospective experience has suggested that this approach is common and can be efficacious. Data are emerging supporting the benefit of combination therapy; however, limitations and questions remain about this strategy. This report reviewed the rationale for combination therapy and summarized the results from clinical trials.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension: new insights into the optimal role of current and emerging prostacyclin therapies

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), which is a subset of pulmonary hypertension, is a group of diseases distinguished by vascular remodeling of the small pulmonary arteries with associated elevated pulmonary arterial pressure and right ventricular failure. This progressive and sometimes fatal disease occurs as an idiopathic disease or as a component of other disease states. Estimates of the incidence of PAH have varied from 5 to 52 cases/1 million population. Symptoms begin with shortness of breath with exertion and progress to dyspnea with normal activities and, finally, dyspnea at rest. Untreated patients with PAH have a 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate of 68%, 48%, and 34%, respectively. Treated, the survival rates improve to 91% to 97% after 1 year and 84% to 91% after 2 years. The current definition of PAH consists of 3 specific hemodynamic assessments confirmed by right heart catheterization findings. One of several important pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in PAH is pulmonary vascular remodeling, which is caused by endothelial and smooth muscle cell hyperproliferation. This is coincident with overexpression of the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 and a reduction in the vasodilators nitric oxide and prostacyclin, which further impedes proper vasomotor tone, among other effects. Prostacyclin therapies augment the decreased prostacyclin levels in patients with PAH. The currently approved prostacyclins for the treatment of PAH include epoprostenol, iloprost, and treprostinil. Among the 3 medications, the delivery options include intravenous infusion, subcutaneous infusion, and inhaled formulations. Epoprostenol has been shown to have a positive effect on survival in patients with PAH. All prostacyclins have demonstrated improvements in functional class, exercise tolerance, and hemodynamics in patients with PAH. Intravenously and subcutaneously administered formulations of prostacyclins require continuous infusion pump administration, which presents clinical challenges for both the patient and the care provider. Dosing must be individualized and also presents a clinical challenge. Inhaled formulations seem efficacious in moderately symptomatic patients with PAH and might be appropriate when combined with an oral medication. Combination therapies are commonly used in clinical practice, with the decision to do so based on randomized controlled trial data and case study evidence. The present report provides an overview of PAH, the scientific rationale for treatment with prostacyclin therapy, and the benefits and risks of prostacyclin therapy, both as monotherapy and combined with other medications approved for the treatment of PAH.

Two case studies of cardiopulmonary effects of intra-abdominal hypertension

Intra-abdominal hypertension falsely elevates the pulmonary artery pressure. Volumetric pulmonary artery catheter monitoring is an optionfor estimating preload in this condition. Treatment of intra-abdominal hypertension begins with medical therapy but once abdominal compartment syndrome develops it requires decompressive laparotomy for definitive management. Pulmonary hypertension reduces cardiac function which may be improved with inotropes that simultaneously reduce pulmonary artery pressure. Oxygenation may be improved with elevated PEEP and FiO(2).

Pharmacotherapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disabling, progressive disease. The past decade has seen an explosion in the available therapies for the management of PAH. Choosing appropriate pharmacotherapy can be a daunting task for the practitioner, as no head-to-head comparisons between drugs have been published. This article aims to assist the practitioner in developing an evidence-based, rational pharmacologic treatment algorithm for the management of patients with PAH. Currently approved pharmacotherapy and the pivotal trials that led to approval for the respective agents are reviewed. Common dilemmas in the treatment of PAH for which strong evidence is lacking are discussed.

The pharmacological treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening and progressive disease of various origins characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling that leads to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, most often resulting in right-sided heart failure. The most common symptom at presentation is breathlessness, with impaired exercise capacity as a hallmark of the disease. Advances in understanding the pathobiology over the last 2 decades have led to therapies (endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and prostacyclins or analogs) initially directed at reversing the pulmonary vasoconstriction and more recently directed toward reversing endothelial cell dysfunction and smooth muscle cell proliferation. Despite these advances, disease progression is common even with use of combination regimens targeting multiple mechanistic pathways. Overall 5-year survival for PAH has increased significantly from approximately 30% in the 1980s to approximately 60% at present, yet remains abysmal. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action, clinical data, and regulatory histories of approved PAH therapies and describes the latest agents in late-stage clinical development.

Endothelin receptor antagonists -- their role in pulmonary medicine

INTRODUCTION

Understanding of the function of endothelin-1 in the pathophysiology of endothelial disease, in particular pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has paved the way for the development of endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) and explains the leading role they now play in the treatment armamentarium for this disease.

BACKGROUND

Three active ERA drugs (bosentan, sitaxentan, ambrisentan) are currently approved for the treatment of PAH in France. Several randomised clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy and safety in PAH.

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION

Besides its vasoconstrictor effect, endothelin-1 (ET-1) plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation and apoptosis. ERAs are innovative drugs potentially useful in some pulmonary disorders such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or systemic sclerosis, even though the preliminary results published remain insufficient or controversial.

CONCLUSION

ERAs play a major role in the management of pulmonary vascular disease. Other drugs, still under study, could prove useful in the treatment of infiltrating pneumonias.

Acute effect of sildenafil is maintained in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients chronically treated with bosentan

The chronic use of bosentan has been reported to reduce the plasma concentration of sildenafil. However, it remains unclear how sildenafil exerts the effect at reduced concentrations in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients chronically treated with bosentan.We examined the hemodynamic effects of sildenafil (50 mg) in 8 Japanese patients with PAH, and simultaneously measured the plasma concentration of sildenafil ([Sil]) and its major metabolite, desmethylsildenafil ([Des]).The overall effects of sildenafil were 12.4% decrease in mean pulmonary arterial pressure, 19.9% increase in cardiac index (CI), and 25% reduction in derived pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). When the patients were divided into two groups, a group with bosentan pretreatment [BOS (+), n = 4] and a group without bosentan pretreatment [BOS (-), n = 4], both [Sil] and [Des] were lower at the peak concentration (C(max)) and the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC(0-6h)), and the time to reach C(max) was longer in BOS (+), although only the difference in AUC(0-6h) of [Des] reached statistical significance (P = 0.02). In spite of lower concentration, the effect of sildenafil on CI was maintained in the BOS (+) group, while the decrease in PVR was less marked.Sildenafil acutely dilated the pulmonary artery and increased CI in the PAH patients. These effects were still observed or maintained in the PAH patients chronically treated with bosentan, even when [Sil] was reduced.

Bosentan for the treatment of adult pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a severe progressive disease with a marked morbidity and a high mortality attributed to right heart failure. Bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, is an effective and well-tolerated oral therapy for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; WHO group 1 pulmonary hypertension). Bosentan improves cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, exercise capacity, WHO functional class and quality of life, as well as delaying time to clinical worsening in patients with PAH. This article reviews the role of endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis and progression of PAH, the diagnosis of PAH and the pharmacology of bosentan, and summarizes the current available evidence for the safety and efficacy of bosentan for the treatment of PAH as a monotherapy and combination therapy, as well as its role in the management of other forms of pulmonary hypertension.

Recent trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension is a serious and unrelenting pulmonary vascular disorder that affects the functional quality of patients and significantly decreases their life span. If diagnosed early, with the number of new therapeutic options that are available, a better quality of life can be provided for a protracted length of time. It is likely that the available treatment will change the natural course of the disease and perhaps prolong survival. As symptoms are often subtle in the early stages of the disease it is imperative that physicians are aware of the manifestations of this condition. A thorough investigation of patients suspected of this condition is essential so that appropriate treatment can be initiated promptly. The routine workup of a patient suspected to have pulmonary hypertension could easily be carried out in any well-equipped peripheral hospital in many affluent and advanced countries. However, it must be mentioned that in some less advanced countries the necessary work up can only be done in major teaching hospitals. Both pulmonologists and cardiologists should be aware of the pathophysiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension, the workup and the treatment options that are available. Patients with refractory pulmonary hypertension should be referred to these research centers for enrolment into any ongoing drug trials as well as for evaluation for heart-lung, single lung, or double lung transplantation. This paper is primarily aimed at pulmonologists and cardiologists taking care of these patients. Unless indicated otherwise this paper mainly deals with WHO group 1 pulmonary hypertension which is designated pulmonary arterial hypertension. Extensive review of the literature spanning the last 30 years was made through Medline using titles such as primary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary arterial hypertension, secondary pulmonary hypertension, and pulmonary vascular diseases.

Update on the clinical utility of sildenafil in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Sildenafil is an orally administered phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The hemodynamic effects of sildenafil are mitigated primarily via potentiating the effects of endogenous nitric oxide, leading to smooth muscle cell relaxation and reductions in pulmonary arterial pressures and pulmonary vascular resistance. When added to standard background therapy in patients with idiopathic or associated PAH from congenital heart disease, anorexigen use, or connective tissue disease, sildenafil treatment results in improved exercise capacity as measured by 6 minute walk distance, improved hemodynamics, and favorable changes in quality of life. Sildenafil use is contraindicated with concomitant nitrate administration, and caution should be exercised when used in combination with antihypertensive agents due to risks of precipitating hypotension. Side effects are generally mild, and include flushing, headaches, and epistaxis. The combination of sildenafil with intravenous epoprostenol is safe and well tolerated, and further improves exercise capacity. Sildenafil is approved only for treatment of PAH, and although emerging data suggest a potential role in treating other types of pulmonary hypertension, larger trials are required to confirm these findings.

Bosentan: in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Bosentan is a dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist that has affinity for ET-1 receptors A and B. In the EU, oral bosentan (Tracleer) is indicated to improve exercise capacity and symptoms in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) of WHO functional class III; benefits have also been seen in patients with WHO functional class II PAH. Bosentan is available as film-coated tablets, and a new dispersible formulation of bosentan has also recently been approved in the EU for the treatment of PAH in children aged > or =2 years. A noncomparative, multicenter, phase III trial (FUTURE-1), which was primarily designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics of dispersible bosentan in pediatric patients, demonstrated that increasing the dosage of bosentan from 2 to 4 mg/kg twice daily was unlikely to result in increased exposure to bosentan. Exploratory measures of efficacy in FUTURE-1 demonstrated that target dosages of twice-daily dispersible bosentan 4 mg/kg (in patients weighing <30 kg) or 120 mg (in patients weighing > or =30 kg) for 12 weeks were beneficial in pediatric patients (aged > or =2 to <12 years) with WHO functional class II or III PAH. Film-coated bosentan 31.25, 62.5, or 125 mg (in pediatric patients weighing 10-20, >20-40, or >40 kg, respectively) twice daily for 12 weeks significantly (p < 0.05) improved the majority of hemodynamic measures evaluated as an exploratory measure in pediatric patients (aged 3-15 years) with WHO functional class II or III PAH in another noncomparative, multicenter, pharmacokinetic trial (BREATHE-3). However, there was no significant change in peak oxygen consumption or mean walk distance in those patients capable (i.e. children aged > or =8 years) of performing the 6-minute walk test. Bosentan was generally well tolerated in clinical trials of pediatric patients with PAH, with most adverse events being mild or moderate in severity and resolving with continued treatment.