Benefits and burdens of genetic carrier identification

"There Are Hills and Valleys": Experiences of Parenting a Son With X-Linked Retinoschisis

PURPOSE

To explore the experiences of parents of sons with X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS).

DESIGN

Mixed methods-qualitative interviews with quantitative survey.

METHODS

Parents of sons with XLRS who were evaluated at the National Eye Institute between December 2017 and January 2019 were eligible for this study. Participation involved engaging in a semistructured interview and completing a survey assessing optimism, anxiety, personality traits, and sociodemographics using valid and reliable scales. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically, and scales were scored and used descriptively.

RESULTS

Eleven mothers and 8 fathers from 13 families participated. Optimism, anxiety, and personality traits fell into the normative ranges for the scales. Parents described a process of continuous adaptation to their son's condition. The initial diagnosis was characterized by shock, grief, and "devastation" for most parents. Maternal guilt was common, but usually lessened over time. As parents adjusted to life postdiagnosis, they attempted to achieve a state of normalcy while balancing a desire to protect their sons. Significant sources of stress included decisions around sports participation and driving. Among all parents, the fear of retinal detachment was an ongoing concern. Most parents did identify perceived benefits from their experiences, such as feelings of gratitude or family cohesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Most parents viewed XLRS as a significant challenge in their sons' lives, but one that could be overcome. Clinical encounters may be enhanced for families with XLRS by providing accurate information, preparing families for potential challenges, anticipating stressful decisions, and meeting other families with XLRS.

Experiences of Being Heterozygous for Fabry Disease: a Qualitative Study

Little is known about the experiences of women with Fabry disease. The aim of this study was to explore women's experiences of being heterozygous for Fabry disease. We used an explorative qualitative study design and selected ten Norwegian women who were known heterozygous for Fabry disease to participate. We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed the interviews using inductive thematic analysis. We found that learning about one's heterozygous status may be devastating for some. However, for most of the participants, heterozygous status, as well as doctors' acceptance of symptoms in women heterozygous for Fabry disease, provided an explanation and relief. Although many women did not consider themselves ill, they wished to be acknowledged as more than "just carriers." The participants were grateful for enzyme replacement therapy, although it had its burdens regarding time, planning, and absences from school or work. Women with Fabry disease felt that the lack of knowledge among healthcare professionals about Fabry disease was frustrating and worrisome. These findings suggest that healthcare professionals should acknowledge the different ways women react to their diagnosis, and be aware of the personal costs of receiving treatment.

Support Seeking or Familial Obligation: An Investigation of Motives for Disclosing Genetic Test Results

Genetic test results reveal not only personal information about a person's likelihood of certain medical conditions but also information about the person's genetic relatives. Given the familial nature of genetic information, one's obligation to protect family members may be a motive for disclosing genetic test results, but this claim has not been methodically tested. Existing models of disclosure decision making presume self-interested motives, such as seeking social support, instead of other-interested motives, like familial obligation. This study investigated young adults' (N = 173) motives to share a genetic-based health condition, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, after reading a hypothetical vignette. Results show that social support and familial obligation were both reported as motives for disclosure. In fact, some participants reported familial obligation as their primary motivator for disclosure. Finally, stronger familial obligation predicted increased likelihood of disclosing hypothetical genetic test results. Implications of these results were discussed in reference to theories of disclosure decision-making models and the practice of genetic disclosures.

[The impact of screening sickle-cell carriers in the general population. A retrospective study in the Paris screening center]

BACKGROUND

Since 2006 the CIDD, the Paris information and screening center for sickle-cell disease, provides free assistance for adults who may be at risk of having children with sickle-cell disease. Recently, an increasing number of parents of a silent-carrier newborn detected by systematic neonatal screening are attending the center. We present a retrospective study of the impact of such information and screening on people.

METHODS

The study involved 81 silent-carrier men and women aged 18 to 45 years, interviewed using a telephone questionnaire (n=70) or during consultation (n=11) one to three years after screening.

RESULTS

The study group represented 12% of individuals attending the center with the same characteristics. In general, the information delivered concerning sickle-cell disease and silent-carriers was well understood although concerns about personal and family history and the correctness of prior knowledge revealed a lack of information input from the environment (media, schools, health professionals). Poorly assimilated information involved three subjects: the difference between trait and disease; the difference between type of hemoglobin and blood group; and Mendelian transmission. The screening result was not a cause of separation among couples and was often passed on to family or friends. Disparities in adherence to prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy were mainly related to different representations of disease severity.

CONCLUSION

Joint screening of newborns and their parents is a good measure for adults, who are satisfied with being informed despite the psychological difficulties involved. However the implication for children detected remains a relevant issue because of the persistent perception of the trait as a pseudo-disease and the risk of reification of a biological difference between relatives.

Psychosocial Responses to being Identified as a Balanced Chromosomal Translocation Carrier: a Qualitative Investigation of Parents in Japan

Undergoing chromosome analysis and receiving the results may have various psychosocial effects. To identify the impact on balanced translocation carriers identified through affected offspring, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven parents at Saitama Children's Medical Center. The results of the interviews were analyzed qualitatively by the KJ (Kawakita Jiro) method. Categories and subcategories of the various thoughts, emotions and responses experienced by balanced chromosomal translocation carriers were extracted. Participants' reactions were mixed, and appeared to be interrelated in some cases. Parents' reactions were sometimes ambivalent with regard to effects on reproductive issues and disclosure of test results. We recommend genetic counseling before and after carrier testing to help parents cope with the mixed and complex thoughts and feelings that arise upon being identified as a carrier.

Attitudes towards potentially carrying the FMR1 premutation: before vs after testing of non-carrier females with diminished ovarian reserve

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and premature ovarian failure are associated with elevated FMR1 CGG repeat alleles. We assessed pretest attitudes about potentially carrying the FMR1 premutation (FXP) (>55 CGG repeats) among reproductive age women compared with attitudes after learning their non-carrier status. Ninety-two women with DOR, regular menses and no family history of Fragile X Syndrome underwent FMR1 testing and completed attitudinal questionnaires before (T1) and 3 months after learning the test results (T2). The analysis utilized signed rank tests and α = 0.05. Very few women thought they were likely to have a FXP (6.6%). More participants thought FMR1 premutations were "serious" at T2 (62.9%) than at T1 (46.1%, p < 0.0003). When asked at T1 to "describe your feelings when you consider that you are potentially a carrier" of a FXP, 10% had negative feelings, 50% felt ambivalent, and 40% had positive feelings. At T2, feelings about not being a carrier were significantly more favorable (p < 0.0001): negative (0%), ambivalent (6.5%), positive (93%). Corroborating prior reports, few women had a negative view of FXP, perhaps anticipating that carrying the FXP explains their infertility. Perception of the seriousness of FXP increased after learning they did not carry the FXP, which would be predicted by health belief models.

Reproductive empowerment: the main motivator and outcome of carrier testing

The aim of this Grounded Theory study was to assess the motivation and outcomes of carrier testing. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants who had undergone carrier testing for autosomal recessive, X-linked conditions and chromosome translocations. Reproductive empowerment emerged as the central phenomenon. A desire to manage risk was the main motivator for carrier testing, and information gathering the main facilitator. Participants were then able to make informed decisions, regain control over their reproductive risk and pass on information to family members. These findings support a patient-reported outcome measure of empowerment currently being developed for genetic services.

Can we make assumptions about the psychosocial impact of living as a carrier, based on studies assessing the effects of carrier testing?

Receiving the results of genetic carrier testing may have an impact on the psychosocial health of the individual. Numerous studies have been conducted to assess the psychosocial effects of carrier status for a range of conditions. To systematically review research focused on the psychological and social impact of carrier testing on individuals in order to identify factors affecting the impact of carrier testing results, and discern areas where further research is needed. Twenty relevant papers meeting criteria for inclusion in this review were found. The main themes identified across these studies included: anxiety, guilt and stigmatization, effect on family relationships, effect on self image, active coping mechanisms and reproductive issues. Variables related to the psychosocial effect of carrier testing included whether the carrier has an affected child, mode of inheritance, genetic counseling, and life stage. A key finding concerns carriers who already have an affected child; they are more likely to experience guilt and self-blame, and change their reproductive plans compared to carriers without affected children. Additionally, some participants reported clinical features of the disorder for which they were being tested. Genetic counselors may erroneously assume that parents with affected children are aware of their own carrier status in the absence of testing, and they may offer inadequate support. Additionally, counselors should attempt to address patient misconceptions related to their health and carrier status.

Population screening for reproductive risk for single gene disorders in Australia: now and the future

Abstract As the results of the Human Genome Project are realized, it has become technically possible to identify carriers of numerous autosomal and X-linked recessive disorders. Couples at risk of having a child with one of these conditions have a number of reproductive options to avoid having a child with the condition should they wish. In Australia the haemoglobinopathies are the only group of conditions for which population screening is widely offered and which is government funded. In some Australian states there are also population screening programs for cystic fibrosis and autosomal recessive conditions more common in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals which are generally offered on a user pays basis. It is predicted that as consumer demand increases and testing becomes cheaper, that many people planning or in the early stages of pregnancy will have carrier screening for multiple genetic conditions. This will have significant implications for genetic counseling, laboratory and prenatal testing resources. In addition such screening raises a number of ethical issues including the value of lives of those born with genetic conditions for which screening is available.

Sharing GJB2/GJB6 Genetic Test Information with Family Members

Although GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing for non-syndromic hearing loss is available, there is no information regarding sharing of test results with family members. A qualitative study was conducted to elucidate if, how, and why parents of a child with hearing loss share GJB2/GJB6 test results with relatives. Parents whose child had testing (n = 7 positive, n = 4 negative, n = 1 inconclusive results) participated in a semi-structured interview and responses were analyzed using qualitative methods. All participants shared the test result with at least one relative, but selective non-disclosure also was observed. Reasons for, and reactions to, sharing were diverse and differed as a function of test result. In comparing the results from this study to published literature, similarities and differences were identified with regards to disclosure of genetic test results for hearing loss versus other conditions. Differences suggest that hearing loss may have unique attributes that influence responses to genetic test information. Further research is needed to replicate these findings.

Using the Impact of Event Scale to Evaluate Psychological Response to Being a Phenylketonuria Gene Carrier

The birth of a child with phenylketonuria (PKU) is almost always a shock to the parents, who are faced with the realities of caring for a child with special needs and the need to cope with the realization that they are obligate carriers of the responsible gene. The Impact of Event Scale (IES) was used to assess the psychological impact of being a PKU gene carrier on 83 parents of children with PKU. IES scores decreased significantly from the time of initial diagnosis of PKU to the current time. The magnitude of the psychological impact did not correlate with the age of the parent, the number of years since the diagnosis of PKU, or the health or development of the child. As more tests become available for detecting the presence of disease-related genes, instruments such as the IES may prove useful in the evaluation of psychological responses to genetic information.

Psychosocial issues in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis remains controversial because there is still little agreement that prophylactic interventions provide substantial long-term benefits. In such situations, where there are some medical benefits and the costs are not prohibitive, it is important to consider the psychosocial implications of screening. This paper reviews the evidence on the psychosocial issues raised by newborn screening for cystic fibrosis, in particular the issues of parental attitudes to screening, the evidence from families with an affected infant, the evidence from families with a carrier infant and the lessons for service delivery.

Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the psychosocial implications for families whose infant was identified as a cystic fibrosis carrier by newborn screening.

DESIGN

Prospective psychosocial assessment.

SETTING

Primary care.

STUDY

(a) families of an affected infant identified by screening (n = 9); (b) families of a carrier infant identified by screening (n = 10).

CONTROL

group of mothers from the general population (n = 82).

INTERVENTIONS

Questionnaires and semistructured interviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Attitude to screening, assessments of the mother/baby relationship, anxiety, wellbeing.

RESULTS

All families were in favour of screening, with no evidence that the mother/baby relationship, anxiety or wellbeing had been adversely affected. Parents, however, did identify problems in terms of the service delivery protocol and genetic counselling practice.

CONCLUSION

Six months after disclosure, carrier identification was not perceived by parents to be problematic.

Effect of family history on disclosure patterns of cystic fibrosis carrier status

As general population screening becomes more common, an increasing number of cystic fibrosis (CF) carriers will be identified who do not have a family history of CF. Whether these carriers inform their relatives of their carrier status and whether their relatives are motivated to pursue carrier screening is unknown. We surveyed CF carriers with and without a family history of CF to understand whether and how information dissemination patterns differ, why information is or is not shared, and to what extent relatives are known to undergo testing. CF carriers were identified from a general population carrier screening clinic (group B = 18) or were parents of affected children followed at a CF clinic (group A = 30). CF carriers with a family history told essentially 100% of their living parents, siblings, and half-siblings, while those without a family history told 84% of living parents and 56% of siblings (P < 0.05). Despite the high rate of information dissemination in both groups, few siblings were known to have undergone carrier screening (14/74). Significantly fewer second- and third-degree relatives were informed about carrier status or were known to have undergone carrier screening. Group A was more likely to inform second- and third-degree relatives about carrier status. Our study documents that the frequency and reasons for disclosing CF carrier status differ between individuals with and without a family history of CF despite the fact that the reproductive risks for their relatives are the same.

Voluntary disclosure of BRCA1 mutation test results

This study assessed the probability that individuals tested for a BRCA1 gene mutation share their test results with family members, co-workers, and insurers. Members of a large kindred known to be at-risk for carrying a BRCA1 gene mutation were tested and they learned their results from a genetic counselor. During a follow-up interview, 4 months later, subjects were asked with whom they had shared their results. Respondents were most likely to have communicated results to family members, followed by co-workers, and insurers. Carrier status affected their willingness to disclose results to insurers. High rates of disclosure to family members should promote awareness of hereditary cancer risk. Selective disclosure to co-workers and insurers may promote information asymmetries that could affect employment and insurance markets.

Comparisons between cancer survivors and family members on meaning of the illness and family quality of life

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To explore the meaning of the illness to the family and family quality of life (QOL) for survivors and family members and to describe similarities and differences between survivors' and family members' meaning of the illness and family QOL.

RESEARCH APPROACH

Descriptive, qualitative.

SETTING

Homes of survivors and family members in an urban metropolitan area in the midwestern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of 123 Caucasian and African American cancer survivors, one to six years after treatment had ended, and their family members (N = 246). Four cancer diagnoses (i.e., breast, colon, prostate, and uterine) were represented.

METHODOLOGIC APPROACH

Two open-ended questions derived from a family model of survivorship. Content analysis was used to analyze the responses.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Meaning of the illness and family QOL.

FINDINGS

The positive dimensions of survivorship in meaning of the illness and family QOL were seen for patients and family members, although long-term stressors also were reported. More similarities than differences in meaning and QOL were noted between survivors and family members.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' and family members' perspectives of the meaning of the illness and family QOL are important to assess during survivorship to address both individual- and family-level perspectives in cancer care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses should offer opportunities for patients and family members to search for positive meaning in the cancer illness, develop strategies to handle stressors that are present during survivorship, and enhance family strengths and resources to promote family QOL.

Personal experiences of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier couples prospectively identified in CF families

This qualitative study explores the experiences of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier couples, prospectively identified in CF families, and the impact of the resulting genetic risk on reproductive behavior. Of the 12 couples identified until 1997, seven couples participated in semistructured interviews and two couples filled in a questionnaire, two to eight years after receipt of the test-results. After receiving the results, most couples reported that they were shocked, because they did not expect to both be carriers. More anxiety was expressed by those who were pregnant (n = 4) at the time of testing. There were reported difficulties in disclosing the results to family members, and the reactions of family members were not always supportive. After testing, some couples had problems with reproductive decision-making. All viable pregnancies (17 in 8 couples) were monitored by prenatal diagnosis; all affected pregnancies were terminated (6 in 4 couples). Couples who have live-born children after testing may subsequently have concerns during infancy about the correctness of the results of prenatal diagnosis and how to inform their children. Most couples did not regret the testing and, in general, the counseling was experienced positively, although some dissatisfaction was reported with regard to the psychological support received during pregnancy. Couples supported the idea of carrier screening in the general population, although various concerns were expressed. The results indicate a preference for testing before pregnancy. These findings may be useful in investigating possible dilemmas caused by the introduction of population carrier screening. Observations reported here might also apply to other recessively inherited disorders.

Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications

As the number of genes associated with inherited disease continues to grow, researchers and practitioners in behavioral medicine will encounter complex psychological issues faced by individuals at risk for these diseases. A review of the literature concerning prenatal, carrier, and predictive genetic testing suggests that the severity of psychological risks posed by research-based genetic testing is not great. However, subgroups of individuals with particular psychological traits may be more vulnerable to adverse effects. Available data do not provide evidence that genetic testing promotes changes in health-related behaviors. Thus, although there may be less of a role for mental health professionals in the psychological counseling of genetic testing participants, there is a need for research and practice to facilitate health protective behaviors in response to genetic risk information.

Impact of genome research on children and their families

Human genome research has made it possible to identify the presence of gene mutations in persons with specific genetic, conditions, who may be carriers of genetic disorders, or who are at risk for future development of inherited diseases. Gene discovery has the potential to identify individual response to medications and new management and preventive interventions. Pediatric nurses must be informed about genetic discoveries and their implications for child and family health to act as advocates for children and their families in all child health care settings.

Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a perinatal perspective

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common autosomal recessive disorders in the United States today. One in 29 Americans, greater than 10 million people of Caucasian ethnicity, is a carrier for this genetic condition. Although it has been 10 years since the discovery of the gene for CF, carrier screening is not yet a standard of practice. The ultimate goal of carrier testing is to provide individuals at risk with information and guidance that will permit them to make informed and independent decisions. It can be anticipated that perinatal nurses will be part of the process of carrier screening of CF for prenatal patients. This article describes the nature of CF, the options for testing, and the basics of the molecular testing so nurses can be instrumental in the education process when this becomes standard practice.

Genetic testing in Alzheimer's disease. Benefits risks and public policy

1. Genetic research is providing new information about the structure and function of genes associated with diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. 2. The ability to perform genetic tests to diagnose or predict disease often exists before the ability to prevent or treat disease. 3. Genetic tests are associated with both benefits and risks, which likely will apply to the Alzheimer's disease population. 4. Safe and effective tests, laboratories of assured quality, competent providers, assured privacy of genetic information, and informed consumers are important prerequisites to the successful integration of genetic tests into health care services.

Genetic testing: implications for professional nursing

Scientific information emerging from human genome research has significant implications for the practice of professional nursing. Professional nurses assist individuals in making decisions about DNA studies, ensure that consent is informed before genetic testing, and help clients cope with genetic information after test results are known. Nurses with advanced education in genetics identify and counsel people who are candidates for DNA testing. Gene identification can have beneficial as well as harmful outcomes. Education is needed to prepare nurses for new roles regarding genetic testing.