COVID-19 related thrombosis: A mini-review

Broadening indications: A descriptive and comparative in-depth analysis of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes in trauma and nontrauma patients

BACKGROUND

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has been used for medical etiologies of acute respiratory distress syndrome refractory to conventional management. More recently, VV ECMO has been used to stabilize trauma patients with acute lung injury. We hypothesize that patients with traumatic injuries requiring VV ECMO have similar survival outcomes and describe the characteristics between the two populations.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included all trauma and nontrauma patients in an 8-year period who were placed on VV ECMO. Cannulation decisions were made via multidisciplinary discussions between two intensivists and a trauma surgeon. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and regression analysis. After testing for normality, significance was defined as a p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 516 patients were identified (438 nontrauma and 78 trauma VV ECMO patients). The trauma patient, defined as undergoing cannulation during initial trauma admission, had a median age of 29 years with 81% of patients being male, while the nontrauma patient had a median age of 41 years with 64% being males. Trauma VV ECMO patients had shorter ECMO courses (216 hours vs. 372 hours, p < 0.001), earlier cannulation (8 hours vs. 120 hours, p < 0.001), higher lactic acid levels precannulation (4.2 mmol/L vs. 2.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (13 vs. 11, p = 0.001), and higher Simplified Acute Physiology Scores II (63 vs. 48, p < 0.001). There was no difference in bleeding complications. Survival to discharge rates were similar between trauma and nontrauma VV ECMO groups (69% vs. 71%, p = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that trauma VV ECMO patients have higher markers of severe illness/injury when compared with their nontrauma VV ECMO counterparts yet have similar survival rates and shorter ECMO runs. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients is a useful treatment modality for refractory hypoxemia, respiratory acidosis, and stabilization because of acute lung and thoracic injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Prevalence and risk factors of hospital acquired venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics and risk factors of hospital acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) in a Chinese Hospital.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed as HA-VTE in a single institution from January 2016 to December 2022 was performed. Patients with VTE prior to admission or within 48 h after admission were excluded. Demographic data of patients was retrieved from the electronic medical database, and parameters affecting the occurrence of HA-VTE were analyzed.

RESULTS

4,022 patients from 321,997 episodes of medical admissions were diagnosed as VTE. Among these, 952 (23.7%) fulfilled the criteria of HA-VTE, corresponding to an incidence of 0.296%. 76% of patients presented with HA-deep vein thrombosis (DVT) alone, 13% presented with isolated HA-pulmonary embolism (PE), and 11% presented with concomitant HA- DVT and PE. Risk factor analyses showed statistically higher incidence in patients with elder age (67.5 ± 15.5 vs 48.3 ± 17.2 years, p < .001), male gender (0.346% vs 0.262%, p < .001), malignancy (0.513% vs 0.252%, p < .001), trauma (0.659% vs 0.28%, p < .001), emergency admission (0.664% vs 0.186%, p < .001), ICU stay (2.981% vs 0.226%, p < .001), and patients undergoing major surgery (0.702% vs 0.176%, p < .001). Patients with HA-VTE had longer hospital stay (22.5 ± 26.6 vs 7.21 ± 9.23 days, p < .001) and higher mortality rate (8.51% vs 1.01%, p < .001). The crude incidence rate of HA-VTE increased annually from 0.75 per 1,000 patients in 2016 to 5.89 per 1,000 patients in 2022. The subspecialties with the highest incidence rate of HA-VTE were cardiovascular surgery (1.40%), neurosurgery (1.10%), and respiratory medicine (0.72%).

CONCLUSION

This is one of the few large scale studies to show that HA-VTE, accounting for nearly one quarter of all VTE events, occurs in 0.296% of adult hospitalizations. Patients with elder age, malignancy, ICU stay, and undergoing major surgery require more intensive HA-VTE surveillance and prevention.

Arterial Thrombosis in Acute Respiratory Infections: An Underestimated but Clinically Relevant Problem

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was increased interest in the issue of thrombotic complications of acute respiratory infections. Clinical reports and pathological studies have revealed that thrombus formation in COVID-19 may involve the venous and arterial vasculature. As thrombotic complications of infectious respiratory diseases are increasingly considered in the context of COVID-19, the fact that thrombosis in lung diseases of viral and bacterial etiology was described long before the pandemic is overlooked. Pre-pandemic studies show that bacterial and viral respiratory infections are associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications such as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, pulmonary embolism, and other critical illnesses caused by arterial and venous thrombosis. This narrative review article aims to summarize the current evidence regarding thrombotic complications and their pathogenesis in acute lower respiratory tract infections.

Hereditary thrombophilia as a possible risk factor for severe disease in COVID-19: a case series

PURPOSE

The risk factors that modulate one's susceptibility for severe COVID-19 have been well documented. Despite this, hypercoagulability remains an often overlooked risk factor for severe disease for COVID-19. Because COVID-19 infection is a risk factor for hypercoagulability, a reasonable presumption/hypothesis is that patients with hereditary thrombophilia would be at a higher risk of thrombotic complications associated with COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

This case report details two cases where previously unknown hereditary thrombophilias likely contributed to the mortality of COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

The first COVID-19 patient's cause of death was pulmonary thromboemboli from deep vein thrombosis due to heterozygous MTHFR C667T and heterozygous PAI-1 4G/5G mutations. The second COVID-19 patient's cause of death was an acute myocardial infarct due to a coronary artery thrombosis in the setting of heterozygous MTHFR A1298C and homozygous PAI-1 4G/5G mutations. In each case, COVID-19 infection was also considered contributory to death.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of these fatal thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients with hereditary thrombophilias raises questions as to whether this combination of thrombotic risk factors for hypercoagulability may have placed patients at a significant enough risk to experience these fatal thrombotic complications. Thus, while not sufficient alone to prove that SARS-CoV-2 patients with hereditary thrombophilias are at increased risk for thrombotic complications, these two cases indicate that further investigation is warranted into elucidating the relationship between thrombotic risk factors as it may identify an additional high-risk medical condition for COVID-19 and have important diagnostic and therapeutic ramifications.

Scanning optoacoustic angiography for assessing structural and functional alterations in superficial vasculature of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome: A pilot study

This study highlights the potential of scanning optoacoustic angiography (OA) in identifying alterations of superficial vasculature in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) of the foot, a venous stress disorder associated with significant morbidity developing from long-term effects of deep venous thrombosis. The traditional angiography methods available in the clinics are not capable of reliably assessing the state of peripheral veins that provide blood outflow from the skin, a key hallmark of personalized risks of PTS formation after venous thrombosis. Our findings indicate that OA can detect an increase in blood volume, diameter, and tortuosity of superficial blood vessels. The inability to spatially separate vascular plexuses of the dermis and subcutaneous adipose tissue serves as a crucial criterion for distinguishing PTS from normal vasculature. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the ability of scanning optoacoustic angiography to detect blood filling decrease in an elevated limb position versus increase in a lowered position.

Anesthetic and Intensive Care Approaches Following Radical Pneumonectomy: A Short Review of Patient Management and a Case Report

Around the world, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death and the most commonly diagnosed cancer. In the early stages, surgery is the preferable therapeutic strategy. We present the case of a male patient aged 49 years diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer of the left lower lobe who was referred for a radical left pneumonectomy. After careful preoperative preparation, the surgery was proceeded with. During the surgery, the patient needed bronchoscopy for the aspiration of the trachea and bronchial tree; after the aspiration procedure, an intraoperative massive hemorrhage started, with shock and ventricular tachycardia. Nine days after surgery, the patient developed a pulmonary embolism and returned to the ICU. The patient benefited from transfusion, intrathoracic cardiac compressions, pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO), renal replacement therapy (RRT), anticoagulation, and intensive care. After a complicated clinical course, the patient is discharged, and after more than 18 months, the patient comes regularly for follow-up consultation in good health.

Simultaneous portal vein thrombosis and splenic vein thrombosis in a COVID-19 patient: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

It is well-described that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic complications. While there have been many cases of pulmonary emboli and deep vein thrombosis in these patients, reports of COVID-19 associated portal vein thrombosis (PVT) have been uncommon. We present a unique case of concomitant PVT and splenic artery thrombosis in a COVID-19 patient.

CASE SUMMARY

A 77-year-old-male with no history of liver disease presented with three days of left-sided abdominal pain. One week earlier, the patient was diagnosed with mildly symptomatic COVID-19 and was treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Physical exam revealed mild right and left lower quadrant tenderness, but was otherwise unremarkable. Significant laboratory findings included white blood cell count 12.5 K/μL, total bilirubin 1.6 mg/dL, aminoaspartate transferase 40 U/L, and alanine aminotransferase 61 U/L. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis revealed acute PVT with thrombus extending from the distal portion of the main portal vein into the right and left branches. Also noted was a thrombus within the distal portion of the splenic artery with resulting splenic infarct. Hypercoagulable workup including prothrombin gene analysis, factor V Leiden, cardiolipin antibody, and JAK2 mutation were all negative. Anticoagulation with enoxaparin was initiated, and the patient's pain improved. He was discharged on apixaban.

CONCLUSION

It is quite uncommon for PVT to present simultaneously with an arterial thrombotic occlusion, as in the case of our patient. Unusual thrombotic manifestations are classically linked to hypercoagulable states including malignancy and hereditary and autoimmune disorders. Viral infections such as Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, viral hepatitis, and COVID-19 have all been found to increase the risk of splanchnic venous occlusions, including PVT. In our patient, prompt abdominal imaging led to early detection of thrombus, early treatment, and an excellent outcome. This case is unique in that it is the second known case within the literature of simultaneous PVT and splenic artery thrombosis in a COVID-19 patient.

Can serum interleukin 34 levels be used as an indicator for the prediction and prognosis of COVID-19?

OBJECTIVE

Interleukin 34 (IL-34) is a molecule whose expression is increased in conditions such as autoimmune disorders, inflammation, and infections. Our study aims to determine the role of IL-34 in the diagnosis, follow-up, and prognosis of Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19).

METHOD

A total of 80 cases were included in the study as 40 COVID-19 positive patient groups and 40 COVID-19 negative control groups. The COVID-19-positive group consisted of 20 intensive-care unit (ICU) patients and 20 outpatients. Serum IL-34, c-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, D-dimer, troponin I, hemogram, and biochemical parameters of the cases were studied and compared between groups.

RESULTS

IL-34 levels were significantly higher in the COVID-19-positive group than in the negative group. IL-34 levels increased in correlation with CRP in predicting the diagnosis of COVID-19. IL-34 levels higher than 31.75 pg/m predicted a diagnosis of COVID-19. IL-34 levels did not differ between the outpatient and ICU groups in COVID-19-positive patients. IL-34 levels were also not different between those with and without lung involvement.

CONCLUSION

While IL-34 levels increased in COVID-19-positive patients and were successful in predicting the diagnosis of COVID-19, it was not found to be significant in determining lung involvement, risk of intensive care hospitalization, and prognosis. The role of IL-34 in COVID-19 deserves further evaluation.

Long COVID-ACOEM Guidance Statement

ABSTRACT

Persistent symptoms are common after acute COVID-19, often referred to as long COVID. Long COVID may affect the ability to perform activities of daily living, including work. Long COVID occurs more frequently in those with severe acute COVID-19. This guidance statement reviews the pathophysiology of severe acute COVID-19 and long COVID and provides pragmatic approaches to long COVID symptoms, syndromes, and conditions in the occupational setting. Disability laws and workers' compensation are also addressed.

COVID-19-Associated Bilateral Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head in a Young Male Without Corticosteroid Exposure: A Case Report

Avascular necrosis (AVN), also known as osteonecrosis, ischemic bone necrosis, or aseptic necrosis, is a progressive bone disease marked by the deterioration of bone tissue due to compromised blood flow in the subchondral region. AVN is typically caused by disruptions in vascular supply, intravascular blockages, or pressure on blood vessels, leading to diminished circulation. This condition predominantly affects the long-bone epiphysis in weight-bearing joints, particularly impacting the femoral head. The ongoing global health challenge posed by the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has raised awareness of its diverse clinical manifestations. While pulmonary dysfunction remains a hallmark, reports of AVN of the hip have emerged in association with COVID-19 infection. Despite existing literature documenting cases of unilateral and bilateral femoral head necrosis associated with COVID-19 infection, it is noteworthy that corticosteroid use has been identified as a significant contributing factor to the development of this condition. Here, we present a case of bilateral AVN of the femoral head in a young individual linked solely to COVID-19 infection. Existing case records show only a handful of instances where COVID-19 has led to avascular necrosis, all involving either older individuals or those with notable risk factors. What sets our case apart is that the patient is young and lacks any significant risk factors. This report aims to propose a credible connection between COVID-19 infection and femoral head osteonecrosis in young patients not exposed to steroid treatment.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 in a Non-Intensive Care Unit

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may contribute to venous thromboembolism (VTE) with adverse effects on the course of COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to investigate an incidence and risk factors for VTE in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a non-intensive care unit (non-ICU). Consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 hospitalized from November 2021 to March 2022 in the isolation non-ICU at our center were included in the study. Incidence of VTE including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), clinical characteristics, and D-dimer plasma levels during the hospitalization were retrospectively evaluated. Among the 181 patients (aged 68.8 ± 16.2 years, 44% females, 39% Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant, 61% Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant), VTE occurred in 29 patients (VTE group, 16% of the entire cohort). Of them, PE and DVT were diagnosed in 15 (8.3% of the entire cohort) and 14 (7.7%) patients, respectively. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the VTE and non-VTE groups. On admission, median D-dimer was elevated in both groups, more for VTE group (1549 ng/mL in VTE vs. 1111 ng/mL in non-VTE, p = 0.09). Median maximum D-dimer was higher in the VTE than in the non-VTE group (5724 ng/mL vs. 2200 ng/mL, p < 0.005). In the univariate analysis, systemic arterial hypertension and the need for oxygen therapy were predictors of VTE during hospitalization for COVID-19 (odds ratio 2.59 and 2.43, respectively, p < 0.05). No significant associations were found between VTE risk and other analyzed factors; however, VTE was more likely to occur in patients with a history of VTE, neurological disorders, chronic pulmonary or kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, obesity, and Delta variant infection. Thromboprophylaxis (83.4% of the entire cohort) and anticoagulant treatment (16.6%) were not associated with a decreased VTE risk. The incidence of VTE in patients hospitalized in non-ICU for COVID-19 was high despite the common use of thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulant treatment. A diagnosis of arterial hypertension and the need for oxygen therapy were associated with an increased VTE risk. Continuous D-dimer monitoring is required for the early detection of VTE.

COVID-19 and Antipsychotic Therapy: Unraveling the Thrombosis Risk

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study investigates the potential correlation between the increased use of antipsychotic medications and the rising incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). As psychiatric disorders surged, the consequential escalation in antipsychotic drug use raised concerns about thrombotic risks. We conducted a comprehensive literature review using PubMed, focusing on articles that intersected COVID-19, antipsychotic medication, and thrombosis. This approach allowed for a nuanced examination of the historical and recent data on antipsychotic drugs and their association with thrombotic events. Our findings reveal a notable link between the use of antipsychotic medications, particularly second-generation antipsychotics, and an increased risk of VTE, including pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. This association was evident, despite variations in study designs and populations. The study underscores the need for cautious medication management in psychiatric care, especially during pandemic conditions like COVID-19, to mitigate thrombotic risks. It advocates a personalized approach to prescribing antipsychotics, considering individual patient factors and comorbidities, to balance the benefits against potential thrombotic complications.

[Predictors of thromboembolic complications in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection]

AIM

To identify predictors of the development of thromboembolic complications (TECs) in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center observational retrospective study included 1634 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection. The patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the availability of the feasibility study. The criterion for inclusion of patients in the main group was the presence of venous feasibility studies in 127 patients (group I), the comparison group consisted of 1507 patients in whom the course of COVID-19 was not complicated by the development of feasibility studies (group II).

RESULTS

When performing computed tomography of the chest organs, it was revealed that patients with a feasibility study had a higher percentage of lung tissue damage than patients in the comparison group: 55% [37.5; 67.5] and 37.5% [25.0; 47.5], respectively (p<0.001). The average values of C-reactive protein in I patients group were 129 [60.1; 211] ng/l, which was significantly higher than in II patients group - 41.0 [12.2; 97.6] ng/l (p<0.001), interleukin-6 - 176 [52.9; 471] pg/ml and 39.4 [11.0; 107] pg/ml (p<0.001), respectively. A one-factor regression analysis proved a significant contribution of comorbid pathology to the development of feasibility studies in patients with COVID-19. The presence of three nosologies at the same time: arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD) and chronic kidney disease increased the probability of a feasibility study by 4.81 times (odds ratio 4.8117, 95% confidence interval 3.2064-7.2207), in patients with arterial hypertension, CHD, chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes - by 5.63 times (odds ratio 5.6321, 95% confidence interval 3.1870-9.9531).

CONCLUSION

The presence of severe comorbid pathology significantly increased the risk of developing a feasibility study in patients with COVID-19. The most significant predictors of the development of feasibility studies in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infection. They are: CHD, arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

Spectrum of Thrombotic Complications in Fatal Cases of COVID-19: Focus on Pulmonary Artery Thrombosis In Situ

COVID-19-related thrombosis affects the venous and arterial systems. Data from 156 autopsies of COVID-19 patients were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the pattern of thrombotic complications and factors associated with pulmonary artery thrombosis and thromboembolism. Thrombotic complications were observed in a significant proportion (n = 68, 44%), with pulmonary artery thrombosis the most frequently identified thrombotic event (42, 27%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the length of hospital stay (OR 1.1, p = 0.004), neutrophil infiltration in the alveolar spaces (OR 3.6, p = 0.002), and the absence of hyaline membranes (OR 0.1, p = 0.01) were associated with thrombotic complications. Neutrophil infiltration in the alveolar spaces (OR 8, p < 0.001) and the absence of hyaline membranes (OR 0.1, p = 0.003) were also independent predictors of pulmonary artery thrombosis. The association of pulmonary artery thrombosis with an absence of hyaline membranes suggests it occurs later in the course of COVID-19 infection. As neutrophil infiltration in the alveolar spaces may indicate bacterial infection, our studies suggest the consideration of bacterial infections in these critically ill patients.

Interaction of COVID-19 With Common Cardiovascular Disorders

The onset and widespread dissemination of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 in late 2019 impacted the world in a way not seen since the 1918 H1N1 pandemic, colloquially known as the Spanish Flu. Much like the Spanish Flu, which was observed to disproportionately impact young adults, it became clear in the early days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic that certain groups appeared to be at higher risk for severe illness once infected. One such group that immediately came to the forefront and garnered international attention was patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. Here, we examine the available literature describing the interaction of COVID-19 with a myriad of cardiovascular conditions and diseases, paying particular attention to patients diagnosed with arrythmias, heart failure, and coronary artery disease. We further discuss the association of acute COVID-19 with de novo cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction due to coronary thrombosis, myocarditis, and new onset arrhythmias. We will evaluate various biochemical theories to explain these findings, including possible mechanisms of direct myocardial injury caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 virus at the cellular level. Finally, we will discuss the strategies employed by numerous groups and governing bodies within the cardiovascular disease community to address the unprecedented challenges posed to the care of our most vulnerable patients, including heart transplant recipients, end-stage heart failure patients, and patients suffering from acute coronary syndromes, during the early days and height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Thrombotic and Thromboembolic Complications After Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Thromboembolic complications after the COVID-19 vaccination have been reported from all over the world. We aimed to identify the thrombotic and thromboembolic complications that can arise after receiving various types of COVID-19 vaccines, their frequency, and distinguishing characteristics. Articles published in Medline/PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the CDC database, the WHO database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and servers like medRxiv.org and bioRxiv.org, as well as the websites of several reporting authorities between December 1, 2019, and July 29, 2021, were searched. Studies were included if they reported any thromboembolic complications post-COVID-19 vaccination and excluded editorials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, and commentaries. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and conducted the quality assessment. Thromboembolic events and associated hemorrhagic complications after various types of COVID-19 vaccines, their frequency, and distinguishing characteristics were assessed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (ID-CRD42021257862). There were 59 articles, enrolling 202 patients. We also studied data from two nationwide registries and surveillance. The mean age of presentation was 47 ± 15.5 (mean ± SD) years, and 71.1% of the reported cases were females. The majority of events were with the AstraZeneca vaccine and with the first dose. Of these, 74.8% were venous thromboembolic events, 12.7% were arterial thromboembolic events, and the rest were hemorrhagic complications. The most common reported event was cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (65.8%), followed by pulmonary embolism, splanchnic vein thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The majority had thrombocytopenia, high D-dimer, and anti-PF4 antibodies. The case fatality rate was 26.5%. In our study, 26/59 of the papers were of fair quality. The data from two nationwide registries and surveillance revealed 6347 venous and arterial thromboembolic events post-COVID-19 vaccinations. COVID-19 vaccinations have been linked to thrombotic and thromboembolic complications. However, the benefits far outweigh the risks. Clinicians should be aware of these complications because they may be fatal and because prompt identification and treatment can prevent fatalities.

A multicenter international prospective study of the validity and reliability of a COVID-19-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire for patients with current or previous coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in an international setting.

METHODS

This multicenter international methodology study followed standardized guidelines for a four-phase questionnaire development. Here, we report on the pretesting and validation of our international questionnaire. Adults with current or previous COVID-19, in institutions or at home were eligible. In the pretesting, 54 participants completed the questionnaire followed by interviews to identify administration problems and evaluate content validity. Thereafter, 371 participants completed the revised questionnaire and a debriefing form to allow preliminary psychometric analysis. Validity and reliability were assessed (correlation-based methods, Cronbach's α, and intra-class correlation coefficient).

RESULTS

Eleven countries within and outside Europe enrolled patients. From the pretesting, 71 of the 80 original items fulfilled the criteria for item-retention. Most participants (80%) completed the revised 71-item questionnaire within 15 min, on paper (n = 175) or digitally (n = 196). The final questionnaire included 61 items that fulfilled criteria for item retention or were important to subgroups. Item-scale correlations were > 0.7 for all but nine items. Internal consistency (range 0.68-0.92) and test-retest results (all but one scale > 0.7) were acceptable. The instrument consists of 15 multi-item scales and six single items.

CONCLUSION

The Oslo COVID-19 QLQ-W61© is an international, stand-alone, multidimensional HRQoL questionnaire that can assess the symptoms, functioning, and overall quality of life in COVID-19 patients. It is available for use in research and clinical practice. Further psychometric validation in larger patient samples will be performed.

THE ROLE OF THROMBOSIS RISK SCALES LIKE PROGRESSION PREDICTORS OF COVID-19-ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To determine the risk factors for progression by establishing the diagnostic and prognostic role of PPS and ISTH DIC score in patients with COVID-19 required hospitalization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Main group was 130 patients with COVID-19, divided depending on the severity into 3 subgroups. Patients were examined twice. On visit 1 and visit 2 (after 7-14 days after hospitalization). Were provided: physical examination, lung ultrasound (LUS), laboratory tests (D-dimer, coagulogram). Were counted PPS and ISTH DIC score. Non-parametrical statistic, ROC analysis.

RESULTS

Results: The level of D-dimer was significantly elevated in the examined patients and correlated with the severity of the disease. The number of points on the scales ISTH DIC and Padua had a significant difference between the subgroups. The maximum number of points was obtained by patients of subgroup 3, which indicates the maximum risk of thrombotic complications, as well as DIC. The ROC analysis showed that among coagulation parameters the most sensitive and specific factors associated with the progression of the clinical course is the D-dimer at admission.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Thus, the determination of D-dimer, fibrinogen, as well as usage of the DIC and Padua scales is a useful tool not only to estimate the severity of COVID-19, but also to predict the prognosis. Thus, the level of D-dimer above 260 ng/ml, as well as the presence of three or more points on the DIC scale and/or five or more points on the Padua scale in patients with COVID-19 during hospitalization significantly increases the risk of progression clinical process.