1
|
Govindaraj R, Agar M, Currow D, Luckett T. Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e48483. [PMID: 38015606 PMCID: PMC10716761 DOI: 10.2196/48483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The routine measurement of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical care using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is gaining momentum worldwide. However, a deep understanding of the mechanisms underpinning ePROM interventions that could inform their optimal design to improve health outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the implicit mechanisms that underpin the effectiveness of ePROM interventions and develop program theories about how and when ePROM interventions improve health outcomes. METHODS A realist synthesis of the literature about ePROM interventions in cancer clinical care was performed. A conceptual framework of ePROM interventions was constructed to define the scope of the review and frame the initial program theories. Literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, supplemented by citation tracking, were performed to identify relevant literature to develop, refine, and test program theories. Quality appraisal of relevant studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Overall, 61 studies were included in the realist synthesis: 15 (25%) mixed methods studies, 9 (15%) qualitative studies, 13 (21%) descriptive studies, 21 (34%) randomized controlled trials, and 3 (5%) quasi-experimental studies. In total, 3 initial program theories were developed regarding the salient components of ePROM interventions-remote self-reporting, real-time feedback to clinicians, and clinician-patient telecommunication. The refined theories posit that remote self-reporting enables patients to recognize and report symptoms accurately and empowers them to communicate these to clinicians, real-time feedback prompts clinicians to manage symptoms proactively, and clinician-patient telephone interactions and e-interactions between clinic encounters improve symptom management by reshaping how clinicians and patients communicate. However, the intervention may not achieve the intended benefit if ePROMs become a reminder to patients of their illness and are not meaningful to them and when real-time feedback to clinicians lacks relevance and increases the workload. CONCLUSIONS The key to improving health outcomes through ePROM interventions is enabling better symptom reporting and communication through remote symptom self-reporting, promoting proactive management of symptoms through real-time clinician feedback, and facilitating clinician-patient interactions. Patient engagement with self-reporting and clinician engagement in responding to feedback are vital and may reinforce each other in improving outcomes. Effective ePROM interventions might fundamentally alter how clinicians and patients interact between clinic encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramkumar Govindaraj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Currow
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janssen S, El Shafie RA, Ruder AM, Buergy D, Scafa D, Giordano FA, Nicolay NH, Vogel MME, Combs SE, Fahlbusch FB, Rades D, Käsmann L. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:337-349. [PMID: 36810957 PMCID: PMC9943039 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02048-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review existing scientific literature on mobile applications (apps) in the field of radiation oncology and to evaluate characteristics of commercially available apps across different platforms. METHODS A systematic review of the literature for publications presenting apps in the field of radiation oncology was carried out using the PubMed database, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and annual meetings of major radiation oncology societies. Additionally, the two major marketplaces for apps, App Store and Play Store, were searched for available radiation oncology apps for patients and health care professionals (HCP). RESULTS A total of 38 original publications which met the inclusion criteria were identified. Within those publications, 32 apps were developed for patients and 6 for HCP. The vast majority of patient apps focused on documenting electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). In the two major marketplaces, 26 apps were found, mainly supporting HCP with dose calculations. CONCLUSION Apps used in (and for) scientific research in radiation oncology are rarely available for patients and HCP in common marketplaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- Private Practice of Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Rami A El Shafie
- Clinic of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Arne M Ruder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Buergy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Fabian B Fahlbusch
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adams A, Miller-Lewis L, Tieman J. Learning Designers as Expert Evaluators of Usability: Understanding Their Potential Contribution to Improving the Universality of Interface Design for Health Resources. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:4608. [PMID: 36901617 PMCID: PMC10001568 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
User-based evaluation by end users is an essential step in designing useful interfaces. Inspection methods can offer an alternate approach when end-user recruitment is problematic. A Learning Designers' usability scholarship could offer usability evaluation expertise adjunct to multidisciplinary teams in academic settings. The feasibility of Learning Designers as 'expert evaluators' is assessed within this study. Two groups, healthcare professionals and Learning Designers, applied a hybrid evaluation method to generate usability feedback from a palliative care toolkit prototype. Expert data were compared to end-user errors detected from usability testing. Interface errors were categorised, meta-aggregated and severity calculated. The analysis found that reviewers detected N = 333 errors, with N = 167 uniquely occurring within the interface. Learning Designers identified errors at greater frequencies (60.66% total interface errors, mean (M) = 28.86 per expert) than other evaluator groups (healthcare professionals 23.12%, M = 19.25 and end users 16.22%, M = 9.0). Patterns in severity and error types were also observed between reviewer groups. The findings suggest that Learning Designers are skilled in detecting interface errors, which benefits developers assessing usability when access to end users is limited. Whilst not offering rich narrative feedback generated by user-based evaluations, Learning Designers complement healthcare professionals' content-specific knowledge as a 'composite expert reviewer' with the ability to generate meaningful feedback to shape digital health interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Adams
- Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
| | - Lauren Miller-Lewis
- Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity Australia, Wayville, Adelaide, SA 5034, Australia
| | - Jennifer Tieman
- Research Centre for Palliative Care, Death and Dying, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sarbaz M, Manouchehri Monazah F, Eslami S, Kimiafar K, Mousavi Baigi SF. Effect of mobile health interventions for side effects management in patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review. HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2022.100680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
5
|
Lundereng ED, Nes AAG, Holmen H, Winger A, Thygesen H, Jøranson N, Borge CR, Dajani O, Mariussen KL, Steindal SA. Health Care Professionals’ Experiences and Perspectives on Using Telehealth for Home-based Palliative Care: A Scoping Review (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e43429. [PMID: 36989024 PMCID: PMC10131609 DOI: 10.2196/43429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth seems feasible for use in home-based palliative care (HBPC). It may improve access to health care professionals (HCPs) at patients' homes, reduce hospital admissions, enhance patients' feelings of security and safety, and increase the time spent at home for patients in HBPC. HBPC requires the involvement of various HCPs such as nurses, physicians, allied health professionals, dietitians, psychologists, religious counselors, and social workers. Acceptance of the use of technology among HCPs is essential for the successful delivery of telehealth in practice. No scoping review has mapped the experiences and perspectives of HCPs regarding the use of telehealth in HBPC. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to systematically map published studies on HCPs' experiences and perspectives on the use of telehealth in HBPC. METHODS A scoping review was conducted using the methodology of Arksey and O'Malley. The review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. A systematic search was performed in AMED, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for studies published in peer-reviewed journals between January 1, 2000, and August 23, 2022. The reference lists of the included papers were hand searched to identify additional studies. The inclusion criteria were (1) studies using qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods; (2) studies including HCPs using telehealth with patients in HBPC; (3) studies on HCPs' experiences and perspectives on the use of telehealth in HBPC; (4) studies published between January 1, 2000, and August 23, 2022; and (5) studies published in English, Portuguese, Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, or Spanish. Pairs of authors independently included studies and extracted data. The first 2 stages of thematic synthesis were used to thematically organize the data. RESULTS This scoping review included 29 papers from 28 studies. Four descriptive themes were identified: (1) easy to use but technological issues undermine confidence, (2) adds value but personal and organizational barriers challenge adoption, (3) potential to provide useful and meaningful patient-reported data, and (4) mutual trust as a prerequisite for interpersonal relationships. CONCLUSIONS Telehealth in HBPC seems to be easy to use and may improve the coordination of care, time efficiency, clinical assessments, and help build and enhance personal and professional relationships. However, the introduction of technology in HBPC is complex, as it may not align well with the overall aim of palliative care from HCPs' point of view. Further, changes in practice and requirements for HCPs may reduce motivation for the use of telehealth in HBPC. HCPs consider themselves to have central roles in implementing telehealth, and a lack of acceptance and motivation is a key barrier to telehealth adoption. Policy makers and telehealth developers should be aware of this potential barrier when developing or implementing new technology for use in HBPC. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/33305.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias David Lundereng
- Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Heidi Holmen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anette Winger
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Thygesen
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Jøranson
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christine Råheim Borge
- Research Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olav Dajani
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Simen A Steindal
- Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Consolo L, Castellini G, Cilluffo S, Basile I, Lusignani M. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROMs) in palliative cancer care: a scoping review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:102. [PMID: 36138279 PMCID: PMC9500127 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00509-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In palliative oncology settings, electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment can play an important role in supporting clinical activities for clinicians and patients. This scoping review aims to map the technological innovation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) in cancer palliative care and how PRO data collected through e-PROMs can influence the monitoring and management of symptoms and enable better communication between health professionals and patients.
Methods
A scoping review study was designed according to the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, PsycINFO and CINAHL and gray literature sources were consulted. The inclusion criteria were people over 18 years old receiving palliative and/or end-of-life care using e-PROMs.
Results
Thirteen primary studies were included: nine quantitative studies, two qualitative studies, and two mixed-method studies. The recently developed software that supports e-PROMs allows patients to receive feedback on their symptoms, helps clinicians prioritize care needs and monitors patients’ conditions as their symptoms change. Electronic PRO data prompt difficult, end-of-life communication between clinicians and patients to better organize care in the last phase of life.
Conclusion
This work shows that electronic PRO data assessment provides valuable tools for patients’ well-being and the management of symptoms; only one study reported conflicting results. However, with studies lacking on how clinicians can use these tools to improve communication with patients, more research is needed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Caraceni A, Pellegrini C, Shkodra M, Zecca E, Bracchi P, Lo Dico S, Caputo M, Zappata S, Zito E, Brunelli C. Telemedicine for outpatient palliative care during COVID-19 pandemics: a longitudinal study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022:bmjspcare-2022-003585. [PMID: 35710705 PMCID: PMC9240442 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine (TM) emerged as an important mean to reduce risks of transmission, yet delivering the necessary care to patients. Our aim was to evaluate feasibility, characteristics and satisfaction for a TM service based on phone/video consultations for patients with cancer attending an outpatient palliative care clinic during COVID-19 pandemics. Methods A longitudinal observational study was conducted from April to December 2020. Consecutive patients were screened for video consultations feasibility. Either patients or their caregivers received video/phone consultations registering reason and intervention performed. Those contacted at least twice were eligible for experience of care assessment. Results Video consultations were feasible in 282 of 572 screened patients (49%, 95% CI 45% to 52%); 112 patients among the 572 had at least two phone/video consultations and 12 of them had one or more video consultations. Consultations were carried out with patients (56%), caregivers (30%) or both (14%). 63% of the consultations were requested by the patients/caregivers. Reasons for consultation included uncontrolled (66%) or new symptom onset (20%), therapy clarifications (37%) and updates on diagnostic tests (28%). Most interventions were therapy modifications (70%) and appointments’ rescheduling (51%). 49 patients and 19 caregivers were interviewed, reporting good care experience (average of 1–5 satisfaction score of 3.9 and 4.2, respectively). The majority (83% and 84%) declared they would use TM after the pandemics. Conclusions Although feasibility is still limited for some patients, TM can be a satisfactory alternative to in-person visits for palliative care patients in need of limiting access to the hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Caraceni
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Pellegrini
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Morena Shkodra
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ernesto Zecca
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Paola Bracchi
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Lo Dico
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Mariangela Caputo
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Simonetta Zappata
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Emanuela Zito
- Information and communication technology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Cinzia Brunelli
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ellis-Smith C, Tunnard I, Dawkins M, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Evans CJ. Managing clinical uncertainty in older people towards the end of life: a systematic review of person-centred tools. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:168. [PMID: 34674695 PMCID: PMC8532380 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00845-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Older people with multi-morbidities commonly experience an uncertain illness trajectory. Clinical uncertainty is challenging to manage, with risk of poor outcomes. Person-centred care is essential to align care and treatment with patient priorities and wishes. Use of evidence-based tools may support person-centred management of clinical uncertainty. We aimed to develop a logic model of person-centred evidence-based tools to manage clinical uncertainty in older people. Methods A systematic mixed-methods review with a results-based convergent synthesis design: a process-based iterative logic model was used, starting with a conceptual framework of clinical uncertainty in older people towards the end of life. This underpinned the methods. Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ASSIA were searched from 2000 to December 2019, using a combination of terms: “uncertainty” AND “palliative care” AND “assessment” OR “care planning”. Studies were included if they developed or evaluated a person-centred tool to manage clinical uncertainty in people aged ≥65 years approaching the end of life and quality appraised using QualSyst. Quantitative and qualitative data were narratively synthesised and thematically analysed respectively and integrated into the logic model. Results Of the 17,095 articles identified, 44 were included, involving 63 tools. There was strong evidence that tools used in clinical care could improve identification of patient priorities and needs (n = 14 studies); that tools support partnership working between patients and practitioners (n = 8) and that tools support integrated care within and across teams and with patients and families (n = 14), improving patient outcomes such as quality of death and dying and satisfaction with care. Communication of clinical uncertainty to patients and families had the least evidence and is challenging to do well. Conclusion The identified logic model moves current knowledge from conceptualising clinical uncertainty to applying evidence-based tools to optimise person-centred management and improve patient outcomes. Key causal pathways are identification of individual priorities and needs, individual care and treatment and integrated care. Communication of clinical uncertainty to patients is challenging and requires training and skill and the use of tools to support practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-021-00845-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Ellis-Smith
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - India Tunnard
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Marsha Dawkins
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.,Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton General Hospital, Elm Grove, Brighton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fukui S, Ikuta K, Maeda I, Hattori S, Hatano Y, Yamakawa M, Utsumi M, Higami Y, Tanaka H, Higuchi A. Association between respiratory and heart rate fluctuations and death occurrence in dying cancer patients: continuous measurement with a non-wearable monitor. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:77-86. [PMID: 34232391 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06346-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to explore the association between impending death and continual changes in respiratory and heart rates measured using a non-wearable monitor every minute for the final 2 weeks of life in dying cancer patients. METHODS In this longitudinal study, we enrolled patients in a palliative care unit and continuously measured their respiratory and heart rates via a monitor and additionally captured their other vital signs and clinical status from medical records. RESULT A dataset was created comprising every 24-h data collected from every-minute raw data, including information from 240 days prior to death from 24 patients (345,600 data); each patient's data were measured for 3-14 days until death. After confirming the associations between the respiratory and heat rate values on the day of death (n = 24) or other days (2-14 days before death, n = 216) and the mean, maximum, minimum, and variance of respiratory and heart rates every 24 h by univariate analyses, we conducted a repeated-measures logistic regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation. Finally, the maximum respiratory rate and mean heart rate were significantly associated with death occurring within the following 3 days (0-24 h, 0-48 h, and 0-72 h), except for the maximum respiratory rate that occurs within 0-24 h. CONCLUSION The maximum respiratory rate and mean heart rate measured every minute using a monitor can warn family caregivers and care staff, with the support of palliative care professionals, of imminent death among dying patients at home or other facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakiko Fukui
- Department of Home Care Nursing, Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-15 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
- Department of Evidence-Based Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Kasumi Ikuta
- Department of Evidence-Based Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Isseki Maeda
- Department of Palliative Care, Senri-Chuo Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hattori
- Department of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, and Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Hatano
- Department of Palliative Care, Daini Kyoritsu Hospital, 5-28 Sakaemachi, Kawanishi, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miyae Yamakawa
- Department of Evidence-Based Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Momoe Utsumi
- Department of Evidence-Based Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoko Higami
- Department of Nursing, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Haruka Tanaka
- Department of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Akari Higuchi
- Department of Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sullivan DR. The Role of Palliative Care in Lung Cancer. Respir Med 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-81788-6_12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
11
|
Schmalz O, Jacob C, Ammann J, Liss B, Iivanainen S, Kammermann M, Koivunen J, Klein A, Popescu RA. Digital Monitoring and Management of Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Impact on Quality of Clinical Care: Interview and Survey Study Among Health Care Professionals and Patients. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18655. [PMID: 33346738 PMCID: PMC7781800 DOI: 10.2196/18655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer immunotherapy (CIT), as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, has been shown to extend overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients experience treatment-related symptoms that they are required to recall between hospital visits. Digital patient monitoring and management (DPMM) tools may improve clinical practice by allowing real-time symptom reporting. Objective This proof-of-concept pilot study assessed patient and health care professional (HCP) adoption of our DPMM tool, which was designed specifically for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with CIT, and the tool’s impact on clinical care. Methods Four advisory boards were assembled in order to co-develop a drug- and indication-specific CIT (CIT+) module, based on a generic CIT DPMM tool from Kaiku Health, Helsinki, Finland. A total of 45 patients treated with second-line single-agent CIT (ie, atezolizumab or otherwise) for advanced or metastatic NSCLC, as well as HCPs, whose exact number was decided by the clinics, were recruited from 10 clinics in Germany, Finland, and Switzerland between February and May 2019. All clinics were provided with the Kaiku Health generic CIT DPMM tool, including our CIT+ module. Data on user experience, overall satisfaction, and impact of the tool on clinical practice were collected using anonymized surveys—answers ranged from 1 (low agreement) to 5 (high agreement)—and HCP interviews; surveys and interviews consisted of closed-ended Likert scales and open-ended questions, respectively. The first survey was conducted after 2 months of DPMM use, and a second survey and HCP interviews were conducted at study end (ie, after ≥3 months of DPMM use); only a subgroup of HCPs from each clinic responded to the surveys and interviews. Survey data were analyzed quantitatively; interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English, where applicable, for coding and qualitative thematic analysis. Results Among interim survey respondents (N=51: 13 [25%] nurses, 11 [22%] physicians, and 27 [53%] patients), mean rankings of the tool’s seven usability attributes ranged from 3.2 to 4.4 (nurses), 3.7 to 4.5 (physicians), and 3.7 to 4.2 (patients). At the end-of-study survey (N=48: 19 [40%] nurses, 8 [17%] physicians, and 21 [44%] patients), most respondents agreed that the tool facilitated more efficient and focused discussions between patients and HCPs (nurses and patients: mean rating 4.2, SD 0.8; physicians: mean rating 4.4, SD 0.8) and allowed HCPs to tailor discussions with patients (mean rating 4.35, SD 0.65). The standalone tool was well integrated into HCP daily clinical workflow (mean rating 3.80, SD 0.75), enabled workflow optimization between physicians and nurses (mean rating 3.75, SD 0.80), and saved time by decreasing phone consultations (mean rating 3.75, SD 1.00) and patient visits (mean rating 3.45, SD 1.20). Workload was the most common challenge of tool use among respondents (12/19, 63%). Conclusions Our results demonstrate high user satisfaction and acceptance of DPMM tools by HCPs and patients, and highlight the improvements to clinical care in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with CIT monotherapy. However, further integration of the tool into the clinical information technology data flow is required. Future studies or registries using our DPMM tool may provide insights into significant effects on patient quality of life or health-economic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Schmalz
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Christine Jacob
- The Faculty of Business and Law, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,School of Business, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Ammann
- Medical Affairs (Personalised Healthcare and Patient Access), F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Blasius Liss
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Sanna Iivanainen
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Jussi Koivunen
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Alexander Klein
- Medical Affairs (Personalised Healthcare and Patient Access), F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sandhu S, King Z, Wong M, Bissell S, Sperling J, Gray M, Ratliff W, Herring K, LeBlanc TW. Implementation of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Care at an Academic Center: Identifying Opportunities and Challenges. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e1255-e1263. [DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can help clinicians proactively assess and manage their patients’ symptoms. Despite known benefits, there is limited adoption of ePROs into routine clinical care as a result of workflow and technologic challenges. This study identifies oncologists’ perspectives on factors that affect integration of ePROs into clinical workflows. METHODS: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with 16 oncologists from a large academic medical center, across diverse subspecialties and cancer types. Oncologists were asked how they currently use or could imagine using ePROs before, during, and after a patient visit. We used an inductive approach to thematically analyze these qualitative data. RESULTS: Results were categorized into the following three main themes: (1) selection and development of ePRO tool, (2) contextual drivers of adoption, and (3) patient-facing concerns. Respondents preferred diagnosis-based ePRO tools over more general symptom screeners. Although they noted information overload as a potential barrier, respondents described strong data visualization and ease of use as facilitators. Contextual drivers of oncologist adoption include identifying target early adopters, incentivizing uptake through use of ePRO data to support billing and documentation, and emphasizing benefits for patient care and efficiency. Respondents also indicated the need to focus on patient-facing issues, such as patient response rate, timing of survey distribution, and validity and reliability of responses. DISCUSSION: Respondents identified several barriers and facilitators to successful uptake of ePROs. Understanding oncologists’ perspectives is essential to inform both practice-level implementation strategies and policy-level decisions to include ePROs in alternative payment models for cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Sandhu
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Zoe King
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Michelle Wong
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sean Bissell
- Trinity College of Arts and Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Megan Gray
- Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abdel-Wahab M, Rosenblatt E, Prajogi B, Zubizarretta E, Mikhail M. Opportunities in Telemedicine, Lessons Learned After COVID-19 and the Way Into the Future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:438-443. [PMID: 32890528 PMCID: PMC7462967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- May Abdel-Wahab
- Telemedicine, Radiation Oncology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Eduardo Rosenblatt
- Telemedicine, Radiation Oncology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ben Prajogi
- Telemedicine, Radiation Oncology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eduardo Zubizarretta
- Telemedicine, Radiation Oncology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miriam Mikhail
- Telemedicine, Radiation Oncology, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nguyen M, Fujioka J, Wentlandt K, Onabajo N, Wong I, Bhatia RS, Bhattacharyya O, Stamenova V. Using the technology acceptance model to explore health provider and administrator perceptions of the usefulness and ease of using technology in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:138. [PMID: 32895060 PMCID: PMC7476427 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00644-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that telehealth applications in palliative care are feasible, can improve quality of care, and reduce costs but few studies have focused on user acceptance of current technology applications in palliative care. Furthermore, the perspectives of health administrators have not been explored in palliative care and yet they are often heavily involved, alongside providers, in the coordination and use of health technologies. The study aim was to explore both health care provider and administrator perceptions regarding the usefulness and ease of using technology in palliative care. METHODS The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was used as the guiding theoretical framework to provide insight into two key determinants that influence user acceptance of technology (perceived usefulness and ease of use). Semi-structured interviews (n = 18) with health providers and administrators with experience coordinating or using technology in palliative care explored the usefulness of technologies in palliative care and recommendations to support adoption. Interview data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to identify common, meaningful themes. RESULTS Four themes were identified; themes related to perceived usefulness were: enabling remote connection and information-sharing platform. Themes surrounding ease of use included: integration with existing IT systems and user-friendly with ready access to technical support. Telehealth can enable remote connection between patients and providers to help address insufficiencies in the current palliative care environment. Telehealth, as an information sharing platform, could support the coordination and collaboration of interdisciplinary providers caring for patients with palliative needs. However, health technologies need to passively integrate with existing IT systems to enhance providers' workflow and productivity. User-friendliness with ready access to technical support was considered especially important in palliative care as patients often experience diminished function. CONCLUSION Participants' perspectives of technology acceptance in palliative care were largely dependent on their potential to help address major challenges in the field without imposing significant burden on providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Nguyen
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| | - J Fujioka
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - K Wentlandt
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - N Onabajo
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - I Wong
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - R S Bhatia
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - O Bhattacharyya
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - V Stamenova
- Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, 76 Grenville Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontaro, M5S 1B2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oldenburger E, Oldenburger F, Coolbrandt A, Isebaert S, Neyens I, Sevenants A, Van Audenhove C, Haustermans K. The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative radiotherapy: A topical review. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:94-103. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
16
|
Roberts NA, Alexander K, Wyld D, Janda M. Statistical process control assessed implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 127:76-86. [PMID: 32569618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ensuring implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the complex clinical setting remains exigent. We aimed to integrate the routine use of PROM reports in day-to-day patient care and assess the implementation outcomes using statistical process control (SPC) methods. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING This prospective pilot study used an implementation science framework to integrate PROMs. SPC analysis was applied to track patient completion rates and staff acknowledgment rates over time. Daily observational data across clinical areas were collected to assess potential variations. RESULTS Data were available from 324 patient encounters over 14 weeks. On average, 78% (52% to 100%) of eligible patients entering the clinic completed the PROMs; staff acknowledged 78% (50-100%) of these patient reports. Most patterns of fluctuation were inside the control frame. Dips in compliance relating to changes in clinic daily routine, including the introduction of the second randomized clinic, were quickly resolved with a structured response. CONCLUSION Implementation of PROMs was feasible with reasonable patient completion and staff acknowledgment rates. Fidelity was vulnerable to barriers impacting the daily routine or unusual events in the clinics, suggesting that greater standardization and integration into clinic processes may yet further improve compliance and consistency of reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A Roberts
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work, and the Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Kimberly Alexander
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; St Vincent's Private Hospital Northside, Chermside, Australia
| | - David Wyld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- School of Public Health and Social Work, and the Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Radionova N, Becker G, Mayer-Steinacker R, Gencer D, Rieger MA, Preiser C. The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:45. [PMID: 32247316 PMCID: PMC7129326 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. Methods Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. Results The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. Conclusions A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Radionova
- Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Gerhild Becker
- Clinic for Palliative Care, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Deniz Gencer
- Department of Medicine III, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Monika A Rieger
- Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.,Core Facility Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christine Preiser
- Institute for Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany.,Core Facility Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e15935. [PMID: 32130167 PMCID: PMC7059085 DOI: 10.2196/15935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the potential of mobile health (mHealth) in reducing health care costs, enhancing access, and improving the quality of patient care. However, user acceptance and adoption are key prerequisites to harness this potential; hence, a deeper understanding of the factors impacting this adoption is crucial for its success. Objective The aim of this review was to systematically explore relevant published literature to synthesize the current understanding of the factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mHealth tools, not only from a technological perspective but also from social and organizational perspectives. Methods A structured search was carried out of MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the SAGE database for studies published between January 2008 and July 2018 in the English language, yielding 4993 results, of which 171 met the inclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines and the Cochrane handbook were followed to ensure a systematic process. Results The technological factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mHealth tools were categorized into eight key themes: usefulness, ease of use, design, compatibility, technical issues, content, personalization, and convenience, which were in turn divided into 14 subthemes altogether. Social and organizational factors were much more prevalent and were categorized into eight key themes: workflow related, patient related, policy and regulations, culture or attitude or social influence, monetary factors, evidence base, awareness, and user engagement. These were divided into 41 subthemes, highlighting the importance of considering these factors when addressing potential barriers to mHealth adoption and how to overcome them. Conclusions The study results can help inform mHealth providers and policymakers regarding the key factors impacting mHealth adoption, guiding them into making educated decisions to foster this adoption and harness the potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Jacob
- Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez
- Innovation and Management Practice Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Ivory
- Innovation and Management Practice Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jacob C, Sanchez-Vazquez A, Ivory C. Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020. [PMID: 32130167 DOI: 10.2196/preprints.15935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a growing body of evidence highlighting the potential of mobile health (mHealth) in reducing health care costs, enhancing access, and improving the quality of patient care. However, user acceptance and adoption are key prerequisites to harness this potential; hence, a deeper understanding of the factors impacting this adoption is crucial for its success. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to systematically explore relevant published literature to synthesize the current understanding of the factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth tools, not only from a technological perspective but also from social and organizational perspectives. METHODS A structured search was carried out of MEDLINE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the SAGE database for studies published between January 2008 and July 2018 in the English language, yielding 4993 results, of which 171 met the inclusion criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines and the Cochrane handbook were followed to ensure a systematic process. RESULTS The technological factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth tools were categorized into eight key themes: usefulness, ease of use, design, compatibility, technical issues, content, personalization, and convenience, which were in turn divided into 14 subthemes altogether. Social and organizational factors were much more prevalent and were categorized into eight key themes: workflow related, patient related, policy and regulations, culture or attitude or social influence, monetary factors, evidence base, awareness, and user engagement. These were divided into 41 subthemes, highlighting the importance of considering these factors when addressing potential barriers to mHealth adoption and how to overcome them. CONCLUSIONS The study results can help inform mHealth providers and policymakers regarding the key factors impacting mHealth adoption, guiding them into making educated decisions to foster this adoption and harness the potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Jacob
- Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez
- Innovation and Management Practice Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Ivory
- Innovation and Management Practice Research Centre, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nic Giolla Easpaig B, Tran Y, Bierbaum M, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Ward RL, Olver I, Currow D, Girgis A, Durcinoska I, Braithwaite J. What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:102. [PMID: 32041593 PMCID: PMC7011235 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4939-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in cancer care has been widely advocated, but little is known about the evidence for the implementation of PROMs in practice. Qualitative research captures the perspectives of health professionals as end-users of PROMs and can be used to inform adoption efforts. This paper presents a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research conducted to address the question: What are the attitudes of health professionals towards PROMs in oncology, including any barriers and facilitators to the adoption of PROMS, reported in qualitative evidence? METHODS Systematic searches of qualitative evidence were undertaken in four databases and reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies published in English between 1998 and 2018, which reported qualitative findings about the attitudes of health professionals working in oncology towards PROMs were eligible. Studies were assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme's Qualitative Research Checklist. A sentiment analysis was conducted on primary text to examine the polarity (neutral, positive or negative) of health professionals' views of PROMs. Qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted using a constant comparative analysis. RESULTS From 1227 articles after duplicates were removed, with 1014 excluded against the screening criteria, 213 full text articles remained and were assessed; 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. The majority of studies were of good quality. Sentiment analysis on primary text demonstrated an overall positive polarity from the expressed opinions of health professionals. The meta-synthesis showed health professionals' attitudes in four domains: identifying patient issues and needs using PROMs; managing and addressing patient issues; the care experience; and the integration of PROMs into clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS From the accounts of health professionals, the fit of PROMs with existing practice, how PROMs are valued, capacity to respond to PROMs and the supports in place, formed the key factors which may impede or promote adoption of PROMs in routine practice. To assist policy-makers and services involved in implementing these initiatives, further evidence is required about the relationship between PROMs data collection and corresponding clinical actions. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019119447, 6th March, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Geoff P Delaney
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.,Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- St. George Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.,St. George Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Robyn L Ward
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - David Currow
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.,Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - Ivana Durcinoska
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.,Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pavic M, Klaas V, Theile G, Kraft J, Tröster G, Blum D, Guckenberger M. Mobile Health Technologies for Continuous Monitoring of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care Aiming to Predict Health Status Deterioration: A Feasibility Study. J Palliat Med 2019; 23:678-685. [PMID: 31873052 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Unplanned readmissions or emergency visits (EVs) after discharge from hospital are frequent in patients in palliative care. Strategies to anticipate and prevent rapid deterioration of health are needed. Objective: Assessing feasibility and predictive ability of remote monitoring using wearables. Design: Prospective observational feasibility study in a single center. Setting/Subjects: Thirty cancer patients with an estimated life expectancy of >8 weeks to <12 months, aged >18 years and being discharged from inpatient to outpatient care were included. Measurements: Patients were provided with a smartphone, including the preinstalled "Activity Monitoring" application and a sensor-equipped bracelet. Follow-up was 12 weeks. Both devices recorded several features (e.g., vital signs). Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and distress was reported once daily and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) once weekly. Statistical methods were applied to explore relationship between sensor data, self-reports, and EVs or readmissions or death. Results: Between February 2017 and May 2018, 30 patients were included. Twenty-five of 30 participants (83%) completed 12 weeks of follow-up. On average, bracelet was worn on 53% and smartphone on 85% of study days. Completion rate of daily digital questionnaires for subjective ratings was 73%. Eight unplanned hospital readmissions occurred. Ratings of pain, distress, and QLQ-C30 scores were not associated with readmission, whereas resting heart rate, resting heart rate variability, as well as speed of steps differed significantly in patients with and without readmission. Conclusions: Monitoring of palliative cancer patients using wearables is feasible. First results indicate that mobile health features might be promising biomarkers to predict unplanned readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vanessa Klaas
- Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gudrun Theile
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard Tröster
- Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Blum
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital of Zurich, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hancock S, Preston N, Jones H, Gadoud A. Telehealth in palliative care is being described but not evaluated: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care 2019; 18:114. [PMID: 31835998 PMCID: PMC6911274 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-019-0495-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth is growing and its application in palliative care is seen as a solution to pressures on palliative care services. A 2010 UK review reported growing awareness of telehealth in palliative care but a lack of evidence-based research to support its use. The primary aim of this review was to describe the current use of telehealth in palliative care in the UK and evaluate telehealth initiatives against a digital service standard. The secondary aim was to explore whether telehealth results in a reduction in emergency care access. METHODS Systematic review of the literature with thematic synthesis. Records were screened and data extracted by two reviewers. EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Psychinfo and Cochrane central register for controlled trials were searched using pre-defined terms. Hand searching of conference literature, thesis databases and citation tracking was also conducted. The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and can be found at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017080038. RESULTS The search identified 3807 titles and 30 studies were included in the review. Telehealth was used to support patients and carers, electronic record keeping and professional education. Notably, the number of home telemonitoring initiatives for patients had increased from the 2010 review. Despite this variety, many studies were small scale, descriptive and provided little evidence of evaluation of the service. Ten papers were sufficiently detailed to allow appraisal against the digital service standard and only one of these met all of the criteria to some extent. Seven studies made reference to emergency care access. CONCLUSIONS Although there is growth of telehealth services, there remains a lack of evaluation and robust study design meaning conclusions regarding the clinical application of telehealth in palliative care cannot be drawn. There is insufficient evidence to appreciate any benefit of telehealth on access to emergency care. Future work is needed to evaluate the use of telehealth in palliative care and improve telehealth design in line with digital service standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hancock
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Furness Building, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG UK
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Furness Building, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG UK
| | - Helen Jones
- St Catherine’s Hospice, Lostock Hall, Lostock Lane, Preston, PR5 5XU UK
| | - Amy Gadoud
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Furness Building, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG UK
- Trinity Hospice, Low Moor Road, Bispham, Blackpool, FY2 OGB UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roberts NA, Alexander K, Wyld D, Janda M. What is needed by staff to implement PROMs into routine oncology care? A qualitative study with the multi-disciplinary team. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13167. [PMID: 31603590 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to identify strategies to implement patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine oncology outpatients' clinical care. METHODS Qualitative focus groups were conducted with staff from multiple disciplines using a semistructured interview guide, with supporting data collected in field notes. Data were analysed using a Directed Content Analysis guided by an implementation science framework. The synthesis of the extracted data aimed to identify key requirements which correspond to intrinsic enablers and barriers for implementation. RESULTS 52 staff members from the multi-disciplinary team participated. Data extracted showed five key themes and three key requirements regarding implementation of PROMs. Staff would consider using PROMs if there was strong research evidence that demonstrates benefits for patient outcomes, if PROM data was relevant to current clinical practice, and if applied appropriately in the specific setting. These findings add pragmatic detail and new knowledge to the current evidence on pathways to PROM implementation. This data can be used to inform implementation of PROMs into health services. CONCLUSION Staff have valuable tacit knowledge of what works in practice that offers a unique opportunity to increase successful implementation of a PROM intervention for patient symptom reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha A Roberts
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia.,Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
| | - Kim Alexander
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - David Wyld
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia.,Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pavic M, Klaas V, Theile G, Kraft J, Tröster G, Guckenberger M. Feasibility and Usability Aspects of Continuous Remote Monitoring of Health Status in Palliative Cancer Patients Using Wearables. Oncology 2019; 98:386-395. [PMID: 31336377 DOI: 10.1159/000501433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health is a promising strategy aiming to anticipate and prevent the deterioration of health status in palliative cancer patients. A prerequisite for successful implementation of this technology into clinical routine is a high level of usability and acceptance of devices. OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate feasibility as well as patients' acceptance of remote monitoring using wearables in palliative cancer patients. METHODS In this prospective single-center observational feasibility study, 30 cancer patients treated with palliative intent in an inpatient setting with an estimated life expectancy of >8 weeks and <12 months were provided with a smartphone including a pre-installed "Activity Monitoring" app and a sensor-equipped bracelet and monitored over a period of 12 weeks starting at discharge from hospital. We report detailed feasibility and usability aspects and comment on patients' acceptance of the wearables. RESULTS Between February 2017 and May 2018 a total of 30 patients were included in the study. From these, 25 participants (83%) completed the whole study period. On average, the bracelet was worn on 53% and smartphone used on 85% of the study days. The completion rate of daily digital questionnaires for subjective ratings (pain and distress scale) was 73%, and 28 patients were able to handle the wearables and to operate the app without major problems. Use of the bracelet was low during the night hours, with a wearing time of 1.7% of all night hours (8 p.m. to 8 a.m.). CONCLUSIONS Remote monitoring of health care status in palliative cancer patients with a limited life expectancy is feasible and patients are able to handle the smartphone and the sensor-equipped bracelet. Feedback towards use of this monitoring system was mostly positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,
| | - Vanessa Klaas
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Wearable Computing Laboratory, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gudrun Theile
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gerhard Tröster
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Wearable Computing Laboratory, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology/Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Anatchkova M, Donelson SM, Skalicky AM, McHorney CA, Jagun D, Whiteley J. Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2018; 2:64. [PMID: 30588562 PMCID: PMC6306371 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0091-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the existing evidence of the real-world implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical practice and address two aims: (1) summarize available evidence of PRO use in clinical practice using a framework based on the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) PRO Implementation Guide; and (2) describe reports of real-world, standardized PRO administration in oncology conducted outside of scope of a research study. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was developed to guide the systematic literature review (SLR) that was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase databases. A two step search strategy was implemented including two searches based on previously completed reviews. Studies published from 2006 to 2017 were synthesized using a framework based on the ISOQOL PRO Implementation Guide. RESULTS After screening 4427 abstracts, 36 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most elements of the ISOQOL PRO Implementation Guide were followed. Two notable exceptions were found: 1) providing PRO score interpretation guidelines (39% of studies); and 2) providing patient-management guidance for addressing issues identified by PROs (25% of studies). Of the 22 studies with an intervention component, 19 (86%) reported intervention effects on study outcomes. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was the most commonly used PRO (n = 10, 28%); use of 38 other PRO measures was also reported. Only three studies (8%) reported real-world PRO implementation. CONCLUSION Reports of real-world PRO implementation are limited. Reports from studies conducted in clinical settings suggest gaps in information on PRO score interpretation and the use of PRO results to inform patient management. Before the promise of practice-based PRO assessment in oncology can be truly realized, investigators need to advance the state-of-the-art of real-time PRO score interpretation as well as developing guidance on how to use PRO insights to drive clinically-meaningful patient-management strategies.
Collapse
|
26
|
Electronic patient-reported symptom assessment in palliative end-of-life home care. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2017. [DOI: 10.1057/hs.2013.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
27
|
Taylor S, Allsop MJ, Bennett MI, Bewick BM. Usability testing of an electronic pain monitoring system for palliative cancer patients: A think-aloud study. Health Informatics J 2017; 25:1133-1147. [PMID: 29172951 DOI: 10.1177/1460458217741754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Pain experienced by advanced cancer patients is often poorly controlled due to inadequate assessment. We aimed to test an electronic pain monitoring system (PainCheck) with advanced cancer patients and health professionals. In all, 29 participants (13 patients and 16 health professionals (n = 16)) used PainCheck while thinking their thoughts aloud. After the think aloud, both groups were asked about their experiences. Think-aloud and semi-structured interview data were analysed using framework analysis. Both groups were generally positive about PainCheck and found it easy to understand but they had concerns about clinical integration. Their concerns related to impact on workload, how lack of response may affect patient care and ability to engage with and use the technology. PainCheck has the capacity to be useful in clinical practice. For integration to be successful, patients and health professionals need guidance on how to use PainCheck and the expectations of users need to be clarified.
Collapse
|
28
|
Allsop MJ, Taylor S, Bennett MI, Bewick BM. Understanding patient requirements for technology systems that support pain management in palliative care services: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J 2017; 25:1105-1115. [PMID: 29148298 DOI: 10.1177/1460458217740724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Approaches to pain management using electronic systems are being developed for use in palliative care. This article explores palliative care patients' perspectives on managing and talking about pain, the role of technology in their lives and how technology could support pain management. Face-to-face interviews were used to understand patient needs and concerns to inform how electronic systems are developed. A total of 13 interviews took place with a convenience sample of community-based patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care through a hospice. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Four meta-themes emerged: Technology could be part of my care; I'm trying to understand what is going on; My pain is ever-changing and difficult to control; and I'm selective about who to tell about pain. Patients described technology as peripheral to existing processes of care. To be relevant, systems may need to take account of the complexity of a patient's pain experience alongside existing relationships with health professionals.
Collapse
|
29
|
Adam R, de Bruin M, Burton CD, Bond CM, Giatsi Clausen M, Murchie P. What are the current challenges of managing cancer pain and could digital technologies help? BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017; 8:204-212. [PMID: 28554888 PMCID: PMC5969332 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Pain remains a problem for people with cancer despite effective treatments being available. We aimed to explore current pain management strategies used by patients, caregivers and professionals and to investigate opportunities for digital technologies to enhance cancer pain management. Methods A qualitative study comprising semistructured interviews and focus groups. Patients with cancer pain, their caregivers and health professionals from Northeast Scotland were recruited from a purposive sample of general practices. Professionals were recruited from regional networks. Results Fifty one participants took part in 33 interviews (eight patients alone, six patient/caregiver dyads and 19 professionals) and two focus groups (12 professionals). Living with cancer was hard work for patients and caregivers and comparable to a ‘full-time job’. Patients had personal goals which involved controlling pain intensity and balancing this with analgesic use, side effects, overall symptom burden and social/physical activities. Digital technologies were embraced by most patients, and made living life with advanced cancer easier and richer (eg, video calls with family). Technology was underutilised for pain and symptom management. There were suggestions that technology could support self-monitoring and communicating problems to professionals, but patients and professionals were concerned about technological monitoring adding to the work of managing illness. Conclusions Cancer pain management takes place in the context of multiple, sometimes competing personal goals. It is possible that technology could be used to help patients share individual symptom experiences and goals, thus enhancing tailored care. The challenge is for digital solutions to add value without adding undue burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind Adam
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Marijn de Bruin
- Aberdeen Health Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Christine M Bond
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Peter Murchie
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Worster B, Swartz K. Telemedicine and Palliative Care: an Increasing Role in Supportive Oncology. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19:37. [PMID: 28417310 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0600-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
With the emergence of telemedicine as a routine form of care in various venues, the opportunities to use technology to care for the most vulnerable, most ill cancer patients are extremely appealing. Increasingly, evidence supports early integration of palliative care with standard oncologic care, supported by recent NCCN guidelines to increase and improve access to palliative care. This review looks at the use of telemedicine to expand access to palliative care as well as provide better care for patients and families where travel is difficult, if not impossible. When telemedicine has been used, often in Europe, for palliative care, the results show improvements in symptom management, comfort with care as well as patient and family satisfaction. One barrier to use of telemedicine is the concerns with technology and technology-related complications in population that is often elderly, frail and not always comfortable with non-face-to-face physician care. There remain significant opportunities to explore this intersection of supportive care and telemedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Worster
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, 1015 Walnut St, Suite 401, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Kristine Swartz
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, 1015 Walnut St, Suite 401, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Adam R, Burton CD, Bond CM, de Bruin M, Murchie P. Can patient-reported measurements of pain be used to improve cancer pain management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2016; 7:0. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
32
|
Development of a novel remote patient monitoring system: the advanced symptom management system for radiotherapy to improve the symptom experience of patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 2016; 38:E37-47. [PMID: 24836956 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of technology-enhanced patient-reported outcome measures to monitor the symptoms experienced by people with cancer is an effective way to offer timely care. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to (a) explore the feasibility and acceptability of the Advanced Symptom Management System with patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy and clinicians involved in their care and (b) assess changes in patient outcomes during implementation of the Advanced Symptom Management System with patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy in clinical practice. METHODS A repeated-measures, single-arm, mixed-methods study design was used involving poststudy interviews and completion of patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and end of treatment with 16 patients with lung cancer and 13 clinicians who used this mobile phone-based symptom monitoring system. RESULTS Only rarely did patients report problems in using the handset and they felt that the system covered all relevant symptoms and helped them to manage their symptoms and effectively communicate with clinicians. Clinical improvements in patient anxiety, drowsiness, and self-care self-efficacy were also observed. Clinicians perceived the use of "real-time" risk algorithms and automated self-care advice provided to patients as positively contributing to clinical care. Reducing the complexity of the system was seen as important to promote its utility. CONCLUSIONS Although preliminary, these results suggest that monitoring patient symptoms using mobile technology in the context of radiotherapy for lung cancer is feasible and acceptable in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Future research would be most beneficial if the use of this technology was focused on the postradiotherapy phase and expanded the scope of the system to encompass a wider range of supportive care needs.
Collapse
|
33
|
Boudreaux ED, Fischer AC, Haskins BL, Saeed Zafar Z, Chen G, Chinai SA. Implementation of a Computerized Screening Inventory: Improved Usability Through Iterative Testing and Modification. JMIR Hum Factors 2016; 3:e10. [PMID: 27025766 PMCID: PMC4811667 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.4896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The administration of health screeners in a hospital setting has traditionally required (1) clinicians to ask questions and log answers, which can be time consuming and susceptible to error, or (2) patients to complete paper-and-pencil surveys, which require third-party entry of information into the electronic health record and can be vulnerable to error and misinterpretation. A highly promising method that avoids these limitations and bypasses third-party interpretation is direct entry via a computerized inventory. Objective To (1) computerize medical and behavioral health screening for use in general medical settings, (2) optimize patient acceptability and feasibility through iterative usability testing and modification cycles, and (3) examine how age relates to usability. Methods A computerized version of 15 screeners, including behavioral health screeners recommended by a National Institutes of Health Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research collaborative workgroup, was subjected to systematic usability testing and iterative modification. Consecutive adult, English-speaking patients seeking treatment in an urban emergency department were enrolled. Acceptability was defined as (1) the percentage of eligible patients who agreed to take the assessment (initiation rate) and (2) average satisfaction with the assessment (satisfaction rate). Feasibility was defined as the percentage of the screening items completed by those who initiated the assessment (completion rate). Chi-square tests, analyses of variance, and Pearson correlations were used to detect whether improvements in initiation, satisfaction, and completion rates were seen over time and to examine the relation between age and outcomes. Results Of 2157 eligible patients approached, 1280 agreed to complete the screening (initiation rate=59.34%). Statistically significant increases were observed over time in satisfaction (F3,1061=3.35, P=.019) and completion rates (F3,1276=25.44, P<.001). Younger age was associated with greater initiation (initiated, mean [SD], 46.6 [18.7] years; declined: 53.0 [19.5] years, t2,155=−7.6, P<.001), higher completion (r=−.20, P<.001), and stronger satisfaction (r=−.23, P<.001). Conclusions In a rapid-paced emergency department with a heterogeneous patient population, 59.34% (1280/2157) of all eligible patients initiated the computerized screener with a completion rate reaching over 90%. Usability testing revealed several critical principles for maximizing usability of the computerized medical and behavioral health screeners used in this study. Further work is needed to identify usability issues pertaining to other screeners, racially and ethnically diverse patient groups, and different health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin D Boudreaux
- Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J. Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1846-1858. [PMID: 25888610 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 332] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review focused on the identification of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in routine cancer clinical practice, the impact on patient, provider, and system outcomes, and the implementation factors influencing uptake. METHODS A scoping review of the published health literature was conducted using empirical databases, namely, Ovid Medline (2003 to September 2013), CINAHL (2003-2013) and PsycINFO (2003-2013). Scoping reviews are systematic literature reviews in a broad topic area that provide relevant and quantified results about the knowledge available on a particular topic and aim to rapidly map and synthesize the evidence to emphasize what is known. RESULTS From a total of 2447 unique publications, 30 articles that met eligibility criteria were reviewed. PRO use appears to be acceptable to patients, enables earlier detection of symptoms and may improve communication between clinicians and patients. However, the impact of routine PROMs collection on health outcomes is less clear and high-quality research is still warranted. CONCLUSION PROMs use in routine cancer clinical practice is growing with improvements on essential care processes shown but a number of implementation barriers must still be addressed. The lack of standardization in PROMs used in cancer organizations may make it difficult to use these data for quality monitoring in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Howell
- Nursing, University Health Network (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), Toronto.
| | - S Molloy
- Symptom Management, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto
| | - K Wilkinson
- Symptom Management, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto
| | - E Green
- Nursing and Psychosocial Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto
| | - K Orchard
- Evidence Search and Review Service, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - K Wang
- Evidence Search and Review Service, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Liberty
- Evidence Search and Review Service, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cox A, Faithfull S. Aiding a reassertion of self: a qualitative study of the views and experiences of women with ovarian cancer receiving long-term nurse-led telephone follow-up. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23:2357-64. [PMID: 25588575 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2578-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explored the views and experiences of women following treatment for ovarian cancer who had received long-term (at least 3 years) nurse-led telephone follow-up. Exploring the long-term experiences of follow-up for women with ovarian cancer provides important information regarding the coping processes of cancer survivors that can inform the development of innovative and patient-centred approaches of cancer follow-up. METHODS This is a qualitative study approach using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Eleven women were identified by a clinical nurse specialist as having received nurse-led telephone follow-up for a period of at least 3 years. These women were interviewed in person or over the telephone using a semi-structured interview schedule; interviews were audio-recorded and transcriptions were analysed using IPA. RESULTS Nurse-led telephone follow-up was felt to support a reassertion of self and a rejection of patient identity. Three core themes emerged regarding the positive impact of nurse-led telephone follow-up: 'Somebody was looking out for me' highlights the perception of increased psychosocial support; 'It's just reassurance' includes both the deep trust in the expertise of the nurse and the reassurance of the continued blood tests; and 'Time was never an issue' presents the perception of relaxed follow-up appointments with time to talk and the perceived practical benefits of this approach. CONCLUSIONS Nurse-led telephone follow-up was broadly recommended for women following treatment for ovarian cancer, particularly for those later on in the survivorship trajectory when focus may move from biomedical aspects of cure to holistic approaches to well-being. Remote interventions which provide a perception of a consistent and constant source of medical and psychosocial support may support adaption to cancer survivorship by enabling a reassertion of self and a rejection of patient identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cox
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK,
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tieman JJ, Morgan DD, Swetenham K, To THM, Currow DC. Designing clinically valuable telehealth resources: processes to develop a community-based palliative care prototype. JMIR Res Protoc 2014; 3:e41. [PMID: 25189279 PMCID: PMC4180353 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changing population demography and patterns of disease are increasing demands on the health system. Telehealth is seen as providing a mechanism to support community-based care, thus reducing pressure on hospital services and supporting consumer preferences for care in the home. OBJECTIVE This study examined the processes involved in developing a prototype telehealth intervention to support palliative care patients involved with a palliative care service living in the community. METHODS The challenges and considerations in developing the palliative care telehealth prototype were reviewed against the Center for eHealth Research (CeHRes) framework, a telehealth development model. The project activities to develop the prototype were specifically mapped against the model's first four phases: multidisciplinary project management, contextual inquiry, value specification, and design. This project has been developed as part of the Telehealth in the Home: Aged and Palliative Care in South Australia initiative. RESULTS Significant issues were identified and subsequently addressed during concept and prototype development. The CeHRes approach highlighted the implicit diversity in views and opinions among participants and stakeholders and enabled issues to be considered, resolved, and incorporated during design through continuous engagement. CONCLUSIONS The CeHRes model provided a mechanism that facilitated "better" solutions in the development of the palliative care prototype by addressing the inherent but potentially unrecognized differences in values and beliefs of participants. This collaboration enabled greater interaction and exchange among participants resulting in a more useful and clinically valuable telehealth prototype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Joy Tieman
- Discipline of Palliative and Supportive Services, Department of Health Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yount SE, Rothrock N, Bass M, Beaumont JL, Pach D, Lad T, Patel J, Corona M, Weiland R, Del Ciello K, Cella D. A randomized trial of weekly symptom telemonitoring in advanced lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2014; 47:973-89. [PMID: 24210705 PMCID: PMC4013267 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Revised: 07/19/2013] [Accepted: 07/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lung cancer patients experience multiple, simultaneous symptoms related to their disease and treatment that impair functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Computer technology can reduce barriers to nonsystematic, infrequent symptom assessment and potentially contribute to improved patient care. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of technology-based symptom monitoring and reporting in reducing symptom burden in patients with advanced lung cancer. METHODS This was a prospective, multisite, randomized controlled trial. Two hundred fifty-three patients were enrolled at three sites and randomized to monitoring and reporting (MR) or monitoring alone (MA). Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks and symptom surveys via interactive voice response weekly for 12 weeks. MR patients' clinically significant symptom scores generated an e-mail alert to the site nurse for management. The primary endpoint was overall symptom burden; secondary endpoints included HRQL, treatment satisfaction, symptom management barriers, and self-efficacy. RESULTS This randomized controlled trial failed to demonstrate efficacy of symptom monitoring and reporting in reducing symptom burden compared with monitoring alone in lung cancer. HRQL declined over 12 weeks in both groups (P < 0.006 to P < 0.025); at week 12, treatment satisfaction was higher in MA than MR patients (P < 0.012, P < 0.027). Adherence to weekly calls was good (82%) and patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION Feasibility of using a technology-based system for systematic symptom monitoring in advanced lung cancer patients was demonstrated. Future research should focus on identifying patients most likely to benefit and other patient, provider, and health system factors likely to contribute to the system's success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Deborah Pach
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Thomas Lad
- John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jyoti Patel
- Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | | - David Cella
- Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Blum D, Koeberle D, Omlin A, Walker J, Von Moos R, Mingrone W, deWolf-Linder S, Hayoz S, Kaasa S, Strasser F, Ribi K. Feasibility and acceptance of electronic monitoring of symptoms and syndromes using a handheld computer in patients with advanced cancer in daily oncology practice. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:2425-34. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2201-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2013] [Accepted: 03/04/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
39
|
Allsop MJ, Taylor S, Mulvey MR, Bennett MI, Bewick BM. Information and communication technology for managing pain in palliative care: a review of the literature. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2014; 5:481-9. [PMID: 24644214 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Accepted: 01/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information and communication technology (ICT) systems are being developed for electronic symptom reporting across different stages of the cancer trajectory with research in palliative care at an early stage. AIM/DESIGN This paper presents the first systematic search of the literature to review existing ICT systems intended to support management of pain in palliative care patients with cancer. The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES Four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Healthcare Management Information Consortium) from 1990 to December 2012 were searched, with exclusion of papers based on their description of ICT systems and language used. RESULTS 24 articles met the inclusion criteria, many of which reported the use of non-experimental research designs. Studies were identified at different stages of development with no systems having reached implementation. Most systems captured pain as part of quality-of-life measurement with wide variation in approaches to pain assessment. CONCLUSIONS ICT systems for symptom reporting are emerging in the palliative care context. Future development of ICT systems need to increase the quality and scale of development work, consider how recommendations for pain measurement can be integrated and explore how to effectively use system feedback with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Allsop
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Sally Taylor
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Matthew R Mulvey
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Michael I Bennett
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Bridgette M Bewick
- Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med 2014; 28:158-75. [PMID: 23801463 DOI: 10.1177/0269216313491619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 241] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patient-reported outcome measures have been developed in the past two decades, playing an increasingly important role in palliative care. However, their routine use in practice has been slow and difficult to implement. AIM To systematically identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in different palliative care settings for routine practice, and to generate evidence-based recommendations, to inform the implementation process in clinical practice. DESIGN Systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES Medline, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase and British Nursing Index were systematically searched from 1985. Hand searching of reference lists for all included articles and relevant review articles was performed. RESULTS A total of 3863 articles were screened. Of these, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. First, data were integrated in the main themes: facilitators, barriers and lessons learned. Second, each main theme was grouped into either five or six categories. Finally, recommendations for implementation on outcome measures at management, health-care professional and patient levels were generated for three different points in time: preparation, implementation and assessment/improvement. CONCLUSIONS Successful implementation of patient-reported outcome measures should be tailored by identifying and addressing potential barriers according to setting. Having a coordinator throughout the implementation process seems to be key. Ongoing cognitive and emotional processes of each individual should be taken into consideration during changes. The educational component prior to the implementation is crucial. This could promote ownership and correct use of the measure by clinicians, potentially improving practice and the quality of care provided through patient-reported outcome measure data use in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Antunes
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chih MY, DuBenske LL, Hawkins RP, Brown RL, Dinauer SK, Cleary JF, Gustafson DH. Communicating advanced cancer patients' symptoms via the Internet: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials examining caregiver preparedness, physical burden, and negative mood. Palliat Med 2013; 27:533-43. [PMID: 22988042 PMCID: PMC3819140 DOI: 10.1177/0269216312457213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using available communication technologies, clinicians may offer timely support to family caregivers in managing symptoms in patients with advanced cancer at home. AIM To assess the effects of an online symptom reporting system on caregiver preparedness, physical burden, and negative mood. DESIGN A pooled analysis of two randomized trials (NCT00214162 and NCT00365963) was conducted to compare caregiver outcomes at 6 and 12 months after intervention between two randomized, unblinded groups using General Linear Mixed Modeling. Caregivers in one group (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System-Only) were given access to an interactive cancer communication system, the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System. Those in the other group (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System + Clinician Report) received access to Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System plus an online symptom reporting system called the Clinician Report. Clinicians of patients in the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System + Clinician Report group received e-mail alerts notifying them when a symptom distress was reported over a predetermined threshold. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Dyads (n = 235) of advanced-stage lung, breast, and prostate cancer patients and their adult caregivers were recruited at five outpatient oncology clinics in the United States. RESULTS Caregivers in the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System + Clinician Report group reported less negative mood than those in the Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System-Only group at both 6 months (p = 0.009) and 12 months (p = 0.004). Groups were not significantly different on caregiver preparedness or physical burden at either time point. CONCLUSIONS This study provides new evidence that by using an online symptom reporting system, caregivers may experience less emotional distress due to the Clinician Report's timely communication of caregiving needs in symptom management to clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Yuan Chih
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2012; 6:543-52. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e32835ad036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
43
|
Abernethy AP, Currow DC. Patient self-reporting in palliative care using information technology: Yes, there is hope! Palliat Med 2011; 25:673-4. [PMID: 21987664 DOI: 10.1177/0269216311422760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P Abernethy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - David C Currow
- Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|