1
|
da Cunha-Bang S, Frokjaer VG, Mc Mahon B, Jensen PS, Svarer C, Knudsen GM. The association between brain serotonin transporter binding and impulsivity and aggression in healthy individuals. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 165:1-6. [PMID: 37441926 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
The serotonin system plays a critical role in the modulation of impulsive aggression. Although serotonin transporters (SERT) are key in modulating synaptic serotonin levels, few studies have investigated the role of SERT levels in human impulsive aggression. The aim of this study was to investigate whether brain SERT levels are associated with trait impulsive aggression. We included 148 healthy individuals (mean age 29.3 ± 13.0, range 18-80 years, 91 females) who had undergone positron emission positron (PET) examinations with the SERT tracer [11C]DASB and filled in self-report questionnaires of trait aggression, trait impulsivity and state aggression. We evaluated the association between cerebral SERT binding (BPND) and trait impulsive aggression in a latent variable model, with one latent variable (LVSERT) modelled from SERT BPND in frontostriatal and frontolimbic networks implicated in impulsive aggression, and another latent variable (LVIA) modelled from various trait measures of impulsivity and aggression. The LVSERT was not significantly associated with the LVIA (p = 0.8). Post-hoc univariate analyses did not reveal any significant associations between regional SERT levels and trait aggression, trait impulsivity or state aggression, but we found that state aggression at the day of PET scan was significantly lower in LA/LA homozygotes vs S-carriers of the 5-HTTLPR gene (p = 0.008). We conclude that brain SERT binding was not related to variations in trait impulsive aggression or state aggression. Our findings do not support that SERT is involved in mediating the serotonergic effects on aggression and impulsivity, at least not in individuals with non-pathological levels of impulsive aggression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofi da Cunha-Bang
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark; Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Vibe G Frokjaer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
| | - Brenda Mc Mahon
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Peter Steen Jensen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Claus Svarer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Gitte Moos Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niso G, Botvinik-Nezer R, Appelhoff S, De La Vega A, Esteban O, Etzel JA, Finc K, Ganz M, Gau R, Halchenko YO, Herholz P, Karakuzu A, Keator DB, Markiewicz CJ, Maumet C, Pernet CR, Pestilli F, Queder N, Schmitt T, Sójka W, Wagner AS, Whitaker KJ, Rieger JW. Open and reproducible neuroimaging: From study inception to publication. Neuroimage 2022; 263:119623. [PMID: 36100172 PMCID: PMC10008521 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Empirical observations of how labs conduct research indicate that the adoption rate of open practices for transparent, reproducible, and collaborative science remains in its infancy. This is at odds with the overwhelming evidence for the necessity of these practices and their benefits for individual researchers, scientific progress, and society in general. To date, information required for implementing open science practices throughout the different steps of a research project is scattered among many different sources. Even experienced researchers in the topic find it hard to navigate the ecosystem of tools and to make sustainable choices. Here, we provide an integrated overview of community-developed resources that can support collaborative, open, reproducible, replicable, robust and generalizable neuroimaging throughout the entire research cycle from inception to publication and across different neuroimaging modalities. We review tools and practices supporting study inception and planning, data acquisition, research data management, data processing and analysis, and research dissemination. An online version of this resource can be found at https://oreoni.github.io. We believe it will prove helpful for researchers and institutions to make a successful and sustainable move towards open and reproducible science and to eventually take an active role in its future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guiomar Niso
- Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Madrid and CIBER-BBN, Spain; Instituto Cajal, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
| | - Stefan Appelhoff
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Oscar Esteban
- Dept. of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joset A Etzel
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Karolina Finc
- Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rémi Gau
- Institute of Psychology, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain la Neuve, Belgium
| | - Yaroslav O Halchenko
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Peer Herholz
- Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Agah Karakuzu
- Biomedical Engineering Institute, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Montréal Heart Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David B Keator
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | - Camille Maumet
- Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm - IRISA UMR 6074, Empenn ERL U 1228, Rennes, France
| | - Cyril R Pernet
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Franco Pestilli
- Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Nazek Queder
- Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Tina Schmitt
- Neuroimaging Unit, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Weronika Sójka
- Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Adina S Wagner
- Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Centre Juelich, Germany
| | | | - Jochem W Rieger
- Neuroimaging Unit, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany; Department of Psychology, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Veldman ER, Varrone A, Varnäs K, Svedberg MM, Cselényi Z, Tiger M, Gulyás B, Halldin C, Lundberg J. Serotonin 1B receptor density mapping of the human brainstem using positron emission tomography and autoradiography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2022; 42:630-641. [PMID: 34644198 PMCID: PMC8943614 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211049185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The serotonin 1B (5-HT1B) receptor has lately received considerable interest in relation to psychiatric and neurological diseases, partly due to findings based on quantification using Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Although the brainstem is an important structure in this regard, PET radioligand binding quantification in brainstem areas often shows poor reliability. This study aims to improve PET quantification of 5-HT1B receptor binding in the brainstem.Volumes of interest (VOIs) were selected based on a 3D [3H]AZ10419369 Autoradiography brainstem model, which visualized 5-HT1B receptor distribution in high resolution. Two previously developed VOI delineation methods were tested and compared to a conventional manual method. For a method based on template data, a [11C]AZ10419369 PET template was created by averaging parametric binding potential (BPND) images of 52 healthy subjects. VOIs were generated based on a predefined volume and BPND thresholding and subsequently applied to test-retest [11C]AZ10419369 parametric BPND images of 8 healthy subjects. For a method based on individual subject data, VOIs were generated directly on each individual parametric image.Both methods showed improved reliability compared to a conventional manual VOI. The VOIs created with [11C]AZ10419369 template data can be automatically applied to future PET studies measuring 5-HT1B receptor binding in the brainstem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma R Veldman
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Varrone
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katarina Varnäs
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie M Svedberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Health Promotion Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zsolt Cselényi
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.,PET Science Centre, Personalized Medicine and Biosamples, R&D, AstraZeneca, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Tiger
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Balázs Gulyás
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christer Halldin
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lundberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imaging Histamine H3 Receptors with Positron Emission Tomography. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2021; 59:147-167. [PMID: 34964937 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2021_285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) provides a unique tool to study the biochemistry of the human brain in vivo. By using PET probes that are binding selectively to certain receptor subtypes, brain PET allows the quantification of receptor levels in various brain areas of human subjects. This approach has the potential to reveal abnormal receptor expressions that may contribute to the physiopathology of some psychiatric and neurological disorders. This approach also has the potential to assist in the drug development process by determining receptor occupancy in vivo allowing selection of proper drug dosage to produce therapeutic effects. Several PET tracers have been developed for histamine H3 receptors (H3R). However, despite the potential of PET to elucidate the role of H3R in vivo, only limited work has been conducted so far. This article reviews the work that has been done in this area. Notably, we will cover the limitations of the first-generation PET radioligand for H3R and present the advantages of novel radioligands that promise an explosion of clinical PET research on the role of H3R in vivo.
Collapse
|
5
|
Joo YH, Lee MW, Son YD, Chang KA, Yaqub M, Kim HK, Cumming P, Kim JH. In Vivo Cerebral Translocator Protein (TSPO) Binding and Its Relationship with Blood Adiponectin Levels in Treatment-Naïve Young Adults with Major Depression: A [ 11C]PK11195 PET Study. Biomedicines 2021; 10:biomedicines10010034. [PMID: 35052718 PMCID: PMC8773340 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Adiponectin is an adipokine that mediates cellular cholesterol efflux and plays important roles in neuroinflammatory processes. In this study, we undertook positron emission tomography (PET) with the translocator protein (TSPO) ligand [11C]PK11195 and measured serum adiponectin levels in groups of treatment-naïve young adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and matched healthy controls. Thirty treatment-naïve MDD patients (median age: 24 years) and twenty-three healthy controls underwent [11C]PK11195 PET. We quantified TSPO availability in brain as the [11C]PK11195 binding potential (BPND) using a reference tissue model in conjunction with the supervised cluster analysis (SVCA4) algorithm. Age, sex distribution, body mass index, and serum adiponectin levels did not differ between the groups. Between-group analysis using a region-of-interest approach showed significantly higher [11C]PK11195 BPND in the left anterior and right posterior cingulate cortices in MDD patients than in controls. Serum adiponectin levels had significant negative correlations with [11C]PK11195 BPND in the bilateral hippocampus in MDD patients, but significant positive correlations in the bilateral hippocampus in the control group. Our results indicate significantly higher TSPO binding in the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices in treatment-naïve young MDD patients, suggesting microglial activation in these limbic regions, which are involved in cognitive and emotional processing. The opposite correlations between [11C]PK11195 BPND in the hippocampus with serum adiponectin levels in MDD and control groups suggest that microglial activation in the hippocampus may respond differentially to adiponectin signaling in MDD and healthy subjects, possibly with respect to microglial phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yo-Han Joo
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea; (Y.-H.J.); (M.-W.L.); (Y.-D.S.); (K.-A.C.); (H.-K.K.)
| | - Min-Woo Lee
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea; (Y.-H.J.); (M.-W.L.); (Y.-D.S.); (K.-A.C.); (H.-K.K.)
| | - Young-Don Son
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea; (Y.-H.J.); (M.-W.L.); (Y.-D.S.); (K.-A.C.); (H.-K.K.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Health Science, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea
- Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Graduate School, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
| | - Keun-A Chang
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea; (Y.-H.J.); (M.-W.L.); (Y.-D.S.); (K.-A.C.); (H.-K.K.)
- Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Graduate School, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
- Department of Pharmacology, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Hang-Keun Kim
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea; (Y.-H.J.); (M.-W.L.); (Y.-D.S.); (K.-A.C.); (H.-K.K.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Health Science, Gachon University, Incheon 21936, Korea
- Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Graduate School, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
| | - Paul Cumming
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland;
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Jong-Hoon Kim
- Neuroscience Research Institute, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea; (Y.-H.J.); (M.-W.L.); (Y.-D.S.); (K.-A.C.); (H.-K.K.)
- Gachon Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Graduate School, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
- Department of Psychiatry, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University, Incheon 21565, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-32-460-2696
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Veronese M, Rizzo G, Belzunce M, Schubert J, Searle G, Whittington A, Mansur A, Dunn J, Reader A, Gunn RN. Reproducibility of findings in modern PET neuroimaging: insight from the NRM2018 grand challenge. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41:2778-2796. [PMID: 33993794 PMCID: PMC8504414 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211015101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The reproducibility of findings is a compelling methodological problem that the neuroimaging community is facing these days. The lack of standardized pipelines for image processing, quantification and statistics plays a major role in the variability and interpretation of results, even when the same data are analysed. This problem is well-known in MRI studies, where the indisputable value of the method has been complicated by a number of studies that produce discrepant results. However, any research domain with complex data and flexible analytical procedures can experience a similar lack of reproducibility. In this paper we investigate this issue for brain PET imaging. During the 2018 NeuroReceptor Mapping conference, the brain PET community was challenged with a computational contest involving a simulated neurotransmitter release experiment. Fourteen international teams analysed the same imaging dataset, for which the ground-truth was known. Despite a plurality of methods, the solutions were consistent across participants, although not identical. These results should create awareness that the increased sharing of PET data alone will only be one component of enhancing confidence in neuroimaging results and that it will be important to complement this with full details of the analysis pipelines and procedures that have been used to quantify data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Veronese
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Belzunce
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Julia Schubert
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Ayla Mansur
- Invicro LLC, London, UK
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Joel Dunn
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
- King's College London & Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK
| | - Andrew Reader
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Roger N Gunn
- Invicro LLC, London, UK
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - and the Grand Challenge Participants#
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Invicro LLC, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, UK
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- King's College London & Guy's and St. Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ganz M, Nørgaard M, Beliveau V, Svarer C, Knudsen GM, Greve DN. False positive rates in positron emission tomography (PET) voxelwise analyses. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41:1647-1657. [PMID: 33241770 PMCID: PMC8221774 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x20974961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Issues with inflated false positive rates (FPRs) in brain imaging have recently received significant attention. However, to what extent FPRs present a problem for voxelwise analyses of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) data remains unknown. In this work, we evaluate the FPR using real PET data under group assignments that should yield no significant results after correcting for multiple comparisons. We used data from 159 healthy participants, imaged with the serotonin transporter ([11C]DASB; N = 100) or the 5-HT4 receptor ([11C]SB207145; N = 59). Using this null data, we estimated the FPR by performing 1,000 group analyses with randomly assigned groups of either 10 or 20, for each tracer, and corrected for multiple comparisons using parametric Monte Carlo simulations (MCZ) or non-parametric permutation testing. Our analyses show that for group sizes of 10 or 20, the FPR for both tracers was 5-99% using MCZ, much higher than the expected 5%. This was caused by a heavier-than-Gaussian spatial autocorrelation, violating the parametric assumptions. Permutation correctly controlled the FPR in all cases. In conclusion, either a conservative cluster forming threshold and high smoothing levels, or a non-parametric correction for multiple comparisons should be performed in voxelwise analyses of brain PET data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Nørgaard
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vincent Beliveau
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claus Svarer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kolinger GD, Vállez García D, Lohith TG, Hostetler ED, Sur C, Struyk A, Boellaard R, Koole M. A dual-time-window protocol to reduce acquisition time of dynamic tau PET imaging using [ 18F]MK-6240. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:49. [PMID: 34046730 PMCID: PMC8160074 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00790-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background [18F]MK-6240 is a PET tracer with sub-nanomolar affinity for neurofibrillary tangles. Therefore, tau quantification is possible with [18F]MK-6240 PET/CT scans, and it can be used for assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. However, long acquisition scans are required to provide fully quantitative estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters. Therefore, on the present study, dual-time-window (DTW) acquisitions was simulated to reduce PET/CT acquisition time, while taking into consideration perfusion changes and possible scanning protocol non-compliance. To that end, time activity curves (TACs) representing a 120-min acquisition (TAC120) were simulated using a two-tissue compartment model with metabolite corrected arterial input function from 90-min dynamic [18F]MK-6240 PET scans of three healthy control subjects and five subjects with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, TACs corresponding to different levels of specific binding were generated and then various perfusion changes were simulated. Next, DTW acquisitions were simulated consisting of an acquisition starting at tracer injection, a break and a second acquisition starting at 90 min post-injection. Finally, non-compliance with the PET/CT scanning protocol were simulated to assess its impact on quantification. All TACs were quantified using reference Logan’s distribution volume ratio (DVR) and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR90) using the cerebellar cortex as reference region. Results It was found that DVR from a DTW protocol with a 60-min break between two 30-min dynamic scans closely approximates the DVR from the uninterrupted TAC120, with a regional bias smaller than 2.5%. Moreover, SUVR90 estimates were more susceptible (regional bias ≤ 19%) to changes in perfusion compared to DVR from a DTW TAC (regional bias ≤ 10%). Similarly, SUVR90 was affected by late-time scanning protocol delays reaching an increase of 8% for a 20-min delay, while DVR was not affected (regional bias < 1.5%) by DTW protocol non-compliance. Conclusions Therefore, such DTW protocol has the potential to increase patient comfort and throughput without compromising quantitative accuracy and is more reliable against SUVR in terms of perfusion changes and protocol deviations, which could prove beneficial for drug effect assessment and patient follow-up using longitudinal [18F]MK-6240 PET imaging. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00790-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme D Kolinger
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Vállez García
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Talakad G Lohith
- Translational Imaging Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, Mailstop WP44D-216, West Point, PA, 19486, USA
| | - Eric D Hostetler
- Translational Imaging Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, Mailstop WP44D-216, West Point, PA, 19486, USA
| | - Cyrille Sur
- Translational Imaging Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., 770 Sumneytown Pike, Mailstop WP44D-216, West Point, PA, 19486, USA
| | - Arie Struyk
- Translational Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc, 351 N Sumneytown Pike, Mailstop UG4D-48, North Wales, PA, 19454, USA
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VU Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michel Koole
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 - Bus 7003, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kolinger GD, Vállez García D, Willemsen ATM, Reesink FE, de Jong BM, Dierckx RAJO, De Deyn PP, Boellaard R. Amyloid burden quantification depends on PET and MR image processing methodology. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248122. [PMID: 33667281 PMCID: PMC7935288 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantification of amyloid load with positron emission tomography can be useful to assess Alzheimer's Disease in-vivo. However, quantification can be affected by the image processing methodology applied. This study's goal was to address how amyloid quantification is influenced by different semi-automatic image processing pipelines. Images were analysed in their Native Space and Standard Space; non-rigid spatial transformation methods based on maximum a posteriori approaches and tissue probability maps (TPM) for regularisation were explored. Furthermore, grey matter tissue segmentations were defined before and after spatial normalisation, and also using a population-based template. Five quantification metrics were analysed: two intensity-based, two volumetric-based, and one multi-parametric feature. Intensity-related metrics were not substantially affected by spatial normalisation and did not significantly depend on the grey matter segmentation method, with an impact similar to that expected from test-retest studies (≤10%). Yet, volumetric and multi-parametric features were sensitive to the image processing methodology, with an overall variability up to 45%. Therefore, the analysis should be carried out in Native Space avoiding non-rigid spatial transformations. For analyses in Standard Space, spatial normalisation regularised by TPM is preferred. Volumetric-based measurements should be done in Native Space, while intensity-based metrics are more robust against differences in image processing pipelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme D. Kolinger
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David Vállez García
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antoon T. M. Willemsen
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Fransje E. Reesink
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bauke M. de Jong
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P. De Deyn
- Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Research Centre, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Increased pulmonary serotonin transporter in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who developed pulmonary hypertension. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:1081-1092. [PMID: 33009594 PMCID: PMC8041706 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05056-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is characterized by a progressive remodelling of the pulmonary vasculature resulting in right heart failure and eventually death. The serotonin transporter (SERT) may be involved in the pathogenesis of PH in patients with chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study investigated for the first time the SERT in vivo availability in the lungs of patients with COPD and PH (COPD+PH). Methods SERT availability was assessed using SERT-selective [11C]DASB and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with dynamic acquisition over 30 min in 4 groups of 5 participants each: COPD, COPD+PH, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and a healthy control (HC). Time activity curves were generated based on a volume of interest within the middle lobe. Tissue-to-blood concentration ratios after 25 to 30 min (TTBR25–30) served as receptor parameter for group comparison and were corrected for lung tissue attenuation. Participants underwent comprehensive pulmonary workup. Statistical analysis included group comparisons and correlation analysis. Results [11C]DASB uptake peak values did not differ among the cohorts after adjusting for lung tissue attenuation, suggesting equal radiotracer delivery. Both the COPD and COPD+PH cohort showed significantly lower TTBR25–30 values after correction for lung attenuation than HC. Attenuation corrected TTBR25–30 values were significantly higher in the COPD+PH cohort than those in the COPD cohort and higher in non-smokers than in smokers. They positively correlated with invasively measured severity of PH and inversely with airflow limitation and emphysema. Considering all COPD patients ± PH, they positively correlated with right heart strain (NT-proBNP). Conclusion By applying [11C]DASB and PET/CT, semiquantitative measures of SERT availability are demonstrated in the lung vasculature of patients with COPD and/or PH. COPD patients who developed PH show increased pulmonary [11C]DASB uptake compared to COPD patients without PH indicating an implication of pulmonary SERT in the development of PH in COPD patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-020-05056-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nørgaard M, Ganz M, Svarer C, Frokjaer VG, Greve DN, Strother SC, Knudsen GM. Different preprocessing strategies lead to different conclusions: A [ 11C]DASB-PET reproducibility study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2020; 40:1902-1911. [PMID: 31575336 PMCID: PMC7446563 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x19880450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) neuroimaging provides unique possibilities to study biological processes in vivo under basal and interventional conditions. For quantification of PET data, researchers commonly apply different arrays of sequential data analytic methods ("preprocessing pipeline"), but it is often unknown how the choice of preprocessing affects the final outcome. Here, we use an available data set from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled [11C]DASB-PET study as a case to evaluate how the choice of preprocessing affects the outcome of the study. We tested the impact of 384 commonly used preprocessing strategies on a previously reported positive association between the change from baseline in neocortical serotonin transporter binding determined with [11C]DASB-PET, and change in depressive symptoms, following a pharmacological sex hormone manipulation intervention in 30 women. The two preprocessing steps that were most critical for the outcome were motion correction and kinetic modeling of the dynamic PET data. We found that 36% of the applied preprocessing strategies replicated the originally reported finding (p < 0.05). For preprocessing strategies with motion correction, the replication percentage was 72%, whereas it was 0% for strategies without motion correction. In conclusion, the choice of preprocessing strategy can have a major impact on a study outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Nørgaard
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Svarer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibe G Frokjaer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen C Strother
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Knudsen GM, Ganz M, Appelhoff S, Boellaard R, Bormans G, Carson RE, Catana C, Doudet D, Gee AD, Greve DN, Gunn RN, Halldin C, Herscovitch P, Huang H, Keller SH, Lammertsma AA, Lanzenberger R, Liow JS, Lohith TG, Lubberink M, Lyoo CH, Mann JJ, Matheson GJ, Nichols TE, Nørgaard M, Ogden T, Parsey R, Pike VW, Price J, Rizzo G, Rosa-Neto P, Schain M, Scott PJ, Searle G, Slifstein M, Suhara T, Talbot PS, Thomas A, Veronese M, Wong DF, Yaqub M, Zanderigo F, Zoghbi S, Innis RB. Guidelines for the content and format of PET brain data in publications and archives: A consensus paper. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2020; 40:1576-1585. [PMID: 32065076 PMCID: PMC7370374 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x20905433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
It is a growing concern that outcomes of neuroimaging studies often cannot be replicated. To counteract this, the magnetic resonance (MR) neuroimaging community has promoted acquisition standards and created data sharing platforms, based on a consensus on how to organize and share MR neuroimaging data. Here, we take a similar approach to positron emission tomography (PET) data. To facilitate comparison of findings across studies, we first recommend publication standards for tracer characteristics, image acquisition, image preprocessing, and outcome estimation for PET neuroimaging data. The co-authors of this paper, representing more than 25 PET centers worldwide, voted to classify information as mandatory, recommended, or optional. Second, we describe a framework to facilitate data archiving and data sharing within and across centers. Because of the high cost of PET neuroimaging studies, sample sizes tend to be small and relatively few sites worldwide have the required multidisciplinary expertise to properly conduct and analyze PET studies. Data sharing will make it easier to combine datasets from different centers to achieve larger sample sizes and stronger statistical power to test hypotheses. The combining of datasets from different centers may be enhanced by adoption of a common set of best practices in data acquisition and analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefan Appelhoff
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guy Bormans
- Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, KU, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Richard E Carson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Ciprian Catana
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Doris Doudet
- Department of Medicine/Neurology, Pacific Parkinson Research Center, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Antony D Gee
- Clinical PET Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roger N Gunn
- Invicro and Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Christer Halldin
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Herscovitch
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Henry Huang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Sune H Keller
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rupert Lanzenberger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Jeih-San Liow
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Mark Lubberink
- Uppsala University, Department of Surgical Sciences/Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, Department of Medical Physics, Sweden
| | - Chul H Lyoo
- Department of Neurology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - J John Mann
- Department of Psychiatry, Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology Division, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Granville J Matheson
- Center for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas E Nichols
- Oxford Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Martin Nørgaard
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Rigshospital and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Todd Ogden
- Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Ramin Parsey
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Victor W Pike
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Julie Price
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gaia Rizzo
- Invicro and Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Pedro Rosa-Neto
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.,Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada
| | - Martin Schain
- Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Peter Jh Scott
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Graham Searle
- Invicro and Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Slifstein
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Tetsuya Suhara
- Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institute for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Peter S Talbot
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Adam Thomas
- National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Mattia Veronese
- Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Dean F Wong
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA
| | - Maqsood Yaqub
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sami Zoghbi
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - Robert B Innis
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tjerkaski J, Cervenka S, Farde L, Matheson GJ. Kinfitr - an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:77. [PMID: 32642865 PMCID: PMC7343683 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose from and numerous analytical decisions that must be made when modelling PET data. Therefore, it is important that analysis tools be adapted to the specific circumstances, and that analyses be documented in a transparent manner. Kinfitr, written in the open-source programming language R, is a tool developed for flexible and reproducible kinetic modelling of PET data, i.e. performing all steps using code which can be publicly shared in analysis notebooks. In this study, we compared outcomes obtained using kinfitr with those obtained using PMOD: a widely used commercial tool. Results Using previously collected test-retest data obtained with four different radioligands, a total of six different kinetic models were fitted to time-activity curves derived from different brain regions. We observed good correspondence between the two kinetic modelling tools both for binding estimates and for microparameters. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed in the test-retest reliability estimates between the two tools. Conclusions In summary, we showed excellent agreement between the open-source R package kinfitr, and the widely used commercial application PMOD. We, therefore, conclude that kinfitr is a valid and reliable tool for kinetic modelling of PET data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Tjerkaski
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Simon Cervenka
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Farde
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Granville James Matheson
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Millot M, Saga Y, Duperrier S, Météreau E, Beaudoin-Gobert M, Sgambato V. Prior MDMA administration aggravates MPTP-induced Parkinsonism in macaque monkeys. Neurobiol Dis 2020; 134:104643. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
15
|
Matheson GJ, Plavén-Sigray P, Tuisku J, Rinne J, Matuskey D, Cervenka S. Clinical brain PET research must embrace multi-centre collaboration and data sharing or risk its demise. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:502-504. [PMID: 31713656 PMCID: PMC6974527 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04541-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Granville James Matheson
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pontus Plavén-Sigray
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jouni Tuisku
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Juha Rinne
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Turku PET Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - David Matuskey
- PET Center, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Simon Cervenka
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rischka L, Gryglewski G, Berroterán-Infante N, Rausch I, James GM, Klöbl M, Sigurdardottir H, Hartenbach M, Hahn A, Wadsak W, Mitterhauser M, Beyer T, Kasper S, Prayer D, Hacker M, Lanzenberger R. Attenuation Correction Approaches for Serotonin Transporter Quantification With PET/MRI. Front Physiol 2019; 10:1422. [PMID: 31824335 PMCID: PMC6883225 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several MR-based attenuation correction (AC) approaches were developed to conquer the challenging AC in hybrid PET/MR imaging. These AC methods are commonly evaluated on standardized uptake values or tissue concentration. However, in neurotransmitter system studies absolute quantification is more favorable due to its accuracy. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the accuracy of segmentation- and atlas-based MR AC approaches on serotonin transporter (SERT) distribution volumes and occupancy after a drug challenge. Methods 18 healthy subjects (7 male) underwent two [11C]DASB PET/MRI measurements in a double-blinded, placebo controlled, cross-over design. After 70 min the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram or a placebo was infused. The parameters total and specific volume of distribution (VT, VS = BPP) and occupancy were quantified. All subjects underwent a low-dose CT scan as reference AC method. Besides the standard AC approaches DIXON and UTE, a T1-weighted structural image was recorded to estimate a pseudo-CT based on an MR/CT database (pseudoCT). Another evaluated AC approach superimposed a bone model on AC DIXON. Lastly, an approach optimizing the segmentation of UTE images was analyzed (RESOLUTE). PET emission data were reconstructed with all 6 AC methods. The accuracy of the AC approaches was evaluated on a region of interest-basis for the parameters VT, BPP, and occupancy with respect to the results of AC CT. Results Variations for VT and BPP were found with all AC methods with bias ranging from -15 to 17%. The smallest relative errors for all regions were found with AC pseudoCT (<|5%|). Although the bias between BPP SSRI and BPP placebo varied markedly with AC DIXON (<|12%|) and AC UTE (<|9%|), a high correlation to AC CT was obtained (r 2∼1). The relative difference of the occupancy for all tested AC methods was small for SERT high binding regions (<|4%|). Conclusion The high correlation might offer a rescaling from the biased parameters VT and BPP to the true values. Overall, the pseudoCT approach yielded smallest errors and the best agreement with AC CT. For SERT occupancy, all AC methods showed little bias in high binding regions, indicating that errors may cancel out in longitudinal assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Rischka
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor Gryglewski
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Neydher Berroterán-Infante
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivo Rausch
- QIMP Group, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregory Miles James
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manfred Klöbl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helen Sigurdardottir
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Hartenbach
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Hahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wadsak
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,CBmed, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Mitterhauser
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Group, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Siegfried Kasper
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Prayer
- Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rupert Lanzenberger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Silberbauer LR, Gryglewski G, Berroterán-Infante N, Rischka L, Vanicek T, Pichler V, Hienert M, Kautzky A, Philippe C, Godbersen GM, Vraka C, James GM, Wadsak W, Mitterhauser M, Hacker M, Kasper S, Hahn A, Lanzenberger R. Serotonin Transporter Binding in the Human Brain After Pharmacological Challenge Measured Using PET and PET/MR. Front Mol Neurosci 2019; 12:172. [PMID: 31354428 PMCID: PMC6639732 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In-vivo quantification of the serotonin transporter (SERT) guided our understanding of many neuropsychiatric disorders. A recently introduced bolus plus constant infusion protocol has been shown to allow the reliable determination of SERT binding with reduced scan time. In this work, the outcomes of two methods, a bolus injection paradigm on a GE PET camera, and a bolus plus infusion paradigm on a combined Siemens PET/MR camera were compared. Methods: A total of seven healthy subjects underwent paired PET and paired PET/MR scans each with intravenous double-blind application of 7.5 mg citalopram or saline in a randomized cross-over study design. While PET scans were performed according to standard protocols and non-displaceable binding potentials (BPND) were calculated using the multi-linear reference tissue model, during PET/MR measurements [11C]DASB was applied as bolus plus constant infusion, and BPND was calculated using the steady state method and data acquired at tracer equilibrium. Occupancies were calculated as the relative decrease in BPND between saline and citalopram scans. Results: During placebo scans, a mean difference in BPND of -0.08 (-11.71%) across all ROIs was found between methods. PET/MR scans resulted in higher BPND estimates than PET scans in all ROIs except the midbrain. A mean difference of -0.19 (-109.40%) across all ROIs between methods was observed for citalopram scans. PET/MR scans resulted in higher BPND estimates than PET scans in all ROIs. For occupancy, a mean difference of 23.12% (21.91%) was observed across all ROIs. PET/MR scans resulted in lower occupancy compared to PET scans in all ROIs except the temporal cortex. While for placebo, BPND of high-binding regions (thalamus and striatum) exhibited moderate reliability (ICC = 0.66), during citalopram scans ICC decreased (0.36-0.46). However, reliability for occupancy remained high (0.57-0.82). Conclusion: Here, we demonstrated the feasibility of reliable and non-invasive SERT quantification using a [11C]DASB bolus plus constant infusion protocol at a hybrid PET/MR scanner, which might facilitate future pharmacological imaging studies. Highest agreement with established methods for quantification of occupancy and SERT BPND at baseline was observed in subcortical high-binding regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo R Silberbauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregor Gryglewski
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Neydher Berroterán-Infante
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lucas Rischka
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Vanicek
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Verena Pichler
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marius Hienert
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Kautzky
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Cecile Philippe
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Godber M Godbersen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Chrysoula Vraka
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gregory M James
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wadsak
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Mitterhauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Siegfried Kasper
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Hahn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rupert Lanzenberger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Perani D, Iaccarino L, Lammertsma AA, Windhorst AD, Edison P, Boellaard R, Hansson O, Nordberg A, Jacobs AH. A new perspective for advanced positron emission tomography-based molecular imaging in neurodegenerative proteinopathies. Alzheimers Dement 2019; 15:1081-1103. [PMID: 31230910 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies in neurodegenerative conditions have increasingly highlighted that the same neuropathology can trigger different clinical phenotypes or, vice-versa, that similar phenotypes can be triggered by different neuropathologies. This evidence has called for the adoption of a pathology spectrum-based approach to study neurodegenerative proteinopathies. These conditions share brain deposition of abnormal protein aggregates, leading to aberrant biochemical, metabolic, functional, and structural changes. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a well-recognized and unique tool for the in vivo assessment of brain neuropathology, and novel PET techniques are emerging for the study of specific protein species. Today, key applications of PET range from early research and clinical diagnostic tools to their use in clinical trials for both participants screening and outcome evaluation. This position article critically reviews the role of distinct PET molecular tracers for different neurodegenerative proteinopathies, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities, with special emphasis on methodological challenges and future applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Perani
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Nuclear Medicine Unit San Raffaele Hospital, Division of Neuroscience San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Iaccarino
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Nuclear Medicine Unit San Raffaele Hospital, Division of Neuroscience San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert D Windhorst
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Edison
- Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Neurology Imaging Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Center for Alzheimer Research, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas H Jacobs
- European Institute for Molecular Imaging, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nørgaard M, Ganz M, Svarer C, Frokjaer VG, Greve DN, Strother SC, Knudsen GM. Optimization of preprocessing strategies in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) neuroimaging: A [ 11C]DASB PET study. Neuroimage 2019; 199:466-479. [PMID: 31158479 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is an important neuroimaging tool to quantify the distribution of specific molecules in the brain. The quantification is based on a series of individually designed data preprocessing steps (pipeline) and an optimal preprocessing strategy is per definition associated with less noise and improved statistical power, potentially allowing for more valid neurobiological interpretations. In spite of this, it is currently unclear how to design the best preprocessing pipeline and to what extent the choice of each preprocessing step in the pipeline minimizes subject-specific errors. To evaluate the impact of various preprocessing strategies, we systematically examined 384 different pipeline strategies in data from 30 healthy participants scanned twice with the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) radioligand [11C]DASB. Five commonly used preprocessing steps with two to four options were investigated: (1) motion correction (MC) (2) co-registration (3) delineation of volumes of interest (VOI's) (4) partial volume correction (PVC), and (5) kinetic modeling. To quantitatively compare and evaluate the impact of various preprocessing strategies, we used the performance metrics: test-retest bias, within- and between-subject variability, the intraclass-correlation coefficient, and global signal-to-noise ratio. We also performed a power analysis to estimate the required sample size to detect either a 5% or 10% difference in 5-HTT binding as a function of preprocessing pipeline. The results showed a complex downstream dependency between the various preprocessing steps on the performance metrics. The choice of MC had the most profound effect on 5-HTT binding, prior to the effects caused by PVC and kinetic modeling, and the effects differed across VOI's. Notably, we observed a negative bias in 5-HTT binding across test and retest in 98% of pipelines, ranging from 0 to 6% depending on the pipeline. Optimization of the performance metrics revealed a trade-off in within- and between-subject variability at the group-level with opposite effects (i.e. minimization of within-subject variability increased between-subject variability and vice versa). The sample size required to detect a given effect size was also compromised by the preprocessing strategy, resulting in up to 80% increases in sample size needed to detect a 5% difference in 5-HTT binding. This is the first study to systematically investigate and demonstrate the effect of choosing different preprocessing strategies on the outcome of dynamic PET studies. We provide a framework to show how optimal and maximally powered neuroimaging results can be obtained by choosing appropriate preprocessing strategies and we provide recommendations depending on the study design. In addition, the results contribute to a better understanding of methodological uncertainty and variability in preprocessing decisions for future group- and/or longitudinal PET studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Nørgaard
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melanie Ganz
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Svarer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibe G Frokjaer
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen C Strother
- Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gitte M Knudsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Spuhler KD, Gardus J, Gao Y, DeLorenzo C, Parsey R, Huang C. Synthesis of Patient-Specific Transmission Data for PET Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Neuroimaging Using a Convolutional Neural Network. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:555-560. [PMID: 30166355 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.214320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karl D Spuhler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - John Gardus
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Yi Gao
- Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Guangdong, China; and
| | - Christine DeLorenzo
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Ramin Parsey
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Chuan Huang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
- Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
- Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molecular Imaging of the Serotonergic System in Parkinson's Disease. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2018; 141:173-210. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|