1
|
Hoek JM, Brenninkmeijer J, de Vries YA, Meijer RR, van Ravenzwaaij D. Assessing the credibility of a drug's effects: identification and judgment of uncertainty by the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1409259. [PMID: 39086943 PMCID: PMC11288978 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1409259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Medicine regulators need to judge whether a drug's favorable effects outweigh its unfavorable effects based on a dossier submitted by an applicant, such as a pharmaceutical company. Because scientific knowledge is inherently uncertain, regulators also need to judge the credibility of these effects by identifying and evaluating uncertainties. We performed an ethnographic study of assessment procedures at the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) and describe how regulators evaluate the credibility of an applicant's claims about the benefits and risks of a drug in practice. Our analysis shows that regulators use an investigative approach, which illustrates the effort required to identify uncertainties. Moreover, we show that regulators' expectations about the presentation, the design, and the results of studies can shape how they perceive a medicine's dossier. We highlight the importance of regulatory experience and expertise in the identification and evaluation of uncertainties. In light of our observations, we provide two recommendations to reduce avoidable uncertainty: less reliance on evidence generated by the applicant; and better communication about, and enforcement of, regulatory frameworks toward drug developers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce M. Hoek
- Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jonna Brenninkmeijer
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands
| | - Ymkje Anna de Vries
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rob R. Meijer
- Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mfutso-Bengo J, Jeremiah F, Kasende-Chinguwo F, Ng'ambi W, Nkungula N, Kazanga-Chiumia I, Juma M, Chawani M, Chinkhumba J, Twea P, Chirwa E, Langwe K, Manthalu G, Ngwira LG, Nkhoma D, Colbourn T, Revill P, Sculpher M. A qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing health technology assessment in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:353. [PMID: 37041590 PMCID: PMC10088659 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09276-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of institutionalizing Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Malawi. METHODS This study employed a document review and qualitative research methods, to understand the status of HTA in Malawi. This was complemented by a review of the status and nature of HTA institutionalization in selected countries.Qualitative research employed a Focus Group Discussion (FGD ) with 7 participants, and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with12 informants selected based on their knowledge and expertise in policy processes related to HTA in Malawi.Data extracted from the literature was organized in Microsoft Excel, categorized according to thematic areas and analyzed using a literature review framework. Qualitative data from KIIs and the FGD was analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS Some HTA processes exist and are executed through three structures namely: Ministry of Health Senior Management Team, Technical Working Groups, and Pharmacy and Medicines Regulatory Authority (PMRA) with varyingdegrees of effectiveness.The main limitations of current HTA mechanisms include limited evidence use, lack of a standardized framework for technology adoption, donor pressure, lack of resources for the HTA process and technology acquisition, laws and practices that undermine cost-effectiveness considerations. KII and FGD results showed overwhelming demand for strengthening HTA in Malawi, with a stronger preference for strengthening coordination and capacity of existing entities and structures. CONCLUSION The study has shown that HTA institutionalization is acceptable and feasible in Malawi. However, the current committee based processes are suboptimal to improve efficiency due to lack of a structured framework. A structured HTA framework has the potential to improve processes in pharmaceuticals and medical technologies decision-making.In the short to medium term, HTA capacity building should focus on generating demand and increasing capacity in cost-effectiveness assessments. Country-specific assessments should precede HTA institutionalization as well as recommendations for new technology adoptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Mfutso-Bengo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi.
- Centre of Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Faless Jeremiah
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Florence Kasende-Chinguwo
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Wingston Ng'ambi
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Centre of Excellence in Ethics and Governance, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Nthanda Nkungula
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Isabel Kazanga-Chiumia
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mercy Juma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Marlen Chawani
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Jobiba Chinkhumba
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Pakwanja Twea
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Emily Chirwa
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Kate Langwe
- Ministry of Health, Malawi Government, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Lucky Gift Ngwira
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Dominic Nkhoma
- Health Economics and Policy Unit, Department of Health Systems and Policy, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KuHes), Private Bag 360, BLANTYRE 3, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Tim Colbourn
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Revill
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kasperowski D, Hagen N. Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 2022; 52:447-462. [PMID: 35380069 PMCID: PMC9109578 DOI: 10.1177/03063127221085241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
This paper focuses on how particularities are performed and made to travel through the creation of trust. The Swedish Species Observation System (Artportalen) is one of the largest inscription and calculation centers for citizen data in the world, used extensively by public authorities in Sweden. Observations by members of the public become actionable through environmental governance laws in Sweden. These observations are made through networks of things and humans in which trust is created but unevenly distributed. Important for them to be trusted and to travel are such things as computer software to filter and map observations, red lists, GIS-tools to determine time and place, and validation committees. However, trust is more concentrated in a core set of actors, and there depends on interpersonal relations - though these relations are facilitated by other parts of the epistemic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dick Kasperowski
- Dick Kasperowski, Department of Philosophy,
Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Box 200, Gothenburg 405 30,
Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calnan M. Decision-making in the midst of uncertainty: appraising expensive medicines in England. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2021; 26:5523-5531. [PMID: 34852087 DOI: 10.1590/1413-812320212611.41872020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Decisions need to be made about which services or technologies should be prioritized for provision in the NHS in England .The analysis focuses specifically on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and on how they appraise expensive medicines. This analysis takes a sociological perspective on decision-making in relation to uncertainty and how uncertainties are managed, drawing on evidence from a scoping study and an ethnographic study. Uncertainties were central to these rationing decisions. Three types of layers of uncertainty -epistemic, procedural and interpersonal - were shown to be salient. Another form of uncertainty was associated with the complexity of the science and that included the level of technicality of the information provided. The analysis highlighted the salience of uncertainties associated with interpersonal relations and the relations between the committees and the drug industry, clinical and patient experts. A key element in these relationships was trust. Decision makers adopted a mixture of formal and informal, collective and individual strategies in making decisions and a need to exercise pragmatism within a more formal institutional framework. The paper concludes by considering more recent policy developments in relation to appraising expensive medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Calnan
- School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, England.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smith K, McLeod J, Blunden N, Cooper M, Gabriel L, Kupfer C, McLeod J, Murphie MC, Oddli HW, Thurston M, Winter LA. A Pluralistic Perspective on Research in Psychotherapy: Harnessing Passion, Difference and Dialogue to Promote Justice and Relevance. Front Psychol 2021; 12:742676. [PMID: 34552542 PMCID: PMC8450328 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The adoption of a pluralistic perspective on research design, processes of data collection and analysis and dissemination of findings, has the potential to enable psychotherapy research to make a more effective contribution to building a just society. A review of the key features of the concept of pluralism is followed by a historical analysis of the ways in which research in counselling, psychotherapy and related disciplines has moved in the direction of a pluralistic position around knowledge creation. Core principles of a pluralistic approach to research are identified and explored in the context of a critical case study of contemporary research into psychotherapy for depression, examples of pluralistically oriented research practices, and analysis of a pluralistic conceptualisation of the nature of evidence. Implications of a pluralistic perspective for research training and practice are discussed. Pluralistic inquiry that emphasises dialogue, collaboration, epistemic justice and the co-existence of multiple truths, creates opportunities for individuals, families and communities from a wide range of backgrounds to co-produce knowledge in ways that support their capacities for active citizenship and involvement in open democratic decision-making. To fulfil these possibilities, it is necessary for psychotherapy research to be oriented towards social goals that are sufficiently relevant to both researchers and co-participants to harness their passion and work together for a common good.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Smith
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - John McLeod
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mick Cooper
- Department of Psychology, Roehampton University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lynne Gabriel
- School of Education, Language and Psychology, York St John University, York, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Kupfer
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Julia McLeod
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hanne Weie Oddli
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mhairi Thurston
- School of Applied Sciences, Abertay University, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Anne Winter
- Manchester Institute of Education, Schools of Environment, Education, and Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gunn CJ, Bertelsen N, Regeer BJ, Schuitmaker-Warnaar TJ. Valuing patient engagement: Reflexive learning in evidence generation practices for health technology assessment. Soc Sci Med 2021; 280:114048. [PMID: 34052699 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Much attention in health technology assessment (HTA), a health system governance mechanism used for determining the value of health technologies, is being paid to improving the quality and patient-relevance of the evidence used in assessment pratices. Whilst the direct involvement of patient actors throughout HTA processes has become a more routine element of institutional practice, the 'impacts' of patient engagement (PE) initiatives have proven difficult to determine and enhance. In reflexive governance theories, reflexive learning is a critical mechanism of multi-stakeholder arrangements that better handles the complexities of technologies and how they are understood through governance practices. This paper explores how reflexive learning can be used to build a richer conceptualisation of PE in HTA, in order to generate suggestions for enhancing PE practices and their impact. We critically apply reflexive learning insights on qualitative data derived from the co-creation process of a PE evaluation framework, organised through an EU project focused on strengthening PE practices across medicines development (2018-2020), including 24 interactive case studies, 3 multi-stakeholder workshops, and our observations throughout the project. The findings characterise two dimensions of reflexive learning in PE: First, reflexive learning refers to the adaptive reorganisation of evidence generating practices, including the revision of medicines' evaluation criteria and the conditions under which evidence 'relevant' to HTA is constructed. Second, reflexive learning spotlights the sociopolitics which shape technology evaluation. Four themes affecting meaningful and sustained PE in medicines development were analysed: institutional boundaries due to established evaluation criteria; timing of engagements; network relations between institutional actors; and the politics of patient representation. Extending beyond discrete PE activities and their reported impacts, reflexive forms of learning are crucial to yielding more 'meaningful' PE for HTA and medicines development, facilitating a HTA practice that more meaningfully deals with the complexities of medicines evidence generation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callum J Gunn
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Neil Bertelsen
- Patient & Citizen Involvement in HTA Group, HTAi, Germany
| | - Barbara J Regeer
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
RUSHFORTH ALEX, GREENHALGH TRISHA. Personalized Medicine, Disruptive Innovation, and "Trailblazer" Guidelines: Case Study and Theorization of an Unsuccessful Change Effort. Milbank Q 2020; 98:581-617. [PMID: 32433825 PMCID: PMC8454330 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Policy Points For complex reasons, the promise of "precision medicine" based on molecular pathways remains unrealized for many conditions. Clinical practice guidelines (theoretically, at least) can act as "trailblazers" to introduce tests and treatments that reflect precision medicine discoveries. We describe a detailed case study from the United Kingdom in which such an attempt was (so far) unsuccessful and show how this case provides generalizable lessons. Policymakers should be wary of using clinical practice guidelines as the sole, or even the primary, lever for introducing precision medicine. CONTEXT Precision medicine, which addresses underlying molecular mechanisms of disease, depends on new technologies that measure specific biomarkers, leading (it is anticipated) to more accurate diagnosis, patient stratification, and tailored treatment. These technologies can be disruptive-that is, they make possible, and often require, radical changes to clinical practice and service organization-thereby improving quality, safety, or efficiency of care. Clinical practice guidelines may act as "trailblazers," introducing and legitimizing novel technologies and practices. METHODS We describe a case study of an attempt by academic researchers to radically change asthma management in the United Kingdom using a precision medicine biomarker (fractional exhaled nitric oxide, FeNO), measured using a portable breath device. We collected a wide-ranging data set that included more than 100 documents, 61 interviews, and 150 hours of ethnographic observation, and we analyzed it using technology-enhanced strong structuration theory (TESST). FINDINGS Our study describes a so-far unsuccessful attempt by academic respiratory medicine researchers to pave the way for a precision medicine approach to asthma using a government-endorsed national guideline. These researchers considered asthma management, especially in primary care, to be characterized by overdiagnosis and poor tailoring of treatment; engaged a national guideline development body in an effort to fix this problem; and ensured that the guideline required primary care clinicians to use FeNO technology for diagnosis and monitoring. However, clinicians working outside the tertiary referral centers did not accept, or agree to enact, the vision of precision medicine inscribed in the guideline-for multiple professional, operational, and economic reasons. CONCLUSIONS "Trailblazer" guidelines, in which new technologies are recommended, may succeed as catalysts of change only in a limited way for interested individuals and groups. In the absence of a wider program of professionally led and adequately resourced change efforts, such guidelines will lack meaning, legitimacy, and authority among intended users and may be strongly resisted.
Collapse
|
8
|
Löblová O, Trayanov T, Csanádi M, Ozierański P. The Emerging Social Science Literature on Health Technology Assessment: A Narrative Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:3-9. [PMID: 31952670 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social scientists have paid increasing attention to health technology assessment (HTA). This paper provides an overview of existing social scientific literature on HTA, with a focus on sociology and political science and their subfields. METHODS Narrative review of key pieces in English. RESULTS Three broad themes recur in the emerging social science literature on HTA: the drivers of the establishment and concrete institutional designs of HTA bodies; the effects of institutionalized HTA on pricing and reimbursement systems and the broader society; and the social and political influences on HTA decisions. CONCLUSION Social scientists bring a focus on institutions and social actors involved in HTA, using primarily small-N research designs and qualitative methods. They provide valuable critical perspectives on HTA, at times challenging its otherwise unquestioned assumptions. However, they often leave aside questions important to the HTA practitioner community, including the role of culture and values. Closer collaboration could be beneficial to tackle new relevant questions pertaining to HTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Löblová
- Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK.
| | - Trayan Trayanov
- Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, UK
| | - Marcell Csanádi
- Doctoral School of Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Piotr Ozierański
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
How to strengthen the presence of patients in health technology assessments conducted by the health authorities. Therapie 2018; 73:95-105. [DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
10
|
Mamzer MF, Dubois S, Saout C, Albin N, Béhier JM, Buisson A, Diebolt V, Delaitre O, Duguet C, Fagon JY, Gaillard S, Le Jeunne C, Mazars R, Micallef J, Nabarette H, Piazza L, Raynaud C, Varoqueaux N. Comment renforcer la place des patients dans les évaluations des technologies de santé faites par les autorités de santé. Therapie 2018; 73:83-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2017.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
11
|
Veltkamp G, Brown P. The everyday risk work of Dutch child-healthcare professionals: inferring 'safe' and 'good' parenting through trust, as mediated by a lens of gender and class. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2017; 39:1297-1313. [PMID: 28543376 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Amidst intensifying policy concerns with children's wellbeing and development, healthcare professionals are required not only to assess risk of abuse and neglect, but to manage risk of 'poor parenting' more broadly. Drawing on 15 in-depth interviews and non-participant observations of 61 professional-family interactions, across four preventative public health services for children in the Netherlands, we explored how professionals accomplished such risk work amid intractable uncertainties. Building inferences from brief encounters with families, professionals gauged the extent to which they trusted parents to care 'appropriately'. This trust developed most readily with parents experienced as 'familiar' by the largely middle-class female professionals. Harnessing Schutzian phenomenology, we analyse the related manifestations of social structure within the interactional-dynamics and lifeworlds of risk assessment. We argue that social structures of gender, class and ethnicity can be seen as influential both through the differing potential for 'we-relationships' to be formed and via the generalising and stereotyped knowledge applied in their absence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick Brown
- Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hashem F, Calnan MW, Brown PR. Decision making in NICE single technological appraisals: How does NICE incorporate patient perspectives? Health Expect 2017; 21:128-137. [PMID: 28686809 PMCID: PMC5750768 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has an explicit mandate to include patient and public involvement in the appraisal of medicines to be available for funding on the NHS. NICE involves an appraisal committee who are required to take on board experiential evidence from patient experts alongside population-based evidence on clinical and cost-effectiveness when making a decision whether to fund a drug. OBJECTIVE This paper considers how NICE Single Technological Appraisal (STA) committees attempt to incorporate the views of patients in making decisions about funding medicines on the NHS. METHODS A prospective design was employed to follow three pharmaceutical products involving three different appraisal committees. Three data collection methods were used: analysis of documentary evidence sent by NICE, non-participant unstructured observations of the open and closed sessions of meetings and qualitative interviews. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS Unstructured non-participant observations were carried out at nine STA meetings, and 41 semi-structured interviews were undertaken with committee members from NICE's STA committees, patient experts, analysts from NICE's project team and drug manufacturers. RESULTS Our analysis showed how the committees displayed a preference for an ideal-type of patient representative, disagreement among the committee when weighing-up patient statements in the STA process and more pre-preparation support for patient involvement. CONCLUSIONS Although NICE has attempted to adopt an approach flexible to patients and carers through formal decision-making arrangements that incorporate patient views, nonetheless, the processes of the STAs can in fact undermine the very evidence collected from patient representatives.
Collapse
|
13
|
Calnan M, Hashem F, Brown P. Still Elegantly Muddling Through? NICE and Uncertainty in Decision Making About the Rationing of Expensive Medicines in England. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES 2017; 47:571-594. [PMID: 28114872 DOI: 10.1177/0020731416689552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article examines the "technological appraisals" carried out by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence as it regulates the provision of expensive new drugs within the English National Health Service on cost-effectiveness grounds. Ostensibly this is a highly rational process by which the regulatory mechanisms absorb uncertainty, but in practice, decision making remains highly complex and uncertain. This article draws on ethnographic data-interviews with a range of stakeholders and decision makers (n = 41), observations of public and closed appraisal meetings, and documentary analysis-regarding the decision-making processes involving three pharmaceutical products. The study explores the various ways in which different forms of uncertainty are perceived and tackled within these Single Technology Appraisals. Difficulties of dealing with the various levels of uncertainty were manifest and often rendered straightforward decision making problematic. Uncertainties associated with epistemology, procedures, interpersonal relations, and technicality were particularly evident. The need to exercise discretion within a more formal institutional framework shaped a pragmatic combining of strategies tactics-explicit and informal, collective and individual-to navigate through the layers of complexity and uncertainty in making decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Patrick Brown
- 2 Department of Sociology, Faculteit der Maatschappij - en Gedragswetenschappen, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|