1
|
Lindner D, Holle-Lee D, Scheffler A. [Digitalization in Migraine Therapy]. FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE-PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 92:289-293. [PMID: 38781988 DOI: 10.1055/a-2314-2960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Digitalization is a commonly used keyword in medicine and also in the area of migraine and its therapy. However, digitalization should not be an end in itself, but should improve the treatment of patients and make the work of practitioners easier. This article summarizes the use of e-health applications for migraine medicine, today and in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Lindner
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dagny Holle-Lee
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Armin Scheffler
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monteith TS, Stark-Inbar A, Shmuely S, Harris D, Garas S, Ironi A, Kalika P, Irwin SL. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) wearable device for adolescents with migraine: a real-world study of high-frequency abortive treatment suggests preventive effects. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1247313. [PMID: 38028429 PMCID: PMC10657883 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1247313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Migraine is a chronic neurological disease manifesting as attacks of disabling head pain and associated symptoms. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a non-pharmacological, prescribed, wearable device (Nerivio®). This device has been certified by the FDA for the acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years of age or older. The device is affixed to the user's arm during 45-min treatment sessions and is operated using a smartphone app. This study (NCT05769322) aims to evaluate whether frequent use of REN for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents resulted in a reduction in monthly migraine treatment days (MMTD), as previously demonstrated in adults through a dedicated prevention clinical trial (NCT04828707). Methods The study included real-world prospective data from adolescent patients who used REN on at least 10 days every 28-day month, following the REN migraine prevention guideline of an every-other-day pattern. Additional requirements were at least three REN treatment days in each of the two subsequent months. The number of MMTD was used as a proxy measure for the number of monthly migraine days (MMD). The change in MMTD from the first month, taken as a "baseline," to each of the following months was used to evaluate the presence and size of potential migraine preventive benefits of REN in adolescents. Results A total of 83 adolescents were eligible for analysis. The users were 15.9 ± 1.3 years of age (mean ± SD), and 89% of them were female. The results demonstrated a substantial month-to-month reduction in the mean (±SD) number of REN treatment days from 12.6 (±3.2) MMTD in the first month to 9.0 (±4.8) MMTD in the second month (p < 0.001), and a further decrease to 7.4 (±4.2) MMTD in the third month (p < 0.001). This indicates an accumulative reduction of 5.2 (±4.8) mean REN MMTD from the first month to the third month of consecutive REN treatment. The users also reported consistent 2-h acute pain responses in at least 50% of their treated attacks, with 61.9% of the users reported experiencing pain relief, 24.5% reported pain freedom, 67.4% indicated relief in functional disability, and 41.3% reported complete freedom from functional disability. Conclusion The frequent use of REN among adolescents as an acute treatment for migraine attacks resulted in a decrease in the mean number of monthly treatment days in the subsequent months, suggesting that REN may have potential preventive benefits for migraine in this subpopulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sharon Shmuely
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Dagan Harris
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Sandy Garas
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Alon Ironi
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Paige Kalika
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Samantha L. Irwin
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moyes C, Belaghi R, Webster RJ, Whitley N, Pohl D. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children With Headaches: Will an App Do the Trick? J Child Neurol 2023; 38:169-177. [PMID: 37097885 DOI: 10.1177/08830738231170067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Participants were enrolled into a pilot randomized-controlled 4-week trial comparing the efficacy and feasibility of app-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to a stretching program. Headache-related disability and quality of life were assessed using the Pediatric Migraine Disability Scale (PedMIDAS), Kidscree27, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Multivariable regression analysis were performed to assess the group effects in the presence of adherence and other covariates. Twenty participants completed the study. Adherence was significantly higher in the stretching than in the CBT app group (100% vs 54%, P < .034). When controlling for adherence and baseline scores, the stretching group showed greater reduction in PedMIDAS score (average: 29.2, P < .05) as compared to the CBT app group. However, in terms of the Quality-of-Life Indicators, pre- and postintervention raw scores were not significantly different between groups (P > .05). App-based CBT was not superior to a stretching program in reducing headache-related disability in a select population of pediatric headache patients. Future studies should assess if implementing features to the CBT app, like tailoring to pediatric age groups, would improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carinna Moyes
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Reza Belaghi
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Richard J Webster
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole Whitley
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Daniela Pohl
- Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salisbury KR, Ranpariya VK, Feldman SR. Accountability in reminder-based adherence interventions: A review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2645-2652. [PMID: 34953618 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Interventions to elicit accountability capitalize on social behaviors to improve adherence but are distinct from reminders. However, little is known about the impact of accountability in reminder-based adherence interventions. Through a literature review, we aim to identify the frequency and effectiveness of accountability in reminder-based intervention studies. METHODS PubMed and PsycArticles were searched for reminder-based adherence studies. Articles were categorized as reminder-only or reminder with accountability studies. Studies were characterized by outcome measures, and differences between control and intervention groups were compared for studies that used electronic monitoring devices. RESULTS 165 studies met the inclusion criteria; 154 used reminders without accountability (93%). 79 of the 154 reminder-only studies (51%) improved adherence in intervention groups compared to controls. Eleven of the 165 studies (6.6%) included an accountability aspect. The intervention group had better adherence than controls in 10 out of the 11 reminder with accountability studies (91%). CONCLUSIONS Although distinct from reminders, accountability can be incorporated in reminder-based interventions. However, it is not commonly included in reminder-based interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS It is important to consider accountability's effects on encouraging patient medication adherence. The addition of accountability interventions may further boost adherence, but few studies currently incorporate these types of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine R Salisbury
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.
| | - Varun K Ranpariya
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bonfert MV, Sollmann N, Renner T, Börner C, Urban G, Schandelmaier P, Hannibal I, Huß K, Parisi C, Gerstl L, Vill K, Blaschek A, Koenig H, Klose B, Heinen F, Landgraf MN, Albers L. Burden of disease and lifestyle habits in adolescents and young adults prone
to frequent episodic migraine: A secondary comparative analysis. J Child Health Care 2022; 26:215-227. [PMID: 33955272 PMCID: PMC9194962 DOI: 10.1177/13674935211008712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the burden of disease and prevalence of lifestyle factors for adolescents and young adults with frequent episodic migraine. We conducted a secondary comparative analysis of data collected during two previous studies. Inclusion criteria for this analysis were age 15-35 years, 15 to 44 migraine episodes within 12 weeks, and completeness of Migraine Disability Assessment and lifestyle questionnaire data. Datasets of 37 adults (median age [interquartile range]: 25 [6]) and 27 adolescents (median age [interquartile range]: 15 [1]) were analyzed. 81% (n = 30) of adults reported severe disability (16% [n = 3] of adolescents; p < 0.001). Headache frequency (24 vs. 17 days; p = 0.005) and prevalence of regular analgesic use (60% [n = 22] vs. 18% [n = 5]; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in adults. In adults, sleep duration on weekdays was significantly lower (8.5 vs. 10 h; p < 0.001). Any consumption of caffeine tended to be higher in adolescents and alcohol consumption tended to be higher in adults (p > 0.05). This study underlines the importance of educating adolescents and young adults with migraine about lifestyle habits that are likely to interfere with the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela V Bonfert
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany,Michaela V Bonfert, Department of Pediatric
Neurology and Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity,
Dr von Hauner Children’s Hospital, LMU Hospital, Lindwurmstraße 4, Munich, Bavaria 80337,
Germany.
| | - Nico Sollmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional
Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany,TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum Rechts
der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional
Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Tabea Renner
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Corinna Börner
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Giada Urban
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Paul Schandelmaier
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Iris Hannibal
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Kristina Huß
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Carmen Parisi
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Lucia Gerstl
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Katharina Vill
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Astrid Blaschek
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Helene Koenig
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Birgit Klose
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Florian Heinen
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Mirjam N Landgraf
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany
| | - Lucia Albers
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and
Developmental Medicine and LMU Center for Children with Medical Complexity, Dr von Hauner
Children’s Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany,Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts
der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Noser AE, Klages KL, Gamwell KL, Brammer CN, Hommel KA, Ramsey RR. A systematic evaluation of primary headache management apps leveraging behavior change techniques. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:510-523. [PMID: 34786974 PMCID: PMC11452072 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211053572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile health apps have the potential to promote adherence to headache management through the use of evidence-based behavior change techniques (e.g., self-monitoring). While many headache management apps exist, the extent to which these apps include behavior change techniques remains unknown. Thus, the present study systematically evaluated the content and quality of commercially available headache management apps. METHODS Headache apps were identified using a systematic search in the Apple App and Google Play stores. A total of 55 apps were evaluated using the taxonomy of behavior change techniques and app quality using the Mobile App Rating Scale. RESULTS Headache management apps included 0-14 behavior change techniques (Mean [M] = 5.89) and 0-8 headache management behavior change techniques (M = 4.29). App quality ranged from 2.84-4.67 (M = 3.73) out of 5.00. Three apps, Migraine Trainer, Easeday: Headache & Migraine, and PainScale, included the highest number of overall and headache management behavior change techniques along with good quality scores. CONCLUSIONS While randomized controlled trials are necessary to determine the efficacy of individual headache apps, most existing apps include evidence-based headache management behavior change techniques. Headache apps often focus on either self-monitoring or stress management via relaxation training, suggesting that patients' needs should be used to inform app selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Noser
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kimberly L Klages
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kaitlyn L Gamwell
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Caitlin N Brammer
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kevin A Hommel
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rachelle R Ramsey
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agbetou M, Adoukonou T. Lifestyle Modifications for Migraine Management. Front Neurol 2022; 13:719467. [PMID: 35370920 PMCID: PMC8971279 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.719467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a disabling disease that inflicts a heavy burden on individuals who suffer from it. Significant advances are being made in understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of the disease. The role of lifestyle modifications has become increasingly predominant. We reviewed the current and available data on the role of a healthy lifestyle in the management of migraine. Physical activity, management of obesity, a healthy diet, and a better lifestyle, such as adequate sleep and avoidance of drug abuse, significantly contribute to reducing the frequency and severity of attacks. It is important to consider these factors in the overall management strategies for migraine sufferers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mendinatou Agbetou
- Department of Neurology, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
- Clinic of Neurology, Teaching Hospital of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
| | - Thierry Adoukonou
- Department of Neurology, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
- Clinic of Neurology, Teaching Hospital of Parakou, Parakou, Benin
- Inserm U1094, IRD U270, Univ. Limoges, CHU Limoges, EpiMaCT - Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases in Tropical Zone, Institute of Epidemiology and Tropical Neurology, OmegaHealth, Limoges, France
- *Correspondence: Thierry Adoukonou
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parsons RD, McParland J, Jordan A. Commentary: Multimodal Assessment of Medication Adherence Among Youth With Migraine: An Ancillary Study of the CHAMP Trial. J Pediatr Psychol 2022; 47:388-390. [PMID: 35182147 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Parsons
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK.,Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, UK
| | | | - Abbie Jordan
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK.,Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reidy BL, Powers SW, Coffey CS, Chamberlin LA, Ecklund DJ, Klingner EA, Yankey JW, Korbee LL, Porter LL, Peugh J, Kabbouche MA, Kacperski J, Hershey AD. Multimodal Assessment of Medication Adherence Among Youth With Migraine: An Ancillary Study of the CHAMP Trial. J Pediatr Psychol 2021; 47:376-387. [PMID: 34865085 DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine preventive medication adherence among youth with migraine. METHODS Adherence (self-report, pill count, and blood serum drug levels) was assessed as an ancillary study that utilized data from 328 CHAMP Study participants (ages 8-17). CHAMP was a multisite trial of preventive medications. Participants completed a prospective headache diary during a six-month active treatment period during which youth took amitriptyline, topiramate, or placebo pill twice daily. Self-reported medication adherence was collected via daily diary. At monthly study visits, pill count measures were captured. At trial month 3 (trial midpoint) and 6 (end of active trial), blood serum drug levels were obtained. Self-report and pill count adherence percentages were calculated for the active trial period, at each monthly study visit, and in the days prior to participants' mid-trial blood draw. Percentages of nonzero drug levels were calculated to assess blood serum drug level data. Adherence measures were compared and assessed in context of several sociodemographic factors. Multiple regression analyses investigated medication adherence as a predictor of headache outcomes. RESULTS Self-report and pill count adherence rates were high (over 90%) and sustained over the course of the trial period. Serum drug level adherence rates were somewhat lower and decreased significantly (from 84% to 76%) across the trial period [t (198) = 3.23, p = .001]. Adherence measures did not predict headache days at trial end; trial midpoint serum drug levels predicted headache-related disability. CONCLUSIONS Youth with migraine can demonstrate and sustain relatively high levels of medication adherence over the course of a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke L Reidy
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA
| | - Scott W Powers
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA
| | - Christopher S Coffey
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Trials Statistical and Data Management Center, University of Iowa, USA
| | - Leigh A Chamberlin
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
| | - Dixie J Ecklund
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Trials Statistical and Data Management Center, University of Iowa, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Klingner
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Trials Statistical and Data Management Center, University of Iowa, USA
| | - Jon W Yankey
- Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Trials Statistical and Data Management Center, University of Iowa, USA
| | | | - Linda L Porter
- The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, USA
| | - James Peugh
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
| | - Marielle A Kabbouche
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA.,Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
| | - Joanne Kacperski
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA.,Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
| | - Andrew D Hershey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA.,Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Newton AS, March S, Gehring ND, Rowe AK, Radomski AD. Establishing a Working Definition of User Experience for eHealth Interventions of Self-reported User Experience Measures With eHealth Researchers and Adolescents: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25012. [PMID: 34860671 PMCID: PMC8686463 DOI: 10.2196/25012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across eHealth intervention studies involving children, adolescents, and their parents, researchers have measured user experience to assist with intervention development, refinement, and evaluation. To date, no widely accepted definitions or measures of user experience exist to support a standardized approach for evaluation and comparison within or across interventions. OBJECTIVE We conduct a scoping review with subsequent Delphi consultation to identify how user experience is defined and measured in eHealth research studies, characterize the measurement tools used, and establish working definitions for domains of user experience that could be used in future eHealth evaluations. METHODS We systematically searched electronic databases for published and gray literature available from January 1, 2005, to April 11, 2019. We included studies assessing an eHealth intervention that targeted any health condition and was designed for use by children, adolescents, and their parents. eHealth interventions needed to be web-, computer-, or mobile-based, mediated by the internet with some degree of interactivity. We required studies to report the measurement of user experience as first-person experiences, involving cognitive and behavioral factors reported by intervention users. We appraised the quality of user experience measures in included studies using published criteria: well-established, approaching well-established, promising, or not yet established. We conducted a descriptive analysis of how user experience was defined and measured in each study. Review findings subsequently informed the survey questions used in the Delphi consultations with eHealth researchers and adolescent users for how user experience should be defined and measured. RESULTS Of the 8634 articles screened for eligibility, 129 articles and 1 erratum were included in the review. A total of 30 eHealth researchers and 27 adolescents participated in the Delphi consultations. On the basis of the literature and consultations, we proposed working definitions for 6 main user experience domains: acceptability, satisfaction, credibility, usability, user-reported adherence, and perceived impact. Although most studies incorporated a study-specific measure, we identified 10 well-established measures to quantify 5 of the 6 domains of user experience (all except for self-reported adherence). Our adolescent and researcher participants ranked perceived impact as one of the most important domains of user experience and usability as one of the least important domains. Rankings between adolescents and researchers diverged for other domains. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the various ways in which user experience has been defined and measured across studies and what aspects are most valued by researchers and adolescent users. We propose incorporating the working definitions and available measures of user experience to support consistent evaluation and reporting of outcomes across studies. Future studies can refine the definitions and measurement of user experience, explore how user experience relates to other eHealth outcomes, and inform the design and use of human-centered eHealth interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda S Newton
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sonja March
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Australia
| | - Nicole D Gehring
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Arlen K Rowe
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Australia
| | - Ashley D Radomski
- Knowledge Institute for Child and Youth Mental Health and Addictions, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,CHEO (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Morse RM, Myburgh H, Reubi D, Archey AE, Busakwe L, Garcia-Prats AJ, Hesseling AC, Jacobs S, Mbaba S, Meyerson K, Seddon JA, van der Zalm MM, Wademan DT, Hoddinott G. Opportunities for Mobile App-Based Adherence Support for Children With Tuberculosis in South Africa. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e19154. [PMID: 33174850 PMCID: PMC7688382 DOI: 10.2196/19154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Tuberculosis is the number one infectious cause of death globally. Young children, generally those younger than 5 years, are at the highest risk of progressing from tuberculosis infection to tuberculosis disease and of developing the most severe forms of tuberculosis. Most current tuberculosis drug formulations have poor acceptability among children and require consistent adherence for prolonged periods of time. These challenges complicate children’s adherence to treatment and caregivers’ daily administration of the drugs. Rapid developments in mobile technologies and apps present opportunities for using widely available technology to support national tuberculosis programs and patient treatment adherence. Pilot studies have demonstrated that mobile apps are a feasible and acceptable means of enhancing children’s treatment adherence for other chronic conditions. Despite this, no mobile apps that aim to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment have been developed for children. In this paper, we draw on our experiences carrying out research in clinical pediatric tuberculosis studies in South Africa. We present hypothetical scenarios of children’s adherence to tuberculosis medication to suggest priorities for behavioral and educational strategies that a mobile app could incorporate to address some of the adherence support gaps faced by children diagnosed with tuberculosis. We argue that a mobile app has the potential to lessen some of the negative experiences that children associate with taking tuberculosis treatment and to facilitate a more positive treatment adherence experience for children and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Morse
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanlie Myburgh
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David Reubi
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ava E Archey
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Leletu Busakwe
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Social Aspects of Public Health, Human Sciences Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Anthony J Garcia-Prats
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Anneke C Hesseling
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Stephanie Jacobs
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sharon Mbaba
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Kyla Meyerson
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - James A Seddon
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marieke M van der Zalm
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Dillon T Wademan
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Graeme Hoddinott
- Desmond Tutu Tuberculosis Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patient adherence to multivitamin supplementation after bariatric surgery: a narrative review. J Nutr Sci 2020; 9:e46. [PMID: 33101663 PMCID: PMC7550964 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2020.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Morbid obesity is a growing problem worldwide and has subsequently resulted in a wide application of bariatric surgery to achieve long-term weight loss and improvement of obesity-related co-morbidities. In spite of these clinical benefits, vitamin deficiencies are common after bariatric surgery; therefore, lifelong multivitamin supplementation (MVS) is recommended. However, patient adherence to MVS intake is generally poor. The aim of this narrative review is to analyse which factors influence the adherence of MVS intake after bariatric surgery. To provide an extensive overview, we will discuss the different factors that influence MVS use in patients who underwent bariatric surgery, but also review the literature on MVS in other patient groups.
Collapse
|
13
|
Eaton C, Comer M, Pruette C, Psoter K, Riekert K. Text Messaging Adherence Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial and Stakeholder Interviews. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19861. [PMID: 32795983 PMCID: PMC7455868 DOI: 10.2196/19861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to one-third of adolescents and young adults (11-21 years old) with chronic kidney disease exhibit suboptimal rates of adherence to renal-protective antihypertensive medications. Mobile health interventions may promote higher adherence to these medicines in these individuals, but empirical research is needed to inform best practices for applying these modalities. Objective In this multiphase investigation, we developed and tested a theoretically informed text messaging intervention based on the COM-B model, a well-established health intervention framework stating that capability, opportunity, and motivation interactively modify health behaviors, to improve participants’ antihypertensive medication adherence in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Qualitative data on user experiences were obtained. Methods In phase 1, intervention messages (Reminder+COM-B Message) were developed via stakeholder engagement of participants and pediatric nephrologists. In phase 2, the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention was tested against a Reminder-only Message active control condition in an 8-week pilot randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome was daily electronically monitored antihypertensive medication adherence and secondary outcomes included pre-post participant surveys of adherence self-efficacy, adherence barriers, outcome expectancies for taking medicine, and motivation for and importance of taking medicine. In phase 3, qualitative interviews related to user experiences were conducted with participants in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group. Results Following phase 1, 34 participants (mean age 16.59 years, 41% female, 38% African American/Black, 35% hypertension diagnosis) completed the phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial (n=18 in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group, n=16 in the Reminder-only Message active control group). All participants in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group completed a phase 3 qualitative interview. Overall, study procedures were feasible and the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention was acceptable to the participants (eg, 15/18 participants reported reading the majority of messages sent to them, 0/18 reported that the messages reduced their desire to take medicine). Prerandomization, there were no significant group differences in the rate of change in daily adherence over time. However, postrandomization, there was a significant group by time interaction (B=.01, P=.04) in which daily adherence decreased significantly over time in the Reminder-only Message active control group but remained stable in the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention group. There were no significant differences between groups in pre-post changes in survey responses. Qualitative interviews revealed participants’ perceptions of how the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention changed adherence behavior and highlighted several areas for improving the intervention (eg, adapt messaging timing, intensity, and content to match daily adherence, send praise when medicine is taken). Conclusions The Reminder+COM-B Message intervention was feasible and acceptable to adolescents/young adults and demonstrated potential to promote participants’ daily medication adherence beyond simple reminders. Further research is needed to determine the Reminder+COM-B Message intervention’s mechanisms of adherence behavior change and to incorporate qualitative participant feedback into a modified version of this intervention to enhance its acceptability. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03651596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03651596
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyd Eaton
- Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Margaret Comer
- Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Cozumel Pruette
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kevin Psoter
- Division of General Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kristin Riekert
- Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van de Graaf DL, Schoonman GG, Habibović M, Pauws SC. Towards eHealth to support the health journey of headache patients: a scoping review. J Neurol 2020; 268:3646-3665. [PMID: 32529582 PMCID: PMC8463346 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09981-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to (1) review the digital health tools that have been used in headache studies, and (2) discuss the effectivity and reliability of these tools. Background Many headache patients travel a long and troublesome journey from first symptoms until a meaningful care plan. eHealth, mHealth, and digital therapeutic modalities have been advocated as the way forward to improve patient care. Method Online databases PubMed, Cinahl, and PsycINFO were searched using a predefined search query. A data extraction form was used to gather relevant data elements from the selected papers. Results A total of 39 studies were selected. The studies included 94,127 participants. The majority of studies focused on diaries (N = 27 out of 39). Digital (cognitive) behavioral therapy were also quite common (N = 7 out of 39). Other digital health tool categories were tele-consultations, telemonitoring and patient portals. Conclusion Many digital health tools for headache patients regarding diaries and behavioral/therapeutical treatment are described in scientific research with limited information on effectivity and reliability. Scientific knowledge with regard to other categories such as tele-consultations, patient portals, telemonitoring including medication adherence, online information resources, wearable, symptom checkers, digital peer support is still scarce or missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guus G Schoonman
- Department of Neurology, Elizabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Mirela Habibović
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiology, Elizabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Steffen C Pauws
- TiCC-Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,Philips Research, Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Singh N, Varshney U. IT-based reminders for medication adherence: systematic review, taxonomy, framework and research directions. EUR J INFORM SYST 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/0960085x.2019.1701956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neetu Singh
- Department of Management Information Systems, University of Illinois at Springfield, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Upkar Varshney
- Department of Computer Information Systems, J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Ramsey RR, Carmody JK, Holbein CE, Guilbert TW, Hommel KA. Examination of the uses, needs, and preferences for health technology use in adolescents with asthma. J Asthma 2019; 56:964-972. [PMID: 30207802 PMCID: PMC6414273 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1514048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To examine the health technology uses and preferences of adolescents with asthma using a qualitative descriptive individual interview approach. Methods: Twenty adolescents were recruited from regularly scheduled asthma clinic appointments from February to July 2016. Patients were interviewed about their technology use and ways in which health technology could improve their asthma management using an open-ended semi-structured interview format. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded into themes. Results: Social media (e.g. Snapchat, Instagram) and general communication (e.g. messaging) were the most common uses of technology while medical reminders (e.g. appointment, refill, medication) were the most common use of health technology. Adolescents identified ways in which health technology could improve their asthma management including (1) tracking symptoms and medication, (2) medical reminders, and (3) asthma and self-management knowledge specifically related to medications and individual action plans. Other themes that emerged included a desire to customize health technology to fit with individual schedules and medical routines and use of health technology data with medical providers. Conclusions: Adolescents and parents experience a number of challenges related to managing asthma, and health technology interventions should focus on ways to improve adherence and self-management. Future research considerations and potential interventions including ways to integrate adolescent preferences with evidence-based interventions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle R Ramsey
- a Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , OH , USA
- b Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Julia K Carmody
- a Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Christina E Holbein
- a Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Theresa W Guilbert
- b Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine , Cincinnati , OH , USA
- c Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
[Healthcare behavior of migraine and headache patients when treatment is accompanied by the digital migraine app]. Schmerz 2019; 33:147-155. [PMID: 30649625 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-018-0355-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tension-type headache and migraine are the second and third most prevalent disorders of mankind worldwide, after dental caries. The widespread implementation of smartphones enables the use of specific software applications (apps) for digital treatment accompaniment. In this study, the use of the migraine app (Migräne-App) for iOS and Android was examined in the practical treatment of migraine and headache patients in an extensive population sample. METHODS An online survey was developed for the analysis of experiences as part of the treatment accompaniment and app usage. It contains questions concerning sociodemographic variables, the course of headache disorders and the previous treatment as well as the usage of the migraine app. The survey establishes compliance to the recommended treatment, the treatment plan, and treatment rules devised by the treating physician. The data collected were compared to traditional pen and paper documentation, prior to using the migraine app. RESULTS A total of 1464 users participated in the standardized survey. The average age was 47.19 ± 11.37 years (87.4% female, 12.5% male). On average, users suffered from headaches for 27.28 ± 13.6 years. The majority (76.5%) were cared for by a general practitioner. Of the users 70.9% reported that they presented the aggregated data from the app to their physician on consultation, 76.4% reported that the migraine app helped them to adhere to the treatment plan designed together with their physician and the rules about headache therapy. It showed both a highly significant reduction of headache days per months prior to usage (13.30 ± 7.45 days) in comparison to at the time of conducting the survey (10.03 ± 7.30 days) as well as a highly significant reduction of intake of acute medication (before 7.61 ± 5.58 vs. ongoing 6.78 ± 4.72 days). CONCLUSION The data show that the digital treatment control for therapy decisions made by the physician is highly relevant and established. Therapy compliance is improved and possible complications such as headache due to medication overuse are reduced. At the same time, a significant improvement of headache parameters and a marked overall improvement of treatment quality, amongst other things due to more easily available information and self-help tools can be observed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Adherence to Behavioral Therapy for Migraine: Knowledge to Date, Mechanisms for Assessing Adherence, and Methods for Improving Adherence. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:3. [PMID: 30661135 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0739-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In other disease states, adherence to behavioral therapies has gained attention, with a greater amount of studies discussing, defining, and optimizing adherence. For example, a meta-analysis formally discussed adherence in 25 studies of CBT for 11 different disorders, with only 6 of the 25 omitting addressing or defining adherence. Many studies have discussed the use of text messages, graph-based adherence rates, and email/telephone reminders to improve adherence. This paper examined the available literature regarding adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine as well as adherence to similar therapies in other disease states. The goal of this research is to apply lessons learned from adherence to behavioral therapy for other diseases in better understanding how we can improve adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment for migraine typically includes both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, including progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and biofeedback. Behavioral therapies have been shown to significantly reduce headache frequency and intensity, but high attrition rates and suboptimal adherence can undermine their efficacy. Traditionally, adherence to behavioral therapy has been defined by self-report, including paper headache diaries and assignments. In person attendance has also been employed as a method of defining and monitoring adherence. With the advent of personal electronics, measurements of adherence have shifted to include electronic-based methods such as computer-based programs and mobile-based therapies. Furthermore, some studies have taken advantage of electronic methods such as email reminders, push notifications, and other mobile-based reminders to optimize adherence. The JITA-I, a novel method of engaging individual patient adherence, has also been suggested as a possible method to improve adherence by tailoring engagement with a mobile health app-based on patient input. These novel methods may be utilized in behavioral therapy for migraine for further optimizing adherence. Few intervention studies to date have addressed the optimal ways to impact adherence to migraine behavioral therapy. Further research is required regarding adherence with behavioral therapies, specifically via mobile health interventions to better understand how to define and improve adherence via this novel forum. Once we are able to understand optimal methods of tracking adherence, we will be better equipped to understand the role of adherence in shaping outcomes for behavioral therapy in migraine.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kroon Van Diest AM, Powers SW. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Headache and Migraine: Why to Prescribe and What New Research Is Critical for Advancing Integrated Biobehavioral Care. Headache 2018; 59:289-297. [PMID: 30444269 DOI: 10.1111/head.13438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight current evidence supporting the prescription of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as part of first-line preventive treatment for children and adolescents with headache and discuss a research strategy aimed at: (1) understanding how and why CBT works, and (2) developing effective and efficient approaches for integrating CBT into headache specialty, neurology, and primary care settings. RECENT FINDINGS Although preventive medications for pediatric headache and migraine are commonly prescribed, recent meta-analyses and an NIH-funded, multi-center clinical trial suggests that the effect of pill-taking therapies may be mostly due to a placebo effect. These findings have led to greater consideration of prescription of non-pharmacological therapies as first-line interventions (either alone or in combination with pill-based therapy). A literature that extends back to the 1980s and includes recent clinical trials and meta-analyses demonstrates that CBT decreases headache frequency and related disability in youth with headache and migraine and has a favorable benefit to risk profile with almost no negative side effects. SUMMARY CBT has been repeatedly demonstrated as effective in treating pediatric headache and migraine. As such, it should be considered as part of first-line preventive treatment for pediatric headache (either alone or in combination with a pill-based therapy). We need to better understand how this therapy works and what makes it distinct (if anything) from the placebo effect. What we need to achieve is empirical support for efficient access to this evidence-based treatment and clarity on how to match the intensity of non-pharmacological intervention to the needs of our patients at the time they present for care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M Kroon Van Diest
- Department of Pediatric Psychology and Neuropsychology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Scott W Powers
- Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Headache Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|