1
|
Storman D, Jemioło P, Sawiec Z, Swierz MJ, Antonowicz E, Bala MM, Prokop-Dorner A. Needs Expressed in Peer-to-Peer Web-Based Interactions Among People With Depression and Anxiety Disorders Hospitalized in a Mental Health Facility: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e51506. [PMID: 38996331 DOI: 10.2196/51506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalization in psychiatric wards is a necessary step for many individuals experiencing severe mental health issues. However, being hospitalized can also be a stressful and unsettling experience. It is crucial to understand and address the various needs of hospitalized individuals with psychiatric disorders to promote their overall well-being and support their recovery. OBJECTIVE Our objectives were to identify and describe individual needs related to mental hospitals through peer-to-peer interactions on Polish web-based forums among individuals with depression and anxiety disorders and to assess whether these needs were addressed by peers. METHODS We conducted a search of web-based forums focused on depression and anxiety and selected samples of 160 and 176 posts, respectively, until we reached saturation. A mixed methods analysis that included an in-depth content analysis, the Pearson χ2 test, and φ coefficient was used to evaluate the posts. RESULTS The most frequently identified needs were the same for depression and anxiety forums and involved informational (105/160, 65.6% and 169/393, 43%, respectively), social life (17/160, 10.6% and 90/393, 22.9%, respectively), and emotional (9/160, 5.6% and 66/393, 16.8%, respectively) needs. The results show that there is no difference in the expression of needs between the analyzed forums. The needs were directly (42/47, 89% vs 98/110, 89.1% of times for depression and anxiety, respectively) and not fully (27/47, 57% vs 86/110, 78.2% of times for depression and anxiety, respectively) addressed by forum users. In quantitative analysis, we found that depression-related forums had more posts about the need for informational support and rectification, the expression of anger, and seeking professional support. By contrast, anxiety-related forums had more posts about the need for emotional support; social life; and information concerning medications, hope, and motivation. The most common co-occurrence of expressed needs was between sharing own experience and the need for professional support, with a strong positive association. The qualitative analysis showed that users join web-based communities to discuss their fears and questions about psychiatric hospitals. The posts revealed 4 mental and emotional representations of psychiatric hospitals: the hospital as an unknown place, the ambivalence of presumptions and needs, the negative representation of psychiatric hospitals, and the people associated with psychiatric hospitals. The tone of the posts was mostly negative, with discussions revolving around negative stereotypes; traumatic experiences; and beliefs that increased anxiety, shock, and fright and deterred users from hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that web-based forums can provide a platform for individuals with depression and anxiety disorders to express a wide range of needs. Most needs were addressed by peers but not sufficiently. Mental health professionals can benefit from these findings by gaining insights into the unique needs and concerns of their patients, thus allowing for more effective treatment and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawid Storman
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | | | - Zuzanna Sawiec
- Students' Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Mateusz Jan Swierz
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Ewa Antonowicz
- Students' Scientific Research Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Malgorzata M Bala
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Anna Prokop-Dorner
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medical Sociology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Birkeland S, Bogh SB, Pedersen ML, Kerring JH, Morsø L, Tingleff EB, Gildberg FA. Variation in opinions on coercion use among mental healthcare professionals: a questionnaire study. Nord J Psychiatry 2024; 78:448-455. [PMID: 38626028 DOI: 10.1080/08039488.2024.2341928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Even if coercive measures are widely applied in psychiatry and have numerous well-known drawbacks, there is limited known on the agreement among mental healthcare professionals' opinions on their use. In a questionnaire study using standardized scenarios, we investigated variation in staff opinions on coercion. METHODS In a web-based survey distributed to staff at three psychiatry hospitals, respondents were asked to consider if and what coercion to use by introducing two hypothetical scenarios involving involuntary psychiatric admission and in-hospital coercion. RESULTS One hundred thirty-two out of 601 invited staff members responded to the survey (Response Rate = 22%). There was large variation in participating staff members' opinions on how to best manage critical situations and what coercive measures were warranted. In the first scenario, 57% of respondents (n = 76) believed that the patient should be involuntarily admitted to hospital while the remaining respondents believed that the situation should be managed otherwise. Regarding the second scenario, 62% of respondents responded that some in-hospital coercion should be used. The majority of respondents believed that colleagues would behave similarly (60%) or with a tendency towards more coercion use (34%). Male gender, being nursing staff and having less coercion experience predicted being less inclined to choose involuntary hospital admission. CONCLUSION There is a high degree of variation in coercion use. This study suggests that this variation persists despite staff members being confronted with the same standardized situations. There is a need for evidence-based further guidance to minimize coercion in critical mental healthcare situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren Birkeland
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Søren Bie Bogh
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Martin Locht Pedersen
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Jonas Harder Kerring
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lars Morsø
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Ellen Boldrup Tingleff
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Frederik Alkier Gildberg
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pedersen ML, Gildberg FA, Baker J, Tingleff EB. A systematic review of interventions to reduce mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:505-522. [PMID: 38017713 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Mechanical restraint is a commonly used restrictive practice worldwide, although reducing its use is an international priority. Interventions to reduce mechanical restraint are needed if reducing mechanical restraint is to succeed. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to examine evaluated evidence-based interventions that seek to reduce the incidence of and/or time in mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings. The JBI framework was used to guide this systematic review. The search strategy included peer-reviewed primary research literature published between 1999 and 2023. Two authors independently conducted the systematic search, selection process and data extraction process. Forty-one studies were included in this review. Using content analysis, we grouped interventions into four categories: (I) calm-down methods, (II) staff resources, (III) legal and policy changes and (IV) changing staff culture. Interventions to reduce mechanical restraint in adult mental health inpatient settings have shown some promise. Evidence suggests that a range of interventions can reduce the incidence of and/or time in mechanical restraint. However, controlled trials were lacking and consensus was lacking across studies. Furthermore, specific findings varied widely, and reporting was inconsistent, hampering the development of interventions for this issue. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for reducing mechanical restraint in mental health inpatient settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Locht Pedersen
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - Frederik Alkier Gildberg
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| | - John Baker
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ellen Boldrup Tingleff
- Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
- Psychiatric Department Middelfart, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shields MC, Davis KA. Inpatient Psychiatric Care in the United States: Former Patients' Perspectives on Opportunities for Quality Improvement. J Patient Exp 2024; 11:23743735241257810. [PMID: 38827226 PMCID: PMC11141210 DOI: 10.1177/23743735241257810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient-centered care is a salient value expressed by stakeholders, but a commitment to implementing patient-centered care environments lags in the context of inpatient psychiatry. The current study aimed to describe patients' suggestions for improving the quality of inpatient psychiatry. We fielded a national survey online in 2021, in which we asked participants to report their recommendations for care improvement through a free-response box. We used an inductive qualitative approach to synthesize responses into themes. Most responses described negative experiences, with suggested improvements implied as the inverse or absence of the respondent's negative experience. Among 510 participants, we identified 10 themes: personalized care, empathetic connection, communication, whole health approach, humane care, physical safety, respecting patients' rights and autonomy, structural environment, equitable treatment, and continuity of care and systems. To implement the value of patient-centered care, we suggest that those in positions of power prioritize improvement initiatives around these aspects of care that patients find most in need of improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan C. Shields
- Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kelly A. Davis
- School of Social Policy and Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Mental Health America, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aragonés-Calleja M, Sánchez-Martínez V. Evidence synthesis on coercion in mental health: An umbrella review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2024; 33:259-280. [PMID: 37908175 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Coercion in mental healthcare is ubiquitous and affects the physical health, recovery and psychological and emotional well-being of those who experience it. Numerous studies have explored different issues related to coercion, and the present umbrella review aims to gather, evaluate and synthesise the evidence found across systematic reviews. The protocol, registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020196713), included 46 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of primary studies whose main theme was coercion and which were obtained from databases (Medline/PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL) and repositories of systematic reviews following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the reviews were subjected to independent assessment of quality and risk of bias and were grouped in two categories: (1) evidence on specific coercive measures (including Community Treatment Orders, forced treatment, involuntary admissions, seclusion and restriction and informal coercion), taking into account their prevalence, related factors, effectiveness, harmful effects and alternatives to reduce their use; and (2) experiences, perceptions and attitudes concerning coercion of professionals, mental health service users and their caregivers or relatives. This umbrella review can be useful to professionals and users in addressing the wide variety of aspects encompassed by coercion and the implications for professionals' daily clinical practice in mental health units. This research received funding from two competitive calls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Aragonés-Calleja
- Mental Health Department, Hospital Padre Jofre, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Chiropody, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Vanessa Sánchez-Martínez
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Chiropody, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miodownik C, Friger MD, Teitelbaum A, Demchuk N, Zhuk A, Agababa T, Sokolik S, Lerner PP, Calfon N, Lerner V. Risk factors for coercion length at psychiatric hospitals in Israel: Relationship with staff. Indian J Psychiatry 2024; 66:36-42. [PMID: 38419935 PMCID: PMC10898533 DOI: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_814_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Coercive interventions continue to be applied frequently in psychiatric care when patients are at imminent risk of harming themselves and/or others. Aim The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the relationship between the length of coercion and a variety of factors, including the sociodemographic background of patients, their diagnoses and the characteristics of hospital staff. Methods This is a one-year cross-sectional retrospective study, including records of 298 patients who underwent restraint and/or seclusion interventions in male acute, closed wards in two psychiatric hospitals in Israel. Results A higher proportion of academic nurses to nonacademic nurses on duty leads to a shorter coercion time (P < 0.000). The number of male staff on duty, without any relation to their level of education, also leads to the shortening of the coercion time. Conclusion The presence of registered, academic female nurses, male staff on duty and the administration of medication before coercive measures can reduce the length of restriction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanoch Miodownik
- Be’er Sheva Mental Health Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| | - Michael D. Friger
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| | | | - Natalya Demchuk
- Be’er Sheva Mental Health Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| | | | - Tsipora Agababa
- Be’er Sheva Mental Health Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| | - Shmuel Sokolik
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| | | | | | - Vladimir Lerner
- Be’er Sheva Mental Health Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be’er Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brekke E, Clausen H, Brodahl M, Landheim AS. Patients' experiences with coercive mental health treatment in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:764. [PMID: 37853402 PMCID: PMC10585822 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05264-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams have been implemented in Norwegian health and social services over the last years, partly aiming to reduce coercive mental health treatment. We need knowledge about how service users experience coercion within the FACT context. The aim of this paper is to explore service user experiences of coercive mental health treatment in the context of FACT and other treatment contexts they have experienced. Are experiences of coercion different in FACT than in other treatment contexts? If this is the case, which elements of FACT lead to a different experience? METHOD Within a participatory approach, 24 qualitative interviews with service users in five different FACT teams were analyzed with thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants described negative experiences with formal and informal coercion. Three patterns of experiences with coercion in FACT were identified: FACT as clearly a change for the better, making the best of FACT, and finding that coercion is just as bad in FACT as it was before. Safety, improved quality of treatment, and increased participation were described as mechanisms that can prevent coercion. CONCLUSION Results from this study support the argument that coercion is at odds with human rights and therefore should be avoided as far as possible. Results suggest that elements of the FACT model may prevent the use of coercion by promoting safety, improved quality of treatment and increased participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Brekke
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway.
| | - Hanne Clausen
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Morten Brodahl
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
| | - Anne S Landheim
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wullschleger A, Vandamme A, Mielau J, Heinz A, Bermpohl F, Mahler L, Montag C. Relationship between perceived coercion and perceived justification of coercive measures - secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:712. [PMID: 37784077 PMCID: PMC10546675 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05192-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subjective perception of coercion has gained attention as an important outcome. However, little is known about its relation to patients' appraisal of the justification of coercive measures. The present study aims to analyze the relationship between patients' appraisal of the justification of coercive measures and their level of perceived coercion. METHODS This study presents a secondary analysis of the results of a multi-center RCT conducted to evaluate the effects of post-coercion review. Patients who experienced at least one coercive measure during their hospital stay were included in the trial. Participants' appraisal of the justification of coercive measures was categorized into patient-related and staff-related justifications. Subjective coercion was assessed using the Coercion Experience Scale (CES) and used as dependent variable in a multivariate regression model. RESULTS 97 participants who completed the CES were included in the analysis. CES scores were significantly associated with the perception of the coercive measure as justified by staff-related factors (B = 0,540, p < 0,001), as well as with higher level of negative symptoms (B = 0,265, p = 0,011), and with mechanical restraint compared to seclusion (B=-0,343, p = 0,017). CONCLUSIONS Patients' perceptions of coercive measures as justified by staff-related factors such as arbitrariness or incompetence of staff are related to higher levels of perceived coercion. Multiprofessional efforts must be made to restrict the use of coercive measures and to ensure a transparent and sustainable decision-making process, particularly with patients showing high levels of negative symptoms. Such key elements should be part of all coercion reduction programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Wullschleger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
- Division of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Ch. Du Petit-Bel-Air 2, Thônex, 1226, Switzerland.
| | - Angelika Vandamme
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliane Mielau
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Heinz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Bermpohl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lieselotte Mahler
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Clinics in the Theodor-Wenzel-Werk, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christiane Montag
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt- Universität Zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aragonés-Calleja M, Sánchez-Martínez V. Experience of coercion among nursing professionals in a medium-stay mental health unit: A qualitative study in Spain. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2023; 30:983-993. [PMID: 36971519 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Coercive measures represent an ethical conflict because they limit the person's freedom, compromising their personal autonomy, self-determination and fundamental rights. The reduction of the use of coercive measures implies not only regulations and mental health systems, but also cultural aspects, such as societal beliefs, attitudes, and values. There is evidence about the professionals' views on coercion in acute mental health care units and community settings, but they remain unexplored in inpatient rehabilitation units. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The knowledge about coercion varied from not knowing at all the meaning of the word, to a proper description of the phenomenon. Coercive measures are considered a necessary evil or normalized in mental health care and considered implicit to daily practice. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The perceptions and attitudes towards coercion might be influenced by the knowledge about the phenomenon. Training of mental health nursing staff in non-coercive practice could help professionals to detect, be conscious towards, and question coercive measures, thus orienting them to the effective implementation of interventions or programmes with evidenced effectiveness to reduce them. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Creating a therapeutic and safe milieu with the minimum coercive measures requires knowing professionals' perceptions and attitudes towards coercion, but they remain unexplored in medium and long-stay inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation units. AIM To explore the knowledge, perception and experience of coercion among nursing staff at a rehabilitation medium-stay mental health unit (MSMHU) in Eastern Spain. METHOD Qualitative phenomenological study including 28 face-to-face, semi-structured interviews based on a script. Data were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Two main themes were found: (1) therapeutic relationship and treatment in the MSMHU, which included three subthemes: qualities of the professionals for building the therapeutic relationship; perceptions about the persons admitted to the MSMHU; views of the therapeutic relationship and treatment in the MSMHU; (2) Coercion at the MSMHU, comprising five subthemes: professional knowledge; general aspects; emotional impact of coercion; opinions; alternatives. DISCUSSION Coercive measures are often normalized in mental health care and considered implicit to daily practice. A proportion of participants who did not know what coercion is. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Knowledge about coercion might influence attitudes towards coercion. Mental health nursing staff could benefit from formal training in non-coercive practice, facilitating the operative implementation of effective interventions or programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vanessa Sánchez-Martínez
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Chiropody, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moyles J, Hunter A, Grealish A. Forensic mental health nurses' experiences of rebuilding the therapeutic relationship after an episode of physical restraint in forensic services in Ireland: A qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2023; 32:1377-1389. [PMID: 37243405 DOI: 10.1111/inm.13176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have explored how forensic mental health nurses can rebuild the therapeutic relationship following an episode of physical restraint in the acute forensic setting. In this study, we aimed to redress this gap in the literature by exploring with forensic mental health nurses the factors that enable or hinder the rebuilding of the therapeutic relationship following an episode of physical restraint. A qualitative study design was used to capture participants' experiences, views and perceptions of the therapeutic relationship following an episode of physical restraint in the acute forensic setting. Data were collected through individual interviews with forensic mental health nurses (n = 10) working in an acute forensic setting. Interviews were audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim and accounts were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: 'Building a Recovery Focused Therapeutic Relationship'; 'Authoritarian Role'; 'Inevitable Imbalance'; 'Rebuilding the Therapeutic Relationship'; plus two sub-themes 'Facilitators to rebuilding' and 'Barriers to rebuilding'. Findings suggest that an inevitable imbalance exists in building a recovery-focused therapeutic relationship and at times, is hindered by the authoritarian role of the forensic mental health nurse. Recommendations for changes in clinical practice and in upcoming policies should incorporate a dedicated debrief room and protected time for staff to debrief effectively following restraint. Routine post-restraint-focused clinical supervision would also be beneficial to mental health nursing staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Moyles
- Department of Nursing, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew Hunter
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Annmarie Grealish
- Department of Nursing, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aguilera-Serrano C, Goodman-Casanova JM, Bordallo-Aragón A, García-Sánchez JA, Mayoral-Cleries F, Guzmán-Parra J. Attitudes about Mechanical Restraint Use in Mental Health Hospitalization Services: A Spanish Survey. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1909. [PMID: 37444743 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the attitudes of professionals in Mental Health Services throughout Spain who are directly or indirectly involved in the use of mechanical restraint and the barriers perceived to reduce its use. The study involved an online anonymous survey using Google Forms completed by Spanish mental health professionals working with service users; the survey assessed their involvement in and general attitudes and beliefs towards mechanical restraint. The survey was completed by 225 participants. Only 13.30% of the participants considered that mechanical restraint use was never necessary to guarantee the safety of users/staff in dangerous situations. Poor staff training (38.0%) and a lack of resources/staff (34.7%) were the most frequent barriers identified for the reduction of mechanical restraint. In the multivariate analysis, participation in learning programs to prevent the use of mechanical restraint was associated with lower acceptance of the use of mechanical restraint, but the result was barely significant (p = 0.050). A high percentage of mental health staff still consider mechanical restraint use necessary for safety reasons. According to the results, the participants perceived that more staff and resources and better training could reduce the use of mechanical restraint in Mental Health Hospitalization Services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Aguilera-Serrano
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand), 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Jessica Marian Goodman-Casanova
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand), 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Antonio Bordallo-Aragón
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand), 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio García-Sánchez
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand), 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand), 29009 Málaga, Spain
- COST Action CA19133-Fostering and Strengthening Approaches to Reducing Coercion in European Mental Health Services (FOSTREN), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - José Guzmán-Parra
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Salud Mental, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina (IBIMA Plataforma Bionand), 29009 Málaga, Spain
- COST Action CA19133-Fostering and Strengthening Approaches to Reducing Coercion in European Mental Health Services (FOSTREN), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To investigate the effects of post‐incident debriefing after coercive measures for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia‐type psychosis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Berg J, Lipponen E, Sailas E, Soininen P, Varpula J, Välimäki M, Lahti M. Nurses' perceptions of nurse-patient communication in seclusion rooms in psychiatric inpatient care: A focus group study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2023. [PMID: 36718606 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Communication between nurses and patients is essential in mental health nursing. In coercive situations (e.g. seclusion), the importance of nurse-patient communication is highlighted. However, research related to nurses' perceptions of nurse-patient communication during seclusion is scant. AIM The aim of this study was to describe nurses' perceptions of nurse-patient communication during patient seclusion and the ways nurse-patient communication can be improved. METHOD A qualitative study design using focus group interviews was adopted. Thirty-two nurses working in psychiatric wards were recruited to participate. The data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Nurses aimed to communicate in a patient-centred way in seclusion events, and various issues affected the quality of communication. Nurses recognized several ways to improve communication during seclusion. DISCUSSION Treating patients in seclusion rooms presents highly demanding care situations for nurses. Seclusion events require nurses to have good communication skills to provide ethically sound care. CONCLUSION Improved nurse-patient communication may contribute to shorter seclusion times and a higher quality of care. Improving nurses' communication skills may help support the dignity of the secluded patients. Safewards practices, such as respectful communication and recognizing the effect of non-verbal behaviour, could be considered when developing nurse-patient communication in seclusion events. RELEVANCE STATEMENT This study deepens the understanding of nurse-patient communication during seclusion events from the perspective of nurses. Caring for patients in seclusion presents challenging situations for nurses and demands that they have good communication skills. To enhance their communication skills in seclusion events, nurses require opportunities to take part in further training after education related to communication skills for demanding care situations. Knowing the appropriate ways to interact with individual patients during seclusion can help nurses create and maintain communication with patients. For mental health nursing, nurses' enhanced communication may promote increased use of noncoercive practices in psychiatric settings. For patients, improving nurses' communication skills may help support dignity and autonomy during seclusion and shorten the time spent in seclusion, resulting in a better quality of care and more positive patient experiences related to care offered in seclusion. In this, the perspectives of people with lived experience of mental health problems should be acknowledged. Components of Safewards practices, such as using respectful and individual communication and paying attention to one's non-verbal communication (Soft Words), could be useful when developing nurse-patient communication in seclusion events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Berg
- Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Eila Sailas
- Helsinki University Hospital, Kellokoski Hospital, Kellokoski, Finland
| | - Päivi Soininen
- Helsinki University Hospital, Kellokoski Hospital, Kellokoski, Finland.,Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Jaakko Varpula
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Maritta Välimäki
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Mari Lahti
- Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.,Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Berring LL, Bak J, Hvidhjelm JC. National Strategies to Reduce the Use of Coercive Measures in Psychiatry in Denmark - A Review of Two Decades of Initiatives. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2023; 44:35-47. [PMID: 35849544 DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2022.2089788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Coercive measures are a major infringement of the autonomy of psychiatric patients and no medical justification exists for applying mechanical restraint (MR) to these patients currently. Knowledge regarding how preventive strategies affect the use of MR is limited. This paper aimed to understand the link between the initiatives taken by national authorities and the practical implications to MR reduction. Policy texts and the number of coercive measures used in two decades were reviewed. Trends were discussed with five experts with real-life experience and suggestions were obtained regarding how to end the use of mechanical restraint in mental health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Lauge Berring
- Psychiatric Research Unit, Mental Health Services Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Bak
- Clinical Mental Health and Nursing Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Jacob Christian Hvidhjelm
- Clinical Mental Health and Nursing Research Unit, Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
De Cuyper K, Vanlinthout E, Vanhoof J, van Achterberg T, Opgenhaffen T, Nijs S, Peeters T, Put J, Maes B, Van Audenhove C. Best practice recommendations on the application of seclusion and restraint in mental health services: An evidence, human rights and consensus-based approach. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2022; 30:580-593. [PMID: 36565433 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Seclusion and restraint still regularly occur within inpatient mental health services. The Council of Europe requires the development of a policy on for instance age limits, techniques and time limits. However, they only define the outer limits of such a policy by indicating when rights are violated. Within these limits, many choices remain open. Staff and service managers lack clarity on safe and humane procedures. Research literature provides limited and contradictory insights on these matters. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The study resulted in 77 best practice recommendations on the practical application of restraint and seclusion as last resort intervention in inpatient youth and adult mental health services, including forensic facilities. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the development of recommendations on this topic is not only based on scientific evidence, but also on an analysis of European human rights standards and consensus within and between expert-professionals and experts-by-experience. This approach allowed to develop for the first time recommendations on time limits, asking for second opinion, and registration of seclusion and restraint. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The 77 recommendations encourage staff to focus on teamwork, safety measures, humane treatment, age and time limits, asking for second opinion, observation, evaluation and registration when applying seclusion and restraint as last resort intervention. The implementation of the best practice recommendations is feasible provided that they are combined with a broad preventive approach and with collaboration between service managers, staff (educators) and experts-by-experience. Under these conditions, the recommendations will improve safety and humane treatment, and reduce harm to both service users and staff. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Seclusion and restraint still regularly occur within inpatient mental health services. Professionals lack clarity on safe and humane procedures. Nevertheless, a detailed policy on for instance age limits, techniques and time limits is required. AIM We developed recommendations on the humane and safe application of seclusion, physical intervention and mechanical restraint in inpatient youth and adult mental health services, including forensic facilities. METHOD After developing a questionnaire based on a rapid scientific literature review and an analysis of human rights sources stemming from the Council of Europe, 60 expert-professionals and 18 experts-by-experience were consulted in Flanders (Belgium) through a Delphi-study. RESULTS After two rounds, all but one statement reached the consensus-level of 65% in both panels. The study resulted in 77 recommendations on teamwork, communication, materials and techniques, maximum duration, observation, evaluation, registration, second opinion and age limits. DISCUSSION Combining an evidence, human rights and consensus-based approach allowed for the first time to develop recommendations on time limits, asking for second opinion and registration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE When combined with a preventive approach and collaboration between service managers, staff (educators) and experts-by-experience, the recommendations will improve safety and humane treatment, and reduce harm to service users and staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen De Cuyper
- LUCAS - Centre for Care Research & Consultancy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Vanlinthout
- LUCAS - Centre for Care Research & Consultancy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasper Vanhoof
- Academic Centre of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Theo van Achterberg
- Academic Centre of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tim Opgenhaffen
- Institute for Social Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sara Nijs
- Parenting and Special Education, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tine Peeters
- LUCAS - Centre for Care Research & Consultancy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Put
- Institute for Social Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bea Maes
- Parenting and Special Education, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chantal Van Audenhove
- LUCAS - Centre for Care Research & Consultancy, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guzmán-Parra J, Aguilera-Serrano C, Huizing E, Bono Del Trigo A, Villagrán JM, Hurtado Melero V, García-Sanchez JA, Mayoral-Cleries F. Factors associated with prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint in mental health hospitalization units in Andalusia. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2022; 29:873-882. [PMID: 35088924 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Risk factors associated with prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint and other coercive measures are understudied. There have been no studies of this phenomenon in the context of the Andalusian public health system. Knowledge about factors associated with prolonged episodes is essential to increase the understanding of this phenomenon and develop strategies to reduce its occurrence. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: In Andalusia, prolonged restraint is still frequent and varies depending on the unit. It is associated with less time since admission, male gender, diagnosis, reason for restraint and the shift on which it was initiated. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Interventions at the level of the units could be necessary to prevent prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint. The results suggest the need for stricter control during the shifts on which restraint starts, especially in the first days after the patient's admission. Preventive risk assessment considering clinical and sociodemographic risk factors could help to reduce prolonged restraint. ABSTRACT: Introduction Factors associated with prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint and other coercive interventions are not clearly established and have been not studied in Andalusia (Spain). Aim To study factors associated with prolonged episodes of mechanical restraint. Method We analysed retrospectively episodes of mechanical restraint (N = 6267, prolonged episode >9.5 hours) in all public mental health hospitalization units (N = 20, 535 beds) that offer health coverage for the autonomous community of Andalusia. The data came from clinical records. A multivariable mixed logistic regression was used. Results In Andalusia, prolonged restraint is still frequent and varies depending on the unit. It is associated with less time since admission, male gender, diagnosis, reason for restraint and the shift on which it was initiated. Discussion The results provide evidence that prolonged episodes largely depend on the unit where they occur and that stricter control and regulation are necessary to prevent prolonged episodes. Implications for practice Interventions at the level of the unit are necessary. Stricter control in the shifts during which there is more risk of prolonged restraint may be necessary, especially in the first days following admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Guzmán-Parra
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Carlos Aguilera-Serrano
- South Health Management Area of Granada, Community Mental Health Unit of Motril, Motril, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Verónica Hurtado Melero
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio García-Sanchez
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lessard-Deschênes C, Goulet MH, Pariseau-Legault P. Factors associated with perceived coercion in adults receiving psychiatric care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065393. [PMID: 36253035 PMCID: PMC9577918 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Coercion is inevitably linked to psychiatric and mental healthcare. Though many forms of coercion exist, perceived coercion appears to be a less studied form despite its marked prevalence and negative consequences. In the literature, several factors have been studied for their association with perceived coercion, but few literature reviews have focused on this precise subject. Gaining knowledge of the association between these factors and the degree of perceived coercion is essential to guide future research and develop informed interventions. The purpose of this review will be to identify, in the literature, factors associated with perceived coercion by adults receiving psychiatric care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A scoping review will be conducted by following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A search with descriptors and keywords will be performed in the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Then, a search for grey literature will be conducted, psychiatric and mental health journals will be searched, and reference lists will be examined to identify further pertinent literature. All literature on factors (human, health related, organisational, etc) and their association to perceived coercion by adults (18 and older) in inpatient, outpatient and community-based psychiatry will be included. A quality assessment of the literature included will be performed. The extracted data will be analysed with a method of content analysis. An exploratory search was conducted in September 2021 and will be updated in September 2022 once the evidence selection process is planned to begin. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethics approval is required for this review. The results of this scoping review will be submitted to a scientific journal for publication, presented in conferences and shared with clinicians working in psychiatric and mental healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Lessard-Deschênes
- Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Goulet
- Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pérez-Toribio A, Moreno-Poyato AR, Roldán-Merino JF, Nash M. Spanish mental health nurses' experiences of mechanical restraint: A qualitative descriptive study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2022; 29:688-697. [PMID: 35856924 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Mechanical restraint is a common practice in mental healthcare settings in Spain, despite controversy. Mechanical restraint is perceived as a negative experience for nurses and service users. Mechanical restraint damages the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship, which is essential in providing quality care and promoting recovery. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The negative experiences of service users and mental health nurses arising from use of mechanical restraint affects both parties involved and results in trauma. Using mechanical restraint can provoke a moral injury in mental health nurses which can negatively impact on the establishment of trust within the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Nurses must be aware of the negative effects that mechanical restraint use has on both their practice and their day-to-day lives. Post-mechanical restraint debriefing is required to repair the damage to the trust aspect of the nurse-patient relationship. Involving service users in co-producing a debriefing framework may be a way to rebuild trust through constructive dialogue. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Mechanical restraint is an intervention that causes harm to service users and nurses, yet continues to be used in many countries, including Spain. However, there is a lack of research exploring Spanish mental health nurses' experiences of using mechanical restraint. AIM To describe the experiences of mental health nurses who have used mechanical restraint in practice. METHODS A qualitative descriptive methodology was used and a purposive sample of 10 Spanish mental health nurses were interviewed about their experiences of using mechanical restraint. Thematic analysis was then employed to analyse interview data. RESULTS Participants' experiences of using mechanical restraint were mostly negative. Three main themes arose from the analysis of interview transcripts, (i) symmetrical trauma, (ii) moral injury and (iii) broken trust. DISCUSSION The use of restrictive practices, which can be perceived as counter-therapeutic, exposes nurses to risks such as moral injury and service users to broken trust in the therapeutic nurse patient relationship. Avoiding empathy in order to use mechanical restraint is counterproductive, in the understanding that empathy is key to reducing this intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Reducing or eliminating use of mechanical restraints should be a policy and practice priority due to the symmetrical harms it causes both nurses and service users. The trust aspect of the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship is a significant casualty when mechanical restraint is used, therefore involving service users in co-production of post-mechanical restraint debriefing can be an avenue for restoring this trust through dialogue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alonso Pérez-Toribio
- Unitat de Salut Mental de l'Hospitalet, Servei d'Atenció Primària Delta de Llobregat/Direcció d'Atenció Primària Costa de Ponent, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio R Moreno-Poyato
- Departament of Public Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Nursing School, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan F Roldán-Merino
- Campus Docent Sant Joan de Déu Fundació Privada, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael Nash
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stoll J, Westermair AL, Kübler U, Reisch T, Cattapan K, Bridler R, Maier R, Trachsel M. A two-center pilot study on the effects of clinical ethics support on coercive measures in psychiatry. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:370. [PMID: 35650555 PMCID: PMC9156353 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04024-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of formal coercion such as seclusion, mechanical restraint, and forced medication is one of the most challenging and complex issues in mental health care, on the clinical, the legal, and the ethical level. Clinical ethics support aims at assisting healthcare practitioners in determining the morally most justifiable course of action in these situations. However, the effectiveness of clinical ethics support has hardly been studied so far. METHODS Monthly moral case deliberation (MCD) was implemented in two acute wards of two different psychiatric hospitals in Switzerland. Frequency and intensity of coercion was measured on ward level (npatients = 405), and the Moral Attentiveness Scale, Knowledge on Coercion Scale, and Staff Attitudes towards Coercion Scale were applied on healthcare practitioner level (nHP = 46). Pre-post-comparisons were conducted using multi-level modeling where appropriate. RESULTS After implementation of MCD, formal coercion was less frequent (particularly seclusion, small effect size; 9.6 vs. 16.7%, p = .034, Cramér's V = .105) and less intense (particularly mechanical restraint, large effect size; 86.8 ± 45.3 vs. 14.5 ± 12.1 h, exact p = .019, r = -.74), and approval for coercive measures among healthcare practitioners was lower when controlling for the number of MCD sessions attended. CONCLUSIONS Clinical ethics support such as MCD may be a hitherto underutilized service for the reduction of coercion, complementing existing strategies and programs. Implementing clinical ethics support may help improve quality of care for persons suffering from severe mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Stoll
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Lisa Westermair
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Clinical Ethics Unit, University Hospital Basel and University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas Reisch
- Psychiatriezentrum Münsingen, Münsingen, Switzerland
| | - Katja Cattapan
- Sanatorium Kilchberg, Zurich, Switzerland
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Manuel Trachsel
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Clinical Ethics Unit, University Hospital Basel and University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aragonés-Calleja M, Sánchez-Martínez V. Current State of Research on Coercion in Mental Health: Umbrella Review Protocol. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2022; 60:49-55. [PMID: 35522935 DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20220428-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, international organizations, professionals, and representatives of mental health service users have expressed the need to regulate, limit, and even eliminate coercive measures in psychiatric treatment. The main objective of the current review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of existing evidence on coercion in mental health care through a protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews. This protocol was designed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guide for methodological development, conduct, and reporting of umbrella reviews. To minimize bias in the process, two independent reviewers selected the studies to be included, extracted, and synthesized; analyzed the data; and assessed risk of bias of each review. The review protocol was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. This review offers a comprehensive compilation of systematic reviews on coercion developed to date. Coercion causes adverse physical and psychological effects and is an emotional stressor for individuals with psychiatric diagnoses and health care workers. Characterization of coercion across care settings, its impact on clinical outcomes, the perception of those involved, and how coercion could be reduced will also be discussed. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, xx(xx), xx-xx.].
Collapse
|
21
|
Pérez-Toribio A, Moreno-Poyato AR, Lluch-Canut T, Molina-Martínez L, Bastidas-Salvadó A, Puig-Llobet M, Roldán-Merino JF. Relationship between nurses' use of verbal de-escalation and mechanical restraint in acute inpatient mental health care: a retrospective study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2022; 31:339-347. [PMID: 34837275 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Although the use of verbal de-escalation in nursing has been shown to be an effective tool for controlling agitation and avoiding mechanical restraint, there is scarce evidence supporting the use of de-escalation by nurses and factors related to the patients who ultimately receive mechanical restraint. This retrospective study sought to examine the relationship between the use of verbal de-escalation by nurses and the clinical profile of patients who had received mechanical restraint at an acute mental health unit. This study analysed the records of patients who had received mechanical restraint between the years 2012 and 2019. A bivariate analysis was initially performed, followed by multiple logistic regression analysis. A total of 493 episodes of restraint were recorded. Of these, in almost 40% of cases, no prior use of verbal de-escalation was noted. The factors associated with the use of verbal de-escalation by nurses were patients with a history of restraint episodes and patients who previously had been administered medication. Furthermore, episodes of mechanical restraint that occurred later during the admission were also associated with the use of de-escalation. These findings confirm the relevance of early nurse interventions. Consequently, it is important to establish an adequate therapeutic relationship from the start of hospitalization to facilitate getting to know the patient and to enable the timely use of verbal de-escalation, thus avoiding the use of mechanical restraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alonso Pérez-Toribio
- Unitat de Salut Mental de l'Hospitalet, Servei d'Atenció Primària Delta de Llobregat / Direcció d'Atenció Primària Costa de Ponent, Institut Català de la Salut, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio R Moreno-Poyato
- Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Nursing School, Universitat de Barcelona, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Teresa Lluch-Canut
- Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Nursing School, Universitat de Barcelona, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Molina-Martínez
- Programa Atención Domiciliaria Intensivo (PADI), Associació d'Higiene Mental Nou Barris, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Montserrat Puig-Llobet
- Department of Public Health, Mental Health and Maternal and Child Health Nursing, Nursing School, Universitat de Barcelona, L´Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan F Roldán-Merino
- Campus Docent Sant Joan de Déu Fundació Privada, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shields MC, Trinh NHT, Borba CPC, Chen R, Reddy AK, Singer SJ. Former Inpatient Psychiatric Patients' Past Experiences With Traditional Frontline Staff and Their Thoughts on the Benefits of Peers as Part of Frontline Staff. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2022; 60:15-22. [PMID: 34590985 PMCID: PMC10182870 DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20210916-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about how integrating peers into frontline staff might improve the quality of inpatient psychiatric care. In the current study, we interviewed 18 former adult patients of inpatient psychiatric facilities using semi-structured interviews. We first asked about positive and negative past experiences with traditional staff. We then asked participants to share their opinions on the potential benefits of peers as part of frontline staff. We identified themes through a joint inductive and deductive approach. Participants reported past positive experiences with traditional staff as being (a) personable and caring, (b) validating feelings and experiences, (c) de-escalating, and (d) providing agency. Past negative experiences included (a) not sharing information, (b) being inattentive, (c) not providing agency, (d) being dehumanizing/disrespectful, (e) incompetency, (f) escalating situations, and (g) being apathetic. Participants believed that peers as part of frontline staff could champion emotional needs in humanizing and nonjudgmental ways, help navigate the system, and disrupt power imbalances between staff and patients. Further research is needed to understand financial, organizational, and cultural barriers to integrating peers into frontline staff. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 60(3), 15-22.].
Collapse
|
23
|
Rassenhofer M, Korger S, Fegert JM, Hoffmann U. Häufigkeiten von Übergriffen auf Kinder und Jugendliche durch Angehörige der Heil- und Pflegeberufe. KINDHEIT UND ENTWICKLUNG 2021. [DOI: 10.1026/0942-5403/a000355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Kindesmisshandlung, -missbrauch und Vernachlässigung stellen ein gesamtgesellschaftliches Entwicklungsrisiko für Kinder in Deutschland dar. Zweithäufigster Kontext des Geschehens nach dem familiären Umfeld sind Institutionen. Fragestellung: Der vorliegende Artikel gibt eine Übersicht zu Häufigkeiten von Übergriffen durch Angehörige der Heil- und Pflegeberufe mit Schwerpunkt auf dem kinder- und jugendpsychiatrischen/-psychotherapeutischen Bereich. Methode: Mittels Literaturrecherche wird der Forschungsstand zum Thema dargestellt. Ergebnisse: Neben Auswertungen zu Zwangsmaßnahmen, welche von Betroffenen häufig als viktimisierend erlebt werden, existieren für Deutschland zwei repräsentative retrospektive Befragungen zum medizinischen Bereich. Hier ergaben sich Prävalenzen zwischen einem Fünftel und einem Drittel der Befragten, die mindestens eine Form von Gewalt oder Vernachlässigung bejahten. Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung: Neben alarmierenden Zahlen zeigt sich der große Bedarf an weiterer Forschung zum Thema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Rassenhofer
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie/Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
| | - Simone Korger
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie/Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
| | - Jörg M. Fegert
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie/Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
| | - Ulrike Hoffmann
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie/Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Modini M, Burton A, Abbott MJ. Factors influencing inpatients perception of psychiatric hospitals: A meta-review of the literature. J Psychiatr Res 2021; 136:492-500. [PMID: 33127069 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Inpatient psychiatric hospitals have remained a standard aspect of mental health treatment for many centuries. While numerous treatments have been empirically validated to assist inpatients, less is known about how inpatients perceive psychiatric hospitals. A meta-review, which is a systematic review of systematic reviews, was conducted to examine the factors reported by inpatients which affect their perception of psychiatric hospitals. MEDLINE, PsycINFO and EMBASE were systematically searched. Reviews that considered the perception of adults with mental illness admitted to an inpatient psychiatric hospital were eligible for inclusion. The AMSTAR-2 was used to assess for methodological quality and bias of eligible reviews, with reviews judged to have critical issues excluded. Thematic synthesis was used to detect key overarching factors that generalised across multiple reviews. Twelve systematic reviews were included of which seven key factors were extracted. These were; relationships on the ward, the ward environment, coercive measures, legal status, autonomy, feeling deserving of care, and expectations of care at admission and discharge. Inpatients report several factors that need to be considered when creating a therapeutic environment in a psychiatric hospital. While the importance of therapeutic rapport was the most consistently referenced factor in the included reviews, all factors are likely interwoven and modifiable. Limitations of this meta-review and directions for future research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Modini
- Concord Centre for Mental Health, Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Amy Burton
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maree J Abbott
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Guzman-Parra J, Aguilera-Serrano C, Huizing E, Bono Del Trigo A, Villagrán JM, García-Sánchez JA, Mayoral-Cleries F. A regional multicomponent intervention for mechanical restraint reduction in acute psychiatric wards. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2021; 28:197-207. [PMID: 32667113 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: A relevant number of restraint prevention programmes have been developed internationally. In Spain, there is no harmonized policy to prevent the use of restraint. More studies are necessary to establish which programmes and components are necessary to prevent restraint. WHAT DOES THE PAPER ADD TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: There was a significant decreasing trend in the total number of mechanical restraint hours during the implementation of the intervention. There was no significant decreasing trend in the number of mechanical restraint episodes. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Interventions at a regional level aimed at preventing mechanical restraint are feasible in the Spanish context. All components of the Six Core Strategies could be necessary to prevent episodes of mechanical restraint. ABSTRACT: Introduction Mechanical restraint (MR) is used in many countries, including Spain, where non-harmonized policies between autonomous communities exist. There is a lack of research about interventions at regional levels to reduce their use. Aim To analyse data on key outcomes during the implementation of a multicomponent intervention in Andalusia (Spain) to reduce the use of MR. Method Episodes in a period of 30 months in all wards (N = 20) were analysed. The intervention consisted of five strategies: (a) leadership, (b) analysis of the situation, (c) awareness training for the heads of the wards, (d) unified record of MR and (e) staff training. We analysed the monthly trend of restraint hours and restraint episodes/1,000 bed days using segmented regression. Results There were 206.32 restraint hours and 12.96 restraint episodes/1,000 bed days during the study period. A significant decreasing trend was observed in restraint hours (-1.79%, p < .001), but not in the number of restraint episodes (-0.45%; p = .149). Discussion The results coincide with other international studies; however, studies with better designs are required to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Implications for Practice Interventions at a regional level aimed at preventing MR are feasible in the Spanish context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Guzman-Parra
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Carlos Aguilera-Serrano
- Community Mental Health Unit of Motril, South Health Management Area of Granada, Motril, Spain
| | | | | | - José María Villagrán
- Mental Health Hospitalization Unit, Jerez de la Frontera Hospital, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio García-Sánchez
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| | - Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Heumann K, Stückle L, Jung A, Bock T, Mahlke C, Lincoln TM. [Do we Choose the Right Measures to Avoid Coercion? - A Survey of Service Users who Experienced Coercion About Potentially Helpful Milder Measures]. PSYCHIATRISCHE PRAXIS 2021; 48:301-308. [PMID: 33773501 DOI: 10.1055/a-1347-5184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM We investigated which milder measures service users perceive as helpful to prevent coercive measures and in which extent these measures are offered. METHODS A sample of 155 former service users who experienced coercion was recruited and questioned via online or paper pencil survey. RESULTS On average, participants reported to have received 4.7 from a total of 25 milder measures. The measures, which where most frequent rated as potentially helpful where "crisis talks", "considering needs" and "showing interest". The analysis showed a negative relation between the frequency of offered measures and the frequency these measures where rated as potentially helpful. 86 % of the participants reported low satisfaction with treatment overall. CONCLUSION It seems, that in escalating situations service users do not receive the measures they perceive as helpful. In order to prevent the use of coercive measures staff members should focus on crisis talks and a need-orientated, empathic interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kolja Heumann
- Arbeitsbereich Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Hamburg.,Hochschulklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Medizinischen Hochschule Brandenburg, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf
| | - Luise Stückle
- Arbeitsbereich Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Hamburg
| | | | - Thomas Bock
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Candelaria Mahlke
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
| | - Tania M Lincoln
- Arbeitsbereich Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Universität Hamburg
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lindkvist RM, Westling S, Liljedahl SI, Landgren K. A Brief Breathing Space: Experiences of Brief Admission by Self-Referral for Self-Harming and Suicidal Individuals with a History of Extensive Psychiatric Inpatient Care. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2021; 42:172-182. [PMID: 32762578 DOI: 10.1080/01612840.2020.1789787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with severe self-harm and experiences of lengthy psychiatric admissions often have complex mental health conditions and are at risk of suicide. In this qualitative study, self-harming individuals with >180 days of psychiatric admission over 12 months shared their experiences of Brief Admission (BA), a standardized crisis-management intervention encouraging self-admission and autonomy. Phenomenological hermeneutic analysis formulated BA as a worthy respite, replacing an old system of having to prove need 'in blood' or wait and get worse. Successes and struggles in early help-seeking, interpreted in the light of human rights and person-centered care, suggested that individual development of autonomy depended on perceived focus on recovery and compassion. Future research may consider ethical and health-economic aspects of BA in a broader perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose-Marie Lindkvist
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Psychiatry, Lund University, Clinical Psychiatric Research Center, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sofie Westling
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Psychiatry, Lund University, Clinical Psychiatric Research Center, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sophie I Liljedahl
- Region Västra Götaland, Psykiatri Affektiva, Department of Psychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kajsa Landgren
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Division of Psychiatry, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Muir-Cochrane E, Oster C, Grimmer K. Interrogating systematic review recommendations for effective chemical restraint. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:1768-1779. [PMID: 32059065 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Muir-Cochrane
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Candice Oster
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Grimmer
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bernheim E. Les substances chimiques utilisées à des fins de contrôle : un statut juridique controversé. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 2020. [DOI: 10.7202/1073543ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Au Québec, les mesures de contrôle – isolement, contentions et substances chimiques – font l’objet d’un encadrement législatif depuis 1998. Or, depuis cette date, les substances chimiques sont au coeur d’un débat sur leur statut juridique, entre thérapie et contrôle. En 2015, le ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux publie un Cadre de référence révisé sensé établir des normes directrices en matière de substances chimiques utilisées à des fins de contrôle. Un examen de ce cadre laisse pourtant transparaître plusieurs incohérences, entretenant l’indétermination sur leur statut. D’une part, l’exception prévue en matière de consentement ne correspond pas au cadre juridique québécois en matière de soins, laissant penser qu’il s’agit bien d’une mesure de contrôle. D’autre part, les actes réservés sont les mêmes, que les substances chimiques soient utilisées à des fins de contrôle ou à des fins thérapeutiques, laissant penser qu’il s’agit plutôt d’une mesure thérapeutique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Bernheim
- Section de droit civil, Faculté de droit, Université d’Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hammervold UE, Norvoll R, Vevatne K, Sagvaag H. Post-incident reviews-a gift to the Ward or just another procedure? Care providers' experiences and considerations regarding post-incident reviews after restraint in mental health services. A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:499. [PMID: 32493391 PMCID: PMC7268524 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05370-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Public guidelines in many western countries recommend post-incident reviews (PIRs) with patients after restraint use in mental health care. PIRs are one of several elements of seclusion and restraint reduction in internationally used programmes. PIRs may improve restraint prevention, patients’ recovery processes and care providers’ ethical mindfulness. The knowledge base on PIRs is, however, vague. This qualitative study explores professional care providers’ experiences and considerations regarding PIRs that included patients after restraint use in a Norwegian context. Methods Within a phenomenological hermeneutical framework, 19 multidisciplinary care providers were interviewed about their experiences and views regarding PIRs that included patients after restraint events. The interviews were performed over the period 2015–2016. Data analysis followed a data-driven stepwise approach in line with thematic content analysis. A group of two patient consultants in mental health services, and one patient’s next of kin, contributed with input regarding the interview guide and analysis process. Results Care providers experienced PIRs as having the potential to improve the quality of care through a) knowledge of other perspectives and solutions; b) increased ethical and professional awareness; and c) emotional and relational processing. However, the care providers considered that PIRs’ potential could be further exploited as they struggled to get hold on the patients’ voices in the encounter. The care providers considered that issue to be attributable to the patients’ conditions, the care providers’ safety and skills and the characteristics of institutional and cultural conditions. Conclusion Human care philosophies and a framework of care ethics seem to be preconditions for promoting patients’ active participation in PIRs after restraints. Patients’ voices strengthen PIRs’ potential to improve care and may also contribute to restraint prevention. To minimise the power imbalance in PIRs, patients’ vulnerability, dependency and perceived dignity must be recognised. Patients’ individual needs and preferences should be assessed and mapped when planning PIRs, particularly regarding location, time and preferred participants. Care providers must receive training to strengthen their confidence in conducting PIRs in the best possible way. Patients’ experiences with PIRs should be explored, especially if participation by trusted family members, peers or advocates may support the patients in PIRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Unn Elisabeth Hammervold
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Reidun Norvoll
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kari Vevatne
- Department of care and ethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Hildegunn Sagvaag
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Muir-Cochrane E, Oster C, Grimmer K. International research into 22 years of use of chemical restraint: An evidence overview. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:927-956. [PMID: 31318109 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemical restraint (CR) (also known as rapid tranquilisation) is the forced (non-consenting) administration of medications to manage uncontrolled aggression, anxiety, or violence in people who are likely to cause harm to themselves or others. Our population of interest was adults with mental health disorders (with/without substance abuse). There has been a growing international movement over the past 22 years towards reducing/eliminating restrictive practices such as CR. It is appropriate to summarise the research that has been published over this time, identify trends and gaps in knowledge, and highlight areas for new research to inform practice. AIMS To undertake a comprehensive systematic search to identify, and describe, the volume and nature of primary international research into CR published since 1995. METHODS This paper reports the processes and overall findings of a systematic search for all available primary research on CR published between 1 January 1996 and 31 July 2018. It describes the current evidence base by hierarchy of evidence, country (ies) producing the research, CR definitions, study purpose, and outcome measures. RESULTS This review identified 311 relevant primary studies (21 RCTs; 46 non-controlled experimental or prospective observational studies; 77 cross-sectional studies; 69 retrospective studies; 67 opinion pieces, position or policy statements; and 31 qualitative studies). The USA, UK, and Australia contributed over half the research, whilst cross-country collaborations comprised 6% of it. The most common research settings comprised acute psychiatric wards (23.3%), general psychiatric wards (21.6%), and general hospital emergency departments (19.0%). DISCUSSION A key lesson learnt whilst compiling this database of research into CR was to ensure that all papers described non-consenting administration of medications to manage adults with uncontrolled aggression, anxiety, or violence. There were tensions in the literature between using effective CR without producing adverse events, and how to decide when CR was needed (compared with choosing non-chemical intervention for behavioural emergencies), respecting patients' dignity whilst safeguarding their safety, and preserving safe workplaces for staff, and care environments for other patients. The range of outcome measures suggests opportunities to standardise future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Muir-Cochrane
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, 5042
| | - Candice Oster
- On-Line Education and Development, Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit (FHBHRU), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, 5042
| | - Karen Grimmer
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia, 5042.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Muir-Cochrane E, Oster C, Gerace A, Dawson S, Damarell R, Grimmer K. The effectiveness of chemical restraint in managing acute agitation and aggression: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2020; 29:110-126. [PMID: 31498960 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
One approach to manage people with behaviours of concern including agitated or aggressive behaviours in health care settings is through the use of fast-acting medication, called chemical restraint. Such management often needs to be delivered in crisis situations to patients who are at risk of harm to themselves or others. This paper summarizes the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of chemical restraint from 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3788 patients. The RCTs were of moderate to high quality and were conducted in pre-hospital, hospital emergency department, or ward settings. Drugs used in chemical restraint included olanzapine, haloperidol, droperidol, risperidol, flunitrazepam, midazolam, promethazine, ziprasidone, sodium valproate, or lorazepam. There was limited comparability between studies in drug choice, combination, dose, method of administration (oral, intramuscular, or intravenous drip), or timing of repeat administrations. There were 31 outcome measures, which were inconsistently reported. They included subjective measures of behaviours, direct measures of treatment effect (time to calm; time to sleep), indirect measures of agitation (staff or patient injuries, duration of agitative or aggressive episodes, subsequent violent episodes), and adverse events. The most common were time to calm and adverse events. There was little clarity about the superiority of any chemical method of managing behaviours of concern exhibited by patients in Emergency Departments or acute mental health settings. Not only is more targeted research essential, but best practice recommendations for such situations requires integrating expert input into the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eimear Muir-Cochrane
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Candice Oster
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Adam Gerace
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Suzanne Dawson
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Raechel Damarell
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Karen Grimmer
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Duxbury J, Baker J, Downe S, Jones F, Greenwood P, Thygesen H, McKeown M, Price O, Scholes A, Thomson G, Whittington R. Minimising the use of physical restraint in acute mental health services: The outcome of a restraint reduction programme (‘REsTRAIN YOURSELF’). Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 95:40-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 03/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
34
|
McKeown M, Thomson G, Scholes A, Jones F, Baker J, Downe S, Price O, Greenwood P, Whittington R, Duxbury J. "Catching your tail and firefighting": The impact of staffing levels on restraint minimization efforts. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2019; 26:131-141. [PMID: 31111648 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Revised: 03/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Mental health nursing in the UK and other countries faces an acute workforce crisis. Safe staffing levels are called for, and in some jurisdictions have been legislated for. The evidence base linking staffing levels and patient outcomes is limited. Staffing levels are implicated in adverse experiences of service users and staff within mental health ward settings, and they might contribute to levels of violence and aggression and the application of restrictive practices, such as physical restraint but there is limited research evidence to support this. Programmes such as Safewards, No Force First, the Engagement Model and the Six Core Strategies can reduce the use of restrictive practices. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Staffing levels on acute mental health wards appeared crucial in the implementation of a restraint minimization project. Both staff and service users implicate insufficient staffing for deficiencies in the relational elements of care, such as lack of face-to-face contact between nurses and service users. Similarly, staffing levels are associated with perceived problems in the cause of violence and aggression and responses to it. Despite successes in minimizing restrictive practices in this project, difficulties implementing alternative forms of practice that would reduce use of physical restraint, such as de-escalation, were also attributed to staffing levels. There is an irony that a project concerned with safety itself provoked concern over safe staffing levels. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Efforts to reduce restrictive practices will be hampered without adequate staffing levels. Restrictive practices may justifyably be framed as an employment relations matter. Organisations and policy makers ought to address environmental, contextual and resourcing factors, rather than identify problems exclusively in terms of perceived aberrant behaviour of staff or service users. ABSTRACT: Introduction Safe staffing and coercive practices are of pressing concern for mental health services. These are inter-dependent, and the relationship is under-researched. Aim To explore views on staffing levels in a context of attempting to minimize physical restraint practices on mental health wards. Findings emerged from a wider data set with the broader aim of exploring experiences of a restraint reduction initiative. Methods Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with staff (n = 130) and service users (n = 32). Results Five themes were identified regarding how staffing levels impact experiences and complicate efforts to minimize physical restraint. We titled the themes-"insufficient staff to do the job"; "detriment to staff and service users"; "a paperwork exercise: the burden of non-clinical tasks"; "false economies"; and, "you can't do these interventions." Discussion Tendencies detracting from relational aspects of care are not independent of insufficiencies in staffing. The relational, communicative and organizational developments that would enable reductions in use of restraint are labour intensive and vulnerable to derailment by insufficient and poorly skilled staff. Implications for practice Restrictive practices are unlikely to be minimized unless wards are adequately staffed. Inadequate staffing is not independent of restrictive practices and reduces access to alternative interventions for reducing individuals' distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mick McKeown
- School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Gill Thomson
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Amy Scholes
- School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | | | - John Baker
- School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Soo Downe
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Owen Price
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Richard Whittington
- Brøset Centre for Research & Education in Forensic Psychiatry, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joy Duxbury
- Faculty of Health, Psychology & Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tingleff EB, Hounsgaard L, Bradley SK, Wilson RL, Gildberg FA. A Matter of Trust and Distrust: A Qualitative Investigation of Parents' Perceptions About the Use of Mechanical Restraint on Their Adult Children in a Forensic Psychiatric Setting. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC NURSING 2019; 15:120-130. [PMID: 31116178 DOI: 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increased knowledge about forensic psychiatric patients' relatives' perceptions in regard to the use of mechanical restraint (MR) is necessary, if clinical practice is to be improved and to achieve a reduction in the use and frequency of MR. However, a specific knowledge deficit about relatives' perspectives on the use of MR limits the evidence base considerably. AIM The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions of MR held by relatives of forensic psychiatric patients' including factors impacting its use and duration. METHOD Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 parents of patients within a forensic psychiatry setting and thematically analyzed. FINDINGS Two main themes were identified, namely, "care and protection" and "inclusion and involvement," and one subtheme, "information." These themes revealed the framework used by parents to construct a sense of "trust or distrust" about the ability of staff to provide adequate and safe care for their adult children in the forensic psychiatric setting. CONCLUSION Some parents in this study considered that forensic psychiatric staff used MR as a necessary protection. However, most parents held strong negative perceptions regarding the use of MR and the quality and safety of care provision. It is apparent that parents in this study believed they should be included and involved in the care in situations associated with the use of MR, because they considered that this could reduce its use. Further research is required to target interventions to reduce the use and duration of MR episodes and to improve clinical practice in forensic psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rhonda L Wilson
- Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
| | - Frederik A Gildberg
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark
- Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tingleff EB, Hounsgaard L, Bradley SK, Gildberg FA. Forensic psychiatric patients' perceptions of situations associated with mechanical restraint: A qualitative interview study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:468-479. [PMID: 30341808 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To reduce the use and duration of mechanical restraint in forensic settings and ensure evidence-based patient care, we need more knowledge about patients' subjective experiences and perceptions. The aim was to investigate forensic psychiatric patients' perceptions of situations associated with the use of mechanical restraint and what they perceive as factors impacting the use and duration of mechanical restraint. Twenty participants were interviewed. Four themes were identified through a thematic analysis: 'overt protest reactions', 'silent protest reactions', 'illness-related behaviour', and 'genuinely calm', which together characterize patients' perceptions of their ways of acting and reacting during mechanical restraint episodes. These themes are linked together in two patterns in the process of mechanical restraint: 'pattern of protest' and 'pattern of illness'. Further research is needed to illuminate the associations between patients' perceptions of being subjected to mechanical restraint and ways of acting and reacting through the process of mechanical restraint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen B Tingleff
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital/Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,Department of Nursing, UCL University College, Vejle, Denmark.,Health Sciences Research Center, UCL University College, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lise Hounsgaard
- OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital/Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Health Sciences Research Center, UCL University College, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.,Institute of Nursing & Health Science, University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland
| | | | - Frederik A Gildberg
- Research & Development Unit, Department of Psychiatry Middelfart, Region of Southern Denmark, Middelfart, Denmark.,Center for Psychiatric Nursing and Health Research, Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Guzmán-Parra J, Aguilera-Serrano C, García-Sanchez JA, García-Spínola E, Torres-Campos D, Villagrán JM, Moreno-Küstner B, Mayoral-Cleries F. Experience coercion, post-traumatic stress, and satisfaction with treatment associated with different coercive measures during psychiatric hospitalization. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019; 28:448-456. [PMID: 30239098 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Coercive measures are frequently used in psychiatric hospitalization. However, there are few studies that analyse perceived coercion, post-traumatic stress, and subjective satisfaction with the hospitalization treatment associated with different types of coercive measures. The sample consisted of 111 patients admitted to two psychiatric units and divided into three groups based on the measure applied: involuntary medication (N = 41), mechanical restraint (N = 32), and combined measures (mechanical restraint and involuntary medication; N = 38). The outcome variables were perceived coercion evaluated with the Coercion Experience Scale (CES), post-traumatic stress evaluated with the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS), and satisfaction with the treatment evaluated with the Client's Assessment of Treatment (CAT). The results found higher levels of perceived coercion associated with the use of mechanical restraint (P = 0.002) and combined measures (P < 0.001) in comparison with involuntary medication. Additionally, in relation to post-traumatic stress, mechanical restraint (P = 0.013) and combined measures (P = 0.004) were more stressful compared to involuntary medication. Finally, the use of combined measures was associated with lower satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric treatment compared to the use of involuntary medication (P = 0.006). The following recommendation would be consistent with the results found: if a patient does not specify a preference for some type of measure, involuntary medication could be used and mechanical restraint avoided, especially when used in combination with involuntary medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Guzmán-Parra
- Department of Mental Health, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University General Hospital of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Carlos Aguilera-Serrano
- Department of Mental Health, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University General Hospital of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.,Andalucía Tech, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio García-Sanchez
- Department of Mental Health, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University General Hospital of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Berta Moreno-Küstner
- Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico, Grupo GAP, Faculty of Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
- Department of Mental Health, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), University General Hospital of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gowda GS, Lepping P, Ray S, Noorthoorn E, Nanjegowda RB, Kumar CN, Math SB. Clinician attitude and perspective on the use of coercive measures in clinical practice from tertiary care mental health establishment - A cross-sectional study. Indian J Psychiatry 2019; 61:151-155. [PMID: 30992609 PMCID: PMC6425791 DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_336_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of coercive measures in mental health care is an important issue for research. There are scarce data available on perception and attitudes toward coercion among Indian psychiatrists. AIMS This study aims to study psychiatrists' attitude and perspectives on the use of coercive measure in clinical practice against the background of family and patients' opinion. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted at the Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India. Psychiatrist in charge of the inpatients was asked about their general opinion on coercion and was administered Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale questionnaire. Findings were compared to previously published studies on patients' opinion and family opinion in the same sample. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Coercion proved to be a common measure applied in nearly 70% of the patients studied. The 189 psychiatrists participating in the study almost all perceived coercion as care, protection and safety, and as protection from dangerous situations. About 66% of psychiatrists perceived physical and chemical restraint (sedation) as necessary and acceptable in acute emergency care. One-third of the psychiatrists felt their patients lost autonomy, dignity, and the possibility of interpersonal contact. The same amount agreed that some patients could have been treated with less restriction and fewer coercive measures. CONCLUSION Psychiatrists felt that physical and chemical restraints are necessary and acceptable in acute emergencies. Most psychiatrists considered coercion as a caring protective and safety attitude but also acknowledged its potential negative impact on patient dignity and therapeutic relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guru S. Gowda
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Peter Lepping
- Bangor University, Centre for Mental Health and Society, Wales, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India
- Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Liaison Psychiatry, BCUHB, Wrexham, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Sujoy Ray
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Eric Noorthoorn
- GGNet Community Mental Health Centre, Warnsveld, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Suresh Bada Math
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Aguilera-Serrano C, Guzmán-Parra J, Miranda-Paez J, García-Spínola E, Torres-Campos D, Villagrán-Moreno JM, Moreno-Küstner B, García-Sanchez JA, Mayoral-Cleries F. Validation of a short version of the Coercion Experience Scale (CES-18): Psychometric characteristics in a Spanish sample. Psychiatry Res 2019; 272:284-289. [PMID: 30594761 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The Coercion Experience Scale (CES) is a questionnaire that evaluates the subjective experience of coercion during psychiatric hospitalization. This study aimed to assess a short version of the Coercion Experience Scale (CES-18) in a Spanish Sample (N = 114). Two authors independently selected the items, choosing those that could also be applied to the experience of coercion after the use of forced medication. Reliability was estimated using internal consistency coefficients. Internal validity was assessed by means of a factorial analysis based on the method of extraction of main components and using orthogonal rotation VARIMAX. Convergent and discriminatory validity was evaluated by correlation between the total score of the CES-18 with the original CES and a Visual Analogue Scale, The Davidson Trauma Scale and the Client Assessment of Treatment Scale. The CES-18 showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.940). Factor analysis resulted in a two-factor solution (Coercion and Humiliation and Fear) explaining 64.2% of the total variance. The correlation between the original CES and CES-18 was adequate (r = 0.968). The scores suggested good divergent and convergent validity. The Spanish language CES-18 demonstrated adequate psychometric proprieties in order to assess perceived coercion during psychiatric hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Aguilera-Serrano
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain; University of Málaga, Andalucía Tech, Faculty of Psychology, Málaga, Spain
| | - José Guzmán-Parra
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
| | - Jesús Miranda-Paez
- University of Málaga, Departamento de Psicobiología y Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Faculty of Psychology, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Berta Moreno-Küstner
- University of Málaga, Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico. Grupo GAP, Faculty of Psychology, Málaga, Spain
| | - Juan Antonio García-Sanchez
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Fermín Mayoral-Cleries
- Department of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Málaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rabenschlag F, Cassidy C, Steinauer R. Nursing Perspectives: Reflecting History and Informal Coercion in De-escalation Strategies. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:231. [PMID: 31105598 PMCID: PMC6491964 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Health professionals like nurses respond to aggression and violence with de-escalation techniques, and still often with coercive measures. Such measures applied by institutions are often rooted in historically grown traditions rather than evidence, reflection, or formation. In this article, we present de-escalation strategies integrating a high and critical awareness toward traditions and the practice of formal and informal coercion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Rabenschlag
- Department of Nursing Development and Research, University of Basel Psychiatric Clinics (UPK), Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Cassidy
- Department of Psychiatric Services of the Canton of Aargau (PDAG), Windisch, Switzerland
| | - Regine Steinauer
- Department of Nursing Development and Research, University of Basel Psychiatric Clinics (UPK), Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Spanish translation and analysis of the metric properties of inpatient satisfaction scale in psychiatry: The Satispsy-22-E. Psychiatry Res 2018; 268:8-14. [PMID: 29986179 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The Satispsy-22 scale is an instrument created for the specific evaluation of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction. Therefore, the study aims to carry out the Satispsy-22 scientific translation to Spanish and to learn its psychometric properties. The Satipsy-22-E was administered to discharged patients from four units of acute psychiatric admission, a unit of dual pathology and two units of subacute psychiatric admission (N = 268). Cronbach's alpha was 0.886, which can be interpreted as good internal reliability. All the dimensions showed a good internal consistency with scores from 0.722 to 0.919. Test-retest offered scores of 0.752-0.951 showing good stability. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all elements load in the estimated dimensions of the original scale and these were significant and the adjustment measures showed, in general, a rather good adjustment, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) showed that the error between observations and actual data is small and acceptable. Satispsy-22-E is a specific scale in Spanish language for the assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction. It is an easy to use tool that offers good psychometric properties. The availability of a validated survey in Spanish may help to improve the care provided by psychiatric wards in Spanish-speaking countries.
Collapse
|
42
|
Masters KJ. Seclusion and Restraint: The Voice of the Patient. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2018; 63:78-79. [PMID: 29129113 PMCID: PMC5788137 DOI: 10.1177/0706743717743207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kim J Masters
- 1 Three Rivers Midlands Campus Behavioral Health, West Columbia, SC, USA.,2 Wake Health Medical School, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|