Anti-C1q antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

OBJECTIVE

To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

RESULTS

All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

CONCLUSION

This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Double-Edged Sword: Exploring the Mitochondria-Complement Bidirectional Connection in Cellular Response and Disease

Mitochondria serve an ultimate purpose that seeks to balance the life and death of cells, a role that extends well beyond the tissue and organ systems to impact not only normal physiology but also the pathogenesis of diverse diseases. Theorized to have originated from ancient proto-bacteria, mitochondria share similarities with bacterial cells, including their own circular DNA, double-membrane structures, and fission dynamics. It is no surprise, then, that mitochondria interact with a bacterium-targeting immune pathway known as a complement system. The complement system is an ancient and sophisticated arm of the immune response that serves as the body's first line of defense against microbial invaders. It operates through a complex cascade of protein activations, rapidly identifying and neutralizing pathogens, and even aiding in the clearance of damaged cells and immune complexes. This dynamic system, intertwining innate and adaptive immunity, holds secrets to understanding numerous diseases. In this review, we explore the bidirectional interplay between mitochondrial dysfunction and the complement system through the release of mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns. Additionally, we explore several mitochondria- and complement-related diseases and the potential for new therapeutic strategies.

Management of Lupus Nephritis: New Treatments and Updated Guidelines

Management of lupus nephritis has evolved considerably over the past years. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of clinical trials that form the basis for the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes and EULAR/ERA-EDTA updated guidelines and present day trials that will change the landscape of lupus nephritis therapy in years to come. In addition, we highlight the issues related to cost of therapy, resistant disease, and downstream adverse effects of specific therapies.

Acquired Non-histaminergic Angioedema With C1q Autoantibody and Urticaria: A Case Report

Acquired angioedema (AAE) is a rare disease with life-threatening complications. This pathology has classically been associated with medication use and B cell lymphoproliferative disorders. In this report, we describe a 61-year-old man with a six-year history of angioedema, unrelated to any known triggers or malignancy. Extensive workup has led to a diagnosis of idiopathic nonhistaminergic AAE with normal C1 inhibitor. The patient is currently being treated with lanadelumab, which has resolved the patient's symptoms. This case provides insight into the onset, exploration, treatment, and outcomes of an extremely rare disease process.

The Immunodiagnostic Utility of Antinuclear Antibody Patterns: A Prediction for Renal Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia

Objectives Previous studies have noted associations between the immunofluorescence patterns of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) and the autoimmune responses seen in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In this study, the authors tested the hypothesis of whether ANA patterns predict renal involvement in SLE patients. Method A retrospective study was carried out on consecutive SLE patients who had ANA staining pattern data and who were screened for renal involvement defined as all-stage proteinuria or chronic kidney disease (CKD) at a referral tertiary center in western Saudi Arabia from December 2021 to February 2022. Demographic data and levels of lupus immune markers including ANA titers, anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid antibodies (anti-dsDNA), complements C3 and C4, anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM, anti-β2 glycoprotein (β2-IgM and β2-IgG), and lupus anticoagulant (LA) antibodies were collected. Result Among 243 patients included, 25.1% had renal involvement (95% confidence interval {CI}=19.8-31.0). A mixed ANA pattern was associated with a higher prevalence of renal involvement (46.2%), followed by homogenous (26.5%) and speckled (25.6%) patterns, compared with 4.5% for the other patterns (p=0.044). No further association of renal involvement was observed with other biological markers. Adjusted logistic regression showed age (odds ratio {OR}=0.95; 95% CI=0.92-0.97) and mixed ANA pattern (OR=26.66; 95% CI=2.53-281.11) to be independently associated with renal involvement, explaining 12.6% of the variance. Conclusion A mixed homogenous/speckled ANA staining pattern is associated with an increased risk of renal involvement, independent of ANA titer or other lupus immune markers. The potential clinical applications of the ANA staining pattern in SLE should be explored in various subtypes of SLE and patient groups.

Anti-KIF20B autoantibodies in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: Their high prevalence in systemic lupus erythematosus

The kinesin superfamily protein 20B (KIF20B), also known as M-phase phosphoprotein-1, is a plus-end-directed motor enzyme for cytokinesis. Anti-KIF20B antibodies have been reported in idiopathic ataxia, but no previous studies have examined anti-KIF20B antibodies in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). We aimed to establish methods for detecting anti-KIF20B antibodies and to investigate the clinical significance of these antibodies in SARDs. Serum samples from 597 patients with various SARDs and 46 healthy controls (HCs) were included. Fifty-nine samples that had been examined by immunoprecipitation using the recombinant KIF20B protein produced by in vitro transcription/translation were used for establishing the ELISA cutoff with the same recombinant protein for measuring the anti-KIF20B antibodies. The ELISA performed well, showing close agreement with the immunoprecipitation results (Cohen's κ >0.8). The ELISA results for 643 samples showed the prevalence of anti-KIF20B to be higher in the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients than in the HCs (18/89 vs. 3/46, P = 0.045). Since no SARD other than SLE had higher frequencies of anti-KIF20B antibodies than those of the HCs, we investigated the clinical characteristics of anti-KIF20B antibody-positive cases in SLE. The score on the SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) was significantly higher for the anti-KIF20B-positive SLE patients than for the anti-KIF20B-negative SLE patients (P = 0.013). In a multivariate regression analysis of the anti-single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid, anti-double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid, and anti-KIF20B antibodies, the presence of anti-KIF20B antibody was significantly associated with high SLEDAI-2K scores (P = 0.003). Anti-KIF20B antibodies were found in ~20% of patients with SLE and were associated with high SLEDAI-2K scores. Much larger cohort and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the association between anti-KIF20B antibodies and SLE.

The complement system and human autoimmune diseases

Genetic deficiencies of early components of the classical complement activation pathway (especially C1q, r, s, and C4) are the strongest monogenic causal factors for the prototypic autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but their prevalence is extremely rare. In contrast, isotype genetic deficiency of C4A and acquired deficiency of C1q by autoantibodies are frequent among patients with SLE. Here we review the genetic basis of complement deficiencies in autoimmune disease, discuss the complex genetic diversity seen in complement C4 and its association with autoimmune disease, provide guidance as to when clinicians should suspect and test for complement deficiencies, and outline the current understanding of the mechanisms relating complement deficiencies to autoimmunity. We focus primarily on SLE, as the role of complement in SLE is well-established, but will also discuss other informative diseases such as inflammatory arthritis and myositis.

Lupus nephritis as a specific clinical and immunological phenotype of systemic lupus erythematosus

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the leading cause of death in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), so its early detection and treatment is of utmost importance. Features of the onset, clinical signs, certain morphological classes, as well as more aggressive therapy make it possible to assign SLE with LN to a distinct disease phenotype.

Objective: to characterize the clinical, immunological and morphological features of the SLE phenotype with a predominant kidney involvement based on a comparative analysis of patients with LN and without LN.

Patients and methods. The study included 400 patients with SLE who met the 2012 SLICC criteria and were hospitalized to V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology from 2013 to 2021. The diagnosis of LN was established in 192 (48%) patients, of which in 82 (43%) it was confirmed by pathological study of kidney biopsy specimens (the SLE group with LN). In 208 (52%) patients, no kidney damage was observed, and they constituted the SLE group without LN.

All patients underwent a standard examination with an assessment of disease activity according to the SLEDAI-2K index, irreversible changes in organs according to the SLICC damage index, immunological disorders, clinical and biochemical blood tests, urinalysis according to unified methods, glomerular filtration rate, as well as pathological examination of kidney biopsy specimens for confirmation of LN in the presence of an appropriate clinical picture. In patients of both groups, a comparative study of the main clinical, laboratory, immunological manifestations of SLE, the features of the disease onset, its first clinical signs, possible trigger factors, and the drugs used was carried out.

Results and discussion. In the LN group, insolation was more likely to trigger the development of SLE than in the group without LN (respectively, in 26% and 13% of cases; p=0.007). In turn, SLE without kidney damage more often than SLE with LN debuted during pregnancy or after childbirth.

The first signs of the disease in almost 40% of patients with LN were proteinuria and/or changes in urinary sediment, edema, increased blood pressure, the development of LN in some cases was preceded by polyarthritis or combined lesions of the skin and joints, but no later than 6 months, signs of kidney damage appeared. In the SLE group without LN, polyarthritis (in 33%), combined lesions of the skin and joints (in 26%), and Raynaud's syndrome (in 16%; p <0.0001) were more often observed at the onset. In patients with LN, erythematous lesions of the facial skin ("butterfly", in 42%), serositis (exudative pleuritis — in 44%, pericarditis — in 46%, ascites and hydrothorax — in 5%; p<0.0001), as well as hematological disorders such as anemia (in 63%), leukopenia (in 49%) and thrombocytopenia (in 42%) were present more frequently. With the development of LN, an acute course and high activity of the disease occurred significantly more often. In the study of immunological parameters in the group without LN, lupus anticoagulant (in 6%) and antibodies to SS-A/Ro and SS-B/La (in 18 and 9% of patients, respectively) were detected significantly more often, while in the LN group — hypocomplementemia (in 81%; p<0.0001). Therapy also differed significantly: patients with LN received higher doses of glucocorticoids (p<0.0001), mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide.

Conclusion. SLE with LN can be considered a distinct disease phenotype with a set of characteristics (clinical and laboratory parameters, response to therapy, prognosis) that distinguish it from other SLE variants.

Diagnostic test accuracy of novel biomarkers for lupus nephritis-An overview of systematic reviews

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with multiorgan inflammatory involvement and a mortality rate that is 2.6-fold higher than individuals of the same age and sex in the general population. Approximately 50% of patients with SLE develop renal impairment (lupus nephritis). Delayed diagnosis of lupus nephritis is associated with a higher risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, the need for replacement therapy, and mortality. The initial clinical manifestations of lupus nephritis are often discrete or absent and are usually detected through complementary tests. Although widely used in clinical practice, their accuracy is limited. A great scientific effort has been exerted towards searching for new, more sensitive, and specific biomarkers in recent years. Some systematic reviews have individually evaluated new serum and urinary biomarkers tested in patients with lupus nephritis. This overview aimed to summarize systematic reviews on the accuracy of novel serum and urinary biomarkers for diagnosing lupus nephritis in patients with SLE, discussing how our results can guide the clinical management of the disease and the direction of research in this area.

METHODS

The research question is "What is the accuracy of the new serum and urinary biomarkers studied for the diagnosis of LN in patients with SLE?". We searched for systematic reviews of observational studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of new serum or urinary biomarkers of lupus nephritis. The following databases were included: PubMed, EMBASE, BIREME/LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, including gray literature found via Google Scholar and PROQUEST. Two authors assessed the reviews for inclusion, data extraction, and assessment of the risk of bias (ROBIS tool).

RESULTS

Ten SRs on the diagnostic accuracy of new serum and urinary BMs in LN were selected. The SRs evaluated 7 distinct BMs: (a) antibodies (anti-Sm, anti-RNP, and anti-C1q), (b) cytokines (TWEAK and MCP-1), (c) a chemokine (IP-10), and (d) an acute phase glycoprotein (NGAL), in a total of 20 review arms (9 that analyzed serum BMs, and 12 that analyzed BMs in urine). The population evaluated in the primary studies was predominantly adults. Two SRs included strictly adults, 5 reviews also included studies in the paediatric population, and 4 did not report the age groups. The results of the evaluation with the ROBIS tool showed that most of the reviews had a low overall risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 10 SRs of evidence relating to the diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary biomarkers for lupus nephritis. Among the BMs evaluated, anti-C1q, urinary MCP-1, TWEAK, and NGAL stood out, highlighting the need for additional research, especially on LN diagnostic panels, and attempting to address methodological issues within diagnostic accuracy research. This would allow for a better understanding of their usefulness and possibly validate their clinical use in the future.

REGISTRATION

This project is registered on the International Prospective Registry of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42020196693).

The Role of Autoantibody Testing in Modern Personalized Medicine

Personalized medicine (PM) aims individualized approach to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Precision Medicine applies the paradigm of PM by defining groups of individuals with akin characteristics. Often the two terms have been used interchangeably. The quest for PM has been advancing for centuries as traditional nosology classification defines groups of clinical conditions with relatively similar prognoses and treatment options. However, any individual is characterized by a unique set of multiple characteristics and therefore the achievement of PM implies the determination of myriad demographic, epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters. The accelerated identification of numerous biological variables associated with diverse health conditions contributes to the fulfillment of one of the pre-requisites for PM. The advent of multiplex analytical platforms contributes to the determination of thousands of biological parameters using minute amounts of serum or other biological matrixes. Finally, big data analysis and machine learning contribute to the processing and integration of the multiplexed data at the individual level, allowing for the personalized definition of susceptibility, diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, and treatment. Autoantibodies are traditional biomarkers for autoimmune diseases and can contribute to PM in many aspects, including identification of individuals at risk, early diagnosis, disease sub-phenotyping, definition of prognosis, and treatment, as well as monitoring disease activity. Herein we address how autoantibodies can promote PM in autoimmune diseases using the examples of systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and autoimmune neurologic diseases.

Overview on the role of complement-specific autoantibodies in diseases

The complement system is recognized as a major pathogenic or contributing factor in an ever-growing number of diseases. In addition to inherited factors, autoantibodies to complement proteins have been detected in various systemic and organ-specific disorders. These include antibodies directed against complement components, regulators and receptors, but also protein complexes such as autoantibodies against complement convertases. In some cases, the autoantibodies are relatively well characterized and a pathogenic role is incurred and their detection has diagnostic value. In other cases, the relevance of the autoantibodies is rather unclear. This review summarizes what we know of complement specific autoantibodies in diseases and identifies unresolved questions regarding their functional effect and relevance.

Autoantibodies against Complement Classical Pathway Components C1q, C1r, C1s and C1-Inh in Patients with Lupus Nephritis

Autoantibodies against the complement component C1q (anti-C1q) are among the main biomarkers in lupus nephritis (LN) known to contribute to renal injury. C1q, the recognition subcomponent of the complement classical pathway, forms a heterotetrameric complex with C1r and C1s, and can also associate a central complement regulator and C1 Inhibitor (C1-Inh). However, the frequency and the pathogenic relevance of anti-C1r, anti-C1s and anti-C1-Inh autoantibodies remain poorly studied in LN. In this paper, we screened for anti-C1q, anti-C1r, anti-C1s and anti-C1-Inh autoantibodies and evaluated their association with disease activity and severity in 74 LN patients followed up for 5 years with a total of 266 plasma samples collected. The presence of anti-C1q, anti-C1r, anti-C1s and anti-C1-Inh was assessed by ELISA. IgG was purified by Protein G from antigen-positive plasma and their binding to purified C1q, C1r and C1s was examined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The abilities of anti-C1q, anti-C1r and anti-C1s binding IgG on C1 complex formation were analyzed by ELISA. The screening of LN patients’ plasma revealed 14.9% anti-C1q positivity; only 4.2%, 6.9% and 0% were found to be positive for anti-C1r, anti-C1s and anti-C1-Inh, respectively. Significant correlations were found between anti-C1q and anti-dsDNA, and anti-nuclear antibodies, C3 and C4, respectively. High levels of anti-C1q antibodies were significantly associated with renal histologic lesions and correlated with histological activity index. Patients with the most severe disease (A class according to BILAG Renal score) had higher levels of anti-C1q antibodies. Anti-C1r and anti-C1s antibodies did not correlate with the clinical characteristics of the LN patients, did not interfere with the C1 complex formation, and were not measurable via SPR. In conclusion, the presence of anti-C1q, but not anti-C1s or anti-C1r, autoantibodies contribute to the autoimmune pathology and the severity of LN.

Comparison of circulating miR-148a and miR-126 with autoantibodies as biomarkers of lupus nephritis in patients with SLE

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the main manifestation of systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and autoantibodies could be suitable candidate biomarkers of LN. This study evaluates the expression of circulating miR-148a and miR-126 along with anti-dsDNA, anti-C1q, and anti-C3b autoantibodies in SLE patients with LN (SLE + LN). 30 women with SLE, 30 women with SLE + LN, and 25 women as healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled in this study. The plasma expression of selected miRNAs was evaluated by real-time PCR. The serum level of anti-dsDNA, C1q, and C3b antibodies was measured by the ELISA. The expression of miR-148a was significantly increased in SLE and SLE+LN groups compared with the control group. No significant difference was found in the expression of miR-126 among the groups. The frequency of autoantibodies was significantly higher in the SLE + LN group than SLE. The Higher levels of circulating miR-148a in the SLE samples compared with the HCs suggest that this miRNA could be a reliable biomarker for SLE patients (with or without LN). Also, autoantibodies against dsDNA, C1q, and, C3 could be used for the prediction of SLE nephritis, independently. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Classical complement pathway factor alterations in narcolepsy

OBJECTIVE

Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder long hypothesised to be an autoimmune disease. Complement-mediated immune mechanisms have not been investigated in detail in narcolepsy. Our aim was to establish the significance of classical pathway activation in narcolepsy.

METHODS

Sera of 42 narcolepsy patients and 26 healthy controls were screened with ELISA to determine the levels of C1q, C3a, C4d and complement component 4 binding protein (C4BP). A home-made ELISA method was developed to detect antibodies to C4BP-alpha (anti-C4BPA). The correlation between complement levels and clinical findings was examined.

RESULTS

C1q levels were significantly higher in narcolepsy patients while C4d and C4BP levels were significantly lower compared to healthy controls. C3a levels were comparable among patients and controls. Eleven narcolepsy patients showed serum anti-C4BPA levels. Total rapid eye movements (REM) time, sleep onset latency, REM sleep latency, sleep activity, percentage of wakefulness after sleep onset and Epworth sleepiness scale scores were correlated with levels of different complement factors.

CONCLUSION

Complement-mediated immune mechanisms might partake in narcolepsy pathogenesis. The precise role of autoantibodies on complement level alterations needs to be investigated. Levels of complement factors and degradation products may potentially be utilised as biomarkers to predict the clinical severity of narcolepsy.

Understanding the Concept of Pre-Clinical Autoimmunity: Prediction and Prevention of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Identifying Risk Factors and Developing Strategies Against Disease Development

There is growing evidence that preceding the diagnosis or classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), patients undergo a preclinical phase of disease where markers of inflammation and autoimmunity are already present. Not surprisingly then, even though SLE management has improved over the years, many patients will already have irreversible disease-related organ damage by time they have been diagnosed with SLE. By gaining a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of preclinical SLE, we can potentially identify patients earlier in the disease course who are at-risk of transitioning to full-blown SLE and implement preventative strategies. In this review, we discuss the current state of knowledge of SLE preclinical pathogenesis and propose a screening and preventative strategy that involves the use of promising biomarkers of early disease, modification of lifestyle and environmental risk factors, and initiation of preventative therapies, as examined in other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes.

Epitope-Specific Anti-C1q Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complement C1q is frequently targeted by autoantibodies (anti-C1q), that correlate best with active renal disease. Anti-C1q bind to largely unknown epitopes on the collagen-like region (CLR) of this highly functional molecule. Here we aimed at exploring the role of epitope-specific anti-C1q in SLE patients.

Methods

First, 22 sera of SLE patients, healthy controls and anti-C1q positive patients without SLE were screened for anti-C1q epitopes by a PEPperMAP^® microarray, expressing CLR of C1q derived peptides with one amino acid (AA) shift in different lengths and conformations. Afterwards, samples of 378 SLE patients and 100 healthy blood donors were analyzed for antibodies against the identified epitopes by peptide-based ELISA. Relationships between peptide-specific autoantibodies and SLE disease manifestations were explored by logistic regression models.

Results

The epitope mapping showed increased IgG binding to three peptides of the C1q A- and three of the C1q B-chain. In subsequent peptide-based ELISAs, SLE sera showed significantly higher binding to two N-terminally located C1q A-chain peptides than controls (p < 0.0001), but not to the other peptides. While anti-C1q were associated with a broad spectrum of disease manifestations, some of the peptide-antibodies were associated with selected disease manifestations, and antibodies against the N-terminal C1q A-chain showed a stronger discrimination between SLE and controls than conventional anti-C1q.

Conclusion

In this large explorative study anti-C1q correlate with SLE overall disease activity. In contrast, peptide-antibodies are associated with specific aspects of the disease suggesting epitope-specific effects of anti-C1q in patients with SLE.

Clinical and Immunological Biomarkers for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by immune system dysfunction and is clinically heterogeneous, exhibiting renal, dermatological, neuropsychiatric, and cardiovascular symptoms. Clinical and physiological assessment is usually inadequate for diagnosing and assessing pathophysiological processes in SLE. Clinical and immunological biomarkers could play a critical role in improving diagnosis, assessment, and ultimately, control of SLE. This article reviews clinical and immunological biomarkers that could diagnose and monitor disease activity in SLE, with and without organ-specific injury. In addition, novel SLE biomarkers that have been discovered through “omics” research are also reviewed.

Autoantibody-mediated impairment of DNASE1L3 activity in sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus

Antibodies to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) are prevalent in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly in patients with lupus nephritis, yet the nature and regulation of antigenic cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are poorly understood. Null mutations in the secreted DNase DNASE1L3 cause human monogenic SLE with anti-dsDNA autoreactivity. We report that >50% of sporadic SLE patients with nephritis manifested reduced DNASE1L3 activity in circulation, which was associated with neutralizing autoantibodies to DNASE1L3. These patients had normal total plasma cfDNA levels but showed accumulation of cfDNA in circulating microparticles. Microparticle-associated cfDNA contained a higher fraction of longer polynucleosomal cfDNA fragments, which bound autoantibodies with higher affinity than mononucleosomal fragments. Autoantibodies to DNASE1L3-sensitive antigens on microparticles were prevalent in SLE nephritis patients and correlated with the accumulation of cfDNA in microparticles and with disease severity. DNASE1L3-sensitive antigens included DNA-associated proteins such as HMGB1. Our results reveal autoantibody-mediated impairment of DNASE1L3 activity as a common nongenetic mechanism facilitating anti-dsDNA autoreactivity in patients with severe sporadic SLE.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: The search for the ideal biomarker

During the last decades, there has been an increased interest in the discovery and validation of biomarkers that reliably reflect specific aspects of lupus. Although many biomarkers have been developed, few of them have been validated and used in clinical practice, but with unsatisfactory performances. Thus, there is still a need to rigorously validate many of these novel promising biomarkers in large-scale longitudinal studies and also identify better biomarkers not only for lupus diagnosis but also for monitoring and predicting upcoming flares and response to treatment. Besides serological biomarkers, urinary and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers have emerged for assessing both renal and central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus, respectively. Also, novel omics techniques help us to understand the molecular basis of the disease and also allow the identification of novel biomarkers which may be potentially useful for guiding new therapeutic targets.

Complement system network in cell physiology and in human diseases

The complement system is a multi-functional system representing the first line host defense against pathogens in innate immune response, through three different pathways. Impairment of its function, consisting in deficiency or excessive deregulated activation, may lead to severe systemic infections or autoimmune disorders. These diseases may be inherited or acquired. Despite many diagnostic tools are currently available, ranging from traditional, such as hemolytic or ELISA based assays, to innovative ones, like next generation sequencing techniques, these diseases are often not recognized. As for therapeutic aspects, strategies based on the use of targeted drugs are now widespread. The aim of this review is to present an updated overview of complement system pathophysiology, clinical implications of its dysfunction and to summarize diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

The Complement System in the Pathophysiology of Pregnancy and in Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases During Pregnancy

The complement system plays a double role in pregnancy exerting both protective and damaging effects at placental level. Complement activation at fetal-maternal interface participates in protection against infectious agents and helps remove apoptotic and necrotic cells. Locally synthesized C1q contributes to the physiologic vascular remodeling of spiral arteries characterized by loss of smooth muscle cells and transformation into large dilated vessels. Complement activation triggered by the inflammatory process induced by embryo implantation can damage trophoblast and other decidual cells that may lead to pregnancy complications if the cells are not protected by the complement regulators CD55, CD46, and CD59 expressed on cell surface. However, uncontrolled complement activation induces placental alterations resulting in adverse pregnancy outcomes. This may occur in pathological conditions characterized by placental localization of complement fixing antibodies directed against beta2-glycoprotein 1, as in patients with anti-phospholipid syndrome, or circulating immune complexes deposited in placenta, as in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. In other diseases, such as preeclampsia, the mechanism of complement activation responsible for complement deposits in placenta is unclear. Conflicting results have been reported on the relevance of complement assays as diagnostic and prognostic tools to assess complement involvement in pregnant patients with these disorders.

Classical complement activation on human erythrocytes in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus and a history of autoimmune hemolytic anemia

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In order to more fully understand the causative pathways, we utilized sera from subjects with SLE and active AIHA, or a history of AIHA, to evaluate the classical complement pathway, anti-erythrocyte antibodies, and immune complexes.

METHODS

To evaluate antibody-mediated complement activation on the surface of erythrocytes, as occurs in AIHA, blood type O erythrocytes were incubated with sera from 19 subjects with SLE and a history of AIHA. Circulating anti-erythrocyte antibodies and immune complexes were measured with ELISA-based assays.

RESULTS

In total, 90% of subjects with SLE and a history of AIHA, but not active clinical hemolysis, had measurable anti-erythrocyte antibodies. Of those with anti-erythrocyte antibody, 53% demonstrated complement opsonization on the erythrocyte surface >twofold above negative control and 29% generated the anaphylatoxin C5a.

CONCLUSIONS

For subjects with SLE and a history of AIHA, the persistence of circulating anti-erythrocyte antibodies and resultant erythrocyte complement opsonization and anaphylatoxin generation suggests the possibility that these complement effectors contribute to chronic morbidity and risk of AIHA relapse.

The clinical and serological associations of hypocomplementemia in a longitudinal sle cohort

BACKGROUND

In SLE, low complement is an important serological manifestation. Recent classification criteria include hypocomplementemia and one gives additional weight if both C3 and C4 are low. We evaluated patients with a history of, and those with persistently, low complement. As complement activation occurs in the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, an analysis was also performed on those with positive antiphospholipid antibodies to evaluate thrombotic outcomes.

METHODS

In a longitudinal SLE cohort, organ manifestations, damage, C3, C4 and antiphospholipid antibodies were assessed quarterly. Using univariate and multivariate methods we compared those with and without a history of low C3, low C4 and both. We evaluated those who had a history of low complement at any time point, and those who had persistent hypocomplementemia. Further analysis considered thrombotic outcomes in patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies and a history of low complement.

RESULTS

2399 patients were evaluated. Fifty-five percent had a history of low C3 and 47% low C4; 83 (4%) had persistently low C3 and 65 (3.2%) had persistently low C4. Hematological, renal and serological abnormalities associated with a history of low C3 but not low C4. With anticardiolipin antibodies, a history of hypocomplementemia (both C3 and C4 low) associated with stroke and deep venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Low C4 was a weak marker in terms of the associated clinical and serological manifestations. Low C3 associated with renal involvement and poor renal outcomes. A history of both low C3 and C4 associated with stroke in the presence of lupus anticoagulant or anticardiolipin antibodies, and low C4 with digital gangrene (with lupus anticoagulant).

Anti-C1q antibodies in lupus nephritis and their correlation with the disease activity

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune connective tissue disorder. Renal involvement usually develops in the first few years of illness and should be detected early by periodic urine analysis and quantitation of proteinuria. The aim of our work was to evaluate the biological marker [anti-complement 1q antibodies (anti-C1q Ab)] in lupus nephritis (LN) patients and its correlation to SLE disease activity. Sixty-five subjects were divided into four groups; Group I: SLE patients with LN (proteinuria >0.5 g/day), Group II: SLE patients without LN (all of them had a lupus flares rather than nephritis; active nonrenal), Group III: SLE patients without any activity (inactive disease), and Group IV: Control group. All subjects underwent urine analysis, complete blood picture, liver function tests, kidney function tests, albumin/ creatinine ratio, antinuclear antibody, anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody, C3, C4, and anti-C1q Ab. All patients in the first group underwent renal biopsy and pathological diagnosis showed: Class II in two patients, Class III and IV in nine patients, and Class V in four patients. Anti-C1q Ab were found in the serum of SLE patients and not in the control group and showed an association with active lupus with much higher concentration in active renal group, specifically those with severe renal histological lesions (proliferative form). There was significant statistical positive correlation between anti-C1q Ab with anti-dsDNA and SLE disease activity index in both active groups. There was statistically significant negative correlation between anti-C1q Ab with C3 and C4 in both active groups. Anti-C1q Ab could be used as useful marker for active lupus, especially with nephritis.

Clinical and functional consequences of anti-properdin autoantibodies in patients with lupus nephritis

Properdin is the only positive regulator of the complement system. In this study, we characterize the prevalence, functional consequences and disease associations of autoantibodies against properdin in a cohort of patients with autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) suffering from lupus nephritis (LN). We detected autoantibodies against properdin in plasma of 22·5% of the LN patients (16 of 71) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The binding of these autoantibodies to properdin was dose-dependent and was validated by surface plasmon resonance. Higher levels of anti-properdin were related to high levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-nuclear antibodies and low concentrations of C3 and C4 in patients, and also with histological signs of LN activity and chronicity. The high negative predictive value (NPV) of anti-properdin and anti-dsDNA combination suggested that patients who are negative for both anti-properdin and anti-dsDNA will not have severe nephritis. Immunoglobulin G from anti-properdin-positive patients' plasma increased the C3b deposition on late apoptotic cells by flow cytometry. Nevertheless, these IgGs did not modify substantially the binding of properdin to C3b, the C3 convertase C3bBb and the pro-convertase C3bB, evaluated by surface plasmon resonance. In conclusion, anti-properdin autoantibodies exist in LN patients. They have weak but relevant functional consequences, which could have pathological significance.

Association of Urine sCD163 With Proliferative Lupus Nephritis, Fibrinoid Necrosis, Cellular Crescents and Intrarenal M2 Macrophages

CD163 is a marker for alternatively activated macrophages, which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (LN). In our preliminary screening of urine proteins in LN, urine soluble CD163 (sCD163) was significantly elevated in patients with active LN. To evaluate the potential of sCD163 as a biomarker in LN, urine sCD163 was assayed in patients with active LN, active non-renal lupus patients (ANR), inactive SLE and healthy controls (HC), using ELISA and normalized to urine creatinine. The correlation of urine sCD163 with clinical parameters and renal pathological attributes was further investigated in LN patients with concurrent renal biopsies. A total of 228 SLE patients and 56 HC were included from three cohorts. Results demonstrated that urine sCD163 was significantly elevated in active LN when compared with HC, inactive SLE, or ANR in African-American, Caucasian and Asian subjects (all P < 0.001). In LN patients with concurrent renal biopsies, urine sCD163 was significantly increased in patients with proliferative LN when compared with non-proliferative LN (P < 0.001). Urine sCD163 strongly correlated with SLEDAI, rSLEDAI, activity index (AI) of renal pathology, fibrinoid necrosis, cellular crescents, and interstitial inflammation on biopsies (all P < 0.01). Macrophages, particularly M2 macrophages, the predominant cells expressing CD163 within LN kidneys, represented a potential source of elevated urine sCD163, based on single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. To conclude, urine sCD163 discriminated patients with active LN from other SLE patients and was significantly elevated in proliferative LN. It strongly correlated with concurrent AI and several specific pathological attributes, demonstrating its potential in predicting renal pathology.

Wire-loop lesion is associated with serological immune abnormality, but not renal prognosis, in lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Wire-loop lesion (WL) is one of the active lesions of lupus nephritis (LN). However, few reports have focused on the clinicopathological relationships of WL to serological immune abnormality and renal prognosis.

METHODS

We enrolled 126 Japanese LN patients subjected to renal biopsy in 11 hospitals from 2000 to 2018. In patients with class III or IV of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification, we retrospectively compared clinicopathological findings between those with WL (WL+ group) and without WL (WL- group) to detect factors associated with WL. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73m² for more than three months. We also compared these findings between those with CKD (CKD+ group) and without CKD (CKD- group) at the last visit to investigate factors associated with renal prognosis.

RESULTS

Of 126 patients, 100 (79.4%) were classified as class III or IV. WL was found in 36 (36.0%) of them. Although the renal function did not differ, the WL+ group had a higher titre of serum anti-dsDNA antibodies and lower serum complement 3 levels than the WL- group. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association only between anti-dsDNA antibodies and WL (β = 0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.001-0.100, p = 0.01). Of these patients, 69 were tracked for 59.6 ± 55.1 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in renal prognosis between these groups. Next, the CKD+ group included 15 (22.1%) patients. They were older and had higher frequencies of hypertension and hyperuricaemia, serum creatinine (Cr) level, glomerulosclerosis, interstitial inflammation, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy than the CKD- group at the time of renal biopsy. The frequency of WL was not significantly different. Cox regression analysis revealed significant associations of CKD with hypertension, hyperuricaemia, serum Cr level at the time of renal biopsy clinically and with tubular atrophy histologically.

CONCLUSIONS

WL was associated with serum anti-dsDNA antibodies but not with renal prognosis, suggesting that WL reflects immune abnormality but is not an independent factor predictive of renal prognosis in LN.

Mercury-induced autoimmunity: Drifting from micro to macro concerns on autoimmune disorders

Mercury (Hg) is widely recognized as a neurotoxic metal, besides it can also act as a proinflammatory agent and immunostimulant, depending on individual exposure and susceptibility. Mercury exposure may arise from internal body pathways, such as via dental amalgams, preservatives in drugs and vaccines, and seafood consumption, or even from external pathways, i.e., occupational exposure, environmental pollution, and handling of metallic items and cosmetics containing Hg. In susceptible individuals, chronic low Hg exposure may trigger local and systemic inflammation, even exacerbating the already existing autoimmune response in patients with autoimmunity. Mercury exposure can trigger dysfunction of the autoimmune responses and aggravate immunotoxic effects associated with elevated serum autoantibodies titers. The purpose of the present review is to provide a critical overview of the many issues associated with Hg exposure and autoimmunity. In addition, the paper focuses on individual susceptibility and other health effects of Hg.

Lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a form of glomerulonephritis that constitutes one of the most severe organ manifestations of the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Most patients with SLE who develop LN do so within 5 years of an SLE diagnosis and, in many cases, LN is the presenting manifestation resulting in the diagnosis of SLE. Understanding of the genetic and pathogenetic basis of LN has improved substantially over the past few decades. Treatment of LN usually involves immunosuppressive therapy, typically with mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide and with glucocorticoids, although these treatments are not uniformly effective. Despite increased knowledge of disease pathogenesis and improved treatment options, LN remains a substantial cause of morbidity and death among patients with SLE. Within 10 years of an initial SLE diagnosis, 5-20% of patients with LN develop end-stage kidney disease, and the multiple comorbidities associated with immunosuppressive treatment, including infections, osteoporosis and cardiovascular and reproductive effects, remain a concern. Clearly, early and accurate diagnosis of LN and prompt initiation of therapy are of vital importance to improve outcomes in patients with SLE.

Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

In November 2017, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) initiative brought a diverse panel of experts in glomerular diseases together to discuss the 2012 KDIGO glomerulonephritis guideline in the context of new developments and insights that had occurred over the years since its publication. During this KDIGO Controversies Conference on Glomerular Diseases, the group examined data on disease pathogenesis, biomarkers, and treatments to identify areas of consensus and areas of controversy. This report summarizes the discussions on primary podocytopathies, lupus nephritis, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated nephritis, complement-mediated kidney diseases, and monoclonal gammopathies of renal significance.

Clinical Complement Analysis-An Overview

The complement system plays an important role in varying types of disease, ranging from inflammatory and autoimmune disorders to immune deficiency states. In addition, new settings have emerged where complement analysis is of interest to monitor complement-directed therapy and aid identification of transplant complications. Therefore, it is critical that clinical laboratories offer optimized and timely complement analysis. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the most important complement analysis methods that are currently used. It also points to some areas within complement diagnostics where development is needed, for example, regarding certain analytes for which practical methods suitable for the routine laboratory are lacking. Furthermore, it contains a more detailed discussion on complement autoantibody assessment. The list of analyses providing clinically valuable information includes analysis of complement function, quantification of individual complement components and complement activation fragments, identification of autoantibodies to complement, as well as genetic complement analyses. There is still a shortage of commercially available methods suitable for high-throughput screening of complement deficiency and for assessment of complement activation, but development is under way. There is also ongoing work within the complement community to improve standardization of measurements, and recently, an extensive quality assurance program has been initiated.

Utilization of Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in up to 60% of SLE patients, and is a leading cause of disability and death. Current treatment of LN consists of a combination of high dose corticosteroids that non-specifically decrease inflammation and cytotoxic medications that reduce auto-antibody production. That combination of therapy is associated with significant side effects while remission rates remain inadequate. Since the introduction of biologics into the pharmacological armamentarium, there has been hope for less toxic and more effective therapies for LN. Unfortunately, after multiple clinical trials, no biologic has improved efficacy over standard of care therapies for LN. This is likely, in part, due to disease heterogeneity. The utilization of biomarkers in LN may provide a way to stratify patients and guide therapeutic options. In this review, we summarize traditional and novel LN biomarkers and discuss how they may be used to diagnose, stratify, and guide therapy in patients with LN, bringing precision medicine to the forefront of LN therapy.

Preclinical and early systemic lupus erythematosus

The challenge of early diagnosis and treatment is a timely issue in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), as autoimmunity starts earlier than its clinical manifestations. Hence, growing efforts for stratification of patients according to the individual risk of developing specific clinical manifestations and/or predicting a better response to a given treatment have led to the proposal of several biomarkers, which require validation for use in clinical practice. In this viewpoint, we aim at distinguishing and discussing the features and the approach to asymptomatic immunological abnormalities potentially heralding the development of SLE, defined as preclinical lupus, and clinical manifestations consistent with SLE not yet fulfilling classification criteria, defined as early lupus. In case of preclinical SLE, careful surveillance using available screening tools is paramount, while patients with early lupus deserve an appropriate and timely diagnosis and, consequently, a proper treatment including hydroxychloroquine as the anchor drug.

Anti-C1q autoantibodies are frequently detected in patients with systemic sclerosis associated with pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Anti-C1q autoantibodies (autoAbs) are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but their presence in other rheumatic diseases has not been adequately investigated.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess anti-C1q autoAbs and circulating immune complexes (CICs) in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

In total 124 patients with SSc were studied; 106 were female and the median age was 59·4 years (range 25-81·4). Overall 75 (60·5%) had limited cutaneous SSc and 49 (39·5%) had diffuse cutaneous SSc. Also included were 25 patients with Sjögren syndrome (SjS), 29 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 38 with SLE and 53 healthy controls. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with high- and low-salt buffers were used to measure anti-C1q antibodies and CICs. The former allows only anti-C1q antibody binding to C1q and the latter also allows IgG Fc to bind to C1q.

RESULTS

Anti-C1q antibodies were present in 20 of 124 (16·1%) patients with SSc: five had high levels (> 80 RU mL^-1 ) and 10 (50%) had moderate levels (40-80 RU mL^-1 ). Anti-C1q antibodies were also present in one of 25 (4%) patients with SjS, one of 29 (3%) with RA (P < 0·05 for both) and three of 53 (6%) healthy controls (P < 0·01). Anti-C1q antibodies were detected in 13 of 38 (34%) patients with SLEs. Anti-C1q antibodies were more frequent in male than female patients with SSc (P = 0·005); this association remained after multivariate regression analysis. Anti-C1q antibody level was the most important factor in predicting the presence of pulmonary fibrosis, and the second most important in predicting pulmonary arterial hypertension. Fourteen patients with SSc (11·3%) had CICs.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-C1q autoAbs were frequently detected in patients with SSc, and their high levels predict the co-occurrence of pulmonary fibrosis or pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: Diagnosis and clinical management

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a worldwide chronic autoimmune disease which may affect every organ and tissue. Genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and the hormonal milieu, interplay in disease development and activity. Clinical manifestations and the pattern of organ involvement are widely heterogenous, reflecting the complex mosaic of disrupted molecular pathways converging into the SLE clinical phenotype. The SLE complex pathogenesis involves multiple cellular components of the innate and immune systems, presence of autoantibodies and immunocomplexes, engagement of the complement system, dysregulation of several cytokines including type I interferons, and disruption of the clearance of nucleic acids after cell death. Use of immunomodulators and immunosuppression has altered the natural course of SLE. In addition, morbidity and mortality in SLE not only derive from direct immune mediated tissue damage but also from SLE and treatment associated complications such as accelerated coronary artery disease and increased infection risk. Here, we review the diagnostic approach as well as the etiopathogenetic rationale and clinical evidence for the management of SLE. This includes 1) lifestyle changes such as avoidance of ultraviolet light; 2) prevention of comorbidities including coronary artery disease, osteoporosis, infections, and drug toxicities; 3) use of immunomodulators (i.e. hydroxychloroquine and vitamin D); and 4) immunosuppressants and targeted therapy. We also review new upcoming agents and regimens currently under study.

Analysis of Anti-C1q Autoantibodies by Western Blot

Anti-C1q autoantibodies may be found in many conditions, most commonly in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS), and are diagnostic markers as well as disease activity markers in lupus nephritis. Sera from patients with SLE and HUVS show partly distinct autoantibody reactivities to separated protein chains B and C of the first component of complement, C1q. These different binding specificities can be detected by Western blot analysis of the autoantibodies under reducing conditions. Results may help clinicians to differentiate between SLE and HUVS.

Clinical Implications of Excessive Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation in Renal Autoimmune Diseases

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular DNA structures covered with antimicrobial peptides, danger molecules, and autoantigens that can be released by neutrophils. NETs are an important first-line defense mechanism against bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, but they can also play a role in autoimmune diseases. NETs are immunogenic and toxic structures that are recognized by the autoantibodies of patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies−associated vasculitis (AAV) (i.e., against myeloperoxidase or proteinase-3) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (i.e., against double-stranded DNA, histones, or nucleosomes). There is cumulating preclinical and clinical evidence that both excessive formation and impaired degradation of NETs are involved in the pathophysiology of AAV and SLE. These autoimmune diseases give rise to 2 clinically and pathologically distinct forms of glomerulonephritis (GN), respectively, crescentic pauci-immune GN and immune complex−mediated GN. Therefore, it is relevant to understand the different roles NET formation can play in the pathophysiology of these most prevalent renal autoimmune diseases. This review summarizes the current concepts on the role of NET formation in the pathophysiology of AAV and SLE, and provides a translational perspective on the clinical implications of NETs, such as potential therapeutic approaches that target NET formation in these renal autoimmune diseases.

Precision medicine in lupus nephritis: can biomarkers get us there?

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus frequently develop lupus nephritis (LN), a condition that can lead to end-stage kidney disease. Multiple serum and urine biomarkers for LN have been proposed in recent years, yet none have become incorporated into clinical use. The majority of studies have been single center with significant variability in cohorts, assays, and sample storage, leading to inconclusive results. It has become clear that no single biomarker is likely to be sufficient to diagnose LN, identify flares, and define the response to therapy and prognosis. A more likely scenario is a panel of urine, serum, tissue, and genetic biomarkers. In this review, we summarize traditional and novel biomarkers and discuss how they may be utilized in order to bring precision medicine to clinical practice in LN.

Interpretation of Serological Complement Biomarkers in Disease

Complement system aberrations have been identified as pathophysiological mechanisms in a number of diseases and pathological conditions either directly or indirectly. Examples of such conditions include infections, inflammation, autoimmune disease, as well as allogeneic and xenogenic transplantation. Both prospective and retrospective studies have demonstrated significant complement-related differences between patient groups and controls. However, due to the low degree of specificity and sensitivity of some of the assays used, it is not always possible to make predictions regarding the complement status of individual patients. Today, there are three main indications for determination of a patient's complement status: (1) complement deficiencies (acquired or inherited); (2) disorders with aberrant complement activation; and (3) C1 inhibitor deficiencies (acquired or inherited). An additional indication is to monitor patients on complement-regulating drugs, an indication which may be expected to increase in the near future since there is now a number of such drugs either under development, already in clinical trials or in clinical use. Available techniques to study complement include quantification of: (1) individual components; (2) activation products, (3) function, and (4) autoantibodies to complement proteins. In this review, we summarize the appropriate indications, techniques, and interpretations of basic serological complement analyses, exemplified by a number of clinical disorders.

Anti-Double-Stranded DNA Isotypes and Anti-C1q Antibody Improve the Diagnostic Specificity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the value of immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgM, and IgA isotypes of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and anti-C1q antibody in diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and elucidate their association with disease activity and lupus nephritis.

Methods

Blood samples were obtained from 96 SLE patients, 62 other autoimmune disease patients, and 60 healthy blood donors. Anti-dsDNA IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes and anti-C1q antibody were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Disease activity of SLE patients was assessed according to the SLE Disease Activity Index score.

Results

When specificity was greater than 90%, the sensitivity of anti-dsDNA IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes and anti-C1q antibody in diagnosing SLE was 75%, 45%, 33%, and 49%, respectively. The prevalence of anti-dsDNA IgG (p = 0.002), anti-dsDNA IgA (p = 0.028), and anti-C1q antibody (p = 0.000) in active cases was significantly higher than those in inactive ones. In addition, the presence of anti-C1q antibody was associated with renal involvement (p = 0.032). Anti-dsDNA IgM showed no significant association with disease activity, but it was inversely linked with lupus nephritis (p = 0.005). When anti-dsDNA IgG and IgA and anti-C1q were combined to evaluate SLE disease activity, the specificity reached the highest level (90%). When anti-C1q positive was accompanied by anti-dsDNA IgM negative, the specificity of diagnosing lupus nephritis was up to 96%.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the role of anti-dsDNA IgG, IgM, and IgA isotypes and anti-C1q antibody alone or combination in diagnosing SLE. Anti-dsDNA IgG and IgA and anti-C1q were shown to be associated with disease activity, while anti-dsDNA IgM and anti-C1q were associated with lupus nephritis. When the related antibodies were combined, the diagnostic specificity was significantly higher.

Association Between C1q, TRAIL, and Tim-1 Gene Polymorphisms and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

AIM

The present study was designed to examine the relationship between gene polymorphisms of C1q, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), T cell immunoglobulin mucin (Tim-1), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 245 SLE patients were selected from February 2012 to August 2016, along with 245 healthy donors as the control group. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples from all subjects followed by mutational analyses. Gene polymorphisms of the C1q gene (rs292001, rs631090, rs294223 loci); the TRAIL gene (1525A/G, 1588A/G, 1595T/C locus); and the Tim-1 gene were detected by sequencing after polymerase chain reaction amplification. The concentration of anti-C1q antibody and the protein levels of sTRAIL/Tim-1 in serum of all subjects were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

As for the C1q gene, the frequency of the T allele at the rs631090 locus in the study group was lower than that in the controls, and the frequency of the C allele was higher in the study group than in the healthy donors. The frequency of the G allele at the 1525A/G locus of TRAIL gene in the study group was significantly higher than those in the control group. The frequency of the G allele at -1454G/A of Tim-1 was dramatically higher in the study group than in the control group. Anti-C1q antibody concentrations of subjects carrying CC and CT genotype at the rs631090 locus were statistically higher than TT genotype carriers. The sTRAIL protein level of the TRAIL 1525A/G GG genotype carriers was significantly higher than that of GA and AA genotype carriers, as well as CC genotype carriers at 1595T/C site compared with CT/TT genotype carriers. GG genotype carriers at -1454G/A had higher Tim-1 expression levels than GA/AA genotype carriers.

CONCLUSION

The C allele at the rs631090 locus of C1q, the G allele at 1525A/G site of TRAIL, and the G allele of Tim-1 at -1454G/A site are susceptibility variants associated with SLE.

Two-Parametric Immunological Score Development for Assessing Renal Involvement and Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objective

Anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA and anti-C1q autoantibodies are useful tools in the assessment of disease activity and nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. This study aimed to explore the utility of these antibodies along with anti-Ku antibodies in an oligoparametric model approach for the assessment of disease activity and lupus nephritis.

Methods

Samples from 261 well-characterized SLE patients were tested using chemiluminescent immunoassays (CIA) for anti-dsDNA and anti-Ku antibodies as well as by anti-C1q antibody ELISA (Inova Diagnostics, USA). Of these SLE patients, 26.4% had lupus nephritis (LN) at the time of blood draw or had a history of LN, and modified SLE disease activity index-2K (SLEDAI) scores were used to assess disease activity.

Results

All three antibodies demonstrated higher prevalence and higher antibody levels in active versus inactive SLE patients and in LN versus non-LN patients. When oligoparametric analysis was performed, the likelihood of LN and patients with active disease increased with dual and triple positivity.

Conclusions

Anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies are useful tools to identify disease activity and/or renal involvement in SLE patients. In addition, the combination of those antibodies in a two-parametric score might improve the clinical utility of those markers.

Antibodies targeting circulating protective molecules in lupus nephritis: Interest as serological biomarkers

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most frequent and severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), considered as the major predictor of poor prognosis. An early diagnosis of LN is a real challenge in the management of SLE and has an important implication in guiding treatments. In clinical practice, conventional parameters still lack sensitivity and specificity for detecting ongoing disease activity in lupus kidneys and early relapse of nephritis. LN is characterized by glomerular kidney injury, essentially due to deposition of immune complexes involving autoantibodies against cellular components and circulating proteins. One of the possible mechanisms of induction of autoantibodies in SLE is a defect in apoptotic cells clearance and subsequent release of intracellular autoantigens. Autoantibodies against soluble protective molecules involved in the uptake of dying cells, including complement proteins and pentraxins, have been described. In this review, we present the main autoantibodies found in LN, with a focus on the antibodies against these protective molecules. We also discuss their pathogenic role and conclude with their potential interest as serological biomarkers in LN.

Autoantibodies Associated With Connective Tissue Diseases: What Meaning for Clinicians?

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, myositis, Sjögren's syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis are systemic diseases which are often associated with a challenge in diagnosis. Autoantibodies (AAbs) can be detected in these diseases and help clinicians in their diagnosis. Actually, pathophysiology of these diseases is associated with the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In the last decades, many new antibodies were discovered, but their implication in pathogenesis of CTDs remains unclear. Furthermore, the classification of these AAbs is nowadays misused, as their targets can be localized outside of the nuclear compartment. Interestingly, in most cases, each antibody is associated with a specific phenotype in CTDs and therefore help in better defining either the disease subtypes or diseases activity and outcome. Because of recent progresses in their detection and in the comprehension of their pathogenesis implication in CTD-associated antibodies, clinicians should pay attention to the presence of these different AAbs to improve patient's management. In this review, we propose to focus on the different phenotypes and features associated with each autoantibody used in clinical practice in those CTDs.

Inhibition of Immune Complex Complement Activation and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation by Peptide Inhibitor of Complement C1

Two major aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis that have yet to be targeted therapeutically are immune complex-initiated complement activation and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation by neutrophils. Here, we report in vitro testing of peptide inhibitor of complement C1 (PIC1) in assays of immune complex-mediated complement activation in human sera and assays for NET formation by human neutrophils. The lead PIC1 derivative, PA-dPEG24, was able to dose-dependently inhibit complement activation initiated by multiple types of immune complexes (IC), including C1-anti-C1q IC, limiting the generation of pro-inflammatory complement effectors, including C5a and membrane attack complex (sC5b-9). In several instances, PA-dPEG24 achieved complete inhibition with complement effector levels equivalent to background. PA-dPEG24 was also able to dose-dependently inhibit NET formation by human neutrophils stimulated by PMA, MPO, or immune complex activated human sera. In several instances PA-dPEG24 achieved complete inhibition with NETosis with quantitation equivalent to background levels. These results suggest that PA-dPEG24 inhibition of NETs occurs by blocking the MPO pathway of NET formation. Together these results demonstrate that PA-dPEG24 can inhibit immune complex activation of the complement system and NET formation. This provides proof of concept that peptides can potentially be developed to inhibit these two important contributors to rheumatologic pathology that are currently untargeted by available therapies.

Clinical predictors of proteinuric remission following an LN flare - evidence from the UK JSLE cohort study

BACKGROUND

Proteinuria is a well-known risk factor for progression of renal dysfunction in a variety of chronic kidney diseases. In adult-onset Systemic Lupus Erytematosus (SLE) patients with lupus nephritis (LN), proteinuria takes a significant period of time to normalise, with proteinuric remission being associated with improved renal survival and reductions in mortality. The length of time required to attain proteinuric remission has not previously been investigated in Juvenile-onset SLE (JSLE). The aim of this study was to elucidate when proteinuric remission occurs, and whether clinical/demographic factors at LN onset bear influence on the time to proteinuric remission.

METHODS

Participants of the UK JSLE Cohort Study and Repository were included if they had active LN (renal biopsy and/or renal British Isles Lupus Assessment Grade (BILAG) score defined active LN) and proteinuria. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression modelling was used to explore factors associated with time to proteinuric recovery. Covariates with p-value < 0.2 were included in a multivariable Cox regression model, and backward stepwise variable selection applied.

RESULT

64/350 (18%) of UK JSLE Cohort Study patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. 25 (39%) achieved proteinuric remission within a median of 17 months (min 2.4, max 78). Within a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model, age at time of LN flare (p = 0.007, HR 1.384, CI 1.095-1.750), eGFR (p = 0.035, HR 1.016, CI 1.001-1.030) and haematological involvement (p = 0.016, HR 0.324, CI 0.129-0.812) at the time of LN onset were found to be significantly associated with time to proteinuric recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of children with LN have on-going proteinuria approximately two years after their initial flare. Poor prognostic factors all at time of LN onset include younger age, low eGFR, and concomitant haematological involvement.

Systemic lupus erythematosus with C1q deficiency: treatment with fresh frozen plasma

Treatment and outcome of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in C1q deficient patients are rarely reported. The aim of this report is to share our experience about the course of management of three cases diagnosed as SLE with C1q deficiency, in light of present literature. Initial and dominant complaints of three cases from two different families were cutaneous manifestations. One patient was also diagnosed with arthritis and thrombocytopenia. Antinuclear antibody was positive in all cases, whereas anti-dsDNA was negative with normal levels of complement C3, C4 and decreased CH50 activity. C1QA gene of two patients had homozygous nonsense mutation (c.622 > T/p.Gln208Ter). Previously, all of them had been treated with steroids, hydroxychloroquine and methotrexate or azathioprine. It was learned that they had responded only to high dosage prednisolone and their symptoms flared up during dosage reduction even under methotrexate or azathioprine. All symptoms of all three cases improved by daily fresh frozen plasma (FFP) infusions, and once cutaneous lesions subsided, the infusions were reduced to a frequency that would prevent the flare up of the symptoms. Literature search revealed seven reports on fresh frozen plasma treatment in SLE with C1q deficient patients. In this report, it is concluded that severe cutaneous lesions, as seen in these C1q deficient SLE patients, cannot be controlled with conventional immunosuppressive treatment. Instead, regular fresh frozen plasma infusions are proposed as a more reasonable method of treatment.