"Shared Destiny": The Dynamics of Relationships in Families of Patients With Brain Injury

Burden in caregivers of patients with acquired brain injury: Influence of family role and gender

BACKGROUND

Acquired brain injuries (ABI) represent neurological disorders that can arise after traumatic and non-traumatic events. In addition to the physical, emotional and cognitive challenges that patients face, these injuries can bring changes in the life of the patient and his or her family.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand how the occurrence of an ABI condition can disrupt and reshape family functioning by examining certain dimensions such as role in the family, gender and age, which may have a major influence on family dynamics.

METHODS

We enrolled 86 caregivers of patients with ABI. Two experienced psychologists examined family functioning with Olso's Family Adaptability and Cohesion Rating Scale (FACES IV).

RESULTS

The correlation between groups by generics showed a significant difference only for flexibility (p = 0.05). Specifically, flexibility was greater in male caregivers, particularly in sons. Most of the constructs defining family functioning, such as communication, remained unchanged despite the ABI event.

CONCLUSION

This study provides an in-depth understanding of how families face the challenges posed by the ABI and the role caregivers play within the system.

Community Caring for a Family Member With Brain Injury: Women's Lived Experiences

Individuals with a brain injury often require a caregiver to live safely in a community-based setting. This role typically defaults to a woman family member. Under the auspices of a constructivist interpretive tradition that honors a desire-based approach, this study blended narrative inquiry and grounded theory to explore the lived experiences of women caring for loved ones with brain injury. Twenty women completed the semi-structured interview, electing to participate either via videoconferencing or telephone. Employing a constant comparative method, three consecutive rounds of interviews, coding, and analysis occurred. Findings revealed an overarching theme surrounding the intractable challenges and enduring triumphs of caregiving. This discovery further sub-divided into four themes. Two themes focused on traversing a fragmented system of care and managing the burden of caregiving. The remaining two entailed finding supports in family and friends and leveraging professional skillset(s) to optimize caregiving. The recommendations garnered from the women's experiences included enhanced caregiver education with follow-up post-medical care, expanding services into the community to support caregivers and their family members appropriately, and building compassionate networks of women living the caregiving experience. Consistent with a desire-based paradigm, leveraging relationships to triumph over the challenges provided this group of women a voice to promote effective care for self, loved ones, and others.

Factors that support and hinder recovery and adjustment after traumatic brain injury: a qualitative multiple case study

Background/Aims

The numbers of individuals acquiring brain injuries in childhood is increasing. The deficits caused by brain injury can often have long-term implications that require support from caregivers, friends and the community. This study was conducted to gain an understanding of the shared perspectives of parental caregivers and their adolescent children as to what factors supported and hindered recovery and adjustment after traumatic brain injury.

Methods

In this qualitative multiple case study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of four individuals with traumatic brain injury and their five parental caregivers. A thematic, cross-case analysis was used to identify factors that support and hinder recovery and adjustment.

Results

Seven themes were identified from the interviews: lack of educational resources about traumatic brain injury; poor consistency of care; caregiver stress and guilt; disconnection and isolation; connection, empathy and social support; being high achieving and resourceful; and authentic relationships between adolescents with traumatic brain injury and their parents.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the need for improved access to follow-up or community-based services for adolescents with traumatic brain injury who do not experience a hospital or inpatient rehabilitation stay. Additionally, healthcare providers should capitalise on the relationships between adolescents with traumatic brain injury and their parents to support recovery. The information gained from this study can be used to inform allied health professionals when developing and implementing interventions to support recovery in adolescents with traumatic brain injury and their parental caregivers.

A 'good dyadic relationship' between older couples with one having mild cognitive impairment: a Q-methodology

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment gradually brings changes to the relationship between older married couples. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the individual viewpoints of couple dyads on the important attributes of a 'good dyadic relationship' in the context of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and to explore if the congruencies and discrepancies in their perceptions related to the quality and closeness of their relationship and well-being.

METHODS

Q-methodology was used to reveal the perceptions of a 'good dyadic relationship' among couples with one having MCI. The participating couples were separated in two rooms and independently ranked 18 relationship attributes from least to most important on a 7-point Q-sort response grid. All participants also completed a post-sort interview and surveys to assess their psychological well-being and closeness. Q-sorts were analyzed using by-person factor analysis.

RESULTS

Forty people with MCI and forty spousal partners completed the Q-sort. Three viewpoints, accounting for 48% of the total variance, were identified and were labeled 'Provider,' 'Problem-solver,' and 'Partner.' Different viewpoints of a 'good dyadic relationship' primarily varied by perceived importance of commitment, dedication, tolerance, and personal space. Despite these differences, there was wide consensus that respecting each other and cherishing the current moment are two universally salient attributes of a good relationship across all viewpoints. Couples with discrepant views scored significantly higher on perceptions of the quality of the relationship and closeness with the partner.

CONCLUSIONS

This study advances the theoretical understanding of the dyadic relationship between couples with one having MCI, from both perspectives. MCI is a state in which couples can openly discuss their expectations. The findings provide practitioners with insights to work with couples experiencing MCI.

Grandfathers' Experiences of Grief and Support Following Pregnancy Loss or Neonatal Death of a Grandchild

Pregnancy loss and neonatal death are recognized as distressing experiences for parents and other family members. However, no research has specifically addressed the experiences of grandfathers. This study aimed to understand grandfathers' grief experiences, and to identify supports they provide, receive, and desire following the loss of a grandchild in pregnancy or the neonatal period. Semi-structured interviews with 10 Australian grandfathers were analyzed, applying principles of thematic analysis. Three themes related to grief and three themes related to support were identified. Findings indicated that grandfathers expressed grief in a range of ways, and emotional expressiveness did not reflect the extent of their grief. Grandfathers typically provided extensive support to their child and family; however, few supports were available to help grandfathers. Recognition and validation of grandfathers' grief, early access to information, and guidance to a variety of supports including written materials, peer and professional support, is required.

Psychological status and role of caregivers in the neuro-rehabilitation of patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (ABI)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationships between (a) the psychological status of the caregiver, (b) the specific features of caregiving as perceived by the cognitive therapist in neuro-rehabilitation, (c) the caregivers' subjective approach to neuro-rehabilitation, and (d) the functional outcome of the patient.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with severe acquired brain injury and their 24 caregivers participated in this observational study. Caregivers underwent a psychological assessment examining emotional distress, burden and family strain; their subjective approach to neuro-rehabilitation has been evaluated by two specific answers. The patients' cognitive therapists responded to an ad-hoc questionnaire, namely the "Caregiving Impact on Neuro-Rehabilitation Scale" (CINRS), evaluating the features (i.e., amount and quality) of caregiving. Finally, the functional outcome of the patient was assessed through standardized scales of disability and cognitive functioning.

RESULTS

The caregivers' psychological well-being was associated to the features of caregiving, to the subjective approach to neuro-rehabilitation, and to the functional recovery of their loved ones. A better caregivers' approach to neuro-rehabilitation was also associated to an overall positive impact of caregiving in neuro-rehabilitation and to a better functional outcome of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We posited a virtuous circle involving caregivers within the neuro-rehabilitation process, according to which the caregivers' psychological well-being could be strictly associated to a better level of caregiving and to a better functional outcome of the patients that, in turn, could positively influence the caregivers' psychological well-being. Although preliminary, these results suggest a specific psycho-educational intervention, aimed at improving the caregivers' psychological well-being and at facilitating their caring of the loved one.

Families' Experiences Living with Acquired Brain Injury: "Thinking Family"-A Nursing Pathway for Family-Centered Care

The objective of this study was to examine families' experiences living with acquired brain injury (ABI) using a research approach that included both the affected individual family member and the family together as a family group. A narrative inquiry study, informed by the life-stage approach of Lieblich, Tuval-Mashiach, and Zilber, was used to obtain family stories. Families experiencing an ABI event were purposefully selected from different regions in a western Canadian province. Centered on the life stages of before the ABI event, now living with the ABI, and the future, thematic findings included: Families, a grounding force; Losses, individual and family; Family adaptive capacities; Experiences with the healthcare system-hospital to home; and A patchwork future-entering the unknown. Themes affirmed the significant impacts of ABI on individual and family members and acknowledged ABI as an ambiguous loss event. The findings also illuminated families' strengths and resiliencies in coping with living with ABI. The study results suggest by “thinking family” nurses can contribute towards a healthcare model that focuses on “family” as the central unit of care.

Five Phases of Dyadic Analysis: Stretching the Boundaries of Understanding of Family Relationships

In the last decade, an increasing number of qualitative studies sought to investigate the dynamics of various dyads by conducting in-depth, multiple family member interviews. The emphasis in the methodological literature dealing with this type of research is primarily on the data collection process, and much less on the development of methods suitable for the analysis of the data thus derived, especially with regard to dyads consisting of family members belonging to different systems: families of origin or nuclear families. The purpose of this paper is to propose a model for dyadic analysis based on examining the dynamics of the evolving relationships between key caregivers of a family member with brain injury. The model includes inductive and abductive phases of analysis, and it is based on an ecological-systemic perspective. The benefits of this model are highlighted, and its potential contribution is further discussed.

#13ReasonsWhy Health Professionals and Educators are Tweeting: A Systematic Analysis of Uses and Perceptions of Show Content and Learning Outcomes

This study is a content analysis of health professionals' and educators' tweets about a popular Netflix show that depicts teen suicide: 13 Reasons Why. A content analysis of 740 tweets was conducted to determine the main themes associated with professionals' and educators' tweets about the show, as well as the valence of the tweets. Additionally, a thematic analysis of linked content in tweets (n = 178) was conducted to explore additional content shared about the show and modeling outcomes. Results indicated the largest percentage of tweets was related to social learning, particularly about outcomes that could occur from viewing the show. The valence of the tweets about outcomes was more positive than negative. However, linked materials commonly circulated in tweets signified greater concern with unintended learning outcomes. Some of the linked content included media guidelines for reporting on suicide with recommendations that entertainment producers follow the guidelines. This study emphasizes the importance of including social learning objectives in future typologies of Twitter uses and demonstrates the importance of examining linked content in Twitter studies.

Family Members' Existential and Moral Dilemmas With Coercion in Mental Healthcare

Coercion in mental healthcare does not only affect the patient, but also the patient's families. Using data from interviews with 36 family members of adult and adolescent people with mental health problems and coercion experiences, the present narrative study explores family members' existential and moral dilemmas regarding coercion and the factors influencing these dilemmas. Four major themes are identified: the ambiguity of coercion; struggling to stay connected and establishing collaboration; worries and distress regarding compulsory care; and dilemmas regarding initiating coercion. Subsequently, coercion can reduce, but also add burden for the family by creating strains on family relations, dilemmas, (moral) distress, and retrospective regrets; this is reinforced by the lack of information or involvement and low-quality care. Subsequently, it is a moral obligation to develop more responsive health services and professionals who provide more guidance and balanced information to increase the possibilities for voluntary alternatives and informed decision making.