Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36

Validated Tools Used to Assess Musculoskeletal Injuries in Dancers: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Dance is a physically demanding art form that often results in musculoskeletal injuries. To effectively treat these injuries, standardized and reliable assessment tools designed to the dancer's needs are required. Thus, the aim of this review is to identify studies that have employed validated tools to assess musculoskeletal injuries in ballet, modern, and contemporary dancers, focusing on describing the content and psychometric quality of the tools used. Methods: This systematic review is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022306755). PubMed, Cochrane, LILACS, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus databases were searched by two independent reviewers. Articles assessing musculoskeletal injuries with validated tools in ballet, modern and/or contemporary dancers and written in English, Portuguese, or Spanish were included. Non-peer reviewed articles, books, conference abstracts, thesis/review articles, or case design studies were excluded. The original validation studies were compiled when necessary. Two independent reviewers conducted a standardized data extraction and evaluated the methodological quality using an adapted Downs and Black checklist. Results: From the 3933 studies screened, 172 were read to verify if they met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 37 studies included accounting for 16 unique validated tools. Two were imaging exams, one was an injury classification system, and 13 were self-reported injury questionnaires. Only four injury assessment tools were validated for dancers, emphasizing the need for further validation studies for the dance population. Most of the articles (57%) achieved high-quality methodological scores and the remaining (43%) reported medium-quality scores. Conclusions: Valid, reliable, and specific tools to assess dance injuries are lacking in general. For enhanced methodological rigor in future studies, the incorporation of validated tools is recommended to improve methodological quality and facilitate cross-study comparisons. Researchers may consider conducting validation studies, involving processes such as translation into another language, validation of modifications to the original tool, or reporting reliability within the article itself.

Surgical interventions for treating hallux valgus and bunions

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus (lateral angulation of the great toe towards the lesser toes, commonly known as bunions) presents in 23% to 35% of the population. This condition leads to poor balance and increases the risk of falling, adding to the difficulty in fitting into shoes and pain. Conservative (non-surgical) interventions treating pain rather than curing deformity are usually first-line treatments. When surgery is indicated, the overall best surgical procedure is an ever-evolving topic of discussion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different types of surgery compared with placebo or sham surgery, no treatment, non-surgical treatments and other surgical interventions for adults with hallux valgus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries to 20 April 2023. We did not apply any language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for treating hallux valgus compared to placebo surgery or sham surgery, no treatment, non-surgical treatment or other surgical interventions. The major outcomes were pain, function, quality of life, participant global assessment of treatment success, reoperation (treatment failure), adverse events and serious adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 studies involving 1597 participants with hallux valgus. All studies included adults and most were women. One study compared surgery (V-shaped osteotomy) with no treatment and with non-surgical treatment. Fifteen studies compared different surgical techniques, including a V-shaped osteotomy (Chevron osteotomy), to other types of osteotomy. Nine studies compared different simple osteotomy techniques to each other or to a mid-shaft Z-shaped osteotomy (Scarf osteotomy). Most trials were susceptible to bias: in particular, selection (80%), performance (88%), detection (96%) and selective reporting (64%) biases. Surgery versus no treatment Surgery may result in a clinically important reduction in pain. At 12 months, mean pain was 39 points (0 to 100 visual analogue scale, 100 = worst pain) in the no treatment group and 21 points in the surgery group (mean difference (MD) -18.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -26.14 to -9.86; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may result in a slight increase in function. At 12 months, mean function was 66 points (0 to 100 American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Scale (AOFAS), 100 = best function) in the no treatment group and 75 points in the surgery group (MD 9.00, 95% CI 5.16 to 12.84; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may result in little to no difference in quality of life. At 12 months, mean quality of life (0 to 100 on 15-dimension scale, 100 = higher quality of life) was 93 points in both groups (MD 0, 95% CI -2.12 to 2.12; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may result in a slight increase in participant global assessment of treatment success. At 12 months, mean participant global assessment of treatment success was 61 points (0 to 100 visual analogue scale, 100 = completely satisfied) in the no treatment group and 80 points in the surgery group (MD 19.00, 95% CI 8.11 to 29.89; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may have little effect on reoperation (relative effect was not estimable), adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 8.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 159.53; 1 study, 140 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and serious adverse events (relative effect was not estimable), but we are uncertain. Surgery versus non-surgical treatment Surgery may result in a clinically important reduction in pain; a slight increase in function and participant global assessment of treatment success; and little to no difference in quality of life (1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect on reoperation, adverse events and serious adverse events (1 study, 140 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Complex versus simple osteotomies Complex osteotomies probably result in little to no difference in pain compared with simple osteotomies (7 studies, 414 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Complex osteotomies may increase reoperation (7 studies, 461 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference in participant global assessment of treatment success (8 studies, 462 participants; low-certainty evidence) and serious adverse events (12 studies; data not pooled; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of complex osteotomies on function and adverse events (very low-certainty evidence). No study reported quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There were no trials comparing surgery to placebo or sham. Surgery may result in a clinically important reduction in pain when compared to no treatment or non-surgical treatment. Surgery may also result in a slight increase in function and participant global assessment of treatment success compared to no treatment or non-surgical treatment. There may be little to no difference in quality of life between surgery and no treatment or non-surgical treatment. We are uncertain about the effect of surgery on reoperation (treatment failure), adverse events or serious adverse events, when compared to no treatment or non-surgical treatment. Complex and simple osteotomies demonstrated similar results for pain. Complex osteotomies may increase reoperation (treatment failure) and may result in little to no difference in participant global assessment of treatment success and serious adverse events compared to simple osteotomies. We are uncertain about the effect of complex osteotomies on function, quality of life and adverse events.

Syndesmosis Injury Contributes a Large Negative Effect on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The literature largely addresses questions of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic accuracy. However, the magnitude of the clinical impact of syndesmosis injury is commonly described in intuitive yet qualitative terms. This systematic review aimed to quantify the impact of syndesmosis injury.

METHODS

Published clinical outcomes data were used to compute an effect size reflecting the impact of syndesmosis injury. This was done within the clinical contexts of isolated syndesmosis injury and syndesmosis injury with concomitant ankle fracture. Clinical outcomes data included Olerud-Molander (OM) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale for pain, and days missed from sport competition. Parametric data were compared with Student t tests. Effect size was computed using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

In ankle fracture patients, syndesmosis injury demonstrated a large effect size for OM (d = 0.96) and AOFAS (d = 0.83) scores. In athletic populations without concomitant ankle fracture, syndesmosis injury demonstrated a large effect size on days missed from competition (d = 2.32).

DISCUSSION

These findings confirm the magnitude of the negative impact of syndesmosis injury in athletic populations with isolated injury and in ankle fracture patients. In ankle fracture patients, this large negative effect remains despite surgery. Thus, syndesmosis repair may not fully mitigate the impact of the injury.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Systematic review.

Impact of Minimally Invasive Intra-Capsular Metatarsal Osteotomy on Plantar Pressure Decrease: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Metatarsalgia is a common pathology that is initially treated conservatively, but failure to do so requires surgery, such as the minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy (DICMO). Methods: In this prospective study of 65 patients with primary metatarsalgia who underwent DICMO, plantar pressures, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society MetaTarsoPhalangeal-InterPhalangeal scale (AOFAS-MTP-IP) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively and there was a subgroup in which an inclinometer was used to observe the importance of the inclination of the osteotomy. Results: The results show a significant reduction in plantar pressures after DICMO surgery without overloading the adjacent radii, especially in the subgroup with an inclinometer to guide the osteotomy. The AOFAS-MTP-IP scale evidenced a marked improvement in metatarsal function and alignment with scores close to normal. The VAS scale showed a substantial decrease in pain after DICMO osteotomy. Conclusions: DICMO, with an inclinometer for a 45° osteotomy, proved to be a safe and effective procedure for primary metatarsalgia, although further comparative studies are needed to confirm its superiority.

The role of peroneus longus (PL) autograft in the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL): A comprehensive narrative review

Background

Peroneus longus tendon (PLT) is a known graft utilised in the ligamentous reconstructions of knee. The current review was performed to analyze the available evidence regarding PLT in the arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

A comprehensive search of literature was performed on March 1, 2023 using 5 databases (for manuscripts published between 2010 and 2023). All studies reporting ACL reconstruction with PL graft in adults ≥18 years were considered; and final studies were shortlisted based on specific exclusion criteria.

Results

The search identified 684 articles, among which 26 manuscripts were finally selected. PLT has been used in primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR), revision ACLR, ACLR in multiligamentous injuries and those at risk for anterior knee pain. The full-thickness PLT graft is variable in its dimensions with the mean size ranging between 7 and 8.8 mm (half-PLT grafts ≤8.1 mm). The ultimate strength of doubled PLT graft is significantly higher than native ACL and comparable to the quadrupled hamstring.There was statistically insignificant difference in the laxity and functional outcome of knee following ACLR with PLT, as compared with other autografts (p > 0.05). PLT harvest is associated with satisfactory clinical foot and ankle outcomes, as well as excellent regenerative ability. Overall, studies have demonstrated lower complications with PLT (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The dimensions of harvested PLT graft are more consistent than HT. It has similar functional outcome and survival, as compared to other autografts. It also has lower risk for donor-site morbidity and lower complications than HT. PLT is a promising, alternative autograft choice in patients undergoing ACLR.

Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Visual Analogue Scale for the Foot and Ankle (VASFA)

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study is to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Visual Analogue Scale for the Foot and Ankle (VASFA) questionnaire, creating a Spanish-language version (VASFA-Sp), and to determine the measurement properties of this instrument.

METHODS

VASFA was cross-culturally translated into Spanish following the guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). The study sample was composed of 228 participants who were recruited from February to May 2022. All were at least 18 years old, gave signed informed consent to take part and properly completed the Foot and Ankle Ability Measures-Sp and VASFA-Sp questionnaires. Cronbach's alpha and test/re-test reliability values were calculated. Structural validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The 228 patients included in the final analysis presented the following characteristics: 35.53% were male and 64.47% were female; the mean age was 35.95 (18-81) years; and the mean body mass index was 23.79. Internal consistency was excellent. The Cronbach's alpha for VASFA-Sp was 0.96 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.932 (95% CI; 0.84 to 0.97). Exploratory factor analysis identified one main factor.

CONCLUSIONS

VASFA-Sp is a reliable, valid and sensitive questionnaire that is suitable for measuring perceived foot and ankle function impairment in a Spanish-speaking population.

Outcomes following minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) application in tibial pilon fractures - A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review evaluates postoperative complications and functional outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal tibial pilon fractures. This paper aims to fill a key literature gap, as no previous reviews have specifically addressed MIPO for tibial pilon fractures or fractures other than those involving the humeral shaft.

METHODS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was done using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2000 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were MIPO treatment in skeletally mature patients, while exclusion criteria were non-English papers, conference abstracts, papers with multiple treatment modalities that didn't analyze MIPO outcomes separately, skeletally immature patients, case reports, and cohorts smaller than five patients. Unpublished papers were also searched using Clinical Trials. Data extraction included general study information, injury specification, outcome measures, and complications. Finally, a risk of bias assessment (RoB) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1732 studies were identified, of which 23 were included in this review, with 673 patients and 678 fractures analyzed. The mean follow-up ranged from 6 to 62.53 months, with most studies representing intermediate to long-term follow-up. Primary outcome measures showed that 87.33% achieved 'excellent to good' results, 8.67% achieved 'fair' results, and 4% achieved 'poor' results. Stratified by fracture type, 76.47%, 80.05%, and 76.92% of AO/OTA type A, B, and C fractures, respectively, achieved 'excellent to good' results. 35.06% of cases reported complications (236 in total). These included one case of deep infection (0.148%), 28 superficial wound infections (4.16%), 4 nonunion cases (0.59%), and 22 malunion instances (3.27%). RoB assessment showed that 52.17% had a moderate overall risk of bias, 39.13% had a serious overall risk of bias, and 8.7% had a critical overall risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

MIPO technique for pilon fractures showed good functional outcomes and reliability, with low complication rates and should be considered in cases where proper indirect reduction is possible. However, while the evidence is promising, further high-quality studies with larger sample sizes, longer-term follow-up, and comparison to other techniques are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Kinetics of functional recovery after foot and ankle surgery. Comparison of EFAS and SF36 scores

INTRODUCTION

The EFAS score is a new recently validated European quality of life score for foot and ankle surgery, comprising 6 questions on activities of daily living (ADL) and 4 on sport. The aim of the present study was to assess the kinetics of functional recovery on the EFAS and SF36 scores, and to assess correlations between the two at 0 to 6 months then 6 months to 1 year in a population of foot and ankle surgery patients, globally and per pathology.

HYPOTHESIS

Hindfoot and ankle surgery requires at least 1 year's follow-up for assessment of recovery, whereas 6 months is sufficient to assess forefoot recovery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study included all patients undergoing surgery for foot and ankle pathology between December 2015 and July 2016. Statistical analysis, global and per pathology, was performed preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year.

RESULTS

In total, 98 patients were assessed at 1 year. In the global population, EFAS ADL score improved by 17.1±22.1 points (hindfoot, 16.9±24.6; forefoot, 19.7±21.4) and global SF36 score by 8.7±17.1 points (hindfoot, 10.2±19.1; forefoot, 9.6±15.9). Both scores progressed between 6 months and 1 year for hindfoot pathologies, whereas they remained constant after 6 months for the forefoot. The EFAS score showed weak correlation with SF36.

CONCLUSION

Recovery kinetics differs according to type of foot and ankle pathology. The EFAS score is more suitable than the SF36.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Graft and Flap: Orthoplastic Approach to Achilles Tendon Secondary Rupture

SUMMARY

Achilles tendon rupture represents one of the most common tendon ruptures. Although primary repair remains the treatment of choice, surgical complications, such as secondary rupture and tendon exposure, require salvage procedures. This article aims to present the authors' orthoplastic approach for the functional reconstruction of composite secondary Achilles tendon defects. Seven patients with chronic open-wound and large Achilles tendon defects (Kuwada type IV) underwent one-stage reconstruction between October of 2018 and October of 2020. The size of the average soft-tissue defect was 126.2 cm 2 (range, 86.1 to 175.9 cm 2 ), with a tendon gap of 8.2 cm (range, 7.1 to 10.3 cm). A combined team of orthoplastic surgeons performed the reconstructive procedure, using a turndown gastrocnemius fascial flap and a fascia lata autograft for the tendon reconstruction and a free fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flap for soft-tissue coverage (graft and flap). Subjective evaluation and quality-of-life measures were obtained preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 18.3 months (range, 12 to 24 months). The flap survival rate was 100%. Overall range of motion of the reconstructed side was 87% of the unaffected side (54 degrees versus 62 degrees). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores of all patients improved significantly ( P < 0.005) at 12 months of follow-up. A microsurgical approach combined with orthopedic techniques can solve complex cases of Achilles tendon secondary rupture, providing a reconstructed tendon that achieves satisfactory anatomic shape and function.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Description of the Simple Ankle Value: A Simplified Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for the Assessment of Ankle and Hindfoot Function

Background

The Simple Ankle Value (SAV) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in which patients grade their ankle function as a percentage of that of their contralateral uninjured ankle.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The primary aims of this study were to validate the SAV and evaluate its correlation with other PROMs. It was hypothesized that the SAV would be seen as a valid score that provides results comparable with those of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the European Foot & Ankle Society (EFAS) score.

Study Design

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

Patients seen for an ankle or hindfoot tissue were divided into those treated operatively and nonoperatively. A control group of patients treated for issues outside of the foot and ankle was also created. All patients completed the SAV followed by the FAAM and the EFAS scores. Patients treated operatively completed the questionnaires before surgery and 3 months after surgery. Patients treated nonoperatively completed the questionnaires twice 15 days apart. The correlation between the SAV score, the FAAM score, and the EFAS score was estimated with the Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results

A total of 209 patients (79 in the operative group, 103 in the nonoperative group, and 27 in the control group) were asked to complete the questionnaire, and all were included. The test-retest reliability of the SAV was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94). No ceiling or floor effect was reported. Strong correlation was found between the SAV and the FAAM and EFAS scores. The SAV was able to discriminate patients from controls (54.18 ± 21.22 and 93.52 ± 9.589; P < .0001); however, SAV was not able to detect change from preoperative to 3 months postoperative (from 54.18 ± 21.22 to 62.53 ± 20.83; P = .44).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the SAV is correlated with existing accepted ankle PROMs. Further work with this PROM is needed to validate the questionnaire.

Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus is the most common foot deformity and affects 23% to 35% of the general population. More than 150 different techniques have been described for surgical correction. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the use of minimally invasive surgery to correct hallux valgus deformities. A variety of studies have been published with differing outcomes regarding minimally invasive surgery. However, most studies lack sufficient power and are small, making it difficult to draw adequate conclusions. A meta-analysis can therefore be helpful to evaluate and compare minimally invasive and open surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled studies to answer the following question: Compared with open surgery, does minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus result in (1) improved American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores and VAS scores for pain, (2) improved radiologic outcomes, (3) fewer complications, or (4) a shorter duration of surgery?

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. A search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases on May 3, 2022. Studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled or prospective controlled studies that compared minimally invasive surgery and open surgery to treat patients with hallux valgus. We defined minimally invasive surgery as surgery performed through the smallest incision required to perform the procedure accurately, with an incision length of approximately 2 cm at maximum. Open surgery, on the other hand, involves a larger incision and direct visualization of deeper structures. Seven studies (395 feet), consisting of six randomized controlled studies and one prospective comparative study, were included in the qualitative and quantitative data synthesis. There were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups regarding age, gender, or severity of hallux valgus deformity. Each included study was assessed for the risk of bias using the second version of the Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials or by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative studies. Most of the included studies had intermediate quality regarding the risk of bias. We excluded one study from our analysis because of its high risk of bias to avoid serious distortions in the meta-analysis. We performed a sensitivity analysis to confirm that our meta-analysis was robust by including only studies with a low risk of bias. The analyzed endpoints included the AOFAS score (range 0 to 100), where higher scores represent less pain and better function; the minimum clinically important difference on this scale was 29 points. In addition, the VAS score was analyzed, which is based on a pain rating scale (range 0 to 10), with higher scores representing greater pain. Radiologic outcomes included the hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, and distal metatarsal articular angle. Complications were qualitatively assessed and evaluated for differences. A random-effects model was used if substantial heterogeneity (I 2 > 50%) was found; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used.

RESULTS

We found no clinically important difference between minimally invasive and open surgery in terms of the AOFAS score (88 ± 7 versus 85 ± 8, respectively; mean difference 4 points [95% CI 1 to 6]; p < 0.01). There were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups in terms of VAS scores (0 ± 0 versus 0 ± 1, respectively; standardized mean difference 0 points [95% CI -1 to 0]; p = 0.08). There were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups in terms of the hallux valgus angle (12° ± 4° versus 12° ± 4°; mean difference 0 points [95% CI -2 to 2]; p = 0.76). Radiographic measurements of the intermetatarsal angle did not differ between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups (7° ± 2° versus 7° ± 2°; mean difference 0 points [95% CI -1 to 1]; p = 0.69). In addition, there were no differences between the minimally invasive and open surgery groups in terms of the distal metatarsal articular angle (7° ± 4° versus 8° ± 4°; mean difference -1 point [95% CI -4 to 2]; p = 0.28). The qualitative analysis revealed no difference in the frequency or severity of complications between the minimally invasive and the open surgery groups. The minimally invasive and open surgery groups did not differ in terms of the duration of surgery (28 ± 8 minutes versus 40 ± 10 minutes; mean difference -12 minutes [95% CI -25 to 1]; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found that hallux valgus treated with minimally invasive surgery did not result in improved clinical or radiologic outcomes compared with open surgery. Methodologic shortcomings of the source studies in this meta-analysis likely inflated the apparent benefits of minimally invasive surgery, such that in reality it may be inferior to the traditional approach. Given the associated learning curves-during which patients may be harmed by surgeons who are gaining familiarity with a new technique-we are unable to recommend the minimally invasive approach over traditional approaches, in light of the absence of any clinically important benefits identified in this meta-analysis. Future research should ensure studies are methodologically robust using validated clinical and radiologic parameters, as well as patient-reported outcome measures, to assess the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery.

Contemporary Review: An Overview of the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has favorable psychometric and administrative properties in orthopaedic clinical research. It facilitates clinically meaningful data collection while minimizing administration time and survey fatigue and improving compliance. PROMIS is a critical component of patient-centered care and shared decision making, as it provides enhanced communication and engagement between patients and providers. As a validated instrument, it may also aid in measuring value-based health care quality. The goal of the current work is to provide an overview of PROMIS metrics used in orthopaedic foot and ankle, including advantages and disadvantages compared to legacy scales and PROMIS's applicability in specific foot and ankle conditions based on psychometric properties. We provide a review of the literature regarding the utilization of PROMIS as an outcome measure for specific foot and ankle procedures and conditions.

Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Use in Infracalcaneal Heel Pain

There is growing interest in adopting validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures following surgery. While the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) has previously been validated for use in multiple foot/ankle conditions, it has not yet been validated in patients with infracalcaneal heel pain. In this study we aimed to validate the FAOS by looking at 4 psychometric properties of the survey: construct validity, content validity, reliability, and responsiveness, using patients in our practice with a clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. A total of 150 patients (mean age 49.7 ± 12.1 years [36 men and 114 women]) were included in one or more of the 4 components of this study. All FAOS subscales demonstrated adequate construct validity when compared with the physical health component of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and 2 out of 5 subscales demonstrated moderate correlation with the mental health component of SF-12 (all Spearman rho >0.3, and p values <0.05). Most FAOS subscales demonstrated content validity and were found to contain relevant questions from the patient's perspective. All 5 subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.827. Finally, 4 out of the 5 subscales (all but other symptoms) were responsive to change at a mean follow up of 12.2 months after surgery (p < .05). We conclude that the FAOS is a responsive, reliable, and valid instrument for use in infracalcaneal heel pain. We believe that due to its ease of use and broad applicability, the FAOS could be more widely adopted in foot/ankle practices as patient-centered healthcare delivery and research becomes increasingly prioritized in the US and abroad.

PROMIS Scores for Plantar Fasciitis Before and After Gastrocnemius Recession

BACKGROUND

There has been an established relationship between increased loading on the Achilles tendon and tension on the plantar fascia. This supports the idea that either tight gastrocnemius and soleus muscles or contractures of the Achilles tendon are risk factors for plantar fasciitis. Gastrocnemius recession has gained popularity as a viable surgical intervention for cases of chronic plantar fasciitis due to isolated gastrocnemius contracture. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) scores in patients with plantar fasciitis before and after gastrocnemius recession.

METHODS

The Electronic Medical Record was queried for medical record numbers associated with Current Procedural Terminology code 27687 (gastrocnemius recession). Our study included all patients with a preoperative diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis with treatment via isolated gastrocnemius recession with 1-year minimum follow-up. Forty-one patients were included in our study. Patient variables were collected via chart review. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores were collected in the clinic.

RESULTS

We followed up 41 patients with a median age of 48 years (interquartile range [IQR] 38-55) and median body mass index of 29.02 (IQR 29.02-38.74) for 1 year post surgery. Preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores improved for physical function from 39.3 to 44.5 (P = .0005) and for pain interference from 62.8 to 56.5 (P = .0001). PROMIS depression scores were not significantly different (P = .6727). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly decreased from 7.05 to 1.71 (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this case series, we found the gastrocnemius recession to be an effective option for patients with refractory pain in plantar fasciitis. Our PROMIS and VAS data confirm this procedure's utility and highlight its ability to significantly decrease pain and improve physical function in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis, although final median scores did not reach normative standards for the population, suggesting some residual pain and/or dysfunction was, on average, present. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that gastrocnemius recession is a reasonable treatment option for chronic plantar fasciitis patients who fail nonoperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Validity and Reliability of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) Score in Patients With Hallux Valgus in Singapore

The European Foot and Ankle Society score is a popular tool for monitoring treatment outcomes of foot or ankle conditions. However, few studies have assessed its psychometric properties in patients with hallux valgus. We aimed to validate the European Foot and Ankle Society score in patients with hallux valgus in Singapore. This is a cohort study of 121 patients with operatively managed hallux valgus from a tertiary referral hospital, evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively with the primary endpoint of restoring patients to premorbid status. Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed through 7 a priori hypotheses by correlating the European Foot and Ankle Society score with other patient-reported outcomes measures. Structural validity was assessed via Confirmatory Factor Analysis, whereby a good fit was indicated when Comparative Fit Index >0.95, Tucker-Lewis Index >0.95, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation <0.06, and Standardized Root Mean Residuals <0.08. Among our subjects, the European Foot and Ankle Society score demonstrated reliability, reflected by a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.773). Six out of the 7 a priori hypotheses were fulfilled, indicating both convergent and divergent construct validity. Structural validity was confirmed with our European Foot and Ankle Society score model which showed good fit for a 1-factor structure (Confirmatory Factor Analysis = 0.998, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.996, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.025 [90% CI: 0-0.111], Standardized Root Mean Residuals = 0.027). In conclusion, the European Foot and Ankle Society score was validated for monitoring treatment outcomes of patients with hallux valgus in Singapore.

Intermediate-term Outcomes in Adolescent Recurrent Ankle Instability Managed With a Modified Broström-Gould Procedure Augmented With Distal Fibular Periosteum Incorporation

BACKGROUND

Once a child has developed chronic ankle instability with recurrent events despite conservative treatment, then ligamentous repair is warranted. We utilize a modification of the modified Broström-Gould technique that further incorporates the distal fibular periosteum into the construct. The purpose of this study was to describe the intermediate-term outcomes of our modified Broström-Gould technique for chronic lateral ankle instability in childhood athletes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of children who underwent the surgical technique over a 10-year time period (2010 to 2019) was performed, excluding those with <2 years of follow-up. Demographic, surgical, and clinical data were recorded, as well as outcome scores: (1) the Marx activity scale, (2) University of California, Los Angeles activity score, and (3) foot and ankle outcomes score. Recurrent instability events, repeat surgeries, satisfaction with the surgical experience, and return to sport (if applicable) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-six children (43 females) with 1 bilateral ankle met the criteria with a mean age at surgery of 14.8 years, and a mean follow-up duration of 4.9 years. The mean Marx activity score was 9.0±5.1, the mean University of California, Los Angeles score was 8.3±1.8, and the mean total foot and ankle outcomes score was 84.0±15.6. Twenty-six ankles (55.3%) reported having at least 1 recurrent episode of instability and 6 of the ankles (12.8%) underwent revision surgery between 3.5 months and 6.5 years of the index procedure. Thirty-nine (84.8%) patients responded that they would undergo our surgery again.

CONCLUSION

A modified Broström-Gould procedure can be performed in children with the incorporation of the adjacent periosteum, but recurrence of instability is distinctly possible with longer follow-up with a risk for revision surgery despite good subjective outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; retrospective case series.

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Scale in Patients With Hallux Valgus in Colombia

The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale for hallux metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints is used throughout the world for the clinical assessment of patients with hallux valgus, and it has 3 subscales: pain, function, and alignment. The objective of this prospective, observational study was to perform translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of this scale for Colombian Spanish. The Foot Function Index and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were also used in the validation process. Patients who were 18 years or older, resided in the city of Bogota, were able to read and write in Spanish, and were within 4 years of corrective surgery for hallux valgus were included. A total of 79 patients were included in the study, 25 of whom were involved in the translation process and all of whom were involved in the validation process. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant positive Spearman's correlations between the AOFAS pain subscale and the AOFAS function subscale (r_s = 0.483), total AOFAS scale (r_s = 0.795), and SF-36 physical summary subscale (r_s = 0.364); and between the AOFAS function subscale and the total AOFAS scale (r_s = 0.894) and SF-36 physical summary subscale (r_s = 0.310). The test-retest process for reliability yielded intraclass correlation coefficients between the AOFAS pain, function, and alignment subscales that were all 0.70 or higher. The AOFAS scale for hallux MTP and IP joints was successfully translated and adapted into Colombian Spanish, and this version demonstrated construct validity and reliability, rendering it suitable for clinical use in Colombian patients with hallux valgus.

A Systematic Review of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treating Recurrent Hallux Valgus

Background  Despite advancements in primary correction of hallux valgus (HV), significant rates of reoperation remain across common techniques, with complications following primary correction up to 50% according to some studies. 1 This study explored different methods of surgery currently used in treating HV recurrence specifically (for which literature on the subject has been limited), evaluating open and adapted minimally invasive surgical (MIS) primary techniques used for revision. Methods  In December 2020, literature search for both open and MIS surgical techniques in HV revision was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE library databases. Results and Conclusion  Of initial 143 publications, 10 were finally included for data synthesis including 273 patients and 301 feet. Out of 301 feet, 80 (26.6%) underwent revision with MIS techniques (involving distal metatarsal osteotomies). Those undergoing grouped MIS revisions had an average improvement of 38.3 in their American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, compared to 26.8 in those using open techniques. Revision approaches using grouped MIS techniques showed a postoperative reduction in intermetatarsal angle and HV angle of 5.6 and 18.4 degrees, respectively, compared to 15.5 and 4.4 degrees, respectively, for open techniques. There are, however, limitations in the current literature on MIS techniques in revision HV surgery specifically. MIS techniques grouped did not show worse outcomes or safety concerns compared to open techniques.

Surgical Management of Focal Chondral Defects of the Talus: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached regarding the optimal surgical treatment for focal chondral defects of the talus.

PURPOSE

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical scores and complications of mosaicplasty, osteochondral auto- and allograft transplant, microfracture, matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplant, and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the talus at midterm follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Bayesian network meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This Bayesian network meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were accessed in February 2021. All clinical trials comparing 2 or more surgical interventions for the management of chondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, rate of failure, and rate of revision surgery. The network meta-analysis were performed through the routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis. The log odds ratio (LOR) effect measure was used for dichotomous variables, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Data from 13 articles (521 procedures) were retrieved. The median length of the follow-up was 47.8 months (range, 31.7-66.8 months). Analysis of variance revealed no difference between the treatment groups at baseline in terms of age, sex, body mass index, AOFAS score, VAS score, and mean number of defects. AMIC demonstrated the greatest AOFAS score (SMD, 11.27) and lowest VAS score (SMD, -2.26) as well as the lowest rates of failure (LOR, 0.94) and revision (LOR, 0.94). The test for overall inconsistency was not significant.

CONCLUSION

At approximately 4 years of follow-up, the AMIC procedure for management of focal chondral defects of the talus produced the best outcome.

Foot Assessment Clinical Scales in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: A Scoping Review

Introduction

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a slow and progressive peripheral motor sensory neuropathy frequently associated with the cavo-varus foot deformity. We conducted a scoping review on the clinical scales used to assess foot deviations in CMT patients and analyzed their metric properties.

Evidence Acquisition

A first search was conducted to retrieve all scales used to assess foot characteristics in CMT patients from the Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and PEDro databases. A second search was conducted to include all studies that evaluated the metric properties of such identified scales from the same databases. We followed the methodologic guidelines specific for scoping reviews and used the PICO framework to set the eligibility criteria. Two independent investigators screened all papers.

Evidence Synthesis

The first search found 724 papers. Of these, 41 were included, using six different scales: “Foot Posture Index” (FPI), “Foot Function Index”, “Maryland Foot Score”, “American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society's Hindfoot Evaluation Scale”, “Foot Health Status Questionnaire”, Wicart-Seringe grade. The second search produced 259 papers. Of these, 49 regarding the metric properties of these scales were included. We presented and analyzed the properties of all identified scales in terms of developmental history, clinical characteristics (domains, items, scores), metric characteristics (uni-dimensionality, inter- and intra-rater reliability, concurrent validity, responsiveness), and operational characteristics (normative values, manual availability, learning time and assessors' characteristics).

Conclusions

Our results suggested the adoption of the six-item version of the FPI scale (FPI-6) for foot assessment in the CMT population, with scoring provided by Rasch Analysis. This scale has demonstrated high applicability in different cohorts after a short training period for clinicians, along with good psychometric properties. FPI-6 can help health professionals to assess foot deformity in CMT patients over the years.

Post-Operative Outcomes of Circular External Fixation in the Definitive Treatment of Tibial Plafond Fractures: A Systematic Review

Tibial plafond fractures (TPFs) are uncommon but potentially devastating injuries to the ankle. Operative treatments include internal and external fixation modalities. This article provides a systematic review of the clinical and functional outcomes of TPFs treated specifically with circular external fixation (CEF). A literature search of medical databases from inception to 13th November 2020 was performed. Original studies written in the English language reporting clinical, radiological, and functional outcome data of TPF treated with CEF were included. Patient demographics, fracture classification, open fractures, post-operative complications, clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, and functional outcomes were collected. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using standardised scoring tools.In total, 16 studies were included. One prospective randomised study was identified. Collated data of 303 patients were analysed. The mean time to union was 21 weeks. Malunion occurred in 12.4%. The rate of deep infection was 4.8%, but no amputations were recorded. The risk of minor soft tissue infection (including pin-site infections) was 54%. Almost two-thirds achieved good-to-anatomic reduction radiologically. Approximately one-third reported excellent functional outcome scores. The quality of the studies was deemed satisfactory. A moderate risk of bias was acknowledged. This systemic review provides a summary of outcome data regarding CEF as a treatment for TPF. It highlights CEF as an acceptable treatment option with comparable results to that of internal fixation. Further higher-quality evidence is advised.

Fractures of the posterior malleolus: a systematic review and analysis of patient-reported outcome scale selection

PURPOSE

Despite the extensive use of PROs in ankle fracture research, no study has quantified which PROs are most commonly used for assessing outcomes of patients who sustain fractures of the posterior malleolus. The purpose of this study was therefore to quantify which PROs are most commonly used for outcome research after posterior malleolus fractures.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Articles were identified through Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and cochrane central register of controlled trials through May of 2021. Included articles were analyzed for the primary outcome of the most commonly reported PRO.

RESULTS

The American orthopedic foot and ankle ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS) was the most commonly used PRO for assessment of posterior malleolus fracture outcomes, used in 37 of 72 studies (51.4%). The second and third most common were the olerud-molander ankle score (OMAS) (22 studies, 30.6%) and the visual analogue score (VAS) (21 studies, 29.2%). Eleven different PROs were used only once. Quality of evidence was graded as low given the percentage of studies that were observational or case series (68 of 72 studies, 94.4%).

CONCLUSION

Investigators have used many different PROs to assess outcomes for posterior malleolus fractures, the most common of which are the AOFAS, OMAS, and VAS. Future investigators should attempt to unify outcome reporting for these injuries.

The effect of BMI on long-term outcomes after operatively treated ankle fractures: a study with up to 16 years of follow-up

Background

Ankle fractures are a common injury and the main cause of post-traumatic ankle arthritis. The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide, and this population is known to have poorer short and midterm outcomes after ankle fractures. Our objective is to assess long-term patient-reported outcomes in patients with operatively treated ankle fractures, and the effect of BMI on these results using the new and validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire, the Manchester Oxford foot and ankle questionnaire (MOXFQ).

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of all ankle fractures treated operatively in a ten-year period from 2002–2012. The MOXFQ and SF-12 were sent to all patients and were obtained, on average, 11.1 years after surgery (range 5.3–16.2 years).

Results

Two thousand fifty-five ankle fractures were reviewed, of which 478 (34%) patients completed the questionnaires. The mean age was 48.1 ± 15.5 years, 52% were men and the mean BMI was 26.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2. Of the 478, 47% were of normal weight, 36% were overweight, and 17% were obese. Overall, 2.1% were type A, 69.9% B, and 24.9% type C fractures. There were no significant differences in the type of fracture between the BMI groups. Comparing obese and non-obese patients, there were large differences in MOXFQ pain (33 ± 29 vs. 18.7 ± 22.1, effect size 0.55), and function scores (27.3 ± 29 vs. 12.5 ± 21.1, effect size 0.58). No differences in complications and reoperations rates were observed. The BMI value at surgery correlated more strongly with the MOXFQ pain score than the BMI at follow-up (Spearman’s Rho 0.283 vs. 0.185, respectively).

Conclusion

These findings reveal that obese patients have significant worse long-term outcomes, namely increased pain, poorer function, and greater impairment in everyday life after an operatively treated ankle fracture. Moreover, pain and function linearly declined with increasing BMI. Our findings appear to indicate that increased BMI at surgery is an important contributor to adverse outcome in the operative management of rotational ankle fractures.

Level of evidence

III.

Impact of pes planus on clinical outcomes of hallux valgus surgery

BACKGROUND

Pes planus is associated with hallux valgus development. This study evaluated the impact of pes planus on clinical outcomes following hallux valgus surgery.

METHODS

191 patients underwent Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. Pes planus angles including talonavicular coverage angle, lateral talus-first metatarsal angle (Meary's angle) and lateral talocalcaneal angle were measured. The cohort was stratified into control (0°-4.0°), mild (4.1°-14.9°), moderate (15.0°-30.0°) and severe (> 30.0°) pes planus groups according to Meary's angle. Clinical outcomes were compared at baseline, 6 months and 24 months.

RESULTS

There were 78 controls, 95 mild and 18 moderate cases of pes planus. Meary's angle was independently associated with preoperative hallux valgus angle. Pes planus angles were not associated with pain, AOFAS, SF-36 physical or mental scores. All three groups had similar clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Compared to patients with neutral foot arches, those with pes planus presented with more severe hallux valgus deformity but had similar clinical outcomes following surgical correction.

Outcome Assessment Performance of the SF-36, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and AOFAS in Forefoot Reconstruction Surgery

The purpose of this study was to investigate the measurement properties of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) to detect real change after forefoot reconstruction surgery. Responsiveness and minimally important change estimates were compared with those from the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) measures. Eighty-three patients awaiting surgery were recruited. Patients completed pre- and 12 months postoperative the SF-36 and the MOXFQ. A surgeon assessed the AOFAS scores. The responsiveness to change was determined using the effect size (ES), the minimal detectable change (MDC) and the minimal clinically important change. Two subscales of the SF-36 demonstrated significant improvement, bodily pain (BP) and mental health. Only the BP domain appeared the most responsive with an ES of 0.73. All domains of the MOXFQ and AOFAS produced much larger effect sizes (ES > 1.5). MDC values for the majority of the SF-36 domains fell within measurement error except for the BP domain. Fewer patients showed significant improvement when compared with the MOXFQ pain domain. In conclusion, the SF-36 measuring tool proved to be neither reliable nor responsive enough to detect real change after forefoot surgery. Though the BP domain appeared to be the most responsive, it failed to detect meaningful change when compared to the MOXFQ-Pain and the Visual Analogue Scale.

Comparison of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Minimally Invasive Plating in the Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures: A Retrospective Study

Introduction

Treatment of distal tibial fractures may be problematic due to their close proximity to the ankle joint and poor skin coverage, resulting in skin problems, deep infection, and malunion. To address these problems, minimally invasive plating methods have been described. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical findings, radiological findings, and complication rates of patients treated with open reduction or minimally invasive plating.

Methods

A total of 44 patients with distal tibial fractures with a mean follow-up period of 20.73 (12-50) months were included in this study retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, those who underwent open reduction and internal fixation and those treated with minimally invasive plates. The two groups were statistically compared in terms of radiological and clinical scores and complication rates (p=0.05). Comparative analysis was also performed for three fracture types in both groups.

Results

Twenty patients were treated with a minimally invasive approach and 24 patients were treated with the open reduction method. Age, gender, fracture type, and follow-up times were similar between the two groups (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between postop American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score (AOFAS), anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA), or lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) values between both groups. There was also no difference in union times or nonunion rates (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of superficial skin problems or deep infections between the two groups (p>0.05). In comparison regarding fracture types, patients with type C fractures seemed to have better outcomes with minimal invasive plating.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive plating is a good approach in the treatment of distal tibial fractures. The technique seems to be advisable, especially for patients with type C fractures. However, the rates of skin problems and deep infections are similar to those seen with the open reduction method.

Third-Generation Minimally Invasive Chevron-Akin Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus Produces Similar Clinical and Radiological Outcomes as Scarf-Akin Osteotomy at 2 Years: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The minimally invasive chevron-Akin (MICA) osteotomy is an increasingly popular technique for the correction of hallux valgus. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing it with traditional open techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of the MICA osteotomy using a new-generation MICA screw and scarf-Akin osteotomy for hallux valgus correction.

METHODS

Thirty cases of MICA osteotomy were propensity score matched 1:1 with a control group of 30 scarf-Akin osteotomy cases. The groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index, preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (MTP-IP) score, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS), preoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and concomitant procedures. Outcomes were compared at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Early postoperative VAS scores were also compared.

RESULTS

Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score, AOFAS score, and SF-36 PCS and MCS at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. For the MICA group, HVA improved from 23.5 to 7.7 degrees, and IMA improved from 13.5 to 7.5 degrees. For the scarf-Akin osteotomy group, HVA improved from 23.7 to 9.3 degrees, and IMA improved from 13.6 to 7.8 degrees. The first 24-hour postoperative VAS score was significantly lower in the MICA group compared with the scarf-Akin group (2.0 ± 2.0 vs 3.4 ± 2.6, P = .029). However, there was no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcomes between the groups at 6 and 24 months.

CONCLUSION

The MICA procedure with the new-generation MICA screw is an attractive option for the correction of hallux valgus, yielding similar midterm radiological and clinical outcomes compared with the well-established scarf-Akin osteotomy. The first 24-hour postoperative VAS score in the MICA group was also statistically lower, although its clinical significance remains to be determined.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Validity and Reliability of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score for the English-Literate Singapore Population With Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal (AOFAS MTP-IP) score in patients with hallux valgus in Singapore.

METHOD

A total of 121 English-literate patients with hallux valgus identified between October 2017 and May 2020 were analyzed. Reliability was assessed via Cronbach α. Construct validity was evaluated through 20 a priori hypotheses by correlating the AOFAS MTP-IP score for hallux and lesser toes with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Standardized response means (SRMs) were calculated to evaluate responsiveness at 6 months postoperative. Structural validity was evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) whereby a good fit was indicated when comparative fit index (CFI) is >0.95, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) is >0.95 and standardized root mean residual (SRMR) is <0.08.

RESULTS

The AOFAS MTP-IP score demonstrated reliability with a Cronbach α of 0.837. Convergent construct validity was confirmed when all a priori hypotheses were fulfilled. Structural validity was established with our AOFAS MTP-IP score model that displayed good fit for a 1-factor structure (CFI = 0.988, TLI = 0.960, SRMR = 0.034). Responsiveness of the AOFAS MTP-IP score for hallux was demonstrated by an SRM score of 1.28.

CONCLUSION

The AOFAS MTP-IP score displayed adequate reliability and validity among English-literate patients in Singapore with an operatively managed hallux valgus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective cohort study.

Influence of Foot Type on the Clinical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Metatarsalgia. A Prospective Pilot Study

Background and aims: Surgical procedures for central metatarsalgia seek to harmonise the metatarsal parabola with osteotomies that can be performed by minimally invasive techniques. However, the possible relationship of the foot type and the mid-term postoperative outcome is poorly described. The objective of this prospective pilot study was therefore to determine whether the foot type (pronate, neutral, or supinate) conditions the postoperative mid-term functional outcome.

Methods: A series of 28 patients (6 men, 22 women) were treated for primary central metatarsalgia by means of minimally invasive distal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO).

Results: Their functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months were assessed by the self-reporting AOFAS scale. Pre-surgery, the patients' scores were 42.82 ± 15.60. Scores improved at 6 months to 86.50 ± 8.6 and to 92.93 ± 8.6 at 12 months (p < 0.001 in both cases). There were no differences either by sex or by foot type in these overall values, although there was only a slight limitation of interphalangeal mobility in the supinated feet (p = 0.03) at 6-month follow-up as compared to other foot types.

Conclusion: Hence, DMMO provides an optimal clinical and functional outcome for the surgical treatment of metatarsalgia, regardless of the patient's foot posture. The occurrence of adverse events was minimal and clinically irrelevant.

Trial registration: The study was authorised by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, with the registry UCV/2018-2019/019.

Isolated Arthroscopic-Assisted Subtalar Fusion: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The subtalar joint has a complex anatomic function that includes inversion and eversion of the hindfoot, assisting in walking on uneven surfaces. Arthritis is the most common pathological condition affecting this joint and can require fusion. The surgery can be performed open or with arthroscopic assistance. This systematic review assesses articles written on the safety and efficacy of isolated arthroscopic subtalar fusion.

METHODS

Using MEDLINE and Embase, we systematically reviewed articles published before May 21, 2020.

RESULTS

Of 395 articles, 17 on a total of 395 patients (409 operations) were included in the review. The average duration of follow-up was 40.0 months (range, 3 to 105 months). Radiographic evidence of union was reported for 95.8% of cases at an average of 11.9 weeks (range, 6 to 56 weeks) postoperatively. Delayed union was reported in 1.0% of patients and nonunion, in 4.3% of patients. In the articles reporting patient satisfaction, including pain relief, 95.4% of patients had positive outcomes. Postoperative complications were reported in 64 patients (16.2%), including 37 (9.4%) with symptomatic implants, 11 (2.8%) with dysesthesia or neuropathic pain, and 3 (0.8%) with postoperative infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic subtalar fusion is a safe and effective alternative to open subtalar arthrodesis, with high patient satisfaction rates, high union rates at similar follow-up intervals, and low complication rates. The aim of future research should be to determine the ideal cases for this approach as well as the most efficient arthroscopic surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation to optimize function and union as seen on radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications on Percutaneous Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Systematic Review

Lately there has been a growing interest in the use of percutaneous surgery for the correction of hallux valgus (HV). The purpose of the present study was to systematically review the published data about this topic and establish the efficacy and safety, stressing the complication rates found on this percutaneous technique. A systematic review of the literature available in PubMed was performed. The radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated as well as complication rates. A total of 16 studies were included and 1157 procedures reported for percutaneous HV on 1246 patients. The mean angle correction of HV deformity improved postoperatively. Reported complications vary among the studies. The highest complication rate was joint stiffness in 18.47% of cases, followed by HV recurrence and shortening of M1, both in 15.2%, material intolerance in 10.1%, osteoarthritic changes in 9.1%, infection in 7.6%, and transfer metatarsalgia in 5.4%. There is a lack of randomized control trials and insufficient comparative case control studies to assess whether one technique is more effective than another or if the percutaneous surgery is recommended rather than open surgery with respect to complications.

Lisfranc Fixation Techniques and Postoperative Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review

The optimal method of fixation of acute Lisfranc injuries is yet to be established. We aim to systematically review the literature to identify the impact of fixation method on postoperative functional outcomes. A systematic review was undertaken using the PRISMA framework to identify all studies reporting postoperative functional outcomes in patients who underwent open-reduction internal fixation of acute Lisfranc injuries. Studies reporting outcomes of numerous fixation methods were divided into fixation subcohorts. Studies comparing bridge plate with transarticular screw fixation were included for meta-analysis, conducted using a random-effects model. Seventeen studies (20 subcohorts) with 462 patients were included. Mean patient age was 29.6 (rang, 15-81) years. Mean follow-up was 38.7 (range 11 to 287) months. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons midfoot score (AOFAS-MF) was the most frequently reported functional outcome (16/20 subcohorts). Overall weighted mean AOFAS-MF was 76.3 ± 9.4 for all cases, with 74.2 ± 9.4 for transarticular screws and 79.2 ± 8.3 for bridge plates. The mean difference between screw and plate was not statistically significant (mean difference = 5.0, 95% confidence interval, -4.8 - 14.8, p = .3). A single study reported AOFAS-MF mean of 92 using suture button fixation. Meta-analysis of the 2 available comparative studies revealed higher postoperative AOFAS-MF with bridge plate fixation (pooled standardized mean difference, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.87, p = .006). There is scarcity of literature examining the impact of fixation method on postoperative functional outcomes in acute Lisfranc injuries. A small number of studies have reported superior functional outcomes with use of bridge plate fixation. Further evidence is needed to ascertain which injuries are best managed with each fixation method or whether 1 fixation construct is universally superior.

Total Ankle Arthroplasty Survivorship: A Meta-analysis

The gold standard for management of end-stage ankle arthritis was previously ankle arthrodesis; however, improvements in total ankle replacements are making this a more viable treatment option. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the survivorship of total ankle replacement implants currently in use. An extensive search strategy initially captured 20,842 citations that were evaluated for relevance. Abstract screening produced 97 articles to be read in entirety, of which 10 articles studying 1963 implants met all prospective inclusion criteria for analysis. Overall survivorship of all implants was 93.0% (95% confidence interval, 85.2-96.9) using a random effect model. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (Q = 131.504). Meta-regression identified an inverse relationship between survivorship and study follow-up duration (p < .0001). Furthermore, age (p = .36) and implant type (fixed-bearing [95.6%, 95% confidence interval, 85.9-98.7] versus mobile-bearing ]89.4%, 95% confidence interval, 79.6%-94.8%]) did not have a statistically significant impact on survivorship, p = .213. However, patients with higher preoperative functional scores had improved survivorship (p = .001). Complications were inconsistently reported with varied definitions. In order of reported frequency, complications were classified into technical error (28.15%), subsidence (16.89%), implant failure (13.28%), aseptic loosening (6.3%), intraoperative fracture (5.67%), wound problems (4.3%), deep infection (1%), and postoperative fracture (0.0001%). Overall study quality was low, with only 10% being prospective and 90% from nonregistry data. The results from this meta-analysis revealed a promising overall survivorship of current implants in use for total ankle replacement; however higher quality studies with standardized outcomes measures are needed.

Danish Language Version of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) in Patients with Ankle-Related Fractures

The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) is, to date, the most widely used scale for evaluating foot and ankle disorders. We translated it into Danish and evaluated the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Danish version of the AOFAS-AHS (AOFAS-DK) in patients aged >18 years with isolated ankle-related fractures. Forward-backward translation, cross-cultural adaption, and validation study were performed. In total, 125 patients completed the AOFAS-DK and the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) at 3 time points after the date of fracture. The evaluation was performed according to the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments guidelines. The intra-class correlation coefficient level of the AOFAS-DK total score was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.91). Cronbach's alpha (CA) for the AOFAS-DK function subscale was 0.62, whereas the floor and ceiling effect of the function subscale was 32% (T1) and 19% (T2), respectively. Construct validity was correlated with the SEFAS, and >75% of the predefined hypotheses could be confirmed. Responsiveness was analyzed using longitudinal data, and showed that the AOFAS-DK can detect changes in scores. The Danish version of the self-administered section of the AOFAS-AHS showed overall good reliability, validity, and responsiveness. The low CA values and the presence of the floor effect might be due to the low number of items and response options available in the scale. The AOFAS-DK can be used to evaluate physical function in patients with ankle-related fractures.

American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Joint Scale: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study in the Persian Language

We evaluated the reliability and validity of the Persian translation of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal joint scale (AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP). The translated AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP scale form was completed for 101 patients with hallux deformities; the subjective questions were answered by the patients, whereas the orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon and his assistant answered the objective questions. The validated Persian version of the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) was used for validity assessment. Eighty-five females and 16 males with a mean age of 49 years were enrolled. Hallux valgus and hallux rigidus was the diagnosis in 73 and 28 patients, respectively. Intrarater reliability had a high level of correlation (rho >0.6) for all subscales and total score. Although the correlation between the total score of the AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP scale and role: physical subscale of SF-36 was the highest (rho = 0.47), the total score of AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP scale and the other 7 domains of SF-36 had a correlation ranging between -0.17 and 0.43. Moreover, the correlation between total score of AOFAS-Hallux MTP-IP and SF-36 physical component summary scale was 0.50, which was higher than the correlation between total score of AOFAS and SF-36 mental component summary scale (rho = 0.35). Convergent validity was approved for MTP joint motion (0.59), IP joint motion (0.51), and callus (0.56) items of AOFAS-Hallux MTP-IP. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between all items of the functional subscale of AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP scale with its own subscales was higher than the coefficient between these items and other subscales, including pain and alignment (discriminate validity). Floor and ceiling effects were calculated as 2% and 1%, respectively. Our findings indicate that the translated Persian version of the AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP scale is a reliable instrument, but its validity is not satisfactory.

Intra-articular fibrous bands at the tibiotalar joint: diagnosis and outcomes of arthroscopic removal in 4 ankles

The authors retrieved the records of 4 patients that exhibited unusual structural anomalies or pathologies, notably the presence of a fibrous band at the anterior aspect of the tibiotalar joint, observed during arthroscopic exploration or treatment between January and December 2019. Only 1 patient had surgical antecedents on the ipsilateral ankle (extra-articular tenodesis 10 years earlier). The remaining 3 patients had no surgical antecedents on the ipsilateral ankle. The fibrous band was removed in all patients during arthroscopic Brostöm procedure or exploration. For the first 3 patients, the intra-articular fibrous band was not observed prior to arthroscopy by either the senior surgeon or radiologist on any of the images (2 MRIs and 1 CTA), but retrospective inspection confirmed that the intra-articular fibrous band was present but had been overlooked.

At a follow-up of 22.3 ± 5.0 months (range, 15–26), all patients reported a decrease in pVAS (− 5.0 ± 2.6, range, 2–8), and an improvement in AOFAS (51.0 ± 17.7, range, 26–65), EFAS (14.5 ± 8.7, range, 6–23) and EFAS sport (8.0 ± 5.3, range, 2–10).

This case report corroborates the findings of an earlier discovery of an intra-articular fibrous band in 4 ankles, with more detailed information for clinical and radiologic diagnosis, as well as outcomes of arthroscopic removal. Clinicians should beware of such foreign bodies in the ankle, particularly in patients with history of sprains, and consider arthroscopic removal in cases with persistent pain and/or functional impairment.

Rheumatoid Forefoot Reconstruction in Nonrheumatic Patients: Lesser Metatarsal Head Resection versus Osteotomy

In the literature, first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with lesser metatarsal head resection seems to be a reliable procedure in rheumatoid foot deformity. Maybe this procedure could be proposed in nonrheumatoid severe forefoot deformity (hallux valgus angle >40° and lesser metatarsophalangeal dislocation). The aim of this study was to compare radiological and clinical outcomes between lesser metatarsal head resection and lesser metatarsal head osteotomy in nonrheumatoid patients. Thirty-nine patients (56 feet) suffering from well-defined nonrheumatoid severe forefoot deformity were retrospectively enrolled in our institution between 2009 and 2015. Metatarsal head resection and metatarsal head osteotomy represented 13 patients (20 feet) and 26 patients (36 feet), respectively. In this observational study, a rheumatoid population (21 patients) was included as the control. The clinical outcome measures consisted of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measurement, and Short Form-36. The radiological outcomes were: intermetatarsal angle, hallux valgus angle, and metatarsophalangeal alignment. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Satisfaction rate was, respectively, 92% for resection, 91% for osteotomy procedure, and 80% for surgery in rheumatoid patients. Short Form-36 global score was, respectively, 80.7 (52.5-96.4), 76 (57.7-93), and 68.3 (22.6-86). No functional outcome difference was found between resection and osteotomy procedures, except that the metatarsal head resection group had poorer results in sports activities than the osteotomy group. Complications were similar between osteotomy and resection (p > .05). The radiological outcomes were improved significantly from preoperative to postoperative. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis with lesser metatarsal head resection in nonrheumatoid severe forefoot deformity might be a good therapeutic option.

What is the optimal treatment for equinus deformity in walking-age children with clubfoot? A systematic review

Equinus contracture is the most common deformity at clubfoot relapse and causes pain and functional limitation. It presents a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon throughout childhood.A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included were: (i) original articles, (ii) investigating management of relapsed idiopathic clubfoot, (iii) with at least a partial study population of primarily equinus deformity, and (iv) a paediatric study population of independent walking age.Nine studies were included with a total of 163 patients (207 feet). Studies presented five management paradigms: gastrocnemius-soleus complex release, extensive posterior soft tissue and joint release, anterior distal tibial hemi-epiphysiodesis, distal tibial osteotomy, and circular frame distraction.All approaches reported success in at least one of our selected outcome domains: plantigrade status, range of motion, clinical outcome scores, functional status, radiographic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. Younger children tend to be managed with soft tissue release while older children tend to require more extensive bone/joint procedures. Relapse in surgically treated feet is harder to treat.Comparison across treatment approaches is limited by the small size and low evidence level of the literature, as well as a lack of consistent outcome reporting. It is therefore not possible to recommend any one treatment option in any age group.This review highlights the need for a validated core outcome set to enable high-quality research into the management of equinus deformity. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:354-363. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200110.

Endoscopic Surgery for Delayed Wound Healing After Achilles Tendon Suture Repair: A Report of Three Cases

Background

Delayed wound healing is a potention complication after Achilles tendon suture repair and occurs for various reasons. The conventional treatment for delayed wound healing is open surgery, but patients face long recovery times and postoperative care is difficult.

Case Presentation

This report presents three patients who were seen at our institute from April 2008 to October 2017 due to long‐term non‐healing wounds after surgery. All three patients had undergone surgery at least 2 months previously. We performed endoscopic surgery on these patients. After the operation, patients received less antibiotics and simpler care than would be required for conventional open surgery. There is no need to keep the wound open after the operation or perform wound cleaning for multiple times at the same time, which can reduce healing time. At the last follow up, all postoperative scores among the patients were significantly improved compared to before surgery. The Achilles tendon total rupture scores were excellent and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were satisfactory, indicating improvements in Achilles tendon function and movement in patients after surgery.

Conclusion

Our case reports demonstrate that arthroscopic treatment for delayed wound healing after Achilles tendon suture repair is satisfactory and reliable; frequent opening of the wound for cleaning is not required after the operation, thus reducing the healing time.

Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Neuroma

Mechanical compression of interdigital nerves beneath the deep transverse intermetatarsal ligament and between the metatarsal heads leads to painful irritation and possible fibrosis. Conservative measures of padding and injections often fail to provide long-term relief. Surgical excision provides definitive relief, but the procedure is not without risk. Incomplete excision and stump neuroma formation are a few of the possible complications associate with open excision. This retrospective cohort study was performed to provide a review of the available literature on the identification and treatment of interdigital neuromas and to examine the overall incidence of patient satisfaction after radiofrequency ablation as definitive treatment for interdigital neuroma formation. This study population consisted of 32 patients (25 females and 7 males with 1 patient having bilateral procedures) with a mean age of 46.3 ± 17 (range 31 to 65) years. For all procedures, the median patient satisfaction score was 92.5 (interquartile range 50 to 100) of 100, with a mean follow-up period of > 2.5 years. Only 1 patient in the study population reported no relief after 3 total procedures. Radiofrequency ablation offers a minimally invasive alternative with a short postoperative recovery course and considerably fewer complications compared with surgical excision of the intermetatarsal neuroma as described in prior reports.

A Development of the Essex-Lopresti Maneuver: Minimally Invasive Reduction and Fixation of Tongue-Type Calcaneal Fractures via a Single Incision

Tongue-type calcaneal fractures are a subset of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures. A reduction maneuver for this fracture pattern was described by Essex-Lopresti. The aim of this article is to describe a modification of this technique that allows reduction and fixation of tongue-type calcaneal fractures via a single, minimally invasive incision. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing fixation utilizing this technique at our institution. We identified 13 fractures in 12 patients with a median follow-up of 12 months. Median Böhler angle was 3.5° preoperatively and 26.5° at final follow-up. The median AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) hindfoot score was 78. There were no complications or further surgeries in this series. We believe that reduction and fixation of tongue-type calcaneal fractures using this minimally invasive technique is safe and reliable and avoids the potential soft tissue problems of fixation with more extensive incisions.Levels of Clinical Evidence: Level IV.

All-inside endoscopic anatomic reconstruction leads to satisfactory functional outcomes in patients with chronic ankle instability

PURPOSE

Ankle sprain is a common injury that can be treated conservatively, though many injured patients do not seek treatment or are not adequately managed, both of which can lead to subsequent chronic ankle instability (CAI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional scores and complication rates of an all-inside anatomic reconstruction technique to treat CAI at a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively collected the records of 41 patients that underwent all-inside endoscopic anatomic reconstruction of the ATFL and CFL including demographics, complications, satisfaction, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson score, and ankle activity score (AAS), at a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

RESULTS

The study cohort, comprised 34 patients aged 35.6 ± 10.8 years, were assessed at 48.7 ± 19.0 months. AOFAS scores improved from 60.3 ± 11.9 to 94.3 ± 6.2 postoperatively. Karlsson scores improved from 49.0 ± 10.9 to 87.2 ± 10.1 postoperatively. Thirty-three (97%) patients returned to the same AAS (5.6 ± 3.1) and rated their overall satisfaction ≥ 7. One patient (3%) was reoperated to treat a hematoma, while five patients (15%) were reoperated to remove the cortical fixation device that caused discomfort.

CONCLUSION

The novel all-inside endoscopic technique for anatomic reconstruction of the ATFL and CFL grants satisfactory functional outcomes at a minimum of 24 months, and the improvements in AOFAS and Karlsson scores compared favourably to those reported for other techniques in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Do We Really Need to Worry About Calcaneocuboid Subluxation During Lateral Column Lengthening for Planovalgus Foot Deformity?

BACKGROUND

Although lengthening of the lateral column through an osteotomy of the anterior calcaneus is an integral component of flatfoot reconstruction in younger patients with flexible planovalgus deformities, the procedure has been implicated in iatrogenic calcaneocuboid (CC) subluxation and subsequent degenerative changes at the CC articulation. The purpose of this study is to characterize alterations at the CC joint after lateral column lengthening (LCL) and determine if Steinmann pin stabilization of the CC joint before distraction maintains a normal relationship.

METHODS

Seven matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric feet underwent preprocedure plain radiography and cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging. LCL by osteotomy through the anterior calcaneus was then performed. One foot of each matched pair had a single smooth Steinmann pin placed centrally across the CC joint before osteotomy distraction. Distraction across each osteotomy was then performed and maintained with a 12-mm porous titanium wedge. Repeat imaging was obtained and compared with preprocedure studies to quantify sagittal and rotational differences at the CC articulation.

RESULTS

Following LCL, plain radiography demonstrated statistically significant increases in the percentage of the calcaneal articular surface dorsal to the superior aspect of the cuboid in both the pinned (8.2% vs. 17.6%, P=0.02) and unpinned (12.5% vs. 16.3%, P=0.04) specimens. No difference in the percentage of subluxation was found between the 2 groups after LCL. CT imaging demonstrated statistically significant increases in rotation between the calcaneus and cuboid after LCL in both the pinned (7.6±5.6 degrees, P=0.01) and unpinned (17±12.3 degrees, P=0.01) specimens. The degree of rotation was greater in unpinned specimens after LCL (P=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Both sagittal and rotatory subluxation seem to occur at the CC joint after LCL regardless of pin stabilization. As a single pin would be expected to limit pure translation while having little effect on rotation, it is possible that the rotational changes identified on 3-dimensional imaging are interpreted as dorsal translation when viewed 2 dimensionally using plain radiography. Consideration should therefore be given to CC stabilization with 2 pins during LCL to prevent this rotatory subluxation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V-cadaver study.

The 50 most cited articles in ankle surgery

This paper aims to establish a ranking of the 50 most cited research articles pertaining to ankle surgery in the field of orthopaedics. In addition, the demographic features such as the date of publications, location of primary author and country of the publisher were all analysed. Studies similar to these have been completed in other subspecialties, however we were not able to find studies relevant to ankle surgery. The Web of Science Cor Collection Database was utilised to identify the target articles. The most cited article was cited 394 times and the least was cited 120 times, and the majority of articles were published in the United States of America. This research will benefit the scientific community in identifying popular research topics, identifying lacking fields and identifying key hubs in the field of ankle surgery.

Incidence of concomitant chondral/osteochondral lesions in acute ankle fractures and their effect on clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite successful osteosynthesis, some patients report residual symptoms after ankle fractures. One of the reasons behind the postoperative complaints might be traumatic concomitant chondral lesions (CL) and/or osteochondral lesions (OCL) within the ankle joint. The study aims to systematically review the incidence of CL and/or OCL in ankle fractures and to assess their effect on the clinical outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This work was conducted according to PRISMA checklists. A systematic literature search was performed using following keywords: "Ankle Fractures" OR "Trimalleolar Fracture" OR "Bimalleolar Fracture" OR "Maisonneuve fracture" OR "Malleolus Fracture" AND "Cartilage" OR "Cartilage Diseases" OR "Cartilage, Articular" OR "chondral" up to March 2020. The identified articles were analysed to determine the incidence of CL and/or OCL. Included studies in the meta-analysis assessed possible cartilage damage through arthroscopy or MRI immediately after traumatic ankle fractures and described the postoperative clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The search identified a total of 111 publications; 19 described the incidence of CL and/or OCL after ankle fractures; six met the criteria to be included in the meta-analysis: five (n = 293) diagnosed CL and/or OCL through arthroscopy during ORIF and one study (n = 153) used preoperative MRI. The clinical outcome was evaluated in four studies (n = 177) using AOFAS score and in two (n = 269) using FAOS score. The mean incidence of arthroscopically detected CL and/or OCL was 65 ± 21% [95% CI 53.9 to 76.72]. The cumulative meta-analysis sample size comprised a total of 400 Patients (170 with and 230 without CL and/or OCL) available for a mean follow-up of 23.9 ± 11.5 months [95% CI 11.79 to 36.07]. The average age was 44.3 ± 5.5 years [95% CI 38.57 to 50.13]. The meta-analysis revealed a mean AOFAS score of 91.2 ± 4.8 [95% CI 83.53 to 98.93] with versus 94.4 ± 4.7 [95% CI 86.81 to 102.07] without CL and/or OCL (p = 0.15) and a mean FAOS score of 73.2 ± 11.31 [95% CI - 28.44 to 174.85] with versus 79.0 ± 18.4 [95% CI - 86.77 to 244.87] without CL and/or OCL (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

CL and/or OCL appear very frequently after ankle fractures. A tendency towards a favourable short- to mid-term clinical outcome was noticed in ankle fractures without CL and/or OCL, however without reaching statistical significance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: A systematic review

This study was performed to determine whether Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with symptomatic Osteochondral defects of the Talus (OCTs) and to identify factors that influence the clinical outcome. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three reviewers independently conducted the literature search using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The databases were queried using the terms "autologous" AND "matrix" AND "induced" AND "chondrogenesis." Thirteen studies were eligible for review. All studies that compared the preoperative and postoperative mean values of different clinical/functional scores showed significant clinical improvement. The final postoperative mean Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score ranged from 50.9 to 74.5. The included studies indicated that age and body mass index may have a detrimental impact on the postoperative outcome. A higher re-intervention rate is expected with the open technique, mainly because of hardware removal after malleolar osteotomy. This data analysis demonstrated that both arthroscopic and open AMIC procedures are effective and safe for the treatment of OCTs. Level IV, systematic review of therapeutic studies.

Development and psychometric performance of the French language version of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ)

BACKGROUND

The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is a 16-item patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) validated for use in patients with foot and ankle pathologies. It contains three sub-scores for pain, walking/standing and social interaction dimensions. The aim of this study was to develop a French language version of the MOXFQ and to assess its psychometric properties in patients affected by foot and ankle pathologies.

METHODS

According to guidelines, forward and backward independent translations were performed. The final French version was pre-tested in 45 patients. The French MOXFQ and the Short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) were filled in by 149 patients. A retest was performed in 39 patients. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis, and through correlations of MOXFQ scales with SF-36 scales.

RESULTS

Internal consistency coefficients were high with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.79 and 0.94. Test-retest ICCs were between 0.74 and 0.93. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. The correlations between French MOXFQ and French SF-36 subscales were moderate ranging from -0.33 to -0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

The French translation of the MOXFQ revealed good psychometric properties. Our French version proved to be a reliable instrument which can be used for evaluation of patients with foot and ankle disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an Arabic version of the American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)

BACKGROUND

The evaluation process is essential to optimize the management of patients with foot and ankle pathologies and disorders. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the four scoring systems of the American Orthopedics Foot and ankle Score (AOFAS) into Arabic and explore its psychometric properties.

METHODS

A multicenter observational design was used, following the forward-backward translation method. One hundred and twenty patients with foot and ankle problems were included. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were analyzed using Intra-class correlation coefficients; internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha, and the responsiveness was analyzed using a paired-sample test.

RESULTS

The validity ranged from 0.303 to 0.542 and from 0.018 to 0.753 when correlated to the SF-12 physical and mental component scores, respectively. Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.727 to 0.974; from 0.826 to 0.983 for internal consistency and from 0.001 to 0.182 for sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The AOFAS's four systems were successfully translated and culturally adapted into Arabic with sufficient psychometric properties.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

II.