Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity

Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of this review was to take an in-depth look at the six most cited measurement tools to assess FAI, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures related to ankle and foot. Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and SportDiscus) were searched (up to November 2022) to identify the six most cited questionnaires for assessing FAI. Our analysis showed that the most cited questionnaires are the following: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Each questionnaire was thoroughly assessed and discussed in three sections: Development, Reliability, and Summaries. In addition, bibliometric data were calculated to analyze the relevance of each questionnaire. Despite variations in terms of validity and reliability, conceptualization, structure, and usefulness, the six questionnaires proved to be robust from a psychometric point of view, being widely supported in the literature. The bibliometric analyses suggested that the FAOS ranks first and the FFI ranks sixth in the weighted average of the impact factors of their original publications.

Clinical outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis for the treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity

BACKGROUND

The use of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is controversial. The aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes and report the implant removal rate of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct for stage 1 PCFD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 212 consecutive feet undergoing operative management of stage 1 PCFD with adjunctive subtalar arthroereisis between October 2010 and April 2018. The primary outcome was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Secondary outcomes included Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Euroqol-5D-5L Index and implant removal rate.

RESULTS

Post-operative clinical FAOS outcomes were collected for 153 feet (72.2%). At mean 2.5-year follow-up, the mean ± standard deviation FAOS for each domain was as follows; Pain: 81.5 ± 18.5, Symptoms: 79.5 ± 12.9, Activities of Daily Living: 82.5 ± 15.4 and Quality of Life: 64.2 ± 23.7. EQ-5D-5L Index was 0.884 ± 0.152. Pre-operative scores were available for 20 of these feet demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in all FAOS, FADI and EQ-5D-5L domains (p < 0.05). The implant removal rate for persistent sinus tarsi pain was 48.1% (n = 102).

CONCLUSION

Use of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct to conventional procedures in stage 1 flexible PCFD can result in significant improvement in pain and function. Patients should be counselled as to the relatively frequent rate of subsequent implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to validate the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). We hypothesize that the FAOS will meet all 4 psychometric criteria for validity in this patient population.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2014, a total of 208 patients with OLTs were included in the construct validity portion of the study. All patients completed FAOS and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) scores. Twenty additional patients were prospectively recruited and were asked to complete questionnaires to determine the relevance of each of the FAOS questions as it related to their OLT. Forty-four patients completed the FAOS 1 month after the first FAOS to assess reliability via Spearman correlation coefficient. Responsiveness of the FAOS was assessed with 54 patients who had both preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores via Student paired t test with significance determined as P < .05. In total, 229 unique patients were included in this study.

RESULTS

Statistically significant associations were found between all FAOS and SF-12 subscales (P < .01). The FAOS symptoms subscale demonstrated the lowest correlation with the SF-12 physical health domains. No floor or ceiling effects were identified. Weak correlations were calculated between the 5 FAOS subscales and the SF-12 mental component summary score. All FAOS domains met the threshold for acceptable content validity (score > 2.0). All FAOS subscales demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability, with ICC values ranging from 0.81 (ADL) to 0.92 (Pain).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the acceptable yet moderate construct and content validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the FAOS for patients with OLTs of the ankle joint. We endorse the use of the FAOS in evaluating ankle OLTs in both the research and clinical setting and consider it a useful patient-reported, self-administered instrument following surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case study.

Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Use in Infracalcaneal Heel Pain

There is growing interest in adopting validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measures following surgery. While the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) has previously been validated for use in multiple foot/ankle conditions, it has not yet been validated in patients with infracalcaneal heel pain. In this study we aimed to validate the FAOS by looking at 4 psychometric properties of the survey: construct validity, content validity, reliability, and responsiveness, using patients in our practice with a clinical diagnosis of plantar fasciitis. A total of 150 patients (mean age 49.7 ± 12.1 years [36 men and 114 women]) were included in one or more of the 4 components of this study. All FAOS subscales demonstrated adequate construct validity when compared with the physical health component of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and 2 out of 5 subscales demonstrated moderate correlation with the mental health component of SF-12 (all Spearman rho >0.3, and p values <0.05). Most FAOS subscales demonstrated content validity and were found to contain relevant questions from the patient's perspective. All 5 subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.827. Finally, 4 out of the 5 subscales (all but other symptoms) were responsive to change at a mean follow up of 12.2 months after surgery (p < .05). We conclude that the FAOS is a responsive, reliable, and valid instrument for use in infracalcaneal heel pain. We believe that due to its ease of use and broad applicability, the FAOS could be more widely adopted in foot/ankle practices as patient-centered healthcare delivery and research becomes increasingly prioritized in the US and abroad.

Characteristics and Future Direction of Tibialis Posterior Tendinopathy Research: A Scoping Review

Background and Objectives: Tibialis posterior tendon pathologies have been traditionally categorized into different stages of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD), or adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), and more recently to progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize and characterize literature on early stages of PTTD (previously known as Stage I and II), which we will describe as tibialis posterior tendinopathy (TPT). We aim to identify what is known about TPT, identify gaps in knowledge on the topics of TPT, and propose future research direction. Materials and Methods: We included 44 studies and categorized them into epidemiology, diagnosis, evaluation, biomechanics outcome measure, imaging, and nonsurgical treatment. Results: A majority of studies (86.4%, 38 of 44 studies) recruited patients with mean or median ages greater than 40. For studies that reported body mass index (BMI) of the patients, 81.5% had mean or median BMI meeting criteria for being overweight. All but two papers described study populations as predominantly or entirely female gender. Biomechanical studies characterized findings associated with TPT to include increased forefoot abduction and rearfoot eversion during gait cycle, weak hip and ankle performance, and poor balance. Research on non-surgical treatment focused on orthotics with evidence mostly limited to observational studies. The optimal exercise regimen for the management of TPT remains unclear due to the limited number of high-quality studies. Conclusions: More epidemiological studies from diverse patient populations are necessary to better understand prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for TPT. The lack of high-quality studies investigating nonsurgical treatment options is concerning because, regardless of coexisting foot deformity, the initial treatment for TPT is typically conservative. Additional studies comparing various exercise programs may help identify optimal exercise therapy, and investigation into further nonsurgical treatments is needed to optimize the management for TPT.

Ultrasound assessment of distal femoral cartilage thickness measurements after walking/jogging in subjects with pes planus

BACKGROUND

Because there is a closed kinematic chain between the lower extremity joints during weight-bearing activities, pes planus can affect knee biomechanics.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure distal femoral cartilage thickness with ultrasound after 3 different conditions (at rest, during walking and jogging) in subjects with pes planus and compare these conditions with each other and also with controls.

METHOD

Sixteen participants with pes planus(5-men, 11-women; aged 18-30 years) and 16 controls(3-men, 13-women; aged 18-30 years) were enrolled. Distal femoral cartilage thickness was evaluated with ultrasound before and after three separate 30-min conditions. Preferred walking speed (PWS) was determined on the ground. Subjects walked on a treadmill for 30-min at their PWS and jogged 30-min at 30% above their PWS. The Foot Function Index and the Foot-Ankle Outcome Survey were used to evaluate the clinical and functional status of the subjects.

RESULTS

Neither PWSs nor jogging speeds were statistically different between groups (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for absolute and percent change of cartilage thickness for all three conditions (p > 0.05). There were also no statistically significant differences between conditions for each intragroup (p > 0.05). The median Foot Function Index score of the subjects with pes planus was 9.78(0-44.35) for the right foot and 9.52(0-40.87) for the left foot. The median the Foot-Ankle Outcome Survey score of the subjects with pes planus was 88(65-100).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in knee joint cartilage deformations under different loading conditions, neither in subjects with pes planus nor in controls.

Subtalar Fusion for Correction of Forefoot Abduction in Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

BACKGROUND

Correction of talonavicular uncoverage (TNU) in adult-acquired flatfoot deformities (AAFD) can be a challenge. Lateral column lengthening (LCL) traditionally is utilized to address this. The primary study objective is examining stage II AAFD patients and determining if correction can be achieved with subtalar fusion (STF) comparable to LCL.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, retrospective chart review performed identifying patients meeting criteria for stage IIB AAFD who underwent either STF with concomitant flatfoot procedures (but not LCL) to correct TNU, or who underwent LCL as part of their flatfoot reconstruction. Patients indicated for STF had one or more of the following: higher body mass index (BMI), were older, had greater deformity, lateral impingement pain, intraoperative spring ligament hyperlaxity. Patients without 1-year follow-up or compete records were excluded. All other patients were included. A total of 27 isolated STFs identified, along with 143 who underwent LCL. Pre-/postoperative radiographic parameters obtained as well as PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) and FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) scores. Radiographic and patient reported outcomes both preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up evaluated for both groups.

RESULTS

STF patients were older (P < .05), with higher BMIs (P < .004). STF had significantly worse TNU (P < .001) than LCL patients, and average change in STF TNU was larger than LCL change postoperatively (P = .006), after adjusting for age, BMI, gender. PROMIS STF improvement reached statistical significance in Physical Function (P 0.011), for FAOS Pain (P 0.025) and Function (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

STF can be used in appropriately indicated patients to correct flatfoot deformity without compromising radiographic or clinical, correcting not only hindfoot valgus, but also talonavicular uncoverage (TNU) and corresponding medial arch collapse.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective chart review comparison study (case control).

Evaluation and Validation of the Dutch European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) Score

The European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score is a recently developed foot and ankle patient-reported outcome measure. It has been developed and partly validated in seven languages. This study's aim was to investigate the measurement properties of the Dutch version of the EFAS score. Subscales of the Dutch EFAS score were evaluated in 547 patients with a variety of foot and ankle diagnoses. Floor and ceiling effect, reliability, and construct validity were assessed. The internal consistency of the EFAS score was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha 0.79-0.94). Repeatability was considered poor, with intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.32 and 0.39. Construct validity was inadequate with confirmation of 67% of the hypothesized correlations. In conclusion, the Dutch version of the EFAS score does not have adequate measurement properties for use in patient with patients with varying foot and ankle problems.

Midterm Survivorship of the INBONE II Total Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The use of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in the treatment of ankle arthritis has grown substantially as advancements are made in design and surgical technique. Among the criteria guiding the choice between arthroplasty and arthrodesis, the long-term survival and postoperative outcomes are of crucial importance. Although outcomes of the INBONE I have been published, there is limited midterm survival data for the INBONE II. The purpose of this study was to determine the radiographic and patient-reported outcomes, and survivorship of this prosthesis in patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 51 ankles (46 patients) from 2010 to 2015 who underwent TAA with the INBONE II prosthesis at our institution. Of these, 44 cases had minimum clinical follow-up of 5 years (mean, 6.4; range 5-9). Median age was 66 years (range 42-81) and median BMI was 27.5 (range 20.1-33.0). A chart review was performed to record the incidence of revision and reoperation. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed to assess the coronal tibiotalar alignment (TTA), the talar inclination angle, and the presence of periprosthetic lucencies and cyst formation. Preoperative and minimum 5-year postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) subscales were compared. Survivorship was determined by incidence of revision, defined as removal of a metallic component.

RESULTS

The survivorship at 5 years was 98% and the rate of reoperation was 7.8% (n = 4); 2 patients underwent irrigation and debridement for infection, 1 patient underwent a medializing calcaneal osteotomy, and 1 patient underwent open gutter debridement, 1 patient underwent a revision of a subsided talar component at 3.2 years after index surgery. Average postoperative TTA was 88.6 degrees, with 42 rated as neutral (85-95 degrees), 2 varus (<85 degrees), and no valgus (>95 degrees) ankles. At final follow-up, asymptomatic periprosthetic cysts were observed in 8 patients. All FAOS domain scores improved between preoperative and final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

At midterm follow-up, we observed significant improvement in radiographic alignment and patient-reported outcome scores for the INBONE II total ankle prosthesis. In addition, this cohort has had a relatively low reoperation rate and high survivorship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Structural validity of the foot and ankle outcome score for orthopaedic pathologies with Rasch Measurement Theory

BACKGROUND

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures for foot and ankle conditions. The aim is to test the structural validity of the Finnish version of the FAOS using Rasch Measurement Theory.

METHODS

FAOS scores were obtained from 218 consecutive patients who received operative treatment for foot and ankle conditions. The FAOS data were fitted into the Rasch model and person separation index (PSI) calculated.

RESULTS

All the five subscales provided good coverage and targeting. Three subscales presented unidimensional structure. Thirty-eight of the 42 items had ordered response category thresholds. Three of the 42 items had differential item functioning towards gender. All subscales showed sufficient fit to the Rasch model. PSI ranged from 0.73 to 0.94 for the subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The Finnish version of the FAOS shows acceptable structural validity for assessing complaints in orthopaedic foot and ankle patients.

Minimal important change for Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

BACKGROUND

Although Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for foot and ankle conditions, research on its longitudinal validity is still needed. Minimal important change (MIC) values for the FAOS were determined using predictive modeling.

METHODS

Overall, 134 patients that underwent operative treatment for foot and ankle conditions were included. An anchor based predictive logistic modeling method was used for estimating the MIC values for the FAOS subscales after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean score changes in the improved and the unimproved groups were 17.7 and 0.43 points for Pain, 3.9 and -3.3 points for Symptoms, 21.3 and 1.8 points for Activities and daily living (ADL), 8.7 and -2.8 points for Sport, and 12.5 and -3.3 points for quality of life subscale, respectively. MIC was successfully determined to four out of five subgroups as follows: Pain 9.5 (94% CI -6.4 to 24.6); ADL 11.7 (95% CI -19.6 to 46.6); Sport (95% CI -10.4 to 15.4); QoL 5.0 (95% CI -2.6 to 12.9). The Symptoms subgroup presented with low MIC of 0.3 (95% CI -11.7 to 13.4) fitting to the measurement error.

CONCLUSION

ADL, Sports, Pain, and QoL subscales of the FAOS presented logical MIC values. The MIC can be further evaluated for specific conditions.

Comparison of Calcaneal Subchondral Injection of Calcium Phosphate and Plantar Fasciotomy vs Plantar Fasciotomy Alone for Refractory Infracalcaneal Heel Pain

BACKGROUND

Treatment of chronic refractory heel pain has evolved to consider calcaneal structural fatigue as a component of the symptom profile. While concomitant calcium phosphate injection has become a method of addressing the accompanying calcaneal bone marrow edema (BME) frequently seen in this population, there is no literature supporting its use compared to traditional fasciotomy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with symptoms of refractory infracalcaneal heel pain and calcaneal BME were treated in our practice by either surgical fasciotomy (n = 33) or fasciotomy plus calcium phosphate injection (n = 31) between 2014 and 2019. Outcomes were retrospectively assessed via Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), return to activity, and complication rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (64 feet) were included with a mean age of 50.3 ± 12.9 years and mean follow-up of 23.2 ± 22.3 months. No differences were observed between groups preoperatively. Significant improvements in 4 of 5 FAOS subscales were observed postoperatively in both groups (P < .05 for all, paired t test). However, patients undergoing concomitant calcium phosphate injection reported significantly better scores for both activities of daily living (ADL; mean difference +10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-20.2) and foot-specific QOL (mean difference +21.9, 95% CI 7.0-36.6) at final follow-up compared with those undergoing plantar fasciotomy alone. All patients returned to their desired level of activity, and the frequency of complications did not differ between groups (P > .05, Fisher exact test).

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with recalcitrant infracalcaneal heel pain accompanied by calcaneal BME, calcium phosphate injection into the calcaneus, when combined with plantar fasciotomy, was safe and more effective than traditional plantar fasciotomy alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) During Early Recovery After Ankle Fracture

BACKGROUND

Several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are available for assessing the outcomes following ankle fractures. This study aimed to evaluate validity, reliability, and responsiveness and detect the minimal clinically important difference of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in patients with ankle fractures.

METHODS

The study design is a prospective cohort study, including all patients treated both conservatively and surgically following an ankle fracture (AO-43A/B/C). Content validity, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference were evaluated from 14 days to 3 months following the fracture.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 52 females and 24 males. The mean age was 52.0 years (range, 15-75 years). The percentage of patients at 12 weeks reporting the 5 subscales at least somewhat relevant were pain, 77%; symptoms, 75%; activities of daily living (ADL), 64%; sport, 81%; and quality of life (QOL), 88%. High test-retest reliability of the FAOS questionnaire was observed. The interclass coefficients were 0.78, 0.77, 0.71, 0.73, and 0.74 for the pain, symptoms, ADL, sport, and QOL subscales, respectively. Responsiveness was evaluated with high effect size for the symptoms (0.83), ADL (1.19), sport (4.36), and QOL (2.12) subscales. The minimal clinically important difference of the FAOS was 14 (95% CI, 12-17).

CONCLUSION

The FAOS during early recovery after ankle fracture has high reliability and validity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Influence of Complications and Revision Surgery on Fulfillment of Expectations in Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

Fulfillment of patients' expectations following foot and ankle surgery has been previously studied, and shown to be an effective modality in assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Although this assessment has been shown to correlate well with patient satisfaction and other validated PROs, the impact of postoperative complications on fulfillment of expectations is unknown. The aim of this study is to therefore investigate the impact of postoperative complications on fulfillment of patients' expectations.

METHODS

Preoperatively, patients completed a validated Foot and Ankle Expectations Survey consisting of 23 questions encompassing domains including pain, ambulation, daily function, exercise, and shoe wear. At 2 years postoperatively, patients answered how much improvement they received for each item cited preoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated as the amount of improvement received versus the amount of improvement expected. Chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, comorbidities, pain management, and postoperative complications, which were classified as minor (infection requiring antibiotics) or major (return to operating room for revision, deep infection). FP in patients with a complication was compared to patients who did not experience a complication. In addition, the Foot and Ankle Outcomes Score (FAOS), satisfaction, and Delighted-Terrible scale (how they would feel if asked to spend the rest of their life with their current foot/ankle symptom) were collected at final follow-up. Of the 271 patients (mean age 55.4 years, 65% female), 31 (11.4%, mean age 53.6, 58% female) had a postoperative complication: 25 major (19 revisions, 6 deep infections requiring irrigation and debridement), 4 minor (4 superficial infections requiring antibiotics), and 2 major and minor (revision and superficial infection). Average time from complication to completion of fulfillment survey was 15 (±3.6) months. The groups were similar in diagnoses.

RESULTS

Complications were associated with significantly worse FP (0.69 ± 0.45 vs 0.86 ± 0.40, P = .02). Having a complication significantly correlated with worse satisfaction, Delighted-Terrible scale, and FP (P < .001). FAOS domains were similar between groups preoperatively; postoperatively, patients without complications had significantly higher Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life scores (P < .05). Demographically, there was no difference in age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, depression/anxiety, or pain management between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that postoperative complications following foot and ankle surgery were associated with worse patient-reported fulfillment of their operative expectations even after recovery from the initial surgery and complication. This finding is independent of preoperative expectations, and correlates with patient satisfaction with their procedure. Therefore, while patient-perceived fulfillment following foot and ankle surgery is multifactorial, the incidence of a postoperative complication negatively impacts fulfillment as well as satisfaction following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative series.

Lateral column osteotomy versus subtalar arthroereisis in the correction of Grade IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity: A clinical and radiological follow-up at 24 months

BACKGROUND

Adult acquired flat foot deformity (AAFD) is a spectrum of conditions which can be progressive if untreated. Surgical correction and restoration of anatomical relationship are often required in the treatment of symptomatic Grade II AAFD after a failed course of conservative treatment. There is a paucity of literature recommending best practice-especially in the adult population. The authors aim to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of two widely employed surgical techniques in the treatment of symptomatic AAFD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 76 patients with Grade IIB AAFD and had undergone either lateral column lengthening (LCL) or subtalar arthroereisis (STA) surgical correction of their symptomatic AAFD. Each technique was augmented with both bony osteotomy and soft tissue transfer as determined by on table assessment. Clinical and radiological outcomes were reviewed 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

LCL and STA groups had comparable radiological outcomes at 24 months after surgery. However, LCL group demonstrated superior American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot (90.3 ± 12.6 vs 81.1 ± 20.6, p < 0.001) as well as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) midfoot scores (0.5 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 2.4, p < 0.001) at 24 months compared to the STA group. STA had a higher complication rate (20.6% vs 4.4%), with all cases complaining of sinus tarsi pain requiring subsequent removal of implant.

CONCLUSION

There is a role for either techniques in the treatment of symptomatic AAFD. LCL whilst more invasive has demonstrated superior outcome scores and lower complication rates at 24 months compared to STA. Patients need to be counselled appropriately to appreciate the benefits of each technique.

Effectiveness of Hospital-Based Systemic Rehabilitation in Improving Ankle Function after Surgery in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients

We investigated the therapeutic effect of a postoperative hospital-based systemic rehabilitation protocol on ankle function in chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients. Thirty-five patients who underwent a modified Broström procedure for CAI were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Fifty-minute sessions of hospital-based rehabilitation were performed three times weekly for 12 weeks in the intervention group. Education-based rehabilitation was conducted at home in the control group. The outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0), 12 weeks (T1), and 16 weeks (T2). The primary outcome was the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS). Ankle motor strength and spatiotemporal gait metrics were assessed as secondary outcomes. There were significant time and group interaction effects on the pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports activities, and quality of life (QOL) domains of the FAOS (P < 0.05, all). The patients in the intervention group showed larger improvements in all domains of the FAOS than did the control group at both T1 and T2 (P < 0.05, all). The time and group interaction effects on invertor and evertor strength were also significant (P = 0.047 and P = 0.044). Invertor and evertor strength improved significantly more in the intervention group than in the control group at T1 and T2 (P < 0.05, all). The preferred walking velocity, cadence, step length on the affected side, and double stance phase duration tended to improve over time. Postoperative hospital-based rehabilitation helped improve CAI pain, symptoms, independence in activities of daily living, sports activity levels, and QOL more effectively than did conventional rehabilitation at home.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Assessment in Primary and Revision Stage II, III, and IV Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND

Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a progressive hindfoot and midfoot deformity causing pain and disability. Although operative treatment is stage dependent, few studies have looked at patient-reported and radiographic outcomes stratified by primary vs revision stage II, III, and IV reconstruction surgery. Our goal was to assess operative improvement using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and to determine whether radiographic parameter improvement correlates with patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores were prospectively obtained on 46 consecutive patients who underwent PCFD reconstruction between November 2013 and January 2019. Thirty-six patients completed pre- and postoperative PROMIS surveys, 6 patients completed only preoperative PROMIS surveys, and 4 patients completed 12-month postoperative PROMIS surveys but did not complete preoperative PROMIS surveys. Minimum follow-up was 12 (average, 23) months. Radiographic correction was measured with pre- and postoperative weightbearing radiographs and correlated with PROMIS scores. Measurements included the talonavicular uncoverage angle, talonavicular uncoverage percentage, anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal angle, Meary angle, medial cuneiform height (MCH), and medial cuneiform-fifth metatarsal height.

RESULTS

For the overall cohort, PROMIS PF increased significantly from 37.5±5.6 to 42.3±7.1 (P = .0014). PROMIS PI improved significantly from 64.5±6.0 to 55.1±9.8 (P < .0001). Preoperative, postoperative, and change in PROMIS scores were not statistically different between PCFD stages. Change in PROMIS PI was significantly greater in primary (-12.3) vs revision (-3.7) surgery (P = .0157). Change in PROMIS PF was greater in primary (+6.0) vs revision surgery (+2.3) but did not reach statistical significance. All radiographic measurements improved significantly (P < .05). In primary stage II PCFD, postoperative PROMIS scores correlated with postoperative MCH (PF: r = 0.7725, P = .0020; PI: r = -0.5692, P = .0446).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes improved significantly after PCFD reconstruction. We found no significant difference in preoperative, postoperative, or change in PROMIS scores between PCFD stages. However, stage III patients had smaller improvements in PROMIS PF, which we feel may be secondary to change in function after arthrodesis. Primary operations had better patient-reported outcomes compared to revision operations. In primary stage II PCFD, reconstructing the medial arch height correlated significantly with improvement in pain and functionality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Estimates of Direct and Indirect Costs of Ankle Fractures: A Prospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The quantification of the costs of ankle fractures and their associated treatments has garnered increased attention in orthopaedics through cost-effectiveness analysis. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the direct and indirect costs of ankle fractures in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, single-center study was performed. Adult patients presenting for an initial consult for an ankle fracture were enrolled and were followed until recurring indirect costs amounted to zero. Patients completed a cost form at every visit that assessed time away from work and the money spent in the last week on transportation, household chores, and self-care due to an ankle fracture. Direct cost data were obtained directly from the hospital billing department.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in this study. With regard to patient characteristics, the mean patient age was 46.5 years, 55% of patients were female, 10% of patients had diabetes, and 17% of patients were active smokers. Weber A fractures composed 12% of fractures, Weber B fractures composed 72% of fractures, and Weber C fractures composed 18% of fractures. Operatively treated patients (n = 37) had significantly higher total costs and direct costs compared with nonoperatively treated patients (p < 0.01). In all patients, losses from missed work accounted for the largest portion of total and indirect costs, with a mean percentage of 35.8% of the total cost. The mean period preceding return to work of the 39 employed patients was 11.2 weeks. Longer periods of return to work were significantly associated with surgical fixation and having less than a college-level education (p < 0.05). The mean time for recurring observed costs to cease was 19.1 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated operatively and nonoperatively, the largest discrete cost component was a specific indirect cost. Indirect costs accounted for a mean of 41.3% of the total cost. Although the majority of the direct costs of ankle fractures are accrued in the period immediately following the injury, indirect cost components will regularly be incurred for nearly 5 months and often longer. To capture the full economic impact of these injuries, future research should include detailed reporting on an intervention's impact on the indirect costs of ankle fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of the Salto Talaris Total Ankle Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Salto Talaris is a fixed-bearing implant first approved in the US in 2006. While early surgical outcomes have been promising, mid- to long-term survivorship data are limited. The aim of this study was to present the survivorship and causes of failure of the Salto Talaris implant, with functional and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Eighty-seven prospectively followed patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty with the Salto Talaris between 2007 and 2015 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Of these, 82 patients (85 ankles) had a minimum follow-up of 5 (mean, 7.1; range, 5-12) years. The mean age was 63.5 (range, 42-82) years and the mean body mass index was 28.1 (range, 17.9-41.2) kg/m². Survivorship was determined by incidence of revision, defined as removal/exchange of a metal component. Preoperative, immediate, and minimum 5-year postoperative AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs were reviewed; tibiotalar alignment (TTA) and the medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) were measured to assess coronal talar and tibial alignment, respectively. The sagittal tibial angle (STA) was measured; the talar inclination angle (TIA) was measured to evaluate for radiographic subsidence of the implant, defined as a change in TIA of 5 degrees or more from the immediately to the latest postoperative lateral radiograph. The locations of periprosthetic cysts were documented. Preoperative and minimum 5-year postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) subscales were compared.

RESULTS

Survivorship was 97.6% with 2 revisions. One patient underwent tibial and talar component revision for varus malalignment of the ankle; another underwent talar component revision for aseptic loosening and subsidence. The rate of other reoperations was 21.2% (n = 18), with the main reoperation being exostectomy with debridement for ankle impingement (n = 12). At final follow-up, the average TTA improved 4.4 (± 3.8) degrees, the average MDTA improved 3.4 (± 2.6) degrees, and the average STA improved 5.3 (± 4.5) degrees. Periprosthetic cysts were observed in 18 patients, and there was no radiographic subsidence. All FAOS subscales demonstrated significant improvement at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We found the Salto Talaris implant to be durable, consistent with previous studies of shorter follow-up lengths. We observed significant improvement in radiographic alignment as well as patient-reported clinical outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Outcomes Following Revision Surgery After Failed Kidner Procedure for Painful Accessory Navicular

BACKGROUND

The Kidner procedure is performed to treat painful accessory navicular syndrome, with varying results. Recurrent pain remains a complication, and to date, there is a paucity of literature regarding the causes of recurrent pain and surgical outcomes of revision.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients who underwent revision surgery for recurrent pain after the Kidner procedure were identified. All patients had their tendon inspected and treated, and all had a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy. Revision was indicated after 6 months of failed conservative therapy. Pre- and postrevision radiographic measurements included lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (Meary's angle), talonavicular coverage angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot moment arm (HMA). Meary's angle >4 degrees was considered a planus deformity and HMA >9.1 mm was considered a hindfoot valgus deformity; patients fulfilling both criteria were categorized as having planovalgus deformity. Measurements in the contralateral foot were performed to determine whether alignment of the involved side was attributed to failed treatment or a preexisting deformity. Visual analog scale and Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores were compared and average follow-up was 20.1 months (range, 14-26).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 20 of 21 (95%) patients had a form of valgus heel alignment (planovalgus, n = 11; hindfoot valgus only, n = 9), and 1 had an isolated planus deformity. The contralateral side revealed similar deformity, with 17 of 21 (81%) patients having a form of valgus heel alignment (planovalgus, n = 13; hindfoot valgus only, n = 4) and 4 patients with an isolated planus deformity. All patients underwent realignment surgery with medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy. All radiographic parameters except Meary's angle (P = .885) significantly improved postoperatively along with significantly improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent pain following the Kidner procedure was associated with valgus heel alignment. Revision surgery including realignment procedure alleviated pain and improved functional outcomes with minimal complications. Therefore, we recommend assessing heel alignment in patients presenting with recurrent pain following the Kidner procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Delayed stabilisation of dynamically unstable syndesmotic injuries results in worse functional outcomes

PURPOSE

Patients with primarily ligamentous injuries of the distal tibiofibular joint comprise up to 12% of all ankle sprains. Patients frequently present late after a syndesmosis injury and delayed treatment potentially leads to pain, prolonged disability and arthritis in the long term. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes in patients who required syndesmosis fixation in the presence of arthroscopically proven instability, the hypothesis being that a delay to treatment would be associated with worse function.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients with dynamic instability requiring fixation between the years of 2010-2016. The procedures were performed by two foot and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons, over three hospital sites. Patients were classified into three groups based on the time since injury to surgery, acute syndesmotic injury (< 6 weeks), sub-acute (6 weeks-6 months) and chronic syndesmotic injury (> 6 months). Functional scores were retrospectively collected using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).

RESULTS

Compared to patients with acute injuries, those with chronic injuries had significantly lower FAOS subscales (p < 0.001), with the greatest difference in quality of life (- 20.7, 95% CI - 31.6 to - 9.8, p = 0.012). There was a mean follow-up of 4.3 years. Although the average FAOS subscales in those with sub-acute injuries were lower than in those with acute injuries, the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that delayed surgical stabilisation (> 6 months) is associated with significantly worse clinical function, and thus timely identification and early referral of those patients with potentially unstable syndesmotic injuries is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Chopart Amputation: Questioning the Clinical Efficacy of a Long-standing Surgical Option for Diabetic Foot Infection

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers with associated infection and osteomyelitis often lead to partial or complete limb loss. Determination of the appropriate level for amputation based on the patient's baseline physical function, extent of infection, vascular patency, and comorbidities can be challenging. Although Chopart amputation preserves greater limb length than more proximal alternatives such as Syme or below-the-knee amputations (BKA), challenges with wound healing and prosthesis fitting have been reported. We aimed to investigate the functional and clinical outcomes of Chopart amputation combined with tendon transfers.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent Chopart amputations for diabetic foot infections by an academic orthopaedic group between August 2013 and September 2018. Subjects completed three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) instruments. Incidence of postoperative complications and change in patient-reported outcomes before and after surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with an average age of 60.8 (range, 44 to 79) years were identified. The mean follow-up was 22.8 months (range, 6.7 to 51.0). Seventeen of the 18 total patients developed postoperative wound complications. These lead to revision amputations in 10 Chopart amputees, consisting of two Syme and eight BKAs. Half of the Chopart patients never received a prosthesis because of delayed wound healing and revision amputation. PROMIS physical function (PF) (31.1 pre-op and 28.6 post-op), pain interference (63.1 pre-op and 59.4 post-op), and depression (53.0 pre-op and 54.8 post-op) did not show significant change (P-values = 0.38, 0.29, 0.72, respectively). Pre- and post-op the PROMIS physical function scores were well below the US average.

DISCUSSION

In our patient cohort, 94% of patients developed postoperative wound complication. Only 44% of patients ever successfully ambulated with a prosthesis after Chopart amputation, and the others (56%) required revision amputations such as a BKA. Even after wound healing, Chopart amputees may struggle with obtaining a prosthesis suitable for ambulation. Surgeons should exercise judicious patient selection before performing Chopart amputation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Case Series.

Dynamic and Stabilometric Analysis After Syndesmosis Injuries

BACKGROUND

Distal tibiofibular syndesmosis contributes to dynamic stability of the ankle joint and thereby affects gait cycle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the grade of syndesmosis injury on plantar pressure distribution and dynamic parameters of the foot.

METHODS

Grade of syndesmosis injury was determined by preoperative plain radiographic evaluation, intraoperative hook test, or external rotation stress test under fluoroscopic examination, and two groups were created: group 1, patients with grade III syndesmosis injury (n = 17); and group 2, patients with grade II syndesmosis injury (n = 10). At the last visit, radiologic and clinical assessment using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score was performed. Dynamic and stabilometric analysis was carried out at least 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 48.9 years (range, 17-80 years), and the mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 12-24 months). No statistically significant difference was noted between two groups regarding Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. The comparison of stabilometric and dynamic analysis revealed no significant difference between grade II and grade III injuries (P > .05). However, comparison of the data of patients with grade III syndesmosis injury between injured and healthy feet showed a significant difference for dynamic maximum and mean pressures (P = .035 and P = .49, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Syndesmosis injury does not affect stance phase but affects the gait cycle by generating increased pressures on the uninjured foot and decreased pressures on the injured foot. With the help of pedobarography, processing suitable orthopedic insoles for the injured foot and interceptive measures for overloading of the normal foot may prevent later consequences of ankle trauma.

Symptom and Disability Measurement by Common Foot and Ankle-Specific Outcome Rating Scales

BACKGROUND

Well-designed foot and ankle clinical outcomes research requires region-specific subjective outcome measures. Many foot and ankle-specific instruments are now available. Determining which instruments to choose is daunting. We present a patient survey to determine the most relevant questions pertaining to them.

METHODS

Sixteen foot and ankle-specific outcome instruments were chosen based on popularity, emphasizing valid, reliable, responsive scores. Subjective portions were consolidated and given to 109 patients with osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) (39), ankle instability (35), and ankle arthritis (35). Outcome instruments were measured according to 4 criteria: number of questions endorsed by 51%, number with high mean importance, number with low mean importance, and number with the highest-ranking frequency importance product. Instruments were then ranked based on relative score, with the highest scores indicating the instrument was the most useful for that sample.

RESULTS

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) achieved the highest score in all 4 categories for OLT, followed by Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Score. The FAOS achieved the highest score in all 4 categories for ankle instability, followed by FAAM and AAOS. For osteoarthritis, the FAOS achieved the highest relative score followed by FAAM and AAOS. The AOF, Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, and AAS are instruments commonly used that had lower relative scores.

CONCLUSION

The FAOS, FAAM, and AAOS Foot and Ankle Score contain several items important to patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus, ankle instability, and ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Outcomes of Reconstruction of the Flexible Adult-acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Reconstruction of the flexible adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is controversial, and numerous procedures are frequently used in combination, including flexor digitorum longus transfer, medializing calcaneal osteotomy (MCO), heel cord lengthening/gastrocnemius recession, lateral column lengthening (LCL), Cotton osteotomy or first tarsometatarsal fusion, and spring ligament reconstruction. This article summarizes recent studies demonstrating that patients have significant improvements after operative treatment of flexible AAFD. It reviews current literature on clinical and radiographic outcomes of the MCO, LCL, and Cotton osteotomies. The authors describe how this information can be used in surgical decision making in order to tailor operative treatment to an individual patient's deformity.

Fulfillment of Expectations After Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

To date, no study has assessed fulfillment of patients' expectations after foot and ankle surgery. This study aimed to validate a method of assessing expectation fulfillment in foot/ankle patients postoperatively.

METHODS

Preoperatively, patients completed the expectations survey, consisting of 23 questions for domains including pain, ambulation, daily function, exercise, and shoe wear. At 2 years postoperatively, patients answered how much improvement they received for each item cited preoperatively. A fulfillment proportion (FP) was calculated as the amount of improvement received versus the amount of improvement expected. The FP ranges from 0 (no expectations fulfilled), to between 0 and 1 (expectations partially fulfilled), to 1 (expectations met), to greater than 1 (expectations surpassed). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare the expectations survey to other outcome surveys, including Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, improvement, overall fulfillment, Delighted-Terrible scale, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Of the 271 patients (mean age 55.4 years, mean BMI 27.5, 65% female), 34% had expectations surpassed (FP >1), 4% had expectations met, 58% had expectations partially fulfilled (FP between 0 and 1), and 5% had no expectations met. The mean FP was 0.84 ± 0.41 (range 0-3.13), indicating partially fulfilled expectations. FP correlated significantly with all outcome measures (P ≤ .007). FP was associated most closely with satisfaction (r = 0.66 [95% CI 0.57-0.75]; AUC = 0.92 [95% CI 0.88-0.96]; P < .001) and improvement (r = 0.73 [95% CI 0.64-0.81]; AUC = 0.94 [95% CI 0.91-0.96]; P < .001). Based on the associations with satisfaction and improvement outcomes, a clinically important proportion of expectations fulfilled is 0.68, with sensitivity 0.85-0.90 and specificity 0.84-0.86.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of expectations fulfilled is a novel patient-centered outcome that correlated with validated outcome measures. The expectations survey may be used by surgeons to counsel patients preoperatively and also to assess patients' results postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative series.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a measure of health care quality that reflect the patient's perceptions of their own health status. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in implementation of PROs into everyday clinical practice. There are many dozens of PROs available to foot and ankle surgeons with little consensus on which measures are most appropriate for a given condition. These measures vary widely in length, validity, and content. When integrating PROs into clinical practice, we recommend that clinicians should collect, at a minimum, validated PRO scores that assess pain, function, and general health. Furthermore, concise instruments should be used wherever possible to minimize patient burden, maximize patient engagement, and ensure meaningful data are collected. In the near future, outcomes registries employing computer adaptive testing will facilitate the routine collection of PRO data from all patients.

Level of Evidence

Level V, expert opinion.

Postoperative Medial Cuneiform Position Correlation With Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cotton Osteotomy for Reconstruction of the Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

BACKGROUND

Residual supination of the midfoot during reconstruction of the stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is often addressed with a medial cuneiform (Cotton) osteotomy after adequate correction of the hindfoot valgus deformity. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a correlation between postoperative alignment of the medial cuneiform and patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Sixty-three feet in 61 patients with stage II AAFD who underwent a Cotton osteotomy as part of a flatfoot reconstruction were included in the study. Radiographic angles were measured on weightbearing lateral radiographs at a minimum of 40 weeks postoperatively. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine if there was an association between postoperative radiographic angles and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively. Patients were also divided into mild plantarflexion (cuneiform articular angle [CAA] ≥-2 degrees) and moderate plantarflexion (CAA <-2 degrees) groups to evaluate for differences in clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Postoperative CAA was significantly positively correlated with the postoperative FAOS symptoms ( r = .27, P = .03), daily activities ( r = .29, P = .02), sports activities ( r = .26, P = .048), and quality of life ( r = .28, P = .02) subscales. Patients in the mild plantarflexion group had statistically and clinically better outcomes compared with the moderate plantarflexion group in the FAOS symptoms ( P = .04), daily activities ( P = .04), and sports activities ( P = .01) subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the surgeon should avoid excessive plantarflexion of the medial cuneiform and use the Cotton osteotomy judiciously as part of a flatfoot reconstruction for stage II AAFD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative series.

Surgical Treatment for Stenosing Peroneal Tenosynovitis

BACKGROUND:

Stenosing peroneal tenosynovitis (SPT) is an uncommon entity that is equally difficult to diagnose. We evaluated our outcomes with a local anesthetic diagnostic injection followed by surgical release of the sheath and calcaneal exostectomy.

METHODS:

Eleven patients diagnosed with SPT underwent surgery between 2006 and 2014. Upon initial presentation, all patients reported a persistent history of pain along the ankle. Ultrasound-guided injections of anesthetics were administered into the peroneal tendon sheath to confirm the diagnosis. In patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SPT, we proceeded with surgical intervention with release of the peroneal tendon sheath and debridement of the calcaneal exostosis. Retrospective chart review was performed, and functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). FAOS results were collected pre- and postoperatively and were successfully obtained at 1 year or greater.

RESULTS:

Of these patients, all showed significant improvements ( P < .05) in 4 of 5 categories of the FAOS (pain, daily activities, sports activities, and quality of life).

CONCLUSION:

We present a case series in which the peroneal tendon sheath was diagnostically injected with anesthetic to confirm a diagnosis of SPT. In each of these cases, symptomatic improvement was obtained following the injection. With the fact that many of these patients had advanced imaging denoting no significant tears, we believe that this diagnostic injection is paramount for the success of surgical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Short-Term Outcomes and Influencing Factors After Ankle Fracture Surgery

The present study investigated the factors influencing the early clinical outcomes after ankle fracture surgery. We included 88 patients, who had undergone implant removal surgery at 1 year after ankle fracture surgery, with ankle computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained before ankle fracture surgery and at implant removal available. We collected demographic information, including age, sex, the presence of diabetes mellitus, level of trauma energy, and fracture classification from the medical records. We also recorded the fracture height using the radiographs and CT images. The medial joint space and articular incongruity were assessed on the follow-up radiographs and CT scans. Bone attenuation was measured by placing a circular region of interest around the ankle joint on the preoperative CT image. The postimplant removal outcomes were assessed using 2 functional questionnaires, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Significant factors related to the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale scores and FAOS were identified through univariate analysis using age, sex, radiographic measurements, and CT findings as explanatory variables, followed by multiple regression analysis. On multiple regression analysis, the total FAOS was independently related to the AO classification (p = .003) and Lauge-Hansen classification (p = .003). The total AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale score was related to articular incongruity (p = .044). The early clinical outcomes after ankle fracture surgery were affected by involvement of the ankle joint fracture rather than the lateral malleolus fracture height. Female sex and the presence of postoperative articular incongruity correlated with inferior early clinical outcomes.

AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Outcome measures evaluate various aspects of patient health, and when appropriately utilized can provide valuable information in both clinical practice and research settings. The orthopedic community has placed increasing emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures, recognizing their value for understanding patients' perspectives of treatment outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes are information directly reported by patients regarding their perceptions of health, quality of life, or functional status without interpretation by healthcare providers. The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) supports the use of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to assess patient general health, functional status, and outcomes of treatment. It is not possible to recommend a single instrument to collect quality orthopedic data as the selection is dependent on the population being examined and the question being asked. We support the use of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test (PF CAT) or Lower Extremity Computerized Adaptive Test (LE CAT), which can be assessed with other domains such as Pain Interference. In addition, a disease-specific measure can be used when available.

Outcomes of Reconstruction of the Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity in Older Patients

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) often requires the use of multiple osteotomies and soft tissue procedures that may not heal well in older patients. The purpose of our study was to determine whether patients older than 65 years with stage II AAFD had inferior clinical outcomes or an increased number of subsequent surgical procedures after flatfoot reconstruction when compared with younger patients.

METHODS

One-hundred forty consecutive feet (70 right, 70 left) with stage II AAFD in 137 patients were divided into 3 groups based on age: younger than 45 years (young; n = 21), 45 to 65 years (middle-aged; n = 87), and 65 years and older (older; n = 32). Preoperative and postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOSs) at a minimum of 2 years were compared. Hospital records were reviewed to determine if patients underwent a subsequent procedure postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patients in the older group did not demonstrate any differences in changes in FAOS subscales compared with patients in the young and middle-aged groups (all P > .15). The older group had significant preoperative to postoperative improvements in all the FAOS subgroups ( P < .01). In addition, patients in the older group were not more likely to undergo a subsequent surgery than were the younger patients (all P > .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that patients older than 65 years with stage II AAFD have improvements in patient-reported outcomes and rates of revision surgery after surgical reconstruction that were not significantly different than those of younger patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III, comparative series.

The Presence and Degree of Bone Marrow Edema Influence Midterm Clinical Outcomes After Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

BACKGROUND

Subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) has been associated with articular cartilage loss, with the potential to be a negative prognostic indicator for clinical outcomes after microfracture. However, no single study has investigated the association between BME and clinical outcomes after microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) at midterm follow-up.

PURPOSE

To clarify the association between postoperative subchondral BME and clinical outcomes in patients treated with microfracture for OLTs at both short-term and midterm follow-up using a grading system that classified the extent of BME of the talus.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent microfracture between 2008 and 2013 were assessed at 2- and 4-year postoperative follow-up. BME was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging, and the presence of subchondral BME was determined with fat-suppressed T2-weighted sequences. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Forty-three (83%) of 52 eligible patients were included. No significant differences were found in the FAOS between the BME and no BME groups at 2-year follow-up (83.1 ± 6.5 vs 88.6 ± 8.0, respectively; P = .109), but there was a significant difference at 4-year follow-up (77.5 ± 11.1 vs 84.7 ± 8.4, respectively; P = .041). A significant difference was found among BME grades at 4-year follow-up (grade 0: 84.7 ± 7.4, grade 1: 80.1 ± 10.5, grade 2: 74.0 ± 10.3, and grade 3: 67.5 ± 7.1; P = .035). A post hoc analysis showed significant differences between grades 0 and 2, 0 and 3, and 1 and 3 ( P = .041, .037, and .048, respectively). In addition, at 4-year follow-up, a significant correlation was noted between the FAOS and BME grade ( r = -0.453, P = .003) but not at 2-year follow-up ( r = -0.212, P = .178). Seventy-four percent of patients still had subchondral BME at 4-year follow-up after microfracture for OLTs.

CONCLUSION

Patients with subchondral BME at midterm follow-up after microfracture for OLTs had worse clinical outcomes than those without subchondral BME. In addition, the degree of subchondral BME at midterm follow-up was correlated with clinical outcomes. However, at short-term follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes based on both the presence and degree of BME, and no correlation was found between clinical outcomes and the degree of BME. The current study suggests that BME at short-term follow-up is a normal physiological reaction. However, BME at midterm follow-up after microfracture for OLTs may be pathological and is associated with poorer clinical outcomes.

Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review

PURPOSE

In the foot and ankle literature, a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is used, however, consensus as to which PROMs are preferred is lacking. Selection of a PROM is among other reasons, often based on measurement properties without considering the methodological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties. The aim of current study was first to identify the most frequently used foot and ankle-specific PROMs in recent orthopaedic foot and ankle literature, and second to conduct a systematic review to synthesize and critically appraise the measurement properties of these PROMS.

METHODS

Six PubMed indexed journals focussing on foot and ankle research were screened to identify most commonly used foot and ankle-specific PROMs over a 2 year period (2015-2016). Subsequently, a systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus and Scopus to identify relevant studies on their measurement properties. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, criteria for good measurement properties were applied, and a level of evidence was determined for the measurement properties of each domain of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

The three most frequently reported PROMs were the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Foot and Ankle Activity Measure (FAAM). Among 2046 unique citations, 50 studies were included evaluating these PROMs. Evidence to support the measurement properties of the FFI was mainly lacking due to poor methodological quality. More evidence was available for the measurement properties of the FAOS and the FAAM, but overall evidence supporting all measurement properties is not yet sufficient.

CONCLUSION

The best available evidence retrieved in this review showed that the FAOS and the FAAM are promising outcome measures for evaluation of patients with foot and ankle conditions, but their shortcomings should be taken into account when interpreting results in clinical setting or trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Ankle Arthroscopy for Diagnosis of Full-thickness Talar Cartilage Lesions in the Setting of Acute Ankle Fractures

PURPOSE

To delineate the prevalence of chondral lesions, in particular full-thickness talar dome lesions, with concurrent arthroscopy in acute ankle fracture open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) and evaluate the impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of prospectively collected registry data at our institution from 2012 to 2016. Consecutive patients who underwent acute ankle fracture ORIF with concurrent arthroscopy were identified. Charts were reviewed to determine the prevalence and grade of chondral lesions, fracture type, and associated factors. Clinical outcomes with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score.

RESULTS

The study included 116 consecutive patients undergoing acute ankle fracture ORIF with concurrent arthroscopy. A chondral lesion was identified in 78% (90 of 116). A full-thickness talar dome chondral lesion was identified in 43% of these patients (39 of 90). Patient age was a significant predictor, with patients younger than 30 years being less likely to have a chondral injury than those aged 30 years or older (59% vs 85%, P = .0077). Of the patients who sustained a dislocation at the time of injury, 100% had a chondral lesion (P = .039). Patients with complete syndesmosis disruption and instability were also more likely to have a chondral lesion (96% vs 73%, P = .013). Patients with chondral lesions had statistically significantly worse clinical outcomes than those without them (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, 81.2 vs 92.1; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Ankle arthroscopy performed concomitantly with ankle ORIF is a useful tool in diagnosing chondral injuries. Chondral lesions are common with ankle fractures. An ankle with a dislocation at presentation or a syndesmotic injury may be more likely to present with a chondral lesion and should thus prompt evaluation. The presence of a talar chondral injury may be associated with a negative impact on clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

EFAS Score - Multilingual development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) by the score committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)

BACKGROUND

A scientifically sound validated foot and ankle specific score validated ab initio for different languages is missing. The aim of a project of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) was to develop, validate, and publish a new score(the EFAS-Score) for different European languages.

METHODS

The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: (1) item (question) identification, (2) item reduction and scale exploration, (3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness. The following score specifications were chosen: scale/subscale (Likert 0-4), questionnaire based, outcome measure, patient related outcome measurement. For stage 3, data were collected pre-operatively and at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using analyses from classical test theory and item response theory.

RESULTS

Stage 1 resulted in 31 general and 7 sports related questions. In stage 2, a 6-item general EFAS Score was constructed using English, German, French and Swedish language data. In stage 3, internal consistency of the scale was confirmed in seven languages: the original four languages, plus Dutch, Italian and Polish (Cronbach's Alpha >0.86 in all language versions). Responsiveness was good, with moderate to large effect sizes in all languages, and significant positive association between the EFAS Score and patient-reported improvement. No sound EFAS Sports Score could be constructed.

CONCLUSIONS

The multi-language EFAS Score was successfully validated in the orthopaedic ankle and foot surgery patient population, including a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.co.

Influence of Diagnosis and Other Factors on Patients' Expectations of Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

Many patient factors have been associated with higher or lower expectations of orthopedic surgery. In foot and ankle surgery, the diverse diagnoses seen may also influence expectations. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between diagnosis and patients' preoperative expectations of elective foot and ankle surgery.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy-eight patients undergoing elective foot or ankle surgery for 1 of 7 common diagnoses were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Preoperative expectations were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey. Patients also completed the Foot & Ankle Outcome Score, Short Form 12, pain visual analog scale, and questionnaires for depressive and anxiety symptoms. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Patient factors and diagnosis were analyzed using multivariate regression analysis to identify independent predictors of higher expectations and determine the effect of diagnosis relative to other patient factors on expectations.

RESULTS

The multivariate regression analysis adjusting for demographics and other clinical characteristics showed that diagnosis contributed the most to the model, accounting for 10.5% of the variation in expectations survey scores. Patients with mid- or hindfoot arthritis ( P < .001), hallux valgus ( P = .001), or hallux rigidus ( P = .005) had lower scores (lower expectations) than those with ankle instability or osteochondral lesion. In the model, female sex ( P = .001), non-Caucasian race ( P = .031), and lower scores on the Foot & Ankle Outcome Score daily activities subscale ( P = .024) were associated with higher scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of ankle instability or osteochondral lesion, female sex, non-Caucasian race, and lower Foot & Ankle Outcome Score daily activities subscale score were all associated with higher expectations. These findings may help inform and guide surgeons as they counsel patients preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, cross-sectional study.

Reliability and validity analysis of the open-source Chinese Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

AIM

Develop the first reliable and validated open-source outcome scoring system in the Chinese language for foot and ankle problems.

METHODS

Translation of the English FAOS into Chinese following regular protocols. First, two forward-translations were created separately, these were then combined into a preliminary version by an expert committee, and was subsequently back-translated into English. The process was repeated until the original and back translations were congruent. This version was then field tested on actual patients who provided feedback for modification. The final Chinese FAOS version was then tested for reliability and validity. Reliability analysis was performed on 20 subjects while validity analysis was performed on 50 subjects. Tools used to validate the Chinese FAOS were the SF36 and Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Internal consistency between the FAOS subgroups was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Spearman's correlation was calculated between each subgroup in the FAOS, SF36 and NRS.

RESULTS

The Chinese FAOS passed both reliability and validity testing; meaning it is reliable, internally consistent and correlates positively with the SF36 and the NRS.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese FAOS is a free, open-source scoring system that can be used to provide a relatively standardised outcome measure for foot and ankle studies.

Comparing Functional Outcomes After Injury-Specific Fixation of Posterior Malleolar Fractures and Equivalent Ligamentous Injuries in Rotational Ankle Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of posterior bony versus ligamentous injury pattern on functional outcomes in operatively treated rotational ankle fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis of prospective registry.

SETTING

Academic Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Operatively treated supination external rotation IV and pronation external rotation IV ankle fractures.

INTERVENTION

Lateral malleolus plate fixation with either posterior malleolus (PM) plate fixation or posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) repair.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Foot and ankle outcome scores at minimum 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-eight fractures were treated with injury-specific anatomic fixation of a PM fracture (n = 122) or torn PITFL (n = 56). The PM group was significantly older, contained more women, and had lower mean body mass index versus the PITFL group. There was a higher rate of medial malleolar fracture in the PM group; other fracture and baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Univariate and multivariable analysis revealed no difference in foot and ankle outcome scores for any of the 5 summary domains (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports, or quality of life) at the time of most recent follow-up. The median length of follow-up was 16.3 and 12.8 months in the PM and PITFL groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of ankle fractures, we have demonstrated comparable outcomes in stage IV rotational ankle fractures with and without PM fractures, indicating that the presence of a PM fracture may not result in inferior outcomes compared with ligamentous equivalent injuries if these fractures are addressed in an injury-specific manner.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a measure of health care quality that empower patients to share their health care perceptions with their providers. In orthopedic foot and ankle surgery, these measures can range from global assessments of pain or satisfaction to complex questionnaires designed to assess the function of specific anatomic regions or the recovery from specific procedures. This article seeks to characterize the use of PROs in foot and ankle surgery, describe some of the most commonly used measures, discuss implementation in everyday clinical practice, and explore the future of PROs in foot and ankle orthopedics.

Comparative Outcomes Between Step-Cut Lengthening Calcaneal Osteotomy vs Traditional Evans Osteotomy for Stage IIB Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

BACKGROUND

The forefoot abduction component of the flexible adult-acquired flatfoot can be addressed with lengthening of the anterior process of the calcaneus. We hypothesized that the step-cut lengthening calcaneal osteotomy (SLCO) would decrease the incidence of nonunion, lead to improvement in clinical outcome scores, and have a faster time to healing compared with the traditional Evans osteotomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 111 patients (143 total feet: 65 Evans, 78 SLCO) undergoing stage IIB reconstruction followed clinically for at least 2 years. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for the amount of deformity correction. Computed tomography (CT) was used to analyze osteotomy healing. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) and lateral pain surveys were used to assess clinical outcomes. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess nonnormally distributed data while χ² and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables (α = 0.05 significant).

RESULTS

The Evans group used a larger graft size ( P < .001) and returned more often for hardware removal ( P = .038) than the SLCO group. SLCO union occurred at a mean of 8.77 weeks ( P < .001), which was significantly lower compared with the Evans group ( P = .02). The SLCO group also had fewer nonunions ( P = .016). FAOS scores improved equivalently between the 2 groups. Lateral column pain, ability to exercise, and ambulation distance were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Following SLCO, patients had faster healing times and fewer nonunions, similar outcomes scores, and equivalent correction of deformity. SLCO is a viable technique for lateral column lengthening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Are current foot- and ankle outcome measures appropriate for the evaluation of treatment for osteoarthritis of the ankle?: Evaluation of ceiling effects in foot- and ankle outcome measures

BACKGROUND

Many PROMs used for evaluation of ankle osteoarthritis are not validated for this purpose. We hypothesize that frequently used PROMs have an early ceiling or floor effect.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from patients with ankle osteoarthritis between 2011 and 2013. At baseline visit patients completed the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, the Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale, a visual analogue scale for pain and quality of life. Outcomes were analyzed for floor or ceiling effects.

RESULTS

197 patients were included in the study. A floor effect was present for the AOFAS and VAS for pain in all groups. Floor and ceiling effect are absent for the FAOS outcome measure for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be aware of floor or ceiling effects when evaluating treatment using patient reported outcome measures. The FAOS outcome measure lacks early ceiling or floor effects.

Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Tests Against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for 6 Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies

BACKGROUND

The field of foot and ankle surgery lacks a widely accepted gold-standard patient-reported outcome instrument. With the changing infrastructure of the medical profession, more efficient patient-reported outcome tools are needed to reduce respondent burden and increase participation while providing consistent and reliable measurement across multiple pathologies and disciplines. The primary purpose of the present study was to validate 3 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computer adaptive tests (CATs) most relevant to the foot and ankle discipline against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Short Form 12 general health status survey in patients with 6 common foot and ankle pathologies.

METHODS

Patients (n = 240) indicated for operative treatment for 1 of 6 common foot and ankle pathologies completed the CATs, FAOS, and Short Form 12 at their preoperative surgical visits, 1 week subsequently (before surgery), and at 6 months postoperatively. The psychometric properties of the instruments were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System CATs each took less than 1 minute to complete, whereas the FAOS took 6.5 minutes, and the Short Form 12 took 3 minutes. CAT scores were more normally distributed and had fewer floor and ceiling effects than those on the FAOS, which reached as high as 24%. The CATs were more precise than the FAOS and had similar responsiveness and test-retest reliability. The physical function and mobility CATs correlated strongly with the activities subscale of the FAOS, and the pain interference CAT correlated strongly with the pain subscale of the FAOS. The CATs and FAOS were responsive to changes with operative treatment for 6 common foot and ankle pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The CATs performed as well as or better than the FAOS in all aspects of psychometric validity. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System CATs show tremendous potential for improving the study of patient outcomes in foot and ankle research through improved precision and reduced respondent burden.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Injected corticosteroids for treating plantar heel pain in adults

BACKGROUND

Plantar heel pain, commonly resulting from plantar fasciitis, often results in significant morbidity. Treatment options include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), orthoses, physical therapy, physical agents (e.g. extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), laser) and invasive procedures including steroid injections.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of injected corticosteroids for treating plantar heel pain in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, clinical trials registries and conference proceedings. Latest search: 27 March 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of corticosteroid injections in the treatment of plantar heel pain in adults were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcome measures. We used a fixed-effect model unless heterogeneity was significant, when a random-effects model was considered. We assessed the overall quality of evidence for individual outcomes using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 39 studies (36 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 quasi-RCTs) that involved a total of 2492 adults. Most studies were small (median = 59 participants). Participants' mean ages ranged from 34 years to 59 years. When reported, most participants had heel pain for several months. The trials were usually conducted in outpatient specialty clinics of tertiary care hospitals in 17 countries. Steroid injection was given with a local anaesthetic agent in 34 trials. Follow-up was from one month to over two years. With one exception, trials were assessed at high risk of bias in one or more domains, mostly relating to lack of blinding, including lack of confirmation of allocation concealment. With two exceptions, we rated the available evidence as very low quality, implying in each case that we are 'very uncertain about the estimate'.The 39 trials covered 18 comparisons, with six of the seven trials with three or four groups providing evidence towards two comparisons.Eight trials (724 participants) compared steroid injection versus placebo or no treatment. Steroid injection may lead to lower heel pain visual analogue scores (VAS) (0 to 100; higher scores = worse pain) in the short-term (< 1 month) (MD -6.38, 95% CI -11.13 to -1.64; 350 participants; 5 studies; I² = 65%; low quality evidence). Based on a minimal clinically significant difference (MCID) of 8 for average heel pain, the 95% CI includes a marginal clinical benefit. This potential benefit was diminished when data were restricted to three placebo-controlled trials. Steroid injection made no difference to average heel pain in the medium-term (1 to 6 months follow-up) (MD -3.47, 95% CI -8.43 to 1.48; 382 participants; 6 studies; I² = 40%; low quality evidence). There was very low quality evidence for no effect on function in the medium-term and for an absence of serious adverse events (219 participants, 4 studies). No studies reported on other adverse events, such as post-injection pain, and on return to previous activity. There was very low quality evidence for fewer treatment failures (defined variously as persistent heel pain at 8 weeks, steroid injection at 12 weeks, and unrelieved pain at 6 months) after steroid injection.The available evidence for other comparisons was rated as very low quality. We are therefore very uncertain of the estimates for the relative effects on people with heel pain of steroids compared with other interventions in:1. Tibial nerve block with anaesthetic (2 trials); orthoses (4 trials); oral NSAIDs (2 trials); and intensive physiotherapy (1 trial).2. Physical modalities: ESWT (5 trials); laser (2 trials); and radiation therapy (1 trial).3. Other invasive procedures: locally injectable NSAID (1 trial); platelet-rich plasma injections (5 trials); autologous blood injections (2 trials); botulinum toxin injections (2 trials); cryopreserved human amniotic membrane injection (1 trial); localised peppering with a needle (1 trial); dry needling (1 trial); and mini scalpel needle release (1 trial).We are also uncertain about the estimates from trials testing different techniques of local steroid injection: ultrasonography-guided versus palpation-guided (5 trials); and scintigraphy-guided versus palpation-guided (1 trial).An exploratory analysis involving pooling data from 21 trials reporting on adverse events revealed two ruptures of plantar fascia (reported in 1 trial) and three injection site infections (reported in 2 trials) in 699 participants allocated to steroid injection study arms. Five trials reported a total of 27 participants with less serious short-term adverse events in the 699 participants allocated steroid injection study arms. Reported treatments were analgesia, ice or both. Given the high risk of selective reporting for these outcomes and imprecision, this evidence was rated at very low quality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low quality evidence that local steroid injections compared with placebo or no treatment may slightly reduce heel pain up to one month but not subsequently. The available evidence for other outcomes of this comparison was very low quality. Where available, the evidence from comparisons of steroid injections with other interventions used to treat heel pain and of different methods of guiding the injection was also very low quality. Although serious adverse events relating to steroid injection were rare, these were under-reported and a higher risk cannot be ruled out.Further research should focus on establishing the effects (benefits and harms) of injected steroids compared with placebo in typical clinical settings, subsequent to a course of unsuccessful conservative therapy. Ideally, this should be preceded by research, including patient involvement, aimed to obtain consensus on the priority questions for treating plantar heel pain.

Patient Factors Associated With Higher Expectations From Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

Few authors have investigated patients' expectations from foot and ankle surgery. In this study, we aimed to examine relationships between patients' preoperative expectations and their demographic and clinical characteristics. We hypothesized that patients with more disability and those with anxiety or depressive symptoms would have greater expectations.

METHODS

All adult patients scheduled for elective foot or ankle surgery by 1 of 6 orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons were screened for inclusion over 8 months. Preoperatively, all patients completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey in addition to the Foot & Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Short Form (SF)-12, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and pain visual analog scale (VAS). The expectations survey contained 23 expectations categories, each with 5 answer choices ranging from "I do not have this expectation" to "complete improvement" expected. It was scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more expectations. Differences in expectations relating to numerous patient demographic and clinical variables were assessed. In total, 352 patients with an average age of 55 ± 15 (range, 18-86) years were enrolled.

RESULTS

Expectations scores were not related to age ( P = .36). On average, women expected to achieve complete improvement more often than men ( P = .011). Variables that were significantly associated with higher expectations scores ( P < .05) included nonwhite race, use of a cane or other assistive device, and greater medical comorbidity. Worse function and quality of life (as assessed by all FAOS subscales and the SF-12 physical and mental components), more depressive and anxiety symptoms, and higher pain VAS scores were associated with higher expectations scores and more expectations ( P < .01 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study may help inform surgeons' preoperative discussions with their patients regarding realistic expectations from surgery. Generally, patients with worse function and more disability had higher expectations from surgery. Addressing these patients' expectations preoperatively may help improve their ultimate satisfaction with surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, cross sectional study.

Development of an Expectations Survey for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

Many authors have reported on patient satisfaction from foot and ankle surgery, but rarely on expectations, which may vary widely between patients and strongly affect satisfaction. In this study, we aimed to develop a patient-derived survey on expectations from foot and ankle surgery.

METHODS

We developed and tested our survey using a 3-phase process. Patients with a wide spectrum of foot and ankle diagnoses were enrolled. In phase 1, patients were interviewed preoperatively with open-ended questions about their expectations from surgery. Major concepts were grouped into categories that were used to form a draft survey. In phase 2, the survey was administered to preoperative patients on 2 occasions to establish test-retest reliability. In phase 3, the final survey items were selected based on weighted kappa values for response concordance and clinical relevance.

RESULTS

In phase 1, 94 preoperative patients volunteered 655 expectations. Twenty-nine representative categories were discerned by qualitative analysis and became the draft survey. In phase 2, another 60 patients completed the draft survey twice preoperatively. In phase 3, 23 items were retained for the final survey. For retained items, the average weighted kappa value was 0.54. An overall score was calculated based on the amount of improvement expected for each item on the survey and ranged from zero to 100, with higher scores indicating more expectations. For patients in phase 2, mean scores for both administrations were 65 and 66 and approximated normal distributions. The intraclass correlation coefficient between scores was 0.78.

CONCLUSION

We developed a patient-derived survey specific to foot and ankle surgery that is valid, reliable, applicable to diverse diagnoses, and includes physical and psychological expectations. The survey generates an overall score that is easy to calculate and interpret, and thus offers a practical and comprehensive way to record patients' expectations. We believe this survey may be used preoperatively by surgeons to help guide patients' expectations and facilitate shared decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, cross-sectional study.

Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle

BACKGROUND

Although the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is commonly used in several languages for a variety of foot disorders, it has not been validated specifically for foot and ankle arthritic conditions. The aims of the present study were to translate the original English FAOS into Thai and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the FAOS for the foot and ankle arthritic conditions.

METHODS

The original FAOS was translated into Thai using forward-backward translation. The Thai FAOS and validated Thai Short Form-36 (SF-36^®) questionnaires were distributed to 44 Thai patients suffering from arthritis of the foot and ankle to complete. For validation, Thai FAOS scores were correlated with SF-36 scores. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were also analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

The Thai FAOS score demonstrated sufficient correlation with SF-36 total score in Pain (Pearson's correlation coefficient (r)=0.45, p=0.002), Symptoms (r=0.45, p=0.002), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (r=0.47, p=0.001), and Quality of Life (QOL) (r=0.38, p=0.011) subscales. The Sports and Recreational Activities (Sports & Rec) subscale did not correlate significantly with the SF-36^® (r=0.20, p=0.20). Cronbach's alpha, a measure of internal consistency, for the five subscales was as follows: Pain, 0.94 (p<0.001); Symptoms, 0.58 (p<0.001); ADL, 0.96 (p<0.001); Sports & Rec, 0.79 (p<0.001); and QOL, 0.93 (p<0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of a major subscale of ADL, containing 17 items, was significant at 0.33 (p=0.013; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.57).

CONCLUSION

The Thai FAOS demonstrated sufficient levels of construct and content validity for the evaluation of foot and ankle arthritis. Although reliability was satisfactory for the major subscale ADL, it was not sufficient for the minor subscales. Our findings suggest that it can be used as a disease-specific instrument to evaluate foot and ankle arthritis and can complement other reliable outcome surveys.

Use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered platelet-rich plasma for early stage adult acquired flatfoot deformity

PURPOSE

Early stage adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is traditionally treated with osteotomy and tendon transfer. Despite a high success rate, the long recovery time and associated morbidity are not sufficient. This study aims to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes following the use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered PRP for early stage AAFD.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIa AAFD who underwent the use of the arthroereisis screw with tendoscopic delivered PRP with a minimum follow-up time of 24 months were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical outcomes for pain were evaluated with the Foot and Ankle Outcomes Score (FAOS) and Visual Analog Score (VAS). Radiographic deformity correction was assessed using weight-bearing imaging.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (13 feet) with mean follow-up of 29.5 months were included. The mean age was 37.3 years (range, 28-65 years). FAOS-reported symptoms, pain, daily activities, sports activities, and quality of life significantly improved from 52.1, 42.6, 57.6, 35.7, and 15.4 pre-operatively to 78.5, 68.2, 83.3, 65.0, and 49.6 post-operatively, respectively (p < 0.05). Statistically significant radiographic improvements (lateral talus first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch, and cuneiform to ground distance) were also observed between the pre- and post-operative images.

CONCLUSIONS

This study elucidates the successful implementation of a less invasive approach to stage IIa AAFD. Through the use of a subtalar arthroereisis screw, PTT tendoscopy, and PRP injection, clinical and radiographic outcomes were improved.