A Comparison of Rate Control Agents for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Follow-Up Investigation of the AFFIRM Study

BMP2 Diminishes Angiotensin II-Induced Atrial Fibrillation by Inhibiting NLRP3 Inflammasome Signaling in Atrial Fibroblasts

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia to affect 1% of the global population and increases with age. Atrial fibrosis is a crucial substrate for promoting structural remodeling to cause atrial arrhythmogenesis. Bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP2) has been reported to be involved in cardiac fibrogenesis. However, its role in modulating atrial fibrosis to affect AF development remains unknown. Our study aimed to investigate the expression of BMP2 under different AF conditions and the effect of BMP2 on the progression of atrial fibrosis using an angiotensin II (Ang II) rat model and an ex vivo cardiac fibroblast model. The qRT-PCR and Western blot assay showed increased BMP2 mRNA and protein levels in the atria of chronic AF patients and the right atria of a tachypacing rabbit model. In contrast, the levels of BMP2 receptor mRNA were comparable. The AF incidence of the Ang II rat was higher than that of a control rat, which was reduced by BMP2 treatment. Masson staining demonstrated an anti-fibrogenic impact on BMP2-subjected rat atria compared to only Ang II-treated rat atria. RNA-sequencing indicated the potential function of blocking NLRP3-associted inflammasome activation in BMP2-treated rat atrial tissues. In vitro, transfecting BMP2 shRNA into neonatal rat atrial fibroblasts upregulated the mRNA levels of NLRP3/Caspase-1/p20/ASC and the secretion of IL-1β and IL-6. In contrast, recombinant BMP2 protein attenuated the increased levels of the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway induced by Ang II. In summary, BMP2 opposes atrial fibrosis to alleviate AF susceptibility by inhibiting the activation of the inflammasome in atrial fibroblasts.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Personalized Antiarrhythmic Therapy Using a Self-Managed Daily-ECG Device

A 50-year-old Caucasian man arrived at the emergency department presenting paucisymptomatic atrial fibrillation. Once discharged after the appropriate treatments, the patient continued to have paucisymptomatic episodes. For this reason, he was provided with the Cardionica device which made it possible to better investigate the type of arrhythmic episodes, in order to tailor his therapy and to finally restore a normal sinus rhythm in the patient.

Use of Diltiazem in Chronic Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Case-Control Study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a multifaceted disease requiring personalised treatment. The aim of our study was to explore the prognostic impact of a patient-specific therapy (PT) for rate control, including the use of non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NDDC) in patients with heart failure (HF) or in combination with beta-blockers (BB), compared to standard rate control therapy (ST), as defined by previous ESC guidelines. This is a single-centre prospective observational registry on AF patients who were followed by our University Hospital. We included 1112 patients on an exclusive rate control treatment. The PT group consisted of 125 (11.2%) patients, 93/125 (74.4%) of whom were prescribed BB + NDCC (±digoxin), while 85/125 (68.0%) were HF patients who were prescribed NDCC, which was diltiazem in all cases. The patients treated with a PT showed no difference in one-year overall survival compared to those with an ST. Notably, the patients with HF in ST had a worse prognosis (p < 0.001). To better define this finding, we performed three sensitivity analyses by matching each patient in the PT subgroups with three subjects from the ST cohort, showing an improved one-year survival of the HF patients treated with PT (p = 0.039). Our results suggest a potential outcome benefit of NDCC for rate control in AF patients, either alone or in combination with BB and in selected patients with HF.