An Investigation into the Association Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Cardiac Arrhythmias: An Examination of the United States National Inpatient Sample Database

Navigating the Gut-Cardiac Axis: Understanding Cardiovascular Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) presents a complex interplay of chronic inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract and is associated with various extraintestinal manifestations, including cardiovascular complications (CVCs). IBD patients face an elevated risk of CVCs, including coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, stroke, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, and mesenteric ischemia, necessitating comprehensive cardiovascular risk assessment and management. The intricate interplay between chronic inflammation, genetic predisposition, environmental factors, and immune dysregulation likely contributes to the development of CVCs in IBD patients. While the exact mechanisms linking IBD and CVCs remain speculative, potential pathways may involve shared inflammatory pathways, endothelial dysfunction, dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, and traditional cardiovascular risk factors exacerbated by the chronic inflammatory state. Moreover, IBD medications, particularly corticosteroids, may impact cardiovascular health by inducing hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, further amplifying the overall CVC risk. Lifestyle factors such as smoking, obesity, and dietary habits may also exacerbate cardiovascular risks in individuals with IBD. Lifestyle modifications, including smoking cessation, adoption of a heart-healthy diet, regular exercise, and optimization of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, play a fundamental role in mitigating CVC risk. Emerging preventive strategies targeting inflammation modulation and gut microbiome interventions hold promise for future interventions, although further research is warranted to elucidate their efficacy and safety profiles in the context of IBD. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration, advanced research methodologies, and innovative interventions are essential to address the growing burden of CVCs in individuals living with IBD and to improve their long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Cardiovascular implications of inflammatory bowel disease: An updated review

Emerging data highlights the heightened risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) in patients with chronic inflammatory disorders, particularly those afflicted with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review delves into the epidemiological connections between IBD and ASCVD, elucidating potential underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, it discusses the impact of current IBD treatments on cardiovascular risk. Additionally, the cardiovascular adverse effects of novel small molecule drugs used in moderate-to-severe IBD are investigated, drawing parallels with observations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This article aims to comprehensively evaluate the existing evidence supporting these associations. To achieve this, we conducted a meticulous search of PubMed, spanning from inception to August 2023, using a carefully selected set of keywords. The search encompassed topics related to IBD, such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as ASCVD, including coronary artery disease, cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, conduction abnormalities, heart blocks, and premature coronary artery disease. This review encompasses various types of literature, including retrospective and prospective cohort studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and relevant guidelines, with the objective of providing a comprehensive overview of this critical intersection of inflammatory bowel disease and cardiovascular health.

Long-term risk of arrhythmias in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based, sibling-controlled cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although previous evidence has suggested an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), its association with arrhythmias is inconclusive. In this study, we aimed to explore the long-term risk of arrhythmias in patients with IBD.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Through a nationwide histopathology cohort, we identified patients with biopsy-confirmed IBD in Sweden during 1969 to 2017, including Crohn's disease (CD: n = 24,954; median age at diagnosis: 38.4 years; female: 52.2%), ulcerative colitis (UC: n = 46,856; 42.1 years; 46.3%), and IBD-unclassified (IBD-U: n = 12,067; 43.8 years; 49.6%), as well as their matched reference individuals and IBD-free full siblings. Outcomes included overall and specific arrhythmias (e.g., atrial fibrillation/flutter, bradyarrhythmias, other supraventricular arrhythmias, and ventricular arrhythmias/cardiac arrest). Flexible parametric survival models estimated hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), after adjustment for birth year, sex, county of residence, calendar year, country of birth, educational attainment, number of healthcare visits, and cardiovascular-related comorbidities. Over a median of approximately 10 years of follow-up, 1,904 (7.6%) patients with CD, 4,154 (8.9%) patients with UC, and 990 (8.2%) patients with IBD-U developed arrhythmias, compared with 6.7%, 7.5%, and 6.0% in reference individuals, respectively. Compared with reference individuals, overall arrhythmias were increased in patients with CD [54.6 versus 46.1 per 10,000 person-years; aHR = 1.15 (95% CI [1.09, 1.21], P < 0.001)], patients with UC [64.7 versus 53.3 per 10,000 person-years; aHR = 1.14 (95% CI [1.10, 1.18], P < 0.001)], and patients with IBD-U [78.1 versus 53.5 per 10,000 person-years; aHR = 1.30 (95% CI [1.20, 1.41], P < 0.001)]. The increased risk persisted 25 years after diagnosis, corresponding to 1 extra arrhythmia case per 80 CD, 58 UC, and 29 IBD-U cases over the same period. Patients with IBD also had a significantly increased risk of specific arrhythmias, except for bradyarrhythmias. Sibling comparison analyses confirmed the main findings. Study limitations include lack of clinical data to define IBD activity, not considering the potential role of IBD medications and disease activity, and the potential residual confounding from unmeasured factors for arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed that patients with IBD were at an increased risk of developing arrhythmias. The excess risk persisted even 25 years after IBD diagnosis. Our findings indicate a need for awareness of this excess risk among healthcare professionals.

Inflammatory bowel disease and atrial fibrillation: a contemporary overview

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Atrial fibrillation is linked with inflammatory signaling while inflammation and oxidative stress promote atrial remodeling promoting the development and perpetuation of the arrhythmia. On the other hand, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is considered a chronic inflammatory condition with flares and remissions. IBD has been associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but its relationship with atrial fibrillation has not been studied well. Recent epidemiological evidence indicates an association between IBD and atrial fibrillation, especially during flares/hospitalizations. This brief review provides a concise overview of all available data regarding the association between IBD and atrial fibrillation including the predictive role of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic markers. Several unresolved issues including the thromboembolic risk in this setting and the potential role of antiinflammatory interventions are also discussed.

Inflammatory bowel disease and associated cardiovascular disease outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is limited and conflicting data available regarding the cardiovascular disease outcomes associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

OBJECTIVE

We aim to perform a systematic review to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes and mortality associated with IBD patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search has been performed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus from inception till May 2022 without any language restrictions.

RESULTS

A total of 2,029,941 patients were included in the analysis from 16 studies. The mean age of the patients was 45.6 years. More females were found compared with males (57% vs 43%). The most common risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) included smoking (24.19%) and alcohol (4.60%). The most common comorbidities includes hypertension (30%), diabetes mellitus (14.41%), dyslipidemia (18.42%), previous CVD (22%), and renal disease (10%). Among outcomes, all-cause mortality among IBD patients was 1.66%; ulcerative colitis (UC): 15.92%; and Crohn disease (CD): 0.30%. Myocardial Infarction (MI) among IBD patients were 1.47%, UC: 30.96%; and CD: 34.14%. CVD events among IBD patients were 1.95%. Heart failure events among IBD patients were 5.49%, stroke events among IBD patients were 0.95%, UC: 2.63%, and CD: 2.41%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

IBD patients are at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes, especially in women. Although there remains a lack of concrete treatment algorithms and assessment parameters that better characterize IBD risk factors, nutritional modifications and physical activity should be at the forefront of CVD prevention in IBD.

The Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Mortality and Other Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis: An Observational Study of the United States National Inpatient Sample

Background

Recent studies have shown an increased risk of diabetes mellitus in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease. However, the impact of IBD on outcomes of patients with diabetic ketoacidosis remains unknown.

Methods

This is an observational analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database. The authors identified patients with a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Outcomes studied were differences in risk of mortality, in-hospital outcomes and healthcare resources utilization. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed and results were adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics and comorbidities.

Results

No significant difference in mortality was observed in the DKA-IBD group when compared to the DKA-only group (aOR 0.55, p = 0.560). Similarly, inflammatory bowel disease had no impact on risk of sepsis (aOR 1.06, p = 0.742), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.08, p = 0.389), acute coronary syndrome (aOR 0.70, p = 0.397), ischemic stroke (aOR 1.53, p = 0.094), acute respiratory failure (aOR 1.00, p = 0.987), invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 0.54, p = 0.225), deep vein thrombosis (aOR 1.68, p = 0.275), pulmonary embolism (aOR 2.16, p = 0.279) or cardiac arrest (aOR 1.35, p = 0.672) in diabetic ketoacidosis patients. The study group had a significant increase in length of stay (adjusted mean difference 0.63, p = 0.002) and charge of care (adjusted mean difference 3,950$, p = 0.026).

Conclusion

Inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with risk difference in mortality or morbidity in admitted patients with diabetic ketoacidosis, however, it does contribute to increased healthcare resources utilization.

Impact of atrial fibrillation on inflammatory bowel disease hospitalizations-a nationwide retrospective study

Systemic inflammation seen in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may cause electrophysiological changes in the atria leading to atrial fibrillation (AF). We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample for 2018 to identify all adult hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of IBD, which were further divided based on the presence or absence of AF. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality while the secondary outcomes included inpatient complications, mean length of stay, and mean total hospital charge. We identified 92,055 IBD hospitalizations, of which 3900 (4.2%) had AF and 88,155 (95.8%) served as controls. IBD hospitalizations with AF were older (70.9 vs. 45.0 years, P < 0.001) and had a higher association with comorbidities compared to the non-AF cohort. Furthermore, the AF cohort had significantly higher adjusted odds of inpatient mortality (2.05% vs. 0.24%; adjusted odds ratio 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.90; P = 0.025), longer length of stay (6.5 vs. 4.9 days; incidence rate ratio 1.23; 95% CI 1.14-1.33; P < 0.001), and higher total hospital charge ($14,587 vs. $11,475; incidence rate ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.15-1.38; P < 0.001). Additionally, complications such as acute respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, and necessity of blood product transfusion were more common for IBD hospitalizations with AF than those without.

Inflammatory bowel disease and cardiovascular diseases: a concise review

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite aggressive treatment of traditional risk factors. Chronic inflammation plays an important role in the initiation and progression of CVDs. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a systemic state of inflammation exhibiting increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6. Importantly, IBD is associated with increased risk for CVDs especially in women and young adults, including coronary artery disease, stroke, thromboembolic diseases, and arrhythmias. Potential mechanisms underlying the increased risk for CVDs in IBD patients include increased levels of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, altered platelet function, hypercoagulability, decreased numbers of circulating endothelial progenitor cells, endothelial dysfunction, and possible interruption of gut microbiota. Although IBD does not appear to exacerbate the traditional risk factors for CVDs, including hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, and obesity, aggressive risk stratifications are important for primary and secondary prevention of CVDs for IBD patients. Compared to 5-aminosalicylates and corticosteroids, anti-TNF-α therapy in IBD patients was consistently associated with decreasing cardiovascular events. In the absence of contraindications, low-dose aspirin and statins appear to be beneficial for IBD patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin is also recommended for patients who are hospitalized with acute IBD flares without major bleeding risk. A multidisciplinary team approach should be considered for the management of IBD patients.

Does Chronic Intestinal Inflammation Promote Atrial Fibrillation: A Mendelian Randomization Study With Populations of European Ancestry

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD), has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the causal role of the chronic intestinal inflammation (CII) in the development of AF remains controversial. We use Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the causal inference of CII on AF. Methods: A two-sample MR analysis was performed to estimate the potential causal effect of CII on AF. Statistical summaries for the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotypes of CII were obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with cohorts of CD (n = 51,874), UC (n = 47,745), and IBD (n = 65,642) of European descent. The GWAS of 1,030,836 people of European ancestry, including 60,620 AF cases and 970,216 controls was collected to identify genetic variants underlying AF. The causal inference was estimated using the multiplicative random effects inverse-variance weighted method (IVW). The methods of MR-Egger, simple median, and weighted median were also employed to avoid the bias of pleiotropy effects. Results: Using three sets of SNPs (75 SNPs of CD, 60 SNPs of UC, and 95 SNPs of IBD), multiplicative random-effect IVW model estimated a universal null effect of CII on AF (CD: OR = 1.0059, 95% CI: 0.9900, 1.0220, p = 0.47; UC: OR = 1.0087, 95% CI: 0.9896, 1.0281, p = 0.38; IBD: OR = 1.0080, 95% CI: 0.9908, 1.0255, p = 0.37). Similar results were observed using the MR-Egger, simple median, weighted median methods. Conclusion: As opposing to the traditional observational studies, our two-sample MR analysis did not find enough evidence to support a causal role of either CD or UC in the development of AF.