Prescribing Home Narrowband UVB Phototherapy: A Review of Current Approaches

Clinical efficacy analysis of 110 cases of childhood vitiligo with non-surgical combined therapy

BACKGROUND

Vitiligo has a negative effect on children's physical and psychological health. Few studies have examined long-term treatment efficacy for childhood vitiligo. Therefore, we evaluated the long-term effectiveness of non-surgical combination therapy in pediatric patients with vitiligo and analyzed factors that affect its efficacy.

METHODS

Pediatric patients (⩽12 years) with vitiligo who were treated with topical corticosteroids/topical calcineurin inhibitors and phototherapy for 12 months were retrospectively studied. Short-term systemic corticosteroids were administered according to individual clinical conditions. All lesions were photographed to assess repigmentation at 3-month intervals. Clinical data, the treatment effectiveness, and factors affecting the therapeutic effect were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 110 children (51 [53.6%] girls; mean [SD] age, 7.1 ± 3.0 years; 104 [94.5%] with activity status) were treated for a mean period of 23.13 ± 14.03 months (range, 5-86 months). The overall >50% repigmentation rate was 64.5%. A longer duration of treatment was associated with a higher repigmentation rate (X² _trend = 36.229, P < .001). The vitiligo disease activity score at the first visit was positively correlated with the overall repigmentation rate (r_s = 0.301, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment lasting longer than 1 year is recommended in children with vitiligo. The best repigmentation effect can be achieved by combination therapy in the rapid progression stage.

Prescribing and using vitiligo treatments - lessons from a nested Process Evaluation within the HI-Light Vitiligo Randomised Controlled Trial

Background

The HI‐Light Trial demonstrated that for active, limited vitiligo, combination treatment with potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) and handheld narrowband ultraviolet B offers a better treatment response than potent TCS alone. However, it is unclear how to implement these findings.

Aim

We sought to answer three questions: (i) Can combination treatment be used safely and effectively by people with vitiligo?; (ii) Should combination treatment be made available as routine clinical care?; and (iii) Can combination treatment be integrated within current healthcare provision?

Methods

This was a mixed‐methods process evaluation, including semi‐structured interviews with a purposive sample of trial participants, structured interviews with commissioners, and an online survey and focus groups with trial staff. Transcripts were coded by framework analysis, with thematic development by multiple researchers.

Results

Participants found individual treatments easy to use, but the combination treatment was complicated and required nurse support. Both participants and site investigators felt that combination treatment should be made available, although commissioners were less certain. There was support for the development of services offering combination treatment, although this might not be prioritized above treatment for other conditions. A ‘mixed economy’ model was suggested, involving patients purchasing their own devices, although concerns regarding the safe use of treatments mean that training, monitoring and ongoing support are essential. The need for medical physics support may mean that a regional service is more practical.

Conclusion

Combination treatment should be made available for people seeking treatment for vitiligo, but services require partnership with medical physics and ongoing training and support for patients.

Advances in phototherapy for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis

Introduction: Phototherapy has long been used for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. The most frequent treatment approach utilizes ultraviolet (UV) light, however, recently, different lasers and low-level light therapies (LLLT) emitting wavelengths in the spectrum of the visible light have also been tried for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases with variable success.Areas covered: This review provides an update on the different forms of phototherapy used for the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. The proposed mechanism of action of the different phototherapeutical approaches are covered, including the immunosuppressive effect of UV light, the anti-inflammatory effect of vascular lasers and the LLLT induced photobiomodulation. The clinical efficacy of the different treatment options is also discussed.Expert opinion: Based on the efficacy and safety, NB-UVB represents the gold standard for treating psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. The UVB excimer laser and excimer lamp might be the best option for clearing localized therapy-resistant lesions. Home UV phototherapy systems might promote treatment adherence and better compliance of the patients. Vascular lasers, IPLs and LLLT, however, can not currently be recommended for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases because of the lack of well-controlled studies.

Home phototherapy for patients with vitiligo: challenges and solutions

Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune condition involving selective dysfunction and destruction of melanocytes in the skin, hair, or both. The typical presentation is well-demarcated depigmented skin patches. Given vitiligo is the most common cause of depigmentation worldwide and early disease responds best to treatment, prompt diagnosis and proactive management of vitiligo are critical. While a wide variety of treatments has demonstrated variable effectiveness in treating vitiligo, phototherapy remains standard of care because of its proven efficacy and favorable side effect profile. However, many patients with vitiligo are unable to access affordable, consistent, or convenient phototherapy. To address these issues, home-based phototherapy has emerged as a patient-centered alternative. The purpose of this review is to discuss management of vitiligo with a specific focus on access to home-based phototherapy (HBPT) for patients with this condition. Key challenges to HBPT include misperceptions around safety and efficacy, inadequate physician education and training, insurance and financial barriers, and appropriate patient selection. Solutions to these challenges are presented, such as approaches to improve physician education and increasing the evidence surrounding the effectiveness and safety of this treatment for vitiligo. In addition, various practical considerations are discussed to guide dermatologists on how to approach HBPT as a treatment option for patients with vitiligo.