1
|
Kiss N, Jongebloed H, Baguley B, Marshall S, White VM, Livingston PM, Bell K, Young L, Sabesan S, Swiatek D, Boltong A, Britto JM, Ugalde A. Meaningful consumer involvement in cancer care: a systematic review on co-design methods and processes. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae048. [PMID: 38897655 PMCID: PMC11240760 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although the benefits of consumer involvement in research and health care initiatives are known, there is a need to optimize this for all people with cancer. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the application of co-design in the oncology literature and develop recommendations to guide the application of optimal co-design processes and reporting in oncology research, practice, and policy. METHODS A systematic review of co-design studies in adults with cancer was conducted, searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO databases and included studies focused on 2 concepts, co-design and oncology. RESULTS A total of 5652 titles and abstracts were screened, resulting in 66 eligible publications reporting on 51 unique studies. Four frameworks were applied to describe the co-design initiatives. Most co-design initiatives were designed for use in an outpatient setting (n = 38; 74%) and were predominantly digital resources (n = 14; 27%) or apps (n = 12; 23%). Most studies (n = 25; 49%) used a co-production approach to consumer engagement. Although some studies presented strong co-design methodology, most (n = 36; 70%) did not report the co-design approach, and 14% used no framework. Reporting was poor for the participant level of involvement, the frequency, and time commitment of co-design sessions. Consumer participation level was predominantly collaborate (n = 25; 49%). CONCLUSIONS There are opportunities to improve the application of co-design in oncology research. This review has generated recommendations to guide 1) methodology and frameworks, 2) recruitment and engagement of co-design participants, and 3) evaluation of the co-design process. These recommendations can help drive appropriate, meaningful, and equitable co-design, leading to better cancer research and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Kiss
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hannah Jongebloed
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Brenton Baguley
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Skye Marshall
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Bond University Nutrition & Dietetics Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Victoria M White
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Patricia M Livingston
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Kathy Bell
- Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leonie Young
- Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sabe Sabesan
- Clinical Oncology Society of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Townsville Cancer Centre, Townsville, QLD, Australia
| | - Dayna Swiatek
- Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Boltong
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne M Britto
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Veldman MHJ, van der Aa HPA, Knoop H, Bode C, Hulshof CTJ, van der Ham L, van Rens GHMB, Heymans MW, van Nispen RMA. Usability and feasibility of E-nergEYEze: a blended vision-specific E-health based cognitive behavioral therapy and self-management intervention to reduce fatigue in adults with visual impairment. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1271. [PMID: 37974261 PMCID: PMC10655361 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 50% of adults with visual impairment experience severe fatigue. Therefore, we developed a guided E-health intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy and self-management to reduce fatigue in this population. This pilot study evaluated the usability, feasibility, fidelity and potential effectiveness of E-nergEYEze. METHODS E-nergEYEze was developed by a design team and customized by conducting a pilot study using an iterative development strategy. The intervention was first tested in a usability study among adults with visual impairment (n = 5). Participants were asked to think-aloud while exploring the intervention features and a semi-structured interview was performed afterwards. Subsequently, the enhanced intervention was tested in a feasibility study. Adults with visual impairment and severe fatigue (n = 10) followed the intervention partially with guidance from a social worker and one-time computer trainer support. Fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength), fatigue impact (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale) and cognitive behavioral therapy skills (Competencies of Cognitive Therapy Scale-Self Report) were measured at baseline and at three months follow-up and analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The intervention was evaluated through evaluation forms. RESULTS The usability study resulted in adjustments to content and lay-out with regard to optically shortened text sentences, separate pages for information and assignments with one read-aloud audio and an additional descriptive explanation of page content. Digital challenges were overcome with mandatory computer training and e-platform modifications. The feasibility study showed a positive trend in reducing fatigue severity (Z -6.108; P < .001; SD 8.4), impact of fatigue (Z - 4.451; P < .001; SD 11.4) and cognitive behavioral therapy skills (Z -2.278; P = .023; SD 19.3). Participants gave useful feedback regarding accessibility, content and guidance, with an overall positive experience. The intervention was rated with a median score of 8 (range 7-10). CONCLUSION We developed, evaluated and optimized E-nergEYEze by applying a user-centered and iterative approach. E-nergEYEze showed a promising trend to reduce fatigue severity and impact of fatigue and to increase cognitive behavioral therapy skills. The study methods were feasible and the fidelity of the intervention protocol was suitable. Performing a randomized controlled trial is warranted to give insight into whether E-nergEYEze is cost-effective in reducing severe fatigue in adults with visual impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Clinical Trial Registry Platform: NL7764. Date registered: 28-05-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H J Veldman
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Mental Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - H P A van der Aa
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Mental Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Knoop
- Departments of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Bode
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - C T J Hulshof
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L van der Ham
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G H M B van Rens
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R M A van Nispen
- Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Mental Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heijsters FACJ, van Loon GAP, Santema JMM, Mullender MG, Bouman M, de Bruijne MC, van Nassau F. A usability evaluation of the perceived user friendliness, accessibility, and inclusiveness of a personalized digital care pathway tool. Int J Med Inform 2023; 175:105070. [PMID: 37121138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to acquire insight into the perceived user friendliness, accessibility and inclusiveness of a personalized digital care pathway. MATERIALS & METHODS Usability of the tool was tested in an experimental setting. Mixed methods data collection consisted of scenario-based eye tracking tests in a web- or mobile-based prototype of the tool, followed by a questionnaire assessing user friendliness (System Usability Scale; SUS) and a structured interview. Inclusiveness was assessed by subgroup comparisons based on language proficiency, age and education level. Via purposive sampling a heterogeneous population of users (N = 24) was recruited. Eye tracking was used to measure gaze behavior. RESULTS Overall, participants were satisfied with the tool (scale 0-10, 7.5; SD = 1.29). User friendliness of the mobile version (68.3; SD = 21.6) was higher than the web version (50.9; SD = 17.3) measured by SUS score (0-100). With regard to accessibility, eye tracking scenarios showed that the menu bar was hard to find (17% mobile, 55% web). In all scenario's, information was found faster in the mobile version than the web version. Attention was easily drawn to images. Regarding inclusiveness of the tool, we found significantly longer completing time of the scenario tasks for low language proficiency (p-value = 0.029) and higher age subgroups (p-value = 0.049). Lower language proficiency scored a significant lower SUS score (p-value = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS Overall, user friendliness and accessibility were positively evaluated. Assessment of inclusiveness emphasized the need for tailoring digital tools to those with low language proficiency and/or an older age. Co-creation of digital care tools with users is therefore important to match users' needs, make tools easily understandable and accessible to all users, and ultimately result in better uptake and impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F A C J Heijsters
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Strategy and Innovation, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - J M M Santema
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M G Mullender
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M Bouman
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M C de Bruijne
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - F van Nassau
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Health Behaviors and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wickline M, Wolpin S, Cho S, Tomashek H, Louca T, Frisk T, Templin J, Loechl A, Goff B, Berry D. Usability and acceptability of the electronic self-assessment and care (eSAC) program in advanced ovarian cancer: A mixed methods study. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 167:239-246. [PMID: 36150917 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine usability and acceptability of the electronic self-assessment and care (eSAC) web-based, patient reported outcome (PRO) program for people with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS Patient participants recruited from a single ambulatory site were prompted by email to answer symptom/quality of life items prior to each clinic visit. Patient participant acceptability was measured with the Acceptability E-Scale Score (AES). Usability was measured among a subset of patient participants using semi-structured interviews. Clinician participant acceptability and usability were measured via survey and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. A mixed methods analysis was performed. RESULTS Of 163 eligible patients approached, 143 (87.7%) provided written consent. Patient participants (n = 71) who created an eSAC report prior to at least 3 clinic visits, rated eSAC as acceptable with a mean AES score of 26.19 ± 3.36 (out of 30). Interview data from patient participants (n = 33) revealed that eSAC was easy to use and important to the clinic visit conversation. Data from clinician surveys (n = 8) and focus groups (n = 3) revealed that the eSAC program was acceptable and useful for clinicians. Qualitative analysis suggested process improvements from patients and clinicians for effectiveness in the advanced ovarian cancer setting. Mixed methods analysis demonstrated no major discrepancies between quantitative and qualitative findings, with the qualitative data broadening understanding of quantitative ratings. CONCLUSION eSAC was useful and acceptable in this setting. This PRO is a promising strategy for enhancing patient-centered care for people with advanced ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihkai Wickline
- University of Washington School of Nursing, BOX 357260, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America.
| | - Seth Wolpin
- University of Washington School of Nursing, BOX 357260, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Susie Cho
- University of Washington School of Nursing, BOX 357260, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Holly Tomashek
- University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake, Gynecologic Oncology, United States of America
| | - Tanya Louca
- North York General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tori Frisk
- EvergreenHealth, United States of America
| | - Janna Templin
- Microsoft Health and Life Sciences, United States of America
| | - Alison Loechl
- University of Washington School of Nursing, BOX 357260, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| | - Barbara Goff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America
| | - Donna Berry
- University of Washington School of Nursing, BOX 357260, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
LeBaron V, Alam R, Bennett R, Blackhall L, Gordon K, Hayes J, Homdee N, Jones R, Lichti K, Martinez Y, Mohammadi S, Ogunjirin E, Patel N, Lach J. Deploying the Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention for Cancer Smart Health System to Support Patients and Family Caregivers in Managing Pain: Feasibility and Acceptability Study. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e36879. [PMID: 35943791 PMCID: PMC9399893 DOI: 10.2196/36879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Distressing cancer pain remains a serious symptom management issue for patients and family caregivers, particularly within home settings. Technology can support home-based cancer symptom management but must consider the experience of patients and family caregivers, as well as the broader environmental context. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a smart health sensing system-Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention for Cancer (BESI-C)-that was designed to support the monitoring and management of cancer pain in the home setting. METHODS Dyads of patients with cancer and their primary family caregivers were recruited from an outpatient palliative care clinic at an academic medical center. BESI-C was deployed in each dyad home for approximately 2 weeks. Data were collected via environmental sensors to assess the home context (eg, light and temperature); Bluetooth beacons to help localize dyad positions; and smart watches worn by both patients and caregivers, equipped with heart rate monitors, accelerometers, and a custom app to deliver ecological momentary assessments (EMAs). EMAs enabled dyads to record and characterize pain events from both their own and their partners' perspectives. Sensor data streams were integrated to describe and explore the context of cancer pain events. Feasibility was assessed both technically and procedurally. Acceptability was assessed using postdeployment surveys and structured interviews with participants. RESULTS Overall, 5 deployments (n=10 participants; 5 patient and family caregiver dyads) were completed, and 283 unique pain events were recorded. Using our "BESI-C Performance Scoring Instrument," the overall technical feasibility score for deployments was 86.4 out of 100. Procedural feasibility challenges included the rurality of dyads, smart watch battery life and EMA reliability, and the length of time required for deployment installation. Postdeployment acceptability Likert surveys (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree) found that dyads disagreed that BESI-C was a burden (1.7 out of 5) or compromised their privacy (1.9 out of 5) and agreed that the system collected helpful information to better manage cancer pain (4.6 out of 5). Participants also expressed an interest in seeing their own individual data (4.4 out of 5) and strongly agreed that it is important that data collected by BESI-C are shared with their respective partners (4.8 out of 5) and health care providers (4.8 out of 5). Qualitative feedback from participants suggested that BESI-C positively improved patient-caregiver communication regarding pain management. Importantly, we demonstrated proof of concept that seriously ill patients with cancer and their caregivers will mark pain events in real time using a smart watch. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to deploy BESI-C, and dyads find the system acceptable. By leveraging human-centered design and the integration of heterogenous environmental, physiological, and behavioral data, the BESI-C system offers an innovative approach to monitor cancer pain, mitigate the escalation of pain and distress, and improve symptom management self-efficacy. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/16178.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia LeBaron
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Ridwan Alam
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Rachel Bennett
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Leslie Blackhall
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Kate Gordon
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - James Hayes
- Trident Systems, Inc, Fairfax, VA, United States
| | - Nutta Homdee
- Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
| | - Randy Jones
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Kathleen Lichti
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Yudel Martinez
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Sahar Mohammadi
- Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Emmanuel Ogunjirin
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Nyota Patel
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - John Lach
- The George Washington University School of Engineering & Applied Science, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Su Z, Li X, McDonnell D, Fernandez AA, Flores BE, Wang J. Technology-Based Interventions for Cancer Caregivers: Concept Analysis. JMIR Cancer 2021; 7:e22140. [PMID: 34783664 PMCID: PMC8663574 DOI: 10.2196/22140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is a taxing chronic disease that demands substantial care, most of which is shouldered by informal caregivers. As a result, cancer caregivers often have to manage considerable challenges that could result in severe physical and psychological health consequences. Technology-based interventions have the potential to address many, if not all, of the obstacles caregivers encounter while caring for patients with cancer. However, although the application of technology-based interventions is on the rise, the term is seldom defined in research or practice. Considering that the lack of conceptual clarity of the term could compromise the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for cancer caregivers, timely research is needed to bridge this gap. Objective This study aims to clarify the meaning of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving and provide a definition that can be used by cancer caregivers, patients, clinicians, and researchers to facilitate evidence-based research and practice. Methods The 8-step concept analysis method by Walker and Avant was used to analyze the concept of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving. PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies that examined technology-based interventions for cancer caregivers. Results The defining attributes of technology-based interventions were recognized as being accessible, affordable, convenient, and user-friendly. On the basis of insights gained on the defining attributes, antecedents to, and consequences of technology-based interventions through the concept analysis process, technology-based interventions were defined as the use of technology to design, develop, and deliver health promotion contents and strategies aimed at inducing or improving positive physical or psychological health outcomes in cancer caregivers. Conclusions This study clarified the meaning of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving and provided a clear definition that can be used by caregivers, patients, clinicians, and researchers to facilitate evidence-based oncology practice. A clear conceptualization of technology-based interventions lays foundations for better intervention design and research outcomes, which in turn have the potential to help health care professionals address the needs and preferences of cancer caregivers more cost-effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Su
- Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Xiaoshan Li
- Program of Public Relations and Advertising, Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College, Zhuhai, China
| | - Dean McDonnell
- Department of Humanities, Institute of Technology, Carlow, Ireland
| | - Andrea A Fernandez
- School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Bertha E Flores
- School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Jing Wang
- Florida State University College of Nursing, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sezgin MG, Bektas H. The effect of web-based intervention programs on self-management and symptom management in patients with lymphoma: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2021; 19:e12460. [PMID: 34738318 DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM This systematic review aimed to systematically summarize studies obtained through a database search and examine the effect of web-based intervention programs on self-management and symptom management in patients with lymphoma. METHODS A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, Science Direct, and Ovid databases were reviewed until January 2021. The flow chart of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist was used in the search procedure without setting a year limit. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study criteria were determined by two independent investigators and published randomized controlled studies in English with lymphoma diagnosis and web-based intervention programs for self-management and symptom management were included in the systematic review. The included studies were examined for their risk of bias with the help of the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A narrative synthesis of study findings was performed. RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials with 2382 participants were included in the systematic review. Web-based intervention programs in patients diagnosed with lymphoma were found to be generally implemented for determining the levels of self-management and symptom management. In all of the studies reviewed, it was found that the interventions had treatment outcomes. The risk of Bias 2 was evaluated as high risk in two studies that did not meet the criteria for blinding outcome evaluations. The included studies, while evaluating the effects of web-based intervention programs on patient outcomes, could not provide information about the underlying mechanisms by which these effects occur and how they occur. CONCLUSIONS All of the studies included were found to apply a technology designed to improve outcomes in patients with lymphoma. It is recommended that web-based intervention programs be individualized by adapting them to lymphoma types and stages, and serve as a guide for effective symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Gozde Sezgin
- Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Hicran Bektas
- Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patients and Caregivers Rate the PAINReportIt Wireless Internet-Enabled Tablet as a Method for Reporting Pain During End-of-Life Cancer Care. Cancer Nurs 2021; 43:419-424. [PMID: 31517649 PMCID: PMC7098847 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In several studies, investigators have successfully used an internet-enabled PAINReportIt tablet to allow patients to report their pain to clinicians in real-time, but it is unknown how acceptable this technology is to patients and caregivers when used in their homes. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to examine computer use acceptability scores of patients with end-stage cancer in hospice and their caregivers and to compare the scores for differences by age, gender, race, and computer use experience. INTERVENTION/METHODS Immediately after using the tablet, 234 hospice patients and 231 caregivers independently completed the Computer Acceptability Scale (maximum scores of 14 for patients and 9 for caregivers). RESULTS The mean (SD) Computer Acceptability score was 12.2 (1.9) for patients and 8.5 (0.9) for caregivers. Computer Acceptability scores were significantly associated with age and with previous computer use for both patients and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS This technology was highly acceptable to patients and caregivers for reporting pain in real time to their hospice nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Findings provide encouraging results that are worthy of serious consideration for patients who are in end stages of illness, including older persons and those with minimal computer experience. Increasing availability of technology can provide innovative methods for improving care provided to patients facing significant cancer-related pain even at the end of life.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kondylakis H, Axenie C, Kiran Bastola D, Katehakis DG, Kouroubali A, Kurz D, Larburu N, Macía I, Maguire R, Maramis C, Marias K, Morrow P, Muro N, Núñez-Benjumea FJ, Rampun A, Rivera-Romero O, Scotney B, Signorelli G, Wang H, Tsiknakis M, Zwiggelaar R. Status and Recommendations of Technological and Data-Driven Innovations in Cancer Care: Focus Group Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e22034. [PMID: 33320099 PMCID: PMC7772066 DOI: 10.2196/22034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The status of the data-driven management of cancer care as well as the challenges, opportunities, and recommendations aimed at accelerating the rate of progress in this field are topics of great interest. Two international workshops, one conducted in June 2019 in Cordoba, Spain, and one in October 2019 in Athens, Greece, were organized by four Horizon 2020 (H2020) European Union (EU)-funded projects: BOUNCE, CATCH ITN, DESIREE, and MyPal. The issues covered included patient engagement, knowledge and data-driven decision support systems, patient journey, rehabilitation, personalized diagnosis, trust, assessment of guidelines, and interoperability of information and communication technology (ICT) platforms. A series of recommendations was provided as the complex landscape of data-driven technical innovation in cancer care was portrayed. OBJECTIVE This study aims to provide information on the current state of the art of technology and data-driven innovations for the management of cancer care through the work of four EU H2020-funded projects. METHODS Two international workshops on ICT in the management of cancer care were held, and several topics were identified through discussion among the participants. A focus group was formulated after the second workshop, in which the status of technological and data-driven cancer management as well as the challenges, opportunities, and recommendations in this area were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Technical and data-driven innovations provide promising tools for the management of cancer care. However, several challenges must be successfully addressed, such as patient engagement, interoperability of ICT-based systems, knowledge management, and trust. This paper analyzes these challenges, which can be opportunities for further research and practical implementation and can provide practical recommendations for future work. CONCLUSIONS Technology and data-driven innovations are becoming an integral part of cancer care management. In this process, specific challenges need to be addressed, such as increasing trust and engaging the whole stakeholder ecosystem, to fully benefit from these innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cristian Axenie
- Audi Konfuzius-Institut Ingolstadt Lab, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
| | - Dhundy Kiran Bastola
- School of Interdisciplinary Informatics, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, United States
| | | | | | - Daria Kurz
- Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, Helios Klinikum München West, Munich, Germany
| | - Nekane Larburu
- Vicomtech, Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Iván Macía
- Vicomtech, Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Roma Maguire
- University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Christos Maramis
- eHealth Lab, Institute of Applied Biosciences - Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Philip Morrow
- School of Computing, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom
| | - Naiara Muro
- Vicomtech, Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | - Andrik Rampun
- Academic Unit of Radiology, Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Bryan Scotney
- School of Computing, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hui Wang
- School of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Reyer Zwiggelaar
- Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
LeBaron V, Bennett R, Alam R, Blackhall L, Gordon K, Hayes J, Homdee N, Jones R, Martinez Y, Ogunjirin E, Thomas T, Lach J. Understanding the Experience of Cancer Pain From the Perspective of Patients and Family Caregivers to Inform Design of an In-Home Smart Health System: Multimethod Approach. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e20836. [PMID: 32712581 PMCID: PMC7481872 DOI: 10.2196/20836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Inadequately managed pain is a serious problem for patients with cancer and those who care for them. Smart health systems can help with remote symptom monitoring and management, but they must be designed with meaningful end-user input. Objective This study aims to understand the experience of managing cancer pain at home from the perspective of both patients and family caregivers to inform design of the Behavioral and Environmental Sensing and Intervention for Cancer (BESI-C) smart health system. Methods This was a descriptive pilot study using a multimethod approach. Dyads of patients with cancer and difficult pain and their primary family caregivers were recruited from an outpatient oncology clinic. The participant interviews consisted of (1) open-ended questions to explore the overall experience of cancer pain at home, (2) ranking of variables on a Likert-type scale (0, no impact; 5, most impact) that may influence cancer pain at home, and (3) feedback regarding BESI-C system prototypes. Qualitative data were analyzed using a descriptive approach to identity patterns and key themes. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS; basic descriptive statistics and independent sample t tests were run. Results Our sample (n=22; 10 patient-caregiver dyads and 2 patients) uniformly described the experience of managing cancer pain at home as stressful and difficult. Key themes included (1) unpredictability of pain episodes; (2) impact of pain on daily life, especially the negative impact on sleep, activity, and social interactions; and (3) concerns regarding medications. Overall, taking pain medication was rated as the category with the highest impact on a patient’s pain (=4.79), followed by the categories of wellness (=3.60; sleep quality and quantity, physical activity, mood and oral intake) and interaction (=2.69; busyness of home, social or interpersonal interactions, physical closeness or proximity to others, and emotional closeness and connection to others). The category related to environmental factors (temperature, humidity, noise, and light) was rated with the lowest overall impact (=2.51). Patients and family caregivers expressed receptivity to the concept of BESI-C and reported a preference for using a wearable sensor (smart watch) to capture data related to the abrupt onset of difficult cancer pain. Conclusions Smart health systems to support cancer pain management should (1) account for the experience of both the patient and the caregiver, (2) prioritize passive monitoring of physiological and environmental variables to reduce burden, and (3) include functionality that can monitor and track medication intake and efficacy; wellness variables, such as sleep quality and quantity, physical activity, mood, and oral intake; and levels of social interaction and engagement. Systems must consider privacy and data sharing concerns and incorporate feasible strategies to capture and characterize rapid-onset symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia LeBaron
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Rachel Bennett
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Ridwan Alam
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Leslie Blackhall
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Kate Gordon
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - James Hayes
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Nutta Homdee
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Randy Jones
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Yudel Martinez
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Emmanuel Ogunjirin
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Tanya Thomas
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - John Lach
- The George Washington University School of Engineering & Applied Science, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Amweg LN, McReynolds J, Lansang K, Jones T, Snow C, Berry DL, Partridge AH, Underhill-Blazey ML. Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivor Wellness: Development of a Web-Based Intervention. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24:284-289. [PMID: 32441674 DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.284-289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informational and supportive care resources are needed for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors. OBJECTIVES The aim of this article is to adapt and evaluate a previously developed survivorship care website for HL survivors. METHODS A mixed-methods, user-centered design, including one-time focus groups, was followed by iterative web design and user testing. Transcripts were content analyzed, and survey responses were summarized. FINDINGS HL survivors need survivorship care education and support. Tailored web-based resources may be an effective adjunct to clinical care. The Survivor Wellness website is a usable web-based resource for HL survivors that may facilitate survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kristina Lansang
- Angeles Clinic and Research Institute Cedars Sinai Medical Center Affiliate
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kip H, Kelders SM, Bouman YHA, van Gemert-Pijnen LJEWC. The Importance of Systematically Reporting and Reflecting on eHealth Development: Participatory Development Process of a Virtual Reality Application for Forensic Mental Health Care. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e12972. [PMID: 31429415 PMCID: PMC6718085 DOI: 10.2196/12972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The use of electronic health (eHealth) technologies in practice often is lower than expected, mostly because there is no optimal fit among a technology, the characteristics of prospective users, and their context. To improve this fit, a thorough systematic development process is recommended. However, more knowledge about suitable development methods is necessary to create a tool kit that guides researchers in choosing development methods that are appropriate for their context and users. In addition, there is a need for reflection on the existing frameworks for eHealth development to be able to constantly improve them. Objective The two main objectives of this case study were to present and reflect on the (1) methods used in the development process of a virtual reality application for forensic mental health care and (2) development model that was used: the CeHRes Roadmap (the Centre for eHealth Research Roadmap). Methods In the development process, multiple methods were used to operationalize the first 2 phases of the CeHRes Roadmap: the contextual inquiry and value specification. To summarize the most relevant information for the goals of this study, the following information was extracted per method: (1) research goal, (2) explanation of the method used, (3) main results, (4) main conclusions, and (5) lessons learned about the method. Results Information on 10 methods used is presented in a structured manner. These 10 methods were stakeholder identification, project team composition, focus groups, literature study, semistructured interviews, idea generation with scenarios, Web-based questionnaire, value specification, idea generation with prototyping, and a second round of interviews. The lessons learned showed that although each method added new insights to the development process, not every method appeared to be the most appropriate for each research goal. Conclusions Reflection on the methods used pointed out that brief methods with concrete examples or scenarios fit the forensic psychiatric patients the best, among other things, because of difficulties with abstract reasoning and low motivation to invest much time in participating in research. Formulating clear research questions based on a model’s underlying principles and composing a multidisciplinary project team with prospective end users appeared to be important in this study. The research questions supported the project team in keeping the complex development processes structured and prevented tunnel vision. With regard to the CeHRes Roadmap, continuous stakeholder involvement and formative evaluations were evaluated as strong points. A suggestion to further improve the Roadmap is to explicitly integrate the use of domain-specific theories and models. To create a tool kit with a broad range of methods for eHealth development and further improve development models, studies that report and reflect on development processes in a consistent and structured manner are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanneke Kip
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Research, Stichting Transfore, Deventer, Netherlands
| | - Saskia M Kelders
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
| | | | - Lisette J E W C van Gemert-Pijnen
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rivas C, Tkacz D, Antao L, Mentzakis E, Gordon M, Anstee S, Giordano R. Automated analysis of free-text comments and dashboard representations in patient experience surveys: a multimethod co-design study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPatient experience surveys (PESs) often include informative free-text comments, but with no way of systematically, efficiently and usefully analysing and reporting these. The National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (CPES), used to model the approach reported here, generates > 70,000 free-text comments annually.Main aimTo improve the use and usefulness of PES free-text comments in driving health service changes that improve the patient experience.Secondary aims(1) To structure CPES free-text comments using rule-based information retrieval (IR) (‘text engineering’), drawing on health-care domain-specific gazetteers of terms, with in-built transferability to other surveys and conditions; (2) to display the results usefully for health-care professionals, in a digital toolkit dashboard display that drills down to the original free text; (3) to explore the usefulness of interdisciplinary mixed stakeholder co-design and consensus-forming approaches in technology development, ensuring that outputs have meaning for all; and (4) to explore the usefulness of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) in structuring outputs for implementation and sustainability.DesignA scoping review, rapid review and surveys with stakeholders in health care (patients, carers, health-care providers, commissioners, policy-makers and charities) explored clinical dashboard design/patient experience themes. The findings informed the rules for the draft rule-based IR [developed using half of the 2013 Wales CPES (WCPES) data set] and prototype toolkit dashboards summarising PES data. These were refined following mixed stakeholder, concept-mapping workshops and interviews, which were structured to enable consensus-forming ‘co-design’ work. IR validation used the second half of the WCPES, with comparison against its manual analysis; transferability was tested using further health-care data sets. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) explored which toolkit features were preferred by health-care professionals, with a simple cost–benefit analysis. Structured walk-throughs with NHS managers in Wessex, London and Leeds explored usability and general implementation into practice.Key outcomesA taxonomy of ranked PES themes, a checklist of key features recommended for digital clinical toolkits, rule-based IR validation and transferability scores, usability, and goal-oriented, cost–benefit and marketability results. The secondary outputs were a survey, scoping and rapid review findings, and concordance and discordance between stakeholders and methods.Results(1) The surveys, rapid review and workshops showed that stakeholders differed in their understandings of the patient experience and priorities for change, but that they reached consensus on a shortlist of 19 themes; six were considered to be core; (2) the scoping review and one survey explored the clinical toolkit design, emphasising that such toolkits should be quick and easy to use, and embedded in workflows; the workshop discussions, the DCE and the walk-throughs confirmed this and foregrounded other features to form the toolkit design checklist; and (3) the rule-based IR, developed using noun and verb phrases and lookup gazetteers, was 86% accurate on the WCPES, but needs modification to improve this and to be accurate with other data sets. The DCE and the walk-through suggest that the toolkit would be well accepted, with a favourable cost–benefit ratio, if implemented into practice with appropriate infrastructure support.LimitationsSmall participant numbers and sampling bias across component studies. The scoping review studies mostly used top-down approaches and focused on professional dashboards. The rapid review of themes had limited scope, with no second reviewer. The IR needs further refinement, especially for transferability. New governance restrictions further limit immediate use.ConclusionsUsing a multidisciplinary, mixed stakeholder, use of co-design, proof of concept was shown for an automated display of patient experience free-text comments in a way that could drive health-care improvements in real time. The approach is easily modified for transferable application.Future workFurther exploration is needed of implementation into practice, transferable uses and technology development co-design approaches.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Rivas
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Social Science Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daria Tkacz
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Laurence Antao
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Emmanouil Mentzakis
- Economics within Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Sydney Anstee
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Richard Giordano
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tremblay M, Latulippe K, Giguere AM, Provencher V, Poulin V, Dubé V, Guay M, Ethier S, Sévigny A, Carignan M, Giroux D. Requirements for an Electronic Health Tool to Support the Process of Help Seeking by Caregivers of Functionally Impaired Older Adults: Co-Design Approach. JMIR Aging 2019; 2:e12327. [PMID: 31518279 PMCID: PMC6715009 DOI: 10.2196/12327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In Quebec, Canada, many public, community, and private organizations provide resources to caregivers of functionally impaired older adults. Nevertheless, these resources may be difficult for caregivers to find. A co-design study was conducted to address the gap between caregivers and access to resources. The purpose of this study was to support the process of help seeking by caregivers of functionally impaired older adults through electronic health (eHealth). Objective The purpose of this study was to focus on the identification of functional and content requirements for an eHealth tool to support the help-seeking process of caregivers of functionally impaired older adults. Methods This study uses a co-design process based on qualitative action research approach to develop an eHealth tool with health and social service professionals (HSSPs), community workers, and caregivers. The participants acted as co-designers in identifying requirements for the tool. A total of 4 design workshops and 1 advisory committee session were held in different locations in Quebec, Canada. Activities were videotaped and analyzed with a conceptual framework of user experience. Results A total of 11 caregivers, 16 community workers, and 11 HSSPs participated in identifying the requirements for the eHealth tool. Several functional and content requirements were identified for each user need (19). Content requirements differed depending on the category of participant, corresponding to the concept of user segmentation in the design of information and communication technology. Nevertheless, there were disagreements among co-designers about specific functionalities, which included (1) functionalities related to the social Web, (2) functionalities related to the evaluation of resources for caregivers, and (3) functionalities related to the emerging technologies. Several co-design sessions were required to resolve disagreements. Conclusions Co-designers (participants) were able to identify functional and content requirements for each of the previously identified needs; however, several discussions were required to achieve consensus. Decision making was influenced by identity, social context, and participants’ knowledge, and it is a challenge to reconcile the different perspectives. The findings stressed the importance of allowing more time to deal with the iterative aspect of the design activity, especially during the identification of requirements of an eHealth tool. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/11634
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélanie Tremblay
- Department of Teaching and Learning Studies, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Karine Latulippe
- Department of Teaching and Learning Studies, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anik Mc Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.,Centre of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Véronique Provencher
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.,Centre of Research on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Valérie Poulin
- Université du Québec in Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.,Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Véronique Dubé
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Research Centre of the University Hospital of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Manon Guay
- School of Rehabilitation, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.,Centre of Research on Aging, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Sophie Ethier
- Centre of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Québec, QC, Canada.,School of Social Work and Criminology, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Andrée Sévigny
- Centre of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Québec, QC, Canada.,School of Social Work and Criminology, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Maude Carignan
- Centre of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Dominique Giroux
- Centre of Excellence on Aging Quebec, Québec, QC, Canada.,Department of Rehabilitation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Georgsson M, Staggers N, Årsand E, Kushniruk A. Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation. J Biomed Inform 2019; 91:103110. [PMID: 30721757 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Self-management of chronic diseases using mobile health (mHealth) systems and applications is becoming common. Current evaluation methods such as formal usability testing can be very costly and time-consuming; others may be more efficient but lack a user focus. We propose an enhanced cognitive walkthrough (CW) method, the user-centered CW (UC-CW), to address identified deficiencies in the original technique and perform a beginning validation with think aloud protocol (TA) to assess its effectiveness, efficiency and user acceptance in a case study with diabetes patient users on a mHealth self-management application. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 12 diabetes patients at University of Utah Health, USA, were divided into UC-CW and think aloud (TA) groups. The UC-CW method included: making the user the main evaluator for detecting usability problems, having a dual domain facilitator, and using three other improved processes: validated task development, higher level tasks and a streamlined evaluation process. Users interacted with the same mHealth application for both methods. Post-evaluation assessments included the NASA RTLX instrument and a set of brief interview questions. RESULTS Participants had similar demographic characteristics. A total of 26 usability problems were identified with the UC-CW and 20 with TA. Both methods produced similar ratings: severity across all views (UC-CW = 2.7 and TA = 2.6), numbers of problems in the same views (Main View [UC-CW = 11, TA = 10], Carbohydrate Entry View [UC-CW = 4, TA = 3] and List View [UC-CW = 3, TA = 3]) with similar heuristic violations (Match Between the System and Real World [UC-CW = 19, TA = 16], Consistency and Standards [UC-CW = 17, TA = 15], and Recognition Rather than Recall [UC-CW = 13, TA = 10]). Both methods converged on eight usability problems, but the UC-CW group detected five critical issues while the TA group identified two. The UC-CW group identified needed personalized features for patients' disease needs not identified with TA. UC-CW was more efficient on average time per identified usability problem and on the total evaluation process with patients. NASA RTLX scores indicated that participants experienced the UC-CW half as cognitively demanding. Common themes from interviews indicated the UC-CW as enjoyable and easy to perform while TA was considered somewhat awkward and more cognitively challenging. CONCLUSIONS UC-CW was effective for finding severe, recurring usability problems and it highlighted the need for personalized user features. The method was also efficient and had high user acceptance. These results indicate UC-CW's utility and user acceptance in evaluating a mHealth self-management application. It provides an additional usability evaluation technique for researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Georgsson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Faculty of Computing, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden
| | - Nancy Staggers
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Summit Health Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Eirik Årsand
- The Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Department of Clinical Medicine, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Andre Kushniruk
- School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liew MS, Zhang J, See J, Ong YL. Usability Challenges for Health and Wellness Mobile Apps: Mixed-Methods Study Among mHealth Experts and Consumers. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e12160. [PMID: 30698528 PMCID: PMC6372932 DOI: 10.2196/12160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND By 2019, there will be an estimated 4.68 billion mobile phone users globally. This increase comes with an unprecedented proliferation in mobile apps, a plug-and-play product positioned to improve lives in innumerable ways. Within this landscape, medical apps will see a 41% compounded annual growth rate between 2015 and 2020, but paradoxically, prevailing evidence indicates declining downloads of such apps and decreasing "stickiness" with the intended end users. OBJECTIVE As usability is a prerequisite for success of health and wellness mobile apps, this paper aims to provide insights and suggestions for improving usability experience of the mobile health (mHealth) app by exploring the degree of alignment between mHealth insiders and consumers. METHODS Usability-related major themes were selected from over 20 mHealth app development studies. The list of themes, grouped into 5 categories using the Nielsen usability model, was then used as a framework to identify and classify the responses from mHealth expert (insider) interviews. Responses from the qualitative phase were integrated into some questions for a quantitative consumer survey. Subsequently, categorical data from qualitative mHealth insider interviews and numerical data from a quantitative consumer survey were compared in order to identify common usability themes and areas of divergence. RESULTS Of the 5 usability attributes described in Nielsen model, Satisfaction ranked as the top attribute for both mHealth insiders and consumers. Satisfaction refers to user likability, comfort, and pleasure. The consumer survey yielded 451 responses. Out of 9 mHealth insiders' top concerns, 5 were similar to those of the consumers. On the other hand, consumers did not grade themes such as Intuitiveness as important, which was deemed vital by mHealth insiders. Other concerns of the consumers include in-app charges and advertisements. CONCLUSIONS This study supports and contributes to the existing pool of mixed-research studies. Strengthening the connectivity between suppliers and users (through the designed research tool) will help increase uptake of mHealth apps. In a holistic manner, this will have a positive overall outcome for the mHealth app ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Shan Liew
- Alliance Manchester Business School, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jian Zhang
- Alliance Manchester Business School, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jovis See
- Alliance Manchester Business School, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Yen Leng Ong
- Alliance Manchester Business School, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Joensson K, Melholt C, Hansen J, Leth S, Spindler H, Olsen MV, Dinesen B. Listening to the patients: using participatory design in the development of a cardiac telerehabilitation web portal. Mhealth 2019; 5:33. [PMID: 31620460 PMCID: PMC6789193 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2019.08.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of all deaths worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation is an effective approach for preventing secondary complications, but it remains a complex intervention because of the need for lifestyle changes. One solution is to employ interactive telerehabilitation or eHealth web portals. However, these have not been implemented as intended by developers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the design and usability of a cardiac telerehabilitation web portal, called the 'HeartPortal', for use among heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS The HeartPortal was designed using participatory design (PD). The design process involved HF patients, their relatives, healthcare professionals (HCP), healthcare company specialists and researchers. Self-determination theory (SDT) was used to enable the design to elicit intrinsic motivation within the patients. With eHealth literacy skills in mind, the goal of the HeartPortal was to successfully target the end-users. The PD process and data collection techniques included cultural probes, workshops, participant-observation, questionnaires, and problem-solving tasks. RESULTS The PD process helped us design an interactive web portal, the HeartPortal. Based on participants' feedback, the design incorporated features such as being able to make notes and to communicate with HCP, view data from self-tracking devices in a graphic form, and to obtain information on rehabilitation in the form of text, audio, and video. More than half of those testing the HeartPortal found that it was easy to navigate, and most of the users stated that it had an excellent structure and that using it could possibly improve their condition. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the HeartPortal was found to be logical and easy to navigate and will now be tested in a clinical trial within the Future Patient Telerehabilitation Program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrine Joensson
- Laboratory of Welfare Technologies-Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Camilla Melholt
- Laboratory of Welfare Technologies-Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - John Hansen
- Laboratory for Cardio-Technology, Medical Informatics Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Soeren Leth
- Laboratory of Welfare Technologies-Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Helle Spindler
- Department of Psychology and Behavior Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mathias Vassard Olsen
- Laboratory of Welfare Technologies-Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Birthe Dinesen
- Laboratory of Welfare Technologies-Telehealth & Telerehabilitation, SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, Marshall T, Dutton M, Walmsley-Allen N, Auti R, Calvert M. Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Comput Biol Med 2018; 101:120-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
19
|
Krogstad H, Sundt-Hansen SM, Hjermstad MJ, Hågensen LÅ, Kaasa S, Loge JH, Raj SX, Steinsbekk A, Sand K. Usability testing of EirV3-a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:1835-1844. [PMID: 30173402 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4435-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Eir version 3 (V3) is an electronic tool for administration of patient-reported outcome measures (Eir-Patient) that immediately presents patient scores on the physician's computer (Eir-Doctor). Perceived usability is an important determinant for successful implementation. The aim of this study was to answer the following research question evaluated at the cancer outpatient clinics, in the patients' home, and at general practitioners' (GPs) offices: What are the number, type, and severity of usability issues evaluated by the patient (Eir-Patient module) and by the physician (Eir-Doctor module)? METHODS A usability evaluation using observations, think-aloud sessions, individual interviews and focus group interviews in cancer patients and their physicians was conducted. Identified usability issues were graded on a severity scale from 1 (irritant) to 4 (unusable). RESULTS Overall, 73 Eir registrations were performed by 37 patients, and used by 17 physicians in clinical consultations. All patients were able to complete the Eir-Patient symptom registration. Seventy-two usability issues were identified. None of them were graded as unusable. For the Eir-Patient module, 62% of the identified usability issues was graded as irritant (grade 1), 18% as moderate (grade 2), and 20% as severe (grade 3). For the Eir-Doctor module, 46% of the identified usability issues were graded as irritant, 36% as moderate and 18% as severe. CONCLUSIONS In the updated Eir version, issues in the severe and moderate categories have been changed, to optimize the usability of using real-time PROMs in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Krogstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. .,Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Stine Marie Sundt-Hansen
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Stein Kaasa
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jon Håvard Loge
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sunil X Raj
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Aslak Steinsbekk
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kari Sand
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.,Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Faccio F, Renzi C, Crico C, Kazantzaki E, Kondylakis H, Koumakis L, Marias K, Pravettoni G. Development of an eHealth tool for cancer patients: monitoring psycho-emotional aspects with the Family Resilience (FaRe) Questionnaire. Ecancermedicalscience 2018; 12:852. [PMID: 30079114 PMCID: PMC6057659 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, clinicians have started to shift from an individualistic perspective of the patient towards family-centred models of care, due to the increasing evidence from research and clinical practice of the crucial role of significant others in determining the patient's adjustment to cancer disease and management. eHealth tools can be considered a means to compensate the services gap and support outpatient care flows. Within the works of the European H2020 iManageCancer project, a review of the literature in the field of family resilience was conducted, in order to determine how to monitor the patient and his/her family's resilience through an eHealth platform. An analysis of existing family resilience questionnaires suggested that no measure was appropriate for cancer patients and their families. For this reason, a new family resilience questionnaire (named FaRe) was developed to screen the patient's and caregiver's psycho-emotional resources. Composed of 24 items, it is divided into four subscales: Communication and Cohesion, Perceived Family Coping, Religiousness and Spirituality, and Perceived Social Support. Embedded in the iManageCancer eHealth platform, it allows users and clinicians to monitor the patient's and the caregivers' resilience throughout the cancer trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Faccio
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milano 20122, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milano 20141, Italy.,These authors equally contributed to the manuscript
| | - Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milano 20141, Italy.,These authors equally contributed to the manuscript
| | - Chiara Crico
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milano 20122, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milano 20141, Italy
| | - Eleni Kazantzaki
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Lefteris Koumakis
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| | - Kostas Marias
- Computational BioMedicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Heraklion 70013, Crete, Greece
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, Milano 20122, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milano 20141, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Renzi C, Fioretti C, Oliveri S, Mazzocco K, Zerini D, Alessandro O, Rojas DP, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Pravettoni G. A Qualitative Investigation on Patient Empowerment in Prostate Cancer. Front Psychol 2017; 8:1215. [PMID: 28798701 PMCID: PMC5526923 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Men with prostate cancer often describe low levels of empowerment. eHealth interventions may represent useful tools to deliver care and education and to meet patients' needs within an empowerment framework. In order to design a platform for cancer patients' empowerment within the H2020 iManageCancer project, the perspective of the target population for the platform was assessed. The present study aims to assess the qualitative experience of prostate cancer patients during treatment in order to provide insights for clinical practice with a particular focus on the design of a web platform to promote cancer patients' empowerment. Methods: Ten patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment took part in a semi-structured interview to explore different aspects of patient empowerment. Four main thematic areas were addressed: patient-healthcare providers' communication, decision-making, needs, and resources. A qualitative approach using thematic analysis was followed. Results: Half of the patients reported little to no possibility to share information and questions with healthcare providers. With regards to decision-making, the role of healthcare providers was perceived as directive/informative, but half of the patients perceived to assume an active role in at least one interaction. Difficulties and needs included the choice of the specialist or of the structure after diagnosis, clinicians' support in self-management, surgical consequences, and side effects, preparation for radiation therapy. Resources included family and social support both from a practical and from an emotional perspective, coping style, and work schedule management. Conclusions: These results suggest that relations with healthcare providers should be supported, especially immediately after diagnosis and after surgery. Support to self-management after surgery and at the beginning of radiation therapy treatment also constitutes a priority. The adoption of a personalized approach from the beginning of prostate cancer care flow may promote patient empowerment, overcoming the aforementioned needs and mobilizing resources. The social network represents an important resource that could be integrated in interventions. These considerations will be taken into account in the design of a cancer self-management platform aiming to increase patients' empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Renzi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy
| | - Chiara Fioretti
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy
| | - Serena Oliveri
- Interdisciplinary Research and Intervention on Decision, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy.,Interdisciplinary Research and Intervention on Decision, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy
| | - Ombretta Alessandro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy
| | - Damaris P Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy.,Interdisciplinary Research and Intervention on Decision, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of MilanMilan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lund H. Eye tracking in library and information science: a literature review. LIBRARY HI TECH 2016. [DOI: 10.1108/lht-07-2016-0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to present a systematic literature review of the application of eye-tracking technology within the field of library and information science. Eye-tracking technology has now reached a level of maturity, which makes the use of the technology more accessible. Subsequently, a growing interest in employing eye tracking as a methodology within library and information science research must be anticipated.
Design/methodology/approach
The review follows the guidelines set in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. Two reference databases are searched for relevant references: Library and Information Science Abstracts and Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts. The main selection criteria are peer-reviewed literature that describes the experimental setting, including which eye-tracking equipment was used, the number of test persons and reports on the eye-tracking measures. Furthermore, this study will report which other methods were applied in combination with eye tracking.
Findings
The number of published research utilizing eye-tracking technologies within library and information science (LIS) is still limited although an increase in the use of eye-tracking technologies is observed during recent years.
Originality/value
To the knowledge of the author, this is the first systematic review on eye-tracking technology and application in LIS.
Collapse
|
23
|
Crane HM, Fredericksen RJ, Church A, Harrington A, Ciechanowski P, Magnani J, Nasby K, Brown T, Dhanireddy S, Harrington RD, Lober WB, Simoni J, Safren SA, Edwards TC, Patrick DL, Saag MS, Crane PK, Kitahata MM. A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol to Evaluate the Effectiveness of an Integrated Care Management Approach to Improve Adherence Among HIV-Infected Patients in Routine Clinical Care: Rationale and Design. JMIR Res Protoc 2016; 5:e156. [PMID: 27707688 PMCID: PMC5071617 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2016] [Revised: 05/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to antiretroviral medications is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. Many adherence intervention trials investigated the effects of time-intensive or costly interventions that are not feasible in most clinical care settings. OBJECTIVE We set out to evaluate a collaborative care approach as a feasible intervention applicable to patients in clinical care including those with mental illness and/or substance use issues. METHODS We developed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating an integrated, clinic-based care management approach to improve clinical outcomes that could be integrated into the clinical care setting. This is based on the routine integration and systematic follow-up of a clinical assessment of patient-reported outcomes targeting adherence, depression, and substance use, and adapts previously developed and tested care management approaches. The primary health coach or care management role is provided by clinic case managers allowing the intervention to be generalized to other human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinics that have case managers. We used a stepped-care approach to target interventions to those at greatest need who are most likely to benefit rather than to everyone to maintain feasibility in a busy clinical care setting. RESULTS The National Institutes of Health funded this study and had no role in study design, data collection, or decisions regarding whether or not to submit manuscripts for publication. This trial is currently underway, enrollment was completed in 2015, and follow-up time still accruing. First results are expected to be ready for publication in early 2017. DISCUSSION This paper describes the protocol for an ongoing clinical trial including the design and the rationale for key methodological decisions. There is a need to identify best practices for implementing evidence-based collaborative care models that are effective and feasible in clinical care. Adherence efficacy trials have not led to sufficient improvements, and there remains little guidance regarding how adherence interventions should be implemented into clinical care. By focusing on improving adherence within care settings using existing staff, routine assessment of key domains, such as depression, adherence, and substance use, and feasible interventions, we propose to evaluate this innovative way to improve clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01505660; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01505660 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation/ 6ktOq6Xj7).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi M Crane
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cnossen IC, van Uden-Kraan CF, Eerenstein SE, Rinkel RN, Aalders IJJ, van den Berg K, de Goede CJ, van Stijgeren AJ, Cruijff-Bijl Y, de Bree R, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. A Participatory Design Approach to Develop a Web-Based Self-Care Program Supporting Early Rehabilitation among Patients after Total Laryngectomy. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2016; 67:193-201. [DOI: 10.1159/000441251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
25
|
Heckman C, Darlow S, Munshi T, Caruso C, Ritterband L, Raivitch S, Fleisher L, Manne S. Development of an Internet Intervention to Address Behaviors Associated with Skin Cancer Risk among Young Adults. Internet Interv 2015; 2:340-350. [PMID: 26640776 PMCID: PMC4669098 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2015.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US, and its incidence is increasing. The major risk factor for skin cancer is exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UV). Young adults tend to expose themselves to large amounts of UV and engage in minimal skin protection, which increases their skin cancer risk. Interventions are needed to address risk behaviors among young adults that may lead to skin cancer. The nternet offers a cost-effective way to widely disseminate efficacious interventions. The current paper describes the development of an online skin cancer risk reduction intervention (UV4.me) for young adults. PROCEDURES The iterative development process for UV4.me followed best-practice guidelines and included the following activities: individual interviews, focus groups, content development by the expert team, acceptability testing, cognitive interviewing for questionnaires, quality control testing, usability testing, and a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participant acceptability and usability feedback was assessed. PRINCIPAL RESULTS The development process produced an evidence-informed intervention that is individually-tailored, interactive, and multimedia in nature based on the Integrative Model of Behavior Prediction, a model for internet interventions, and other best-practice recommendations, expert input, as well as user acceptability and usability feedback gathered before, during, and after development. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS Development of an acceptable intervention intended to have a significant public health impact requires a relatively large investment in time, money, expertise, and ongoing user input. Lessons learned and recommendations are discussed. The comprehensive process used may help prepare others interested in creating similar behavioral health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Heckman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111
| | - Susan Darlow
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111
| | - Teja Munshi
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111
| | - Carolyn Caruso
- BeHealth Solutions, LLC, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22901
| | - Lee Ritterband
- BeHealth Solutions, LLC, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22901,University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesvile, VA 22908
| | | | - Linda Fleisher
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111
| | - Sharon Manne
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1914
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Berry DL, Blonquist TM, Patel RA, Halpenny B, McReynolds J. Exposure to a patient-centered, Web-based intervention for managing cancer symptom and quality of life issues: impact on symptom distress. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17:e136. [PMID: 26041682 PMCID: PMC4526904 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Revised: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective eHealth interventions can benefit a large number of patients with content intended to support self-care and management of both chronic and acute conditions. Even though usage statistics are easily logged in most eHealth interventions, usage or exposure has rarely been reported in trials, let alone studied in relationship to effectiveness. Objective The intent of the study was to evaluate use of a fully automated, Web-based program, the Electronic Self Report Assessment-Cancer (ESRA-C), and how delivery and total use of the intervention may have affected cancer symptom distress. Methods Patients at two cancer centers used ESRA-C to self-report symptom and quality of life (SxQOL) issues during therapy. Participants were randomized to ESRA-C assessment only (control) or the ESRA-C intervention delivered via the Internet to patients’ homes or to a tablet at the clinic. The intervention enabled participants to self-monitor SxQOL and receive self-care education and customized coaching on how to report concerns to clinicians. Overall and voluntary intervention use were defined as having ≥2 exposures, and one non-prompted exposure to the intervention, respectively. Factors associated with intervention use were explored with Fisher’s exact test. Propensity score matching was used to select a sample of control participants similar to intervention participants who used the intervention. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare change in Symptom Distress Scale (SDS-15) scores from pre-treatment to end-of-study by groups in the matched sample. Results Radiation oncology participants used the intervention, overall and voluntarily, more than medical oncology and transplant participants. Participants who were working and had more than a high school education voluntarily used the intervention more. The SDS-15 score was reduced by an estimated 1.53 points (P=.01) in the intervention group users compared to the matched control group. Conclusions The intended effects of a Web-based, patient-centered intervention on cancer symptom distress were modified by intervention use frequency. Clinical and personal demographics influenced voluntary use. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00852852; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00852852 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6YwAfwWl7).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna L Berry
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Asan O, Yang Y. Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Hum Factors 2015; 2:e5. [PMID: 27026079 PMCID: PMC4797658 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.4062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2014] [Revised: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 03/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Eye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usability methodologies to achieve its full potential. Objective The objective of this study was to report on HIT evaluation studies that have used eye-tracker technology, and to envision the potential use of eye-tracking technology in future research. Methods We used four reference databases to initially identify 5248 related papers, which resulted in only 9 articles that met our inclusion criteria. Results Eye-tracking technology was useful in finding usability problems in many ways, but is still in its infancy for HIT usability evaluation. Limited types of HITs have been evaluated by eye trackers, and there has been a lack of evaluation research in natural settings. Conclusions More research should be done in natural settings to discover the real contextual-based usability problems of clinical and mobile HITs using eye-tracking technology with more standardized methodologies and guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur Asan
- Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|