Clinical features and efficacy of escitalopram treatment for geriatric depression

Antidepressants available in Japan for older people with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To update the major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment guidelines of the Japanese Society of Mood Disorders, we conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of available antidepressants in Japan for older adults with MDD.

METHODS

Outcome measures included response rate (primary), improvement in depressive symptom scale score, remission rate, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and at least one adverse event. A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Nine double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 2145) were identified. No study has been conducted in Japan. Our meta-analysis included the following antidepressants: duloxetine, escitalopram, imipramine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine. Antidepressants have significantly higher response rates than placebo (RR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.04, 1.83], p = 0.02). Antidepressants outperformed placebo in terms of improving depressive symptom scale score (SMD [95% CI] = -0.62 [-0.92, -0.33], p < 0.0001). However, antidepressants were associated with a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events (RR [95% CI] = 1.94 [1.30, 2.88], p = 0.001) and a higher incidence of at least one adverse event (RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.02, 1.21], p = 0.02) compared to placebo. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of remission rate or all-cause discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis concluded that treatment with antidepressants available in Japan is only weakly recommended for moderate to severe MDD in older adults.

Grey matter volume predicts improvement in geriatric depression in response to Tai Chi compared to Health Education

OBJECTIVES

Geriatric depression (GD) is associated with cognitive impairment and brain atrophy. Tai-Chi-Chih (TCC) is a promising adjunct treatment to antidepressants. We previously found beneficial effects of TCC on resting state connectivity in GD. We now tested the effect of TCC on gray matter volume (GMV) change and the association between baseline GMV and clinical outcome.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-nine participants with GD (>=60 y) underwent antidepressant treatment (38 women).

INTERVENTION

Participants completed 3 months of TCC (N = 26) or health and wellness education control (HEW; N = 23).

MEASUREMENTS

Depression and anxiety symptoms and MRI scans were acquired at baseline and 3-month follow-up. General linear models (GLMs) tested group-by-time interactions on clinical scores. Freesurfer 6.0 was used to process T1-weighted images and to perform voxel-wise whole-brain GLMs of group on symmetrized percent GMV change, and on the baseline GMV and symptom change association, controlling for baseline symptom severity. Age and sex served as covariates in all models.

RESULTS

There were no group differences in baseline demographics or clinical scores, symptom change from baseline to follow-up, or treatment-related GMV change. However, whole-brain analysis revealed that lower baseline GMV in several clusters in the TCC, but not the HEW group, was associated with larger improvements in anxiety. This was similar for right precuneus GMV and depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

While we observed no effect on GMV due to the interventions, baseline regional GMV predicted symptom improvements with TCC but not HEW. Longer trials are needed to investigate the long-term effects of TCC on clinical symptoms and neuroplasticity.

Regional gray matter volume correlates with anxiety, apathy, and resilience in geriatric depression

OBJECTIVES

Geriatric depression (GD) is associated with significant medical comorbidity, cognitive impairment, brain atrophy, premature mortality, and suboptimal treatment response. While apathy and anxiety are common comorbidities, resilience is a protective factor. Understanding the relationships between brain morphometry, depression, and resilience in GD could inform clinical treatment. Only few studies have addressed gray matter volume (GMV) associations with mood and resilience.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-nine adults aged >60 years (38 women) with major depressive disorder undergoing concurrent antidepressant treatment participated in the study.

MEASUREMENTS

Anatomical T1-weighted scans, apathy, anxiety, and resilience data were collected. Freesurfer 6.0 was used to preprocess T1-weighted images and qdec to perform voxel-wise whole-brain analyses. Partial Spearman correlations controlling for age and sex tested the associations between clinical scores, and general linear models identified clusters of associations between GMV and clinical scores, with age and sex as covariates. Cluster correction and Monte-Carlo simulations were applied (corrected alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

Greater depression severity was associated with greater anxiety (r = 0.53, p = 0.0001), lower resilience (r = -0.33, p = 0.03), and greater apathy (r = 0.39, p = 0.01). Greater GMV in widespread, partially overlapping clusters across the brain was associated with reduced anxiety and apathy, as well as increased resilience.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that greater GMV in extended brain regions is a potential marker for resilience in GD, while GMV in more focal and overlapping regions may be markers for depression and anxiety. Interventions focused on improving symptoms in GD may seek to examine their effects on these brain regions.

Pharmacotherapy for late-life depression

Background: Late-life depression (LLD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders. However, LLD is often undetected or inadequately treated by clinicians. This review summarizes the recent research on pharmacotherapy for LLD, updates information on monotherapy using recommended antidepressants, and discusses the clinical features and diagnostic criteria for LLD.Current Concepts: The diagnostic criteria for depression in both elderly and young adults are identical. Clinical features of the elderly with depression more likely include more comorbid medical conditions and cognitive impairment than those of young adults. Depression in the elderly tends to have a more chronic course with frequent recurrences or relapses.Discussion and Conclusion: The current pharmacological treatment guidelines for LLD recommend the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, bupropion, mirtazapine, and vortioxetine as first-line medications. SSRIs, among them, are recommended first because they present fewer serious adverse effects and more clinical evidence than those of other antidepressants. Before starting antidepressant treatment for LLD, clinicians should consider patients’ comorbid medical conditions, drug interactions, possible adverse effects of antidepressants, and polypharmacy. The starting dose of antidepressants for elderly patients should be half of that prescribed for young adults to minimize the adverse effects; however, most elderly patients need the same antidepressant doses as that prescribed for young patients. After remission, a 1-year maintenance treatment is required to prevent recurrence or relapse of LLD.

Regional White Matter Integrity Predicts Treatment Response to Escitalopram and Memantine in Geriatric Depression: A Pilot Study

Background: Geriatric depression with subjective memory complaints increases the risk for Alzheimer's Disease. Memantine, a neuroprotective drug, can improve depression and help prevent cognitive decline. In our 6-months clinical trial, escitalopram/memantine (ESC/MEM) improved mood and cognition compared to escitalopram/placebo treatment (ESC/PBO; NCT01902004). In this report, we investigated whether baseline brain white matter integrity in fronto-limbic-striatal tracts can predict clinical outcomes using fractional anisotropy (FA). Methods: Thirty-eight older depressed adults (mean age = 70.6, SD = 7.2) were randomized to ESC/MEM or ESC/PBO and underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3 Tesla at baseline. Mood was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), apathy using the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and anxiety using the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) at baseline and 6-months follow-up. FA was extracted from seven tracts of interest (six in each hemisphere and one commissural tract) associated with geriatric depression. Non-parametric General Linear Models were used to examine group differences in the association between FA and symptom improvement, controlling for age, sex, baseline symptom scores and scanner model, correcting for false discovery rate (FDR). Post-hoc tests further investigated group differences in axial, mean and radial diffusivity (AD, MD, and RD, respectively). Lastly, we performed an exploratory whole-brain model to test whether FA might be related to treatment response with memantine. Results: There were no differences in remission rates or HAMD change between groups. In bilateral anterior and posterior internal capsule tracts and bilateral inferior and right superior fronto-occipital (IFO and SFO) fasciculus, higher FA was associated with larger improvements in depressive symptoms for ESC/MEM, but not ESC/PBO, correcting for FDR. Lower MD in the left IFO and RD in the right anterior internal capsule were associated with improved treatment responses. We found no significant associations in the whole-brain analysis. Limitations: Included small sample size and high dropout. Conclusions: Higher baseline FA and lower RD and MD in hypothesized fronto-limbic-striatal tracts predicted greater improvement in mood and anxiety with ESC/MEM compared to ESC/PBO in geriatric depression. FA as a biomarker for white matter integrity may serve as a predictor of treatment response but requires confirmation in larger future studies.

Combined treatment with escitalopram and memantine increases gray matter volume and cortical thickness compared to escitalopram and placebo in a pilot study of geriatric depression

BACKGROUND

Geriatric depression with subjective cognitive complaints increases the risk of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Memantine is a cognitive enhancer used to treat AD. In a 6-month double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram and memantine (ESC/MEM), ESC/MEM improved cognition at 12 month in geriatric depression (NCT01902004). We now investigated structural neuroplastic changes at 3 months.

METHODS

Forty-one older depressed adults (mean age=70.43, SD=7.33, 26 female) were randomized to receive ESC/MEM or ESC/PBO. Mood scores (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, HAMD) and high-resolution structural T1-weighted images were acquired at baseline and 3 months. Freesurfer 6.0 for image processing and General Linear Models was used to examine group differences in symmetrized percent change gray matter volume (GMV) and cortical thickness, controlling for age and intracranial volume. Nonparametric tests were used to investigate group differences in mood and subcortical volume change.

RESULTS

Among 27 completers (ESC/MEM n = 13; ESC/PBO n = 14), 62% achieved remission (HAMD≤6) with ESC/MEM and 43% with ESC/PBO (Fisher's exact p=.45). Change in HAMD did not differ between groups (F(1,23)=0.14, p=.7). GMV and thickness increased more with ESC/MEM than with ESC/PBO in the left middle and inferior temporal lobe, right medial, and lateral orbito-frontal cortex (OFC).

LIMITATIONS

included small sample size, dropout, and the lack of cognitive data at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although significant group differences in mood improvement were not observed, ESC/MEM resulted in increased GMV and cortical thickness in several brain regions compared to placebo. Larger longitudinal clinical trials can further examine the neuroprotective effect of memantine in geriatric depression.

Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in older patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis

As there is currently no comprehensive evaluation about the efficacy and safety of interventions in elderly patients with major depressive disorder, we did a systematic review and network meta-analysis about all interventions in this population. We searched the specialised register of the Cochrane common mental disorders group, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CochraneLibrary, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO registry until Dec 12, 2017 to identify all randomized controlled trials about the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients over an age of 65. The primary outcome was response defined as reduction of at least 50% on the Hamilton Depression Scale or any other validated depression scale. Secondary outcomes were remission, depressive symptoms, dropouts total, dropouts owing to inefficacy and dropouts due to adverse events, quality of life and social functioning. Additionally, we analysed 116 adverse events. We identified 129 references from 53 RCTs with 9274 participants published from 1990 to 2017. The mean participant age was 73.7 years. In terms of the primary outcome response to treatment the network-meta-analysis showed significant superiority compared to placebo for quetiapine and duloxetine; in addition, agomelatine, imipramine and vortioxetine outperformed placebo in pairwise meta-analyses, and there were also significant superiorities of several antidepressants compared to placebo in secondary efficacy outcomes. Very limited evidence suggests that competitive memory training, geriatric home treatment group and detached mindfulness condition reduce depressive symptoms. Several antidepressants and quetiapine have been shown to be efficacious in elderly patients with major depressive disorder, but due to the comparably few available data, the results are not robust. Differences in the multiple side-effects analysed should also be considered in drug choice. Although there were significant effects for some non-pharmacological treatments, the overall evidence for non-pharmacological treatments in major depressive disorder is insufficient, because it is based on a few trials with usually small sample sizes.

Advances in Pharmacotherapy of Late-Life Depression

This paper reviews recent research on late-life depression (LLD) pharmacotherapy, focusing on updated information for monotherapy and augmentation treatments. We then review new research on moderators of clinical response and how to use the information for improved efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A recent review shows that sertraline, paroxetine, and duloxetine were superior to placebo for the treatment of LLD. There is concern that paroxetine could have adverse outcomes in the geriatric population due to anticholinergic properties; however, studies show no increases in mortality, dementia risk, or cognitive measures. Among newer antidepressants, vortioxetine has demonstrated efficacy in LLD, quetiapine has demonstrated efficacy especially for patients with sleep disturbances, and aripiprazole augmentation for treatment resistance in LLD was found to be safe and effective. Researchers have also been identifying moderators of LLD that can guide treatment. Researchers are learning how to associate moderators, neuroanatomical models, and antidepressant response. SSRI/SNRIs remain first-line treatment for LLD. Aripiprazole is an effective and safe augmentation for treatment resistance. Studies are identifying actionable moderators that can increase treatment response.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

The evidence on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for major depressive disorder is unclear.

METHODS

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review assessing the effects of SSRIs versus placebo, 'active' placebo, or no intervention in adult participants with major depressive disorder. We searched for eligible randomised clinical trials in The Cochrane Library's CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycLIT, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, clinical trial registers of Europe and USA, websites of pharmaceutical companies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency until January 2016. All data were extracted by at least two independent investigators. We used Cochrane systematic review methodology, Trial Sequential Analysis, and calculation of Bayes factor. An eight-step procedure was followed to assess if thresholds for statistical and clinical significance were crossed. Primary outcomes were reduction of depressive symptoms, remission, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were suicides, suicide attempts, suicide ideation, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 131 randomised placebo-controlled trials enrolling a total of 27,422 participants were included. None of the trials used 'active' placebo or no intervention as control intervention. All trials had high risk of bias. SSRIs significantly reduced the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at end of treatment (mean difference -1.94 HDRS points; 95% CI -2.50 to -1.37; P < 0.00001; 49 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted CI -2.70 to -1.18); Bayes factor below predefined threshold (2.01*10-23). The effect estimate, however, was below our predefined threshold for clinical significance of 3 HDRS points. SSRIs significantly decreased the risk of no remission (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.91; P < 0.00001; 34 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis adjusted CI 0.83 to 0.92); Bayes factor (1426.81) did not confirm the effect). SSRIs significantly increased the risks of serious adverse events (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.75; P = 0.009; 44 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted CI 1.03 to 1.89). This corresponds to 31/1000 SSRI participants will experience a serious adverse event compared with 22/1000 control participants. SSRIs also significantly increased the number of non-serious adverse events. There were almost no data on suicidal behaviour, quality of life, and long-term effects.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRIs might have statistically significant effects on depressive symptoms, but all trials were at high risk of bias and the clinical significance seems questionable. SSRIs significantly increase the risk of both serious and non-serious adverse events. The potential small beneficial effects seem to be outweighed by harmful effects.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42013004420.

Geriatric characteristics in randomised controlled trials on antidepressant drugs for older adults: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Meta-analyses of antidepressant drug treatment trials have found that increasing age is associated with a less favourable outcome. Because the prevalence of geriatric characteristics, like disability, medical co-morbidity, malnutrition, cognitive (dys)function and frailty increase with age and are associated with depression, these characteristics are likely to modify the treatment outcome of antidepressant drugs in late-life depression. This review examines how these five characteristics are taken into account in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with antidepressant drugs for major depressive disorder in patients aged 60 years or above.

DESIGN

A systematic search in PubMED, PsychInfo and EMBASE, from the year 2000 onwards, yielded 27 RCTs, with a total of 6356 subjects with a median age of 71 years. Two reviewers independently assessed whether each characteristic was considered as inclusion or exclusion criterion, descriptive variable, stratification variable, co-variable, outcome measure, or in adverse effect monitoring.

RESULTS

Malnutrition and frailty were not taken into account in any study. Disability was used as an outcome measure in five studies. Two studies explicitly included a population with possibly serious medical co-morbidity. Cognitive status was the only condition taken into account as co-variable (n = 3) or stratifying variable (n = 1) and was used as outcome measure in seven studies.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that geriatric characteristics are rarely taken into account in RCTs on antidepressant drugs in late-life depression, and studies including the oldest adults are underrepresented. This warrants recruitment of the oldest adults and adjustment of treatment strategies in future studies. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

What to expect from a third step in treatment resistant depression: A prospective open study on escitalopram

OBJECTIVES

Only few studies investigated treatment strategies for treatment resistant depression (TRD). The objective of this multicentre study was to evaluate TRD patients who did not respond to at least two antidepressants.

METHODS

A total of 417 patients, who failed to respond to a previous retrospectively assessed antidepressant (AD1), were firstly included in a 6-week venlafaxine treatment (AD2); secondly, those who failed to respond were treated for further 6 weeks with escitalopram (AD3).

RESULTS

Out of 417 patients who had failed to respond to previous treatment (AD1), 334 completed treatment with venlafaxine to prospectively define TRD. In the intent to treat (ITT) population in the first phase of the trial (AD2), responders to venlafaxine were 151 (36.21%) out of which remitters were 83 (19.90%). After phase one, 170 non-responders, defined as TRD, were included in the second phase and 157 completed the course. Of the 170 ITT entering the second phase (AD3), responders to escitalopram were 71 (41.76%) out of which remitters were 39 (22.94%). After the third treatment, patients showed a dropout rate of 7.65% and a rate of presence of at least one serious adverse event of 19.18%.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant rates of response and remission may be observed after a third line treatment in patients resistant to two previous treatments. A relevant limitation of this study was represented by the design: naturalistic, non-randomized, open-label, without a control sample and with unblinded raters.

Moderation of antidepressant and placebo outcomes by baseline severity in late-life depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Baseline severity is a crucial moderator of trial outcomes in adult depression, with the advantage of antidepressants over placebo increasing as severity increases. However, this relationship has not been examined in late-life depression.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane were searched for studies published through September 2014. Randomized, acute phase, and double-blind studies comparing an antidepressant group with a placebo group in depressed elderly patients were included.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met all inclusion criteria. Within-group effect sizes revealed significant improvement in antidepressant groups (g=1.35, p<.000), as well as in placebo groups (g=.96, p<.000). Change in depressive symptoms assessed by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) was moderated by baseline severity in antidepressant groups (Z=2.67, p=.008) and placebo groups (Z=4.46, p<.000). However, this would be expected as a result of regression toward the mean, and mean differences between groups did not increase (r=.19, p=.469) as a function of baseline severity.

LIMITATIONS

Limited to published data and information was only analyzed at the level of treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Baseline severity was not associated with an antidepressant-placebo difference and placebo responses are large in the treatment of depressed elderly people. We propose a stepwise approach, i.e., to initially offer elderly depressed patients psychosocial interventions and only consider antidepressants if patients do not respond.