1
|
Chen W, Ge H, Cong J, Zhou W, Chang X, Quan X, Xia J, Tao X, Pu D, Wu J. Risk factors and prediction model for postpartum psychiatric disorders: a retrospective cohort study of 1418 Chinese women from 2020 to 2022. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2025; 38:2438756. [PMID: 39667804 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2438756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 11/24/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postpartum psychiatric disorders (PPDs) have been deemed as a significant public health concern, affecting both maternal health and family dynamics. This study aimed to examine the current status of PPDs, identify the potential risk factors of PPDs, and further develop a clinical nomogram model for predicting PPDs in Chinese women. METHOD In this retrospective cohort study, 1418 postpartum women attending the routine postpartum examination at the 42nd day after delivery in Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital were recruited as participants from December 2020 to December 2022. The Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) was utilized to assess the status of postpartum psychiatric disorders. A prediction model was constructed by multivariate logistic regression and presented as a nomogram. The performance of nomogram was measured by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The relationships between predictive factors of PPDs and SCL-90 were also evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis. The relationships between predictive factors of PPDs and SCL-90 were evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS With the SCL-90 cutoff value of 160, the incidence of postpartum psychiatric disorders was 9.17% among Chinese urban women. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that age ≤ 25 years old (OR = 10.07, 95%CI = 1.83-55.33), prenatal mood disorder (OR = 4.12, 95%CI = 1.99-8.53), invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures (OR = 4.39, 95%CI = 1.16-16.56), poor relationship with husband (OR = 2.86, 95%CI = 1.58-5.16) and poor relationship with mother-in-law (OR = 5.10, 95%CI = 2.70-9.64) were significantly associated with PPDs. A nomogram prediction model for PPDs was further constructed based on these five independent risk factors, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the nomogram model was 0.823 (95% CI = 0.781-0.865). The calibration curves showed remarkable accuracy of the nomogram and the DCA exhibited high clinical net benefit of the nomogram. Besides, we also explored the relationships between the five risk factors and different symptom dimensions of PPDs and found that the five risk factors were almost associated with increased levels of all symptom dimensions. CONCLUSIONS Five psychosocial risk factors for PPDs were identified in Chinese women and the nomogram prediction model constructed based on these five risk factors could predict the risk of PPDs intuitively and individually. Systematic screening these risk factors and further conducting psychosocial interventions earlier during the pregnancy period are crucial to prevent PPDs. For future research, we intend to incorporate additional risk factors, including blood biomarkers and facial expression indicators, to refine our risk model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxi Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Huan Ge
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing Cong
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Wenjie Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoxia Chang
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaojie Quan
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing Xia
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xincheng Tao
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Danhua Pu
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital/Jiangsu Women and Children Health Hospital, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brace M, Copel L, McKeever A, Smeltzer SC. Reproductive Health Care Inequities by Disability Status: Experiences With Providers and Barriers to Care. Res Nurs Health 2025. [PMID: 39985418 DOI: 10.1002/nur.22455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 12/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
The literature has documented that many women with disability (WWD) report barriers to obtaining reproductive health care as well as poor experiences with providers when care is received. This project sought to compare barriers and experiences in reproductive health care for WWD to those of women without disability in the United States. Using representative data from the National Survey of Family Growth (2017-2019), we present weighted estimates of poor or fair experiences with providers by disability status, as well as weighted estimates of the proportion of women reporting types of barriers to services by disability status, among individuals identifying as women between the ages of 15 and 49. We then used weighted logistic regressions to compare barriers and experiences with providers by disability status. After controlling for potential confounders, women with any disability had 2.6 times higher odds as women without disability to rate their providers' respect for them as "poor" or "fair" (95% CI: 1.1-6.2). WWD did not significantly differ from women without disability in whether they reported more than one type of barrier (AOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.8-2.1), yet WWD had higher odds of reporting financial barriers compared to women without disability (AOR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.02-2.2). While access to reproductive health care and experience with providers needs to be improved for all, these findings suggest that targeted efforts are needed to eliminate inequities for WWD in the reproductive health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Brace
- Villanova University M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Linda Copel
- Villanova University M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amy McKeever
- Villanova University M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suzanne C Smeltzer
- Villanova University M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deierlein AL, Park C, Patel N, Gagnier R, Thorpe M. Mental health outcomes across the reproductive life course among women with disabilities: a systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health 2024:10.1007/s00737-024-01506-5. [PMID: 39222078 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-024-01506-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review examined literature on mental health outcomes among women with disabilities living in high-income countries within the context of reproductive health, spanning menstruation through menopause. METHODS Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for studies published through June 2023. Eligible studies were observational, quantitative, and included a comparison group without disabilities. RESULTS A total of 2,520 studies were evaluated and 27 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies assessed mental health during prepregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum, and parenting among women with and without disabilities. None of the studies examined reproductive health time periods related to menstruation, fertility, or menopause. Women of reproductive age with disabilities were more likely to have poor mental health outcomes compared to women without disabilities. During pregnancy and the postpartum, women with disabilities were at greater risk of diagnosed perinatal mental disorders and psychiatric-related healthcare visits. Findings also suggested mental distress and inadequate emotional and social support related to parenting among women with disabilities. The greatest risks of poor mental health outcomes were often observed among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and among women with multiple types of disabilities, compared to women without disabilities. CONCLUSIONS Routine reproductive healthcare visits provide significant prevention and treatment opportunities for poor mental health among women with disabilities. Further research examining mental health outcomes within the context of reproductive health, especially understudied areas of menstruation, fertility, parenting, and menopause, among women with disabilities is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Curie Park
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nishtha Patel
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robin Gagnier
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michele Thorpe
- Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shea L, Sadowsky M, Tao S, Rast J, Schendel D, Chesnokova A, Headen I. Perinatal and Postpartum Health Among People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2428067. [PMID: 39145975 PMCID: PMC11327882 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.28067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Small, geographically limited studies report that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have increased risk for serious pregnancy-related and birth-related challenges, including preeclampsia, preterm birth, and increased anxiety and depression, than their peers. United States-based population-level data among people with IDD are lacking. Objectives To identify perinatal and postpartum outcomes among a national, longitudinal sample of people with IDD enrolled in public health insurance, compare subgroups of people with IDD, and compare outcomes among people with IDD with those of peers without IDD. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used national Medicaid claims from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2019, for 55 440 birthing people with IDD and a random sample of 438 557 birthing people without IDD. Medicaid funds almost half of all births and is the largest behavioral health insurer in the US, covering a robust array of services for people with IDD. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2023 to June 2024. Exposure People who had a documented birth in Medicaid during the study years. Main Outcome and Measures Perinatal outcomes were compared across groups using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The probability of postpartum anxiety and depression was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results The study sample included 55 440 birthing people with IDD (including 41 854 with intellectual disabilities [ID] and 13 586 with autism; mean [SD] age at first delivery, 24.9 [6.7] years) and a random sample of 438 557 birthing people without IDD (mean [SD] age at first delivery, 26.4 [6.3] years). People with IDD were younger at first observed delivery, had a lower prevalence of live births (66.6% vs 76.7%), and higher rates of obstetric conditions (gestational diabetes, 10.3% vs 9.9%; gestational hypertension, 8.7% vs 6.1%; preeclampsia, 6.1% vs 4.4%) and co-occurring physical conditions (heart failure, 1.4% vs 0.4%; hyperlipidemia, 5.3% vs 1.7%; ischemic heart disease, 1.5% vs 0.4%; obesity, 16.3% vs 7.4%) and mental health conditions (anxiety disorders, 27.9% vs 6.5%; depressive disorders, 32.1% vs 7.5%; posttraumatic stress disorder, 9.5% vs 1.2%) than people without IDD. The probability of postpartum anxiety (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 3.2 [95% CI, 2.9-3.4]) and postpartum depression (AHR, 2.4 [95% CI, 2.3-2.6]) was significantly higher among autistic people compared with people with ID only and people without IDD. Conclusions and Relevance In this retrospective cohort study, people with IDD had a younger mean age at first delivery, had lower prevalence of live births, and had poor obstetric, mental health, and medical outcomes compared with people without IDD, pointing toward a need for clinician training and timely delivery of maternal health care. Results highlight needed reproductive health education, increasing clinician knowledge, and expanding Medicaid to ensure access to care for people with IDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Shea
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Molly Sadowsky
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sha Tao
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica Rast
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Diana Schendel
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Arina Chesnokova
- Division of Academic Specialists, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Irene Headen
- Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tinsae T, Shumet S, Azale T, Salelew E, Demilew D, Lema A, Nakie G, Andualem F, Srahbzu M, Amare T, Getinet W. Exposure to stress-full life events and help-seeking behaviors among reproductive-age women in Northwest Ethiopia: Community-based cross-sectional study. J Affect Disord 2024; 346:310-316. [PMID: 37972661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stressful life events are a significant public health issue worldwide. Despite its mental, psychological, and social problems, important questions about the prevalence and risk factors remained unanswered. Therefore, this study aimed to show major life events and help-seeking behaviors among women in the reproductive-age group. METHODS A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted using a multistage cluster sampling technique to get a total of 845 study participants from March 20 to April 29, 2021. Exposure to stressful life events and help-seeking behavior was collected using Women's Exposure to the Stressful Life Events Test, and General Help-Seeking Questionnaire (GHQ) respectively. Data were cleaned, coded, and entered into EPI-Info version 3.1 and analyzed using SPSS version 20. RESULTS The prevalence of stressful life events and help-seeking behaviors was 47.9 % and 38.7 % respectively. Reproductive-age women with poor social support (AOR = 2.392, 95 % CI: 1.422, 4.026), moderate social support (AOR = 1.861, 95 % CI: 1.341, 2.583), husband alcohol users (AOR = 1.496, 95 % CI: 1.027, 2.178), husband chat users (AOR = 2.962, 95 % CI: 1.140, 7.696), and having ever suicidal attempt (AOR = 8.702, CI: 1.719, 44.049), were positively associated with stressful life events. CONCLUSION Nearly half of reproductive-age women had stressful life events. Thus, it is important to give serious attention to addressing those identified factors to increase public awareness, especially among husbands, their families, and elected authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Techilo Tinsae
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia.
| | - Shegaye Shumet
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Telake Azale
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Public Health, Ethiopia
| | - Endalamaw Salelew
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Demeke Demilew
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Alemu Lema
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Girum Nakie
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Fantahun Andualem
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Mengesha Srahbzu
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Tadele Amare
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| | - Wondale Getinet
- University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alhusen JL, Hughes RB, Lyons G, Laughon K. Depressive symptoms during the perinatal period by disability status: Findings from the United States Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:223-233. [PMID: 36320150 PMCID: PMC9795828 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of the current study was to compare the prevalence of depressive symptoms during the perinatal period among respondents with a disability as compared to those without a disability. DESIGN We conducted a secondary analysis of nationally representative data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 24 participating United States between 2018 and 2020. METHODS A cross-sectional sample of 37,989 respondents provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication and self-care. The outcome of interest was perinatal depressive symptoms, defined as experiencing depressive symptoms during the antenatal period or postpartum period. Regression models were used to calculate odds of depressive symptoms during these two time periods by disability status while controlling for relevant sociodemographic characteristics and depressive symptoms prior to pregnancy. RESULTS Respondents with disabilities experienced a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms in both the antenatal period and postpartum period as compared to those without disabilities. In fully adjusted models, respondents with disabilities had 2.4 times the odds of experiencing depressive symptoms during pregnancy and 2.1 times the odds of experiencing postpartum depressive symptoms as compared to respondents without disabilities. CONCLUSION Respondents with disabilities experience a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms throughout the perinatal period thereby increasing the risk for adverse maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes. IMPACT Perinatal depression is a significant public health issue globally, and our findings suggest that persons with disability are at an increased risk for depressive symptoms both during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Our findings represent a call to action to improve clinical and supportive services for women with disabilities during the perinatal period to improve their mental health and the consequent health of their offspring. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION We thank our Community Advisory Board members who have been instrumental in the conception of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne L. Alhusen
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rosemary B. Hughes
- University of Montana Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, Missoula, Montana, USA
| | - Genevieve Lyons
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kathryn Laughon
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Disability and suicidal behaviors among women of reproductive age. Arch Womens Ment Health 2022; 25:1009-1019. [PMID: 36322287 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-022-01275-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Limited research exists on suicidal behaviors among women with disabilities. This study examined disability, suicidal behaviors, and associated health determinants among non-pregnant women of reproductive age. Data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 76,750) were used to estimate associations between disability and suicidal behaviors and evaluate the effects of health determinants on suicidal behaviors among non-pregnant women of reproductive age with disabilities. Approximately 22% of non-pregnant women of reproductive age with disabilities reported suicidal behaviors compared to only 4.3% of women without disabilities. Women with disabilities had greater adjusted odds of past-year suicidal behaviors (AOR 1.73; 95% CI 1.60-1.87) than those without disabilities. Psychological distress (OR 3.66; 95% CI 2.98-4.49), major depressive episode (OR 3.22; 95% CI 2.82-3.67), unmet perceived mental health need (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.98-2.65), age 18-25 years (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.43-1.92), and illicit drug use (OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.20-1.64) were significantly associated with higher odds of suicidal behaviors, and specifically suicidal ideation, among women with disabilities. Non-pregnant women of reproductive age with disabilities are at increased risk for exhibiting suicidal behaviors. Better understanding of suicidal behaviors among women with disabilities can assist public health officials and medical professionals in developing meaningful prevention, detection, and intervention programs.
Collapse
|