|
1
|
da Cruz AP, Martins G, Martins CM, Marques V, Christovam S, Battaglini D, Robba C, Pelosi P, Rocco PRM, Cruz FF, Dos Santos Samary C, Silva PL. Comparison between high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) alternated with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and HFNO and NIV alone in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29:248. [PMID: 38649940 PMCID: PMC11036698 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01826-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-invasive respiratory support (conventional oxygen therapy [COT], non-invasive ventilation [NIV], high-flow nasal oxygen [HFNO], and NIV alternated with HFNO [NIV + HFNO] may reduce the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with COVID-19. The outcome of patients treated non-invasively depends on clinical severity at admission. We assessed the need for IMV according to NIV, HFNO, and NIV + HFNO in patients with COVID-19 according to disease severity and evaluated in-hospital survival rates and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay. METHODS This cohort study was conducted using data collected between March 2020 and July 2021. Patients ≥ 18 years admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included. Patients hospitalized for < 3 days, receiving therapy (COT, NIV, HFNO, or NIV + HFNO) for < 48 h, pregnant, and with no primary outcome data were excluded. The COT group was used as reference for multivariate Cox regression model adjustment. RESULTS Of 1371 patients screened, 958 were eligible: 692 (72.2%) on COT, 92 (9.6%) on NIV, 31 (3.2%) on HFNO, and 143 (14.9%) on NIV + HFNO. The results for the patients in each group were as follows: median age (interquartile range): NIV (64 [49-79] years), HFNO (62 [55-70] years), NIV + HFNO (62 [48-72] years) (p = 0.615); heart failure: NIV (54.5%), HFNO (36.3%), NIV + HFNO (9%) (p = 0.003); diabetes mellitus: HFNO (17.6%), NIV + HFNO (44.7%) (p = 0.048). > 50% lung damage on chest computed tomography (CT): NIV (13.3%), HFNO (15%), NIV + HFNO (71.6%) (p = 0.038); SpO2/FiO2: NIV (271 [118-365] mmHg), HFNO (317 [254-420] mmHg), NIV + HFNO (229 [102-317] mmHg) (p = 0.001); rate of IMV: NIV (26.1%, p = 0.002), HFNO (22.6%, p = 0.023), NIV + HFNO (46.8%); survival rate: HFNO (83.9%), NIV + HFNO (63.6%) (p = 0.027); ICU length of stay: NIV (8.5 [5-14] days), NIV + HFNO (15 [10-25] days (p < 0.001); hospital length of stay: NIV (13 [10-21] days), NIV + HFNO (20 [15-30] days) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for comorbidities, chest CT score and SpO2/FiO2, the risk of IMV in patients on NIV + HFNO remained high (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.04). CONCLUSIONS In patients with COVID-19, NIV alternating with HFNO was associated with a higher rate of IMV independent of the presence of comorbidities, chest CT score and SpO2/FiO2. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05579080.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Pereira da Cruz
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
| | - Gloria Martins
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
- D'or Institute of Research and Teaching, Barra D'or Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Victoria Marques
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
- Department of Cardiorespiratory and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Samantha Christovam
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
- Department of Cardiorespiratory and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Chiara Robba
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Ferreira Cruz
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
| | - Cynthia Dos Santos Samary
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil
- Department of Cardiorespiratory and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Pedro Leme Silva
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 273, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Manole C, Dediu-Anghel M, Baroiu L, Ștefanopol IA, Nechifor A, Niculet E, Mihailov R, Moroianu LA, Voinescu DC, Firescu D. Efficiency of continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in critically ill patients with COVID-19. J Int Med Res 2024; 52:3000605231222151. [PMID: 38194495 PMCID: PMC10777799 DOI: 10.1177/03000605231222151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Critically ill patients with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome characterized by relatively well-preserved pulmonary compliance but severe hypoxemia. The challenge in managing such patients lies in optimizing oxygenation, which can be achieved through either high oxygen flow or noninvasive mechanical ventilation. This study was performed to compare the efficiency of two methods of noninvasive oxygen therapy: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO). METHODS This retrospective cohort study involved 668 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the "Sf. Apostol Andrei" Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 (CPAP, n = 108; HFNO, n = 108). RESULTS Mortality was significantly lower in the CPAP and HFNO groups than in the group of patients who underwent intubation and mechanical ventilation after ICU admission. Mortality in the ICU was not significantly different between the CPAP and HFNO groups. CONCLUSIONS HFNO and CPAP represent efficient alternative therapies for patients with severe COVID-19 whose respiratory treatment has failed. Studies involving larger groups of patients are necessary to establish a personalized, more complex management modality for critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corina Manole
- Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Intensive Care Department, “Sfantul Apostol Andrei” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Mihaela Dediu-Anghel
- Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Intensive Care Department, “Sfantul Apostol Andrei” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Liliana Baroiu
- Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Infectious Diseases Department, “Sf. Cuv. Parascheva” Infectious Diseases Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Ioana Anca Ștefanopol
- Clinical Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Surgical Department, “Sfantul Ioan” Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Galati, Romania
| | - Alexandru Nechifor
- Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Multidisciplinary Integrated Center of Dermatological Interface Research Center (MIC-DIR), “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
| | - Elena Niculet
- Department of Morphological and Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Pathology Department, “Sfantul Apostol Andrei” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Raul Mihailov
- Department of Morphological and Functional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Surgical Department, “Sfantul Apostol Andrei” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Lavinia Alexandra Moroianu
- Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Psychiatry Department, “Elisabeta Doamna” Psychiatric Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Doina Carina Voinescu
- Clinical Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Medical Department, “Sfantul Apostol Andrei” Emergency County Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| | - Dorel Firescu
- Clinical Surgical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galat,i, Romania
- Surgical Department, “Sfantul Apostol Andrei” Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Bagnato G, Imbalzano E, Ioppolo C, La Rosa D, Chiappalone M, De Gaetano A, Viapiana V, Irrera N, Nassisi V, Tringali MC, Singh EB, Falcomatà N, Russo V, Neal Roberts W, Di Micco P, Versace AG. Stratification of COVID-19 Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure for Response to High-Flow Nasal Cannula: A Retrospective Observational Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:71. [PMID: 38256332 PMCID: PMC10819134 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: In patients with COVID-19, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are widely applied as initial treatments for moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The aim of the study was to assess which respiratory supports improve 28-day mortality and to identify a predictive index of treatment response. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center retrospective observational study including 159 consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. Results: A total of 159 patients (82 in the CPAP group and 77 in the HFNC group) were included in the study. Mortality within 28 days was significantly lower with HFNC compared to CPAP (16.8% vs. 50%), while ICU admission and tracheal intubation within 28 days were significantly higher with CPAP compared to HFNC treatment (32% vs. 13%). We identified an index for survival in HFNC by including three variables easily available at admission (LDH, age, and respiratory rate) and the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at 48 h. The index showed high discrimination for survival with an AUC of 0.88, a negative predictive value of 86%, and a positive predictive value of 95%. Conclusions: Treatment with HFNC appears to be associated with greater survival and fewer ICU admission than CPAP. LDH, respiratory rate, age, and PaO2/FiO2 at 48 h were independently associated with survival and an index based on these variables allows for the prediction of treatment success and the assessment of patient allocation to the appropriate intensity of care after 48 h. Further research is warranted to determine effects on other outcomes and to assess the performance of the index in larger cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Bagnato
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Egidio Imbalzano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Carmelo Ioppolo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Daniela La Rosa
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Marianna Chiappalone
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Alberta De Gaetano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Valeria Viapiana
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Natasha Irrera
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Veronica Nassisi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Maria Concetta Tringali
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Emanuele Balwinder Singh
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Nicola Falcomatà
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| | - Vincenzo Russo
- Department of Medical Translational Sciences, Division of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | | | - Pierpaolo Di Micco
- Emergency Department, Rizzoli Hospital, Health Authority NA2, 80122 Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonio Giovanni Versace
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (G.B.); (E.I.); (C.I.); (D.L.R.); (M.C.); (A.D.G.); (N.I.); (V.N.); (M.C.T.); (E.B.S.); (N.F.); (A.G.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Arunachala S, Parthasarathi A, Basavaraj CK, Malamardi S, Chandran S, Venkataraman H, Ullah MK, Ganguly K, Upadhyay S, Mahesh PA. The Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Management of COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Study. Viruses 2023; 15:1879. [PMID: 37766286 PMCID: PMC10535869 DOI: 10.3390/v15091879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and ventilator-delivered non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) were used to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), due to lack of ventilators and manpower resources despite the paucity of data regarding their efficacy. This prospective study aimed to analyse the efficacy of HFNC versus NIV in the management of COVID-19 ARDS. A total of 88 RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients with moderate ARDS were recruited. Linear regression and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used for trends in vital parameters over time. A total of 37 patients were on HFNC, and 51 were on NIV. Patients in the HFNC group stayed slightly but not significantly longer in the ICU as compared to their NIV counterparts (HFNC vs. NIV: 8.00 (4.0-12.0) days vs. 7.00 (2.0-12.0) days; p = 0.055). Intubation rates, complications, and mortality were similar in both groups. The switch to HFNC from NIV was 5.8%, while 37.8% required a switch to NIV from HFNC. The resolution of respiratory alkalosis was better with NIV. We conclude that in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia with moderate ARDS, the duration of treatment in the ICU, intubation rate, and mortality did not differ significantly with the use of HFNC or NIV for respiratory support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumalatha Arunachala
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India; (S.A.); (C.K.B.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (H.V.)
- Public Health Research Institute of India, Mysuru 570020, India
| | - Ashwaghosha Parthasarathi
- Allergy, Asthma, and Chest Centre, Krishnamurthy Puram, Mysuru 570004, India;
- RUTGERS Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | - Chetak Kadabasal Basavaraj
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India; (S.A.); (C.K.B.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (H.V.)
| | - Sowmya Malamardi
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India; (S.A.); (C.K.B.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (H.V.)
- School of Psychology & Public Health, College of Science Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia
| | - Shreya Chandran
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India; (S.A.); (C.K.B.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (H.V.)
| | - Hariharan Venkataraman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India; (S.A.); (C.K.B.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (H.V.)
| | - Mohammed Kaleem Ullah
- Centre for Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine (A DST-FIST Supported Center), Department of Biochemistry (A DST-FIST Supported Department), JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India;
- Division of Infectious Disease and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Koustav Ganguly
- Unit of Integrative Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Swapna Upadhyay
- Unit of Integrative Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Padukudru Anand Mahesh
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru 570015, India; (S.A.); (C.K.B.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (H.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Littlejohns A, Please H, Musasizi R, Murdoch S, Nampiina G, Waters I, Birch WD, de Boer G, Kapur N, Ambrozi T, Carol N, Noel N, Parmar J, Culmer P, Lawton T, Namulema E. Descriptive account of the first use of the LeVe CPAP System, a new frugal CPAP System, in adult patients with COVID-19 Pneumonitis in Uganda. Trop Med Health 2023; 51:42. [PMID: 37545001 PMCID: PMC10405477 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-023-00533-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been a key treatment modality for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. Globally, the demand for CPAP outstripped the supply during the pandemic. The LeVe CPAP System was developed to provide respiratory support for treatment of COVID-19 and tailored for use in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings. Prior to formal trial approval, received in November 2021, these devices were used in extremis to support critically unwell adult patients requiring non-invasive ventilatory support. METHODS This is a retrospective descriptive review of adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonitis, who were treated with advanced respiratory support (CPAP and/or high-flow nasal oxygen, HFNO) at Mengo Hospital, Uganda. Patients were treated with the LeVe CPAP System, Elisa CPAP and/or AIRVO™ HFNO. Treatment was escalated per standard local protocols for respiratory failure, and CPAP was the maximum respiratory support available. Data were collected on patient characteristics, length of time of treatment, clinical outcome, and any adverse events. RESULTS Overall 333 patients were identified as COVID-19 positive, 44 received CPAP ± HFNO of which 43 were included in the study. The median age was 58 years (range 28-91 years) and 58% were female. The median duration of advanced respiratory support was 7 days (range 1-18 days). Overall (all device) mortality was 49% and this was similar between those started on the LeVe CPAP System and those started non-LeVe CPAP System devices (50% vs 47%). CONCLUSIONS The LeVe CPAP system was the most used CPAP device during the pandemic, bringing the hospital's number of available HFNO/CPAP devices from two to 14. They were a critical resource for providing respiratory support to the sickest group of patients when no alternative devices were available. The devices appear to be safe and well-tolerated with no serious adverse events recorded. This study is unable to assess the efficacy of the LeVe CPAP System; therefore, formal comparative studies are required to inform further use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Littlejohns
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Helen Please
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Racheal Musasizi
- Mengo Hospital, Sir Albert Cook Road, Mengo, P. O. Box 7161, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Stuart Murdoch
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Gorret Nampiina
- Mengo Hospital, Sir Albert Cook Road, Mengo, P. O. Box 7161, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ian Waters
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | | | | | - Nikil Kapur
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Tumwesigye Ambrozi
- Mengo Hospital, Sir Albert Cook Road, Mengo, P. O. Box 7161, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ninsiima Carol
- Mengo Hospital, Sir Albert Cook Road, Mengo, P. O. Box 7161, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Nakigudde Noel
- Mengo Hospital, Sir Albert Cook Road, Mengo, P. O. Box 7161, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jiten Parmar
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Peter Culmer
- University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Tom Lawton
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Ln, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Edith Namulema
- Mengo Hospital, Sir Albert Cook Road, Mengo, P. O. Box 7161, Kampala, Uganda.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Godoy DA, Longhitano Y, Fazzini B, Robba C, Battaglini D. High flow nasal oxygen and awake prone positioning - Two allies against COVID-19: A systematic review. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2023; 310:104015. [PMID: 36646354 PMCID: PMC9838094 DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2023.104015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) can lead to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) with possible multisystemic involvement. Ventilation/perfusion mismatch and shunt increase are critical determinants of hypoxemia. Understanding hypoxemia and the mechanisms involved in its genesis is essential to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy. High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and awake prone positioning (APP) in patients with COVID-19 AHRF showed promising benefits. The aim of this systematic review was to depict current situation around the combined use of HFNO and APP in patients with COVID-19 AHRF. Particularly, to investigate and report the pathophysiological rationale for adopting this strategy and to evaluate the (1) criteria for initiation, (2) timing, monitoring and discontinuation, and to assess the (3) impact of HFNO/ APP on outcome. METHODS We performed a systematic search collecting the articles present in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases with the following keywords: COVID-19 pneumonia, high flow nasal oxygen, awake prone position ventilation. RESULTS Thirteen studies displayed inclusion criteria and were included, accounting for 1242 patients who received HFNO/ APP. The combination of HFNO/ APP has an encouraging pathophysiological rationale for implementing this technique. The recognition of patients who can benefit from HFNO/ APP is difficult and there are no validated protocols to start, monitoring, and discontinue HFNO/ APP therapy. The most used method to monitor the efficacy and failure of this combined technique are oxygenation indexes, but discontinuation techniques are inconsistently and poorly described limiting possible generatability. Finally, this technique provided no clear benefits on outcome. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic search provided positive feedbacks for improving the utilization of this combination technique, although we still need further investigation about methods to guide timing, management, and discontinuation, and to assess the intervention effect on outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Agustin Godoy
- Neurointensive Care Unit, Sanatorio Pasteur; Catamarca, Argentina; Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Carlos G. Malbran, Catamarca, Argentina
| | - Yaroslava Longhitano
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brigitta Fazzini
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Robba
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Denise Battaglini
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Noninvasive Ventilation Alone Cannot Solve COVID-19 Respiratory Failure. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 81:159-161. [PMID: 36328856 PMCID: PMC9797249 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|