Facial Trauma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence, Etiology, Demographics, and Treatment of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence, etiology, demographics, and treatment of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma before, during, and after COVID-19.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Eighty-three health care organizations across the United States.

METHODS

The TriNetX Research Network identified 77,977,880 patients during 2017 to 2022. CMF fractures and soft tissue injuries during March to August of each year, aligning with the 2020 pandemic lockdown, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 2020, compared to immediately prepandemic in 2019, there were significant reductions of -17.5% in facial fractures and -19.0% in soft tissue injuries (P < .001). Conversely, in 2021, both injury types increased by +16.7% and +16.3%, respectively, compared to 2020 (P < .001). Changes in injury mechanisms in 2020 included significant decreases in athletic injuries (-57.6%), falls (-16.8%), assaults (-15.5%), motor vehicle collisions (-8.7%), and pedestrian accidents (-6.9%) (P < .01), while off-road vehicle (+48.4%), bicycle (+16.2%), and motorcycle (+8.9%) accidents increased (P < .01). The 10- to 14- and 5- to 9-year-old age groups experienced the most substantial reductions in facial fractures (-39.7% and -29.9%, respectively) and soft tissue injuries (-29.2% and -28.3%, respectively) in 2020 compared to 2019 (P < .001). Operative management of fractures and soft tissue injuries dropped by -20.3% and -12.4%, respectively, in 2020 versus 2019, and then rebounded with +15.8% and +14.6% increases in 2021 compared to 2020 (P < .001). In 2022, compared to prepandemic rates of 2019, there were fewer patients with facial fractures (-2.8%), soft tissue injuries (-4.5%), and operative repairs (-6.9% for fractures, -1.2% for soft tissue injuries) (P < .03).

CONCLUSION

CMF trauma decreased in 2020, with subsequent years showing a rebound to levels slightly below those immediately prior to pandemic onset. Changes in etiology, demographics, and treatment highlight the complex dynamics of traumatic injuries during periods of societal disruption.

Changes in hospital admissions for facial fractures during and after COVID 19 pandemic: national multicentric epidemiological analysis on 2938 patients

PURPOSE

The objective of this multicenter study was to examine the differences in maxillo-facial fractures epidemiology across the various phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study on patients who underwent surgery for facial bone fractures in 18 maxillo-facial surgery departments in Italy, spanning from June 23, 2019, to February 23, 2022. Based on the admission date, the data were classified into four chronological periods reflecting distinct periods of restrictions in Italy: pre-pandemic, first wave, partial restrictions, and post-pandemic. Epidemiological differences across the groups were analysed.

RESULTS

The study included 2938 patients. A statistically significant difference in hospitalization causes was detected between the pre-pandemic and first wave groups (p = 0.005) and between the pre-pandemic and partial restriction groups (p = 0.002). The differences between the pre- and post-pandemic groups were instead not significant (p = 0.106). Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the number of patients of African origin was significantly higher during the first wave and the post-pandemic period. No statistically significant differences were found across the periods concerning gender, age, fracture type, treatment approach, and hospital stay duration CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic brought about significant changes in fracture epidemiology, influenced by the restrictive measures enforced by the government in Italy. Upon the pandemic's conclusion, the fracture epidemiology returned to the patterns observed in the pre-pandemic period.

Have Incidence and Severity of Craniomaxillofacial Fractures Changed Since SARS-CoV-2?

BACKGROUND

An increase in severity and a decrease in incidence of craniomaxillofacial fractures (CMFs) were identified during the first several months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. It is unclear if these changes have persisted in the current timeframe.

PURPOSE

The investigators hypothesize that the incidence and severity of CMF will not return to baseline prepandemic (control) levels as the pandemic stabilizes and becomes endemic.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This retrospective cohort study enrolled subjects who presented to Harborview Medical Center a Level 1 trauma center for the evaluation and management of CMF. Inclusion criteria were 1) Presentation timeline 2018 through 2022, 2) CMF identified by the 10th International Classification of Disease. Exclusion criteria were: 1) Undocumented etiology of facial fracture and 2) inadequate/unclear documentation otherwise.

PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLE

The predictor variable was year of injury relating to the start of the pandemic. The groups were the prepandemic (2018, 2019) and postpandemic (2020, 2021. 2022).

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variable was the CMF diagnosis identified using the corresponding International Classification of Disease, 10th Edition codes. The secondary outcome variables were mechanism of injury and injury severity.

COVARIATES

The covariates were age, sex, race/ethnicity, admission status, alcohol intoxication, toxicology screen, reimbursement source, abuse reported, and abuse investigated.

ANALYSES

Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed with statistical significance at P < .05.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 5203 subjects. The annual volumes of subjects presenting with CMF were consistent over the study period (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 n = 1018, 963, 1020, 1062, 1140, respectively). The incidence of Hispanics increased (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022: 11.1, 9.6, 12.2, 13.9, 13.2% (P < .05)) as did firearm CMF injuries (2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022: 4.13, 4.98, 4.71, 7.16, 6.75% (P < .05)). The Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Scale were both lower postpandemic compared to prepandemic; mean Injury Severity Score post [18.27 ± 12.46] versus pre [19.25 ± 12.89] (P < .05), mean Abbreviated Injury Scale post [2.94 ± 1.15] versus pre [3.04 ± 1.14] (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

While the severity of CMF decreased postpandemic, Hispanic and firearm CMF increased. The overall CMF incidence remained the same. The significant rise in firearm injuries warrants further study.

The Effects of COVID-19 Surges on Otolaryngology Consults

Objectives We aimed to evaluate the effects COVID-19 surges had on an otolaryngology service's consultation data. Methods After obtaining Upstate University Hospital institutional review board exemption to perform this research, a retrospective review analyzing otolaryngology consults at a single institution during COVID-19 surges in the years 2020 to 2021 was performed. The total consult volume and emergency department, inpatient, pediatric, adult, weekday, night, and weekend consults were assessed. Statistical analysis was used to compare these findings to the otolaryngology consult volumes and characteristics during the same time frames as the COVID-19 surges in the years 2014 to 2019. Results Based on bivariate analysis, an upward trend in otolaryngology consult volume was found over the study period. Although there was not a significant difference in consult volume during COVID-19 surges compared to historical data (p = 0.718, p = 0.695), both surge periods had significantly lower proportions of emergency department and pediatric consults (p < 0.001 for both). Conclusion Our study demonstrated that despite increasing cases of COVID-19 infection, otolaryngology consult volume remained high during surges. It was found that there has been an increase in otolaryngology consult volume at our academic center from the year 2014 to the present, a finding that was also seen in previous studies from our institution. Interestingly, consult parameters that changed when compared to the historical data included a decreased percentage of emergency department and pediatric consults during COVID-19 surges. The summation of these findings can be used to provide insight into how hospitals and otolaryngology services can prepare for the anticipated fluctuations in COVID-19 cases and associated hospitalizations.