1
|
Ungan G, Pons-Escoda A, Ulinic D, Arús C, Ortega-Martorell S, Olier I, Vellido A, Majós C, Julià-Sapé M. Early pseudoprogression and progression lesions in glioblastoma patients are both metabolically heterogeneous. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 37:e5095. [PMID: 38213096 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
The standard treatment in glioblastoma includes maximal safe resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide. The first follow-up study to evaluate treatment response is performed 1 month after concomitant treatment, when contrast-enhancing regions may appear that can correspond to true progression or pseudoprogression. We retrospectively evaluated 31 consecutive patients at the first follow-up after concomitant treatment to check whether the metabolic pattern assessed with multivoxel MRS was predictive of treatment response 2 months later. We extracted the underlying metabolic patterns of the contrast-enhancing regions with a blind-source separation method and mapped them over the reference images. Pattern heterogeneity was calculated using entropy, and association between patterns and outcomes was measured with Cramér's V. We identified three distinct metabolic patterns-proliferative, necrotic, and responsive, which were associated with status 2 months later. Individually, 70% of the patients showed metabolically heterogeneous patterns in the contrast-enhancing regions. Metabolic heterogeneity was not related to the regions' size and only stable patients were less heterogeneous than the rest. Contrast-enhancing regions are also metabolically heterogeneous 1 month after concomitant treatment. This could explain the reported difficulty in finding robust pseudoprogression biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gülnur Ungan
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER), Madrid, Spain
- Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular and Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Pons-Escoda
- Grup de Neuro-oncologia, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Ulinic
- Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular and Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Arús
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER), Madrid, Spain
- Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular and Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ivan Olier
- Data Science Research Centre, Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), Liverpool, UK
| | - Alfredo Vellido
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER), Madrid, Spain
- IDEAI-UPC Research Center, UPC BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Majós
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER), Madrid, Spain
- Grup de Neuro-oncologia, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarida Julià-Sapé
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER), Madrid, Spain
- Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular and Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zamanian M, Abedi I, Danazadeh F, Amouheidari A, Shahreza BO. Post-chemo-radiotherapy response and pseudo-progression evaluation on glioma cell types by multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study. BMC Med Imaging 2023; 23:176. [PMID: 37932656 PMCID: PMC10626695 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01135-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We focused on Differentiated pseudoprogression (PPN) of progression (PN) and the response to radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using diffusion and metabolic imaging. METHODS Seventy-five patients with glioma were included in this prospective study (approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20230904059352N1) in September 2023). Contrast-enhanced lesion volume (CELV), non-enhanced lesion volume (NELV), necrotic tumor volume (NTV), and quantitative values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (Cho/Cr, Cho/NAA and NAA/Cr) were calculated by a neuroradiologist using a semi-automatic method. All patients were followed at one and six months after CRT. RESULTS The results of the study showed statistically significant changes before and six months after RT-CRT for M-CELV in all glioma types (𝑝 < 0.05). In glioma cell types, the changes in M-ADC, M-Cho/Cr, and Cho/NAA indices for PN were incremental and greater for PPN patients. M-NAA/Cr ratio decreased after six months which was significant only on PN for GBM, and Epn (𝑝 < 0.05). A significant difference was observed between diffusion indices, metabolic ratios, and CELV changes after six months in all types (𝑝 < 0.05). None of the patients were suspected PPN one month after treatment. The DWI/ADC indices had higher sensitivity and specificity (98.25% and 96.57%, respectively). CONCLUSION The results of the present study showed that ADC values and Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios can be used to differentiate between patients with PPN and PN, although ADC is more sensitive and specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Zamanian
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Iraj Abedi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
| | - Fatemeh Danazadeh
- Department of Radiology, School of Paramedicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdul Rashid K, Ibrahim K, Wong JHD, Mohd Ramli N. Lipid Alterations in Glioma: A Systematic Review. Metabolites 2022; 12:metabo12121280. [PMID: 36557318 PMCID: PMC9783089 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12121280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are highly lethal tumours characterised by heterogeneous molecular features, producing various metabolic phenotypes leading to therapeutic resistance. Lipid metabolism reprogramming is predominant and has contributed to the metabolic plasticity in glioma. This systematic review aims to discover lipids alteration and their biological roles in glioma and the identification of potential lipids biomarker. This systematic review was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Extensive research articles search for the last 10 years, from 2011 to 2021, were conducted using four electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and ScienceDirect. A total of 158 research articles were included in this study. All studies reported significant lipid alteration between glioma and control groups, impacting glioma cell growth, proliferation, drug resistance, patients' survival and metastasis. Different lipids demonstrated different biological roles, either beneficial or detrimental effects on glioma. Notably, prostaglandin (PGE2), triacylglycerol (TG), phosphatidylcholine (PC), and sphingosine-1-phosphate play significant roles in glioma development. Conversely, the most prominent anti-carcinogenic lipids include docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and vitamin D3 have been reported to have detrimental effects on glioma cells. Furthermore, high lipid signals were detected at 0.9 and 1.3 ppm in high-grade glioma relative to low-grade glioma. This evidence shows that lipid metabolisms were significantly dysregulated in glioma. Concurrent with this knowledge, the discovery of specific lipid classes altered in glioma will accelerate the development of potential lipid biomarkers and enhance future glioma therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khairunnisa Abdul Rashid
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Kamariah Ibrahim
- Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
| | - Norlisah Mohd Ramli
- Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +60-379673238
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:873-883. [PMID: 36038669 PMCID: PMC9515024 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01994-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Working Group for Neuro-Oncology of the German Society for Radiation Oncology in cooperation with members of the Neuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society aimed to define a practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced necrosis (RN) of the central nervous system (CNS). METHODS Panel members of the DEGRO working group invited experts, participated in a series of conferences, supplemented their clinical experience, performed a literature review, and formulated recommendations for medical treatment of RN including bevacizumab in clinical routine. CONCLUSION Diagnosis and treatment of RN requires multidisciplinary structures of care and defined processes. Diagnosis has to be made on an interdisciplinary level with the joint knowledge of a neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist, neurosurgeon, neuropathologist, and neuro-oncologist. A multistep approach as an opportunity to review as many characteristics as possible to improve diagnostic confidence is recommended. Additional information about radiotherapy (RT) techniques is crucial for the diagnosis of RN. Misdiagnosis of untreated and progressive RN can lead to severe neurological deficits. In this practice guideline, we propose a detailed nomenclature of treatment-related changes and a multistep approach for their diagnosis.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chawla S, Bukhari S, Afridi OM, Wang S, Yadav SK, Akbari H, Verma G, Nath K, Haris M, Bagley S, Davatzikos C, Loevner LA, Mohan S. Metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance imaging in distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 35:e4719. [PMID: 35233862 PMCID: PMC9203929 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Pseudoprogression (PsP) refers to treatment-related clinico-radiologic changes mimicking true progression (TP) that occurs in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), predominantly within the first 6 months after the completion of surgery and concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) with temozolomide. Accurate differentiation of TP from PsP is essential for making informed decisions on appropriate therapeutic intervention as well as for prognostication of these patients. Conventional neuroimaging findings are often equivocal in distinguishing between TP and PsP and present a considerable diagnostic dilemma to oncologists and radiologists. These challenges have emphasized the need for developing alternative imaging techniques that may aid in the accurate diagnosis of TP and PsP. In this review, we encapsulate the current state of knowledge in the clinical applications of commonly used metabolic and physiologic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques such as diffusion and perfusion imaging and proton spectroscopy in distinguishing TP from PsP. We also showcase the potential of promising imaging techniques, such as amide proton transfer and amino acid-based positron emission tomography, in providing useful information about the treatment response. Additionally, we highlight the role of "radiomics", which is an emerging field of radiology that has the potential to change the way in which advanced MR techniques are utilized in assessing treatment response in GBM patients. Finally, we present our institutional experiences and discuss future perspectives on the role of multiparametric MR imaging in identifying PsP in GBM patients treated with "standard-of-care" CCRT as well as novel/targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sultan Bukhari
- Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan University, Voorhees, New Jersey, USA
| | - Omar M. Afridi
- Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine at Rowan University, Voorhees, New Jersey, USA
| | - Sumei Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Santosh K. Yadav
- Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hamed Akbari
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gaurav Verma
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Kavindra Nath
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammad Haris
- Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | - Stephen Bagley
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christos Davatzikos
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laurie A. Loevner
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bodensohn R, Forbrig R, Quach S, Reis J, Boulesteix AL, Mansmann U, Hadi I, Fleischmann D, Mücke J, Holzgreve A, Albert N, Ruf V, Dorostkar M, Corradini S, Herms J, Belka C, Thon N, Niyazi M. MRI-based contrast clearance analysis shows high differentiation accuracy between radiation-induced reactions and progressive disease after cranial radiotherapy. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100424. [PMID: 35248822 PMCID: PMC9058918 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pseudoprogression (PsP) or radiation necrosis (RN) may frequently occur after cranial radiotherapy and show a similar imaging pattern compared with progressive disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-based contrast clearance analysis (CCA) in this clinical setting. Patients and methods Patients with equivocal imaging findings after cranial radiotherapy were consecutively included into this monocentric prospective study. CCA was carried out by software-based automated subtraction of imaging features in late versus early T1-weighted sequences after contrast agent application. Two experienced neuroradiologists evaluated CCA with respect to PsP/RN and PD being blinded for histological findings. The radiological assessment was compared with the histopathological results, and its accuracy was calculated statistically. Results A total of 33 patients were included; 16 (48.5%) were treated because of a primary brain tumor (BT), and 17 (51.1%) because of a secondary BT. In one patient, CCA was technically infeasible. The accuracy of CCA in predicting the histological result was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.95; one-sided P = 0.051; n = 32]. Sensitivity and specificity of CCA were 0.93 (95% CI 0.66-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.52-0.94), respectively. The accuracy in patients with secondary BTs was 0.94 (95% CI 0.71-1.00) and nonsignificantly higher compared with patients with primary BT with an accuracy of 0.73 (95% CI 0.45-0.92), P = 0.16. Conclusions In this study, CCA was a highly accurate, easy, and helpful method for distinguishing PsP or RN from PD after cranial radiotherapy, especially in patients with secondary tumors after radiosurgical treatment. CCA is accurate in distinguishing treatment reactions from true PD. CCA was more accurate for irradiated metastases than primary BTs. CCA is not feasible for lesions with no contrast media uptake.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sidibe I, Tensaouti F, Roques M, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E, Laprie A. Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Role of Metabolic and Functional MRI-Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10020285. [PMID: 35203493 PMCID: PMC8869397 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma is the most frequent malignant primitive brain tumor in adults. The treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. During follow-up, combined chemoradiotherapy can induce treatment-related changes mimicking tumor progression on medical imaging, such as pseudoprogression (PsP). Differentiating PsP from true progression (TP) remains a challenge for radiologists and oncologists, who need to promptly start a second-line treatment in the case of TP. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion MRI, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging are more efficient than conventional MRI in differentiating PsP from TP. None of these techniques are fully effective, but current advances in computer science and the advent of artificial intelligence are opening up new possibilities in the imaging field with radiomics (i.e., extraction of a large number of quantitative MRI features describing tumor density, texture, and geometry). These features are used to build predictive models for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Method: Out of 7350 records for MR spectroscopy, GBM, glioma, recurrence, diffusion, perfusion, pseudoprogression, radiomics, and advanced imaging, we screened 574 papers. A total of 228 were eligible, and we analyzed 72 of them, in order to establish the role of each imaging modality and the usefulness and limitations of radiomics analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Sidibe
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
| | - Fatima Tensaouti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
| | - Margaux Roques
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
- Radiology Department, Purpan University Hospital, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- INSERM UMR.1037-Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT)/University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 31100 Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Radiation Oncology Department, Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse University Cancer Institute Oncopole, 31100 Toulouse, France; (I.S.); (F.T.); (E.C.-J.-M.)
- Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), University of Toulouse Paul Sabatier INSERM, 31100 Toulouse, France;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
El-Abtah ME, Talati P, Fu M, Chun B, Clark P, Peters A, Ranasinghe A, He J, Rapalino O, Batchelor TT, Gilberto Gonzalez R, Curry WT, Dietrich J, Gerstner ER, Ratai EM. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy outperforms perfusion in distinguishing between pseudoprogression and disease progression in patients with glioblastoma. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac128. [PMID: 36071927 PMCID: PMC9446677 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is a need to establish biomarkers that distinguish between pseudoprogression (PsP) and true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with chemoradiation.
Methods
We analyzed magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion data in patients with GBM with PsP or disease progression after chemoradiation. MRSI metabolites of interest included intratumoral choline (Cho), myo-inositol (mI), glutamate + glutamine (Glx), lactate (Lac), and creatine on the contralateral hemisphere (c-Cr). Student T-tests and area under the ROC curve analyses were used to detect group differences in metabolic ratios and their ability to predict clinical status, respectively.
Results
28 subjects (63 ± 9 years, 19 men) were evaluated. Subjects with true progression (n = 20) had decreased enhancing region mI/c-Cr (P = .011), a marker for more aggressive tumors, compared to those with PsP, which predicted tumor progression (AUC: 0.84 [0.76, 0.92]). Those with true progression had elevated Lac/Glx (P = .0009), a proxy of the Warburg effect, compared to those with PsP which predicted tumor progression (AUC: 0.84 [0.75, 0.92]). Cho/c-Cr did not distinguish between PsP and true tumor progression. Despite rCBV (AUC: 0.70 [0.60, 0.80]) and rCBF (AUC: 0.75 [0.65, 0.84]) being individually predictive of tumor response, they added no additional predictive value when combined with MRSI metabolic markers.
Conclusions
Incorporating enhancing lesion MRSI measures of mI/c-Cr and Lac/Glx into brain tumor imaging protocols can distinguish between PsP and true progression and inform patient management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed E El-Abtah
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Pratik Talati
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Melanie Fu
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Benjamin Chun
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Patrick Clark
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Anna Peters
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Anthony Ranasinghe
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Julian He
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Neurosciences Center , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - R Gilberto Gonzalez
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - William T Curry
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| | - Eva-Maria Ratai
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging , Charlestown, Massachusetts , USA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
- Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bapuraj JR, Perni K, Gomez-Hassan D, Srinivasan A. Imaging Surveillance of Gliomas: Role of Basic and Advanced Imaging Techniques. Radiol Clin North Am 2021; 59:395-407. [PMID: 33926685 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
It is essential to be aware of widely accepted criteria for grading of treatment response in both high-grade and low-grade gliomas. These criteria primarily take into account responses of measurable and nonmeasurable lesions on T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and postcontrast images to determine a final category of response for the patient. The additional role that other advanced imaging techniques, such as diffusion and perfusion imaging, can play in the surveillance of these tumors is discussed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayapalli Rajiv Bapuraj
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UMHS, B2-A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Krishna Perni
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UMHS, B2-A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Diana Gomez-Hassan
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 4260 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Michigan Medicine, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UMHS, B2-A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maudsley AA, Andronesi OC, Barker PB, Bizzi A, Bogner W, Henning A, Nelson SJ, Posse S, Shungu DC, Soher BJ. Advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopic neuroimaging: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 34:e4309. [PMID: 32350978 PMCID: PMC7606742 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) offers considerable promise for monitoring metabolic alterations associated with disease or injury; however, to date, these methods have not had a significant impact on clinical care, and their use remains largely confined to the research community and a limited number of clinical sites. The MRSI methods currently implemented on clinical MRI instruments have remained essentially unchanged for two decades, with only incremental improvements in sequence implementation. During this time, a number of technological developments have taken place that have already greatly benefited the quality of MRSI measurements within the research community and which promise to bring advanced MRSI studies to the point where the technique becomes a true imaging modality, while making the traditional review of individual spectra a secondary requirement. Furthermore, the increasing use of biomedical MR spectroscopy studies has indicated clinical areas where advanced MRSI methods can provide valuable information for clinical care. In light of this rapidly changing technological environment and growing understanding of the value of MRSI studies for biomedical studies, this article presents a consensus from a group of experts in the field that reviews the state-of-the-art for clinical proton MRSI studies of the human brain, recommends minimal standards for further development of vendor-provided MRSI implementations, and identifies areas which need further technical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Maudsley
- Department of Radiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Ovidiu C Andronesi
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter B Barker
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and the Kennedy Krieger Institute, F.M. Kirby Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alberto Bizzi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Bogner
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anke Henning
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sarah J Nelson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Stefan Posse
- Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Dikoma C Shungu
- Department of Neuroradiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Brian J Soher
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel M, Zhan J, Natarajan K, Flintham R, Davies N, Sanghera P, Grist J, Duddalwar V, Peet A, Sawlani V. Machine learning-based radiomic evaluation of treatment response prediction in glioblastoma. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:628.e17-628.e27. [PMID: 33941364 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate machine learning based models combining clinical, radiomic, and molecular information to distinguish between early true progression (tPD) and pseudoprogression (psPD) in patients with glioblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was undertaken of 76 patients (46 tPD, 30 psPD) with early enhancing disease following chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma. Outcome was determined on follow-up until 6 months post-chemoradiotherapy. Models comprised clinical characteristics, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status, and 307 quantitative imaging features extracted from enhancing disease and perilesional oedema masks on early post-chemoradiotherapy contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Feature selection was performed within bootstrapped cross-validated recursive feature elimination with a random forest algorithm. Naive Bayes five-fold cross-validation was used to validate the final model. RESULTS Top selected features included age, MGMT promoter methylation status, two shape-based features from the enhancing disease mask, three radiomic features from the enhancing disease mask on ADC, and one radiomic feature from the perilesional oedema mask on T2WI. The final model had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.80, sensitivity 78.2%, specificity 66.7%, and accuracy of 73.7%. CONCLUSION Incorporating a machine learning-based approach using quantitative radiomic features from standard-of-care magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in combination with clinical characteristics and MGMT promoter methylation status has a complementary effect and improves model performance for early prediction of glioblastoma treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Patel
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Zhan
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao Shi, Shandong Sheng, China
| | - K Natarajan
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Flintham
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Davies
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Sanghera
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Grist
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - V Duddalwar
- Departments of Radiology, Urology and Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, USA
| | - A Peet
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - V Sawlani
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Physiological Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapies in Glioblastomas. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22083867. [PMID: 33918043 PMCID: PMC8069140 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22083867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant brain tumor in adults, with a dismal prognosis despite aggressive multi-modal therapy. Immunotherapy is currently being evaluated as an alternate treatment modality for recurrent GBMs in clinical trials. These immunotherapeutic approaches harness the patient's immune response to fight and eliminate tumor cells. Standard MR imaging is not adequate for response assessment to immunotherapy in GBM patients even after using refined response assessment criteria secondary to amplified immune response. Thus, there is an urgent need for the development of effective and alternative neuroimaging techniques for accurate response assessment. To this end, some groups have reported the potential of diffusion and perfusion MR imaging and amino acid-based positron emission tomography techniques in evaluating treatment response to different immunotherapeutic regimens in GBMs. The main goal of these techniques is to provide definitive metrics of treatment response at earlier time points for making informed decisions on future therapeutic interventions. This review provides an overview of available immunotherapeutic approaches used to treat GBMs. It discusses the limitations of conventional imaging and potential utilities of physiologic imaging techniques in the response assessment to immunotherapies. It also describes challenges associated with these imaging methods and potential solutions to avoid them.
Collapse
|
13
|
Strauss SB, Meng A, Ebani EJ, Chiang GC. Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021; 31:103-120. [PMID: 33220823 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Strauss
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alicia Meng
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Edward J Ebani
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Gloria C Chiang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sawlani V, Patel MD, Davies N, Flintham R, Wesolowski R, Ughratdar I, Pohl U, Nagaraju S, Petrik V, Kay A, Jacob S, Sanghera P, Wykes V, Watts C, Poptani H. Multiparametric MRI: practical approach and pictorial review of a useful tool in the evaluation of brain tumours and tumour-like lesions. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:84. [PMID: 32681296 PMCID: PMC7367972 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00888-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI has a vital role in the assessment of intracranial lesions. Conventional MRI has limited specificity and multiparametric MRI using diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows more accurate assessment of the tissue microenvironment. The purpose of this educational pictorial review is to demonstrate the role of multiparametric MRI for diagnosis, treatment planning and for assessing treatment response, as well as providing a practical approach for performing and interpreting multiparametric MRI in the clinical setting. A variety of cases are presented to demonstrate how multiparametric MRI can help differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions compared to conventional MRI alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Sawlani
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Markand Dipankumar Patel
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Nigel Davies
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Robert Flintham
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Roman Wesolowski
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Ismail Ughratdar
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Ute Pohl
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Santhosh Nagaraju
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Vladimir Petrik
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Andrew Kay
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Saiju Jacob
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Paul Sanghera
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Victoria Wykes
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Colin Watts
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
- University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Harish Poptani
- Centre for Pre-Clinical Imaging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gonçalves FG, Chawla S, Mohan S. Emerging MRI Techniques to Redefine Treatment Response in Patients With Glioblastoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52:978-997. [PMID: 32190946 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common and most malignant primary brain tumor. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, its prognosis remains poor. Even with continuous developments in MRI, which has provided us with newer insights into the diagnosis and understanding of tumor biology, response assessment in the posttherapy setting remains challenging. We believe that the integration of additional information from advanced neuroimaging techniques can further improve the diagnostic accuracy of conventional MRI. In this article, we review the utility of advanced neuroimaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, perfusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and chemical exchange saturation transfer in characterizing and evaluating treatment response in patients with glioblastoma. We will also discuss the existing challenges and limitations of using these techniques in clinical settings and possible solutions to avoiding pitfalls in study design, data acquisition, and analysis for future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:978-997.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Strauss SB, Meng A, Ebani EJ, Chiang GC. Imaging Glioblastoma Posttreatment: Progression, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, Radiation Necrosis. Radiol Clin North Am 2019; 57:1199-1216. [PMID: 31582045 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2019.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiographic monitoring of posttreatment glioblastoma is important for clinical trials and determining next steps in management. Evaluation for tumor progression is confounded by the presence of treatment-related radiographic changes, making a definitive determination less straight-forward. The purpose of this article was to describe imaging tools available for assessing treatment response in glioblastoma, as well as to highlight the definitions, pathophysiology, and imaging features typical of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Strauss
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Alicia Meng
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Edward J Ebani
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Gloria C Chiang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 East 68th Street, Box 141, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu H, Deng Z, Wang H, Li X, Sun T, Tao Z, Yao L, Jin Y, Wang X, Yang L, Ma H, Huang Y, Zhou Y, Du Z. MGMT autoantibodies as a potential prediction of recurrence and treatment response biomarker for glioma patients. Cancer Med 2019; 8:4359-4369. [PMID: 31210005 PMCID: PMC6675704 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer‐specific autoantibodies found in serum of cancer patients have been characterized as potential predictors of the high risk of recurrence and treatment response. The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical utility of serum O‐6‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) autoantibodies as novel biomarkers for prediction of recurrence and treatment response for glioma through MGMT peptides microarray. Methods A total of 201 serum samples of glioma patients with various WHO grade and 311 serum samples of healthy donors were examined for the detection of MGMT autoantibodies by peptides microarray. The clinical value of MGMT autoantibodies was studied through univariable and multivariable analyses. Results Autoantibodies to MGMT peptides were detected in sera from glioma patients and five highly responsive autoantibodies to peptides were identified in the glioma group. The positive rate of MGMT autoantibody to 20 peptides in glioma groups is compared with healthy individuals, the positive rate of MGMT‐02 (45%), MGMT‐04 (27%), MGMT‐07 (21%), MGMT‐10 (13%), and MGMT‐18 (24%) were significantly elevated in patients with glioma. MGMT autoantibody and its protein expression exhibited a significant correlation. The levels of MGMT autoantibodies decreased on the 30th day after operation, reaching preoperative levels, similar to those when tumor recurrence developed. Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that the only preoperative autoantibodies to MGMT‐02 peptide were independently correlated with recurrence‐free survival. Preoperative seropositive patients were more likely than seronegative patients to have shorter recurrence times and to be resistant to chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy with temozolomide. Conclusion Monitoring the levels of preoperative serum autoantibodies to MGMT‐02 peptide was useful for predicting patients at high risk of recurrence and treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haibin Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Zhitong Deng
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Xuetao Li
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Ting Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Zhennan Tao
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Lin Yao
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Yanping Jin
- Nano-Bio-Chem Centre, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Nano-Bio-Chem Centre, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Lan Yang
- Nano-Bio-Chem Centre, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Hongwei Ma
- Nano-Bio-Chem Centre, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Yulun Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Youxin Zhou
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| | - Ziwei Du
- Department of Neurosurgery & Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Buemi F, Guzzardi G, Del Sette B, Sponghini AP, Matheoud R, Soligo E, Trisoglio A, Carriero A, Stecco A. Apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor volume measurements help stratify progression-free survival of bevacizumab-treated patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Neuroradiol J 2019; 32:241-249. [PMID: 31066622 DOI: 10.1177/1971400919847184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) bi-component curve-fitting histogram analysis and volume percentage change (VPC) prior to bevacizumab treatment can stratify progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) on first recurrence. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 17 patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab and fotemustine (n = 13) or only bevacizumab (n = 4) on first recurrence at our institution between December 2009 and July 2015. Both T2/FLAIR abnormalities and enhancing tumor on T1 images were mapped to the ADC images. ADC-L and ADC-M values were obtained trough bi-Gaussian curve fitting histogram analysis. Furthermore, the study population was dichotomized into two subgroups: patients displaying a reduction in enhancing tumor volume of either >55% or <55% between the mean value calculated at baseline and first follow-up. Subsequently, a second dichotomization was performed according to a reduction in the T2 / FLAIR volume >41% or <41% at first check after treatment. OS and PFS were assessed using volume parameters in a Cox regression model adjusted for significant clinical parameters. RESULTS In univariate analysis, contrast-enhanced (CE)-ADC-L was significantly predictive of PFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p = 0.03). When we dichotomized our sample using the 55% cut-off for enhancing tumor volume, CE-VPC was able to predict PFS (p = 0.01) but not OS (p = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, only the CE-ADC-L was predictive of PFS (p = 0.01), albeit not predictive of OS (p = 0.14). CE-ADC-M, T2/FLAIR-ADC-L, T2/FLAIR-ADC, and T2/FLAIR VPC were not significantly predictive of PFS and OS (p > 0.05) in both univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS CE-ADC and CE-VPC can stratify PFS for patients with recurrent glioblastoma prior to bevacizumab treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giuseppe Guzzardi
- 2 Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Bruno Del Sette
- 2 Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Andrea P Sponghini
- 3 Oncology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Roberta Matheoud
- 4 Medical Physics Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Eleonora Soligo
- 2 Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandra Trisoglio
- 2 Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carriero
- 2 Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Stecco
- 2 Radiology Department, University of Eastern Piedmont, "Maggiore della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verma G, Chawla S, Mohan S, Wang S, Nasrallah M, Sheriff S, Desai A, Brem S, O'Rourke DM, Wolf RL, Maudsley AA, Poptani H. Three-dimensional echo planar spectroscopic imaging for differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2019; 32:e4042. [PMID: 30556932 PMCID: PMC6519064 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Accurate differentiation of true progression (TP) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in patients with glioblastomas (GBMs) is essential for planning adequate treatment and for estimating clinical outcome measures and future prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of three-dimensional echo planar spectroscopic imaging (3D-EPSI) in distinguishing TP from PsP in GBM patients. For this institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant retrospective study, 27 patients with GBM demonstrating enhancing lesions within six months of completion of concurrent chemo-radiation therapy were included. Of these, 18 were subsequently classified as TP and 9 as PsP based on histological features or follow-up MRI studies. Parametric maps of choline/creatine (Cho/Cr) and choline/N-acetylaspartate (Cho/NAA) were computed and co-registered with post-contrast T1 -weighted and FLAIR images. All lesions were segmented into contrast enhancing (CER), immediate peritumoral (IPR), and distal peritumoral (DPR) regions. For each region, Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA ratios were normalized to corresponding metabolite ratios from contralateral normal parenchyma and compared between TP and PsP groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to obtain the best model to distinguish TP from PsP. Significantly higher Cho/NAA was observed from CER (2.69 ± 1.00 versus 1.56 ± 0.51, p = 0.003), IPR (2.31 ± 0.92 versus 1.53 ± 0.56, p = 0.030), and DPR (1.80 ± 0.68 versus 1.19 ± 0.28, p = 0.035) regions in TP patients compared with those with PsP. Additionally, significantly elevated Cho/Cr (1.74 ± 0.44 versus 1.34 ± 0.26, p = 0.023) from CER was observed in TP compared with PsP. When these parameters were incorporated in multivariate regression analyses, a discriminatory model with a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 87% was observed in distinguishing TP from PsP. These results indicate the utility of 3D-EPSI in differentiating TP from PsP with high sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Verma
- Department of RadiologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of RadiologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Department of RadiologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Sumei Wang
- Department of RadiologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - MacLean Nasrallah
- Department of Pathology and Lab MedicinePerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | | | - Arati Desai
- Department of Hematology‐OncologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of NeurosurgeryPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Donald M. O'Rourke
- Department of NeurosurgeryPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ronald L. Wolf
- Department of RadiologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | | | - Harish Poptani
- Department of RadiologyPerelman School of Medicine at the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular PhysiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Eijgelaar RS, Bruynzeel AME, Lagerwaard FJ, Müller DMJ, Teunissen FR, Barkhof F, van Herk M, De Witt Hamer PC, Witte MG. Earliest radiological progression in glioblastoma by multidisciplinary consensus review. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:591-598. [PMID: 29777418 PMCID: PMC6132963 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2896-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of glioblastoma progression is important for clinical decision-making on cessation or initiation of therapy, for enrollment in clinical trials, and for response measurement in time and location. The RANO-criteria are considered standard for the timing of progression. To evaluate local treatment, we aim to find the most accurate progression location. We determined the differences in progression free survival (PFS) and in tumor volumes at progression (Vprog) by three definitions of progression. METHODS In a consecutive cohort of 73 patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2013, progression was established according to three definitions. We determined (1) earliest radiological progression (ERP) by retrospective multidisciplinary consensus review using all available imaging and follow-up, (2) clinical practice progression (CPP) from multidisciplinary tumor board conclusions, and (3) progression by the RANO-criteria. RESULTS ERP was established in 63 (86%), CPP in 64 (88%), RANO progression in 42 (58%). Of the 63 patients who had died, 37 (59%) did with prior RANO-progression, compared to 57 (90%) for both ERP and CPP. The median overall survival was 15.3 months. The median PFS was 8.8 months for ERP, 9.5 months for CPP, and 11.8 months for RANO. The PFS by ERP was shorter than CPP (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.84, p = 0.004) and RANO-progression (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.19-0.43, p < 0.001). The Vprog were significantly smaller for ERP (median 8.8 mL), than for CPP (17 mL) and RANO (22 mL). CONCLUSION PFS and Vprog vary considerably between progression definitions. Earliest radiological progression by retrospective consensus review should be considered to accurately localize progression and to address confounding of lead time bias in clinical trial enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roelant S Eijgelaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenique M J Müller
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek R Teunissen
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology & Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Philip C De Witt Hamer
- Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G Witte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abrouk N, Oronsky B, Caroen S, Ning S, Knox S, Peehl D. A note on improved statistical approaches to account for pseudoprogression. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 81:621-626. [PMID: 29404682 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3529-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Responses to immuno-oncology agents are often subject to misinterpretation as apparent tumor growth due to immune infiltration leads to the appearance of progressive disease and can result in the discontinuation of effective therapeutic agents. Better statistical strategies to determine experimental outcomes are needed to distinguish between true and pseudoprogression. We applied time-to-event statistical analyses methods that account for study design features and capture the longitudinal and panoramic aspects of pseudoprogression to test superiority of a combination of RRx-001, a novel tumor-associated macrophage polarizing agent in Phase 2, and an anti-PD-L1 antibody in a myeloma preclinical model, comparing to traditional, mean-based mixed effects modeling approaches that did not show statistical significance. Nonparametric p values for the difference of cumulative incidence rates of time to ≥ 50% tumor growth reduction and its associated restricted mean survival times are computed and found to be statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier description of time-to-volume reduction (≥ 50%) coupled with Cox's proportional hazards model follows the data longitudinally and therefore permits an analysis of immune infiltration resolution, making it an improved method for analysis of preclinical experiments with immuno-oncology agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nacer Abrouk
- EpicentRx Inc, 4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Bryan Oronsky
- EpicentRx Inc, 4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
| | - Scott Caroen
- EpicentRx Inc, 4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | - Shoucheng Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Susan Knox
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Donna Peehl
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Skolnik AD, Wang S, Gopal PP, Mohan S. Commentary: Pitfalls in the Neuroimaging of Glioblastoma in the Era of Antiangiogenic and Immuno/Targeted Therapy. Front Neurol 2018; 9:51. [PMID: 29459848 PMCID: PMC5807681 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron D Skolnik
- Radiology, Penn Medicine Princeton Health, Plainsboro, NJ, United States
| | - Sumei Wang
- Neuroradiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Pallavi P Gopal
- Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Suyash Mohan
- Neuroradiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zygogianni A, Protopapa M, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Simopoulou F, Nikoloudi S, Kouloulias V. From imaging to biology of glioblastoma: new clinical oncology perspectives to the problem of local recurrence. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:989-1003. [PMID: 29335830 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1831-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
GBM is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors. Surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation have succeeded in providing a survival benefit. Although most patients will eventually experience local recurrence, the means to fight recurrence are limited and prognosis remains poor. In a disease where local control remains the major challenge, few trials have addressed the efficacy of local treatments, either surgery or radiation therapy. The present article reviews recent advances in the biology, imaging and biomarker science of GBM as well as the current treatment status of GBM, providing new perspectives to the problem of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zygogianni
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M Protopapa
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece
| | - F Simopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Nikoloudi
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - V Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Perry LA, Korfiatis P, Agrawal JP, Erickson BJ. Increased signal intensity within glioblastoma resection cavities on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging to detect early progressive disease in patients receiving radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide therapy. Neuroradiology 2017; 60:35-42. [PMID: 29103145 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-017-1941-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our study tested the diagnostic accuracy of increased signal intensity (SI) within FLAIR MR images of resection cavities in differentiating early progressive disease (ePD) from pseudoprogression (PsP) in patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide therapy. METHODS In this retrospective study approved by our Institutional Review Board, we evaluated the records of 122 consecutive patients with partially or totally resected glioblastoma. Region of interest (ROI) analysis assessed 33 MR examinations from 11 subjects with histologically confirmed ePD and 37 MR examinations from 14 subjects with PsP (5 histologically confirmed, 9 clinically diagnosed). After applying an N4 bias correction algorithm to remove B0 field distortion and to standardize image intensities and then normalizing the intensities based on an ROI of uninvolved white matter from the contralateral hemisphere, the mean intensities of the ROI from within the resection cavities were calculated. Measures of diagnostic performance were calculated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using the threshold intensity that maximized differentiation. Subgroup analysis explored differences between the patients with biopsy-confirmed disease. RESULTS At an optimal threshold intensity of 2.9, the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for FLAIR to differentiate ePD from PsP was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.686-0.873) with a sensitivity of 0.818 and specificity of 0.694. The AUROC increased to 0.86 when only the patients with biopsy-confirmed PsP were considered. CONCLUSIONS Increased SI within the resection cavity of FLAIR images is not a highly specific sign of ePD in glioblastoma patients treated with the Stupp protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Panagiotis Korfiatis
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St Sw, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Jay P Agrawal
- Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St Sw, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mallick S, Benson R, Hakim A, Rath GK. Management of glioblastoma after recurrence: A changing paradigm. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2016; 28:199-210. [PMID: 27476474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma remains the most common primary brain tumor after the age of 40years. Maximal safe surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has remained the standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM). But recurrence is an inevitable event in the natural history of GBM with most patients experiencing it after 6-9months of primary treatment. Recurrent GBM poses great challenge to manage with no well-defined management protocols. The challenge starts from differentiating radiation necrosis from true local progression. A fine balance needs to be maintained on improving survival and assuring a better quality of life. Treatment options are limited and ranges from re-excision, re-irradiation, systemic chemotherapy or a combination of these. Re-excision and re-irradiation must be attempted in selected patients and has been shown to improve survival outcomes. To facilitate the management of GBM recurrences, a treatment algorithm is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Rony Benson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Abdul Hakim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Goura K Rath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Faivre G, Pentsova E, Demopoulos A, Taillibert S, Rosenblum M, Omuro A. Clinical Reasoning: Worsening neurologic symptoms in a brain tumor patient. Neurology 2015; 85:e57-61. [PMID: 26283762 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Geraldine Faivre
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (G.F., E.P., M.R., A.O.), New York; North Shore University Hospital (A.D.), Manhasset, NY; and Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (S.T.), Paris, France
| | - Elena Pentsova
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (G.F., E.P., M.R., A.O.), New York; North Shore University Hospital (A.D.), Manhasset, NY; and Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (S.T.), Paris, France
| | - Alexis Demopoulos
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (G.F., E.P., M.R., A.O.), New York; North Shore University Hospital (A.D.), Manhasset, NY; and Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (S.T.), Paris, France
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (G.F., E.P., M.R., A.O.), New York; North Shore University Hospital (A.D.), Manhasset, NY; and Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (S.T.), Paris, France
| | - Marc Rosenblum
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (G.F., E.P., M.R., A.O.), New York; North Shore University Hospital (A.D.), Manhasset, NY; and Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (S.T.), Paris, France
| | - Antonio Omuro
- From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (G.F., E.P., M.R., A.O.), New York; North Shore University Hospital (A.D.), Manhasset, NY; and Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière (S.T.), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|