Optimal treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

In vitro model to evaluate effect of acidic pepsin on vocal fold barrier function

The pathophysiology of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and its impact on the vocal fold is not well understood, but may involve acid damage to vocal fold barrier functions. Two different components encompass vocal fold barrier function: the mucus barrier and tight junctions. Mucus retained on epithelial microprojections protects the inside of the vocal fold by neutralizing acidic damage. Tight junctions control permeability between cells. Here we developed an in vitro experimental system to evaluate acidic injury and repair of vocal fold barrier functions. We first established an in vitro model of rat vocal fold epithelium that could survive at least one week after barrier function maturation. The model enabled repeated evaluation of the course of vocal fold repair processes. Then, an injury experiment was conducted in which vocal fold cells were exposed to a 5-min treatment with acidic pepsin that injured tight junctions and cell surface microprojections. Both of them healed within one day of injury. Comparing vocal fold cells treated with acid alone with cells treated with acidic pepsin showed that acidic pepsin had a stronger effect on intercellular permeability than acid alone, whereas pepsin had little effect on microprojections. This result suggests that the proteolytic action of pepsin has a larger effect on protein-based tight junctions than on phospholipids in microprojections. This experimental system could contribute to a better understanding of vocal fold repair processes after chemical or physical injuries, as well as voice problems due to LPR pathogenesis.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary healthcare physicians

Objective

The aim of this study was to estimate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) among primary healthcare (PHC) physicians in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This quantitative cross-sectional study used an online-based questionnaire distributed to physicians in PHC facilities and hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire consisted of four sections that provided data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

Results

Of the 473 physicians included in the study, one-third were unaware of LPR, and two-thirds were unfamiliar with the reflux symptom index (RSI). The most common sources of LPR knowledge were textbooks and literature (49.8%). The most recognised risk factor, symptom, and complication were high body mass index (75.8%), voice problems (82.4%), and laryngeal cancer (70.6%), respectively. The most recognised diagnostic and treatment options were laryngoscopy (73.5%) and lifestyle modifications (87.3%), respectively, while only 60.4% of participants recognised proton pump inhibitors as a treatment option. Most PHC physicians believed that LPR is underdiagnosed and that primary prevention and awareness among the general population need to be improved.

Conclusions

One in three PHC physicians knew nothing about LPR, and two in three were unfamiliar with the RSI. More than half could not recognise all major symptoms of LPR, which might be a cause for concern, as recognising these symptoms is crucial for proper diagnosis. We recommend increasing the education of physicians about LPR, its signs and symptoms, and the RSI, all of which provide valuable clues for diagnosis.

Pharmacological management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: state of the art in 2024

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease of the esophagus characterized by the regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Among patients with GERD, around 30% of patients have visible mucosal damage, while 70% have normal esophageal mucosa. Accordingly, the optimal pharmacological treatment of GERD should address different disease manifestations, including symptoms, the mucosal damage when present, and possible chronic complications, including strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

Available medical treatments for GERD include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2-RAs), prokinetics, and mucosal protectants, such as alginates, hyaluronic acid/chondroitin-sulfate, and poliprotect. Each compound has its own advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge of expected benefits and tips for their use is paramount for the success of treatment. In addition, the appropriateness of indications for initiating treatment is also crucial to achieve positive results when managing GERD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

PPIs, PCABs, H2-RAs, prokinetics, and mucosal protectants can all be used in patients with GERD, but careful assessment of patients' characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic compound is essential to ensure successful treatment of GERD.

Narrative review of relationship between chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a possible cause of chronic cough is known for decades. However, more than 75% of patients with extraoesophageal symptoms do not suffer from typical symptoms of GERD like pyrosis and regurgitations and have negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For such a condition term laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was introduced and is used for more than two decades. Since the comprehensive information on relationship between chronic cough and LPR is missing the aim of this paper is to summarize current knowledge based on review of published information during last 13 years. Laryngopharyngeal reflux is found in 20% of patients with chronic cough. The main and recognized diagnostic method for LPR is 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, revealing reflux episodes irritating the upper and lower respiratory tract mucosa. The treatment of LPR should be initiated with dietary and lifestyle measures, followed by proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and other measures. Despite progress, more research is needed for accurate diagnosis and targeted therapies. Key areas for exploration include biomarkers for diagnosis, the impact of non-acid reflux on symptom development, and the efficacy of new drugs. Further studies with a focused population, excluding other causes like asthma, and using new diagnostic criteria for LPR are essential. It's crucial to consider LPR as a potential cause of unexplained chronic cough and to approach diagnosis and treatment with a multidisciplinary perspective.

The Role of a Plant-Only (Vegan) Diet in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Online Survey of the Italian General Population

The relationship between food and the pathophysiological mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unclear. There are few data on the impact of dietary habits on GERD symptoms and on the incidence of GERD in subjects undergoing plant-based diets. In this study, we investigated the association between diet and GERD, using data collected through an online survey of the Italian general population. In total, 1077 subjects participated in the study. GERD was defined according to the Montreal Consensus. For all subjects age, gender, body mass index (BMI), marital status, education, occupation, alcohol consumption, and smoking habits were recorded. All participants also completed the SF-36 questionnaire on Quality of Life. A total of 402 subjects (37.3%) were vegans and 675 (62.7%) non-vegans. The prevalence of GERD in the total population was 9%. Subjects with GERD-related symptoms recorded a worse quality of life according to SF-36 analysis (p < 0.05 for all dimensions). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, participants undergoing a vegan diet had a significantly lower risk of GERD (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.81, p = 0.006). These findings should be taken into account to inform the lifestyle management of GERD.

A New Risk of Using Alkaline Drops in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is common in the otolaryngologist's office, and a multimodal treatment regimen is employed often. Counseling patients on lifestyle modifications is important. Alkaline water consumption has been recommended as a nonmedical "antacid" for its value in deactivating pepsin, a proteolytic enzyme responsible for laryngeal tissue inflammatory changes in LPR. Alkaline water can be found as premade bottled water, or it can be made at home by titrating regular-pH water with concentrated alkaline drops. We present a patient who mistakenly instilled the alkaline drops into her eye, causing alkali-related chemical burns to the sclera and cornea, which subsequently resulted in scar.

Is magnetic sphincter augmentation indicated in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux?

Up to 30% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) suffer from laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) with symptoms, as chronic cough, laryngitis, or asthma. Besides life-style modifications and medical acid suppression, laparoscopic fundoplication is an established treatment option. Treatment-related side effects after laparoscopic fundoplication have to be weighted against LPR symptom control in 30-85% of patients after surgery. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is described as an effective alternative to fundoplication for surgical treatment of GERD. However, evidence on the efficacy of MSA in patients with LPR is very limited. Preliminary data on the results of MSA treating LPR symptoms in patients with acid and weakly acid reflux are promising; showing comparable results to laparoscopic fundoplication by providing the potential of decrease side effects.

Role of Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD) is caused due to reflux of gastric content into the larynx and pharynx. The present study was done to assess the role of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) in the treatment outcomes in symptomatic patients with LPRD. This is a prospective analytical study conducted on 200 patients for a period of 2 years, from January 2020 to February 2022. Patients suspected with LPR were evaluated using RSI and RFS, and both pre and post treatment scores were compared to assess the change in scores of RSI and RFS following 8 weeks of treatment with PPI (Proton pump inhibitor). The patients experienced a greater incidence of moderate symptoms in RSI. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant difference between pre and post treatment scores with respect to reflux symptoms and reflux findings (p < 0.05). Implementation of RSI and RFS scoring system helped for early diagnosis of LPR, and a significant difference was seen between pre and post treatment scores in both RSI and RFS.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Extraesophageal Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update is to review the available evidence and expert advice regarding the clinical management of patients with suspected extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

This article provides practical advice based on the available published evidence including that identified from recently published reviews from leading investigators in the field, prospective and population studies, clinical trials, and recent clinical guidelines and technical reviews. This best practice document is not based on a formal systematic review. The best practice advice as presented in this document applies to patients with symptoms or conditions suspected to be related to extraesophageal reflux (EER). This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. These Best Practice Advice (BPA) statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Gastroenterologists should be aware of potential extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and should inquire about such disorders including laryngitis, chronic cough, asthma, and dental erosions in GERD patients to determine whether GERD may be a contributing factor to these conditions. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Development of a multidisciplinary approach to extraesophageal (EER) manifestations is an important consideration because the conditions are often multifactorial, requiring input from non-gastroenterology (GI) specialties. Results from diagnostic testing (ie, bronchoscopy, thoracic imaging, laryngoscopy, etc) from non-GI disciplines should be taken into consideration when gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is considered as a cause for extraesophageal symptoms. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Currently, there is no single diagnostic tool that can conclusively identify GER as the cause of EER symptoms. Determination of the contribution of GER to EER symptoms should be based on the global clinical impression derived from patients' symptoms, response to GER therapy, and results of endoscopy and reflux testing. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Consideration should be given toward diagnostic testing for reflux before initiation of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with potential extraesophageal manifestations of GERD, but without typical GERD symptoms. Initial single-dose PPI trial, titrating up to twice daily in those with typical GERD symptoms, is reasonable. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Symptom improvement of EER manifestations while on PPI therapy may result from mechanisms of action other than acid suppression and should not be regarded as confirmation for GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: In patients with suspected extraesophageal manifestation of GERD who have failed one trial (up to 12 weeks) of PPI therapy, one should consider objective testing for pathologic GER, because additional trials of different PPIs are low yield. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Initial testing to evaluate for reflux should be tailored to patients' clinical presentation and can include upper endoscopy and ambulatory reflux monitoring studies of acid suppressive therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Testing can be considered for those with an established objective diagnosis of GERD who do not respond to high doses of acid suppression. Testing can include pH-impedance monitoring while on acid suppression to evaluate the role of ongoing acid or non-acid reflux. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Alternative treatment methods to acid suppressive therapy (eg, lifestyle modifications, alginate-containing antacids, external upper esophageal sphincter compression device, cognitive-behavioral therapy, neuromodulators) may serve a role in management of EER symptoms. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Shared decision-making should be performed before referral for anti-reflux surgery for EER when the patient has clear, objectively defined evidence of GERD. However, a lack of response to PPI therapy predicts lack of response to anti-reflux surgery and should be incorporated into the decision process.

Acoustics Features of Voice in Adolescent Females With Anorexia Nervosa

INTRODUCTION

The process of human voice production is a complex physiological and acoustic phenomenon that depends on many structural, physical, and hormonal factors, systemic diseases as well as emotional states. All these factors can be present in eating disorders. However, studies on eating disorders and voice problems have usually been evaluated in terms of bulimia. Chronic starvation and emotional problems in the course of anorexia nervosa (AN) appear to be under-researched, despite various biochemical, metabolic, and hormonal changes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate voice quality, specifically acoustic analysis, in adolescent female with AN from the point of view of the possible influence on the function and structure of the larynx, low body mass accompanying AN, as well as energy deficiency, hormonal and emotional disturbances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 84 girls diagnosed with AN (Gr.A) (15.32 years, SD = 2.12; range 12-19, BMI = 14.11 ± 1.72) were assessed for the condition of the voice such as perceptual voice evaluation on the GRBAS scale, maximal phonation time (MPT), laryngoscopy, with special attention to voice acoustic analysis - Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP). The control group (Gr.C) included 62 girls without eating disturbances (aged 12-19, mean age 15.41 ± 2.40, BMI = 21.60 ± 1.92). Perceptual voice assessment, aerodynamic test MPT, and acoustic parameters were analyzed according to girls' age.

RESULTS

Total GRBAS scale was higher in girls with AN compared to the control group mainly for two parameters: breathiness (B) (P = 0.00015) and asthenia (A) (P < 0.05). The MPT for Gr.A was significantly shorter compared to Gr.C (15.40 ± 3.51 seconds vs. 23.19 ± 5.17 seconds) (P < 0.001), and a correlation of MPT values with the age of the adolescent female was observed: Spearman's coefficient for Gr.A = (-)0.5378, for Gr.C = 0.5516 (P = 0.0012). Acoustic analysis revealed the decrease in the basic frequency F0 in Gr.A compared to Gr.C (231.08 Hz vs. 242.30 Hz), and narrowing of the voice scale was observed, resulting mainly from a reduction in the upper limit. Significant differences were found for measures of frequency perturbations (Jita, Jitter, RPA, PPQ, sPPR), with Gr.A scoring significantly higher than Gr.C (P < 0.05 for all). Significant changes in voice acoustic analysis parameters were found with age. Negative correlations were found for measures of F0 for Gr.A to a much greater extent compared to Gr.C. Positive correlations were found with measures of tremor assessment (SPI, FTRI, ATRI) for Gr.A.

Breathing Exercises in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial. The severity of abnormal reflux burden corresponds to the dysfunction of the antireflux barrier and inability to clear refluxate. The crural diaphragm is one of the main components of the esophagogastric junction and plays an important role in preventing gastroesophageal reflux. The diaphragm, as a skeletal muscle, is partially under voluntary control and its dysfunction can be improved via breathing exercises. Thus, diaphragmatic breathing training (DBT) has the potential to alleviate symptoms in selected patients with GERD. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is a useful method for the assessment of antireflux barrier function and can therefore elucidate the mechanisms responsible for gastroesophageal reflux. We hypothesize that HRM can help define patient phenotypes that may benefit most from DBT, and that HRM can even help in the management of respiratory physiotherapy in patients with GERD. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current data supporting physiotherapeutic practices in the treatment of GERD and to illustrate how HRM may guide treatment strategies focused on respiratory physiotherapy.

[Current possibilities and challenges in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux]

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is characterized by backflow of gastric or gastroduodenal content and gases into the upper aerodigestive tract, which can damage the mucus membranes of the larynx and pharynx. It is associated with a variety of symptoms such as retrosternal burning and acid regurgitation, or other unspecific symptoms such as hoarseness, globus sensation, chronic cough, or mucus hypersecretion. Due to the lack of data and the heterogeneity of studies, diagnosis of LPR is problematic and challenging, as recently discussed. Moreover, the different therapeutic approaches are also discussed controversially in the face of the poor evidence base, and include pharmacologic and conservative dietary measures. Hence, in the following review, the available options for treatment of LPR are critically discussed and summarized for daily clinical use.

Oral and Inhaled Fosamprenavir Reverses Pepsin-Induced Damage in a Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Mouse Model

OBJECTIVE

More than 20% of the US population suffers from laryngopharyngeal reflux. Although dietary/lifestyle modifications and alginates provide benefit to some, there is no gold standard medical therapy. Increasing evidence suggests that pepsin is partly, if not wholly, responsible for damage and inflammation caused by laryngopharyngeal reflux. A treatment specifically targeting pepsin would be amenable to local, inhaled delivery, and could prove effective for endoscopic signs and symptoms associated with nonacid reflux. The aim herein was to identify small molecule inhibitors of pepsin and test their efficacy to prevent pepsin-mediated laryngeal damage in vivo.

METHODS

Drug and pepsin binding and inhibition were screened by high-throughput assays and crystallography. A mouse model of laryngopharyngeal reflux (mechanical laryngeal injury once weekly for 2 weeks and pH 7 solvent/pepsin instillation 3 days/week for 4 weeks) was provided inhibitor by gavage or aerosol (fosamprenavir or darunavir; 5 days/week for 4 weeks; n = 3). Larynges were collected for histopathologic analysis.

RESULTS

HIV protease inhibitors amprenavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and darunavir bound and inhibited pepsin with IC50 in the low micromolar range. Gavage and aerosol fosamprenavir prevented pepsin-mediated laryngeal damage (i.e., reactive epithelia, increased intraepithelial inflammatory cells, and cell apoptosis). Darunavir gavage elicited mild reactivity and no discernable protection; aerosol protected against apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosamprenavir and darunavir, FDA-approved therapies for HIV/AIDS, bind and inhibit pepsin, abrogating pepsin-mediated laryngeal damage in a laryngopharyngeal reflux mouse model. These drugs target a foreign virus, making them ideal to repurpose. Reformulation for local inhaled delivery could further improve outcomes and limit side effects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA. Laryngoscope, 133:S1-S11, 2023.

Laryngeal and Esophageal Mucosal Protection Using the Angico Gum Biopolymer in a Mouse Model of Reflux

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo protective effect of the angico gum biopolymer in reducing the inflammatory response and preserving the integrity of the laryngeal and esophageal mucosa.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal study.

METHODS

A murine surgical model of gastroesophageal reflux disease was accomplished and subsequently treated with angico gum or omeprazole. On days 3 and 7 post surgery, samples of the larynx and esophagus, respectively, were collected to measure the level of inflammation (wet weight and myeloperoxidase activity) and mucosal integrity (transepithelial electrical resistance and mucosal permeability to fluorescein).

RESULTS

Angico gum and omeprazole decreased laryngeal inflammation (wet weight and myeloperoxidase activity) and dramatically improved the integrity of the laryngeal mucosa. It also reduced inflammation (decreased wet weight and myeloperoxidase activity) of the esophagus and preserved the barrier function (inferred by assessing the integrity of the mucosa).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the protective effect of angico gum in an experimental gastroesophageal reflux disease model. Angico gum attenuates inflammation and impairment of the mucosal barrier function not only in the larynx but also in the esophagus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 133:162-168, 2023.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Can Mutually Influence

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the mutually relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHODS

All included patients completed simultaneous 24-hour hypopharyngeal intraluminal multichannel impedance pH monitoring (24h-MII-pH), Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). The LPRD diagnosis was based on the occurrence of ≥1 acid or non-acid hypopharyngeal proximal reflux episode(HRE), GERD was defined as a length of time >4.0% of the 24-hour recording spent below pH 4.0 or a DeMeester score >14.72. Patients with both positive LPRD and GERD were classified as LPRD & GERD group, patients with positive LPRD and negative GERD were classified as ILPRD group, patients with negative LPRD and positive GERD were classified as IGERD group, and patients with both negative LPRD and GERD were classified as N group. The differences in clinical characteristics of reflux between the groups were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 437 patients were included, including 248 (56.75%) in the ILPRD group, 98 (22.43%) in the LPRD & GERD group, 23 (5.26%) in the IGERD group, and 68 (15.56%) in the N group. There was no significant difference between the types of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with GERD. The number of weak acid/acid/gas/liquid HREs was significantly more in LPRD & GERD patients than in ILPRD patients (P < 0.01), and the number of distal acid reflux events and Longest distal acid clearance time were significantly higher in LPRD & GERD patients than in IGERD patients (P > 0.01).

CONCLUSION

GERD and LPRD are not the same disease but can mutually influence. Combined GERD increased all types of laryngopharyngeal reflux events in patients with LPRD, whereas combined LPRD only increased acidic distal reflux events and acid clearance time in patients with GERD.

Is Adjunctive Alginate Therapy Beneficial in the Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in a Rural Indian Population? A Prospective Randomized Study

To assess the benefit of adjunctive alginate therapy in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) in a rural population in south India, by comparing the outcome of alginate plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy versus PPI monotherapy. 100 consenting adults of both sexes, with LPRD symptoms for ≥ 1 month, with both Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) > 13 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) > 7, were included in a randomised prospective analytical clinical study. Patients were randomised into two treatment groups for 8 weeks. Group A received oral pantoprazole (40 mg, twice a day),and Group B received oral pantoprazole (40 mg) and oral alginate (500 mg/10 ml) twice a day each. Treatment outcome was assessed with RSI and RFS at 4 and 8 weeks. On follow-ups, both groups showed significant improvement in RSI. At 4 weeks, significant improvement in RFS was seen in Group B, but not in Group A; both groups showed improvement at 8 weeks. The improvement was significantly better in Group B RSI and RFS on both follow ups. On analysis of each RSI item at 8 weeks, choking sensation showed no significant improvement in Group A. All other items showed significant improvement in both groups, with all items except difficulty swallowing and choking sensation showing significantly better improvement in Group B. Analysis of each RFS item at 8 weeks, showed significant improvement in Group B but not in Group A. The addition of alginate to PPI shows greater definitive improvement in both symptoms and signs of LPRD within a short period of 8 weeks, compared to PPI monotherapy, making it a feasible treatment option with good results in routine practice in a rural set-up. Adjunctive alginate therapy enhances the resolution of clinical features of LPRD and is thus beneficial in its routine treatment in all populations.

Ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations and complications of reflux

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease describes the backflow of acidic stomach content towards the larynx and is associated with symptoms such as cough, throat clearing and globus. It is a common presentation in primary care and the sequelae of symptoms that arise from the disease often present in ear, nose and throat clinics. Assessment and examination of patients presenting with reflux symptoms includes questionnaires, as well as direct visualisation of the pharynx and larynx, and takes a multidisciplinary team approach. Treatment options include lifestyle modification, medical therapy and in some specialist centres, surgical management to address the multitude of symptoms associated with the disease.

Utility of reflux finding score and reflux symptom index in diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease

Objective

The study aimed to determine the utility of reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Methods

A prospective hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a private hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21. Relationship between independent and dependent variables was established using chi-square test, a variable with p-value of equal or less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

In this study, a total of 2500 patients were recruited, out of which 800 (32.0%) were males and 1700 (68.0%) were female. Out of the 2500, 1520 (60.8%) patients were found to have a RSI of >13. Out of the 1520 patients subjected to 70-degree laryngoscopy, 1425 patients (95.0%) were found to have a RFS > 7. Of the 1425 patients with RFS > 7, 260 were males (18.2%) and 1165 were females (81.8%).

Conclusion

RFS and RSI have demonstrated their role in establishing the diagnosis of LPRD.

Level of Evidence

4.

How to Understand and Treat Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is frustrating, as symptoms are nonspecific and diagnosis is often unclear. Two main approaches to diagnosis are empiric treatment trials and objective reflux testing. Initial empiric trial of Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) twice daily for 2-3 months is convenient, but risks overtreatment and delayed diagnosis if patient complaints are not from LPR. Dietary modifications, H2-antagonists, alginates, and fundoplication are other possible LPR treatments. If objective diagnosis is desired or patients' symptoms are refractory to empiric treatment, pH testing with/without impedance should be considered. Additionally, evaluation for non-reflux etiologies of complaints should be performed, including laryngoscopy or videostroboscopy.

Swallowing and laryngeal complications in lung and heart transplantation: Etiologies and diagnosis

Despite continued surgical advancements in the field of cardiothoracic transplantation, post-operative complications remain a burden for the patient and the multidisciplinary team. Lesser-known complications including swallowing disorders (dysphagia), and voice disorders (dysphonia), are now being reported. Such disorders are known to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in other medical populations, however their etiology amongst the heart and lung transplant populations has received little attention in the literature. This paper explores the potential mechanisms of oropharyngeal dysphagia and dysphonia following transplantation and discusses optimal modalities of diagnostic evaluation and management. A greater understanding of the implications of swallowing and laryngeal dysfunction in the heart and lung transplant populations is important to expedite early diagnosis and management in order to optimize patient outcomes, minimize allograft injury and improve quality of life.

Esophageal Pressure and Clinical Assessments in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) might be associated with reflux symptoms, and its severity is correlated with the Reflux Symptoms Index. Diagnosis is often challenging because of a lack of accurate diagnostic tools. Although an association between LPRD and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) exists, the extent to which esophageal pressure changes in patients with LPRD with GERD has been unknown. Therefore, this study surveys the clinical assessments and extent of esophageal pressure changes in LRPD patients with various GERD severities, and compares esophageal sphincter pressures between ages, genders, and body mass index (BMI). This observational study assessed patients with LPRD and GERD. High-resolution esophageal manometry was used to gather data pertaining to the area pressure on the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and the correlation between such pressure and symptom severity was determined. We compared the esophageal pressure of different UES and LES levels in the following categories: gender, age, BMI, and GERD severity. We analyzed correlations between esophageal pressure and clinical assessments among 90 patients with throat globus with laryngitis with LPRD. LPRD was measured using laryngoscopy, and GERD was measured using esophagoscopy and 24 h PH monitoring. There were no significant differences in the clinical assessments among the four grades of GERD. The LPRD patients with serious GERD had a lower UES and LES pressure. The lowest pressure and longer duration of LES and UES were also observed among patients with LPRD of grade D GERD. No significant differences in UES and LES pressures among ages, genders, or BMIs were noted.

Chronic Course, Weaning, and Awareness of Patients With Reflux Toward Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of middle-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) weaning in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and evaluate patient awareness of PPI adverse events.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 100 LPR patients treated with an association of diet, PPIs, and alginate. Patients were followed from September 2016 to May 2020. At the end of the initial 3-to-6 months therapeutic period, LPR patients were weaned from PPIs and instructed to respect diet and stress management over the long-term. The 3-year symptom recurrence rate, PPI use, and patient awareness of PPI adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients completed the evaluation. Twenty-seven patients (40.3%) reported a chronic course of LPR-symptoms, requiring chronic or occasional PPI use. LPR symptom recurrence occurred 1-to-2 or 3-to-5 times yearly in 8.9% and 20.9% of patients, respectively. Recurrences were managed by short-term diet, alginate, or PPI intake. The remaining patients (29.9%) did not report middle-term LPR recurrence. The 3-year weaning rate of occasional or chronic use of PPIs was 64.2%. Among participants, 26.8% were aware of PPI-related adverse events, most frequently through physicians (33%), online sources (17%), and friends or family (17%). Nonresponder patients were significantly more aware of PPI adverse events than responders (P = 0.029). PPI-attributed adverse events occurred in 29.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Sixty-four percent of LPR patients treated with PPIs were weaned at 3-year posttreatment time. Different forms of LPR may exist regarding symptom relief, recurrences, and chronic course.

The Effects of Caffeine on Voice: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Caffeine is considered a dehydrating agent due to its diuretic effects and influences the body's fluid balance. The relationship between voice and hydration has been widely investigated and it is accepted that inadequate hydration has detrimental effects on phonation. Since dehydration negatively affects the vocal folds and caffeine is considered a dehydrating agent, it can be hypothesized that voice might be negatively affected by caffeine intake. This systematic review aims to summarize and appraise the available evidence regarding the effects of caffeine on voice.

METHODS

Randomized and non-randomized experimental studies of healthy participants were retrieved following an electronic searching of six databases in June 2020. No publication, language or date restrictions were applied. Data extraction of relevant data and risk of bias assessment was conducted independently by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Five non-randomized experimental studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. The format of the administered interventions in the included studies was either liquid (coffee) or solid (caffeine tablets). Reported outcome measures used to examine the effects of caffeine on phonation consisted of acoustic, aerodynamic and (auditory & self-) perceptual. No measures were adversely affected by caffeine consumption.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians commonly advise patients to refrain from caffeine, as caffeine intake increases diuresis with subsequent effects on fluid balance. Such imbalances can potentially induce dehydration which can be detrimental to phonation. This notion cannot be supported empirically, as the evidence is deemed unreliable and no firm conclusions can be elicited to guide clinical practice. The results of this review demonstrate the lack of research in the field and the necessity for future investigations in order to inform evidence-based practice through reliable and valid outcomes.

Manifestations of ENT Caused By Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Introduction. The presence of gastric reflux in the pharynx and larynx causes reflux laryngopharyngitis. The incidence of laryngopharyngeal reflux has increased dramatically in recent years, but with the introduction of flexible fiber optic esophagoscopy, evidence-based research on gastroesophageal reflux disease has evolved greatly. Laryngoscopy is the main investigation to be performed to establish the diagnosis of reflux.

Material and methods. This study is both retrospective and prospective, the first being performed on a group of 175 patients, who presented in the ENT outpatient clinic, within the County Emergency Clinical Hospital “St. Andrew the Apostle” Constanta.

The aim of this paper is to evaluate and compare the manifestations of ENT caused by reflux disease but also to establish the correct therapeutic conduct.

The Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Based on pH Monitoring

OBJECTIVES

Many studies on the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) were based on symptoms, but there are few research on it using reflux monitoring. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between GERD and LPR based on pH monitoring.

METHODS

All patients were scheduled for esophageal manometry and pH monitoring sequentially. They were stratified into 4 groups as no reflux disease, isolated GERD, isolated LPR (iLPR), and GERD combined with LPR (GERD&LPR) according to pH monitoring.

RESULTS

The incidence of LPR in GERD was 46.3%, while the probability of combining GERD in LPR was 52.7%. The reflux profile in the laryngopharynx showed a significant difference in the total reflux time (17.82 ± 18.4 vs 9.62 ± 9.58, P = .023) and the percentage of total reflux time (1.31% ± 1.37% vs 0.71% ± .0.73%, P = .023) between the GERD&LPR and iLPR groups.

CONCLUSION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux can be combined with GERD or it can exist as an independent diagnosis. In patients with GERD&LPR, the total reflux time and the percentage of reflux time in the laryngopharynx are higher than those in the iLPR group. Reflux episodes in the laryngopharynx of patients with GERD&LPR may be derived from GERD.

Hiatal hernia repair and magnetic sphincter augmentation to treat laryngopharyngeal reflux aiding the prevention of recurrent laryngeal cancer

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a difficult disease to treat and can result in mucosal injury in the pharynx and larynx. This typically results in symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, and globus sensation, but the manifestation of cancer is a possibility. We present a patient with a squamous cell cancer of the larynx who was diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and found to have LPR. The cancer was treated locally and GERD was eradicated with magnetic sphincter augmentation. After 15 months of follow-up, there was no residual cancer. This case highlights the role that untreated LPR may play in patients' risk of developing laryngeal cancer.

Performing Arts Medicine

Performing artists are a unique subset of athletes. With the highly repetitive nature of performance training, emphasis on proper technique, ergonomics, and preventive cross-training is vital, as many injuries are due to overuse or poor technique. There are novel medical concerns in performers, including ENT problems, mental health concerns and substance use risks. While music is central to performances, it is also a treatment modality to address cognitive, sensory, and motor dysfunctions in certain neurological conditions. Due to this wide array of issues, it is imperative to understand the specific needs and risks of performers to provide optimal medical care.

Predictors of reflux aspiration and laryngo-pharyngeal reflux

BACKGROUND

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) can present with typical or atypical or laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms. Pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate is one of the most serious variants of reflux disease as its complications are difficult to diagnose and treat. The aim of this study was to establish predictors of pulmonary aspiration and LPR symptoms.

METHODS

Records of 361 consecutive patient from a prospectively populated database were analyzed. Patients were categorized by symptom profile as predominantly LPR or GERD (98 GER and 263 LPR). Presenting symptom profile, pH studies, esophageal manometry and scintigraphy and the relationships were analyzed.

RESULTS

Severe esophageal dysmotility was significantly more common in the LPR group (p = 0.037). Severe esophageal dysmotility was strongly associated with isotope aspiration in all patients (p = 0.001). Pulmonary aspiration on scintigraphy was present in 24% of patients. Significant correlation was established between total proximal acid on 24-h pH monitoring and isotope aspiration in both groups (p < 0.01). Rising pharyngeal curves on scintigraphy were the strongest predictors of isotope aspiration (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe esophageal dysmotility correlates with LPR symptoms and reflux aspiration in LPR and GERD. Abnormal proximal acid score on 24-h pH monitoring associated with pulmonary aspiration in reflux patients. Pharyngeal contamination on scintigraphy was the strongest predictor of pulmonary aspiration.

Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Scale: Psychometric Properties using Optimal Scaling Techniques

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the psychometric properties of the reflux symptom index (RSI) as short screening approach for the diagnostic of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with confirmed diagnosed regarding the 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH).

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2018, 56 patients with LPR symptoms and 71 healthy individuals (control group) were prospectively enrolled. The LPR diagnosis was confirmed through MII-pH results. All subjects (n = 127) fulfilled RSI and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) was performed through flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. The sensitivity and the specificity of RSI was assessed by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 15 LPR patients (26.8%) of the clinical group met MII-pH diagnostic criteria. Among subjects classified as positive for MII- pH diagnoses, RSI and RFS mean scores were respectively 20 (SD ± 10.5) and 7.1 (SD ± 2.5), values not significantly different compared to the negative MII-pH group. The metric analysis of the items led to the realization of a binary recoding of the score. Both versions had similar psychometric properties, α was 0.840 for RSI original version and 0.836 for RSI binary version. High and comparable area under curve (AUC) values indicate a good ability of both scales to discriminate between individuals with and without LPR pathology diagnosis. Based on balanced sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cut-off scores for LPR pathology were ≥ 5 for RSI binary version and ≥ 15 for RSI original version. Both version overestimated LPR prevalence. The original version had more sensitivity and the RSI Binary version had more specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

It would be necessary to think about modifying the original RSI in order to improve its sensitivity and specificity (RSI binary version, adding or changing some items), or to introduce new scores in order to better frame the probably affected of LPR patient.

Proximal reflux: biochemical mediators, markers, therapeutic targets, and clinical correlations

Airway reflux is implicated in the pathophysiology of a wide range of adult and pediatric upper and lower airway diseases. However, the diagnosis of proximal reflux-associated disease remains challenging due to evolving clinical criteria and institutional and regional variances in diagnostic practices. Evidence suggests that nonacidic contents of reflux may serve as both pathologic mediators of and biomarkers for reflux in the upper airway. Furthermore, they offer potential pharmaceutical and surgical intervention targets and are the focus of novel clinical diagnostic tools currently under investigation.

The Relation Between Eating Disorders and Voice Disorders

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine the relation between specific eating disorder diagnoses/purging behaviors and voice disorders.

METHOD

One hundred-nine participants with eating disorders completed a survey inquiring about eating disorder symptoms, purging behaviors, and voice disorder symptoms. Participants also completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, Voice Handicap Index, and the Reflux Symptom Index.

RESULTS

The prevalence of voice disorders among the group with eating disorders was 21.88%. Of those with both eating disorders and voice disorders, anorexia nervosa appeared to be more prevalent in this group than bulimia nervosa. In addition, purging behaviors of exercise presented with a higher prevalence of voice problems than vomiting.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with eating disorders seem to be at a higher risk for voice disorders than the general population. Anorexia nervosa and exercise as a purging method were identified as the highest risk factors for voice disorders.

Gastroesophageal reflux in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients: Clinical features and therapeutic response

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical features and the therapeutic response of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients with or without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Patients with LPR symptoms were enrolled from three European Hospitals. The diagnosis of LPR and GERD was made through impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH). A gastrointestinal endoscopy was realized in patients with digestive complaints or ≥60 years old. The 3- to 6-month treatment was based on the association of diet, pantoprazole, alginate, and magaldrate regarding the MII-pH characteristics. Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA) were used to evaluate the clinical evolution throughout treatment. The gastrointestinal endoscopy findings, clinical features, and therapeutic response were compared between patients with LPR and GERD (LPR/GERD) and patients with LPR.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven LPR patients were included, 54 being LPR/GERD. LPR/GERD patients had a higher number of proximal reflux episodes compared with LPR patients. The prevalence of esophagitis, hernia hiatal, and lower esophageal sphincter insufficiency did not differ between groups. The presence of GERD was strongly associated with acid LPR. Patients without GERD had a higher proportion of nonacid and mixed LPR compared with LPR/GERD patients. The pre- to posttreatment evolutions of RSS and RSA were quite similar in both groups, with the exception of the 3- to 6-month improvement of digestive symptoms, which was better in LPR/GERD group. The therapeutic success rates were 79.6% and 77.2% in GERD/LPR and LPR group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

GERD is predictive of acid LPR. The clinical evolution and the therapeutic response rates were quite similar in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130: E479-E489, 2020.

Clinical and psychological characteristics in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients overlapping with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) defined as reflux of gastric content reaching above the upper esophageal sphincter is frequently found in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to investigate clinical and psychological differences between GERD patients with or without LPR symptoms.

METHODS

This study enrolled 303 consecutive patients with proton pump inhibitor treatment-naïve scheduled for upper endoscopy because of troublesome reflux symptoms and recognized as GERD by non-dyspepsia reflux disease questionnaire score. Included GERD patients were further categorized into two study groups: with or without LPR by reflux symptoms index score. All participants were also evaluated with questionnaires for depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances.

RESULTS

There were 132 (43.6%) GERD patients with LPR symptoms and 171 (56.4%) GERD patients without LPR symptoms. GERD patients with LPR symptoms had more depression (P < 0.001), sleep disturbance (P = 0.002), irritable bowel syndrome (P = 0.008), functional dyspepsia (P = 0.005), and reflux symptoms burden (P < 0.001) than those without LPR symptoms. Erosive esophagitis was more in patients without LPR symptoms (P = 0.03). GERD patients with LPR symptoms (28.8%) had more complex psychological distress than those without LPR symptoms (28.8% vs 14%, P < 0.001). Reflux symptoms burden, sleep disturbance, and erosive esophagitis were independently associated with GERD overlapping with LPR symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with LPR symptoms appear to have more reflux symptoms, psychological distress, and functional gastrointestinal disturbance but less erosive esophagitis. This work suggests that therapeutic strategy with tailored multidimensional approach is promising for GERD patients overlapping with LPR symptoms.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease - LPRD

INTRODUCTION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) referes to an inflammatory reaction of the mucous membrane of pharynx, larynx and other associated respiratory organs, caused by a reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus. LPRD is considered to be a relatively new clinical entity with a vast number of clinical manifestations which are treated through different fields of medicine, often without a proper diagnosis. In gastroenterology it is still considered to be a manifestation of GERD, which stands for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients suffering from LPRD communicate firstly with their primary physicians, and since further treatment might ask for a multidisciplinary approach, it is important to have a unified approach among experts when treating these patients.

GOAL

This paper is written with the intention to assess the frequency of symptoms of LPR in family medicine, possible diagnostics and adequate treatment in primary health care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective, descriptive cohort study. Authors used "The Reflux Symptom Index" (RSI) questionnaire. Examinees were all patients who reported to their family medicine office in Gracanica for the first time with new symptoms during a period of one year. Patients with positive results for LPR (over 13 points) were treated in accordance with the suggested algorithm and were monitored during the next year.

RESULTS

Out of 2123 examinees who showed symptoms of LPR, 390 tested positive according to the questionnaire. This group of examinees were treated in accordance with all suggested protocols and algorithms. 82% showed signs of improvement as a response to basic treatment provided by their physicians.

CONCLUSION

Almost every fifth patient who reports to their family medicine physician shows symptoms of LPR. On primary health care levels it is possible to establish some form of prevention, diagnostics and therapy for LPR in accordance with suggested algorithms. Only a small number of patients requires procedures which fall under other clinical fields.

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms among Italian university students: epidemiology and dietary correlates using automatically recorded transactions

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders worldwide, with relevant impact on the quality of life and health care costs.The aim of our study is to assess the prevalence of GERD based on self-reported symptoms among university students in central Italy. The secondary aim is to evaluate lifestyle correlates, particularly eating habits, in GERD students using automatically recorded transactions through cashiers at university canteen.

METHODS

A web-survey was created and launched through an app, ad-hoc developed for an interactive exchange of information with students, including anthropometric data and lifestyle habits. Moreover, the web-survey allowed users a self-diagnosis of GERD through a simple questionnaire. As regard eating habits, detailed collection of meals consumed, including number and type of dishes, were automatically recorded through cashiers at the university canteen equipped with an automatic registration system.

RESULTS

We collected 3012 questionnaires. A total of 792 students (26.2% of the respondents) reported typical GERD symptoms occurring at least weekly. Female sex was more prevalent than male sex. In the set of students with GERD, the percentage of smokers was higher, and our results showed that when BMI tends to higher values the percentage of students with GERD tends to increase. When evaluating correlates with diet, we found, among all users, a lower frequency of legumes choice in GERD students and, among frequent users, a lower frequency of choice of pasta and rice in GERD students.

DISCUSSION

The results of our study are in line with the values reported in the literature. Nowadays, GERD is a common problem in our communities, and can potentially lead to serious medical complications; the economic burden involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the disease has a relevant impact on healthcare costs.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the prevalence of typical GERD-related symptoms in a young population of University students in Italy. Considering the young age of enrolled subjects, our prevalence rate, relatively high compared to the usual estimates, could represent a further negative factor for the future economic sustainability of the healthcare system.

Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux and Aspiration: Does Laparoscopic Fundoplication Significantly Decrease Pulmonary Aspiration?

PURPOSE

Pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate is one of the indications for anti-reflux surgery. Effectiveness of surgery in preventing pulmonary aspiration post-operatively has not been previously tested. The aim of this project is to assess effectiveness of anti-reflux surgery on preventing pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively populated database of patients with confirmed aspiration of gastric refluxate on scintigraphy. Patients that have undergone anti-reflux surgery between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2015 and had scintigraphy post-operatively were included. Objective data such as resolution of aspiration, degree of proximal aero-digestive contamination, surgical complications and oesophageal dysmotility as well as patient quality of life data were analysed.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were satisfied by 39 patients (11 male and 28 female). Pulmonary aspiration was prevented in 24 out of 39 patients (61.5%) post-operatively. Significant reduction of isotope contamination of upper oesophagus supine and upright (p = 0.002) and pharynx supine and upright (p = 0.027) was confirmed on scintigraphy post-operatively. Severe oesophageal dysmotility was strongly associated with continued aspiration post-operatively OR 15.3 (95% CI 2.459-95.194; p = 0.02). Majority (24/31, 77%) of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with surgery, whilst 7/31 (23%) were dissatisfied. Pre-operative GIQLI scores were low (mean 89.77, SD 20.5), modest improvements at 6 months (mean 98.4, SD 21.97) and deterioration at 12 months (mean 88.41, SD 28.07) were not significant (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Surgery is partially effective in reversing pulmonary aspiration of gastric refluxate on short-term follow-up. Severe oesophageal dysmotility is a predictor of inferior control of aspiration with surgery.

Pepsin: biomarker, mediator, and therapeutic target for reflux and aspiration

Extra-esophageal reflux is suspected to cause a wide range of clinical symptoms in the upper airways. Diagnosis and treatment has focused on acid, but realization of the role of nonacid reflux has resulted in research investigating the use of pepsin as a biomarker for gastric reflux and aspiration. Pepsin analysis can complement the use of questionnaires and office-based diagnosis and lessen the dependency on invasive and expensive diagnostic tests. Furthermore, pepsin as a first-line diagnostic biomarker has been shown to improve the accuracy of reflux diagnosis. In addition to its use as a diagnostic biomarker, pepsin has been shown to cause inflammation independent of the pH of the refluxate and thus despite acid suppression therapy. Research is ongoing to develop new therapies for airway reflux that specifically target pepsin.

Vegetal and Animal Food Proteins Have a Different Impact in the First Postprandial Hour of Impedance-pH Analysis in Patients with Heartburn

Background and Aims

By means of 24 h impedance-pH monitoring, we aimed to evaluate the effect of two different meals with a bromatological balanced composition: one with a prevailing component of animal proteins and the other with vegetable proteins.

Patients and Methods

We enrolled 165 patients with heartburn and negative endoscopy, who underwent impedance-pH monitoring off therapy. Patients were allocated to receive a Mediterranean diet with a total caloric intake of about 1694 kcal, divided into two meals: one with a prevailing component of animal proteins and the other with vegetable proteins. We evaluated the total reflux number, acid exposure time (AET), and symptom-reflux association with impedance-pH analysis. Moreover, during the first postprandial hour (at lunch and dinner), we evaluated the total reflux number, number of acid and weakly acidic refluxes, AET, and presence of symptoms.

Results

The male/female ratio was 80/85. Mean age was 51.9 ± 12.1 years. Impedance-pH analysis showed that 55/165 patients had pathological AET or a number of refluxes (nonerosive reflux disease (NERD)), 49/165 had normal AET and a number of refluxes but positive symptom-reflux association (hypersensitive esophagus (HE)), and 61/165 had normal AET and a number of refluxes with negative symptom-reflux association (functional heartburn (FH)). The overall first postprandial hour analysis showed a higher total reflux number, acid reflux number, and AET after the animal protein meal than after the vegetable protein meal. Moreover, more symptoms were reported after the animal protein meal. Similar results have been observed in the three different subcategories of patients (NERD, HE, and FH).

Conclusions

Vegetable proteins are associated with a lower number of refluxes, particularly acid refluxes, and with a reduced number of symptoms during the first postprandial hour. This is a pilot study and future investigations are warranted to confirm these results.

Reflux Finding Score (RFS) a Quantitative Guide for Diagnosis and Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

The study was under taken to know the prevalence of reflux signs in an individuals with throat complaints on the basis of reflux finding score (RFS) and quantitatively assess the effect of treatment. A cross-sectional study was done to evaluate the presence of laryngo-pharyngeal reflux signs in patients visiting ENT clinic with throat or voice problems in central India. There were 80 patients included in the study from 2017 to 2018 individuals. They were questioned regarding their symptoms. Their pharyngeal findings on rigid 70° laryngoscopy were viewed and RFS was made. The patients were reviewed at monthly intervals. Laryngopharyngeal reflux changes were seen in 36 of the 80 patients (45%). The reflux was graded as per the reflux finding score. The score ranged from 7 to maximum of 17 out of 26 in the patients with LPRD. Majority of the patients the score decreased with lifestyle changes and pantaprazole twice daily. There was poor response in 5% (4) patients, who were then advised to undergo upper gastro intestinal endoscopy for further assessment. Laryngopharyngeal reflux has become a very common entity in urban lifestyle. On careful examination the signs can be picked and assessed with the RFS, which is a very useful tool to grade and reassess patient on subsequent follow up.

High-resolution manometry in patients with and without globus pharyngeus and/or symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux

Background

Globus pharyngeus is common and has a low cure rate. Its etiology is complex and reported to be associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, some patients with globus do not exhibit any reflux symptoms or respond to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatments. The purpose of this study was to clarify the related risk factors of these patients with a final objective of improving the curative effect.

Methods

Forty two patients afflicted with globus pharyngeus (G group) and 38 patients without globus pharyngeus (NG group) were included in this study. According to the laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptom Index and the response to PPIs treatments, the patients were further divided into reflux groups (G-R, NG-R) and non-reflux groups (G-NR, NG-NR). High Resolution Manometry (HRM) was performed to assess esophageal motility. Questionnaires, including categories such as life exposure factors, were conducted.

Results

a) The average resting and residual pressures of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in the G-NR group was higher than in the NG-NR and NG-R groups (P < 0.05). b) The average resting and residual pressures of the lower esophageal sphincter showed no differences between the G-NR group and the NG-NR group (P > 0.05). c) The esophageal distal contractile integral score of the G-NR group was not different from the NG-NR group (P > 0.05). d) Compared to the NG-NR group, the G-NR group showed higher incidence of stress, smoking, drinking, high salt and anxiety (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Globus pharyngeus without LPR may occur due to high UES pressure. Stress, smoking, alcoholic drinking, high salt and anxiety may be its risk factors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-017-0666-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A review of pharmacotherapy for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

INTRODUCTION

Medical therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is based on the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as first choice treatment. Despite their effectiveness, about 20-30% of patients report an inadequate response and alternative drugs are required. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of current pharmacotherapy for treating GERD by showing the results of PPIs, reflux inhibitors, antidepressants and mucosa protective medications. Expert opinion: Medical therapy of GERD does not definitely cure the disease, because even PPIs are not able to change the key factors responsible for it. However, they remain the mainstay of medical treatment, allowing us to alleviate symptoms, heal esophagitis and prevent complications in the majority of cases. Nevertheless, many patients do not respond, because acid does not play any pathogenetic role. Prokinetics and reflux inhibitors have the potential to control motor abnormalities, but the results of clinical trials are inconsistent. Antidepressant drugs are effective in specific subgroups of NERD patients with visceral hypersensitivity, but larger, controlled clinical studies are necessary. Protective drugs or medical devices have been recently adopted to reinforce mucosal resistance and preliminary trials have confirmed their efficacy either combined with or as add-on medication to PPIs in refractory patients.

Vonoprazan fumarate for the management of acid-related diseases

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) display a number of limitations and unmet clinical needs that have prompted the development of novel drugs to improve the outcomes of acid-related diseases, including the eradication of H. pylori. In this context, a new synthesized potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), vonoprazan, showed higher suppression of gastric acid secretion. Areas covered: This review discusses the current knowledge regarding the efficacy of vonoprazan in the treatment of acid-related diseases, with a particular focus on its use in Helicobacter pylori eradication. Expert opinion: Vonoprazan showed some advantages over PPIs in terms of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile: fast onset of action without requiring acid activation and specific administration timing, more potent and prolonged inhibition of acid secretion, including a better nighttime acid control, and a less antisecretory variability. Recent evidence suggests that vonoprazan can be preferred to PPIs as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis and eradication of Helicobacter pylori owing to its stronger antisecretory effect. Moreover, vonoprazan displays favorable safety and tolerability profiles, even though long-term studies on the effects of vonoprazan are required.

The Utility of the Reflux Symptom Index for Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in an Allergy Patient Population

BACKGROUND

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is associated with asthma, vocal cord dysfunction, cough, postnasal drainage, and throat irritation. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a clinical tool to predict the presence of LPR, but a threshold RSI score has never been validated for the diagnosis of LPR in an allergic patient population.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal threshold RSI score predictive of LPR in an allergy clinic population.

METHODS

The 9-question RSI questionnaire was administered to 84 patients in the Kaiser Permanente San Diego Allergy Department. The patient's allergist (who was blinded to the patient's RSI responses) was asked to determine whether the patient had symptoms consistent with LPR. Each subject's RSI score was then compared with a corresponding physician-based diagnosis. After determining the correlation between the subject's RSI score and physician-diagnosed LPR/supraesophageal reflux, a cutoff level above which LPR/supraesophageal reflux would be highly suspected was calculated on the basis of most optimal balance of sensitivity and specificity determined via a receiver-operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty of the 84 patients (36%) were diagnosed with LPR. The mean RSI score for the group without LPR was 18.3 ± 9.8 (out of 45 possible), while the LPR group's mean was 25.0 ± 8.3 (P < .01). The optimal RSI score cutoff was determined to be 19. An abbreviated questionnaire was also generated using 6 of the RSI questions found to be significantly different between patients with and without LPR.

CONCLUSIONS

An RSI score of 19 appears to represent the best threshold for predicting LPR in an allergy clinic patient population.

Voice disorder in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic disease characterized by progressive tissue damage. In recent decades, novel treatments have greatly extended the life span of SLE patients. This creates a high demand for identifying the overarching symptoms associated with SLE and developing therapies that improve their life quality under chronic care. We hypothesized that SLE patients would present dysphonic symptoms. Given that voice disorders can reduce life quality, identifying a potential SLE-related dysphonia could be relevant for the appraisal and management of this disease. We measured objective vocal parameters and perceived vocal quality with the GRBAS (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scale in SLE patients and compared them to matched healthy controls. SLE patients also filled a questionnaire reporting perceived vocal deficits. SLE patients had significantly lower vocal intensity and harmonics to noise ratio, as well as increased jitter and shimmer. All subjective parameters of the GRBAS scale were significantly abnormal in SLE patients. Additionally, the vast majority of SLE patients (29/36) reported at least one perceived vocal deficit, with the most prevalent deficits being vocal fatigue (19/36) and hoarseness (17/36). Self-reported voice deficits were highly correlated with altered GRBAS scores. Additionally, tissue damage scores in different organ systems correlated with dysphonic symptoms, suggesting that some features of SLE-related dysphonia are due to tissue damage. Our results show that a large fraction of SLE patients suffers from perceivable dysphonia and may benefit from voice therapy in order to improve quality of life.

The Role of Helicobacter pylori in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Objective The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori among patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. The secondary objective was determining if H pylori eradication leads to greater symptom improvement in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux as compared with standard proton pump inhibitor therapy alone. Data Sources EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, European Union Clinical Trials Register, Cochrane Library databases of clinical trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Review Methods A systematic review was performed of studies assessing the diagnosis or treatment of H pylori among patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series were included. A meta-analysis of prevalence data and assessment of heterogeneity was performed on relevant studies. Results Fourteen studies were analyzed in the review, with 13 eligible for the meta-analysis. We determined that the prevalence of H pylori among patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux was 43.9% (95% confidence interval, 32.1-56.5). The heterogeneity of studies was high, with an overall I² value of 92.3%. We were unable to quantitatively assess findings for our secondary outcome, since H pylori identification and treatment were not the primary focus of the majority of studies. Conclusion There is a high rate of H pylori infection among patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. The infection rate in North America and Western Europe has not been adequately studied. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation regarding the testing and treatment of H pylori infection among patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Adult and paediatric GERD: diagnosis, phenotypes and avoidance of excess treatments

Detailed investigations and objective measurements in patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux should be performed with the intent of making the correct diagnosis, thus enabling choice of appropriate therapy. Establishing the most effective therapy is particularly important in adults who do not respond to standard treatment and in children. The use of PPIs for suspected GERD has increased substantially over the past decade, providing great relief in patients with acid-related symptoms, but also leading to adverse effects and a considerable economic burden. Adults with functional heartburn do not benefit from PPIs, while prolonged PPI use in patients with extraoesophageal symptoms remains a controversial area. Moreover, PPIs are not indicated in infants with GERD unless symptoms are proven to be acid-related. With regard to antireflux surgery, patients must be carefully selected to avoid the need for ongoing PPI treatment postoperatively. Correct diagnosis and phenotyping of patients with symptoms attributed to gastro-oesophageal reflux through detailed investigations is therefore imperative, leading to improved patient outcomes and rationalized use of available treatment options. In this Review, we outline currently available diagnostic tests and discuss approaches to limit any unnecessary medical or surgical interventions.

Unmet needs in treating laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease: where do we go from here?

INTRODUCTION

Many patients experience ear, nose and throat symptoms associated with their gastroesophageal reflux disease. These symptoms are purportedly caused by reflux of gastroduodenal contents into the larynx, which leads to laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Various modalities are used to diagnose LPR, including ambulatory pH monitoring, laryngoscopy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy, as well as a few new emerging diagnostic tests. However, there are still no established diagnostic criteria or gold standard methodologies that can reliably distinguish LPR from other conditions.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will evaluate currently available diagnostic tests and therapeutic options for patients with laryngeal signs and symptoms of reflux and briefly discuss the development and emergence of new treatments. Numerous studies have investigated the role of proton pump inhibitor therapy in this patient population, but have led to disparate and often inconsistent results. Expert commentary: While a subgroup of patients with LPR appears to respond to PPI therapy, many patients show no symptomatic improvement, particularly with respect to extraesophageal symptoms. As such, there is a vital need to explore alternative treatment options, including anti-reflux surgery, lifestyle changes, and other classes of medications to better address LPR.