Antihyperglycemic therapy during colonoscopy preparation: A review and suggestions for practical recommendations

Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence demonstrates minimal impact of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) on reducing postoperative complications following elective colectomy. This study investigated the necessity of MBP prior to elective colonic resection.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted across PubMed, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing the effects of MBP with no preparation before elective colectomy, up until May 26, 2023. Surgical-related outcomes were compiled and subsequently analyzed. The primary outcomes included the incidence of anastomosis leakage (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI), analyzed using Review Manager Software (v 5.3).

RESULTS

The analysis included 14 studies, comprising seven RCTs with 5146 participants. Demographic information was consistent across groups. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of AL ((P = 0.43, OR = 1.16, 95% CI (0.80, 1.68), I2 = 0%) or SSI (P = 0.47, OR = 1.20, 95% CI (0.73, 1.96), I2 = 0%), nor were there significant differences in other outcomes. Subgroup analysis on oral antibiotic use showed no significant changes in results. However, in cases of right colectomy, the group without preparation showed a significantly lower incidence of SSI (P = 0.01, OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.31, 0.86), I2 = 1%). No significant differences were found in other subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence robustly indicates that MBP before elective colectomy does not confer significant benefits in reducing postoperative complications. Therefore, it is justified to forego MBP prior to elective colectomy, irrespective of tumor location.

Progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with Type I Diabetes

(1) Background: Little research is conducted on the link between diabetic kidney disease (DKD) progression and diabetic gastroenteropathy in type 1 diabetes (T1D). (2) Methods. We performed a cross-sectional study with 100 T1D patients; 27 of them had progressive DKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline ≥3 mL/min/year or increased albuminuria stage, over a mean follow-up time of 5.89 ± 1.73 years. A newly developed score with 17 questions on gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms was used. Faecal calprotectin was measured by ELISA. Lower GI endoscopies were performed in 21 patients. (3) Results: The gastrointestinal symptom score demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.78). Patients with progressive DKD had higher GI symptom scores compared to those with stable DKD (p = 0.019). The former group demonstrated more frequent bowel movement disorders (p < 0.01). The scores correlated negatively with eGFR (r = -0.335; p = 0.001), positively with albuminuria (r = 0.245; p = 0.015), Hba1c (r = 0.305; p = 0.002), and diabetes duration (r = 0.251; p = 0.012). Faecal calprotectin levels did not differ between DKD groups significantly. The most commonly reported histopathological findings of enteric mucosa were infiltration with eosinophils, lymphocytes, plasmacytes, the presence of lymphoid follicles, and lymphoid aggregates. Conclusion: The progression of DKD is positively correlated with gastrointestinal symptoms; however, more research is needed to clarify the causal relationships of the gut-kidney axis in T1D.

Visualization analysis of research on pre-colonoscopy bowel preparation

BACKGROUND

Bowel preparation is an essential step before colonoscopy, and its research topics are relatively scattered. Understanding the research status and development trend of bowel preparation is of great value for disease research and actual clinical work. However, there is currently a lack of research in this field in the form of bibliometrics.

AIM

To understand the research hotspots and development trends of bowel preparation during colonoscopy around the world.

METHODS

The literature about the topics of bowel preparation was retrieved from the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Web of Science core datasets from the inception of the database to September 10, 2022. CiteSpace 6.1. R3 was used to visually analyze the annual number of publications, countries, institutions, authors, keywords, clusters, and co-citation literature.

RESULTS

A total of 2340 Chinese and 2574 English publications were included, and the number of annual publications showed an increasing trend from year to year. The author with the largest number of publications worldwide was Hassan Cesare, and the most productive countries included USA, Korea, UK, Italy, and China. Meng Xiao-Fen, Zhang Yuan-Yuan, and Niu Mei-E were the China's most prolific authors. The First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, the General Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an University were the most prolific institutions. Research hotspots focused on the quality of bowel preparation, the design of bowel preparation programs, and special groups for bowel preparation.

CONCLUSION

Studies related to bowel preparation have certain foundations, and China's research can follow international hotspots, but cooperation among countries still needs to be strengthened. We should expand the research output related to bowel preparation based on a broader population and more suitable for the development of the era of big data, to provide higher quality research evidence for clinical practice.

Prediction of Hypoglycemia in Diabetic Patients During Colonoscopy Preparation

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical outcomes and establish a predictive model of hypoglycemia during colonoscopy preparation for diabetic patients.

METHODS

Three-hundred ninety-four patients with diabetes who received colonoscopy were retrospectively enrolled in this study and assigned to hypoglycemia or non-hypoglycemia groups. Information about clinical characteristics and outcomes during colonoscopy preparation was collected and compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the risk factors of hypoglycemia. These risk factors were used to construct a hypoglycemia predictive model verified by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness fit test.

RESULTS

Among 394 participants, 66 (16.8%) underwent a total of 88 hypoglycemia attacks during the bowel preparation. Grade 1 hypoglycemia (≤3.9 mmol/L) comprised 90.9% (80/88) of all hypoglycemia attacks and grade 2 hypoglycemia accounted for 9.1% (8/88), signifying that grade 1 hypoglycemia is the most common type. No severe hypoglycemia was identified. The incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was 15.9%. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the main risk factors of hypoglycemia during colonoscopy preparation were postprandial C-peptide, serum triglyceride, gender, type of diabetes mellitus, and insulin injection frequencies. The area under the ROC curve of the hypoglycemia prediction model was 0.777 (95% CI: 0.720-0.833).

CONCLUSION

Diabetic patients are prone to develop mild to moderate hypoglycemia during colonoscopy preparation. This study proposes a predictive model that could provide a reference for identifying patients with a high risk of hypoglycemia during colonoscopy preparation.

Peri-colonoscopy Implications of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor Therapy: A Mini-review of Available Evidence

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a class of oral glucose-lowering agents commonly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. With increased use, there has been an increase in the incidence of the rare but life-threatening complication of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. A common but underappreciated precipitant is colonoscopy. In this work, we outline the pathophysiology of the interaction between colonoscopy and SGLT2i use, the evidence regarding SGLT2i use in the periprocedural setting and Australian Diabetes Society guidelines.

Factors affecting the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in hard-to-prepare patients: Evidence from the literature

Adequate bowel cleansing is critical for a high-quality colonoscopy because it affects diagnostic accuracy and adenoma detection. Nevertheless, almost a quarter of procedures are still carried out with suboptimal preparation, resulting in longer procedure times, higher risk of complications, and higher likelihood of missing lesions. Current guidelines recommend high-volume or low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG)/non-PEG-based split-dose regimens. In patients who have had insufficient bowel cleansing, the colonoscopy should be repeated the same day or the next day with additional bowel cleansing as a salvage option. A strategy that includes a prolonged low-fiber diet, a split preparation regimen, and a colonoscopy within 5 h of the end of preparation may increase cleansing success rates in the elderly. Furthermore, even though no specific product is specifically recommended in the other cases for difficult-to-prepare patients, clinical evidence suggests that 1-L PEG plus ascorbic acid preparation are associated with higher cleansing success in hospitalized and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) should be prepared with isotonic high volume PEG solutions. Few data on cirrhotic patients are currently available, and no trials have been conducted in this population. An accurate characterization of procedural and patient variables may lead to a more personalized approach to bowel preparation, especially in patients undergoing resection of left colon lesions, where intestinal preparation has a poor outcome. The purpose of this review was to summarize the evidence on the risk factors influencing the quality of bowel cleansing in difficult-to-prepare patients, as well as strategies to improve colonoscopy preparation in these patients.

Associations of Colonoscopy and Risk of Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

Inpatients undergoing colonoscopy may be at increased risk of hypoglycemia. However, few high-quality studies have examined the relationship between hypoglycemia and colonoscopy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1016 patients from a large tertiary hospital were enrolled in this retrospective study. We collected demographic information, laboratory indices, colonoscopy information and hypoglycemia information from the enrolled patients during hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to estimate the adjusted odds ratios to determine the association between hypoglycemia and colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Hypoglycemia occurred in 80 of 788 (10.1%) patients without colonoscopy exposure and 37 of 228 (16.2%) patients with colonoscopy exposure. 25 patients (67.6%) had hypoglycemic events from 3 hours to 68 hours after the end of colonoscopy. Adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates, the risk of hypoglycemia was 1.99 times higher in those who underwent colonoscopy than in those who did not (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.25-3.19). The association was consistent in subgroups of females, the elderly, the overweight patients, patients with long duration of disease or patients with suboptimal glycemic control.

CONCLUSION

A strong association between colonoscopy and an increased risk of hypoglycemia is observed in patients with T2DM. When performing a colonoscopy for diabetics, the risk of hypoglycemia should be considered even within 68 hours after colonoscopy.

Preparing for Colonoscopy in People with Diabetes: A Review with Suggestions for Clinical Practice

People with diabetes have an increased risk of adverse events during the peri-colonoscopy period, including hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, diabetic ketoacidosis and acute kidney injury. This is secondary to inadequate dietary modification, the bowel preparation and antihyperglycemic agent modification. With the availability of many new diabetes agents, endoscopists need updated guidance. This review of current literature provides a practical approach to antihyperglycemic agent modification in the context of colonoscopy preparation, as well as guidelines on dietary changes, the bowel preparation itself and glucose monitoring.

[Bowel preparation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: Development of a procedure model]

BACKGROUND

Adequate bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy is the key factor for high quality preparation for colonoscopy. Inadequate preparation can result in prolonged procedure time, incomplete colonoscopy and an increased risk of procedural adverse events. Diabetes mellitus has been identified as a predictor of inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparation. Currently, standard recommendations for diabetes patients before colonoscopy are missing.

METHODS

This review is based on a selective literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar carried out in June 2021. Systematic reviews, guidelines, expert opinions, and recommendations from German and international societies were also considered.

RESULTS

The currently available preparations comprise two different groups: High-, medium- and low- volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) preparations and hyperosmotic agents. So far, a couple of reviews tried to identify outcome related differencies. Results are heterogeneous. In practise, preparation agents and timing of preparation as well as a thorough patient information before the preparation process are considered the most relevant items. In diabetes patients, preinterventional dietary recommendations are of paramount importance.

CONCLUSION

Split dosing of PEG preparations are recommended in diabetes patients with expected motility disorders. Extensive counseling about preparation intake and dietary recommendations should be offered.

Colonoscopy: an evidence-based approach

Colonoscopy is an invasive, endoscopic procedure undertaken to visualise the inner lumen of the colon and is used for a variety of diagnostic purposes. The procedure is increasingly performed by nurse endoscopists. This article provides an overview of the indications and contraindications for colonoscopy and describes various elements of the procedure, including consent, sedation and bowel preparation within the context of the evidence base. The article also discusses patient care before, during and after the procedure.

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Percutaneous Muscle Biopsies in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia is present in many chronic disease states including decompensated end stage liver disease (ESLD) and non-cirrhotic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Sarcopenia in ESLD can negatively impact quality of life and increase mortality. Despite this, very little is understood about the mechanisms of sarcopenia in these conditions. One key reason for this is the reluctance to undertake percutaneous muscle biopsies due to the perceived increased risks. ESLD can induce thrombocytopaenia and coagulopathy which significantly increases the risk of bleeding. In addition, patients with either NAFLD or ESLD often have co-morbidities that would require additional care and risk assessment. Thus, the aim of this study was to establish an effective and safe protocol for the implementation of percutaneous muscle biopsies in patients with NAFLD and ESLD.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients with ESLD and 9 patients with non-cirrhotic NAFLD were recruited from the Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Birmingham, United Kingdom). A total of 71 percutaneous vastus lateralis biopsies were attempted over two study visits. A vigorous safety screening occurred prior to and during each visit and a strict protocol was followed to mitigate against complications and risk.

RESULTS

A total of 85% of patients consented to the muscle biopsy at either visit (48/56). A total of 9% of consented biopsies could not occur due to medical considerations, including high international normalised ratio (INR) (n = 3) and the use of aspirin (n = 4). Muscle tissue was obtained from 90% of attempts, with a mean average yield (wet weight tissue) of 98.1 ± 52.9 mg.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous muscle biopsies are both feasible and yield sufficient tissue in an ESLD population. The procedure is effective for obtaining muscle tissue whilst also safe, with only one adverse event. This study provides evidence for the successful use of muscle biopsies in this population, even in consideration of disease specific complications, medications, and comorbidities.

Bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for poor bowel preparation in patients who undergo colonoscopy, because of their decreased intestinal transit and slow gastric emptying. This might lead to neoplastic or preneoplastic lesions being missed, longer procedural time, a higher risk of procedure-related adverse events, significant cost burden, patient dissatisfaction, and the need for a repeat colonoscopy. Multiple strategies have been suggested to improve bowel preparation in these patients. Proposed pharmacologic strategies include adding magnesium citrate, bisacodyl, lubiprostone or pyridostigmine. Non-pharmacologic strategies include preferential procedure scheduling or using a diabetes-specific preparation protocol. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the literature and provide specific recommendations to general practitioners and gastroenterologists for improving bowel preparation in patients with diabetes.