Complications Associated With Spine Surgery in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA) Multicenter Study

Trends in Spinal Orthosis Utilization Among Patients Insured Through Medicare Part B

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective population-based database analysis from the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Medicare/Medicaid Data Set.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive analysis of trends in spinal orthosis utilization over a 12-year period.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Widespread prescription of spinal orthosis persists, despite evidence suggesting equivocal efficacy in many spinal conditions. The utilization of spinal orthosis on a national level, including prescribing specialty data, has not been previously analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Health care common procedure coding system codes for cervical (CO), thoracic-lumbar-sacral (TLSO), lumbar (LO), lumbar-sacral (LSO), and cervical-thoracic-lumbar-sacral (CTLSO) orthosis were used to determine spinal orthosis utilization from 2010 to 2021. Provider specialty codes were utilized to compare trends between select specialties. In addition, a neurosurgical CO analysis based on subclassifications of cervical bracing was performed. Linear trendlines were implemented to elucidate and present trends by slope (β).

RESULTS

Among 332,241 claims, decreases in CO (β=-0.3387), TLSO (β=-0.0942), LO (β=-0.3485), and LSO (β=-0.1545) per 100,000 Medicare Part B enrollees and CTLSO (β=-0.052) per 1,000,000 Medicare Part B enrollees were observed. Decreases among neurosurgery (β=-7.9208), family medicine (β=-1.0097), emergency medicine (β=-2.1958), internal medicine (β=-1.1151), interventional pain management (β=-5.0945), and chiropractic medicine (β=-49.012), and increases among orthopedic surgery (β=5.5891), pain management (β=30.416), physical medicine and rehabilitation (β=4.6524), general practice (β=79.111), and osteopathic manipulative medicine (β=45.303) in total spinal orthosis use per 100,000 specialty claims were observed. Analysis of subclassifications of cervical orthosis among neurosurgeons revealed decreases in flexible (β=-1.7641), semirigid (β=-0.6157), and collar bracing (β=-2.7603), and an increase in multipost collar bracing (β=2.2032) per 100 neurosurgical cervical orthosis claims.

CONCLUSIONS

While utilization of spinal orthosis decreased between 2010 and 2021, increased utilization was observed among a subset of specialties. Identifying these specialties allows for focused research and educational efforts to minimize unnecessary durable medical equipment use for effective health care spending.

Intraoperative navigation in surgical management of traumatic spine injury: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic spinal injury (TSI) can lead to severe morbidity and significant health care resource utilization. Intraoperative navigation (ION) systems have been shown to improve outcomes in some populations. However, controversy about the benefit of ION remains. To our knowledge, there is no large database analysis studying the outcomes of ION on TSI patients. Here we hope to compare complications and outcomes in patients with TSI undergoing spinal fusion of 3 or more levels with or without the use of ION.

METHODS

The 2015-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for cases of posterior spinal instrumentation of 3 or more levels. This population was then selected for postoperative diagnosis consistent with TSI. The effect of prolonged operative time was analyzed for all patients. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to create ION case and non-ION control groups. Baseline demographic characteristics, complications, and outcome data were collected and compared between ION and non-ION groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1,034 patients were included in the propensity matched analysis. Among comorbidities, only obesity was significantly more likely in the non-ION group. There was no difference in case complexity between the two groups. ION was associated with higher incidence of prolonged operative time but was a negative independent predictor for sepsis. Prolonged operative time was a significant independent predictor for pulmonary embolism and requirement of transfusion in all patients. Discharge to home, readmission, and reoperation rates did not differ between TSI patients with or without ION.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ION during posterior spinal fusion of 3 or more levels in TSI patients is not associated with worse outcomes. Prolonged operative time, rather than ION, appears to have a higher influence on the rate of complications in this population. Evaluation of ION in the context of specific populations and pathology is warranted to optimize its use.

Predictors of Nonhome Discharge After Cervical Disc Replacement

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a national database.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the factors that increase the risk of nonhome discharge after CDR.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As spine surgeons continue to balance increasing surgical volume, identifying variables associated with patient discharge destination can help expedite postoperative placement and reduce unnecessary length of stay. However, no prior study has identified the variables predictive of nonhome patient discharge after cervical disc replacement (CDR).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent primary 1-level or 2-level CDR between 2011 and 2020. Multivariable Poisson regression with robust error variance was employed to identify the predictors for nonhome discharge destination following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 7276 patients were included in this study, of which 94 (1.3%) patients were discharged to a nonhome destination. Multivariable regression revealed older age (OR: 1.076, P <0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (OR: 4.222, P =0.001), BMI (OR: 1.062, P =0.001), ASA class ≥3 (OR: 2.562, P =0.002), length of hospital stay (OR: 1.289, P <0.001), and prolonged operation time (OR: 1.007, P <0.001) as predictors of nonhome discharge after CDR. Outpatient surgery setting was found to be protective against nonhome discharge after CDR (OR: 0.243, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, Hispanic ethnicity, BMI, ASA class, prolonged hospital stay, and prolonged operation time are independent predictors of nonhome discharge after CDR. Outpatient surgery setting is protective against nonhome discharge. These findings can be utilized to preoperatively risk stratify expected discharge destination, anticipate patient discharge needs postoperatively, and expedite discharge in these patients to reduce health care costs associated with prolonged length of hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The role of environmental and seasonal factors in spine deep surgical site infection: the air pollution, a factor that may be underestimated

BACKGROUND

Different strategies have been described in order to reduce spine deep surgical site infection (SSI); however, non-intervenable items such as environmental factors remain as one of the main concerns for spine surgeons.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was designed in order to evaluate the effect of environmental factors such as temperature, humidity and particularly the air pollution index (PM 2.5) on spine surgical site infection. The files of 3609 patients who underwent spinal surgery from April 2019 to March 2022 were reviewed, and 121 patients with spine SSI were detected.

RESULTS

There was no significant relationship between mean temperature and humidity of each month with infection and type of bacteria. However, there was a significant relation between warmer season periods and infection. The rate of infection among patients was 3.25% ranged from 2.5% to 4% in colder and warmer seasons accordingly. It was determined that air pollution had a significant relationship with the infection and the type of bacteria. (p value < 0.05, R-Squared = 0.249).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed a 60% increase in spine SSI during warmer seasons. There was a significant correlation between air pollution and the rate of infection. These may suggest the necessity to reduce the number of elective spine surgeries during warmer seasons and when the level of air pollutant is high.

Epidemiology of Cervical Fracture/Cervical Spinal Cord Injury and Changes in Surgical Treatment Modalities in Elderly Individuals During a 10-year Period: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate changes over a 10-years period in the profile of cervical spine and spinal cord injuries among the elderly in Japan.

METHODS

The current multicenter study was a retrospective analysis of inpatients aged ≥65 years, suffering cervical fracture (CF) and/or cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). We analyzed 1413 patients' epidemiology (from 2010 to 2019). Moreover, 727 patients who underwent surgical treatment were analyzed in 2 groups: the early (2010-2014) and late period (2015-2019).

RESULTS

Both the number of patients and number of surgical patients showed a significant increasing trend (P < .001), while the mean age, the distribution of injury levels and paralysis severity, and the proportion of surgical indications remained the same. The number of surgical patients doubled from 228 to 499 from the early to late periods. Posterior surgery was the most common approach (90.4%), instrumentation surgery with screws increased significantly, and the range of fusion was significantly longer in the late period (2.1 vs 2.7 levels, P = .001). Significantly worsening neurological symptoms were recorded in the late period (1.3% vs 5.8%, P = .006), with C5 palsy being the major one. Otherwise, perioperative, major, and other complications, including mortality, did not differ significantly in incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the number of elderly CF and/or CSCI patients and number of patients undergoing surgery increased dramatically over the decade without any change in profile. Instrumentation surgeries with screws increased, without an increase in systemic complications.

Comparative surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated posterior spinal fusions in ankylosing spondylitis patients

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients with acute spinal fractures represent a challenge for practicing spine surgeons due to difficult operative anatomy and susceptibility to complications.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does intraoperative CT-navigation improve outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing surgery?

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out at our centre from 05/2016-06/2021 to identify AS patients presenting with a traumatic spinal fracture, managed surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cohorts were categorised and compared for outcomes based on those who underwent PSF with intraoperative CT-navigation versus those surgically managed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

37 AS patients were identified. 29/37 (78.4%) underwent PSF. Intraoperative navigation was used in 14 (48.3%) cases. Mean age of the entire cohort was 67.6 years. No difference existed between the navigated and non-navigated groups for mean levels fused (5.35 vs 5.07; p ​= ​0.31), length of operation (217.9mins vs 175.3mins; p ​= ​0.07), overall length-of-stay (12 days vs 21.9 days; p ​= ​0.16), patients requiring HDU (3/14 vs 5/15; p ​= ​0.09) or ICU (5/14 vs 9/15; p ​= ​0.10), postoperative neurological improvement (1/14 vs 1/15; p ​= ​0.48) or deterioration (1/14 vs 0/15; p ​= ​0.15), intraoperative complications (2/14 vs 3/15; p ​= ​0.34), postoperative complications 4/14 vs 4/15; p ​= ​0.46), revision surgeries (3/14 vs 1/15; p ​= ​0.16) and 30-day mortality (0/14 vs 0/15).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that compares surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated PSFs for AS patients with an acute spinal fracture. Although limited by its retrospective design and sample size, this study highlights the non-inferiority of intraoperative navigation as a surgical aid in a challenging cohort.

A Comprehensive Prospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Adverse Events in Spinal Procedures Among Octogenarians: A Detailed Analysis From a German Tertiary Center

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

OBJECTIVES

Drawing from prospective data, this study delves into the frequency and nature of adverse events (AEs) following spinal surgery specifically in octogenarians, shedding light on the challenges and implications of treating this specific cohort as well as on risk factors for their occurrence.

METHODS

Octogenarians who received spinal surgery and were discharged between January 2019 and December 2022 were proactively included in our study. An AE was characterized as any incident transpiring within the initial 30 days after surgery that led to an unfavorable outcome.

RESULTS

From January 2020 to December 2022, 184 octogenarian patients (average age: 83.1 ± 2.8 years) underwent spinal surgeries. Of these, 81.5% were elective and 18.5% were emergencies, with 69.0% addressing degenerative pathologies. Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the mean score was 8.1 ± 2.2, highlighting cardiac diseases as predominant. Surgical details show 71.2% had decompression, with 28.8% receiving instrumentation. AEs included wound infections 3.1% for degenerative, 13.3% for tumor and dural leaks. The overall incidence of dural leaks was found to be 2.7% (5/184 cases), and each case underwent surgical revision. Pulmonary embolism resulted in two fatalities post-trauma. Wound infections (26.7%) were prevalent in infected spine cases. Significant AE risk factors were comorbidities, extended surgery durations, and instrumentation procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In octogenarian spinal surgeries, AEs occurred in 15.8% of cases, influenced by comorbidities and surgical complexities. The 2.2% mortality rate wasn't linked to surgeries. Accurate documentation remains crucial for assessing outcomes in this age group.

Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Awake surgery, under spinal anesthesia (SA), is an alternative to surgery under general anesthesia (GA), in neurological and spine surgery. In the literature, there seem to be some evidence supporting benefits associated with the use of this anesthetic modality, as compared to GA. Currently, there is a notable lack of updated and comprehensive review addressing the complications associated with both awake SA and GA in spine surgery. We hence aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the topic.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies that assessed SA in spine surgery from database inception to April 14, 2023, in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes of interest included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, operative time, and overall complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.

RESULTS

In total, 38 studies that assessed 7820 patients were included. The majority of the operations that were treated with SA were single-level lumbar cases. Awake patients had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay (Mean difference (MD): - 0.40 days; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.17) and operative time (MD: - 19.17 min; 95% CI - 29.68 to - 8.65) compared to patients under GA. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients under GA than SA (RR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.74]). Patients under GA had significantly higher rates of postoperative nausea/vomiting RR, 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.90]) and urinary retention (RR, 0.61 [95% CI 0.37-0.99]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing awake spine surgery under SA had significantly shorter operations and hospital stays, and fewer rates of postoperative nausea and urinary retention as compared to GA. In summary, awake spine surgery offers a valid alternative to GA and added benefits in terms of postsurgical complications, while being associated with relatively low morbidity.

Prospective insights into spinal surgery outcomes and adverse events: A comparative study between patients 65-79 years vs. ≥80 years from a German tertiary center

Introduction

In light of an aging global population, understanding adverse events (AEs) in surgeries for older adults is crucial for optimal outcomes and patient safety.

Research question

Our study compares surgical outcomes and AEs in patients aged 65-79 with those aged ≥80, focusing on clinical outcomes, morbidity and mortality rates, and age-related risk factors for AEs.

Material and methods

Our study, from January 2019 to December 2022, involved patients aged 65-79 and ≥ 80 undergoing spinal surgery. Each patient was evaluated for AEs post-discharge, defined as negative clinical outcomes within 30 days post-surgery. Patients were categorized based on primary spinal diagnoses: degenerative, oncological, traumatic, and infectious.

Results

We enrolled 546 patients aged 65-79 and 184 octogenarians. Degenerative diseases were most common in both groups, with higher infection and tumor rates in the younger cohort. Octogenarians had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and longer ICU/hospital stays. Surgery-related AE rates were 8.1% for 65-79-year-olds and 15.8% for octogenarians, with mortality around 2% in both groups.

Discussion and conclusion

Our prospective analysis shows octogenarians are more susceptible to surgical AEs, linked to greater health complexities. Despite higher AEs in older patients, low mortality rates across both age groups highlight the safety of spinal surgery. Tracking AEs is crucial for patient communication and impacts healthcare accreditation and funding.

Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Elderly Traumatic Cervical Spinal Injury: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of early surgery for cervical spinal injury (CSI) has been demonstrated. However, whether early surgery improves outcomes in the elderly remains unclear. This study investigated whether early surgery for CSI in elderly affects complication rates and neurological outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 462 patients. We included patients with traumatic acute cervical spinal cord injury aged ≥65 years who were treated surgically, whereas patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale E, those with unknown operative procedures, and those waiting for surgery for >1 month were excluded. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months. Sixty-five patients (early group, 14.1%) underwent surgical treatment within 24 hours, whereas the remaining 397 patients (85.9%) underwent surgery on a standby basis (delayed group). The propensity score-matched cohorts of 63 cases were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in the early group were significantly younger, had significantly more subaxial dislocations (and fractures), tetraplegia, significantly lower ASIA motor scores, and ambulatory abilities 6 months after injury. However, no significant differences in the rate of complications, ambulatory abilities, or ASIA Impairment Scale scores 6 months after injury were observed between the matched cohorts. At 6 months after injury, 61% of the patients in the early group (25% unsupported and 36% supported) and 53% of the patients in the delayed group (34% unsupported and 19% supported) were ambulatory.

CONCLUSIONS

Early surgery is possible for CSI in elderly patients as the matched cohort reveals no significant difference in complication rates and neurological or ambulatory recovery between the early and delayed surgery groups.

Utility of Surgical Risk Calculators in Spine Surgery in Patients Aged Over 80 Years: Analysis of SpineSage and ACS NSQIP

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the predictive accuracy of both the SpineSage and ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculators in patients over the age of 80 years, undergoing spine surgery for any reason.

METHODS

We included 210 consecutive patients treated with single-stage spine surgery at our institution between 2009 and 2019. The demographic details and preoperative characteristics of each patient were collected and reviewed for entry into both the SpineSage and ACS risk calculators. The estimated risk supplied by these calculators was compared to the observed rate of complications post-surgery. The main method of comparison was using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Complications were identified in 51 patients (24%). Most patients underwent surgery for a degenerative cause (71%), with the majority of procedures performed on the lumbosacral spine (66%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to compare the outcomes of each tool. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed similar predictive accuracy between SpineSage and ACS when predicting overall complications (0.688; P < .001 vs 0.634; P = .021). AUC analysis demonstrated that SpineSage had better predictive accuracy when estimating risk of major complications (0.778; P = .037 vs 0.675; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

For the prediction of risks associated with spine surgery in those aged >80 years, SpineSage appears to be preferable to the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in this single centre cohort, SpineSage was more accurate in predicting the risk of serious medical complications. The accuracy of both of these tools could still be improved upon.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Outcomes of Metastatic Spine Tumors in the Very Elderly: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Super-Aged Society

The number of advanced-age patients with spinal metastases is rising. This study was performed to clarify the characteristics and surgical outcomes of spinal metastases in advanced-age patients. We prospectively analyzed 216 patients with spinal metastases from 2015 to 2020 and divided them into three age groups: <70 years (n = 119), 70-79 years (n = 73), and ≥80 years (n = 24). Although there were no significant intergroup differences in preoperative characteristics and surgery-related factors except for age, patients aged ≥80 years tended to have a worse performance status (PS), Barthel index, and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) before and after surgery than the other two groups. Although the median PS, mean Barthel index and mean EQ-5D greatly improved postoperatively in each group, the median PS and mean Barthel index at 6 months and the mean EQ-5D at 1 month postoperatively were significantly poorer in the ≥80-year group than the 70-79-year group. The rates of postoperative complications and re-deterioration of the EQ-5D were significantly higher in the oldest group than in the other two groups. Although surgery for spinal metastases improved the PS, Barthel index, and EQ-5D regardless of age, clinicians should be aware of the poorer outcomes and higher complication rates in advanced-age patients.

Prognosis of Cervical Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis-Related Spine Injuries in Elderly Patients: Analyses of Both Fracture and Spinal Cord Injury Without Fracture

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the prognosis of elderly patients with injuries related to cervical diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (cDISH) to matched control for each group, with and without fractures.

METHODS

The current multicenter study was a retrospective analysis of 140 patients aged 65 years or older with cDISH-related cervical spine injuries; 106 fractures and 34 spinal cord injuries without fracture were identified. Propensity score-matched cohorts from 1363 patients without cDISH were generated and compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk of early mortality for patients with cDISH-related injury.

RESULTS

Patients with cDISH-related injuries with fracture did not differ significantly in the incidence of each complication and ambulation or severity of paralysis compared to matched controls. In patients with cDISH-related injury without fracture, those who were nonambulatory at discharge comprised 55% vs 34% of controls, indicating significantly poorer ambulation in those with cDISH-related injuries (P = .023). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and ambulation or paralysis severity at 6 months as compared with controls. Fourteen patients died within 3 months. Logistic regression analysis identified complete paralysis (odds ratio [OR] 36.99) and age (OR 1.24) as significant risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed no significant differences in the incidence of complications, ambulation outcomes between patients with cDISH-related injury with fracture and matched controls, and that the ambulation at discharge for patients with cDISH-related injury without fractures were significantly inferior to those of matched controls.

Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with pediculoplasty for Kümmell's disease: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with pediculoplasty (PVP-PP) for Kümmell's disease (KD).

METHODS

Between February 2017 and November 2020, 76 patients with KD undergoing PVP or PVP-PP were included in this retrospective study. Based on the PVP whether combined with pediculoplasty, those patients were divided into PVP group (n = 39) and PVP-PP group (n = 37). The operation duration, estimated blood loss, cement volume, and hospitalization stays were recorded and analyzed. Meanwhile, the radiological variations including the Cobb's angle, anterior height of index vertebra, and middle height of index vertebra from X-ray were recorded preoperatively, at 1 days postoperatively and the final follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were also evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative recovery values of these data were compared.

RESULTS

The two groups showed no significant difference in demographic features (p > 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and time of hospital stay revealed no sharp statistical distinctions either (p > 0.05), except that PVP-PP used more bone cement than PVP (5.8 ± 1.5 mL vs. 5.0 ± 1.2 mL, p < 0.05). The anterior and middle height of vertebra, Cobb's angle, VAS, and ODI was observed a little without significant difference between the two groups before and 1 days postoperatively (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, ODI and VAS scores decreased significantly in the PVP-PP group than in the PVP group at follow-up (p < 0.001). The PVP-PP group exhibited a slight amelioration in Ha, Hm, and Cobb's angle when compared to the PVP group, displaying statistical significance (p < 0.05). No significant disparity in cement leakage was observed between the PVP-PP and PVP groups (29.4% vs. 15.4%, p > 0.05). It is worth noting that the prevalence of bone cement loosening displayed a remarkable decrement within the PVP-PP group, with only one case recorded, as opposed to the PVP group's seven cases (2.7% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PVP-PP and PVP can relieve pain effectively in patients with KD. Moreover, PVP-PP can achieve more satisfactory results than PVP. Thus, compared with PVP, PVP-PP is more suitable for KD without neurological deficit, from a long-term clinical effect perspective.

Age-based exclusion is common and multifactorial in spinal RCTs: a systematic review and quantitative analysis

Most diseases of the spine disproportionately impact older persons, with the modal (i.e., commonest) patient a female in their 8th decade of life. We examined the corpus of spinal RCTs to determine how many included "average" spine patients. We searched PubMed for randomized clinical trials published in the top 7 spine journals over a period of 5 years from 2016 to 2020 and extracted nominal upper age cut-offs and the distribution of ages actually recruited. We identified 186 trials of 26,238 patients. We found that only 4.8% of trials could be applied to an "average" 75-year-old patient. This age-based exclusion was not dependent on funding source. Age-based exclusion was exacerbated by explicit upper age cut-offs, however, the age-based exclusion went beyond explicit age cut-offs. Only few trials were applicable to older patients even amongst trials with no age cut-off specified. Age-based exclusion from clinical trials starts at late middle age. The mismatch between spinal patient's age seen in clinical practice and spinal patient's age in trials was so severe that over the 5 years (2016-2020) almost no RCT evidence was produced applicable to the "average" aged-patient across the body of literature available. In conclusion, age-based exclusion is ubiquitous, multifactorial, and happens on a supratrial level. Eliminating age-based exclusion involves more than an arbitrary lifting of explicitly stated upper age cut-offs. Instead, recommendations include increasing input from geriatricians and ethics committees, establishing updated or new models of cares, and creating new protocols to facilitate further research.

Frequency and Associated Factors of Postoperative Wound Dehiscence in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Wound dehiscence after cervical spine surgery is a well-known complication that can be a challenge for spine surgeons to manage, especially in cases of exposed implants. However, few studies have focused primarily on this phenomenon in cervical spine surgery to date. This investigation sought to determine the frequency of wound dehiscence following posterior cervical spine surgery and identify patient-based risk factors.

METHODS

The medical data of 405 consecutive patients (290 male and 115 female; mean age: 68.9 years) who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery were retrospectively examined. Logistic regression models were employed to examine the prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of postoperative wound dehiscence.

RESULTS

We observed that 5.2% of cervical spine surgery patients experienced procedural postoperative wound dehiscence. In comparisons of dehiscence and non-dehiscence groups, significant differences were found for posterior instrumented fusion (81.0% vs. 45.3%; P < 0.01), extended T1 fusion (57.1% vs. 12.8%; P < 0.01), occipitocervical fusion (19.0% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.048), fused intervertebral levels (4.0 vs. 1.5; P < 0.01), surgical time (246 minutes vs. 165 minutes; P < 0.01), blood loss volume (228 mL vs. 148 mL; P = 0.023), and dialysis (14.3% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified extended T1 fusion and dialysis to be significantly associated with wound dehiscence with odds ratios of 5.82 and 10.70, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed frequency of postoperative wound dehiscence in cervical spine surgery was 5.2%. As extended T1 fusion and dialysis may increase the risk of dehiscence after surgery, patients who display such risk factors may require additional observation and care.

The Effect of Local Administration of Vancomycin Suspended in Fibrin Glue for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Instrumentation: Comparison by Probability of Treatment Weighting Model

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical site infection (SSI) rate in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation surgery who received vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue at the surgical site and those who did not.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The intrawound application of vancomycin powder for preventing SSI after spinal surgery remains controversial. Vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue is another option for local administration that may be effective. The present study assessed whether vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue could prevent SSI after spinal instrumentation surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled patients who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation surgery with or without fusion for degenerative conditions, spinal trauma, or tumor. A multiple logistic regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score was used to assess the efficacy of vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue and to account for confounding. A secondary multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors associated with SSI.

RESULTS

Of the 264 patients enrolled in this study, 134 underwent application of vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue at the surgical site and 130 did not. The incidence of SSI was lower in patients who were treated with vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue (2.2% vs. 8.5%) even after inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 0.25; 95% CI, 0.0768-0.91; P =0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the treatment with vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue was significantly associated with a lower odds of SSI (odds ratio: 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05-0.85; P =0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of vancomycin suspended in fibrin glue was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of SSI in patients undergoing spinal instrumentation surgery.

Comorbidity data collection across different spine registries: an evidence map

INTRODUCTION

Comorbidities are significant patient factors that contribute to outcomes after surgery. There is highly variable collection of this information across the literature. To help guide the systematic collection of best practice data, the Australian Spine Registry conducted an evidence map to investigate (i) what comorbidities are collected by spine registries, (ii) how they are collected and (iii) the compliance and completeness in collecting comorbidity data.

METHOD

A literature search was performed to identify published studies of adult spine registry data reporting comorbidities. In addition, targeted questionnaires were sent to existing global spine registries to identify the maximum number of relevant results to build the evidence map.

RESULTS

Thirty-six full-text studies met the inclusion criteria. There was substantial variation in the reporting of comorbidity data; 55% of studies reported comorbidity collection, but only 25% reported the data collection method and 20% reported use of a comorbidity index. The variation in the literature was confirmed with responses from 50% of the invited registries (7/14). Of seven, three use a recognised comorbidity index and the extent and methods of comorbidity collection varied by registry.

CONCLUSION

This evidence map identified variations in the methodology, data points and reporting of comorbidity collection in studies using spine registry data, with no consistent approach. A standardised set of comorbidities and data collection methods would encourage collaboration and data comparisons between patient cohorts and could facilitate improved patient outcomes following spine surgery by allowing data comparisons and predictive modelling of risk factors.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Unstable Spine Fractures in the Elderly: Outcomes and Mortality

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes and mortality in elderly patients following unstable spine fractures depending on treatment modality.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Operative management of unstable spine fractures in the elderly remains controversial due to increased risk of perioperative complications. Mortality rates after operative versus nonoperative treatment of these injuries have not been well-characterized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged above 65 with unstable spine fractures without neurologic injury from 2015 to 2021 were identified from the Clinformatics ® Data Mart (CDM) Database. Demographics, complications, and mortality were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for the effect of baseline characteristics on mortality following unstable fracture diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 3688 patients included, 1330 (36.1%) underwent operative management and 2358 (63.9%) nonoperative. At baseline, nonoperative patients were older, female, had higher Elixhauser comorbidity scores, and were more likely to have a cervical fracture. Operative patients had a longer length of stay in the hospital compared with nonoperative patients (9.7 vs. 7.7 days; P <0.001). Although patients in the operative group had higher rates of readmission at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after diagnosis ( P <0.01), they had lower mortality rates up to five years after injury. After adjusting for covariates, nonoperative patients had a 60% greater risk of mortality compared with operative patients (hazard ratio: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-1.78, P <0.001). After propensity score matching, operative patients age 65 to 85 had greater survivorship compared with their nonoperative counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with an unstable spine fracture who undergo surgery experience lower mortality rates up to five years postdiagnosis compared with patients who received nonoperative management, despite higher hospital readmission rates and an overall perioperative complication rate of 37.3%. Operating on elderly patients with unstable spine fractures may outweigh the risks and should be considered as a viable treatment option in appropriately selected patients.

Are Octogenarians at Higher Risk of Complications After Elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery? Analysis of a Cohort of 7880 Patients From the Kaiser Permanente Spine Registry

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study with chart review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in risk of adverse outcomes following elective posterior instrumented lumbar spinal fusions for patients aged 80 years and above compared with patients aged 50 to 79 years.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients aged 80 years and above are undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion surgery in increasing numbers. There are conflicting data on the risks of intraoperative and postoperative complications in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 80 years and above were compared with 50 to 79 years (reference group) using time-dependent multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with a competing risk of death for longitudinal outcomes and multivariable logistic regression for binary outcomes. Outcome measures used were: (1) intraoperative complications (durotomy), (2) postoperative complications: 30-day outcomes (pneumonia); 90-day outcomes (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, emergency room visits, readmission, reoperations, and mortality); and two-year outcomes (reoperations and mortality).

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 7880 patients who underwent primary elective posterior instrumented lumbar spinal fusion (L1-S1) for degenerative disk disease or spondylolisthesis. This was subdivided into 596 patients were aged 80 years and above and 7284 patients aged 50 to 79. After adjustment, patients aged 80 years and above had a higher likelihood of durotomy [odds ratio (OR)=1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-2.02] and 30-day pneumonia (OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.01-3.23). However, there was a lower risk of reoperation within two years of the index procedure (hazard ratio=0.69, 95% CI=0.48-0.99). No differences were observed for mortality, readmissions, emergency room visits, pulmonary embolism, or deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of 7880 elective posterior instrumented lumbar fusion patients for degenerative disk disease or spondylolisthesis, we did not observe any significant risks of adverse events between patients aged 80 years and above and those aged 50 to 79 except for higher durotomies and 30-day pneumonia in the former. We believe octogenarians can safely undergo lumbar fusions, but proper preoperative screening is necessary to reduce the risks of 30-day pneumonia.

Perioperative Complications of Open Spine Surgery in Older Adults over 90 Years of Age

Introduction

Despite perioperative risks in nonagenarian patients who undergo open spine surgery for degeneration disorder or spinal trauma being of great interest, the prevalence of complications in this group remains unclear. This study aims to examine the perioperative complications of open spine surgery in the elderly over 90 years of age.

Methods

Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics including the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) class, type of surgery, and complications within 30 postoperative days were retrospectively collected from the medical records of nonagenarians who underwent open spine surgery between April 2004 and July 2019 at our spine centers.

Results

A total of 48 patients met the inclusion criteria of this study. All belong to ASA-PS class 2 (69%) or 3. Preoperative American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades in trauma group were grade A in 4 cases, B in 1 case, C in 5 cases, D in 11 cases, and E in 1 case. Major complications (deep surgical site infection, cardiac event, respiratory disorder, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and renal failure) occurred in 13 cases, and the rate of overall perioperative complications was 45.8%. One patient who underwent cervical stabilization for cervical fracture dislocation died at postoperative 13 days due to respiratory disorder. The rates of major complications and overall perioperative complications were 3.6% and 14.3% in the degenerative group and 45.5% and 81.8% in the trauma group, respectively. Especially in the trauma group, respiratory disorder occurred in 7 cases, delirium in 11 cases, and urinary tract infection in 5 cases.

Conclusions

Although the perioperative complication rate reached 81.8% in spinal trauma cases, the complication rate in degenerative disorders was relatively low as 14.3%. Open spine surgery for degenerative disorders can be relatively safe even in nonagenarians, whereas the risks of perioperative complications, including respiratory disorder and delirium, were high in spinal trauma cases.

The impact of frailty on postoperative complications in geriatric patients undergoing multi-level lumbar fusion surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the impact of patient frailty status on postoperative complications in those undergoing multi-level lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was retrospectively queried between 2016 and 2017 for patients receiving multi-level lumbar fusion surgery. Demographics, frailty status, and relevant complications were queried at index admission and readmission intervals. Primary outcome measures included perioperative complications and 30-, 90-, and 180-day complication and readmission rates. Perioperative complications of interest were infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), and posthemorrhagic anemia. Secondary outcome measures included inpatient length of stay (LOS), adjusted all-payer costs, and discharge disposition. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching for demographics was implemented to identify non-frail patients with similar diagnoses and procedures. Subgroup analysis of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open surgery within frail and non-frail cohorts was conducted to evaluate differences in surgical and medical complication rates. The analysis used nonparametric Mann-Whitney U testing and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Frail patients encountered higher rates perioperative complications including posthemorrhagic anemia (OR: 1.73, 95%CI 1.50-2.00, p < 0.0001), infection (OR: 2.94, 95%CI 2.04-4.36, p < 0.0001), UTI (OR: 2.57, 95%CI 2.04-3.26, p < 0.0001), and higher rates of non-routine discharge (OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.80-2.38, p < 0.0001). Frail patients had significantly greater LOS and total all-payer inpatient costs compared to non-frail patients (p < 0.0001). Frailty was associated with significantly higher rates of 90- (OR: 1.43, 95%CI 1.18-1.74, p = 0.0003) and 180-day (OR: 1.28, 95%CI 1.03-1.60, p = 0.02) readmissions along with higher rates of wound dehiscence (OR: 2.21, 95%CI 1.17-4.44, p = 0.02) at 90 days. Subgroup analysis revealed that frail patients were at significantly higher risk for surgical complications with open surgery (16%) compared to MIS (0%, p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between surgical approaches with respect to medical complications in both cohorts, nor surgical complications in non-frail patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was associated with higher odds of all perioperative complications, LOS, and all-payer costs following multi-level lumbar fusion. Frail patients had significantly higher rates of 90 and 180-day readmission and higher rates of wound disruption at 90-days. On subgroup analysis, MIS was associated with significantly reduced rates of surgical complications specifically in frail patients. Our results suggest frailty status to be an important predictor of perioperative complications and long-term readmissions in geriatric patients receiving multi-level lumbar fusions. Frail patients should undergo surgery utilizing minimally invasive techniques to minimize risk of surgical complications. Future studies should explore the utility of implementing frailty in risk stratification assessments for patients undergoing spine surgery.

Outcomes and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) may be used to treat degenerative spinal pathologies while reducing risks associated with open procedures. As an increasing number of lumbar fusions are performed in the aging United States population, MIS-TLIF has been widely adopted into clinical practice in recent years. However, its complication rate and functional outcomes in elderly patients remain poorly characterized. The objective of this study was to assess complication rates and functional outcomes in elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) undergoing MIS-TLIF.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched for relevant records in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed original research; English language; full text available; use of MIS-TLIF; and an elderly cohort of at least 5 patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions) tool. Pooled complication rates were calculated for elderly patients, with subgroup analyses performed for single versus multiple-level fusions. Complication rates in elderly compared to nonelderly patients were also assessed. Postoperative changes in patient-reported outcomes, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) back pain (BP) and leg pain (LP) scores, were calculated.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. Compared to nonelderly patients, MIS-TLIF in elderly patients resulted in significantly higher rates of major (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.07-4.34) and minor (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.22-3.95) complications. The pooled major complication rate in elderly patients was 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.08) and the pooled minor complication rate was 0.20 (95% CI 0.13-0.30). Single-level MIS-TLIF had lower major and minor complication rates than multilevel MIS-TLIF, although not reaching significance. At a minimum follow-up of 6 months, the postoperative change in ODI (-30.70, 95% CI -41.84 to -19.55), VAS-BP (-3.87, 95% CI -4.97 to -2.77), and VAS-LP (-5.11, 95% CI -6.69 to -3.53) in elderly patients all exceeded the respective minimum clinically important difference. The pooled rate of fusion was 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

MIS-TLIF in elderly patients results in a high rate of fusion and significant improvement of patient-reported outcomes, but has significantly higher complication rates than in nonelderly patients. Limitations of this study include heterogeneity in the definition of elderly and limited reporting of risk factors among included studies. Further study of the impact of complications and the factors predisposing elderly patients to poor outcomes is needed.

In-hospital medical complication in older people after spine surgery: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Worldwide, older people are suffering from lumbar degenerative disease at an annual rate of 266 million. Although spine surgeries restore mobility, reduce pain and resolve neurological damage, these procedures can place older persons at high-risk for medical complications due to multiple comorbid conditions that are often present in this population. However, the prevalence of complications occurring in older people prior to discharge is unknown. Postoperative medical complications lead to increased healthcare costs as well as pain and potential harm for the patient. Hence, this scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the current knowledge state regarding in-hospital medical postoperative complications in older people (≥65 years) after elective spine surgery.

METHOD

A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and CINAHL) were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were medical complication(s) after elective spine surgery prior to discharge, age ≥65 years and English language. Co-occurrence analysis was used to examine how often each complication was examined in the literature and how often the complications co-occur.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. The most frequently examined postoperative medical complications after spine surgery are delirium and urinary tract infection, followed by gastrointestinal and pulmonary embolus. Despite the list of in-hospital medical complications, definitions or criteria for measurement of any identified complication were sparse and inconsistent. There is a lack of definition or instruments to comprehensively assess medical complications incurred by older people following spine surgery, including characteristics, classification methodology and temporality. To date, no research has been conducted on how older people experience or perceive a medical complication after elective spine surgery.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the importance to develop comprehensive instruments to assess co-occurrence of postoperative medical complications and design interventions to mitigate the negative impacts of medical complications incurred by older people after spine surgery.

Trends in the numbers of spine surgeries and spine surgeons over the past 15 years

The purpose of this study is to examine trends in spine surgeries at ten facilities over 15 years, and to analyze relationships with the number of spine surgeons at these facilities. The subjects were patients who underwent spine surgery at the ten facilities from 2003 to 2017. Data were collected every year via a questionnaire designed to obtain clinicopathological and surgical information. There were 37,601 spine surgeries (60.2% male) recorded in the registry at 9 facilities in the Nagoya Spine Group (NSG) between 2003 and 2017, with an increase in the annual number of surgeries by 2.4 times over 15 years. On the other hand, the number of spine surgeons has increased by just under 1.5 times. Instrumentation surgeries increased from 959 in 2003 to 2,276 in 2017 (2.3 times). There was a particularly marked increase in surgeries for spinal degenerative disease from 1,075 in 2003 to 2,821 in 2017 (2.6 times). The number of surgeries performed per surgeon increased from 61.4 in 2003 to 102.8 in 2017, while the average number of spine surgeons per hospital increased from 2.6 in 2003 to 3.7 in 2017. In conclusion, with heavier burden on spine surgeons and the major changes in the spine surgery environment, training and increasing surgeons with advanced expertise and skills will become increasingly important.

Demographic Predictors of Treatment and Complications for Spinal Disorders: Part 2, Lumbar Spine Trauma

Objective

To study the impact of demographic factors on management of traumatic injury to the lumbar spine and postoperative complication rates.

Methods

Data was obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2010–2014. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes identified patients diagnosed with lumbar fractures or dislocations due to trauma. A series of multivariate regression models determined whether demographic variables predicted rates of complication and revision surgery.

Results

A total of 38,249 patients were identified. Female patients were less likely to receive surgery and to receive a fusion when undergoing surgery, had higher complication rates, and more likely to undergo revision surgery. Medicare and Medicaid patients were less likely to receive surgical management for lumbar spine trauma and less likely to receive a fusion when operated on. Additionally, we found significant differences in surgical management and postoperative complication rates based on race, insurance type, hospital teaching status, and geography.

Conclusion

Substantial differences in the surgical management of traumatic injury to the lumbar spine, including postoperative complications, among individuals of demographic factors such as age, sex, race, primary insurance, hospital teaching status, and geographic region suggest the need for further studies to understand how patient demographics influence management and complications for traumatic injury to the lumbar spine.

Rates of early complications and mortality in patients older than 80 years of age after surgical treatment of acute traumatic spinal fractures: ankylosing spondylitis versus osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the early complications and mortality associated with multilevel spine surgery for unstable fractures in patients older than 80 years of age with ankylosing spondylitis and to compare the results with an age- and sex-matched cohort of patients with unstable osteoporotic fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the electronic medical records at a single institution was conducted between January 2014 and December 2019. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, hospital course, and 90-day mortality were collected. Comorbidities were stratified using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

RESULTS

Among 11,361 surgically treated patients, 22 patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS group) and 24 patients with osteoporosis (OS group) were identified. The mean ages were 83.1 ± 3.1 years and 83.2 ± 2.6 years, respectively. A significant difference in the mean CCI score was found (7.6 vs 5.6; p < 0.001). Multilevel posterior fusion procedures were conducted in all patients, with 6.7 ± 1.4 fused levels in the AS group and 7.1 ± 1.1 levels fused in the OS group (p > 0.05). Major complications developed in 10 patients (45%) in the AS group compared with 4 patients (17%) in the OS group (p < 0.05). The 90-day mortality was 36% in the AS group compared with 0% in the OS group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients older than 80 years of age with AS bear a high risk of adverse events after multilevel spinal fusion procedures. The high morbidity and 90-day mortality should be clearly discussed and carefully weighed against surgical treatment.

The influence of frailty on postoperative complications in geriatric patients receiving single-level lumbar fusion surgery

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the influence of patient frailty status on postoperative complications in those receiving single-level lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

The nationwide readmission database was retrospectively queried between 2016 and 2017 for all patients receiving single-level lumbar fusion surgery. Readmissions were analyzed at 30, 90, and 180 days from primary discharge. Demographics, frailty status, and relevant complications were queried at index admission and all readmission intervals. Complications of interest included infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), posthemorrhagic anemia, inpatient length of stay (LOS), and adjusted all-payer costs. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching for demographics was implemented to identify non-frail control patients with similar diagnoses and procedures. The analysis used nonparametric Mann-Whitney U testing and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Comparing propensity-matched cohorts revealed significantly greater LOS and total all-payer inpatient costs in frail patients than non-frail patients with comparable demographics and comorbidities (p < 0.0001 for both). Furthermore, frail patients encountered higher rates of UTI (OR: 3.97, 95%CI: 3.21-4.95, p < 0.0001), infection (OR: 6.87, 95%CI: 4.55-10.86, p < 0.0001), and posthemorrhagic anemia (OR: 1.94, 95%CI: 1.71-2.19, p < 0.0001) immediately following surgery. Frail patients had significantly higher rates of 30-day (OR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.02-1.51, p = 0.035), 90-day (OR: 1.38, 95%CI: 1.17-1.63, p < 0.001), and 180-day (OR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.30-1.85, p < 0.0001) readmissions. Lastly, frail patients had higher rates of infection at 30-day (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.05-2.46, p = 0.027) and 90-day (OR: 1.51, 95%CI: 1.07-2.16, p = 0.020) readmission intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient frailty status may serve as an important predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients receiving single-level lumbar fusion surgery.

Percutaneous Cement Discoplasty for Degenerative Low Back Pain with Vacuum Phenomenon: A Multicentric Study with a Minimum of 2 Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

To report clinical results after percutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) in a multicentric case series with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Between December 2014 and January 2019, 180 patients with low back pain and advanced degeneration were treated with percutaneous discoplasty in 2 centers. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients 65 years or older, with mechanical low back pain with or without spinal stenosis, who did not respond to conservative management. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1: patients without previous spine surgeries who underwent PCD, group 2: patients with previous spine surgeries who underwent PCD, and group 3: patients with/without previous surgery who underwent PCD plus decompression surgery. Clinical and radiological analyses were performed as well as complication and readmission rates.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (74% female; mean age, 75.8 ± 5.7 years; mean body mass index, 29.9 ± 5.2) were included in our study. Overall preoperative visual analog score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were 7.8 ± 0.9 and 68.1 ± 9.6, respectively. At 2 years of follow-up, mean VAS improvement was 3.56 (95% confidence interval: 3.92-3.20; P < 0.0001) and mean ODI improvement was 17.18 (95% confidence interval: 19.52-14.85; P < 0.0001), showing a significant and sustained improvement in both scores. In addition, 84% of patients reached both VAS and ODI minimum important clinical difference at the final follow-up. Finally, 5.7% of patients suffered major complications 30 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

PCD showed significant improvement of VAS and ODI scores at 2 years of follow-up with relatively low rate of complications.

Inclusion of Frailty Improves Predictive Modeling for Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Management of Primary and Secondary Lumbar Spine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Malignant spinal tumors are common, continually increasing in incidence as a function of improved survival times for patients with cancer. Using predictive analytics and propensity score matching, we evaluated the influence of frailty on postoperative complications compared with age in patients with malignant neoplasms of the lumbar spine.

METHODS

We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 and 2017 to identify patients with malignant neoplasms of the lumbar spine who received a fusion procedure. Patient frailty was queried using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups. Propensity score matching for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgical approach, and number of levels fused was implemented between frail and nonfrail patients, identifying 533 frail patients and 538 nonfrail patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of each ROC served as a proxy for model performance.

RESULTS

Frail patients reported significantly higher inpatient lengths of stay, costs, infection, posthemorrhagic anemia, and urinary tract infections (P < 0.05). In addition, frail patients were more often discharged to skilled nursing facilities and short-term hospitals compared with nonfrail patients (P < 0.0001). Regression models for mortality (AUC = 0.644), nonroutine discharge (AUC = 0.600), and acute infection (AUC = 0.666) were improved when using frailty as the primary predictor. These models were also improved using frailty when predicting 30-day readmission and 90-day hardware failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty demonstrated a significant relationship with increased postoperative patient complications, length of stay, costs, and acute complications in patients receiving fusion following resection of a malignant neoplasm of the lumbar spine region. Frailty demonstrated better predictive validity of outcomes compared with patient age.

Seasonal variation in incidence and causal organism of surgical site infection after PLIF/TLIF surgery: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative SSI is a common and potentially serious complication in spine surgery. Seasonal variation occurs in rates of nosocomial infection, with higher rates found in the summer, during which hot, humid conditions may be optimal for proliferation of bacteria. This might also influence the rate of SSI. The purpose of the study was to examine seasonal variation in SSI after PLIF/TLIF surgery, including relationships with experience of surgeons and causal organisms.

METHODS

Cases with SSI after PLIF/TLIF surgery at 10 facilities between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014 were retrieved from a database. Infection was defined based on CDC guidelines for SSIs. Patients were followed for at least two years after surgery. Surgeries were examined in spring (April-June), summer (July-September), autumn (October-December), and winter (January-March). Seasonal variation and other factors with a potential association with SSIs were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1174 patients (607 males, 567 females) who underwent PLIF/TLIF surgery were identified. The operations were PLIF (n = 667), TLIF (n = 443), MIS-PLIF (n = 27), and MIS-TLIF (n = 37). The total SSI rate for the 2-year period was 2.5% (29/1174), and the 2-year average SSI rates for surgeries in each season were spring, 2.6% (7/266); summer, 3.9% (13/335); fall, 1.3% (4/302); winter, 1.8% (5/271). The SSI rate was significantly higher in summer than non-summer (3.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.05). SSIs were caused by a variety of pathogens, including Gram-positive cocci, and Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogenic organism to cause SSI.

CONCLUSION

Seasonality should be taken into account in strategies for SSI prevention, with particular attention on mitigation of increased temperature and humidity in the summer and on infection caused by Gram-positive cocci and S. aureus.

Application of Cooperative Game Theory Principles to Interpret Machine Learning Models of Nonhome Discharge Following Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify interaction effects that modulate nonhome discharge (NHD) risk by applying coalitional game theory principles to interpret machine learning models and understand variable interaction effects underlying NHD risk.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

NHD may predispose patients to adverse outcomes during their care. Previous studies identified potential factors implicated in NHD; however, it is unclear how interaction effects between these factors contribute to overall NHD risk.

METHODS

Of the 11,150 reviewed cases involving procedures for degenerative spine conditions, 1764 cases (15.8%) involved NHD. Gradient boosting classifiers were used to construct predictive models for NHD for each patient. Shapley values, which assign a unique distribution of the total NHD risk to each model variable using an optimal cost-sharing rule, quantified feature importance and examined interaction effects between variables.

RESULTS

Models constructed from features identified by Shapley values were highly predictive of patient-level NHD risk (mean C-statistic = 0.91). Supervised clustering identified distinct patient subgroups with variable NHD risk and their shared characteristics. Focused interaction analysis of surgical invasiveness, age, and comorbidity burden suggested age as a worse risk factor than comorbidity burden due to stronger positive interaction effects. Additionally, negative interaction effects were found between age and low blood loss, indicating that intraoperative hemostasis may be critical for reducing NHD risk in the elderly.

CONCLUSION

This strategy provides novel insights into feature interactions that contribute to NHD risk after spine surgery. Patients with positively interacting risk factors may require special attention during their hospitalization to control NHD risk.Level of Evidence: 3.

Spinal Surgery in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older: Risk Stratification Using the Modified Frailty Index

STUDY DESIGN

This was an ambispective clinical quality registry study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate utility of 11-variable modified Frailty Index (mFI) in predicting postoperative outcomes among patients ≥80 years undergoing spinal surgery.

METHODS

Consecutive patients ≥80 years who underwent spinal surgery between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2018, were included. Primary outcome measure was rate of major complication. Secondary outcome measures were (1) overall complication rate, (2) surgical site infection, and (3) 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 121 operations were performed. Demographic metrics were (1) age (mean ± SD) = 83.1 ± 2.8 years and (2) mFI (mean ± SD) = 2.1 ± 1.4 variables. As mFI increased from 0 to ≥4 variables, risk of major complication increased from 18.2% to 40.0% (P = .014); overall complication increased from 45.5% to 70.0% (P = .032); surgical site infection increased from 0.0% to 25.0% (P = .007). There were no significant changes in risk of 6-month mortality across mFIs (P = .115). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher mFI score of ≥3 variables was associated with a significantly higher risk of (1) major complication (P = .025); (2) overall complication (P = .015); (3) surgical site infection (P = .007); and (4) mortality (P = .044).

CONCLUSIONS

mFI scores of ≥3/11 variables were associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity in patients aged ≥80 years undergoing spinal surgery. The mFI-associated risk stratification provides a valuable adjunct in surgical decision making for this rapidly growing subpopulation of patients.

Aortic injury in spine surgery……What a spine surgeon needs to know

Aortic injury is a rare, yet underreported and underestimated complication of spine surgery. Anatomical relation between the aorta and the spine changes under physiological (positional) as well as pathological (deformity) conditions, which puts the aorta at risk of injury during spine surgery. Clinical presentation of aortic injury ranges from asymptomatic perforation of the aorta to acute fatal bleeding. Although several diagnostic methods have been reported, CT-angiography remains an important diagnostic study. Several advancements in the open and the endovascular surgical management have been reported to be successfully used in the management of aortic injury following spine surgery. Management approach of malpositioned screws abutting the aorta is still controversial. Anatomical knowledge and understanding of the previously reported mechanisms of aortic injury are important to be integrated in the preoperative planning process. If the complication occurs, time-to- recognition and to-appropriate-management are important factors for predicting mortality. If unrecognized and untreated in the acutely injured patients, mortality can approach 100%.

Surgical treatment of senile spinal diseases

Advanced age is a well-known risk factor for spinal surgery-related complications. Decisions on spine surgery in the elderly are difficult due to higher morbidity and mortality than in younger age groups. In addition, spine surgery is a kind of ‘functional surgery’ which does not directly affect the survival of patients. In recent years, individualized risk stratification has gained ground over simple chronological age-based assessment. In the elderly, frailty is one of the strongest factors which affect surgical outcomes for both cervical and thoracolumbar spine surgery, regardless of the surgical technique used. Spine surgery in the elderly have worse surgical outcomes in terms of duration of hospital stay, degree of functional recovery, and complication, readmission, and mortality rates. However, the benefit of spine surgery even in the very-elderly is substantial. In conclusion, surgical decisions should be made based on both personalized risk assessment and benefits of surgery. Recent advanced surgical techniques such as minimally invasive surgical techniques and robotics assistance are likely to be helpful in minimizing surgical complications. Therefore, advanced age in itself should not be considered as a contraindication for spine surgery.

Development of a model to predict the probability of incurring a complication during spine surgery

PURPOSE

Predictive models in spine surgery are of use in shared decision-making. This study sought to develop multivariable models to predict the probability of general and surgical perioperative complications of spinal surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases.

METHODS

Data came from EUROSPINE's Spine Tango Registry (1.2012-12.2017). Separate prediction models were built for surgical and general complications. Potential predictors included age, gender, previous spine surgery, additional pathology, BMI, smoking status, morbidity, prophylaxis, technology used, and the modified Mirza invasiveness index score. Complete case multiple logistic regression was used. Discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Plots were used to assess the calibration of the models.

RESULTS

Overall, 23'714/68'111 patients (54.6%) were available for complete case analysis: 763 (3.2%) had a general complication, with ASA score being strongly predictive (ASA-2 OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.20-2.12; ASA-3 OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.19-4.07; ASA-4 OR 5.62, 95% CI 3.04-10.41), while 2534 (10.7%) had a surgical complication, with previous surgery at the same level being an important predictor (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.71-2.12). Respectively, model AUCs were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.76) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.62-0.65), and calibration was good up to predicted probabilities of 0.30 and 0.25, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We developed two models to predict complications associated with spinal surgery. Surgical complications were predicted with less discriminative ability than general complications. Reoperation at the same level was strongly predictive of surgical complications and a higher ASA score, of general complications. A web-based prediction tool was developed at https://sst.webauthor.com/go/fx/run.cfm?fx=SSTCalculator .

Deep Learning Application in Spinal Implant Identification

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the clinical usefulness of deep learning by identifying previous spinal implants through application of deep learning.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Deep learning has recently been actively applied to medical images. However, despite many attempts to apply deep learning to medical images, the application has rarely been successful. We aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness and usefulness of deep learning in the medical field. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the clinical usefulness of deep learning by identifying previous spinal implants through application of deep learning.

METHODS

For deep learning algorithm development, radiographs were retrospectively obtained from clinical cases in which the patients had lumbar spine one-segment instrument surgery. A total of 2894 lumbar spine anteroposterior (AP: 1446 cases) and lateral (1448 cases) radiographs were collected. Labeling work was conducted for five different implants. We conducted experiments using three deep learning algorithms. The traditional deep neural network model built by coding the transfer learning algorithm, Google AutoML, and Apple Create ML. Recall (sensitivity) and precision (specificity) were measured after training.

RESULTS

Overall, each model performed well in identifying each pedicle screw implant. In conventional transfer learning, AP radiography showed 97.0% precision and 96.7% recall. Lateral radiography showed 98.7% precision and 98.2% recall. In Google AutoML, AP radiography showed 91.4% precision and 87.4% recall; lateral radiography showed 97.9% precision and 98.4% recall. In Apple Create ML, AP radiography showed 76.0% precision and 73.0% recall; lateral radiography showed 89.0% precision and 87.0% recall. In all deep learning algorithms, precision and recall were higher in lateral than in AP radiography.

CONCLUSION

The deep learning application is effective for spinal implant identification. This demonstrates that clinicians can use ML-based deep learning applications to improve clinical practice and patient care.Level of Evidence: 3.

Prospective cohort study of surgical outcome for spinal metastases in patients aged 70 years or older

AIMS

With recent progress in cancer treatment, the number of advanced-age patients with spinal metastases has been increasing. It is important to clarify the influence of advanced age on outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases, especially with a focus on subjective health state values.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 101 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery from 2013 to 2016. These patients were divided into two groups based on age (< 70 years and ≥ 70 years). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), Barthel index (BI), and EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) score were assessed at study enrolment and at one, three, and six months after surgery. The survival times and complications were also collected.

RESULTS

In total, 65 patients were aged < 70 years (mean 59.6 years; 32 to 69) and 36 patients were aged ≥ 70 years (mean 75.9 years; 70 to 90). In both groups, the PS improved from PS3 to PS1 by spine surgery, the mean BI improved from < 60 to > 80 points, and the mean EQ-5D score improved from 0.0 to > 0.7 points. However, no significant differences were found in the improvement rates and values of the PS, BI, and EQ-5D score at any time points between the two groups. The PS, BI, and EQ-5D score improved throughout the follow-up period in approximately 90% of patients in each group. However, the improved PS, BI, and EQ-5D scores subsequently deteriorated in some patients, and the redeterioration rate of the EQ-5D was significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 70 than < 70 years (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Palliative surgery for spinal metastases improved the PS, activities of daily living, and quality of life, regardless of age. However, clinicians should be aware of the higher risk of redeterioration of the quality of life in advanced-age patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(12):1709-1716.

Surgical Outcome in Spinal Operation in Patients Aged 70 Years and Above

Introduction

The world is seeing a growth of the aging population and the number of surgical treatments in this age group which is also true for spinal conditions. The greatest increase in spinal fusion surgery has been observed in patients aged 65 years and above. Only a few works of literature were available on the issue, especially in India.

Materials and Methods

An observational study in which 70 patients aged 70 years and above who underwent spinal surgery for degenerative and traumatic spinal injury, from January 2013 to July 2017 in the neurosurgery department of a single institute, were reviewed. Around 53 patients were assessed for disability/functional outcome and their health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and RAND 36-item health survey 1.0 scoring method (SF-36) comparing the preoperative and postoperative status.

Result

The mean age was 74.19 years (range 70-91 years). Laminectomy-19 (27.14%) was the most common surgical procedure performed. Overall there were nine (12.85%) major complications with mortality of five (7.14%) patients. There was a significant reduction of crippled patients (14-9, P = 0.009) in the ODI score. SF-36: There was significant improvement in degenerative patient (P = 0.000 to P = 0.012). In traumatic patient, only pain had significant improvement (P = 0.045).

Conclusion

This study showed that the age of the patient should not be the limiting factor for the surgical management of a patient with a degenerative or a traumatic spinal condition.

Trends in Reoperation for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery With Instrumentation in a Multicenter Study

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the characteristics of reoperation for surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal instrumentation surgery, including the efficacy of treatment for SSI and instrumentation retention.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Aging of the population and advances in surgical techniques have increased the demand for spinal surgery in elderly patients. Treatment of SSI after this surgery has the main goals of eliminating infection and retaining instrumentation.

METHODS

The subjects were 16,707 patients who underwent spine surgery with instrumentation in 11 hospitals affiliated with the Nagoya Spine Group from 2004 to 2015. Details of those requiring reoperations for SSI were obtained from surgical records at each hospital.

RESULTS

There were significant increases in the mean age at the time of surgery (54.6-63.7 years) and the number of instrumentation surgeries (726-1977) from 2004 to 2015. The incidence of reoperation for SSI varied from 0.9% to 1.8%, with a decreasing trend over time. Reoperation for SSI was performed in 206 cases (115 men, 91 women; mean age 63.2 years). The average number of reoperations (1.4 vs. 2.3, P < 0.05), time from SSI to first reoperation (4.3 vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.05), and the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus identification rate (20% vs. 37%, P < 0.01) were all significantly lower in cases with instrumentation retention (n = 145) compared to those with instrumentation removal (n = 61).

CONCLUSION

There were marked trends of aging of patients and an increase in operations over the study period; however, the incidences of reoperation and instrumentation removal due to SSI significantly decreased over the same period. Rapid debridement after SSI diagnosis may have contributed to instrumentation retention. These results can serve as a guide for developing strategies for SSI treatment and for improved planning of spine surgery in an aging society.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Intraoperative inadvertent piercing of the aortic arch: case report

Aortic injury is a rarely encountered complication of spinal surgery. The authors report a case of a 32-year-old woman with a T3 tumor who experienced an intraoperative aortic arch injury during T3 spondylectomy. The patient was successfully treated with no postoperative neurological deficits.

Outcomes and Complications With Age in Spondylolisthesis: An Evaluation of the Elderly From the Quality Outcomes Database

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective database analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of age on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates after surgical treatment for spondylolisthesis SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis affects 3% to 20% of the population and up to 30% of the elderly. There is not yet consensus on whether age is a contraindication for surgical treatment of elderly patients.

METHODS

The Quality Outcomes Database lumbar registry was used to evaluate patients from 12 US academic and private centers who underwent surgical treatment for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis between July 2014 and June 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 608 patients who fit the inclusion criteria were categorized by age into the following groups: less than 60 (n = 239), 60 to 70 (n = 209), 71 to 80 (n = 128), and more than 80 (n = 32) years. Older patients showed lower mean body mass index (P < 0.001) and higher rates of diabetes (P = 0.007), coronary artery disease (P = 0.0001), and osteoporosis (P = 0.005). A lower likelihood for home disposition was seen with higher age (89.1% in <60-year-old vs. 75% in >80-year-old patients; P = 0.002). There were no baseline differences in PROs (Oswestry Disability Index, EuroQol health survey [EQ-5D], Numeric Rating Scale for leg pain and back pain) among age categories. A significant improvement for all PROs was seen regardless of age (P < 0.05), and most patients met minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for improvement in postoperative PROs. No differences in hospital readmissions or reoperations were seen among age groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, after controlling other variables, a higher age did not decrease the odds of achieving MCID at 12 months for the PROs.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that well-selected elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment of grade 1 spondylolisthesis can achieve meaningful outcomes. This modern, multicenter US study reflects the current use and limitations of spondylolisthesis treatment in the elderly, which may be informative to patients and providers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

A sliding scale to predict postoperative complications undergoing posterior spine surgery

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus of operative time (OT) and estimated blood loss (EBL) for elderly patients based on the predicted risk of complications after posterior spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age, OT, and EBL on the postoperative complication risk and to develop a simple sliding scale.

METHODS

We explored prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent posterior spine surgery in seven tertiary referral hospitals from November 2013 to May 2016. Age (<70, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, ≥85 years), OT (<2, 2-<3, 3-<4, 4-<5, ≥5 h), and EBL (<500, 500-<1000, 1000-<1500, 1500-<2000, ≥2000 ml) were categorized ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). The association between the crude cumulative categories' number and the incidence of complications was analyzed. We further evaluated the association by re-categorizing the cumulative number into three groups (3-4, 5-10, ≥11).

RESULTS

Total of 2416 patients (median age: 70 years old) were enrolled and major complications were observed in 75 (3.1%) patients. Age, OT, and EBL showed similar odds ratio (1.18-1.19) as each category increased. The cumulative categories' number fitted the estimate complication risk (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.87), and statistically significant trend was observed between predicted and actual complication rates (Cochran-Armitage test, P < 0.001). When cumulative categories' numbers were stratified into three groups, significant increasing trend of risk were observed (Mantel-Haenszel P < 0.001). Based on the categorical numbers, we proposed a simple sliding scale.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicated that the risk of postoperative complication was associated with cumulative score based on increased age, OT, and EBL. A simple sliding scale was developed based on these factors, which may be useful to predict complication risk after posterior spine surgery.

Perioperative complications of spine surgery in patients 80 years of age or older: a multicenter prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The number of spine surgeries performed in elderly patients is consistently increasing. However, to date the prevalence of and risk factors for perioperative complications remain unclear, especially in patients 80 years of age or older. This study had two goals: 1) determine the perioperative complications of spine surgery associated with patients 80 years of age or older; and 2) investigate the risk factors for perioperative systemic complications.

METHODS

In this paper, the authors describe a multicenter prospective cohort study. Seven spine centers with board-certified spine surgeons participated in this all-case investigation. A total of 270 consecutively enrolled patients (109 males and 161 females), 80 years of age or older, underwent spine surgery between January and December 2017. Patients with trauma, infection, or tumor were excluded in this cohort. Perioperative complications were defined as adverse events that occurred intraoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively. The patients' preoperative health status was determined using the following means of assessment: 1) the Charlson Comorbidity Index, 2) the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System, 3) the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), 4) the presence of sarcopenia, and 5) the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index. Associations among patient age, preoperative health status, surgical factors (instrumentation surgery, operation time, number of spinal levels treated, and estimated blood loss), and perioperative systemic complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall perioperative, surgical site, and minor systemic complications were observed in 20.0%, 8.1%, and 14.8% of patients, respectively. Major systemic complications, on the other hand, were not observed. The reoperation rate was low-only 4.1%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the ECOG-PS (p = 0.013), instrumentation surgery (p = 0.024), and an operation time longer than 180 minutes (p = 0.016) were associated with minor systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first multicenter prospective all-case investigation of perioperative complications of spine surgery in elderly patients. Although decreased daily activity (ECOG-PS), instrumentation surgery, and longer operation time were associated with minor systemic complications, no major systemic complications were observed in these elderly patients. Thus, spine surgery can be safely performed in elderly patients 80 years of age or older.

The Role of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgical Procedures in the Elderly Patient: An Analysis of 49 Patients Between 75 and 95 Years of Age

As the population gets older, yet remains active, the number of patients presenting with symptomatic spinal disease over the age of 75 increases. These include pain from osteoporotic spinal fractures, lumbar degenerative disease, as well as radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication from stenosis over the age of 75 and older increases. While some of these patients are very healthy, taking minimal medication, many are not good candidates for more invasive surgical procedures under general anesthesia because of medical co-morbidities such as insulin-dependent diabetes and medication use such as anti-coagulants. Past reviews of lumbar surgery in elderly patients have examined the risk factors with spinal fusion and multilevel surgery and many were written before the recent advent of more minimally invasive spinal procedures that reduce both operative time and the need for general anesthesia. This review examines effectiveness in return to activity and reduction in pain in these elderly patients stratified by underlying disease category, i.e. fractures, stenosis with neurogenic claudication and chronic pain, rather than just by the procedure, since there are often several minimally invasive procedures that are available. This review demonstrates very similar pain relief outcomes as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) scores which dropped in the range of 70% or more with the different procedures. Since the majority of these procedures involve short surgical times and minimal blood loss with small incisions that lower the risk of wound infection as well as cardio-respiratory stress and can be performed under local anesthesia as an outpatient, they are particularly advantageous for the properly selected elderly patient.

Complications after spinal fixation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurological deficits: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with ambition multicenter study

BACKGROUND

There have been few reports on the incidence and risk factors of the complications after spinal fixation surgery for osteoporotic vertebral collapse (OVC) with neurological deficits. This study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors of the complications after OVC surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, a total of 403 patients (314 women and 89 men; mean age 73.8 years) who underwent spinal fixation surgery for OVC with neurological deficits between 2005 and 2014 were enrolled. Data on patient demographics were collected, including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, steroid use, medical comorbidities, and surgical procedures. All postoperative complications that occurred within 6 weeks were recorded. Patients were classified into two groups, namely, complication group and no complication group, and risk factors for postoperative complications were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications occurred in 57 patients (14.1%), and the most common complication was delirium (5.7%). In the univariate analysis, the complication group was found to be older (p = 0.039) and predominantly male (p = 0.049), with higher occurrence rate of liver disease (p = 0.001) and Parkinson's disease (p = 0.039) compared with the no-complication group. In the multivariate analysis, the significant independent risk factors were age (p = 0.021; odds ratio [OR] 1.051, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.007-1.097), liver disease (p < 0.001; OR 8.993, 95% CI 2.882-28.065), and Parkinson's disease (p = 0.009; OR 3.636, 95% CI 1.378-9.599).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after spinal fixation surgery for OVC with neurological deficits occurred in 14.1%. Age, liver disease, and Parkinson's disease were demonstrated to be independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

Preoperative Narcotic Use, Impaired Ambulation Status, and Increased Intraoperative Blood Loss Are Independent Risk Factors for Complications Following Posterior Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective cohort study seeks to identify risk factors associated with complications following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion (PCLF) surgery.

METHODS

Adults undergoing PCLF from 2012 through 2018 at a single center were identified. Demographic and radiographic data, surgical characteristics, and complication rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent predictors of complications following surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The medical, surgical, and overall complication rates were 10.2%, 23.0%, and 29.1% respectively. Risk factors associated with medical complications in multivariate analysis included impaired ambulation status (odds ratio [OR], 2.27; p=0.02) and estimated blood loss over 500 mL (OR, 3.67; p=0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative narcotic use (OR, 2.43; p=0.02) and operative time (OR, 1.005; p=0.03) as risk factors for surgical complication, whereas antidepressant use was a protective factor (OR, 0.21; p=0.01). Overall complication was associated with preoperative narcotic use (OR, 1.97; p=0.04) and higher intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.0007; p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative narcotic use and estimated blood loss predicted the incidence of complications following PCLF for CSM. Ambulation status was a significant predictor of the development of a medical complication specifically. These results may help surgeons in counseling patients who may be at increased risk of complication following surgery.