Effects of tranexamic acid on blood loss during total hip arthroplasty

Die perioperative Gabe von Tranexamsäure

The application of tranexamic acid (TXA) during endoprosthetic surgical procedures has significantly increased in recent years. Due its ability to reduce perioperative blood loss and avert the need for blood transfusions as well as wound drainage, TXA is becoming part of a 'standard practice'. However, TXA is currently not approved for the application during endoprosthetic procedures and therefore, a benefit-risk analysis should always be conducted. Prophylactic administration of TXA without prior patient consent is only justified if fibrinolytic bleeding is expected and there are no contraindications or relevant risk factors for thromboembolic complications. Respectively, no patient consent is required when a therapeutic dose of TXA is administered in the context of fibrinolytic bleeding. The following guidelines provide updated recommendations based on the current state of knowledge on TXA optimal timing, routes of administration and dosing regimen.

Use of Tranexamic Acid for Elective Resection of Intracranial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

As an established antifibrinolytic agent, tranexamic acid (TXA) has garnered widespread use during surgery to limit intraoperative blood loss. In the field of neurosurgery, TXA is often introduced in cases of traumatic brain injury or elective spine surgeries; however, its role during elective cranial surgeries is not well established. We report a systematic review of the use of TXA in elective surgical resection of intracranial neoplasms.

METHODS

We performed this systematic review following PRISMA guidelines to identify studies investigating the use of TXA in elective neurosurgical resection of intracranial neoplasms. Variables extracted included patient demographics, surgical indications, type of surgery performed, TXA dose and route of administration, operative duration, blood loss, transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin level, and complications.

RESULTS

After careful screening, 4 articles (consisting of 682 patients) met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. The studies included 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 1 case series. A χ² test of pooled data demonstrated that patients administered TXA had a significantly decreased need for blood transfusions during surgery (odds ratio, 0.6273; 95% confidence interval, 0.4254-0.9251; P = 0.018). Mean total blood loss was 821.9 mL in the TXA group and 1099.0 mL in the control group across the studies. There was no significant difference in postoperative hemoglobin levels, with a mean of 11.4 g/dL in both the TXA and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the use of intraoperative TXA in tumor resection. However, its role in tumor resection has been less well investigated compared with its use in other areas of neurosurgery.

Intravenous tranexamic acid for reducing perioperative blood loss during revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) for reducing perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusions in revision hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

TXA was routinely administered as an intravenous preoperative dose in all the revision hip arthroplasty cases in our institution from December 2012. We retrospectively reviewed 803 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty from January 2008 to September 2018. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received intravenous TXA (n=482; 231 men and 251 women; mean age: 63.27±11.73 years) or not (n=321; 159 men and 162 women; mean age: 63.91±11.69 years). The 2 groups were compared in terms of estimated intraoperative blood loss, visible blood loss, hidden blood loss, the rate and volume of allogeneic blood transfusions, and the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The patients were also compared depending on whether they underwent total hip revision, isolated acetabular revision, or isolated femoral revision.

RESULTS

Regardless of the type of revision involved, the patients who received TXA showed significantly lower estimated intraoperative blood loss, visible blood loss, hidden blood loss, and allogeneic blood transfusion rate and volume (all p values were less than 0.001). Use of TXA was not associated with significant changes in the incidence of postoperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism (p=0.911). Similar results were obtained with subgroups of patients who underwent different types of revision surgeries, except hidden blood loss (p=0.994) of patients in the isolated femoral revision subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The administration of intravenous TXA can safely and effectively reduce the perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusions in revision hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study.

The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss in uncemented total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head: a prospective blinded randomized controlled study

Background

The purpose of this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study is to assess the efficacy of administration of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) for reducing blood loss in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head.

Methods

Between April 2012 and March 2014, 73 patients with avascular necrosis of femoral head were treated in our center. The patients were randomized and allocated to study group (n = 36; treated with TXA) and control group (n = 37). Intra- and postoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and incidence of deep vein thrombosis were assessed. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The intraoperative, postoperative, and total (clinical method and Gross’ formula) blood loss were significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.05). On the first, second, and third postoperative days, the levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly better in the study group (p < 0.05). There was a significantly greater number of patients who required blood transfusion in the control group (p = .027). Deep vein thrombosis was not found in either group.

Conclusions

A single dose of TXA used preoperatively may minimize intraoperative, postoperative, and total blood loss in uncemented THA for the treatment of osteonecrosis of femoral head, and may not increase the risk of prothrombotic complications.

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces blood transfusions in revision total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Aim: We performed a meta-analysis to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in revision total hip arthroplasty. Method: Potential academic articles were identified from Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect and other databases. The time range we retrieved from was that from the inception of electronic databases to February 2019. Gray studies were identified from the references of included literature reports. STATA version 11.0 was used to analyze the pooled data. Results: A total of eight articles were involved in our study. The overall participants of tranexamic acid (TXA) group were 3533, whereas it was 11,007 in the control group. Our meta-analysis showed that TXA is preferable for revision total hip arthroplasty because of its lower value of hemoglobin reduction (weighted mean difference = -1.277-1.405; 95% CI: -1.996 to -0.559; p < 0.001), the rate of blood transfusion (odds ratio: 0.233; 95% CI: 0.129-0.422; p < 0.001) and the number of red blood cell units transfused (weighted mean difference = -0.978; 95% CI = -1.631 to -0.324; p = 0.003). However, there was no difference in calculated blood loss (p = 0.075), operation duration (p = 0.569) and venous thromboembolism complications (p = 0.338). Conclusion: Based on available evidence, use of intravenous TXA for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty may reduce hemoglobin reduction, number of red blood cell units transfused and blood transfusion rate without increasing the risk of venous thromboembolism and length of operation duration. Given the relevant possible biases in our study, adequately powered and better-designed studies with long-term follow-up are required to reach a firmer conclusion.

The combined administration of systemic and topical tranexamic acid for total hip arthroplasty: Is it better than systemic?

Obective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of combined intravenous and topical use of tranexamic acid (TXA) on total blood loss and transfusion rate in total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

This prospective randomized study included 57 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty between September 2016 and September 2017. The IV administration group (Group 1) consisted of 26 patients (mean age: 63.73 ± 10.29 years), while the IV and topical administiration group (Group 2) consisted of 22 patients (62.82 ± 8.31 years). Demographic data and outcomes were obtained through a review of individual medical records. Medical comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), ASA and CCI, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, postoperative transfusion records and 90-day joint-related (implant subsidence, dislocation, postoperative anemia, deep infection, hematoma and/or wound problem, postoperative periprosthetic fracture) readmission rate and complication rate were compared between the groups.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), the level of preoperative Hb values, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Charleson Comorbidty Index (CCI) rating (p > 0.05). The mean postoperative Hgb in the group 2 was higher by a small amount compared to the group 1. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of the Hgb values (p = 0.562). Hgb Delta in the group 2 was lower than that of the group 1. The difference between the groups in the Hgb Delta values was not statistically significant (p = 0.268). The mean total blood loss was lower in the group 2 than in the group 1 but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.788). There was no significant difference observed in terms of any adverse complications among the 2 groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The combined administration of IV and topical TXA compared with IV alone can decrease total blood loss and the number of blood transfusions required without increasing the risk of DVT or/and PE in total hip arthroplasty. But the statistical analysis and clinical relevance is not significant.

Level of Evidence

Level I Therapeutic Study.

OBTAIN E: outcome benefits of tranexamic acid in hip arthroplasty with enoxaparin: a randomised double-blinded controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We examined the blood conserving effect of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach with enoxaparin as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) chemoprophylaxis, and whether this translates to an effect on functional outcomes in the perioperative period. We also compare the effect of aspirin and enoxaparin as DVT chemoprophylactic agents.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. 105 patients were randomised to receive either tranexamic acid or an equivalent volume of normal saline with enoxaparin used as DVT chemoprophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was thigh swelling. Blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusions was also recorded. Secondary outcome measures including postoperative functional scores and mobility, pain scores and length of stay. We also compared and pooled the results of a previous study with the same study intervention methodology which used aspirin as DVT chemoprophylaxis instead of enoxaparin.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the primary outcome of thigh swelling. There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss observed in the tranexamic acid (TXA) group (0.510 L, SD 0.210) compared with the control group (0.698, SD 0.301) ( p < 0.001). The estimated blood loss was also significantly less in the TXA group (1.130 L, SD 0.311) compared with the control group (1.48 L, SD 0.510) ( p < 0.001). Pooled data of both consecutive trials showed there was a statistically significant reduction in length of stay for those that received TXA (3.72 days, SD 0.83 versus 4.24 days, SD 0.97, p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant increased risk of a transfusion in the control group as compared those that received TXA (OR 5.5, 1.188 to 25.449, p = 0.029). There was no difference in blood loss between DVT chemoprophylactic agents.

INTERPRETATION

TXA is an effective agent in reducing blood loss in THR using the anterior approach and was not affected by choice of DVT chemoprophylaxis. Patients who received TXA had fewer transfusions and a reduction in their length of stay. The blood conserving effect of TXA was not associated with improved postoperative recovery across the measures of pain and mobility.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ANZCTR number: ACTRN12616000606482.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different hemostatic methods in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis

Background

It is unclear which kind of interventional therapy is the best when reducing blood loss in patients prepared for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We performed this network meta-analysis to rank the best intervention arm for blood loss control in THA patients.

Methods

We searched electronic databases about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare three treatments (topical tranexamic acid (TXA), intravenous TXA, and topical fibrin sealant (FS)) versus placebo for the people prepared for THA. Traditional and network meta-analyses were performed. The quality assessment was conducted using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. The network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 13.0 software.

Results

Finally, a total of 32 RCTs were included in this network meta-analysis. Topical TXA, intravenous TXA, and topical FS significantly decreased the need for transfusion and total blood loss when compared with placebo. And intravenous TXA ranks the first hemostasis agent for reducing the need for transfusion and total blood loss. There was no significant difference between these three treatments (intravenous TXA, topical TXA, and topical FS) in the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Conclusion

Intravenous TXA may be the best way to reduce the need for transfusion and total blood loss. More direct studies that focused on topical TXA versus FS are needed in the future.

The Effect of Preoperative Administration of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid During Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Revision hip arthroplasty poses several challenges, including the management of perioperative blood loss. Recent studies have validated the use of tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty, showing reduced blood loss and decreased number of allogenic blood transfusions. The effectiveness of tranexamic acid has not been well studied in the revision hip arthroplasty setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 1,072 patients who underwent revision hip arthroplasty at our institution from 2008 to 2016. A total of 634 patients met the inclusion criteria, and comparisons were made between 232 consecutive patients without the use of tranexamic acid and 402 consecutive patients with the use of tranexamic acid. Patients were subdivided into 4 groups based on the complexity of revision surgical procedures: (1) major revision, (2) isolated femoral component revision, (3) isolated acetabular component revision, and (4) isolated femoral head and acetabular liner exchange. Within these groups, we compared the demographic data, estimated intraoperative blood loss, perioperative blood units transfused, postoperative hemoglobin drop, and thromboembolic complications between patients receiving either tranexamic acid or no antifibrinolytic therapy.

RESULTS

The primary outcomes of our study (estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin drop, and perioperative blood transfusion) were all reduced in patients who received tranexamic acid compared with patients who received no antifibrinolytic therapy. When analyzed on the basis of the complexity of surgical revision, there was a decrease in estimated intraoperative blood loss following tranexamic acid administration in the major revision group (845 compared with 1,095 mL; p < 0.001). The postoperative drop in hemoglobin was lower in the major revision group with tranexamic acid administration (by 8.9 g/L; p < 0.01) and the isolated acetabular component revision group with tranexamic acid administration (by 11.9 g/L; p < 0.001). The need for perioperative blood transfusion was reduced across all revisions treated with tranexamic acid (major revision group, 1.79 compared with 3.33 units, p < 0.001; femoral revision only, 0.97 compared with 2.25 units, p < 0.01; acetabular revision only, 0.73 compared with 1.72 units, p < 0.001; and head and liner exchange, 0.15 compared with 0.89 unit, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this study, preoperative administration of intravenous tranexamic acid in revision hip arthroplasty reduces allogenic blood transfusions and perioperative blood loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tranexamic acid use during total hip arthroplasty: A single center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent that has shown promise in reducing blood loss during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several studies have reported side effects of high-dose TXA administration, including myocardial infarction (MI), thromboembolic events, and seizures. These possible side effects have prevented the widespread adoption of TXA in the surgical community.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 564 primary and revision THAs performed at a single academic center. Surgical patients received either no TXA or 1 g IV TXA at the beginning of surgery followed by a second bolus just before the surgical wound closure, at the surgeon's discretion. We analyzed differences in hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), estimated blood loss (EBL), and adverse events in patients receiving TXA versus patients not receiving TXA up to 2 days following surgery.

RESULTS

Significantly higher Hb and Hct values were found across all time points among patients undergoing primary posterior or revision THA who had received TXA. In addition, transfusion rates were significantly decreased in both primary posterior THAs and revision THAs when TXA was administered. Patients who received TXA experienced significantly fewer adverse events than those who did not for all surgery types.

CONCLUSION

Administration of low-dose intravenous (IV) and intra-articular (IA) TXA does not appear to increase rates of adverse events and may be effective in minimizing blood loss, as reflected by Hb and Hct values following THA.

Low-Dose Epinephrine Plus Tranexamic Acid Reduces Early Postoperative Blood Loss and Inflammatory Response: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The reductions of perioperative blood loss and inflammatory response are important in total knee arthroplasty. Tranexamic acid reduced blood loss and the inflammatory response in several studies. However, the effect of epinephrine administration plus tranexamic acid has not been intensively investigated, to our knowledge. In this study, we evaluated whether the combined administration of low-dose epinephrine plus tranexamic acid reduced perioperative blood loss or inflammatory response further compared with tranexamic acid alone.

METHODS

This randomized placebo-controlled trial consisted of 179 consecutive patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty. Patients were randomized into 3 interventions: Group IV received intravenous low-dose epinephrine plus tranexamic acid, Group TP received topical diluted epinephrine plus tranexamic acid, and Group CT received tranexamic acid alone. The primary outcome was perioperative blood loss on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included perioperative blood loss on postoperative day 3, coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters (measured by thromboelastography), inflammatory cytokine levels, transfusion values (rate and volume), thromboembolic complications, length of hospital stay, wound score, range of motion, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score.

RESULTS

The mean calculated total blood loss (and standard deviation) in Group IV was 348.1 ± 158.2 mL on postoperative day 1 and 458.0 ± 183.4 mL on postoperative day 3, which were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) compared with Group TP at 420.5 ± 188.4 mL on postoperative day 1 and 531.1 ± 231.4 mL on postoperative day 3 and Group CT at 520.4 ± 228.4 mL on postoperative day 1 and 633.7 ± 237.3 mL on postoperative day 3. Intravenous low-dose epinephrine exhibited a net anti-inflammatory activity in total knee arthroplasty and did not induce an obvious hypercoagulable status. Transfusion values were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in Group IV, but no significant differences were observed in the incidence of thromboembolic complications, wound score, range of motion, and HSS score among the 3 groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined administration of low-dose epinephrine and tranexamic acid demonstrated an increased effect in reducing perioperative blood loss and the inflammatory response compared with tranexamic acid alone, with no apparent increased incidence of thromboembolic and other complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: Mixed treatment comparisons of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies

Background

The present study is a network meta-analysis of various routes of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies evaluating TXA in patients with THA were included. Number of patients requiring blood transfusion was the primary outcome.

Results

Pooled estimate for TXA use against placebo for blood transfusion rate was 0.30 [0.23, 0.39] favoring TXA. Maximum reduction in the risk of blood transfusion was observed with topical plus intra-operative intravenous TXA.

Conclusion

Combined topical and intravenous TXA during surgery may perform better than other modes in patients undergoing THA.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in total hip replacement: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hip osteoarthritis is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal degenerative diseases in elderly. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most effective surgical treatment for end stage hip osteoarthritis. Tranexamic acid (TA) is a potent drug to reduce surgical blood loss in surgery, therefore, as a potential drug for application in THA.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the combined efficacy of TA administration in THA. A meta-analysis including 25 randomized controlled trials was conducted for generating synthesized effects.

METHODS

This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis. A total of 25 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled results illustrated that total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rate, and average hospital stay were significantly lower than controls (standardized mean difference or odds ratio (OR) (95%CI): -0.87, (-1.13,-0.61), -0.68, (-0.96,-0.39), -1.41, (-2.24,-0.59), -1.11, (-1.63,-0.58), 0.28, (0.20,-0.38), -0.17, (-0.49,0.14), P < .05, respectively). Moreover, TA acts efficiently without increasing risk of thromboembolic events with OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.50-2.62, P = .75. Subgroup analysis indicated no statistically significant differences between a higher dose of topical TA (≥2 g or 15 mg/kg) or a lower dose (<2 g or 15 mg/kg).

CONCLUSION

The findings indicated that TA is clinically effective and safe in patients receiving total hip arthroplasty.

Comparative study of topical vs. intravenous tranexamic acid regarding blood loss in total knee arthroplasty

Objective

To compare topical vs. intravenous tranexamic acid (TA) in total knee arthroplasty regarding blood loss and transfusion.

Methods

Ninety patients were randomized to receive TA intravenously (20 mg/kg in 100 mL of saline; group IV), topically (1.5 g in 50 mL of saline, sprayed over the operated site, before release of the tourniquet; topical group), or intravenous saline (100 mL with anesthesia; control group). The volume of drained blood in 48 h, the amount of transfused blood, and the serum levels of hemoglobin and hematocrit before and after surgery were evaluated.

Results

The groups were similar for gender, age, weight, laterality, and preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels (p > 0.2). The hemoglobin level dropped in all groups when comparing the preoperative and the 48-h evaluations: the control group decreased 3.8 mg/dL on average, while the IV group had a decrease of 3.0, and the topical group, of 3.2 (p = 0.019). The difference between the control and IV groups was confirmed by Bonferroni test (p = 0.020). The difference between the control group and the topical group was not significant (p = 0.130), although there was less reduction in hemoglobin in the topical group; the comparison between the IV group and the topical group was also not significant (p = 1.000).

Conclusion

Using topic and IV tranexamic acid decreased blood loss and the need for transfusion in total knee arthroplasty. Topical application showed results similar to IV use regarding the need for blood transfusion, but without the possible side effects of IV administration.

OBTAIN A: Outcome Benefits of Tranexamic Acid in Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We examined whether the blood conserving effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach, translates to an effect on functional outcomes in the perioperative period.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. One hundred one patients were randomized to receive either TXA or an equivalent volume of normal saline. The primary outcome measure was thigh swelling. Secondary outcome measures included, visual analogue pain score, timed up and go test, a 10 meter walk test, and length of stay. Blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusions were also recorded.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the primary outcome of thigh swelling or the secondary outcome measures of postoperative pain nor mobility. There was a significant reduction in length of stay for those that received TXA 3.58 days (0.84) compared with the control group 4.27 days (0.98) (P < .001). There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss observed in the TXA group (0.460L SD 0.228) compared with the control group (0.687L SD 0.283L) (P < .001). The estimated blood loss was also significantly less in the TXA group (1.084L SD 0.440) compared with the control group (1.394 L SD 0.426).

CONCLUSION

TXA is an effective agent in reducing blood loss in total hip arthroplasty using the anterior approach. The blood conserving effect of TXA was not associated with improved postoperative recovery across the measures of pain and mobility. Administration of TXA may have a positive effect on reducing the duration of inpatient stays.

Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in Orthopedic Surgery

Perioperative bleeding and postsurgical hemorrhage are common in invasive surgical procedures, including orthopedic surgery. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a pharmacologic agent that acts through an antifibrinolytic mechanism to stabilize formed clots and reduce active bleeding. It has been used successfully in orthopedics to reduce perioperative blood loss, particularly in total hip and knee arthroplasty and spine surgery. Numerous research studies have reported favorable safety and efficacy in orthopedic cases, although there is no universal standard on its administration and its use has not yet become the standard of practice. Reported administration methods often depend on the surgeon's preference, with both topical and intravenous routes showing efficacy. The type and anatomic site of the surgery seem to influence the decision making but also result in conflicting opinions. Reported complication rates with TXA use are low. The incidence of both arterial and venous thromboembolic events, particularly deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, has not been found to be significantly different with TXA use for healthy patients. The route of administration and dosage do not appear to affect complication rates either. However, data on patients with higher-risk conditions are deficient. In addition, TXA has shown potential to reduce blood loss, transfusion rates and volumes, perioperative hemoglobin change, and hospital-related costs at various degrees among the published studies. Conservation of blood products, reduced laboratory costs, and shorter hospital stays are likely the major factors driving the cost savings associated with TXA use. This article reviews current data supporting the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of TXA in orthopedic surgery.

FIBTEM provides prediction of massive bleeding in total hip replacement arthroplasty

This retrospective study evaluated the association between maximum clot firmness of FIBTEM (MCFFIB) and blood loss, and determined a cutoff value of MCFFIB that may predict massive bleeding in total hip replacement arthroplasty (THRA). Seventy-two adult patients undergoing THRA for avascular necrosis of the femoral head or degenerative arthritis of the hip were included. Patients' medical records were reviewed to collect pre and postoperative laboratory data, as well as the amount of intra and postoperative blood loss (IBL and PBL). Each pre and postoperative fibrinogen level had a significant correlation with the pre and postoperative MCFFIB, respectively (ρ = 0.289, P = 0.014 and ρ = 0.286, P = 0.015). IBL had significant correlations with pre and postoperative MCFFIB (ρ = -0.305, P = 0.010 and ρ = -0.297, P = 0.013, respectively), and PBL also showed significant correlations with the pre and postoperative MCFFIB (ρ = -0.471, P < 0.001 and ρ = -0.475, P < 0.001, respectively). A respective pre or postoperative MCFFI cutoff value of 16 mm or less or 10 mm or less showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting IBL 1000 ml or above or PBL 400 ml or above. Postoperative transfusion was performed more frequently in patients showing postoperative MCFFIB 10 mm or less (31 vs. 3.3%, P = 0.005). MCFFIB correlated well with the amount of IBL or PBL. In addition, a particular value of pre or postoperative MCFFIB could offer the predictive standard for massive bleeding in THRA.

Tranexamic Acid Administration in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Combined with Topical Versus Single-Dose Intravenous Administration

BACKGROUND

The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total hip arthroplasty is well documented. However, considering the potential side effects, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, the ideal method of providing TXA to patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty remains controversial. The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) administration combined with topical administration of TXA regarding postoperative blood loss and transfusion rates in patients treated with primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 150 patients were divided into three groups: the combined group (IV administration of 15 mg/kg of TXA combined with topical administration of 1 g/100 mL of TXA), the single IV group (IV administration of 15 mg/kg of TXA), and the placebo group. The primary outcomes included blood-loss variables (total, intraoperative, and drainage blood loss; changes in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet concentration; and amount of IV transfusion fluid) and transfusion values (frequency of transfusion and number of transfused blood units). The secondary outcomes included the length of the hospital stay, range of hip motion, Harris hip score, and prevalences of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

The total blood loss in the combined group (mean and standard deviation, 835.49 ± 343.50 mL) was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in comparison with that in the single IV group (1002.62 ± 366.85 mL) and placebo group (1221.11 ± 386.25 mL). The combined group also had fewer transfusions in comparison with the single IV and placebo groups (1, 8, and 19, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no difference among the 3 groups with regard to the rates of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous combined with topical administration of TXA in patients undergoing a primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty significantly reduced postoperative bleeding and the transfusion rate. Studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to confirm whether this promising combined strategy is safe with regard to thromboembolic complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Single-dose tranexamic acid for reducing bleeding and transfusions in total hip arthroplasty: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of different doses

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid can be effective at decreasing blood loss and transfusion requirements associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA), but few studies have compared the efficacy of different intravenous dosing regimes. This double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the ability of two doses of intravenous TXA (IV-TXA, 10 or 15mg/kg) to reduce bleeding and transfusions associated with THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 124 patients scheduled for THA were consecutively randomized 1:1:1 into three parallel arms: control (placebo), 10mg/kg IV-TXA and 15mg/kg IV-TXA.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients who experienced bleeding and required transfusions was significantly lower in the 15mg/kg IV-TXA group (1 of 42, 2.4%) than in the 10mg/kg IV-TXA group (8 of 39, 20.5%; P=0.012) and in the control group (10 of 38, 26.3%; P=0.002). In fact, this proportion was similar between the 10mg/kg IV-TXA and control groups (P=0.547). Ultrasound examination on postoperative day 3 revealed only one case of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (in the femoral vein) in the 10mg/kg IV-TXA group, which was managed by administering low-molecular-weight heparin. No cases of deep-vein thrombosis were observed in the other two groups. No cases of symptomatic pulmonary embolism were observed.

CONCLUSION

IV-TXA at 10mg/kg significantly reduced blood loss and mitigated the decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit after THA, but it did not significantly reduce the need for transfusions. In contrast, a dose of 15mg/kg reduced both bleeding and transfusion requirements. Our results argue for a dose of 15mg/kg when using single-dose IV-TXA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I.

Does tranexamic acid reduce blood transfusion cost for primary total hip arthroplasty? A case-control study

Peri-operative tranexamic acid (TXA) significantly reduces the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and thus hospital costs are reduced. Before employing TXA in primary THA at our institution, facility costs were $286.90/THA for blood transfusion and required 0.45 man-hours/THA (transfusion rate 19.87%). After incorporating TXA, the cost for intravenous application was $123.38/THA for blood transfusion and TXA medication and 0.07 man-hours/THA (transfusion rate 4.39%) and the cost for topical application was $132.41/THA for blood transfusion and TXA and 0.14 man-hours/THA (transfusion rate 12.86%). TXA has the potential to reduce the facility cost per THA and the man-hours/THA from blood transfusions.

Topical application of tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind controlled trial

So far, studies of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were still lacking and controversial. We conducted this randomized double-blind controlled trial which included 101 patients to assess the effect of a high-dose 3g topical TXA in THA. The results showed that 3g topical TXA could significantly reduce transfusions from 22.4% to 5.7% (P<0.05) without increasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and other complications. In addition, topical TXA significantly reduced total blood loss, reduced drain blood loss, and the drops of HB and HCT in topical TXA group were lower than control group. We concluded that 3g topical TXA was effective and safe in reducing bleeding and transfusions in THA.

Comparison of topical and intravenous tranexamic acid on blood loss and transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty

The objective of this study was to determine whether topical tranexamic acid (TXA) carried similar hemostatic effect compared with intravenous TXA in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Three hundred and three THA patients were enrolled and randomized into 3 groups: no TXA group, topical and intravenous TXA group. The results showed that the topical and intravenous TXA group had reduced but similar blood transfusion rates (5.88% v. s. 5.94%, P = 0.816). No significant difference was detected in total blood loss between the two TXA groups [(963.4 ± 421.3) ml vs. (958.5 ± 422) ml P = 0.733]. We conclude that topical use of TXA was equally effective and safe compared with intravenous TXA in reducing blood loss and transfusion rate following THA without substantial complications.

Effect of intra-articular injection of tranexamic acid on postoperative hemoglobin in total hip arthroplasty

Postoperative anemia is a significant risk factor in total hip arthroplasty, leading to increased length of hospital stay and delayed mobility and rehabilitation, and is poorly tolerated by patients with peripheral vascular and cardiovascular disease. Intravenous tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic drug, has been shown to reduce postoperative anemia in total joint replacement. Intra-articular administration eliminates the risk of systemic effects, the most concerning of which is thrombosis. Although this method of administering tranexamic acid has been studied in total knee replacement, currently no literature has been published on its efficacy in primary total hip replacement. The purpose of this study was to examine postoperative hemoglobin decrease and the transfusion rate following intra-articular tranexamic acid administration in primary total hip arthroplasty. The authors conducted a retrospective review of 181 consecutive total hip replacements, 91 of which received tranexamic acid. No statistical significance was found between these groups in any of the demographic variables. Postoperative hemoglobin decrease in the control group was 4.4±1.0 g/dL compared with a decrease of 3.6±1.1 g/dL in the tranexamic group, demonstrating an 18% reduction in blood loss (P<.001). No significant difference was found between the number of patients transfused (P=.777) or the number of units used (P=.993). No clotting events were seen in either group. Overall, the study demonstrates that intra-articular tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty is associated with a significant improvement in postoperative hemoglobin decrease without systemic hypercoagulability.

Topical tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion rates associated with primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Systemic tranexamic acid can decrease blood loss and rates of transfusion in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the efficacy of topical tranexamic acid in THA has only recently been characterized in a small number of studies.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to compare (1) the greatest hemoglobin decrease after surgery; (2) transfusion rates; and (3) symptomatic thromboembolic events among patients undergoing THA who did and did not receive topical tranexamic acid.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 135 patients (154 THAs) who received 10 mL 5% tranexamic acid added in a topical cocktail solution during surgery between January 2009 and July 2011 with 211 patients (234 THAs) who received only the topical cocktail solution (analgesic and antibiotic agent) between January 2005 and December 2008. Contraindications for the use of tranexamic acid included a documented history of a venous thromboembolic event, an allergy to tranexamic acid, thrombophilia, or a high risk of venous thromboembolism based on the guidelines of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; the 135 patients who received it during that period represented 99.4% of the patients undergoing THA during that time. We compared changes in Hb, transfusion rates, estimated blood loss, surgical results, and complications between the groups. The transfusion threshold was the same, when the Hb values were < 10 g/dL. Patients were screened for thromboembolic disease if symptoms or signs appeared.

RESULTS

Hb decreased less in the tranexamic acid group (1.87 ± 1.10 g/dL) than in the control group (2.2 ± 1.36 g/dL; p = 0.01) on the first postoperative day. The frequency of transfusion was lower in patients receiving tranexamic acid (17% as compared with 35% in the control group; p < 0.001). There was only one nonfatal pulmonary embolism in the control group during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of topical tranexamic acid in patients undergoing THA reduces postoperative bleeding and decreases blood transfusion rates. No increase in major complications was identified in patients managed with topical tranexamic acid. This retrospective study confirms the results of a smaller randomized trial on the same topic by another group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Enhanced recovery in total hip replacement: a clinical review

The outcome after total hip replacement has improved with the development of surgical techniques, better pain management and the introduction of enhanced recovery pathways. These pathways require a multidisciplinary team to manage pre-operative education, multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation. The current economic climate and restricted budgets favour brief hospitalisation while minimising costs. This has put considerable pressure on hospitals to combine excellent results, early functional recovery and shorter admissions. In this review we present an evidence-based summary of some common interventions and methods, including pre-operative patient education, pre-emptive analgesia, local infiltration analgesia, pre-operative nutrition, the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields, peri-operative rehabilitation, wound dressings, different surgical techniques, minimally invasive surgery and fast-track joint replacement units.

The effect of tranexamic acid on transfusion rate in primary total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) may produce blood loss requiring allogenic blood transfusion. Recently several authors have reported success decreasing their transfusion rate with tranexamic acid (TXA). We retrospectively reviewed our last 1595 primary THA in 1494 patients looking at whether the patients received TXA via IV infusion, topical application, or neither, and the need for a blood transfusion. Infusion of TXA acid produced a statistically significant difference in transfusion rate (p<0.001) while topical TXA failed to reach statistical significance (P=0.15). The transfusion rate without TXA was 19.86%, 4.39% with TXA infusion (odds ratio=5.36), and 12.86% (odds ratio=1.67) with topical TXA.

Randomized blinded study comparing a bipolar sealer and standard electrocautery in reducing transfusion requirements in anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty

Managing blood loss in total hip arthroplasty (THA) minimizes complications and decreases cost. Tissue-sparing anterior supine intermuscular THA (ASI-THA) may offer a quicker recovery but increases blood loss and transfusion requirements. This double-blinded prospective study compared a bipolar sealer (Aquamantys 6.0 bipolar sealer) to standard monopolar electrocautery in reducing blood loss in ASI-THA. Differences in calculated actual blood loss (ABL), hemoglobin, and transfusion requirements were examined. One hundred hips were randomized to each group. Transfusion rates were similar, 6% and 4%, respectively (p>0.05). ABL and change in hemoglobin were identical (1.35 and 3.3g). No significant differences in transfusion, blood loss, or hemoglobin were seen with a bipolar sealer device. Routine use of this bipolar sealer device has been discontinued in ASI-THA.

Do we really need tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of nineteen randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion need in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. However, no to date, no study has been large enough to determine definitively whether the drug is safe and effective. We examined whether intravenous tranexamic acid, when compared with placebo, was safe and effective in total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. Data were evaluated using the generic evaluation tool designed by the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. Ultimately, 19 randomized controlled trials involving 1,030 patients were included.

RESULTS

The use of tranexamic acid significantly reduced total blood loss by a mean of 305.27 mL [95 % confidence interval (CI) -397.66 to -212.89, p < 0.001], intraoperative blood loss by a mean of 86.33 mL(95 % CI -152.29 to -20.37, p = 0.01), postoperative blood loss by a mean of 176.79 mL (95 % CI -236.78 to -116.39, p < 0.001), and "hidden" blood loss by a mean of 152.70 mL (95 % CI -187.98 to -117.42, p < 0.001), resulting in a meaningful reduction in the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion (odds ratio 0.28, 95 % CI 0.19 to 0.42, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in occurrence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other complications among the study groups, or cost or hospitalization duration.

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this meta-analysis indicate that intravenous tranexamic acid may reduce blood loss and transfusion need in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty without increasing the risk of complications. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to validate the results.

Efficacy of tranexamic acid on blood loss after primary cementless total hip replacement with rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis: A case-control study in 70 patients

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative blood loss is a frequent cause of complications in total hip replacement (THR). The present prospective study assessed the efficacy of tranexamic acid (Exacyl(®)) in reducing blood loss in primary THR associated to rivaroxaban (Xarelto(®)) thromboprophylaxis.

HYPOTHESIS

Tranexamic acid associated to rivaroxaban reduces blood loss.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A prospective case-control study included 70 primary cementless THRs performed by a single surgeon on a standardized technique, between September 2009 and September 2010. Thirty-seven patients received perioperative tranexamic acid; all patients received rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of peroperative blood-loss volume or rates of thromboembolic or ischemic events or hematoma. Postoperative blood loss, D0-5 differential hemoglobinemia and real blood loss (in mL 100% hematocrit) were significantly lower in the tranexamic acid group. No transfusions were required in the tranexamic acid group, versus four in the control group.

DISCUSSION

Tranexamic acid associated to direct anti-Xa (antithrombin-independent) oral anticoagulants was effective in reducing postoperative blood loss, improving hemoglobinemia at 5 days and reducing transfusion rates. The results also confirmed the efficacy of and tolerance for rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis in primary THR, with no clinical thrombotic events induced by the association of tranexamic acid with rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid is a simple means of reducing postoperative blood loss in THR, without increased risk of thromboembolism when associated to rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III prospective case-control study.

Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and financial cost in primary total hip and knee replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Blood conservation strategies have been developed to diminish blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery. Tranexamic acid (TA) is an inexpensive antifibrinolytic agent that is little used in orthopaedic surgery due to the absence of standardised optimal administration regimens.

HYPOTHESIS

Blood transfusion requirements and induced costs can be diminished by using TA according to a standardised administration protocol in a large cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study in patients who underwent joint replacement surgery by a single surgeon compared two periods, 2007-2008 without TA and 2008-2009 with TA. The 451 included patients underwent primary unilateral hip (n=261) or knee (n=190) replacement for osteoarthritis. Standardised protocols were used for surgery and anaesthesia. TA was given intravenously in a dose of 1g (i.e., 15mg/kg) at incision and wound closure then at 6-hour intervals for 24 hours. Blood losses were estimated using the Mercuriali formula. Haemoglobin on D -1 and D 8 and the number and volume of autologous (from intra-operative blood salvage) and homologous blood transfusions were collected. The costs of TA, blood salvage systems, and homologous blood units were recorded. The two groups were compared using Student's test, Wilcoxon's test, and the Khi(2) test, and multivariate analyses were performed. Values of p less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

TA use was associated with a significant decrease in the homologous blood transfusion rate (from 4% to 0%) and with 38% and 68% reductions in the rate and volume of autologous blood transfusions, respectively, due to a 34% decrease in blood losses. After taking into account the additional cost of TA therapy, there was a 25% reduction in the cost of the blood conservation strategy.

CONCLUSION

TA therapy abolished the need for homologous blood transfusion and induced no notable side effects. TA therapy decreased the amount of blood salvaged intra-operatively, allowing a more rational use of the blood salvage system and decreasing the cost of anaesthesia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV. Retrospective case-control.

Revision total hip arthroplasty in Jehovah's Witnesses

Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with greater blood loss than primary THA. Jehovah's Witnesses will not accept transfusions of blood or blood products and are thus at an increased risk for complications due to perioperative anemia. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, morbidity, and mortality of Jehovah's Witnesses who were medically optimized and underwent revision THA. Databases from 2 institutions were reviewed to identify 10 patients (11 THAs) who were Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing revision THA with a minimum 24-month follow-up. At most recent follow-up, all patients were doing well clinically, with Harris Hip Scores greater than 80 points. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated well-positioned components and no progressive radioluciencies. No major perioperative medical or surgical complications occurred in patients undergoing THA. Revision THA for aseptic causes results in good clinical outcomes in patients who are preoperatively optimized before undergoing surgery.

Anesthesia for bone replacement surgery

Advances in clinical medicine, improved understanding of pathophysiology, and the extensive application of medical technology have projected hitherto high risk and poor outcome surgical procedures into the category of routine and relatively good outcome surgeries. Bone replacement surgery is one amongst these and is wrought with a multitude of perioperative complexities. An understanding of these goes a long way in assisting in the final outcome for the patient. Here we present a review of the literature covering various issues involved during the different stages of the perioperative period.

Proinflammatory cytokines and complement activation in salvaged blood from abdominal aortic aneurism surgery and total hip replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Levels of proinflammatory mediators in unwashed salvaged blood from abdominal aortic aneurism (AAA) surgery are unknown. We hypothesized that there are higher levels of these mediators in unwashed blood salvaged in AAA surgery compared to hip replacement surgery.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten patients scheduled for AAA surgery (Group A) and 10 patients for total hip replacement surgery (Group H) were included. Blood samples from the autotransfusion set were obtained during surgery and arterial samples before, during, and 6 hours after surgery. Determination of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, activated complement 3 (C3a), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were performed. Salvaged blood was not retransfused.

RESULTS

Levels (median [range]) of IL-8 in blood in the salvage system were higher in Group A versus Group H (215.3 [22.5-697.2] vs. 35.3 [16.7-66.6] pg/mL; p = 0.002). Higher levels of IL-6 were also seen in Group A versus Group H (60.0 [52.6-62.2] vs. 42.34 [19.4-62.2] pg/mL; p = 0.049). Levels of IL-6 in blood sampled during surgery were approximately fivefold higher in Group A versus Group H (p = 0.023), whereas approximately 70% higher levels of C3a were observed in Group H versus Group A (p = 0.021). Postoperative concentrations of IL-1β (p = 0.002), IL-6 (p = 0.001), and IL-8 (0.005) were higher in Group A versus Group H.

CONCLUSION

Salvaged blood in AAA surgery contains substantially higher levels of proinflammatory mediators compared to blood in total hip replacement surgery.