1
|
Marx M, Laborde ML, Algans C, Tartayre M, James CJ. Barriers to Early Progress in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Ear Hear 2024:00003446-990000000-00329. [PMID: 39129126 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients obtain varying levels of speech perception from their device. Adult CI users adapt quickly to their CI if they have no peripheral "bottom-up" or neurocognitive "top-down" limiting factors. Our objective here was to understand the influence of limiting factors on the progression of sentence understanding in quiet and in noise, initially and over time. We hypothesized that the presence of limiting factors, detected using a short test battery, would predictably influence sentence recognition with practical consequences. We aimed to validate the test battery by comparing the presence of limiting factors and the success criteria of >90% sentence understanding in quiet 1 month after activation. DESIGN The study was a single-clinic, cross-sectional, retrospective design incorporating 32 adult unilateral Nucleus CI users aged 27 to 90 years (mean = 70, SD = 13.5). Postoperative outcome was assessed through sentence recognition scores in quiet and in varying signal to noise ratios at 1 day, 1 to 2 months, and up to 2 years. Our clinic's standard test battery comprises physiological and neurocognitive measures. Physiological measures included electrically evoked compound action potentials for recovery function, spread of excitation, and polarity effect. To evaluate general cognitive function, inhibition, and phonological awareness, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening test, the Stroop Color-Word Test, and tests 3 and 4 of the French Assessment of Reading Skills in Adults over 16 years of age, respectively were performed. Physiological scores were considered abnormal, and therefore limiting, when total neural recovery periods and polarity effects, for both apical and basal electrode positions, were >1.65 SDs from the population mean. A spread of excitation of >6 electrode units was also considered limiting. For the neurocognitive tests, scores poorer than 1.65 SDs from published normal population means were considered limiting. RESULTS At 1 month, 13 out of 32 CI users scored ≥90% sentence recognition in quiet with no significant dependence on age. Subjects with no limiting peripheral or neurocognitive factors were 8.5 times more likely to achieve ≥90% score in quiet at 1 month after CI switch-on (p = 0.010). In our sample, we detected 4 out of 32 cases with peripheral limiting factors that related to neural health or poor electrode-neural interface at both apical and basal positions. In contrast, neurocognitive limiting factors were identified in 14 out of 32 subjects. Early sentence recognition scores were predictive of long-term sentence recognition thresholds in noise such that limiting factors appeared to be of continuous influence. CONCLUSIONS Both peripheral and neurocognitive processing factors affect early sentence recognition after CI activation. Peripheral limiting factors may have been detected less often than neurocognitive limiting factors because they were defined using sample-based criteria versus normal population-based criteria. Early performance was generally predictive of long-term performance. Understanding the measurable covariables that limit CI performance may inform follow-up and improve counseling. A score of ≥90% for sentence recognition in quiet at 1 month may be used to define successful progress; whereas, lower scores indicate the need for diagnostic testing and ongoing rehabilitation. Our findings suggest that sentence test scores as early as 1 day after activation can provide vital information for the new CI user and indicate the need for rehabilitation follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Marx
- Service Oto Rhino Laryngologie Hôpital Riquet, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Carol Algans
- Service Oto Rhino Laryngologie Hôpital Riquet, Toulouse, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drouin JR, Davis CP. Individual differences in visual pattern completion predict adaptation to degraded speech. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE 2024; 255:105449. [PMID: 39083999 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Recognizing acoustically degraded speech relies on predictive processing whereby incomplete auditory cues are mapped to stored linguistic representations via pattern recognition processes. While listeners vary in their ability to recognize degraded speech, performance improves when a written transcription is presented, allowing completion of the partial sensory pattern to preexisting representations. Building on work characterizing predictive processing as pattern completion, we examined the relationship between domain-general pattern recognition and individual variation in degraded speech learning. Participants completed a visual pattern recognition task to measure individual-level tendency towards pattern completion. Participants were also trained to recognize noise-vocoded speech with written transcriptions and tested on speech recognition pre- and post-training using a retrieval-based transcription task. Listeners significantly improved in recognizing speech after training, and pattern completion on the visual task predicted improvement for novel items. The results implicate pattern completion as a domain-general learning mechanism that can facilitate speech adaptation in challenging contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia R Drouin
- Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA.
| | - Charles P Davis
- Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang F, McGuire K, Skeeters M, Barbara M, Chang PF, Zhang N, Xiang J, Huang B. Cognitive Functions and Subjective Hearing in Cochlear Implant Users. J Audiol Otol 2024; 28:176-185. [PMID: 38685833 PMCID: PMC11273187 DOI: 10.7874/jao.2023.00276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A cochlear implant (CI) is an effective prosthetic device used to treat severe-to-profound hearing loss. The present study examined cognitive function in CI users by employing a web-based cognitive testing platform, i.e., BrainCheck, and explored the correlation between cognitive function and subjective evaluation of hearing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Forty-two CI users (mean age: 58.90 years) were surveyed in the subjective evaluation of hearing, and 20/42 participated in the BrainCheck cognitive tests (immediate recognition, Trail Making A, Trail Making B, Stroop, digit symbol substitution, and delayed recognition). As controls for cognitive function, young normal-hearing (YNH, mean age=23.83 years) and older normal-hearing (ONH, mean age=52.67 years) listener groups were subjected to Brain-Check testing. RESULTS CI users exhibited poorer cognitive function than the normal hearing groups in all tasks except for immediate and delayed recognition. The highest percentage of CI users who had "possible" and "likely" cognitive impairment, based on BrainCheck scores (ranging from 0-200), was observed in tests assessing executive function. The composite cognitive score across domains tended to be related to subjective hearing (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS The findings of the current study suggest that CI users had a higher likelihood of cognitive impairment in the executive function domain than in lower-level domains. BrianCheck online cognitive testing affords a convenient and effective tool to self-evaluate cognitive function in CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fawen Zhang
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kelli McGuire
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Madeline Skeeters
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Matthew Barbara
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Pamara F. Chang
- Department of Information & Logistics Technology, College of Technology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nanhua Zhang
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jing Xiang
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Skidmore J, Oleson JJ, Yuan Y, He S. The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Ear Hear 2023; 44:1485-1497. [PMID: 37194125 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) and speech perception scores measured in quiet and in noise in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) users. It tested the hypothesis that how well the auditory nerve (AN) responds to electrical stimulation is important for speech perception with a CI in challenging listening conditions. DESIGN Study participants included 24 postlingually deafened adult CI users. All participants used Cochlear Nucleus CIs in their test ears. In each participant, eCAPs were measured at multiple electrode locations in response to single-pulse, paired-pulse, and pulse-train stimuli. Independent variables included six metrics calculated from the eCAP recordings: the electrode-neuron interface (ENI) index, the neural adaptation (NA) ratio, NA speed, the adaptation recovery (AR) ratio, AR speed, and the amplitude modulation (AM) ratio. The ENI index quantified the effectiveness of the CI electrodes in stimulating the targeted AN fibers. The NA ratio indicated the amount of NA at the AN caused by a train of constant-amplitude pulses. NA speed was defined as the speed/rate of NA. The AR ratio estimated the amount of recovery from NA at a fixed time point after the cessation of pulse-train stimulation. AR speed referred to the speed of recovery from NA caused by previous pulse-train stimulation. The AM ratio provided a measure of AN sensitivity to AM cues. Participants' speech perception scores were measured using Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word lists and AzBio sentences presented in quiet, as well as in noise at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of +10 and +5 dB. Predictive models were created for each speech measure to identify eCAP metrics with meaningful predictive power. RESULTS The ENI index and AR speed individually explained at least 10% of the variance in most of the speech perception scores measured in this study, while the NA ratio, NA speed, the AR ratio, and the AM ratio did not. The ENI index was identified as the only eCAP metric that had unique predictive power for each of the speech test results. The amount of variance in speech perception scores (both CNC words and AzBio sentences) explained by the eCAP metrics increased with increased difficulty under the listening condition. Over half of the variance in speech perception scores measured in +5 dB SNR noise (both CNC words and AzBio sentences) was explained by a model with only three eCAP metrics: the ENI index, NA speed, and AR speed. CONCLUSIONS Of the six electrophysiological measures assessed in this study, the ENI index is the most informative predictor for speech perception performance in CI users. In agreement with the tested hypothesis, the response characteristics of the AN to electrical stimulation are more important for speech perception with a CI in noise than they are in quiet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Skidmore
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jacob J Oleson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Yi Yuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Shuman He
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Audiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amini AE, Naples JG, Hwa T, Larrow DC, Campbell FM, Qiu M, Castellanos I, Moberly AC. Emerging Relations among Cognitive Constructs and Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:792-810. [PMID: 37365967 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hearing loss has a detrimental impact on cognitive function. However, there is a lack of consensus on the impact of cochlear implants on cognition. This review systematically evaluates whether cochlear implants in adult patients lead to cognitive improvements and investigates the relations of cognition with speech recognition outcomes. DATA SOURCES A literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies evaluating cognition and cochlear implant outcomes in postlingual, adult patients from January 1996 to December 2021 were included. Of 2510 total references, 52 studies were included in qualitative analysis and 11 in meta-analyses. REVIEW METHODS Proportions were extracted from studies of (1) the significant impacts of cochlear implantation on 6 cognitive domains and (2) associations between cognition and speech recognition outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models on mean differences between pre- and postoperative performance on 4 cognitive assessments. RESULTS Only half of the outcomes reported suggested cochlear implantation had a significant impact on cognition (50.8%), with the highest proportion in assessments of memory & learning and inhibition-concentration. Meta-analyses revealed significant improvements in global cognition and inhibition-concentration. Finally, 40.4% of associations between cognition and speech recognition outcomes were significant. CONCLUSION Findings relating to cochlear implantation and cognition vary depending on the cognitive domain assessed and the study goal. Nonetheless, assessments of memory & learning, global cognition, and inhibition-concentration may represent tools to assess cognitive benefit after implantation and help explain variability in speech recognition outcomes. Enhanced selectivity in assessments of cognition is needed for clinical applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew E Amini
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James G Naples
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tiffany Hwa
- Division of Otology, Neurotology, and Lateral Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Danielle C Larrow
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Frank M Campbell
- Biotech Commons, Johnson Pavilion, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maylene Qiu
- Biotech Commons, Johnson Pavilion, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Irina Castellanos
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaron C Moberly
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Winn MB. Time Scales and Moments of Listening Effort Revealed in Pupillometry. Semin Hear 2023; 44:106-123. [PMID: 37122881 PMCID: PMC10147502 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This article offers a collection of observations that highlight the value of time course data in pupillometry and points out ways in which these observations create deeper understanding of listening effort. The main message is that listening effort should be considered on a moment-to-moment basis rather than as a singular amount. A review of various studies and the reanalysis of data reveal distinct signatures of effort before a stimulus, during a stimulus, in the moments after a stimulus, and changes over whole experimental testing sessions. Collectively these observations motivate questions that extend beyond the "amount" of effort, toward understanding how long the effort lasts, and how precisely someone can allocate effort at specific points in time or reduce effort at other times. Apparent disagreements between studies are reconsidered as informative lessons about stimulus selection and the nature of pupil dilation as a reflection of decision making rather than the difficulty of sensory encoding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B. Winn
- Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beckers L, Tromp N, Philips B, Mylanus E, Huinck W. Exploring neurocognitive factors and brain activation in adult cochlear implant recipients associated with speech perception outcomes-A scoping review. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1046669. [PMID: 36816114 PMCID: PMC9932917 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1046669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cochlear implants (CIs) are considered an effective treatment for severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, speech perception outcomes are highly variable among adult CI recipients. Top-down neurocognitive factors have been hypothesized to contribute to this variation that is currently only partly explained by biological and audiological factors. Studies investigating this, use varying methods and observe varying outcomes, and their relevance has yet to be evaluated in a review. Gathering and structuring this evidence in this scoping review provides a clear overview of where this research line currently stands, with the aim of guiding future research. Objective To understand to which extent different neurocognitive factors influence speech perception in adult CI users with a postlingual onset of hearing loss, by systematically reviewing the literature. Methods A systematic scoping review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating the influence of one or more neurocognitive factors on speech perception post-implantation were included. Word and sentence perception in quiet and noise were included as speech perception outcome metrics and six key neurocognitive domains, as defined by the DSM-5, were covered during the literature search (Protocol in open science registries: 10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3G7W of searches in June 2020, April 2022). Results From 5,668 retrieved articles, 54 articles were included and grouped into three categories using different measures to relate to speech perception outcomes: (1) Nineteen studies investigating brain activation, (2) Thirty-one investigating performance on cognitive tests, and (3) Eighteen investigating linguistic skills. Conclusion The use of cognitive functions, recruiting the frontal cortex, the use of visual cues, recruiting the occipital cortex, and the temporal cortex still available for language processing, are beneficial for adult CI users. Cognitive assessments indicate that performance on non-verbal intelligence tasks positively correlated with speech perception outcomes. Performance on auditory or visual working memory, learning, memory and vocabulary tasks were unrelated to speech perception outcomes and performance on the Stroop task not to word perception in quiet. However, there are still many uncertainties regarding the explanation of inconsistent results between papers and more comprehensive studies are needed e.g., including different assessment times, or combining neuroimaging and behavioral measures. Systematic review registration https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3G7W.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes Beckers
- Cochlear Ltd., Mechelen, Belgium,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Loes Beckers,
| | - Nikki Tromp
- Cochlear Ltd., Mechelen, Belgium,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Emmanuel Mylanus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wendy Huinck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu R, Struys E. A Domain-General Monitoring Account of Bilingual Language Control in Recognition: The Role of Language Dominance and Bilingual Experience. Front Psychol 2022; 13:854898. [PMID: 35496216 PMCID: PMC9039186 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability of bilingual individuals to manage two competing languages is assumed to rely on both domain-specific language control and domain-general control mechanisms. However, previous studies have reported mixed findings about the extent and nature of cross-domain generality. The present study examined the role of language dominance, along with bilingual language experience, in the relationship between word recognition and domain-general cognitive control. Two single-language lexical decision tasks (one in L1 and another in L2) and a domain-general flanker task were administered to bilinguals who live in the sociolinguistic context of a minority and a majority language, namely, Uyghur (L1) and Chinese (L2), respectively. The results showed a diversity in language dominance patterns with better performance in L2 than L1 in the recognition modality, even for participants who self-identified as globally being dominant in L1. This finding reflected all bilinguals’ self-evaluation that their preferred language for reading was L2, suggesting that language dominance is dynamic, depending on what language modality is measured. Furthermore, it was found that an earlier onset age of L2 acquisition (but not recent exposure) and a higher across-modality dominance in L2 were related to faster L2 word recognition. When self-reported language dominance was operationalised as a grouping variable, it was further found that both across-modality L1- and L2-dominant bilingual participants demonstrated a significant relationship between L2 word recognition and domain-general monitoring control, while only L1-dominant bilinguals additionally tapped into inhibitory control, indexed by the flanker effect during L2 word recognition. These findings suggest that language dominance has an impact on the extent and nature of the overlap in control mechanisms across specific linguistic and domain-general cognitive domains and add evidence to a domain-general monitoring account of bilingual word recognition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruilin Wu
- Centre for Linguistics, Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Centre for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Esli Struys
- Centre for Linguistics, Department of Linguistics and Literary Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Centre for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neal K, McMahon CM, Hughes SE, Boisvert I. Listening-Based Communication Ability in Adults With Hearing Loss: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures. Front Psychol 2022; 13:786347. [PMID: 35360643 PMCID: PMC8960922 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hearing loss in adults has a pervasive impact on health and well-being. Its effects on everyday listening and communication can directly influence participation across multiple spheres of life. These impacts, however, remain poorly assessed within clinical settings. Whilst various tests and questionnaires that measure listening and communication abilities are available, there is a lack of consensus about which measures assess the factors that are most relevant to optimising auditory rehabilitation. This study aimed to map current measures used in published studies to evaluate listening skills needed for oral communication in adults with hearing loss. Methods A scoping review was conducted using systematic searches in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar to retrieve peer-reviewed articles that used one or more linguistic-based measure necessary to oral communication in adults with hearing loss. The range of measures identified and their frequency where charted in relation to auditory hierarchies, linguistic domains, health status domains, and associated neuropsychological and cognitive domains. Results 9121 articles were identified and 2579 articles that reported on 6714 discrete measures were included for further analysis. The predominant linguistic-based measure reported was word or sentence identification in quiet (65.9%). In contrast, discourse-based measures were used in 2.7% of the articles included. Of the included studies, 36.6% used a self-reported instrument purporting to measures of listening for communication. Consistent with previous studies, a large number of self-reported measures were identified (n = 139), but 60.4% of these measures were used in only one study and 80.7% were cited five times or fewer. Discussion Current measures used in published studies to assess listening abilities relevant to oral communication target a narrow set of domains. Concepts of communicative interaction have limited representation in current measurement. The lack of measurement consensus and heterogeneity amongst the assessments limit comparisons across studies. Furthermore, extracted measures rarely consider the broader linguistic, cognitive and interactive elements of communication. Consequently, existing measures may have limited clinical application if assessing the listening-related skills required for communication in daily life, as experienced by adults with hearing loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Neal
- Department of Lingustics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine M McMahon
- Department of Lingustics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Hearing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah E Hughes
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Applied Research Collaboration (ARC), West Midlands, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Isabelle Boisvert
- Hearing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abdel-Latif KHA, Meister H. Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Listeners. Front Neurosci 2022; 15:725412. [PMID: 35221883 PMCID: PMC8867819 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.725412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The outcome of cochlear implantation is typically assessed by speech recognition tests in quiet and in noise. Many cochlear implant recipients reveal satisfactory speech recognition especially in quiet situations. However, since cochlear implants provide only limited spectro-temporal cues the effort associated with understanding speech might be increased. In this respect, measures of listening effort could give important extra information regarding the outcome of cochlear implantation. In order to shed light on this topic and to gain knowledge for clinical applications we compared speech recognition and listening effort in cochlear implants (CI) recipients and age-matched normal-hearing listeners while considering potential influential factors, such as cognitive abilities. Importantly, we estimated speech recognition functions for both listener groups and compared listening effort at similar performance level. Therefore, a subjective listening effort test (adaptive scaling, “ACALES”) as well as an objective test (dual-task paradigm) were applied and compared. Regarding speech recognition CI users needed about 4 dB better signal-to-noise ratio to reach the same performance level of 50% as NH listeners and even 5 dB better SNR to reach 80% speech recognition revealing shallower psychometric functions in the CI listeners. However, when targeting a fixed speech intelligibility of 50 and 80%, respectively, CI users and normal hearing listeners did not differ significantly in terms of listening effort. This applied for both the subjective and the objective estimation. Outcome for subjective and objective listening effort was not correlated with each other nor with age or cognitive abilities of the listeners. This study did not give evidence that CI users and NH listeners differ in terms of listening effort – at least when the same performance level is considered. In contrast, both listener groups showed large inter-individual differences in effort determined with the subjective scaling and the objective dual-task. Potential clinical implications of how to assess listening effort as an outcome measure for hearing rehabilitation are discussed.
Collapse
|
11
|
van Wieringen A, Magits S, Francart T, Wouters J. Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:773427. [PMID: 34916902 PMCID: PMC8669965 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.773427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Speech-perception testing is essential for monitoring outcomes with a hearing aid or cochlear implant (CI). However, clinical care is time-consuming and often challenging with an increasing number of clients. A potential approach to alleviating some clinical care and possibly making room for other outcome measures is to employ technologies that assess performance in the home environment. In this study, we investigate 3 different speech perception indices in the same 40 CI users: phoneme identification (vowels and consonants), digits in noise (DiN) and sentence recognition in noise (SiN). The first two tasks were implemented on a tablet and performed multiple times by each client in their home environment, while the sentence task was administered at the clinic. Speech perception outcomes in the same forty CI users showed that DiN assessed at home can serve as an alternative to SiN assessed at the clinic. DiN scores are in line with the SiN ones by 3–4 dB improvement and are useful to monitor performance at regular intervals and to detect changes in auditory performance. Phoneme identification in quiet also explains a significant part of speech perception in noise, and provides additional information on the detectability and discriminability of speech cues. The added benefit of the phoneme identification task, which also proved to be easy to administer at home, is the information transmission analysis in addition to the summary score. Performance changes for the different indices can be interpreted by comparing against measurement error and help to target personalized rehabilitation. Altogether, home-based speech testing is reliable and proves powerful to complement care in the clinic for CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Magits
- Experimental ORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Francart
- Experimental ORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Wouters
- Experimental ORL, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bosen AK, Sevich VA, Cannon SA. Forward Digit Span and Word Familiarity Do Not Correlate With Differences in Speech Recognition in Individuals With Cochlear Implants After Accounting for Auditory Resolution. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2021; 64:3330-3342. [PMID: 34251908 PMCID: PMC8740688 DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose In individuals with cochlear implants, speech recognition is not associated with tests of working memory that primarily reflect storage, such as forward digit span. In contrast, our previous work found that vocoded speech recognition in individuals with normal hearing was correlated with performance on a forward digit span task. A possible explanation for this difference across groups is that variability in auditory resolution across individuals with cochlear implants could conceal the true relationship between speech and memory tasks. Here, our goal was to determine if performance on forward digit span and speech recognition tasks are correlated in individuals with cochlear implants after controlling for individual differences in auditory resolution. Method We measured sentence recognition ability in 20 individuals with cochlear implants with Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-set sentences. Spectral and temporal modulation detection tasks were used to assess individual differences in auditory resolution, auditory forward digit span was used to assess working memory storage, and self-reported word familiarity was used to assess vocabulary. Results Individual differences in speech recognition were predicted by spectral and temporal resolution. A correlation was found between forward digit span and speech recognition, but this correlation was not significant after controlling for spectral and temporal resolution. No relationship was found between word familiarity and speech recognition. Forward digit span performance was not associated with individual differences in auditory resolution. Conclusions Our findings support the idea that sentence recognition in individuals with cochlear implants is primarily limited by individual differences in working memory processing, not storage. Studies examining the relationship between speech and memory should control for individual differences in auditory resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria A. Sevich
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE
- The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Listening effort is a valuable and important notion to measure because it is among the primary complaints of people with hearing loss. It is tempting and intuitive to accept speech intelligibility scores as a proxy for listening effort, but this link is likely oversimplified and lacks actionable explanatory power. This study was conducted to explain the mechanisms of listening effort that are not captured by intelligibility scores, using sentence-repetition tasks where specific kinds of mistakes were prospectively planned or analyzed retrospectively. Effort measured as changes in pupil size among 20 listeners with normal hearing and 19 listeners with cochlear implants. Experiment 1 demonstrates that mental correction of misperceived words increases effort even when responses are correct. Experiment 2 shows that for incorrect responses, listening effort is not a function of the proportion of words correct but is rather driven by the types of errors, position of errors within a sentence, and the need to resolve ambiguity, reflecting how easily the listener can make sense of a perception. A simple taxonomy of error types is provided that is both intuitive and consistent with data from these two experiments. The diversity of errors in these experiments implies that speech perception tasks can be designed prospectively to elicit the mistakes that are more closely linked with effort. Although mental corrective action and number of mistakes can scale together in many experiments, it is possible to dissociate them to advance toward a more explanatory (rather than correlational) account of listening effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B. Winn
- Matthew B. Winn, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 164 Pillsbury Dr SE, Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55455, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10102093. [PMID: 34068067 PMCID: PMC8152499 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10102093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
In the case of hearing loss, cochlear implants (CI) allow for the restoration of hearing. Despite the advantages of CIs for speech perception, CI users still complain about their poor perception of their auditory environment. Aiming to assess non-verbal auditory perception in CI users, we developed five listening tests. These tests measure pitch change detection, pitch direction identification, pitch short-term memory, auditory stream segregation, and emotional prosody recognition, along with perceived intensity ratings. In order to test the potential benefit of visual cues for pitch processing, the three pitch tests included half of the trials with visual indications to perform the task. We tested 10 normal-hearing (NH) participants with material being presented as original and vocoded sounds, and 10 post-lingually deaf CI users. With the vocoded sounds, the NH participants had reduced scores for the detection of small pitch differences, and reduced emotion recognition and streaming abilities compared to the original sounds. Similarly, the CI users had deficits for small differences in the pitch change detection task and emotion recognition, as well as a decreased streaming capacity. Overall, this assessment allows for the rapid detection of specific patterns of non-verbal auditory perception deficits. The current findings also open new perspectives about how to enhance pitch perception capacities using visual cues.
Collapse
|
15
|
de Graaff F, Eikelboom RH, Sucher C, Kramer SE, Smits C. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants Int 2021; 22:245-256. [PMID: 33832408 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1894686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The number of bilateral adult cochlear implant (CI) users and bimodal CI users is expanding worldwide. The addition of a hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral non-implanted ear (bimodal) or a second CI (bilateral) can provide CI users with some of the benefits associated with listening with two ears. Our was to examine whether bilateral and bimodal CI users demonstrate binaural summation, binaural unmasking and a fluctuating masker benefit. METHODS Direct audio input was used to present stimuli to 10 bilateral and 10 bimodal CochlearTM CI users. Speech recognition in noise (speech reception threshold, SRT) was assessed monaurally, diotically (identical signals in both devices) and dichotically (antiphasic speech) with different masking noises (steady-state and interrupted), using the digits-in-noise test. RESULTS Bilateral CI users demonstrated a trend towards better SRTs with both CIs than with one CI. Bimodal CI users showed no difference between the bimodal SRT and the SRT for CI alone. No significant differences in SRT were found between the diotic and dichotic conditions for either group. Analyses of electrodograms created from bilateral stimuli demonstrated that substantial parts of the interaural speech cues were preserved in the Advanced Combination Encoder, an n-of-m channel selection speech coding strategy, used by the CI users. Speech recognition in noise was significantly better with interrupted noise than with steady-state masking noise for both bilateral and bimodal CI users. CONCLUSION Bilateral CI users demonstrated a trend towards binaural summation, but bimodal CI users did not. No binaural unmasking was demonstrated for either group of CI users. A large fluctuating masker benefit was found in both bilateral and bimodal CI users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feike de Graaff
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Science Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.,Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Cathy Sucher
- Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Australia.,Ear Science Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Sophia E Kramer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Cas Smits
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Correlation between Speech Perception Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation and Postoperative Acoustic and Electric Hearing Thresholds. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10020324. [PMID: 33477270 PMCID: PMC7830395 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The reliable prediction of cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes is highly relevant and can facilitate the monitoring of postoperative hearing performance. To date, multiple audiometric, demographic, and surgical variables have shown some degree of correlation with CI speech perception outcomes. In the present study, postsurgical acoustic and electric hearing thresholds that are routinely assessed in clinical practice were compared to CI speech perception outcomes in order to reveal possible markers of postoperative cochlear health. A total of 237 CI recipients were included in this retrospective monocentric study. An analysis of the correlation of postoperative pure-tone averages (PTAs) and electric CI fitting thresholds (T-/C-levels) with speech perception scores for monosyllabic words in quiet was performed. Additionally, a correlation analysis was performed for postoperative acoustic thresholds in intracochlear electrocochleography (EcochG) and speech recognition scores in a smaller group (n = 14). The results show that neither postoperative acoustic hearing thresholds nor electric thresholds correlate with postoperative speech perception outcomes, and they do not serve as independent predictors of speech perception outcomes. By contrast, the postoperative intracochlear total EcochG response was significantly correlated with speech perception. Since the EcochG recordings were only performed in a small population, a large study is required to clarify the usefulness of this promising predictive parameter.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bosen AK, Barry MF. Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2020; 63:1282-1298. [PMID: 32213149 PMCID: PMC7242981 DOI: 10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The goal of this study was to determine how various aspects of cognition predict speech recognition ability across different levels of speech vocoding within a single group of listeners. Method We tested the ability of young adults (N = 32) with normal hearing to recognize Perceptually Robust English Sentence Test Open-set (PRESTO) sentences that were degraded with a vocoder to produce different levels of spectral resolution (16, eight, and four carrier channels). Participants also completed tests of cognition (fluid intelligence, short-term memory, and attention), which were used as predictors of sentence recognition. Sentence recognition was compared across vocoder conditions, predictors were correlated with individual differences in sentence recognition, and the relationships between predictors were characterized. Results PRESTO sentence recognition performance declined with a decreasing number of vocoder channels, with no evident floor or ceiling performance in any condition. Individual ability to recognize PRESTO sentences was consistent relative to the group across vocoder conditions. Short-term memory, as measured with serial recall, was a moderate predictor of sentence recognition (ρ = 0.65). Serial recall performance was constant across vocoder conditions when measured with a digit span task. Fluid intelligence was marginally correlated with serial recall, but not sentence recognition. Attentional measures had no discernible relationship to sentence recognition and a marginal relationship with serial recall. Conclusions Verbal serial recall is a substantial predictor of vocoded sentence recognition, and this predictive relationship is independent of spectral resolution. In populations that show variable speech recognition outcomes, such as listeners with cochlear implants, it should be possible to account for the independent effects of spectral resolution and verbal serial recall in their speech recognition ability. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12021051.
Collapse
|
18
|
Cardin V, Rosen S, Konieczny L, Coulson K, Lametti D, Edwards M, Woll B. The effect of dopamine on the comprehension of spectrally-shifted noise-vocoded speech: a pilot study. Int J Audiol 2020; 59:674-681. [PMID: 32186216 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1734675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Cochlear implantation has proven beneficial in restoring hearing. However, success is variable, and there is a need for a simple post-implantation therapy that could significantly increase implantation success. Dopamine has a general role in learning and in assigning value to environmental stimuli. We tested the effect of dopamine in the comprehension of spectrally-shifted noise-vocoded (SSNV) speech, which simulates, in hearing individuals, the signal delivered by a cochlear implant (CI).Design and study sample: Thirty-five participants (age = 38.0 ± 10.1 SD) recruited from the general population were divided into three groups. We tested SSNV speech comprehension in two experimental sessions. In one session, a metabolic precursor of dopamine (L-DOPA) was administered to participants in two of the groups; a placebo was administered in the other session.Results: A single dose of L-DOPA interacted with training to improve perception of SSNV speech, but did not significantly accelerate learning.Conclusions: These findings are a first step in exploring the use of dopamine to enhance speech understanding in CI patients. Replications of these results using SSNV in individuals with normal hearing, and also in CI users, are needed to determine whether these effects can translate into benefits in everyday language comprehension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Velia Cardin
- Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Rosen
- Speech, Hearing and Phonetics Sciences, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Konieczny
- Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kim Coulson
- Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Lametti
- Department of Psychology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Mark Edwards
- Neuroscience Research Centre, Institute of Molecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bencie Woll
- Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moore DR, Whiston H, Lough M, Marsden A, Dillon H, Munro KJ, Stone MA. FreeHear: A New Sound-Field Speech-in-Babble Hearing Assessment Tool. Trends Hear 2020; 23:2331216519872378. [PMID: 31599206 PMCID: PMC6787881 DOI: 10.1177/2331216519872378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Pure-tone threshold audiometry is currently the standard test of hearing.
However, in everyday life, we are more concerned with listening to speech of
moderate loudness and, specifically, listening to a particular talker against a
background of other talkers. FreeHear delivers strings of three spoken digits
(0–9, not 7) against a background babble via three loudspeakers placed in front
and to either side of a listener. FreeHear is designed as a rapid, quantitative
initial assessment of hearing using an adaptive algorithm. It is designed
especially for children and for testing listeners who are using hearing devices.
In this first report on FreeHear, we present developmental considerations and
protocols and results of testing 100 children (4–13 years old) and 23 adults
(18–30 years old). Two of the six 4 year olds and 91% of all older children
completed full testing. Speech reception threshold (SRT) for digits and noise
colocated at 0° or separated by 90° both improved linearly across 4 to 12 years
old by 6 to 7 dB, with a further 2 dB improvement for the adults. These data
suggested full maturation at approximately 15 years old SRTs at 90° digits/noise
separation were better by approximately 6 dB than SRTs colocated at 0°. This
spatial release from masking did not change significantly across age.
Test–retest reliability was similar for children and adults (standard deviation
of 2.05–2.91 dB SRT), with a mean practice improvement of 0.04–0.98 dB. FreeHear
shows promise as a clinical test for both children and adults. Further trials in
people with hearing impairment are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Moore
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Communication Sciences Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH, USA
| | - Helen Whiston
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Melanie Lough
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Antonia Marsden
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Harvey Dillon
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Australian Hearing Hub, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Kevin J Munro
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| | - Michael A Stone
- Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Völter C, Götze L, Bruene-Cohrs U, Dazert S, Thomas JP. [Hearing and cognition: neurocognitive test batteries in otorhinolaryngology]. HNO 2019; 68:155-163. [PMID: 31628531 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00762-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing and cognition are closely related to each other. Particularly in suboptimal listening situations, cognitive abilities become important to enable speech comprehension. Besides, studies have indicated that hearing impairment is associated with a more rapid mental decline compared to persons with normal hearing. However, hearing loss also has an impact on neurocognitive testing, which is generally based on auditive stimuli. With increasing age, the risk of sensory but also of cognitive impairments increases. So far this comorbidity receives little consideration in otorhinolaryngology. MATERIALS AND METHODS The paper presents an overview and evaluation of widely used German neurocognitive test batteries for older patients, with regard to the different test modalities and their focus. RESULTS A multitude of different neurocognitive screening tests and detailed test batteries are available, particularly in the field of dementia. So far, sensory deficits have not been considered in neurocognitive testing, neither concerning application nor interpretation. Normative data adapted to the hearing impaired are still missing. CONCLUSION With regard to demographic changes and the well-known bias between hearing and cognition, screening of neurocognitive functions should be implemented in basic otorhinolaryngologic diagnostics. More comprehensive test batteries might be useful for research purposes or speech therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Völter
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland.
| | - L Götze
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - U Bruene-Cohrs
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum, Alexandrinentrasse 1, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - S Dazert
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - J P Thomas
- Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Archer-Boyd AW, Southwell RV, Deeks JM, Turner RE, Carlyon RP. Development and validation of a spectro-temporal processing test for cochlear-implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2018; 144:2983. [PMID: 30522311 PMCID: PMC6805218 DOI: 10.1121/1.5079636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Psychophysical tests of spectro-temporal resolution may aid the evaluation of methods for improving hearing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners. Here the STRIPES (Spectro-Temporal Ripple for Investigating Processor EffectivenesS) test is described and validated. Like speech, the test requires both spectral and temporal processing to perform well. Listeners discriminate between complexes of sine sweeps which increase or decrease in frequency; difficulty is controlled by changing the stimulus spectro-temporal density. Care was taken to minimize extraneous cues, forcing listeners to perform the task only on the direction of the sweeps. Vocoder simulations with normal hearing listeners showed that the STRIPES test was sensitive to the number of channels and temporal information fidelity. An evaluation with CI listeners compared a standard processing strategy with one having very wide filters, thereby spectrally blurring the stimulus. Psychometric functions were monotonic for both strategies and five of six participants performed better with the standard strategy. An adaptive procedure revealed significant differences, all in favour of the standard strategy, at the individual listener level for six of eight CI listeners. Subsequent measures validated a faster version of the test, and showed that STRIPES could be performed by recently implanted listeners having no experience of psychophysical testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan W. Archer-Boyd
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| | - Rosy V. Southwell
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| | - John M. Deeks
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| | - Richard E. Turner
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P. Carlyon
- MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|