How I treat myelofibrosis

Molecular Genetic Profile of Myelofibrosis: Implications in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Advancements

Myelofibrosis (MF) is an essential element of primary myelofibrosis, whereas secondary MF may develop in the advanced stages of other myeloid neoplasms, especially polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Over the last two decades, advances in molecular diagnostic techniques, particularly the integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratories, have revolutionized the diagnosis, classification, and clinical decision making of myelofibrosis. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR, and MPL induce hyperactivity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which plays a central role in cell survival and proliferation. Approximately 80% of myelofibrosis cases harbor additional mutations, frequently in the genes responsible for epigenetic regulation and RNA splicing. Detecting these mutations is crucial for diagnosing myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially in cases where no mutations are present in the three driver genes (triple-negative MPNs). While fibrosis in the bone marrow results from the disturbance of inflammatory cytokines, it is fundamentally associated with mutation-driven hematopoiesis. The mutation profile and order of acquiring diverse mutations influence the MPN phenotype. Mutation profiling reveals clonal diversity in MF, offering insights into the clonal evolution of neoplastic progression. Prognostic prediction plays a pivotal role in guiding the treatment of myelofibrosis. Mutation profiles and cytogenetic abnormalities have been integrated into advanced prognostic scoring systems and personalized risk stratification for MF. Presently, JAK inhibitors are part of the standard of care for MF, with newer generations developed for enhanced efficacy and reduced adverse effects. However, only a minority of patients have achieved a significant molecular-level response. Clinical trials exploring innovative approaches, such as combining hypomethylation agents that target epigenetic regulators, drugs proven effective in myelodysplastic syndrome, or immune and inflammatory modulators with JAK inhibitors, have demonstrated promising results. These combinations may be more effective in patients with high-risk mutations and complex mutation profiles. Expanding mutation profiling studies with more sensitive and specific molecular methods, as well as sequencing a broader spectrum of genes in clinical patients, may reveal molecular mechanisms in cases currently lacking detectable driver mutations, provide a better understanding of the association between genetic alterations and clinical phenotypes, and offer valuable information to advance personalized treatment protocols to improve long-term survival and eradicate mutant clones with the hope of curing MF.

Imetelstat in intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis refractory to JAK inhibitor: IMpactMF phase III study design

Imetelstat, a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor, demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit including a robust symptom response rate and potential overall survival benefit in IMbark, a phase II study in intermediate-2 or high-risk MF patients who have relapsed after or are refractory to JAK inhibitors. We describe the rationale and design for the phase III trial, IMpactMF (NCT04576156), an open-label evaluation of imetelstat versus best available therapy, excluding JAK inhibitors, in MF patients refractory to JAK inhibitor. Imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg is administered as an intravenous infusion every 21 days. Primary objective is to assess overall survival. Secondary objectives include symptom and spleen responses, progression-free survival, clinical response assessment, bone marrow fibrosis reduction, safety and pharmacokinetics. Biomarker, cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed.

New Markers of Disease Progression in Myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm due to the clonal proliferation of a hematopoietic stem cell. The vast majority of patients harbor a somatic gain of function mutation either of JAK2 or MPL or CALR genes in their hematopoietic cells, resulting in the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Patients display variable clinical and laboratoristic features, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, splenomegaly, thrombotic complications, systemic symptoms, and curtailed survival due to infections, thrombo-hemorrhagic events, or progression to leukemic transformation. New drugs have been developed in the last decade for the treatment of PMF-associated symptoms; however, the only curative option is currently represented by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, which can only be offered to a small percentage of patients. Disease prognosis is based at diagnosis on the classical International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and Dynamic-IPSS (during disease course), which comprehend clinical parameters; recently, new prognostic scoring systems, including genetic and molecular parameters, have been proposed as meaningful tools for a better patient stratification. Moreover, new biological markers predicting clinical evolution and patient survival have been associated with the disease. This review summarizes basic concepts of PMF pathogenesis, clinics, and therapy, focusing on classical prognostic scoring systems and new biological markers of the disease.

Dynamic changes in murine erythropoiesis from birth to adulthood: implications for the study of murine models of anemia

Liver, spleen, and bone marrow are 3 key erythropoietic tissues in mammals. In the mouse, the liver is the predominant site of erythropoiesis during fetal development, the spleen responds to stress erythropoiesis, and the bone marrow is involved in maintaining homeostatic erythropoiesis in adults. However, the dynamic changes and respective contributions of the erythropoietic activity of these tissues from birth to adulthood are incompletely defined. Using C57BL/6 mice, we systematically examined the age-dependent changes in liver, spleen, and bone marrow erythropoiesis following birth. In addition to bone marrow, the liver and spleen of newborn mice sustain an active erythropoietic activity that is gradually lost during first few weeks of life. While the erythropoietic activity of the liver is lost 1 week after birth, that of the spleen is maintained for 7 weeks until the erythropoietic activity of the bone marrow is sufficient to sustain steady-state adult erythropoiesis. Measurement of the red cell parameters demonstrates that these postnatal dynamic changes are reflected by varying indices of circulating red cells. While the red cell numbers, hemoglobin concentration, and hematocrit progressively increase after birth and reach steady-state levels by week 7, reticulocyte counts decrease during this time period. Mean cell volume and mean cell hemoglobin progressively decrease and reach steady state by week 3. Our findings provide comprehensive insights into developmental changes of murine erythropoiesis postnatally and have significant implications for the appropriate interpretation of findings from the variety of murine models used in the study of normal and disordered erythropoiesis.

Myelofibrosis: challenges for preclinical models and emerging therapeutic targets

Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by anemia, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and bone marrow fibrosis. MF has no curative treatment to date, except for a small subset of patients that are eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The discovery in recent years of the MF mutational landscape and the role of bone marrow microenvironment in disease pathogenesis has led to further insights into disease biology and consequentially rationally derived therapies.Areas covered: We searched PubMed/Medline/American Society of Hematology (ASH) abstracts until November 2020 using the following terms: myelofibrosis, mouse models, pre-clinical studies and clinical trials. The development of targeted therapies is aimed to modify the history of the disease. Although JAK inhibitors showed encouraging results in terms of spleen and symptoms response, long term remissions and disease modifying ability is lacking. Beyond JAK inhibitors, a range of agents targeting proliferative, metabolic, apoptotic pathways, the microenvironment, epigenetic modification and immunomodulation are in various stages of investigations. We review pre-clinical data, preliminary clinical results of these agents, and finally offer insights on the management of MF patients.Expert opinion: MF patients refractory or with suboptimal response to JAK inhibitors, may be managed by addition of agents with differing mechanisms, such as bromodomain (BET), lysine demethylase 1 (LSD1), MDM2, or Bcl-Xl inhibitors which could prevent emergence of resistance. Immunotherapies as long-acting interferons, and calreticulin directed antibodies or peptide vaccination are eagerly awaited. Historically, therapeutic challenges in MF have arisen due to the fact that rationally derived therapies that are based on murine models have limited impact on fibrosis and underlying disease biology in human studies, the latter illustrates the complex multi-faceted disease pathogenesis of MF. Together, we not only suggest individualized therapy in MF that is guided by genomic signature but also its early implementation potentially in prefibrotic MF.

Role of Inflammatory Factors during Disease Pathogenesis and Stem Cell Transplantation in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Hematopoiesis is a highly regulated and complex process involving hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), cell surface adhesion molecules, and cytokines as well as cells of the hematopoietic niche in the bone marrow (BM). Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by clonal expansion of HSCs involving one or more blood cell lineages. Philadelphia-negative MPNs (Ph-neg MPNs) comprise polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). In nearly all patients with Ph-neg MPN, mutations in the genes encoding janus kinase 2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), or the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) can be detected and, together with additional mutations in epigenetic modifier genes, these genetic aberrations contribute to the clonal expansion of the cells. In addition to these intracellular changes in the malignant clone, inflammatory processes involving both the clonal and the non-clonal cells contribute to the signs and symptoms of the patients, as well as to progression of the disease to myelofibrosis (MF) or acute leukemia, and to thrombotic complications. This contribution has been corroborated in preclinical studies including mouse models and patient-derived iPS cells, and in clinical trials, using anti-inflammatory drugs such as JAK inhibitors and steroids, or immunomodulatory drugs such as IMiDs and interferon-alpha (IFNa), all of which change the (im)balance of circulating inflammatory factors (e.g., TNFa, IL-1b, and TGFβ) in MPN. Currently, allogeneic hematopoietic (stem) cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for Ph-neg MPN and is the treatment of choice in intermediate-2 and high-risk MF. HCT can reverse inflammatory changes induced by MPN as well as fibrosis in a large proportion of patients, but it also induces itself profound changes in inflammatory cells and cytokines in the patient, which may help to eradicate the disease but also in part cause significant morbidity (e.g., by graft-versus-host disease). In this review, we focus on the contribution of aberrant inflammation to disease pathogenesis in Ph-neg MPN as well as the current understanding of its alterations after allogeneic HCT.

Ruxolitinib-based combinations in the treatment of myelofibrosis: worth looking forward to

Ruxolitinib is a targeted drug to treat myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib has significant advantages in spleen reduction and increasing 5-year overall survival (OS), and ruxolitinib-based combinations might provide more benefits than ruxolitinib monotherapy. In this review, we focus on the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and safety. We analyzed and summarized the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone + thalidomide + danazol (TPD), panobinostat, pracinostat, azacytidine, or hydroxyurea has well reduced spleen. Ruxolitinib combined with danazol or TPD had well therapies in improvement of hemoglobin (Hgb) and platelets (PLT). Most ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies showed a superior benefit on reduced treatment-related AEs than ruxolitinib monotherapy. Treatment-related AEs and dose modification affect the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Genetic testing before treatment is recommended. To provide better clinical guidance, comparisons of these randomized controlled trials with the trials of ruxolitinib alone are necessary. This review suggests that the clinical application of ruxolitinib-based combinations is worth waiting for.

Current and future therapies for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is classified as a 'Philadelphia-chromosome negative' clonal myeloproliferative disorder. The heterogeneity of this condition and patient population and array of often challenging clinical manifestations can frequently make therapeutic decisions challenging. Despite many advances in therapy with targeted and combination approaches, following an enhanced understanding of underlying disease pathogenesis, cure only remains achievable with allogeneic stem cell transplant. This option is often limited to a small group of younger transplant-eligible patients with more advanced disease who have both a suitable donor and no or few co-morbidities. In this article, we will discuss up-to-date disease prognostication, common clinical challenges associated with myelofibrosis and both standard and novel therapeutic approaches. Increasingly complex prognostic modelling utilises patient-specific, haematological and genomic parameters to improve the accuracy of risk assessment and predict disease progression. We will also focus on difficult clinical scenarios such as disease-associated anaemia, thrombocytopenia and extremes of age. Future and evolving therapies within this field are highly anticipated and novel JAK inhibitor and non-JAK inhibitor-based therapy will also be discussed, including the new challenge of how to switch from one JAK inhibitor therapy to another.

Myelofibrosis biology and contemporary management

Myelofibrosis is an enigmatic myeloproliferative neoplasm, despite noteworthy strides in understanding its genetic underpinnings. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR or MPL in 90% of patients mediate constitutive JAK-STAT signaling which, in concert with epigenetic alterations (ASXL1, DNMT3A, SRSF2, EZH2, IDH1/2 mutations), play a fundamental role in disease pathogenesis. Aberrant immature megakaryocytes are a quintessential feature, exhibiting reduced GATA1 protein expression and secreting a plethora of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1 ß, TGF-ß), growth factors (b-FGF, PDGF, VEGF) in addition to extra cellular matrix components (fibronectin, laminin, collagens). The ensuing disrupted interactions amongst the megakaryocytes, osteoblasts, endothelium, stromal cells and myofibroblasts within the bone marrow culminate in the development of fibrosis and osteosclerosis. Presently, prognostic assessment tools for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are centered on genetics, with incorporation of cytogenetic and molecular information into the mutation-enhanced (MIPSS 70-plus version 2.0) and genetically-inspired (GIPSS) prognostic scoring systems. Both models illustrate substantial clinical heterogeneity in PMF and serve as the crux for risk-adapted therapeutic decisions. A major challenge remains the dearth of disease-modifying drugs, whereas allogeneic transplant offers the chance of long-term remission for some patients. Our review serves to synopsise current appreciation of the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis together with emerging management strategies.

Off-label uses of denosumab in metabolic bone diseases

Denosumab (Dmab), a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) ligand (RANKL) which substantially suppresses osteoclast activity, has been approved for the treatment of common metabolic bone diseases, including postmenopausal osteoporosis, male osteoporosis, and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, in which the pathway of the RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin is dysregulated. However, the imbalance of RANKL/RANK/osteoprotegerin is also implicated in the pathogenesis of several other rare metabolic bone diseases, including Juvenile Paget disease, fibrous dysplasia, Hajdu Cheney syndrome and Langerhans cell histiocytosis, thus rendering Dmab a potential treatment option for these diseases. Dmab has been also administered off-label in selected patients (e.g., with Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, aneurysmal bone cysts) due to contraindications or unresponsiveness to standard treatment, such as bisphosphonates. Moreover, Dmab was administered to improve hypercalcemia induced by various diseases, including primary hyperparathyroidism, tuberculosis and immobilization. The aim of this review is to summarize existing evidence on off-label uses of Dmab in metabolic bone diseases and provide opinion for or against its use, which should be always considered on an individual basis.

Myelofibrosis: best practices, controversies and 2019 update

Introduction: Recent advances in the prognostic scheme and treatment of primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) have resulted in an overwhelming amount of clinical information to assimilate. The authors believe a comprehensive review that summarizes the most recent published literature, could serve as guidelines for the practicing hematologist.Areas covered: The authors provide a summary of landmark articles regarding epidemiology, symptoms, and pathogenesis of disease. The authors conducted a systematic literature review to answer questions regarding differences between primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and secondary myelofibrosis (SMF), appropriate use and selection of the current risk-stratification models, early versus late treatment of MF and current practices in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for MF. The authors conclude the article with their clinical opinion based on their experience and literature review. The purpose of this article is to identify current practices, address any variation, identify and investigate conflicting results and produce statements to guide decision-making.Expert opinion: In this section, the authors advocate for and provide examples of a standardized way of incorporating future discoveries in the pathogenesis and risk-stratification models of MF. They also discuss the importance of using only one risk-stratification model for PMF and one for SMF and their reasoning for early instead of late treatment of MF.

Ruxolitinib in combination with prednisone and nilotinib exhibit synergistic effects in human cells lines and primary cells from myeloproliferative neoplasms

Ruxolitinib is the front-line non-palliative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). However, a significant number of patients lose or present suboptimal response, are resistant or have unacceptable toxicity. In an attempt to improve response and avoid the adverse effects of this drug, we evaluated the combination of 17 drugs with ruxolitinib in ex vivo models of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from MF patients and cell lines. We found that the combination ruxolitinib and nilotinib had a synergistic effect against MF cells (ΔEC₅₀ nilotinib, -21.6%). Moreover, the addition of prednisone to combined ruxolitinib/nilotinib improved the synergistic effect in all MF samples studied. We evaluated the molecular mechanisms of combined ruxolitinib/nilotinib/prednisone and observed inhibition of JAK/STAT (STAT5, 69.2+11.8% inhibition) and MAPK (ERK, 29.4+4.5% inhibition) signaling pathways. Furthermore, we found that the triple therapy combination inhibited collagen protein and COL1A1 gene expression in human bone marrow mesenchymal cells. Taken together, we provide evidence that combined ruxolitinib/nilotinib/prednisone is a potential therapy for MF, possibly through the anti-fibrotic effect of nilotinib, the immunomodulatory effect of ruxolitinib and prednisone, and the anti-proliferative effect of ruxolitinib. This combination will be further investigated in a phase Ib/II clinical trial in MF.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of primary myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) in which dysregulation of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathways is the major pathogenic mechanism. Most patients with PMF carry a driver mutation in the JAK2, MPL (myeloproliferative leukemia), or CALR (calreticulin) genes. Mutations in epigenetic regulators and RNA splicing genes may also occur, and play critical roles in PMF disease progression. Based on revised World Health Organization diagnostic criteria for MPNs, both screening for driver mutations and bone marrow biopsy are required for a specific diagnosis. Clinical trials of JAK2 inhibitors for PMF have revealed significant efficacy for improving splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. However, the currently available drug therapies for PMF do not improve survival. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation is potentially curative, it is associated with substantial treatment-related morbidity and mortality. PMF is a heterogeneous disorder and decisions regarding treatments are often complicated, necessitating the use of prognostic models to determine the management of treatments for individual patients. This review focuses on the clinical aspects and outcomes of a cohort of Japanese patients with PMF, including discussion of recent advances in the management of PMF.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms or after lenalidomide exposure

Philadelphia‐negative (Ph⁻) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) do rarely transform to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While causality is difficult to establish, a few cases of ALL arising after exposure to lenalidomide for registered indications (multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome with 5q deletion) have been described in the literature.

LepR+ cells dispute hegemony with Gli1+ cells in bone marrow fibrosis

Bone marrow fibrosis is a reactive process, and a central pathological feature of primary myelofibrosis. Revealing the origin of fibroblastic cells in the bone marrow is crucial, as these cells are considered an ideal, and essential target for anti-fibrotic therapy. In 2 recent studies, Decker et al. (2017) and Schneider et al. (2017), by using state-of-the-art techniques including in vivo lineage-tracing, provide evidence that leptin receptor (LepR)-expressing and Gli1-expressing cells are responsible for fibrotic tissue deposition in the bone marrow. However, what is the relationship between these 2 bone marrow cell populations, and what are their relative contributions to bone marrow fibrosis remain unclear. From a drug development perspective, these works bring new cellular targets for bone marrow fibrosis.

Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Available therapies for myelofibrosis can exacerbate cytopenias and are not indicated for patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Pacritinib, which inhibits both JAK2 and FLT3, induced spleen responses with limited myelosuppression in phase 1/2 trials. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pacritinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias.

METHODS

This international, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial (PERSIST-1) was done at 67 sites in 12 countries. Patients with higher-risk myelofibrosis (with no exclusions for baseline anaemia or thrombocytopenia) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral pacritinib 400 mg once daily or best available therapy (BAT) excluding JAK2 inhibitors until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified by risk category, platelet count, and region. Treatment assignments were known to investigators, site personnel, patients, clinical monitors, and pharmacovigilance personnel. The primary endpoint was spleen volume reduction (SVR) of 35% or more from baseline to week 24 in the intention-to-treat population as assessed by blinded, centrally reviewed MRI or CT. We did safety analyses in all randomised patients who received either treatment. Here we present the final data. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01773187.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 8, 2013, and Aug 1, 2014, 327 patients were randomly assigned to pacritinib (n=220) or BAT (n=107). Median follow-up was 23·2 months (IQR 14·8-28·7). At week 24, the primary endpoint of SVR of 35% or more was achieved by 42 (19%) patients in the pacritinib group versus five (5%) patients in the BAT group (p=0·0003). 90 patients in the BAT group crossed over to receive pacritinib at a median of 6·3 months (IQR 5·8-6·7). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events through week 24 were anaemia (n=37 [17%]), thrombocytopenia (n=26 [12%]), and diarrhoea (n=11 [5%]) in the pacritinib group, and anaemia (n=16 [15%]), thrombocytopenia (n=12 [11%]), dyspnoea (n=3 [3%]), and hypotension (n=3 [3%]) in the BAT group. The most common serious adverse events that occurred through week 24 were anaemia (10 [5%]), cardiac failure (5 [2%]), pyrexia (4 [2%]), and pneumonia (4 [2%]) with pacritinib, and anaemia (5 [5%]), sepsis (2 [2%]), and dyspnoea (2 [2%]) with BAT. Deaths due to adverse events were observed in 27 (12%) patients in the pacritinib group and 14 (13%) patients in the BAT group throughout the duration of the study.

INTERPRETATION

Pacritinib therapy was well tolerated and induced significant and sustained SVR and symptom reduction, even in patients with severe baseline cytopenias. Pacritinib could be a treatment option for patients with myelofibrosis, including those with baseline cytopenias for whom options are particularly limited.

FUNDING

CTI BioPharma Corp.

Emerging treatments for classical myeloproliferative neoplasms

There has been a major revolution in the management of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and in particular those with myelofibrosis and extensive splenomegaly and symptomatic burden, after the introduction of the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. The drug also has been approved as second-line therapy for polycythemia vera (PV). However, the therapeutic armamentarium for MPN is still largely inadequate for coping with patients' major unmet needs, which include normalization of life span (myelofibrosis and some patients with PV), reduction of cardiovascular complications (mainly PV and essential thrombocythemia), prevention of hematological progression, and improved quality of life (all MPN). In fact, none of the available drugs has shown clear evidence of disease-modifying activity, even if some patients treated with interferon and ruxolitinib showed reduction of mutated allele burden, and ruxolitinib might extend survival of patients with higher-risk myelofibrosis. Raised awareness of the molecular abnormalities and cellular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MPN is facilitating the development of clinical trials with novel target drugs, either alone or in combination with ruxolitinib. Although for most of these molecules a convincing preclinical rationale was provided, the results of early phase 1 and 2 clinical trials have been quite disappointing to date, and toxicities sometimes have been limiting. In this review, we critically illustrate the current landscape of novel therapies that are under evaluation for patients with MPN on the basis of current guidelines, patient risk stratification criteria, and previous experience, looking ahead to the chance of a cure for these disorders.

Splenic pooling and loss of VCAM-1 causes an engraftment defect in patients with myelofibrosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that results in cytopenia, bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative treatment but is associated with a risk of delayed engraftment and graft failure. In this study, patients with myelofibrosis (n=31) and acute myeloid leukemia (n=31) were analyzed for time to engraftment, graft failure and engraftment-related factors. Early and late neutrophil engraftment and late thrombocyte engraftment were significantly delayed in patients with myelofibrosis as compared to acute myeloid leukemia, and graft failure only occurred in myelofibrosis (6%). Only spleen size had a significant influence on engraftment efficiency in myelofibrosis patients. To analyze the cause for the engraftment defect, clearance of hematopoietic stem cells from peripheral blood was measured and immunohistological staining of bone marrow sections was performed. Numbers of circulating CD34⁺ were significantly reduced at early time points in myelofibrosis patients, whereas CD34⁺CD38^- and colony-forming cells showed no significant difference in clearance. Staining of bone marrow sections for homing proteins revealed a loss of VCAM-1 in myelofibrosis with a corresponding significant increase in the level of soluble VCAM-1 within the peripheral blood. In conclusion, our data suggest that reduced engraftment and graft failure in myelofibrosis patients is caused by an early pooling of CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells in the spleen and a bone marrow homing defect caused by the loss of VCAM-1. Improved engraftment in myelofibrosis might be achieved by approaches that reduce spleen size and cleavage of VCAM-1 in these patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: A Practical Review

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with cardinal features of extramedullary hematopoiesis, hepatosplenomegaly, cytopenias, and constitutional symptoms that result in shortened survival and leukemic transformation. It is a disease predominantly of the elderly, and currently available therapies only offer symptom control without curative benefit or ability to alter disease progression. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) is the only potentially curative intervention; however, this is only feasible in younger and medically fit patients and selectively offered to those with high-risk disease. Despite ongoing advancements, HSCT is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and the determination of which patients with myelofibrosis are ideal candidates and the selection of the opportune moment to proceed with transplantation remains challenging. This review summarizes our current recommendations for the role of and indications for HSCT in myelofibrosis.

Secondary Bone Marrow Fibrosis in Children And Young Adults: An Institutional Experience

Secondary bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) is associated with many disease conditions in children, but its prevalence and characteristics have not been well elucidated. We present our experience with pediatric secondary BMF, in an attempt to characterize it in terms of underlying diagnoses, severity, and outcome. A retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with secondary BMF by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy between January 1984 and April 2011 showed a total of 214 patients, the majority (67.1%) of whom had an underlying oncologic disease. At diagnosis, 87 patients (39.7%) had mild, 51 (23.3%) had moderate, and 33 (15.1%) had marked BMF; it was not quantified in 48 (21.9%) patients. An underlying oncologic disease was more frequently associated with marked fibrosis compared with hematologic and miscellaneous diagnoses. Follow-up posttreatment bone marrow aspirate assessments were available for 117 patients. The outcome ranges from worsening of fibrosis to complete resolution. A majority of these children (N=70/117, 60%) showed complete resolution of fibrosis. Of note, 27 patients had marked fibrosis at initial diagnosis and 16 (60%) of them showed complete resolution. These findings underscore the importance of appropriate treatment of the underlying disorder in reversing secondary BMF. Ours is the largest series of pediatric secondary BMF reported.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms: Current molecular biology and genetics

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal disorders characterized by increased production of mature blood cells. Philadelphia chromosome-negative MPNs (Ph-MPNs) consist of polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). A number of stem cell derived mutations have been identified in the past 10 years. These findings showed that JAK2V617F, as a diagnostic marker involving JAK2 exon 14 with a high frequency, is the best molecular characterization of Ph-MPNs. Somatic mutations in an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone, named calreticulin (CALR), is the second most common mutation in patients with ET and PMF after JAK2 V617F mutation. Discovery of CALR mutations led to the increased molecular diagnostic of ET and PMF up to 90%. It has been shown that JAK2V617F is not the unique event in disease pathogenesis. Some other genes' location such as TET oncogene family member 2 (TET2), additional sex combs-like 1 (ASXL1), casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene (CBL), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/IDH2), IKAROS family zinc finger 1 (IKZF1), DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A), suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS), enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), tumor protein p53 (TP53), runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) and high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) have also identified to be involved in MPNs phenotypes. Here, current molecular biology and genetic mechanisms involved in MNPs with a focus on the aforementioned factors is presented.

The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in COMFORT-II: an open-label, phase 3 study assessing efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in the treatment of myelofibrosis

Background

Anemia is considered a negative prognostic risk factor for survival in patients with myelofibrosis. Most patients with myelofibrosis are anemic, and 35–54 % present with anemia at diagnosis. Ruxolitinib, a potent inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2, was associated with an overall survival benefit and improvements in splenomegaly and patient-reported outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis in the two phase 3 COMFORT studies. Consistent with the ruxolitinib mechanism of action, anemia was a frequently reported adverse event. In clinical practice, anemia is sometimes managed with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of concomitant ruxolitinib and ESA administration in patients enrolled in COMFORT-II, an open-label, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib with best available therapy for treatment of myelofibrosis. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg twice daily or best available therapy. Spleen volume was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan.

Results

Thirteen of 146 ruxolitinib-treated patients had concomitant ESA administration (+ESA). The median exposure to ruxolitinib was 114 weeks in the +ESA group and 111 weeks in the overall ruxolitinib arm; the median ruxolitinib dose intensity was 33 mg/day for each group. Six weeks before the first ESA administration, 10 of the 13 patients had grade 3/4 hemoglobin abnormalities. These had improved to grade 2 in 7 of the 13 patients by 6 weeks after the first ESA administration. The rate of packed red blood cell transfusions per month within 12 weeks before and after first ESA administration remained the same in 1 patient, decreased in 2 patients, and increased in 3 patients; 7 patients remained transfusion independent. Reductions in splenomegaly were observed in 69 % of evaluable patients (9/13) following first ESA administration.

Conclusions

Concomitant use of an ESA with ruxolitinib was well tolerated and did not affect the efficacy of ruxolitinib. Further investigations evaluating the effects of ESAs to alleviate anemia in ruxolitinib-treated patients are warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00934544; July 6, 2009).

Nuclear factor-erythroid 2, nerve growth factor receptor, and CD34-microvessel density are differentially expressed in primary myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia

Because of the presence of various overlapping findings, the discrimination of polycythemia vera (PV) from prefibrotic/fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PF/F-PMF) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) may be challenging, particularly in suboptimal bone marrow biopsy specimens. In this study, we assessed whether differences in the expression of nuclear factor-erythroid 2 (NF-E2), nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR; CD271), CD34, CD68, p53, CD3, CD20, and CD138 by immunohistochemistry could be useful in separating among them. Higher frequencies of nuclear positive erythroblasts with NF-E2 were observed in ET and PV cases (50% ± 13.3% and 41.5% ± 9.4%, respectively) when compared with both PF-PMF (21% ± 11.7%) and F-PMF (28.5% ± 10.8%). We found that with a cutoff level of at least 30% nuclear staining for NF-E2 in erythroblasts, we could reliably exclude the possibility of PMF. Conversely, NGFR+ stromal cells per high-power field (HPF) was significantly increased in F-PMF (53.5 ± 19.1/HPF) and PF-PMF (13.5 ± 3.8/HPF) compared with ET (4.4 ± 2.2/HPF) and PV (6.6 ± 3.3/HPF). Similarly, differences in CD34-microvessel density was remarkable in F-PMF and PF-PMF cases in comparison with PV and ET (49.9 ± 12.1/HPF, 29.3 ± 12.4/HPF, 13.7 ± 4.6/HPF, and 11.9 ± 5.1/HPF, respectively). Thus, the assessment of NF-E2 and NGFR expression and the evaluation of CD34-microvessel density may provide additional support in reaching a correct diagnosis in these cases of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Impact of bone marrow pathology on the clinical management of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms include primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Although these 3 entities share many pathogenic characteristics, such as dysregulated Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling, they differ substantially regarding prognosis, progression to myelofibrosis (MF), risk of leukemic transformation, and specific medical needs. Accurate diagnosis and classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms are prerequisites for appropriate risk-based therapy and should be based on an integrated approach following the World Health Organization guidelines that, in addition to clinical, molecular, and cytogenetic evaluation, includes the examination of bone marrow morphology. Reticulin fibrosis at presentation in ET and PV is associated with increased risk of myelofibrotic transformation, and higher fibrosis grade in patients with MF is associated with worse prognosis. Additional assessment of collagen deposition and osteosclerosis may further increase diagnostic and prognostic precision. Moreover, the evaluation of bone marrow pathology has become very important in the new era of disease-modifying agents. In randomized controlled phase 3 studies, the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib provided rapid and lasting improvement in MF-related splenomegaly and symptom burden as well as a survival advantage compared with placebo or best available therapy. Follow-up for up to 5 years of patients who participated in a phase 1/2 study of ruxolitinib, revealed stabilization or reversal of bone marrow fibrosis in a proportion of patients with MF. Combinations of JAK inhibitors with other therapies, including agents with antifibrotic and/or anti-inflammatory properties, may possibly decrease bone marrow fibrosis further and favorably influence clinical outcomes.

Janus kinase-1 and Janus kinase-2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND

Myelofibrosis is a bone marrow disorder characterized by excessive production of reticulin and collagen fiber deposition caused by hematological and non-hematological disorders. The prognosis of myelofibrosis is poor and treatment is mainly palliative. Janus kinase inhibitors are a novel strategy to treat people with myelofibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical benefits and harms of Janus kinase-1 and Janus kinase-2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis secondary to hematological or non-hematological conditions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 11), Ovid MEDLINE (from 1946 to 13 November 2014), EMBASE (from 1980 to 12 January 2013), and LILACS (from 1982 to 20 November 2014). We searched WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and The metaRegister of Controlled Trials. We also searched for conference proceedings of the American Society of Hematology (from 2009 to October 2013), European Hematology Association (from 2009 to October 2013), American Society of Clinical Oncology (from 2009 to October 2013), and European Society of Medical Oncology (from 2009 to October 2013). We included searches in FDA, European Medicines Agency, and Epistemonikos. We handsearched the references of all identified included trials, and relevant review articles. We did not apply any language restrictions. Two review authors independently screened search results.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized clinical trials comparing Janus kinase-1 and Janus kinase-2 inhibitors with placebo or other treatments. Both previously treated and treatment naive patients were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for overall survival, progression-free survival and leukemia-free survival, risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI for reduction in spleen size and adverse events binary data, and standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous data (health-related quality of life). Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included trials. Primary outcomes were overall survival, progression-free survival and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two trials involving 528 participants, comparing ruxolitinib with placebo or best available therapy (BAT). As the two included trials had different comparators we did not pool the data. The confidence in the results estimates of these trials was low due to the bias in their design, and their limited sample sizes that resulted in imprecise results.There is low quality evidence for the effect of ruxolitinib on survival when compared with placebo at 51 weeks of follow-up (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.98) and compared with BAT at 48 weeks of follow-up (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.47). Similarly there was very low quality evidence for the effect of ruxolitinib on progression free survival compared with BAT (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.39).There is low quality evidence for the effect of ruxolitinib in terms of quality of life. Compared with placebo, the drug achieved a greater proportion of patients with a significant reduction of symptom scores (RR 8.82, 95% CI 4.40 to 17.69), and treated patients with ruxolitinib obtained greater MFSAF scores at the end of follow-up (MD -87.90, 95% CI -139.58 to -36.22). An additional trial showed significant differences in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores when compared ruxolitinib with best available therapy (MD 7.60, 95% CI 0.35 to 14.85).The effect of ruxolitinib on reduction in the spleen size of participants compared with placebo or BAT was uncertain (versus placebo: RR 64.58, 95% CI 9.08 to 459.56, low quality evidence; versus BAT: RR 41.78, 95% CI 2.61 to 669.75, low quality evidence).There is low quality evidence for the effect of the drug compared with placebo on anemia (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.41), neutropenia (RR 3.57, 95% CI 1.02 to 12.55) and thrombocytopenia (RR 9.74, 95% CI 2.32 to 40.96). Ruxolitinib did not result in differences versus BAT in the risk of anemia (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.99, low quality evidence) or thrombocytopenia (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.44 to 3.28, low quality evidence). The risk of non-hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse events (including fatigue, arthralgia, nausea, diarrhea, extremity pain and pyrexia) was similar when ruxolitinib was compared with placebo or BAT. The rate of neutropenia comparing ruxolitinib with standard medical treatment was not reported by the trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to allow any conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib for treating myelofibrosis. The findings of this Cochrane review should be interpreted with caution as they are based on trials sponsored by industry, and include a small number of patients. Unless powered randomized clinical trials provide strong evidence of a treatment effect, and the trade-off between potential benefits and harms is established, clinicians should be cautious when administering ruxolitinib for treating patients with myelofibrosis.

Myelofibrosis patients in Belgium: disease characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To date, only a small number of epidemiological studies on myelofibrosis have been performed. The current study aimed to characterize the myelofibrosis patient population in Belgium according to pre-defined disease parameters (diagnosis, risk categories, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, spleen size, constitutional symptoms, platelet count, myeloblast count), with a view to obtaining a deeper understanding of the proportion of patients that may benefit from the novel myelofibrosis therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

A survey was used to collect data on prevalence and disease parameters on all myelofibrosis patients seen at each of 18 participating hematologic centers in 2011. Aggregated data from all centers were used for analysis. Analyses were descriptive and quantitative.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients with myelofibrosis were captured; of these, 136 (54%) were male and 153 (61%) were over 65 years old. One hundred sixty-five (66%) of myelofibrosis patients had primary myelofibrosis and 85 (34%) had secondary myelofibrosis. One hundred ninety-three myelofibrosis patients (77%) had a palpable spleen. About a third of patients (34%) suffered from constitutional symptoms. Two hundred twenty-two (89%) myelofibrosis patients had platelet count ≧50 000/μl and 201 (80%) had platelet count ≧100 000/μl. Of 250 patients, 85 (34%) had a myeloblast count ≧1%. Six (2%) patients had undergone a splenectomy. Thirteen (5·2%) patients had undergone radiotherapy for splenomegaly.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey provide insight into the characteristics of the Belgian myelofibrosis population. They also suggest that a large proportion of these patients could stand to benefit from the therapies currently under development.

The JAK2 V617F mutational status and allele burden may be related with the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph(-) MPNs) are at increased risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between JAK2 V617F mutational status, JAK2 V617F allele burden and the risk of vascular complications occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis was performed in a cohort of 186 patients diagnosed with polycythemia vera (53), essential thrombocythemia (114), primary myelofibrosis (11), and unclassified MPN (8). The risk of vascular complications development was analyzed in 126 JAK2 V617F-positive patients with respect to allele burden assessed with allele-specific 'real-time' quantitative polymerase chain reaction (AS RQ-PCR).

RESULTS

Overall prevalence of any vascular complications was 44.6%. Arterial thrombosis occurred in 20.4%, venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 11.3%, bleeding episodes in 24.7% of patients. Individuals harboring JAK2 V617F mutation, regardless of MPN type, were at higher risk of VTE (OR=5.15, 95%CI: 1.16-22.90, P=0.024), mainly deep vein thrombosis (DVT). JAK2 allele burden higher than 20% identified patients with 7.4-fold increased risk of VTE (95%CI: 1.6-33.7, P=0.004), but not of arterial thrombosis, neither of bleeding complications, and remained the only significant VTE risk factor in multivariate logistic regression. High allele burdens (over 50%) were strikingly associated with proximal DVT cases, but not with distal DVT.

CONCLUSIONS

The group of MPN patients with JAK2 V617F allele burden higher than 20% may benefit the most from vigilant monitoring and appropriate prophylaxis against vascular events. Inclusion of JAK2 V617F mutant allele burden in new risk stratifications seems to be justified and requires controlled prospective trials.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of primary myelofibrosis

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenomics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of ruxolitinib for the treatment of primary myelofibrosis are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Ruxolitinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the Janus-associated kinases (JAKs) 1 and 2, has been recently approved for the treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. Unlike previous treatment options for patients with myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib offers a targeted therapy option for these patients who often suffer with severe and debilitating symptoms associated with the disease process. After oral administration, ruxolitinib is rapidly absorbed and can be given without regard to meals. Ruxolitinib is primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 isoenzyme system; therefore, if concomitant use with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor is unavoidable, an initial dosage reduction is warranted. Two Phase III randomized trials comparing ruxolitinib to either placebo or best available therapy found a rapid and sustained response in the reduction of spleen size and improvements in constitutional symptoms and quality of life, with one study demonstrating an improvement in overall survival. The most commonly reported serious adverse effects of ruxolitinib are anemia and thrombocytopenia. Ruxolitinib is administered as an oral tablet given twice daily, with the initial starting dosage based on the baseline platelet count. Dosage reductions are based on the development of thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

By directly targeting both JAK1 and JAK2 through small-molecule inhibition, ruxolitinib elicits a reduction in splenomegaly and disease-related symptoms in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis while maintaining an acceptable toxicity profile and a low treatment-discontinuation rate.

Role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myeloproliferative disease

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders. While some MPN patients have an indolent course, all are at risk of progressing to severe marrow failure or transforming into acute leukemia. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only potential curative therapy. Major pre-transplant risk factors are disease stage of the MPN, the presence of comorbid conditions and the use of HLA non-identical donors. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has allowed for successful allo-HCT even for older patients and patients with comorbid conditions. The pre-transplant use of JAK2 inhibitors, which may be effective in down staging a patient's disease, may improve the outcomes following allo-HCT.

How I treat polycythemia vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with JAK2 mutations (V617F or exon 12) in almost all cases. The World Health Organization has defined the criteria for diagnosis, but it is still unclear which parameter (hemoglobin or hematocrit) is the most reliable for demonstrating increased red cell volume and for monitoring response to therapy; also, the role of bone marrow biopsy is being revisited. PV is associated with reduced survival because of cardiovascular complications and progression to post-PV myelofibrosis or leukemia. Criteria for risk-adapted treatment rely on the likelihood of thrombosis. Controlled trials have demonstrated that incidence of cardiovascular events is reduced by sustained control of hematocrit with phlebotomies (low-risk patients) and/or cytotoxic agents (high-risk patients) and antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. Hydroxyurea and interferon may be used as first-line treatments, whereas busulfan is reserved for patients that are refractory or resistant to first-line agents. However, there is no evidence that therapy improves survival, and the significance of reduction of JAK2 mutated allele burden produced by interferon is unknown. PV is also associated with a plethora of symptoms that are poorly controlled by conventional therapy. This article summarizes my approach to the management of PV in daily clinical practice.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of disease-related splenomegaly or symptoms in adult patients with myelofibrosis

SUMMARY 

Myelofibrosis is characterized by progressive splenomegaly, cytopenias and debilitating constitutional symptoms. It has the worst prognosis and poorest quality of life of all the chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only curative therapy, but it carries high treatment-related risks and is thus available to only a small subset of patients. All other interventions merely palliate either anemia or splenomegaly. Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, has recently been shown to be effective in reducing splenomegaly and improving constitutional symptoms to a degree that has not been achieved with conventional therapy. However, treatment with ruxolitinib can often worsen anemia, and its ability to change the natural history of myelofibrosis has not been definitively established.

Controversies and dilemmas in allogeneic transplantation for myelofibrosis

JAK1/2 inhibitors have broadened the therapeutic options in myelofibrosis. Though not curative, they result in a meaningful clinical benefit with relatively fewer side effects. In contrast, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative option, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, an important question is the optimal timing of HCT in the era of JAK inhibitors. Timing of HCT is a crucial decision, and need to be individualized based on the personal preferences and goals of therapy; in addition to patient, disease, and transplant related factors. Risk stratification by the currently established prognostic scoring systems need to be further refined by incorporation of prognostically significant mutations to guide the treatment choices better. Data on use of JAK inhibitors prior to HCT have just started to emerge. We discuss some of the current controversies and dilemmas in transplantation for myelofibrosis based on a few real life scenarios.

An update on allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for myeloproliferative neoplasms in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are a category of diseases that have been traditionally amenable to allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Current developments in drug therapy have delayed transplantation for more advanced phases of the disease, especially for patients with CML, whereas transplantation remains a mainstream treatment modality for patients with advanced myelofibrosis and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Reduced-intensity conditioning has decreased the treatment-related mortality, and advances in the use of alternative donors for transplantation could extend the use of this procedure to an increasing number of patients with improved safety and efficacy. Here we review the current knowledge about allogeneic transplantation for myeloproliferative neoplasms and discuss the most important aspects to be considered when contemplating transplantation for patients with these diseases. Janus kinase 2 inhibitors offer the promise to improve spleen size and performance of patients with myelofibrosis and extend transplantation for patients with more advanced disease.

Novel myelofibrosis treatment strategies: potential partners for combination therapies

Of the myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelofibrosis (MF) is associated with the greatest symptom burden and poorest prognosis and is characterized by constitutional symptoms, cytopenias, splenomegaly and bone marrow fibrosis. A hallmark of MF is dysregulation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway that has led to the development of JAK inhibitors targeting this pathway. Calreticulin gene mutations have recently been identified in JAK2 mutation-negative patients with MF. Identification of JAK inhibitor resistance and broad contributions to MF disease pathogenesis from epigenetic deregulators, pathways that work in concert with JAK/STAT (that is, mammalian target of rapamycin/AKT/phosphoinositide 3-kinase, RAS/RAF/MEK, PIM kinase), fibrosis-promoting factors and the MF megakaryocyte, suggest that numerous options may be partnered with a JAK inhibitor. Therefore, we will discuss logical and potential partners for combination therapies for the treatment of patients with MF.

Cardiac hypertrophy associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms in JAK2V617F transgenic mice

BACKGROUND

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are blood malignancies manifested in increased production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and/or platelets. A major molecular lesion associated with the diseases is JAK2V617F, an activation mutation form of tyrosine kinase JAK2. Cardiovascular events represent the leading cause of morbidity and mortality associated MPNs, but the underlying mechanism is not well understood.

METHODS

Previously, we generated JAK2V617F transgenic mice which displayed MPN-like phenotypes. In the present study, we further characterized these mice by analyzing the time course of MPN phenotype development and associated cardiac abnormalities. We performed detailed histochemical staining of cardiac sections.

RESULTS

JAK2V617F transgenic mice developed cardiomegaly as a subsequent event of increased blood cell production during the course of MPN phenotype development. The cardiomegaly is manifested in increased ventricular wall thickness and enlarged cardiomyocytes. Trichrome and reticulin staining revealed extensive collagen fibrosis in the heart of JAK2V617F transgenic mice. Thrombosis in the coronary artery and inflammatory cell infiltration into cardiac muscle were also observed in JAK2V617F transgenic mice, and the latter event was accompanied by fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

JAK2V617F-induced blood disorders have a major impact on heart function and lead to cardiac hypertrophy. JAK2V617F transgenic mice represent an excellent model system to study both hematological malignancies and cardiovascular diseases.

Polyploidy in myelofibrosis: analysis by cytogenetic and SNP array indicates association with advancing disease

Background

Myelofibrosis occurs as primary myelofibrosis or as a late occurrence in the evolution of essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera. It is the rarest of the three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Polyploidy has only rarely been reported in MPN despite the prominent involvement of abnormal megakaryocytes. The use of peripheral blood samples containing increased numbers of haematopoietic progenitors has improved the output from cytogenetic studies in myelofibrosis and together with the use of single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNPa) has contributed to an improved knowledge regarding the diverse genetic landscape of this rare disease.

Results

Cytogenetic studies performed on a consecutive cohort of 42 patients with primary or post ET/PV myelofibrosis showed an abnormal karyotype in 24 cases and of these, nine showed a polyploid clone. Six of the nine cases showed a tetraploid (4n) subclone, whereas three showed mixed polyploid subclones with both tetraploid and octoploid (4n/8n) cell lines. The abnormal clone evolved from a near diploid karyotype at the initial investigation to a tetraploid karyotype in follow-up cytogenetic analysis in four cases. In total, six of the nine polyploid cases showed gain of 1q material. The remaining three cases showed polyploid metaphases, but with no detectable structural karyotypic rearrangements. Three of the nine cases showed chromosome abnormalities of 6p, either at diagnosis or later acquired. SNPa analysis on eight polyploid cases showed additional changes not previously recognised by karyotype analysis alone, including recurring changes involving 9p, 14q, 17q and 22q. Except for gain of 1q, SNPa findings from the polyploid group compared to eight non-polyploid cases with myelofibrosis found no significant differences in the type of abnormality detected.

Conclusions

The study showed the use of peripheral blood samples to be suitable for standard karyotyping evaluation and DNA based studies. The overall profile of abnormalities found were comparable with that of post-MPN acute myeloid leukaemia or secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and cases in the polyploidy group were associated with features of high risk disease. The above represents the first documented series of polyploid karyotypes in myelofibrosis and shows a high representation of gain of 1q.

Treatment options for myelofibrosis and myeloproliferative neoplasia

SUMMARY Essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and primary myelofibrosis belong to the Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) group of diseases. MPNs are clonal bone marrow stem cell disorders characterized by a proliferation of one or more of the myeloid, erythroid or megakaryocytic cell lines. The treatment of MPN patients should be carried out according to their risk stratification. In 2005 a mutation in the JAK2 gene was discovered that generated more insight into the pathogenetic working mechanism of MPNs. However, the treatment of MPN patients is still mainly only palliative, although progress is being made in reducing the symptoms for MPN patients. This review will give a general overview of the treatment of MPN patients.

Rescue of a primary myelofibrosis model by retinoid-antagonist therapy

Molecular targeting of the two receptor interaction domains of the epigenetic repressor silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT(mRID)) produced a transplantable skeletal syndrome that reduced radial bone growth, increased numbers of bone-resorbing periosteal osteoclasts, and increased bone fracture risk. Furthermore, SMRT(mRID) mice develop spontaneous primary myelofibrosis, a chronic, usually idiopathic disorder characterized by progressive bone marrow fibrosis. Frequently linked to polycythemia vera and chronic myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis displays high patient morbidity and mortality, and current treatment is mostly palliative. To decipher the etiology of this disease, we identified the thrombopoietin (Tpo) gene as a target of the SMRT-retinoic acid receptor signaling pathway in bone marrow stromal cells. Chronic induction of Tpo in SMRT(mRID) mice results in up-regulation of TGF-β and PDGF in megakaryocytes, uncontrolled proliferation of bone marrow reticular cells, and fibrosis of the marrow compartment. Of therapeutic relevance, we show that this syndrome can be rescued by retinoid antagonists, demonstrating that the physical interface between SMRT and retinoic acid receptor can be a potential therapeutic target to block primary myelofibrosis disease progression.

Ruxolitinib: a new treatment option for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Evolution of myelofibrosis can lead to life-threatening complications, including transformation to leukemia, thrombotic events, and hemorrhagic episodes. The only curative therapy for myelofibrosis is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because this disease manifests primarily in the older population, many patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis are not considered medically fit for such aggressive therapy. Other available medical therapies do not halt disease progression; instead, current treatment strategies have focused on targeting specific symptomology, although with limited efficacy. The lack of effective treatment options for patients with myelofibrosis has rendered this orphan disease state an unmet medical need, and novel approaches to improve outcomes are necessary. Emerging research has identified numerous molecular mutations in patients with myelofibrosis, making this disease a potential candidate for molecularly targeted therapy. The most prevalent mutation identified is a gain-of-function mutation in the Janus kinase (JAK) family, JAK2 V617F, which has been identified in more than half of patients with myelofibrosis. This mutation results in a constitutively active JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway resulting in dysregulated cellular proliferation and hematopoiesis. Ruxolitinib is a small-molecule inhibitor of JAK1 and JAK2 and recently became the first drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of symptomatic intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. In clinical trials, ruxolitinib demonstrated promising efficacy in reducing splenomegaly and myelofibrosis-related symptoms. However, ruxolitinib did not demonstrate disease-modifying potential and is not considered a curative therapeutic option. Adverse events associated with ruxolitinib are primarily hematologic, with thrombocytopenia and anemia being the most common toxicologic events identified. Future research will shed light on whether ruxolitinib in combination with other treatments will further enhance outcomes in myelofibrosis.

Increased prevalence of autoimmune phenomena in myelofibrosis: relationship with clinical and morphological characteristics, and with immunoregulatory cytokine patterns

Autoimmune phenomena and cytokines were investigated in 100 patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and related to marrow fibrosis and clinical risk. Anti-erythrocyte antibodies by mitogen-stimulated direct antiglobulin test (MS-DAT) were positive in 45%, anti-platelets in 15% and organ/non organ-specific in 57% of cases, without clinically overt disease, and mostly in low-risk/intermediate-risk-1 and MF-0/MF-1. TGF-β and IL-8 were increased in MS-DAT positive cases, and IFN-γ in patients with serological autoantibodies. TGF-β and IL-17 were elevated in early clinical and morphological stages, while IL-8 increased in advanced stages. These data suggest that autoimmune phenomena and cytokine disregulation are particularly relevant in early MF.

Efficacy and safety of pegylated-interferon α-2a in myelofibrosis: a study by the FIM and GEM French cooperative groups

Myeloproliferative neoplasm-related myelofibrosis is associated with cytopenic or proliferative phases, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Few effective treatments are available and small series suggested that interferon could be an option for myelofibrosis therapy. We performed a retrospective study of pegylated-interferon α-2a (Peg-IFNα-2a) therapy in myelofibrosis. Sixty-two patients treated with Peg-IFNα-2a at 17 French and Belgian centres were included. Responses were determined based on the criteria established by the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Mean follow-up was 26 months. Sixteen of 25 anaemic patients (64%) (eight concomitantly receiving recombinant erythropoietin) achieved a complete response and transfusion-independence was obtained in 5/13 patients (38·5%). Constitutional symptoms resolved in 82% of patients. All five leucopenic patients normalized their leucocyte counts, whereas a normal platelet count was obtained in 5/8 thrombocytopenic patients. Splenomegaly was reduced in 46·5% of patients, and complete resolution of thrombocytosis and leucocytosis were observed in 82·8% and 68·8% of patients, respectively. Side effects (mostly haematological) were mainly of grade 1-2. The only factor independently associated with treatment failure was a spleen enlargement of more than 6 cm below the costal margin. In conclusion, Peg-IFNα-2a induced high response rates with acceptable toxicity in a large proportion of patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis, especially in early phases.

Advances in the discovery of selective JAK inhibitors

In this review, we describe the current knowledge of the biology of the JAKs. The JAK family comprises the four nonreceptor tyrosine kinases JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and Tyk2, all key players in the signal transduction from cytokine receptors to transcription factor activation. We also review the progresses made towards the optimization of JAK inhibitors and the importance of their selectivity profile. Indeed, the full array of many medicinal chemistry enabling tools (HTS, X-ray crystallography, scaffold morphing, etc.) has been deployed to successfully design molecules that discriminate among JAK family and other kinases. While the first JAK inhibitor was launched in 2011, this review also summarizes the status of several other small-molecule JAK inhibitors currently in development to treat arthritis, psoriasis, organ rejection, and multiple cancer types.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms

The myeloproliferative neoplasms that are associated with the JAK2 mutation are a heterogeneous group of disorders. The additional mutations that result in the clinical phenotype are still the subject of research. As more than one mutation is involved, and as JAK2 has a necessary physiological role (unlike BCR-ABL), the development of targeted therapy remains a challenge. Although new drugs are being developed, treatment at present is predominantly with agents that have been in use for many years. An understanding of the need to control the thrombotic risk has, however, led to improved survival rates such that ET and PV can be seen as chronic diseases.