Impact of additional cytogenetic aberrations at diagnosis on prognosis of CML: long-term observation of 1151 patients from the randomized CML Study IV

Cancer cytogenetics in a genomics world: Wedding the old with the new

Since the discovery of the Philadelphia chromosome in 1960, cytogenetic studies have been instrumental in detecting chromosomal abnormalities that can inform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk assessment efforts. The initial expansion of cancer cytogenetics was with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess submicroscopic alterations in dividing or non-dividing cells and has grown into the incorporation of chromosomal microarrays (CMA), and next generation sequencing (NGS). These molecular technologies add additional dimensions to the genomic assessment of cancers by uncovering cytogenetically invisible molecular markers. Rapid technological and bioinformatic advances in NGS are so promising that the idea of performing whole genome sequencing as part of routine patient care may soon become economically and logistically feasible. However, for now cytogenetic studies continue to play a major role in the diagnostic testing and subsequent assessments in leukemia with other genomic studies serving as complementary testing options for detection of actionable genomic abnormalities. In this review, we discuss the role of conventional cytogenetics (karyotyping, chromosome analysis) and FISH studies in hematological malignancies, highlighting the continued clinical utility of these techniques, the subtleties and complexities that are relevant to treating physicians and the unique strengths of cytogenetics that cannot yet be paralleled by the current high-throughput molecular technologies. Additionally, we describe how CMA, optical genome mapping (OGM), and NGS detect abnormalities that were beyond the capacity of cytogenetic studies and how an integrated approach (broad molecular testing) can contribute to the detection of actionable targets and variants in malignancies. Finally, we discuss advances in the field of genomic testing that are bridging the advantages of individual (single) cell based cytogenetic testing and broad genomic testing.

Exploring treatment decision-making in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has transformed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Each approved TKI has its own risk-benefit profile, and patients have choices across lines of therapy. Identifying the initial and subsequent treatment that will lead to the best possible outcome for individual patients is challenging. In this review, we summarize data for each approved TKI across lines of therapy in patients with CML in chronic phase, highlighting elements of each agent's safety and efficacy profile that may impact patient selection, and provide insights into individualized treatment sequencing decision-making aimed at optimizing patient outcomes.

Section E6.1-6.6 of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Technical Laboratory Standards: Cytogenomic studies of acquired chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic blood, bone marrow, and lymph nodes

Cytogenomic analyses of acquired clonal chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic blood, bone marrow, and/or lymph nodes are instrumental in the clinical management of patients with hematologic neoplasms. Cytogenetic analyses assist in the diagnosis of such disorders and can provide important prognostic information. Furthermore, cytogenetic studies can provide crucial information regarding specific genetically defined subtypes of these neoplasms that may have targeted therapies. At time of relapse, cytogenetic analysis can confirm recurrence of the original neoplasm, detect clonal disease evolution, or uncover a new unrelated neoplastic process. This section deals specifically with the technical standards applicable to cytogenomic studies of acquired clonal chromosomal abnormalities in neoplastic blood, bone marrow, and/or lymph nodes. This updated Section E6.1-6.6 supersedes the previous Section E6 in Section E: Clinical Cytogenetics of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Technical Standards for Clinical Genetics Laboratories.

Novel Four-Way Variant Translocation, t(1;9;22;16)(q21;q34;q11.2;q24), in a Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome resulting from the translocation of t(9;22)(q34;q11), producing the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. Variant Ph chromosome translocations, involving rearrangements in chromosomes other than 9 and 22, occur in 5-10% of CML cases. Herein, we report a unique case of a 36-year-old male with a four-way variant Ph chromosome. Conventional chromosomal analysis performed on bone marrow aspirate samples showed 46, XY, t(1;9;22;16)(q21;q34;q11.2;q24). Nested RT-PCR of the BCR::ABL1 gene revealed a major BCR::ABL rearrangement. The treatment with nilotinib achieved a complete hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular response after 12 months.

Is very high platelet count always associated with essential thrombocythemia? An unusual presentation in a child

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are rare in childhood. They are categorized as Philadelphia chromosome-positive and Philadelphia chromosome-negative. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the most common myeloproliferative disease in which the Philadelphia chromosome is detected as a result of BCR-ABL rearrangements. In others, the most common genetic abnormality is JAK2V617F mutation. The coexistence of these 2 abnormalities in CML is unexpected, and rare cases have recently been reported in adults. We present a child who had a very high platelet count in which we found this coexistence. The clinical presentation, laboratory findings, management, and prognosis of this coexistence is challenging in such a rare condition.

European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia

From the laboratory perspective, effective management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires accurate diagnosis, assessment of prognostic markers, sequential assessment of levels of residual disease and investigation of possible reasons for resistance, relapse or progression. Our scientific and clinical knowledge underpinning these requirements continues to evolve, as do laboratory methods and technologies. The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically consider the current status of genetic laboratory approaches to help diagnose and manage CML patients. Our recommendations focus on current best practice and highlight the strengths and pitfalls of commonly used laboratory tests.

SET-CAN/NUP214 fusion gene in leukemia: general features and clinical advances

SET-CAN/NUP214 fusion is a recurrent event commonly observed in adult male patients diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and has occasionally been reported in other diseases such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloid sarcoma (MS), acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). This fusion gene is derived from chromosome del(9)(q34.11;q34.13) or t(9;9)(q34;q34) and may have an inhibitory effect on primitive progenitor differentiation. The prognosis of the reported patients is varied, with these patients often show resistance to chemotherapy regimens that include high doses of glucocorticoids. The optional treatment has not been determined, more cases need to be accumulated and evaluated. The scope of this review is to summarize the general features and prognostic significance in leukemia associated with the SET-CAN/NUP214 fusion gene and to discuss the methods of detection and treatment, aiming at providing some useful references for relevant researchers in the field of blood tumor.

Cytogenetics in the management of myeloproliferative neoplasms, mastocytosis and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms: Guidelines from the Group Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique (GFCH)

Myeloproliferative neoplasms, mastocytosis, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with hypereosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms are clonal hematopoietic cancers that, with the exception of certain entities, have an indolent course. In addition to their increasingly important role in the diagnosis of these entities, as shown by the recent classification of hematolymphoid tumors in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and the International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, identification of the profile of acquired genetic abnormalities is essential for adapting patient management and early detection of patients at high risk of progression. Alongside molecular abnormalities, cytogenetic abnormalities play an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of these diseases. Here, we review the recent literature on the impact of chromosomal abnormalities in these different entities and provide updated cytogenetic recommendations and guidelines for their management.

The presence of additional cytogenetic aberrations in chronic myeloid leukemia cells at the time of diagnosis or their appearance on tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy predicts the imatinib treatment failure

Currently used treatment of CML dramatically improved the prognosis of disease. However, additional chromosome aberrations (ACA/Ph+) are still one of the adverse prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVES

evaluation of the impact of ACA/Ph+ appearance during disease outcome on the response to treatment. THE STUDY GROUP: consisted of 203 patients. The median time of follow-up was 72 months. ACA/Ph+ was found in 53 patients.

RESULTS

patients were divided into four groups: standard risk, intermediate, high and very high risk. When ACA/Ph+ presence was documented at diagnosis time the optimal response was observed in 41.2%, 25%, and 0% of pts with intermediate, high and very high risk, respectively. If ACA/Ph+ were detected during imatinib treatment the optimal response was in 4.8% of patients. The risk of blastic transformation for patients with standard risk, intermediate, high and very high risk was 2.7%, 18.4%, 20% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

the presence of ACA/Ph+ at diagnosis time or their appearance on therapy seems to be clinically relevant not only in terms of the risk of blastic transformation but also in terms of the treatment failure. Gathering patients with various karyotypes and their responses to treatment would allow to set better guidelines and predictions.

Control of Ph+ and additional chromosomal abnormalities in chronic myeloid leukemia by tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a type of blood cancer that is known to affect hematopoietic stem cells. The presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) is the major characteristic of CML. A protein expressed by the Philadelphia chromosome shows elevated tyrosine kinase activity and is considered a tumorigenic factor. The first line of therapy that had been established for CML was "imatinib," a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Various other second- and third-generation TKIs are taken into account in cases of imatinib failure/resistance. With the subsequent rise in the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, optimization in the treatment of CML and amplified total survival were observed throughout TKI dosage. As the disease progresses, additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) have been reported, but their prognostic effect and impact on the response to treatment are still unknown. However, some substantial understandings have been achieved into the disease transformation mechanisms, including the role of somatic mutations, ACAs, and several different genomic mutations that occur during diagnosis or have evolved during treatment. The acquisition of ACAs impedes CML treatment. Due to additional chromosomal lesions, there are greater chances of future disease progression at the time of CML diagnosis beyond the Ph+ translocation. The synchronous appearance of two or more ACAs leads to lower survival and is classified as a poor prognostic group. The key objective of this review is to provide detailed insights into TKIs and their role in controlling Ph+ and ACAs, along with their response, treatment, overall persistence, and survival rate.

Prognosis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Baseline Factors, Dynamic Risk Assessment and Novel Insights

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), leading to a dramatic improvement of the outcome of CML patients, who now have a nearly normal life expectancy and, in some selected cases, the possibility of aiming for the more ambitious goal of treatment-free remission (TFR). However, the minority of patients who fail treatment and progress from chronic phase (CP) to accelerated phase (AP) and blast phase (BP) still have a relatively poor prognosis. The identification of predictive elements enabling a prompt recognition of patients at higher risk of progression still remains among the priorities in the field of CML management. Currently, the baseline risk is assessed using simple clinical and hematologic parameters, other than evaluating the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs), especially those at "high-risk". Beyond the onset, a re-evaluation of the risk status is mandatory, monitoring the response to TKI treatment. Moreover, novel critical insights are emerging into the role of genomic factors, present at diagnosis or evolving on therapy. This review presents the current knowledge regarding prognostic factors in CML and their potential role for an improved risk classification and a subsequent enhancement of therapeutic decisions and disease management.

First-line second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with newly diagnosed accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Accelerated phase (AP) CML at onset and have poorer prognosis than CP-CML. We hypothesize that off-license use of second generation TKI (TKI2) as front-line therapy might counterbalance this poor prognosis, with limited toxicity. In "real-life" conditions, newly diagnosed patients meeting the ELN cytological criteria for AP-CML or harboring ACA and treated with first-line TKI2 were included in this retrospective multicenter observational study. We enrolled 69 patients [69.5 % male, median age 49.5 years, median follow-up 43.5 months], segregated into hematologic AP [HEM-AP (n = 32)] and cytogenetically defined AP [ACA-AP (n = 37)]. Hematologic parameters were worse in HEM-AP [spleen size (p = 0.014), PB basophils (p < .001), PB blasts (p < .001), PB blasts+promyelocytes (p < .001), low hemoglobin levels (p < .001)]. Dasatinib was initiated in 56 % patients in HEM-AP and in 27 % in ACA-AP, nilotinib in 44 % and 73 % respectively. Response and survival do not differ, regardless of the TKI2: 81 % vs 84.3 % patients achieved CHR, 88 % vs 84 % CCyR, 73 % vs 75 % MMR respectively. The estimated 5-year PFS 91.5 % (95%CI: 84.51-99.06 %) and 5-year OS 96.84 % (95%CI: 92.61-100 %). Only BM blasts (p < 0.001) and BM blasts+promyelocytes (p < 0.001) at diagnosis negatively influenced OS. TKI2 as front-line therapy in newly diagnosed AP-CML induce excellent responses and survival, and counterbalance the negative impact of advanced disease phase.

Blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia with concurrent BCR::ABL1 and SET::NUP214: A report of two cases

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm defined by the presence of t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)/BCR::ABL1. Additional chromosomal abnormalities play an important role in the progression to CML. However, the additional fusion gene was rarely reported such as CBFB::MYH11. In this report, we described two cases of the co-occurrence of BCR::ABL1 and SET::NUP214 in CML-BP for the first time, which is associated with poor outcomes during tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Meanwhile, we retrospectively analyzed SET::NUP214 fusion transcript of the two cases at initial diagnosis of the CML chronic phase by quantitative RT-PCR, and detected at a ratio of 1.63% and 1.50%, respectively. SET::NUP214 may promote disease progression during the transformation of CML. This study highlights the importance of extended molecular testing at the initial diagnosis of CML-CP at TKI resistance and/or disease transformation.

Deep Molecular Response Achieved with Chemotherapy, Dasatinib and Interferon α in Patients with Lymphoid Blast Crisis of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

The treatment outcome in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) in blast crisis (BC) is unsatisfactory despite the use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Moreover, in some patients ASCT is contraindicated, with limited treatment options. We report the case series of two patients with lymphoid BC CML in whom ASCT was not approachable. The first patient developed BC two months after diagnosis in association with dic(7;9)(p11.2;p11.2) and T315I mutation. Blast crisis with central nervous system leukemic involvement and K611N mutation of the SETD2 gene developed abruptly in the second patient five years after ceasing treatment with nilotinib in major molecular response (MMR) at the patient's request. Both underwent one course of chemotherapy in combination with rituximab and imatinib, followed by dasatinib and interferon α (INFα) treatment in the first and dasatinib alone in the second case. Deep molecular response (DMR; MR 4.0) was achieved within a short time in both cases. It is probable that DMR was caused by a specific immune response to CML cells, described in both agents. The challenging medical condition that prompted these case series, and the subsequent results, suggest a re-visit to the use of a combination of well-known drugs as an area for further investigation.

Current Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Myeloid Blast Phase

Despite the major advancements in the management of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), blast crisis (BC) remains a major therapeutic challenge. BC can be myeloid, lymphoid, or mixed lineage with myeloid BC being the most common type. BC in CML is mediated by aberrant tyrosine kinase activity of the BCR::ABL fusion protein. The introduction of BCR::ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been a gamechanger in the treatment of CML and there has been a significant reduction in the incidence of BC. The main treatment goal in BC is to achieve a second CP and consolidate that with an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in eligible patients. The outcomes in BC remain dismal even in the current era. In this review, we provide an overview of the biology and current therapeutic approach in myeloid BC.

Treatment of blast phase chronic myeloid leukaemia: A rare and challenging entity

Despite the success of BCR-ABL-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib in chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), patients with blast phase (BP)-CML continue to have a dismal outcome with median survival of less than one year from diagnosis. Thus BP-CML remains a critical unmet clinical need in the management of CML. Our understanding of the biology of BP-CML continues to grow; genomic instability leads to acquisition of mutations which drive leukaemic progenitor cells to develop self-renewal properties, resulting in differentiation block and a poor-prognosis acute leukaemia which may be myeloid, lymphoid or bi-phenotypic. Similar advances in therapy are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes; however, this is challenging given the rarity and heterogeneity of BP-CML, leading to difficulty in designing and recruiting to prospective clinical trials. This review will explore the treatment of BP-CML, evaluating the data for TKI therapy alone, combinations with intensive chemotherapy, the role of allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation, the use of novel agents and clinical trials, as well as discussing the most appropriate methods for diagnosing BP and assessing response to therapy, and factors predicting outcome.

A Unique Three-Way Variant Philadelphia Chromosome t(6;9;22)(p21.3;q34;q11.2) in a Newly Diagnosed Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Responded to Flumatinib

Background

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is a clonal malignant disorder of a pluripotent hematopoetic stem cell characterized by the presence of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome in more than 90% of patients. However, about 5–10% of CML patients show a variant Ph translocation, involving one or more chromosomes in addition to 9 and 22. The treatment and prognostic impact of such additional abnormalities is not known. Herein, we report a unique case of a three-way translocation variant in CML and responded to flumatinib.

Case Presentation

A 22-year-old Asian female who presented with leukocytosis was diagnosed with CML. Cytogenetic karyotyping analysis showed 46,XX,t(6;9;22)(p21.3;q34;q11.2). She was treated with flumatinib, and MR5.0 (BCR-ABL1 IS≤0.001%, international scale) was achieved after three months of continuous treatment.

Conclusion

This was the 5th case of t(6;9;22), in particular, a new variant Ph translocation, and the first successful case treated with flumatinib in the world.

Differential prognostic impact of stratified additional chromosome abnormalities on disease progression among Malaysian chronic myeloid leukemia patients undergoing treatment with imatinib mesylate

The emergence of additional chromosome abnormalities (ACAs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients during treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) regime is generally associated with resistance to treatment and a sign of disease progression to accelerated phase or blast phase. We report the type, frequency, and differential prognostic impact of stratified ACAs with treatment response in 251 Malaysian CML patients undergoing TKI therapy. ACAs were observed in 40 patients (15.9%) of which 7 patients (17.5%) showed ACAs at time of initial diagnosis whereas 33 patients (82.5%) showed ACAs during the course of IM treatment. In order to assess the prognostic significance, we stratified the CML patients with ACAs into four groups, group 1 (+8/+Ph), group 2 (hypodiploidy), group 3 (structural/complex abnormalities); group 4 (high-risk complex abnormalities), and followed up the disease outcome of patients. Group 1 and group 2 relatively showed good prognosis while patients in group 3 and group 4 had progressed or transformed to AP or blast phase with a median survival rate of 12 months after progression. Novel ACAs consisting of rearrangements involving chromosome 11 and chromosome 12 were found to lead to myeloid BP while ACAs involving the deletion of 7q or monosomy 7 led toward a lymphoid blast phase. There was no evidence of group 2 abnormalities (hypodiploidy) contributing to disease progression. Compared to group 1 abnormalities, CML patients with group 3 and group 4 abnormalities showed a higher risk for disease progression. We conclude that the stratification based on individual ACAs has a differential prognostic impact and might be a potential novel risk predictive system to prognosticate and guide the treatment of CML patients at diagnosis and during treatment.

Outcome prediction of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in children

We evaluated the feasibility of existing risk assessment tools for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in children. Fifty-five patients with newly diagnosed CML between 1996 and 2019 were included. Forty-nine patients presented in chronic phase, thirty-six of whom were treated with upfront tyrosine kinase inhibitor (CP-TKI group); one presented in accelerated phase and four in blastic phase. Treatment, survival, responses, and tolerance were evaluated. All patients in the CP-TKI group received imatinib as their first TKI treatment. The 10-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and event-free survival (EFS) of TKI-treated group was 97%, 91.4%, and 72.3%, respectively. At 60 months, the rates of major molecular response were 81.2% and deep molecular response was 67.5%. The EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) risk grouping did not predict OS, PFS, or EFS. The IMAFAIL risk groups were correlated with the risk of imatinib failure. Further studies are required to modify the existing risk assessment tools for children.

Chromosomal Instability in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Mechanistic Insights and Effects

The most recent two decades have seen tremendous progress in the understanding and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia, a disease defined by the characteristic Philadelphia chromosome and the ensuing BCR::ABL fusion protein. However, the biology of the disease extends beyond the Philadelphia chromosome into a nebulous arena of chromosomal and genetic instability, which makes it a genetically heterogeneous disease. The BCR::ABL oncoprotein creates a fertile backdrop for oxidative damage to the DNA, along with impairment of genetic surveillance and the favoring of imprecise error-prone DNA repair pathways. These factors lead to growing chromosomal instability, manifested as additional chromosomal abnormalities along with other genetic aberrations. This worsens with disease progression to accelerated and blast phase, and modulates responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Treatment options that target the genetic aberrations that mitigate chromosome instability might be a potential area for research in patients with advanced phase CML.

Myeloid Sarcoma Involving the Testis in Adults: Clonal Evolution of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

To describe the clinical, histologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic characteristics of myeloid sarcoma (MS) diagnosed in the testes of adults, 3 cases were identified, and information on their presentation, clinical features, treatment, and outcome was retrieved from the medical records. In addition, histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics were reviewed. This showed that all patients had a previous history of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in 2 cases diagnosed >10 years before the testicular lesions. In 1 case, there was bilateral involvement, while in 2, involvement was unilateral. The neoplastic cells showed evidence of cytogenetic/molecular clonal evolution in all cases, 1 of which also had significant immunophenotypic changes. A mutational profile including NPM1 p.Trp288Cysfs*12, IDH1 p.Arg132His NRAS p.Gly12Asp was seen in 2 of the 3 cases. Concurrent bone marrow involvement by a myeloid neoplasm was diagnosed in 2 patients, in 1, there was AML in the second 8% blasts. These patients progressed rapidly after MS and had a dismal outcome. The patient with no concurrent bone marrow disease had a favorable outcome. In conclusion, MS involving the testes of adults is a rare event, and it may represent the clonal evolution of AML.

Effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for controlling Ph+ clone and additional clonal abnormalities in a chronic myeloid leukemia

Purpose

The chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the presence of t(9;22)(q34;q11) that results in chimerization of BCR and ABL genes on the rearranged chromosome 22 or Philadelphia chromosome (Ph). Imatinib has been established as the first line of therapy for CML; in case of Imatinib failure or resistance, other second or third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered. However, acquisition of additional clonal abnormalities (ACAs) interferes in management of CML. We described a complex scenario of cytogenetic remission, relapse, response to TKIs and behavior of ACAs in a case of CML.

Materials and Methods

Conventional G-banding and FISH cytogenetics, and quantitative PCR studies were conducted in the bone marrow for diagnosis and follow up (FU) of the changes of BCR-ABL gene and ACAs at different time intervals.

Results

Ph- chromosome disappeared within 6 months of Imatinib therapy, and re-appeared within a year. Subsequent change of TKI to dasatinib eliminated the Ph+ clone, but established an ACA with trisomy 8 (+8). Further change to Nilotinib, eliminated +8 clone, but re-emergence of Ph+ clone occurred with an ACA with monosomy 7 (-7). Reinstate of Dasatinib eliminated Ph+ and -7 clones, but with gradual reappearance of Ph+ and +8 clones. The patient discontinued FU, though participated in a long term examination.

Conclusion

The complexity of ACAs and Ph+ clones needs frequent monitoring with changes of TKI and technologies.

The Cytogenetic Landscape of Pediatric Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Diagnosed in Chronic Phase

Simple Summary

Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the translocation of the chromosomes 9 and 22. Additional non-Philadelphia aberrations of chromosomes (nPhAs) and their prognostic relevance for the disease course are comparably well known in adult patients with CML. However, due to the rarity of CML in children and adolescents, nPhAs have hardly been determined systematically in these age groups. Here, we present a large analysis of nPhAs detected in a cohort of 161 patients younger than 18 years who had been diagnosed with CML in chronic phase and enrolled in the German national CML-PAED-II registry. We found a distinct distribution of nPhAs in this pediatric cohort with possible impact on treatment response whereas the survival remained unaffected. Our findings emphasize differences in the disease biology between pediatric and adult patients and prompt further joint international efforts to acquire more data on the disease in this age group.

Abstract

Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is cytogenetically characterized by the classic translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11), whereas additional non-Philadelphia aberrations (nPhAs) have been studied extensively in adult patients with CML, knowledge on nPhAs in pediatric patients with CML is still sparse. Here, we have determined nPhAs in a cohort of 161 patients younger than 18 years diagnosed with chronic phase CML and consecutively enrolled in the German national CML-PAED-II registry. In 150 cases (93%), an informative cytogenetic analysis had been performed at diagnosis. In total, 21 individuals (13%) showed nPhAs. Of these, 12 (8%) had a variant translocation, 4 (3%) additional chromosomal aberrations (ACAs) and 5 (3%) harbored a complex karyotype. Chromosome 15 was recurrently involved in variant translocations. No significant impact of the cytogenetic subgroup on the time point of cytogenetic response was observed. Patients with a complex karyotype showed an inferior molecular response compared to patients carrying the classic translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11), variant translocations or ACAs. No significant differences in the probability of progression-free survival and overall survival was found between patients with nPhAs and patients with the classic Philadelphia translocation only. Our results highlight the distinct biology of pediatric CML and underline the need for joint international efforts to acquire more data on the disease pathogenesis in this age group.

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia with Double Philadelphia Chromosome and Coexpression of p210 and p190 Fusion Transcripts

The Philadelphia (Ph+) chromosome, t(9;22)(q34;q11.2), originates from a chimeric gene called BCR-ABL and is present in more than 90% of CML patients. Most patients with CML express the protein p210 BCR-ABL and, with a frequency lower than 5%, express rare isoforms, the main one being p190. In the transition from the chronic phase to the blast phase (BP), additional chromosomal abnormalities, such as the presence of the double Ph+ chromosome, are revealed. Of the 1132 patients analyzed via molecular biology in this study, two patients (0.17%) showed the co-expression of the p210 and p190 isoforms for the BCR-ABL transcript, with the concomitant presence of a double Ph+ chromosome, which was observed via conventional cytogenetics and confirmed by fluorescent in situ hybridization. The BCR-ABL/ABL% p210 and p190 ratio increased in these two patients from diagnosis to progression to blast crisis. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the literature of patients who co-expressed the two main BCR-ABL transcript isoforms and concomitantly presented Ph+ chromosome duplication. The evolution from the chronic phase to BP often occurs within 5 to 7 years, and, in this study, the evolution to BP was earlier, since disease-free survival was on average 4.5 months and overall survival was on average 9.5 months. The presence of the p190 transcript and the double Ph+ chromosome in CML may be related to the vertiginous progression of the disease.

Genomic Mechanisms Influencing Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) represents the disease prototype of genetically based diagnosis and management. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), that target the causal BCR::ABL1 fusion protein, exemplify the success of molecularly based therapy. Most patients now have long-term survival; however, TKI resistance is a persistent clinical problem. TKIs are effective in the BCR::ABL1-driven chronic phase of CML but are relatively ineffective for clinically defined advanced phases. Genomic investigation of drug resistance using next-generation sequencing for CML has lagged behind other hematological malignancies. However, emerging data show that genomic abnormalities are likely associated with suboptimal response and drug resistance. This has already been supported by the presence of BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations in drug resistance, which led to the development of more potent TKIs. Next-generation sequencing studies are revealing additional mutations associated with resistance. In this review, we discuss the initiating chromosomal translocation that may not always be a straightforward reciprocal event between chromosomes 9 and 22 but can sometimes be accompanied by sequence deletion, inversion, and rearrangement. These events may biologically reflect a more genomically unstable disease prone to acquire mutations. We also discuss the future role of cancer-related gene mutation analysis for risk stratification in CML.

Overcoming Resistance to Kinase Inhibitors: The Paradigm of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Protein kinases (PKs) play crucial roles in cellular proliferation and survival, hence their deregulation is a common event in the pathogenesis of solid and hematologic malignancies. Targeting PKs has been a promising strategy in cancer treatment, and there are now a variety of approved anticancer drugs targeting PKs. However, the phenomenon of resistance remains an obstacle to be addressed and overcoming resistance is a goal to be achieved. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the first as well as one of the best examples of a cancer that can be targeted by molecular therapy; hence, it can be used as a model disease for other cancers. This review aims to summarize up-to-date knowledge on the main mechanisms implicated in resistance to PK inhibitory therapies and to outline the main strategies that are being explored to overcome resistance. The importance of molecular diagnostics and disease monitoring in counteracting resistance will also be discussed.

Late Responses in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Initially Refractory to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, the prognosis for those who do not meet treatment milestones remains guarded. Here, we report our experience of patients with CML treated at a single center who did not achieve a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 24 months.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 305 patients who were diagnosed with CML at the University of Michigan between 2001 and 2014 and were treated with TKIs. We assessed rates of CCyR at 24 months correlated to clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (79%) achieved CCyR at 24 months and were classified as responders. At a median follow-up of 8.1 years from TKI initiation, overall survival among responders was significantly greater than nonresponders (93% vs. 85%, P < .001). Progression to blast phase was more common in nonresponders (1.9% vs. 10.4%, P = .004). However, 34% of nonresponders (at 24 months) went on to achieve CCyR with continued TKI therapy.

CONCLUSION

Here, we re-demonstrate the importance of early CCyR in predicting survival and prevention of progression to blast phase. In addition, late CCyR appears to have prognostic implications, and continued TKI therapy with the goal of achieving a later CCyR may be a reasonable strategy in patients with limited alternate treatment options.

High incidence of minor and micro breakpoints in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia with additional cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis – the Western Australian series

Introduction and objective

Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) is defined by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome, a balanced translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 that results in the constitutively active tyrosine kinase, BCR-ABL1. Additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) at diagnosis occur in 5–10% of CML patients, and are important for prognosis. They are classified as major or minor route. The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency and type of ACAs in 193 newly diagnosed CML patients, and to evaluate patient characteristics, treatment response, and survival.

Methods

Medical records, in conjunction with data from the PathWest cytogenetics and molecular laboratories, were analysed.

Results

ACAs were present in 14 (7.3%) of patients at diagnosis. Seven patients had major-route abnormalities, with additional chromosome 8 (+8) the most common. All patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Three patients presented in blast crisis; two patients have died. Of note, there was a high incidence of the rare minor and micro BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts.

Conclusions

Frequency of ACAs at diagnosis was similar to that of previous reports. These patients consist a higher-risk cohort, and require individualised treatment, with consideration of frontline and secondary TKIs, adjunct chemotherapy, novel agents, and allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Genetic Biomarkers in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Have We Learned So Far?

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is a rare malignant proliferative disease of the hematopoietic system, whose molecular hallmark is the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph). The Ph chromosome originates an aberrant fusion gene with abnormal kinase activity, leading to the buildup of reactive oxygen species and genetic instability of relevance in disease progression. Several genetic abnormalities have been correlated with CML in the blast phase, including chromosomal aberrations and common altered genes. Some of these genes are involved in the regulation of cell apoptosis and proliferation, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tumor protein p53 (TP53), or Schmidt-Ruppin A-2 proto-oncogene (SRC); cell adhesion, e.g., catenin beta 1 (CTNNB1); or genes associated to TGF-β, such as SKI like proto-oncogene (SKIL), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) or transforming growth factor beta 2 (TGFB2); and TNF-α pathways, such as Tumor necrosis factor (TNFA) or Nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NFKB1). The involvement of miRNAs in CML is also gaining momentum, where dysregulation of some critical miRNAs, such as miRNA-451 and miRNA-21, which have been associated to the molecular modulation of pathogenesis, progression of disease states, and response to therapeutics. In this review, the most relevant genomic alterations found in CML will be addressed.

Gemtuzumab-ozogamicin and blinatumomab as treatment for refractory mixed-phenotype blast crisis in chronic myeloid leukaemia

In the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era, the blast phase of chronic myeloid leukaemia (BP-CML) renders an uncommon presentation and has a poor prognosis with an estimated overall survival below 20%. Mixed-phenotype blast phase is even more infrequent, presenting in 3.3% of these patients. Blast phase manifests along haematological sarcomas, with extramedullary activity in lymph nodes, skin and bone. We report the case of a patient with an ovarian sarcoma as an extramedullary presentation of mixed-phenotype BP-CML refractory to conventional treatment which responded to immunotherapy against CD33 and CD19.

Which Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Should Be Selected as the First-Line Treatment for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase?

Simple Summary

This review discusses the optimal selection of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). With the advent of TKIs, the treatment goals for CML-CP patients have changed from “simply survival” to “survival with adequate quality of life”, hence the number of CML-CP patients aiming to achieve treatment-free remission has increased, irrespective of age or comorbidities. Therefore, optimal selection of TKIs for maximizing the number of patients to achieve treatment-free remission is an important factor for consideration in future studies. To this end, we must understand the advantages and disadvantages of each TKI in terms of treatment response, disease risk at diagnosis, comorbidities, and medical expenses, and use of effective 2GTKIs based on patient background. This review provides insights into “shared decision-making” in individual cases, including the elderly population.

Abstract

With the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) has been transformed into a non-fatal chronic disease. Hence, “treatment-free remission (TFR)” has become a possible treatment goal of patients with CML-CP. Currently, four types of TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib) are used as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed CML-CP. However, the second-generation TKI (2GTKI), the treatment response of which is faster and deeper than that of imatinib, is not always recommended as the first-line treatment for CML-CP. Factors involved in TKI selection in the first-line treatment of CML-CP include not only patients’ medical background, but also patients’ choice regarding the desired treatment goal (survival or TFR?). Therefore, it is important that clinicians select an appropriate TKI to successfully achieve the desired treatment goal for each patient, while minimizing the development of adverse events. This review compares the pros and cons of using imatinib and 2GTKI for TKI selection as the first-line treatment for CML-CP, mainly considering treatment outcomes, medical history (i.e., desire for pregnancy, aging factor, and comorbidity), and cost. The optimal use of 2GTKIs is also discussed.

Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Relevance

Simple Summary

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasia associated with a molecular alteration, the fusion gene BCR-ABL1, that encodes the tyrosine kinase oncoprotein BCR-ABL1. This led to the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), with Imatinib being the first TKI approved. Although the vast majority of CML patients respond to Imatinib, resistance to this targeted therapy contributes to therapeutic failure and relapse. Here we review the molecular mechanisms and other factors (e.g., patient adherence) involved in TKI resistance, the methodologies to access these mechanisms, and the possible therapeutic approaches to circumvent TKI resistance in CML.

Abstract

Resistance to targeted therapies is a complex and multifactorial process that culminates in the selection of a cancer clone with the ability to evade treatment. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was the first malignancy recognized to be associated with a genetic alteration, the t(9;22)(q34;q11). This translocation originates the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, encoding the cytoplasmic chimeric BCR-ABL1 protein that displays an abnormally high tyrosine kinase activity. Although the vast majority of patients with CML respond to Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), resistance might occur either de novo or during treatment. In CML, the TKI resistance mechanisms are usually subdivided into BCR-ABL1-dependent and independent mechanisms. Furthermore, patients’ compliance/adherence to therapy is critical to CML management. Techniques with enhanced sensitivity like NGS and dPCR, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and the development of mathematical modeling and computational prediction methods could reveal the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance and facilitate the design of more effective treatment strategies for improving drug efficacy in CML patients. Here we review the molecular mechanisms and other factors involved in resistance to TKIs in CML and the new methodologies to access these mechanisms, and the therapeutic approaches to circumvent TKI resistance.

Genomic Copy Number Variants in CML Patients With the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+): An Update

Background

Submicroscopic segmental imbalances detected by array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) were discovered to be common in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with t(9;22) as the sole chromosomal anomaly. To confirm the findings of the previous study and expand the investigation, additional CML patients with t(9;22) as the sole chromosomal anomaly were recruited and copy number variants (CNVs) were searched for.

Methods

Karyotyping tests were performed on 106 CML patients during January 2010-September 2019 in our Genetics Laboratory. Eighty-four (79.2%) patients had the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome as the sole chromosomal anomaly. Only 49(58.3%) of these 84 patients had sufficient marrow or leukemia blood materials to additionally be included in the array-CGH analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out to confirm the genes covered by the deleted or duplicated regions of the CNVs.

Results

11(22.4%) out of the 49 patients were found to have one to three somatic segmental somatic segmental (CNVs), including fourteen deletions and three duplications. The common region associated with deletions was on 9q33.3-34.12. Identified in five (45.5%) of the 11 positive patients with segmental CNVs, the deletions ranged from 106 kb to 4.1 Mb in size. Two (18.2%) cases had a deletion in the ABL1-BCR fusion gene on der (9), while three (27.3%) cases had a deletion in the ASS1 gene. The remaining CNVs were randomly distributed on different autosomes.

Conclusion

Subtle genomic CNVs are relatively common in CML patients without cytogenetically visible additional chromosomal aberrations (ACAs). Long-term studies investigating the potential impact on patient prognosis and treatment outcome is underway.

[Analysis of clinical features and prognosis of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia harboring additional chromosomal abnormalities in Ph-positive cells]

目的

探讨Ph阳性附加染色体异常（ACA/Ph⁺）对初诊慢性期（CP）和治疗中进展为加速期和急变期慢性髓性白血病（CML-AP/BP）患者生物学特征、疗效和预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2020年6月河南省人民医院收治的410例Ph⁺ CML[初诊CML-CP 348例，治疗中进展为AP/BP（进展期CML）62例]患者的临床资料，根据ELN2020标准将其分为高危、非高危和无ACA/Ph⁺三组，并比较分析高危/非高危ACA/Ph⁺对其生物学特征、疗效和预后的影响。

结果

①348例初诊CML-CP患者，合并ACA/Ph⁺者20例（5.75%），其中高危ACA/Ph⁺组3例，非高危ACA/Ph⁺组17例；无ACA/Ph⁺组328例。伴ACA/Ph⁺和无ACA/Ph⁺组患者的基本临床特征差异无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）；非高危ACA/Ph⁺组和无ACA/Ph⁺组间完全血液学缓解（CHR）率、完全细胞遗传学反应（CCyR）率、主要分子学反应（MMR）率和5年总生存（OS）率差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）；非高危ACA/Ph⁺组5年无进展生存（PFS）率显著低于无ACA/Ph⁺组（42.0%对74.5%，χ²＝4.766，P＝0.029）。②62例进展期CML患者，合并ACA/Ph⁺者41例（66.13%），其中高危ACA/Ph⁺组28例，非高危ACA/Ph⁺组13例；无ACA/Ph⁺组21例。高危ACA/Ph⁺组患者中位PLT水平（42.5×10⁹/L）低于非高危（141×10⁹/L）和无ACA/Ph⁺组（109×10⁹/L）（χ²＝4.968，P＝0.083）；三组间ABL激酶区点突变发生率差异无统计学意义（P＝0.652）。高危ACA/Ph⁺组CCyR率显著低于无ACA/Ph⁺组（5.3%对46.7%，χ²＝5.851，P＝0.016）。高危ACA/Ph⁺组5年OS率为46.2%，非高危ACA/Ph⁺组为64.3%，无ACA/Ph⁺组为77.8%，其中高危ACA/Ph⁺组患者5年OS率明显低于无ACA/Ph⁺组（χ²＝3.878，P＝0.049）。亚组分析显示高危Ⅰ组（+8，+Ph或含+8/+Ph的复杂ACA）CML患者的5年OS率为54.5%，与无ACA/Ph⁺组相比差异无统计学意义（χ²＝1.514，P＝0.219）；高危Ⅱ组[含−7/7q−或i（17q）或含2个及以上高危ACA的复杂核型]为28.6%，显著低于无ACA/Ph⁺组（χ²＝8.035，P＝0.005）。

结论

因ACA类型和疾病分期不同，伴ACA/Ph⁺ CML患者的治疗反应和预后存在差异，治疗过程中高危ACA的出现意味着更差的治疗反应和预后，严格、规范的细胞遗传学监测对此类患者的早期发现和精准诊疗具有重要意义。

Molecular, Cytogenetic, and Hematological Analysis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients and Discovery of Two Novel Translocations

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a disease of hematopoietic stem cells and is caused by the balanced translocations among the long arms of chromosomes 9 and 22, which are called the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. In this study, 131 CML patients were enrolled. Complete blood cell count was performed at the time of diagnosis for all the patients. Cytogenetic (karyotyping) examination using bone marrow samples was conducted on 76 CML patients for the confirmation of Ph-positive (9;22)(q34;q11) standard translocation, complex variant translocation, and additional chromosome abnormalities. FISH was performed on 38 patients for diagnostic purposes and on 39 patients for monitoring purposes. Twenty-two samples of CML patients were evaluated by reverse transcriptase PCR and real-time PCR for the patients who failed to respond against imatinib mesylate. In this study, 72 (54.96%) were males and 59 (45.03%) were females with a median age of 38.5 years. CBC values in the diagnosis process showed that 75 patients had high values of WBC being >100 × 103/μl, while 71 (58.01) patients exhibited reduced values of hemoglobin, i.e., <10.00 mg/dl, and high values of PLTs > 100 were observed in 40 (30.53%) patients. Cytogenetic results show that standard translocation was developed in 63 (82.89%), development of complex variant translocations in 4 (5.32%), additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in 3 (3.94%), and ACAs together with complex variant translocations in 1 (1.31%) patient. At the time of diagnosis, 61 (92.95%) patients were in the chronic phase, 4 (5.63%) were in the accelerated phase, and only 1 (1.40%) was in the blast crisis. Out of twenty-two patients, only 6 CML patients who were shifted from imatinib mesylate to nilotinib showed BCR-ABL-positive amplification. However, only 7 out of twenty-one patients exhibit BCR-ABL gene values ≥ 1 after three months of follow-up when analyzed by the quantitative real-time PCR. In conclusion, we found a novel five-way translocation 46XX,t(1;2;2;17;9;22)(p36.3,q21;q11.2,q21,q34,q11.2) and a novel four-way complex variant translocation 48XY,+8(8;17)(9;22),+der(22)(q11.2;q23)(q34;q11.2) in the accelerated phase.

Understanding and Monitoring Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Blast Crisis: How to Better Manage Patients

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is triggered primarily by the t(9;22) (q34.13; q11.23) translocation. This reciprocal chromosomal translocation leads to the formation of the BCR-ABL fusion gene. Patients in the chronic phase (CP) experience a good curative effect with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, cases are treatment refractory, with a dismal prognosis, when the disease has progressed to the accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP). Until now, few reports have provided a comprehensive description of the mechanisms involved at different molecular levels. Indeed, the underlying pathogenesis of CML evolution comprises genetic aberrations, chromosomal translocations (except for the Philadelphia chromosome), telomere biology, and epigenetic anomalies. Herein, we provide knowledge of the biology responsible for blast transformation of CML at several levels, such as genetics, telomere biology, and epigenetic anomalies. Because of the limited treatment options available and poor outcomes, only the therapeutic response is monitored regularly, which involves BCR-ABL transcript level assessment and immunologic surveillance, with the optimal treatment strategy for patients in CP adapted to evaluate disease recurrence or progression. Overall, selecting optimal treatment endpoints to predict survival and successful TFR improves the quality of life of patients. Thus, identifying risk factors and developing risk-adapted therapeutic options may contribute to a better outcome for advanced-phase patients.

Measuring prognosis in chronic myeloid leukemia: what's new?

Introduction: The outcome of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in chronic phase has changed after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The life expectancy is actually similar to that of the general population. Prognostic stratification at baseline is part of a patient-centered approach to decide the best therapeutic approach.Areas covered: In this review, the current prognostic factors examined at baseline are detailed and the meaning is explained. A broad research on Medline, Embase and archives from EHA and ASH congresses, was performed. Prognostic factors have been divided into patient-related (age, gender, comorbidities, etc.) and disease-related (additional cytogenetic abnormalities, type of transcript, etc). New information about genomic data and the potential role of patient-reported outcomes is also discussed.Expert Opinion: Prognostic factors at baseline should be considered to evaluate the long-term probability of disease-related death, the possible toxicity, and the projected long-term overall survival. The genomic assessment would provide the basis for a genomic-based risk and help in oriented decision-making process.

Additional chromosomal abnormalities at chronic myeloid leukemia diagnosis predict an increased risk of progression

At diagnosis of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), there are conflicting data as to whether additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) beyond a standard Philadelphia (Ph) translocation confer a higher risk of subsequent disease progression. In the United Kingdom SPIRIT2 trial comparing imatinib 400 mg daily with dasatinib 100 mg daily, diagnostic karyotypes were available in 763 of the 814 patients recruited. Of these, 27 had ACAs in either/both the original 4 major route group (trisomy 8 or 19, iso17q or a second Ph) or the 5 additional lesions recently described (trisomy 21, 3q26.2, monosomy 7/7q-, 11q23, and complex karyotypes), and their progression rate was significantly higher (22.2%) than in patients without one of these ACAs (2.2%; P < .001). Patients with ACAs had worse progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 5.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-10.50; P < .001) and freedom from progression (FFP; HR, 12.66; 95% CI, 4.95-32.37; P < .001) compared with patients without ACAs. No association was seen between the Sokal or European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival (ELTS) scores and the presence of ACAs. Univariate analysis showed that higher Sokal and ELTS scores and the presence of ACAs were associated with poorer PFS, though only ACAs and high-risk ELTS scores were associated with poorer FFP. Multivariable models identified both the Sokal/ELTS score and ACAs as significant independent factors for PFS but only ELTS score and ACAs as significant independent factors for FFP. The data support the view that certain ACAs are predictive of disease progression independently of Sokal or ELTS scores.

A unique three-way Philadelphia chromosome variant t(4;9;22)(q21;q34;q11.2) in a newly diagnosed patient with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Chronic myeloid leukemia is a hematologic malignancy associated with the fusion of two genes: BCR and ABL1. This fusion results from a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22, which is called the Philadelphia chromosome. Although the Philadelphia chromosome is present in more than 90% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, 5–8% of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia show complex variant translocations. Herein, we report a unique case of a three-way translocation variant in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old Asian male who presented with leukocytosis was diagnosed with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Cytogenetic karyotyping analysis showed 46,XY,t(4;9;22)(q21;q34;q11.2). He was treated with bosutinib and then changed to dasatinib because of intolerance, and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL/ABL ≦ 0.0032%, international scale) was achieved after 17 months of continuous treatment.

Conclusion

This was the 14th case of t(4;9;22), in particular, a new variant Ph translocation involved in chromosome 4q21 and the first successful case treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the world. We summarize previous case reports regarding three-way variant chromosome translocation, t(4;9;22) and discuss how this rare translocation is linked to prognosis.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia With Concurrent Core Binding Factor Rearrangement and Philadelphia Chromosome

BACKGROUND

Acquisition of additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACAs) in addition to Philadelphia chromosome is frequently observed in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in advanced phase. The presence of core binding factor (CBF) translocations determines the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia regardless of blast percentage, and CBF rearrangements are rarely identified as ACAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with CML who had CBF rearrangement, t(8;21) or inv(16), in Philadelphia chromosome-positive clones was conducted. Additional cases of CML with CBF rearrangements were identified through literature review.

RESULTS

Between August 1997 and December 2014, we identified 11 patients who had Philadelphia chromosome and CBF rearrangement in the same clones: 1 (9%) with t(8;21) and 10 (91%) with inv(16). Nine (82%) patients were in blast phase, and 2 (18%) in second chronic phase. Four (36%) patients received tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy, 2 (18%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitor and chemotherapy, and 5 (45%) received chemotherapy only. Three (27%) patients achieved complete remission with incomplete count recovery, and 4 (36%) had no response after the initial therapy. Three (27%) patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The median event-free survival and overall survival for the 11 patients were 2 months and 6 months, respectively. Literature review identified 14 patients with CML with CBF rearrangement with a median overall survival of 14 months.

CONCLUSION

Acquisition of CBF rearrangement in addition to Philadelphia chromosome is a rare phenomenon associated with poor prognosis. CBF rearrangements as ACAs in patients with CML can be considered high-risk features.

An Evaluation of a Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Strategy Using Air-dried Blood and Bone-marrow Smears in the Risk Stratification of Pediatric B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Resource-limited Settings

Cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs), one of the strongest influencers of therapeutic outcome in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), can be identified by different techniques. Despite several technological advances, many centers with resource-limited settings continue to use either reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to identify prognostically relevant CAs. We evaluated a simple and cost-effective triple-probe FISH strategy on air-dried blood and bone-marrow smears and compared its performance with a multiplex RT-PCR-based approach in the prognostication of pediatric BCP-ALL patients. Three hundred twenty BCP-ALL patients were tested prospectively and in parallel by FISH on air-dried blood or bone-marrow smears and RT-PCR. The FISH strategy correctly diagnosed all genetic abnormalities identified by RT-PCR. Prognostically relevant genetic abnormalities were missed by RT-PCR in 24 (8.1%) patients. In another 20 children (6%), with samples inadequate for RT-PCR testing (dry taps or due to poor sample quality), a successful FISH testing could be performed on bone-marrow aspirate or trephine-imprint smears. In addition, FISH detected ploidy changes, which could be confirmed by FxCycle Violet-based flow-cytometry. FISH testing on air-dried smears identified more prognostically relevant CAs, provided information on the ploidy status, and could be successfully performed in children with difficulty in bone-marrow sampling.

Lab tests for MPN

Molecular laboratory investigations for myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) can ideally be divided into two distincts groups, those for the detection of the BCR-ABL rearrangement (suspect of chronic myeloid leukemia) and those for the variants determination of the driver genes of the negative Philadelphia forms (MPN Ph neg). The BCR-ABL detection is based on RT-Polymerase Chain Reaction techniques and more recently on droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). For this type of analysis, combined with chromosome banding analysis (CBA) and Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), it is essential to quantify BCR-ABL mutated copies by standard curve method. The investigation on driver genes for MPN Ph neg forms includes activity for erythroid forms such as Polycythemia Vera (test JAK2V617F and JAK2 exon 12), for non-erythroid forms such as essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis (test JAK2V617F, CALR exon 9, MPL exon 10), for "atypical" ones such as mastocytosis (cKIT D816V test) and for hypereosinophilic syndrome (FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha test). It's crucial to assign prognosis value through calculating allelic burden of JAK2 V617F variant and determining CALR esone 9 variants (type1/1like, type2/2like and atypical ones). A fundamental innovation for investigating triple negative cases for JAK2, CALR, MPL and for providing prognostic score is the use of Next Generation Sequencing panels containing high molecular risk genes as ASXL1, EZH2, TET2, IDH1/IDH2, SRSF2. This technique allows to detect additional or subclonal mutations which are usually acquired in varying sized sub-clones of hematopoietic progenitors. These additional variants have a prognostic significance and should be indagated to exclude false negative cases.

Current status and novel strategy of CML

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has dramatically improved the outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Currently, four TKIs are available for the frontline treatment, including the first-generation TKI (imatinib) and the second-generation TKIs (dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib). The second-generation TKIs lead to a faster and deeper molecular response without a survival benefit compared with imatinib. However, the opportunity for the treatment discontinuation and functional cure requires the achievement of durable deep molecular remission. Therefore, the second-generation TKIs should be considered as initial therapy for chronic-phase CML. Switch of therapy is warranted in case of treatment failure, including resistance and/or intolerance. The life expectancy of patients with CML is approaching that of the general population. Given an expected lifespan, future perspectives should consider the strategy for the optimal choice of TKIs, allowing for long-duration of effective TKI therapy with less toxicity to aim for a functional cure. A novel prediction approach such as artificial intelligence-driven analysis on the accumulated data from clinical trials paves a promising path for the personalized recommendation on frontline TKIs and precise survival prediction.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Modern therapies, current challenges and future directions

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by a reciprocal translocation [t(9;22)(q34;q11.2)] that leads to the fusion of ABL1 gene sequences (9q34) downstream of BCR gene sequences (22q11) and is cytogenetically visible as Philadelphia chromosome (Ph). The resulting BCR/ABL1 chimeric protein is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that activates multiple signaling pathways, which collectively lead to malignant transformation. During the early (chronic) phase of CML (CP-CML), the myeloid cell compartment is expanded, but differentiation is maintained. Without effective therapy, CP-CML invariably progresses to blast phase (BP-CML), an acute leukemia of myeloid or lymphoid phenotype. The development of BCR-AB1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the treatment of CML and ignited the start of a new era in oncology. With three generations of BCR/ABL1 TKIs approved today, the majority of CML patients enjoy long term remissions and near normal life expectancy. However, only a minority of patients maintain remission after TKI discontinuation, a status termed treatment free remission (TFR). Unfortunately, 5-10% of patients fail TKIs due to resistance and are at risk of progression to BP-CML, which is curable only with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Overcoming TKI resistance, improving the prognosis of BP-CML and improving the rates of TFR are areas of active research in CML.

BCR-ABL1 positive AML or CML in blast crisis? A pediatric case report with inv(3) and t(9;22) in the initial clone

The co-occurrence of an inversion inv(3)(q21q26)/GATA2-MECOM and a Philadelphia translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11)/BCR-ABL1 in the context of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in blast crisis or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has only rarely been described. To our knowledge, this co-occurrence has been reported in six pediatric patients with CML but not in pediatric patients with AML. Here, we report on a 7-year-old girl, who, presented with a t(9;22) and inv(3) in 14 of 15 metaphases and an additional monosomy 7 was detected in 5 of these metaphases (ISCN: 46,​XX,​inv(3)(q21q26),​t(9;22)(q34q11)[9]/45,​idem,​-7[5]/46,​XX[1]). The p190 BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript was detected by multiplex PCR and targeted RNA sequencing. Due to these results, a clear distinction between a CML in blast crisis and a BCR-ABL1 positive AML was not possible. The patient was treated according to the treatment recommendations of the AML-BFM study group and additionally received tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (Dasatinib). The treatment with Dasatinib was successful in eliminating the inv(3)/t(9;22) clone, but the ancestral inv(3) clone persisted. Based upon these findings we diagnosed an AML with inv(3) and a secondary acquisition of t(9;22). This treatment as well as an allogenic transplantation has led to a complete remission of the disease up to this date (21 months post diagnosis).

First-generation vs second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors: which is best at diagnosis of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia?

In 2020, for the great majority of patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), life expectancy is unaffected by a diagnosis of CML because of the unparalleled efficacy of ABL-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in halting disease progression. A wealth of choices exist for first-line treatment selection, including the first-generation TKI imatinib and the second-generation TKIs bosutinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. How I select first-line therapy between first-generation and second-generation TKIs is discussed in the context of patient-specific CML disease risk, therapy-related risks, and treatment goals. Although rare, identifying patients with CML at higher risk for disease progression or resistance is important and influences first-line TKI selection. I review the impact of first-generation vs second-generation TKI selection on treatment response and outcomes; the ability to achieve, as well as the timing of, treatment-free remission; and the impact of specific TKIs on longer-term health.

The EUTOS long-term survival score predicts disease-specific mortality and molecular responses among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in a practice-based cohort

The European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) long‐term survival (ELTS) score predicts disease‐specific death in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) being treated with imatinib during the chronic phase (CP) of the disease. However, it is unclear whether the ELTS score predicts CML‐related events or treatment responses. This study evaluated the predictive value of the ELTS score regarding prognosis and treatment response in patients with CML‐CP. Clinical data were retrospectively obtained from patients enrolled in the CML Cooperative Study Group (CML‐CSG), which included patients diagnosed with CML‐CP from April 2001 to January 2016, and treated with any tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as first‐line therapy. Among 342 eligible patients, the ELTS scores indicated low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk in 74%, 21%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Patients with high ELTS scores had significantly higher disease‐specific mortality and worse event‐free survival, progression‐free survival, and overall survival. Among four risk scores, including the Sokal, Hasford, EUTOS, and ELTS scores, risk stratification by the ELTS score had the highest predictive value in assessing patient prognosis, and also in treatment responses. In fact, the EUTOS and ELTS scores were able to predict the major molecular response within 12 months. Most importantly, the ELTS score was the only scoring system that predicted deep molecular response at any time, regardless of risk level (65.0%, 43.7%, and 23.5% in low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk groups, respectively). Compared to other risk scores, the ELTS score was the most sensitive risk classification tool for the four endpoints of interest in this study, as well as molecular responses in patients with CML‐CP.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) which results from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22] that gives rise to a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is a highly effective first-line treatment option for all patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic phase CML.