A universal solution for eliminating false positives in myeloma due to therapeutic monoclonal antibody interference

Quantitative assessment of daratumumab in serum via intact light chain measurement using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry: a method suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring

Daratumumab, a pivotal treatment for multiple myeloma, exhibits considerable inter-patient variability in pharmacological clinical outcomes, likely attributed to serum concentration that may underscore the need for its therapeutic drug monitoring. This study aims to develop and validate a straightforward analytical method for quantifying daratumumab in serum, focusing on intact light chain determination, using liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. The sample preparation involved immunoglobulin enrichment using Melon gel followed by a reduction step to dissociate the light from the heavy chains of immunoglobulins. The latter were then separated using a MabPac RP 2.1 × 50 mm chromatographic column and the intact light chains were detected and quantified using a Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer operating in ESI-positive ion mode at 17 500 resolution. The method demonstrated excellent linearity (R2 > 0.992) across a serum concentration range of 100 to 2000 μg mL-1 and good precision and accuracy: intra- and interday relative errors ranged from -5.1% to 6.5%, with a relative standard deviation of less than 5.8%. Clinical suitability was confirmed by analyzing 80 clinical samples from multiple myeloma patients treated with 1800 mg of daratumumab. 99% of the samples fell within the analytical range with a mean daratumumab concentration evaluated before the next administration (Ctrough) of 398 μg mL-1. These findings highlighted that intact light chain monoclonal antibody quantification could be a valid and robust alternative to either immunoassays or to LC-MS/MS targeting peptides for measuring daratumumab in clinical samples, positioning it as a suitable method for therapeutic drug monitoring applications.

Isatuximab-Specific Immunofixation Electrophoresis Assay to Remove Interference in Serum M-Protein Measurement in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Isatuximab, an IgG-kappa (IgGκ) anti-cluster of differentiation 38 (CD38) monoclonal antibody approved for use in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), can potentially interfere with the visualization of endogenous monoclonal protein (M-protein) on standard immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) and lead to inaccurate classification of a patient's response to therapy. The Hydrashift 2/4 isatuximab IFE assay (Hydrashift isatuximab assay) removes isatuximab interference from IFE. Using samples from patients enrolled in clinical trials of isatuximab-based therapy for MM, we demonstrate how the Hydrashift isatuximab assay improves the ability to detect residual M-protein and offer recommendations for when the assay is most useful.

METHODS

Samples from 141 patients with a variety of known M-protein isotypes were selected and analyzed by standard IFE and the Hydrashift isatuximab assay. A positive control containing isatuximab was run on every standard IFE and Hydrashift gel.

RESULTS

The Hydrashift isatuximab assay reliably shifted the migration of isatuximab in patient samples. Standard IFE was adequate for determining 104 patients' M-protein status, and the Hydrashift isatuximab assay confirmed these results. In samples from 37 patients with a history of IgGκ MM and a single IgGκ band visible on standard IFE near the isatuximab migration site, the Hydrashift isatuximab assay was able to separate isatuximab from endogenous M-protein, identifying residual M-protein in 17 samples and preventing false-positive interpretations of standard IFE in 20 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hydrashift isatuximab assay is most useful in patients with known IgGκ MM when a single IgGκ band appears near the isatuximab migration site on standard IFE during isatuximab-based therapy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03275285 and NCT03319667.

Top-down proteomics

Proteoforms, which arise from post-translational modifications, genetic polymorphisms and RNA splice variants, play a pivotal role as drivers in biology. Understanding proteoforms is essential to unravel the intricacies of biological systems and bridge the gap between genotypes and phenotypes. By analysing whole proteins without digestion, top-down proteomics (TDP) provides a holistic view of the proteome and can decipher protein function, uncover disease mechanisms and advance precision medicine. This Primer explores TDP, including the underlying principles, recent advances and an outlook on the future. The experimental section discusses instrumentation, sample preparation, intact protein separation, tandem mass spectrometry techniques and data collection. The results section looks at how to decipher raw data, visualize intact protein spectra and unravel data analysis. Additionally, proteoform identification, characterization and quantification are summarized, alongside approaches for statistical analysis. Various applications are described, including the human proteoform project and biomedical, biopharmaceutical and clinical sciences. These are complemented by discussions on measurement reproducibility, limitations and a forward-looking perspective that outlines areas where the field can advance, including potential future applications.

A Qualitative Method to Detect Paraproteins from Serum Using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry

BACKGROUND

Mass spectrometry-based techniques are increasingly reported in the literature for identifying paraproteins due to their improved specificity and sensitivity. The present study demonstrates the capability of ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) electrospray ionization triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for the qualitative analysis of paraproteins.

METHODS

Paraproteins from patient serum (n = 40) were immunopurified using agarose beads coated with camelid antibodies that are specific for various subtypes of immunoglobulins (Igs; G, A, M, and light chains κ, λ). The extracted Igs are reduced to separate light chains from heavy chains in solution. The reduced sample was subjected to UPLC and mass measured using electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. The mass spectral peaks at specific retention times were deconvoluted after clean-up to obtain the mass of light chains. The interpretation of liquid chromatography peaks and LC-MS data was validated by comparing them with immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) results.

RESULTS

The interpretation from the chromatographic pattern had a 92.5% (37/40) agreement when compared with mass information. The correlation of mass spectrometry data to IFE was 90% (36/40). The high mass of light chains (>25 kDa) was suggestive of glycosylation. Patient sera positive for IgGκ on IFE (n = 15) were analyzed for the interference of tAbs. The mass of Daratumumab observed in a sample was confirmed by the treating physician. A biclonal of same isotype (IgGκ) was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of using liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for the identification of the subtype of paraproteins has been demonstrated. The method's applicability to screen for interference from tAbs and identification of biclonals of the same isotype has been highlighted.

M-protein detection by mass spectrometry for minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by excessive production of monoclonal immunoglobulins (M proteins). Routine screening methods for M proteins to assess prognosis are unable to detect low levels of M proteins produced by residual tumor cells, ie, minimal residual disease (MRD). Assessment of MRD can be conducted by examining residual tumor cells in bone marrow or circulating M proteins. Advances in mass spectrometry have enabled reliable and highly sensitive detection of low abundance serum biomarkers making it a viable and significantly less invasive approach. Mass spectrometry can achieve dynamic monitoring of MRD and identify therapeutic monoclonal antibodies as well as oligoclonal proteins. In this review we summarize mass spectrometry methods in M protein detection and their applications of MRD detection in MM.

Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy. Part I: Update on laboratory tests for the study of monoclonal gammopathies

Monoclonal gammopathies (MG) are characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells that produce identical abnormal immunoglobulins (intact or some of their subunits). This abnormal immunoglobulin component is called monoclonal protein (M-protein), and is considered a biomarker of proliferative activity. The identification, characterization and measurement of M-protein is essential for the management of MG. We conducted a systematic review of the different tests and measurement methods used in the clinical laboratory for the study of M-protein in serum and urine, the biochemistry and hematology tests necessary for clinical evaluation, and studies in bone marrow, peripheral blood and other tissues. This review included literature published between 2009 and 2022. The paper discusses the main methodological characteristics and limitations, as well as the purpose and clinical value of the different tests used in the diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and assessment of treatment response in MG. Included are methods for the study of M-protein, namely electrophoresis, measurement of immunoglobulin levels, serum free light chains, immunoglobulin heavy chain/light chain pairs, and mass spectrometry, and for the bone marrow examination, morphological analysis, cytogenetics, molecular techniques, and multiparameter flow cytometry.

Lack of observed interference by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in select commonly utilized immunoassays

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmabs) have been hypothesized to interfere with immunoassay measurements, although studies investigating this potential new class of interference are lacking. This study evaluated the effects of tmabs used in cancers ipilimumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), nivolumab (Bristol Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Merck) and autoimmune disorders adalimumab (AbbVie), infliximab (Janssen) and vedolizumab (Takeda) in common immunoassays used in the clinical laboratory.

METHODS

Residual sera from 10 randomly chosen patients were split into two tubes and spiked with same volume (approximately 5 % final volume) of either saline (control) or 6 tmabs (final concentration of 100 μg/mL each). Concentrations from sixteen analytes in 19 different assays were assessed: TSH (Roche and Beckman), free thyroxine (Roche and Siemens), cortisol (Beckman), Cancer Antigens (CA): CA19-9 (Beckman), CA15-3 (Roche), CA125 (Roche), and CA27.29 (Siemens), carcinoembryonic antigen (Beckman), alpha-fetoprotein (Beckman), thyroglobulin (Beckman) and thyroglobulin antibodies (Beckman), thyroid peroxidase antibody (Beckman), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (Roche and Beckman), total prostate-specific antigen (Roche), parathyroid hormone (Roche) and antinuclear antibodies IgG (Werfen). The tmab spiked residual sera were compared with matched saline spiked sera and percent error was assessed against allowable total error defined from biological variation or CLIA limits.

RESULTS

None of the tested immunoassays were affected by the presence of the tmabs, in samples within or outside assay reference intervals. The median % error among all immunoassays ranged between -2.0% (for TSH) to 2.7% (for TPO Ab assay).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate no detectable tmab interference for the assessed immunoassays using spiked preparations of the tmabs in residual human sera. The findings are limited to the tmabs and immunoassays studied here.

Measurable residual disease in peripheral blood in myeloma: dream or reality

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Therapeutic advancements in multiple myeloma have led to increasingly deeper and more durable responses, creating a need for highly sensitive and applicable techniques for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Bone marrow assays can deeply assess for MRD, but it is not conducive to performing frequent and dynamic evaluations, which may be needed for MRD-adapted treatment approaches. Recently, numerous techniques for MRD assessment in peripheral blood have come under investigation, and their integration into routine clinical practice is eagerly anticipated.

RECENT FINDINGS

The identification of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), evaluation of cell-free DNA, and measuring monoclonal protein concentration with mass spectrometry are promising research areas for assessing myeloma in peripheral blood. CTCs assessment and cell-free DNA may carry prognostic significance, but they lack the sensitivity of bone marrow-based techniques. Mass spectrometry has already been implemented in clinical practice in certain centers, but its full potential has yet to be fully realized. This review focuses on recent developments in these fields, emphasizing the potential future roles of these assessments.

SUMMARY

MRD assessment in peripheral blood is still in the development stage but holds promise for not only complementing bone marrow based evaluations but also potential for improving sensitivity.

Rapid detection of serum free light chains by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Introduction: Serum free light chain (FLC) measurements are increasingly prominent for patients with plasma cell disorders (PCDs) in screening, prognostic stratification, and monitoring therapy responses. Objectives: We aimed to develop a sensitive, reliable, and accurate method for diagnosing PCDs that can notably decrease the time and cost of current methods. Methods: Here, we present a novel approach for FLC measurement using immunoenrichment on micro-affinity chromatography in combination with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) detection. In this study, serum free kappa (κ) and free lambda (λ) light chain (LC) levels in the serum of 105 patients were compared between the nephelometric serum FLC quantification and MALDI-TOF MS detection. Results: Cohen's kappa coefficient between the MALDI-TOF MS-based method and the FLC assay revealed an almost perfect agreement in the case of normal (negative) results (κ = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.837 to 0.968) and a good agreement in the case of increased (positive) results (κ = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.608 to 0.870). In Spearman's correlation analysis, the best correlation was found between serum free κ/λ ratios (r = 0.628, 0.496 to 0.732; p <0.0001). Our method showed sensitivity (92.5%) and specificity (76.3%) for discrimination between the κ/λ FLC ratio compared to the serum FLC assay. Conclusion: The proposed method can significantly contribute to diagnosing and monitoring PCDs as it can significantly be time-saving, cost-effective in FLC measurement.

The potential role of mass spectrometry for the identification and monitoring of patients with plasma cell disorders: Where are we now and which questions remain unanswered?

Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques provide a highly sensitive methodology for the assessment and monitoring of paraproteins compared to standard electrophoretic techniques. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) recently approved the use of intact light chain matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in lieu of immunofixation in the clinical assessment of patients and the assessment of patients enrolled on clinical trials. The increased sensitivity of these assays may help to detect and monitor monoclonal proteins (MP) in many patients with previously non-measurable disease, will reduce complete response (CR) rates and increase detection of low-level MP. The ability to track the unique mass or amino acid sequence of the MP also eliminates interference from therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) in most patients with IgG kappa myeloma. The intact light chain assays also provide structural information about the monoclonal light chain, including the presence of N-linked glycosylation, which has been shown to be commoner on amyloidogenic light chains and may have prognostic significance in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). In this review, we discuss these issues alongside differences in the analytical and practical aspects related to the different MS assays under development and the challenges for MS.

Bringing mass spectrometry into the care of patients with multiple myeloma

Serum protein electrophoresis methods are widely employed to detect, quantify and isotype M-proteins for multiple myeloma patients. Increasing clinical demands to detect residual disease and interferences from new therapeutic monoclonal antibody treatments have stretched electrophoretic methods to their analytical limits. Newer techniques to detect M-proteins using mass spectrometry (MS) are emerging with improved clinical and analytical performance. These techniques are beginning to gain traction within the routine clinical lab testing. This review describes these MS methods with attention to the current and future roles such testing could play in the care of multiple myeloma patients.

False positive results: a challenge for laboratory physicians and hematologists in treating multiple myeloma with daratumumab

Daratumumab injection was approved by China in 2019 for the treatment of recurrent or refractory multiple myeloma. However, the molecular weight of daratumumab, an immunoglobin G1 kappa human monoclonal antibody, was similar to that of M protein and could not be distinguished from IgG κ M protein in SPEP and SIFE. It might lead to false-positive detection resulting in misdiagnose and confusing evaluation of therapeutic response, especially for patients with IgG κ M proteins. Herein, we reported two cases encountered in our daily clinical work. These two case reports could serve as a reminder to global hematologists who have not yet started or just begun to use the drug of daratumumab.

Mass-Fix better predicts for PFS and OS than standard methods among multiple myeloma patients participating on the STAMINA trial (BMT CTN 0702 /07LT)

Measuring response among patients with multiple myeloma is essential for the care of patients. Deeper responses are associated with better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To test the hypothesis that Mass-Fix, a mass spectrometry-based means to detect monoclonal proteins, is superior to existing methodologies to predict for survival outcomes, samples from the STAMINA trial (NCT01109004), a trial comparing three transplant approaches, were employed. Samples from 575 patients from as many as three time points (post-induction [post-I; pre-maintenance [pre-M]; 1 year post enrollment [1YR]) were tested when available. Four response parameters were assessed: Mass-Fix, serum immunofixation, complete response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) by next generation flow cytometry. Of the four response measures, only MRD and Mass-Fix predicted for PFS and OS at multiple testing points on multivariate analyses. Although MRD drove Mass-Fix from the model for PFS at post-I and pre-M, 1YR Mass-Fix was independent of 1YR MRD. For OS, the only prognostic pre-I measure was Mass-Fix, and the only 1YR measures that were prognostic on multivariate analysis were 1YR MRD and 1YR Mass-Fix. SIFE and CR were not. Mass-Fix is a powerful means to track response.

Detection of Plasma Cell Disorders by Mass Spectrometry: A Comprehensive Review of 19,523 Cases

OBJECTIVES

To verify the analytical performance of a new mass spectrometry-based method, termed MASS-FIX, when screening for plasma cell disorders in a routine clinical laboratory.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Results from 19,523 unique patients tested for an M-protein between July 24, 2018, and March 6, 2020, by a combination serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and MASS-FIX were examined for consistency with pretest implementation performance. MASS-FIX's ability to verify abnormal results from SPEP and free light chain measurements was then compared with that of immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) using a separate cohort of 52,586 patients tested by SPEP/IFE during the same period.

RESULTS

Overall, 62.4% of our cohort was negative for an M-protein. Importantly, 7.3% of all specimens had an M spike on SPEP (0.1 to 8.5 g/dL) and MASS-FIX detected an M-protein in all these samples. Of all samples, 30.3% had M-proteins that were detected by MASS-FIX but the SPEP finding was too small for quantification. Of the positive samples, 5.7% contained a therapeutic monoclonal antibody. Of the positive samples, 4.1% had an N-glycosylated light chain (biomarker of high-risk plasma cell disorders). MASS-FIX confirmed a higher percentage of SPEP abnormalities than IFE. MASS-FIX was slightly more sensitive than IFE when confirming an M-protein in samples with an abnormal free light chain ratio. MASS-FIX had a very low sample repeat rate (1.5%). MASS-FIX was highly automatable resulting in a higher number of samples/technologist/day than IFE (∼30% more).

CONCLUSION

Overall, MASS-FIX was successful in maintaining validation characteristics. MASS-FIX was more sensitive in confirming SPEP abnormalities when compared with IFE. Ability to detect therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and glycosylated light chains was distinctly advantageous.

Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where

Improvements in multiple myeloma therapy have led to deeper responses that are beyond the limit of detection by historical immunohistochemistry and conventional flow cytometry in bone marrow samples. In parallel, more sensitive techniques for assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) through next-generation flow cytometry and sequencing have been developed and are now routinely available. Deep responses when measured by these assays correspond with improved outcomes and survival. We review the data supporting MRD testing as well as its limitations and how it may fit in with current and future clinical practice.

Monitoring the M-protein of multiple myeloma patients treated with a combination of monoclonal antibodies: the laboratory solution to eliminate interference

OBJECTIVES

The therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb) daratumumab, used to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients, interferes with routine, electrophoretic based M-protein diagnostics. Electrophoretic response assessment becomes increasingly difficult when multiple t-mAbs are combined for use in a single patient. This is the first study to address the analytical challenges of M-protein monitoring when multiple t-mAbs are combined.

METHODS

In this proof-of-principle study we evaluate two different methods to monitor M-protein responses in three MM patients, who receive both daratumumab and nivolumab. The double hydrashift assay aims to resolve t-mAb interference on immunofixation. The MS-MRD (mass spectrometry minimal residual disease) assay measures clonotypic peptides to quantitate both M-protein and t-mAb concentrations.

RESULTS

After exposure to daratumumab and nivolumab, both t-mAbs become visible on immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) as two IgG-kappa bands that migrate close to each other at the cathodal end of the γ-region. In case the M-protein co-migrates with these t-mAbs, the observed interference was completely abolished with the double IFE hydrashift assay. In all three patients the MS-MRD assay was also able to distinguish the M-protein from the t-mAbs. Additional advantage of the MS-MRD assay is that this multiplex assay is more sensitive and allows quantitative M-protein-, daratumumab- and nivolumab-monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Daratumumab and nivolumab interfere with electrophoretic M-protein diagnostics. However, the M-protein can be distinguished from both t-mAbs by use of a double hydrashift assay. The MS-MRD assay provides an alternative method that allows sensitive and simultaneous quantitative monitoring of both the M-protein and t-mAbs.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry can distinguish immunofixation bands of the same isotype as monoclonal or biclonal proteins

BACKGROUND

Plasma cell disorders (PCDs) are typically characterized by excessive production of a single immunoglobulin, defined as a monoclonal protein (M-protein). Some patients have more than one identifiable M-protein, termed biclonal. Traditional immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) cannot distinguish if two bands of the same isotype represent biclonal proteins or M-proteins with some other feature. A novel assay using immunoenrichment coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (Mass-Fix) was applied to determine whether two bands of the same isotype represented (1) monomers and dimers of a single M-protein, (2) an M-protein plus a therapeutic monoclonal antibody (t-mAb), (3) an M-protein with light chain glycosylation, or (4) two distinct biclonal M-proteins.

METHODS

Patient samples with two bands of the same isotype identified by IFE were enriched using nanobodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, or κ and λ light chains then analyzed by Mass-Fix. Light chain masses were used to differentiate IgGκ M-proteins from t-mAbs. Mass differences between peaks were calculated to identify N-glycosylation or matrix adducts. High-resolution mass spectrometry was used as a comparator method in a subset of samples.

RESULTS

Eighty-one residual samples were collected. For IgA, 93% (n = 25) were identified as monoclonal. For IgG, 67% (n = 24) were monoclonal, and 33% (n = 12) were truly biclonal. Among the monoclonal IgGs, the second band represented a glycosylated form for 21% (n = 5), while 33% (n = 8) had masses consistent with a t-mAb. 44% (n = 8) of IgM samples were biclonal, and 56% (n = 10) were monoclonal, of which one was glycosylated.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the utility of mass spectrometry in the characterization of multiple IFE bands of the same isotype. Improved reporting accuracy of M-proteins is useful for monitoring of patients with PCDs.

An international multi-center serum protein electrophoresis accuracy and M-protein isotyping study. Part I: factors impacting limit of quantitation of serum protein electrophoresis

Background Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is used to quantify the serum monoclonal component or M-protein, for diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies. Significant imprecision and inaccuracy pose challenges in reporting small M-proteins. Using therapeutic monoclonal antibody-spiked sera and a pooled beta-migrating M-protein, we aimed to assess SPEP limitations and variability across 16 laboratories in three continents. Methods Sera with normal, hypo- or hypergammaglobulinemia were spiked with daratumumab, Dara (cathodal migrating), or elotuzumab, Elo (central-gamma migrating), with concentrations from 0.125 to 10 g/L (n = 62) along with a beta-migrating sample (n = 9). Provided with total protein (reverse biuret, Siemens), laboratories blindly analyzed samples according to their SPEP and immunofixation (IFE) or immunosubtraction (ISUB) standard operating procedures. Sixteen laboratories reported the perpendicular drop (PD) method of gating the M-protein, while 10 used tangent skimming (TS). A mean percent recovery range of 80%-120% was set as acceptable. The inter-laboratory %CV was calculated. Results Gamma globulin background, migration pattern and concentration all affect the precision and accuracy of quantifying M-proteins by SPEP. As the background increases, imprecision increases and accuracy decreases leading to overestimation of M-protein quantitation especially evident in hypergamma samples, and more prominent with PD. Cathodal migrating M-proteins were associated with less imprecision and higher accuracy compared to central-gamma migrating M-proteins, which is attributed to the increased gamma background contribution in M-proteins migrating in the middle of the gamma fraction. There is greater imprecision and loss of accuracy at lower M-protein concentrations. Conclusions This study suggests that quantifying exceedingly low concentrations of M-proteins, although possible, may not yield adequate accuracy and precision between laboratories.

An evaluation of isatuximab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone for adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Despite therapeutic advances, myeloma remains an essentially incurable disease, with a median survival of approximately 8 - 10 years. Most patients will develop disease that is refractory to immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and treatment regimens containing drugs with different mechanisms of action are necessary. Isatuximab is one such novel agent, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (MoAb), and is the second drug in this class after daratumumab. This paper will consider the current role for isatuximab with pomalidomide for the treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM).

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the pharmacological characteristics of isatuximab, and its clinical development including safety and efficacy data to date.

EXPERT OPINION

Isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone offers a new treatment option for those patients with RRMM who are refractory to PIs and lenalidomide, a patient group with poor prognosis and unmet clinical need. The challenge of where it is best placed in the treatment algorithm remains, particularly with the increasing application of daratumumab particularly in the front- and second-line settings.

Clinical Mass Spectrometry Approaches to Myeloma and Amyloidosis

The diagnosis of myeloma and other plasma cell disorders has traditionally been done with the aid of electrophoretic methods, whereas amyloidosis has been characterized by immunohistochemistry. Mass spectrometry has recently been established as an alternative to these traditional methods and has been proved to bring added benefit for patient care. These newer mass spectrometry-based methods highlight some of the key advantages of modern proteomic methods and how they can be applied to the routine care of patients.

Antibody-Based Treatment Approaches in Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of multiple myeloma treatment has entered a new era with antibody-based approaches in clinical practice. In this review, we focus on the clinical approaches of utilizing antibody-based modality, specifically monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and bispecific T-cell antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab) and one anti-BCMA (B-cell maturation antigen) antibody-drug conjugate (belantamab mafodotin) have been approved by the FDA in the last 5 years for the treatment of multiple myeloma. There are many ongoing clinical trials using novel targets and constructs, including bispecific antibodies against BCMA, GPRC5D, and FCRH5. In addition to exploring efficacy, there are ongoing efforts to overcome the resistance to therapy. Antibody-based therapy has improved the outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma and has been incorporated in the standard of care. We expect to see novel targets and constructs that can achieve a deeper and more durable response while minimizing toxicity, as well as better strategies for toxicity management for existing agents. We also expect that antibody-based strategies will be used in earlier lines of therapy in the future.

Clearing drug interferences in myeloma treatment using mass spectrometry

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possibility of using a combination of a rapid MALDI-TOF-MS method (Mass-Fix) in conjunction with higher resolution LC-ESI-QTOF-MS (miRAMM) measurements to discriminate the IgG kappa M-protein from daratumumab, elotuzumab and isatuximab in myeloma patients.

DESIGN & METHODS

86 patients with an IgG kappa M-protein were spiked with therapeutic levels of the drugs and examined by Mass-Fix and miRAMM to establish the percent of cases that could be resolved by each method. The method was then applied to 21 samples from patients receiving one of the drugs.

RESULTS

Mass-Fix was capable of resolving the t-mAb from M-protein for 87 percent of the spiked samples. For the cases unresolved by Mass-Fix, miRAMM was capable of resolving the remaining drug interferences. The 21 IgG kappa myeloma patients that were receiving the drugs were all resolved by Mass-Fix.

CONCLUSION

This proposed algorithm allows use of a clinical available assay (Mass-Fix) while maximizing the number of cases that can accurately resolve the t-mAb from the M-protein.

MASS-FIX for the detection of monoclonal proteins and light chain N-glycosylation in routine clinical practice: a cross-sectional study of 6315 patients

Immunoenrichment-based matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS), termed MASS-FIX, offers several advantages over immunofixation for the detection and isotyping of serum monoclonal protein, including superior sensitivity and specificity, the ability to differentiate therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, and the rapid identification of light chain (LC) N-glycosylation. We identified 6315 patients with MASS-FIX performed at our institution since 2018. Of these, 4118 patients (65%) with a wide array of plasma cell disorders (PCD), including rare monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance, had a positive MASS-FIX. Two-hundred twenty-one (5%) of the MASS-FIX positive patients had evidence of LC N-glycosylation, which was more commonly identified in IgM heavy chain isotype, kappa LC isotype, and in diagnoses of immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis and cold agglutinin disease (CAD) compared to other PCD. This cross-sectional study describes the largest cohort of patients to undergo MASS-FIX in routine clinical practice. Our findings demonstrate the widespread utility of this assay, and confirm that LC N-glycosylation should prompt suspicion for AL amyloidosis and CAD in the appropriate clinical context.

Using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in peripheral blood for the follow up of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab-based combination therapy

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab-based combination therapies have shown high rates of complete response (CR) and minimal residual disease negativity in patients with multiple myeloma. However, daratumumab, an IgGκ monoclonal antibody, interferes with electrophoretic techniques making it difficult to reliably define residual disease versus CR, especially in patients with IgGκ multiple myeloma.

METHODS

Enrichment with polyclonal sheep antibody-coated magnetic microparticles combined with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis was used to detect M-proteins in serial samples from newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab-based therapy. The performance of the MALDI-TOF MS assay was compared to that of a routine test panel (serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP), immunofixation (IFE) and serum free light chain (FLC)).

RESULTS

Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS to SPEP/IFE/FLC showed a concordance of 84.9% (p < 0.001). When MALDI-TOF MS and FLC results were combined, the M-protein detection rate was the same or better than the routine test panel. For the 9 patients who obtained CR during follow-up, MALDI-TOF MS detected an M-protein in 46% of subsequent samples. Daratumumab could be distinguished from the M-protein in 215/222 samples.

CONCLUSION

MALDI-TOF MS is useful in assessing CR in patients treated with monoclonal antibody-based therapies.

Monoclonal antibodies in relapsed/refractory myeloma: updated evidence from clinical trials, real-life studies, and meta-analyses

Introduction: In the last few years, monoclonal antibodies have rapidly modified the therapeutic strategies for treating patients with multiple myeloma.Areas covered: In this review, the most recent literature data regarding indications for which monoclonal antibodies are currently or will be shortly approved as salvage therapies in relapsed/refractory myeloma are discussed. In particular, updated results until March 22, 2020 of antibodies directed against CD38 (daratumumab and isatuximab), SLAMF7 (elotuzumab), BCMA (GSK2857916/belantamab mafodotin), and PD-1/PD-1 L axis (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) will be analyzed in detail.Expert opinion: Monoclonal antibodies represent a new, very effective approach that will open novel and dynamic treatment scenarios for myeloma patients in the coming years. Optimal positioning and selection of different antibodies that are or will be soon available, appropriate combinations and careful evaluation of possible new toxicities should be considered in the future management of these patients.

Mass spectrometry for the evaluation of monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related disorders: an International Myeloma Working Group Mass Spectrometry Committee Report

Plasma cell disorders (PCDs) are identified in the clinical lab by detecting the monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein) which they produce. Traditionally, serum protein electrophoresis methods have been utilized to detect and isotype M-proteins. Increasing demands to detect low-level disease and new therapeutic monoclonal immunoglobulin treatments have stretched the electrophoretic methods to their analytical limits. Newer techniques based on mass spectrometry (MS) are emerging which have improved clinical and analytical performance. MS is gaining traction into clinical laboratories, and has replaced immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) in routine practice at one institution. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Mass Spectrometry Committee reviewed the literature in order to summarize current data and to make recommendations regarding the role of mass spectrometric methods in diagnosing and monitoring patients with myeloma and related disorders. Current literature demonstrates that immune-enrichment of immunoglobulins coupled to intact light chain MALDI-TOF MS has clinical characteristics equivalent in performance to IFE with added benefits of detecting additional risk factors for PCDs, differentiating M-protein from therapeutic antibodies, and is a suitable replacement for IFE for diagnosing and monitoring multiple myeloma and related PCDs. In this paper we discuss the IMWG recommendations for the use of MS in PCDs.

A High-Level Overview of the Regulations Surrounding a Clinical Laboratory and Upcoming Regulatory Challenges for Laboratory Developed Tests

OBJECTIVE

Regulations for clinical laboratories in the United States are complex. The goal of this review is to improve the clarity of laboratory-developed test (LDT) regulation to facilitate innovation.

METHODS

A literature and regulation review of current legislation for compliance by U.S. clinical laboratories was performed, and examples of the steps to implement LDTs within compliance with the regulatory environment are shared.

RESULTS

Many federal and state jurisdictions are critical to the functionality of a laboratory in addition to upcoming potential promulgation of the Verifying Accurate Leading-Edge IVCT Development Act. Increased regulation, although imperative to maintain consistent, high-standard clinical care, could mean additional costs for developers and healthcare while also hindering innovation.

CONCLUSION

An extensive discussion of proposed regulations for LDTs needs to occur. Laboratory testing requires the sustained use of innovative methods at a cost that will permit continued, timely, uninterrupted high-quality service.

Mass Spectrometry for Identification, Monitoring, and Minimal Residual Disease Detection of M-Proteins

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) are plasma cell disorders defined by the clonal expansion of plasma cells, resulting in the characteristic excretion of a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein). M-protein detection and quantification are integral parts of the diagnosis and monitoring of MGs. Novel treatment modalities impose new challenges on the traditional electrophoretic and immunochemical methods that are routinely used for M-protein diagnostics, such as interferences from therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and the need for increased analytical sensitivity to measure minimal residual disease.

CONTENT

Mass spectrometry (MS) is ideally suited to accurate mass measurements or targeted measurement of unique clonotypic peptide fragments. Based on these features, MS-based methods allow for the analytically sensitive measurement of the patient-specific M-protein.

SUMMARY

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the MS methods that have been developed recently to detect, characterize, and quantify M-proteins. The advantages and disadvantages of using these techniques in clinical practice and the impact they will have on the management of patients with MGs are discussed.

Development of novel methods for non-canonical myeloma protein analysis with an innovative adaptation of immunofixation electrophoresis, native top-down mass spectrometry, and middle-down de novo sequencing

Objectives

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell neoplasm, requiring the integration of clinical examination, laboratory and radiological investigations for diagnosis. Detection and isotypic identification of the monoclonal protein(s) and measurement of other relevant biomarkers in serum and urine are pivotal analyses. However, occasionally this approach fails to characterize complex protein signatures. Here we describe the development and application of next generation mass spectrometry (MS) techniques, and a novel adaptation of immunofixation, to interrogate non-canonical monoclonal immunoproteins.

Methods

Immunoprecipitation immunofixation (IP-IFE) was performed on a Sebia Hydrasys Scan2. Middle-down de novo sequencing and native MS were performed with multiple instruments (21T FT-ICR, Q Exactive HF, Orbitrap Fusion Lumos, and Orbitrap Eclipse). Post-acquisition data analysis was performed using Xcalibur Qual Browser, ProSight Lite, and TDValidator.

Results

We adapted a novel variation of immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE) with an antibody-specific immunosubtraction step, providing insight into the clonal signature of gamma-zone monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein) species. We developed and applied advanced mass spectrometric techniques such as middle-down de novo sequencing to attain in-depth characterization of the primary sequence of an M-protein. Quaternary structures of M-proteins were elucidated by native MS, revealing a previously unprecedented non-covalently associated hetero-tetrameric immunoglobulin.

Conclusions

Next generation proteomic solutions offer great potential for characterizing complex protein structures and may eventually replace current electrophoretic approaches for the identification and quantification of M-proteins. They can also contribute to greater understanding of MM pathogenesis, enabling classification of patients into new subtypes, improved risk stratification and the potential to inform decisions on future personalized treatment modalities.

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) have improved dramatically in the last two decades with the advent of novel therapies including immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In recent years, immunotherapy for the treatment of MM has advanced rapidly, with the approval of new targeted agents and monoclonal antibodies directed against myeloma cell-surface antigens, as well as maturing data from late stage trials of chimeric antigen receptor CAR T cells. Therapies that engage the immune system to treat myeloma offer significant clinical benefits with durable responses and manageable toxicity profiles, however, the appropriate use of these immunotherapy agents can present unique challenges for practicing physicians. Therefore, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer convened an expert panel, which met to consider the current role of approved and emerging immunotherapy agents in MM and provide guidance to the oncology community by developing consensus recommendations. As immunotherapy evolves as a therapeutic option for the treatment of MM, these guidelines will be updated.

N-glycosylation of monoclonal light chains on routine MASS-FIX testing is a risk factor for MGUS progression

Our group previously demonstrated that M-protein light chain (LC) glycosylation can be detected on routine MASS-FIX testing. Glycosylation is increased in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) and rarely changes over the course of a patient’s lifetime. To determine the rates of progression to AL and other plasma cell disorders (PCDs), we used residual serum samples from the Olmsted monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) screening cohort. Four-hundred and fourteen patients with known MGUS were tested by MASS-FIX, and 25 (6%) were found to have glycosylated light chains (LCs). With a median follow-up of surviving patients of 22.2 years, the 20-year progression rates to a malignant PCD were 67% (95% CI 29%, 84%) and 13% (95% CI 9%, 18%) for patients with and without glycosylated LCs, respectively. The risk of progression was independent of Mayo MGUS risk score. The respective rates of progression to AL at 20-years were 21% (95% CI 0.0, 38%) and 3% (95% CI 0.6%, 5.5%). In summary, monoclonal LC glycosylation is a potent risk factor for progression to AL, myeloma, and other PCDs, an observation which could lead to earlier diagnoses and potentially reduced morbidity and mortality.

Blood mass spectrometry detects residual disease better than standard techniques in light-chain amyloidosis

In patients with immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, depth of hematologic response correlates with both organ response and overall survival. Our group has demonstrated that screening with a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) is a quick, sensitive, and accurate means to diagnose and monitor the serum of patients with plasma cell disorders. Microflow liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization and quadrupole TOF MS adds further sensitivity. We identified 33 patients with AL amyloidosis who achieved amyloid complete hematologic response, who also had negative bone marrow by six-color flow cytometry, and who had paired serum samples to test by MS. These samples were subjected to blood MS. Four patients (12%) were found to have residual disease by these techniques. The presence of residual disease by MS was associated with a poorer time to progression (at 50 months 75% versus 13%, p = 0.003). MS of the blood out-performed serum and urine immunofixation, the serum immunoglobulin free light chain, and six-color flow cytometry of the bone marrow in detecting residual disease. Additional studies that include urine MS and next-generation techniques to detect clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow will further elucidate the full potential of this technique.

Tracking of low disease burden in multiple myeloma: Using mass spectrometry assays in peripheral blood

Efforts over the last 5 years have demonstrated that it is technically feasible to detect low levels of monoclonal proteins in peripheral blood using mass spectrometry. These methods are based on the fact that an M-protein has a specific amino acid sequence, and therefore, a specific mass. This mass can be tracked over time and can serve as a surrogate marker of the presence of clonal plasma cells. This review describes the use of mass spectrometry to detect M-proteins in multiple myeloma to date, identifies the challenges of using this biomarker, and describes potential strategies to overcome these challenges. We discuss the work that must be done for these techniques to be incorporated into clinical practice for tracking of low disease burden in multiple myeloma.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry distinguishes daratumumab from M-proteins

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab, a therapeutic IgG kappa monoclonal antibody, can cause a false positive interference on electrophoretic assays that are routinely used to monitor patients with monoclonal gammopathies. In this study, we evaluate the ability of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) to distinguish daratumumab from disease-related IgG kappa monoclonal proteins (M-protein).

METHODS

Waste clinical samples from 31 patients who were receiving daratumumab and had a history of IgG kappa monoclonal gammopathy were collected. Immunoglobulins were purified from serum and analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. Mass spectra were assessed for the presence of distinct monoclonal proteins. For samples in which only one monoclonal peak was identified near the expected m/z of daratumumab, the Hydrashift 2/4 Daratumumab Assay was used to confirm the presence of an M-protein.

RESULTS

Using MALDI-TOF MS, daratumumab could be distinguished from M-proteins in 26 out of 31 samples (84%). Results from 2 samples were inconclusive since the M-protein was not detected by the Hydrashift assay and may also be undetectable by MALDI-TOF MS. Comparatively, daratumumab was distinguishable from M-proteins in 14 out of 31 samples (45%) by immunofixation.

CONCLUSIONS

MALDI-TOF MS offers greater specificity compared to immunofixation for distinguishing daratumumab from M-proteins.