Comprehensive clinical-molecular transplant scoring system for myelofibrosis undergoing stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis aged 70 years or older: a study from the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Current consensus recommends hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with myelofibrosis with intermediate or high-risk disease and age of less than 70 years. However, a higher chronological age should not be prohibitive for the eligibility decision in general, acknowledging that current life expectancy for the general population aged 70 years is ∼15 years, and current numbers of patients transplanted at 70 years or older is steadily increasing.

OBJECTIVE

The following study aimed to evaluate characteristics and outcomes of HCT in 115 myelofibrosis patients aged 70 years or older.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicenter study, using the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (DRST). Adult myelofibrosis patients were included who received HCT up until 2021. Patients with secondary leukemia were excluded. Main endpoints were HCT demographics over time and outcomes after HCT (including overall survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and graft-versus-host disease/relapse-free survival).

RESULTS

Numbers of HCT increased over the past decade, with a significant spike since 2019. Comorbidity status of transplanted patients improved over time, while reduced intensity conditioning was the preferred HCT platform especially in most recent years. The 3-year overall survival was 55% (95% confidence interval, 44-65%). The 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 7% (95% CI, 3-13%) and the 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 22% (95% CI, 14-31%). The 3-year graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival was 37% (95% CI, 27-47%). Driver mutation genotype (in particular non-CALR/MPL genotype) appeared to be the only variable that was significantly and independently associated with better survival in multivariable analysis, whereas neither comorbidity index nor dose intensity of pre-transplant conditioning appeared to influence outcome.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated feasibility of curative treatment with HCT for myelofibrosis aged 70 or older, with significant increases in HCT numbers and improved fitness of the elderly over recent years.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Early Intervention in Myelofibrosis: Where Are We and Does It Matter?

Historically, therapeutic clinical trials in myelofibrosis have predominantly focused on targeting patients with higher-risk disease who are at risk of increased morbidity and mortality. The endpoints have been designed to target regularly measured disease parameters that are of immediate pertinence to patient's welfare including splenic volume reduction and symptom reduction. These efforts have resulted in meaningful and measurable improvements in disease parameters in these high-risk study populations and multiple FDA approved agents. However, they have not tackled specific interventions that may be applied to patients with earlier or less advanced disease state. In this review, we summarize evidence from completed and ongoing clinical trials investigating different aspects of intervention targeted at less advanced disease and advocate for the merit of this approach.

Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin improves GvHD-free and relapse-free survival in myelofibrosis after matched related or unrelated donor transplantation

Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are major complications of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). In vivo T-cell depletion with anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) as part of the conditioning regimen prior to alloHCT is frequently used as GvHD prophylaxis, but data on its role in myelofibrosis is scarce. We took advantage of an international collaborative network to investigate the impact of ATLG in myelofibrosis undergoing first alloHCT. We included 707 patients (n = 469 ATLG and n = 238 non-ATLG prophylaxis). The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD grade II-IV was 30% for the ATLG group vs. 56% for the non-ATLG group (P < 0.001). Acute GvHD grade III-IV occurred in 20% vs. 25%, respectively (P = 0.01). Incidence of mild-to-severe chronic GvHD was 49% vs. 50% (P = 0.52), while ATLG showed significantly lower rates of severe chronic GvHD (7% vs. 18%; P = 0.04). GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) at 6 years was 45% for the ATLG group vs. 37% for the non-ATLG group (P = 0.02), driven by significantly improved GRFS of ATLG in matched related and matched unrelated donors. No significant differences in risk for relapse, non-relapse mortality, and overall survival were observed. Multivariable modeling for GRFS showed a 48% reduced risk of GvHD, relapse, or death when using ATLG.

Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in children and adolescents: the retrospective study of the EBMT Paediatric Diseases WP

This retrospective study evaluated 35 children (median age 5.2 years; range 0.4-18) with myelofibrosis (MF), including 33 with primary myelofibrosis and 2 with secondary myelofibrosis transplanted from matched sibling donor (MSD) (n = 17) or non-MSD (n = 18) between 2000 and 2022. Conditioning was usually chemotherapy-based (n = 33) and myeloablative (n = 32). Fifteen patients received bone marrow (BM), 14 haematopoietic cells (HC) from peripheral blood (PB), and 6 from cord blood (CB). Day +100 acute GvHD II-IV incidence was significantly lower after MSD-haematopoietic cell transplantation (MSD-HCT) than after non-MSD-HCT [18.8% (4.3-41.1) vs 58.8% (31-78.6); p = 0.01]. Six-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 18% (7.1-32.8), relapse incidence was 15.9% (5.6-30.9), progression-free survival (PFS) was 66.1% (47-79.7), GvHD-free relapse-free survival was 50% (30.6-66.7), and overall survival (OS) was 71.1% (51.4-84). Six-year PFS and OS were significantly higher after BM transplantation compared to HCT from other sources [85.1% (52.3-96.1) vs 50.8% (26.3-71), p = 0.03, and 90.9% (50.8-98.7) vs 54% (28.1-74.2), p = 0.01, respectively], whereas NRM was significantly lower [0% vs 32% (12.3-53.9); p = 0.02]. This first multicentre study on outcomes of allogeneic HCT in children with myelofibrosis proves feasibility and curative effect of transplantation in these children, suggests that bone marrow transplantation is associated with better outcomes, and indicates the need for further studies.

Consistency of Spleen and Symptom Reduction Regardless of Cytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis Treated With Pacritinib

BACKGROUND

Pacritinib is a JAK2/IRAK1/ACVR1 inhibitor that is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have a platelet count < 50 × 109/L. Phase 3 clinical studies of pacritinib included patients across a wide range of baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In order to assess the impact of baseline blood counts on pacritinib efficacy, an analysis of efficacy outcomes by baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels was performed using data pooled from 2 Phase 3 studies of pacritinib in patients with MF (PERSIST-1 and PERSIST-2).

RESULTS

Of 276 patients evaluable for spleen response, spleen volume reduction occurred consistently across platelet subgroups (< 100 × 109/L or ≥ 100 × 109/L) and hemoglobin subgroups (< 8 g/dL, ≥ 8 to < 10 g/dL, or > 10 g/dL), with no diminution in treatment effect in patients with severe thrombocytopenia or anemia. Among 159 patients evaluable for symptoms response, improvement in total symptom score (TTS) was similar across platelet subgroups. A ≥ 50% improvement of TSS occurred more frequently in patients with baseline hemoglobin < 8 g/dL compared with those with baseline hemoglobin ≥ 8 to < 10 g/dL or > 10 g/dL. Patients with baseline hemoglobin < 8 g/dL also experienced improved hemoglobin sustained over 24 weeks, whereas subgroups with less severe anemia had stable hemoglobin levels over time. Symptom improvement as assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Change instrument was generally consistent across platelet and hemoglobin subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Pacritinib demonstrates consistent efficacy in patients with MF regardless of baseline platelet and hemoglobin counts.

Transplantation for myelofibrosis patients in the ruxolitinib era: a registry study from the Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire

In this SFGM-TC registry study, we report the results after stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in 305 myelofibrosis patients, in order to determine potential risk factors associated with outcomes, especially regarding previous treatment with ruxolitinib. A total of 102 patients were transplanted from an HLA-matched-sibling donor (MSD), and 143 patients received ruxolitinib. In contrast with previous studies, our results showed significantly worse outcomes for ruxolitinib patients regarding overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), especially in the context of unrelated donors (URD). When exploring reasons for potential confounders regarding the ruxolitinib effect, an interaction between the type of donor and the use of ATG was found, therefore subsequent analyses were performed separately for each type of donor. Multivariable analyses did not confirm a significant negative impact of ruxolitinib in transplantation outcomes. In the setting of URD, only age and Fludarabine-Melphalan (FM) conditioning were associated with increased NRM. For MSD, only Karnoksfy <70% was associated with reduced OS. However, a propensity score analysis showed that ruxolitinib had a negative impact on OS but only in non-responding patients, consistent with previous data. To conclude, with all the precautions due to confounders and bias, ruxolitinib itself does not appear to increase mortality after HSCT.

Myelofibrosis and allogeneic transplantation: critical points and challenges

New available drugs allow better control of systemic symptoms associated with myelofibrosis (MF) and splenomegaly but they do not modify the natural history of progressive and poor prognosis disease. Thus, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still considered the only available curative treatment for patients with MF. Despite the increasing number of procedures worldwide in recent years, HSCT for MF patients remains challenging. An increasingly complex network of the patient, disease, and transplant-related factors should be considered to understand the need for and the benefits of the procedure. Unfortunately, prospective trials are often lacking in this setting, making an evidence-based decision process particularly arduous. In the present review, we will analyze the main controversial points of allogeneic transplantation in MF, that is, the development of more sophisticated models for the identification of eligible patients; the need for tools offering a more precise definition of expected outcomes combining comorbidity assessment and factors related to the procedure; the decision-making process about the best transplantation time; the evaluation of the most appropriate platform for curative treatment; the impact of splenomegaly; and splenectomy on outcomes.

2024 update on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for myelofibrosis: A review of current data and applications on risk stratification and management

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) currently remains the only curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Transplant related mortality (TRM) and relapse, remain two significant complications which need to be addressed.

AIMS

The aim of this manuscript is to review current available reports on changes which have recently occurred, to improve the outcome of MF patients undergoing an allogeneic HSCT.

METHODS

Published papers were used to analyze different aspects of allogeneic HSCT.

RESULTS

Changes and updates are provided on selection of patients, prognostic systems, managing splenomegaly, conditioning regimens, predicting transplant outcome, stem cell sources, stem cell donors, graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, patients with blast phase, hematopoietic reconstitution, disease markers, donor chimerism, and treatment of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The review outlines new transplant platforms which are now available for patients with myelofibrosis, together with persisting problems, among which, older age combined with marrow fibrosis and an inflammatory disease. Relapse also requires aggressive monitoring of drivers mutations, and early cellular therapy.

Splenic irradiation for myelofibrosis prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation: A global collaborative analysis

Splenomegaly is the clinical hallmark of myelofibrosis. Splenomegaly at the time of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with graft failure and poor graft function. Strategies to reduce spleen size before HCT especially after failure to Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition represent unmet clinical needs in the field. Here, we leveraged a global collaboration to investigate the safety and efficacy of splenic irradiation as part of the HCT platform for patients with myelofibrosis. We included 59 patients, receiving irradiation within a median of 2 weeks (range, 0.9-12 weeks) before HCT. Overall, the median spleen size prior to irradiation was 23 cm (range, 14-35). Splenic irradiation resulted in a significant and rapid spleen size reduction in 97% of patients (57/59), with a median decrease of 5.0 cm (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.3 cm). The most frequent adverse event was thrombocytopenia, with no correlation between irradiation dose and hematological toxicities. The 3-year overall survival was 62% (95% CI, 48%-76%) and 1-year non-relapse mortality was 26% (95% CI, 14%-38%). Independent predictors for survival were severe thrombocytopenia and anemia before irradiation, transplant-specific risk score, higher-intensity conditioning, and present portal vein thrombosis. When using a propensity score matching adjusted for common confounders, splenic irradiation was associated with significantly reduced relapse (p = .01), showing a 3-year incidence of 12% for splenic irradiation versus 29% for patients with immediate HCT and 38% for patients receiving splenectomy. In conclusion, splenic irradiation immediately before HCT is a reasonable approach in patients experiencing JAK inhibition failure and is associated with a low incidence of relapse.

Risk models in myelofibrosis-the past, present, and future

Risk models in myelofibrosis (MYSEC-PM) or primary myelofibrosis (IPSS, DIPSS, DIPSS+, MIPSS70, MIPSS70+, MIPSSv2, GIPSS).

Graft-versus-host disease and impact on relapse in myelofibrosis undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). Relapse occurs in 10-30% and remains a major factor for dismal outcomes. Previous work suggested that graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) might be associated with risk of relapse. This study included 341 patients undergoing their first (n = 308) or second (n = 33) alloHSCT. Anti-T-lymphocyte or antithymocyte globulin was used for GVHD prophylaxis in almost all patients. Median time to neutrophile and platelet engraftment was 13 days and 19 days, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV was 41% (median, 31 days; range, 7-112). Grade III-IV acute GVHD was observed in 22%. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 61%. Liver was affected in 23% of acute GVHD cases and 46% of chronic GVHD cases. Severe acute GVHD was associated with high non-relapse mortality. The development of acute GVHD grade II and moderate GVHD was an independent factor for reduced risk for relapse after transplantation without increased risk for non-relapse mortality, while especially acute GVHD grade IV was associated with high non-relapse mortality. Last, we identified that ongoing response to ruxolitinib, accelerated-phase MF at time of transplantation and splenectomy prior to transplantation were independent predictors for relapse.

Understanding triple negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: pathogenesis, clinical features, and management

ABSTRACTMyeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) that lack the classical "driver mutations," termed triple negative MPNs, remain a poorly understood entity. Despite considerable progress toward understanding MPN pathobiology, the mechanisms leading to the development of these MPNs remains inadequately elucidated. While triple negative primary myelofibrosis (TN-PMF) portends a poor prognosis, triple negative essential thrombocythemia (TN-ET) is more favorable as compared with JAK2 mutated ET. In this review, we summarize the clinical features and prognosis of TN-PMF and -ET as well as diagnostic challenges including identification of non-canonical driver mutations. We also discuss additional molecular drivers to better understand possible pathogenic mechanisms underlying triple negative MPNs. Finally, we highlight current therapeutic approaches as well as novel targets, particularly in the difficult to treat TN-PMF population.

Upfront allogeneic transplantation versus JAK inhibitor therapy for patients with myelofibrosis: a North American collaborative study

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF) and is recommended for patients with higher risk disease. However, there is a risk of early mortality, and optimal timing is unknown. JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy may offer durable improvement in symptoms, splenomegaly and quality of life. The aim of this multicentre, retrospective observational study was to compare outcomes of patients aged 70 years or below with MF in chronic phase who received upfront JAKi therapy vs. upfront HCT in dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-stratified categories. For the whole study cohort, median overall survival (OS) was longer for patients who received a JAKi vs. upfront HCT, 69 (95% CI 57-89) vs. 42 (95% CI 20-not reached, NR) months, respectively (p = 0.01). In patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk disease, median OS was 55 (95% CI 36-73) months with JAKi vs. 36 (95% CI 20-NR) months for HCT (p = 0.27). An upfront HCT strategy was associated with early mortality and difference in median OS was not observed in any risk group by 5 years of follow-up. Within the limitations of a retrospective observational study, we did not observe any benefit of a universal upfront HCT approach for higher-risk MF.

Molecular Genetic Profile of Myelofibrosis: Implications in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Advancements

Myelofibrosis (MF) is an essential element of primary myelofibrosis, whereas secondary MF may develop in the advanced stages of other myeloid neoplasms, especially polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Over the last two decades, advances in molecular diagnostic techniques, particularly the integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratories, have revolutionized the diagnosis, classification, and clinical decision making of myelofibrosis. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR, and MPL induce hyperactivity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which plays a central role in cell survival and proliferation. Approximately 80% of myelofibrosis cases harbor additional mutations, frequently in the genes responsible for epigenetic regulation and RNA splicing. Detecting these mutations is crucial for diagnosing myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially in cases where no mutations are present in the three driver genes (triple-negative MPNs). While fibrosis in the bone marrow results from the disturbance of inflammatory cytokines, it is fundamentally associated with mutation-driven hematopoiesis. The mutation profile and order of acquiring diverse mutations influence the MPN phenotype. Mutation profiling reveals clonal diversity in MF, offering insights into the clonal evolution of neoplastic progression. Prognostic prediction plays a pivotal role in guiding the treatment of myelofibrosis. Mutation profiles and cytogenetic abnormalities have been integrated into advanced prognostic scoring systems and personalized risk stratification for MF. Presently, JAK inhibitors are part of the standard of care for MF, with newer generations developed for enhanced efficacy and reduced adverse effects. However, only a minority of patients have achieved a significant molecular-level response. Clinical trials exploring innovative approaches, such as combining hypomethylation agents that target epigenetic regulators, drugs proven effective in myelodysplastic syndrome, or immune and inflammatory modulators with JAK inhibitors, have demonstrated promising results. These combinations may be more effective in patients with high-risk mutations and complex mutation profiles. Expanding mutation profiling studies with more sensitive and specific molecular methods, as well as sequencing a broader spectrum of genes in clinical patients, may reveal molecular mechanisms in cases currently lacking detectable driver mutations, provide a better understanding of the association between genetic alterations and clinical phenotypes, and offer valuable information to advance personalized treatment protocols to improve long-term survival and eradicate mutant clones with the hope of curing MF.

Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group

New options for medical therapy and risk scoring systems containing molecular data are leading to increased complexity in the management of patients with myelofibrosis. To inform patients' optimal care, we updated the 2015 guidelines on indications for and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with the support of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN). New recommendations were produced using a consensus-building methodology after a comprehensive review of articles released from January, 2015 to December, 2022. Seven domains and 18 key questions were selected through a series of questionnaires using a Delphi process. Key recommendations in this update include: patients with primary myelofibrosis and an intermediate-2 or high-risk Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System score, or a high-risk Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score Systems (MIPSS70 or MIPSS70-plus) score, or a low-risk or intermediate-risk Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System score should be considered candidates for allogeneic HSCT. All patients who are candidates for allogeneic HSCT with splenomegaly greater than 5 cm below the left costal margin or splenomegaly-related symptoms should receive a spleen-directed treatment, ideally with a JAK-inhibitor; HLA-matched sibling donors remain the preferred donor source to date. Reduced intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning are both valid options for patients with myelofibrosis. Regular post-transplantation driver mutation monitoring is recommended to detect and treat early relapse with donor lymphocyte infusion. In a disease where evidence-based guidance is scarce, these recommendations might help clinicians and patients in shared decision making.

Martin A, Wang Y, He M, Spellman SR, Wang T, Deeg HJ, Gupta V, Lee SJ, Bolon YT, Chanock SJ, Machiela MJ, Saber W, Gadalla SM. JAK2 V617F mutation and associated chromosomal alterations in primary and secondary myelofibrosis and post-HCT outcomes

JAK2 V617F is the most common driver mutation in primary or secondary myelofibrosis for which allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative treatment. Knowledge of the prognostic utility of JAK2 alterations in the HCT setting is limited. We identified all patients with MF who received HCT between 2000 and 2016 and had a pre-HCT blood sample (N = 973) available at the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research biorepository. PacBio sequencing and single nucleotide polymorphism-array genotyping were used to identify JAK2V617F mutation and associated mosaic chromosomal alterations (mCAs), respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used for HCT outcome analyses. Genomic testing was complete for 924 patients with MF (634 primary MF [PMF], 135 postpolycythemia vera [PPV-MF], and 155 postessential thrombocytopenia [PET-MF]). JAK2V617F affected 562 patients (57.6% of PMF, 97% of PPV-MF, and 42.6% of PET-MF). Almost all patients with mCAs involving the JAK2 region (97.9%) were JAK2V617-positive. In PMF, JAK2V617F mutation status, allele burden, or identified mCAs were not associated with disease progression/relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), or overall survival. Almost all PPV-MF were JAK2V617F-positive (97%), with no association between HCT outcomes and mutation allele burden or mCAs. In PET-MF, JAK2V617F high mutation allele burden (≥60%) was associated with excess risk of NRM, restricted to transplants received in the era of JAK inhibitors (2013-2016; hazard ratio = 7.65; 95% confidence interval = 2.10-27.82; P = .002). However, allele burden was not associated with post-HCT disease progression/relapse or survival. Our findings support the concept that HCT can mitigate the known negative effect of JAK2V617F in patients with MF, particularly for PMF and PPV-MF.

Are transplant indications changing for myelofibrosis?

Myelofibrosis is a devastating myeloid malignancy characterized by dysregulation of the JAK-STAT pathway, resulting in splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, and an increased likelihood of progression to acute leukemia. The only curative option is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The numbers of transplants have been increasing every year, and although there have been improvements in survival, there remain many unanswered questions. In this review, we will evaluate patient selection and appropriate timing for transplantation. We will cover the current prognostic scoring systems, which can aid in the decision of when to move forward with transplant. We will also review the different donor options, as well as the conditioning regimens. The peritransplant management of splenomegaly will be reviewed. We will discuss management of posttransplant complications such as loss of donor chimerism or disease relapse. Finally, we will review what is known about the outlook of patients who have undergone allogeneic stem cell transplant with regards to quality of life and long-term survival.

Transplantation Outcomes of Myelofibrosis with Busulfan and Fludarabine Myeloablative Conditioning

Outcomes of myelofibrosis (MF) with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) have improved over the past decade, related in part to advances in supportive treatments and conditioning regimens. Several factors are known to predict transplantation outcomes. However, most studies lack homogeneity in conditioning regimens used, limiting their ability to assess prognostic factors on transplantation outcomes. We aimed to identify the risk factors that predict transplantation outcomes in patients with MF who underwent matched or mismatched allo-SCT using a uniform myeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan and fludarabine with tacrolimus and methotrexate-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. This single-center study included patients with MF who underwent allo-SCT with a matched unrelated donor (MUD), matched related donor (MRD), or mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and received busulfan and fludarabine conditioning with methotrexate/tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis. Sixty-five patients with MF met the study criteria and were included in our analysis. At a median follow-up of 35.6 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS) for all study patients were 27%, 20%, and 65%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis for CIR, prior use of JAK inhibitors was significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .33; 95% confidence interval [CI], .11 to .99; P = .048). For NRM, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (≥3 versus <3; HR, 10.09; 95% CI, 2.09 to 48.76; P = .004) and donor type (MUD versus MRD: HR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.14 to 25.30; P = .033; MMUD versus MRD: HR, 10.73; 95% CI, 1.05 to 109.4; P = .045) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Likewise for OS, HCT-CI (≥3 versus <3; HR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.22 to 8.99; P = .019) and donor type (MMUD versus MRD: HR, 5.20; 95% CI, 1.35 to 19.98; P = .016) were significantly associated with inferior survival. Longer time from diagnosis to allo-SCT seemed to confer worse survival, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (>12 months versus ≤12 months: NRM: HR, 7.20; 95% CI, .96 to 53.94; P = .055; OS: HR, 2.60; 95% CI, .95 to 7.14; P = .06). In a homogenous cohort of MF patients uniformly treated with busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative conditioning and methotrexate-based GVHD prophylaxis, we show that donor choice and HCT-CI are the 2 strongest predictors for improved survival after allo-SCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with CALR-mutated myelofibrosis: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is curative for myelofibrosis (MF) but assessing risk-benefit in individual patients is challenging. This complexity is amplified in CALR-mutated MF patients, as they live longer with conventional treatments compared to other molecular subtypes. We analyzed outcomes of 346 CALR-mutated MF patients who underwent allo-HCT in 123 EBMT centers between 2005 and 2019. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the estimated overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 81%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. Patients receiving busulfan-containing regimens achieved a 5-year OS rate of 71%. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 16%, 22%, and 26%, respectively, while the incidence of relapse/progression was 11%, 15%, and 17%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that older age correlated with worse OS, while primary MF and HLA mismatched transplants had a near-to-significant trend to decreased OS. Comparative analysis between CALR- and JAK2-mutated MF patients adjusting for confounding factors revealed better OS, lower NRM, lower relapse, and improved graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in CALR-mutated patients. These findings confirm the improved prognosis associated with CALR mutation in allo-HCT and support molecular profiling in prognostic scoring systems to predict OS after transplantation in MF.

Management of classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia: consensus of the Asian Myeloid Working Group

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by the proliferation of one or more hematopoietic lineage(s). The classical Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph)-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The Asian Myeloid Working Group (AMWG) comprises representatives from fifteen Asian centers experienced in the management of MPN. This consensus from the AMWG aims to review the current evidence in the risk stratification and treatment of Ph-negative MPN, to identify management gaps for future improvement, and to offer pragmatic approaches for treatment commensurate with different levels of resources, drug availabilities and reimbursement policies in its constituent regions. The management of MPN should be patient-specific and based on accurate diagnostic and prognostic tools. In patients with PV, ET and early/prefibrotic PMF, symptoms and risk stratification will guide the need for early cytoreduction. In younger patients requiring cytoreduction and in those experiencing resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-α preparations (pegylated interferon-α 2A or ropeginterferon-α 2b) should be considered. In myelofibrosis, continuous risk assessment and symptom burden assessment are essential in guiding treatment selection. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in MF should always be based on accurate risk stratification for disease-risk and post-HSCT outcome. Management of classical Ph-negative MPN entails accurate diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular evaluation, risk stratification, and treatment strategies that are outcome-oriented (curative, disease modification, improvement of quality-of-life).

How I treat transplant-eligible patients with myelofibrosis

Despite the approval of Janus kinase inhibitors and novel agents for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), disease-modifying responses remain limited, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment option. The number of HSCTs for MF continues to increase worldwide, but its inherent therapy-related morbidity and mortality limit its use for many patients. Furthermore, patients with MF often present at an older age, with cytopenia, splenomegaly, and severe bone marrow fibrosis, posing challenges in managing them throughout the HSCT procedure. Although implementation of molecular analyses enabled improved understanding of disease mechanisms and subsequently sparked development of novel drugs with promising activity, prospective trials in the HSCT setting are often lacking, making an evidence-based decision process particularly difficult. To illustrate how we approach patients with MF with respect to HSCT, we present 3 different clinical scenarios to capture relevant aspects that influence our decision making regarding indication for, or against, HSCT. We describe how we perform HSCT according to different risk categories and, furthermore, discuss our up-to-date approach to reduce transplant-related complications. Last, we show how to harness graft-versus-MF effects, particularly in the posttransplant period to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients.

Adoptive Immunotherapy via Donor Lymphocyte Infusions following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: A Real-World, Retrospective Multicenter Study

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the sole curative option for myelofibrosis (MF). Relapse remains a significant problem, however, occurring in up to 20% to 30% of cases. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) represents a potentially effective strategy for relapse prevention and management, but the optimal timing based on measurable residual disease/chimerism analyses and the choice of regimen remain undetermined. We performed a retrospective real-world analysis of a multicenter cohort of MF allo-HCT recipients from 8 European transplantation centers who received DLI between 2005 and 2022. Response was assessed using International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment-defined response criteria, and survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test. The study included 28 patients with a median age of 58 years and a Karnofsky Performance Status of >80. The majority of patients had Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus intermediate-2 or high-risk disease at the time of allo-HCT. In vivo T cell depletion was used in 20 patients (71.2%), with 19 of the 20 receiving antithymocyte globulin. The indication for DLI was either "preemptive" (n = 15), due to a decrease in recipient chimerism (n = 13) or molecular relapse (n = 2), or "therapeutic" (n = 13) for clinician-defined hematologic/clinical relapse. No patient received DLI prophylactically. The median time of DLI administration was 23.4 months post allo-HCT. Of the 16 patients receiving multiple DLIs, 12 were part of a planned escalating dose regimen. The median follow-up from the time of first DLI was 55.4 months. The responses to DLI were complete response in 9 patients, partial response in 1 patient, and clinical improvement in 6 patients. Chimerism levels improved in 16 patients, and stable disease was reported in 5 patients. No response or progression was reported in 7 patients. DLI-induced acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) was reported in 11 patients (39%), with grade III-IV aGVHD in 7 (25%). The median overall survival from the time of first DLI was 62.6 months, and the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression after first DLI was 30.8% at 6 months. This study highlights that good response rates can be achieved with DLI even after frank relapse in some patients in a cohort in which other treatment options are very limited. More prospective studies are warranted to identify the optimal DLI regimen and timing to improve patient outcomes.

A Journey Through JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) represent a group of diseases characterised by constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in a clonal myeloid precursor. The therapeutic approach aims to treat the symptom burden (headache, itching, debilitation), splenomegaly, slow down the fibrotic proliferation in the bone marrow and reduce the risk of thrombosis/bleeding whilst avoiding leukaemic transformation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, the advent of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) has significantly broadened treatment options for these patients. In myelofibrosis, symptom control and splenomegaly reduction can improve quality of life with improved overall survival, not impacting progression into acute leukaemia. Several JAKi are available and used worldwide, and combination approaches are now being explored. In this chapter, we review the approved JAKi, highlighting its strengths, exploring potential guidelines in choosing which one to use and reasoning towards future perspectives, where the combinations of therapies seem to promise the best results.

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: prognostic indicators and the role of JAK2V617F measurable-residual disease monitoring by droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction

Relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is one of the key determinants of outcome in myelofibrosis (MF) and remains an important unmet need. In this retrospective single-centre study, we evaluated 35 consecutive patients with MF receiving allogeneic HSCT. At 30 days post-HSCT, full donor chimerism was achieved in 31 patients (88.6%). The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16.8 (10-42) days and the median time to platelet engraftment was 26 (12-245) days. Four patients (11.4%) experienced primary graft failure. With a median duration of follow-up of 33 (1-223) months, with the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 51.6% and 46.3%, respectively. Relapse after HSCT (P < 0.001), leucocyte count ≥ 18 × 109/L at HSCT (P = 0.003) and accelerated/blast phase disease at HSCT (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with worse OS. Age at HSCT ≥ 54 years (P = 0.01), mutated ETV6 (P = 0.03), leucocyte count ≥ 18 × 109/L (P = 0.02), accelerated/blast phase MF (P = 0.001), and grade 2-3 bone marrow reticulin fibrosis at 12 months post-HSCT (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with worse PFS. JAK2V617F MRD ≥ 0.047 [sensitivity 85.7%; positive predictive value (PPV) 100%; AUC 0.984; P = 0.001] at 6 months and JAK2V617F MRD ≥ 0.009 (sensitivity 100%; PPV 100%; AUC 1.0; P = 0.001) at 12 months were highly predictive of post-HSCT relapse. Inferior OS and PFS were significantly associated with detectable JAK2V617F MRD at 12 months (P = 0.003 and P = 0.0001, respectively).

The pharmacotherapeutic management of patients with myelofibrosis: looking beyond JAK inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The approach to myelofibrosis (MF) has been revolutionized in recent years, overcoming the traditional therapies, often not very effective. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi - from ruxolitinib up to momelotinib) were the first class of drugs with considerable results.

AREAS COVERED

Ongoing, new molecules are being tested that promise to give hope even to those patients not eligible for bone marrow transplants who become intolerant or are refractory to JAKi, for which therapeutic hopes are currently limited. Telomerase, murine double minute 2 (MDM2), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ), BCL-2/xL, and bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) inhibitors are the drugs with promising results in clinical trials and close to closure with consequent placing on the market, finally allowing JAK to look beyond. The novelty of the MF field was searched in the PubMed database, and the recently completed/ongoing trials are extrapolated from the ClinicalTrial website.

EXPERT OPINION

From this point of view, the use of new molecules widely described in this review, probably in association with JAKi, will represent the future treatment of choice in MF, leaving, in any case, the potential new approaches actually in an early stage of development, such as the use of immunotherapy in targeting CALR, which is coming soon.

Use of ropeginterferon in inducing graft versus myelofibrosis effect in post-transplant myelofibrosis relapse

Here, we describe a patient with post-transplant myelofibrosis with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), who showed successful molecular remission with ropeginterferon with 100% donor chimerism without any flare up of GVHD. He was initially diagnosed with polycythemia vera (PV) which progressed to myelofibrosis after 6 years. The MYSEC (Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model) and MTSS (myelofibrosis transplant scoring system) scores were 13.1 and 4, respectively, and the patient was in intermediate risk group. He underwent an allogenic stem cell transplant; however, his disease gradually progressed and was administered two donor lymphocyte infusions with minimal response. A second allogeneic transplant was performed, which led to a persistent molecular remission for more than a decade, although he developed chronic skin graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The JAK2 V617F levels started to increase 10 years post-transplant with ongoing chronic GVHD and a corresponding decrease in donor chimerism levels. He was administered ropeginterferon, which led to a decrease in JAK 2617F to undetectable levels. A graft versus myelofibrosis effect was attained with reversal to 100% donor chimerism, and he has since maintained a molecular remission with undetectable JAK 2617F levels. Chronic GVHD made him ineligible for donor lymphocyte infusions later. Thus, ropeginterferon was successful in inducing graft versus myelofibrosis effect, leading to a molecular response with no flare up of GVHD. The use of ropeginterferon needs to be further evaluated in larger cohorts of post-transplant myelofibrosis patients.

A simple prognostic system in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a CIBMTR/EBMT analysis

To develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.

Spleen volume and length determined by computed tomography impact outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Splenomegaly is a hallmark of myelofibrosis (MF), and reports on the impact of spleen size on the outcome of allo-HSCT have been conflicting, possibly due to differences in methods of assessment. We retrospectively analysed the impact of spleen volume and length measured by computed tomography on allo-HSCT outcome in 93 patients, 74% of whom had prior ruxolitinib treatment. Median spleen volume and length were 1.58 dm3 and 20 cm, respectively. We found a strong correlation between spleen volume and length (Pearson's r = 0.95, p < 0.001), Spearman (rho = 0.96, p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 41.7 months, 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 66% and 59%, respectively. Spleen size did not impact overall survival or non-relapse mortality. Larger spleen volume and length as continuous variables were associated with slower platelet and leucocyte engraftment and a higher risk of disease relapse in univariate and multivariate analyses. Spleen length measured precisely by imaging is a good surrogate for spleen volume. In the era of JAK inhibitors, larger spleen size reflects advanced disease in MF and is associated with an increased risk of relapse but has no impact on non-relapse mortality and overall survival after allo-HSCT.

Association between the choice of the conditioning regimen and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. However, the optimal conditioning regimen either with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is not well known. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years with myelofibrosis undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and analyzed the outcomes separately in the RIC and MAC cohorts based on the conditioning regimens used. Among 872 eligible patients, 493 underwent allo-HCT using RIC (fludarabine/ busulfan n=166, fludarabine/melphalan n=327) and 379 using MAC (fludarabine/busulfan n=247, busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=132). In multivariable analysis with RIC, fludarabine/melphalan was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.80; 95% confidenec interval [CI]: 1.15-2.81; P=0.009), higher early non-relapse mortality (HR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.12-2.91; P=0.01) and higher acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (grade 2-4 HR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.03-2.03; P=0.03; grade 3-4 HR=2.21; 95%CI: 1.28-3.83; P=0.004) compared to fludarabine/busulfan. In the MAC setting, busulfan/cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher acute GvHD (grade 2-4 HR=2.33; 95% CI: 1.67-3.25; P<0.001; grade 3-4 HR=2.31; 95% CI: 1.52-3.52; P<0.001) and inferior GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR=1.94; 95% CI: 1.49-2.53; P<0.001) as compared to fludarabine/busulfan. Hence, our study suggests that fludarabine/busulfan is associated with better outcomes in RIC (better overall survival, lower early non-relapse mortality, lower acute GvHD) and MAC (lower acute GvHD and better GRFS) in myelofibrosis.

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative approach for myelofibrosis patients, but relapse is a major cause of treatment failure. We investigated the effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in 37 patients with molecular (n = 17) or hematological relapse (n = 20) after HCT. Patients received median of 2 (range, 1-5) cumulative DLI (total of 91 infusions). Median starting dose was 1 × 10⁶ cells/kg, escalated by half-log ≥6 weeks if no response nor graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) occurred. Median time to first DLI was 40 weeks for molecular relapse versus 145 weeks for hematological relapse. Overall molecular complete response (mCR) at any time was 73% (n = 27) and was significantly higher for initial molecular relapse (88%) versus hematological relapse (60%; P = 0.05). The 6-year overall survival was 77% versus 32% (P = 0.03). Acute GvHD 2-4 occurred in 22% and half of the patients achieved mCR without any GvHD. All patients who relapsed from mCR achieved after first DLI could be salvaged with subsequent DLI, showing long-term survival. No second HCT was needed for molecular relapse versus 6 for hematological relapse. This comprehensive and largest study to date suggests molecular monitoring together with DLI as standard of care and a crucial approach to achieve excellent outcomes in relapsed myelofibrosis.

Molecular diagnostic criteria of myeloproliferative neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms characterized by the driver mutations JAK2, CALR, and MPL. These mutations cause constitutive activation of JAK-STAT signaling, which is central to pathogenesis of MPNs. Next-generation sequencing has further expanded the molecular landscape allowing for improved diagnostics, prognostication, and targeted therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to address current understanding of the molecular diagnosis of MPN not only through improved awareness of the driver mutations but also the disease modifying mutations. In addition, other genetic factors such as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), order of mutation, and mutation co-occurrence are discussed and how these factors influence disease initiation and ultimately progression. How this molecular information is incorporated into risk stratification models allowing for earlier intervention and targeted therapy in the future will be addressed further.

EXPERT OPINION

The genomic landscape of the MPN has evolved in the last 15 years with integration of next-generation sequencing becoming the gold standard of MPN management. Although diagnostics and prognostication have become more personalized, additional studies are required to translate these molecular findings into targeted therapy therefore improving patient outcomes.

Myelofibrosis

The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety of blood cell alterations, and a tendency to develop vascular complications and blast phase. Diagnosis requires assessing complete cell blood counts, bone marrow morphology, deep genetic evaluations, and disease history. Driver molecular events consist of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations, whereas about 8% to 10% of MF are "triple-negative." Additional myeloid-gene variants are described in roughly 80% of patients. Currently available clinical-based and integrated clinical/molecular-based scoring systems predict the survival of patients with MF and are applied for conventional treatment decision-making, indication to stem cell transplant (SCT) and allocation in clinical trials. Standard treatment consists of anemia-oriented therapies, hydroxyurea, and JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. Overall, spleen volume reduction of 35% or greater at week 24 can be achieved by 42% of ruxolitinib-, 47% of fedratinib-, 19% of pacritinib-, and 27% of momelotinib-treated patients. Now, it is time to move towards new paradigms for evaluating efficacy like disease modification, that we intend as a robust and unequivocal effect on disease biology and/or on patient survival. The growing number of clinical trials potentially pave the way for new strategies in patients with MF. Translational studies of some molecules showed an early effect on bone marrow fibrosis and on variant allele frequencies of myeloid genes. SCT is still the only curative option, however, it is associated with relevant challenges. This review focuses on the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of MF.

Clonal architecture evolution in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: from a driver mutation to a complex heterogeneous mutational and phenotypic landscape

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are characterized by the acquisition at the hematopoietic stem cell level of driver mutations targeting the JAK/STAT pathway. In addition, they also often exhibit additional mutations targeting various pathways such as intracellular signalling, epigenetics, mRNA splicing or transcription. The natural history of myeloproliferative neoplasms is usually marked by a chronic phase of variable duration depending on the disease subtype, which can be followed by an accelerated phase or transformation towards more aggressive diseases such as myelofibrosis or acute leukemia. Besides, recent studies revealed important new information about the rates and mechanisms of sequential acquisition and selection of mutations in hematopoietic cells of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Better understanding of these events has been made possible in large part with the help of novel techniques that are now available to precisely decipher at the single cell level both the clonal architecture and the mutation-induced cell modifications. In this review, we will summarize the most recent knowledge about the mechanisms leading to clonal selection, how clonal architecture complexity can explain disease heterogeneity, and the impact of clonal evolution on clinical evolution.

Myelofibrosis and Survival Prognostic Models: A Journey between Past and Future

Among the myeloproliferative diseases, myelofibrosis is a widely heterogeneous entity characterized by a highly variable prognosis. In this context, several prognostic models have been proposed to categorize these patients appropriately. Identifying who deserves more invasive treatments, such as bone marrow transplantation, is a critical clinical need. Age, complete blood count (above all, hemoglobin value), constitutional symptoms, driver mutations, and blast cells have always represented the milestones of the leading models still used worldwide (IPSS, DIPSS, MYSEC-PM). Recently, the advent of new diagnostic techniques (among all, next-generation sequencing) and the extensive use of JAK inhibitor drugs have allowed the development and validation of new models (MIPSS-70 and version 2.0, GIPSS, RR6), which are continuously updated. Finally, the new frontier of artificial intelligence promises to build models capable of drawing an overall survival perspective for each patient. This review aims to collect and summarize the existing standard prognostic models in myelofibrosis and examine the setting where each of these finds its best application.

Comparison of Pretransplantation Prediction Models for Nonrelapse Mortality in Patients with Myelofibrosis Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is the only known curative treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). Risk assessment remains important for patient counseling and predicting survival outcomes for relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Outcome-prediction tools can guide decision-making. Their use in MF has relied on their extrapolation from other malignancies. The primary objective of this study was to assess the performance of the Hematopoietic cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI), the augmented HCT-CI (aHCT-CI), and the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) in predicting NRM in patients with MF undergoing alloSCT. We retrospectively reviewed patients with MF undergoing alloSCT between 2012 and 2020 at the Mayo Clinic. Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. EASIX score was calculated before starting conditioning therapy and analyzed based on log2- transformed values. We evaluated the log2-EASIX scores by quartiles to assess the effect of increasing values on NRM. NRM was evaluated using competing risk analyses. We used the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods to evaluate OS. The Fine-Gray model was used to determine risk factors for NRM. The performance of HCT-CI and aHCT-CI was compared by evaluation of model concordance given the high correlation between HCT-CI and aHCT-CI (r = .75). A total of 87 patients were evaluated. The median duration of follow-up after alloSCT was 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4 to 6.31 years). Patients with a high HCT-CI score had significantly increased cumulative incidence of NRM at 3 years (35.5% versus 11.6%; P = .011) after alloSCT. A progressively increasing 3-year NRM was observed with increasing aHCT-CI risk category, and patients with a high or very high aHCT-CI score had significantly higher 3-year NRM compared to those with intermediate-risk or low-risk aHCT-CI scores at 3 years post-alloSCT (31.9% versus 6.52%; P = .004). An increasing log2-EASIX score quartile was not associated with 3-year NRM (19.0% versus 10.1% versus 25% versus 14.3%; P = .59), and the EASIX score was not found to be a predictor of post-transplantation NRM. A high HCT-CI was associated with significantly worse 3-year overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 4.41; 95% CI, 1.97 to 9.87; P < .001). A high or very high aHCT-CI was significantly associated with poor 3-year OS (HR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.56 to 10.22; P = .004). An increasing log2-EASIX score quartile group was not associated with 3-year OS (3-year OS rate, 66.7% versus 80.4% versus 64.6% versus 76.2%; P = .57). The EASIX score should not be used routinely in patients with MF. Both the HCT-CI and the aHCT-CI are accurate in predicting long-term survival outcomes in this patient population. Further studies are important to validate our findings of the role of EASIX in predicting NRM in patients with MF or other myeloproliferative neoplasms undergoing alloSCT. © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Essential Thrombocythemia and Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis: Updates on Diagnosis, Clinical Aspects, and Management

Although several decades have passed since the description of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), many aspects of their pathophysiology have not been elucidated. In this review, we discuss the mutational landscape of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), prognostic scores and salient pathology, and clinical points. We discuss also the diagnostic challenges of differentiating ET from prefibrotic MF. We then focus on post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-ET MF), a rare subset of MPN that is usually studied in conjunction with post-polycythemia vera MF. The transition of ET to post-ET MF is not well studied on a molecular level, and we present available data. Patients with secondary MF could benefit from allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and we present available data focusing on post-ET MF.

Biological drivers of clinical phenotype in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative disorder that exhibits considerable biological and clinical heterogeneity. At the two ends of the disease spectrum are the myelodepletive or cytopenic phenotype and the myeloproliferative phenotype. The cytopenic phenotype has a high prevalence in primary MF (PMF) and is characterized by low blood counts. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF (SMF), mild anemia, minimal need for transfusion support, and normal to mild thrombocytopenia. Differences in somatic driver mutations and allelic burden, as well as the acquisition of non-driver mutations further influences these phenotypic differences, prognosis, and response to therapies such as JAK2 inhibitors. The outcome of patients with the cytopenic phenotype are comparatively worse and frequently pose a challenge to treat given the inherent exacerbation of cytopenias. Recent data indicate that an innate immune deregulated state that hinges on the myddosome-IRAK-NFκB axis favors the cytopenic myelofibrosis phenotype and offers opportunity for novel treatment approaches. We will review the biological and clinical features of the MF disease spectrum and associated treatment considerations.

Molecular prognostication in Ph-negative MPNs in 2022

The application of genomic techniques, including cytogenetics and DNA sequencing, to decipher the molecular landscape of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has radically modified diagnostic approach and management through improved risk stratification. Three driver mutated genes (JAK2, MPL, CALR) are variably harbored by >80% of patients and associated with clinical characteristics, as well as major disease-related complications and different survival outcomes. Therefore, JAK2 V617F mutation is included in the revised International Prognosis Score of Thrombosis for Essential Thrombocythemia score for prediction of thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia and prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis, while a CALR type 1 mutated genotype constitutes a favorable variable for survival in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Novel, integrated clinical and cytogenetic/mutation scores (Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70/v2], genetically inspired prognostic scoring system [GIPSS], Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET- Prognostic Model [MYSEC-PM]) have been devised that guide selection of stem cell transplantation candidates with MF or help predict the risk associated with the transplant procedure (Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System), with greater performance compared with conventional scores based on hematologic and clinical variables only. On the other hand, several clinical needs remain unmet despite the great amount of molecular information available nowadays. These include the prediction of evolution to acute leukemia in a clinically actionable time frame, the identification of patients most likely to derive durable benefits from target agents, in primis JAK inhibitors, and, conversely, the significance of molecular responses that develop in patients receiving interferon or some novel agents. Here, we discuss briefly the significance and the role of genomic analysis for prognostication in patients with MPNs from a clinician's point of view, with the intent to provide how-to-use hints.

Innovative strategies to improve hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by inflammation, marrow fibrosis, and an inherent risk of blastic transformation. Hematopoietic allogeneic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative therapy for this disease, however, survival gains observed for other transplant indications over the past two decades have not been realized for MF. The role of transplantation may also evolve with the use of novel targeted agents. The chronic inflammatory state associated with MF necessitates pretransplantation assessment of end-organ function. Applying the transplant methodology employed for other myeloid disorders to patients with MF fails to acknowledge differences in the underlying disease pathophysiology. Limited understanding of the causes of poor transplant outcomes in this cohort has prevented refinement of transplant eligibility criteria in MF. There is increasing evidence of heterogeneity in molecular disease grade, beyond the clinical manifestations which have traditionally guided transplant timing. Exploring the physiological consequences of disease chronicity unique to MF, acknowledging the heterogeneity in disease grade, and using advanced prognostic models, molecular diagnostics and other organ function diagnostic tools, we present an innovative review of strategies with the potential to improve transplant outcomes in this disease. Larger, prospective studies which consider the impact of molecular-based disease grade are needed for MF transplantation.

High Molecular and Cytogenetic Risk in Myelofibrosis Does Not Benefit From Higher Intensity Conditioning Before Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: An International Collaborative Analysis

There is no direct evidence to recommend specific conditioning intensities in myelofibrosis undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, especially in the molecular era. We aimed to compare outcomes of reduced intensity (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) transplantation in myelofibrosis with molecular information. The study included 645 genetically annotated patients (with at least driver mutation status available), of whom 414 received RIC and 231 patients received MAC. The median follow-up time from transplantation was 6.0 years for RIC and 9.4 years for MAC. The 6-year overall survival rates for RIC and MAC were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%-68%) and 59% (95% CI, 52%-66%; P = 0.34) and progression-free survival was 52% (95% CI, 47%-57%) and 52% (95% CI, 45%-59%; P = 0.64). The 2-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 26% (95% CI, 21%-31%) for RIC and 29% (95% CI, 23%-34%) for MAC (P = 0.51). In terms of progression/relapse, the 2-year cumulative incidence was 10% (95% CI, 5%-19%) for RIC and 9% (95% CI, 4%-14%) for MAC (P = 0.46). Higher intensity conditioning did not seem to improve outcomes for higher-risk disease, according to mutational, cytogenetic, and clinical profile. In contrast, patients with reduced performance status, matched unrelated donors, and ASXL1 mutations appeared to benefit from RIC in terms of overall survival.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia and are a heterogeneous group of clonal blood disorders characterized by an overproduction of blood cells. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the goal of providing recommendations for the management of MPN in adults. The Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnostic workup, risk stratification, treatment, and supportive care strategies for the management of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Assessment of symptoms at baseline and monitoring of symptom status during the course of treatment is recommended for all patients. This article focuses on the recommendations as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis of MPN and the risk stratification, management, and supportive care relevant to MF.

Towards a Personalized Definition of Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Purpose of Review

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), prefibrotic (pre-), and overt-primary myelofibrosis (primary MF, PMF). PV and ET could evolve into secondary MF (SMF), whose early diagnosis relies on monitoring signs of possible progression. All MPNs have a risk of blast phase (BP), that is associated with a very dismal outcome. Overall survival (OS) is different among MPNs, and disease-specific prognostic scores should be applied for a correct clinical management. In this review, an overview of current prognostic scores in MPNs will be provided.

Recent Findings

The biological complexity of MPNs and its role on the trajectory of disease outcome have led to the design of integrated prognostic models that are nowadays of common use in PMF patients. As for PV and ET, splicing gene mutations could have a detrimental role, but with the limit of the not routinary recommended application of extensive molecular analysis in these diseases. SMF is recognized as a distinct entity compared to PMF, and OS estimates should be calculated by the MYSEC-PM (Myelofibrosis SECondary-prognostic model). Both in PMF and SMF, decisions as selection of patients potentially candidates to allogenic stem cell transplant or that could benefit from an early shift from standard treatment are based not only on conventional prognostic scores, but also on multivariable algorithms.

Summary

The expanding landscape of risk prediction for OS, evolution to BP, and SMF progression from PV/ET informs personalized approach to the management of patients affected by MPNs.

Management of Myelofibrosis during Treatment with Ruxolitinib: A Real-World Perspective in Case of Resistance and/or Intolerance

The development and approval of ruxolitinib, the first JAK1/2 inhibitor indicated to treat myelofibrosis, has improved patient outcomes, with higher spleen and symptoms responses, improved quality of life, and overall survival. Despite this, several unmet needs remain, including the absence of resistance criteria, suboptimal response, the timing of allogeneic transplant, and the management of patients in case of intolerance. Here, we report the results of the second survey led by the “MPN Lab” collaboration, which aimed to report physicians’ perspectives on these topics. As in our first survey, physicians were selected throughout Italy, and we included those with extensive experience in treating myeloproliferative neoplasms and those with less experience representing clinical practice in the real world. The results presented here, summarized using descriptive analyses, highlight the need for a clear definition of response to ruxolitinib as well as recommendations to guide the management of ruxolitinib under specific conditions including anemia, thrombocytopenia, infections, and non-melanoma skin cancers.

Impact of molecular profiling on the management of patients with myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical course, which can be complicated by severe constitutional symptoms, massive splenomegaly, progressive bone marrow failure, cardiovascular events, and development of acute leukemia. Constitutive signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway plays a fundamental role in its pathogenesis, generally due to activating mutations of JAK2, CALR and MPL genes (i.e., the MPN driver mutations), present in most MF patients. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panel testing has shown that additional somatic mutations can already be detected at the time of diagnosis in more than half of patients, and that they accumulate along the disease course. These mutations, mostly affecting epigenetic modifiers or spliceosome components, may cooperate with MPN drivers to favor clonal dominance or influence the clinical phenotype, and some, such as high molecular risk mutations, correlate with a more aggressive clinical course with poor treatment response. The current main role of molecular profiling in clinical practice is prognostication, principally for selecting high-risk patients who may be candidates for transplantation, the only curative treatment for MF to date. To this end, contemporary prognostic models incorporating molecular data are useful tools to discriminate different risk categories. Aside from certain clinical situations, decisions regarding medical treatment are not based on patient molecular profiling, yet this approach may become more relevant in novel treatment strategies, such as the use of vaccines against the mutant forms of JAK2 or CALR, or drugs directed against actionable molecular targets.

Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis: Pathogenesis, Prevalence, Prognostic Impact, and Treatment

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm, characterized by pathologic myeloproliferation associated with inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokine release, that results in functional compromise of the bone marrow. Thrombocytopenia is a disease-related feature of MF, which portends a poor prognosis impacting overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival. Thrombocytopenia in MF has multiple causes including ineffective hematopoiesis, splenic sequestration, and treatment-related effects. Presently, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curable treatment for MF, which, unfortunately, is only a viable option for a minority of patients. All other currently available therapies are either focused on improving cytopenias or the alleviating systemic symptoms and burdensome splenomegaly. While JAK2 inhibitors have moved to the forefront of MF therapy, available JAK inhibitors are advised against in patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 × 10⁹/L). In this review, we describe the pathogenesis, prevalence, and prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia in MF. We also explore the value and limitations of treatments directed at addressing cytopenias, splenomegaly and symptom burden, and those with potential disease modification. We conclude by proposing a treatment algorithm for patients with MF and severe thrombocytopenia.