Partial F8 gene duplication (factor VIII Padua) associated with high factor VIII levels and familial thrombophilia

Thrombophilia Screening: Not So Straightforward

Although inherited thrombophilias are lifelong risk factors for a first thrombotic episode, progression to thrombosis is multifactorial and not all individuals with inherited thrombophilia develop thrombosis in their lifetimes. Consequently, indiscriminate screening in patients with idiopathic thrombosis is not recommended, since presence of a thrombophilia does not necessarily predict recurrence or influence management, and testing should be selective. It follows that a decision to undertake laboratory detection of thrombophilia should be aligned with a concerted effort to identify any significant abnormalities, because it will inform patient management. Deficiencies of antithrombin and protein C are rare and usually determined using phenotypic assays assessing biological activities, whereas protein S deficiency (also rare) is commonly detected with antigenic assays for the free form of protein S since available activity assays are considered to lack specificity. In each case, no single phenotypic assay is capable of detecting every deficiency, because the various mutations express different molecular characteristics, rendering thrombophilia screening repertoires employing one assay per potential deficiency, of limited effectiveness. Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is more common than discrete deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S and also often detected initially with phenotypic assays; however, some centres perform only genetic analysis for factor V Leiden, as this is responsible for most cases of hereditary APCR, accepting that acquired APCR and rare F5 mutations conferring APCR will go undetected if only factor V Leiden is evaluated. All phenotypic assays have interferences and limitations, which must be factored into decisions about if, and when, to test, and be given consideration in the laboratory during assay performance and interpretation. This review looks in detail at performance and limitations of routine phenotypic thrombophilia assays.

The Basic Principles of Pathophysiology of Venous Thrombosis

The past few decades have brought tremendous insight into the molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for thrombus generation. For a clinician, it is usually sufficient to explain the incident of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with provoking factors such as trauma with vascular injury, immobilization, hormonal factors, or inherited or acquired coagulation defects. About half of DVTs are, however, lacking such triggers and are called unprovoked. Venous stasis and hypoxia at the valve sinus level may start a chain of reactions. The concept of immunothrombosis has added a new dimension to the old etiological triad of venous stasis, vessel wall injury, and changes in blood components. This is particularly important in COVID-19, where hyperinflammation, cytokines, and neutrophil extracellular traps are associated with the formation of microthrombi in the lungs. To better understand the mechanisms behind DVT and reach beyond the above-mentioned simplifications, animal models and clinical epidemiological studies have brought insight into the complex interplay between leukocytes, platelets, endothelium, cytokines, complements, and coagulation factors and inhibitors. These pathways and the interplay will be reviewed here, as well as the roles of cancer, anticancer drugs, and congenital thrombophilic defects on the molecular level in hypercoagulability and venous thromboembolism.

Next-generation sequencing strategies in venous thromboembolism: in whom and for what purpose?

This invited review follows the oral presentation "To Sequence or Not to Sequence, That Is Not the Question; But 'When, Who, Which and What For?' Is" given during the State of the Art session "Translational Genomics in Thrombosis: From OMICs to Clinics" of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2023 Congress. Emphasizing the power of next-generation sequencing technologies and the diverse strategies associated with DNA variant analysis, this review highlights the unresolved questions and challenges in their implementation both for the clinical diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and in translational research.

The risk profiles of pregnancy-related cerebral venous thrombosis: a retrospective study in a comprehensive hospital

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the risk factors and underlying causes of pregnancy-related cerebral venous thrombosis (PCVT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 16 patients diagnosed with CVT during pregnancy and postpartum (within six weeks after delivery) in a comprehensive hospital in China between 2009 and 2022 were carefully reviewed, focusing on demographic, clinical, and etiological characteristics, especially underlying causes. We matched 16 PCVT patients with 64 pregnant and puerperal women without PCVT to explore risk factors and clinical susceptibility to PCVT.

RESULTS

PCVT occurred commonly during the first trimester (43.75%) and the puerperium (37.5%). The frequency of anemia, thrombocytosis and thrombocytopenia during pregnancy, dehydration, and pre-pregnancy anemia was significantly higher in women with PCVT than in those without PCVT (P < 0.05). Among the 16 patients, five were diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome and one was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus. Three patients had distinct protein S deficiency and one had protein C deficiency. Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) was performed for five patients and revealed likely pathogenic mutations associated with CVT, including heterozygous PROC c.1218G > A (p. Met406Ile), heterozygous PROS1 c.301C > T (p. Arg101Cys), composite heterozygous mutation in the F8 gene (c.144-1259C > T; c.6724G > A (p. Val2242Met)) and homozygous MTHFR c.677C > T (p. Ala222Val).

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of anemia, thrombocytopenia and thrombocytosis during pregnancy, dehydration and pre-pregnancy anemia suggested a greater susceptibility to PCVT. For confirmed PCVT patients, autoimmune diseases, hereditary thrombophilia, and hematological disorders were common causes. Screening for potential etiologies should be paid more attention, as it has implications for treatment and long-term management.

Identification of the Efficient Enhancer Elements in FVIII-Padua for Gene Therapy Study of Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A (HA) is a common X-linked recessive hereditary bleeding disorder. Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is insufficient in patients with HA due to the mutations in the F8 gene. The restoration of plasma levels of FVIII via both recombinant B-domain-deleted FVIII (BDD-FVIII) and B-domain-deleted F8 (BDDF8) transgenes was proven to be helpful. FVIII-Padua is a 23.4 kb tandem repeat mutation in the F8 associated with a high F8 gene expression and thrombogenesis. Here we screened a core enhancer element in FVIII-Padua for improving the F8 expression. In detail, we identified a 400 bp efficient enhancer element, C400, in FVIII-Padua for the first time. The core enhancer C400 extensively improved the transcription of BDDF8 driven by human elongation factor-1 alpha in HepG2, HeLa, HEK-293T and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with different genetic backgrounds, as well as iPSCs-derived endothelial progenitor cells (iEPCs) and iPSCs-derived mesenchymal stem cells (iMSCs). The expression of FVIII protein was increased by C400, especially in iEPCs. Our research provides a novel molecular target to enhance expression of FVIII protein, which has scientific value and application prospects in both viral and nonviral HA gene therapy strategies.

A unique case of thrombophilia: the role of F9 gene duplication and increased factor IX activity in cerebral venous thrombosis

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare cerebrovascular disorder characterized by the obstruction of venous channels in the brain. Genetic factors play a significant role in CVT development, and recent studies have identified gain-of-function mutations in coagulation factors, including factor IX (FIX). This case report focuses on a unique neonatal case of CVT, where an X-chromosome duplication involving the F9 gene resulted in increased FIX activity. The neonate presented with feeding difficulties, weight loss, nystagmus, and seizures. Imaging and laboratory tests confirmed a 554-kb X-chromosome duplication encompassing the F9 gene. This genetic abnormality likely contributed to the elevated FIX activity level and subsequent CVT development. Understanding the relationship between coagulation factor abnormalities and CVT risk expands our knowledge of thrombophilia's genetic basis and may aid in the development of targeted treatment strategies for CVT management.

Plasma levels of coagulation factors VIII and IX and risk of venous thromboembolism: Systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The associations of plasma factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) levels with risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are not well defined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these associations.

METHODS

Random effects inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled odds ratios for comparisons across equal quartiles of the distributions and 90 % thresholds (higher versus lower), and for testing linear trends.

RESULTS

Among 15 studies (5327 cases) the pooled odds ratio of VTE for the fourth versus first quarter was 3.92 (95 % confidence interval 1.61, 5.29) for FVIII level; and among 7 studies (3498 cases) 1.57 (1.32, 1.87) for FIX level. Comparing factor levels above, versus below, the 90th percentile, the estimated pooled odds ratios were 3.00 (2.10, 4.30) for FVIII; 1.77 (1.22, 2.56) for FIX; and 4.56 (2.73, 7.63) for both FVIII and FIX considered jointly.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm increases in risk of VTE across population distributions of FVIII and FIX levels. Levels above the 90th percentile have almost twice the risk for FIX level compared to levels below; three-fold risk for FVIII level; and almost five-fold risk for both FVIII and FIX levels elevated.

Factor V Leiden-independent activated protein C resistance: Communication from the plasma coagulation inhibitors subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee

Activated protein C resistance (APC-R) due to the single-nucleotide polymorphism factor V Leiden (FVL) is the most common cause of hereditary thrombophilia. It is found predominantly in Caucasians and is uncommon or absent in other populations. Although FVL is responsible for >90% of cases of hereditary APC-R, a number of other F5 variants that also confer various degrees of APC-R and thrombotic risk have been described. Acquired APC-R due to increased levels of coagulation factors, reduced levels of inhibitors, or the presence of autoantibodies occurs in a variety of conditions and is an independent risk factor for thrombosis. It is common for thrombophilia screening protocols to restrict assessment for APC-R to demonstrating the presence or absence of FVL. The aim of this Scientific and Standardisation Committee communication is to detail the causes of FVL-independent APC-R to widen the diagnostic net, particularly in situations in which in vitro APC-R is encountered in the absence of FVL. Predilution clotting assays are not FVL specific and are used to detect clinically significant F5 variants conferring APC-R, whereas different forms of acquired APC-R are preferentially detected using the classical activated partial thromboplastin time-based APC-R assay without predilution and/or endogenous thrombin potential APC-R assays. Resource-specific recommendations are given to guide the detection of FVL-independent APC-R.

Evolving Knowledge on Primary and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Carriers of Hereditary Thrombophilia: A Narrative Review

The association between heritability of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia was first reported clinically in 1956, later followed by the first description of a congenital cause of hypercoagulability-antithrombin deficiency-in 1965. Since then, our knowledge of hereditary causes of hypercoagulability, which may predispose carriers to VTE has improved greatly. Novel genetic defects responsible for severe thrombophilia have been recently identified and we have learned that a wide range of interactions between thrombophilia and other genetic and acquired risk factors are important determinants of the overall individual risk of developing VTE. Furthermore, therapeutic strategies in thrombophilic patients have benefited significantly from the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. The present review is an overview of the current knowledge on the mechanisms underlying inherited thrombophilia, with a particular focus on the latest achievements in anticoagulation protocols and prevention strategies for thrombosis in carriers of this prothrombotic condition.

Evolving Knowledge on Primary and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Carriers of Hereditary Thrombophilia: A Narrative Review

The association between heritability of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thrombophilia was first reported clinically in 1956, later followed by the first description of a congenital cause of hypercoagulability-antithrombin deficiency-in 1965. Since then, our knowledge of hereditary causes of hypercoagulability, which may predispose carriers to VTE has improved greatly. Novel genetic defects responsible for severe thrombophilia have been recently identified and we have learned that a wide range of interactions between thrombophilia and other genetic and acquired risk factors are important determinants of the overall individual risk of developing VTE. Furthermore, therapeutic strategies in thrombophilic patients have benefited significantly from the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. The present review is an overview of the current knowledge on the mechanisms underlying inherited thrombophilia, with a particular focus on the latest achievements in anticoagulation protocols and prevention strategies for thrombosis in carriers of this prothrombotic condition.

Non-coding genetic variation in regulatory elements determines thrombosis and hemostasis phenotypes

Since the early inception of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), it became clear that, in all diseases or traits studied, most genetic variants are likely to exert their effect on gene expression mainly by altering the function of regulatory elements. At the same time, the regulation of the gene expression field broadened its boundaries, from the univocal relationship between regulatory elements and genes to include genome organization, long-range DNA interactions, and epigenetics. Next-generation sequencing has introduced genome-wide approaches that have greatly improved our understanding of the general principles of gene expression. However, elucidating how these apply in every single genomic locus still requires painstaking experimental work, in which several independent lines of evidence are required, and often this is helped by rare genetic variants in individuals with rare diseases. This review will focus on the non-coding features of the genome involved in transcriptional regulation, that when altered, leads to known cases of inherited (familial) thrombotic and hemostatic phenotypes, emphasizing the role of enhancers and super-enhancers.

Two SERPINC1 variants affecting N-glycosylation of Asn224 cause severe thrombophilia not detected by functional assays

Antithrombin deficiency, the most severe congenital thrombophilia, might be underestimated, as some pathogenic variants are not detected by routine functional methods. We have identified 2 new SERPINC1 variants, p.Glu227Lys and p.Asn224His, in 4 unrelated thrombophilic patients with early and recurrent thrombosis that had normal antithrombin activity. In one case, the mutation was identified by whole genome sequencing, while in the 3 remaining cases, the mutation was identified by sequencing SERPINC1 based on a single functional positive finding supporting deficiency. The 2 variants shared a common functional defect, an impaired or null N-glycosylation of Asn224 according to a eukaryotic expression model. Carriers had normal anti-FXa or anti-FIIa activities but impaired anti-FVIIa activity and a detectable loss of inhibitory function when incubating the plasma for 1 hour at 41°C. Moreover, the β glycoform of the variants, lacking 2 N-glycans, had reduced secretion, increased heparin affinity, no inhibitory activity, and a potential dominant-negative effect. These results explain the increased thrombin generation observed in carriers. Mutation experiments reflected the role that Lysine residues close to the N-glycosylation sequon have in impairing the efficacy of N-glycosylation. Our study shows new elements involved in the regulation of N-glycosylation, a key posttranslational modification that, according to our results, affects folding, secretion, and function, providing new evidence of the pathogenic consequence of an incorrect N-glycosylation of antithrombin. This study supports that antithrombin deficiency is underestimated and encourages the development of new functional and genetic tests to diagnose this severe thrombophilia.

High factor VIII levels and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective comparative study

Background  The natural course of elevated factor VIII (FVIII) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and with or without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well described. Furthermore, the data on effectiveness and safety of extended anticoagulation in these patients are limited.

Methods  We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with VTE who had an elevated FVIII level (>1.5 IU/mL) during a period of 16 years. FVIII levels, duration of anticoagulation, recurrent thromboembolic events, and bleeding requiring hospitalization were captured and compared between patients with and without IBD.

Results  Fourteen patients with IBD and 66 without IBD were followed for 8.0 years (standard deviation [SD] =  ±  3.5) and 5.6 years (SD =  ±  5.1), respectively. Among the 41 patients with repeat levels, FVIII remained elevated in most patients. None of the IBD patients had thromboembolic events or major bleeding during a mean of 5.6 years (SD =  ±  5.1) of anticoagulation. Three of five IBD patients who stopped anticoagulation had thromboembolic events at a median of 9 months after stopping, observed event rate of 12 per 100 patient-years. For the 66 non-IBD patients, the event rates of thromboembolism on and off anticoagulation were 1.6 and 7.2 per 100 patient-years, respectively, and of major bleeding on anticoagulation 0.8 per 100 patient-years.

Conclusion  Elevated FVIII in patients with VTE is often a persistent risk factor. The cohort with VTE and elevated FVIII that we analyzed appeared to have a favorable benefit/risk ratio of extended anticoagulation.

Reference values of coagulation assays performed for thrombophilia screening after a first venous thrombosis and their intra-patient associations

INTRODUCTION

No reference values are currently available for coagulation assays performed for thrombophilia screening prescribed according to guidelines, after a first venous thromboembolic (VTE) event, and we have no idea of the intra-patient associations between results.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of consecutive prescriptions fulfilling guidelines in a French university hospital from 2010 to 2019 (n = 3842) from the Glims® laboratory information system. We collected results of 12 parameters: aPTT, PT, fibrinogen (Fg), one-stage clotting methods for factors VIII, IX, XI and II (FVIII, FIX, FXI, FII), antithrombin (using an amidolytic assay: AT), protein C and S (using clotting assays: PC and PS) and mixing tests of a lupus-anticoagulant sensitive aPTT and of DRVVT.

RESULTS

We show the results of the 12 parameters from 3603 individual files with less than 6 missing values, then describe these distributions and correlations between results from 2930 files with no missing value. We give the frequency of results described as indicating a risk of first VTE or of VTE recurrence. We propose 2 quantitative scores linking the 12 parameters at the individual level and reflecting their degree of dispersion with respect to their mean, describe the values of these scores and their associations with thrombophilic results.

CONCLUSIONS

These normal values should help laboratory workers to validate process results and to assess their degree of originality. Our 2 scores should help to determine the intra-patient plausibility of associations of results. The usefulness of these laboratory scores for predicting clinically-relevant outcomes deserves to be investigated.

Multiyear Factor VIII Expression after AAV Gene Transfer for Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

The goal of gene therapy for patients with hemophilia A is to safely impart long-term stable factor VIII expression that predictably ameliorates bleeding with the use of the lowest possible vector dose.

METHODS

In this phase 1-2 trial, we infused an investigational adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector (SPK-8011) for hepatocyte expression of factor VIII in 18 men with hemophilia A. Four dose cohorts were enrolled; the lowest-dose cohort received a dose of 5  × 10¹¹ vector genomes (vg) per kilogram of body weight, and the highest-dose cohort received 2 × 10¹² vg per kilogram. Some participants received glucocorticoids within 52 weeks after vector administration either to prevent or to treat a presumed AAV capsid immune response. Trial objectives included evaluation of the safety and preliminary efficacy of SPK-8011 and of the expression and durability of factor VIII.

RESULTS

The median safety observation period was 36.6 months (range, 5.5 to 50.3). A total of 33 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 8 participants; 17 events were vector-related, including 1 serious adverse event, and 16 were glucocorticoid-related. Two participants lost all factor VIII expression because of an anti-AAV capsid cellular immune response that was not sensitive to immune suppression. In the remaining 16 participants, factor VIII expression was maintained; 12 of these participants were followed for more than 2 years, and a one-stage factor VIII assay showed no apparent decrease in factor VIII activity over time (mean [±SD] factor VIII activity, 12.9±6.9% of the normal value at 26 to 52 weeks when the participants were not receiving glucocorticoids vs. 12.0±7.1% of the normal value at >52 weeks after vector administration; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.4 to 0.6 for the difference between matched pairs). The participants had a 91.5% reduction (95% CI, 88.8 to 94.1) in the annualized bleeding rate (median rate, 8.5 events per year [range, 0 to 43.0] before vector administration vs. 0.3 events per year [range, 0 to 6.5] after vector administration).

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained factor VIII expression in 16 of 18 participants who received SPK-8011 permitted discontinuation of prophylaxis and a reduction in bleeding episodes. No major safety concerns were reported. (Funded by Spark Therapeutics and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03003533 and NCT03432520.).

Gene therapy for hemophilia: Current status and laboratory consequences

Since the cloning and characterization of the factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX genes in the mid-1980s, gene therapy has been perceived as having significant potential for the treatment of severe hemophilia. Now, some 35 years later, these proposals are close to being realized through the licensing of the first clinical gene therapy product. Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated gene therapy for hemophilia A and B has been extensively investigated in preclinical models over the past 20 years, and since 2011, there has been increasing evidence in early phase clinical trials that this therapeutic strategy can provide safe and effective rescue of the hemostatic phenotype in severe hemophilia. As the uptake of hemophilia gene therapy progresses, it is clear that many aspects of the gene therapy process require crucial laboratory support to ensure safe and effective outcomes from his new therapeutic paradigm. These laboratory contributions extend from evaluations of the gene therapy vehicle, assessments of the patient immune status for the vector, and ultimately the performance of assays to determine the hemostatic benefit of the gene therapy and potentially of its long-term safety on the host genome. As with many aspects of past hemophilia care, the safe and effective delivery of gene therapy will require an informed and coordinated contribution from laboratory science.