Etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061 phase 2b): normal/near normal FIX activity and bleed cessation in hemophilia B

The impact of capping health system cost savings on the projected cost-effectiveness of etranacogene dezaparvovec compared with factor IX prophylaxis for the treatment of hemophilia B

This viewpoint discusses cost-effectiveness estimates for EtranaDez, a gene therapy for hemophilia B, using the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's (ICER) framework for single and short-term therapies (SSTs). EtranaDez offers long-term benefits from a single administration, in contrast to the high costs and frequent dosing required by current factor IX prophylaxis. However, the projected gains in health from EtranaDez are small relative to the cost implications of the therapy, and consequently, how the cost offsets associated with EtranaDez are counted has a substantial impact on assessing its cost-effectiveness. Strategies for assessing cost offsets used in the ICER SST framework include a 50/50 cost-sharing model between the health care system and the manufacturer and a cap of $150,000 annually on health care cost offsets. Results from the standard full cost-offset analysis as reported by ICER depicted EtranaDez as a dominant therapy with substantial cost savings compared with factor IX prophylaxis. However, while considering the ICER SST framework, particularly the $150,000 annual cap scenario, the cost-effectiveness was significantly reduced. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio varied notably between these scenarios, challenging the conventional perception of value of gene therapy in health care. These cost-sharing scenarios highlight the potential of the ICER SST framework to help curtail inefficient health care spending. In cases in which the cost of existing treatment is exceedingly high, the application of such frameworks would improve efficiency in resource allocation, fostering a balance between incentives for innovation and economic sustainability in managed care systems.

Recent Advances in Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: Projecting the Perspectives

One of the well-known X-linked genetic disorders is hemophilia, which could be hemophilia A as a result of a mutation in the F8 (factor VIII) gene or hemophilia B as a result of a mutation in the F9 (factor IX) gene, leading to insufficient levels of the proteins essential for blood coagulation cascade. In patients with severe hemophilia, factor VIII or factor IX activities in the blood plasma are considerably low, estimated to be less than 1%. This is responsible for spontaneous or post-traumatic bleeding episodes, or both, leading to disease complications and death. Current treatment of hemophilia relies on the prevention of bleeding, which consists of expensive lifelong replacement infusion therapy of blood plasma clotting factors, their recombinant versions, or therapy with recombinant monoclonal antibodies. Recently emerged gene therapy approaches may be a potential game changer that could reshape the therapeutic outcomes of hemophilia A or B using a one-off vector in vivo delivery and aim to achieve long-term endogenous expression of factor VIII or IX. This review examines both traditional approaches to the treatment of hemophilia and modern methods, primarily focusing on gene therapy, to update knowledge in this area. Recent technological advances and gene therapeutics in the pipeline are critically reviewed and summarized. We consider gene therapy to be the most promising method as it may overcome the problems associated with more traditional treatments, such as the need for constant and expensive infusions and the presence of an immune response to the antibody drugs used to treat hemophilia.

Correlation of antigen expression with epigenetic modifications after rAAV delivery of a human factor IX variant in mice and rhesus macaques

We investigated long-term human coagulation factor IX (huFIX) expression of a novel variant when delivered into mice and rhesus macaques and compared transduction efficiencies using two different adeno-associated virus (AAV) capsids. In hemophilic mice injected with KP1-packaged recombinant AAV (rAAV) expressing the hyperactive FIX variant specific activity plasma levels were 10-fold or 2-fold enhanced when compared with wild-type or Padua huFIX injected mice, respectively. In rhesus macaques AAV-LK03 capsid outperformed AAV-KP1 in terms of antigen expression and liver transduction. Two animals from each group showed sustained low-level huFIX expression at 3 months after administration, while one animal from each group lost huFIX mRNA and protein expression over time, despite comparable vector copies. We investigated whether epigenetic differences in the vector episomes could explain this loss of transcription. Cut&Tag analysis revealed lower levels of activating histone marks in the two animals that lost expression. When comparing rAAV genome associated histone modifications in rhesus macaques with those in mice injected with the same vector, the activating histone marks were starkly decreased in macaque-derived episomes. Differential epigenetic marking of AAV genomes may explain different expression profiles in mice and rhesus macaques, as well as the wide dose response variation observed in primates in both preclinical and human clinical trials.

Field Study and Correlative Studies of Factor IX Variant FIX-R338L in Participants Treated with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec

BACKGROUND

 Fidanacogene elaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy vector expressing the high-activity factor IX (FIX) variant FIX-R338L, is in development for hemophilia B. One-stage clotting (OS) assays and chromogenic substrate (CS) assays are commonly used to measure FIX-R338L variant activity. Data from ongoing trials suggest FIX activity varies between different OS and CS assays.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 To better understand FIX-R338L activity in clinical samples, an international multisite field study was conducted across a central laboratory and 18 local laboratories, using standard protocols, reagents, and instrumentation, with individual participant samples from a phase 1/2a study of fidanacogene elaparvovec.

RESULTS

 Unlike the wild-type FIX control, FIX-R338L activity was higher with the OS silica-based assay versus OS ellagic acid-based and CS assays. Variation in FIX activity was greater at the lowest activity levels. Activated FIX (FIXa) in plasma could result in higher OS assay activity or increased thrombin generation, which could overestimate FIX activity. However, FIXa was not detected in the participant samples, indicating that it was not contributing to the OS assay differences. Since individuals on gene therapy may receive exogenous replacement FIX products, replacement products were spiked into patient plasma samples to target a therapeutic concentration. Exogenous FIX was additive to endogenous FIX-R338L, with no interference from FIX-R338L.

CONCLUSION

 These results demonstrate FIX-R338L activity can be measured with OS and CS assays in clinical laboratories and provide insight into assay variability when measuring FIX with endogenously produced FIX-R338L. The findings may help establish best practices for measuring FIX-R338L activity (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02484092).

AAV mediated genome engineering with a bypass coagulation factor alleviates the bleeding phenotype in a murine model of hemophilia B

It is crucial to develop a long-term therapy that targets hemophilia A and B, including inhibitor-positive patients. We have developed an Adeno-associated virus (AAV) based strategy to integrate the bypass coagulation factor, activated FVII (murine, mFVIIa) gene into the Rosa26 locus using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 mediated gene-editing. AAV vectors designed for expression of guide RNA (AAV8-gRNA), Cas9 (AAV2 neddylation mutant-Cas9), and mFVIIa (AAV8-mFVIIa) flanked by homology arms of the target locus were validated in vitro. Hemophilia B mice were administered with AAV carrying gRNA, Cas9 (1 × 1011 vgs/mouse), and mFVIIa with homology arms (2 × 1011 vgs/mouse) with appropriate controls. Functional rescue was documented with suitable coagulation assays at various time points. The data from the T7 endonuclease assay revealed a cleavage efficiency of 20-42 %. Further, DNA sequencing confirmed the targeted integration of mFVIIa into the safe-harbor Rosa26 locus. The prothrombin time (PT) assay revealed a significant reduction in PT in mice that received the gene-editing vectors (22 %), and a 13 % decline in mice that received only the AAV-FVIIa when compared to mock treated mice, 8 weeks after vector administration. Furthermore, FVIIa activity in mice that received triple gene-editing vectors was higher (122.5mIU/mL vs 28.8mIU/mL) than the mock group up to 15 weeks post vector administration. A hemostatic challenge by tail clip assay revealed that hemophilia B mice injected with only FVIIa or the gene-editing vectors had significant reduction in blood loss. In conclusion, AAV based gene-editing facilitates sustained expression of coagulation FVIIa and phenotypic rescue in hemophilia B mice.

Gene Therapy for Hemophilia B: Achievements, Open Issues, and Perspectives

Hemophilia B is the first bleeding disorder for which gene therapy clinical programs began. Presently, adenovirus-associated vectors represent the best means to deliver the transgene, and their administration by intravenous route has been used in recent clinical trials. The natural occurring factor IX (FIX) Padua variant, which allows for a 5- to 8-fold higher activity of FIX, while maintaining a normal protein concentration, was subsequently used to enhance the level of transgene expression. All the recent trials using this variant showed good results, and accumulating data suggest that long-term expression durability could be maintained at a significant hemostatic level. However, the risk of loss of transgene expression associated to immune response with liver enzymes elevation remains a concern, especially as to the efficacy and duration of immunosuppressive treatment. Notwithstanding this limitation, the results of clinical trials suggest that gene therapy in hemophilia B has the potential to provide long-term benefits with sustained factor activity levels predicted to last several years in many patients.

Multicenter assessment and longitudinal study of the prevalence of antibodies and related adaptive immune responses to AAV in adult males with hemophilia

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) based gene therapy has demonstrated effective disease control in hemophilia. However, pre-existing immunity from wild-type AAV exposure impacts gene therapy eligibility. The aim of this multicenter epidemiologic study was to determine the prevalence and persistence of preexisting immunity against AAV2, AAV5, and AAV8, in adult participants with hemophilia A or B. Blood samples were collected at baseline and annually for ≤3 years at trial sites in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United States. At baseline, AAV8, AAV2, and AAV5 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were present in 46.9%, 53.1%, and 53.4% of participants, respectively; these values remained stable at Years 1 and 2. Co-prevalence of NAbs to at least two serotypes and all three serotypes was present at baseline for ~40% and 38.2% of participants, respectively. For each serotype, ~10% of participants who tested negative for NAbs at baseline were seropositive at Year 1. At baseline, 38.3% of participants had detectable cell mediated immunity by ELISpot, although no correlations were observed with the humoral response. In conclusion, participants with hemophilia may have significant preexisting immunity to AAV capsids. Insights from this study may assist in understanding capsid-based immunity trends in participants considering AAV vector-based gene therapy.

Deciphering conundrums of adeno-associated virus liver-directed gene therapy: focus on hemophilia

Adeno-associated virus gene therapy has been the subject of intensive investigation for monogenic disease gene addition therapy for more than 25 years, yet few therapies have been approved by regulatory agencies. Most have not progressed beyond phase 1/2 due to toxicity, lack of efficacy, or both. The liver is a natural target for adeno-associated virus since most serotypes have a high degree of tropism for hepatocytes due to cell surface receptors for the virus and the unique liver sinusoidal geometry facilitating high volumes of blood contact with hepatocyte cell surfaces. Recessive monogenic diseases such as hemophilia represent promising targets since the defective proteins are often synthesized in the liver and secreted into the circulation, making them easy to measure, and many do not require precise regulation. Yet, despite initiation of many disease-specific clinical trials, therapeutic windows are often nonexistent, resulting in excess toxicity and insufficient efficacy. Iterative progress built on these attempts is best illustrated by hemophilia, with the first regulatory approvals for factor IX and factor VIII gene therapies eventually achieved 25 years after the first gene therapy studies in humans. Although successful gene transfer may result in the production of sufficient transgenic protein to modify the disease, many emerging questions on durability, predictability, reliability, and variability of response have not been answered. The underlying biology accounting for these heterogeneous responses and the interplay between host and virus is the subject of intense investigation and the subject of this review.

Hemophilia B and gene therapy: a new chapter with etranacogene dezaparvovec

ABSTRACT

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s authorization of etranacogene dezaparvovec (Hemgenix) is a significant milestone, constituting not only the first FDA approval of a gene therapy for hemophilia but also the first approval of a liver-targeted adeno-associated virus vector gene therapy. This review summarizes the nonclinical studies and clinical development that supported regulatory clearance. Similar to other gene therapies for single gene disorders, both the short-term safety and the phenotypic improvement were unequivocal, justifying the modest-sized safety and efficacy database, which included 57 participants across the phase 2b (3 participants) and phase 3 (54 participants) studies. The most common adverse reactions included liver enzyme elevation, headache, flu-like symptoms, infusion-related reactions, creatine kinase elevation, malaise, and fatigue; these were mostly transient. One participant had hepatocellular carcinoma on a study-mandated liver ultrasound conducted 1 year after vector infusion; molecular analysis of the resected tumor showed no evidence of vector-related insertional mutagenesis as the etiology. A remarkable 96% of participants in the phase 3 trial were able to stop factor IX (FIX) prophylaxis, with the study demonstrating noninferiority to FIX prophylaxis in terms of the primary end point, annualized bleeding rate. Key secondary end points such as the annualized infusion rate, which declined by 97%, and the plasma FIX activity level at 18 months after infusion, with least squares mean increase of 34.3 percentage points compared with baseline, were both clinically and statistically significant. The FDA's landmark approval of Hemgenix as a pioneering treatment for hemophilia stands on the shoulders of >20 years of gene therapy clinical research and heralds a promising future for genomic medicines.

AAV mediated gene therapy for haemophilia B: From the early attempts to modern trials

Early gene therapy clinical trials for the treatment of Haemophilia B have been instrumental to our global understanding of gene therapy and have significantly contributed to the rapid expansion of the field. The use of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) as vectors for gene transfer has successfully led to therapeutic expression of coagulation factor IX (FIX) in severe haemophilia B patients. Expression of FIX has remained stable following a single administration of vector for up to 8 years at levels that are clinically relevant to reduce the incidence of spontaneous bleeds and have permitted a significant change in the disease management with reduction or elimination of the need for coagulation factor concentrates. These trials have also shed light on several concerns around AAV-mediated gene transfer such as the high prevalence of pre-existing immunity against the vector capsid as well as the elevation of liver transaminases that is associated with a loss of FIX transgene expression in some patients. However, this field is advancing very rapidly with the development of increasingly more efficient strategies to overcome some of these obstacles and importantly raise the possibility of a functional cure, which has been long sought after. This review overviews the evolution of gene therapy for haemophilia B over the last two decades.

Using an In Vivo Mouse Model to Determine the Exclusion Criteria of Preexisting Anti-AAV9 Neutralizing Antibody Titer of Pompe Disease Patients in Clinical Trials

The efficacy of adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy is dependent on effective viral transduction, which might be inhibited by preexisting immunity to AAV acquired from infection or maternal delivery. Anti-AAV neutralizing Abs (NAbs) titer is usually measured by in vitro assay and used for patient enroll; however, this assay could not evaluate NAbs' impacts on AAV pharmacology and potential harm in vivo. Here, we infused a mouse anti-AAV9 monoclonal antibody into Balb/C mice 2 h before receiving 1.2 × 1014 or 3 × 1013 vg/kg of rAAV9-coGAA by tail vein, a drug for our ongoing clinical trials for Pompe disease. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and cellular responses combined with in vitro NAb assay validated the different impacts of preexisting NAbs at different levels in vivo. Sustained GAA expression in the heart, liver, diaphragm, and quadriceps were observed. The presence of high-level NAb, a titer about 1:1000, accelerated vector clearance in blood and completely blocked transduction. The AAV-specific T cell responses tended to increase when the titer of NAb exceeded 1:200. A low-level NAbs, near 1:100, had no effect on transduction in the heart and liver as well as cellular responses, but decreased transduction in muscles slightly. Therefore, we propose to preclude patients with NAb titers > 1:100 from rAAV9-coGAA clinical trials.

The current challenges faced by people with hemophilia B

Hemophilia B (HB) is a rare, hereditary disease caused by a defect in the gene encoding factor IX (FIX) and leads to varying degrees of coagulation deficiency. The prevailing treatment for people with HB (PWHB) is FIX replacement product. The advent of recombinant coagulation products ushered in a new era of safety, efficacy, and improved availability compared with plasma-derived products. For people with severe HB, lifelong prophylaxis with a FIX replacement product is standard of care. Development of extended half-life FIX replacement products has allowed for advancements in the care of these PWHB. Nonetheless, lifelong need for periodic dosing and complex surveillance protocols pose substantive challenges in terms of access, adherence, and healthcare resource utilization. Further, some PWHB on prophylactic regimens continue to experience breakthrough bleeds and joint damage, and subpopulations of PWHB, including women, those with mild-to-moderate HB, and those with inhibitors to FIX, experience additional unique difficulties. This review summarizes the current challenges faced by PWHB, including the unique subpopulations; identifying the need for improved awareness, personalized care strategies, and new therapeutic options for severe HB, which may provide future solutions for some of the remaining unmet needs of PWHB.

Gene therapy for monogenic disorders: challenges, strategies, and perspectives

Monogenic disorders refer to a group of human diseases caused by mutations in single genes. While disease-modifying therapies have offered some relief from symptoms and delayed progression for some monogenic diseases, most of these diseases still lack effective treatments. In recent decades, gene therapy has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for genetic disorders. Researchers have developed various gene manipulation tools and gene delivery systems to treat monogenic diseases. Despite this progress, concerns about inefficient delivery, persistent expression, immunogenicity, toxicity, capacity limitation, genomic integration, and limited tissue specificity still need to be addressed. This review gives an overview of commonly used gene therapy and delivery tools, along with the challenges they face and potential strategies to counter them.

Optimal trade-off control in machine learning-based library design, with application to adeno-associated virus (AAV) for gene therapy

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) hold tremendous promise as delivery vectors for gene therapies. AAVs have been successfully engineered-for instance, for more efficient and/or cell-specific delivery to numerous tissues-by creating large, diverse starting libraries and selecting for desired properties. However, these starting libraries often contain a high proportion of variants unable to assemble or package their genomes, a prerequisite for any gene delivery goal. Here, we present and showcase a machine learning (ML) method for designing AAV peptide insertion libraries that achieve fivefold higher packaging fitness than the standard NNK library with negligible reduction in diversity. To demonstrate our ML-designed library's utility for downstream engineering goals, we show that it yields approximately 10-fold more successful variants than the NNK library after selection for infection of human brain tissue, leading to a promising glial-specific variant. Moreover, our design approach can be applied to other types of libraries for AAV and beyond.

A functional mini-GDE transgene corrects impairment in models of glycogen storage disease type III

Glycogen storage disease type III (GSDIII) is a rare inborn error of metabolism affecting liver, skeletal muscle, and heart due to mutations of the AGL gene encoding for the glycogen debranching enzyme (GDE). No curative treatment exists for GSDIII. The 4.6 kb GDE cDNA represents the major technical challenge toward the development of a single recombinant adeno-associated virus-derived (rAAV-derived) vector gene therapy strategy. Using information on GDE structure and molecular modeling, we generated multiple truncated GDEs. Among them, an N-terminal-truncated mutant, ΔNter2-GDE, had a similar efficacy in vivo compared with the full-size enzyme. A rAAV vector expressing ΔNter2-GDE allowed significant glycogen reduction in heart and muscle of Agl-/- mice 3 months after i.v. injection, as well as normalization of histology features and restoration of muscle strength. Similarly, glycogen accumulation and histological features were corrected in a recently generated Agl-/- rat model. Finally, transduction with rAAV vectors encoding ΔNter2-GDE corrected glycogen accumulation in an in vitro human skeletal muscle cellular model of GSDIII. In conclusion, our results demonstrated the ability of a single rAAV vector expressing a functional mini-GDE transgene to correct the muscle and heart phenotype in multiple models of GSDIII, supporting its clinical translation to patients with GSDIII.

Indirect treatment comparisons of the gene therapy etranacogene dezaparvovec versus extended half-life factor IX therapies for severe or moderately severe haemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for haemophilia B demonstrated superior efficacy at 24 months in reducing bleeds versus a ≥6-month lead-in period of prophylaxis with FIX products in the phase 3 trial, HOPE-B. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus FIX products, indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) can be used.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus rIX-FP, rFIXFc and N9-GP using ITC, and support HOPE-B results.

METHODS

Data were leveraged from Phase 3 pivotal trials: HOPE-B, PROLONG-9FP, B-LONG and Paradigm 2. Annualised bleeding rates (ABR), spontaneous (AsBR) and joint (AjBR) bleeding rates, percentage of patients with no bleeds, and FIX consumption were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting and matching adjusted indirect comparisons.

RESULTS

Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated statistically significantly lower bleeding rates versus all comparators. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rIX-FP were 0.19 (p < .0001), 0.08 (p < .0001) and 0.09 (p < .0001), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rFIXFc were 0.14 (p < .0001), 0.13 (p = .0083) and 0.15 (p = .0111), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR and AsBR, versus N9-GP were 0.24 (p = .0231) and 0.13 (p = .0071), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated significantly higher percentage of patients with no bleeds versus rIX-FP and rFIXFc; odds ratios: 17.60 (p < .0001) and 5.65 (p = .0037), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec resulted in significantly lower FIX consumption than all comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

ITC suggests that etranacogene dezaparvovec offers patients with haemophilia B (≤2% of normal FIX expression) a single dose treatment that can significantly reduce bleeding rates and eliminate routine infusions associated with FIX therapies.

Current limitations of gene therapy for rare pediatric diseases: Lessons learned from clinical experience with AAV vectors

Gene therapy using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is a promising therapeutic strategy for multiple inherited diseases. Following intravenous injection, AAV vectors carrying a copy of the missing gene or the genome-editing machinery reach their target cells and deliver the genetic material. Several clinical trials are currently ongoing and significant success has already been achieved with at least six AAV gene therapy products with market approval in Europe and the United States. Nonetheless, clinical trials and preclinical studies have uncovered several limitations of AAV gene transfer, which need to be addressed in order to improve the safety and enable the treatment of the largest patient population. Limitations include the occurrence of immune-mediated toxicities, the potential loss of correction in the long run, and the development of neutralizing antibodies against AAV vectors preventing re-administration. In this review, we summarize these limitations and discuss the potential technological developments to overcome them. © 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of French Society of Pediatrics.

Gene therapy for hemophilia, a clinical viewpoint

Gene therapy for hemophilia has been investigated for decades but no breakthroughs were made until Nathwani et al. achieved a significant and sustainable factor IX increase in hemophilia B patients in 2011. About eleven years later, in August 2022, the first hemophilia A gene therapy product was approved by the European Commission and hemophilia treatment entered a new era. This review does not focus on the newest advances but rather the practical aspects of gene therapy aiming to provide an overview for physicians who treat hemophiliacs who did not participate in the clinical trials. The current status of gene therapy, focusing particularly on products likely to be clinically available soon, are reviewed and summarized. Currently, possible limitations of gene therapy are pre-existing neutralizing antibodies toward the vector, liver health, age, and inhibitor status. Possible safety concerns include infusion reactions, liver damage, and adverse effects from immune suppressants or steroids. In summary, generally speaking, gene therapy is effective, at least for several years, but the exact effect may be unpredictable and intensive monitoring for several months is needed. It can also be considered safe with careful practice on selected patients. In its current form, gene therapy will not replace all hemophilia treatments. Advances in non-factor therapy will also improve hemophilia care greatly in the future. We envisage that gene therapy may be included in multiple novel therapies for hemophilia and benefit some hemophilia patients while novel non-factor therapies may benefit others, together fulfilling the unmet needs of all hemophilia patients.

Stable and durable factor IX levels in patients with hemophilia B over 3 years after etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy

Etranacogene dezaparvovec (AMT-061) is a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 5 (AAV5) vector containing a codon-optimized Padua variant human factor IX (FIX) transgene with a liver-specific promoter. Here, we report 3-year outcomes from a phase 2b, open-label, single-dose, single-arm, multicenter trial conducted among adults with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (FIX ≤2%). All participants (n = 3) received a single intravenous dose (2 × 1013 gene copies per kg) and will be followed up for 5 years. The primary end point of FIX activity ≥5% at 6 weeks was met. Secondary end points included bleed frequency, FIX concentrate use, joint health, and adverse events (AEs). All participants required routine FIX prophylaxis and had neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 before etranacogene dezaparvovec treatment. After administration, FIX activity rose to a mean of 40.8% in year 1 and was sustained in year 3 at 36.9%. All participants discontinued FIX prophylaxis. Bleeding was completely eliminated in 2 out of 3 participants. One participant required on-demand FIX replacement therapy per protocol because of elective surgical procedures, for 2 reported bleeding episodes, and twice for a single self-administered infusion because of an unreported reason. One participant experienced 2 mild, self-limiting AEs shortly after dosing. During the 3-year study period, there were no clinically significant elevations in liver enzymes, no requirement for steroids, no FIX inhibitor development, and no late-emergent safety events in any participant. Etranacogene dezaparvovec was safe and effective in adults with hemophilia B over 3 years after administration. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03489291.

Mechanistic modeling explains the production dynamics of recombinant adeno-associated virus with the baculovirus expression vector system

Current manufacturing processes for recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAVs) have less-than-desired yields and produce significant amounts of empty capsids. The increasing demand and the high cost of goods for rAAV-based gene therapies motivate development of more efficient manufacturing processes. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first rAAV-based gene therapy product manufactured in the baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS), a technology that demonstrated production of high titers of full capsids. This work presents a first mechanistic model describing the key extracellular and intracellular phenomena occurring during baculovirus infection and rAAV maturation in the BEVS. The model predictions are successfully validated for in-house and literature experimental measurements of the vector genome and of structural and non-structural proteins collected during rAAV manufacturing in the BEVS with the TwoBac and ThreeBac constructs. A model-based analysis of the process is carried out to identify the bottlenecks that limit full capsid formation. Vector genome amplification is found to be the limiting step for rAAV production in Sf9 cells using either the TwoBac or ThreeBac system. In turn, vector genome amplification is hindered by limiting Rep78 levels. Transgene and non-essential baculovirus protein expression in the insect cell during rAAV manufacturing also negatively influences the rAAV production yields.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Haemophilia B in Algeria: Realities and therapeutic perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia B is a debilitating hereditary coagulation disorder characterized by prolonged or spontaneous episodes of bleeding caused by a deficiency of endogenous factor IX. In Algeria, even though many studies are being carried out to evaluate the prevalence and management of haemophilia B, there is a paucity of locally published literature that can be used to understand the most recent information on the disease's epidemiology, diagnostic techniques and treatment options.

AIMS

The aim of this manuscript is to raise awareness among patients and family clinicians about current practices, recent developments and unmet needs related to haemophilia B in Algeria.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted through online scientific databases to review publications regarding haemophilia B in Algeria. Exclusions of the review include case studies, interregional comparisons, abstract-only papers and studies outside the range of 2012-2022.

RESULTS

The findings discussed relate to the epidemiology of haemophilia B in Algeria, the clinical diagnostic process, disease symptoms, the benefits of molecular and genetic testing, advancements in prophylactic care, as well as unmet needs hindering the progression of optimal haemophilia B management.

CONCLUSION

These findings are crucial to encourage the maintenance of national registries with updated epidemiological data, facilitate early and timely detection of disease symptoms, improve the provision of diagnostic facilities and enhance the overall treatment landscape for better patient outcomes.

Hemophilia gene therapy: first, do no harm

The introduction of adeno-associated virus-mediated, liver-directed gene therapy into the hemophilia treatment landscape brings not only great promise but also considerable uncertainty to a community that has a history punctuated by the devastating effects of HIV and hepatitis C virus. These infections were introduced into people with hemophilia through the innovation of factor concentrates in the 1970s and 1980s. Concentrates, heralded as a major advance in treatment at the time, brought devastation and death to the community already challenged by the complications of bleeding into joints, vital organs, and the brain. Over the past 5 decades, considerable advances in hemophilia treatment have improved the survival, quality of life, and participation of people with hemophilia, although challenges remain and health equity with their unaffected peers has not yet been achieved. The decision to take a gene therapy product is one in which an informed, holistic, and shared decision-making approach must be employed. Bias on the part of health care professionals and people with hemophilia must be addressed and minimized. Here, we review data leading to the regulatory authorization of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus 5 gene therapy, in Europe to treat hemophilia A and etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb in the United States and Europe to treat hemophilia B. We also provide an overview of the decision-making process and recommend steps that should be taken by the hemophilia community to ensure the safety of and optimal outcomes for people with hemophilia who choose to receive a gene therapy product.

Altered cleavage of human factor VIII at the B-domain and acidic region 3 interface enhances expression after gene therapy in hemophilia A mice

BACKGROUND

Variants of human factor VIII (hFVIII) have been developed to further understand the structure and function of hFVIII and improve gene-based therapeutics. We have previously characterized several hFVIII variants of the furin cleavage site (1645-1648) with improved secretion. We have also identified a second cleavage site in the acidic region 3 (a3) (1657-1658) that becomes the primary hFVIII intracellular cleavage position in the absence of the furin site. We tested a hypothesis that modification of this site may confer additional functional advantages to hFVIII.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to conduct the biochemical and functional characterization of hFVIII variants of the furin cleavage site, the a3 cleavage site, or in combination, both in vitro and in vivo after AAV mediated gene therapy.

METHODS

Recombinant hFVIII variants of the furin cleavage site (hFVIII-Δ3), the a3 cleavage site (hFVIII-S1657P/D1658E [SP/DE]), or in combination (hFVIII-Δ3-SP/DE) were purified and characterized in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

Recombinant hFVIII-Δ3, hFVIII-SP/DE, and hFVIII-Δ3-SP/DE variants all had comparable specific activity to B-domain deleted (BDD) hFVIII. Hemophilia A mice tolerant to hFVIII did not develop immune responses to hFVIII after protein challenge with these variants or after adeno-associated virus (AAV) delivery. Following AAV delivery, hFVIII-Δ3-SP/DE resulted in expression levels that were 2- to 5-fold higher than those with hFVIII-BDD in hemophilia A mice.

CONCLUSION

The novel hFVIII-Δ3-SP/DE variant of the furin and a3 cleavage sites significantly improved secretion compared with hFVIII-BDD. This key feature of the Δ3-SP/DE variant provides a unique strategy that can be combined with other approaches to further improve factor VIII expression to achieve superior efficacy in AAV-based gene therapy for hemophilia A.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb gene therapy for patients with hemophilia B (congenital factor IX deficiency)

INTRODUCTION

Congenital hemophilia B (HB) is an X-linked bleeding disorder resulting in Factor IX (FIX) deficiency and bleeding of variable severity. There is no cure for HB. Typical management consists of prophylactic intravenous (IV) recombinant or plasma-derived FIX infusions. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb (Hemgenix, AMT-061) is an adeno-associated virus serotype 5 (AAV5) vector containing a codon-optimized Padua variant of the human F9 gene with a liver-specific promoter. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb received FDA approval on 22 November 2022 for the treatment of HB in adult patients who use FIX prophylaxis therapy, have current or historical life-threatening hemorrhage, or have experienced repeated, serious spontaneous bleeding episodes.

AREAS COVERED

This drug profile discusses the safety and efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb in patients with HB.

EXPERT OPINION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb therapy results in stable and sustained expression of near-normal to normal FIX levels in patients with HB regardless of neutralizing antibodies to AAV5 up to a titer of 678. Its use has led to significant reduction in bleeding and FIX prophylaxis. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb was well tolerated; however, 17% of patients required corticosteroid therapy for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation. Etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb therapy marks the beginning of an exciting era in HB treatment and opens questions regarding treatment longevity and long-term safety.

Etranacogene dezaparvovec for the treatment of adult patients with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec is the first gene therapy approved for treatment of adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the results of the clinical trial program of AMT-060 and etranacogene dezaparvovec, outlining the pharmacokinetic, clinical efficacy and safety data. With the entry of etranacogene dezaparvovec into the market, this review summarizes the treatment landscape in hemophilia B and discusses the current unknowns in the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Gene therapy appears to be a feasible option for adults with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B. Etranacogene dezaparvovec enables most patients to reach stable factor IX (FIX) levels after a single intravenous infusion, eliminating the need for regular prophylaxis; thus, drastically reducing treatment burden and avoiding variable bleeding risk owing to fluctuating FIX activity levels. Efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec has been demonstrated even in the presence of preexisting neutralizing antibodies (up to a titer of 1:678), with a relative low risk of transaminitis and its associated potential loss of transgene expression. However, long-term data are required to ascertain the durability of FIX levels achieved and safety. The cost-effectiveness and adoption of innovative payment models for reimbursement are key in choosing gene therapy over existing treatments.

Gene Therapy Approaches for the Treatment of Hemophilia B

In contrast to the standard enzyme-replacement therapy, administered from once per 7-14 days to 2-3 times a week in patients with severe hemophilia B, as a result of a single injection, gene therapy can restore F9 gene expression and maintain it for a prolonged time. In clinical research, the approach of delivering a functional copy of a gene using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is widely used. The scientific community is actively researching possible modifications to improve delivery efficiency and expression. In preclinical studies, the possibility of genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 technology for the treatment of hemophilia B is also being actively studied.

Proof-of-concept study for liver-directed miQURE technology in a dyslipidemic mouse model

A gene-silencing platform (miQURE) has been developed and successfully used to deliver therapeutic microRNA (miRNA) to the brain, reducing levels of neurodegenerative disease-causing proteins/RNAs via RNA interference and improving the disease phenotype in animal models. This study evaluates the use of miQURE technology to deliver therapeutic miRNA for liver-specific indications. Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) was selected as the target mRNA because it is produced in the liver and because loss-of-function ANGPTL3 mutations and/or pharmacological inhibition of ANGPTL3 protein lowers lipid levels and reduces cardiovascular risk. Overall, 14 candidate miRNA constructs were tested in vitro, the most potent of which (miAngE) was further evaluated in mice. rAAV5-miAngE led to dose-dependent (≤-77%) decreases in Angptl3 mRNA in WT mice with ≤-90% reductions in plasma ANGPTL3 protein. In dyslipidemic APOE∗3-Leiden.CETP mice, AAV5-miAngE significantly reduced cholesterol and triglyceride levels vs. vehicle and scrambled (miSCR) controls when administrated alone, with greater reductions when co-administered with lipid-lowering therapy (atorvastatin). A significant decrease in total atherosclerotic lesion area (-58% vs. miSCR) was observed in AAV5-miAngE-treated dyslipidemic mice, which corresponded with the maintenance of a non-diseased plaque phenotype and reduced lesion severity. These results support the development of this technology for liver-directed indications.

Etranacogene Dezaparvovec: First Approval

Etranacogene dezaparvovec (etranacogene dezaparvovec-drlb; Hemgenix^®) is an adeno-associated virus vector-based gene therapy being developed by uniQure and CSL Behring for the treatment of haemophilia B. In November 2022, etranacogene dezaparvovec was approved in the USA for the treatment of haemophilia B [congenital factor IX (FIX) deficiency] in adults who are currently using FIX prophylaxis therapy, have current or historical life-threatening haemorrhage or have repeated, serious spontaneous bleeding episodes. In December 2022, etranacogene dezaparvovec also received positive opinion in the EU for the treatment of haemophilia B. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of etranacogene dezaparvovec leading to this first approval.

Binding and neutralizing anti-AAV antibodies: Detection and implications for rAAV-mediated gene therapy

Assessment of anti-adeno-associated virus (AAV) antibodies in patients prior to systemic gene therapy administration is an important consideration regarding efficacy and safety of the therapy. Approximately 30%-60% of individuals have pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies. Seroprevalence is impacted by multiple factors, including geography, age, capsid serotype, and assay type. Anti-AAV antibody assays typically measure (1) transduction inhibition by detecting the neutralizing capacity of antibodies and non-antibody neutralizing factors, or (2) total anti-capsid binding antibodies, regardless of neutralizing activity. Presently, there is a paucity of head-to-head data and standardized approaches associating assay results with clinical outcomes. In addition, establishing clinically relevant screening titer cutoffs is complex. Thus, meaningful comparisons across assays are nearly impossible. Although complex, establishing screening assays in routine clinical practice to identify patients with antibody levels that may impact favorable treatment outcomes is achievable for both transduction inhibition and total antibody assays. Formal regulatory approval of such assays as companion diagnostic tests will confirm their suitability for specific recombinant AAV gene therapies. This review covers current approaches to measure anti-AAV antibodies in patient plasma or serum, their potential impact on therapeutic safety and efficacy, and investigative strategies to mitigate the effects of pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies in patients.

Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B

BACKGROUND

Moderate-to-severe hemophilia B is treated with lifelong, continuous coagulation factor IX replacement to prevent bleeding. Gene therapy for hemophilia B aims to establish sustained factor IX activity, thereby protecting against bleeding without burdensome factor IX replacement.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 3 study, after a lead-in period (≥6 months) of factor IX prophylaxis, we administered one infusion of adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) vector expressing the Padua factor IX variant (etranacogene dezaparvovec; 2×10¹³ genome copies per kilogram of body weight) to 54 men with hemophilia B (factor IX activity ≤2% of the normal value) regardless of preexisting AAV5 neutralizing antibodies. The primary end point was the annualized bleeding rate, evaluated in a noninferiority analysis comparing the rate during months 7 through 18 after etranacogene dezaparvovec treatment with the rate during the lead-in period. Noninferiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% Wald confidence interval of the annualized bleeding rate ratio that was less than the noninferiority margin of 1.8. Superiority, additional efficacy measures, and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

The annualized bleeding rate decreased from 4.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.22 to 5.45) during the lead-in period to 1.51 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.82) during months 7 through 18 after treatment, for a rate ratio of 0.36 (95% Wald CI, 0.20 to 0.64; P<0.001), demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec as compared with factor IX prophylaxis. Factor IX activity had increased from baseline by a least-squares mean of 36.2 percentage points (95% CI, 31.4 to 41.0) at 6 months and 34.3 percentage points (95% CI, 29.5 to 39.1) at 18 months after treatment, and usage of factor IX concentrate decreased by a mean of 248,825 IU per year per participant in the post-treatment period (P<0.001 for all three comparisons). Benefits and safety were observed in participants with predose AAV5 neutralizing antibody titers of less than 700. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy was superior to prophylactic factor IX with respect to the annualized bleeding rate, and it had a favorable safety profile. (Funded by uniQure and CSL Behring; HOPE-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03569891.).

Adeno-associated virus receptor complexes and implications for adeno-associated virus immune neutralization

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are among the foremost vectors for in vivo gene therapy. A number of monoclonal antibodies against several serotypes of AAV have previously been prepared. Many are neutralizing, and the predominant mechanisms have been reported as the inhibition of binding to extracellular glycan receptors or interference with some post-entry step. The identification of a protein receptor and recent structural characterization of its interactions with AAV compel reconsideration of this tenet. AAVs can be divided into two families based on which domain of the receptor is strongly bound. Neighboring domains, unseen in the high-resolution electron microscopy structures have now been located by electron tomography, pointing away from the virus. The epitopes of neutralizing antibodies, previously characterized, are now compared to the distinct protein receptor footprints of the two families of AAV. Comparative structural analysis suggests that antibody interference with protein receptor binding might be the more prevalent mechanism than interference with glycan attachment. Limited competitive binding assays give some support to the hypothesis that inhibition of binding to the protein receptor has been an overlooked mechanism of neutralization. More extensive testing is warranted.

Comprehensive analysis and prediction of long-term durability of factor IX activity following etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy in the treatment of hemophilia B

OBJECTIVE

Congenital hemophilia B is a rare bleeding disorder caused by defects in the gene encoding factor IX (FIX) leading to coagulation deficiency. Recurrent bleeds may cause chronic pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. Phase 2 b and 3 single-arm, open-label, single-dose trials assessing etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for hemophilia B have demonstrated sustained FIX activity levels over observed periods, but long-term durability of the treatment effect has not been established. Using statistical modeling, we estimate long-term durability of FIX activity levels after receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec.

METHODS

Participants from Phase 2 b (N = 3; NCT03489291) and 3 studies (N = 52; NCT03569891) were included. Two participants who did not respond to treatment were excluded. FIX activity was assessed by one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time assay. FIX activity levels at Month 6 post-treatment were considered baseline. Bayesian and Frequentist linear mixed models predicted FIX activity levels up to 25.5 years at an individual and population level with pre-treatment adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) neutralizing antibody (NAb) status as primary covariate.

RESULTS

Bayesian and Frequentist linear mixed models predicted no more than 6/55 (10.91%) observed participants would have FIX activity levels <2% up to 25.5 years post-infusion. Bayesian model-based predictions of future participants suggest >80% would be free from prophylactic FIX replacement products 25.5 years post-infusion. Both models predicted FIX activity levels were not significantly influenced by pre-treatment AAV5 NAb status.

CONCLUSIONS

People with hemophilia B receiving etranacogene dezaparvovec would likely achieve durable FIX activity levels and remain free of prophylactic FIX replacement products for up to 25.5 years following single administration. The long-term factor IX durability predictions are based on statistical methods and results in vivo may differ.

Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy for Hemophilia

In vivo gene therapy is rapidly emerging as a new therapeutic paradigm for monogenic disorders. For almost three decades, hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB) have served as model disorders for the development of gene therapy. This effort is soon to bear fruit with completed pivotal adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector gene addition trials reporting encouraging results and regulatory approval widely anticipated in the near future for the current generation of HA and HB AAV vectors. Here we review the clinical development of AAV gene therapy for HA and HB and examine outstanding questions that have recently emerged from AAV clinical trials for hemophilia and other monogenic disorders.

Gene therapy for liver diseases - progress and challenges

Gene therapy is poised to revolutionize modern medicine, with seemingly unlimited potential for treating and curing genetic disorders. For otherwise incurable indications, including most inherited metabolic liver disorders, gene therapy provides a realistic therapeutic option. In this Review, we discuss gene supplementation and gene editing involving the use of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors for the treatment of inherited liver diseases, including updates on several ongoing clinical trials that are producing promising results. Clinical testing has been essential in highlighting many key translational challenges associated with this transformative therapy. In particular, the interaction of a patient's immune system with the vector raises issues of safety and the duration of treatment efficacy. Furthermore, several serious adverse events after the administration of high doses of rAAVs suggest greater involvement of innate immune responses and pre-existing hepatic conditions than initially anticipated. Finally, permanent modification of the host genome associated with rAAV genome integration and gene editing raises concerns about the risk of oncogenicity that require careful evaluation. We summarize the main progress, challenges and pathways forward for gene therapy for liver diseases.

Association of factor expression levels with annual bleeding rate in people with haemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Gene therapy clinical trials measure steady-state clotting factor expression levels (FELs) to evaluate the modulation of the bleeding phenotype, aiming to offer consistent protection against breakthrough bleeding events. The link between FELs and bleeding risk in people with haemophilia B (PwHB) is not well understood.

AIM

We evaluated the association between FEL and ABR in PwHB.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study extended the CHESS burden of illness studies in Europe and the United States. Recruitment of additional adult males with haemophilia B supplemented the existing CHESS sample size of PwHB and FELs. PwHB receiving prophylaxis were excluded, as fluctuating FELs may have confounded the analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were reported descriptively. Any recorded baseline FEL was reported by the haemophilia-treating physicians according to the medical records. Generalised linear models with log link explored the association between changes in FEL and ABR.

RESULTS

The study included 407 PwHB and no inhibitors receiving on-demand treatment. Mean age was 36.7 years; 56% from the EU, 44% from the United States. Mean baseline FEL was 9.95 IU/dl (SD, 10.47); mean ABR was 2.4 bleeds/year (SD, 2.64). After adjusting for covariates, the model showed that for every 1% increase in FEL the average ABR decreased by .08 (p < .001). Predicted number of bleeding events according to FEL showed a significant non-linear relationship between FEL and ABR (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This analysis showed a significant relationship between FEL and ABR, where increases in FEL were associated with decreases in ABR among men with HB in Europe and the US.

Gene Therapy for Hemophilia-Opportunities and Risks

BACKGROUND

AAV (adeno-associated virus)-based gene therapy is a new treatment for hemophilia and has recently received approval for the treatment of severe hemophilia A. It does not suffer from the limitations of the current standard treatment (regular prophylactic intravenous injections of the missing clotting factor; subcutaneous injection of a bispecific antibody in hemophilia A) and can, it is hoped, raise the concentration of the missing clotting factor over the long term. AAV-based gene therapy can only be performed once, however, because of the generation of antibodies to AAV.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search in the MEDLINE/PubMed database employing the relevant key words, supplemented by expert opinions and the recommendations of the relevant medical societies.

RESULTS

Data from non-randomized phase 1 to phase 3 trials reveal an adequate expression of factors VIII and IX in patients with mostly severe hemophilia A or B. Even though they were no longer receiving prophylactic treatment, most patients experienced a considerable reduction, by 53% to 96%, in the number of bleedings compared to previous therapy. Persistently elevated factor levels have been described for up to six years in hemophilia A and up to eight years in hemophilia B. The most common side effect of gene therapy is an inflammatory response with elevated alanine aminotransferase levels (17% to 89%, depending on the study), which may be associated with a reduced clotting factor level and requires treatment with transient immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

Gene therapy for hemophilia holds out the prospect of freedom from hemorrhage without the need for regular treatment with drugs. The various steps that need to be carried out in gene therapy should be coordinated in a graded and partly overlapping integrated care model (a so-called hub-and-spoke model). Electronic platforms should be used for data acquisition and transmission.

Gene therapy for hemophilia

The cloning of the factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) genes in the 1980s has led to a succession of clinical advances starting with the advent of molecular diagnostic for hemophilia, followed by the development of recombinant clotting factor replacement therapy. Now gene therapy beckons on the back of decades of research that has brought us to the final stages of the approval of 2 products in Europe and United States, thus heralding a new era in the treatment of the hemophilias. Valoctocogene roxaparvovec, the first gene therapy for treatment of hemophilia A, has been granted conditional marketing authorization in Europe. Another approach (etranacogene dezaparvovec, AMT-061) for hemophilia B is also under review by regulators. There are several other gene therapy approaches in earlier stages of development. These approaches entail a one-off infusion of a genetically modified adeno-associated virus (AAV) engineered to deliver either the FVIII or FIX gene to the liver, leading to the continuous endogenous synthesis and secretion of the missing coagulation factor into the circulation by the hepatocytes, thus preventing or reducing bleeding episodes. Ongoing observations show sustained clinical benefit of gene therapy for >5 years following a single administration of an AAV vector without long-lasting or late toxicities. An asymptomatic, self-limiting, immune-mediated rise in alanine aminotransferase is commonly observed within the first 12 months after gene transfer that has the potential to eliminate the transduced hepatocytes in the absence of treatment with immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids. The current state of this exciting and rapidly evolving field, as well as the challenges that need to be overcome for the widespread adaptation of this new treatment paradigm, is the subject of this review.

Long-term prophylaxis: what are our options and how to define success?

Currently, we are at an enviable place in hemophilia treatment. Although full prophylaxis with standard half-life recombinant or plasma-derived factor concentrates has been definitively shown to be inadequate for full protection against bleeding and arthropathy, a number of novel therapies with improved hemostatic enhancement are clinically available or in promising clinical trials. In order to compare outcomes among a number of very efficacious therapies, it is necessary to have sensitive tools employed in long-term follow-up for several years for participants with no or minimal joint disease. The tool kit must be comprehensive, with outcomes of bleeding, factor level restoration or hemostatic capacity, joint structure, joint function, pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. This article reviews the history of prophylaxis, the promise of emerging therapies, and the sensitive tools used to assess long-term efficacy for joint structure and function.

IL-15 blockade and rapamycin rescue multifactorial loss of factor VIII from AAV-transduced hepatocytes in hemophilia A mice

Hepatic adeno-associated viral (AAV) gene transfer has the potential to cure the X-linked bleeding disorder hemophilia A. However, declining therapeutic coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) expression has plagued clinical trials. To assess the mechanistic underpinnings of this loss of FVIII expression, we developed a hemophilia A mouse model that shares key features observed in clinical trials. Following liver-directed AAV8 gene transfer in the presence of rapamycin, initial FVIII protein expression declines over time in the absence of antibody formation. Surprisingly, loss of FVIII protein production occurs despite persistence of transgene and mRNA, suggesting a translational shutdown rather than a loss of transduced hepatocytes. Some of the animals develop ER stress, which may be linked to hepatic inflammatory cytokine expression. FVIII protein expression is preserved by interleukin-15/interleukin-15 receptor blockade, which suppresses CD8+ T and natural killer cell responses. Interestingly, mice with initial FVIII levels >100% of normal had diminishing expression while still under immune suppression. Taken together, our findings of interanimal variability of the response, and the ability of the immune system to shut down transgene expression without utilizing cytolytic or antibody-mediated mechanisms, illustrate the challenges associated with FVIII gene transfer. Our protocols based upon cytokine blockade should help to maintain efficient FVIII expression.

Gene Therapy and Hemophilia: Where Do We Go from Here?

Gene therapy for hemophilia using adeno-associated virus (AAV) derived vectors can reduce or eliminate patients' disease-related complications and improve their quality of life. Broad implementation globally will lead to societal gains and foster health equity. Several vector products each for factor IX (FIX) or factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency are in advanced clinical development. Safety data are reassuring. Efficacy data for up to 8 and 5 years, respectively, vary considerably among vector types and among individuals, but indicate significant reduction in bleeds and factor use. Products will soon be approved for marketing. This review highlights the relevant considerations for implementation of hemophilia gene therapy, specifically across a broad range of socioeconomic backgrounds globally, based on recent publications and our own experience. We address the current efficacy and safety data and relevant aspects of vector immunology. We then discuss pertinent implementation steps including pre-implementation and readiness assessments, considerations on cost, cost-effectiveness and payment models, approaches to education and informed consent, and the operational needs as well as the need for monitoring of health outcomes and implementation outcomes. To prevent a lag or complete lack of establishing access to this life-changing therapy option for all patients with hemophilia worldwide, adaptable pathways supported by collaborative and international efforts of all stakeholders are needed.

Gene therapy in haemophilia: literature review and regional perspectives for Turkey

Haemophilia is an X-linked lifelong congenital bleeding disorder that is caused by insufficient levels of factor VIII (FVIII; haemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; haemophilia B) and characterized by spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding episodes. The cornerstone of the treatment, factor replacement, constitutes several difficulties, including frequent injections due to the short half-life of recombinant factors, intravenous administration and the risk of inhibitor development. While extended half-life factors and subcutaneous novel molecules enhanced the quality of life, initial successes with gene therapy offer a significant hope for cure. Although adeno-associated viral (AAV)-based gene therapy is one of the most emerging approaches for treatment of haemophilia, there are still challenges in vector immunogenicity, potency and efficacy, genotoxicity and persistence. As the approval for the first gene therapy product is coming closer, eligibility criteria for patient selection, multidisciplinary approach for optimal delivery and follow-up and development of new pricing policies and reimbursement models should be concerned. Therefore, this review addresses the unmet needs of current haemophilia treatment and explains the rationale and principles of gene therapy. Limitations and challenges are discussed from a global and national perspective and recommendations are provided to adopt the gene therapies faster and more sufficient for the haemophilia patients in developing countries like Turkey.

Phase 1-2 Trial of AAVS3 Gene Therapy in Patients with Hemophilia B

BACKGROUND

FLT180a (verbrinacogene setparvovec) is a liver-directed adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy that uses a synthetic capsid and a gain-of-function protein to normalize factor IX levels in patients with hemophilia B.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, phase 1-2 trial, we assessed the safety and efficacy of varying doses of FLT180a in patients with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (factor IX level, ≤2% of normal value). All the patients received glucocorticoids with or without tacrolimus for immunosuppression to decrease the risk of vector-related immune responses. After 26 weeks, patients were enrolled in a long-term follow-up study. The primary end points were safety and efficacy, as assessed by factor IX levels at week 26.

RESULTS

Ten patients received one of four FLT180a doses of vector genomes (vg) per kilogram of body weight: 3.84×10¹¹ vg, 6.40×10¹¹ vg, 8.32×10¹¹ vg, or 1.28×10¹² vg. After receiving the infusion, all the patients had dose-dependent increases in factor IX levels. At a median follow-up of 27.2 months (range, 19.1 to 42.4), sustained factor IX activity was observed in all the patients except one, who resumed factor IX prophylaxis. As of the data-cutoff date (September 20, 2021), five patients had normal factor IX levels (range, 51 to 78%), three patients had levels from 23 to 43%, and one had a level of 260%. Of the reported adverse events, approximately 10% were related to FLT180a and 24% to immunosuppression. Increases in liver aminotransferase levels were the most common FLT180a-related adverse events. Late increases in aminotransferase levels occurred in patients who had received prolonged tacrolimus beyond the glucocorticoid taper. A serious adverse event of arteriovenous fistula thrombosis occurred in the patient with high factor IX levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained factor IX levels in the normal range were observed with low doses of FLT180a but necessitated immunosuppression with glucocorticoids with or without tacrolimus. (Funded by Freeline Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03369444 and NCT03641703; EudraCT numbers, 2017-000852-24 and 2017-005080-40.).

Differences in wild-type- and R338L-tenase complex formation are at the root of R338L-factor IX assay discrepancies

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy has the potential to functionally cure hemophilia B by restoring factor (F)IX concentrations into the normal range. Next-generation AAV therapies express a naturally occurring gain-of-function FIX variant, FIX-Padua (R338L-FIX), that increases FIX activity (FIX:C) by approximately eightfold compared with wild-type FIX (FIX-WT). Previous studies have shown that R338L-FIX activity varies dramatically across different clinical FIX:C assays, which complicates the monitoring and management of patients. To better understand mechanisms that contribute to R338L-FIX assay discrepancies, we characterized the performance of R338L-FIX in 13 1-stage clotting assays (OSAs) and 2 chromogenic substrate assays (CSAs) in a global field study. This study produced the largest R338L-FIX assay dataset to date and confirmed that clinical FIX:C assay results vary over threefold. Both phospholipid and activating reagents play a role in OSA discrepancies. CSA generated the most divergent FIX:C results. Manipulation of FIX:C CSA kits demonstrated that specific activity gains for R338L-FIX were most profound at lower FIX:C concentrations and that these effects were enhanced during the early phases of FXa generation. Supplementing FX into CSA had the effect of dampening FIX-WT activity relative to R338L-FIX activity, suggesting that FX impairs WT tenase formation to a greater extent than R338L-FIX tenase. Our data describe the scale of R338L-FIX assay discrepancies and provide insights into the causative mechanisms that will help establish best practices for the measurement of R338L-FIX activity in patients after gene therapy.

Challenges and opportunities when transitioning from in vivo gene replacement to in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 therapies - a spotlight on hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Currently, a few in vivo gene replacement therapies are commercially available, with many in clinical development for the treatment of some inherited monogenic diseases. These disorders arise from mutations in genes encoding essential proteins with a well understood biological function. Wide adoption of gene replacement therapies requires solid safety and efficacy profiles with demonstrable long-term durability and cost-benefit advantages vs standard therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review outlines the challenges and opportunities in treating hemophilia, including the progression from in vivo gene therapies toward in vivo gene editing, focusing on pre-clinical and emerging clinical data for gene editing and addressing the need for sustained and durable gene expression during hepatocyte proliferation when the liver is unable to maintain steady gene expression and protein production.

EXPERT OPINION

In vivo gene editing in liver tissues may be able to rescue patients younger than 18 years who are not eligible for gene replacement therapies, with hemophilia as a prime example.

Gene therapy - are we ready now?

Introduction

Haemophilia therapy has evolved from rudimentary transfusion‐based approaches to an unprecedented level of innovation with glimmers of functional cure brought by gene therapy. After decades of misfires, gene therapy has normalized factor (F)VIII and factor (F)IX levels in some individuals in the long term. Several clinical programmes testing adeno‐associated viral (AAV) vector gene therapy are approaching completion with imminent regulatory approvals.

Discussion

Phase 3 studies along with multiyear follow‐up in earlier phase investigations raised questions about efficacy as well as short‐ and long‐term safety, prompting a reappraisal of AAV vector gene therapy. Liver toxicities, albeit mostly low‐grade, occur in the first year in at least some individuals in all haemophilia A and B trials and are poorly understood. Extreme variability and unpredictability of outcome, as well as a slow decline in factor expression (seemingly unique to FVIII gene therapy), are vexing because immune responses to AAV vectors preclude repeat dosing, which could increase suboptimal or restore declining expression, while overexpression may result in phenotoxicity. The long‐term safety will need lifelong monitoring because AAV vectors, contrary to conventional wisdom, integrate into chromosomes at the rate that calls for vigilance.

Conclusions

AAV transduction and transgene expression engage the host immune system, cellular DNA processing, transcription and translation machineries in ways that have been only cursorily studied in the clinic. Delineating those mechanisms will be key to finding mitigants and solutions to the remaining problems, and including individuals who cannot avail of gene therapy at this time.