A novel flow cytometry procoagulant assay for diagnosis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia

Complex Pattern of Platelet Activation/Reactivity After SARS-CoV-2 Infection

COVID-19 and post-COVID (long COVID) are associated with thromboembolic complications; however, it is still not clear whether platelets play a leading role in this phenomenon. The platelet hyperreactivity could result from the direct interaction between platelets and viral elements or the response to inflammatory and prothrombotic factors released from blood and vessel cells following infection. The existing literature does not provide clear-cut answers, as the results determining platelet status vary according to methodology. Elevated levels of soluble markers of platelet activation (P selectin, PF4), increased platelet aggregates, and platelet-derived microparticles suggest the activation of platelets circulating in the bloodstream of COVID-19 patients. Similarly, platelets isolated from COVID-19 patients demonstrate increased reactivity in response to collagen, thrombin, and ADP. By contrast, an analysis of whole blood from COVID-19 patients indicates the reduced activation of the fibrinogen receptor. Similarly, some in vitro studies report potential targets for SARS-CoV-2 in platelets, whereas others do not indicate any direct effect of the virus on platelets. The aim of this work is to review and evaluate the reliability of the methodology for testing platelet function after contact with SARS-CoV-2. Despite the diversity of methods yielding varying results and the influence of plasma components or blood cells, it can be concluded that platelets play an important role in the development of thrombotic complications after exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

2023 ISTH update of the 2022 ISTH guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19

Based on emerging evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic, the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidelines for antithrombotic treatment in COVID-19 were published in 2022. Since then, at least 16 new randomized controlled trials have contributed additional evidence, which necessitated a modification of most of the previous recommendations. We used again the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association methodology for assessment of level of evidence (LOE) and class of recommendation (COR). Five recommendations had the LOE upgraded to A and 2 new recommendations on antithrombotic treatment for patients with COVID-19 were added. Furthermore, a section was added to answer questions about COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), for which studies have provided some evidence. We only included recommendations with LOE A or B. Panelists agreed on 19 recommendations, 4 for nonhospitalized, 5 for noncritically ill hospitalized, 3 for critically ill hospitalized, and 2 for postdischarge patients, as well as 5 for vaccination and VITT. A strong recommendation (COR 1) was given for (a) use of prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin in noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, (b) for select patients in this group, use of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin/unfractionated heparin in preference to prophylactic dose, and (c) for use of antiplatelet factor 4 enzyme immunoassays for diagnosing VITT. A strong recommendation was given against (COR 3) the addition of an antiplatelet agent in hospitalized, noncritically ill patients. These international guidelines provide recommendations for countries with diverse healthcare resources and COVID-19 vaccine availability.

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT): Brighton Collaboration case definitions and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data

This is a revision of the online November 2021 Brighton thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) case definition and a new Brighton Collaboration case definition for vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). These case definitions are intended for use in clinical trials and post-licensure pharmacovigilance activities to facilitate safety data comparability across multiple settings. They are not intended to guide clinical management. The case definitions were developed by a group of subject matter and Brighton Collaboration process experts as part of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)-funded Safety Platform for Evaluation of vACcines (SPEAC). The case definitions, each with defined levels of diagnostic certainty, are based on relevant published evidence and expert consensus and are accompanied by specific guidelines for TTS and VITT data collection and analysis. The document underwent peer review by a reference group of vaccine safety stakeholders and haematology experts to ensure case definition useability, applicability and scientific integrity.

Plasma from patients with vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia displays increased fibrinolytic potential and enhances tissue-type plasminogen activator but not urokinase-mediated plasminogen activation

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare complication of adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccines. VITT is associated with markedly raised levels of D-dimer; yet, how VITT modulates the fibrinolytic system is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare changes in fibrinolytic activity in plasma from patients with VITT, patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) after vaccination but without VITT (VTE-no VITT), and healthy vaccinated controls.

METHODS

Plasma levels of plasmin-antiplasmin (PAP) complexes, plasminogen, and alpha-2-antiplasmin (α2AP) from 10 patients with VITT, 10 patients with VTE-no VITT, and 14 healthy vaccinated controls were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and/or Western blotting. Fibrinolytic capacity was evaluated by quantitating PAP levels at baseline and after ex vivo plasma stimulation with 50-nM tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) or urokinase for 5 minutes.

RESULTS

Baseline PAP complex levels in control and VTE-no VITT individuals were similar but were ∼7-fold higher in plasma from patients with VITT (P < .0001). VITT samples also revealed consumption of α2AP and fibrinogenolysis consistent with a hyperfibrinolytic state. Of interest, VITT plasma produced significantly higher PAP levels after ex vivo treatment with tPA, but not urokinase, compared to the other groups, indicative of increased fibrinolytic potential. This was not due to D-dimer as addition of D-dimer to VTE-no VITT plasma failed to potentiate tPA-induced PAP levels.

CONCLUSION

A marked hyperfibrinolytic state occurs in patients with VITT, evidenced by marked elevations in PAP, α2AP consumption, and fibrinogenolysis. An unidentified plasma cofactor that selectively potentiates tPA-mediated plasminogen activation also appears to exist in the plasma of patients with VITT.

Heparin-activated procoagulant platelet assay: a flow cytometry-based functional test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Functional platelet activation assays are required for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Due to their sophisticated methodology, they are only available in reference centers.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the flow cytometry-based heparin-activated procoagulant platelet (HAPP) assay in the laboratory diagnosis of HIT.

METHODS

Procoagulant platelets (PCP), defined by the expression of phosphatidylserine and CD62-P, were evaluated by flow cytometry in platelet-rich plasma from healthy donors after incubation with patient sera in the absence and presence of heparin. A sample was considered positive in HAPP assay, if the following 3 criteria were met: 1) the percentage of PCPs was ≥10.3% after incubation with 0.2 IU/mL heparin, 2) the fold increase in presence of 0.2 IU/mL heparin compared with buffer was ≥1.5, and 3) 100 IU/mL of heparin resulted in ≥50% inhibition of PCP. HAPP assay was validated in a prospective cohort (n = 202) of consecutive specimens submitted to our laboratory for serologic diagnosis of HIT. Heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) assay was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

HIT-positive sera induced PCPs in the presence of 0.2 IU/mL heparin, which was inhibited with 100 IU/mL of heparin. In the prospective validation cohort, there were 15 HIPA+ and 187 HIPA- sera. HAPP was positive in 20 samples in this cohort. Using optimized cut-offs, HAPP assay had a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 96.8%.

CONCLUSION

HAPP assay is promising as a simple and reliable functional assay for HIT; however, further studies are needed to confirm our results in larger cohorts.

In vitro characterization of rare anti-αIIbβ3 isoantibodies produced by patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia that severely block fibrinogen binding and generate procoagulant platelets via complement activation

Background

Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by inherited defects of the platelet αIIbβ3 integrin. Platelet transfusions can be followed by an immune response that can block integrin function by interfering with fibrinogen binding.

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of such isoantibodies and better characterize their pathogenic properties.

Methods

Twelve patients with GT were evaluated for anti-αIIbβ3 isoantibodies. Sera from patients with GT with or without anti-αIIbβ3 isoantibodies were then used to study their in vitro effect on platelets from healthy donors. We used several approaches (IgG purification, immunofluorescence staining, and inhibition of signaling pathways) to characterize the pathogenic properties of the anti-αIIbβ3 isoantibodies.

Results

Only 2 samples were able to severely block integrin function. We observed that these 2 sera caused a reduction in platelet size similar to that observed when platelets become procoagulant. Mixing healthy donor platelets with patients' sera or purified IgGs led to microvesiculation, phosphatidylserine exposure, and induction of calcium influx. This was associated with an increase in procoagulant platelets. Pore formation and calcium entry were associated with complement activation, leading to the constitution of a membrane attack complex (MAC) with enhanced complement protein C5b-9 formation. This process was inhibited by the complement 5 inhibitor eculizumab and reduced by polyvalent human immunoglobulins.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that complement activation induced by rare blocking anti-αIIbβ3 isoantibodies may lead to the formation of a MAC with subsequent pore formation, resulting in calcium influx and procoagulant platelet phenotype.

The clinicopathological features of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome following ChAdOx1-S (AZD1222) vaccination and case outcomes in Australia: a population-based study

Background

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) associated with viral vector COVID-19 vaccines, including ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca AZD1222) vaccine, can result in significant morbidity and mortality. We report the clinicopathological features of TTS following ChAdOx1-S vaccination and summarise the case outcomes in Australia.

Methods

In this cohort study, patients diagnosed with TTS in Australia between 23 March and 31 December 2021 were identified according to predefined criteria. Cases were included if they met the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) probable and confirmed case definitions and were reclassified using Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition for analysis. Data were collected on patient baseline characteristics, clinicopathological features, risk factors, treatment and outcomes.

Findings

A total of 170 TTS cases were identified, with most occurring after the first dose (87%) of ChAdOx1-S. The median time to symptom onset after vaccination and symptom onset to admission was 11 and 2 days respectively. The median age of cases was 66 years (interquartile range 55-74). All except two patients received therapeutic anticoagulation and 66% received intravenous immunoglobulin. Overall, 85.3% of cases were discharged home after a median hospitalisation of 6 days, 9.4% required ongoing rehabilitation and 5.3% died. Eight deaths were related to TTS, with another dying from an unrelated condition while receiving treatment for TTS. Deaths occurred more commonly in those classified as Tier 1 according to the CDC definition and were associated with more severe thrombocytopenia and disease-related haemorrhage.

Interpretation

TTS, while rare, can be severe and have catastrophic outcomes in some individuals. In Australia, the mortality rate was low compared to that reported in other high-income countries. Almost all received therapeutic anticoagulation with no bleeding complications and were successfully discharged. This emphasises the importance of community education and an established pathway for early recognition, diagnosis and treatment of TTS.

Funding

Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. H.A Tran, N. Wood, J. Buttery, N.W. Crawford, S.D. Chunilal, V.M. Chen are supported by Medical Research Future Funds (MRFF) grant ID 2015305.

Laboratory Testing for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Antibodies: A Narrative Review

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) are highly prothrombotic (thrombosis frequency ≥50%). Both are caused by platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies, forming PF4/IgG-containing immune complexes that engage platelet FcγIIa receptors, producing strong platelet activation. In HIT, heparin crosslinks several PF4 molecules, whereas in VITT, anti-PF4 antibodies alone crosslink PF4. Sufficient levels of circulating anti-PF4 antibodies are needed to create the pathogenic immune complexes on platelet surfaces; this explains why certain serum (plasma)-based assays are highly sensitive for detecting HIT/VITT antibodies. Accordingly, HIT and VITT are "clinical-pathological" disorders, that is, positive testing for such antibodies-together with a compatible clinical picture-is integral for diagnosis. Heparin (low concentrations) enhances HIT antibody-induced platelet activation, but platelet activation by VITT sera is usually inhibited by heparin. For both HIT and VITT, high sensitivity (>99% and >95%, respectively) characterizes PF4-dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and PF4-enhanced platelet activation assays; in contrast, certain rapid immunoassays have high sensitivity for HIT (>90-97%) but poor sensitivity (<25%) for VITT. HIT and VITT antibodies are directed at distinct sites on PF4: solid-phase EIAs and platelet activation assays are indifferent to these distinct antigen targets, but rapid immunoassays are not. We discuss a conceptual model where PF4 is viewed as a "globe," with the heparin-binding site the "equator"; in this model, HIT antibodies are primarily directed at antigen site(s) at the north and south "poles" of PF4 (formed when PF4 binds to heparin), whereas VITT antibodies recognize sites on the equator.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia post dose 2 ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination: Less severe but remains a problem

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but established complication of 1st dose ChAdOx1 nCoV19 vaccination (AZD1222), however this complication after dose 2 remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinicopathological features of confirmed cases of VITT post dose 2 AZD1222 vaccination in Australia, and to compare this cohort to confirmed cases of VITT post 1st dose.

METHODS

Sequential cases of clinically suspected VITT (thrombocytopenia, D-Dimer > 5x upper limit normal and thrombosis) within 4-42 days of dose 2 AZD1222 referred to Australia's centralised testing centre underwent platelet activation confirmatory testing in keeping with the national diagnostic algorithm. Final classification was assigned after adjudication by an expert advisory committee. Descriptive statistics were performed on this cohort and comparative analyses carried out on confirmed cases of VITT after 1st and 2nd dose AZD1222.

RESULTS

Of 62 patients referred, 15 demonstrated presence of antibody mediated platelet activation consistent with VITT after dose 2 AZD1222. Four were immunoassay positive. Median time to presentation was 13 days (range 1-53) platelet count 116x10^9/L (range 63-139) and D-dimer elevation 14.5xULN (IQR 11, 26). Two fatalities occurred. In each, the dosing interval was less than 30 days. In comparison to 1st dose, dose 2 cases were more likely to be male (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3-15.8, p = 0.03), present with higher platelet counts (p = 0.05), lower D-Dimer (p = 01) and less likely to have unusual site thromboses (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.28, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

VITT is a complication of dose 2 AZD1222 vaccination. Whilst clinicopathological features are less severe, fatalities occurred in patients with concomitant factors.

Platelet-activating functional assay resolution in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: differential alignment to PF4 ELISA platforms

Background

Anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) appear to be transient, with discrepant persistence depending on the platform used for detection.

Objectives

We aimed to report a longitudinal study of antibody persistence using 2 ELISA platforms and 2 platelet-activating functional assays in a clinical cohort of patients with VITT referred for follow-up testing.

Methods

In total, 32 Australian patients with VITT or pre-VITT, confirmed by expert adjudication, with samples referred for clinical follow-up were included. Clinical follow-up assays, including Stago and Hyphen ELISAs, procoagulant platelet flow cytometry, and modified PF4-serotonin-release assay, were performed according to the pattern of reactivity for that patient at diagnosis.

Results

The median follow-up was 24 weeks after diagnosis. A general decline in anti-PF4 antibody levels and platelet-activating capacity over time was observed with a more rapid median time to resolution of 16 weeks by functional assay vs 24 weeks by Stago ELISA. Decline in platelet-activating antibody levels detected by functional assays mirrored Stago ELISA titer but not Hyphen. However, 87% of patients received a documented second vaccination and 74% received an mRNA booster with no reported adverse events.

Conclusion

Anti-PF4 antibodies persist longer than functional platelet-activating antibodies in VITT but do not warrant avoidance of subsequent vaccinations. Persistence detection is assay-dependent. Stago ELISA may be a surrogate where functional assays are unavailable for follow-up testing of confirmed patients with VITT.

Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) are rare, iatrogenic immune-mediated conditions with high rates of thrombosis-related morbidity and mortality. HIT is a long-recognized reaction to the administration of the common parenterally administered anticoagulant heparin (or its derivatives), while VITT is a new, distinct syndrome occurring in response to adenovirus-based vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 and potentially other types of vaccines. A feature of both HIT and VITT is paradoxical thrombosis despite a characteristic low platelet count, mediated by the presence of platelet-activating antibodies to platelet factor 4. Several additional factors have also been suggested to contribute to clot formation in HIT and/or VITT, including monocytes, tissue factor, microparticles, endothelium, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, complement, procoagulant platelets, and vaccine components. In this review, we discuss the literature to date regarding mechanisms contributing to thrombosis in both HIT and VITT and explore the pathophysiological similarities and differences between the two conditions.

Heparin-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (HITT) and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT): Similar but Different

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) represents an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against heparin in complex with platelet factor 4 (PF4) after heparin administration. These antibodies can be detected by a variety of immunological assays, including ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and by chemiluminescence on the AcuStar instrument. However, pathological HIT antibodies are those that activate platelets in a platelet activation assay and cause thrombosis in vivo. We would tend to call this condition heparin-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (HITT), although some workers instead use the truncated abbreviation HIT. Vaccine-induced (immune) thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) instead reflects an autoimmune process whereby antibodies are formed against PF4 after administration of a vaccine, most notably adenovirus-based vaccines directed against COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Although both VITT and HITT reflect similar pathological processes, they have different origins and are detected in different ways. Most notable is that anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT can only be detected immunologically by ELISA assays, tending to be negative in rapid assays such as that using the AcuStar. Moreover, functional platelet activation assays otherwise used for HITT may need to be modified to detect platelet activation in VITT.

Whole Blood Procoagulant Platelet Flow Cytometry Protocol for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) Testing

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well-characterized, iatrogenic complication of heparin anticoagulation with significant morbidity. In contrast, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a recently recognized severe prothrombotic complication of adenoviral vaccines, including the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen, Johnson & Johnson) vaccines against COVID-19. The diagnosis of HIT and VITT involve laboratory testing for antiplatelet antibodies by immunoassays followed by confirmation by functional assays to detect platelet-activating antibodies. Functional assays are critical to detect pathological antibodies due to the varying sensitivity and specificity of immunoassays. This chapter presents a protocol for a novel whole blood flow cytometry-based assay to detect procoagulant platelets in healthy donor blood in response to plasma from patients suspected of HIT or VITT. A method to identify suitable healthy donors for HIT and VITT testing is also described.

Assessment of immunological anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies for vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) in a large Australian cohort: A multicenter study comprising 1284 patients

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare complication of adenovirus-based vaccines aimed to prevent and minimize COVID-19 and related pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVES

To describe patterns of testing for anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies using various ELISA assays in a large Australian cohort and comparative functional platelet activation assays in a subset.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Asserachrom HPIA IgG ELISA was performed in 1284 patients over a period of 12 months, supplemented in select cohorts by comparative ELISA using three other methods (n = 78-179), three different functional assays (flow cytometry, serotonin release assay, and/or Multiplate; n = 476), and rapid immunological chemiluminescence anti-PF4 assay (n = 460), in a multicenter study.

RESULTS

For first episode presentations, 190/1284 (14.8%) ELISA tests were positive. Conversely, most (445/460; 96.7%) chemiluminescence anti-PF4 test results were negative. All functional assays showed associations of higher median ELISA optical density with functional positivity and with high rates of ELISA positivity (64.0% to 85.2%). Data also identified functional positivity in 14.8%-36.0% of ELISA negative samples, suggesting false negative VITT by HPIA IgG ELISA in upward of one third of assessable cases.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest multicenter evaluation of anti-PF4 testing for investigation of VITT. Discrepancies in test results (ELISA vs. ELISA or ELISA vs. functional assay) in some patients highlighted limitations in relying on single methods (ELISA and functional) for PF4 antibody detection in VITT, and also highlights the variability in phenotypic test presentation and pathomechanism of VITT.

Autoimmune Diseases Affecting Hemostasis: A Narrative Review

Hemostasis reflects a homeostatic mechanism that aims to balance out pro-coagulant and anti-coagulant forces to maintain blood flow within the circulation. Simplistically, a relative excess of procoagulant forces can lead to thrombosis, and a relative excess of anticoagulant forces can lead to bleeding. There are a wide variety of congenital disorders associated with bleeding or thrombosis. In addition, there exist a vast array of autoimmune diseases that can also lead to either bleeding or thrombosis. For example, autoantibodies generated against clotting factors can lead to bleeding, of which acquired hemophilia A is the most common. As another example, autoimmune-mediated antibodies against phospholipids can generate a prothrombotic milieu in a condition known as antiphospholipid (antibody) syndrome (APS). Moreover, there exist various autoimmunity promoting environments that can lead to a variety of antibodies that affect hemostasis. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents perhaps the contemporary example of such a state, with potential development of a kaleidoscope of such antibodies that primarily drive thrombosis, but may also lead to bleeding on rarer occasions. We provide here a narrative review to discuss the interaction between various autoimmune diseases and hemostasis.

Procoagulant platelets: novel players in thromboinflammation

Platelets play a key role in maintaining hemostasis. However, dysregulated platelet activation can lead to pathological thrombosis or bleeding. Once a platelet gets activated, it will either become an aggregatory platelet or eventually a procoagulant platelet with both types playing distinct roles in thrombosis and hemostasis. Although aggregatory platelets have been extensively studied, procoagulant platelets have only recently come into the spotlight. Procoagulant platelets are a subpopulation of highly activated platelets that express phosphatidylserine and P-selectin on their surface, allowing for coagulation factors to bind and thrombin to be generated. In recent years, novel roles for procoagulant platelets have been identified and they have increasingly been implicated in thromboinflammatory diseases. Here, we provide an up-to-date review on the mechanisms resulting in the formation of procoagulant platelets and how they contribute to hemostasis, thrombosis, and thromboinflammation.