1
|
Klitgaard A, Ibsen R, Lykkegaard J, Hilberg O, Løkke A. Inhaled corticosteroid treatment and pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - nationwide development from 1998 to 2018. Eur Clin Respir J 2024; 11:2359768. [PMID: 38817947 PMCID: PMC11138226 DOI: 10.1080/20018525.2024.2359768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background A decreasing use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with a hospital-registered diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has recently been documented in Denmark. ICS treatment is not recommended in patients with high pneumonia risk, and we aimed to assess the development of ICS treatment in relation to pneumonia occurrence. Methods Annual nationwide register-based cross-sectional studies from 1998 to 2018 including all patients ≥40 years of age with a hospital-registered ICD-10 diagnosis of COPD on the 31st of December each year. We calculated the annual proportion of patients with at least one outpatient pneumonia (redeemed prescription of relevant antibiotics) or pneumonia hospitalization (hospitalization or ER visit), and stratified by ICS dose (No ICS, low dose, medium dose, or high dose). Results The study population increased from 35,656 patients in 1998 to 99,057 patients in 2018. The annual proportion of patients experiencing a pneumonia decreased from 69.4% to 55.2%. The proportion of patients with at least one outpatient pneumonia, but no hospitalization, decreased (59.2% to 46.2%). The overall proportion of patients with at least one pneumonia hospitalization remained unchanged (10.2% to 9.0%), but this proportion increased in patients in high dose ICS (9.9% to 14.6%). The overall proportion of patients in high dose treatment decreased (12.7% to 5.7%), but not in patients with pneumonia hospitalization (16.5% to 15.1). Conclusions Our study demonstrates a nationwide decrease from 1998 to 2018 in the proportion of patients who redeemed a prescription for antibiotics used mainly for respiratory tract infections, which may reflect a decrease in the number of outpatient pneumonias. This decrease was largely caused by an increase in the number of patients without pneumonia. No differences over time were seen regarding hospitalization-requiring pneumonia. High dose ICS treatment was unchanged in patients with hospitalization-requiring pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Klitgaard
- Department of Internal Medicine Vejle, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | - Jesper Lykkegaard
- Research Unit of General Practice, Syddansk Universitet- Campus Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Ole Hilberg
- Department of Regional Health Research, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Løkke
- Department of Regional Health Research, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bertrams W, Wilhelm J, Veeger PM, Hanko C, Brinke KAD, Klabunde B, Pott H, Weckler B, Greulich T, Vogelmeier CF, Schmeck B. A mRNA panel for differentiation between acute exacerbation or pneumonia in COPD patients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1234068. [PMID: 38585145 PMCID: PMC10995291 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1234068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prone to acute exacerbations (AECOPD) or community acquired pneumonia (CAP), both posing severe risk of morbidity and mortality. There is no available biomarker that correctly separates AECOPD from COPD. However, because CAP and AECOPD differ in aetiology, treatment and prognosis, their discrimination would be important. Methods This study analysed the ability of selected candidate transcripts from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to differentiate between patients with AECOPD, COPD & CAP, and CAP without pre-existing COPD. Results In a previous study, we identified differentially regulated genes between CAP and AECOPD in PBMCs. In the present new cohort, we tested the potential of selected candidate PBMC transcripts to differentiate at early time points AECOPD, CAP+COPD, and CAP without pre-existing COPD. Expression of YWHAG, E2F1 and TDRD9 held predictive power: This gene set predicted diseases markedly better (model accuracy up to 100%) than classical clinical markers like CRP, lymphocyte count and neutrophil count (model accuracy up to 82%). Discussion In summary, in our cohort expression levels of YWHAG, E2F1 and TDRD9 differentiated with high accuracy between COPD patients suffering from acute exacerbation or CAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilhelm Bertrams
- Institute for Lung Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jochen Wilhelm
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Giessen, Germany
| | - Pia-Marie Veeger
- Institute for Lung Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carolina Hanko
- Institute for Lung Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Kristina auf dem Brinke
- Institute for Lung Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Björn Klabunde
- Institute for Lung Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Pott
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Weckler
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Timm Greulich
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Claus F. Vogelmeier
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Schmeck
- Institute for Lung Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Giessen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Center Marburg, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO) and German Center for Infectious Disease Research (DZIF), Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Price D, Henley W, Cançado JED, Fabbri LM, Kerstjens HAM, Papi A, Roche N, Şen E, Singh D, Vogelmeier CF, Nudo E, Carter V, Skinner D, Vella R, Soriano JB, Kots M, Georges G. Risk of Pneumonia in Patients with COPD Initiating Fixed Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) / Long-Acting Bronchodilator (LABD) Formulations Containing Extrafine Beclometasone Dipropionate versus Patients Initiating LABD Without ICS. Pragmat Obs Res 2024; 15:1-16. [PMID: 38274639 PMCID: PMC10807314 DOI: 10.2147/por.s438031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Combined ICS and long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) more effectively reduce COPD exacerbations than LABD therapy alone. Corticosteroid-related adverse effects, including pneumonia, limit ICS use. Previous data suggest this risk is lower for extrafine beclometasone (ef-BDP). We compared pneumonia risk among new users of fixed dose ICS/LABD formulations containing ef-BDP, versus patients initiating LABD without any ICS. Methods A propensity-matched historical cohort study design used data from OPCRD. COPD patients with ≥1 year of continuous data who initiated LABD or ICS/LABD formulations containing ef-BDP were matched. Primary outcome was time to pneumonia event, as treated, using either sensitive (physician diagnosed) or specific (physician diagnosed and x-ray or hospital admission confirmed) definitions, with non-inferiority boundary of 15%. Results 23,898 COPD patients were matched, who were 68±11 years, 54.3% male and 56% current-smokers, while 43% were former-smokers. Initiation of ef-BDP/LABD was not associated with an increased risk of pneumonia versus LABD, for either a sensitive 0.89 (0.78-1.02), P = 0.08 or a specific 0.91 (0.78-1.05), P = 0.18 definition of pneumonia. The probability of remaining pneumonia free 1-year after ef-BDP/LABD was 98.4%, which was comparable to LABD at 97.7%, and was sustained up to 6 years of observation; non-inferiority criterion was met for both definitions. Initiation of ef-BDP/LABD was also associated with a reduced risk of developing LRTIs in the propensity matched cohort. Conclusion Risk of pneumonia when using ICS for the management of COPD reported in several randomised controlled trials may not be relevant with ef-BDP in a diverse real-world clinical population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - William Henley
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
- Health Statistics Group, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Leonardo M Fabbri
- Respiratory Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Huib A M Kerstjens
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, and Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Alberto Papi
- Respiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, APHP-Centre University of Paris, Cochin Hospital and Institute (UMR1016), Paris, France
| | - Elif Şen
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Dave Singh
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Marburg, Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - Elena Nudo
- Global Medical Affairs, Chiesi Farmaceutici, S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Derek Skinner
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Rebecca Vella
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Joan B Soriano
- Respiratory Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa and Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maxim Kots
- Global Medical Affairs, Chiesi Farmaceutici, S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| | - George Georges
- Global Clinical Development, Chiesi Farmaceutici, S.p.A, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lea S, Higham A, Beech A, Singh D. How inhaled corticosteroids target inflammation in COPD. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:230084. [PMID: 37852657 PMCID: PMC10582931 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0084-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the most commonly used anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of COPD. COPD has been previously described as a "corticosteroid-resistant" condition, but current clinical trial evidence shows that selected COPD patients, namely those with increased exacerbation risk plus higher blood eosinophil count (BEC), can benefit from ICS treatment. This review describes the components of inflammation modulated by ICS in COPD and the reasons for the variation in response to ICS between individuals. There are corticosteroid-insensitive inflammatory pathways in COPD, such as bacteria-induced macrophage interleukin-8 production and resultant neutrophil recruitment, but also corticosteroid-sensitive pathways including the reduction of type 2 markers and mast cell numbers. The review also describes the mechanisms whereby ICS can skew the lung microbiome, with reduced diversity and increased relative abundance, towards an excess of proteobacteria. BEC is a biomarker used to enable the selective use of ICS in COPD, but the clinical outcome in an individual is decided by a complex interacting network involving the microbiome and airway inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lea
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Higham
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Augusta Beech
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dave Singh
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Medicines Evaluation Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klitgaard A, Ibsen R, Hilberg O, Løkke A. Study protocol: pneumonia and inhaled corticosteroid treatment patterns in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a cohort study using sequence analysis (PICCS). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072685. [PMID: 37263696 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is a widely used treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The main effects include a reduction in the number of exacerbations and, for some patients, an increase in expected mortality. Unfortunately, the treatment is also linked to an increased risk of pneumonia, and very little is known about which patients experience this increased risk. There is a need for identification of patient characteristics associated with increased risk of pneumonia and treatment with ICS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a register-based cohort study that uses the nationwide Danish registers. Data from several registers in the years 2008-2018 will be merged on an individual level using the personal identification numbers that are unique to every citizen in Denmark. Clusters based on pneumonia incidence and ICS treatment patterns will be explored with a sequence analysis in a 3-year follow-up period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This is a register-based study and research ethics approval is not required according to Danish Law and National Ethics Committee Guidelines. The results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and reported at appropriate national and international meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan Klitgaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Ole Hilberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Løkke
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lineros R, Fernández-Delgado L, Vega-Rioja A, Chacón P, Doukkali B, Monteseirin J, Ribas-Pérez D. Associated Factors of Pneumonia in Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Apart from the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11051243. [PMID: 37238914 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11051243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in combination with long-acting β2 agonists (LABAs) to reduce exacerbations and improve patient lung function and quality of life. However, ICSs have been associated with an increased risk of pneumonia in individuals with COPD, although the magnitude of this risk remains unclear. Therefore, it is difficult to make informed clinical decisions that balance the benefits and adverse effects of ICSs in people with COPD. There may be other causes of pneumonia in patients with COPD, and these causes are not always considered in studies on the risks of using ICSs in COPD. We consider it very useful to clarify these aspects in assessing the influence of ICSs on the incidence of pneumonia and their role in the treatment of COPD. This issue has important implications for current practice and the evaluation and management of COPD, since COPD patients may benefit from specific ICS-based treatment strategies. Many of the potential causes of pneumonia in patients with COPD can act synergistically, so they can be included in more than one section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosario Lineros
- Unidad Salud Mental, Hospital Vázquez Díaz, 21080 Huelva, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Vega-Rioja
- UGC de Alergología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Pedro Chacón
- UGC de Alergología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Bouchra Doukkali
- UGC de Alergología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - David Ribas-Pérez
- Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Doniec Z, Olszanecka-Glinianowicz M, Hantulik P, Almgren-Rachtan A, Chudek J. The Efficacy, Tolerance and Acceptance of a New Fixed-Dose Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate Dry-Powder Inhaler—Salflumix Easyhaler® in COPD Patients in the Daily Clinical Practice. APPLIED SCIENCES 2022; 12:12142. [DOI: 10.3390/app122312142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy of the fix-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was only shown for the original product. This investigator-initiated study aimed to prove the efficacy and safety of Salflumix Easyhaler®, a second-entry product (dry-powder inhaler) in a real-life setting. The efficacy of the therapy was assessed in 440 COPD outpatients (36.1% classified as C&D groups according to GOLD) using the COPD assessment test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). During 86 ± 30 days, the frequency of COPD with a big and very big impact on life (CAT > 20 pts); and high scores of dyspnea (mMRC ≥ 2) decreased from 60.7% and 57.5% at I visit to 15.2% and 22.6% at III visits, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a greater improvement in newly diagnosed patients than those who switched from other devices due to insufficient disease control or patient dissatisfaction with the used inhaler. Patients’ satisfaction was scored 3.2–3.5 in a 4 pts scale. Physicians scored the burden related to the use of Salflumix Easyhaler® as very low. Adherence exceeded 90%. This study supports effectiveness, satisfaction, and convenience with the use of this new product in COPD, and shows that ICS-containing DPI therapy is still improperly prescribed for patients with a low risk of COPD exacerbation in real-life settings.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ismaila AS, Haeussler K, Czira A, Youn JH, Malmenäs M, Risebrough NA, Agarwal J, Nassim M, Sharma R, Compton C, Vogelmeier CF, Han MK, Halpin DMG. Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Triple Therapy Compared with Other Therapies for the Treatment of COPD: A Network Meta-Analysis. Adv Ther 2022; 39:3957-3978. [PMID: 35849317 PMCID: PMC9402726 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02231-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing triple therapies (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS], long-acting β2-agonist [LABA], and long-acting muscarinic antagonist [LAMA]) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are limited. This network meta-analysis (NMA) investigated the comparative efficacy of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus any triple (ICS/LABA/LAMA) combinations and dual therapies in patients with COPD. METHODS This NMA was conducted on the basis of a systematic literature review (SLR), which identified RCTs in adults aged at least 40 years with COPD. The RCTs compared different ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations or an ICS/LABA/LAMA combination with any dual therapy (ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA). Outcomes of interest included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), annualized rate of combined moderate and severe exacerbations, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score and SGRQ responders, transition dyspnea index focal score, and rescue medication use (RMU). Analyses were conducted at 24 weeks (primary endpoint), and 12 and 52 weeks (if feasible). RESULTS The NMA was informed by five trials reporting FEV1 at 24 weeks. FF/UMEC/VI was statistically significantly more effective at increasing trough FEV1 (based on change from baseline) than all triple comparators in the network apart from UMEC + FF/VI. The NMA was informed by 17 trials reporting moderate or severe exacerbation endpoints. FF/UMEC/VI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in annualized rate of combined moderate or severe exacerbations versus single-inhaler budesonide/glycopyrronium bromide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/GLY/FOR). At 24 weeks, the NMA was informed by five trials. FF/UMEC/VI showed statistically significant improvements in annualized rate of combined moderate or severe exacerbations versus UMEC + FF/VI and BUD/GLY/FOR. FF/UMEC/VI also demonstrated improvements in mean SGRQ score versus other triple therapy comparators at 24 weeks, and a significant reduction in RMU compared with BUD/GLY/FOR (160/18/9.6). CONCLUSION The findings of this NMA suggest favorable efficacy with single-inhaler triple therapy comprising FF/UMEC/VI. Further analysis is required as additional evidence becomes available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afisi S Ismaila
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Collegeville, PA, 19426-0989, USA. .,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Alexandrosz Czira
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK
| | | | - Mia Malmenäs
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jatin Agarwal
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Maria Nassim
- ICON Health Economics, ICON plc, Munich, Germany
| | - Raj Sharma
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK
| | - Chris Compton
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK
| | - Claus F Vogelmeier
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany.,German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany
| | - MeiLan K Han
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - David M G Halpin
- University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cazzola M, Ora J, Calzetta L, Rogliani P, Matera MG. Advances in inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what is their value today? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:917-927. [PMID: 35575510 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2076592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As of today, there is still a need to determine which COPD patients may benefit from ICS therapy, whether ICSs are useful in COPD patients without chronic bronchitis, and whether long-acting bronchodilators can reduce the risk of exacerbations in frequent exacerbators even if ICSs are not used, and whether combination therapy including ICSs is helpful in infrequent exacerbators to optimise the use of ICSs in COPD. Nevertheless, in recent years, a fair amount of evidence has been produced that, at least in part, can help define the role of ICSs in COPD better. AREAS COVERED Herein, the authors provide an overview of current use of ICS in COPD and discuss their value to the current treatment armamentarium. The article includes discussion of which patients will benefit best from the use of ICSs, their potential uses and adverse effects. EXPERT OPINION There is growing agreement on why, in whom, and when ICS therapy can be used in COPD, although the consensus is still lacking because of the heterogeneity of COPD. The use of blood eosinophil counts (BECs) is only helpful in T2 inflammation, while there is a lack of biomarkers indicating the presence of T1 and T17 immunity, which is poorly responsive to ICS. Identifying ICS-sensitive endotypes using specific biomarkers that have yet to be identified and validated is likely to demonstrate that ICSs can influence the natural course of COPD in at least a subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cazzola
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Josuel Ora
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, "Tor Vergata" Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigino Calzetta
- Unit of Respiratory Diseases and Lung Function, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Paola Rogliani
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.,Unit of Respiratory Medicine, "Tor Vergata" Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Gabriella Matera
- Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|