Extent of uncontrolled disease and associated medical costs in severe asthma--a PHARMO study

Epidemiology, Treatment and Health Care Resource Use of Patients with severe Asthma in Germany – a retrospective Claims Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Asthma causes various clinical symptoms, including unpredictable severe exacerbations, and even though most patients can achieve a reasonable disease control due to adequate treatment, some patients do not. This study seeks to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and treatment of asthma and severe asthma patients in Germany.

METHOD

A retrospective claims data analysis has been conducted on adult asthma patients and a subset of patients with severe asthma, identified during July 2017 - June 2018. A proxy was used to identify severe asthma patients based on therapy options recommended within the German treatment guideline for treating these patients. These include (i) biologics, (ii) medium/high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in conjunction with LABA/montelukast and antibiotics/oral corticosteroids (OCS), and (iii) long-term OCS therapy. HCRU and treatment of patients were observed during a 1-year follow-up period (July 2018 - June 2019).

RESULTS

The study included 388 932 adult asthma patients (prevalence: 7.90%), with 2.51%-12.88% affected by severe asthma (depending on the definition). 22.60% of all asthma patients experienced hospitalizations (severe asthma: 36.11%). Furthermore, 13.59% received OCS (severe asthma: 39.91%), but only 0.18% (severe asthma: 1.25%) received biologics. Only 23.95% (severe asthma: 41.17%) visited a pulmonologist.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of severe asthma patients receive long-term OCS therapy. However, less than 50% have seen a pulmonologist who would typically seek a change in treatment to avoid the long-term consequences of OCS. To optimize the treatment of severe asthma in Germany, better referral of these patients to specialists is needed and considering potential treatment alternatives.

Use of Biologic Therapies in the Treatment of Asthma - A Comparative Real World Data Analysis on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Before and After Therapy Initiation

Background

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases in Germany. While many patients achieve asthma control under standard therapies, some patients still experience exacerbations and persistent airway obstructions. Thus, further pharmacological treatment is needed, and biologics could fill this gap, as they have shown clinical benefit in patients with severe asthma. Therefore, this real-world study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs before and after biologic therapy initiation.

Methods

A retrospective claims data analysis has been conducted on adult asthma patients who initiated a long-term biologic therapy between January 2015 and June 2018. Patients were therapy-naïve to biologics for at least 12 months. HCRU and cost incurred by patients during 12 months before and after therapy initiation were compared.

Results

Overall, 571 asthma patients initiated a biologic therapy during the observational period (316 omalizumab, 232 mepolizumab, 16 benralizumab, and 7 reslizumab). Patients had a mean age of 54.86 (62.70% female), and the majority (93.70%) received at least one follow-up prescription of their index-biologic agent within one year. During baseline, patients received on average 2.75 OCS prescriptions compared to 2.17 during follow-up. Most patients received less or the same amount of OCS after therapy initiation. Moreover, hospitalizations and asthma-related sick leave days decreased significantly. The average total costs per patient were €6618.90 during baseline and €22,832.33 during follow-up. Biologics mainly drove the increase; however, hospitalization costs were reduced significantly (€2443.37 vs €1941.93; p<0.001).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates an improved asthma control due to the initiation of a biologic therapy in terms of decreased hospitalization frequency, OCS consumption, and sick leave days. However, biologics are associated with high costs for healthcare providers during the first year after initiation. Therefore, short- and long-term clinical benefits and financial burden must be considered in the overall context of healthcare.

Systematic literature review of the clinical, humanistic, and economic burden associated with asthma uncontrolled by GINA Steps 4 or 5 treatment

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to characterize the epidemiologic, clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of patients with asthma uncontrolled by GINA Steps 4 or 5 treatment (severe, uncontrolled asthma [SUA]).

METHODS

A systematic literature review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was performed. Relevant publications were searched for in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2004 to September 2016 and in a conference proceedings database from January 2012 to October 2016. Studies were screened using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study Design, and Time (PICOS-T) framework. Studies of SUA with observational (prospective and retrospective), randomized, or nonrandomized study designs; adult patient populations; sample sizes ≥20 patients; epidemiologic or clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), or economic outcomes were included. For our analysis, SUA was defined as inadequate control of asthma, despite the use of medium- to high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and at least one additional treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 195 articles reporting unique study populations were included. Prevalence of SUA was as great as 87.4% for patients with severe asthma, although values varied depending on the criteria used to define asthma control. Compared with patients with severe asthma who were controlled, patients with SUA experienced more symptoms, night-time awakenings, rescue medication use, and worse PROs. SUA-associated costs were 3-times greater than costs for patients with severe, controlled disease.

CONCLUSION

Despite the availability of approved asthma treatments, this literature analysis confirms that SUA poses a substantial epidemiologic, clinical, humanistic, and economic burden. Published data are limited for certain aspects of SUA, highlighting a need for further research.

Tiotropium Respimat®: A Review of Its Use in Asthma Poorly Controlled with Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting β2-Adrenergic Agonists

Tiotropium bromide (Spiriva®) solution for inhalation via the Respimat® Soft Mist™ inhaler is a long-acting anticholinergic agent approved in the EU for the add-on maintenance treatment of asthma in adults currently receiving maintenance therapy with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) (≥800 µg budesonide per day or equivalent) and a long-acting β2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) and who have experienced at least one severe exacerbation in the previous year. Tiotropium Respimat® added to maintenance ICS/LABA treatment significantly improved lung function after 6 months' treatment and extended the time to the first asthma exacerbation in two well-designed, replicate, phase III trials in patients with poorly controlled asthma despite treatment with an ICS (≥800 µg budesonide/day or equivalent) and a LABA. Tiotropium Respimat® was also associated with a reduced incidence of severe asthma exacerbations and an increase in the median time to asthma worsening. The drug was well tolerated in asthma patients throughout 48 weeks' treatment, with a generally similar incidence of serious adverse events in tiotropium Respimat® and placebo treatment groups. Thus, in patients with poorly controlled asthma despite receiving high-dose ICS and a LABA, tiotropium Respimat® provides a valuable treatment option.

Non-adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of asthma exacerbations in children

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is a major risk factor for poor asthma control in children. However, little is known about the effect of adherence to ICS on the incidence of asthma exacerbations. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of poor adherence to ICS on the risk of exacerbations in children with asthma.

METHODS

In this nested case-control study using data from the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System, children aged 5-12 years who had an asthma exacerbation needing oral corticosteroids or hospital admission were matched to patients without exacerbations. Refill adherence was calculated as medication possession ratio from ICS-dispensing records. Data were analyzed using a multivariable multiplicative intensity regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 646 children were included, of whom 36 had one or more asthma exacerbations. The medication possession ratio was 67.9% (standard deviation [SD] 30.2%) in children with an exacerbation versus 54.2% (SD 35.6%) in the control group. In children using long-acting beta-agonist, good adherence to ICS was associated with a higher risk of asthma exacerbations: relative risk 4.34 (95% confidence interval: 1.20-15.64).

CONCLUSION

In children with persistent asthma needing long-acting beta-agonist, good adherence to ICS was associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations. Possible explanations include better motivation for adherence to ICS in children with more severe asthma, and reduced susceptibility to the consequences of non-adherence to ICS due to overprescription of ICS to children who are in clinical remission. Further study into the background of the complex interaction between asthma and medication adherence is needed.

Should lung biopsies be performed in patients with severe asthma?

Asthma, and severe asthma, in particular, is increasingly recognised as a heterogeneous disease. Identifying these different phenotypes of asthma and assigning patients to phenotype-specific treatments is one of the current conundrums in respiratory medicine. Any diagnostic procedure in severe asthma (or any disease) should have two aims: 1) better understanding or identifying the diagnosis, and 2) providing information on the heterogeneity of asthma phenotypes to guide therapy with the objective of improving outcomes. Lung biopsies can target the large and small airways as well as the lung parenchyma. All compartments are affected in severe asthma; however, knowledge on the distal lung is limited. At this point, it remains uncertain whether lung specimens routinely add diagnostic information that is unable to be obtained otherwise. Indeed, whether a lung biopsy is indicated in the workup of a patient with severe asthma remains an individual decision. It is hoped this review will support rational decision-making and provide a detailed synopsis of the varied histopathological features seen in biopsies of patients with a diagnosis of severe asthma. Due to limited data on this topic this review is primarily based on opinion with recommendations arising primarily from the personal experience of the authors.

Impact of asthma exacerbations and asthma triggers on asthma-related quality of life in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma

BACKGROUND

Few data are available that evaluate the relationship among asthma exacerbations, asthma triggers, and asthma-related quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of asthma exacerbations and asthma triggers on QoL.

METHODS

Patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma, ages ≥ 13 years (n = 2679) from the TENOR (The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens) 3-year observational study were included. Exacerbations were defined hierarchically in descending order of severity (hospitalization, emergency department [ED] visit, steroid burst, no exacerbation) by using data from months 6 and 12. The total number (frequency) of exacerbations was assessed. Asthma-related QoL was measured at month 12 by using the Mini-Asthma QoL Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ); self-reported asthma triggers were collected at baseline and annually. We used 1-way ANOVA to test for differences in Mini-AQLQ domain scores across asthma exacerbation severity, the total number of asthma exacerbations, and the number of asthma triggers.

RESULTS

A significant decrease (P < .001) in Mini-AQLQ domain scores was seen with increasing severity of asthma exacerbation (no exacerbation, steroid burst, ED visit, and hospitalization); symptom (5.5, 4.8, 4.3, and 4.2), activity (5.8, 5.2, 4.6, and 4.4), emotional (5.6, 5.0, 4.4, and 4.2), exposure (5.0, 4.5, 4.0, and 3.9); and overall (5.5, 4.9, 4.3, and 4.1). Increasing exacerbation frequency and the number of baseline asthma triggers also were associated with significant decreases in Mini-AQLQ domain scores. An increasing number of asthma triggers were associated with an increase in severity and frequency of exacerbations.

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of asthma triggers may reduce exacerbation rates and improve asthma-related QoL in patients with severe or difficult-to-treat asthma. Interventional studies are warranted to further explore these outcomes.

Potentially pathogenic airway bacteria and neutrophilic inflammation in treatment resistant severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Molecular microbiological analysis of airway samples in asthma has demonstrated an altered microbiome in comparison to healthy controls. Such changes may have relevance to treatment-resistant severe asthma, particularly those with neutrophilic airway inflammation, as bacteria might be anticipated to activate the innate immune response, a process that is poorly steroid responsive. An understanding of the relationship between airway bacterial presence and dominance in severe asthma may help direct alternative treatment approaches.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to use a culture independent analysis strategy to describe the presence, dominance and abundance of bacterial taxa in induced sputum from treatment resistant severe asthmatics and correlate findings with clinical characteristics and airway inflammatory markers.

METHODS

Induced sputum was obtained from 28 stable treatment-resistant severe asthmatics. The samples were divided for supernatant IL-8 measurement, cytospin preparation for differential cell count and Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) profiling for bacterial community analysis.

RESULTS

In 17/28 patients, the dominant species within the airway bacterial community was Moraxella catarrhalis or a member of the Haemophilus or Streptococcus genera. Colonisation with these species was associated with longer asthma disease duration (mean (SD) 31.8 years (16.7) vs 15.6 years (8.0), p = 0.008), worse post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (68.0% (24.0) vs 85.5% (19.7), p = 0.025) and higher sputum neutrophil differential cell counts (median (IQR) 80% (67-83) vs 43% (29-67), p = 0.001). Total abundance of these organisms significantly and positively correlated with sputum IL-8 concentration and neutrophil count.

CONCLUSIONS

Airway colonisation with potentially pathogenic micro-organisms in asthma is associated with more severe airways obstruction and neutrophilic airway inflammation. This altered colonisation may have a role in the development of an asthma phenotype that responds less well to current asthma therapies.

Efficacy and safety of an anti-IL-13 mAb in patients with severe asthma: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Approximately 5% to 10% of asthmatic patients achieve incomplete symptom control on current therapies. The association of IL-13 with asthma pathology and reduced corticosteroid sensitivity suggests a potential benefit of anti-IL-13 therapy in refractory asthma. GSK679586, a humanized mAb, inhibits IL-13 binding to both IL-13 receptor α1 and α2.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSK679586 in patients with severe asthma refractory to maximally indicated doses of inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Patients who remained symptomatic (Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≥1.5) after uptitration to 1000 μg/d fluticasone propionate or greater were randomized to 3 once-monthly intravenous infusions of 10 mg/kg GSK679586 (n = 99) or placebo (n = 99).

RESULTS

Treatment differences in adjusted mean change from baseline over 12 weeks were nonsignificant for Asthma Control Questionnaire symptom scores (the primary end point; GSK679586 = -0.31, placebo = -0.17, P = .058) and FEV₁ (GSK679586 = -0.01, placebo = 0.03, P = .276). Similar analyses in patients with increased serum IgE levels, blood eosinophil counts, or both were also negative. Incidence of asthma exacerbations was similar between treatments. Most adverse events were nonserious and unrelated to treatment. Two GSK679586-treated patients had treatment-related serious adverse events (lethargy and supraventricular extrasystoles).

CONCLUSIONS

Although well tolerated, GSK679586 did not demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in asthma control, pulmonary function, or exacerbations in patients with severe asthma. Further studies are needed to determine whether therapies targeting IL-13, the functionally related IL-4 cytokine, or both can provide clinical benefit in patients with severe refractory asthma or a subpopulation of these patients beyond that achievable with high-dose corticosteroids.

Omalizumab: a review of its use in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma

Omalizumab (Xolair(®)) is a subcutaneously administered monoclonal antibody that targets circulating free IgE and prevents its interaction with the high-affinity IgE receptor (FCεRI), thereby interrupting the allergic cascade. In the EU, the drug is approved as add-on therapy in adults, adolescents and children aged ≥6 years with severe persistent allergic asthma. In well designed clinical trials, add-on omalizumab significantly reduced the asthma exacerbation rate (primary endpoint) compared with placebo in adults, adolescents and children with severe persistent allergic asthma. Furthermore, add-on omalizumab reduced the need for inhaled corticosteroids in adults and adolescents, and improved asthma control and symptoms, and asthma-related quality of life in all age groups. The efficacy of omalizumab was also demonstrated in the real-world setting, with add-on therapy leading to reduced rates of hospitalizations, emergency room visits and unscheduled doctor's visits, as well as improvements in asthma symptom scores and the physician's overall assessment of treatment response. More data are needed to determine the optimum duration of treatment, and currently the duration is at the discretion of the treating physician. Omalizumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse event was transient injection-site reactions. In cost-utility analyses modelled over a life-time horizon, add-on omalizumab was cost effective compared with standard therapy, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios falling within generally accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds. Thus, in difficult-to-treat patients with severe persistent allergic asthma, omalizumab provides a valuable treatment option.

Evaluation of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines impairment domain for classifying asthma control and predicting asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of asthma control may help predict future asthma exacerbations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate asthma guidelines impairment domain components as predictors of exacerbations in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma.

METHODS

Children (aged 6-11 years; n = 289) and adolescents/adults (aged ≥ 12 years; n = 2,094) with complete baseline and 12-month data from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study were included. Asthma was categorized as very poorly controlled, not well-controlled, and well-controlled using impairment domain components. Effects of omitting each component on very poorly controlled and not well controlled groups were examined. Multivariable logistic regression determined the relationship of components in predicting asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

Omission of individual impairment domain components led to misclassification of asthma control in 11% to 39% of patients. A baseline exacerbation was the strongest independent predictor of exacerbation at month 12 in children (odds ratio = 2.94; P < .001) and adolescents/adults (odds ratio = 2.93; P < .001). In children, very poorly controlled asthma-based short-acting β2-agonist use was associated with a 2-fold higher exacerbation risk (odds ratio = 2.03; P = .011). In adolescents/adults, not well controlled or very poorly controlled asthma based on short-acting β2-agonist use (odds ratio = 1.49), lung function (odds ratio = 1.66), and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (odds ratio = 1.94) were also independent predictors of exacerbations (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the combined use of individual components of the impairment domain increases the sensitivity of identifying patients at high risk for future asthma exacerbations, specific components may be more important than others in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma. Prior exacerbations, short-acting β2-agonist use, lung function, and (in adolescents/adults) the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire were independent predictors of exacerbations.

Current control and future risk in asthma management

Despite international and national guidelines, poor asthma control remains an issue. Asthma exacerbations are costly to both the individual, and the healthcare provider. Improvements in our understanding of the therapeutic benefit of asthma therapies suggest that, in general, while long-acting bronchodilator therapy improves asthma symptoms, the anti-inflammatory activity of inhaled corticosteroids reduces acute asthma exacerbations. Studies have explored factors which could be predictive of exacerbations. A history of previous exacerbations, poor asthma control, poor inhaler technique, a history of lower respiratory tract infections, poor adherence to medication, the presence of allergic rhinitis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, psychological dysfunction, smoking and obesity have all been implicated as having a predictive role in the future risk of asthma exacerbation. Here we review the current literature and discuss this in the context of primary care management of asthma.

Uncontrolled asthma in a commercially insured population from 2002 to 2007: trends, predictors, and costs

OBJECTIVE

Uncontrolled asthma leads to preventable morbidity and increased health care utilization. The authors examined trends, predictors, and costs of uncontrolled asthma over 5 years in a large health plan population.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively examined administrative health claims data from mid-2000 to mid-2007 on patients with asthma aged 1 to 56 years (n = 54,653 patient-years, 28,595 unique patients). Uncontrolled asthma events were defined as > or =2 oral steroid fills or > or =5 short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SABA) fills over 12 months, or an asthma-related hospitalization or emergency department (ED) visit. Multivariate generalized mixed regression models determined patient- and neighborhood-level predictors for uncontrolled asthma events. The authors compared asthma-related costs for patients with and without uncontrolled asthma events.

RESULTS

In 2002-2003, 39% of patients had > or =1 uncontrolled asthma event. Most frequent were high use of rescue asthma medications. Asthma-related hospitalizations and ED visits were infrequent. The percentage having uncontrolled asthma events decreased significantly over time to 27% in 2006-2007, due to a decreased rate of frequent SABA fills. Males and adults > or =24 years had higher odds of medication-based uncontrolled asthma events, whereas residence in neighborhoods with more minorities and lower educational attainment was associated with ED visits or hospitalizations. Patients with uncontrolled asthma events had significantly higher asthma-related costs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, the proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma, particularly as indicated by high SABA fills, decreased over a 5-year period. Several individual- and neighborhood-level characteristics were associated with uncontrolled asthma events. Clinicians and health plans can identify higher-risk patients in order to target asthma management strategies and reduce asthma-related morbidity and its associated costs.

Asthma control and activity limitations: insights from the Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment (REACT) study

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled asthma remains prevalent in the United States and confers a substantial burden on the health care system.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitations in a nationally representative sample of patients with moderate-to-severe-treated asthma and to assess the degree to which demographics and comorbidities were associated with activity limitations.

METHODS

Patients who participated in the Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment study were surveyed regarding type and degree of activity limitations in 4 categories: outdoor activity, physical activity, daily activity, and environmental triggers. Information about asthma control, demographics, and comorbidities was collected. Multivariable regression was used to assess the association between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitations while adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was associated with a greater than 2-fold risk of outdoor (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-3.51) or physical (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.90-3.61) activity limitations and a 66% increased risk of daily activity limitations (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09-2.51). Comorbidities associated with activity limitation included hives, chronic sinusitis, arthritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypercholesterolemia, and depression. The observed associations between uncontrolled asthma and activity limitation remained significant after controlling for demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with controlled asthma, those with uncontrolled asthma are at higher risk for limitations in outdoor activity, physical activity, and daily activity. To help patients achieve optimal health, asthma management should include routine assessment of activity limitations and assessment and coordinated care for comorbid conditions.

Measuring exacerbations in obstructive lung disease

PURPOSE

Using hospitalization always has been seen as a solid measurement for exacerbation in pharmacoepidemiology, but might lead to an underestimation of disease exacerbation because of a trend towards outpatient care. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of different exacerbation markers in obstructive lung disease and to identify predictors for these exacerbation markers.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using the PHARMO record linkage system, including demographic details and complete medication histories of more than two million community-dwelling residents in the Netherlands from 1985 onwards. Eligible patients were adult users of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Outcome parameters were hospitalization and short courses of systemic corticosteroids. Patients were allowed to have multiple exacerbations during follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 5327 patients. During follow-up, 8635 exacerbations occurred in 2332 patients with a trend in time towards treating exacerbations out of the hospital (p-value 0.003). Of all patients with exacerbations, 73% was not hospitalized during follow-up. Exacerbations were associated with high-dose ICS use (adjusted RR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.7) and chronic systemic corticosteroid use (adjusted RR 1.9; 95%CI 1.6-2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Using hospitalization only as exacerbation marker leads to underestimating the exacerbation rate, because of exacerbation treatment out of the hospital. Patients with obstructive lung disease using chronic systemic corticosteroids or high-dose ICS use are more prone to exacerbations. This implies that these patients should be monitored carefully to prevent recurrent exacerbations which are detrimental for their prognosis and quality of life.

Narrative review: the role of Th2 immune pathway modulation in the treatment of severe asthma and its phenotypes

New therapeutic approaches are needed for patients with severe asthma who are refractory to standard therapy comprising high doses of inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta(2)-agonists. Current treatment guidelines for patients with severe asthma from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program recommend the addition of oral corticosteroids, which are associated with substantial morbidity, and, for those with allergic asthma, anti-IgE. Genetic and translational studies, as well as clinical trials, suggest that in a subgroup of patients, the pathobiology of severe asthma is mediated by immune pathways driven by T-helper 2 (Th2)-type CD4(+) T cells, which produce a characteristic repertoire of interleukins (ILs), including IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Therefore, biological modifiers of Th2-type ILs, such as monoclonal antibodies, soluble receptors, and receptor antagonists, are a rational strategy for developing new treatment approaches but will need to be targeted to selected patients in whom the appropriate Th2 immune pathway is "active." The benefits of immune-modifier therapies targeting Th2-type cytokines, however, need to be weighed against the toxicities associated with inhibition of key biological pathways, as well as the expense of future medications. Therefore, future clinical trials need to clearly establish the efficacy and safety of biological modifiers of Th2 immune pathways before these approaches can enter routine clinical practice for the treatment of severe asthma.

The impact of uncontrolled asthma on absenteeism and health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of uncontrolled asthma on the absenteeism and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adults and children with asthma and the caregivers of pediatric patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient information was obtained from datasets maintained by National Jewish Health for this cross-sectional study. Participants in the study were 12 years of age or older. Participants younger than 18 years had their information provided by caregivers. Caregivers also provided 6 months of absenteeism and QOL data. Participants were classified as having uncontrolled asthma based on a treatment and symptom guideline-based algorithm. Absenteeism was assessed from the self-reported number of work or school days missed due to asthma during the previous 6 months. HRQOL among adults was measured using the validated Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Marks-AQLQ) and among caregivers using the validated Pediatric Asthma Caregivers Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ). To account for the positive skew in absenteeism data, a zero-inflated Poisson regression model was used to compare group differences. HRQOL was analyzed for adults and caregivers using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

A total of 15,149 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study and were included in the analysis. Adults with uncontrolled asthma and caregivers of children with uncontrolled asthma reported significantly higher absenteeism than their controlled counterparts: 43% vs 24% adults reported missing days of work, with a median 6 days vs 3 days missed; 31% vs 16% of caregivers reported missing days of work, with 4 days vs 2 days missed; and caregivers reported that more than 70% vs 45% pediatric patients missed school, with a median of 6 days vs 4 days missed (uncontrolled vs controlled asthma, respectively). Adult uncontrolled asthmatics and caregivers of uncontrolled pediatric patients had significantly lower HRQOL as indicated by the Marks-AQLQ (scores 1.5 points higher, p < 0.001) and PACQLQ (scores < 0.5 points lower, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled asthma has far-reaching impact on the productivity and quality of life of asthma patients and their caregivers. Proper assessment, treatment, and disease management to improve asthma control may reduce the impact of uncontrolled asthma on asthmatic adults, children, and the caretakers of pediatric asthmatic patients.

Consistently very poorly controlled asthma, as defined by the impairment domain of the Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines, increases risk for future severe asthma exacerbations in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study

BACKGROUND

Identification of patients at risk for asthma exacerbations can assist physicians in addressing disease management and improve asthma-related health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate whether level of impairment, as defined by the 2007 asthma guidelines, predicts risk for future asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

The study included children aged 6 to 11 years (n = 82) and adolescent/adult patients aged 12 years and older (n = 725) from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study with data representing all components of the impairment domain of the asthma guidelines at baseline, month 12, and month 24. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: (1) consistently very poorly controlled (VPC) asthma from baseline through 2 years of follow-up and (2) improved from VPC asthma at baseline (including patients who improved to not well-controlled or well-controlled asthma), with improvement maintained through 2 years of follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for risk of asthma exacerbations at month 30 were generated by using multivariable logistic regression by age group.

RESULTS

After adjustment, children with consistently VPC asthma over the 2-year period demonstrated a 6-fold increased risk of hospitalization, emergency department visit, or corticosteroid burst (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.2-34.5) compared with the improved group. Adolescent/adult patients with consistently VPC asthma were more likely to have a corticosteroid burst (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.8) or have a hospitalization, emergency department visit, or corticosteroid burst (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistently VPC asthma, as defined by the impairment domain of the 2007 asthma guidelines, is strongly predictive of future asthma exacerbations.

Effects of corticosteroid use on readmission in obstructive lung disease

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive lung disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Some patients are readmitted, but currently predicting parameters for identifying these patients are lacking. The aim of this study was to quantify the incidence of readmission in chronic obstructive lung disease and to identify determinants for hospital readmission.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using the PHARMO record linkage system, including demographic details and complete medication histories of more than two million community-dwelling residents in the Netherlands from 1985 onwards. Eligible patients were adult users of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with an admission for obstructive lung disease. The outcome parameter was readmission within a follow-up period of one year.

RESULTS

We identified 605 ICS users with an admission for chronic obstructive lung disease, 132 of these patients were readmitted. Readmission was associated with a high Chronic Disease Score (adjusted HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1-5.3). Patients using short courses of systemic corticosteroids only (adjusted HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.4-0.8) or combined with antibiotics (adjusted HR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.6) were at decreased risk of readmission. The effect of high-dose ICS use varied over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of exacerbations out of the hospital was associated with a decreased risk of readmission, while patients with multiple chronic diseases are at increased risk of readmission for obstructive lung disease. These patients should be educated and should be invited to consultation more often to be able to detect exacerbation in an early phase and start treatment as early as possible.

CD8+ T cells in asthma: friend or foe?

While it is well established that CD4(+) T lymphocytes play a crucial role in the initiation, progression and persistence of asthma, the role of CD8(+) T cells is less understood. CD8(+) T cells form functionally similar subsets which exhibit similar cytokine profiles as Th1 and Th2 cells, known as Tc1 and Tc2. Evidence from animal studies suggest that CD8(+) T cells are capable of regulating IgE production through the induction of IL-12 and IL-18 production in dendritic cells, and that CD8(+) T cells may act to moderate Th2 polarisation within the localised lymph nodes during allergic sensitisation. Such findings have led to the suggestion that Th1 polarising, CD8(+) T cell-inducing vaccines would inhibit the development of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and Th2 cell infiltration. Despite these positive findings, the role of CD8(+) T cells within the lung remains poorly understood. While CD8(+) T cells, particularly those expressing the Tc1 phenotype, are capable of moderating inflammation and suppressing AHR, it has been postulated that Tc2 CD8(+) T cells predominate within established asthma and may act to amplify the inappropriate immune response which defines the condition. Within the clinic, the association between CD8(+) T cells and asthma is almost universally defined as injurious, further suggesting a prejudicial role for these cells within the established disease. CD8(+) T cells may be a valuable potential target for therapeutic intervention, either by potentiating their regulatory effects prior to the development of sensitisation, or through suppressing their pro-inflammatory properties within established atopy.